international case study: elective surgery in new zealand
DESCRIPTION
Audrey Hauraki, Theatre Manager, from Manukau Surgery Centre delivered this presentation at the 2012 Elective Surgery Redesign Conference. For more information about our wide range of medical and health events covering a broad range of industry issues, please visit www.healthcareconferences.com.auTRANSCRIPT
ELECTIVE SURGICAL
TARGETS
Audrey Hauraki
Auckland’s District Health Boards
Greater Auckland has a total population of 1.5 million people and is divided into three district health boards comprising four major hospitals. • Auckland City Hospital ( ADHB )
• North Shore Hospital and Waitakere City Hospital ( WDHB )
• Counties Manukau District Health Board ( CMDHB )
CMDHB Population
Population 490,000
Diverse ethnicity
– Maaori 17%
– Pacific 19%
– Asian 21%
– European 40%
Middlemore
CMDHB is divided into two major sites Middlemore Hospital • This is a major hospital and includes:
– 920 beds – Emergency department - one of the busiest in Australasia – Department of Critical Care – Burns Unit - Regional & National service – Medicine, General Surgery, Orthopaedics, Plastic Surgery, Women’s
Health wards – Children’s Hospital - Kidz First – Rehabilitation Unit - Healthcare of Older People – Maternity – Mental Health
Middlemore Hospital
Manukau Health Park
• Manukau Health Park is 9km from Middlemore
• Manukau SuperClinic - opened in 1997 • Expanded with additional modules in 2000 & 2009
– Now consists of 10 Modules with 114 clinic rooms and 15 procedure rooms
• Manukau Surgery Centre – extended in 2001 and now
– 74 beds – 4 HDU beds – 10 operating theatres – 2 procedure rooms – 40 chair dialysis unit
Manukau Health Park
Model of Care
• Dedicated elective facility
• Started with Manukau SuperClinic built in 1997 as an
Ambulatory Care facility - transferring majority of outpatients and day surgery from the Middlemore campus
• In the late 1990s the Government identified elective surgery
as a priority with “Waiting Time” funding and Middlemore was at maximum capacity for theatres and beds
• Decision to build Manukau Surgery Centre
Manukau Surgery Centre
• Separation of elective service from acute service to protect the elective service performance
• Phased approach to commissioning
– October 2001 started as an overnight 5.5 day facility – July 2002 Orthopaedic Surgery all elective surgery except of spine and
joint revisions – July 2003 General Surgery moved medium acuity cases – Confidence quickly developed and access was given to higher acuity cases – 2005 a second floor was fitted out to manage the volume
Services Today
• 220,000 outpatient attendances in the past year • 14,456 elective surgical cases in the past year • Specialties include:
– Orthopaedic Surgery - including joint revisions – General Surgery - including Bariatric, Oesophageal & Colorectal – Vascular - cases not requiring ICU – Renal - for tunnel lines – Plastic Surgery - including Breast Reconstruction – Hand and Upper Limb joint replacement – Gynaecology – Ophthalmology - including corneal transplants – ENT - including secondary Head & Neck and Thyroidectomy,
Sialendoscopy – Urology - currently day cases with regional service (expanding to become
CMDHB based service with inpatient beds)
Achievements - Manukau Surgery Centre
• Purpose designed to support elective surgical patients
• 85% of CMDHB elective surgery performed uninterrupted by acute services
• General Surgery recognised the benefits for patient recovery
and started a research programme on why patients recover faster when operated on at MSC
• Staff are rostered separately for each site therefore elective surgery lists are not impacted on by the acute workload
• Decreased length of stay
Achievements
• Innovative health delivery by the Manukau Surgery Centre offers the opportunity to work in an elective environment in a public hospital setting
• 38 additional elective beds plus a 4 bed HDU added to meet demand and increased acuity
• Decreased complications
• High level of patient satisfaction
Elective Surgery Targets
• A dedicated elective facility enabled CMDHB to meet the elective targets set by the organisation and Government
– Initially the targets were total contracted volumes (CWD)
– Waiting lists were managed by highest score/longest waiting
– Then in 2007 Government set volume targets for Total Joint
replacements and Cataract surgery
– Introduction of Government mandated Elective Surgery Targets
– Then notification of a future target of no one waiting longer than 6 months
– Target had to be achieved by 30th June 2012
New Zealand Government Targets
From 2001 the aim has been to provide clarity, timeliness and equity of care on a national basis
The current National Government set targets of:
– No patient waiting over 6 months for First Specialist Assessment (FSA) by 30th June 2012
– No patient waiting over 6 months for treatment by 30th June 2012
Targets met and then
– No patient waiting for FSA or treatment over 5 months by 30th June 2013
– No patient waiting for FSA or treatment over 4 months by 31st December 2014
Achieving no one waiting over 6 months
• Target was not negotiable
• Financial penalty if not achieved
• Need for accurate waiting lists - housekeeping
• Led to improved processes e.g. ensuring patients needing surgery were fit to proceed before being added to the waiting list
• Led to improved customer service - need to negotiate appointments in a timely way
Targets - Achieving 6 months
• All services needed to take responsibility
• Can not remove patients without seeing / treating – once on the list service is committed to seeing that patient
• Maximising the use of all available theatre lists
• Outsourcing surgery to private providers (publicly funded)
Results
• All Services at CMDHB achieved no patient waiting over 6 months by 30th June 2012
• Services are now tracking well to achieving the 5 month target by 30th June 2013
• Some services on target to achieve the 5 month target by 31st December 2012
Case Study
Ophthalmology
• Issue - low number of cataract procedures on each theatre list
• Needed to increase number as only one Ophthalmology theatre available
• To increase 06/07 internal production to achieve annual target of 1037 procedures set by Ministry 05/06 only achieved 855
If Private can do it why can’t we?
