internal image of organization and commitment of employees dr. natalia antonova national research...

27
Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Upload: abraham-harrington

Post on 01-Jan-2016

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of

Employees

Dr. Natalia ANTONOVANational Research University

“Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Page 2: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

The structure of the presentation Problem Statement Theoretical Background The Empirical Investigation of Internal

Image and Organizational Commitment Results Conclusions

Page 3: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Problem Statement

Loyal staff creates a competitive advantage of business organization

Loyal staff creates a positive external image of the company

It’s especially important during crisis period

There are no empirical evidence about relationship between organizational loyalty and commitment and internal image of organization in Russian companies

Page 4: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Theoretical Background

Page 5: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Organizational loyalty/commitment

Two approaches:• the definition of loyalty as commitment,

dedication, which is provided by organizational factors (organizational commitment);

• definition of loyalty as a special psychological phenomenon, directly related to the staff (employee loyalty)

The boundaries between the concepts of commitment and loyalty are blurred

Page 6: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

The study approaches

1) Behavioral approach assumes that loyalty is formed by the behavior of employees.

2) Attitudinal approach: the loyalty is considered as an attitude, and as an emotional connection between the employee and the organization.

Page 7: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Components of Organizational commitmentD. Meyer and H. Allen:1) affective commitment (emotional

relationships between employee and organization) ;

2) normative commitment (perceived obligations towards the organization) ;

3) continuance commitment (perceived costs of leaving the organization).

Page 8: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Factors of Organizational CommitmentOrganizational factors:1) the compensation for the adverse working

conditions; 2) properly structured information policy; 3) promotion of team spirit; 4) caring for employees and help in

resolving difficulties;

Page 9: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Factors of organizational commitmentEmployee’s factors:1) job satisfaction, 2) organizational identification, 3) leadership

Internal image of organization???

Page 10: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Internal image of organizationInternal image of organization is a way the

employees perceive their organization.

Internal image defines trust of employees to the organization and, as a consequence, the organizational commitment (?)

Page 11: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Structure of the organizational image

1) self-actualization as a major factor (the development of professional skills and knowledge, the implementation of needs in career development);

2) social security (material well-being, job security in the future);

3) status prestige of the organization (reputation of the company, developed corporate symbols, the location of the organization, the image of organizational leader, the image of the product)

(Shagzhina)

Page 12: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

The Empirical Investigation of Internal Image and Organizational Commitment

Page 13: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Purpose and Hypotheses

Purpose: to investigate the relationship between employee’s commitment and internal image of organization.

Hypotheses: 1) there is a relationship between the internal image of organization and organizational commitment of the staff;

2) affective component of organizational commitment is mostly associated with the components of the internal image;

3) a kind of business and some characteristics of organization mediate the relationship between internal image and employee’s commitment.

Page 14: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Participants

We investigated the staff of three organizations of Russian cities Lipetsk and Voronezh.

A total of 198 respondents participated: the company "A", located in the city of

Lipetsk, included 98 people; the number of respondents from organizations "B" (47 people) and "C" (53 people), located in Voronezh, was 100.

Page 15: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Features of organizations participated in the study

“A” company: the trade company which sells products in different regions of the world, except in Russia. All employees receive an official (“white”) salary.

“B” company: a branch of American company producing and selling software (official and high salary).

“C” company: distributes foods in the Central and the Volga region of Russia. The salary is only partly official.

Page 16: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Methods1) the method of studying the internal image

of the organization, developed by Shagzhina (the results were processed by factor analysis);

2) "The scale of organizational commitment" developed by Meyer and Allen, in Russian translation made by Dominyak

Page 17: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Results

Page 18: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

“А” organization: internal image

% fro

m m

aximu

m level

factors

dispersion

Positive evaluation

1 2 3 4 5

1 self-actual.

2 social security

3 general attr.

4 status-prestige

5 trust

Page 19: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

“B” organization: internal image

% fro

m m

aximu

m level

dispersion

Positive evaluation

1 self-actual.2 social security3 general attr.4 status-prestige5 trust 1 2 3 4 5

factors

Page 20: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

“C” organization: internal image

Positive evaluation

1 self-actual.2 social security3 general attr.4 status-prestige5 trust

1 2 3 4 5

factors

% fro

m m

aximu

m level

dispersion

Page 21: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Высшая школа экономики, Москва, 2013

Possibilities and attractiveness for self-actualization and self-development

Affective commitment 0,411

Possibilities and attractiveness for self-actualization and self-development

Continuance commitment 0,323

Social SecurityAffective commitment

0,358

Organization “А” : relationship between factors of internal image and commitment components

Page 22: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Высшая школа экономики, Москва, 2013

Possibilities and attractiveness for self-actualization and self-development

Affective commitment 0,506

General attractiveness

Continuance commitment0,333

Social SecurityAffective commitment

0,433

Social SecurityContinuance commitment0,456

Organization “B” : relationship between factors of internal image and commitment components

Page 23: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Высшая школа экономики, Москва, 2013

Possibilities and attractiveness for self-actualization and self-development

Affective commitment 0,311

Trust

Normative commitment-0,300

Affective commitment

0,448

Social Security

Continuance commitment

0,303

Normative commitment

0,384

Organization “C” : relationship between factors of internal image and commitment components

Page 24: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

LimitationsWe studied only three specific companies in

specific Russian region. We tried to observe the companies with

different businesses and characteristics, but of cause didn’t cover all possible organizational conditions.

Page 25: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Conclusions1) There is a correlation between internal image of

organization and some components of organizational commitment.

2) There are correlations which are common for organizations with different characteristics:

a) the correlation between factor "The ability and appeal to self-actualization and development" and the affective component of organizational commitment;

b) b) the correlation between the factor "Social security" and the affective component of commitment. These correlations confirm our second hypothesis about closer ties of affective commitment with internal image of organization.

Page 26: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

ConclusionsWe found some links which are more typical only for

certain companies: a) in the company “C”, which has some specific

features: the factor of internal image “Social security” correlates with all components of organizational commitment, factor "Trust" has a negative correlation with normative commitment;

b) in the company "B" factor "General attractiveness" has weak correlation with continued loyalty. These correlations confirm our third hypothesis that some characteristics of organization mediate the relationship between internal image and employee’s commitment, but due to the limitations of our research, this problem needs further investigations.

Page 27: Internal Image of Organization and Commitment of Employees Dr. Natalia ANTONOVA National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia

Thank you for your attention!

[email protected]