intersubject normalization for group analyses in fmri jody culham department of psychology...

20
Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008 fMRI Course, Louvain, Belgium http://www.fmri4newbies.com/

Upload: edith-ball

Post on 03-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Intersubject Normalizationfor Group Analyses in fMRI

Jody CulhamDepartment of Psychology

University of Western Ontario

Last Update: November 29, 2008fMRI Course, Louvain, Belgium

http://www.fmri4newbies.com/

Page 2: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Brains are Heterogeneous

Slide from Duke course

Page 3: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

How can we define regions?

Talairach coordinates• Example: The FFA is at x = 40, y = -55, z = -10

Anatomical localization• Example: The FFA is in the right fusiform

gyrus at the level of the occipitotemporal junction

Functional localization• Example: The FFA includes all voxels around

the fusiform gyrus that are activated by the comparison between faces and objects

Kanwisher, McDermott & Chun, 1997, J Neurosci

Page 4: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Talairach Coordinate System

Note: That’s TalAIRach, not TAILarach!

Talairach & Tournoux, 1988

• made an atlas based on one brain

• any brain can be squished or stretched to fit hers and locations can be described using a 3D coordinate system (x, y, z)

… from an alcoholic old lady

Page 5: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Rotate brain into ACPC plane

Find posterior commisure (PC)

Find anterior commisure (AC)

ACPC line= horizontal axis

Corpus Callosum

Fornix

Pineal Body“bent asparagus”

Note: official Tal says to use top of AC and bottom of PC but I suspect few people actually do this

Source: Duvernoy, 1999

Page 6: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Squish or stretch brain to fit in “shoebox” of Tal system

Deform brain into Talairach space

yAC=0 y>0y<0

ACPC=0

y>0

y<0

z

x

Extract 3 coordinates

Mark 8 points in the brain:• anterior commisure• posterior commisure• front• back• top• bottom (of temporal lobe)• left• right

Page 7: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Do We need a Tarailalch Atras?

Variability between Japanese and European brains, both male

(red > yellow > green > blue)

Variability between male and female brains, both European

(red > yellow > green > blue)

Source: Zilles et al., 2001, NeuroImage

Page 8: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Smoothing and Averaging

Large activations across multiple subjects are more likely to show common activation than small ones

-->

Need to smooth (esp. for RFX analyses)

UNDER CONSTRUCTION: Need to make a slide that shows this with real data

Page 9: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Talairach Pros and Cons

Advantages• widespread system• allows averaging of fMRI data between subjects• allows researchers to compare activation foci• relatively easy to use

Disadvantages• not appropriate for all brains (e.g., Japanese brains don’t fit well)• activation foci can vary considerably – other landmarks like sulci may be more reliable

Page 10: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

MNI Space• Researchers at the Montreal Neurological Institute created a better

template based on a morphed average of hundreds of brains (not just one brain like Talairach)

• The MNI brain is more representative of average brain shape; however, it does not provide Brodmann areas

• The MNI alignment is more complex than Talairach: SPM uses it but many software packages still use Talairach

• CAVEAT: The MNI and Talairach coordinate are similar but not identical -- careful comparison requires a transformation

Source: http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/personal/matthew.brett/abstracts/MNITal/mniposter.pdf

Page 11: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Left is what?!!!

Neurologic (i.e. sensible) convention• left is left, right is right

L R

Radiologic (i.e. stupid) convention• left is right, right is left

R L

Note: Make sure you know what your magnet and software are doing before publishing left/right info!

x = 0-+

x = 0

+-

Note: If you’re really unsure which side is which, tape a vitamin E capsule to the one side of the subject’s head. It will show up on the anatomical image.

Page 12: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Brodmann’s Areas

Brodmann (1905):Based on cytoarchitectonics: study of differences in cortical layers between areasMost common delineation of cortical areasMore recent schemes subdivide Brodmann’s areas into many smaller regionsMonkey and human Brodmann’s areas not necessarily homologous

Page 13: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Anatomical LocalizationSulci and Gyri

gray matter (dendrites & synapses)

white matter (axons)

FUNDUS

BA

NK

SULCUS

GY

RU

SS

ULC

US

gray

/whi

te b

orde

r

pial

sur

face

FISSURE

Source: Ludwig & Klingler, 1956, in Tamraz & Comair, 2000

Page 14: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Variability of Sulci

Source: Szikla et al., 1977, in Tamraz & Comair, 2000

Page 15: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Variability of Functional Areas

Watson et al., 1995- motion-selective area, MT+ (=V5) is quite variable in stereotaxic space- however, the area is quite consistent in its location relative to sulci

- junction of inferior temporal sulcus and lateral occipital sulcus - see also Dumoulin et al., 2000

Page 16: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Cortical Surfaces

segment gray-whitematter boundary

inflate cortical surface

sulci = concave = dark graygyri = convex = light gray

render cortical surface

Advantages

• surfaces are topologically more accurate

• alignment across sessions and experiments allows task comparisons

Page 17: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Cortical Inflation Movie

Movie: unfoldorig.mpeghttp://cogsci.ucsd.edu/~sereno/unfoldorig.mpg

Source: Marty Sereno’s web page

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 18: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Cortical Flattening

Source: Brain Voyager Getting Started Guide

2) make cuts along the medial surface

(Note, one cut typically goes along the fundus of the calcarine sulcus though in this example the cut was placed below)

1) inflate the brain

3) unfold the medial surface so the cortical surface lies flat

4) correct for the distortions so that the true cortical distances are preseved

Page 19: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Spherical Averaging

Source: Fischl et al., 1999

Future directions of fMRI: Use cortical surface mapping coordinates

Inflate the brain into a sphere

Use sulci and/or functional areas to match subject’s data to template

Cite “latitude” & “longitude” of spherical coordinates

Movie: brain2ellipse.mpeghttp://cogsci.ucsd.edu/~sereno/coord1.mpg

Source: Marty Sereno’s web page

QuickTime™ and aYUV420 codec decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Page 20: Intersubject Normalization for Group Analyses in fMRI Jody Culham Department of Psychology University of Western Ontario Last Update: November 29, 2008

Spherical Averaging

Source: MIT HST583 online course notes