introductionthe plasmjds used il1 this study are listed jn table ]. po]ymerase chail1 reaction (pcr)...

8
MoJ Gen Genet (1996) 253:217-224 Springer- Verlag] 996 K. Leenhouts .G. Buist. A. Bolhuis. A. ten Berge J. Kiel. I. Mierau .M. Dabrowska G. \'enema. J. Kok A general system tor generating uniabelled gene replacements in bacterial chromosomes Received- 2 AprjJ 1996/ Accepted- 15 JuJy 1996 Abstract A genera] system is described that facilitates gene rep]acements such that the recombinant strains are not labelled with antibiotic re sistance gelles. The method is based on the conditiona] replication of deriv- atives of the lactococcal plasmid pW\lOl, which lacks the repA gene encoding the replication initiation protein. Rep]acement vectors can be constructed in and iso]ated from gram-positive and gram-negative helper strains that provide RepA in rrans. Cointegrate forma- tion of the integration vectors with the chromosome of the tare:et strain is selected bv antibiotic resistance. Reso]ution of the cointegrate structure is identified in the second step of the procedure by the ]oss of the lacZ reporter gene present in the de]ivery vector. The second recombination event results either in gene replacement or in restoration of the original copy of the gene. As no antibiotic resistance marker is present in the genome of the mutant the system can be used to introduce mu]- tiple mutations in one strain. A feasibility study was performed using Lacrococcus lacris and Bacillus subrilis as model organisms. The resu]ts indicate that the method shou]d be app]icable to any non-essential gene in numerous bacterial species. Introduction Key words Conditional replication .Gene replacement M utagenesis .lacZ reporter The study of chromosoma] genes in mo]ecu]ar bio- ]ogical research or the modification of bacterial strains with applications in the (medical) industry of ten re- quires the rep]acement, by homo]ogous recombination, of a chromosomal gene by a mutated version, The simplest and most efficient method of achieving this is to exchange the target gene by a copy that is inac- tivated by the insertion of an antibiotic resistance gene. However. the introduction of an antibiotic resistance marker cou]d be undesirab)e for various reasons.. A common strategy that avoids the use of an antibiotic resistance marker in the rep]aced gene is a two-step procedure described by Hamilton et al. (1989). In gen- eral, in the first step homo]ogous recombination be- tween the delivery vector and the chromosome results in the formation of a cointegrate that is se]ected by positive selection. The second step is usuaJly based on negative se]ection and, depending on the nature of the de]ivery vector, is achieved af ter a temperature shift or a period of non-selective growth. Reso)ution of the cointegrate results either in reversion to the parental chromosomal structure or in gene replacement. Bio- assays or ana]yses of the chromosome are required to distinguish between the two possibilities. The use of temperature-sensitive(Ts) rep]icons is high]y efficient in this..strategy (Hami]ton et a]. 1989: Biswas et al. 1993). but Ts plasmids cou]d have restricted host ranges or may not be thermosensitive in certain hostso Therefore. the deve]opment of an efficient non-replicative delivery system with a wide spectrum of potential target organ- isms is justified. We have previously described a conditionaJly rep- ]icating vector derived from the broad-host-range roJI- ing circle-type lactococca] p]asmid pWVOl (Leenhouts et a]o 1991a)o From this vector (pORI)the gene encod- ing the replication initiation protein RepA VI'as re- moved. Therefore, pORI is unable to replicate in any Communicated by w. Goebei K. Leenhouts 1 .G. Buist, A. Bolhuis. A. ten Berge J. Kiel .1. ~ierau .M. Dabrowska .G. Venerna. J. Kok (8) Department of Genetics. Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute. Universily of Groningen. Kerklaan 30. 9751 NN Haren. The Netherlands Presen/ address: 1 International Centre for Genetic Engineering and BiotechnoJogy. Department of Molecular Pathology, Padriciano 99. 1-34012 Trieste, Italy .

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IntroductionThe plasmjds used il1 this study are listed jn Table ]. Po]ymerase chail1 reaction (PCR) primers 5'-GGA CTT GTC TGT TGA AG al1d 5'-A TT A TT TGA TTG GAG TT were used to

MoJ Gen Genet (1996) 253:217-224 Springer- Verlag] 996

K. Leenhouts .G. Buist. A. Bolhuis. A. ten BergeJ. Kiel. I. Mierau .M. DabrowskaG. \'enema. J. Kok

A general system tor generating uniabelled gene replacements

in bacterial chromosomes

Received- 2 AprjJ 1996/ Accepted- 15 JuJy 1996

Abstract A genera] system is described that facilitatesgene rep]acements such that the recombinant strainsare not labelled with antibiotic re si stance gelles. Themethod is based on the conditiona] replication of deriv-atives of the lactococcal plasmid pW\lOl, which lacksthe repA gene encoding the replication initiationprotein. Rep]acement vectors can be constructed in andiso]ated from gram-positive and gram-negative helperstrains that provide RepA in rrans. Cointegrate forma-tion of the integration vectors with the chromosome ofthe tare:et strain is selected bv antibiotic resistance.Reso]ution of the cointegrate structure is identified inthe second step of the procedure by the ]oss of the lacZreporter gene present in the de]ivery vector. The secondrecombination event results either in gene replacementor in restoration of the original copy of the gene. As noantibiotic resistance marker is present in the genome ofthe mutant the system can be used to introduce mu]-tiple mutations in one strain. A feasibility study wasperformed using Lacrococcus lacris and Bacillus subrilisas model organisms. The resu]ts indicate that themethod shou]d be app]icable to any non-essential genein numerous bacterial species.

