interoperability: apis and fhir heat up · 2020. 5. 8. · virtual (within samech) per the reqs...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Interoperability: APIs and FHIR Heat Up
INTEROPATHON | 2020 | Hosted by:
Webinar 2: Accelerator Overviews (Da Vinci, Gravity, and CARIN)
Today’s Agenda
02
03
01 Welcome
Da Vinci Overview Use case and implementation
guides for CDex, DEQM, and Prior Auth
Gravity (SDOH) OverviewOverview of use case and implementation guide
05
04CARIN BlueButton OverviewOverview of use case and
implementation guide
Q & A
https://interoperabilityinstitute.org/virtual-interopathon/
May 7, 2020
HL7 DA VINCI PROJECT OVERVIEW AND USE CASE DEEP DIVE
MIHIN
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Project Challenge
To ensure the success of the industry’s shift to Value Based Care
Transform out of Controlled Chaos: Develop rapid multi-stakeholder process to identify, exercise and
implement initial use cases.
4
Collaboration:Minimize the development and
deployment of unique solutions. Promote industry wide standards
and adoption.
Success Measures:Use of FHIR®, implementation
guides and pilot projects.
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
VENDORS
Da Vinci 2020 Multi-Stakeholder Membership
PROVIDERS EHRs PAYERS
DEPLOYMENT
INDUSTRY PARTNERS
For current membership: http://www.hl7.org/about/davinci/members.cfm
*
*
**
*
*
* *
* * *
* **
*
* *
**Indicates a founding member of the Da Vinci Project.
Organization shown in primary Da Vinci role, Many members participate across categories.
* * *
5
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Data Exchange forQuality Measures
Gaps in Care & Information
Risk Based ContractMember Identification
4
Patient Cost Transparency
Chronic Illness Documentation for
Risk Adjustment
Payer Data Exchange
Use Case Focus Areas
Payer Coverage Decision Exchange
Clinical Data Exchange
Payer Data Exchange: Directory
Payer Data Exchange: Formulary
Quality
Improvem
ent
Clinical D
ataExchange
Coverage / Burden
Reduction
Process Improvement
Mem
berAccess
Payer Data Exchange
Clinical Data Exchange
Notifications
Patient Data Exchange
Performing Laboratory Reporting
Coverage Requirements
Discovery
DocumentationTemplates and Rules
Prior-Authorization Support Use Case
HL7 StandardsProgress
Published
Balloting
Build Future
Aligned with specific ONC or CMS rule
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Use Case Maturity
Clinical Data ExchangeMember Access
Coverage/Burden Reduction
Quality Improvement
Data Exchange for Quality Measures
Gaps in Care & Information
Risk Adjustment for ChronicIllness Documentation
Risk Based Contract Member Identification
Coverage Requirements
Discovery
Documentation Templates and
Rules
Prior-Authorization Support
Clinical Data Exchange
DirectoryPayer Data Exchange
Formulary Coverage Decision Exchange
Clinical Data Exchange
Notifications
Performing Laboratory Reporting
Payer DataExchange
Patient DataExchange
Process Improvement
Price Cost Transparency
Standard Phase Future BuildBa
l
lot Published
Connectathon <1 2-4 5+
Live <1 1-3 >4
Progress
Aligned with specific ONC or CMS rule
6
Da Vinci Demonstration Lara’s Patient Journey
Lara
PCPHospital
ER Cardiologist
Payer APayer B
Booth Activities StatsNumber of Members 46
Members Demonstrating 22+
Number of Demos 30+
Panel Discussions 5
Use Cases in Flight 14
https://confluence.hl7.org/display/DVP/Da+Vinci+2020+Calendar
Benefits of Implementing Da Vinci
Create transparency and reduce burden for patients, providers and payers across all sets of patient experienceSaves money and time by minimizing the development ofone-off solutionsLeverage the collective expertise and efforts of industry experts and HL7 FHIRReduce burden and waste by focusing on knownhighvolume, manual activities that can be automated,Allow efficient, effective real-time data exchange to effect patient outcomes and support VBC
Da Vinci Implementation Guides
IG Status # TimesTested
Quality Improvement
Data Exchange for Quality Measures (DEQM) STU 2 Ballot 1 based on FHIR R4 7
Gaps in Care Active Development N/A
Coverage/ Burden Reduction
Coverage Requirements Discovery (CRD) STU 1 Ballot 2 based on FHIR R4 7
Documentation Templates & Rules (DTR) STU 1 Ballot 2 based on FHIR R4 6
Prior Authorization Support (PAS) STU 1 Ballot 1 based on FHIR R4 4
Member Access
Health Record Exchange Framework (HRex) STU 1 Ballot 1 based on FHIR R4 N/A
Clinical Data Exchange (CDex) STU 1 Ballot 1 based on FHIR R4 5
Payer Data Exchange (PDex) STU 1 Ballot 1 based on FHIR R4 5
Payer Data Exchange (PDex): Formulary STU 1 Ballot 1 based on FHIR R4 4
IG Status # TimesTested
Payer Data Exchange (PDex): Plan Network Directory STU 1 Ballot 1 based on FHIR R4 4
Payer-Payer Coverage Decision Exchange STU 1 Ballot 1 based on FHIR R4 4
Patient Cost Transparency Planning N/A
Clinical Data Exchange
Notifications STU 1 Ballot 1 based on FHIR R4 4
Patient Data Exchange Planning N/A
Performing Laboratory Reporting Planning N/A
Process Improvement
Risk Based Contract Member Identification STU 1 Ballot 1 based on FHIR R4 2
Chronic Illness Documentation Risk Adjustment Planning N/A
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Data Exchange forQuality Measures
Gaps in Care & Information
Risk Based ContractMember Identification
8
Patient Cost Transparency
Chronic Illness Documentation for
Risk Adjustment
Payer Data Exchange
FOCUS FOR MIHIN CONNECTATHON
Payer Coverage Decision Exchange
Clinical Data Exchange
Payer Data Exchange: Directory
Payer Data Exchange: Formulary
Quality
Improvem
ent
Clinical D
ataExchange
Coverage / Burden
Reduction
Process Improvement
Mem
berAccess
Payer Data Exchange
Clinical Data Exchange
Notifications
Patient Data Exchange
Performing Laboratory Reporting
Coverage Requirements
Discovery
DocumentationTemplates and Rules
Prior-Authorization Support Use Case
HL7 StandardsProgress
Published
Balloting
Build Future
Implementation Guides for MIHIN Connectathon
Current Prior-Authorization Environment
Payers
Providers
Telephone
Portals
PA Request
Medical Records
Electronic Transactions
Currently providers and payer exchange prior authorization requests and supporting medical records using a number of methods: telephone, fax, portals, and electronic transactions
Fax
11
Current HIPAA / Anticipated AttachmentApproach
Must be ASC X12N 278 (PA request) / 275 (attachment with CDA)
May be any method (including ASC X12N)
B A
Any Method
ASC X12N 278/275
Any Method1a
2
1bASC X12N 278/275 Any Method
Virtual (within same CH)
Per the reqs (i.e. §162.923 Requirements for covered entities), if the Clearinghouse services bothpayer and provider, they must act as two virtual clearinghouses and must provide the transaction as a HIPAA compliant standard transaction internally – not currently enforced by CMS
Payer 1
12
Payer 2
Any Method
ASC X12N 278/275
Any Method1a
2
1bASC X12N 278/275
Any Method
Payer 1
Payer 2
FHIR FHIR
FHIR
Future FHIR Enabled SolutionMust be ASC X12N 278 (PA request) / 275 (attachment with CDA)
May be any method (including ASC X12N)
HL7 FHIR
Virtual (within same CH)
FHIR FHIR
ASC X12N 278/275
13
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Power to Reduce, Inform and Delegate Prior Authorization Support
CDS Hooks
FHIRAPIs
Coverage Requirements Discovery
Coverage RequirementsDiscovery
Documentation Templatesand Coverage Rules
Documentation Templates and Coverage Rules
Prior Authorization Support Prior AuthorizationSupport
Improve transparency
Reduce effort for prior authorization
Leverage available clinical content and increase automation
PAYE
REH
R/PR
OVID
ERBAC
K O
FFICE
SYSTEMS
Transformatio
n LayerO
ptionalTr
ansf
orm
atio
n L
ayer
14
X12 278
X12 275if required
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Coverage Requirements Discovery
SUMMARYProviders need to easily discover which payer covered services ordevices have
15
– Specific documentation requirements,– Rules for determining need for specific treatments/services– Requirement for Prior Authorization (PA) or otherapprovals– Specific guidance.
