international federation of accountants … filereport. 3. while the terms used ... and current...
TRANSCRIPT
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.0 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 1 of 3
MJK February 2011
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION
OF ACCOUNTANTS 545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor Tel: (212) 286-9344 New York, New York 10017 Fax: (212) 286-9570 Internet: http://www.ifac.org
Agenda Item
7�DATE: February 22, 2011MEMO TO: Members of the IPSASB FROM: Joy Keenan SUBJECT: Narrative Reporting – Discuss Issues
OBJECTIVE OF THIS SESSION
To discuss a draft Issues Paper on Narrative Reporting
AGENDA MATERIAL
7.0 Covering Memo
Appendix 1 – Approved Project Brief (for information)
Appendix 2 – Excerpt from Minutes on Narrative Reporting session from March 2008 IPSASB meeting
7.1 Issues Paper – Narrative Reporting
7.2 Summary of Requirements in Standards and Guidance
7.3 Research Details by Jurisdiction
ACTION REQUIRED
The IPSASB is asked to provide staff with comments and suggestions for further development of the Issues Paper – Narrative Reporting.
BACKGROUND
1. The Project Brief for narrative reporting was approved in March 2008. Due to the IPSASB’s decision to complete its convergence initiative throughout 2008-2009, work on this project was deferred. A copy of the approved Project Brief is appended to this paper.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.0 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 2 of 3
MJK February 2011
2. The topic of narrative reporting has been addressed in a number of jurisdictions internationally within English and non-English speaking jurisdictions. There are a variety of terms applied to it, including Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A), Management Commentary (MC), Financial Statement Discussion and Analysis (FSD&A), Operating and Financial Review (OFR), Rapport de gestion, and Business Report.
3. While the terms used for this type of reporting vary widely, all center on providing narrative explanation by management to enhance the usefulness of financial information. The detail of what is required, however, also varies by jurisdiction to some degree.
4. Material on narrative reporting varies from accounting standards to recommended practices to requirements by regulators, legislatures and government agencies that specify form and content of public sector financial information to be included. In undertaking this project, the work of national standard setters both in the public and private sectors, regulatory guidance, and current practice will be considered.
5. The research undertaken to date is included in agenda papers 7.2 and 7.3. The information reflects material provided by Members and TAs to staff. Members are encouraged to provide staff with additional relevant sources of information to consider as the project progresses.
SCOPE
6. The Project Brief notes that: “This project will evaluate how a narrative explanation (termed Narrative Reporting for this project) by management should be used to enhance the usefulness of financial information provided by general purpose financial statements (GPFS).”
7. Because narrative reporting on financial statements is linked to the financial statements, this project is closely linked to Phase 1 of the IPSASB’s Conceptual Framework project (currently subject to public exposure), which sets out the objectives, users and qualitative characteristics of general purpose financial reports (GPFRs), which include the financial statements. This project will assume the same direction as the project on service performance reporting to be consistent with the users, user needs, and qualitative characteristics identified in the Conceptual Framework ED 1.
8. It may also need to consider the work currently under way in Phase 4 of the Conceptual Framework, dealing with presentation. This project deals with presentation of all GPFRs,
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.0 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 3 of 3
MJK February 2011
and may have an impact on how narrative reports on financial information are presented within a GPFR.
9. At this stage the point of this paper is not to reach any conclusions but to have a preliminary discussion of some of the issues inherent in the project and provide feedback to staff to further develop the Issues Paper.
10. A task-based group (TBG) has been established to develop this project. The TBG members are:
Hong Lou Bharti Prasad Ron Salole Frans van Schaik
11. The TBG met briefly in Jakarta to discuss the project. One of the issues they identified, on which the IPSASB’s views are sought, pertains to the relationship of this project with the project on service performance reporting. This issue is discussed in agenda paper 7.1.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 6.1March 2008 – Toronto, Canada Page 1 of 10
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD
PROJECT BRIEF AND OUTLINE
1. Subject – Narrative Reporting (NR)
This project will evaluate how a narrative explanation (termed Narrative Reporting for this project) by management should be used to enhance the usefulness of financial information provided by general purpose financial statements (GPFS).
2. Project Rationale and Objectives
In the private sector and in many governmental jurisdictions, it is reasonably widely accepted that NR enhances the usefulness of financial information. The focus of the project will be to identify and standardize the unique aspects of NR and how they “add value” in a public sector financial reporting context.
NR provides stakeholders with a narrative description of various matters, such as the major factors underlying the performance of the entity during the reporting period or the known factors which are likely to influence its performance in the future. This description can assist in placing aspects of the financial statements in context. NR can also enhance the value of financial information for decision making and to make assessments of the entity’s discharge of accountability.
As the appropriate scope of NR for the public sector is considered, the project will examine the current International Accounting Standards Boards (IASB) active project on Management Commentary (MC), as well as existing national standards and guidance on NR (or its equivalent) in the public and private sectors, where standards, guidance, and regulatory requirements for NR have a long history. In addition, NR approaches of other public sector bodies interested in making comparative fiscal information, such as Eurostat, IMF, World Bank and the United Nations will be considered.
a) Issues Identification
The main issues to be considered in the NR project are:
� What are the objectives of NR?
� What are the main attributes of high quality narrative explanations?
� Are there essential content elements to include in NR?
� What type of guidance is appropriate?
DRG February 2008
IFAC IPSASB Meeting March 2011-Paris France Appendix 1 – Approved Project Brief (for information)
Agenda Paper 7.0
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 6.1March 2008 – Toronto, Canada Page 2 of 10
DRG February 2008
b) Objectives to be achieved
The objective of the project is to provide guidance for NR.
The initial objective is to produce a Consultation Paper - “Narrative Reporting: Exploring the Issues for Standardization and Use in Public Sector General Purpose Financial Reporting.” The Consultation Paper will highlight and analyze existing approaches by the IASB and in jurisdictions where NR is a feature of governmental financial management.
Preliminary research conducted that indicates NR is used by various groups to enhance GPFR in current practice. Unlike traditional financial statements, NR often includes non-financial information coupled with financial information to explain the current status and potential future financial status while introducing the idea of prospective or future looking financial data. The project will consider whether the standardization of this process will improve financial reporting within the public sector.
i. Target Audience
The definition of the users and objectives of NR should correspond closely with the Conceptual Framework work as it develops.
In considering how NR will be developed for the public sector, a consideration of those who currently define the form and content of public sector narrative explanations will be undertaken. In establishing guidance we must be cognizant of regulators and/or the equivalent government agencies that currently set the form and content (i.e. US Office of Management & Budget, European Commission, FReM) of certain types of reporting.
ii. Project Deliverables
The next step in this project would be to develop a draft Consultation Paper to be presented at the June Moscow IPSASB meeting. Once approved, this Consultation Paper would be issued for comment and eventually lead to guidance or standards as necessary.
iii. Content of IPSAS
This is not a project directly related to the general purpose financial statements. Therefore, it is not feasible or appropriate to provide definitive final outputs at the initiation stage. Dependent upon decisions following analysis of submissions on a Consultation Paper, an Exposure Draft of a Standard and/or detailed Guidance will be developed.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting March 2011-Paris France Appendix 1 – Approved Project Brief (for information)
Agenda Paper 7.0
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 6.1March 2008 – Toronto, Canada Page 3 of 10
DRG February 2008
c) Link to IFAC/IPSASB Strategic Plans
i. Link to IPSASB Strategy
In the IPSASB Strategy and Operating Plan MD&A (NR) is listed as a potential project that is public sector specific and is identified as important. At the March 2007 meeting in Accra, the IPSASB approved the initiation of this project in 2008. The NR project was linked to the #2 IPSASB Strategic Theme of Public Sector specific project. High quality NR will enhance the quality and transparency of public sector financial reporting by providing better information for public sector financial management and decision making.
ii. Link to IFAC Strategic Plan
The alignment of the IPSASB Strategic theme concerning NR results in a direct impact on the IFAC Strategic Theme of “Recognition as the International Standard Setter” as well as a direct impact on the “Enhancement of collaborative efforts.”
3. Outline of the Project
a) Project Scope
The scope of the project is to determine how a narrative explanation by management in the public sector should be used to enhance the usefulness of financial information within general purpose financial statements (GPFS) and how it should be included within general purpose financial reporting (GPFR).
The NR guidance would apply to all public sector entities other than Government Business Enterprises.
Note that there are linkages with the Conceptual Framework, Long-Term Fiscal Sustainability and Performance Reporting projects.
b) Major Problems and Key Issues that Should be Addressed
Key Issue #1 - What are the objectives of NR?
The first issue will be to consider the objectives of narrative reporting since this will ultimately lead to developing the guidance needed to meet those objectives. The work of the IASB and national standard setters will be considered and evaluated in this context.
Key Issue #2 - What are the main attributes of high quality narrative explanations?
In establishing the main attributes that make narrative explanations useful and of high quality, the needs of the public sector GPFR user will be important. Certain definitions like “supplement and complement” will be explored. In addition, the term “through the eyes of management” will be assessed to determine if it is
IFAC IPSASB Meeting March 2011-Paris France Appendix 1 – Approved Project Brief (for information)
Agenda Paper 7.0
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 6.1March 2008 – Toronto, Canada Page 4 of 10
DRG February 2008
appropriate in the public sector and, if so what it means. The use of prospective forward looking information will also be considered.
Key Issue #3 - Are there essential content elements to include in NR?
There are a variety of approaches to the format and elements of NR prescribed by standard setters and regulators. It will be important to consider the approach that will yield the highest quality NR that allows comparison to other entities and periods.
Key Issue #4 – What type of Guidance is appropriate?
There are a number of potential ways that guidance could be developed, including:
� Recognizing best practices;
� Issuing specific non-mandatory guidance;
� Issuing a standard that applies when certain conditions exist
(IPSAS 24, “Presentation of Budget Information in Financial Statements); and
� Issuing a standard (revised or new) that is mandatory.
While the IPSASB has primarily issued standards, as the first project addressing reporting outside of GPFS, there may be other appropriate vehicles. In considering the type of guidance, audit and assurance aspects of NR will also be addressed.
4. Describe the Implications for any Specific Persons or Groups
a) Relationship to IASB
As noted, the IASB project on MC will be followed closely for points of convergence where possible.
b) Relationship to other projects in process or planned
There are close linkages with the Conceptual Framework project, Long Term Fiscal Sustainability, and Performance Reporting.
c) Other
This project has implications for the following:
� Assurance and verifiability (IAASB/INTOSAI); and
� Budget and statistical groups involved with public sector financial statements.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting March 2011-Paris France Appendix 1 – Approved Project Brief (for information)
Agenda Paper 7.0
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 6.1March 2008 – Toronto, Canada Page 5 of 10
DRG February 2008
5. Development Process, Project Timetable and Project Output
a) Development process
The development of outputs will be subject to the IPSASB’s formal due process. The issuance of documents for public comment will be subject to the usual IPSASB voting rules. As the project progresses, regular assessments will be made to confirm the proposed path in the project timetable remains the most appropriate.
The initial output will be a Consultation Paper. Following analysis of submissions on the Consultation Paper, a decision will be made on whether to develop an Exposure Draft of Reporting Requirements and/or Guidance. An Exposure Draft and/or Guidance will also be subject to formal due process, including a consultation period of at least four months.
b) Project timetable
The project timetable should identify the major project milestones and the expected timeline for achieving the objectives.
Major Project Milestones Expected Completion
Present Project Brief & Draft Issues Paper
March 2008
Approve Consultation Paper October 2008
Response date March 31, 2009
Analysis & ED October 2009
Response date March 31, 2010
Analysis of ED responses May/June 2010
Present and Approve Final IPSAS or Guidance as required
October 2010
c) Project output
The nature of the output will depend on the results of IPSASB process.
6. Resources Required
a) Task Force
A full Task Force is unlikely to be required; however, members may need to assist the Technical Staff with a broad understanding of current practices in both English and non-English speaking countries.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting March 2011-Paris France Appendix 1 – Approved Project Brief (for information)
Agenda Paper 7.0
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 6.1March 2008 – Toronto, Canada Page 6 of 10
DRG February 2008
This project has significant interplay with the current IASB project on Management Commentary and other projects by National Standard Setters in both the Public and Private Sectors.
The project would benefit from input from government agencies that set form and content of existing NR reports. Staff will reach out to groups like (FReM – FRAC, European Commission, US Office of Management and Budget, etc) for input.
b) Staff
One staff member will be required on this project for the period of the review (March 2008 – October 2010). It is anticipated that approximately one-third of an FTE would be needed.
c) Factors that might add to complexity or length
� Nature of Product;
� Interaction with other projects at the IPSASB (Conceptual Framework, Fiscal Sustainability, etc);
� Developments/Decisions with the IASB Management Commentary project;
� The IPSASB position of prospective forward looking information; and
� Implication to the Audit and Assurance community. Verifiability of NR.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting March 2011-Paris France Appendix 1 – Approved Project Brief (for information)
Agenda Paper 7.0
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 6.1March 2008 – Toronto, Canada Page 7 of 10
DRG February 2008
7. Important Sources of Information that Address the Matter being Proposed
IASB MC Project:
IASB Project Page Management Commentary Click here for MC Project Page
IPSAS Standards & Projects:
IPSAS 01 Presentation of Financial Statements Click here for IPSAS 01
IPSAS 24 Presentation of Budget information in Financial Statements
Click here for IPSAS 24
Fiscal Sustainability (current project)
Click here for FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY project page
IPSAS Conceptual Framework (current project)
Click here for CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK project page
IPSAS 18 - Segment Reporting Ctrl + Click here for IPSAS 18
IPSAS 22 - Disclosure of Financial Information General Government Sector
Click here for IPSAS 22
IPSAS Glossary of Defined Terms (as of December 31, 2006)
Click here for GLOSSARY
Public Sector Standard Setters:
Canada PSAB http://www.cica.ca//index.cfm/ci_id/225/la_id/1.htm
FReM - Financial Reporting Manual with consultation with the Financial Reporting Advisory Board and is issued by the relevant authorities in England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland http://www.financial-reporting.gov.uk/default.htm
French websites www.comptes-publics.gouv.fr or Conseil National de la comptabilite
USA GASB http://www.gasb.org/
USA FASAB http://www.fasab.gov/
IFAC IPSASB Meeting March 2011-Paris France Appendix 1 – Approved Project Brief (for information)
Agenda Paper 7.0
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 6.1March 2008 – Toronto, Canada Page 8 of 10
DRG February 2008
Private Sector Standard Setters:
Prepared by Date
(Technical Manager IPSASB)
The following should be completed after board or committee approval and after revising the project proposal form to reflect any changes by the board or committee.
Approved by Date
(Chair IPSASB)
IFAC IPSASB Meeting March 2011-Paris France Appendix 1 – Approved Project Brief (for information)
Agenda Paper 7.0
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 6.1March 2008 – Toronto, Canada Page 9 of 10
DRG February 2008
COMMENTS BY TECHNICAL MANAGERS The comments of Technical Manager from each technical area are required before this Project Proposal is considered by the board or committee proposing to undertake the project.
Technical Manager to the Compliance Advisory Panel
[Insert comments (prompts – views on importance of project, other matters wished to be communicated)]
Signed Date Technical Manager to the DNC
[Insert comments (prompts – views on importance of project, other matters wished to be communicated)]
Signed Date Technical Manager to the SMPC
[Insert comments (prompts – views on importance of project, other matters wished to be communicated)]
Signed Date Technical Manager to the IESBA
[Insert comments (prompts – views on importance of project, other matters wished to be communicated)]
Signed Date
IFAC IPSASB Meeting March 2011-Paris France Appendix 1 – Approved Project Brief (for information)
Agenda Paper 7.0
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 6.1March 2008 – Toronto, Canada Page 10 of 10
DRG February 2008
Technical Manager to the IAASB
[Insert comments (prompts – views on importance of project, other matters wished to be communicated)]
Signed Date Technical Manager to the PAIB Committee
[Insert comments (prompts – views on importance of project, other matters wished to be communicated)]
Signed Date Technical Manager to the IAESB
[Insert comments (prompts – views on importance of project, other matters wished to be communicated)]
Signed Date
Technical Manager to the Transnational Auditors Committee
[Insert comments (prompts – views on importance of project, other matters wished to be communicated)]
Signed Date
IFAC IPSASB Meeting March 2011-Paris France Appendix 1 – Approved Project Brief (for information)
Agenda Paper 7.0
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.0 March 2011 – Paris, France
MJK February 2011
Appendix 2 – Excerpt from Minutes on Narrative Reporting session from March 2008 IPSASB meeting
7. NARRATIVE REPORTING
A draft project brief was presented in preparation for the initiation of a project on Narrative Reporting in 2009. Staff had undertaken an initial analysis of issues to be considered, including considering the project in the context of “Rules of the Road”.
Members expressed initial agreement with the scope of the coverage proposed by Staff. They agreed that the project should be initiated only once responses to the Consultation Paper on Conceptual Framework (CF) have been considered. In addition they discussed using an incremental approach towards the evolution of this project with the initial step being focused on financial statement discussion and analysis and further steps going beyond to other aspects of performance reporting.
Staff was also directed to update the Project Brief and draft Issues Paper as follows: � Emphasis that this will not necessarily be an IPSAS but may be in the form of guidance; � Revise the project scope to start to draw a boundary/distinction between performance
reporting, budgetary reporting and narrative reporting, recognizing that there will be overlap and crossover issues that will need to be dealt with;
� Revise the brief to indicate a step-by-step approach to implementation, starting with NR on financial statements but leading to other steps that will correlate with the CF and more public sector specific focus (actual performance against budget, accountability in government, budget modifications, etc);
� Review and revise the public sector justification by further strengthening the accountability to stakeholders;
� Revise language such as “likelihood,” and consider more appropriate terms such as “risk.” � Recognize the need to explore forward looking information, in a fact based way; � Review and enhance the discussion of the whole-of-government versus entity level-of-
government, as well as consideration of a wide variety of other public sector entities, such as the United Nations;
� Explain the need to define “management” in a public sector context, including avoiding political connotations;
� Highlight a number of factors such as the relevance of qualitative characteristics, the need to avoid “boiler plating,” and concerns over the length of NR.
� Recognize that this project will consider the IASB Management Commentary project. However, the IASB project is not the driving force behind IPSASB’s NR project. NR should not be viewed as a convergence project because the different user base in the public sector makes the public sector specific needs quite clear. It is anticipated that there will be fewer correlations to private sector standards as the project moves beyond the financial statement phase; and
� Various editorial suggestions to improve the general readability.
A further version of the project brief will be distributed to Members for comment out of session.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 1 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
NARRATIVE REPORTING – ISSUES PAPER
Introduction
Background
1. At present, there is no internationally generally accepted form or content for narrative reports and the practice of narrative reporting varies across jurisdictions. For example, in some jurisdictions, the requirement to provide such reports is in legislation or regulation, while in others it is strictly voluntary. In some jurisdictions, there is a standard for narrative reporting issued by a standard-setting body specifically for public sector entities, while in other jurisdictions, the form and content of such reports may be left to management’s discretion. See agenda papers 6.2 and 6.3 for the research results.
2. This project was initiated to provide a framework for providing narrative reports. It is recognized that the form and content of such reports may, and should, vary among entities and across jurisdictions. Narrative reports are intended to provide insight into an entity’s specific circumstances, including the legal and economic circumstances of the jurisdiction in which an entity operates. A flexible approach, such as that adopted in the jurisdictions that have either issued standards on, or have a legal or regulatory requirement for, narrative reporting, will permit entities to discuss and analyze the trends, events, and factors that are most relevant to their particular circumstances. March 2008 Approved Project Brief
3. The Project Brief identified the scope of the project as follows:
The scope of the project is to determine how a narrative explanation by management in the public sector should be used to enhance the usefulness of financial information within general purpose financial statements (GPFSs) and how it should be included within general purpose financial reports (GPFRs). The guidance developed would apply to all public sector entities other than Government Business Enterprises.