Introduction

Key words Conditional replication .Gene replacement

M utagenesis .lacZ reporter

The study of chromosoma] genes in mo]ecu]ar bio-]ogical research or the modification of bacterial strainswith applications in the (medical) industry of ten re-quires the rep]acement, by homo]ogous recombination,of a chromosomal gene by a mutated version, Thesimplest and most efficient method of achieving this isto exchange the target gene by a copy that is inac-tivated by the insertion of an antibiotic resistance gene.However. the introduction of an antibiotic resistancemarker cou]d be undesirab)e for various reasons..A common strategy that avoids the use of an antibioticresistance marker in the rep]aced gene is a two-stepprocedure described by Hamilton et al. (1989). In gen-eral, in the first step homo]ogous recombination be-tween the delivery vector and the chromosome resultsin the formation of a cointegrate that is se]ected bypositive selection. The second step is usuaJly based onnegative se]ection and, depending on the nature of thede]ivery vector, is achieved af ter a temperature shift ora period of non-selective growth. Reso)ution of thecointegrate results either in reversion to the parentalchromosomal structure or in gene replacement. Bio-assays or ana]yses of the chromosome are required todistinguish between the two possibilities. The use oftemperature-sensitive(Ts) rep]icons is high]y efficient inthis..strategy (Hami]ton et a]. 1989: Biswas et al. 1993).but Ts plasmids cou]d have restricted host ranges ormay not be thermosensitive in certain hostso Therefore.the deve]opment of an efficient non-replicative deliverysystem with a wide spectrum of potential target organ-isms is justified.

We have previously described a conditionaJly rep-]icating vector derived from the broad-host-range roJI-ing circle-type lactococca] p]asmid pWVOl (Leenhoutset a]o 1991a)o From this vector (pORI)the gene encod-ing the replication initiation protein RepA VI'as re-moved. Therefore, pORI is unable to replicate in any

Communicated by w. Goebei

K. Leenhouts 1 .G. Buist, A. Bolhuis. A. ten Berge

J. Kiel .1. ~ierau .M. Dabrowska .G. Venerna. J. Kok (8)Department of Genetics. Biomolecular Sciences and BiotechnologyInstitute. Universily of Groningen. Kerklaan 30.9751 NN Haren. The Netherlands

Presen/ address:1 International Centre for Genetic Engineering and BiotechnoJogy.

Department of Molecular Pathology, Padriciano 99.1-34012 Trieste, Italy .

Page 2: IntroductionThe plasmjds used il1 this study are listed jn Table ]. Po]ymerase chail1 reaction (PCR) primers 5'-GGA CTT GTC TGT TGA AG al1d 5'-A TT A TT TGA TTG GAG TT were used to

18

Table 1 Bacterial strains and plasmids

Strain

or plasmid

Relevant properties Saurcear reference

Strain

E.~('heri('hia ('{)li

NM522 supE, rhi, LI(lar-proAB), Llhsd5(r-.m~J [F', pruAB.I(/rlqZLlMJ.'J Stratagene(La .JoIJa. Calir.)

Wcinstock et al. (1983)

This work

MCIOOOECJOOO

F-, araDl39 (aru ABC-Ieu)7679, fJullo, fJaIK.lac).'74. r.\pLo rhiRepA+ MCJOOOo Km'. carrying a single copy of the pWVO1 repA genein the gIfJB gene

Bacillu.'i .~uhtili.~

BSJIO RepA+ OBI04 (Kawamura and Ooi 19841. Cm'. carrying multiple copies ofthe pWVOI r(!pA gene in the (Jdd gene region

rrpC2, 1)'5, rhyA. rh.\'B

rrpC2. p/Je. spoOH.1HindrrpC2, degU32(H)') : : ap/JA3

Leenhouts. unpublished

GTyczan and Dubnau

(]982)WeiT et al. (1984)Msadek et al. (1991)

Gasson (1983)

Buist et al. (1995)

Leenhouts, unpublished

]5233

QB4371

Lactococcus lams

MGI363

MGI363acmAJl

LLIOS

Plasmid-free NCDO712Derivative of MGI363 containing a 703 hp Sacl-Spel dele1ion in acmA geneRepA. MG1363. Cm'. carrying multiple copies of the pWV01 repA genein the random chromosomal fragment A ( leenhouts el al. 19901RepA+ MG1363, carrying a single cop)' of 1he pWV01 repA gene inthe pepX p gene

LL302 Leenhouts. unpublished

Plasmid

pUC23rep3

pECI

pUCI9E

leenhouts e.t al. (1991a)law et al. (1995)laboratory col1ection

Laboratory col]ectjon

Vieira and Messing (199J )This workvan de Guchte et al. (1991)Leenhouts et al. (199Jc)This workThis workThis workThis workThis workThis workThjs workThjs workBuist et aJ. (J995)

Apr. carrying the pWVOI repA gene under control of promoter P13Kmr, Tc', pKVB2 (Kiel et al. 1987) carrying the rep.4 gene ofpWVOIApr, Emr, pUCI9 (Yanisch-Perron et al. 19851 carrying the Emr of pEI94(Horinouchi and Weisblum 1982) in the Smal restriction siteApr, Tc', pMTL25 (Chambers et al. J988) carrying the Tcr of pLSI(Lacks el al. J 986) in the Smal restriction siteKmr. lacZaKmr, Tcr, pUK2J carrying the Tcr gene of pTC1 in the );ïlOI restriction siteEm', pMG36e carrying the E. co/i lacZ geneCryptic plasmid of L. lactis Wg2Tcr. ori+ of pWVO1. replicates onJy in strains providing rep.4 in transEmr, ori+ of pWVOI, repJicates only in strains providing repA in transTcr. LacZ~, ori+ of pWVOI. replicates only in strains providing rep.4 in transEmr. LacZ+, ori~ of pWVOJ. replicates only in strains providing repA in transErnr, derivative of pORl280 specific for integrations in the L. lactis pepX p geneEmr, derivative of pORl280 specific for integrations in the L. lacti.~ nrdD geneTcr, derivative of pORI240 specific for integrations in the B .~ubtiHs spo OH geneEmr. derivative of pORl280 specific for integrations in the B. subtili.~ degL' geneEm'. derivative of pORl280 specific for integrations in the L. lactis acmA gene

pUK21pUK24pMG60pWVOIpORI24pORI28pORI240pORI280pORI280-pepXPpORI280-nrdDpORI240-spoOHpORI280-degU32(hy)pINT AA