With a FHIR based API, providers can discover in real-time specific payer requirements that may affect the ability to have certain services or devices covered by the responsible payer.The discovery may be based on
– Plan conditions only (e.g. no need for PHI)– Member identification (PHI) in the event the specific plan isnot
known at the time of requestResponse may be
– The answer to the discover request– A list of services, templates, documents, rules– URI to retrieve specific items (e.g. template)
Stage Ballot Reconciliation &Connectathons
Implementation Guide
CRD FHIR IG (v0.3.0:STU1 ballot 2) basedon FHIR R4
Reference Implementation
CRD GitHub Repository
ConfluenceArtifacts
Coverage Requirements Discovery (CRD)
STATUS
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Coverage Requirements Discovery
Providers need to easily discover which payer covered services or devices have
– Specific documentation requirements,– Rules for determining need for specific treatments/services– Requirement for Prior Authorization (PA) or other approvals– Specific guidance.
With a FHIR based API, providers can discover in real-time specific payer requirements that may affect the ability to have certain services or devices covered by the responsible payer. The discovery may be based on
– Plan conditions only (e.g. no need for PHI)– Member identification (PHI) in the event the specific plan is not
known at the time of requestResponse may be
– The answer to the discovery request– A list of services, templates, documents, rules– URL to retrieve specific items (e.g. template)
Provider
Order Procedure, Lab or Referral
Discover Any Requirements
Payer
16
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Coverage Requirements Discovery
1. Based on a specific clinical workflow event:scheduling,start of encounter, planning treatment, ordering, dischargeProviders send FHIR based request, with appropriate clinical context to the responsible payer
2. Payer may request additional information from the provider EHR using existing FHIR APIs3. Payer responds to the EHR with any specific requirements that may impact the clinical decisions or coverage
PayerProvider
Provider requests coverage requirements from payer
Optional: request additional information
Payer responds to the request
Provider utilizes this information to make treatment decisions while considering specific payer coverage requirements.
17
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Documentation Templates & Coverage Rules (DTR)
SUMMARYProviders are challenged to deal with the diversity of administrative and clinical requirements that impact documenting the need for treatment and selecting the appropriate best path for care. The current environment is made more complex by the large number of payer based requirements that must be met to document that covered services and devices are medically necessary and appropriate.The goal of this use case is to reduce provider burden and simplifyprocess by establishing electronic versions of administrative and clinical requirements that can become part of the providers daily workflow. An exemplar for this use case is to follow the approach taken to incorporate formulary requirements interactively into the medication selection process. Proposal includes the ability to inject payer coverage criteria into provider workflows akin to clinical decision support (CDS Hooks), to expose rules prospectively while providers are making care decisions. A limited reference implementation on a limited use case (e.g. Home Oxygen Therapy)
18
– Address coverage requirements, documentation compliance, and detect misuse/ abuse
– Provide value based care requirements at point of service– Collect, in real-time, patient information to alert provider or care team
StageMay Ballot Reconciliation & Sept STU Ballot
Implementation Guide
DTR FHIR IG (v0.1.0:Ballot for Comment) based on FHIR R3
Reference Implementation
DTR GitHub Repository
Confluence Artifacts
Documentation Templates and Payer Rules (DTR)
STATUS
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
CRD and Document Templates & Rules
DME Ordered “order-review” hook triggers query
CDS Service searches repository leveraging FHIR data
Invokes service & sends pre-fetch FHIR data
including order informationLibrary of coverage
rules/templatesSMART on FHIR App
Send CDS Hooks Response with link to SMART on FHIR App
PAYE
R
EHR
/PRO
VIDER
BACK
OFFIC
ESYSTEM
S
Displays Gaps/Template/Rule Collects Missing Data and Store
as Part of Medical Record
Retrieve rules, if necessary. Parse rule from CQL, identify
gaps in data available in EHR and populate template
19
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Documentation Templates and Payer Rules (DTR)
Providers need to easily incorporate payer requirements into their clinical workflow
– Specific documentation requirements,– Rules for determining need for specific
treatments/services– Requirement for Prior Authorization (PA) or
other approvals– Specific guidance.
Use a FHIR based standard for representingpayer “rules” to communicate, in real-time, payer medical necessity and best clinical practice requirements that may affect the ability to have certain services or devices covered by the responsible payer.
The template/rules may (examples, not complete list)
– Specify provider documentation requirements for coverage, medical necessity
– Provide guidance / documentation requirements regarding social determinates that are antecedents for specific care
– Collect information for some purpose (e.g.authorizations)
– Indicate clinical requirements including appropriate use
– Collect specific documentation for Quality Measures
– Respond with specific information asrequested/documented in the template/rules
DTR/Order Flow
21
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
SUMMARYA FHIR-based B2B process to allow implementers to use existingIT infrastructure resources for exchanging prior authorization. Existing business agreements can also be reused.This use case assumes that the goal is define API services toenable provider, at point of service, to request authorization (including all necessary clinical information to support the request) and receive immediate authorization.The assumption is that this use case will leverage the ASC X12N 278 and275 for compliance with HIPAA.Clearinghouses can continue to route and translate data as appropriate. Investigate ability to enable translation layer to convert FHIR resourcesto HIPAA format.