4. The Project Brief identified the main issues to be considered in the narrative reporting
project as follows: • What are the objectives of narrative reporting? • What are the main attributes of high quality narrative explanations? • Are there essential content elements to include in narrative reporting?
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 2 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
• What type of guidance is appropriate? This paper will explore these issues as well as others identified by the TBG.
5. This project has linkages with the following active IPSASB projects: • The Conceptual Framework (especially Phase 1 and Phase 4); • Reporting on the Long-Term Sustainability of Public Finances (“long-term fiscal
sustainability”); and • Service Performance Reporting.
6. These other IPSASB projects will be considered as this project is developed. As discussed below, the objectives and users of general purpose financial reports (GPFRs) set out in the Conceptual Framework Phase 1 exposure draft are considered to be an appropriate basis for narrative reporting. In addition, the Phase 4 project on presentation may also contain guidance relevant to narrative reporting.
7. For example, as discussed below, some jurisdictions consider both long-term fiscal sustainability reporting and service performance reporting to be included in narrative reporting. In addition, the IPSASB may determine that those two projects, as well as narrative reporting, should have the same level of authoritative status.
8. In addition, the IASB issued the IFRS Practice Statement, Management Commentary: A Framework for Presentation in December 2010, which will also be considered to the extent that the Practice Statement is relevant to the public sector. Note that the approved Project Brief indicated this is not a convergence project.
Questions for the IPSASB: � Do you agree that the project should provide a definition of “narrative reporting”? � Are there any other issues this project should address in addition to those identified in
the approved Project Brief?
Definition of Narrative Reporting
9. The March 2008 Project Brief did not discuss a definition of narrative reporting. The IPSASB had decided to use the term instead of one involving the term “management”. Many of the existing standards refer to management`s involvement.
10. The TBG is of the view that a definition is required to clearly distinguish the scope of this project from others that might be considered to fall under the umbrella of “narrative
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 3 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
reporting” in some jurisdictions. Accordingly, this paper contains a discussion of elements of such a definition.
11. However, additional research on legislation and regulation governing such reports in the public sector and the development of other guidance and proposed pronouncements since the time the Project Brief was prepared have tended to use the term “narrative reporting” in a broader sense. For example, certain jurisdictions include service performance reporting and comparisons with budget within the scope or understanding of narrative reporting (e.g., FASAB, South African Treasury and Municipal Finance Act, New Zealand Public Finance Act 1989 and Local Government Act 2002 Schedule 10 Part 3). These are the subject of existing IPSASs or projects under way. There may also be requirements to report on compliance (e.g., New Zealand Local Government Act 2002 Schedule 10 Part 3).
12. In addition, the December 2010 Exposure Draft, Conceptual Framework for General Purpose Financial Reporting by Public Sector Entities: Role, Authority and Scope; Objectives and Users; Qualitative Characteristics; and Reporting Entity (Conceptual Framework ED 1), notes under the caption of “Narrative Reports”:
2.25 In some cases, quantitative measures of the outputs and outcomes of the entity’s service delivery activities during the period and anticipated activities in future periods will provide relevant information about the achievement of these service delivery objectives�for example, information about the cost, volume, and frequency of service delivery, and the relationship of services provided to the resource base of the entity. In other cases, the achievement of service delivery objectives may need to be communicated by an explanation of the quality of particular services provided or the outcome of certain programs.
This reference to the communication of an explanation of service delivery quality could imply that such an explanation would be part of the narrative report. However, the approved project brief excludes service performance reporting from the scope of this project.
13. The Israel Government Accounting Standards Board has issued draft guidance, Narrative Information Attached to the Financial Statements of a Public Sector Entity, which “… defines the preparation and presentation requirements of narrative information attached to financial statements of a public sector entity (here and after - "a management report"), which shall be attached to the annual financial statements of a public sector entity (here and after – "the entity") and be prepared by the entity's management.” It clearly links the term “narrative information” to the GPFS.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 4 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
14. On the other hand, the December 2010 IFRS Practice Statement defines management commentary as follows:
IN3. Management commentary is a narrative report that provides a context within which to interpret the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of an entity. It also provides management with an opportunity to explain its objectives and its strategies for achieving those objectives. Users routinely use the type of information provided in management commentary to help them evaluate an entity’s prospects and its general risks, as well as the success of management’s strategies for achieving its stated objectives. …
This definition implies there are other types of narrative reports than those specifically related to the financial statements, and clearly distinguishes such reports from other types of narrative reports.
15. The TBG is seeking the IPSASB’s confirmation that narrative reporting should not include or subsume service performance reporting, or other types of reports that may form part of the GPFR, but that it should deal strictly with the narrative analysis of the information contained in the GPFSs. This was the intended scope of the project as described in the March 2008 approved Project Brief.
16. The TBG is of the view that retaining the term used in the Project Brief will cause confusion, and that a more descriptive and specific term should be used. The covering memo accompanying the Project Brief indicated that “At this stage, staff proposes to use the term Narrative Reporting for operational purposes, with a view to determining the most appropriate title once the project has progressed.” The TBG seeks the IPSASB’s views on whether to use a different term to describe this specific type of financial reporting, and if so, what the term should be.
17. In doing so, it is necessary to consider whether to change the name from “narrative reporting” to avoid any potential confusion or overlap with the service performance reporting project. For example, the US public sector standards issued by the GASB and FASB term “management discussion and analysis”, and the private sector term “management commentary” are well understood. Canada’s public sector standard terms this type of reporting “financial statement discussion and analysis”. As noted above, Israel’s draft guidance uses the term “narrative information attached to financial statements” which is appealing because it clearly links to the financial statements without limiting the term “narrative reporting” which is used more broadly in some jurisdictions and pronouncements. The TBG suggests the term “narrative reporting on financial statements” to help reduce potential confusion on the scope of this project relative to the IPSASB project on service performance reporting. The remainder of this paper adopts that approach.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 5 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
18. Based on existing elements of definitions of narrative reporting on financial statements, a
possible definition (subject to change, as noted above) follows:
A narrative report on financial statements is a report by management included in the GPFR of the entity that complements and supplements the GPFS of the entity. It includes qualitative as well as quantitative analysis and discussion that provides a context within which users can interpret the entity’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the period.
19. However, if the IPSASB prefers a term referring to “management” in the definition, as is done in certain existing pronouncements, it is proposed that the starting point would be “key management personnel” IPSAS 20, Related Party Disclosures. Key management personnel would generally be those responsible for preparing a narrative report on financial statements.
Key Management Personnel 6. Key management personnel include all directors or members of the governing body of
the reporting entity, where that body has the authority and responsibility for planning, directing, and controlling the activities of the entity. At the whole-of-government level, the governing body may consist of elected or appointed representatives (for example, a president or governor, ministers, councilors and aldermen or their nominees).
7. Where an entity is subject to the oversight of an elected or appointed representative of
the governing body of the government to which the entity belongs, that person is included in key management personnel, if the oversight function includes the authority and responsibility for planning, directing, and controlling the activities of the entity. In many jurisdictions, key advisors of that person may not possess sufficient authority, legal or otherwise, to satisfy the definition of key management personnel. In other jurisdictions, key advisors of that person may be deemed to be key management personnel because they have a special working relationship with an individual who has control over an entity. They therefore have access to privileged information, and may also be able to exercise control or significant influence over an entity. Judgment is required in assessing whether an individual is a key advisor, and whether that advisor satisfies the definition of key management personnel, or is a related party.
8. The governing body, together with the chief executive and senior management group,
has the authority and responsibility to plan and control the activities of the entity, to manage the resources of the entity and for the overall achievement of entity objectives. Therefore, key management personnel will include the chief executive and senior management group of the reporting entity. In some jurisdictions, civil servants will not have sufficient authority and responsibility to qualify as key management personnel (as defined by this Standard) of the whole-of-government reporting entity. In these cases, key management personnel will consist only of those elected members of the governing body who have the greatest responsibility for the government; often these persons are referred to as Cabinet Ministers.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 6 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
9. The senior management group of an economic entity may comprise individuals from
both the controlling entity and other entities that collectively make up the economic entity.
20. The definition will be supplemented by identifying qualitative characteristics of such
reports that will best meet users’ needs (discussed later in this paper).
Questions for the IPSASB: � Do you agree that the scope of the project should be limited to information reported in
the GPFS? � Should the term used for such reports be changed to something more reflective of the
specific type of information presented (e.g., “narrative report on financial statements” as indicated above)?
� Are there any other elements that need to be included in the definition?
Objectives and Users of Narrative Reports on Financial Statements
21. This project will assume the same direction as the project on service performance reporting to be consistent with the users, user needs, and qualitative characteristics identified in the Conceptual Framework ED 1. Objectives of GPFRs
22. The objectives of narrative reporting on financial statements derive from those of GPFRs. Conceptual Framework ED 1 states:
2.1 The objectives of financial reporting by public sector entities are to provide information about the entity that is useful to users of GPFRs for accountability purposes and for decision-making purposes (hereafter referred to as “useful for accountability and decision-making purposes”).
2.2 Financial reporting is not an end in itself. Its purpose is to provide information useful to users of GPFRs. The objectives of financial reporting are therefore determined by reference to the users of GPFRs, and their information needs.
23. Accountability and decision making are the primary objectives of GPFRs of public sector entities. Information provided in GPFRs for accountability purposes will contribute to, and inform, decision making.
24. Accountability and decision making are likewise the overarching objectives of narrative reporting on financial statements. Accountability is the relationship between those who
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 7 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
control or manage an entity and those who possess formal power over them. Financial reporting is intended to provide information that helps a public sector entity fulfill its duty to be publicly accountable. However, public sector entities’ financial statements alone do not provide all of the information users of those statements need to make informed decisions. Additional quantitative and qualitative information may be required to provide a better context for understanding, interpreting, and assessing public sector GPFS. Objectives of Narrative Reporting on Financial Statements
25. Transactions entered into by public sector entities are increasingly complex and the GPFSs that report on such transactions are consequently increasingly complex and detailed. Narrative reporting on financial statements assists users in understanding and interpreting GPFS by providing more user-friendly descriptions of the entity’s financial operations than the financial statements alone, and in ways that users can readily understand. It may also demonstrate linkages and dependencies among financial statement items that users may not otherwise be able to discern.
26. Narrative reporting on financial statements may encourage better analysis of an entity’s current operations. For example, identification of the main events, trends, and factors influencing the current reporting period, provides useful information for decision making regarding the use of scarce resources. It may also help identify potential impacts on future reporting periods. Some pronouncements on narrative reporting require a forward-looking point of view (see Agenda Paper 7.2).
27. Frameworks for pronouncements (standards or guidance) developed by standard setters generally adopt an approach of linking the objectives pertaining to narrative reporting on financial statements to their financial reporting frameworks. Agenda Paper 7.2 summarizes the main objectives contained the various existing standards.
28. For example, the Israel Government Accounting Standards Board’s proposed guidance indicates the objective of such information is to “…provide to the users information about the entity's objectives and activities, including information about factors that affect the entity.” This is consistent with Conceptual Framework ED 1.
29. In jurisdictions for which narrative reporting on financial statements is required by
legislation or regulation, the objectives may not be specifically stated or may be stated in more general terms. Most legislation or regulation pertaining to narrative reporting on financial statements sets out requirements only. Agenda Paper 7.2.1 includes the summaries of legislative and regulatory requirements provided to staff by Members and TAs to date.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 8 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
30. For example, the South African Municipal Finance Act indicates the following purpose of
the annual report (of which the narrative report on financial statements is a part): (a) To provide a record of the activities of the municipality or municipal entity during
the financial year to which the report relates;
(b) To provide a report on performance against the budget of the municipality or municipal entity for that year; and
(c) To promote accountability to the local community for the decisions made throughout the year by the municipality or municipal entity.
Item (c) relates directly to the IPSASB GPFR objective of accountability.
31. The New Zealand annual report must provide the information that is necessary to enable an informed assessment to be made of the department’s performance during the financial year (including an assessment against the intentions, measures and standards set out at the start of the financial year in the information on the department’s future operating intentions in accordance with sections 40 and 41). This objective is consistent with the IPSASB GPFR objective of decision making.
32. In addition to the overall objectives of GPFRs, the main specific objectives of narrative reports on financial statements, identified from existing and proposed pronouncements and legislative and regulatory requirements (see agenda paper 7.2), include: (a) Enhance user understanding and usefulness of GPFRs;
(b) Expand and explain financial statement information (e.g., what has happened, why,
and implications);
(c) Provide context for the related financial statements; and
(d) Aid in understanding operations, successes, and challenges in present and future.
Questions for the IPSASB: � Do you agree with the identified objectives of narrative reporting on financial
statements identified in paragraph 32 above? � Are there objectives that should be added, deleted, or amended?
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 9 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
Users and their Needs
33. Conceptual Framework ED 1 identifies two groups primary users of GPFRs of public sector entities: (a) Service recipients (taxpayers and other members of the community that benefit from
the services provided by the government or other public sector entity, whether as a result of exchange or non-exchange transactions); and
(b) Resource providers (“involuntary resource providers” such as taxpayers, and
“voluntary resource providers” such as lenders, donors, suppliers, fee-for-service consumers and employees).
These two groups of users are also the identified users of narrative reports on financial statements. Narrative reporting on financial statements assists these users by providing information beyond that contained in the financial statements. It complements and supplements the financial statements by expanding on and explaining information contained in the financial statements.
34. As noted in Conceptual Framework ED 1, for accountability and decision-making
purposes, service recipients and their representatives require information as input to assessments of such matters as whether the range, volume and cost of services provided during the reporting period, and the amounts and sources of their cost recoveries, are appropriate and whether current levels of taxes or other charges are sufficient to maintain the volume and quality of services currently provided. They will also require information about the entity’s anticipated future objectives, and the amounts and sources of cost recoveries necessary to support those activities.
35. Resource providers require information as input to assessments of such matters as whether the entity is achieving the objectives established as the justification for the resources raised during the reporting period; funded current operations from funds raised in the current period from taxpayers or from borrowings or other sources; and is likely to need additional (or less) resources in the future, and the likely sources of those resources. Lenders and creditors require information as input to assessments of the liquidity of the entity and to confirm that the amount and timing of repayment will be as agreed.
36. Conceptual Framework ED 1 specifically discusses the usefulness of narrative reports in providing the information required by service recipients and their representatives and resource providers and their representatives:
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 10 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
2.24 Narrative reports can provide additional information about the major factors underlying the financial and service delivery performance of the entity during the reporting period. They can also outline the assumptions that underpin expectations about, and factors that are likely to influence, the entity’s future performance. This will assist users to better understand and place in context the financial and non-financial information included in GPFRs, and enhance the role of GPFRs in providing information useful for accountability and decision-making purposes.
37. Narrative reporting on financial statements may include quantitative analysis of significant
variances between the prior year and current year, including assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. This allows users to assess the results of past events, and identify future prospects. It also assists in understanding and assessing trends in the entity’s financial position and changes in financial position.
38. In some cases, a significant change may have occurred during the reporting period, but the financial statements and quantitative analyses my not illustrate a significant variance because of offsetting factors. Narrative explanations may identify and explain significant variances between the current year and prior year such as variances due to changes in how a service is delivered, changes in programs and services provided, and changes due to the level of revenues raised or costs incurred. Some of these may be within the control of the entity (e.g., taxation rates, new or discontinued programs or services, restructuring operations, or changing the method of service delivery), while others may be due to external factors (e.g., a decreased tax base, wage contracts, and unexpected events such as a natural disaster). Such explanations may assist users in assessing future services and commitments of the entity.
39. An analysis of financial assets provides information regarding the amount of resources available to be converted to cash if necessary. In addition, specific ratios and analysis of cash flows may be useful to highlight liquidity.
40. Analyses of revenues by major source may indicate trends and dependencies on specific revenue sources (e.g., government business enterprises (GBEs), transfers, or royalties).
41. Analyses of expenses may demonstrate the entity’s allocation and use of resources, provide insight into the cost of programs and services, and assist in evaluating the cost of borrowing to finance spending.
42. Discussion of significant commitments, contingencies, and subsequent events assists users in assessing future revenue requirements of the entity.
Questions for the IPSASB:
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 11 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
� Do you agree that the user needs identified above related to narrative reports on financial statements are also appropriate for narrative reporting?
Qualitative Characteristics of, and Constraints on, Information included in Narrative Reports
Qualitative Characteristics of Information Contained in GPFRs
43. Narrative reports on financial statements are part of GPFRs because they are intended to complement and supplement the GPFSs. Conceptual Framework ED 1 notes that “…the qualitative characteristics of information included in GPFRs are the attributes that make that information useful to users and support the achievement of the objectives of financial reporting.” As noted earlier, the objectives of financial reporting are to provide information useful for accountability and decision-making purposes.
44. Conceptual Framework ED 1 proposes the qualitative characteristics of information
contained in GPFRs are: � Relevance; � Faithful representation; � Understandability; � Timeliness; � Comparability; and � Verifiability.
45. Conceptual Framework ED 1 proposes the constraints are: � Materiality; � Cost-benefit; and � Balance between the qualitative characteristics.
46. These qualitative characteristics are discussed below in relation to narrative reporting. In addition, specific attributes of narrative reports on financial statements identified from the research, will be considered. Relevance
47. Conceptual Framework ED 1 proposes that financial and nonfinancial information is relevant if it is capable of making a difference in achieving the objectives of financial reporting. For narrative reports on financial information to be relevant they must pertain to the specific circumstances of the entity and add management’s insights. Management of an entity has the detailed knowledge of the transactions, events, and conditions reflected in the entity’s financial report and of the policies that govern the entity’s operations.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 12 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
Management also possess informed expectations regarding the future based on that knowledge. For example, some pronouncements on narrative reporting require a summary or overview of the entity’s objectives, significant events and conditions that affected the financial statements (e.g., significant changes, unplanned events), which provides the starting point for assessing the entity’s financial performance and trends.
48. Generic disclosures that do not relate to the specific operations, practices and circumstances of the entity would not be relevant. Likewise, information that simply repeats financial statement information or note disclosures in the financial statements without analysis or presenting discussions that do not provide insight into the entity’s past performance or prospects is unlikely to be relevant to users and may make it more difficult for them to understand the most significant matters the entity faces. For example, a discussion of the risks the entity faces would provide relevant information to users about exposure or vulnerability to concentrations (e.g., significant loans to particular regions or industries) or dependence on a particular source of revenue as noted above. �
Faithful representation 49. Conceptual Framework ED 1 proposes that faithful representation is attained when the
depiction of the phenomenon is complete, neutral, and free from material error. Narrative reports on financial information that faithfully represent the information would be: (a) based on currently-known facts, decisions, or conditions;
(b) consistent with the financial statements; and (c) balanced in discussing both positive and negative facts and views of management. Information that excludes certain facts (e.g., negative) is incomplete and thus could be biased (not neutral). In cases when a narrative report on financial information presents ratios, tables, or charts, they should not distort the information in the financial statements by, for example, using a scale that exaggerates a positive or negative trend.
