introduction to aircraft performance and static stability

Upload: karan-grover

Post on 08-Apr-2018

247 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    1/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Introduction to AircraftPerformance and Static Stability

    16.885J/ESD.35JAircraft Systems Engineering

    Prof. Earll Murman

    September 18, 2003

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    2/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Todays Topics Specific fuel consumption and Breguet range

    equation

    Transonic aerodynamic considerations

    Aircraft Performance

    Aircraft turning Energy analysis

    Operating envelope

    Deep dive of other performance topics for jet transportaircraft in Lectures 6 and 7

    Aircraft longitudinal static stability

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    3/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (TSFC) Definition:

    Measure of jet engine effectiveness at converting fuel touseable thrust

    Includes installation effects such as

    bleed air for cabin, electric generator, etc.. Inlet effects can be included (organizational dependent)

    Typical numbers are in range of 0.3 to 0.9. Can be up to 1.5 Terminology varies with time units used, and it is not all

    consistent. TSFC uses hours c is often used for TSFC Another term used is

    TSFC lb of fuel burned(lb of thrust delivered)(hour)

    ct

    lb of fuel burned

    (lb of thrust delivered)(sec)

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    4/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Breguet Range Equation Change in aircraft weight = fuel burned

    Solve for dt and multiply by V to get ds

    Set L/D, ct, V constant and integrate

    dW ctTdt ctTSPC/3600 T thrust

    dsVdtV

    dW

    ctT

    V

    W

    ctT dWW

    V

    L

    ctD dWW

    R 3600TSFC

    VLD

    ln WTOW

    empty

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    5/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Insights from Breguet Range EquationR 3600

    TSFCV

    LD

    lnW

    TOW

    empty

    3600TSFC

    represents propulsion effects. Lower TSFC is better

    V

    L

    D

    represents aerodynamic effect. L/D is aerodynamic efficiency

    VLD

    aMLD

    . a is constant above 36,000 ft. MLD

    important

    lnW

    TOW

    emptyrepresents aircraft weight/structures effect on range

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    6/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Optimized L/D - Transport A/CSweet spot is in transonic range.

    Lossesdue toshock

    waves

    Ref: Shevell

    M

    ax(L/D)

    Mach No.1 2 3

    10

    20

    Concorde

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    7/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Transonic Effects on Airfoil Cd, ClCd

    Mcr

    Mdragdivergence

    M8

    1.0

    M < Mcr8

    V8

    V8

    Region I. II. III.

    I.

    II.

    III. M > Mdragdivergence

    8

    Mcr < M < Mdragdivergence

    8

    M

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    8/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Strategies for Mitigating Transonic Effects Wing sweep

    Developed by Germans. Discovered after WWII by Boeing

    Incorporated in B-52 Area Ruling, aka coke bottling

    Developed by Dick Whitcomb at NASA Langley in 1954

    Kucheman in Germany and Hayes at North American contributors Incorporated in F-102

    Supercritical airfoils Developed by Dick Whitcomb at NASA Langley in 1965

    Percey at RAE had some early contributions

    Incorporated in modern military and commercial aircraft

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    9/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Basic Sweep Concept Consider Mach Number normal to leading edge

    For subsonic freestreams, Mn < M - Lower effective freestream

    Mach number delays onset of transonic drag rise. For supersonic freestreams Mn < 1, > - Subsonic leading edge Mn > 1, < - Supersonic leading edge

    Extensive analysis available, but this is gist of the concept

    sin =1/ M

    = Mach angle,the directiondisturbances

    travel insupersonic flow

    M Mn=Mcos

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    10/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Wing Sweep Considerations M > 1 Subsonic leading edge

    Can have rounded subsonic type wing section Thicker section Upper surface suction

    More lift and less drag Supersonic leading edge

    Need supersonic type wing section

    Thin section Sharp leading edge

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    11/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Competing Needs Subsonic Mach number

    High Aspect Ratio for low induced drag Supersonic Mach number

    Want high sweep for subsonic leading edge

    Possible solutions Variable sweep wing - B-1 Double delta - US SST Blended - Concorde Optimize for supersonic - B-58

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    12/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Supercritical AirfoilSupercritical

    airfoil shapekeeps uppersurface velocityfrom getting too

    large.Uses aft camberto generate lift.

