introduction to civil engineering - emucivil.emu.edu.tr/courses/insa100/geotechnical...
TRANSCRIPT
Introduction to Civil
Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering
by
Eriş Uygar
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Studied Civil Engineering in the Eastern Mediterranean University, Mağusa, specialised in the field of Geotechnical Engineering after recieving MSc and PhD in the same university;
• Worked in an international and multidisciplinary engineering consultancy firm in the UK from 2005 to 2014, across various sectors of the business including: buildings and infrastructure, oil and gas and metros and civils.
• Experience and research interests include; soil-structure interaction modelling, soil insitu testing and monitoring of ground and structure displacements, potential damage assessment for buildings and tunnels.
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Who am I ?
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Contents
• First things first: what is Geotechnical Engineering ?
• Project 1: Mirdiff City Centre Mall, Dubai, UAE
• Project 2: Asia Petroleum Hub, Tanjung Bin, Malaysia
• Project 3: Crossrail 1, Contract C138, Moorgate and
Liverpool Street.
Do you think you can bear with me for a 1 hour long
presentation ?
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Geotechnical Engineering
This is a cliche but let’s ask
the key question once
again;
Is there any CIVIL
ENGINEERING structure
which doesn’t rest on soil
and rock or doesn’t interact
with soil and rock ?
All CIVIL ENGINEERING structures require consideration of principles of
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING and SOIL & ROCK MECHANICS.
Geotechnical Investigation Investigation of Ground and Groundwater conditions,
Geological and Hydrological Setting and Environmental Considerations.
So, have you watched the movie called AVATAR ?
Floating forests, the Land of Pandora
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Probably we
don’t need to
worry about soil
mechanics here
Zhangjiajie National Forest Park, China, planet Earth
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
These massive cliffs are created by
mother nature, (oops, or from the eye
of a Geotechnical engineer);
-by weathering and erosion of
rocks particularly due to wet
climate and thermal changes
all year round leading to
freeze-thaw of moisture in
rock causing cracks and
fracture of rock, a typical
example for -
Physical/Mechanical
Weathering.
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Geotechnical Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering
Ground Investigation
Foundation Design
Ground Stabilisation
Tunneling and Deep
Excavation Design
Slope Stability and
Retaining Wall Design
Earthworks, Reinforced Earth and Landfill Design
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering
not an exhaustive list !
Deals with Soil and Rock
Mechanics to provide the
following;
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Investigation
• Site Walkover Survey and Report.
• Desk Study Report, including study of;
• historical maps, hydrological and geological setting, old mining
maps and reports, aquifer classification, flood risk assessment,
ecological surveys, records of past contaminating events, historical
exploratory hole records, ground stability hazard maps, ground gas
risk assessment.
• Design of Ground Investigation and Ground Investigation Report;
Factual Report by Ground Investigation Contractor and Ground
Investigation Report by Geotechnical Engineer.
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Investigation – Site Walkover Survey
• Usually carried out at Feasibility Stage for Visual Assessment of;
• topography and superficial ground & groundwater conditions,
• Access arrangements for ground investigation equipment,
• Land use and permissions for investigation works,
• Sketches and photos of any visually identifieable features, hazards and risks.
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Investigation – Site Walkover Survey
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Black Country UTC Building Development
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Investigation – Site Walkover Survey
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Black Country UTC Building Development
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Investigation – Desk Study Sketch
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Black Country UTC Building Development
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Investigation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Simplest form of investigation carried out by studying any existing excavations in the
area and historical exploratory hole logs,
• Exploratory holes for sampling can be in the form of; • Trial pits, boreholes (cable percussion, which is an old skool way of drilling holes in the
ground or by dynamic sampling)
A trial pit Cable percussion rig Comacchio rig
Dynamic
sampling +
rock coring
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Investigation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Data recorded during drilling to classify the ground profile based on visual
observations and laboratory testing.
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Investigation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Insitu tests may one or few of the following; • Standard Penetration Test (SPT), Vane Shear Test (VST), Static Cone Penetration Test
(CPT), Pressuremeter Test (PMT), Dilatometer Test (DT).
Source: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/05037/images/f038.gif
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Investigation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
A typical PiezoCone Data with interpretation on soil classification
Typical Pressuremeter Data and Analysis
for undrained shear strength and unload-
reload modulus, example taken from a
test in Bangkok Clay (Blue Line Tube
extension tender, 2010).
-100
100
300
500
700
900
1100
1300
-0,20 -0,10 0,00 0,10 0,20 0,30 0,40
Pre
ssure
(kP
a)
Strain
Pressure v Cavity Strain
Pressure v Volumetric/Shear Strain
Shear Stress v Shear Strain
2Cu + P0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00 7,00 8,00 9,00
Pre
ssure
(kP
a)
r (cm)
Axis Shifted with Cavity Radius Correction Unloading fitted Guess for Iterations Manually Fitted
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2,68 3,68 4,68 5,68 6,68 7,68
Pre
ssure
(kP
a)
r (cm)
Raw Data
Guess for iterations
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Geotechnical Engineering – Foundation Design
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Consider concepts on; • Shear Strength, compressibility Bearing Capacity, Settlement and Expansion.
