INTENTIONS IN ARCHITECTURECHRISTIAN NORBERG-SHULZ

• A REACTION AGAINST MODERNISM

• PERCEPTION OF FORMS IN ARCHITECTURE-CULTURAL BASIS

• MEANING OF FORMS IN ARCHITECTURE IS THE RESULT OF CULTURAL INTENTIONS

• ARCHITECTS SHOULD HAVE TO WORK WITH IN THE NETWORK OF THOSE INTENTIONS

• REVISION OF AESTHETIC DIMENSION IN ARCHITECTURE ?

Paris opera,france Villa savoye,france

• HOW TO MAKE ARCHITECTURE A SENSITIVE MEDIUM ?

• BUILDING FORM SHOULD BE ACCORDING TO FUNCTION BUT MAINTAINING A VISUAL ORDER. HOW ?

• FORMAL DIFFERENTIATION FOR FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES ?

• DIFFERENTIATION SHOULD BE SYMBOLISING ?

• DEFINITION OF OUR BUILDING TASKS AND THE MEANS OF THEIR SOLUTION ?

• WHAT PURPOSE ARCHITECTURE AS A HUMAN PRODUCT ?

• HOW DOES ARCHITECTURE INFLUENCE US ?

• WHY HAS A BUILDING FROM A PARTICULAR PERIOD HAS A PARTICULAR FORM ?

• RELATION BETWEEN TASK AND SOLUTION

• AM EMBEDDED METHOD OF RELATIONS

• SOLUTION OF CONCRETE PROBLEMS

• FACALITATION IN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS

• ADAPTATION IN ARCHITECTURE

• CONSERAVATION OF STRUCTURAL PRINCIPLES OF TRADITIONS RATHER THAN ITS MOTIVES

• PRIMARY AND SECONDARY WHOLES – FUNCTION AND VISUALS

• SYMBOL SYSTEM ADAPTION

• TRADITION IN MODERN ASPECTS

• A MODERN MOVEMENT CAN BE A TRUE TRADITION

• HOSTORICAL CONTINUITY DOESN’T MEAN TO BE BORROWED

• HUMAN VALUES ARE CONQUERED IN NEW WAYS

• MODERN FORMS ARE EXPERIMENTS

• FIGHT AGAINST BORROWED MOTIVES

• NEVER BEEN ORDERD

• NOT A FORMAL LANGUAGE

• MODERN FORMS