introduction to visual rhetoric

19
Introduction to Visual Rhetoric Theory, Practice, and Method AP English 11 2006

Upload: monifa

Post on 09-Jan-2016

52 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Introduction to Visual Rhetoric. Theory, Practice, and Method AP English 11 2006. So What? Why Care? Or: but the essay’s been working fine!!!. Not an either/or situation Responsive to calls for multi-literacies within composition pedagogy It’s part of the AP exam - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Theory, Practice, and Method

AP English 112006

Page 2: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

So What?Why Care? Or: but the essay’s been working fine!!!

Not an either/or situationResponsive to calls for multi-literacies

within composition pedagogyIt’s part of the AP examReal world practicality/applicabilityBecause it’s fun!

Page 3: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Definitions: or: Ever notice rhetoricians can’t agree on the definition of anything?

Quickest definition: a form of communication that uses images to create meaning or construct an argument

At the core:the idea that visuality and materiality are important parts of creating meaning within any communicative act

Page 4: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Major Concerns: or: what’s at the bottom of all this?

Poststructuralist Analysis

Beyond the Aesthetic

Expression or Argumentation

Page 5: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Poststructa-what?: or give me the jist

Sign: what is seen, read, or experiencedSignified: what is meant or interpreted

PS abandons the primacy of authorially intended meaning of a signifier

PS teases out the infinite multiplicity of the signifier

PS asserts sign/signifier interpretation is historically, culturally, and socially situated

Page 6: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Invisible Visual Rhetoric: or: that sounds kinda cool,

huh?

Margins use alignment to guide the eye downward smoothly

Black words on white paper allow for maximum contrast

Just the right amount of space between words allows for proximity of connection but also distinctive elements

Flimsy weakness of paper suggests the ephemeral andtemporary nature of the work?

Page 7: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Invisible Not Natural: or: on checking your assumptions

These visual conventions of the essay are normalized, not normalThese are cultural conventions that have developed socially over time.

Page 8: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

The Culprit: or: Standards, standards, standards

Page 9: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Cultural Associations: or: you don’t see what I see

I’ll always ask you this question first:

What do you see?

Page 10: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Forward pushing motion suggests a “let’s go to work” mentality

Muted gold suggests potential riches while remaining humble

The figure of the Boilermaker suggests blue-collar, hard-workingdetermination.

Heavy on top, skinny on bottom suggests strength and swiftness

He’s white. He’s a he. What do you make of this?

And how do these relate to the purpose, audience, and context of a mascot figure?

Page 11: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Cultural Associations: or they just keep on coming!

Color in Motionhttp://www.mariaclaudiacortes.com/

Using Fonts with Purpose http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/705/01/

Page 12: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Beyond Aesthetics: or: it looks cool but so what? We ain’t an art class!

If the appearance of all these things are bound up with cultural/personal associations, we can actively use them to add meaning to essays

And this we can build into assignments, ask to be written about, and even evaluate

Page 13: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Student Example: or some simple looking complexity

Page 14: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Student Example: or: does this make an argument to you?

Page 15: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Definitions!: or “The Limits of my language are the limits of my world”

You have long been given language to talk about:Essays (thesis, transitions, conclusions)Literature (themes, plots, characters, moral)Grammar (noun, verb, adjective,

prepositional)

But too often you are expected to analyze the visual with little more than “that looks good,” or “that looks ugly”

Page 16: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Visual Language: or: tell me more about these new words

FontsSerifsWeightPersonality

ColorsSaturationContrast

PhotosRule-of-ThirdsCropping

Page 17: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Photographic Language: or: beyond the point-and-click

Rule of Thirds: Zone Division in a photo where placing the focus point on an intersection tends to create more tension, energy, and interest than mere centering.

Page 18: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

Photographic Language: or: beyond the point-and-click

Cropping: Much more than simply removing unwanted parts of a photo, cropping is a rhetorical decision that alters the mood and focus of the piece and the emotion impact/relationship on the audience.

Does he appear removed- friendly yet somewhat unapproachable?

Does he appear more friendly, relatable, ready to talk?

Page 19: Introduction to Visual Rhetoric

CRAP: or: get your minds out of the gutter!

Robin William’s beginning design principles for quick and dirty visual rhetoric

ContrastRepetitionAlignmentProximity