50. Although some jurisdictions require or permit future-looking information to be presented, such information must also meet the conditions noted above. Understandability
51. Conceptual Framework ED 1 proposes that understandability is the quality of information that enables users to comprehend its meaning. Narrative reports on financial statements complement and supplement the financial statements. They are intended to help users of the financial statements by explaining the complex events and transactions in the financial
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 13 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
statements in a readable, clear, and simple manner. Reports are not understandable when they use descriptions that are too technical, or provide excessive detail or are too vague in describing those events and transactions. Timeliness
52. Conceptual Framework ED 1 proposes that timeliness means having information available for users before it loses its capacity to be useful for accountability and decision-making purposes. Narrative reports on financial statements discuss and analyze the current financial statements. In doing so, they may be useful in predicting future results by explaining significant changes and highlighting trends. They may, for example, include an analysis of trends in financial performance that provides information that is useful beyond the date of the narrative report. Comparability
53. Conceptual Framework ED 1 proposes that comparability is the quality of information that enables users to identify similarities in, and differences between, two sets of phenomena. It is not a quality of an individual item of information, but rather a quality of the relationship between two or more items of information. In some jurisdictions, comparisons with prior years’ results are required. Comparability would be enhanced when the same principles and practices are used for each period for such items as determining ratios and preparation of tables and charts included in a narrative report on financial statements. In addition, disclosure of those principles and practices, including underlying assumptions and formulae, may be useful in interpreting the analyses. Verifiability
54. Conceptual Framework ED 1 proposes that verifiability is the quality of information that helps assure users that information in GPRFs faithfully represents the phenomena that it purports to represent. In some cases it may not be possible to verify the accuracy of all qualitative and quantitative explanations of such information until a future period, if at all. For example, if the entity’s strategy (long-term and risk management) are included in a narrative report on financial statements, such information would be less verifiable than, for example, a ratio calculated from information provided in the financial statements. Verifiability is enhanced when the underlying assumptions and formulae used in the analyses are disclosed. In addition, the methodologies adopted in compiling it, and the factors and circumstances that support any opinions expressed or disclosures made, should be transparent. Materiality
55. Conceptual Framework ED 1 proposes that information is material if its omission or misstatement could influence the discharge of accountability by the entity, or the decisions
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 14 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
that users make on the basis of the entity’s GPFRs prepared for that reporting period. Narrative reports on financial statements must be concise to be useful, therefore management must select the most important matters to discuss. This means that some items that are material to the financial statements, notes, and other sections of the GPFFR may not be discussed in the narrative report on financial statements. For example, a line-by-line analysis of the financial statements is not generally appropriate. Instead, MD&A should summarize the most important items, explain the relevant causes and effects, and place them in context. Inclusion of immaterial disclosures could make the more important information difficult to find.
56. When dealing with qualitative or future-looking information (e.g., expectations about financial results in the future), it is not generally possible to specify a uniform quantitative threshold above which a particular type of information becomes material. Cost-benefit
57. Conceptual Framework ED 1 notes that the benefits of financial reporting should justify the costs it imposes. The benefit to users of a narrative report on financial statements that presents a clear and understandable analysis of the complex information contained in the financial statements must be weighed against such costs as collecting and processing the information used in the analysis, and presenting underlying assumptions and methodologies that support such analysis.
Balance between the qualitative characteristics
58. Conceptual Framework ED 1 notes that in some cases, a balancing or trade-off between qualitative characteristics may be necessary to achieve the objectives of financial reporting. For example, there is often a trade-off between the timeliness of information and its reliability. Narrative reports on financial statements should aim to achieve a balance among the qualitative characteristics to meet the objectives of providing the information. In some cases, depending on the circumstances of the entity, the relative importance of a particular qualitative characteristic may be greater than in others.
Questions for the IPSASB: � Are there additional factors that should be considered in discussing the qualitative
characteristics of narrative reports on financial information to those identified above? Main Attributes of High-quality Narrative Explanations
59. In addition to the overall objectives of GPFRs, the specific attributes of narrative reports on financial statements, identified from existing and proposed pronouncements and legislative and regulatory requirements (see agenda paper 6.2), include:
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 15 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
(a) Provide management perspective and insights, which is linked to relevance;
(b) Complement and supplement financial statements, which is linked to
understandability;
(c) Describe positive and negative circumstances (“balance”), which is linked to faithful representation;
(d) Interpret and assess financial statement information (e.g., whether the entity’s financial position has improved or deteriorated during the period), which is linked to relevance and faithful representation; and
(e) Identify main trends, events, and factors (both for current financial reporting period and likely to affect future performance, position and progress), which is linked to relevance and timeliness.
Questions for the IPSASB: � Do you agree with the specific attributes of narrative reports on financial statements
identified above? � Are there additional items that should be considered? � Should these specific attributes be considered as part of the qualitative characteristics?
Essential Content Elements of Narrative Reports on Financial Statements
Overview
60. There are a variety of approaches to the format and essential elements of narrative reports on financial statements in material issued by standard setters and regulators. It is important to consider the approach that will yield the highest quality narrative reports on financial statements that allow comparisons to other entities and periods.
Standards and Guidance issued by Standard Setters
61. Standard setters identified some similar elements of narrative reports on financial statements: a. Overview or summary;
b. Nature of the entity’s operations;
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 16 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
c. Risks and uncertainties;
d. Strategy (long-term and risk management); e. Changes from prior year; and
f. Analysis of significant trends. These elements were identified in the discussion of the qualitative characteristics, above, and are consistent with those underlying characteristics.
62. In addition to containing similar elements to those noted above, the Israel draft guidance contains the following essential elements for the Management Report (the term used for narrative information attached to financial statements of a public sector entity), which are more specific to that country:
A Management Report shall include an overview of the data from the entity's financial statements, in accordance with its operations, as follows:
(a) The financial position of the entity; (b) The operating results; (c) Special events; (d) Contingent liabilities; (e) Critical accounting estimates.
In addition, significant detailed guidance is provided for each of these items. These requirements are similar to those found in legislative or regulatory requirements for narrative reporting on financial statements in other jurisdictions (see below). Legislative and Regulatory Requirements
63. Legislative or regulatory requirements tend to reflect the specific needs of the jurisdiction, and may not, therefore, provide relevant information to users in other jurisdictions.
64. Article 58(1) of the Central Government of the Netherlands Government Accounting Act 2001 requires that: (a) The financial information includes information on obligations, expenditures, income,
revenues, expenses, capital expenditures, capital income and balance sheet items, as stated in the accounting records and the accompanying notes.
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 17 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
(b) The financial information presented in the annual report can be clearly distinguished from the non-financial information.
65. The Netherlands’�Besluit begroting en verantwoording provincies en gemeenten for local
governments requires the budget1 to at least contain the following paragraphs, unless the aspect concerned is irrelevant for the respective province or municipality: (a) local taxes;(b) financial strength;(c) maintenance of capital assets;(d) financing;(e) management;(f) related parties; and(g) land use policy. Certain of these aspects would be within the scope of narrative reports on financial statements, while others are specific requirements of the jurisdiction`s regulatory framework.
66. Japanese agencies of central government, which are called “Incorporated Administrative Agencies”, and national universities must prepare for their annual reports including “business report”, which is considered similar to “narrative reporting”. The annual report is required to include:
Financial Information (1) Overview of Financial Statements; (2) Overview of Investments (e.g., facilities); (3) Overview of Budgeted Amounts and Actual Amounts; and (4) The Relationship between Reduction of Expenses and the Target of Efficiency.
There are also some practices in Japan where national and local governments prepare narrative explanations regarding particularly changes in financial statements items. There are no prescribed standards or guidelines.
Questions for the IPSASB: � Do you agree with the main common elements of narrative reports on financial
statements identified in paragraph 61? ������������������������������������������������������������1�� The annual report should contain the paragraphs that are included in the budget in accordance with Article 9.
These contain the justification of that which is included in the respective paragraphs in the budget.
�
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 18 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
� Should guidance be provided at the level of detailed requirements in legislation and regulation identified above (paragraphs 63–66), or should it be more broadly based?
� Are there additional items that should be considered as essential content elements (e.g., the entity’s objectives, specific financial statement items such as contingencies and estimates), or should the essential content elements be limited to identification of “significant financial statement items” and examples of such items be provided (e.g., assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, contingent liabilities, accounting estimates)?
Type of Guidance
67. While the IPSASB supports the need for narrative reports on financial statements as a means of improving public sector entities’ accountability and decision making, it acknowledges that the current state of such reporting is still in its early stages of its evolution and development, and that the form and content of narrative reports on financial statements are expected to develop in the future. For example based on the research done, it was found that in some jurisdictions, narrative reporting: g. is required with detailed requirements set out in legislation or regulation;
h. is required with detailed requirements set out in standards (e.g., GASB and FASAB in
the US, and the UK FReM);
i. is voluntary, and there may or may not be standards in place; or j. is not required.
68. Paragraph BC 1.7 of Conceptual Framework ED 1 points out that a more comprehensive scope for financial reporting, such as narrative reports on financial statements, does not mean that it is inevitable that authoritative requirements will be developed.
69. The Project Brief indicated that the decision on the type of pronouncement to be issued by the IPSASB ranges from: k. Recognizing best practices;
l. Issuing specific non-mandatory guidance; m. Issuing a standard that applies when certain conditions exist (e.g., IPSAS 24,
Presentation of Budget Information in Financial Statements); and
IFAC IPSASB Meeting Agenda Paper 7.1 March 2011 – Paris, France Page 19 of 19 �
Prepared by: MJK February 2011
n. Issuing a mandatory IPSAS.
70. Given the state of current practice, it is not expected that this project would mandate which entities should be required to publish narrative reports, how frequently an entity should do so, or the level of assurance to which narrative reports should be subjected. Accordingly, it is proposed that this project develop guidance that is non-authoritative. Such guidance would provide a framework for the preparation of high-quality narrative reports on financial statements in jurisdictions in which such reports are required, that helps achieve the objectives of GPFRs by improving accountability and decision making in the public sector. The guidance would be used by public sector entities that do present narrative reports that relates to financial statements prepared in accordance with IPSASs.
71. However, the nature of the guidance developed and its authoritative status will ultimately depend on the IPSASB’s decisions on this issue in the current IPSASB projects on service performance reporting and long-term fiscal sustainability.
�
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
Age
nda
Pape
r 7.
2 M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
1 o
f 7
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
App
endi
x A
– E
XIS
TIN
G P
RO
NO
UN
CE
ME
NT
S SU
MM
AR
IZE
D
Exa
mpl
es o
f Sta
ndar
ds a
nd G
uida
nce
on N
arra
tive
Rep
ortin
g on
Fin
anci
al S
tate
men
ts (f
or p
ublic
sect
or u
nles
s not
ed o
ther
wis
e)
Fe
dera
l Acc
ount
ing
Stan
dard
s A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd (U
nite
d St
ates
of
Am
eric
a)
Fina
ncia
l Rep
ortin
g M
anua
l (FR
eM) (
UK
–
HM
Tre
asur
y1
Gov
ernm
enta
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Uni
ted
Stat
es o
f A
mer
ica)
Inte
rnat
iona
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Priv
ate
Sect
or)
Isra
el G
over
nmen
t A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
Publ
ic S
ecto
r A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(CIC
A, C
anad
a)
Term
use
d fo
r th
is ty
pe o
f re
port
Man
agem
ent D
iscu
ssio
n an
d A
naly
sis (
MD
&A
) O
pera
ting
and
Fina
ncia
l R
evie
w (O
FR)
Man
agem
ent D
iscu
ssio
n an
d A
naly
sis (
MD
&A
) M
anag
emen
t C
omm
enta
ry
Nar
rativ
e In
form
atio
n A
ttach
ed to
the
Fina
ncia
l St
atem
ents
of a
Pub
lic
Sect
or E
ntity
Fina
ncia
l Sta
tem
ent
Dis
cuss
ion
and
Ana
lysi
s (F
SD&
A)
Type
of
Pron
ounc
emen
t St
anda
rd /C
once
pts
SSFA
SC 3
is n
ot
“pre
scrib
ed g
uide
line
for
requ
ired
supp
lem
enta
ry
info
rmat
ion
(RSI
)”
SSFA
S 15
is re
quire
d
St
anda
rds
Stat
emen
t No,
34
deal
s w
ith S
tate
and
Loc
al
Gov
ernm
ents
St
atem
ent N
o. 3
5 de
als
with
Pub
lic C
olle
ges a
nd
Uni
vers
ities
Non
-man
dato
ry g
uida
nce
Man
dato
ry g
uida
nce
(for
an
ent
ity th
at p
repa
res
and
pres
ents
fina
ncia
l st
atem
ents
und
er th
e ac
crua
l bas
is o
f ac
coun
ting)
Non
-man
dato
ry
guid
ance
– S
tate
men
t of
Rec
omm
ende
d Pr
actic
e (S
OR
P)
Obj
ectiv
es
MD
&A
is a
n im
porta
nt
vehi
cle
for (
1)
com
mun
icat
ing
man
ager
s’ in
sigh
ts a
bout
th
e re
porti
ng e
ntity
, (2)
in
crea
sing
the
unde
rsta
ndab
ility
and
us
eful
ness
of t
he
GPF
FR, a
nd (3
) pr
ovid
ing
acce
ssib
le
info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
en
tity
and
its o
pera
tions
,
A
ssis
t use
rs in
ass
essi
ng
whe
ther
the
finan
cial
po
sitio
n ha
s im
prov
ed o
r de
terio
rate
d as
a re
sult
of
the
year
’s a
ctiv
ities
�M
anag
emen
t co
mm
enta
ry is
a
narr
ativ
e re
port
that
pr
ovid
es a
con
text
w
ithin
whi
ch to
in
terp
ret t
he fi
nanc
ial
posi
tion,
fina
ncia
l pe
rfor
man
ce a
nd c
ash
flow
s of a
n en
tity.
It
also
pro
vide
s m
anag
emen
t with
an
oppo
rtuni
ty to
exp
lain
To p
rovi
de to
the
user
s in
form
atio
n ab
out t
he
entit
y's o
bjec
tives
and
ac
tiviti
es, i
nclu
ding
in
form
atio
n ab
out
fact
ors t
hat a
ffec
t the
en
tity.
A M
anag
emen
t Rep
ort
shou
ld b
e us
ed a
s an
addi
tion
and
as a
co
mpl
etio
n of
a p
ublic
1 Th
e FR
eM is
is th
e te
chni
cal a
ccou
ntin
g gu
ide
that
com
plem
ents
gui
danc
e on
the
hand
ling
of p
ublic
fund
s pub
lishe
d se
para
tely
by
the
rele
vant
aut
horit
ies.
The
Man
ual i
s pre
pare
d fo
llow
ing
cons
ulta
tion
with
the
Fina
ncia
l Rep
ortin
g A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd a
nd is
issu
ed b
y th
e re
leva
nt a
utho
ritie
s in
Engl
and
and
Wal
es, S
cotla
nd a
nd N
orth
ern
Irel
and.
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
Age
nda
Pape
r 7.
2 M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
2 o
f 7
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Fe
dera
l Acc
ount
ing
Stan
dard
s A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd (U
nite
d St
ates
of
Am
eric
a)
Fina
ncia
l Rep
ortin
g M
anua
l (FR
eM) (
UK
–
HM
Tre
asur
y1
Gov
ernm
enta
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Uni
ted
Stat
es o
f A
mer
ica)
Inte
rnat
iona
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Priv
ate
Sect
or)
Isra
el G
over
nmen
t A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
Publ
ic S
ecto
r A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(CIC
A, C
anad
a)
serv
ice
leve
ls, s
ucce
sses
, ch
alle
nges
, and
futu
re.
Som
e fe
dera
l age
ncie
s al
so re
fer t
o M
D&
A a
s th
e “o
verv
iew
.”
its o
bjec
tives
and
its
stra
tegi
es fo
r ach
ievi
ng
thos
e ob
ject
ives
. Use
rs
rout
inel
y us
e th
e ty
pe
of in
form
atio
n pr
ovid
ed in
m
anag
emen
t co
mm
enta
ry to
hel
p th
em e
valu
ate
an
entit
y’s p
rosp
ects
and
its
gen
eral
risk
s, as
w
ell a
s the
succ
ess o
f m
anag
emen
t’s
stra
tegi
es fo
r ach
ievi
ng
its st
ated
obj
ectiv
es.
For m
any
entit
ies,
man
agem
ent
com
men
tary
is a
lread
y an
impo
rtant
ele
men
t of
thei
r com
mun
icat
ion
with
the
capi
tal
mar
kets
, su
pple
men
ting
as w
ell
as c
ompl
emen
ting
the
finan
cial
stat
emen
ts.
�M
anag
emen
t co
mm
enta
ry sh
ould
pr
ovid
e in
form
atio
n to
he
lp u
sers
of t
he
finan
cial
repo
rts to
as
sess
the
perf
orm
ance
of
the
entit
y an
d th
e ac
tions
of i
ts
man
agem
ent r
elat
ive
to
stat
ed st
rate
gies
and
sect
or e
ntity
's fin
anci
al
stat
emen
ts, t
hrou
gh
pres
enta
tion
of n
on-
mon
etar
y in
form
atio
n ab
out t
he e
ntity
's op
erat
ions
and
ana
lysi
s of
the
entit
y's o
pera
tion
from
poi
nt o
f m
anag
emen
t's v
iew
, and
th
roug
h re
fere
nce
to
fore
cast
s and
forw
ard-
look
ing
info
rmat
ion.
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
Age
nda
Pape
r 7.
2 M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
3 o
f 7
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Fe
dera
l Acc
ount
ing
Stan
dard
s A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd (U
nite
d St
ates
of
Am
eric
a)
Fina
ncia
l Rep
ortin
g M
anua
l (FR
eM) (
UK
–
HM
Tre
asur
y1
Gov
ernm
enta
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Uni
ted
Stat
es o
f A
mer
ica)
Inte
rnat
iona
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Priv
ate
Sect
or)
Isra
el G
over
nmen
t A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
Publ
ic S
ecto
r A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(CIC
A, C
anad
a)
plan
s for
pro
gres
s. �
Inte
grat
ed in
form
atio
n th
at p
rovi
des a
con
text
fo
r the
rela
ted
finan
cial
st
atem
ents
Spec
ific
Attr
ibut
es
�Su
pple
men
t &
com
plem
ent G
PFS
�M
gmt i
nsig
hts
�B
alan
ced
(pos
itive
and
ne
gativ
e)
�“V
ital f
ew”
mat
ters
ad
dres
sed
(mat
eria
lity)
�
Forw
ard-
look
ing
info
rmat
ion
rega
rdin
g th
e po
ssib
le fu
ture
ef
fect
s of t
he m
ost
impo
rtant
exi
stin
g,cu
rren
tly-k
now
n de
man
ds, r
isks
, un
certa
intie
s, ev
ents
, co
nditi
ons a
nd tr
ends
�
May
als
o in
clud
e fo
rwar
d-lo
okin
g in
form
atio
n ab
out
the
poss
ible
effe
cts
of a
ntici
pate
d fu
ture
dem
ands
, ev
ents
, con
ditio
ns,
and
tren
ds
�In
trodu
ce th
e fin
anci
al
stat
emen
ts a
nd p
rovi
de
an a
naly
tical
ove
rvie
w
of th
e go
vern
men
t’s
finan
cial
act
iviti
es
�Su
pple
men
t &
com
plem
ent
�O
bjec
tive
�Ea
sily
read
able
�
Bas
ed o
n cu
rren
tly-
know
n fa
cts,
deci
sion
s, or
con
ditio
ns th
at a
re
expe
cted
to h
ave
a si
gnifi
cant
eff
ect o
n fin
anci
al p
ositi
on a
nd
resu
lts o
f ope
ratio
ns
(fw
d-lo
okin
g)
�Pr
ovid
e an
ana
lysi
s of
the
entit
y’s o
vera
ll fin
anci
al p
ositi
on a
nd
resu
lts o
f ope
ratio
ns
�Fa
ct b
ased
�
Focu
s on
prim
ary
gove
rnm
ent n
ot
com
pone
nt u
nits
�
Dis
cuss
cur
rent
yea
r re
sults
com
pare
d w
ith
prio
r yea
r (fo
cus o
n
�M
anag
emen
t’s v
iew
�
Man
agem
ent s
houl
d de
term
ine
the
info
rmat
ion
to in
clud
e in
Man
agem
ent
com
men
tary
cons
ider
ing
the
need
s of
the
prim
ary
user
s of
finan
cial
repo
rts. T
hose
us
ers a
re e
xist
ing
and
pote
ntia
l inv
esto
rs,
lend
ers a
nd o
ther
cr
edito
rs.