    Gives nosedown pitchingmoment.

    Cp

    x/c

    Cp, cr

    V8

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    13/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Todays Performance Topics Turning analysis Critical for high performance military a/c. Applicable to all.

    Horizontal, pull-up, pull-down, pull-over, vertical Universal M- turn rate chart , V-n diagram

    Energy analysis Critical for high performance military a/c. Applicable to all. Specific energy, specific excess power M-h diagram, min time to climb

    Operating envelope Back up charts for fighter aircraft

    M- diagram - Doghouse chart Maneuver limits and some example

    Extensive notes from Lockheed available. Ask me.

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    14/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Horizontal TurnW = L cos, = bank angleLevel turn, no loss of altitude

    Fr= (L2

    - W2

    )1/2

    =W(n2

    -1)1/2

    Where n L/W = 1/ cos is the loadfactor measured in gs.

    But Fr= (W/g)(V2/R)So radius of turn is

    R = V2/g(n2-1)1/2

    And turn rate = V/R is

    = g(n2-1)1/2 / V

    Want high load factor, low velocity

    Flight pa

    th

    R

    R

    L

    W

    Fr

    z

    z

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    15/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Pull Up Pull Over Vertical

    Fr= (L-W) =W(n-1)

    = (W/g)(V2/R)

    R = V2/g(n-1)

    = g(n-1)/ V

    Fr= (L +W) =W(n+1)

    = (W/g)(V2/R)

    R = V2/g(n+1)

    = g(n+1)/ V

    Fr= L =Wn

    = (W/g)(V2/R)R = V2

    /gn

    = gn/ V

    R

    L

    W

    R

    L

    W

    R

    L

    W

    V i l Pl T R

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    16/36

    Let

    Pull Over

    K = (n+1)/(n2-1)1/2

    Vertical Maneuver

    K = n/(n2-1)1/2

    Pull Up

    K = (n-1)/(n2-1)1/2

    For large n, K 1 and for all maneuvers gn/ V

    Similarly for turn radius, for large n, R V2/gn.

    For large and small R, want large n and small V

    Pulloverfrom inverted attitude

    Verticalmaneuver

    Pull-up from level attitude

    0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    Turn

    rate

    ratio,K

    Load factor, in 'g's

    Vertical Plan Turn Rates

    Vertical planeturn rateK=

    Horizontal planeturn rate

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    17/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    gn/ V

    = gn/aM

    so ~ 1/ M

    at const h (altitude) & n

    Using R V2/gn, V

    /R = a

    M/R. So ~ M

    at const h & R

    For high Mach numbers, the turn radius gets large

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    18/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Rmin

    and maxUsing V

    = (2L/

    SCL)1/2 = (2nW/SCL)1/2

    R V2/gn becomes R = 2(W/S)/ g

    CL

    W/S = wing loading, an important performance parameterAnd using n = L/W =

    V2

    SCL/2W

    gn/ V= g

    V

    CL/2(W/S)

    For each airplane, W/S set by range, payload, Vmax.

    Then, for a given airplane

    Rmin

    = 2(W/S)/ gC

    L,maxmax

    = g V

    CL,max /2(W/S)

    Higher CL,max gives superior turning performance.

    But does n CL,max = V2CL,max/2(W/S) exceed structural limits?

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    19/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    V-n diagram

    V* 2nmax

    CL,max

    W

    S

    Highestpossible

    Lowestpossible R

    Each airplane has a V-n diagram.

    Source: Anderson

    Stall area

    Stall area

    Structural damage

    Structural damage

    q>

    qmax

    Loadfactorn

    V8V*

    CL < CLmax

    CL < CLmax

    Positive limit load factor

    Negative limit load factor

    0

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    20/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Summary on Turning Want large structural load factor n

    Want large CL,MAX Want small V

    Shortest turn radius, maximum turn rate isCorner Velocity

    Question, does the aircraft have the powerto execute these maneuvers?

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    21/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Specific Energy and Excess PowerTotal aircraft energy = PE + KE

    Etot = mgh + mV2/2

    Specific energy = (PE + KE)/WHe = h + V2/2g energy height

    Excess Power = (T-D)V

    Specific excess power*

    = (TV-DV)/W

    = dHe/dtPs = dh/dt + V/g dV/dt

    Ps may be used to change altitude, or accelerate, or both* Called specific power in Lockheed Martin notes.

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    22/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Excess PowerPower Required

    PR= DV

    = q

    S(CD,0 + C2L/ARe)V

    = qSCD,0V + qSVC2L/ARe

    = SCD,0V3/2 + 2n2W2/SVARe

    Parasite powerrequired

    Induced powerrequired

    Power Available

    PA = TV and Thrust is approximatelyconstant with velocity, but varieslinearly with density.

    Excess powerdepends uponvelocity, altitudeand load factor

    P

    ower

    Excesspower

    V8

    PR

    PA

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    23/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Altitude Effects on Excess PowerPR= DV = (nW/L) DV

    = nWV

    CD/CL

    From L=

    SV2

    CL/2 = nW, getV

    = (2nW/ SCL)1/2

    Substitute in PRto get

    PR= (2n3W3C2D/ SC3L)1/2

    So can scale between sea level 0 andaltitude alt assuming CD,CL const.

    Valt = V0(0/alt)1/2, PR,alt = PR,0(0/alt)1/2

    Thrust scales with density, so

    PA,alt = PA,0(alt/0)

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    24/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Summary of Power Characteristics He = specific energy represents state of aircraft. Units are in

    feet.

    Curves are universal Ps = (T/W-D/W)V= specific excess power

    Represents ability of aircraft to change energy state.

    Curves depend upon aircraft (thrust and drag) Maybe used to climb and/or accelerate Function of altitude Function of load factor

    Military pilots fly with Ps diagrams in the cockpit,Anderson

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    25/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    A/C Performance SummaryFactor Commercial

    TransportMilitary

    TransportFighter General Aviation

    LiebeckTake-offhobs = 35 hobs = 50 hobs = 50 hobs = 50

    LiebeckLandingVapp = 1.3 Vstall Vapp = 1.2 Vstall Vapp = 1.2 Vstall Vapp = 1.3 Vstall

    Climb LiebeckLevel Flight Liebeck

    Range Breguet Range Radius of action*.Uses refueling

    Breguet for prop

    Endurance,Loiter

    E (hrs) = R (miles)/V(mph), where R = Breguet Range

    Turning,Maneuver

    Emergency handling Major performance

    factor

    Emergencyhandling

    SupersonicDash

    N/A N/A Important N/A

    ServiceCeiling

    100 fpm climb

    Lectures 6 and 7 for commercial and military transport

    * Radius of action comprised of outbound leg, on target leg, and return.

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    26/36

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    27/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    S&C Definitions L - rolling moment Lateral motion/stability

    M - pitching moment

    Longitudinal

    motion/control

    N - rolling moment

    Directional motion/control

    CM

    qSc

    Moment coefficient:

    L'

    M

    Rudder deflection

    Elevator deflection

    N

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    28/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Aircraft Moments

    Aerodynamic center (ac): forces and moments can be completelyspecified by the lift and drag acting through the ac plus a moment aboutthe ac CM,ac is the aircraft pitching moment at L = 0 around any point

    Contributions to pitching moment about cg, CM,cg come from

    Lift and CM,ac Thrust and drag - will neglect due to small vertical separation from cg Lift on tail

    Airplane is trimmed when CM,cg = 0

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    29/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Absolute Angle of Attack

    Stability and control analysis simplified by usingthe absolute angle of attack which is 0 at CL = 0.

    a = + L=0

    Lift s

    lope =

    CL,max

    L=0

    dC L

    d

    Lift s

    lope =

    CL,max

    dC L

    d

    Lift coefficient vs geometric angle of attack, Lift coefficient vs absolute angle of attack,a

    CL

    a

    CL

    16 885J/ESD 35J O t 1 2002

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    30/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Criteria for Longitudinal Static Stability

