internet and higher education shawna lafreniere rex peason john reynolds

Internet and Higher Education

Shawna Lafreniere Rex PeasonJohn Reynolds

A Brief Summary of the Evolution of the Internet

1945 1995

Memex Conceived

1945

WWWCreated

1989

MosaicCreated

1993

A Mathematical

Theory of Communication

1948

Packet Switching Invented

1964

SiliconChip1958

First Vast ComputerNetwork

Envisioned1962

ARPANET1969

TCP/IPCreated

1972

InternetNamed

and Goes

TCP/IP1984

HypertextInvented

1965

Age ofeCommerce

Begins1995

Internet Growth Trends

• 1977: 111 hosts on Internet• 1981: 213 hosts• 1983: 562 hosts• 1984: 1,000 hosts• 1986: 5,000 hosts• 1987: 10,000 hosts• 1989: 100,000 hosts• 1992: 1,000,000 hosts• 2001: 150 – 175 million hosts• 2002: over 200 million hosts• By 2010, about 80% of the planet will be on the Internet

By September 2002The Internet Reached Two

Important Milestones:

Netsizer.com – from Telcordia

Growth of Internet Hosts *Sept. 1969 - Sept. 2002

0

50,000,000

100,000,000

150,000,000

200,000,000

250,000,000

Time Period

No

. of

Ho

sts

The Internet was not known as "The Internet" until January 1984, at which timethere were 1000 hosts that were all converted over to using TCP/IP.

Chart by William F. Slater, III

Sept. 1, 2002

Dot-Com Bust Begins

Statistics from the IITF Report The Emerging Digital Economy *

• To get a market of 50 Million People Participating:• Radio took 38 years • TV took 13 years• Once it was open to the General Public, The Internet

made to the 50 million person audience mark in just 4 years!!!

• http://www.ecommerce.gov/emerging.htm– Released on April 15, 1998

* Delivered to the President and the U.S. Public on April 15, 1998 by Bill Daley, Secretary of Commerce and Chairman of the Information Infrastructure Task Force

What did this mean for Higher Education?

• No freshman student today has not had access to the internet in the U.S.A.

• The average age of faculty is now 54 in US colleges ad universities

• There is no limit to accessing data in text, image, sound or stream format

• The internet is now the accepted starting point for all research

Areas for today’s conversation

• The Internet and the student (Shawna)

• Controlling the internet through legislation (Rex)

• The Internet and the Institution (John)

• Questions

Students and the Internet

Presented by:Shawna Lafreniere

Internet acceptable use policy

Adopted from APU:Azusa Pacific University's domain name (APU.EDU) and other

University computer, network, and electronic mail systems exist for the primary purpose of transmitting and sharing information for the University's purposes. The use of apu.edu by any member must be consistent with the mission of Azusa Pacific University and is subject to control by the University. Computer, network, communications, and Internet services exist to promote the purposes of the University. Every attempt to protect privacy will be maintained, but observation of traffic flow and content may be necessary at the University's discretion for security and legal reasons. The end-user who originates traffic will be responsible if the traffic does not conform to this policy.


User Requirements

• Respect the privacy of others. For example, users shall not intentionally seek information on, obtain copies of, or modify files belonging to other users.

• Only use your own account and password; never misrepresent yourself as another user.

• Respect the legal protection provided by copyright and licenses to programs and data.

• Respect the integrity of apu.edu so as not to interfere with or disrupt network users, services, or equipment. Interference or disruption includes, but is not limited to, distribution of unsolicited advertising, propagation of computer viruses, and use of the network to make unauthorized entry into other computational, communications, or information devices or resources.


Acceptable Uses:

• Use as a vehicle for scholarly or University-related communications

• Use in applying for or administering grants or contracts for research or instruction.

• Use in activities of research or direct support for instruction.

• Use must be consistent with University standards as defined in its publications.


Unacceptable Uses:

• Use of apu.edu or any other University computing resources for illegal purposes.

• Use of apu.edu or any other University computing resources to transmit or receive threatening, obscene, or harassing materials.

• Sending unsolicited advertising.

• Use for personal for-profit business is not permitted.

• Use of the network by employees for recreational games is not acceptable during working hours.


Enforcement and Violations

Action may be taken by system management, subject to the guidance and authority of the Internet Policy Committee, to prevent possible unauthorized activity by temporarily deactivating any member. Reasonable efforts will be made to inform the member prior to disconnection and to re-establish the connection as soon as an acceptable understanding has been reached. Any disciplinary action deemed necessary will be handled through the normal channels as explained and set forth in the student catalogue, student handbook or other materials published by the office of the Dean of Students.