�Ex
plai
ns
man
agem
ent’s
vie
w
not o
nly
abou
t wha
t ha
s hap
pene
d,
incl
udin
g bo
th p
ositi
ve
and
nega
tive
circ
umst
ance
s, bu
t als
o w
hy it
has
hap
pene
d an
d w
hat t
he
impl
icat
ions
are
for t
he
entit
y’s f
utur
e �
Com
plem
ents
and
su
pple
men
ts th
e fin
anci
al st
atem
ents
by
com
mun
icat
ing
�D
ata
incl
uded
in th
e M
anag
emen
t Rep
ort
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith
the
man
agem
ent's
ju
dgm
ent a
bout
the
impo
rtanc
e of
thos
e da
ta to
the
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
the
entit
y's f
inan
cial
po
sitio
n an
d op
erat
ions
by
a re
ason
able
use
r �
Supp
lem
ent &
co
mpl
emen
t GPF
S �
Man
agem
ent’s
vie
w
�Fo
rwar
d lo
okin
g �
Obj
ectiv
e an
alys
is o
f th
e en
tity’
s op
erat
ions
, inc
ludi
ng
a di
scus
sion
of t
he
posi
tive
and
nega
tive
view
s of i
ts
oper
atio
ns a
nd th
e ef
fect
s of v
ario
us
even
ts
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
Age
nda
Pape
r 7.
2 M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
4 o
f 7
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Fe
dera
l Acc
ount
ing
Stan
dard
s A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd (U
nite
d St
ates
of
Am
eric
a)
Fina
ncia
l Rep
ortin
g M
anua
l (FR
eM) (
UK
–
HM
Tre
asur
y1
Gov
ernm
enta
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Uni
ted
Stat
es o
f A
mer
ica)
Inte
rnat
iona
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Priv
ate
Sect
or)
Isra
el G
over
nmen
t A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
Publ
ic S
ecto
r A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(CIC
A, C
anad
a)
curr
ent y
ear)
�
Posi
tive
and
nega
tive
aspe
cts
�U
se o
f cha
rts, g
raph
s, an
d ta
bles
is e
ncou
rage
d to
enh
ance
un
ders
tand
abili
ty
�Fi
nanc
ial m
anag
ers
enco
urag
ed to
repo
rt
only
the
mos
t rel
evan
t in
form
atio
n (a
void
“b
oile
rpla
te”)
�
At a
min
imum
, MD
&A
sh
ould
incl
ude:
a.
A b
rief d
iscu
ssio
n of
the
basi
c f/s
b.
Con
dens
ed
finan
cial
in
form
atio
n de
rived
fr
om g
ov’t-
wid
e f/s
inte
grat
ed in
form
atio
n ab
out t
he e
ntity
’s
reso
urce
s and
the
clai
ms a
gain
st th
e en
tity
and
its re
sour
ces,
and
the
trans
actio
ns
and
othe
r eve
nts t
hat
chan
ge th
em. e
xpla
in
the
mai
n tre
nds a
nd
fact
ors t
hat a
re li
kely
to
aff
ect t
he e
ntity
’s
futu
re p
erfo
rman
ce,
posi
tion
and
prog
ress
�C
omm
enta
ry sh
ould
be
cons
iste
nt w
ith th
e fo
llow
ing
prin
cipl
es:
(a)
to p
rovi
de
man
agem
ent’s
vi
ew o
f the
en
tity’
s pe
rfor
man
ce,
posi
tion
and
prog
ress
; and
(b
) to
supp
lem
ent a
nd
com
plem
ent
info
rmat
ion
pres
ente
d in
the
finan
cial
st
atem
ents
. M
C sh
ould
be
cons
iste
nt
with
the
rela
ted
f/s b
ut
avoi
d du
plic
atio
n w
ith
note
dis
clos
ures
M
C sh
ould
avo
id g
ener
ic
disc
losu
res a
nd ta
ke in
to
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
Age
nda
Pape
r 7.
2 M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
5 o
f 7
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Fe
dera
l Acc
ount
ing
Stan
dard
s A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd (U
nite
d St
ates
of
Am
eric
a)
Fina
ncia
l Rep
ortin
g M
anua
l (FR
eM) (
UK
–
HM
Tre
asur
y1
Gov
ernm
enta
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Uni
ted
Stat
es o
f A
mer
ica)
Inte
rnat
iona
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Priv
ate
Sect
or)
Isra
el G
over
nmen
t A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
Publ
ic S
ecto
r A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(CIC
A, C
anad
a)
acco
unt m
ater
ialit
y Sh
ould
take
n in
to
acco
unt q
ualit
ativ
e ch
arac
teris
tics o
f re
leva
nce
and
faith
ful
repr
esen
tatio
n,co
mpa
rabi
lity,
ve
rifia
bilit
y, ti
mel
ines
s an
dun
ders
tand
abili
tyFo
rwar
d lo
okin
g
Esse
ntia
l Con
tent
M
D&
A sh
ould
add
ress
: �
the
entit
y’s m
issi
on
and
orga
niza
tiona
l st
ruct
ure;
�
the
entit
y’s
perf
orm
ance
goa
ls
and
resu
lts;
�th
e en
tity’
s fin
anci
al
stat
emen
ts;
�th
e en
tity’
s sys
tem
s, co
ntro
ls, a
nd le
gal
com
plia
nce;
and
�
the
poss
ible
futu
re
effe
cts o
n th
e en
tity
of e
xist
ing,
cur
rent
ly-
know
n de
man
ds,
risks
, unc
erta
intie
s, ev
ents
, con
ditio
ns
and
trend
s. M
D&
A sh
ould
als
o ad
dres
s the
repo
rting
en
tity’
s act
ions
take
n or
pl
anne
d to
add
ress
pr
oble
ms a
nd si
gnifi
cant
Sh
ould
pro
vide
an
anal
ysis
of s
igni
fican
t ch
ange
s tha
t occ
ur in
fu
nds a
nd si
gnifi
cant
bu
dget
var
ianc
es.
Shou
ld d
escr
ibe
capi
tal
asse
t and
l-t d
ebt a
ctiv
ity
durin
g th
e ye
ar.
Shou
ld c
oncl
ude
with
a
desc
riptio
n of
cur
rent
ly
know
n fa
cts,
deci
sion
s, or
co
nditi
ons t
hat a
re
expe
cted
to h
ave
a si
gnifi
cant
eff
ect o
n fin
anci
al p
ositi
on o
r re
sults
of o
pera
tions
.
Alth
ough
the
parti
cula
r fo
cus o
f man
agem
ent
com
men
tary
will
dep
end
on th
e fa
cts a
nd
circ
umst
ance
s of t
he
entit
y, m
anag
emen
t co
mm
enta
rysh
ould
incl
ude
info
rmat
ion
that
is
esse
ntia
l to
an
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
: (a
) th
e na
ture
of t
he
busi
ness
; (b
) m
anag
emen
t’s
obje
ctiv
es a
nd it
s st
rate
gies
for
mee
ting
thos
e ob
ject
ives
; (c
) th
e en
tity’
s mos
t si
gnifi
cant
reso
urce
s, ris
ks a
nd
rela
tions
hips
; (d
) th
e re
sults
of
oper
atio
ns a
nd
pros
pect
s; a
nd
The
Man
agem
ent R
epor
t sh
all r
efer
and
pro
vide
ex
plan
atio
ns a
bout
the
key
data
in th
e fin
anci
al
stat
emen
ts w
ithin
a
desc
riptio
n of
ent
ity's
segm
ents
. The
M
anag
emen
t Rep
ort
shal
l als
o in
clud
e in
form
atio
n ab
out n
on-
mon
etar
y da
ta, i
nclu
ding
da
ta u
sed
by th
e en
tity
for i
ts se
gmen
t ana
lysi
s an
d go
als a
chie
vem
ent.
A
Man
agem
ent R
epor
t sh
all i
nclu
de a
n ov
ervi
ew o
f the
dat
a fr
om th
e en
tity'
s fin
anci
al st
atem
ents
, in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith it
s op
erat
ions
, as f
ollo
ws:
(a
)Th
e fin
anci
al
posi
tion
of th
e
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
Age
nda
Pape
r 7.
2 M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
6 o
f 7
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Fe
dera
l Acc
ount
ing
Stan
dard
s A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd (U
nite
d St
ates
of
Am
eric
a)
Fina
ncia
l Rep
ortin
g M
anua
l (FR
eM) (
UK
–
HM
Tre
asur
y1
Gov
ernm
enta
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Uni
ted
Stat
es o
f A
mer
ica)
Inte
rnat
iona
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Priv
ate
Sect
or)
Isra
el G
over
nmen
t A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
Publ
ic S
ecto
r A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(CIC
A, C
anad
a)
even
ts, c
ondi
tions
, tre
nds a
nd c
ontin
genc
ies
that
may
aff
ect f
utur
e op
erat
ions
.
(e)
the
criti
cal
perf
orm
ance
m
easu
res a
nd
indi
cato
rs th
at
man
agem
ent u
ses
entit
y;
(b)
The
oper
atin
gre
sults
; (c
)Sp
ecia
l eve
nts;
(d
)C
ontin
gent
lia
bilit
ies;
(e
)C
ritic
al a
ccou
ntin
g es
timat
es.
Man
agem
ent R
epor
t sh
all i
nclu
de th
e fo
llow
ing
info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
pub
lic se
ctor
en
tity'
s ope
ratio
ns:
(a)
Con
dens
ed
desc
riptio
n of
the
entit
y an
d th
e en
viro
nmen
t in
whi
ch it
ope
rate
s;
(b)
The
entit
y's s
trate
gy
for
the
long
-term
an
d fo
r th
e sh
ort-
term
; (c
)Th
e en
tity'
s co
nduc
ting;
(d
)Th
e en
tity'
s in
tern
atio
nal
activ
ity
An
entit
y sh
all s
peci
fy
the
chan
ges i
t mad
e du
ring
the
last
yea
r and
th
eir i
nflu
ence
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith th
e de
tails
men
tione
d
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
Age
nda
Pape
r 7.
2 M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
7 o
f 7
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Fe
dera
l Acc
ount
ing
Stan
dard
s A
dvis
ory
Boa
rd (U
nite
d St
ates
of
Am
eric
a)
Fina
ncia
l Rep
ortin
g M
anua
l (FR
eM) (
UK
–
HM
Tre
asur
y1
Gov
ernm
enta
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Uni
ted
Stat
es o
f A
mer
ica)
Inte
rnat
iona
l A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(Priv
ate
Sect
or)
Isra
el G
over
nmen
t A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
Publ
ic S
ecto
r A
ccou
ntin
g St
anda
rds
Boa
rd
(CIC
A, C
anad
a)
abov
e.Su
bjec
t to
Aud
it?
Yes
– re
quire
d su
pple
men
tal
info
rmat
ion
(RSI
)
Y
es –
requ
ired
supp
lem
enta
l inf
orm
atio
n (R
SI)
Y
es –
an
inte
gral
par
t of
the
finan
cial
stat
emen
ts
No
– no
t par
t of G
PFS
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
1 o
f 27
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Juris
dict
ion
Japa
nB
ody
issu
ing
pron
ounc
emen
t M
inis
try o
f Int
erna
l Aff
airs
and
Com
mun
icat
ions
(see
bel
ow)
Nat
ure
and
desc
riptio
n of
Pr
onou
ncem
ent
Min
istry
of I
nter
nal A
ffai
rs a
nd C
omm
unic
atio
ns d
evel
oped
the
man
dato
ry g
uide
line
for a
nnua
l rep
orts
pr
epar
ed b
y ag
enci
es o
f cen
tral g
over
nmen
t. Th
ere
are
no p
resc
ribed
stan
dard
s or g
uide
lines
for l
ocal
gov
ernm
ents
. Th
ere
are
no p
resc
ribed
stan
dard
s or g
uide
lines
for n
arra
tive
repo
rting
issu
ed b
y a
stan
dard
-set
ting
body
. Ty
pe o
f org
aniz
atio
ns in
sc
ope
Japa
nese
age
ncie
s of c
entra
l gov
ernm
ent,
whi
ch is
cal
led
“Inc
orpo
rate
d A
dmin
istra
tive
Age
ncie
s “, a
nd
natio
nal u
nive
rsiti
es m
ust p
repa
re fo
r the
ir an
nual
repo
rts in
clud
ing
“bus
ines
s rep
ort”
, whi
ch is
con
side
red
sim
ilar t
o “N
arra
tive
Rep
ortin
g”.
Mai
n re
quire
men
ts o
f St
anda
rd
For c
entra
l gov
ernm
ent a
nnua
l rep
orts
, the
gui
delin
e st
ates
the
min
imum
requ
irem
ents
of a
nnua
l rep
orts
as
follo
ws:
1.
Exec
utiv
e Su
mm
ary
2.
Bas
ic In
form
atio
n 3.
Th
e Su
mm
ary
of F
inan
cial
Sta
tem
ents
4.
Fi
nanc
ial I
nfor
mat
ion
(a)
Ove
rvie
w o
f Fin
anci
al S
tate
men
ts
(b)
Ove
rvie
w o
f Inv
estm
ents
(e.g
. fac
ilitie
s)
(c)
Ove
rvie
w o
f Bud
gete
d A
mou
nts a
nd A
ctua
l Am
ount
s (d
)Th
e R
elat
ions
hip
betw
een
Red
uctio
n of
Exp
ense
s and
the
Targ
et o
f Eff
icie
ncy
5.
Th
e Ex
plan
atio
n of
Out
puts
and
Out
com
es
(a)
The
stru
ctur
e of
Rev
enue
s (b
)Th
e Ex
plan
atio
n of
Out
puts
and
Out
com
es re
late
d to
the
Fina
ncia
l Dat
a O
ther
info
rmat
ion
Ther
e ar
e so
me
prac
tices
whe
re n
atio
nal a
nd lo
cal g
over
nmen
ts p
repa
re n
arra
tive
expl
anat
ion
rega
rdin
g pa
rticu
larly
cha
nge
in fi
nanc
ial s
tate
men
ts it
ems.
Ther
e ar
e no
pre
scrib
ed st
anda
rds o
r gui
delin
es. T
here
fore
, pr
actic
es o
f loc
al g
over
nmen
ts v
ary.
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
2 o
f 27
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Juris
dict
ion
The
Net
herla
nds
Bod
y is
suin
g pr
onou
ncem
ent
Gov
ernm
ent
Nat
ure
and
desc
riptio
n of
pr
onou
ncem
ent
Prov
ince
s and
Mun
icip
aliti
es B
udge
ts a
nd A
ccou
nts D
ecre
e1 – S
ectio
n ab
out n
arra
tive
repo
rting
Type
of o
rgan
izat
ions
in sc
ope
Prov
ince
s and
mun
icip
aliti
esM
ain
requ
irem
ents
of S
tand
ard
Arti
cle
9 1.
Sep
arat
e pa
ragr
aphs
of t
he b
udge
t sho
uld
lay
dow
n th
e po
licie
s rel
atin
g to
rele
vant
adm
inis
trativ
e as
pect
s and
loca
l tax
es.
2.
The
budg
et sh
ould
at l
east
con
tain
the
follo
win
g pa
ragr
aphs
, unl
ess t
he a
spec
t con
cern
ed is
irr
elev
ant f
or th
e re
spec
tive
prov
ince
or m
unic
ipal
ity:
(a)
loca
l tax
es;
(b)f
inan
cial
stre
ngth
;(c
)m
aint
enan
ce o
f cap
ital a
sset
s;(d
)fin
anci
ng;
(e)
man
agem
ent;
(f)
rela
ted
parti
es;
(g)
land
use
pol
icy.
Arti
cle
10
The
para
grap
h on
loca
l tax
es sh
ould
at l
east
con
tain
:(a
)th
e es
timat
ed in
com
e;(b
)the
pol
icy
with
resp
ect t
o lo
cal t
axes
;(c
)a
head
line
over
view
of t
he d
iffer
ent t
axes
;(d
)an
indi
catio
n of
the
loca
l tax
bur
den;
(e)
a de
scrip
tion
of th
e re
mis
sion
pol
icy.
Arti
cle
11
1.
The
finan
cial
stre
ngth
is d
eter
min
ed b
y th
e re
latio
nshi
p be
twee
n:(a
)th
e fin
anci
al st
reng
th, i
.e.,
the
asse
ts a
nd o
ppor
tuni
ties a
vaila
ble
to th
e re
spec
tive
prov
ince
or
mun
icip
ality
to c
over
ext
rabu
dget
ary
cost
s;
1 Bes
luit
begr
otin
g en
ver
antw
oord
ing
prov
inci
es e
n ge
mee
nten
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
3 o
f 27
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
(b)a
ll ris
ks th
at h
ave
not b
een
prov
ided
for a
nd th
at c
an b
e m
ater
ial i
n re
latio
n to
the
finan
cial
po
sitio
n.2.
Th
e pa
ragr
aph
on fi
nanc
ial s
treng
th sh
ould
at l
east
con
tain
:(a
)an
ass
essm
ent o
f the
fina
ncia
l stre
ngth
;(b
)an
asse
ssm
ent o
f the
risk
s;(c
)th
e po
licy
rega
rdin
g th
e fin
anci
al st
reng
th a
nd th
e ris
ks.
Arti
cle
12
1. T
he p
arag
raph
on
the
mai
nten
ance
of c
apita
l ass
ets s
houl
d at
leas
t cov
er th
e fo
llow
ing
capi
tal
asse
ts:
(a)
road
;(b
)sew
erag
e;(c
)w
ater
;(d
)gre
en sp
ace;
(e)
build
ings
.2.
The
follo
win
g sh
ould
be
desc
ribed
in re
spec
t of t
he c
apita
l ass
ets m
entio
ned
in th
e fir
st
para
grap
h:(a
)th
e po
licy
fram
ewor
k;(b
)the
fina
ncia
l con
sequ
ence
s res
ultin
g fr
om th
e po
licy
fram
ewor
k;(c
)th
e in
corp
orat
ion
of th
e fin
anci
al c
onse
quen
ces i
n th
e bu
dget
.
Arti
cle
13
The
para
grap
h on
fina
ncin
g sh
ould
at l
east
des
crib
e th
e po
licy
inte
ntio
ns re
gard
ing
risk
man
agem
ent
of th
e fin
anci
ng p
ortfo
lio.
Arti
cle
14
The
para
grap
h on
man
agem
ent s
houl
d at
leas
t pro
vide
an
insi
ght i
nto
the
curr
ent s
ituat
ion
and
the
polic
y in
tent
ions
rega
rdin
g th
e m
anag
emen
t.
Arti
cle
15
The
para
grap
h on
rela
ted
parti
es sh
ould
at l
east
con
tain
:(a
)th
e vi
sion
on
rela
ted
parti
es in
rela
tion
to th
e re
alis
atio
n of
the
obje
ctiv
es in
clud
ed in
the
budg
et;
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
4 o
f 27
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
(b)t
he p
olic
y in
tent
ions
con
cern
ing
rela
ted
parti
es.
Arti
cle
16
The
para
grap
h on
the
land
pol
icy
shou
ld a
t lea
st c
onta
in:
(a)
a vi
sion
of t
he la
nd p
olic
y in
rela
tion
to th
e re
alis
atio
n of
the
obje
ctiv
es o
f the
pro
gram
s in
clud
ed in
the
budg
et;
(b)a
n in
dica
tion
of th
e m
anne
r in
whi
ch th
e re
spec
tive
prov
ince
or m
unic
ipal
ity is
im
plem
entin
g th
e la
nd u
se p
olic
y;(c
)a
curr
ent f
orec
ast o
f the
exp
ecte
d re
sults
of t
he to
tal l
and
expl
oita
tion;
(d)a
subs
tant
iatio
n of
the
estim
ated
pro
fit-ta
king
;(e
)th
e po
licy
prin
cipl
es re
gard
ing
the
rese
rves
for l
and
use
in re
latio
n to
the
risks
of t
he la
nd
use.