22
Stage September STU Ballot
Implementation Guide
Prior Authorization Support – CI Build
ReferenceImplementation
Prior Auth SupportGitHub Repository
Confluence Artifacts
Prior Authorization Support
Prior Authorization Support
STATUS
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Prior Authorization Support Abstraction/Transform for HIPAA
Compliance
X12 278
X12 275
EHR OR PROVIDERSYSTEM
PAYER SYSTEMCLEARINGHOUSE ORINTEGRATION LAYER
Clearinghouse or Integration Required to Meet HIPAA Regulations
Prior Authorization Support
Support Authorization
Support
Transformatio
n Layer
Tran
sfor
mat
ion
Lay
er
23
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Power to Reduce, Inform and Delegate Prior Authorization Support
CDS Hooks
FHIRAPIs
Coverage Requirements Discovery
Coverage RequirementsDiscovery
Documentation Templatesand Coverage Rules
Documentation Templates and Coverage Rules
Prior Authorization Support Prior AuthorizationSupport
Improve transparency
Reduce effort for prior authorization
Leverage available clinical content and increase automation
PAYE
REH
R/PR
OVID
ERBAC
K O
FFICE
SYSTEMS
Transformatio
n LayerO
ptionalTr
ansf
orm
atio
n L
ayer
24
X12 278
X12 275if required
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Prior Authorization Workflow (X12 processing at Health Plan)
Integrating FHIR and X121) Create FHIR bundle with required
X12 information and supporting clinical documentation
2) Convert FHIR bundle to X12 278,X12 275 and X12 278 I
3) Process by payers as X12 278 with unsolicited attachments
4) Convert X12 278 response o FHIRbundle
5) Present results to provider
25
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Disclaimer 24
FHIR Prior Authorization Endpoint Interactions
Provider System Prior-Authorization Black Box (any valid combination of application, BA, clearinghouse and health plan)
(8))Receive and process
request
(2)Receive and process
Bundle
(1)Assemble
information for PA request
(5)Present result of PA
response to providerin workflow
(3)Manage anyHIPAA
transaction requirements
FHIR bundle including Information for 278/275
FHIR bundle
Response (FHIR bundle) within 15 seconds May be error(s), answer or PEND
(7)Request Status (if PEND, orany
reason)
(9)Present result of PA
response to providerin workflow
(5)Event notification on change in PA status
(6)Receive status change
notification
(4)Process PA request and
associated documentation and return result
Response to subscription
Subscribe to delayed response
FHIR bundle
(10)Request canceland/
or update)
Follows same path as original request and with original PA ID
FHIR PA endpoint requirements1) Receive and process PAbundle
• Respond in <15 seconds2) Receive and process Subscription request
for “PENDED” PA• Reply on change in PAstatus
3) Receive and reply to PA status query
4) Receive and process cancel
5) Receive and process update6) Support Status, Cancel, Update from
both ordering and performing provider
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
25
FHIR Prior Authorization Components
P r o v id e r H e a l t h P l a nD i r e c t c o n n e c t i o n o r v i a e x c h a n g e( e . g . C l e a r i n g h o u s e )
( 2 )H e a l t h P l a n
r e c e i v e s r e q u e s ta n d e v a l u a t e s
( 4 )R e s p o n s e w i t h d o c u m e n t a t io n r e q u i r e m e n t s i f
a p p r o p r i a t e
C D S C A R D S
( 1 )P r o v i d e r o r d e r s o r
p l a n s t r e a t m e n tC D S H o o k s r e q u e s t t o p a y e r
( 6 )E H R / S M A R T A p p
c o l l e c t s a t t e s t a t i o n s , c l i n i c a l d a t a ( f r o m
p a t i e n t r e c o r d w h e r e p o s s i b l e ) ,
( 5 )P r o v i d e r r e c e i v e s a n s w e r
( 9 )H e a l t h P l a n R e c e i v e s P A r e q u e s t a n d a t t a c h m e n t s ,
p r o c e s s r e q u e s t a n d p r o v i d e s r e s p o n s e
( 8 )C o n v e r t F H I R t o / f r o m
X 1 2 i f n o t d o n e b y p r o v i d e r a p p l i c a t i o n
( 7 )G a t h e r s a l l i n f o r m a t i o n f o r P A a n d a t t a c h m e n t a n d s e n d s i t d i r e c t l y o r
v i a i n t e r m e d i a r y t o p a y e r- - r e t u r n s P A N , P e n d ,
D e n y
F H IR A S C X 1 2 N
C o v e r a g e Requirements D i s c o v e r y
Documentation T e m p l a t e s a n d
R u l e s
P r i o r Authorization S u p p o r t
C o n v e r s i o n t o m e e t H I P A A
( 3 a )C o v e r a g e r u l e s /
t e m p l a t e s
A S C X 1 2 N
Y e s( 3 ) I s P A
r e q u i r e d ?
N o
P A
C Q L / S M A R T A p p
N o t e : i f P e n d e d , p r o v i d e r s u b s c r i b e s t o P A r e q u e s t a n d r e t r i e v e s r e s p o n s e w h e n s t a t u s c h a n g e s
Coverage Requirements1) Initiates process
using CDS hooks2) As if PA is requiredTemplates and Rules1) If PA is required start
SMART app and retrieve Payer Rules and Template
2) Prepopulate3) Solicit missing infoPASupport1) Package clinical data
and request/response2) Manage exchanges
with payer
Summary
26
Using new technologies (FHIR , CDS Hooks, SMART on FHIR, CQL) it is possible to integrate previously time intensive tasks into the clinical workflow to achieve significant efficienciesWe can substantially reduce provider burden by
1. Acquiring critical patient information while the patient is available2. Obtain prior-authorizations in real-time for certain common services3. Minimize rework by “getting it right the first time”
One critical impact of improving the prior-authorization workflow is the improvement on patient care and experience.
