interoperability issues – between platforms and with ... · interoperability issues – between...
TRANSCRIPT
Interoperability issues – between platforms and with National Single
Windows
Hangzhou , 17rd October 2018
Aleksei Bondarenko,Eurasian Economic Commission
EURASIANECONOMIC COMMISSION
EURASIANECONOMIC COMMISSION
CONTENT
Challenges and trends
E-commerce and SW in UN/CEFACT recommendations
Interoperability issues and models
Next step forward
EURASIANECONOMIC COMMISSION
CHALLENGES AND TRENDS
EURASIANECONOMIC COMMISSION
CHALLENGES
Obstacles to Cross-border B2B electronic commerce:
• Different legal base and ICT readiness of cross-border partners;
• Trade formalities and cumbersome administrative procedures;
• Paper documents still predominate. Lack of mechanisms of the mutual recognition of the electronic documents;
• Trade formalities legislation not always aligned with B2B E-Commerce legislation. SW mechanism develops separately from B2B E-com Platforms.
EURASIANECONOMIC COMMISSION
TRENDS
Main trends in Cross-border B2B electronic commerce:• Governments support the E-commerce platforms;• Mega trans-borders projects appeared (”One belt, One road” and
etc.)• Trade platforms and trade facilitation eco-system creation.
Interoperability level between B2B trade and service platforms increases;
• International trade Digital transformation (AI, ML, Big data, Blockchain and etc.);
• Single Windows Interoperability agreements (for example EAEU-China agreement on trade facilitation);
EURASIANECONOMIC COMMISSION
EURASIANECONOMIC COMMISSION
Rec 33 – Single Window RecommendationRec 34 – Data Simplification and Standardization for International TradeRec 35 – Establishing a legal framework for international trade Single WindowRec 36 – Single Window Interoperability
Rec ?? – Single Submission Portal
SINGLE WINDOW RECOMMENDATIONS
EURASIANECONOMIC COMMISSION
SINGLE WINDOW INTEROPERABILITY
http://www.unece.org/tradewelcome/un-centre-for-trade-facilitation-and-e-business-uncefact/outputs/cefactrecommendationsrec-index/trade-facilitation-recommendations.html
The purpose of this Recommendation is to highlight the issues and offer options for the establishment of Single Window interoperability, whether the national facility is operated by the public or the private sector, and to give examples of best practice.
| 9
SWI is one of the prerequisite for successful paperless cross-border e-commerce
CROSS-BORDER E-COMMERCE AND SINGLE WINDOW INTEROPERABILITY
| 10STATE-2-STATE SINGLE WINDOW INTEROPERABILITY MODEL
| 11EURAISAN ECONOMIC UNION MEMBER STATES CASE
NSW
INTEGRATED INFORMATION SYSTEM
NSW
NSW NSW NSW
| 12ASEAN SINGLE WINDOW CASE
B2B SINGLE WINDOW INTEROPERABILITY MODEL
| 14PAN ASIAN E-COMMERCE ALLIANCE CASE
Source: PAA official web site
B2B SINGLE WINDOW INTEROPERABILITY MODEL
CROSS-BORDER E-COMMERCE PLATFORM
| 16SINGLE WINDOW INTEROPERABILITYMIXED MODEL
| 17SINGAPORE NATIONAL TRADE PLATFORM CASE
EURASIANECONOMIC COMMISSION
NEXT STEP FORWARD | 18
SW & E-COM
Legal
Org
Tech
Sem-antic
STUDY ON ISSUES OF INTEROPERABILITY BETWEEN CROSS-BORDER E-COMMERCE
AND SINGLE WINDOWS
WHITEPAPER
EURASIANECONOMIC COMMISSION
CONCUSIONS | 19
Trade facilitation (TF) ecosystem is developing
Different elements of TF ecosystem moving separately by many actors
Interoperability one of the main issue for TF eco-system creation
UN/CEFACT activity is very important for cross-border global interoperability
SW Domain has an extensive experience in the field which can be expand into E-com
Whitepaper on interoperability between Cross-border E-commerce platform and SW
EURASIANECONOMIC COMMISSION
QUESTIONS? | 20
Thanks for your attention!
Aleksei [email protected] Economic Commission
http://www.eurasiancommission.org/