Arti
cle
26
The
annu
al re
port
shou
ld c
onta
in th
e pa
ragr
aphs
that
are
incl
uded
in th
e bu
dget
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith
Arti
cle
9. T
hese
con
tain
the
just
ifica
tion
of th
at w
hich
is in
clud
ed in
the
resp
ectiv
e pa
ragr
aphs
in th
e bu
dget
.O
ther
info
rmat
ion
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
5 o
f 27
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Juris
dict
ion
The
Net
herla
nds
Bod
y is
suin
g pr
onou
ncem
ent
Gov
ernm
ent
Nat
ure
and
desc
riptio
n of
pr
onou
ncem
ent
Gov
ernm
ent A
ccou
ntin
g A
ct 2
001
– C
entra
l gov
ernm
ent (
the
Net
herla
nds)
Type
of o
rgan
izat
ions
in sc
ope
Cen
tral G
over
nmen
tM
ain
requ
irem
ents
of S
tand
ard
Cha
pter
V: T
he a
ccou
ntab
ility
of t
he S
tate
Arti
cle
54
1.
The
note
s to
the
acco
unta
bilit
y st
atem
ent i
n an
y ca
se o
ffer
insi
ght i
nto
the
follo
win
g po
licy
rela
ted
issu
es, f
or e
ach
of th
e po
licy
artic
les:
a. g
ener
al a
nd if
app
licab
le m
ore
deta
iled
oper
atio
nalis
ed g
oals
that
hav
e be
en e
ndea
vour
ed a
nd th
e ex
tent
to w
hich
they
hav
e be
en re
alis
ed;
b. in
stru
men
ts u
sed
to a
chie
ve th
e go
als;
… 3. …
An
annu
al re
port
incl
udes
the
achi
evem
ent d
ata,
for e
ach
of th
e po
licy
artic
les,
whi
ch in
clud
es
data
on
effe
ctiv
enes
s, da
ta o
n th
e po
licy
effic
ienc
y, b
oth
obta
ined
from
pol
icy
eval
uatio
n su
rvey
s or
not
, and
the
effic
ienc
y da
ta o
n th
e sy
stem
exp
endi
ture
s, co
mpa
ring
this
dat
a w
ith th
e es
timat
es
incl
uded
in th
e dr
aft b
udge
t. R
emar
kabl
e di
ffer
ence
s are
exp
lain
ed.
... Arti
cle
56
1.
The
not
es to
the
acco
unta
bilit
y st
atem
ent i
n a
depa
rtmen
tal a
nnua
l rep
ort c
onta
in in
form
atio
n on
th
e op
erat
ing
proc
edur
es in
the
finan
cial
yea
r of t
he m
inis
try in
volv
ed.
… Arti
cle
58
1.
An
annu
al re
port
othe
rwis
e fu
lfils
the
follo
win
g re
quire
men
ts:
(a)
the
incl
uded
fina
ncia
l inf
orm
atio
n is
relia
bly
refle
cted
and
law
fully
obt
aine
d;(b
)the
incl
uded
info
rmat
ion
on th
e po
licy
impl
emen
ted
and
the
oper
atin
g pr
oced
ures
is re
liabl
y ob
tain
ed;
(c)
the
incl
uded
info
rmat
ion
on th
e po
licy
impl
emen
ted
and
the
oper
atin
g pr
oced
ures
fulfi
ls th
e re
late
d qu
ality
stan
dard
s.2.
Th
e fin
anci
al in
form
atio
n in
clud
es in
form
atio
n on
obl
igat
ions
, exp
endi
ture
s, in
com
e, re
venu
es,
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
6 o
f 27
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
expe
nses
, cap
ital e
xpen
ditu
res,
capi
tal i
ncom
e an
d ba
lanc
e sh
eet i
tem
s, as
stat
ed in
the
acco
untin
g re
cord
s and
the
acco
mpa
nyin
g no
tes.
3.
The
fina
ncia
l inf
orm
atio
n pr
esen
ted
in th
e an
nual
repo
rt ca
n be
cle
arly
dis
tingu
ishe
d fr
om th
e no
n-fin
anci
al in
form
atio
n.... A
rticl
e 61
... 2.
In
any
cas
e, th
e Fi
nanc
ial a
nnua
l rep
ort o
f the
Sta
te in
clud
es:
(a)c
onsi
dera
tions
abo
ut th
e bu
dget
ary
sign
ifica
nce
of th
e po
licy
impl
emen
ted
for t
he S
tate
and
fo
r oth
er p
arts
of t
he c
olle
ctiv
e se
ctor
, whi
ch is
con
side
red
to fo
rm th
e bu
dget
dis
cipl
ine
sect
or;
(b)a
con
side
ratio
n ab
out t
he o
pera
ting
proc
edur
es o
f the
Sta
te;
Oth
er in
form
atio
n
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
7 o
f 27
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Sect
ions
of N
ew Z
eala
nd A
cts w
hich
con
tain
req
uire
men
ts w
hich
may
be
cons
ider
ed n
arra
tive
repo
rtin
g re
quir
emen
ts:
Cen
tral G
over
nmen
t – P
ublic
Fin
ance
Act
198
9: S
ectio
ns 3
2A, 3
8 an
d 40
and
45
Loca
l Gov
ernm
ent –
Loc
al G
over
nmen
t Act
200
2: S
ched
ule
10, P
art 3
, Sec
tions
15,
16
and
21
Educ
atio
n se
ctor
– E
duca
tion
Act
198
9: S
ectio
ns 8
7 an
d 22
0
Cro
wn
Entit
ies A
ct 2
004:
Sec
tion
151
Ener
gy C
ompa
nies
Act
199
2: S
ectio
n 44
Port
Com
pani
es A
ct 1
988:
Sec
tion
16
Als
o: P
arag
raph
s 38
and
40 o
f NZ
IAS
1 (w
hich
app
lies t
o bo
th p
ublic
and
priv
ate
sect
or e
ntiti
es)
The
wor
ding
of t
hese
sect
ions
and
a li
nk to
the
rele
vant
doc
umen
t is i
nclu
ded
in th
e ta
ble
belo
w.
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
Publ
ic F
inan
ce A
ct
1989
Stat
utor
y�Re
quir
emen
t:�S
ectio
n�38
�and
�40�
of�th
e�PF
A�
�38�
Dep
artm
ents
�mus
t�pro
vide
�info
rmat
ion�
on�fu
ture
�ope
rati
ng�
inte
ntio
ns�
�(1
)�A�d
epar
tmen
t�mus
t,�b
efor
e�th
e�st
art�o
f�eac
h�fin
anci
al�y
ear�
and�
not�l
ater
�than
�the�
date
�spe
cifie
d�by
�its�
Resp
onsi
ble�
Min
iste
r,�p
rovi
de�
info
rmat
ion�
on�th
e�de
part
men
t's�fu
ture
�ope
ratin
g�in
tent
ions
.�(2
)�The
�info
rmat
ion�
mus
t�rel
ate�
to�th
e�fo
rthc
omin
g�fin
anci
al�y
ear�
and,
�for�
the�
purp
oses
�of�s
ectio
n�40
,�to�
at�le
ast�t
he�n
ext�2
�fina
ncia
l�ye
ars.
Not
�a�fi
nanc
ial�
repo
rtin
g�re
quir
emen
t�but
�re
quir
es�a
�nar
rativ
e�of
�the�
entit
y's�
futu
re�
oper
atio
ns.�
The
info
rmat
ion
is
http
://w
ww
.legi
slat
ion
.gov
t.nz
/act
/pub
lic/
1989
/004
4/la
test
/D
LM16
2408
.htm
l?se
arch
=ts_
act_
publ
ic+f
inan
ce+a
ct_r
esel
&p
=1�
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
8 o
f 27
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
40�R
equi
rem
ents
�for�
info
rmat
ion�
on�fu
ture
�ope
rati
ng�in
tent
ions
��
The�
info
rmat
ion�
requ
ired
�und
er�s
ectio
n�38
�mus
t�set
�out
�and
�exp
lain
�fo
r�th
e�pe
riod
�to�w
hich
�it�r
elat
es—
�o
(a)�t
he�n
atur
e�an
d�sc
ope�
of�th
e�de
part
men
t's�fu
nctio
ns�a
nd�
inte
nded
�ope
ratio
ns;�a
nd�
o(b
)�the
�spe
cific
�impa
cts,
�out
com
es,�o
r�obj
ectiv
es�th
at�th
e�de
part
men
t�see
ks�to
�ach
ieve
�or�
to�c
ontr
ibut
e�to
�thro
ugh�
its�
oper
atio
ns;�a
nd�
o(c
)�how
�the�
depa
rtm
ent�i
nten
ds�to
—�
�(i)
�per
form
�its�
func
tions
�and
�con
duct
�its�
oper
atio
ns�
to�a
chie
ve�th
ose�
impa
cts,
�out
com
es,�o
r�ob
ject
ives
;�an
d��
(ii)�e
ffec
tivel
y�m
anag
e�th
ose�
func
tions
�and
�op
erat
ions
�with
in�a
�cha
ngea
ble�
oper
atin
g�en
viro
nmen
t;�a
nd�
o(d
)�the
�mai
n�m
easu
res�
and�
stan
dard
s�th
at�th
e�de
part
men
t�in
tend
s�to
�use
�to�a
sses
s�an
d�re
port
�on�
mat
ters
�rel
atin
g�to
�th
e�de
part
men
t's�fu
ture
�per
form
ance
,�inc
ludi
ng,�w
ithou
t�lim
itatio
n,�th
e�fo
llow
ing�
mat
ters
:��
(i)�th
e�im
pact
s,�o
utco
mes
,�or�
obje
ctiv
es�a
chie
ved�
or�
cont
ribu
ted�
to�b
y�th
e�de
part
men
t�(in
clud
ing�
poss
ible
�uni
nten
ded�
impa
cts�
or�n
egat
ive�
outc
omes
):�
(ii)�t
he�c
ost�
effe
ctiv
enes
s�of
�the�
inte
rven
tions
�that
�th
e�de
part
men
t�del
iver
s�or
�adm
inis
ters
:��
(iii)�
the�
depa
rtm
ent's
�org
anis
atio
nal�h
ealth
�and
�ca
pabi
lity�
to�p
erfo
rm�it
s�fu
nctio
ns�a
nd�c
ondu
ct�it
s�op
erat
ions
�eff
ectiv
ely;
�and
�o
(e)�a
ny�o
ther
�mat
ters
�that
—�
�(i)
�are
�rea
sona
bly�
nece
ssar
y�to
�ach
ieve
�an�
prov
ided
in a
St
atem
ent o
f Int
ent”
th
at is
pub
lishe
d w
ith th
e B
udge
t(th
is u
sual
ly o
ccur
s pr
ior t
o th
e st
art o
f th
e fin
anci
al y
ear)
.
Trea
sury
gui
danc
e fo
r thi
s rep
ort a
nd
the
narr
ativ
e in
form
atio
n it
cont
ains
can
be
foun
d at
this
link
ht
tp://
ww
w.tr
easu
ry.
govt
.nz/
publ
icat
ions
/gu
idan
ce/s
trate
gy/s
oico
nten
t-pro
duct
ion
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
9 o
f 27
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
unde
rsta
ndin
g�of
�the�
depa
rtm
ent's
�ope
ratin
g�in
tent
ions
�and
�dir
ectio
n;�o
r��
(ii)�m
ay�b
e�sp
ecifi
ed�b
y�th
e�M
inis
ter�
or�th
e�Re
spon
sibl
e�M
inis
ter�
for�
the�
purp
oses
�of�
subp
arag
raph
�(i).
Publ
ic F
inan
ce A
ct
1989
Stat
utor
y re
quire
men
t: Se
ctio
n 45
(2) o
f the
PFA
-
The
annu
al r
epor
t mus
t pro
vide
the
info
rmat
ion
that
is n
eces
sary
to
enab
le a
n in
form
ed a
sses
smen
t to
be m
ade
of th
e de
partm
ent’s
pe
rfor
man
ce d
urin
g th
e fin
anci
al y
ear (
incl
udin
g an
ass
essm
ent a
gain
st
the
inte
ntio
ns, m
easu
res a
nd st
anda
rds s
et o
ut a
t the
star
t of t
he
finan
cial
yea
r in
the
info
rmat
ion
on th
e de
partm
ent’s
futu
re o
pera
ting
inte
ntio
ns in
acc
orda
nce
with
sect
ions
40
and
41)
Rep
rese
nts a
le
gisl
ativ
e na
rrat
ive
repo
rting
requ
irem
ent.
Link
is to
Tre
asur
y gu
idan
ce fo
r thi
s re
port
(incl
udin
g na
rrat
ive
requ
irem
ents
)
http
://w
ww
.trea
sury
.go
vt.n
z/pu
blic
atio
ns/
guid
ance
/repo
rting
/ann
ualre
ports
Publ
ic F
inan
ce A
ct
1989
Stat
utor
y re
quire
men
t: Se
ctio
n 32
A (2
) of t
he P
FA -
The
Min
iste
r res
pons
ible
for e
ach
appr
opria
tion
or c
lass
of o
utpu
ts
mus
t, w
ithin
3 m
onth
s of t
he e
nd o
f tha
t fin
anci
al y
ear,
prep
are
and
pres
ent t
o th
e H
ouse
of R
epre
sent
ativ
es a
repo
rt th
at c
ompl
ies w
ith
subs
ectio
n (3
).
�(3
)�The
�rep
ort�m
ust�i
nclu
de—
�o
(a)�a
�sta
tem
ent�o
f�ser
vice
�per
form
ance
�pre
pare
d�in
�ac
cord
ance
�with
�gen
eral
ly�a
ccep
ted�
acco
untin
g�pr
actic
e�in
�re
latio
n�to
�that
�app
ropr
iatio
n�or
�cla
ss�o
f�out
puts
�that
�co
mpa
res�
the�
serv
ice�
perf
orm
ance
�that
�was
�ach
ieve
d�w
ith�
the�
serv
ice�
perf
orm
ance
�that
�was
�fore
cast
�to�b
e�ac
hiev
ed;�
or�
Rep
rese
nts a
se
para
te se
rvic
e pe
rfor
man
ce
repo
rting
requ
irem
ent w
here
th
ese
rvic
e is
pu
rcha
sed
by th
e G
over
nmen
t, bu
t is
not d
eliv
ered
by
a G
over
nmen
t ag
ency
.
Link
s are
to P
FA
and
Trea
sury
http
://w
ww
.legi
slat
ion.
govt
.nz/
act/p
ublic
/19
89/0
044/
late
st/D
LM
1620
73.h
tml?
sear
ch=
ts_a
ct_p
ublic
+fin
anc
e+ac
t_re
sel&
p=1
http
://w
ww
.trea
sury
.go
vt.n
z/pu
blic
atio
ns/
guid
ance
/repo
rting
/s32
arep
orts
/s32
a-gu
idan
ce10
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
10
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
o(b
)�if�t
he�ty
pe�a
nd�s
cope
�of�t
he�a
ppro
pria
tion�
is�s
uch�
that
�a�
stat
emen
t�of�s
ervi
ce�p
erfo
rman
ce�is
�inap
prop
riat
e,�a
�st
atem
ent�o
f�the
�res
ults
�pro
duce
d�or
�ach
ieve
d�in
�rel
atio
n�to
�th
at�a
ppro
pria
tion�
that
�com
pare
s�th
ose�
resu
lts�w
ith�th
e�re
sults
�that
�wer
e�fo
reca
st�to
�be�
prod
uced
�or�
achi
eved
�from
�th
e�ex
pens
es�o
r�ca
pita
l�exp
endi
ture
.
guid
ance
for t
his
repo
rt
Loca
l Gov
ernm
ent
Act
200
2 Sc
hedu
le 1
0 Pa
rt 3
15�G
roup
�of�a
ctiv
ities
��
An�
annu
al�r
epor
t�mus
t,�in
�rel
atio
n�to
�eac
h�gr
oup�
of�a
ctiv
ities
�of�t
he�
loca
l�aut
hori
ty,—
�o
(a)�i
dent
ify�th
e�ac
tiviti
es�w
ithin
�the�
grou
p�of
�act
iviti
es;�a
nd�
o(b
)�ide
ntify
�the�
com
mun
ity�o
utco
mes
�to�w
hich
�the�
grou
p�of
�ac
tiviti
es�p
rim
arily
�con
trib
utes
;�and
�o
(c)�r
epor
t�the
�res
ults
�of�a
ny�m
easu
rem
ent�u
nder
take
n�du
ring
�the�
year
�of�p
rogr
ess�
tow
ards
�the�
achi
evem
ent�o
f�th
ose�
outc
omes
;�and
�o
(d)�d
escr
ibe�
any�
iden
tifie
d�ef
fect
s�th
at�a
ny�a
ctiv
ity�w
ithin
�th
e�gr
oup�
of�a
ctiv
ities
�has
�had
�on�
the�
soci
al,�e
cono
mic
,�en
viro
nmen
tal,�
or�c
ultu
ral�w
ell�b
eing
�of�t
he�c
omm
unity
;�and
o(e
)�inc
lude
�an�
audi
ted�
stat
emen
t—�
�(i)
�set
ting�
out�a
�com
pari
son�
betw
een�
the�
actu
al�
leve
ls�o
f�ser
vice
�pro
visi
on�o
f�tha
t�gro
up�o
f�act
iviti
es�
and�
the�
inte
nded
�leve
ls�o
f�ser
vice
�pro
visi
on�(a
s�se
t�ou
t�in�
the�
long
�ter
m�c
ounc
il�co
mm
unity
�pla
n�in
�re
spec
t�of�t
hat�y
ear)
�of�t
hat�g
roup
�of�a
ctiv
ities
;�and
��
(ii)�g
ivin
g�th
e�re
ason
s�fo
r�an
y�si
gnifi
cant
�var
ianc
e�be
twee
n�th
e�ac
tual
�ser
vice
�pro
visi
on�a
nd�th
e�ex
pect
ed�s
ervi
ce�p
rovi
sion
;�and
�o
(f)�i
nclu
de�a
n�au
dite
d�st
atem
ent—
��
(i)�d
escr
ibin
g�an
y�si
gnifi
cant
�acq
uisi
tions
�or�
Som
e pa
rts m
ay b
e m
ore
in th
e na
ture
of
serv
ice
perf
orm
ance
re
porti
ng
http
://w
ww
.legi
slat
ion.
govt
.nz/
act/p
ublic
/20
02/0
084/
late
st/D
LM
1760
46.h
tml?
sear
ch=
ts_a
ct_l
ocal
+gov
ern
men
t+ac
t_re
sel&
p=1
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
11
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
repl
acem
ents
�of�a
sset
s�un
dert
aken
�by�
the�
loca
l�au
thor
ity�in
�the�
year
�to�w
hich
�the�
repo
rt�r
elat
es;�
and�
�(ii
)�giv
ing�
the�
reas
ons�
why
�the�
loca
l�aut
hori
ty�
acqu
ired
�or�
repl
aced
�thos
e�as
sets
;�and
��
(iii)�
givi
ng�th
e�re
ason
s�fo
r�an
y�si
gnifi
cant
�var
iatio
n�be
twee
n�th
e�ac
quis
ition
s�an
d�re
plac
emen
ts�
proj
ecte
d�in
�the�
long
�ter
m�c
ounc
il�co
mm
unity
�pla
n�an
d�th
ose�
actu
ally
�mad
e.�
16�C
ounc
il�co
ntro
lled�
orga
nisa
tions
��
An�
annu
al�r
epor
t�mus
t�inc
lude
,�in�
rela
tion�
to�e
ach�
coun
cil�c
ontr
olle
d�or
gani
satio
n,—
�o
(a)�a
�rep
ort�o
n�th
e�ex
tent
�to�w
hich
�the�
loca
l�aut
hori
ty's
�si
gnifi
cant
�pol
icie
s�an
d�ob
ject
ives
�in�r
egar
d�to
�ow
ners
hip�
and�
cont
rol�o
f�the
�org
anis
atio
n�(a
s�se
t�out
�in�th
e�re
leva
nt�
long
�ter
m�c
ounc
il�co
mm
unity
�pla
n�or
�ann
ual�p
lan)
�hav
e�be
en�im
plem
ente
d�or
�att
aine
d�in
�the�
year
�to�w
hich
�the�
repo
rt�r
elat
es;�a
nd�
o(b
)�a�c
ompa
riso
n�be
twee
n�th
e�na
ture
�and
�sco
pe�o
f�the
�ac
tiviti
es�in
tend
ed�to
�be�
prov
ided
�by�
the�
orga
nisa
tion�
in�th
e�ye
ar�to
�whi
ch�th
e�re
port
�rel
ates
�(as�
set�o
ut�in
�the�
rele
vant
�lo
ng�t
erm
�cou
ncil�
com
mun
ity�p
lan�
or�a
nnua
l�pla
n)�a
nd�th
e�na
ture
�and
�sco
pe�o
f�the
�act
iviti
es�a
ctua
lly�p
rovi
ded�
by�th
e�or
gani
satio
n�in
�that
�yea
r;�a
nd�
o(c
)�a�c
ompa
riso
n�be
twee
n�ac
tual
�per
form
ance
�and
�the�
key�
perf
orm
ance
�targ
ets�
and�
othe
r�m
easu
res�
set�o
ut�in
�the�
rele
vant
�long
�ter
m�c
ounc
il�co
mm
unity
�pla
n�or
�ann
ual�p
lan.
