introduction to group field theory - course pages of ... workshop helsinki.pdf · introduction to...
TRANSCRIPT
Introduction to Group Field Theory
Sylvain Carrozza
University of Bordeaux, LaBRI
The Helsinki Workshop on Quantum Gravity, 01/06/2016
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 1 / 21
Group Field Theory: what is it?
It is an approach to quantum gravity at the crossroad of loop quantum gravity (LQG)and matrix/tensor models.
A simple definition:�
�A Group Field Theory (GFT) is a non-local quantum field theory defined on
a group manifold.
The group manifold is auxiliary: should not be interpreted as space-time!
Rather, the Feynman amplitudes are thought of as describing space-timeprocesses → QFT of space-time rather than on space-time.
Specific non-locality: determines the combinatorial structure of space-timeprocesses (graphs, 2-complexes, triangulations...).
Recommended reviews:L. Freidel, ”Group Field Theory: an overview”, 2005D. Oriti, ”The microscopic dynamics of quantum space as a group field theory”, 2011
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 2 / 21
Group Field Theory: what is it?
It is an approach to quantum gravity at the crossroad of loop quantum gravity (LQG)and matrix/tensor models.
A simple definition:�
�A Group Field Theory (GFT) is a non-local quantum field theory defined on
a group manifold.
The group manifold is auxiliary: should not be interpreted as space-time!
Rather, the Feynman amplitudes are thought of as describing space-timeprocesses → QFT of space-time rather than on space-time.
Specific non-locality: determines the combinatorial structure of space-timeprocesses (graphs, 2-complexes, triangulations...).
Recommended reviews:L. Freidel, ”Group Field Theory: an overview”, 2005D. Oriti, ”The microscopic dynamics of quantum space as a group field theory”, 2011
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 2 / 21
Group Field Theory: what is it?
It is an approach to quantum gravity at the crossroad of loop quantum gravity (LQG)and matrix/tensor models.
A simple definition:�
�A Group Field Theory (GFT) is a non-local quantum field theory defined on
a group manifold.
The group manifold is auxiliary: should not be interpreted as space-time!
Rather, the Feynman amplitudes are thought of as describing space-timeprocesses → QFT of space-time rather than on space-time.
Specific non-locality: determines the combinatorial structure of space-timeprocesses (graphs, 2-complexes, triangulations...).
Recommended reviews:L. Freidel, ”Group Field Theory: an overview”, 2005D. Oriti, ”The microscopic dynamics of quantum space as a group field theory”, 2011
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 2 / 21
Group Field Theory: what is it?
It is an approach to quantum gravity at the crossroad of loop quantum gravity (LQG)and matrix/tensor models.
A simple definition:�
�A Group Field Theory (GFT) is a non-local quantum field theory defined on
a group manifold.
The group manifold is auxiliary: should not be interpreted as space-time!
Rather, the Feynman amplitudes are thought of as describing space-timeprocesses → QFT of space-time rather than on space-time.
Specific non-locality: determines the combinatorial structure of space-timeprocesses (graphs, 2-complexes, triangulations...).
Recommended reviews:L. Freidel, ”Group Field Theory: an overview”, 2005D. Oriti, ”The microscopic dynamics of quantum space as a group field theory”, 2011
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 2 / 21
From Loop Quantum Gravity to Group Field Theory
1 From Loop Quantum Gravity to Group Field Theory
2 Group Field Theory Fock space and physical applications
3 Group Field Theory renormalization programme
4 Summary and outlook
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 3 / 21
Loop Quantum Gravity proposes kinematical states describing (spatial) quantumgeometry [Ashtekar, Rovelli, Smolin, Lewandowski... ’90s; Dittrich, Geiller, Bahr ’15]:
Dynamics? Define the (improper) projector P : Hkin → Hphys on physical states
Hphys 3 |s〉phys ≡ P|s〉 , 〈s|s ′〉phys ≡ 〈s|P|s ′〉
Spin Foams [Reisenberger, Rovelli... ’00s] are a path-integral formulation of the dynamics→ amplitudes As,C associated to a 2-complex C with boundary spin-network state s.
As,C =∑j
∏f
Af
∏e
Ae
∏v
Av
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 4 / 21
��
��
Structural incompleteness of Spin Foams:
How one should interpret and organize the 2-complexes?How to extract As from the family {As,C | ∂C = s}?
Three interpretations of C found in the literature:
(i) a convenient way of writing up the amplitudes, but amplitudes independent of itfrom the outset: As = As,C ; (ex: Turaev-Viro model)
(ii) a regulator, analogous to the lattice of lattice gauge theory;
(iii) a specific quantum history compatible with the boundary state, analogous to aFeynman diagram in QFT.
