introduction to the science of improving patient safety

34
Introduction to the Introduction to the Science of Improving Science of Improving Patient Safety, Just Patient Safety, Just Culture and Safe Patient Culture and Safe Patient Handling & Mobility Handling & Mobility Dennis Jones, DNP, RN, NREMT-P Safety & Quality Officer Lifeline Critical Care Transport Team Johns Hopkins Hospital Instructor – JHUSON

Upload: ht3

Post on 23-Jun-2015

329 views

Category:

Business


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Introduction to the Science of Introduction to the Science of Improving Patient Safety, Just Improving Patient Safety, Just

Culture and Safe Patient Handling & Culture and Safe Patient Handling & MobilityMobility

Dennis Jones, DNP, RN, NREMT-PSafety & Quality Officer

Lifeline Critical Care Transport TeamJohns Hopkins Hospital

Instructor – JHUSON

Page 2: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

• To recognize that every system is designed to achieve the results it gets

• To identify the basic principles of safe design that apply to both technical and team work

• To discuss how teams make wise decisionsTo identify the basic purpose of a Comprehensive Unit - based Safety Program (CUSP) team

The content for the above objectives from Department of Patient Safety – Johns Hopkins Hospital. Used with permission.

• To discuss the rationale for, and identify components of, Safe Patient Handling & Mobility (SPHM) Interprofessional National Standards

• Identify a variety of assist devices to be used in SPHM.

Page 3: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

The problem of keeping patients safe The problem of keeping patients safe is large is large

In U.S. Healthcare system• 7% of patients suffer a medication error• Every patients admitted to an ICU suffer adverse

event• 44,000- 98,000 deaths• $50 billion in total costs

• Similar results in UK and Australia

Kohn To err is human

Page 4: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

The image of Patient Safety for JHHThe image of Patient Safety for JHH Josie King – 18 months old

• Admitted to JHH January 2001 after suffering 60% BSA (2nd degree, or partial thickness burns)

• Josie stayed in JHH PICU from admission to just before Valentines day when she was moved to IMCU.

• Pt developed vomiting, and diarrhea, confirmed CLABSI. Placed on oral Antibiotics (no IV access) and eventually became dehydrated, lethargic and unresponsive. Treated with Narcan, and Josie was allowed to drink (1 liter of fluid). Methadone was d/c’d.

• Per mom, Josie continued to look bad, and a pain specialist thought she should return to PICU but attending surgeon said no. Pain specialist recommended ½ original dose of methadone to prevent withdrawal. 1 dose of oral Methadone given. Pt went into cardiac arrest, resuscitated for long period. Was brain dead and removed from life support on 2/22.

Page 5: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

How can such an event happen?

• People are fallible• Medicine is still treated as an art, not science• Need to view the delivery of healthcare as a

science• Need systems that catch mistakes before they

reach the patient

Page 6: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

How Can We Improve?How Can We Improve?Understand the Science of SafetyUnderstand the Science of Safety

• Every system is perfectly designed to achieve the results it gets

• Understand principles of safe design – standardize, create checklists, learn when things go

wrong

• Recognize these principles apply to technical and team work

• Teams make wise decisions when there is diverse and independent input

Caregivers are not to blameCaregivers are not to blame

Page 7: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Case studyCentral line removal•A woman with metastatic cancer was hospitalized in theintensive care unit (ICU) for management of congestive heartfailure and acute-on-chronic renal failure. The nephrology serviceinitiated continuous venovenous hemodialysis through alarge-bore catheter inserted in the right internal jugular vein.Two weeks later, a first-year renal fellow removed the catheterwhile the patient was seated upright in a chair. The patientbecame acutely hypoxemic and appeared to seize. Head imagingrevealed global central nervous system ischemia suspiciousfor hypoperfusion. The patient survived but had neurological deficits and died about 6 months later.

Page 8: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

SystemSystem FailureFailure LeadingLeading toto ThisThis ErrorError

Catheter pulled withPatient sitting

Communication betweenresident and nurse

Lack of protocol For catheter removal

Inadequate trainingand supervision

Patient suffers

Venous air embolism

8. Pronovost PJ, Wu Aw, Sexton, JB et al., Ann Int Med, 2004.9. Reason J, Hobbs A., 2000.

Page 9: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

This is a test…This is a test…

Page 10: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

What’s wrong with this picture?

Page 11: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

What’s wrong with this picture?

Page 12: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

What’s wrong with this picture?