Quality Improvement
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Data Exchange for Quality Measures (DEQM)
SUMMARYUse case creates a common framework for quality data exchange Enables the exchange of raw quality measure data between quality measurement Teams and Care teams that provide patient care Timely exchange of key data is critical to evaluate and capture qualityEmerging DEQM patterns
30
– 30 Day Medication Reconciliation (AttestationPattern)– Colorectal Cancer Screening (ScreeningPattern)– Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis (Process Pattern)
Initial example of how Da Vinci funding expandable framework Multiple groups providing resources to build out measures beyond Da VinciEvaluating missing components to expand types of measures/patterns that could leverage framework (i.e., public health)
Stage Ballot Reconciliation & Connectathons
Implementation Guide
DEQM FHIR IG (v0.2.0:STU1 Ballot 2) based onFHIR R3
30 Day Medication Reconciliation Reference Implementation
MRP-Reference-App
MRP-Payer-App
MRP-Operation-Submit-Example
MRP-Sample-Patients
Colorectal Cancer Screening Reference Implementation
COL-CollectData-App
COL-Submit-App
Confluence Artifacts Data Exchange for Quality Measures (DEQM)
STATUS
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Data Exchange for Quality Measures
Use case creates a common framework for quality data exchangeEnables the exchange of raw quality measure data between quality measurement Teams and Care teams that provide patient careTimely exchange of key data is critical to evaluate and capture qualityAdditional Scenarios underway to expand measure patterns in framework
1. Submit
3. Subscribe
2. Collect
Payer Aggregator
Submit Measure Data
OperationOutcome
Provider
Collect Measure Data
Return Measure DataPayer
Aggregator
Subscribe for Measure Data
OperationOutcomeProvider
31
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Emerging DEQM Patterns
32
Initial example of how Da Vinci funding expandable frameworkMultiple groups providing resources to build out measures beyond Da VinciEvaluating missing components to expand types of measures that could leverage framework i.e.,public health
Measure Pattern Status
30 Day Medication Reconciliation Process
STU1 – Ballot ReconciliationColorectal Cancer Screening Screening
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
Process
Controlling Blood Pressure Outcome Discovery
Clinical Data Exchange/Member Access
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Health Record Exchange Simplified
Payer to Provider Data Exchange (PDex)
Provider to Payer Exchange (CDex)
PAYERPROVIDER
Health Record Exchange Framework
Interactions & Profiles
Provider can receive relevant Payer Sourced Data about a patient
Provider can share relevant Provider Sourced Data to Payer and/or other Providers
Payer to Provider/ Member Data Exchange (PDex):
DirectoryPayer to Provider/ Member
Data Exchange (PDex): Formulary
PATIENT/ MEMBER
Provider can access Plan Network Directory information
Provider can access Plan Formulary information
Patient can access Plan Network Directory information
Patient can accessPlanFormulary information
32
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
HRexHealth Record exchange
Framework/Library
Interactions and Profiles
PDexPayer Data exchange
DEQMData Exchange for Quality
Measures
Framework
MRPMedication Reconciliation
Post-discharge
Additional Measures for DEQM IG
CDexClinical Data exchange
Health Record Exchange
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
SUMMARYThe Da Vinci Payer Health Record Exchange (HRex) Framework/Library specifies the FHIR elements used in multiple Da Vinci implementation guides. This includes FHIR profiles, functions, operations, and constraints on other specifications such as CDS-Hooks and other aspects of Da Vinci Use Cases that are common acrossmore than a single use case.Da Vinci HRex Implementation Guide (IG) will make use of US Core profiles that are based on the FHIR R4 specification wherever practical. The HRex IG will use the HL7 FHIR Release 4/US Core STU3 specification as its base.The HRex profiles documented in this IG will be used to exchange databetween providers systems (e.g. EHRs) and other providers, payers, and third-party applications were appropriate. In addition, exchanges from payer systems to providers, other payers, and third-party applications are supported by the HRex profiles and operations.HRex may define new extensions, profiles, value sets, constraints/extension toother specification (e.g. specific CDS-Hooks) that are specific Da Vinci requirements.Where appropriate these Da Vinci specific artifacts will be promoted for incorporation into the future versions of existing standards (e.g. R4 US Core profiles) and deprecated in this guide on publication in the updatedstandard.
36
Stage Early September STUBallot Reconciliation
ImplementationGuide
Da Vinci Health Record Exchange (v0.1.0: STU 1 Ballot 1) based on FHIR R4
Reference Implementation N/A
ConfluenceArtifacts
Health Record Exchange Framework (HRex)
STATUS
Health Record Exchange:Health Record Exchange Framework/Library
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Health Record Exchange:Clinical Data Exchange (CDex)
37
SUMMARYProviders and Payers need to exchange information regarding prior and current healthcare services planned for or received by the patient/member to more effectively manage the patients care. Currently, no FHIR implementation guides exist to standardize the method of exchange (push, pull, triggers, subscription, etc.) and the formal representation (e.g. Documents, Bundles, Profiles and Vocabulary) for the range of exchanges between providers and providers or providers and payers of current and emerging interest to the involvedparties.The focus is on the exchange of provider and payer originated informationto improve patient care and reduce provider and payerburden.This use case will define combinations of exchange methods (push, pull, subscribe, CDS Hooks, …), specific payloads (Documents, Bundles, and Individual Resources), search criteria, conformance, provenance, and other relevant requirements to support specific exchanges of clinical information between: 1) providers, 2) a provider and a payer, 3) a payer and providers, and/or a provider and any third party involved in value based care (e.g. aquality management organization).This project will reference, where possible, the prior work from Argonaut,USCore and QI Core effort for FHIR DSTU2, STU3,
Stage Early September STUBallot Reconciliation
Implementation Guide
Da Vinci CDex (v0.1.0: STU 1 Ballot 1) based on FHIR R4
Reference Implementation
CDex Communication Response App
CDex CommunicationRequest App
Confluence Artifacts
Clinical Data Exchange (CDex)
STATUS
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Health Record Exchange:Payer Data Exchange (PDex)
38
SUMMARYProviders need access to payer information regarding current and priorhealthcare services received by the patient/member to more effectively manage the patients care.It is important to standardize the method of exchange (push, pull, triggers, subscription, etc.) or the formal representation (e.g. Bundles, Profiles and Vocabulary) for specific elements of payer information of interest to providers.The value is to provide a standard for adoption by both payers and providers for the exchange of payer information.Where possible the 'standards' defined by the electronic Health Record exchange (eHRx) Framework Implementation Guide which in turn will utilize prior work from Argonaut, US Core and QI Core effort for FHIR DSTU2, STU3, and R4. The goal is to support the exchange of payer data on specific patients/members for better patient care with providers using technology that support FHIR DSTU2, STU3, and R4 releases of the FHIR standard.Will support the use of other interoperability 'standards' (e.g. CDS Hooks and SMART on FHIR) to effectively exchange payer information regarding the currentor previous care, including the provenance of the data, of one or more specific patients/members with a provider responsible for evaluating/specifying/ordering/delivering care for the patient.