First interpretation seems very hard to realize in 4d (→ construction of 4d invariants ofmanifolds), and the other two hinge on renormalization theory:
1 Lattice interpretation: refining and coarse-graining C (and s)⇒ As ≡ lim
C→∞As,C [Dittrich, Bahr, Steinhaus, Martin-Benito... ’10s]
2 QFT interpretation: amplitudes of a Group Field Theory, to be summed over⇒ As ≡
∑C |∂C=s
wCAs,C [De Pietri, Rovelli, Freidel, Oriti... ’00s, ’10s]
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 5 / 21
��
��
Structural incompleteness of Spin Foams:
How one should interpret and organize the 2-complexes?How to extract As from the family {As,C | ∂C = s}?
Three interpretations of C found in the literature:
(i) a convenient way of writing up the amplitudes, but amplitudes independent of itfrom the outset: As = As,C ; (ex: Turaev-Viro model)
(ii) a regulator, analogous to the lattice of lattice gauge theory;
(iii) a specific quantum history compatible with the boundary state, analogous to aFeynman diagram in QFT.
First interpretation seems very hard to realize in 4d (→ construction of 4d invariants ofmanifolds), and the other two hinge on renormalization theory:
1 Lattice interpretation: refining and coarse-graining C (and s)⇒ As ≡ lim
C→∞As,C [Dittrich, Bahr, Steinhaus, Martin-Benito... ’10s]
2 QFT interpretation: amplitudes of a Group Field Theory, to be summed over⇒ As ≡
∑C |∂C=s
wCAs,C [De Pietri, Rovelli, Freidel, Oriti... ’00s, ’10s]
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 5 / 21
��
��
Structural incompleteness of Spin Foams:
How one should interpret and organize the 2-complexes?How to extract As from the family {As,C | ∂C = s}?
Three interpretations of C found in the literature:
(i) a convenient way of writing up the amplitudes, but amplitudes independent of itfrom the outset: As = As,C ; (ex: Turaev-Viro model)
(ii) a regulator, analogous to the lattice of lattice gauge theory;
(iii) a specific quantum history compatible with the boundary state, analogous to aFeynman diagram in QFT.
First interpretation seems very hard to realize in 4d (→ construction of 4d invariants ofmanifolds), and the other two hinge on renormalization theory:
1 Lattice interpretation: refining and coarse-graining C (and s)⇒ As ≡ lim
C→∞As,C [Dittrich, Bahr, Steinhaus, Martin-Benito... ’10s]
2 QFT interpretation: amplitudes of a Group Field Theory, to be summed over⇒ As ≡
∑C |∂C=s
wCAs,C [De Pietri, Rovelli, Freidel, Oriti... ’00s, ’10s]
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 5 / 21
In the two interpretations, renormalization is central and allows in principle to addresssome other open challenges:
1 consistency of the quantum dynamics under coarse-graining?
2 quantization / discretization ambiguities inherent to spin-foams: what are theuniversal features of the known models? [EPRL, DL, BO, ...]
3 macro-physics from microscopic dynamics: how do we extract the low-energy limitof LQG? are there several quantum phases? compatibility with general relativity?
Refining framework ⇒ background independent generalization of direct spacerenormalization methods:
scale = lattice itself
consistency over scales ⇔ dynamical cylindrical consistency
Summing framework ⇒ background independent generalization of momentum shellrenormalization methods:
scale = spectrum of a specific 1-particle operator (e.g. spin labels)
consistency over scales ⇔ renormalization group flow of a (non-local) field theorydefined on internal space (e.g. SU(2)).
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 6 / 21
In the two interpretations, renormalization is central and allows in principle to addresssome other open challenges:
1 consistency of the quantum dynamics under coarse-graining?
2 quantization / discretization ambiguities inherent to spin-foams: what are theuniversal features of the known models? [EPRL, DL, BO, ...]
3 macro-physics from microscopic dynamics: how do we extract the low-energy limitof LQG? are there several quantum phases? compatibility with general relativity?
Refining framework ⇒ background independent generalization of direct spacerenormalization methods:
scale = lattice itself
consistency over scales ⇔ dynamical cylindrical consistency
Summing framework ⇒ background independent generalization of momentum shellrenormalization methods:
scale = spectrum of a specific 1-particle operator (e.g. spin labels)
consistency over scales ⇔ renormalization group flow of a (non-local) field theorydefined on internal space (e.g. SU(2)).
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 6 / 21
In the two interpretations, renormalization is central and allows in principle to addresssome other open challenges:
1 consistency of the quantum dynamics under coarse-graining?
2 quantization / discretization ambiguities inherent to spin-foams: what are theuniversal features of the known models? [EPRL, DL, BO, ...]
3 macro-physics from microscopic dynamics: how do we extract the low-energy limitof LQG? are there several quantum phases? compatibility with general relativity?