Page 13: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

What’s wrong with this picture?

Page 14: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

What’s wrong with this picture?

Page 15: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Pharmacy Carbon Original

Page 16: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

What’s wrong with this picture?

Page 17: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

System Factors Impact SafetySystem Factors Impact Safety

HospitalHospital

Departmental FactorsDepartmental Factors

Work EnvironmentWork Environment

Team FactorsTeam Factors

Individual ProviderIndividual Provider

Task FactorsTask Factors

Patient CharacteristicsPatient Characteristics

InstitutionalInstitutional

10. Adapted from Vincent C, Taylor- Adams S, Stanhope N., BMJ, 1998.

Page 18: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Principles of Safe DesignPrinciples of Safe Design

• Standardize – Eliminate steps if possible

• Create independent checks

• Learn when things go wrong– What happened– Why– What did you do to reduce risk– How do you know it worked

Page 19: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Standardize - Line Cart Contents Standardize - Line Cart Contents

Page 20: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Eliminate StepsEliminate Steps

Page 21: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Create Independent ChecksCreate Independent Checks

Page 22: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Principles of Safe Design Apply to Principles of Safe Design Apply to Technical and Team WorkTechnical and Team Work

Page 23: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Basic Components and Process of Basic Components and Process of CommunicationCommunication

16. Dayton E, Henriksen K, Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2007.

Page 24: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Teamwork ToolsTeamwork Tools

• Staff Safety Assessment• Daily goals• AM briefing• Shadowing• Barrier Identification and Mitigation• Learning from Defects

Page 25: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Systems Systems

• Every system is designed to achieve the results it gets

• To improve performance we need to change systems

• Start with pilot test one patient, one day, one provider, one RN, one room

Page 26: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP) An An Intervention to Learn from Mistakes and Improve Safety CultureIntervention to Learn from Mistakes and Improve Safety Culture

1. Educate staff on science of safety http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/quality_safety_research_group/

2. Identify defects

3. Assign executive to adopt unit

4. Learn from one defect per quarter

5. Implement teamwork tools

Timmel J, et al. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010;36:252-260.

Page 27: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

RecapRecap• Accept that we will make mistakes• Develop lenses to see systems and design to make

them safer• Value the wisdom of frontline staff• Work to standardize one process• Infuse these principles of standardization and

independent checks in other processes• Recognize culture is local• Seek to expose (not hide) defects• Don’t play man down

– Speak up when you have a concern– Listen when others do

Page 28: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

SPH&M“The incidence rate of back injuries among nurses is more than

double that among construction workers, perhaps becausemisperceptions persist about causes and solutions.”

Nelson, A.; Fragala, G.; Menzel, N. (2003). Myths and Facts About Back Injuries in Nursing. American Journal of Nursing. 103(2), 32-40.

“A healthcare professional is the only professional who considers 100 pounds, light”.

“If you have a 300 pound container in a warehouse that needs to be moved, how is it done?” – forklift

“If you have a 300 pound patient in a hospital that needs to be moved, how has it traditionally been done?” – you get more people.

D. Jones

Page 29: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

SPH&M

• Manual handling/lifting of patients• How much can (should) we lift? • What are barriers to not manually

handling/lifting of patients?• What are the potential negative outcomes to

manual lifting?• So what do we do about it?

Page 30: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

SPH&M – ANA Interprofessional National Standards

1. Establish a culture of safety

2. Implement and sustain a SPH&M program

3. Incorporate ergonomic design principles to provide a safe environment of care

4. Select, install, and maintain SPHM technology

5. Establish a system for education, training, and maintaining competence6. Integrate Pt-centered SPHM assessment, plan of care, and use of SPHM technology7. Include SPHM in reasonable accommodation and post-injury return to work8. Establish a comprehensive evaluation system

Page 31: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Examples of SPHM technology

Maxi-Move lift Maxi-move with patient

Page 32: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Examples of SPHM technology

Maxi – Sky ceiling lift Maxi – Sky ceiling lift with patient

Page 33: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Examples of SPHM technology

• Kreg Bariatric E-Z Wider bed:

http://kreg.us/VideoArchive/EZWider/full/EZ2.7/index.cfm

• Air assisted lateral transfer device

Page 34: Introduction to the science of improving patient safety

Conclusion

• Be aware of systems issues as you go through nursing school

• Think safety, for the patient AND you.• Take the time to get help, appropriate

equipment when moving patients• Get involved in safety & quality committees

initiatives within your organization