bacterial strain unless RepA is provided in trans. Theconstruction of inlegration vectors from pORIplasmids is possible by the availability of Escherichiacoli, Bacillus subrilis and Lacrococcus lacris helperstrains that produce the replication prolein froma chromosomaIly incorporated copy of repA (Leen-houts el al. 1991 a; Law el al. 1995; Leenhouts, unpub-lished data). To simplify cloning procedures and toextend the application ofthe pORI vectors, we describein the present paper the modular construction of pORI\'ectors that can be conveniently used for gene replace-ment strategies. The vectors carry an erythrom)'cin(Em) or a tetracycline (Tc) resistance gene, a multiplecloning site (m cs) and the E. coli lacZ reporter gene.The feasibility of the system is demonstrated by the

replacement of several genes in L. lacris and B. subrili.'\.In principle an)' non-essential chromosomal gene il1a vast repertoire of transformabIe gram-positive andgram-negative bacteria can be replaced by a mutatedcopy using the system described here.

Materials and methods

BacteriaJ strains and gro\\'1h conditions

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table I. E. coliand B. subrili.~ were grown in TY medium (Rottlander and Trautner1970). and L Jaclis was growp in M 17 medium (Terzaghi andSandine 1975) containing 0.5% glucose (GM 17). L. Jacri.~ was plated

Page 3: IntroductionThe plasmjds used il1 this study are listed jn Table ]. Po]ymerase chail1 reaction (PCR) primers 5'-GGA CTT GTC TGT TGA AG al1d 5'-A TT A TT TGA TTG GAG TT were used to

219

onto G M 17 agar containing 0.3 M sucrose arter electrotransrorma-tion. Arter transformatjon B. suhlilis competent cells were platedonto minimal medium (Smith et al. 1983) containing lysine. trypto-phan and thymidine Kanamycin. Em and Tc were used at finalconcentrations or 50. JOO and 1:? J.!g!ml. respectjvely. for E. (.mi. Tcwas used at a final concentration of 8 J.!g!ml for B. suhlilis. Chlor-amphenicol and Em were used at final concentrations of 5 J.!g!ml forB. .~uhlili.~ and L. I(lclis. 5-bromo-4-chJoro-3-indolyl-galactoPYrano-sidc (X-gal) was used at a final concentration of 80 J.!g 'ml for B.~uhlili.~ and L. I(lcris.

containing the mutation produce halwhereas wild-type colonies do nol

on this typc of agar pJatc.

DNA isolation and anaiysis

Chromosomal DNA was isolated as pre\.iously described (Leen-

h()uts et al. 1 990). Plasmid DNA was extracted according t() the

method of Birnboim and Doly ( 19791 \\'ith the m()dification made by

Seegers et aJ. ( ] 994). Large-scale pJasmid iso)atjon was done by CsCI

gradient purification (Maniatis et aJ. 1982). DNA transfer to

Qiabrane NyJon Plus membranes (Qiagen. Diisseldorf. Germanyl

was according to the protocoJ of Chomczynski and Qasba ( 19841.

Probes were labeJJed using the ECL Label)ing Kit and hybridization

and probe detection were carried out according to the instructions

of the ECL system manufacturer (Amersham ]nternationaJ.

Amersham. UK). The PCR was carried out with super Taq DNA

poJymerase according to the instructions of the suppJier (HT

BiotechnoJogy, Cambridge. UK) on chromosomal DNA.

Transformation

E. l"oli and L lal"ri.~ were transformed by electrotransformation asdescribed by Zabarovsky and Winberg (1990) and Holo and Nes(1989). respectively. Competent celIs of B. subrilis were transformedby the method of Bron and Venerna (1972)

Plasmids and oligonucleotides

SDS-paJyacrylamide geJ electrapharesis (SDS-PAGE\.V..'estern bJattjng and immunadetectian

The plasmjds used il1 this study are listed jn Table ]. Po]ymerasechail1 reaction (PCR) primers 5'-GGA CTT GTC TGT TGA AGal1d 5'-A TT A TT TGA TTG GAG TT were used to ana]yse theMG]363::lIrdD integrants. MG]363I1rdD..acmA integrants werechecked lisil1g the primers 5'-CAA GGT TAA GTC CAC G al1d5'-A TT A TT TGA TTG GAG TT. The presence of the 507 bpdeletjol1 in IIrdD or 1he 70] bp de]etjon il1 acmA in the differentintegrants was analysed using the PCR primers 5'-GAC TAT TTAACG AAC TG al1d 5'-GGC AAG AGC A TC A TG TG. Thesequel1ces of the primers are based on sequences present in theEMBL Database under accessjon number X56954 (pWVO] I and theGenBank accession numbers U] 7696 (acmA) and U73336 (m,ID ).

The PCR primers used for the cioning of the mutant spoOH geneof B. SUblilis IS233 were 5'-GGG AGA TCT GAG AGA GGT AGAAAC G and 5'-TTA TCT AGA TTC TCA TGC CAT TAC ACC.Primers 5'-AGA AAA GAT CTA TAT ACA ACC GAG G and5'-GCA TCT AGA GCA CTT CAC A TT CCC GC \\'ere used 10clone the degl' 32(h.ï) mulation of B. Sublilis QB4371. The sequencesof the primers are based on the sequences present in the Genbankunder accession numbers M29693 (spoOH) and M23558 (defJU ). Inboth PCRs a fragment of] kb was generated with the mutationapproximate]y in the middle of the fragment.

Ce]] extracts of overnjghl cu]lures were prepared as descrjbed by vande Guchle el al. ( 1990) Prolejn samp]es \Vere subjecled to SDS-PAGE accordjng 10 the protoCO] descrjbed by Laemmli (1970) wjlha Prolean II minigel syslem (Biorad Laboralories. Rjchmond.Ca]if.). Proteins separated by SDS-PAGE were transfered 10 BA85njlrocellu]oSe membrane (Sch]ejfer & Scheull, Dassel. Germany) bythe method described by Towbin el al. (1979). Endopeplidase anli-gen \Vas delecled \\.ith pO]yC]onaJ endopepljdase antjbodies (T.anel al. 1991) di]uted I: 8000 and aJkaline phosphalase-conjugaledgoal anli-rabbil antibodies (Promega Corporalion. Madison. Wjs.)according 10 the manufacturer.s jnslrucljons.