Mohr-Coulomb Theory on Shear Failure of soil and rock
Source:
http://images.books24
x7.com/bookimages/i
d_23746/fig4-1.jpg
Source: http://www.aboutcivil.org/imajes/soil-shear-strength.jpg
Terzaghi’s theory of one dimensional
consolidation.
• Saturated soil mechanics,
effective stress in soil and
dissipation of excess pore
water pressure.
Geotechnical Engineering – Foundation Design
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Types of foundations; • Shallow foundations (pad, strip, mat), deep foundations or pile foundations (bored, driven)
Shallow foundation for a
bridge viaduct, Worksop
2014, UK.
Pile foundations used as a retaining
measure and holding down anchorage
for a deep excavation and basement
in London Clay, Notting Hill 2012, UK.
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Stabilisation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Some examples of ground stabilisation include; shallow soil mixing, deep soil mixing,
stone columns, preloading, grouting, consolidation by prefabricated drains or vacuum
consolidation, dynamic compaction etc.
Shallow soil mixing, usually with cement and lime. https://youtu.be/jfG-jERhJBs?t=245
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Stabilisation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Deep soil mixing, usually using pumped
cementitious binder slurry. https://youtu.be/UAs76Et9XWM
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Stabilisation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Stone Columns, FARRS, ECML 2014, Doncaster, UK. https://youtu.be/F_kI6vQ5_gE
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Stabilisation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Stone Columns, FARRS, ECML 2014, Doncaster, UK. https://youtu.be/F_kI6vQ5_gE
Countours of long term settlement
due to embankment weight in
millimetres.
Assessment of slope of ground
movement trough along a section
through the ECML
Geotechnical Engineering – Ground Stabilisation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Preloading and reinforced earth, Morfa to Berwick Link Road,
Llanelli 2006, Wales.
Reinforced earth, colliery spoil for embankment fill of approximately 12m height, proximity to
railway lines on two sides, monitoring with magnet extensometers and inclinometers, staged
construction allowing for consolidation and shear strength increase in the underlying soft clay.
Project 1 – Mirdiff City Centre Mall
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Sensitive structures + tight project budgets = need for value engineering.
• Significant savings can be attained, e.g. if shallow foundations are used instead of
piled foundations.
• Prediction of foundation settlements often difficult; need for use of sophisticated
methods; lack of transparency/sometimes reliability when using computer software.
• Practicable hand calculations required to control risks.
• Project fact sheet,
• 283,000m2 gross floor area
(excluding car parks).
• 6,700 labour force, 23 tower cranes.
• Overall duration design and
construction 35 months from concept
masterplan approval.
• Developer Majid Al Futtaim Group.
• Archtitects RTKL.
• Actual costs = a lot !.
Project 1 – Mirdiff City Centre Mall
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Concept of Nonlinear Stiffness Degradation; how can this concept be adopted in hand
calculations ?
• Nonlinear stiffness degradation curves can be obtained using extensive data from;
• Cone penetration testing, Menard pressuremeter testing, Shear wave velocity
testing, Large diameter Plate load testing.
Project 1 – Mirdiff City Centre Mall
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• By using some of the published methods; Mayne et al (1999), O’Brien and Sharp
(2001), Lehane and Fahey (2002) and Loughlin and Lehane (2010).
• Stiffness mobilisation in sand, Fahey and Carter (1993), Shear stress
mobilisation in sand, Duncan and Chang (1970), Failure criterion: Mohr Coulomb.
• A methodology developed for the project, with verification using full size pad test
data by Briaud & Gibbens (1997) and Briaud (2007).
• Methodology also allowing for stiffness increase with depth.
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
0 200 400 600 800
Emax (MPa)
Lev
el
(m D
MD
)
Zone - 1Zone - 2Zone - 3Zone - 4Groundwater Level
variation in level of top of
weathered/extremely weak
sandstone
General trend of Emax within
weathered/extremely weak
sandstone
0.01
0.1
1
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
Axial Strain (%)
E/E
max
Shear w . v. & SPTPLT resultsPMT results
Eq [14] Fit, at sm':100 kPaEq [14] Fit, at sm':39.6 kPaEq [14] Fit, at sm':16.5 kPa
c':0
f':35˚
Emax:150MPa
Example paramter plots
with depth derived from
insitu test data.
Project 1 – Mirdiff City Centre Mall
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Photos from site during construction.
Project 2 – Asia Petroleum Hub, land reclamation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Reclaimed land off south coast of Malaysia.
Project 2 – Asia Petroleum Hub, land reclamation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
Typical section through the
reclaimed fill.
• Reclaimed island on 18m of compressible Marine Clay
• 3m settlement during construction and 500mm in the long term
• Two main challenges;
• Unknown history, time application of the reclamation fill;
• Creep of soft Marine Clay in the long term causing negative skin friction on pile
foundations and settlement.
