international journal of pharmaceutical research …ijprbs.com/issuedocs/2014/6/ijprbs 751.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Vijayalakshmi K, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 528
ANTIOXIDANT PROFILE OF THE FRUIT RIND OF GARCINIA CAMBOGIA AND LEAVES OF BAUHINIA VARIEGATA – AN INVITRO INVESTIGATION
RANJANI R2, KHADIRA SA2, PRIYA N2, VIJAYALAKSHMI K1 1. Associate professor, Department of Biochemistry, Bharathi Women’s College, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India. 2. Research scholar, Department of Biochemistry, Bharathi Women’s College, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Accepted Date: 23/06/2014; Published Date: 27/06/2014
Abstract: This study was carried out to evaluate the free radical scavenging activity of the
ethylacetate extract of fruit rind of Garcinia cambogia and leaves of Bauhinia variegata using
the free radical scavenging assay 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), hydroxyl radical(OH),
superoxide radical(SO), nitric oxide radical(NO), hydrogen peroxide radical(H2O2) scavenging
activity. The reducing activity (RA) was also estimated. The IC50 value of Garcinia cambogia is
42µg/ml (DPPH), 39.8µg/ml (OH), 40µg/ml (SO), 43.3µg/ml (NO), 40µg/ml (H2O2) and
28.6μg/ml (RA) and Bauhinia variegate is 43μg/ml (DPPH), 41.8μg/ml (OH), 45.1μg/ml (SO),
47μg/ml (NO), 41.3μg/ml (H2O2), and 26.2μg/ml (RA). When comparing with BHT (Butylated
hydroxy toluene), Garcinia cambogia is less efficient in scavenging NO, DPPH, SO and H2O2
whereas it is more efficient in scavenging hydroxyl radical and has high reducing activity.
Bauhinia variegata is less efficient in NO, SO, DPPH, OH radical whereas it is more efficient in
H2O2 and has high reducing activity.
Keywords: Garcinia cambogia, Bauhinia variegata, BHT, DPPH, free radical.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND BIO-SCIENCE
PAPER-QR CODE
Corresponding Author: DR. VIJAYALAKSHMI KRISHNAMOORTHY
Access Online On:
www.ijprbs.com
How to Cite This Article:
Ranjani R, Khadira Sa, Priya N, Vijayalakshmi K; IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Vijayalakshmi K, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 529
INTRODUCTION
Antioxidants are chemicals produced within the body or absorbed from the diet to neutralize
the effect of free radicals. Free radicals are generated in the human body through aerobic
respiration and exist in different forms including superoxide, hydroxyl, hydroperoxyl and
peroxyl radicals. Generally, natural antioxidant enzymes in healthy individuals remove these
free radicals. Dietary antioxidants are helpful in assisting the body to neutralize free radicals
and consumption of diet rich in antioxidants reduces the harmful effects of oxidative stress. In
addition, natural antioxidants may have an important role in protecting human health.
The fruit rinds of Garcinia cambogia (GC), commonly known as kodampuli have been used in
the Indian systems of the medicine for hundreds of years for their beneficial role and
hypolipidemic effect. GC is a moderate sized, evergreen tree and flowers are unisexual, sessile
and axillary. The leaves are dark green, shiny, elliptic to obovate. The fruit may resemble a small
yellow or reddish pumpkin, or it may have a unique purple color. GC has garnered a lot of
attention of late as a popular natural weight loss aid. The reason is that the rind of this pumpkin
like fruit is rich in a substance called hydroxycitric acid (HCA) [1] shown below.
Structure of hydroxycitric acid
Bauhinia variegata Linn. (BV) (Caesalpiniaceae) is a medium-sized, deciduous tree, found
throughout India. It is commonly known as Kanchnar (Sanskrit), Mountain Ebony (English),
Mandharai (Tamil) and Raktakanchan (Hindi) [2]. The various parts of the plant viz., flower buds,
flowers, stem, stem bark, leaves, seeds and roots are practiced in various indigenous systems of
medicine and popular among the various ethnic groups in India for the cure of variety of
ailments[3][4]. The leaves of other Bauhinia species are reported to have antiophidian [5],
antidiabetic [6], antimalarial [7], antimicrobial [8] and antioxidant potential [9].