Results and discussion

Construction of pORI240 and pORI280

Derivatives of the lactococcal plasmid pWV01. theso-calIed pORI vectors, lack the gene encoding thereplication initiation protein RepA and are, thus,unable to replicate unless RepA is provided il1 tral1s(Leenhouts et al. 1991a). The vectors pORI24 andpOR128, which were used as the basis for the integra-tion vectors pORI240 and pORI280, were constructedas follows. The Tc resistance gene was isolated fromplasmid pTC2 as a 1.6 kb Bal/1HI fragment and plas-mid pUK21 was digested with XhoI. Prior to ligatjonof the two fragments. blunt ends were generated byKlenow enzyme treatment. The ligation resulted inpUK24. in which the Tcr gene is flanked by two Xho]restriction sites. The 1.7 kb Spe] fragment of pUK24carrying the Tcr gene was treated with Klenow enzymeto create blunt ends. A 601 bp T aq] fragment ofpWV01. which carries the plus origin of replication(Ori + ) but lacks the gene encoding the replication in-

itiation protein (repA ). was also treated with Klenowenzyme and both fragments were ligated. resulting inpORI24. The XhoI fragment of pORI24 carrying the

Selection for gene replacemenl

Transformants of L. lactis and B. subtilis in which p)asmids hadintegrated via a single crossover were grown overnight in GM ] 7 orminjmal medium. respectjvely. with the appropriate antibiolics. Cul-tures were then diluled in medjum wilhoUI antibiolics 10 a densily of]-]0 cel]s/m] of medium, fo]]owed by growlh for approximately30-40 generations. Dilutions of the cultures were spread onto agarp)ates containing X-gal. Afler ]2-48 h white colonies were selectedfor further analysis.

Bioassays

PepXP-deficjent mutants were identified usjng a PepXP plate assayas descrjbed before (Leenhouts et al. 1991 b). AcmA actj\,jty wasanalysed as described by Bujst et al. (1995). Spo0H-deficjentmutants were jdentjfied as prevjously descrjbed (Schaeffer et al

1965).The degU32(h.\") mutation was identified by transferring the CoJo-

njes to TY agar plates cOntajning 0.8% skimmeo milk. C010nies

Page 4: IntroductionThe plasmjds used il1 this study are listed jn Table ]. Po]ymerase chail1 reaction (PCR) primers 5'-GGA CTT GTC TGT TGA AG al1d 5'-A TT A TT TGA TTG GAG TT were used to

220

---~---/

~ XbaI

No11XmallIB gIl

BamHI

NdelAcc]

MluIPst]

HindIllSmal

HpallS~INcol

SphIBglII

T

ORJ+ ~

P'."C1pORI240/280

R REm

//"'

*,~ LacZ+

~A ~ B TcRorEmR

~

Fig. ] Plasmid map or the OTi- RepA- pWVOJ deTi\,ati\,espORI240 (5.9 kb) and pORl280 (5.3 kb). The TestTiction sites in-dicated aTe unique. [Tc'/Em' eTythTqmycin OT tetTacycline Tesist-ance gene. lacZ {J-galactosidase gene or E. (.0/i expTessed undeT thecontToI or lactococca] pTomoteT P31 (P31 ), T terminatoT or thelactococcal pToteinase gene pnP. opel1 square (ORJ+) oTjgin orTeplication or lactococcal plasmid pWVO1. Prepc pTomoteT rTom therepC gene or p]asmid pWVOl (Leenhouts et al. 1991c)J Fig. 2 Schematic representation of a two-step procedure to obtain

gene-replacement recombination. The lollipopsaslerisks indicate thepresence of a mutation or a deJetion or. alternativeJy. of a gene to bejnserted in 1he chromosome. A and B two consecutive fragments onthe plasmids and on the chromosome thTough which recombinationcould take place. In step I depicted here. only recombination via A isvisualized. The end resuJt in II would be the same ir an integrationhad taken place through B. Open har gene (fragmentlof interest.\\,ar.ï line chromosome. See Fig. 1 for a detailed description of thepORI vectors

Tcr gene was replaced by the Emr gene from plasmidpUCI9E, located on a I kb Sa1l fragment, which result-ed in plasmid pORI28. Vectors like pORI24 andpORI28 have a low copy number in the E. coli RepA+strain ECI000, in contrast to RepA+ pWVOl deriva-tives, which have a high copy number in E. coli (Kok etal. 1984}.

To enable the detection of resolution of integratedplasmids in genes for which no simple detectablephenot)'pic difference exists between the wild-type andmutant strains, the E. coli lacZ reporter gene wascloned in pORI24 and pORI28. The lacZ expressionunit from pMG60 (van de Guchte et al. 1991) wasisolated a& a 3.5 kb Sa/1 fragment and, af ter treatmentof Lhe blunt ends with Klenow enzyme, the fragmentwas ligated into the StuI sites of pORI24 and pORI28.resulting in pORI240 and pORI280 (Fig. 1). The lacZgene in these two integration plasmids is under thecontrol ofthe lactococcal promoter P32 which is recog-nized in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (vander \1ossen et al. 1987}. Expression of lacZ frompORI240 and pORI280 resulted in blue colonies onX-gal plates ofthe RepA+ strains LUO8, LL302, BSII0and ECI000.

