integrating risk

Upload: kat-thomas

Post on 08-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    1/38

    Integrating Risk

    Into Project Scheduling

    Scott Brunton, PMP MASc MBA

    Senior [email protected]

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    2/38

    Why Bother

    Well Cross That Bridge When We Get There

    That Will Never Happen On This Project Well Fix Them In The Next Version

    Weve Always Done It This Way

    Bearers of Bad News Get Punished

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    3/38

    PMI PMBOK

    Project Risk Management

    PMBOK Knowledge Area 11An uncertain event or condition

    that, if it occurs, has a positive or

    negative effect on a projectsobjective.

    There Are No Facts About The Future

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    4/38

    Quality

    Purpose of Project Risk Management

    Identify Factors that are Likely to Impact

    Project Objectives

    Time (Schedule)

    Scope Resources

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    5/38

    When Can Risk Occur

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    6/38

    Flavors of Risk

    Spectrum of Risk

    NoInformationPartialInformationFullInformation

    Unknown

    UnknownsKnown

    UnknownsAbsoluteCertainty

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    7/38

    Risk According to Dilbert

    Scott Adams 08 Nov 1997

    United Feature Syndicates, Inc

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    8/38

    Risk Management Process

    Systematic, Continuous Process

    NASA Procedural RequirementsNPR 8000.4 Risk Management Procedural

    Requirements

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    9/38

    Risk Management Process

    Identify

    Analyze

    Plan

    Track

    Control

    Clearly Articulate

    Evaluate, Classify & Prioritize

    Mitigation Opportunities

    Monitor & Report

    Act

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    10/38

    Risk Management Process

    Risk Statement

    Given the tile gap filler material is extended above the

    tiles; there is a possibility that the protrusions mightproduce excessive heat during re-entry causingcatastrophic damage to the vehicle.

    Identify

    DiscoverySTS-114

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    11/38

    Risk Management Process

    Risk Statement

    Given the tile gap filler material is extended above

    the tiles; there is a possibility that the protrusions mightproduce excessive heat during re-entry causingcatastrophic damage to the vehicle.

    Identify

    Risk

    Condition

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    12/38

    Risk Management Process

    Risk Statement

    Given the tile gap filler material is extended above the

    tiles; there is a possibility that the protrusions mightproduce excessive heat during re-entry causingcatastrophic damage to the vehicle.

    Identify

    Risk

    Consequence

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    13/38

    Analyze

    Likelihood of Occurrence

    Consequences ofOccurrence

    5x5 Impact Matrix

    Risk Management Process

    10 16 20 23 25

    7 13 18 22 24

    4 15 19 21

    2 6 11 14 17

    1 3 5 8

    Consequence of Occurrence

    Very High(5)

    High(4)

    Moderate(3)

    Low(2)

    Very Low(1)

    Very High

    (5)

    High

    (4)

    Low

    (2)

    Very Low

    (1)

    LikelihoodofOccurrence

    Moderate

    (3) 9

    12

    Low

    Moderate

    High

    I think there is a world market for five computers.- Thomas Watson, IBM President 1943

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    14/38

    Plan Risk Management Process

    Do Nothing

    Hope is not a Strategy Adjust Expectation

    Develop Mitigation Activities

    Assess Impact of Mitigation

    Burn-Down Risk

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    15/38

    Track Risk Management Process

    Integrate Risk into Project Schedule

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    16/38

    Control Risk Management Process

    Obtain Approval from Risk Board

    Update Risk Registry Request Support for Plan

    Resources: To Support Mitigation

    Schedule: To Align Delivery

    Scope: To Communicate Expectations

    Integrate into Cost & ScheduleFormal Implementation

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    17/38

    Obtaining Credible Estimates

    Overcome Intrinsic Bias

    MethodsExpert Judgment

    Analogous Estimation

    Parametric EstimationThree-Point Estimation

    Reserve Analysis

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    18/38

    Critical Path Methodologies

    Single-Pass

    Multi-Pass

    Discrete Continuous

    Single-PointMulti-Point

    Based UponProbability

    Distributions

    Simulation

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    19/38

    Single-Point Estimation

    Critical Path Method (CPM)