The biomechanical mechanism of liver injury includes metabolite or coenzyme effects
(depletion or stimulation), enzyme effects (inhibition or stimulation), activation to a more toxic
form and membrane disturbances. The antioxidant plays an important role in liver protection
by inhibiting the free radical formation.
Production of free radicals cause depletion of antioxidants, so consuming antioxidants may be
necessary as reported by Halliwell [10]. Currently available synthetic antioxidants like BHT, BHA
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Vijayalakshmi K, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 530
and Gallic acid have a number of negative health effects as reported by Barlon[11] and
Branen[12]. So recently many medicinal plants are studied for their antioxidant potential. Hence,
it was planned to investigate on the antioxidant potential of Garcinia cambogia and Bauhinia
variegata.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Collection and processing of plant samples
The fruit rinds of Garcinia cambogia and leaves of Bauhinia variegata were collected from the
local area during the month of December. The taxonomic identification of plant material was
done by Prof. P. Jayaraman, National Institute of Herbal Science (PARC), Chennai.
(Authentication No PARC/2013/468 & PARC/2013/1469).
The fruit rinds of Garcinia cambogia and leaves of Bauhinia variegata were washed with water,
shade dried at room temperature and powdered coarsely. Exactly 10g of the course powder of
fruit rinds and leaves were taken in 100ml of various solvents such as ethanol, hydro alcohol
(ethanol: water, 1:1 ratio) aqueous and ethyl acetate. The extracts were refrigerated for 72
hours and filtered through Whatmann No.1filter paper. Preliminary phytochemical screening
was done in all the extract and result has been published [13]. From the results the ethyl acetate
extract of GC and BV was found to be best and taken for the further in-vitro antioxidant study.
In-vitro antioxidant activity
DPPH free radical scavenging Activity
Free radical scavenging activity was determined by the method of Koleva et al. [14]. The ability to
scavenge the stable free radical DPPH is measured by a decrease in the absorbance at 517nm.
To an ethanolic solution of DPPH (0.05mM), an equal volume of extracts dissolved in water was
added to a final volume of 1.0ml. An equal volume of alcohol was added to the control. After
20min, absorbance was recorded at 517nm in a UV visible double beam spectrophotometer.
The scavenging activity of the plant extract was calculated using the equation 1.
Equation 1
Percentage of Inhibition = Absorbance of control – Absorbance of sample
Absorbance of control
Nitric Oxide radical scavenging Activity
Nitric oxide scavenging activity was measured spectrophotometrically by the method of
Govindarajan et al [15]. Sodium nitroprusside (5mM) in PBS (phosphate buffer solution) was
mixed with different concentrations of the extract dissolved in methanol and incubated at 25˙C
for 15 minutes. The samples were reacted with Griess reagent (1% Sulphanilamide, 2%
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Vijayalakshmi K, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 531
Phosphoric acid 0.1% napthylethylene diamine dihydrochloride) The absorbance of the
chromophore formed during diazotization of nitrite with sulphanilamide and subsequent
coupling with naphthlethylene diamine hydrochloride was measured at 546nm and compared
with that of standard solutions treated in the same way. The scavenging ability was calculated
using equation 1.
Super Oxide Anion radical scavenging Activity
Superoxide anion scavenging activity was carried out by employing NBT (nitroblue tetrazolium)
reduction assay [16]. A reaction mixture containing 0.4µl of Sodium pyrophosphate, 25µl of
Phenazine methosulphate, 25µl of NBT and 100µl of NADH was mixed with various
concentrations of extracts and incubated for 90seconds at 30˙C. Purpled colored chromogen
formed was measured spectrophotometrically at 560nm. The scavenging activity of the plant
extract was calculated using the equation 1
Hydrogen Peroxide Radical Scavenging Activity:
Hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging activity was assayed by the method of Sinha [17]. The
reaction mixture containing 500µl of phosphate buffer and 400µl of 2mM hydrogen peroxide.