    CM,0

    must be positive

    C

    M,cga must be negativeImplied that e is within flight range of angle of attackfor the airplane, i.e. aircraft can be trimmed

    CM,0

    a

    CM,cg

    e

    Slope= dCM,cgda

    (Trimmed)

    16 885J/ESD 35J O t 1 2002

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    31/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Moment Around cg

    Mcg

    Mac

    wb

    Lwb

    (hc hac

    c) ltL

    t

    Divide by qSc and note that CL ,t L

    t

    qSt

    CM,cg

    CM,ac

    wb C

    L wb(h h

    ac) ltSt

    cSC

    L ,t, or

    C

    M,cg C

    M,acwb C

    L wb

    (h hac

    ) VH

    C

    L ,t, where V

    H

    ltS

    t

    cS

    16 885J/ESD 35J Oct 1 2002

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    32/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    CM,cg

    CM,ac

    wb C

    L wb(h h

    ac) V

    HC

    L ,t

    CLwb

    dCL wb

    d a, wb awba, wb

    Cl, t att at(wb it )

    where is the downwash at the

    tail due to the lift on the wing 0

    a, wb

    CL, t

    at

    a, wb1

    a

    t(i

    t

    0)

    At this point, the

    convention is dropthe wb on awb

    CM,cg

    CM,ac

    wb a

    a(h h

    ac) V

    H

    at

    a1

    VH

    at

    it

    0

    Lift

    slope

    =

    Cl, max

    L=0

    dC l

    d

    Cl

    stall

    16 885J/ESD 35J Oct 1 2002

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    33/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Eqs for Longitudinal Static Stability

    CM,cg

    CM,ac

    wb a

    a(h h

    ac) V

    H

    at

    a1

    VH

    at

    it

    0

    CM,0 CM,cg

    l 0 CM,ac

    wb VHat it0

    CM,cg

    a

    a (h hac

    ) VH

    at

    a1

    CM,acwb < 0, VH> 0, t> 0 it> 0 forCM,0 > 0

    Tail must be angled down to generate negative liftto trim airplane

    Major effect of cg location (h) and tail parameterVH=

    (lS)t/(cs) in determining longitudinal static stability

    CM,0

    a

    CM,cg

    e

    Slope= dCM,cgda

    (Trimmed)

    16 885J/ESD 35J - Oct 1 2002

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    34/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

    Neutral Point and Static Margin

    The slope of the moment curve will vary with h, the

    location of cg. If the slope is zero, the aircraft has neutral longitudinal

    static stability.

    Let this location be denote by

    or

    CM,cg

    a

    a (h hac

    ) VH

    at

    a1

    hn hac VHat

    a 1

    For a given airplane, the neutral point is at a fixed location. For longitudinal static stability, the position of the center of

    gravity must always be forward of the neutral point.

    The larger the static margin, the more stable the airplane

    CM,cg

    a

    a h hn a hn h a static margin

    16 885J/ESD 35J - Oct 1 2002

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    35/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J Oct 1, 2002

    Longitudinal Static Stability

    Aerodynamic centerlocation moves aft forsupersonic flight

    cg shifts with fuel burn,stores separation,configuration changes

    Balancing is a significant design requirement

    Amount of static stability affects handling qualities

    Fly-by-wire controls required for statically unstable aircraft

    16.885J/ESD.35J - Oct 1, 2002

  • 8/7/2019 Introduction to Aircraft Performance and Static Stability

    36/36

    16.885J/ESD.35J Oct 1, 2002

    Todays References Lockheed Martin Notes on Fighter Performance John Anderson Jr. , Introduction to Flight, McGraw-

    Hill, 3rd ed, 1989, Particularly Chapter 6 and 7

    Shevell, Richard S., Fundamentals of Flight, PrenticeHall, 2nd Edition, 1989

    Bertin, John J. and Smith, Michael L., Aerodynamicsfor Engineers, Prentice Hall, 3rd edition, 1998

    Daniel Raymer, Aircraft Design: A ConceptualApproach, AIAA Education Series, 3rd edition, 1999,Particularly Chapter 17

    Note: There are extensive cost and weight estimationrelationships in Raymer for military aircraft.