moter and the 5' end of the gene and fragment B the3' end. In the fina] construct, pORl280-pepX P, pepX P]acks an interna] 716 bp fragment. pORI280-pepXPwas used to transform L. lactis M G 1363 by the tV.'O-step strategy outlined in Fig. 2. Co]onies were screenedfor LacZ activity but not for PepXP activity during thisprocedure to mimic a situation in which a bioassay is]acking. We first determined through which fragmentpORl280-pepX P had integrated. Southern b]ots wereused to ana]yse 28 transformants: 19 had integratedthrough fragment A (MG 1363: : pep.)( P-A) and 9 throughfragment B (MG1363 : : pepX P-B). One transformant ofeach type was taken and grov.'n for 35 generationsunder non-se]ective conditions to a!lov.' reso]ution Qfthe cointegrate structure. Approximate]y 20000 co]onyforming units (4000 cfu per plate of 15 cm diameter) ofeach cu]ture were p]ated onto agar medium containingX-gal. Five LacZ- co]onies were detected among.theMG1363::pepXP-A co]onies and nine among thosederived from MG1363::pepXP-B. A!I LacZ- colonieswere Em' and b)' Southern blot analysis (data notshown) it was shown that the numbers of gene replace-ments were one and three for the M G 1363: : pepX P-Aand MG1363::pepXP-B cu]tures, respecti\'e]y. Themutant nature of the co]onies was confirmed b)' thePepXP plate assay. Taken together, the frequencies bywhich gene replacements were generated in the

Gene replacernent in L. lactis

We previously conducted gene replacement studies inthe pepXP gene of L. lactis using a pVC derivative.Frequencies appeared to be relatively low with vafuesas low as 10-6 per generation (Leenhouts et af. 1991b).Therefore, the pepX P region was chosen to test thepOR] delivery system. Two 1.5 kb fragments of pepX Pwe re clohed in pOR]280. Fragment A carried the pro-

WCRI CRI+t 40 ar 280

TCR ar EmR*

A~B

X~ , ~LacZ-

A ==:> B T cS ar Ems

t )ntegratian

CRI+ lacZ Emr~~~

Page 5: IntroductionThe plasmjds used il1 this study are listed jn Table ]. Po]ymerase chail1 reaction (PCR) primers 5'-GGA CTT GTC TGT TGA AG al1d 5'-A TT A TT TGA TTG GAG TT were used to

221

Strain r..;umber of

lacZ- cru

Frequenc~ of

LacZ- cru

~umber ar

mutantsFrequencyofmutants

Table 2 Numbers and

frequencies of LacZ- colony

forming uni1s (:li/ ) and gene.

rcplacementsMGl363

.:P('J1>.'P-A

::J1ep>.'P-B

: .nrdD-A

::/1/ïID-B

BD393

: : sJ1('OH

BD393.!;J1{10H

:.deIIL'31(h,ï)

59

~5-9)

ï.J x 10-1.

1.3xI0-o

::J x 10-..

4.6 x 10- ..

].4 x 1(1-"4.2 x] 0- "

< 2.1 x 10-~9.1 x 10- ;

3

()"

.,.,

6 ~.5 x 10 3.ti x 10

~ .Ox 10-01 1.5 x ]0

Ten LacZ- cru were lesled

2 3 4M 1

323827312537

2030

Fig. 3 AgaTose ( 1.2%) geJ electTophoTesis of polymeTase chain Teac-

tion (PCRI pToducts foTmed on chTOmOsomal DNAs of MG1363

(1ane 1). MG1363nrdD (1ane 2). MG1363acmAL11 (1ane 3). and

MG 1363nrdDacmA (1ane 4). Sizes of DNA fTagments (in base paiTs)

of bacteTiophage SPP] DNA cut with EcoR] (moleculaT weight

maTkeT. ]ane M) and of PCR pToducts aTe shown in the ]eft and Tight

maTgins. Tespectively

a promoter sho\v higher rates of recombination than

similar.sized fragments without a promoter (Biswaset al. 1993; Buist et al, 1995).

To show that the system can be used to introducemultiple mutations in one strain. pINT AA (Buist et al.1995) was used to introduce a deletion in the QcmA geneof MG(nrdD). In this case integration and excisionevents were not closely examined. The presence of thedeletions in the genomes of the three different mutantsMGI363(nrdD). MGI363(G('mAL11). and the doublemutant MG1363(nrdD GcmA) was checked by P CR.The lengths of the P CR fragments clearly show the

presence of the different delelions in the mutants(Fig, 3), These results were confirmed by Southern hy-bridization and. for the Qcm.4 mutation. by an activity

assay (results not shown).Frequently. genes are organized in operons and in-

sertions in one gene can cause polar effects on down-stream genes, This could preclude the construction ofa mutation in any gene if it is folIowed by an essentialgene under the same transcriptional control, In thepORI plasmids the repC promoter (PrepC) from

pWVO1 (Leenhouts et al. 1991c) is present between

MGJ363::pepXP-A al1d MGJ363::pepXP-B culturesral1ged betweel1 1.4 x 10-6 and 4.2 x 10-6 per genera-tion (Table 2). These frequenciesare in agreement withour pre\'ious results {Leenhouts et al. 1991 b) and dem-onstrate that the pORI system can be used to generategel1e replacements in regions with low recombinationfreq uencies.

To demonstrate ul1ambiguously that with the pres-ent system gel1es can be replaced for \\!hich a pheno-typic distil1ction is lacking. we chose the anaerobicribonucleotide reductase ge;ne nrdD as a target. ThenrdD gel1e (2.24 kb) of L. lactis had not yet been de-scribed. but was idel1tified upstream of the major pep-tidoglycan hydrolase gene (acInA) {Buist et al. 1995).Plasmid pORI280-nrdD carries the promoter and 5'end of the gene in fragment A (0.8 kb) and a 3' internalpart of the gene in fragment B (1.2 kb). In this vectornrdD lacks an interl1al EcoRV fragment of 507 bp. Afterintroduction ofpORI280-nrdD into strainMG1363. 20LacZ+ Emr cfu were analysed by PCR. Fifteen trans-formal1ts (MG1363 : : nrdD-A) had integrated \'ia frag-ment A, while five had il1tegrated through fragmentB (MG1363::nrdD-B). One transformant ofeach typewas taken and grown non-selectively (28 generations).after which LacZ- Em" cfu were identified among4500 cfu of each culture (Table 2). Ten colony formingunits of each type were analysed by PCR and tworeplacement mutants were identified origil1ating fromthe MG1363::nrdD-B culture (9.1 x 10-5 per genera-tion). This result was col1firmed by Southelï1 hybridiza-tion (data not showl1). The fact that nrdD could bereplaced by a mutant cop)' indicates thatthe gene is notessel1tial under the experimental conditions applied. i.e.aerobic growth. A detailed characterization of the nrdDlocus of L': la('tis. wiIJ be published elsewhere (G. Buistet al., mal1uscript in preparation).

