intermediate - h24-files.s3.amazonaws.comh24-files.s3.amazonaws.com/50165/117571-6dqlc.pdfthe first...

6
The FIRST trifocal diffractive IOL which improves intermediate vision while maintaining performance at far and near distances. Give your patients the they want Far Intermediate Near

Upload: lamminh

Post on 09-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Intermediate - h24-files.s3.amazonaws.comh24-files.s3.amazonaws.com/50165/117571-6dqlC.pdfThe FIRST trifocal diffractive IOL which improves intermediate vision while maintaining performance

The FIRST trifocal diffractive IOL which improves intermediate vision while maintaining performance at far and near distances.

Give your patients the they want

Far

Intermediate

Near

The Micro platform features all the characteristics required for quality phaco-refractive surgery. Therefore PhysIOL decided to offer its FineVision trifocal diffractive optic onthis design proven since 2003 with SlimFlex, then MicroSlim, Micro AY and Micro A.

The Micro design: a proven platform

Micro F specifications

Micro F design with FineVision optic:for high quality phaco-refractive surgery

4-point design for stability (1, 2, 3, 4)

Compatibility with micro-incision to avoidinduced astigmatism (1, 2, 3, 4)

2-Step Technology for low Yag rate (1, 3, 5, 6)

BlueTech for photoprotection and photoreception (5, 7)

Aspheric optic for contrast sensitivity and depth of field (8)

(1) Lesieur G. Why use a hydrophilic acrylic IOL in 2009? Insert to Cataract and Refractive Surgery Today Europe. October 2009. (2) Deidier D. A 400 patient study on new IOLs implantable through microincisions. ESCRS 2007. (3) Deidier D. Surgical and clinical performance of a new preloaded micro-incision lens. ASCRS 2009. (4) Rigal-Sastourné JC. Multicentre study on MICS and microincision IOLs: about 124 cases. ESCRS 2009. (5) C. Chassain. Hydrophilic versus hydrophobic: which is the best option ? Ohthalmology Times Europe, Sept 2008. (6) Lesieur G. Clinical outcomes in a large series of 699 eyes implanted with micro-incision lenses. ASCRS 2009. (7) Mashhour B. Photoreception with blue-light filtering IOLs. Insert to Cataract and Refractive Surgery Today Europe. October 2009. (8) Rozot P. Refractive aspect of cataract – Toward customisation. European Ophthalmic Review, 2009:81-82. (9) Observational study, 11 surgeons 100 patients interim results after 50 patients (2 months post-op), 2010. (10) Blaylock JF, Si Z, Vickers C. Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of RESTOR multifocal intraocular lens. JCRS 2006 Sept; 32: 1464-73. (11) Cortesy Dr Blanckaert/Pr Cochener/Dr Lesieur/Dr Rozot/Dr Van Acker /Dr Vryghem. (12) Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Puchades C, Montés-Micó R. Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 May;36(5):733-9. (13) de Vries NE, Webers CA, Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Nuijts RM. Visual outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of a +3.00 D or +4.00 D aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: Comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Aug;36 (8):1316-22.

Liège Science Park • Allée des Noisetiers, 4 • B-4031 Liège - Belgium • Tél.: +32 (0) 4 361 05 49 • Fax: +32 (0) 4 361 05 30www.physiol.eu

Far

Intermediate

Near

2011

/04

25% hydrophilic acrylic10.75 mm6.15 mmAspheric trifocal diffractive FineVisionUV and blue light5°Microincision injection≥ 1.8mm+ 10D to + 30D (0.5D steps)Haigis: a0 = 1.36 (interferometry) 1.04 (ultra-sound), a1 = 0.4, a2 = 0.1Hoffer Q: ACD=5.52 (interferometry) 5.26 (ultra-sound)Holladay 1: Sf=1.74 (interferometry) 1.48 (ultra-sound)SRK II: A =119.3 (interferometry) 118.9 (ultra-sound)SRK/T: A =118.9 (interferometry) 118.6 (ultra-sound)

Material:Overall diameter:Optic diameter:Optic:Filtration:Angulation:Injection system:Incision:Power:Suggested constants:

Page 2: Intermediate - h24-files.s3.amazonaws.comh24-files.s3.amazonaws.com/50165/117571-6dqlC.pdfThe FIRST trifocal diffractive IOL which improves intermediate vision while maintaining performance

The FineVision optic has a diffractive anterior surface entirely convoluted. By varying the height of the diffractive step, the amount of light distributed to the near, intermediate and distant foci is adjusted according to the pupil aperture.

The results obtained with the FineVision optic are promising and consistent with observations and laboratory tests with very satisfactory uncorrected visual acuity at all distances and an extended range of vision in all light conditions.

