inter-hospital transfer of high risk stemi patients for pci is safe and feasible
DESCRIPTION
Inter-Hospital Transfer of High Risk STEMI Patients for PCI is Safe and Feasible. David M. Larson , Katie M. Menssen, Scott W. Sharkey, Marc C. Newell, Anil K. Poulose, Ivan J. Chavez, Yale L. Wang, Barbara T. Unger, Timothy D. Henry - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Inter-Hospital Transfer of High Risk STEMI Patients for
PCI is Safe and Feasible
David M. Larson , Katie M. Menssen, Scott W. Sharkey,Marc C. Newell, Anil K. Poulose, Ivan J. Chavez, Yale L. Wang,
Barbara T. Unger, Timothy D. HenryMinneapolis Heart Institute Foundation at Abbott
Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN
Presenter Disclosure Information
DISCLOSURE INFORMATION:None
David M. Larson, MD
Inter-Hospital Transfer of High Risk ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Safe and Feasible
Background
• Primary PCI is superior to fibrinolysis for treatment of STEMI if performed in a timely manner at experienced centers
• Only 25% of US hospitals have PCI capability• Recent ACC/AHA guideline recommends
transfer for PCI in high risk patients (cardiogenic shock, Killip class ≥3), although the risk of transfer of this group of patients has not been well documented
Fibrinolysis generally preferred •Invasive strategy not an option
Cath lab occupied/not availableVascular access difficultiesNo access to skilled PCI center
• Delay to invasive strategyProlonged transportDoor to balloon >90 minutes>1 hour vs. lysis now
•Very early presentation<1-2 hours from symptoms
ACC/AHA STEMI Guideline
Invasive Strategy generally preferred • Skilled PCI center available/short delay
Operator experience 75 cases/yrTeam experience 36 PCI/yrDoor to balloon <90 minutes
• High risk from STEMICardiogenic shock (age <75)Killip 3
• Increased bleeding riskEspecially ICH
• Late presentation >2-3 hours from symptoms
• Diagnosis in doubt
Number of pts transferred
Exclusions Deaths During Transfer
V-fib During Transfer
Danami 2(n=559)
Cardiogenic shock
Mechanical ventilation0 8
Prague 2(n=425)
None 2 3
Prague (n=201)
Terminal cardiogenic shock
Problems with transport
0 2
Maastricht(n=149)
Age ≥80
Cardiogenic shock0 2
Air PAMI(n=71)
Cardiogenic shock 0 0
Total(n=1405)
2 (0.14%) 15 (1.1%)
Complications During Transfer
Study Objective
• To assess the risk of inter-hospital transfer of an unselected high risk cohort of STEMI patients for primary or facilitated PCI
• With particular focus on high risk patients including cardiogenic shock, out of hospital cardiac arrest, advanced age, long distance
Minneapolis Heart Institute/Abbott Northwestern Hospital (ANW)
A tertiary Cardiovascular Center in Minneapolis, MN
2,500 PCI/year
600 STEMI-PCI
46 Cardiologists
10 Interventional Cardiologists
Methods
• A standardized protocol (“Level 1 MI program”) for transfer of STEMI patients for primary or facilitated PCI from 28 rural and community hospitals was implemented based on the Trauma system concept in 2003
• Consecutive patients presenting with ST-elevation or new LBBB with symptoms <24 hours were included
Methods
• No patients were excluded from transfer or analysis including elderly, cardiogenic shock and post cardiac arrest patients
• Extensive clinical and angiographic data including time intervals, complications during transfer and clinical outcomes were entered in to a prospective registry
Results
• From 7/03 to 6/06, 861 consecutive STEMI patients were transferred from the emergency department for PCI from 28 non-PCI hospitals
• Transfer distances ranged from 17-210 miles
Mode of Transfer
Helicopter – 69% Ground ALS – 31%
Zone 1 – 55 %
Zone 2 – 93%
Zone 1 – 45 %
Zone 2 – 7%
High Risk Patients
• Age 80: 117 (13.5%)
• Cardiogenic shock: 98 (11.4%)
• Cardiac arrest (pre-transfer): 61 (7.1%)
• Endotracheal intubation (pre-transfer): 44 (5.1%)
Time Intervals (median)
59 33 19
49 22 21
66
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Zone 2
Zone 1
ANW
ED Transport ANW to Balloon
66
95
120
Complications During Transfer
• Cardiopulmonary arrest - 17 (2%)
• Intubation - 6 (0.7%)
• Death - 1 (0.1%)
Cardiopulmonary Arrest During Transfer
• 15 patients transferred by helicopter
• 2 patients transferred by ground ambulance
Cardiopulmonary Arrest During Transfer – 17 (2%)
• Ventricular fibrillation - 12 (1.4%)
• Asystole – 4 (0.4%)
• Respiratory arrest – 1 (0.1%)
13/17 (76%) of the patients were Killip 4 pre-transfer
Outcomes of Cardiac Arrest During Transfer
• Of the 17 patients who arrested, all but 1 were resuscitated with return of spontaneous circulation on arrival to cath lab
• 3 died in the cath lab before PCI due to refractory cardiogenic shock
• 2 died post PCI in hospital
• 11 discharged and alive at 30 days
Conclusion• Transfer of STEMI patients including high risk,
unstable patients with cardiogenic shock and post cardiac arrest from community hospitals for PCI utilizing an established transfer protocol is safe and effective.
• Death during transfer occurred in 0.1% similar to previous clinical data of 0.14% despite the inclusion of very high risk patients
• This data represents the largest reported series to date of STEMI patients transferred for Primary PCI