Interestingly, frequel1cies of recombination betweenthe fragments carryil1g the promoter and 5' end of bothpepX P and nrdD were two to three times higher in bothsteps of the procedure. This is in agreemel1t \\,ith earlierobservations tliat homologous fragmel1J.s carrying

Page 6: IntroductionThe plasmjds used il1 this study are listed jn Table ]. Po]ymerase chail1 reaction (PCR) primers 5'-GGA CTT GTC TGT TGA AG al1d 5'-A TT A TT TGA TTG GAG TT were used to

PrepC (Fig.4A. lil1e 5). A Weslern blolOf cel]-freeextracls of the \'arious slrail1s is presented il1 Fig. 4B.The anti-PepO antibodies used also recognize a secondhomologous endopeptidase (PepO.:.), which is some-what largerthan PepO and specified else\\'here on thechromosome (Mierau el al. ] 993 ). As is clear fromFig. 4B. lanes 4 and 5. PrepC is active on lhe chromo-some of L. Jaclis. The smal] amount of PepO. in lane5 is probably caused by degradalion of the truncaled

protein. Proteolytic breakdown combined with theantisense orientation of PrepC relative lO PA couldexplain the absence of the PepO' antigen in Fig. 4B.lane 2. In conclusion. polar effects due to the insertjonof the pORI vectors can be avoided by employing the

transcriptional activity of PrepC.

A

~t:iJ-PA Prepc

2

4 ~PA Prepc

~Prepc

5

B kD 4Gene replacement in B. subti/is

.I PepO2

\" PepO

PepO'

80

Fig. 4A Schematic representation of the chromosoma] regionsaround the pepO gene of the five L. /actis MG1363 deri\.ativesexamined on the Western b)ot in B. The numbers cQrrespond to thelane numbers in B. P A and PrepC represent the oppA and repCpromoter. respectively.For reasons ofclarity. the oppA gene js notdrawn between P A and pepO. Thej(Jgged ends represent deletjon endpojnts. The restrjctjon sites used to make these deletions are shownin )ine 3: E EcoRI. S ScaI. B Western b)ot analysis of cell-freeextracts of MG1363 and four sing)e crossover integrants in pepO (fordetails. see text). Equa] amounts of protein in each )ane were sub-jected to SDS po)yacry)amide (12.5%) gel electrophoresis. The sizeof a molecu]ar weight marker js indicated on the Jeft. PepO. PepO2and PepO' are indicated jn the right margin

Ta demonstrate that the pORl system also operates inanother gram-positive organism even under moderatetransformation frequency conditions, B. subrilis waschosen for the consecutive introduction of the spoORand degU 32(/1.\') mutations into the same strain, Themutated spoOR gene was cloned as a 1 kb fragment byP CR from strain 15233 into pOR1240, with the muta-tion approximately in the middle of the P CR fragment,The resulting plasmid pOR1240spoOR was used tatransfarm B. subtilis BD393, The route of integrationwas nat investigated in this case. A Tc' LacZ- trans-formant was taken and grawn non-selectively for40 generations befare plating, Amang 2000 cfu. 6LacZ- colanies appeared. 3 of which were found ta be5po- in a sparulation assay (3.8 x 10- 5 per generation)

(Table 2).The degU gene from strain QB371. carrying the

degU32(/1y) mutation, was claned as a 1 kb fragmentby P CR in pOR1280. 5train BD393 : : spoOR was trans-formed with the resulting plasmid pORI280de?JL' 32.An Ems LacZ + colany was taken and grawn nan-

selectively for 40 generations. Eight LacZ- colanieswere identified amang 2000 cfu generated from thisculture {Table 2). Two of the LacZ- colanies hadretained the degU32{/1y) mutation {2.5 x 10-5 per gen-eration) as judged by a halo assay using agar plat~scontaining skimmed milk.

Ori... and the mcs (Fig. 1 ). The lactococcal endopep-tidase gene pepO was chosen as a chromosomal targetto examine whether this promoter would be strongenough to express a gene downstream of the insertionpoint. pepO is normally transcribed from promoter PAupstream of oppA, the gene immediately precedingpepO (Mierau et al. 1993: Tynkkynen et al. 1993; seeFig. 4A, line 3). A DNA fragment carrying L1pepO', witha truncation of the last 50 codons of pepO and a largedeletion removing codons 37 to 285 internal to pepO.was cloned in two orientations behind PrepC inpORI280. Integration of the two pORI-pepO con-structs via sequences preceding the internal deletionresults in L1pepO' being transcribed from PA (Fig. 4A,lines 1, 4). An intact copy of pepO is either uncoupledfrom p A (Fig. 4A, line 1) or located immediately down-stream of PrepC (Fig. 4A, line 4). In the case of integra-tion of the two pORI-pepO constructs via sequencesbehind the deletion, pepO' is under the control of P Awhile the internally deleted form (L1pepO) is either de-void of-a promoter (Fig. 4A, line 2) or transcribed from

Camments an the methad

The vectors used in this stud)' lack their cognate repgene. Thus, this type of integration vector does not relyon replication in the target host and does not dependon temperature sensitivity of a replication protein inthat host. Apart from the functionality of the pORIvectors in L. lactis and B. .\"ubtilis, these vectors havebeen used in E. co/i, albeit for single crossover integra-tions (1. MulIer, unpublished data). It is conceivable

Page 7: IntroductionThe plasmjds used il1 this study are listed jn Table ]. Po]ymerase chail1 reaction (PCR) primers 5'-GGA CTT GTC TGT TGA AG al1d 5'-A TT A TT TGA TTG GAG TT were used to

that the vectors can be used in practically any bacterialhost. An exception may be some lactococcal strainsharbouring pWV01-like plasmids, which could provideRepA in trans. A plasmid-curing step prior to the use ofthe pORI vectors will be necessary. Adjustment of thevectors for use in some bacterial species may be re-quired, such as insertion of another selectable markerand replacement ( of the promoter) of the reporter gene.This can easily be achieved by virtue of the modulardesign ofvectors pORI24 and pORI28.

The pORI plasmids have the advantage over othernon-replicalive vectors that they allow cloning of thetarget gene {fragment) in gram-positive or gram-nega-live backgrounds. This may minimise cloning prob-lems. If such problems should persist, construction ofa homologous RepA + background may be considered.

The availability of a repA expression cassette is conve-nient for this purpose.

A drawback of the melhod is that transformationfrequencies are required that are sufficiently high toobtain at least a few integrants. Therefore, it may benecessary to optimise transformation prolocols forpoorly transformabIe strains.

In the present system the presence or absence of anexpressed lacZ gene enabled a simple blue/whitescreening of colonies to visualize recombination eventsin the second step of the .procedure. However, thiss~'stem is still based on negative selection, which mayresult in extensive screeninQ of colonies if recombina-tion frequencies in the target gene are very Iow { < 10- 6

per generation). As already indicated above, the repor-ter gene may be replaced by a gene that allows positiveselection, if available. Nevertheless, the pORI vectorsdescribed here \\'ere found to be highly efficient. Inaddition to the mulations described, the pORI systemhas been used to mulale the dtpT, pepO, pepT andacmA genes of L. lactis {Mierau el al. 1993, 1994;Hagling el al. 1 994; Buist el al. 1995).

The fact that no antibiotic resistance marker is lef 1on the chromosome of a mulated strain makes thestrain not on]y more desirable for applied purposes bulalso Ieaves the possibility of introducing more desiredmutations (or genes).

Acknowledgements This work was supported by Unilever Research,Vlaardingen and by the CEC V ALUE Programme. We thankHenk M ulder for preparing the figures. Jan Kok is the recipient of afellowship of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

(KNAW).

References

Birnboim HC, Doly J (1979) A rapjd alkaljne extraction procedurefor screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res7.1513-1523

Biswas I. Gruss A, Ehrlich SD. Maguin E (1993) High-efficiency geneinactivatjon and replacement system for gram-positive bacterja.J Bacteriol 175:3628-3635

Bron S. Venema G ( ] 9721 U)lraviO)el jnaclivalion and excJSJOnrepair in B(Jcillu.\ SUhlilis: J. Conslruclion and characlerizalion ofa lransformable eighlfold auxolrophic slrajn and IWO u)lraviolelsensilive derivalives. Mulal Res J5: 1-]0

Buisl G. Kok J, Leenhouls KJ. Dabrowska M. Venema G. Haan-drjkman AJ (]995) Molecular c)oning and nucleolide sequence ofIhe gene encoding Ihe ma.ior peplidoglycan hydrolase or L{/cl(l-(.)ccu.\ I(JCli.\. a muramidase needed for celJ separalion. J Baclcrio)]77.]554-]563

Chambers SP. Prior SE. Barstow DA. Minton NP (19~~1 ThepMTL nic-cloning veclors. J. lmproved pUC po):-.linker regions 10facililale Ihe usc of sonicaled DNA for nucleolide sequellcing.Gene 68:]39-]49

Chomczynski P. Qasba PK (]984) Alkaline lransfer of DNA 10plaslic membrane. Bjochem Biophys Res Commun 122: 340- 344

Gasson MJ ( ] 983) Plasmid complements of Slr('pl()C()CCU.~ l{/cli.,NCDO7]2 and olher laclic slreplococci afler proloplasl curing.J Baclerio] ]54: ]-9

Grvczan TJ, Dubnau D (]982) Direcl seleclion of recombinanlplasmids in B(Jcillus .~l/brilis. Gene 20.459-469

Hagljng A. Kunji ERS. Leenhouls KJ. Poolman B. Konjngs WN(]994) The di- and lripeplide lranspOrl prolein of L(JC1()C()CCUSI(JClis. J Bjo] Chem 269: ] ] 391-11399

Hamjllon CM, Aldea M. Washburn BK. Babilzke P. Kushner SR(]989) New melhod for generaljng delelions and gene replace-ments in Escherichi(J c()li. J Bacleriol ]7] .46]7-4622

Holo H. Nes IF (]989J Hjgh-frequenc: lransformalion by e1ec-lroporation of L(JC1()C()CCU.~ :(Jclis subsp. crem()ris grown wjlhglycine in osmolically slabiljzed media. App] Envjron Microbiol55:3]]9-3123

Horinouchi S. Wejsblum B (]982) Nucleotjde sequence and func-tiona) map ofpE194. a plasmid Ihal specifies inducible resislance10 macrolide. lincosamide. and slreplogramin Iype B antibioljcs.J Bacleriol ] 50: 804-8] 4

Kawamura F. Doi R ( 1984J Conslruclion of a B(Jcillu.~ .~uhiili.~doub)e mulant deficient jn exlracellu]ar a)kaline and neulra) pro-leases. J Baclerio] 160:442-444

Kie) JAKW. Vossei1 JPMJ. Venema G (]987) A genera) melhod forIhe COnslrUcljon or Escheri('hi{/ ('()li mulanls b:- homologous re-combination and p)asmid segregalion. Mo) Gen Genel 207 :294-30]

Kok J. van der Vossen JMBM. \'enema G (]984) Conslruclion ofplasmid cJoning veclOrs for lactjc slreplococci which also repljcatejn B(Jcillus SUblilis and Es('heri('hi(J c()li. App) Envjron Microbjol48:726-731

Lacks SA. Lopez P. Greenberg B. Espinoza M (]9861 1dentificaljonand analysis of genes for lelracycJine resistance and repljcalionfuncljons jn Ihe broad-hosl-range plasmid pLS]. J Mol Biol]92:753-765

Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of slruclural proleins during Iheassembly of the head of bacleriophage T 4. Nature 227: 680-685

Law J. Buisl G. Haandrikman A. Kok J. Venema G. LeenhoulsK (1995) A syslem to generale chromosoma] mulalions inL{/('l()(.)('(,/.~ I(JCli.\ \vhich al)o\\.s rasl analysis or largelled gel1es.J Baclerio) ]77:701]-7018

Leenhouls KJ. Kok J. Venema G ( ] 9901 Slabi)ily of integraledplasmids in Ihe chromosome of L{/C1Ul()('('l/.\ l{/('li.\. App] Envirol1Microbiol 56: 2726-2735

Leenhouls KJ. Kok J. Venema G ( ] 99] a I LaclococcaJ plasmidpWVO] as an integralion yeclor for laclococci. App) EnvjronMicrobioJ 57: 2562-2567

Leenhouls KJ. Kok J. Venema G ( ) 991 bl Rep)acemenl recombina-lion il1 L(JC1O('()('('l/.\ I{/('li.\. J BacIerioI ] 73. 4794-4798

Leel1houls KJ. Toll1er B. Brol1 S. Kok J. Venema G. SeegersJFML (1991c) NucJeolide sequence and characlerjzalion ofIhe broad-hosl-range laclococcal plasmid pWYO] Plasmid26:55-66

Manialis T. Frilsch EF. Sambrook J (]982) Molecular cJoning.a laboralory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Lab6ralory Press. ColdSpring Harbor. NY

Page 8: IntroductionThe plasmjds used il1 this study are listed jn Table ]. Po]ymerase chail1 reaction (PCR) primers 5'-GGA CTT GTC TGT TGA AG al1d 5'-A TT A TT TGA TTG GAG TT were used to

224

ure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76.4350-5354

Tynkkynen S, Buist G. Kunjj E, Kok J, Poolman B. Venerna G.Haandrjkman A (]9931 Genetjc and bjochemical characterizationof the oligopeptide transport system of LaCl{}COCCU.\ Jaclis. J Bac-teriol ] 75.7523- 7532

Van de Guchte M. Kodde J, van der Vossen JMBM. Kok J. VenernaG (1990) Heterologous gene expression jn LaCl{}C{}cCU.\ Jac/issubsp. Jac/is. synthesis. secretjon and processing of the BacilJu.\SUhlili.~ neutral protease Appl Envjron Microbiol 56: 2606-26] ]

Van de Guchte M. Kok J, Venerna G (]99]) Djstance-dependenttranslational coupling and jnterference jn LaCl0COCCU.~ lac/is. MolGen Genet 227: 65- 7 ]

Van der Vossen JMBM. van der Lelie D. Venerna G (]987) ]solationand characterization of Lacl0COCCUS lac/i.'i subsp. cremori.'i Wg2-specific promoters. Appl Envjron Microbiol 53: 2452-2457

Vieira J. Messing J (]99]) New pUC-derived cloning vectors withdifferent selectable markers and DNA repljcation origins. Gene]00:189-194

Weinstock GM. Berman ML, Silhavy TJ (]983) Chjmerjc genes wjthfi-galactosidase. In. Papas TS. Rosenberg M, Chirikjian JG (eds)Gene amp)ification and analysis ]11. EIsevier North-HoiJand, NewYork, pp 27-64

Wejr J. Dubnau E, Ramakrishna N, Smith I (1984) BaciJJus SUblilisspoOH gene. J Bacterjol ]57:405-4]2

)'anisch-Perron C, Vjejra J. Messing J (] 985) ]mproved M 13 phageclonjng vectors and host strains: nuc1eotide sequence of theM ]3mp] 8 and pUC]9 vectors. Gene 33: ]03-] 19

Zabarovsky ER. Winberg G (1990) High efficjency e)ectroporationofligated DNA into bacteria. Nuc1eic Acjds Res 18:5912

Mierau 1, Tan PST, Haandrikman AJ. Kok J. Leenhouts KJ. Kon-ings WN. Venerna G (1993) Cloning and sequencing of the genefor a lactococcal endopeptidase, an enzyme with sequencing sim-ilarity to mammalian enkephalinase. J Bacteriol 175: 2087-2096

Mierau I, Haandrikman AJ. Velterop 0. Tan PST. Leenhouts KJ,Konings WN, Venerna G, Kok J (1994) Tripeptidase gene (pepT )of LaclococCUs Jaclis: molecular cioning and nucleotide se-quencing for pepT and construction of a chromosomal deletion

.mutant. J Bacteriol 176: 2854-286JMsadek T, Kunst F, Klier A. Rapoporl G (1991) DegS-DegU and

CornP-ComA modulator effector pairs control expression of theBacillus sublilis pleiotropic regulatory protein de{IQ. J BacteriolJ73:2366-2377

Rott!ander E, Trautner TA (1970) Genetic and transfection studieswith Bacillus Sublilis phage SP50. Mol Gen Genet 108:47-60

Schaeffer p, Mijlet J, Aubert JP (1965) Catabolic repression ofbacteria] sporulation. Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA 54: 704- 7J 1

Seegers JFML, Bron S, Franke CM. Venerna G. Kiewiet R (1994)The majority of !actococcal pJasmids carry a highly related repli-con. Microbiology 140: 1291-1300

Smith H, de Vos W, Bron S i1983) Transformation in Bacillussubtilis. Properties of DNA-binding-deficient mutants. J Bacteriol153:12-20

Tan PST, Pos PM, Konings WN (1991) Purification and character-isation of an endopeptidase frorn Lactococcus lactis subsp.cremoris Wg2. Appl Environ Microbiol 57: 3593-3599

Terzaghi BE, Sandine WE (1975) Improved medium for lactic strep-tococci and their bacteriophages. Appl Microbiol 29: 807-813

Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J (1979) Electrophoretic transfer ofproteins frorn polyacryJamide gels to nitrocelJulose sheets: proced-