�Sc
hedu
le�1
0�cl
ause
�16:
�am
ende
d,�o
n�7�
July
�200
4,�b
y�se
ctio
n�27
(2)�o
f�th
e�Lo
cal�G
over
nmen
t�Act
�200
2�A
men
dmen
t�Act
�200
4�(2
004�
No�
63).
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
12
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
21�G
ener
al�
�A
n�an
nual
�rep
ort�m
ust�i
nclu
de�a
�rep
ort�o
n�th
e�ac
tiviti
es�th
at�th
e�lo
cal�a
utho
rity
�has
�und
erta
ken�
in�th
e�ye
ar�to
�est
ablis
h�an
d�m
aint
ain�
proc
esse
s�to
�pro
vide
�for�
oppo
rtun
ities
�for�
M�o
ri�to
�con
trib
ute�
to�th
e�de
cisi
on�m
akin
g�pr
oces
ses�
of�th
e�lo
cal�a
utho
rity
.Ed
ucat
ion
Act
198
9 87
�Ann
ual�r
epor
ts�
�(1
)�As�
soon
�as�
is�p
ract
icab
le�a
fter
�the�
end�
of�e
very
�fina
ncia
l�yea
r,�a
nd�
in�a
ny�e
vent
�no�
late
r�th
an�a
�day
�fixe
dby
�the�
Secr
etar
y,�e
very
�boa
rd�
shal
l�giv
e�th
e�Se
cret
ary�
an�a
nnua
l�rep
ort�i
n�ac
cord
ance
�with
�this
�se
ctio
n.�
(2)�A
�rep
ort�g
iven
�und
er�s
ubse
ctio
n�(1
)�mus
t�inc
lude
—�
o(a
)�the
�nam
es�o
f�all�
the�
boar
d's�
elec
ted�
trus
tees
,�app
oint
ed�
trus
tees
,�and
�co�
opte
d�tr
uste
es;�a
nd�
o(b
)�the
�dat
e�on
�whi
ch�e
ach�
trus
tee�
goes
�out
�of�o
ffic
e;�a
nd�
o(c
)�the
�aud
itor's
�rep
ort�i
n�ac
cord
ance
�with
�sec
tion�
87A
;�and
�o
(ca)
�in�r
espe
ct�o
f�the
�boa
rd�o
r,�in
�the�
case
�of�a
�Cro
wn�
entit
y�gr
oup,
�for�
each
�Cro
wn�
entit
y�in
�the�
grou
p,—
��
(i)�th
e�to
tal�v
alue
�of�t
he�r
emun
erat
ion�
(oth
er�th
an�
com
pens
atio
n�an
d�ot
her�
bene
fits�
refe
rred
�to�in
�su
bpar
agra
ph�(v
))�p
aid�
or�p
ayab
le�to
�the�
trus
tees
�in�
thei
r�ca
paci
ty�a
s�tr
uste
es�fr
om�th
e�bo
ard�
(or�
entit
ies�
in�th
e�gr
oup,
�as�
the�
case
�may
�be)
,�dur
ing�
that
�fin
anci
al�y
ear;
�and
��
(ii)�t
he�to
tal�v
alue
�of�t
he�r
emun
erat
ion�
(oth
er�th
an�
com
pens
atio
n,�a
nd�o
ther
�ben
efits
�ref
erre
d�to
�in�
subp
arag
raph
�(v))
�pai
d�or
�pay
able
�to�th
e�co
mm
ittee
�m
embe
rs�in
�thei
r�ca
paci
ty�a
s�co
mm
ittee
�mem
bers
�fr
om�th
e�bo
ard�
(or�
entit
ies�
in�th
e�gr
oup,
�as�
the�
case
�
��
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
13
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
may
�be)
�dur
ing�
that
�fina
ncia
l�yea
r�(e
xcep
t�tha
t�thi
s�pa
ragr
aph�
does
�not
�app
ly�to
�trus
tees
�who
se�
rem
uner
atio
n�is
�dis
clos
ed�u
nder
�sub
para
grap
h�(i)
);�an
d��
(iii)�
the�
num
ber�
of�e
mpl
oyee
s�(o
ther
�than
�pri
ncip
als�
of�th
e�sc
hool
)�to�
who
m,�d
urin
g�th
e�fin
anci
al�y
ear,
�re
mun
erat
ion�
(oth
er�th
an�c
ompe
nsat
ion�
and�
othe
r�be
nefit
s�re
ferr
ed�to
�in�s
ubpa
ragr
aph�
(v))
�was
�pai
d�or
�pa
yabl
e�in
�thei
r�ca
paci
ty�a
s�em
ploy
ees,
�the�
tota
l�va
lue�
of�w
hich
�is�o
r�ex
ceed
s�$1
00,0
00�p
er�a
nnum
,�an
d�th
e�nu
mbe
r�of
�thos
e�em
ploy
ees�
in�b
rack
ets�
of�
$10,
000;
�and
��
(iv)�a
�rep
ort,
�pre
sent
ed�in
�the�
man
ner�
requ
ired
�by�
the�
Min
iste
r�by
�not
ice�
in�th
e�G
azet
te,�o
n�th
e�to
tal�
rem
uner
atio
n�(in
clud
ing�
bene
fits,
�any
�co
mpe
nsat
ion,
�ex�
grat
ia�p
aym
ents
,�any
�oth
er�
paym
ents
,�and
�any
�oth
er�c
onsi
dera
tion�
paid
�or�
paya
ble�
in�th
e�sc
hool
�pri
ncip
al's
�cap
acity
�as�
an�
empl
oyee
)�pai
d�to
�a�p
rinc
ipal
�of�t
he�s
choo
l;�an
d��
(v)�t
he�to
tal�v
alue
�of�a
ny�c
ompe
nsat
ion�
or�o
ther
�be
nefit
s�pa
id�o
r�pa
yabl
e�to
�per
sons
�who
�cea
sed�
to�
be�tr
uste
es,�c
omm
ittee
�mem
bers
,�or�
empl
oyee
s�du
ring
�the�
finan
cial
�yea
r�in
�rel
atio
n�to
�that
�ces
satio
n�an
d�th
e�nu
mbe
r�of
�per
sons
�to�w
hom
�all�
or�p
art�o
f�th
at�to
tal�w
as�p
ayab
le;�a
nd�
o(d
)�the
�boa
rd's
�ann
ual�f
inan
cial
�sta
tem
ents
;�and
�o
(e)�a
�sta
tem
ent�i
n�w
hich
�sch
ools
�pro
vide
�an�
anal
ysis
�of�a
ny�
vari
ance
�bet
wee
n�th
e�sc
hool
's�p
erfo
rman
ce�a
nd�th
e�re
leva
nt�a
ims,
�obj
ectiv
es,�d
irec
tions
,�pri
oriti
es,�o
r�ta
rget
s�se
t�ou
t�in�
the�
scho
ol�c
hart
er:
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
14
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
(3)�T
he�a
nnua
l�fin
anci
al�s
tate
men
ts�m
ust�b
e�pr
epar
ed�in
�acc
orda
nce�
with
�gen
eral
ly�a
ccep
ted�
acco
untin
g�pr
actic
e,�a
udite
d�as
�req
uire
d�by
�se
ctio
n�87
A,�a
nd�in
clud
e�al
l�of�t
he�fo
llow
ing:
�o
(a)�a
�sta
tem
ent�o
f�the
�fina
ncia
l�pos
ition
�of�t
he�b
oard
�as�
at�it
s�ba
lanc
e�da
te:�
o(b
)�a�s
tate
men
t�of�f
inan
cial
�per
form
ance
�ref
lect
ing�
the�
reve
nue�
and�
expe
nses
�of�t
he�b
oard
�for�
the�
finan
cial
�yea
r:�
o(c
)�if�r
equi
red�
by�g
ener
ally
�acc
epte
d�ac
coun
ting�
prac
tice,
�a�
stat
emen
t�of�c
ash�
flow
s�re
flect
ing�
cash
�flow
s�of
�the�
boar
d�fo
r�th
e�fin
anci
al�y
ear:
�o
(d)�a
�sta
tem
ent�o
f�the
�com
mitm
ents
�of�t
he�b
oard
�as�
at�th
e�ba
lanc
e�da
te:�
o(e
)�a�s
tate
men
t�of�t
he�c
ontin
gent
�liab
ilitie
s�of
�the�
boar
d�as
�at
�the�
bala
nce�
date
:�o
(f)�a
�sta
tem
ent�o
f�acc
ount
ing�
polic
ies:
�o
(g)�s
uch�
othe
r�st
atem
ents
�as�
are�
nece
ssar
y�to
�fair
ly�r
efle
ct�
the�
finan
cial
�ope
ratio
ns�o
f�the
�boa
rd�fo
r�th
e�fin
anci
al�y
ear�
and�
its�fi
nanc
ial�p
ositi
on�a
t�the
�end
�of�t
he�fi
nanc
ial�y
ear:
�o
(h)�a
ny�o
ther
�sta
tem
ents
�that
�the�
Secr
etar
y�de
term
ines
�in�
cons
ulta
tion�
with
�the�
Aud
itor�
Gen
eral
:�o
(i)�in
�rel
atio
n�to
�eac
h�st
atem
ent�r
equi
red�
by�p
arag
raph
s�(a
)�to
�(c)�a
nd,�i
f�app
ropr
iate
,�by�
para
grap
h�(g
),�bu
dget
ed�fi
gure
s�fo
r�th
e�fin
anci
al�y
ear:
�o
(j)�in
�rel
atio
n�to
�eac
h�st
atem
ent�r
equi
red�
by�p
arag
raph
s�(a
)�to
�(c),�
para
grap
h�(d
),�an
d�pa
ragr
aph�
(e)�a
nd,�i
f�app
ropr
iate
,�by
�par
agra
ph�(g
),�co
mpa
rativ
e�ac
tual
�figu
res�
for�
the�
prev
ious
�fin
anci
al�y
ear.
�(3
A)�I
n�ad
ditio
n,�a
�boa
rd�th
at�is
�a�p
aren
t�in�
a�Cr
own�
entit
y�gr
oup�
mus
t,�to
�the�
exte
nt�r
equi
red�
to�d
o�so
�by�
gene
rally
�acc
epte
d�ac
coun
ting�
prac
tice,
�pre
pare
�con
solid
ated
�fina
ncia
l�sta
tem
ents
�in�
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
15
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
rela
tion�
to�th
e�gr
oup�
for�
that
�fina
ncia
l�yea
r.(4
)�The
�ann
ual�f
inan
cial
�sta
tem
ents
�mus
t�be�
acco
mpa
nied
�by�
a�st
atem
ent�o
f�res
pons
ibili
ty�th
at�c
ompl
ies�
with
�sec
tion�
155�
of�th
e�Cr
own�
Entit
ies�
Act
�200
4�bu
t�tha
t�is�
sign
ed�b
y�th
e�ch
air�
of�th
e�bo
ard�
and�
prin
cipa
l�ins
tead
�of�2
�mem
bers
.�(5
)�In�
subs
ectio
n�(2
),�tr
uste
e�an
d�em
ploy
ee�in
clud
e�a�
pers
on�w
ho�
was
�a�tr
uste
e�or
�em
ploy
ee�a
t�any
�tim
e�du
ring
�the�
appl
icab
le�
finan
cial
�yea
r�bu
t�who
�is�n
o�lo
nger
�a�tr
uste
e�or
�em
ploy
ee.�
(6)�T
he�r
equi
rem
ents
�of�t
his�
sect
ion�
and�
sect
ion�
87A
�as�
to�a
nnua
l�fin
anci
al�s
tate
men
ts�a
lso�
appl
y�to
�a�C
row
n�en
tity�
subs
idia
ry�o
f�a�
boar
d�as
�if�th
e�su
bsid
iary
�wer
e�a�
boar
d�an
d�w
ith�a
ll�ne
cess
ary�
mod
ifica
tions
.�(7
)�Sub
sect
ion�
(2)(
ca)(
iv)�a
nd�(v
)�app
lies�
in�r
espe
ct�o
f�eac
h�fin
anci
al�
year
�that
�end
s�on
�or�
afte
r�31
�Dec
embe
r�20
04.�
87B�
Repo
rt�o
n�pe
rfor
man
ce�o
f�sch
ools
'�sec
tor�
�(1
)�The
�Min
iste
r�of
�Edu
catio
n�m
ust�i
n�ea
ch�y
ear,
�not
�late
r�th
an�
30�S
epte
mbe
r,�p
repa
re�a
nd�p
rese
nt�to
�the�
Hou
se�o
f�Rep
rese
ntat
ives
�a�
repo
rt�o
n�th
e�pe
rfor
man
ce�o
f�the
�sch
ools
'�sec
tor�
in�th
e�im
med
iate
ly�p
rece
ding
�fina
ncia
l�yea
r�en
ding
�on�
31�D
ecem
ber.
�(2
)�The
�rep
ort�m
ust�i
nclu
de�in
form
atio
n�on
—�
o(a
)�the
�per
form
ance
�of�t
he�s
choo
ls'�s
ecto
r�in
�the�
supp
ly�o
f�ou
tput
s:�
o(b
)�the
�man
agem
ent�p
erfo
rman
ce�in
�the�
scho
ols'
�sec
tor,
�in
clud
ing�
the�
qual
ity�o
f�the
�man
agem
ent�s
yste
ms�
and�
prac
tices
�in�th
e�sc
hool
s'�s
ecto
r�an
d�th
e�m
anag
emen
t�of�a
ll�th
e�as
sets
�use
d�in
�the�
scho
ols'
�sec
tor:
�o
(c)�t
he�e
ffec
tiven
ess�
of�th
e�sc
hool
s'�s
ecto
r�in
�term
s�of
�ed
ucat
iona
l�ach
ieve
men
t.�
(3)�T
he�r
epor
t—
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
16
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
o(a
)�mus
t�rel
ate�
to�a
ll�of
�the�
scho
ols�
owne
d�by
�the�
Crow
n;�
and�
o(b
)�may
�rel
ate�
to�o
ther
�sch
ools
�
Educ
atio
n A
ct 1
989
Tert
iary
�Inst
itut
ions
�
220�
Ann
ual�r
epor
t��
(1)�A
s�so
on�a
s�pr
actic
able
�aft
er�th
e�en
d�of
�eac
h�ac
adem
ic�y
ear�
of�a
n�in
stitu
tion�
endi
ng�a
fter
�the�
com
men
cem
ent�o
f�thi
s�se
ctio
n�th
e�co
unci
l�of�t
he�in
stitu
tion�
shal
l�giv
e�to
�the�
Min
iste
r�a�
repo
rt�o
n�th
e�op
erat
ions
�of�t
he�in
stitu
tion�
duri
ng�th
at�y
ear.
�(2
)�A�c
ounc
il�m
ust�i
nclu
de�in
�eve
ry�a
nnua
l�rep
ort�o
f�the
�cou
ncil�
the�
finan
cial
�sta
tem
ents
�pre
pare
d�by
�the�
coun
cil,�
in�a
ccor
danc
e�w
ith�
sect
ion�
154�
of�th
e�Cr
own�
Entit
ies�
Act
�200
4,�in
�res
pect
�of�t
he�
acad
emic
�yea
r�to
�whi
ch�th
e�re
port
�rel
ates
,�tog
ethe
r�w
ith�th
e�au
dit�
repo
rt�a
nd�th
e�st
atem
ent�o
f�res
pons
ibili
ty�u
nder
�sec
tion�
155�
of�th
at�
Act
�rel
atin
g�to
�thos
e�fin
anci
al�s
tate
men
ts.�
(2A
A)�A
�cou
ncil�
mus
t�com
ply�
with
�sec
tions
�154
�to�1
57�o
f�the
�Cro
wn�
Entit
ies�
Act
�200
4�ex
cept
�that
,�des
pite
�sec
tion�
155(
d)�o
f�tha
t�Act
,�the
�st
atem
ent�o
f�res
pons
ibili
ty�m
ust�b
e�si
gned
�by—
�o
(a)�t
he�c
hair
pers
on�o
f�the
�cou
ncil�
and�
the�
chie
f�exe
cutiv
e�of
�th
e�in
stitu
tion;
�or�
o(b
)�if�t
here
�is�n
o�ch
airp
erso
n,�th
e�ch
ief�e
xecu
tive�
of�th
e�in
stitu
tion�
and�
the�
chie
f�fin
anci
al�o
ffic
er.�
(2A
)�A�c
ounc
il�sh
all�i
nclu
de�in
�eve
ry�a
nnua
l�rep
ort—
�o
(a)�a
�sum
mar
y�of
�its�
equa
l�em
ploy
men
t�opp
ortu
nitie
s�pr
ogra
mm
e�fo
r�th
e�ye
ar�to
�whi
ch�th
e�re
port
�rel
ates
;�and
�o
(b)�a
n�ac
coun
t�of�t
he�e
xten
t�to�
whi
ch�th
e�co
unci
l�was
�abl
e,�
�ht
tp:/
/ww
w.le
gisl
ati
on.g
ovt.
nz/a
ct/p
ubli
c/19
89/0
080/
late
st/
DLM
1846
98.h
tml?