Peer to Peer Policy (P2P)

While the definition itself is controversial, generally a peer-to-peer (often referred to as P2P) computer network refers to any network that does not have fixed clients and servers, but a number of peer nodes that function as both clients and servers to the other nodes on the network. This model of network arrangement is contrasted with the client-server model. Any node is able to initiate or complete any supported transaction. Peer nodes may differ in local configuration, processing speed, network bandwidth, and storage quantity. Put simply, peer-to-peer computing is the sharing of computer resources and services by direct exchange between systems. Many researchers are looking into the practical uses of this technology.


This policy intends to make it clear that P2P architecture, itself, is not in question. What is a concern, however, is one of the most prevalent uses of this technology, P2P File Sharing applications used for the distribution of copyrighted content. Morpheus, KaZaA, Aimster, Madster, AudioGalaxy and Gnutella, are examples of the kinds of P2P File Sharing software which can be used inappropriately to share copyrighted content. Note, that some of these applications are not pure peer-too-peer architectures, further reinforcing that the issues with File Sharing applications have more to do with risk of abuses, than in the technology itself. Along with copyright infringement, other concerns of P2P File Sharing applications include network resource utilization, security, and inappropriate content.


For the purposes of this policy, a Peer-to-peer file sharing application is any application that transforms a personal computer into a server that distributes data simultaneously to other computers.


Issues:Copyright Infringement

Downloading or distributing copyrighted material, e.g. documents, music, movies, videos, text, etc., without permission from the rightful owner violates the United States Copyright Act and several university policies. While it is true that a number of artists have allowed their creative works to be freely copied, those artists remain very much the exception. It is best to assume that all works are copyright-protected except those that explicitly state otherwise.


Impact to APU's network

A user's computer acting as a server can place an enormous burden on APU's network(s). If the computer/server is popular and does excessive, high-volume transfers of files, this single computer/server can severely impact the performance of APU's network. Imagine the impact if there are several computers/servers functioning in the same manner. For example, music files (MP3) are usually very large files, between 2 and 10 MB in size, and movie files (DivX) can be enormous, averaging 600 MB in size. Some Peer-to-Peer applications let you choose NOT to be a server, but others, such as Gnutella, don't. If users simply install the software and don't take the time to read the documentation, they may not realize that their computer is acting like a server. Make sure you understand what the software does.


Security

Another serious problem with setting up your computer as a server is that faculty/staff and students could be reducing the security of their system, allowing a cracker (computer criminal) to more easily compromise their entire computer and gain access to private and/or University data. Furthermore, any compromised computer on the University network increases the potential risk to all other devices and systems within that same security context of that network. Peer-to-peer file sharing applications differ in how much security they provide. Be cautious.


PornographyLastly, new reports indicate that Peer-to-Peer applications are being used to disseminate pornography. It is not known at this time if this is done with the authorization or knowledge of computers/servers participating with Peer-to-Peer applications.


Policy It is the policy of APU that the university's

network connections may not be used to violate copyright laws. The unauthorized reproduction of copyrighted materials is a serious violation of APU's Internet Acceptable Use Policy, as well as the U.S. Copyright Laws.


Background Discussion of Copyright Law and Potential Liability for Students Engaged in P2P File Sharing on University Networks

http://www.acenet.edu/washington/legalupdate/2003/P2P.pdf


Electronic Privacy Information Center

http://www.epic.org/privacy/student/p2pletter.html


Joint Committee of the Higher Education and Entertainment Communities Technology Task Force

http://www.educause.edu/issues/rfi/


What Is Higher Education Doing About P2P?

http://www.educause.edu/asp/doclib/abstract.asp?ID=EDU03156


Higher Education & Entertainment p2p report:

http://www.p2pnet.net/article/7408

Spam

The first federal anti-spam legislation, the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, was signed into law by President George W. Bush on December 15, 2003. The Act is effective January 1, 2004. The Act sets rules for commercial e-mail, although it makes no distinction between solicited and unsolicited commercial e-mail. Commercial e-mail is defined as "any electronic mail message the primary purpose of which is the commercial advertisement or promotion of a commercial product or service (including content on an Internet website operated for a commercial purpose". Several states have passed similar anti-spam legislation.

Spam

Six years after spam legislation was first introduced, the first federal spam law was signed by President Bush on December 15, 2003. Despite this milestone, the CAN-SPAM bill remains a "work in progress." While it includes popular provisions from several bills, including making spamming a criminal offense, it also calls for at least five follow-up reports to be submitted to Congress over the next 24 months. These reports call for continued work on such things as defining the "primary purpose of an electronic mail message," what constitutes a "transactional or relationship message," and what is a suitable identifier for mail that contains sexually oriented material. The law also calls for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to submit a plan and timetable for a "do not spam" registry.

Spam laws by state

http://www.spamlaws.com/state/summary.html

Virus and Spam

Microsoft's plan to improve computer security could set off fight over use of online materials

http://chronicle.com/free/v49/i24/24a02701.htm

Great Site for Free!

Keep up to date on law issues and other hot higher education topics:

www.universitybusiness.com

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act

• Took effect May 23, 2003, with an extrayear to conform third-party serviceprovider contracts entered into prior toJune 24, 2002.