The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes. Then 2ml of
dichromate reagent was added and the decrease in color intensity was measured at 570nm.
2ml of dichromate acetic acid reagent alone served as blank whereas the reaction mixture
without the compound served as control. The scavenging activity was calculated using equation
1.
Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Activity
The scavenging of hydroxyl free radicals was measured by the method of Halliwell 10. The
reaction mixture containing 2.8mM deoxyribose, 0.05 KH2PO4 NaOH buffer at pH 7.4, 0.1mM
Ferric chloride, 0.1mM EDTA, 1mM Hydrogen peroxide, 0.1mM ascorbate with different
concentrations of extract in a final volume of 2ml. The reaction mixture was incubated for
30min at ambient temperature followed by the addition of 2ml of trichloro acetic acid and
thiobarbituric acid. The reaction mixture was kept in a boiling water bath for 30min, cooled and
the absorbance was read at 532nm in a UV-visible double beam spectrophotometer. The
scavenging activity was calculated using equation 1.
Estimation of Reducing Activity
The reducing activity (RAI) of the extract was assessed by the method of Oyaizu [18]. 2ml of
extract was added to potassium ferricyanide (2.5ml, 10g/L) and the mixture was incubated at
50oC for 20min. Trichloro acetic acid (2.5ml, 100g/L) was added to the mixture which was then
centrifuged at 650×g for 10min. 2.5ml of distilled water and 0.5ml of ferric chloride was added.
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Vijayalakshmi K, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 532
The absorbance was read at 700nm. Higher absorbance indicated greater reducing capacity
which was calculated using equation 1.
RESULTS:
The antioxidant potential of GC and BV is estimated using the free radical such as DPPH, SO
anion, NO, OH and H2O2 and the reducing capacity of GC and BV was estimated. The IC50 value
of GC and BV is shown in Table 1.
DPPH free radical scavenging activity
DPPH free radical scavenging activity of GC and BV is shown in figure 1. IC50 value for GC was
42µg/ml and for BV it was 43µg/ml. the maximum scavenging activity of GC was found to be
49% and BV was 50%.
Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity
Figure 2 shows the SO anion radical scavenging activity of GC and BV and BHT. IC50 value is
found to be 40µg/ml with GC and 45.1µg/ml for BV. The maximum scavenging activity for GC
and BV are 70% and 60% respectively.
Nitric Oxide radical scavenging activity:
Nitric Oxide radical scavenging activity was measured spectrophotometrically. Figure 3 shows
the % of inhibition and IC50 values. IC50 values of GC were 43.3µg/ml and BV was 47µg/ml.
Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity:
Figure 4 shows the hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of GC and BV. BHT was used as the
standard. IC50 values for GC was 39.8µg/ml and BV was 41.8µg/ml. and the maximum
scavenging activity of GC was 69% and BV was 60%.
Hydrogen Peroxide radical scavenging activity:
Figure 5 shows the hydrogen peroxide radical scavenging activity of GC and BV. BHT was used
as the standard. The IC50 value was 40µg/ml for GC and 41.3µg/ml for BV. The maximum
scavenging activity of GC was 60% and BV was 60%.
Reducing activity:
Figure 6 shows the reducing activity of GC and BV. GC possessed a reducing power of28.6µg/ml
while BV showed 26.2µg/ml respectively. The maximum scavenging activity of GC was 69% and
BV was 60%.