sear
ch=t
s_ac
t_ed
ucat
ion
+act
_res
el&
p=1�
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
17
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
duri
ng�th
e�ye
ar�to
�whi
ch�th
e�re
port
�rel
ates
,�to�
mee
t�the
�eq
ual�e
mpl
oym
ent�o
ppor
tuni
ties�
prog
ram
me�
for�
that
�yea
r;�
and�
o(c
)�an�
acco
unt�o
f�the
�ext
ent�t
o�w
hich
�the�
coun
cil�h
as�
elim
inat
ed�u
nnec
essa
ry�b
arri
ers�
to�th
e�pr
ogre
ss�o
f�stu
dent
s;�
and�
o(d
)�an�
acco
unt�o
f�the
�ext
ent�t
o�w
hich
�the�
coun
cil�h
as�
avoi
ded�
the�
crea
tion�
of�u
nnec
essa
ry�b
arri
ers�
to�th
e�pr
ogre
ss�
of�s
tude
nts;
�and
�o
(e)�a
n�ac
coun
t�of�t
he�e
xten
t�to�
whi
ch�th
e�co
unci
l�has
�de
velo
ped�
prog
ram
mes
�to�a
ttra
ct�s
tude
nts�
from
�gro
ups�
in�
the�
com
mun
ity—
��
(i)�u
nder
�rep
rese
nted
�in�th
e�in
stitu
tion'
s�st
uden
t�bo
dy;�o
r��
(ii)�d
isad
vant
aged
�in�te
rms�
of�th
eir�
abili
ty�to
�att
end�
the�
inst
itutio
n;�a
nd�
o(f
)�in�
the�
case
�of�a
n�in
stitu
tion�
that
�has
�a�p
lan,
�a�s
tate
men
t�of
�ser
vice
�per
form
ance
�for�
that
�fina
ncia
l�yea
r�re
port
ing�
on�
the�
perf
orm
ance
�of�t
he�in
stitu
tion�
as�c
ompa
red�
with
�the�
prop
osed
�out
com
es�d
escr
ibed
�in�th
at�p
lan�
�C
row
n En
titie
s Act
20
04�1
51�F
orm
�and
�con
tent
�of�a
nnua
l�rep
ort�
�(1
)�An�
annu
al�r
epor
t�mus
t�con
tain
�the�
follo
win
g�in
form
atio
n�an
d�re
port
s�in
�res
pect
�of�t
he�fi
nanc
ial�y
ear�
to�w
hich
�it�r
elat
es:�
o(a
)�inf
orm
atio
n�on
�ope
ratio
ns�th
at�c
ompl
ies�
with
�sub
sect
ion�
(2);
�and
�o
(b)�a
�sta
tem
ent�o
f�ser
vice
�per
form
ance
�in�a
ccor
danc
e�w
ith�
sect
ion�
153;
�and
Trea
sury
�Gui
danc
e�se
ttin
g�ou
t�wha
t�is�
expe
cted
�and
/or�
requ
ired
�of�C
row
n�en
titie
s�in
�pre
pari
ng�
thei
r�an
nual
�rep
orts
�
http
://w
ww
.legi
slat
ion
.gov
t.nz
/act
/pub
lic/
2004
/011
5/la
test
/D
LM33
0553
.htm
l?se
arch
=ts_
act_
crow
n+en
titie
s+ac
t_re
sel&
p
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
18
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
o(c
)�the
�ann
ual�f
inan
cial
�sta
tem
ents
�for�
the�
entit
y�an
d,�if
�the�
entit
y�is
�the�
pare
nt�o
f�a�C
row
n�en
tity�
grou
p,�th
e�co
nsol
idat
ed�fi
nanc
ial�s
tate
men
ts�fo
r�th
e�gr
oup�
in�
acco
rdan
ce�w
ith�s
ectio
n�15
4;�a
nd�
o(d
)�a�s
tate
men
t�of�r
espo
nsib
ility
�in�a
ccor
danc
e�w
ith�s
ectio
n�15
5;�a
nd�
o(e
)�the
�aud
it�re
port
�in�a
ccor
danc
e�w
ith�s
ectio
n�15
6;�a
nd�
o(f
)�any
�dir
ectio
n�gi
ven�
to�th
e�en
tity�
by�a
�Min
iste
r�in
�wri
ting�
unde
r�an
y�en
actm
ent�d
urin
g�th
at�fi
nanc
ial�y
ear;
�and
�o
(g)�i
nfor
mat
ion�
on�c
ompl
ianc
e�w
ith�it
s�ob
ligat
ion�
to�b
e�a�
good
�em
ploy
er�(i
nclu
ding
�its�
equa
l�em
ploy
men
t�op
port
uniti
es�p
rogr
amm
e);�a
nd�
o(h
)�inf
orm
atio
n�re
quir
ed�b
y�se
ctio
n�15
2�(w
hich
�rel
ates
�to�
paym
ents
�in�r
espe
ct�o
f�mem
bers
,�com
mitt
ee�m
embe
rs,�a
nd�
empl
oyee
s�du
ring
�that
�fina
ncia
l�yea
r);�a
nd�
o(i)
�info
rmat
ion�
requ
ired
�by�
sect
ion�
20(3
)�(w
hich
�rel
ates
�to�
the�
enfo
rcem
ent�o
f�cer
tain
�nat
ural
�per
son�
tran
sact
ions
);�an
d�o
(j)�in
form
atio
n�re
quir
ed�b
y�se
ctio
n�68
(6)�(
whi
ch�r
elat
es�to
�pe
rmis
sion
�to�a
ct�d
espi
te�b
eing
�inte
rest
ed�in
�a�m
atte
r);�a
nd�
o(k
)�any
�mat
ters
�that
�rel
ate�
to�o
r�af
fect
�the�
entit
y's�
oper
atio
ns�th
at�th
e�en
tity�
is�o
ther
wis
e�re
quir
ed,�o
r�ha
s�un
dert
aken
,�or�
wis
hes�
to�r
epor
t�on�
in�it
s�an
nual
�rep
ort.
�(2
)�The
�ann
ual�r
epor
t�mus
t�pro
vide
�the�
info
rmat
ion�
that
�is�n
eces
sary
�to
�ena
ble�
an�in
form
ed�a
sses
smen
t�to�
be�m
ade�
of�th
e�en
tity'
s�op
erat
ions
�and
�per
form
ance
�for�
that
�fina
ncia
l�yea
r,�in
clud
ing�
an�
asse
ssm
ent�a
gain
st�th
e�in
tent
ions
,�mea
sure
s,�a
nd�s
tand
ards
�set
�out
�in
�the�
stat
emen
t�of�i
nten
t�pre
pare
d�at
�the�
begi
nnin
g�of
�the�
finan
cial
�ye
ar.�
(3)�A
n�an
nual
�rep
ort�m
ust�b
e�in
�wri
ting,
�be�
date
d,�a
nd�b
e�si
gned
�on�
in�a
ccor
danc
e�w
ith�
the�
Crow
n�En
titie
s�A
ct�2
004�
http
://w
ww
.tre
asur
y.g
ovt.
nz/p
ublic
atio
ns/g
uida
nce/
repo
rtin
g/a
nnua
lrep
orts
�ce�
ry�
Gui
danc
e���
=1�
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
19
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
beha
lf�of
�the�
boar
d�by
�2�m
embe
rs�o
r,�in
�the�
case
�of�a
�cor
pora
tion�
sole
,�by�
the�
sole
�mem
ber.
Ener
gy C
ompa
nies
A
ct 1
992
44�R
epor
ts�a
nd�a
ccou
nts�
�(1
)�With
in�3
�mon
ths�
afte
r�th
e�en
d�of
�the�
first
�hal
f�of�e
ach�
finan
cial
�ye
ar�o
f�an�
ener
gy�c
ompa
ny,�t
he�d
irec
tora
te�o
f�the
�ene
rgy�
com
pany
�sh
all�d
eliv
er�to
�the�
shar
ehol
ders
�a�r
epor
t�of�t
he�c
ompa
ny's
�op
erat
ions
�dur
ing�
that
�hal
f�ye
ar.�
(2)�E
ach�
repo
rt�r
equi
red�
by�s
ubse
ctio
n�(1
)�of�t
his�
sect
ion�
shal
l�in
clud
e�th
e�in
form
atio
n�re
quir
ed�b
y�th
e�st
atem
ent�o
f�cor
pora
te�
inte
nt�to
�be�
incl
uded
�ther
ein.
�(3
)�With
in�3
�mon
ths�
afte
r�th
e�en
d�of
�eac
h�fin
anci
al�y
ear�
of�a
n�en
ergy
�co
mpa
ny,�t
he�d
irec
tora
te�s
hall�
deliv
er�to
�the�
shar
ehol
ders
—�
o(a
)�A�r
epor
t�of�t
he�o
pera
tions
�of�t
he�e
nerg
y�co
mpa
ny�a
nd�
thos
e�of
�its�
subs
idia
ries
�(if�a
ny)�d
urin
g�th
e�fin
anci
al�y
ear;
�and
o(b
)�Aud
ited�
cons
olid
ated
�fina
ncia
l�sta
tem
ents
�for�
that
�fin
anci
al�y
ear�
in�r
espe
ct�o
f�the
�ene
rgy�
com
pany
�and
�its�
subs
idia
ries
�(if�a
ny);
�and
�o
(c)�T
he�a
udito
r's�r
epor
t�on—
��
(i)�T
hose
�fina
ncia
l�sta
tem
ents
;�and
��
(ii)�T
he�p
erfo
rman
ce�ta
rget
s�an
d�ot
her�
mea
sure
s�by
�w
hich
�per
form
ance
�has
�bee
n�ju
dged
�in�r
elat
ion�
to�
the�
obje
ctiv
es.�
(4)�E
very
�rep
ort�u
nder
�sub
sect
ion�
(3)(
a)�o
f�thi
s�se
ctio
n�sh
all—
�o
(a)�C
onta
in�s
uch�
info
rmat
ion�
as�is
�nec
essa
ry�to
�ena
ble�
an�
info
rmed
�ass
essm
ent�o
f�the
�ope
ratio
ns�o
f�the
�ene
rgy�
com
pany
�and
�its�
subs
idia
ries
�(if�a
ny),�
incl
udin
g�a�
com
pari
son�
of�th
e�pe
rfor
man
ce�o
f�the
�ene
rgy�
com
pany
�and
�its�
subs
idia
ries
�(if�a
ny)�w
ith�a
ny�r
elev
ant�s
tate
men
t�of�
corp
orat
e�in
tent
;�and
�ht
tp:/
/ww
w.le
gisl
ati
on.g
ovt.
nz/a
ct/p
ubli
c/19
92/0
056/
late
st/
DLM
2677
69.h
tml?
sear
ch=t
s_ac
t_en
ergy
+co
mpa
nies
+act
_res
el&
p=1�
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
20
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
o(b
)�Sta
te�th
e�m
axim
um�d
ivid
end�
(if�a
ny)�r
ecom
men
ded�
to�b
e�pa
yabl
e�by
�the�
ener
gy�c
ompa
ny�in
�res
pect
�of�i
ts�e
quity
�se
curi
ties�
(oth
er�th
an�fi
xed�
inte
rest
�sec
uriti
es)�f
or�th
e�fin
anci
al�y
ear�
to�w
hich
�the�
repo
rt�r
elat
es.
Port
Com
pani
es A
ct
1988
16�R
epor
ts�a
nd�a
ccou
nts�
�(1
)�With
in�2
�mon
ths�
afte
r�th
e�en
d�of
�the�
first
�hal
f�of�e
ach�
finan
cial
�ye
ar�o
f�a�p
ort�c
ompa
ny,�t
he�d
irec
tora
te�o
f�the
�por
t�com
pany
�sha
ll�de
liver
�to�th
e�sh
areh
olde
rs�a
nd�th
e�M
inis
ter�
a�re
port
�of�i
ts�
oper
atio
ns�d
urin
g�th
at�h
alf�
year
.�(2
)�Eac
h�re
port
�req
uire
d�by
�sub
sect
ion�
(1)�o
f�thi
s�se
ctio
n�sh
all�
incl
ude�
the�
info
rmat
ion�
requ
ired
�by�
the�
stat
emen
t�of�c
orpo
rate
�in
tent
�to�b
e�in
clud
ed�th
erei
n.�
(3)�W
ithin
�3�m
onth
s�af
ter�
the�
end�
of�e
ach�
finan
cial
�yea
r�of
�a�p
ort�
com
pany
�or�
such
�long
er�p
erio
d�as
�the�
Min
iste
r�m
ay�a
llow
,�the
�di
rect
orat
e�of
�the�
port
�com
pany
�sha
ll�de
liver
�to�th
e�sh
areh
olde
rs�
and�
the�
Min
iste
r—�
o(a
)�A�r
epor
t�of�t
he�o
pera
tions
�of�t
he�p
ort�c
ompa
ny�a
nd�
thos
e�of
�its�
subs
idia
ries
�dur
ing�
that
�fina
ncia
l�yea
r;�a
nd�
o(b
)�Aud
ited�
cons
olid
ated
�fina
ncia
l�sta
tem
ents
�for�
that
�fin
anci
al�y
ear�
cons
istin
g�of
—�
�(i)
�Sta
tem
ents
�of�f
inan
cial
�pos
ition
,�pro
fit�a
nd�lo
ss,�
and�
cash
�flow
s;�a
nd�
�(ii
)�Suc
h�ot
her�
stat
emen
ts�a
s�m
ay�b
e�ne
cess
ary�
to�
show
�the�
finan
cial
�pos
ition
�of�t
he�p
ort�c
ompa
ny�a
nd�
its�s
ubsi
diar
ies�
and�
the�
finan
cial
�res
ults
�of�t
heir
�op
erat
ions
�dur
ing�
that
�fina
ncia
l�yea
r;�a
nd�
o(c
)�The
�aud
itor's
�rep
ort�o
n�th
ose�
finan
cial
�sta
tem
ents
.�(4
)�Eve
ry�r
epor
t�und
er�s
ubse
ctio
n�(3
)(a)
�of�t
his�
sect
ion�
shal
l—�
o(a
)�Con
tain
�suc
h�in
form
atio
n�as
�is�n
eces
sary
�to�e
nabl
e�an
�
�ht
tp:/
/ww
w.le
gisl
ati
on.g
ovt.
nz/a
ct/p
ubli
c/19
88/0
091/
late
st/
DLM
1321
62.h
tml?
sear
ch=t
s_ac
t_Po
rt+c
om
pani
es+A
ct_r
esel
&p=
1�
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
21
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
info
rmed
�ass
essm
ent�o
f�the
�ope
ratio
ns�o
f�the
�por
t�com
pany
�an
d�its
�sub
sidi
arie
s,�in
clud
ing�
a�co
mpa
riso
n�of
�the�
perf
orm
ance
�of�t
he�p
ort�c
ompa
ny�a
nd�s
ubsi
diar
ies�
with
�any
�re
leva
nt�s
tate
men
t�of�c
orpo
rate
�inte
nt;�a
nd�
o(b
)�Sta
te�th
e�m
axim
um�d
ivid
end�
(if�a
ny)�r
ecom
men
ded�
to�b
e�pa
yabl
e�by
�the�
port
�com
pany
�in�r
espe
ct�o
f�its
�equ
ity�
secu
ritie
s�(o
ther
�than
�fixe
d�in
tere
st�s
ecur
ities
)�for
�the�
finan
cial
�yea
r�to
�whi
ch�th
e�re
port
�rel
ates
.N
Z IA
S 1
Pres
enta
tion
of
Fina
ncia
l Sta
tem
ents
Com
para
tive�
info
rmat
ion�
38�
Exce
pt�w
hen�
NZ�
IFRS
s�pe
rmit�
or�r
equi
re�o
ther
wis
e,�a
n�en
tity�
shal
l�di
sclo
se�c
ompa
rativ
e�in
form
atio
n�in
�res
pect
�of�
the�
prev
ious
�per
iod�
for�
all�
amou
nts�
repo
rted
�in
�th
e�cu
rren
t�pe
riod
’s�
finan
cial
�st
atem
ents
.�A
n�en
tity�
shal
l�in
clud
e�co
mpa
rativ
e�in
form
atio
n�fo
r�na
rrat
ive�
and�
desc
ript
ive�
info
rmat
ion�
whe
n�it�
is�r
elev
ant�
to�a
n�un
ders
tand
ing�
of�th
e�cu
rren
t�per
iod’
s�fin
anci
al�s
tate
men
ts.�
� 40�
In�
som
e�ca
ses,
�na
rrat
ive�
info
rmat
ion�
prov
ided
�in
�th
e�fin
anci
al�
stat
emen
ts�f
or�t
he�p
revi
ous�
peri
od(s
)�co
ntin
ues�
to�b
e�re
leva
nt�i
n�th
e�cu
rren
t�pe
riod
.�Fo
r�ex
ampl
e,�a
n�en
tity�
disc
lose
s�in
�the
�cur
rent
�pe
riod
�det
ails
�of�
a�le
gal�
disp
ute�
who
se�o
utco
me�
was
�unc
erta
in�a
t�th
e�en
d �of
�the
�imm
edia
tely
�pre
cedi
ng�r
epor
ting�
peri
od�a
nd�t
hat�
is�
yet�
to�
be�
reso
lved
.�U
sers
�be
nefit
�fr
om�
info
rmat
ion�
that
�th
e�un
cert
aint
y�ex
iste
d�at
�th
e�en
d�of
�th
e�im
med
iate
ly�
prec
edin
g�re
port
ing�
peri
od,�a
nd�a
bout
�the
�ste
ps�t
hat�
have
�bee
n�ta
ken�
duri
ng�
the�
peri
od�to
�res
olve
�the�
unce
rtai
nty.
�
This
�sta
ndar
d�ap
plie
s�to
�bot
h�pu
blic
�and
�pri
vate
�se
ctor
�ent
ities
�
http
://w
ww
.nzi
ca.c
om
/AM
/Tem
plat
e.cf
m?S
ectio
n=N
ZEIF
RS_2
010_
Volu
me_
files
&Te
mpl
ate=
/CM
/Co
nten
tDis
play
.cfm
&C
onte
ntID
=186
50�
New
Zea
land
Inst
itute
Th
e A
nnua
l Rep
ort A
war
ds a
re d
esig
ned
to e
ncou
rage
exc
elle
nce
in
Two�
links
�sho
wn:
�the�
http
://w
ww
.nzi
ca.c
o
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
22
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Item
R
equi
rem
ents
C
omm
ent
Link
of C
harte
red
Acc
ount
ants
Aw
ards
the
pres
enta
tion
of in
form
atio
n in
ann
ual r
epor
ting.
The
Aw
ards
are
ope
n to
eve
ry o
rgan
isat
ion
that
pro
duce
s an
annu
al
repo
rt, w
ith e
ntra
nts r
angi
ng fr
om m
ultin
atio
nal c
ompa
nies
to sm
all
com
mun
ity g
roup
s. Th
e ju
dges
take
into
acc
ount
the
size
, com
plex
ity
and
soph
istic
atio
n of
eac
h en
trant
as w
ell a
s the
reso
urce
s it h
as
avai
labl
e.
The�
Judg
es'�c
omm
ents
�on�
the�
2009
�aw
ards
�dis
cuss
�the�
crite
ria�
agai
nst�w
hich
�th
e�re
port
s�w
ere�
asse
ssed
.��
first
�is�fo
r�th
e�ju
dges
'�co
mm
ents
�200
9.�
The�
seco
nd�is
�for�
the�
repo
rts�
of�th
e�20
08�
awar
d�w
inne
rs.�
Win
ners
�incl
ude�
a�nu
mbe
r�of
�pub
lic�
sect
or�e
ntiti
es.�
2009
aw
ard
win
ner
repo
rts a
re n
ot in
the
NZI
CA
web
site
but
ca
n be
obt
aine
d if
requ
ired.
m/A
M/T
empl
ate.
cfm
?Sec
tion=
Lead
ersh
ip_A
war
ds&
Tem
plat
e=/C
M/C
onte
ntD
ispl
ay.c
fm&
Cont
entI
D=1
6806
�
http
://w
ww
.nzi
ca.c
om
/AM
/Tem
plat
e.cf
m?S
ectio
n=A
war
ds_
and_
Scho
lars
hips
&T
empl
ate=
/CM
/Con
tent
Dis
play
.cfm
&Co
nten
tID
=831
3�
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
23
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
NA
RR
ATI
VE R
EPO
RTI
NG
IN T
HE
SOU
TH A
FRIC
AN
PU
BLI
C S
ECTO
R
Purp
ose
and
scop
e
The
purp
ose
of t
his
docu
men
t is
to
outli
ne t
he r
equi
rem
ents
and
pra
ctic
es o
f pu
blic
sec
tor
entit
ies
in S
outh
Afri
ca w
ith r
egar
ds t
o na
rrativ
e re
porti
ng.
“Pub
lic s
ecto
r en
titie
s” i
nclu
de n
atio
nal
and
prov
inci
al d
epar
tmen
ts,
gove
rnm
ent
entit
ies/
agen
cies
and
loc
al g
over
nmen
t (in
clud
ing
mun
icip
aliti
es a
nd m
unic
ipal
ent
ities
). G
over
nmen
t bus
ines
s en
terp
rises
hav
e be
en e
xclu
ded
from
this
doc
umen
t.
