intermolecular interaction of water hexamer
TRANSCRIPT
Intermolecular interaction ofwater hexamerwater hexamer
Yiming ChenOctober 5th, 2009
Contents
• Background Information
Previous Investigations
• Energy Decomposition Analysis of Water Hexamer
• Acknowledgement
Contents• Background Informat ion
Intermolecular Interaction
• Water Clusters
• Energy Decomposition Analysis
Previous Investigations
• Energy Decomposition Analysis of Water Hexamer
• Acknowledgement
Intermolecular Interaction
• Forces act between stable molecules.
Categories
• London Dispersion Force
• Dipole-Dipole Interaction
• Hydrogen Boding
Water Cluster
• Definition: discrete hydrogen bonded assembly or cluster of molecules of water
• Examples: Dimer, Trimer, Tetramer, Pentamer, Hexamer, and etc.
Water Cluster
The Cambridge Cluster Database
Water Cluster
• Why we study water clusters?
Understanding cloud and ice formation
• Solution chemistry
• Large number of biochemical processes
Molecular Dynamics
Energy Decomposition Analysis (EDA)
• Definition: Decompose total interaction energy from a supermolecule calculation into several energetic terms.
Example: Intermolecular interaction in water dimer with LMOEDA method (kcal/mol) *
Electrostatic Energy
Exchange Energy
Repulsion Energy
Polarization Energy
Dispersion Energy Total Energy
-8.41 -8.85 16.01 -2.38 -1.33 -4.95
* THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 131, 014102 (2009)
Contents• Background Information
Previous Invest igat ions
• Experimental Studies
• Theoretical Studies
• Energy Decomposition Analysis of Water Hexamer
Acknowledgement
Experimental StudiesObjective: Use sophisticated spectroscopic tools (like Far-infrared (FIR) vibration-rotation-tunneling (VRT) spectroscopy) to determine the structure of water clusters.
Experimental Studies
The structures of (H2O)n (n=6-20) clusters have been characterized by spectroscopy method;
• Different structures of water clusters in different phases (Solid, gas, crystal) are detected;
Supramolecular structures in bulk water is still difficult to study by experimental method.
Theoretical Studies• Structures: larger clusters are predicted,
like W20-W28 (bucky water), icosahedral network;
• Energy: Energetic low-lying clustersare found by theoretical calculation;
• Studies focus on intermolecular interactions are still rare.
Contents• Background Information
Previous Investigations
• Energy Decomposit ion Analysis of Water Hexamer
Introduction of investigation
• Intermolecular interactions of water hexamers
• Many-body interaction: additivity of energy terms
• Acknowledgement
Target of Investigation
• (H2O)n clusters are planar when n=1-5;
Eight low-lying water hexamers are taken: prism, cage, bag, chair, book & boat;
Method of Investigation
• Software: Gamess ver. 118 (Aug. 14, 2009);
Geometry Optimization: MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ;
EDA: LMOEDA method proposed by Su and Li* is taken to study the physical origins of intermolecular interactions, at MP2/aug-cc-pV5Z level;
* THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 131, 014102 (2009)
Method of Investigation
• LMOEDA: Total interaction energy will be decomposed into five terms: electrostatic ( EΔ es), exchange ( EΔ ex), repulsion ( EΔ rep), polarization ( EΔ pol), dispersion ( EΔ disp);
• To evaluate the energy changes aroused by the distortion of geometry, the energetic differences between free water molecule and water in hexamer are calculated, called “Preparation Energy” ( EΔ pre).
* THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS 131, 014102 (2009)
Intermolecular Interactions of Water Hexamers
Cluster EΔ pre EΔ es EΔ ex EΔ rep EΔ pol EΔ disp EΔ total
Prism +1.32 -81.98 -103.15 +187.66 -34.69 -15.26 -46.09Cage +1.28 -82.67 -105.31 +192.51 -36.58 -15.28 -46.05Bag +1.52 -82.36 -107.29 +197.61 -40.27 -14.10 -44.88Chair +1.32 -81.87 -105.83 +196.33 -43.03 -11.87 -44.95Boat-1 +1.33 -80.04 -103.75 +192.30 -41.82 -11.98 -43.96Boat-2 +1.30 -79.64 -103.09 +191.02 -41.62 -11.84 -43.87Book-1 +1.37 -83.38 -107.24 +197.70 -40.39 -13.84 -45.78Book-2 +1.40 -83.14 -106.79 +196.80 -39.81 -13.92 -45.46
Unit: kcal/mol
Intermolecular Interactions of Water Hexamers
• Conclusion:
different terms have various contributions to total interaction energy;
• Absolute value of repulsion roughly equals to the sum of electrostatic energy and exchange energy;
Many-body interactions
• Two-body and three-body interactions of eight hexamers are studied, four-body interactions of most low-lying prism and cage clusters are studied.
• Additivity of different energy terms are discussed separately.
Many-body interactions• Additivity: the total interaction energy term
equals to the sum of energy terms of each pair of water molecules.
In two-body study, the total electrostatic energy equals to the sum 15 pairwise energy terms in water hexamers:EΔ es (TOTAL) = EΔ es (12)+ EΔ es (13)+ EΔ es (14)+ EΔ es (15)+ EΔ es (16)+ EΔ es
(23)+ EΔ es (24)+ EΔ es (25)+ EΔ es (26)+ EΔ es (34)+ EΔ es (35)+ EΔ es (36)+ EΔ es (45)+ EΔ es (46)+ EΔ es (56)
• The total energy could be considered as “Six-Body” interaction energy.
Many-body interactions
Cluster EΔ es EΔ ex EΔ rep EΔ pol EΔ disp EΔ total
Two-BodyInteraction
Prism -81.98 -103.15 +188.49 -25.82 -15.15 -37.64Cage -82.67 -105.30 +193.30 -27.54 -15.18 -37.43Bag -82.36 -107.30 +198.45 -29.44 -15.03 -34.55Chair -81.86 -105.85 +196.95 -29.98 -11.71 -32.39Boat-1 -80.05 -103.76 +192.95 -29.34 -11.77 -31.98Boat-2 -79.63 -103.10 +191.67 -29.11 -11.69 -31.87Book-1 -83.38 -107.26 +198.36 -29.50 -13.67 -35.36Book-2 -83.14 -106.79 +197.44 -29.25 -13.72 -35.46
Three-BodyInteraction
Prism -81.98 -103.15 +188.26 -27.93 -15.15 -39.94Cage -82.67 -105.31 +193.09 -29.69 -15.20 -39.78Bag -82.35 -107.29 +198.23 -31.89 -15.03 -34.55Chair -81.86 -105.82 +196.80 -32.78 -11.68 -35.35Boat-1 -80.04 -103.76 +192.78 -32.04 -11.78 -34.84Boat-2 -79.64 -103.16 +191.62 -31.86 -11.68 -34.70Book-1 -83.38 -107.24 +198.19 -31.95 -13.68 -38.05Book-2 -83.13 -106.79 +197.28 -31.67 -13.74 -38.05
Four-BodyInteraction
Prism -81.98 -103.15 +188.05 -30.10 -15.18 -42.35Cage -82.67 -105.31 +192.88 -31.91 -15.21 -42.22
Unit: kcal/mol
Many-body interactions• Conclusion
• The electrostatic energy ( EΔ es) and exchange energy ( EΔ es) are strictly additive;
• Repulsion energy ( EΔ rep) and dispersion energy ( EΔ disp) are roughly additive (in 1 kcal/mol);
• Polarization energy ( EΔ pol) is not additive at all, it totally dependent on the scale of system.
Contents
• Background Information
• Previous Investigations
• Energy Decomposition Analysis of Water Hexamer
• Acknowledgement
Acknowledgment
• Dr. Hui Li
• Dr. Barry Cheung
• Dr. Peifeng Su
• Dejun Si
• Nandun Thellamurege
Thank you!