Optimising far, near and intermediate vision Promising visual results

FineVision works in conjunction with the pupil to provide a range of quality vision in all light conditions

Early postoperative binocular defocus curve in photopic conditions

Binocular uncorrected visual acuities

The first diffractive trifocal optic

FineVision is designed to improve intermediate visionwhile maintaining far and near vision

Addition + 1.75D intermediate vision Addition + 3.5D near vision Diffractive anterior surface Aspheric surface (-0.11μm SA)

The FineVision optic combines two diffractive structures that are adjusted to offer the +3.5D addition for near vision and another +1.75D addition for intermediate vision.

It is designed so as to reduce the loss of light energy resulting from any diffractive system.

This energy gain results in a significantly improved performance for intermediate vision while maintainingthe performance for far and near vision.

Convolution of the FineVision optic

Near INtermedIate Far

n = 50(9)

J 1.0

± 0.6

J 1.7

± 1.0

1.0

± 0.17

dIFFraCtIVe IOL + 4dn = 37(10)

J 1.5 J 5.5 1.0

Pupil diameter (mm)

% e

nerg

y

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

Far vision (lens power+0D) Near vision (+3.5D) Intermediate vision (+1.75D)

MTF peaks at 50 cy/mm, aperture 3.75 mm, monochromatic light.

0.45

0.4

0.35

0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0

FAR INTERMEDIATE NEAR

(+3.5D & +1.75D)

diffractive IOL (+3D) diffractive IOL (+3.75D) diffractive IOL (+4D)

defocus (d)

Visu

al a

cuit

y (L

ogm

ar

)

0 -1

100 cm

0.4

0.5

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

-0.1

-2

50 cm 33 cm

-3 -4

(25 patients) (11)

diffractive IOL (+3D) (13)

diffractive IOL (+3.75D) (12)

diffractive IOL (+4D) (13)

Page 3: Intermediate - h24-files.s3.amazonaws.comh24-files.s3.amazonaws.com/50165/117571-6dqlC.pdfThe FIRST trifocal diffractive IOL which improves intermediate vision while maintaining performance

The FineVision optic has a diffractive anterior surface entirely convoluted. By varying the height of the diffractive step, the amount of light distributed to the near, intermediate and distant foci is adjusted according to the pupil aperture.

The results obtained with the FineVision optic are promising and consistent with observations and laboratory tests with very satisfactory uncorrected visual acuity at all distances and an extended range of vision in all light conditions.

Optimising far, near and intermediate vision Promising visual results

FineVision works in conjunction with the pupil to provide a range of quality vision in all light conditions

Early postoperative binocular defocus curve in photopic conditions

Binocular uncorrected visual acuities

The first diffractive trifocal optic

FineVision is designed to improve intermediate visionwhile maintaining far and near vision

Addition + 1.75D intermediate vision Addition + 3.5D near vision Diffractive anterior surface Aspheric surface (-0.11μm SA)

The FineVision optic combines two diffractive structures that are adjusted to offer the +3.5D addition for near vision and another +1.75D addition for intermediate vision.

It is designed so as to reduce the loss of light energy resulting from any diffractive system.

This energy gain results in a significantly improved performance for intermediate vision while maintainingthe performance for far and near vision.

Convolution of the FineVision optic

Near INtermedIate Far

n = 50(9)

J 1.0

± 0.6

J 1.7

± 1.0

1.0

± 0.17

dIFFraCtIVe IOL + 4dn = 37(10)

J 1.5 J 5.5 1.0

Pupil diameter (mm)

% e

nerg

y

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

Far vision (lens power+0D) Near vision (+3.5D) Intermediate vision (+1.75D)

MTF peaks at 50 cy/mm, aperture 3.75 mm, monochromatic light.

0.45

0.4

0.35

0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0

FAR INTERMEDIATE NEAR

(+3.5D & +1.75D)

diffractive IOL (+3D) diffractive IOL (+3.75D) diffractive IOL (+4D)

defocus (d)

Visu

al a

cuit

y (L

ogm

ar

)

0 -1

100 cm

0.4

0.5

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

-0.1

-2

50 cm 33 cm

-3 -4

(25 patients) (11)

diffractive IOL (+3D) (13)

diffractive IOL (+3.75D) (12)

diffractive IOL (+4D) (13)

Page 4: Intermediate - h24-files.s3.amazonaws.comh24-files.s3.amazonaws.com/50165/117571-6dqlC.pdfThe FIRST trifocal diffractive IOL which improves intermediate vision while maintaining performance

The FineVision optic has a diffractive anterior surface entirely convoluted. By varying the height of the diffractive step, the amount of light distributed to the near, intermediate and distant foci is adjusted according to the pupil aperture.

The results obtained with the FineVision optic are promising and consistent with observations and laboratory tests with very satisfactory uncorrected visual acuity at all distances and an extended range of vision in all light conditions.

