interaction between jets and dense medium in heavy-ion collisions rudolph c. hwa university of...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
Interaction between jets and dense medium in
heavy-ion collisions
Rudolph C. HwaUniversity of Oregon
TsingHua University, Beijing, China
May 4, 2009
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Jets at high transverse momentum pT
3. Back-to-back jets
(effect of medium on jets)
4. Ridges
(effect of jets on the medium)
5. Conclusion
1. Introduction
Creation of hot, dense matter at RHICT > 170 MeV ~ 1012 K
> 5 GeV/fm3 ~ 50 normal nuclear density
Deconfined quarks and gluons
Non-central collisionx
yz
N participant
(Npart)
Azimuthal variation in non-central collisions
x
y
p
patan=φ
px
py
pT
For good resolution we need << L L ~ size of system
In nuclear collisions the transverse size of collision zone is about 10 fm (10-12cm).For << 1 fm, we need p = h/ >> 1 GeV
At RHIC cm energy of a nucleon is 100 GeV, but it is the momentum-transfer scale that measures the small-distance resolution:
Δp :h
Δx
We can’t shoot a probe through the dense medium, as in X-ray diagnostic.
pT
It must come from within.
Jet quenching
In the transverse plane a hard scattering can occur anywhereIf the hot medium is sQGP, the partons that traverse it lose energy.
pT
pp
AA
So the pT of the detected
jet in AA collision is lower than a similar jet in pp collision.That is a suppression effect
2. Jets at high pT
A more revealing way to see its properties is to examine the azimuthal dependence of jet production
Δφtrigger
associated particle
How can we be sure that the suppression is due to parton interaction with QGP as the medium?
Can it be due to some initial state interaction?
Dihadron correlations
PRL 91, 072304
trigger in-plane
trigger out-of-plane
STARSTARpreliminary20-60% central
Striking final state effects
Dihadron correlations in Δ
Δφ
If there is severe damping on the away side, then most observed jets are produced near the surface.
to detector
undamped
absorbed
3. Back-to-back jets
Measurable: trigger momentum pt
associated particle (same side) pa associated particle (away side) pb
Not measurable: initial parton momenta k, k’parton momenta at surfaces q, q’
centrality c=0.05c=0.5
nearaway
Hwa-Yang 0812.2205, PRC (2009)
Suppression factor
Γnear (pt ) = e−βt
Γaway (pt , pb ) = e−β (L− t )
tL-t
Energy loss 1-Γ
More energy loss on the away side
Much less energy loss on the near side
if we fix the length L
The problem is that the path length L cannot be fixed experimentally.
It is only possible to fix the centrality c.
Data integrates over all points of interaction.
Some paths are long
Some are short
Tangential jets dominate.
Au+Au centrality comparison
12% Central40-60% MB60-80% MB
Δ-1-2 0 1 2 3 4 5
1
_d
N_
Ntr
ig d
Δ
)
2
STAR Preliminary
0
T1: pT>5 GeV/c, T2: pT>4 GeV/c, A: pT>1.5 GeV/c
Δ projection: no significant centrality dependence• No modification of away-side jet
T2A1_T1
STAR has recent data on Di-jets
associates
associates
primary
trigger (T1)
“jet-axis”
trigger (T2)
Dominance by tangential jets!
Very hard to probe the interior of dense medium
--- if the thickness cannot be controlled.
That’s about the effect of dense medium on dihadron correlation in jets.
Interaction between jets and medium
• Effect of medium on jets. trigger
direction
distribution of particles associated with the trigger
4. Ridges
• Effect of jets on medium.
A ridge is discovered on the near side.
ridgeJet
ΔηΔηTrigger
ΔΔ
Trigger
24
Trigger: 3 < pT < 4 GeV/c
Associated: 1.5 < pT < 2 GeV/c
Not hard enough for pQCD to be reliable, too hard for hydrodynamics.
We have no reliable theoretical framework in which to calculate all those subprocesses.
Physical processes involve:
• semihard parton propagating through dense medium
• energy loss due to soft emission induced by medium
• enhancement of thermal partons
• hydro flow and hadronization
• ridge formation above background
hard parton
SS
trigger
ST
peak (J)
TT ridge (R)
η
associated particles
These wings identify the Ridge
We focus below on mainly the Δ distribution.
A very quick explanation of ridge formation in the recombination model of partons
Hwa-QM08
Dependence of ridge yield on the trigger azimuthal angle
ΔηΔηTrigger
ΔΔ
Trigger
restrict |Δη|<0.7
What is the direction of the trigger T?
irrelevant
very relevant
Quark Matter 2008 -- A. Feng (STAR)Dependence on trigger azimuthal angle
1
43
2
56
in-plane
out-of-plane
φs = φT − Ψ RP
top 5%
20-60%
in-plane S=0 out-of-plane S=90o
• In 20-60%, away-side evolves from single-peak (φS =0) to double-peak (φS =90o).• In top 5%, double peak show up at a smaller φS.• At large φS, little difference between two centrality bins.
STAR Preliminary
STAR Preliminary
STAR Preliminary
in-plane S=0 out-of-plane S=90o
Rid
ge
Jet
3<pTtrig<4, 1.5<pT
trig<2.0 GeV/c
φs = φT − Ψ RP
In-plane
Out
-of-
plan
e
1
43
2
56
After separating Ridge from Jet --
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Chiu-Hwa PRC(09)
Strong ridge formation when trigger and flow directions match. probe medium
Correlated emission model (CEM)
s>0
In CEM we found an asymmetry in the Δ distribution
trigger pt=3-4 GeV/c
Jet
Ridge
s|
CEM model
STAR Preliminary
Ridge: assoc pt=1-1.5 GeV/cRidge: assoc pt=1.5-2 GeV/cJet: assoc pt=1.5-2 GeV/c
Netrakanti
QM09
R only
s<0
Δ
Trigger jet
Away side jet
Heating
Sound wave
Recoil jet on the away-side direction
This is an active area of current research.
Do you believe it?
Shock wave?
Correlation among hadrons reveals that quarks interact strongly with QGP, not weakly (as initially suspected).Interaction at intermediate pT cannot be treated by either hydrodynamics or perturbative QCD.
But that is where most of the data exist, and they provide information that we need to understand.
Conclusion
We have discussed jet-medium interaction at intermediate pT.
• Effect of jets on medium:
Semi-hard parton -> energy loss to medium -> Ridge. Our interpretation is that the ridge is formed by the recombination of thermal partons enhanced by jet. The prediction on asymmetry has also been verified by data.
• Effect of medium on dijets:
Energy loss to medium -> strong correlation between jets.
It is hard to probe the medium interior by dijets because of dominance by tangential jets --- it has been verified by data on 2jet+1 correlation.