Bac
kgro
und
Nar
rativ
e re
ports
hav
e be
en p
repa
red
for a
num
ber o
f yea
rs e
ither
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith:
� Le
gisl
atio
n (o
r sim
ilar)
suc
h as
the
Pub
lic F
inan
ce M
anag
emen
t Act
(and
its
acco
mpa
nyin
g R
egul
atio
ns) o
r Mun
icip
al F
inan
ce M
anag
emen
t A
ct (a
nd it
s ac
com
pany
ing
Reg
ulat
ions
and
Circ
ular
s) w
hich
requ
ires
the
prep
arat
ion
of s
peci
fic re
ports
; or
� A
“Cod
e”, s
uch
as th
e Ki
ng C
ode
on C
orpo
rate
Gov
erna
nce2 , o
r pra
ctic
e th
at h
as e
volv
ed o
ver t
ime
(for e
xam
ple,
dra
win
g on
bes
t pra
ctic
e re
porti
ng in
the
priv
ate
sect
or).
Whi
le n
o fo
rmal
sta
ndar
d or
gui
delin
e ex
ists
rega
rdin
g th
e fo
rm a
nd c
onte
nts
of n
arra
tive
repo
rts, t
he N
atio
nal T
reas
ury
has
issu
ed s
ome
liter
atur
e w
hich
bro
adly
out
lines
the
sug
gest
ed c
onte
nts
of s
uch
repo
rts a
t th
e va
rious
leve
ls o
f go
vern
men
t. Th
is d
ocum
ent
outli
nes
the
requ
irem
ent
to
prep
are
such
repo
rts a
t the
var
ious
leve
ls o
f gov
ernm
ent a
nd w
heth
er a
ny g
uida
nce
exis
ts.
Nat
iona
l and
pro
vinc
ial d
epar
tmen
ts
Nat
iona
l an
d pr
ovin
cial
dep
artm
ents
are
req
uire
d to
pre
pare
an
annu
al r
epor
t in
acc
orda
nce
with
sec
tion
40(1
)(d)
of
the
Pub
lic F
inan
ce
Man
agem
ent
Act
(P
FMA
) (s
ee a
ttach
men
t 1)
. F
urth
er t
o th
is,
sect
ion
18.3
of
the
Trea
sury
Reg
ulat
ions
(se
e at
tach
men
t 2)
req
uire
s th
at t
he
follo
win
g in
form
atio
n sh
ould
be
incl
uded
in th
e an
nual
repo
rt.
2 The
Kin
g C
ode
on C
orpo
rate
Gov
erna
nce
is is
sued
by
the
Inst
itute
of D
irect
ors
of S
outh
Afr
ica
(ww
w.io
dsa.
co.z
a).
The
Cod
e is
not
man
dato
ry f
or a
ny e
ntiti
es,
but
is w
idel
y ap
plie
d in
bot
h th
e pu
blic
and
priv
ate
sect
or.
In t
he p
ublic
sec
tor,
man
y go
vern
men
t en
titie
s/ag
enci
es h
ave
adop
ted
Kin
g II.
It is
exp
ecte
d th
at m
any
will
ado
pt th
e ne
w re
vise
d C
ode
(Kin
g III
) in
the
futu
re.
The
Cod
e de
als
with
, for
exa
mpl
e, th
e re
port
ing
on a
ssur
ance
, rem
uner
atio
n an
d su
stai
nabi
lity
(eco
nom
ic a
nd e
nviro
nmen
tal).
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
24
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
S18
.3 o
f the
Tre
asur
y R
egul
atio
ns
In p
repa
ring
the
annu
al re
port
of a
n in
stitu
tion,
the
acco
untin
g of
ficer
mus
t –
a.
in t
he c
ase
of a
dep
artm
ent
or t
radi
ng e
ntity
, co
mpl
y w
ith t
he r
equi
rem
ents
pre
scrib
ed i
n C
hapt
er 1
, P
art
III J
of
the
Pub
lic S
ervi
ce
Reg
ulat
ions
, 200
1 (p
rovi
ded
as a
ttach
men
t 3);
b.
incl
ude
info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
inst
itutio
n’s
effic
ienc
y, e
cono
my
and
effe
ctiv
enes
s in
del
iver
ing
prog
ram
mes
and
ach
ievi
ng it
s ob
ject
ives
and
ou
tcom
es a
gain
st th
e m
easu
res
and
indi
cato
rs s
et o
ut in
any
stra
tegi
c pl
an fo
r the
yea
r und
er c
onsi
dera
tion;
c.
in
clud
e in
form
atio
n on
tran
sfer
s an
d su
bsid
ies
per
orga
nisa
tion
for
the
entir
e fin
anci
al y
ear
as w
ell a
s a
repo
rt on
com
plia
nce
with
sec
tion
38(1
)(j) o
f the
Act
; d.
in
clud
e al
l inf
orm
atio
n re
quire
d in
term
s of
the
annu
al D
ivis
ion
of R
even
ue A
ct;
e.
incl
ude
any
addi
tiona
l inf
orm
atio
n re
quire
d by
Par
liam
ent o
r the
pro
vinc
ial l
egis
latu
re;
f. re
port
on th
e us
e of
fore
ign
aid
assi
stan
ce, d
etai
ling
the
sour
ce a
nd in
tend
ed u
se o
f the
ass
ista
nce
(incl
udin
g th
e va
lue
of a
ny a
id-in
-kin
d in
ra
nd),
perfo
rman
ce in
form
atio
n on
the
inst
itutio
n’s
use
of th
e as
sist
ance
, and
any
pen
ding
app
licat
ions
for a
ssis
tanc
e;
g.
a re
port
from
the
audi
t com
mitt
ee a
s re
quire
d by
par
agra
ph 3
.1.1
3; a
nd
h.
incl
ude
info
rmat
ion
on th
e m
anag
emen
t of P
PP
agr
eem
ents
as
requ
ired
by p
arag
raph
16.
7.1(
f).
The
Offi
ce o
f th
e Ac
coun
tant
-Gen
eral
at
the
Nat
iona
l Tre
asur
y ha
s is
sued
spe
cific
gui
delin
es r
egar
ding
the
ann
ual r
epor
t an
d th
e ac
coun
ting
offic
er’s
re
port
(see
at
tach
men
ts
4 an
d 53 ).
The
guid
ance
is
sued
by
th
e N
atio
nal
Trea
sury
fo
rms
part
of
Dep
artm
enta
l R
epor
ting
Fram
ewor
k/G
uide
issu
ed a
nnua
lly.
In g
ener
al, t
he g
uida
nce
issu
ed b
y th
e N
atio
nal T
reas
ury
outli
nes
that
the
follo
win
g to
pics
sho
uld
be in
clud
ed in
the
Acco
untin
g O
ffice
r’s R
epor
t (m
any
of th
e re
quire
men
ts o
utlin
ed in
sec
tion
18.3
of t
he T
reas
ury
Reg
ulat
ions
are
dis
cuss
ed in
the
Acc
ount
ing
Offi
cer’s
Rep
ort,
with
add
ition
al
info
rmat
ion
bein
g pr
esen
ted
in s
epar
ate
repo
rts):
� G
ener
al re
view
of t
he s
tate
of f
inan
cial
affa
irs.
� S
ervi
ces
rend
ered
by
the
Dep
artm
ent.
�
Cap
acity
con
stra
ints
or c
onsi
dera
tions
. �
Util
isat
ion
of d
onor
fund
s.
� Tr
adin
g en
titie
s an
d pu
blic
ent
ities
that
hav
e be
en e
stab
lishe
d an
d re
port
to th
e D
epar
tmen
t.
� O
rgan
isat
ions
to w
hom
tran
sfer
pay
men
ts m
ade.
�
Pub
lic P
rivat
e P
artn
ersh
ip a
rran
gem
ents
. �
Cor
pora
te g
over
nanc
e ar
rang
emen
ts (f
urth
er in
form
atio
n of
ten
prov
ided
in a
sep
arat
e re
port,
e.g
. rep
ort f
rom
the
audi
t com
mitt
ee).
�
Dis
cont
inue
d or
new
act
iviti
es.
� A
sset
man
agem
ent (
incl
udin
g in
vent
ory
man
agem
ent).
3 The
se d
ocum
ents
are
ava
ilabl
e on
http
://oa
g.tr
easu
ry.g
ov.z
a (C
lick
on P
ublic
atio
ns –
Ann
ual F
inan
cial
Sta
tem
ents
)
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
25
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
� E
vent
s af
ter t
he re
porti
ng d
ate.
�
Rep
ortin
g ag
ains
t pre
-det
erm
ined
obj
ectiv
es (p
erfo
rman
ce re
porti
ng) (
addi
tiona
l inf
orm
atio
n pr
ovid
ed in
a s
epar
ate
repo
rt).
� R
esol
utio
ns is
sued
by
the
Sta
ndin
g C
omm
ittee
on
Pub
lic A
ccou
nts
(SC
OP
A).
�
Mod
ified
aud
it op
inio
ns.
The
annu
al re
port
of th
e N
atio
nal T
reas
ury
has
been
incl
uded
as
an e
xam
ple
of th
e re
ports
pre
pare
d by
dep
artm
ents
(see
atta
chm
ent 6
).
Publ
ic e
ntiti
es
Sim
ilar
to d
epar
tmen
ts,
publ
ic e
ntiti
es a
re a
lso
requ
ired
by t
he P
FMA
to
prep
are
annu
al r
epor
ts (
see
sect
ion
55(1
)(d)
). Fu
rther
to
this
, se
ctio
n 28
.2.2
of t
he T
reas
ury
Reg
ulat
ions
out
lines
cer
tain
info
rmat
ion
that
sho
uld
be in
clud
ed in
the
annu
al re
port.
Sec
tion
28.2
.2 o
f the
Tre
asur
y R
egul
atio
ns
Par
ticul
ars
of th
e pu
blic
ent
ity’s
stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
and
out
com
es a
s id
entif
ied
and
agre
ed o
n by
the
exec
utiv
e au
thor
ity, t
he k
ey p
erfo
rman
ce
mea
sure
s an
d in
dica
tors
for
ass
essi
ng t
he e
ntity
’s p
erfo
rman
ce i
n de
liver
ing
the
desi
red
outc
omes
and
obj
ectiv
es a
nd t
he e
ntity
’s a
ctua
l pe
rform
ance
aga
inst
the
stra
tegi
c ob
ject
ives
and
out
com
es, m
ust b
e di
sclo
sed
in th
e an
nual
repo
rt of
the
publ
ic e
ntity
.
Unl
ike
with
the
dep
artm
ents
, th
e N
atio
nal T
reas
ury
does
not
issu
e an
y gu
idel
ines
on
wha
t in
form
atio
n sh
ould
be
incl
uded
in e
ither
the
ann
ual
repo
rt or
the
repo
rt of
the
Acc
ount
ing
Auth
ority
(gov
erni
ng b
ody,
cou
ncil
or s
imila
r of t
he e
ntity
). M
uch
of th
e re
porti
ng b
y pu
blic
ent
ities
is d
riven
by
goo
d pr
actic
e, a
nd is
ofte
n in
fluen
ced
by th
e re
porti
ng in
priv
ate
sect
or e
ntiti
es (
see
the
Kin
g C
ode
on C
orpo
rate
Gov
erna
nce
II an
d III
). A
s th
ere
is n
o cl
ear
guid
ance
pro
vide
d, th
e in
form
atio
n in
clud
ed in
the
annu
al r
epor
ts m
ay v
ary
from
ent
ity to
ent
ity. I
n ge
nera
l tho
ugh,
the
annu
al
repo
rt an
d/or
acc
ount
ing
auth
ority
’s re
port
incl
ude
a di
scus
sion
of:
� Fi
nanc
ial a
ffairs
�
Ach
ieve
men
t of o
bjec
tives
(mor
e sp
ecifi
c in
form
atio
n pr
ovid
ed in
a s
epar
ate
repo
rt)
� O
pera
tiona
l iss
ues
(fund
ing,
hum
an re
sour
ce is
sues
, com
plia
nce
with
legi
slat
ion,
incl
udin
g he
alth
and
saf
ety)
. �
Gov
erna
nce
(incl
udin
g a
repo
rt fro
m th
e au
dit c
omm
ittee
, env
ironm
enta
l iss
ues/
sust
aina
bilit
y w
hich
is re
lativ
ely
new
, if d
one
at a
ll).
The
annu
al re
port
of th
e A
SB
has
bee
n in
clud
ed a
s an
exa
mpl
e of
the
type
of i
nfor
mat
ion
that
is re
porte
d (s
ee a
ttach
men
t 7).
Loca
l gov
ernm
ent (
mun
icip
aliti
es)
Sec
tion
121
of th
e M
unic
ipal
Fin
ance
Man
agem
ent A
ct (s
ee a
ttach
men
t 8) r
equi
res
the
prep
arat
ion
of a
nnua
l rep
ort,
and
spec
ifies
the
info
rmat
ion
that
mus
t be
incl
uded
in th
e an
nual
repo
rt.
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
26
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
Sec
tion
121
of th
e M
FMA
(1)
Eve
ry m
unic
ipal
ity a
nd e
very
mun
icip
al e
ntity
mus
t fo
r ea
ch f
inan
cial
yea
r pr
epar
e an
ann
ual r
epor
t in
acc
orda
nce
with
thi
s C
hapt
er.
The
coun
cil o
f a m
unic
ipal
ity m
ust w
ithin
nin
e m
onth
s af
ter
the
end
of a
fina
ncia
l yea
r de
al w
ith th
e an
nual
rep
ort o
f the
mun
icip
ality
and
of a
ny
mun
icip
al e
ntity
und
er th
e m
unic
ipal
ity’s
sol
e or
sha
red
cont
rol i
n ac
cord
ance
with
sec
tion
129.
(2
) Th
e pu
rpos
e of
an
annu
al re
port
is—
(a
) to
pro
vide
a re
cord
of t
he a
ctiv
ities
of t
he m
unic
ipal
ity o
r mun
icip
al e
ntity
dur
ing
the
finan
cial
yea
r to
whi
ch th
e re
port
rela
tes;
(b
) to
pro
vide
a re
port
on p
erfo
rman
ce a
gain
st th
e bu
dget
of t
he m
unic
ipal
ity o
r mun
icip
al e
ntity
for t
hat f
inan
cial
yea
r; an
d(c
) to
pro
mot
e ac
coun
tabi
lity
to th
e lo
cal c
omm
unity
for t
he d
ecis
ions
mad
e th
roug
hout
the
year
by
the
mun
icip
ality
or m
unic
ipal
ent
ity.
(3)
The
annu
al re
port
of a
mun
icip
ality
mus
t inc
lude
—
(a)
the
annu
al fi
nanc
ial s
tate
men
ts o
f the
mun
icip
ality
, and
in a
dditi
on, i
f sec
tion
122(
2) a
pplie
s, c
onso
lidat
ed a
nnua
l fin
anci
al s
tate
men
ts, a
s su
bmitt
ed to
the
Aud
itor-
Gen
eral
for a
udit
in te
rms
of s
ectio
n 12
6(1)
; (b
) th
e A
udito
r-G
ener
al’s
aud
it re
port
in te
rms
of s
ectio
n 12
6(3)
on
thos
e fin
anci
al s
tate
men
ts;
(c)
the
ann
ual p
erfo
rman
ce re
port
of th
e m
unic
ipal
ity p
repa
red
by th
e m
unic
ipal
ity in
term
s of
sec
tion
46 o
f the
Mun
icip
al S
yste
ms
Act
; (d
) th
e A
udito
r-G
ener
al’s
aud
it re
port
in te
rms
of s
ectio
n 45
(b) o
f the
Mun
icip
al S
yste
ms
Act
; (e
) an
ass
essm
ent b
y th
e m
unic
ipal
ity’s
acc
ount
ing
offic
er o
f any
arr
ears
on
mun
icip
al ta
xes
and
serv
ice
char
ges;
(f)
an
ass
essm
ent b
y th
e m
unic
ipal
ity’s
acc
ount
ing
offic
er o
f the
mun
icip
ality
’s p
erfo
rman
ce a
gain
st th
e m
easu
rabl
e pe
rform
ance
obj
ectiv
es
refe
rred
to in
sec
tion
17(3
)(b)
for
reve
nue
colle
ctio
n fro
m e
ach
reve
nue
sour
ce a
nd fo
r eac
h vo
te in
the
mun
icip
ality
’s a
ppro
ved
budg
et
for t
he re
leva
nt fi
nanc
ial y
ear;
(g)
parti
cula
rs o
f any
cor
rect
ive
actio
n ta
ken
or to
be
take
n in
resp
onse
to is
sues
rais
ed in
the
audi
t rep
orts
refe
rred
to in
par
agra
phs
(b) a
nd
(d);
(h)
any
expl
anat
ions
that
may
be
nece
ssar
y to
cla
rify
issu
es in
con
nect
ion
with
the
finan
cial
sta
tem
ents
; (i)
an
y in
form
atio
n as
det
erm
ined
by
the
mun
icip
ality
; (j)
an
y re
com
men
datio
ns o
f the
mun
icip
ality
’s a
udit
com
mitt
ee; a
nd
(k)
any
othe
r inf
orm
atio
n as
may
be
pres
crib
ed.
(4)
The
annu
al re
port
of a
mun
icip
al e
ntity
mus
t inc
lude
—
(a)
the
annu
al fi
nanc
ial s
tate
men
ts o
f the
ent
ity, a
s su
bmitt
ed to
the
Aud
itor-
Gen
eral
for a
udit
in te
rms
of s
ectio
n 12
6(2)
; (b
) th
e A
udito
r-G
ener
al’s
aud
it re
port
in te
rms
of s
ectio
n 12
6(3)
on
thos
e fin
anci
al s
tate
men
ts;
(c)
an a
sses
smen
t by
the
entit
y’s
acco
untin
g of
ficer
of a
ny a
rrea
rs o
n m
unic
ipal
taxe
s an
d se
rvic
e ch
arge
s;
(d)
an a
sses
smen
t by
the
entit
y’s
acco
untin
g of
ficer
of t
he e
ntity
’s p
erfo
rman
ce a
gain
st a
ny m
easu
rabl
e pe
rform
ance
obj
ectiv
es s
et in
term
s th
e se
rvic
e de
liver
y ag
reem
ent o
r oth
er a
gree
men
t bet
wee
n th
e en
tity
and
its p
aren
t mun
icip
ality
; (e
) pa
rticu
lars
of a
ny c
orre
ctiv
e ac
tion
take
n or
to b
e ta
ken
in re
spon
se to
issu
es ra
ised
in th
e au
dit r
epor
t ref
erre
d to
in p
arag
raph
(b);
(f)
any
info
rmat
ion
as d
eter
min
ed b
y th
e en
tity
or it
s pa
rent
mun
icip
ality
; (g
) an
y re
com
men
datio
ns o
f the
aud
it co
mm
ittee
of t
he e
ntity
or o
f its
par
ent m
unic
ipal
ity; a
nd
(h)
any
othe
r inf
orm
atio
n as
may
be
pres
crib
ed.
Gui
danc
e ha
s be
en is
sued
by
the
Nat
iona
l Tre
asur
y on
cer
tain
asp
ects
of t
he a
nnua
l rep
ort i
n M
FMA
Circ
ular
11
(see
atta
chm
ent 9
).
IFA
C IP
SASB
Mee
ting
A
gend
a Pa
per
7.3
M
arch
201
1 –
Pari
s, Fr
ance
Page
27
of 2
7
Nar
rativ
e R
epor
ting
– R
esea
rch
Sum
mar
y
MJK
MJK
Feb
ruar
y 20
11
A
link
has
been
pr
ovid
ed
to
the
annu
al
repo
rt of
th
e C
ity
of
Jobu
rg
for
an
exam
ple
of
the
type
of
re
ports
re
prod
uced
(h
ttp://
ww
w.jo
burg
.org
.za/
annu
al_r
epor
t).