Optimising far, near and intermediate vision Promising visual results

FineVision works in conjunction with the pupil to provide a range of quality vision in all light conditions

Early postoperative binocular defocus curve in photopic conditions

Binocular uncorrected visual acuities

The first diffractive trifocal optic

FineVision is designed to improve intermediate visionwhile maintaining far and near vision

Addition + 1.75D intermediate vision Addition + 3.5D near vision Diffractive anterior surface Aspheric surface (-0.11μm SA)

The FineVision optic combines two diffractive structures that are adjusted to offer the +3.5D addition for near vision and another +1.75D addition for intermediate vision.

It is designed so as to reduce the loss of light energy resulting from any diffractive system.

This energy gain results in a significantly improved performance for intermediate vision while maintainingthe performance for far and near vision.

Convolution of the FineVision optic

Near INtermedIate Far

n = 50(9)

J 1.0

± 0.6

J 1.7

± 1.0

1.0

± 0.17

dIFFraCtIVe IOL + 4dn = 37(10)

J 1.5 J 5.5 1.0

Pupil diameter (mm)

% e

nerg

y

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

Far vision (lens power+0D) Near vision (+3.5D) Intermediate vision (+1.75D)

MTF peaks at 50 cy/mm, aperture 3.75 mm, monochromatic light.

0.45

0.4

0.35

0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0

FAR INTERMEDIATE NEAR

(+3.5D & +1.75D)

diffractive IOL (+3D) diffractive IOL (+3.75D) diffractive IOL (+4D)

defocus (d)

Visu

al a

cuit

y (L

ogm

ar

)

0 -1

100 cm

0.4

0.5

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

-0.1

-2

50 cm 33 cm

-3 -4

(25 patients) (11)

diffractive IOL (+3D) (13)

diffractive IOL (+3.75D) (12)

diffractive IOL (+4D) (13)

Page 5: Intermediate - h24-files.s3.amazonaws.comh24-files.s3.amazonaws.com/50165/117571-6dqlC.pdfThe FIRST trifocal diffractive IOL which improves intermediate vision while maintaining performance

The FIRST trifocal diffractive IOL which improves intermediate vision while maintaining performance at far and near distances.

Give your patients the they want

Far

Intermediate

Near

The Micro platform features all the characteristics required for quality phaco-refractive surgery. Therefore PhysIOL decided to offer its FineVision trifocal diffractive optic onthis design proven since 2003 with SlimFlex, then MicroSlim, Micro AY and Micro A.

The Micro design: a proven platform

Micro F specifications

Micro F design with FineVision optic:for high quality phaco-refractive surgery

4-point design for stability (1, 2, 3, 4)

Compatibility with micro-incision to avoidinduced astigmatism (1, 2, 3, 4)

2-Step Technology for low Yag rate (1, 3, 5, 6)

BlueTech for photoprotection and photoreception (5, 7)

Aspheric optic for contrast sensitivity and depth of field (8)

(1) Lesieur G. Why use a hydrophilic acrylic IOL in 2009? Insert to Cataract and Refractive Surgery Today Europe. October 2009. (2) Deidier D. A 400 patient study on new IOLs implantable through microincisions. ESCRS 2007. (3) Deidier D. Surgical and clinical performance of a new preloaded micro-incision lens. ASCRS 2009. (4) Rigal-Sastourné JC. Multicentre study on MICS and microincision IOLs: about 124 cases. ESCRS 2009. (5) C. Chassain. Hydrophilic versus hydrophobic: which is the best option ? Ohthalmology Times Europe, Sept 2008. (6) Lesieur G. Clinical outcomes in a large series of 699 eyes implanted with micro-incision lenses. ASCRS 2009. (7) Mashhour B. Photoreception with blue-light filtering IOLs. Insert to Cataract and Refractive Surgery Today Europe. October 2009. (8) Rozot P. Refractive aspect of cataract – Toward customisation. European Ophthalmic Review, 2009:81-82. (9) Observational study, 11 surgeons 100 patients interim results after 50 patients (2 months post-op), 2010. (10) Blaylock JF, Si Z, Vickers C. Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of RESTOR multifocal intraocular lens. JCRS 2006 Sept; 32: 1464-73. (11) Cortesy Dr Blanckaert/Pr Cochener/Dr Lesieur/Dr Rozot/Dr Van Acker /Dr Vryghem. (12) Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Puchades C, Montés-Micó R. Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 May;36(5):733-9. (13) de Vries NE, Webers CA, Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Nuijts RM. Visual outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of a +3.00 D or +4.00 D aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: Comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Aug;36 (8):1316-22.