Stage Early September STUBallot Reconciliation
Implementation Guide
Da Vinci PDex (v0.1.0STU 1 Ballot 1) basedon FHIR R4
Reference Implementation
PDex GitHub Repository
ConfluenceArtifacts
Payer Data Exchange(PDex)
STATUS
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
PDex: Provider-Health Plan Exchange via CDS-Hook/SMART-on-FHIR
R4PayerEMR
R4Call Hook
SMART APP
Appointment-book
CARD
Review
Member Query Summary
Review > Select > Write• Get EMR Metadata
• Write constrained by write options in EMR• Write documentReference (Optional – complete or selected DocumentBundle + PDF)
• Provide Access Token with US Core Scopes• Provide URL Link to Smart App• FHIR Entrypoint• Make CapabilityStatement available• Human Readable result of Member Query
• No data found• Unable to match individual• N records returned
• UserId• PatientId• EncounterId• Appointments• (subscriberId)• JWT for access
• Query Payer using Access Token• Default Parameters from Provider constrain search• Present US Core Records for Provider selection
• Query EMR for Patient Record• Query EMR for Coverage• Search by SubscriberId• Search by Patient Demographics
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
PDex: Member-Authorized Health Plan Exchange (OAuth2.0)
3838
R4Old Health Plan
R4New Health Plan
3rd Party App
1 Member LoginNew Health Plan
2 Member AuthenticationOld Health Plan
API Handoff
3 Member Access Authorization
1 Member Login3rd Party App
Authenticated
Access Token Returned4
5 API Query with Access Token
Eg. URL/Patient/12345/$everything
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
See Progress, Test, Implement
FIND
• Listserv Sign Up• Background collateral• Active Use Case content• Implementation Guides• Reference
Implementations• Calendar of Activities &
Updates
KEY RESOURCES
HL7 Confluence Site -https://confluence.hl7.org/display/D VP/
Where to find Da Vinci in Industry -https://confluence.hl7.org/display/DVP/Da+Vinci+2020+Calendar
Use Case Summary and Links to Call In & Artifacts -https://confluence.hl7.org/display/D VP/Da+Vinci+Use+Cases
Reference Implementation Code Repository - https://github.com/HL7-DaVinci
VIEW
• Live Demos• Member Panels• End to End Clinical
Scenario
View Full Schedulehl7.me/davincinews
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
HL7 Da Vinci Project: Confluence
Once credentials are approved, log in for full access and editing capabilities.
42
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Click on Spaces to access Directory to find Da Vinci space.
Select “watch”, on each page of interest, to receive email when updates occur.
De-select “watching” to stop email updates.
43
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Self-register for Da Vinci’s Public Listserv on Welcome page.
44
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Use Case scope / overview slide deck.
Summary of use case call schedule and meeting details.(scroll down on Confluence page)
45
Copyright 2020 CONFIDENTIAL – PROPRIETARY – RESTRICTED
Each use case has its own landing page with overview details.
Subpages are broken into meeting documentation and supporting materials.
Add calls to your calendar manually or through HL7’s Conference Call Center.
46
Questions?
Robert Dieterle CEO, EnableCare LLC Senior Advisor for Vinci Program
MiHIN InterOpathonLisa Nelson, Gravity Technical DirectorMay 7, 2020
The Gravity Project: Consensus-driven Standards on Social Determinants of Health
Develop consensus-driven data standards to support use and exchange of social determinants of health (SDOH) data within the health care sectors and between the health care sector and other sectors.
Gravity Project Goal
Graphic from: https://hitconsultant.net/2019/03/18/social-determinants-of-health-sdoh-collection/#.XoQWNHJ7ncs
There is broad consensus that SDOH information improves whole person care and lowers cost. Unmet social needs negatively impact health outcomes.
Arons A, DeSilvey S, Fichtenberg C, Gottlieb L. Documenting social determinants of health-related clinical activities using standardized medical vocabularies. JAMIA Open. 2018;2(1):81-88. (http://sirenetwork.ucsf.edu/tools-resources/mmi/compendium-medical-terminology-codes-social-risk-factors)
Business DriversOne of the biggest barriers to addressing social risk and social needs in clinical settings is the limited standards available to represent the data. We need standards to promote the:• Collection and use of the data; • Facilitate the sharing of the data across clinical and
non-clinical organizations; and• Facilitate payment for social risk data collection
and intervention activities
• Food insecurity correlates to higher levels of diabetes, hypertension, and heart failure.
• Housing instability factors into lower treatment adherence.
• Transportation barriers result in missed appointments, delayed care, and lower medication compliance
Key Learning: Despite increased interest around identifying and addressing SDOH in context of US health care settings, existing medical coding vocabularies and health information exchange standards are poorly equipped to capture related activities.
Call to Action: In May 2019, the Gravity Project was launched as a multi-stakeholder public collaborative with the goal to develop, test, and validate standardized SDOH data for use in patient care, care coordination between health and human services sectors, population health management, public health, value-based payment, and clinical research.
Gravity Project Scope: Develop data standards to represent patient level SDOH data documented across four clinical activities: screening, assessment/diagnosis, goal setting, and treatment/interventions.
https://confluence.hl7.org/display/GRAV/The+Gravity+Project
Deliverables:• Use Cases (includes Personas and Patient Story)• Common data elements and associated concept domains
(Food Insecurity, Housing Instability, and Transportation Access)• Coded data element capture and grouping recommendations • HL7® FHIR® Implementation Guide(s)• Reference Implementation(s) and Pilots
Project Scope & Deliverables
1. Document SDOH data in conjunction with the Patient encounter.
2. Document and track SDOH related interventions to completion.
3. Gather and aggregate SDOH data for uses beyond the point of care (e.g. population health, quality reporting, risk adjustment)*
USE CASES
* Use Case 3 out of scope for Sept 2020 FHIR IG ballot
HL7 FHIR Accelerator: In August 2019, Gravity officially joined the HL7 FHIR Accelerator Program and is on target to ballot an HL7 SDOH FHIR Implementation Guide for Sept. 2020.Public Collaboration: Gravity has convened over 1000 participants from across the health and human services ecosystem from clinical provider groups, community-based organizations, standards development organizations, federal and state government, payers, and technology vendors.Industry Considerations: • Regulatory Trends. Incorporation of Gravity data sets into VSAC, ONC ISA, USCDI.• Payment Reform. CMS, MA, and MCO payments for medically or home delivered meals, housing, and transportation
services.• Tech Innovations. Growth of community referral systems, community information exchanges, and SDOH data analytics
platforms.
SDOH Interoperability Glide Path
Accelerating Adoption: Reuse & Innovation
6
Reuse• US Core; Structured Data Capture (SDC); Da Vinci Clinical Data Exchange (CDex); Bidirectional Service
Request (BSeR); C-CDA on FHIR
New FHIR R4 Profiles for SDOH Content• Screening Data: SDC Questionnaire, SDC QuestionnaireResponse, SDOHCC Consent, SDOHCC List• Encounter Data: SDOHCC Observation, SDOHCC Condition, SDOHCC Goal, SDOHCC Procedure• Referral Data: SDOHCC ServiceRequest
SDOHCC Task PatientScreeningSDOHCC CommunicationRequestSDC Questionnaire FoodInsecuritySDOHCC List PatientScreening
SDOHCC CommunicationSDC QuestionnaireResponse FoodInsecuritySDOHCC Consent FoodInsecurity
SDOHCC Task PatientScreeningSDOHCC CommunicationRequestSDC Questionnaire FoodInsecuritySDOHCC List PatientScreening
SDOHCC CommunicationSDC QuestionnaireResponseSDOHCC Consent
SDOHCC Observation FoodInsecuritySDOHCC Condition FoodInsecuritySDOHCC Goal FoodInsecuritySDOHCC Procedure FoodInsecuritySDOHCC ServiceRequest FoodInsecurityBSer Task PatientReferral
CDex CommunicationRequestCDex Communication
SDOHCC Observation FoodInsecuritySDOHCC Condition FoodInsecuritySDOHCC Goal FoodInsecuritySDOHCC Procedure FoodInsecurity
Use Case 1US Core PatientUS Core PractitionerUS Core OrganizationUS Core PractitionerRoleUS Core LocationOrganizationAffiliation
CCDAF CompositionCCDAF DocumentReference
Key Resources
Location of the IG• http://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/sdoh-cc/
Location of the Zulip Channel• https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/233957-Gravity-sdoh-cc
Prep Session Recordings from HL7 Connectathon• https://confluence.hl7.org/display/GRAV/Gravity+SDOH+FHIR+Connectathon
+Participant+Meetings
Gravity Confluence site• https://confluence.hl7.org/display/GRAV/The+Gravity+Project
8
Questions?
9
Evelyn [email protected]: @egallegoLinkedin: linkedin.com/in/egallego
Lisa Nelson [email protected]: @PHRLisa
Linkedin: linkedin.com/in/lisa-nelson-987b577
CARIN Blue Button Framework and Common Payer Consumer Data SetEMPOWERING CONSUMERS WITH THEIR HEALTH PLAN DATA
Amol VyasChief Architect – InteroperabilityCambia Health SolutionsEmail: [email protected]: @mister_pdx
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 59
Final CMS Rule
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 60
Our Template : The Argonaut ProjectBackground: The Argonaut Project was formed in December 2014 as an implementation community comprising leading technology vendors and provider organizations to accelerate the use of FHIR and OAuth in health care information exchange. The Argonaut project is private-sector initiated and funded and works collaboratively with other FHIR initiatives to create open industry Implementation Guides in high priority use cases of importance to patients, providers and the industry as a whole. Deliverables: Focused on the ONC’s 2015 Edition Common Clinical Data Set (CCDS) to co-develop the SMART App Application Guide using the OAuth 2.0 profile for authorizing apps to access FHIR data and the Argonaut Data Query Implementation Guide (FHIR DSTU2). Timeline: As of October 2018:IG Publication – Mid 2016 (1 ½ years) 82% of all Hospitals using FHIR DSTU2Full Implementation – 2016 to 2019 (3 years) 64% of all Physicians using FHIR DSTU2
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 61
CARIN Blue Button Framework
• Leverage the Argonaut Project as a best practice approach• Common Payer Consumer Data Set (CPCDS)
• Includes key health data that should be accessible and available for exchange.• Data must conform with specified vocabulary standards and code sets.• CPCDS data elements can be stored and queried as profiled FHIR resources.
• Data Query Profiles• Based on CPCDS, define the minimum mandatory elements, extensions and terminology requirements
that must be present in the FHIR resource.
• Data Query Implementation Guide• Collection of security specifications, profile definitions and supporting documentation.• The guide satisfies use cases for member access to health plan data, ensuring the CPCDS elements are
included and modeled in a standard format.
• Mapping From CPCDS To FHIR Resource Profiles• Intermediate Extract-Transform-Load (ETL) Extract Format Specification
Representing CPCDS Data Elements (TBD)
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 62
Argonaut Project & CARIN Blue Button Framework
Argonaut Project CARIN Blue Button Framework
Logical Data Specification Common Clinical Data Set (CCDS) Common Payer Consumer Data Set (CPCDS)
Physical Data Specification Using FHIR (Data Query)
FHIR Resource Profiles Representing CCDS Data Elements
FHIR Resource Profiles Representing CPCDS Data Elements
Physical Data Specification Using Flat Files (ETL)
None Intermediate ETL Extract Format Specification Representing CPCDS Data Elements (TBD)
Document Query DocumentReference Profile Exposing Patient’s Existing Clinical Document
None
Logical Data Specification to FHIR Translation
Mapping From CCDS To FHIR Resource Profiles
Mapping From CPCDS To FHIR Resource Profiles
Authorization SMART on FHIR/OAuth2/OpenID Connect
SMART on FHIR/OAuth2/OpenID Connect
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 63
CARIN Blue Button API Using CARIN Blue Button FrameworkHow can Plans leverage the CARIN Blue Button Framework?
1. Map Claims System of Record (SOR) directly to FHIR Profiles• Leverage CPCDS to FHIR Mapping as a crosswalk to map the Claims SOR data to CARIN Blue Button
Profiled Resources.
2. Map Claims SOR to FHIR Profiles using ETL extracts as an intermediate step• Generate Flat File extracts containing CPCDS elements from the Claims SOR using existing mature
enterprise-grade ETL tools and processes.• Leverage CPCDS to FHIR Mapping to map the intermediate ETL extracts to CARIN Blue Button Profiled
Resources.
• Maintenance and reuse of direct mappings for some Claims SORs in option 1 may be challenging due to the varying versions, configurations or hosting implementations of the SORs.
• The intermediate step in option 2 introduces additional process & governance. However, it can help decouple the FHIR Profiles from the one/many Claims SOR(s), and also enhance the maintainability and reusability of the FHIR mapping.
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 64
CARIN Blue Button Framework
FHIR Server
Key
Health Plan A
Health Plan B
FHIR Profiles
CARIN Blue Button Framework with CPCDS
CMS Medicare
Health Plan Covered Entities/BAs
App A
App B
CPCDS – Common Payer Consumer Data Set (Claims, Eligibility, Benefits)
HIPAA IndividualRight of Access API
Consumer Apps
App Z
CCW RIF FHIR
Health Plan CClaims SOR2
Facets v4
Claims SOR1
CPCDS
FHIR Extensions, Profiles &
Implementation Guides
Mappings & Terminologies
Health Plan DFacets
v3Claims SOR3
SOR – System of Record
Mapping
Custom CSV
Covered Entity/BA
Data Hub A
Multi-plan Data Warehouse
Health Plan ZClaims SOR4
Intermediate Format
(optional)
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 65
Provider B CARIN Blue Button Framework
FHIR Server
Health Plan A
CARIN Blue Button IG (FHIR
Profiles)
EDI X12 and CPCDS
Covered Entities/BAs
Health Plan BClaims SOR1 (EOB)
Facets v4 (EOB)
CPCDS
Health Plan CFacets v3
(EOB)Claims SOR2 (EOB)
Data Hub A
Multi-plan Data Warehouse (EOB)
Health Plan DClaims SOR3 (EOB)
837-I/CMS1450/UB04
999277CA
835
Provider A
270271
EDI C
lear
ingh
ouse
837-P/CMS1500
Key
835 Electronic Remittance Advice Mappings
SOR System of RecordEDI X12 TransactionsCovered
Entity/BA
270 Eligibility & Benefits Inquiry
277CA Individual Claim Acknowledgement999 Claims Submission Acknowledgement
270 Eligibility & Benefits Response837 Claims Submission
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 66
Exceeds
Common Payer Consumer Data Set (CPCDS) v1.0
Meets
CPCDS v1.0
CMS Medicare
Blue Button 2.0 API
Health Plan #3
Health Plan #2
Health Plan #1
In March 2018, CMS launched Blue Button 2.0, whichprovides secure beneficiary-directed data transport in astructured Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources(FHIR) format that is developer-friendly. This will enablebeneficiaries to connect their data to applications,services, and research programs they trust. Blue Button2.0 uses open source code that is available for all plansat https://bluebutton.cms.gov/developers/.
In February 2019, CMS issued the Interoperability andPatient Access Proposed Rule. Under this proposal, thescope and volume of the information to be provided ormade accessible through the open API would include:adjudicated claims (including cost); encounters withcapitated providers; provider remittances; enrollee cost-sharing; and clinical data, including laboratory results(where available)
Data
Ele
men
t Con
sens
us
Proposed Common Payer Consumer Data Set (CPCDS) v1.0 – Draft
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 68
Claim
# CPCDS Element Reference CMS Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
1 Claim service start date CLM_FROM_DT
[institutional] The first day on the billing statement covering services rendered to the beneficiary (i.e. 'Statement Covers From Date’).[non-institutional] Earliest of any of the line-item level dates. It is almost always the same as Claim Service End Date except for DME claims - where some services are billed in advance.
2 Claim service end date CLM_THRU_DT
[institutional] The last day on the billing statement covering services rendered to the beneficiary (i.e. 'Statement Covers Thru Date’)[non-institutional] The latest of any of the line-item level dates
# CPCDS Element Reference CMS Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
3 Claim paid date PD_DT
4 Claim received date NCH_WKLY_PROC_DT
5 Member admission date CLM_ADMSN_DT
[inpatient] The date corresponding with admission of the beneficiary to a facility and the onset of services. May precede the Claim Service Start Date if this claim is for a beneficiary who has been continuously under care.
6 Member discharge date NCH_BENE_DSCHRG_DT
[inpatient] Date the beneficiary was discharged from the facility, or died. Matches the Claim Service End Date. When there is a discharge date, the Patient Discharge Status Code indicates the final disposition of the patient after discharge.Date EOB was created or updated. [Discuss the 2 P i l i
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 69
Claim
# CPCDS Element Reference CMS Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
7 Patient account number
Provider submitted information that can be included on the claim
8 Medical record number
9 Claim unique identifier CLM_ID
10 Claim adjusted from identifier
prior [describe mutable/immutable EOB scenarios here]
11 Claim adjusted to identifier
replaced [describe mutable/immutable EOB scenarios here]
12 Claim diagnosis related group CLM_DRG_CD [inpatient]
13Claim inpatient source admission code CLM_SRC_IP_ADMSN_CD
[inpatient] UB-04 Source of Admission code (FL-15)
14Claim inpatient admission type code CLM_IP_ADMSN_TYPE_CD
[inpatient] UB-04 Type of Admission/Visit (FL-14)
15 Claim bill facility type code CLM_FAC_TYPE_CD
UB-04 Type of Bill (FL-4) structure – Type of facility
16Claim service classification type code
CLM_SRVC_CLSFCTN_TYPE_CD
UB-04 Type of Bill (FL-4) structure – Type of care
UB-04 Type of Bill (FL-4) structure – Sequence in
# CPCDS Element Reference CMS Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
18 Claim processing status code active, cancelled
19 Claim type code NCH_CLM_TYPE_CD Medical, vision, oral, etc
20 Patient discharge status code PTNT_DSCHRG_STUS_CD
[facility] The patient’s status as of the “Through” date of the billing period. UB04 (FL-17)
21 Claim payment denial code
CARR_CLM_PMT_DNL_CD / CLM_MDCR_NON_PMT_RSN_CD
The code on a non-institutional claim indicating to whom payment was made or if the claim was denied / The reason that no payment is made for services on an institutional claim. (CARC/RARC, excddisallowed code)
22 Claim primary payer identifier NCH_PRMRY_PYR_CD
23 Claim payee type codeRecipient of benefits payable
24 Claim payee Recipient reference
25 Claim payment status codepaid, denied, partially-paid
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 70
Claim# CPCDS Element Reference CMS
Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
Drug
1 Days supply DAYS_SUPLY_NUM
Number of days' supply of medication dispensed by the pharmacy
2 RX service reference number RX_SRVC_RFRNC_NUM
Assigned by the pharmacy at the time the prescription is filled
3 DAW product selection code DAW_PROD_SLCTN_CD
Prescriber's instruction regarding substitution of generic equivalents or order to dispense the specific prescribed medication
4 Refill number FILL_NUM
The number fill of the current dispensed supply (0, 1, 2, etc)
5 Prescription origin code RX_ORGN_CD
Whether the prescription was transmitted as an electronic prescription, by phone, by fax, or as a written paper copy
# CPCDS Element Reference CMS Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
6Plan reported brand-generic code BRND_GNRC_CD
Whether the plan adjudicated the claim as a brand or generic drug
7 Pharmacy service type code PHRMCY_SRVC_TYPE_CD
Type of pharmacy that dispensed the prescription
8 Patient residence code PTNT_RSDNC_CD
Where the beneficiary lived when the prescription was filled
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 71
Claim# CPCDS Element Reference CMS
Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
11 Claim prescribing provider NPI Prescribing provider
12Claim prescribing provider network status
contracted | non-contracted
13 Claim PCP NPI
# CPCDS Element Reference CMS Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
Provider
1 Claim billing provider NPI CARR_CLM_BLG_NPI_NUM
2Claim billing provider network status
contracted | non-contracted
3 Claim attending provider NPI AT_PHYSN_NPI
Physician who has overall responsibility for the beneficiary's care and treatment [institutional]
4Claim attending provider network status
contracted | non-contracted
5 Claim site of service NPICARR_CLM_SOS_NPI_NUM, SRVC_LOC_NPI_NUM
The service location NPI will not be on the claim if it is the same as the billing provider NPI
6Claim site of service network status
contracted | non-contracted
6 Claim referring provider NPICARR_CLM_RFRNG_PIN_NUM
8Claim referring provider network status
contracted | non-contracted
9 Claim performing provider NPI
PRF_PHYSN_NPI, OP_PHYSN_NPI, RNDRNG_PHYSN_NPI
Rendering/servicing/operating/prescribing providerpharmacist
Claim performing provider
contracted | non-
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 72
Claim# CPCDS Element Reference CMS
Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
Amounts
1 Claim total submitted amount CLM_TOT_CHRG_AMTSubmitted charge amount
2 Claim total allowed amountNCH_CARR_CLM_ALOWD_AMT
3 Amount paid by patient PTNT_PAY_AMT
Includes all copayments, coinsurance, deductible, or other patient payment amounts [pharmacy]
4 Claim amount paid to providerCARR_CLM_PRMRY_PYR_PD_AMT
5 Member reimbursement NCH_CLM_BENE_PMT_AMT
6 Claim payment amount CLM_PMT_AMT By Payer
7 Claim disallowed amount NCH_IP_NCVRD_CHRG_AMT
8 Member paid deductible NCH_BENE_IP_DDCTBL_AMT
9 Co-insurance liability amountNCH_BENE_PTA_COINSRNC_LBLTY_AMT
10 Copay amount
# CPCDS Element Reference CMS Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
11 Member liabilityE.g. Non-contracted provider
12Claim primary payer paid amount
NCH_PRMRY_PYR_CLM_PD_AMT
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 73
Claim Line# CPCDS Element Reference CMS
Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
Line Service Details
1 Service (from) date LINE_1ST_EXPNS_DT Dispense/fill date (Rx)
2 Line number LINE_NUM
3 Service to date LINE_LAST_EXPNS_DT
4 Type of service LINE_CMS_TYPE_SRVC_CD
5 Place of service code LINE_PLACE_OF_SRVC_CD
6 Revenue center code REV_CNTR
The provider-assigned revenue code for each cost center for which a separate charge is billed (type of accommodation or ancillary) UB-04 Revenue Code (FL-42), Revenue Description (FL-43)
7 Number of units REV_CNTR_UNIT_CNT
Num of times service or procedure performed. UB-04 Units of Service (FL-46)
# CPCDS Element Reference CMS Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
8 Allowed number of unitsMaximum allowed number of units
9 National drug code LINE_NDC_CD
10 Compound code CMPND_CD
Whether or not the dispensed drug was compounded or mixed
11 Quantity dispensedREV_CNTR_NDC_QTY, QTY_DSPNSD_NUM
Quantity dispensed for the drug
12 Quantity qualifier codeREV_CNTR_NDC_QTY_QLFR_CD
The unit of measurement for the drug. (gram, ml, etc)
13Line network indicator benefit payment status
in-network, out-of-network, other
14Line claim payment denial code
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 74
# CPCDS Element Reference CMS Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
6 Line amount paid to provider LINE_PRVDR_PMT_AMT
Actual payment made by Payer to the provider for the line item service on the noninstitutional claim. Additional payments may have been made to the provider -including beneficiary deductible and coinsurance amounts and/or other primary payer amounts
7 Line patient deductibleLINE_BENE_PTB_DDCTBL_AMT
8Line primary payer paid amount
LINE_BENE_PRMRY_PYR_PD_AMT
9 Line coinsurance amount LINE_COINSRNC_AMT
10 Line submitted amount LINE_SBMTD_CHRG_AMT
Provider submitted charges for the line item service on the non-institutional claim
Claim Line# CPCDS Element Reference CMS
Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
Line Amount Details
1Line disallowed charged amount
REV_CNTR_NCVRD_CHRG_AMT
Amount related to a revenue center code for services that are not covered
2 Line member reimbursement LINE_BENE_PMT_AMT
Payment (reimbursement) made to the beneficiary related to the line item service on the non-institutional claim
3 Line amount paid by patientREV_CNTR_PTNT_RSPNSBLTY_PMT
Amount paid by the beneficiary to the provider for the line item service (outpatient)
4 Drug cost TOT_RX_CST_AMTPrice paid for the drug excluding mfr discounts
5 Line payment amount LINE_NCH_PMT_AMT
Amount that Payer is responsible for reimbursing for the line item on the non-institutional claim
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 75
Claim Line# CPCDS Element Reference CMS
Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
11 Line allowed amount LINE_ALOWD_CHRG_AMT
Allowed charges for the line item service on the noninstitutional claim. This charge is used to compute pay to providers or reimbursement to beneficiaries. The amount includes both the line-item Payer and beneficiary-paid amounts (i.e. deductible and coinsurance)
12 Line member liabilityE.g. Non-contracted provider
13 Line copay amount
14 Line discounted rate
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 76
Diagnoses & Procedures# CPCDS Element Reference CMS
Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
Diagnosis (0-n)
1 Diagnosis codePRNCPAL_DGNS_CD, ICD_DGNS_CD(1-25)
2 Diagnosis description
3 Present on admission CLM_POA_IND_SW(1-25)
4 Diagnosis code type ICD_DGNS_VRSN_CD(1-25) ICD 9 or ICD 10
5 Diagnosis type Primary, 1-25primary, secondary, discharge, etc.
6 Is E code ICD_DGNS_E_CD1
External cause of injury code. For hospital and emergency department visits, E-codes are used in addition to the diagnostic codes. They can be used as “other diagnosis”.
# CPCDS Element Reference CMS Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
Procedure (0-n)
1 Procedure code ICD_PRCDR_CD(1-25)
2 Procedure description
3 Procedure date PRCDR_DT(1-25)
4 Procedure code type CPT/HCPCS/ICD-PCS
5 Procedure typeprimary, secondary, discharge, etc.
6 Modifier Code -1 HCPCS_1ST_MDFR_CD
7 Modifier Code -2 HCPCS_2ND_MDFR_CD
8 Modifier Code -3 HCPCS_3RD_MDFR_CD
9 Modifier Code -4 HCPCS_4TH_MDFR_CD
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 77
Member# CPCDS Element Reference CMS
Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
1 Member id BENE_IDUnique identifier to member
2 Date of birth DOB_DT
3 Date of death
4 Deceased boolean
5 County BENE_COUNTY_CD
6 State BENE_STATE_CD
7 Country
8 Race code BENE_RACE_CD
9 Ethnicity
10 Gender code GNDR_CD
11 Name
12 Zip code BENE_MLG_CNTCT_ZIP_CD
13 Relationship to subscriber
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 78
Coverage# CPCDS Element Reference CMS
Medicare BB 2.0 Element
Description
1 Subscriber id
2 Coverage type
3 Coverage status
4 Start date
5 End date
6 Group id
7 Group name
8 Plan
9 Payer
References
©2019 LEAVITT PARTNERS 80
Consumer Directed Payer Data Exchange IG (aka CARIN Blue Button IG)
• CMS Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule• https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Interoperability/index
• HL7 Balloted version (STU1)• http://hl7.org/fhir/us/carin-bb/2020Feb
• HL7 Ballot Comments in Jira• project = "FHIR Specification Feedback" AND Specification = "US CARIN Blue Button (FHIR) [FHIR-us-carin-bb]"
• CARIN Alliance on HL7 Confluence• https://confluence.hl7.org/display/CAR/CARIN+Alliance
• CARIN Track at HL7 Virtual Connectathon (13-15 May)• https://confluence.hl7.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=80119564
• CARIN Track at MiHIN Virtual InterOpathon (28-29 May)• https://confluence.hl7.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=76160714
Thank You
Questions?
Thank you!Please join us for next week’s webinar on Interoperability Land™
(IOL) and use case data representation!
Thursday, May 14th from 12-1:30 PM EST
https://interoperabilityinstitute.org/virtual-interopathon/
For help please contact [email protected]