Was it an equipment issue?
• Aging microscope
• Only five cataract sets
• 5 phaco hand pieces
• 3 operating beds
• A stool with limited function
Was it a staff issue?
• Aging workforce
• Skill mix
Would Equipment alone solve the issue?
• Needed to understand how the private sector achieve their throughput
• Set up a project for streamlining the Surgical Pathway
Objective:
• To observe the differences between a private provider and compare to Manukau Surgery Centre processes
Model of Care Comparison
MSC Private Provider
Reception 2 receptionists 4 receptionists
Pre-op Nurse allocated to block area
May help in pre-op
Distance between
pre-op and theatre
Special room for theatre check and eye drops
Pre-op wait opposite the theatre
Theatre 2 RNs & HCA ORL/Ophthalmology
3-4 RNs experienced in ophthalmic surgery
MSC Private Provider
Theatre Pre-op checking
Computer entries
Very little paper work
No computer
Lens checked by surgeon day before
Microscope Mobile
Nurses set up
Ceiling mounted and surgeons helps set up
Session 8.30 -12
1.30 - 5
8-12/until list finishes
1-5/until the list finishes
MSC Private Provider
Lens Surgeon loads Nurse loads
Anaesthesia Different Anaesthetist depending on roster
Same Anaesthetist every week
Helped with positioning, monitoring set up
Post Op Theatre nurse takes patient to second stage
Nurse comes into theatre to collect patient
MSC Private Provider
SSU 0 dedicated
12 theatres working multi specialty
1 dedicated tech for cleaning, sterilising & repacking
Recommendations for MSC
• Preop nurse to be dedicated to eye list so the theatre nurse does not leave OR
• Theatre model to be 3 RNs & 1 HCA
• Anaesthetists to be encouraged to be part of team to streamline flow
• 2 RNS allocated to 2nd stage to manage volume - allows the theatre nurse to handover
Request for Equipment
• New microscope
• 2 new Stryker beds
• New surgical stool
• Increase in cataract sets to 10
• 5 extra phaco hand pieces
• Development of customised procedure pack
• Introduction of Ozil technology
Outcome of redesign for Cataract lists
• It is standard to have 5 - 6 patients on all lists
• New equipment, customised packs and increased instruments have all helped to improve throughput
• Staffing model of dedicated preop staff, 3 RNs & HCA in theatre and 2 RNs in 2nd stage has improved the work flow
• Stable workforce
• A purpose built Ophthalmology suite would give additional gains
Where are we now?
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
Jul-
11
Au
g-
Se
p-
O
ct-
N
ov-
D
ec-
J
an-
F
eb-
Ma
r-
A
pr-
Ma
y-
J
un-
Month
Seen
Removed Other
Return to GP
TOWL
Waiting > 3 months
Waiting > 5 months
Waiting > 6 months
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Ophthalmology - Managing the volume
• Keep dedicated appointment slots for new patients - not used for follow ups
• Look for alternative clinics to free up SMOs
– Technician led stable post Avastin
– Technician led Anterior Segment photo clinic
– Nurse led post op Cataract clinic
– Stable Glaucoma clinics
• Saturday clinics
• Recruitment
Surgery Waiting List
0
150
300
450
600
750
900
1050
Jul-
11
Au
g-
Se
p-
O
ct-
N
ov-
D
ec-
J
an-
F
eb-
Ma
r-
A
pr-
Ma
y-
J
un-
Month
Treated
Removed Other
TOWL
Waiting > 3 months
Waiting > 6 months
Waiting > 5 months
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Ophthalmology - Managing the volume waiting for surgery
• Development of a procedure room in clinic
• 1992 procedures performed 2011/12 that used to be done in theatre
• Maximising the available theatre lists - 5-6 cataract on each list
• Flexible rostering for lists covering leave
• Reducing cancellations and DNA on day of surgery
• Outsourcing
– 600 Cataract patients outsourced 2011/12 year
CONGRATULATIONS
Local MP visits CMDHB to recognise and congratulate the achievement
Next Challenge - Now working on achieving 5 months
• Target of 5 months is non negotiable • FSA
– constant monitoring – Still working on sustainability of 6 months – Saturday custom clinics as required – outsourcing to private sector 100 FSA for Occular Plastic
• Surgery – Streamlining preadmission processes – Very close to achieving this target – Still outsourcing 600 Cataract procedures
Future Challenges - Achieving the 4 month targets
• Target of 4 months is non negotiable • 5 months will be achieved due to additional clinics and
theatre lists
• Achieving 4 months needs a new way of managing patients across the continuum
– Teamwork at scheduling meetings to maximise theatre use – Currently looking at treatment pathways – Discharge from follow up clinics – What can be managed in the community – Alternative workforce roles
Points to Take Away
• You only need to go from good to better
• Find your natural leaders
• Education
• Reward good performance
• Ignore dinosaurs
Acknowledgements
• My team for staying at work while I present
• Kathie Smith - Service Manager for ORL, Ophthalmology & Audiology, MSC Operational Manager
• Catherine Larsen - Service Manager of Theatres
• Sue Shipperlee - Elective Services Manager
• Photographic Department CMDHB
• Conference Organising Committee