DISCUSSION:
This study was carried out to evaluate the antioxidant potential of Garcinia cambogia and
Bauhinia variegata comparing it with the standard antioxidant, BHT. Antioxidants exert their
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Vijayalakshmi K, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 533
mode of action by suppressing the formation of reactive oxygen species either by inhibition of
enzymes or by chelating trace elements. DPPH is widely used to evaluate the free radical
scavenging effect of natural antioxidant and it is reduced to its corresponding hydrazine. Hence
change in colour depends on number of electrons taken up[19]. This assay was used to
determine the ability of Garcinia cambogia and Bauhinia variegata to reduce DPPH radical to its
corresponding hydrazine. Nitric oxide is an important chemical mediator generated by
endothelial cells, macrophages, neurons and it is involved in the regulation of various
physiological processes. Excess concentration of nitric oxide is associated with several
diseases[20]. The ability of extracts to scavenge the nitric oxide in invitro model using sodium
nitroprusside was studied. Both the extracts were capable of scavenging nitric oxide in a dose
dependant manner. Superoxide anion scavenging radical assay is based on the generation of
superoxide anion radical in PMS, NADH system by the oxidation of NADH. The capacity of the
extract to reduce NBT to blue pharmazone was studied with BHT as the standard. The
superoxide anion indirectly initiates lipid oxidation serving as precursor of singlet oxygen and
hydroxyl radicals. Hydroxyl radicals are one among the reactive oxygen species that are
generated in living cells. It is highly reactive form of free radical which is generated from
superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide in presence of metal ions such as iron or copper which
in turn reacts with various biomolecules such as lipid, protein and DNA leading to cellular
damage[21]. The reducing ability is generally associated with the presence of reductones, which
breaks the free radical chain by donating a hydrogen atom. In our study both the extracts were
capable of scavenging free radicals in a dose dependant manner and it is found that GC was
more potential than BV.
CONCLUSION:
It is concluded from this study that the fruit rinds of Garcinia cambogia and Bauhinia variegata
have antioxidant property. This could justify its claims as antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory,
antiobesity, anticancer, antiulcer, hepatoprotective and hypoglycemic. The activity was found
due to the presence of hydroxycitric acid, polar phenolic compounds flavonoids and tannins.
Garcinia cambogia and Bauhinia variegata can be considered as a model herbal drug for
experimental studies related to free radical induced disorders like cancer, diabetes,
atherosclerosis and many other diseases.
Conflict of interest:
Conflict of interest declared none.
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Vijayalakshmi K, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 534
Figure 1: DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity
Figure 2: Super oxide anion radical scavenging activity
Figure 3: Nitric oxide radical scavenging activity
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Vijayalakshmi K, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 535
Figure 4: Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity
Figure 5: Hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity
Figure 6: Reducing activity
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Vijayalakshmi K, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 536
Table 1: IC50 values of GC and BV
Free Radicals Extracts IC50 (µg/ml) Ethyl Acetate Extract
Garcinia cambogia Bauhinia variegata
DPPH 42 ± 1.2 43 ± 2.3
Nitric Oxide 43.3 ± 1.7 47 ± 2.1
Super Oxide 40 ± 2.1 45.1 ± 2.8
Hydrogen Peroxide 40 ± 1.5 41.3 ± 1.9
Hydroxyl radical 39.8 ± 1.3 41.8 ± 2.1
Reducing Activity 28.6 ± 1.6 26.2 ± 1.3
REFERENCES:
1. Jena B S, Jayaprakasha G K and Sakariah K K: Organic acids from leaves, fruits and rinds of
Garcinia cowa. J Agric Food Chem. 2002; 50(12): 3431-3434.
2. Gayathri Gunalan, A.Saraswathy and Vijayalakshmi Krishnamurthy. Preliminary
phytochemical and pharmacognostical analysis of Bauhinia variegata Linn. Leaves. Research
Journal of Pharmaconosy and Phytochemistry. 2011; 3(5): 236-240.
3. Anonymous, the Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, the Controller of Publications, New
Delhi. 2001; Vol-I: 321-322.
4. Arvind Negi, Nimisha Sharma, Mamta F. Singh. Spectrum of Pharmacological Activities from
Bauhinia variegata: A Review. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2012; 5(2):792-797.