Refining framework ⇒ background independent generalization of direct spacerenormalization methods:
scale = lattice itself
consistency over scales ⇔ dynamical cylindrical consistency
Summing framework ⇒ background independent generalization of momentum shellrenormalization methods:
scale = spectrum of a specific 1-particle operator (e.g. spin labels)
consistency over scales ⇔ renormalization group flow of a (non-local) field theorydefined on internal space (e.g. SU(2)).
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 6 / 21
In the two interpretations, renormalization is central and allows in principle to addresssome other open challenges:
1 consistency of the quantum dynamics under coarse-graining?
2 quantization / discretization ambiguities inherent to spin-foams: what are theuniversal features of the known models? [EPRL, DL, BO, ...]
3 macro-physics from microscopic dynamics: how do we extract the low-energy limitof LQG? are there several quantum phases? compatibility with general relativity?
Refining framework ⇒ background independent generalization of direct spacerenormalization methods:
scale = lattice itself
consistency over scales ⇔ dynamical cylindrical consistency
Summing framework ⇒ background independent generalization of momentum shellrenormalization methods:
scale = spectrum of a specific 1-particle operator (e.g. spin labels)
consistency over scales ⇔ renormalization group flow of a (non-local) field theorydefined on internal space (e.g. SU(2)).
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 6 / 21
General structure of a GFT and long-term objectives
Typical form of a GFT: field ϕ(g1, . . . , gd), g` ∈ G , with partition function
Z =
∫[Dϕ]Λ exp
−ϕ · K · ϕ+∑{V}
tV V · ϕnV
=∑
kV1,...,kVi
∏i
(tVi )kVi {SF amplitudes}
Main objectives of the GFT research programme:
1 Model building: define the theory space.e.g. spin foam models + combinatorial considerations (tensor models) → d, G, K,{V} and [Dϕ]Λ.
2 Perturbative definition: prove that the spin foam expansion is consistent in somerange of Λ.e.g. perturbative multi-scale renormalization.
3 Systematically explore the theory space: effective continuum regime reproducingGR in some limit?e.g. functional RG, constructive methods, condensate states...
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 7 / 21
General structure of a GFT and long-term objectives
Typical form of a GFT: field ϕ(g1, . . . , gd), g` ∈ G , with partition function
Z =
∫[Dϕ]Λ exp
−ϕ · K · ϕ+∑{V}
tV V · ϕnV
=∑
kV1,...,kVi
∏i
(tVi )kVi {SF amplitudes}
Main objectives of the GFT research programme:
1 Model building: define the theory space.e.g. spin foam models + combinatorial considerations (tensor models) → d, G, K,{V} and [Dϕ]Λ.
2 Perturbative definition: prove that the spin foam expansion is consistent in somerange of Λ.e.g. perturbative multi-scale renormalization.
3 Systematically explore the theory space: effective continuum regime reproducingGR in some limit?e.g. functional RG, constructive methods, condensate states...
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 7 / 21
Group Field Theory Fock space and physical applications
1 From Loop Quantum Gravity to Group Field Theory
2 Group Field Theory Fock space and physical applications
3 Group Field Theory renormalization programme
4 Summary and outlook
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 8 / 21
GFT Hilbert space
No embedding in a continuum manifold and no cylindrical consistency imposed.
Instead: Fock construction through decomposition of spin network states in termsof elementary building blocks.
g1g2
g3
g4
h1
h2 h3
h4
g1h−11
Elementary excitations over a vacuum |0〉 interpreted as a ’no-space vacuum’.Creation/annihilation operators ϕ̂(gi )
†/ϕ̂(gi ).
HGFT = Fock(Hv ) =+∞⊕n=0
Sym(H(1)
v ⊗ · · · ⊗ H(n)v
)with Hv = L2(G×d/G)
(rem: bosonic statistics, arbitrary at this stage)
ϕ̂(g1, g2, g3, g4)|0〉 = 0 , ϕ̂†(g1, g2, g3, g4)|0〉 = |g1 g2
g3g4 〉 , . . .
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 9 / 21
Dynamics
Dynamics expressed as a projection in the Fock Hilbert space
F̂ |Ψ〉 ≡(P̂ − 1l
)|Ψ〉 = 0
It turns out that current GFT models do not correspond to a ’micro-canonical’ensemble
Z =∑s
〈s|δ(F̂ )|s〉
but a kind of ’grand-canonical’ ensemble [Oriti ’13]
Z =∑s
〈s|e−β(F̂−µN̂)|s〉
⇒ the GFT genuinely contains more information than the LQG projector onphysical states [Freidel ’05]
Open questions: how to extract the LQG physical projector? what is the role oftopology changing processes?
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 10 / 21
Physical applications
The Fock representation permits the construction of simple condensate states e.g.
|σ〉 ∝ exp
(∫[dgi ]
4 σ(g1, g2, g3, g4)ϕ̂†(g1, g2, g3, g4)
)|0〉
→ arbitrary number of spin-network vertices excited with the same 1-particlewave-function σ(g1, g2, g3, g4).
Such states have been successfully used to describe symmetric quantum geometriesdirectly at the GFT level, hence without recourse to classical symmetry reduction:
Cosmology: [Gielen, Oriti, Sindoni, Calcagni, Wilson-Ewing, Pithis,...]
EPRL model coupled to a scalar field −→ condensate in the hydrodynamicapproximation −→ Friedmann equations with quantum gravity corrections −→bounce at the Planck scale. [Oriti, Sindoni, Wilson-Ewing ’16]
Black Holes: [Pranzetti, Sindoni, Oriti ’15]
Condensates encoding spherically symmetric quantum geometry −→ reduceddensity matrix associated to a horizon −→ horizon entanglement entropy −→Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula for any value of the Immirzi parameter.
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 11 / 21
Physical applications
The Fock representation permits the construction of simple condensate states e.g.
|σ〉 ∝ exp
(∫[dgi ]
4 σ(g1, g2, g3, g4)ϕ̂†(g1, g2, g3, g4)
)|0〉
→ arbitrary number of spin-network vertices excited with the same 1-particlewave-function σ(g1, g2, g3, g4).
Such states have been successfully used to describe symmetric quantum geometriesdirectly at the GFT level, hence without recourse to classical symmetry reduction:
Cosmology: [Gielen, Oriti, Sindoni, Calcagni, Wilson-Ewing, Pithis,...]
EPRL model coupled to a scalar field −→ condensate in the hydrodynamicapproximation −→ Friedmann equations with quantum gravity corrections −→bounce at the Planck scale. [Oriti, Sindoni, Wilson-Ewing ’16]
Black Holes: [Pranzetti, Sindoni, Oriti ’15]
Condensates encoding spherically symmetric quantum geometry −→ reduceddensity matrix associated to a horizon −→ horizon entanglement entropy −→Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula for any value of the Immirzi parameter.
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 11 / 21
Physical applications
The Fock representation permits the construction of simple condensate states e.g.
|σ〉 ∝ exp
(∫[dgi ]
4 σ(g1, g2, g3, g4)ϕ̂†(g1, g2, g3, g4)
)|0〉
→ arbitrary number of spin-network vertices excited with the same 1-particlewave-function σ(g1, g2, g3, g4).
Such states have been successfully used to describe symmetric quantum geometriesdirectly at the GFT level, hence without recourse to classical symmetry reduction:
Cosmology: [Gielen, Oriti, Sindoni, Calcagni, Wilson-Ewing, Pithis,...]
EPRL model coupled to a scalar field −→ condensate in the hydrodynamicapproximation −→ Friedmann equations with quantum gravity corrections −→bounce at the Planck scale. [Oriti, Sindoni, Wilson-Ewing ’16]
Black Holes: [Pranzetti, Sindoni, Oriti ’15]
Condensates encoding spherically symmetric quantum geometry −→ reduceddensity matrix associated to a horizon −→ horizon entanglement entropy −→Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula for any value of the Immirzi parameter.
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 11 / 21
Physical applications
The Fock representation permits the construction of simple condensate states e.g.
|σ〉 ∝ exp
(∫[dgi ]
4 σ(g1, g2, g3, g4)ϕ̂†(g1, g2, g3, g4)
)|0〉
→ arbitrary number of spin-network vertices excited with the same 1-particlewave-function σ(g1, g2, g3, g4).
Such states have been successfully used to describe symmetric quantum geometriesdirectly at the GFT level, hence without recourse to classical symmetry reduction:
Cosmology: [Gielen, Oriti, Sindoni, Calcagni, Wilson-Ewing, Pithis,...]
EPRL model coupled to a scalar field −→ condensate in the hydrodynamicapproximation −→ Friedmann equations with quantum gravity corrections −→bounce at the Planck scale. [Oriti, Sindoni, Wilson-Ewing ’16]
Black Holes: [Pranzetti, Sindoni, Oriti ’15]
Condensates encoding spherically symmetric quantum geometry −→ reduceddensity matrix associated to a horizon −→ horizon entanglement entropy −→Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula for any value of the Immirzi parameter.
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 11 / 21
Summary up to now
GFT can be understood as a version of LQG with:
no embedding in a continuous manifold;organization of LQG states in ’space atoms’;
a new fundamental observable: N̂.
Provides statistical techniques to explore the many-body sector of quantumgeometry: condensate states used for e.g. quantum cosmology and black holes
The construction seems quite general ⇒ other choices of ’building blocks’?
Useful for construction of GFT analogues of new kinematical vacua?[Dittrich, Geiller ’15 ’16]
Quantization ambiguities are encoded in free coupling constants for the variousspin foam vertices compatible with the dynamics one would like to implement ⇒renormalization has to tell us which of these are more relevant.
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 12 / 21
Group Field Theory renormalization programme
1 From Loop Quantum Gravity to Group Field Theory
2 Group Field Theory Fock space and physical applications
3 Group Field Theory renormalization programme
4 Summary and outlook
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 13 / 21
Importance of combinatorics�
�Mathematical objective: step-by-step generalization of standard renormalization
techniques, until we are able to tackle 4d quantum gravity proposals.
Two main aspects in the definition of a group field theory:
Algebraic content and type of dynamics implemented: from LQG and Spin Foams
Combinatorial structures:
Which types of spin-network boundary states? In general, restriction on the valency.Which type of spin foam vertices? In general, restriction on the valency too.Which types of 2-complexes are summed over? Local restrictions on gluing rules toavoid too pathological topologies.
�
�Requirement: the GFT theory space should be stable enough under renormaliza-
tion / coarse-graining.
We currently know of only one such combinatorial structure: tensorial interactionsinitially introduced in the context of tensor models.
[Gurau, Bonzom, Rivasseau, Ben Geloun... ’11...]
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 14 / 21
Importance of combinatorics�
�Mathematical objective: step-by-step generalization of standard renormalization
techniques, until we are able to tackle 4d quantum gravity proposals.
Two main aspects in the definition of a group field theory:
Algebraic content and type of dynamics implemented: from LQG and Spin Foams
Combinatorial structures:
Which types of spin-network boundary states? In general, restriction on the valency.Which type of spin foam vertices? In general, restriction on the valency too.Which types of 2-complexes are summed over? Local restrictions on gluing rules toavoid too pathological topologies.
�
�Requirement: the GFT theory space should be stable enough under renormaliza-
tion / coarse-graining.
We currently know of only one such combinatorial structure: tensorial interactionsinitially introduced in the context of tensor models.
[Gurau, Bonzom, Rivasseau, Ben Geloun... ’11...]
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 14 / 21
Importance of combinatorics�
�Mathematical objective: step-by-step generalization of standard renormalization
techniques, until we are able to tackle 4d quantum gravity proposals.
Two main aspects in the definition of a group field theory:
Algebraic content and type of dynamics implemented: from LQG and Spin Foams
Combinatorial structures:
Which types of spin-network boundary states? In general, restriction on the valency.Which type of spin foam vertices? In general, restriction on the valency too.Which types of 2-complexes are summed over? Local restrictions on gluing rules toavoid too pathological topologies.
�
�Requirement: the GFT theory space should be stable enough under renormaliza-
tion / coarse-graining.
We currently know of only one such combinatorial structure: tensorial interactionsinitially introduced in the context of tensor models.
[Gurau, Bonzom, Rivasseau, Ben Geloun... ’11...]
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 14 / 21
Trace invariants
Trace invariants of fields ϕ(g1, g2, . . . , gd) labelled by d-colored bubbles b:
1 1
3
3
2
2
Trb(ϕ,ϕ) =
∫[dgi ]
6 ϕ(g6, g2, g3)ϕ(g1, g2, g3)
ϕ(g6, g4, g5)ϕ(g1, g4, g5)
(d = 2) · · ·
(d = 3) · · ·
(d = 4) · · ·
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 15 / 21
Trace invariants
Trace invariants of fields ϕ(g1, g2, . . . , gd) labelled by d-colored bubbles b:
1 1
3
3
2
2
Trb(ϕ,ϕ) =
∫[dgi ]
6 ϕ(g6, g2, g3)ϕ(g1, g2, g3)
ϕ(g6, g4, g5)ϕ(g1, g4, g5)
(d = 2) · · ·
(d = 3) · · ·
(d = 4) · · ·
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 15 / 21
Trace invariants
Trace invariants of fields ϕ(g1, g2, . . . , gd) labelled by d-colored bubbles b:
1 1
3
3
2
2
Trb(ϕ,ϕ) =
∫[dgi ]
6 ϕ(g6, g2, g3)ϕ(g1, g2, g3)
ϕ(g6, g4, g5)ϕ(g1, g4, g5)
(d = 2) · · ·
(d = 3) · · ·
(d = 4) · · ·
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 15 / 21
Trace invariants
Trace invariants of fields ϕ(g1, g2, . . . , gd) labelled by d-colored bubbles b:
1 1
3
3
2
2
Trb(ϕ,ϕ) =
∫[dgi ]
6 ϕ(g6, g2, g3)ϕ(g1, g2, g3)
ϕ(g6, g4, g5)ϕ(g1, g4, g5)
(d = 2) · · ·
(d = 3) · · ·
(d = 4) · · ·
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 15 / 21
Feynman amplitudes of TGFTs
Perturbative expansion in the bubble coupling constants tb:
Z =∑G
(∏b∈B
(−tb)nb(G)
)AG
Feynman graphs G:
g1g2
g3=
∫dg1 dg2 dg3 . . .
= δ(gg̃−1)g g̃
g1 g̃1g2
g3 g̃3
g̃2 = C(g1, g2, g3; g̃1, g̃2, g̃3)
Covariances associated to the dashed, color-0 lines.Face of color ` = connected set of (alternating) color-0 and color-` lines.
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 16 / 21
Perturbative renormalization: overview�
�Goal: check that the perturbative expansion - and henceforth the connection to
spin foam models - is consistent.
Types of models considered so far:’combinatorial’ models on G = U(1)D :
C = (∑`
∆`)-1 , CΛ(g`; g
′`) =
∫ +∞
Λ−2dα
d∏`=1
KGα (g`g
′−1` )
[Ben Geloun, Rivasseau ’11; Ben Geloun, Ousmane Samary ’12; Ben Geloun, Livine ’12...]
models with ’gauge invariance’ on G = U(1)D or SU(2):
C = P(∑`
∆`)-1P , CΛ(g`; g
′`) =
∫ +∞
Λ−2dα
∫Gdh
d∏`=1
KGα (g`hg
′−1` )
[SC, Oriti, Rivasseau ’12 ’13; Ousmane Samary, Vignes-Tourneret ’12; SC ’14 ’14; Lahoche, Oriti,
Rivasseau ’14...]
Methods:
multiscale analysis: allows to rigorously prove renormalizability at all orders inperturbation theory;
Connes–Kreimer algebraic methods [Raasakka, Tanasa ’13; Avohou, Rivasseau, Tanasa ’15].
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 17 / 21
Perturbative renormalization: overview�
�Goal: check that the perturbative expansion - and henceforth the connection to
spin foam models - is consistent.
Types of models considered so far:’combinatorial’ models on G = U(1)D :
C = (∑`
∆`)-1 , CΛ(g`; g
′`) =
∫ +∞
Λ−2dα
d∏`=1
KGα (g`g
′−1` )
[Ben Geloun, Rivasseau ’11; Ben Geloun, Ousmane Samary ’12; Ben Geloun, Livine ’12...]
models with ’gauge invariance’ on G = U(1)D or SU(2):
C = P(∑`
∆`)-1P , CΛ(g`; g
′`) =
∫ +∞
Λ−2dα
∫Gdh
d∏`=1
KGα (g`hg
′−1` )
[SC, Oriti, Rivasseau ’12 ’13; Ousmane Samary, Vignes-Tourneret ’12; SC ’14 ’14; Lahoche, Oriti,
Rivasseau ’14...]
Methods:
multiscale analysis: allows to rigorously prove renormalizability at all orders inperturbation theory;
Connes–Kreimer algebraic methods [Raasakka, Tanasa ’13; Avohou, Rivasseau, Tanasa ’15].
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 17 / 21
Perturbative renormalization: overview�
�Goal: check that the perturbative expansion - and henceforth the connection to
spin foam models - is consistent.
Types of models considered so far:’combinatorial’ models on G = U(1)D :
C = (∑`
∆`)-1 , CΛ(g`; g
′`) =
∫ +∞
Λ−2dα
d∏`=1
KGα (g`g
′−1` )
[Ben Geloun, Rivasseau ’11; Ben Geloun, Ousmane Samary ’12; Ben Geloun, Livine ’12...]
models with ’gauge invariance’ on G = U(1)D or SU(2):
C = P(∑`
∆`)-1P , CΛ(g`; g
′`) =
∫ +∞
Λ−2dα
∫Gdh
d∏`=1
KGα (g`hg
′−1` )
[SC, Oriti, Rivasseau ’12 ’13; Ousmane Samary, Vignes-Tourneret ’12; SC ’14 ’14; Lahoche, Oriti,
Rivasseau ’14...]
Methods:
multiscale analysis: allows to rigorously prove renormalizability at all orders inperturbation theory;
Connes–Kreimer algebraic methods [Raasakka, Tanasa ’13; Avohou, Rivasseau, Tanasa ’15].
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 17 / 21
Quasi-locality of divergences
�
�The divergent subgraphs must be quasi-local, i.e. look like trace invariants at
high scales. Always the case in known models, but non–trivial!
ϕ(g1)
ϕ(g2)
ϕ(g3)
ϕ(g4)
∼ϕ(g3)
ϕ(g4)
ϕ(g1)
ϕ(g2)
K× + · · ·
h1 , α1
h2 , α2
1
23
∫dα1dα2
∫dh1dh2
[Kα1+α2
(h1h2)]2∫
[∏i<j
dgij ] Kα1(g11h1g
−131 )Kα2
(g−121 h2g41)
δ(g12g−122 )δ(g13g
−122 )δ(g42g
−132 )δ(g43g
−133 )ϕ(g1)ϕ(g2)ϕ(g3)ϕ(g4)
This property is not generic in TGFTs → ”traciality” criterion.
Nice interplay between structure of divergences and topology → renormalizableinteractions are spherical.
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 18 / 21
Quasi-locality of divergences
�
�The divergent subgraphs must be quasi-local, i.e. look like trace invariants at
high scales. Always the case in known models, but non–trivial!
ϕ(g1)
ϕ(g2)
ϕ(g3)
ϕ(g4)
∼ϕ(g3)
ϕ(g4)
ϕ(g1)
ϕ(g2)
K× + · · ·
h1 , α1
h2 , α2
1
23
∫dα1dα2
∫dh1dh2
[Kα1+α2
(h1h2)]2∫
[∏i<j
dgij ] Kα1(g11h1g
−131 )Kα2
(g−121 h2g41)
δ(g12g−122 )δ(g13g
−122 )δ(g42g
−132 )δ(g43g
−133 )ϕ(g1)ϕ(g2)ϕ(g3)ϕ(g4)
This property is not generic in TGFTs → ”traciality” criterion.
Nice interplay between structure of divergences and topology → renormalizableinteractions are spherical.
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 18 / 21
Quasi-locality of divergences
�
�The divergent subgraphs must be quasi-local, i.e. look like trace invariants at
high scales. Always the case in known models, but non–trivial!
ϕ(g1)
ϕ(g2)
ϕ(g3)
ϕ(g4)
∼ϕ(g3)
ϕ(g4)
ϕ(g1)
ϕ(g2)
K× + · · ·
h1 , α1
h2 , α2
1
23
∫dα1dα2
∫dh1dh2
[Kα1+α2
(h1h2)]2∫
[∏i<j
dgij ] Kα1(g11h1g
−131 )Kα2
(g−121 h2g41)
δ(g12g−122 )δ(g13g
−122 )δ(g42g
−132 )δ(g43g
−133 )ϕ(g1)ϕ(g2)ϕ(g3)ϕ(g4)
This property is not generic in TGFTs → ”traciality” criterion.
Nice interplay between structure of divergences and topology → renormalizableinteractions are spherical.
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 18 / 21
Current developments
1 Non-perturbative renormalization:Wetterich equation applied to:
matrix and tensor models; [Eichhorn, Koslowski ’13 ’14]TGFT without gauge-invariance; [Benedetti, Ben Geloun, Oriti ’14]gauge-invariant models. [Lahoche, Benedetti ’15; Lahoche, SC wip]
Polchinski equation [Krajewski, Toriumi ’15]
Constructive methods such as the loop-vertex expansion (intermediate field) appliedto:
tensor models; [Gurau ’11 ’13; Delepouve, Gurau, Rivasseau ’14...]TGFTs without gauge invariance; [Delepouve, Rivasseau ’14...]TGFTs with gauge invariance. [Lahoche, Oriti, Rivasseau ’15]
Lesson: non-trivial fixed points seem generic. Phase transition to a condensedphase?
2 Towards renormalizable models with simplicity constraints:GFT on SU(2)/U(1); [Lahoche, Oriti ’15]
4d GFT on Spin(4) with Barrett-Crane simplicity constraints. [Lahoche, Oriti, SC wip]
CΛ(g`; g′`) =
∫ +∞
Λ−2dα
∫Spin(4)
dh
∫SU(2)
dk
∫Hk
[dl`]d∏`=1
KSpin(4)α (g`hl`g
′−1` ) .
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 19 / 21
Current developments
1 Non-perturbative renormalization:Wetterich equation applied to:
matrix and tensor models; [Eichhorn, Koslowski ’13 ’14]TGFT without gauge-invariance; [Benedetti, Ben Geloun, Oriti ’14]gauge-invariant models. [Lahoche, Benedetti ’15; Lahoche, SC wip]
Polchinski equation [Krajewski, Toriumi ’15]
Constructive methods such as the loop-vertex expansion (intermediate field) appliedto:
tensor models; [Gurau ’11 ’13; Delepouve, Gurau, Rivasseau ’14...]TGFTs without gauge invariance; [Delepouve, Rivasseau ’14...]TGFTs with gauge invariance. [Lahoche, Oriti, Rivasseau ’15]
Lesson: non-trivial fixed points seem generic. Phase transition to a condensedphase?
2 Towards renormalizable models with simplicity constraints:GFT on SU(2)/U(1); [Lahoche, Oriti ’15]
4d GFT on Spin(4) with Barrett-Crane simplicity constraints. [Lahoche, Oriti, SC wip]
CΛ(g`; g′`) =
∫ +∞
Λ−2dα
∫Spin(4)
dh
∫SU(2)
dk
∫Hk
[dl`]d∏`=1
KSpin(4)α (g`hl`g
′−1` ) .
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 19 / 21
Current developments
1 Non-perturbative renormalization:Wetterich equation applied to:
matrix and tensor models; [Eichhorn, Koslowski ’13 ’14]TGFT without gauge-invariance; [Benedetti, Ben Geloun, Oriti ’14]gauge-invariant models. [Lahoche, Benedetti ’15; Lahoche, SC wip]
Polchinski equation [Krajewski, Toriumi ’15]
Constructive methods such as the loop-vertex expansion (intermediate field) appliedto:
tensor models; [Gurau ’11 ’13; Delepouve, Gurau, Rivasseau ’14...]TGFTs without gauge invariance; [Delepouve, Rivasseau ’14...]TGFTs with gauge invariance. [Lahoche, Oriti, Rivasseau ’15]
Lesson: non-trivial fixed points seem generic. Phase transition to a condensedphase?
2 Towards renormalizable models with simplicity constraints:GFT on SU(2)/U(1); [Lahoche, Oriti ’15]
4d GFT on Spin(4) with Barrett-Crane simplicity constraints. [Lahoche, Oriti, SC wip]
CΛ(g`; g′`) =
∫ +∞
Λ−2dα
∫Spin(4)
dh
∫SU(2)
dk
∫Hk
[dl`]d∏`=1
KSpin(4)α (g`hl`g
′−1` ) .
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 19 / 21
Summary and outlook
1 From Loop Quantum Gravity to Group Field Theory
2 Group Field Theory Fock space and physical applications
3 Group Field Theory renormalization programme
4 Summary and outlook
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 20 / 21
Summary and outlook
GFT is a QFT completion of spin foam models.
It allows to (define and) explore the many-body sector of LQG.
Two parallel lines of investigations:
Construction of effective geometries from condensate states and approximations ofthe full GFT dynamics → some aspects of quantum cosmology and black holesrecovered from 4d quantum gravity models!
See talks by Wilson-Ewing and Pithis
Development of suitable renormalizable tools to check the overall consistency ofGFTs and explore more systematically their phase diagrams → applicable tosimplified toy-models, not yet to 4d quantum gravity.
�
�Can we define a renormalizable 4d quantum gravity model and prove the existence
of a condensed phases with the right properties?
Thank you for your attention
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 21 / 21
Summary and outlook
GFT is a QFT completion of spin foam models.
It allows to (define and) explore the many-body sector of LQG.
Two parallel lines of investigations:
Construction of effective geometries from condensate states and approximations ofthe full GFT dynamics → some aspects of quantum cosmology and black holesrecovered from 4d quantum gravity models!
See talks by Wilson-Ewing and Pithis
Development of suitable renormalizable tools to check the overall consistency ofGFTs and explore more systematically their phase diagrams → applicable tosimplified toy-models, not yet to 4d quantum gravity.
�
�Can we define a renormalizable 4d quantum gravity model and prove the existence
of a condensed phases with the right properties?
Thank you for your attention
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 21 / 21
Summary and outlook
GFT is a QFT completion of spin foam models.
It allows to (define and) explore the many-body sector of LQG.
Two parallel lines of investigations:
Construction of effective geometries from condensate states and approximations ofthe full GFT dynamics → some aspects of quantum cosmology and black holesrecovered from 4d quantum gravity models!
See talks by Wilson-Ewing and Pithis
Development of suitable renormalizable tools to check the overall consistency ofGFTs and explore more systematically their phase diagrams → applicable tosimplified toy-models, not yet to 4d quantum gravity.
�
�Can we define a renormalizable 4d quantum gravity model and prove the existence
of a condensed phases with the right properties?
Thank you for your attention
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 21 / 21
Summary and outlook
GFT is a QFT completion of spin foam models.
It allows to (define and) explore the many-body sector of LQG.
Two parallel lines of investigations:
Construction of effective geometries from condensate states and approximations ofthe full GFT dynamics → some aspects of quantum cosmology and black holesrecovered from 4d quantum gravity models!
See talks by Wilson-Ewing and Pithis
Development of suitable renormalizable tools to check the overall consistency ofGFTs and explore more systematically their phase diagrams → applicable tosimplified toy-models, not yet to 4d quantum gravity.
�
�Can we define a renormalizable 4d quantum gravity model and prove the existence
of a condensed phases with the right properties?
Thank you for your attention
Sylvain Carrozza (Univ. Bordeaux) Introduction to GFT Univ. Helsinki, 01/06/2016 21 / 21