    Developed by DuPont in 1957 Novel, Yet Simplistic, Approach to Project

    Network Modeling Requirements

    Based on Fixed Estimates for TaskDurations

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    20/38

    Multi-Point Estimation

    Program Evaluation & Review Technique

    Developed by Booz-Allen Hamilton in 1958 Polaris Mobile Submarine-Launched Ballistic

    Missile Program

    Special Projects Office Contract with US Navy

    Acknowledges Randomness SurroundingTask Duration Estimation

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    21/38

    PERT

    Studied Bias and Reliability of Task DurationEstimates Collected by Variety of Methods

    Correlated Estimates with Actual Durationsand Curve-fit Results to Beta Distribution

    Closed-form First-Order Estimate

    6

    )*4( cPessimistiMostLikelyOptimistic

    Expected

    ++

    =

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    22/38

    Beta Distribution & PERT 3-Point Estimate

    Shape Parameters: > 0 and > 0

    Unimodal when > 1 and > 1 When = 3 Sqrt(2), = 3 + Sqrt(2)

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    23/38

    Limitations of PERT

    Nave Task Durations Assumptions

    Independent & Uniformly Biased

    Does Not Account For Quality of Estimates

    Expert, Analogous, Parametric

    Assumes Underlying Probability DistributionOf Estimates Can Be Represented By Beta

    Deterministic Single Pass Calculation

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    24/38

    Multi-Pass/Continuous Evaluation

    Reveals Effects of Near-Critical Tasks

    Probabilistic Estimation of Task Durations Monte Carlo Simulation

    Randomly choose from probability distribution

    Used during Manhattan Project in early 1940s

    Appropriate When There Is SignificantUncertainty

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    25/38

    Defense Acquisition University

    Monte Carlo simulation is a statisticaltechnique by which a quantity is calculatedrepeatedly, using randomly selected what-ifscenarios for each calculation

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    26/38

    Uniform Probability Distribution

    All Choices are Equally Likely

    May Lack Enough Information To Estimate

    A B

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    27/38

    Normal Probability Distributions

    Natural First Step

    Estimates are Centered

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    28/38

    Triangular Probability Distributions

    Baseline Distribution

    Less Confident Than Normal

    A B

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    29/38

    Triangular Probability Distributions

    Can Be Skewed To Incorporate AsymmetricEstimates

    Type 1 Estimator

    A B

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    30/38

    Triangular Probability Distributions

    Can Be Skewed To Incorporate AsymmetricEstimates

    Type 2 Estimator

    A B

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    31/38

    Beta Probability Distributions

    Smaller Standard Deviation Than Normal

    Implies Higher Confidence in Estimate

    A B

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    32/38

    Native / Add-in Solutions

    Native to MS Project

    Single-Point Estimation

    3-Point Estimation

    Add-in Capability

    @Risk by Palisade $795 Standard Version

    Full Function 15-day Free Trial

    Risk+ by Deltek $695

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    33/38

    Risky Business Demonstration

    Well Formed Network

    No Hard Constraints

    Predecessors / Successors Defined80%+ Are Finish-to-Start

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    34/38

    Risk+ Analysis Process Steps

    1. Develop Well Formed Project Plan

    2. Enter Risk Parameters3. Identify Reporting Tasks

    4. Run Simulation

    5. Analyze Outputs

    6. Repeat

    Lets Demonstrate

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    35/38

    Key Takeaways

    Existence of Risk is a Certainty

    Risk Impacts Triple Constraint Objectives Continuous Risk Management

    Work the Process & Report Results

    Record Actions & Outcomes

    Probabilistic Simulation of Project Network is

    Meaningful and Do-able

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    36/38

    For More About Risk+

    Deltek

    http://www.deltek.com

    Seamless Integration with MS Project

    Cost & Schedule Risk Histograms

    Add Custom Probability Distributions

    Probability Branching

    VBA Hooks

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    37/38

    Failure to Communicate

    Modifications Made Without Documentation

  • 8/6/2019 Integrating Risk

    38/38

    Questions

    Thank you for attending

    Presentation slides will be posted to theMember Area of the MPUG site archive

    Phoenix