5. Oliveira CZ, Maiorano VA, Marcussi S, Santana CD, Januario AH, Lourenco MV.
Anticoagulant and antifibrinogenolytic properties of the aqueous extract from Bauhinia
forticata against snake venoms. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005; 98:213-216.
6. Frankish N, de Souza Menezes F, Mills C, Sheridan H, Enhancement of Insulin Release from
the ß-Cell Line INS-1 by an Ethanolic Extract of Bauhinia variegata and Its Major Constituent
Roseoside. Planta Med. 2010; 76: 995-997.
7. Kittakoop P, Kirtikara K, Tanticharoen M, Thebtaranonth Y. Antimalarial pre racemosols A
and B, possible biogenetic precursors of racemosol from Bauhinia malabarica Roxb. Phytochem.
2000; 55:349-352.
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Vijayalakshmi K, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 537
8. Gayathri Gunalan, A.Saraswathy and Vijayalakshmi Krishnamurthy. Antimicrobial activity of
Medicinal Plant Bauhinia variegata Linn. International Journal of Pharma and Biological
Sciences. 2011; 1(4): 400 - 408.
9. Mishra A, Kumar S, Bhargava A, Sharma B, Pandey AK. Studies on in vitro antioxidant and
anti staphylococcal activities of some important medicinal plants. Cellular and Molecular
Biology. 2011; 57(1):16-25.
10. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM, Aroma OI. The deoxyribose method: a simple “test tube” assay
for determination of rate constants for reaction of hydroxyl radicals. Anals of Biochemistry.
1987; 165: 215-219.
11. Barlow S. M. Toxicological aspects of antioxidants used as food additives. In B. J. F. Hudson
(Ed.), Food antioxidants. 1990; 253– 307.
12. Branen A. L. Toxicology and biochemistry of butylated hydroxyanisole and butylated
hydroxytoluene. Journal of American Oil Chemical Society.1975; 52: 59–63.
13. Vijayalakshmi Krishnamoorthy, Priya Nagappan, A. Khadira Sereen, Ranjani Rajendran.
Preliminary Phytochemical Screening of the fruit rind of Garcinia cambogia and leaves of
Bauhinia variegata – A Comparative study. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 2014; 3(5): 479-486
14. Koleva, Van Beek T, Linssen JPH, de Groot A, Evstatieva LN. Screening of plant extracts for
antioxidant activity: a comparative study on three testing methods. Phytochem anal. 2002; 13:
8-17.
15. Govindarajan R, Rastogi S, Vijayakumar M, Rawat AKS, Shirwaikar, Mehrota S and
Pushpangadan. Studies on Antioxidant activities of Desmodium gangeticum. Biol.Pharm.Bull.
2003; 26:1424-1427.
16. Pankaj C, Sandeep KS, Prem kumar I, Namita I, Farhat A and Rakesh KS. Radioprotective
properties of apple polyphenols: an invitro study. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 2006;
288:37- 46.
17. Sinha AK. Colorimetric assay of catalase. Anals of Biochemistry. 1972; 47: 389-394.
18. Oyaizu M. Studies on product of browning reaction prepared from glucose amine. Japanese
journal of nutrition. 1986; 44: 307-315.
19. Blois M.S. Antioxidant determination by the use of a stable free radical. Nature. 1958;
181(4617): 1199-1200.
Research Article CODEN: IJPRNK IMPACT FACTOR: 1.862 ISSN: 2277-8713 Vijayalakshmi K, IJPRBS, 2014; Volume 3(3): 528-538 IJPRBS
Available Online at www.ijprbs.com 538
20. Vanitha V, Umadevi K J, and Vijayalakshmi K. Invitro assessment of alcoholic leaf extracts of
Annona squamosa and Aegle marmelos. The Bioscan. 2010; 5(2): 225-229.
21. Krishnaswamy T, Sellamuthu M, Subramanian P. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging
potential of leaf, stem and bark extracts of Bauhinia malabarica. International journal of
pharmacy and pharmaceutical science. 2013; 5(1): 306-311.