Standard for Safeguards• Each financial institution must develop,

implement andmaintain a comprehensive information securityprogram that is written in readily accessible part(s);

• The program must contain administrative, technicaland physical safeguards that are appropriate to:

1. the size and complexity of the financial institution;2. the nature and scope of its activities; and3. the sensitivity its customer information.

Required Elements – Each financialinstitution must:

• Designate one or more employees tocoordinate its program;

• Assess risks to the security of customerinformation;

• Design and implement safeguards to addressrisks, and test and monitor their effectivenessover time;

• Oversee service providers; and• Institute a training program.• Adjust the program to address developments.

Azusa Pacific Universities plan to comply with the GLB

• John Reynolds CIO is designated as APU administrator charged to coordinate the university information security program.

• Mark Dickerson, General Council, as alternate.

US Patriot Act 2001

• In essence the Patriot Act is an Extension of FERPA

• That allow federal agency to request information without the consent of the student.

• Limited liability, not tested, no precedent.

US Patriot Act 2001

Four primary areas:1. The privacy of student records2. Information and Technology3. Subpoenas and warrants4. Environmental health and safety

Privacy of Student Records

• The request must be by a US Assistant Attorney General or higher ranking official.

• It must be through a court order.• There must be a certification that there

are specific and articulable facts supporting the request.

• Institutions do not violate FERPA by responding to such and order without student consent.

Privacy of Student Records

• APU does not need to make a record of disclosure (this is an exception to the current FERPA requirement).

• APU should not be liable to any person for good faith disclosure of educational records in response to such and order.

• There is a monitoring of foreign student session; John Reynolds analysis is that the new information requirements through SERVIS (the students and exchange visitors program information system) should cover this information.

Information Technology Requirement

• Permit government officials to seek stored voicemail messages without wiretap authorization

• Requires APU communication providers to respond to a subpoena for, long distance, local telephone connection records, times and duration, telephone numbers, assigned network addresses, means and source of payment for these services.

Information Technology Requirement

• To provide URL records, technically difficult for APU.

• Authorizes the government to install devices to track internet use.

• Penalties for computer hacking crimes have been increased and these include accessing and transmitting or destructive programs such as viruses. Threshold $5000.

Subpoenas / Warrants• A court order for educational records forces

APU, without student consent, but supported by a court order, to provide officials with educational records that are relevant to a terrorism investigation.

• Subpoenas can reach beyond paper documents and include digital information as well as voice mail, emails, and Internet usage.

• Allows law to intercept wire or electronic communication that relates to terrorism and computer fraud/abuse.

Subpoenas / Warrants

• Allows the FBI to seize with a court order business records pursuant to terrorism investigation.

• The patriot act does restrict APU from disclosing that these request were ever made.

Environmental Health and Safety

• Less relevant for APU• 10 year imprisonment and a large

fine for possessing a biological agent toxin or delivery system that is not reasonably justified by research or other peaceful purposes.

The Internet and the InstitutionConcerns

• Use of bandwidth for non-academic purposes• Capacity issues• Streaming audio and video• Pornographic and hate sites• Interference with legitimate research and

academic use• Hacking/Security• Cost• Privacy• Web Domain Management• Libraries • License Management• Public Address Lists

Concerns

• Sexual harassment • Legal issues related to fair use• Harassment• Downloading of inappropriate or harmful

materials• Faculty training• Response time/Availability• Dorm and off-campus access• Chat rooms• Children using parent's password or access by

non-students• Virus and Spam attacks

Web LinksHighlighting Issues

• Azusa Pacific University www.apu.edu/imt

• Chowan College (Murfreesboro, NC) http://www.chowan.edu/informationtech/policies/default.htm

• Columbus State University (Columbus, GA) http://cins.colstate.edu/policies/

• Linn-Binton Community College (Albany, OR) http://www.lbcc.cc.or.us/aup.html

Web Links Highlighting Issues

• Portland Oregon Community College (Portland, OR) http://www.pcc.edu/lrc/aup.htm

• South Georgia College (Douglas, GA) http://www.sgc.peachnet.edu/ComputerCenter/policies/comppol.htm

• Umpqua Community College (Roseburg, OR) http://www.umpqua.cc.or.us/library/dlibaup.htm

• University of North Carolina Greensboro (Greensboro, NC )http://www.uncg.edu/cis/

• University of Southwestern Louisiana (Lafayette, LA) http://www.usl.edu/InfoTech/Policies/comp_net.html

• Vanderbilt University (Nashville, TN) http://www.vanderbilt.edu/HomePage/aup.html

Questions?

internet and higher education shawna lafreniere rex peason john reynolds

Documents

telcordiathe internet

hostsgrowth of internet

years tv

general public

domain survey078833

domain survey079836

secretary of commerce

bill daley