Project 2 – Asia Petroleum Hub, land reclamation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Conceptual illustration of the problem;
Project 2 – Asia Petroleum Hub, land reclamation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Design strategy;
• Segmental, spun concrete, driven piles for settlement sensitive large diameter
Oil and Petrol tanks.
• Ground stabilisation with Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PVDs) to facilitate
settlement and help manage site levels in the long term.
Spun concrete piles. PVDs.
Project 2 – Asia Petroleum Hub, land reclamation
01 June 2015, EMU, Famagusta
• Design strategy;
• Trial embankment, adaptation of observational method of design, ongoing
monitoring and verification testing, regularly updated predictions, value
engineering during construction.
24 April 2015, METU NCC, Kalkanlı
Project 2 – Asia Petroleum Hub, land reclamation
• Results from site trials, monitoring data
and settlement prediction;
• Design: 0.8m PVD spacing, triangular
grid, Preloading with of 6.5m fill, eq to
120kPa, waiting period of 5 months to
achieve OCR:1.2, target U: 70%.
• Trials achieved: OCR:~1.3 and U >
80%, hence design spacing relaxed
to 1.0m.
Results from site trials, monitoring data and settlement prediction;
Prediction of working pile capacity by:
Project specific CAPWAP versus static load test correlation
Site specific dynamic pile formula versus static load capacity correlation, using PDA monitoring results
Static load test analysis
Project 2 – Asia Petroleum Hub, land reclamation
• Crossrail 1 is the largest infrastructure project in Europe, with an estimated budget of 15 Billion Pounds.
• It involves construction of new and development of a total of 15 underground and overground train/tube stations.
• Involved in the contract C138 including; New Moorgate Station excavation design category 2 check, Moorgate sewer diversion design and settlement mitigation of historical sewers, and Liverpool Street Queen Victoria Tunnel Ground Movement Impact Assessment and Mitigation Designs.
• Also involved in assessment of ground movement impact assessment for the new Cable Tunnel and London Underground Structures (switchrooms, communication rooms and substation).
Project 3 – Crossrail 1
• Moorgate Shaft, approximately 40m wide and 42m deep access shaft .
• The shaft will provide ventilation and emergency access to the new ticket hall.
Project 3 – Crossrail 1
https://youtu.be/HnE8_X5RjZg
• Very congested site in Central London, historical/listed buildings and new sky scrapers with glass façade around the shaft.
• Support design for the excavation and the ground movement effects to the surrounding structures are key drivers for the design.
Project 3 – Crossrail 1
• Staged construction design using finite element modelling, employing soil constitutive models.
• London Clay modelled considering degree of weathering with depth.
• Key checks involved estimations of mobilised lateral ground pressure at the face of the retaining structures and resulting support forces developed. Modelling considered staged construction and a coupled analysis is carried out to account for the drainage characteristics of the ground.
• Limit State approach is used following EN 1997 Eurocode 7 – Geotechnical Design.
Project 3 – Crossrail 1
Ultimate Limit State Serviceability Limit State EC7-DA1-C1
Partial Factors All factors 1.0 except for favourable
actions, which is to be 0.0 EC7-DA1-C2
Ground Parameters
Moderately conservative Shear Strength Moderately conservative
Worst Credible
Lower and upper limits considering a typical strain range between 0.05% to 0.1%
Stiffness Lower and upper limits considering a
typical strain range between 0.05% to 0.1%
Elastic perfectly plastic, Mohr-Coulomb Material Models
Elastic perfectly plastic, Mohr-Coulomb
Ground Behaviour
Strata Active side Passive side Strata Active side* Passive side
LC1 D UD/S LC1 UD/S UD/S LC2 D UD/S LC2 UD/S UD/S LG1 D UD/S LG1 UD/S UD/S LG2 D UD/S LG2* D UD/S
LG3 D D LG3 D D LG4 D D LG4 D D
Notes: EC7-DA1-C1: Eurocode 7 design approach 1 combination 1 EC7-DA1-C2: Eurocode 7 design approach 1 combination 2 LC1: London Clay A3/B, LC2: London Clay A2 LG1: Lambeth group upper mottled beds, LG2: Lambeth group interbedded layers, LG3: Lambeth group sand channels LG4: Lambeth group Upnor formation D: drained, UD: undrained, S: softened
• Remarks and closure;
• Geotechnical Engineering is often called as “Black Art”, as there are many unknowns involved in a geotechnical design.
• Ground conditions rarely reflect homogeneous and isotropic conditions and yet most of the geotechnical concepts can’t deal with anything more sophisticated than these conditions.
• Unlike calculated and well know nature of any other building material, soil and rock always vary unpredictably and hence a risk based approach should always be adopted in a geotechnical design. Predictions carried out on soil behaviour should consider a range of variation.
• Geotechnical input to projects is essential and can provide significant cost savings.
• Geotechnical Engineering should be regarded as an essential integral part of any civil engineering project especially in areas where ground conditions are poor and seismicity is a concern.
Are you up for the challenge then ?
Don’t be afraid to become a Geotechnical Eng.