Liège Science Park • Allée des Noisetiers, 4 • B-4031 Liège - Belgium • Tél.: +32 (0) 4 361 05 49 • Fax: +32 (0) 4 361 05 30www.physiol.eu

Far

Intermediate

Near

2011

/04

25% hydrophilic acrylic10.75 mm6.15 mmAspheric trifocal diffractive FineVisionUV and blue light5°Microincision injection≥ 1.8mm+ 10D to + 30D (0.5D steps)Haigis: a0 = 1.36 (interferometry) 1.04 (ultra-sound), a1 = 0.4, a2 = 0.1Hoffer Q: ACD=5.52 (interferometry) 5.26 (ultra-sound)Holladay 1: Sf=1.74 (interferometry) 1.48 (ultra-sound)SRK II: A =119.3 (interferometry) 118.9 (ultra-sound)SRK/T: A =118.9 (interferometry) 118.6 (ultra-sound)

Material:Overall diameter:Optic diameter:Optic:Filtration:Angulation:Injection system:Incision:Power:Suggested constants:

Page 6: Intermediate - h24-files.s3.amazonaws.comh24-files.s3.amazonaws.com/50165/117571-6dqlC.pdfThe FIRST trifocal diffractive IOL which improves intermediate vision while maintaining performance

The FIRST trifocal diffractive IOL which improves intermediate vision while maintaining performance at far and near distances.

Give your patients the they want

Far

Intermediate

Near

The Micro platform features all the characteristics required for quality phaco-refractive surgery. Therefore PhysIOL decided to offer its FineVision trifocal diffractive optic onthis design proven since 2003 with SlimFlex, then MicroSlim, Micro AY and Micro A.

The Micro design: a proven platform

Micro F specifications

Micro F design with FineVision optic:for high quality phaco-refractive surgery

4-point design for stability (1, 2, 3, 4)

Compatibility with micro-incision to avoidinduced astigmatism (1, 2, 3, 4)

2-Step Technology for low Yag rate (1, 3, 5, 6)

BlueTech for photoprotection and photoreception (5, 7)

Aspheric optic for contrast sensitivity and depth of field (8)

(1) Lesieur G. Why use a hydrophilic acrylic IOL in 2009? Insert to Cataract and Refractive Surgery Today Europe. October 2009. (2) Deidier D. A 400 patient study on new IOLs implantable through microincisions. ESCRS 2007. (3) Deidier D. Surgical and clinical performance of a new preloaded micro-incision lens. ASCRS 2009. (4) Rigal-Sastourné JC. Multicentre study on MICS and microincision IOLs: about 124 cases. ESCRS 2009. (5) C. Chassain. Hydrophilic versus hydrophobic: which is the best option ? Ohthalmology Times Europe, Sept 2008. (6) Lesieur G. Clinical outcomes in a large series of 699 eyes implanted with micro-incision lenses. ASCRS 2009. (7) Mashhour B. Photoreception with blue-light filtering IOLs. Insert to Cataract and Refractive Surgery Today Europe. October 2009. (8) Rozot P. Refractive aspect of cataract – Toward customisation. European Ophthalmic Review, 2009:81-82. (9) Observational study, 11 surgeons 100 patients interim results after 50 patients (2 months post-op), 2010. (10) Blaylock JF, Si Z, Vickers C. Visual and refractive status at different focal distances after implantation of RESTOR multifocal intraocular lens. JCRS 2006 Sept; 32: 1464-73. (11) Cortesy Dr Blanckaert/Pr Cochener/Dr Lesieur/Dr Rozot/Dr Van Acker /Dr Vryghem. (12) Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Puchades C, Montés-Micó R. Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 May;36(5):733-9. (13) de Vries NE, Webers CA, Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Nuijts RM. Visual outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of a +3.00 D or +4.00 D aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: Comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Aug;36 (8):1316-22.

Liège Science Park • Allée des Noisetiers, 4 • B-4031 Liège - Belgium • Tél.: +32 (0) 4 361 05 49 • Fax: +32 (0) 4 361 05 30www.physiol.eu

Far

Intermediate

Near

2011

/04

25% hydrophilic acrylic10.75 mm6.15 mmAspheric trifocal diffractive FineVisionUV and blue light5°Microincision injection≥ 1.8mm+ 10D to + 30D (0.5D steps)Haigis: a0 = 1.36 (interferometry) 1.04 (ultra-sound), a1 = 0.4, a2 = 0.1Hoffer Q: ACD=5.52 (interferometry) 5.26 (ultra-sound)Holladay 1: Sf=1.74 (interferometry) 1.48 (ultra-sound)SRK II: A =119.3 (interferometry) 118.9 (ultra-sound)SRK/T: A =118.9 (interferometry) 118.6 (ultra-sound)

Material:Overall diameter:Optic diameter:Optic:Filtration:Angulation:Injection system:Incision:Power:Suggested constants: