integrated governance & management: a leadership...
TRANSCRIPT
Integrated Governance & Management:
A Leadership Challenge!
Presented by:
Marc D. Halley, MBAChairman and CEO
The Halley Consulting Group, Inc.
Percival Kane, MHASVP & Network AdministratorNorth Oaks Physician Group
Healthcare Financial Management Association
Region 5
February 20, 2015
Discussion Topics
I. Our Business Imperatives
II. The Physician Integration Continuum
III. The Critical Role of Governance
IV. Management Styles and Power Bases
V. Vertical Governance: The Council Model
VI. Horizontal Governance
VII. Q&A
2
Our Business Imperatives
Strategic Imperatives – Organizations
Must Do These Things
Attract Market Share
Demonstrate Quality
Have Access to Capital
Be Productive
4
The Concept of “Value”
5
Clinical
Process
Clinical
Outcome
Patient
ExperienceEffective
Cost
Per
Unit
Utilization Efficient
The Physician Integration Continuum
Common Integration Options
(Multiple “Plugs”)In
tegra
tion
Sustainability/ Infrastructure
Medical Staff
PHO/IPA
Medical Directorships/
Co-management
Joint Venture
Independent Contractor/ PSA/SBS
Employee
H
HLHalley, Marc D. 2011. Owning Medical
Practices: Best Practices for Sustainable
Results. Chicago, IL: AHA Press. 67. 7
Physician Integration Economics –
Fee for Service
8
Capture &Retain
Market Share
Hospital Capital
Generator
Capital Preservation &
Investment
Market Manager
Potential
Capital Loss
Potential
Capital Drain
Potential
Capital Drain
Referral Path
8
© 2008 The Halley Consulting Group, LLC
Halley, Marc D. 2011. Owning
Medical Practices: Best Practices for
Sustainable Results. Chicago, IL:
AHA Press. 10.
Physician Integration Economics –
Risk Payment Model
Panel Size Access
Time & Materials
Hospital Risk Pool
Capital Potential
Capital Preservation &
Investment
Market Manager
Potential
Capital Loss
Potential
Capital Drain
Potential
Capital Drain
Referral Path
9
© 2008 The Halley Consulting Group, LLC
Halley, Marc D. 2011. Owning
Medical Practices: Best Practices for
Sustainable Results. Chicago, IL:
AHA Press. 10.
Moving Up the Integration Pyramid
PHM
Clinical Integration
Functional Integration
Structural Integration
• Population-centered care
• Personal accountability for healthy
behaviors and lifestyle
• Population health management
• Chronic disease prevention &
management
• Access and information = value
• Risk-based payment
• Choreographed care (Accountability)
• Improving process and outcomes
• Clinical quality commitments
• Transparent flow of clinical
information across care continuum
• Managing an episode of care or
chronic disease using clinical metrics
• Individual and joint accountability to
live by established metrics
• Collaborative care (Trust)
• PCMH & “Choice” Initiatives
• Vital behaviors
(“We”/“Our”)
• Service quality extension of
referring provider’s office
• Information lubricates the
Referral Path
• Referral management
• Coordinated care (Silos)
• Basic form of integration
• Legal
structure/Organization
chart
• Payroll silos (“Me”/“You”)
• Referral leakage
10
© 2013 The Halley Consulting Group, Inc.
The Critical Role of Governance
Fiduciary and Operational
Governance
• Select and evaluate
the chief executive
• Enterprise vision &
strategies
• Capital formation and
allocation
• Mergers & acquisitions
• Regulatory compliance
• Enterprise financial &
quality oversight
• Enterprise policy
• Etc.
• Sponsor, direct &
oversee
implementation
• Operating policies,
procedures
• Performance
improvement tactics
and timing
• Key stakeholder
engagement
• Performance
accountability12
Vertical Governance
(Formal Authority or Authorization)
13
Owners
Or
Fiduciaries
Employees
Management
Horizontal Governance
(Common Consent)
Patients*
Primary Care Physicians
and Providers
Specialty Physicians
and Providers
Ancillary Services
Departments
Hospital-Based
Providers
Acute Care Facilities
and Services
Post Acute Facilities
and ServicesPayers*
(* Potential future members)
Service Line Council (SLC)
Clinical Process Teams (CPT)
(Functional Integration)
(Clinical Integration)
14© 2014 The Halley Consulting Group, Inc.
Management Styles and Power Bases
“Knowledge Workers…”
• Own the means of production – unique knowledge and practiced skill
• Highly mobile
• Independent judgment (“professional”)
• Need tools of production – capital investment
• Exceptional clinical opportunities = loyalty
• Compensation “hygiene” factor
• Define their own level of contribution
• “Cannot be supervised effectively”Adapted from: Drucker, P. 1998. Peter
Drucker on the Profession of Management.
Boston: Harvard Business School
Publishing. 122-124.16
17
Power Bases
• Legal Power: official authority &
position
• Expert Power: knowledge, ability,
information
• Reverent Power: respect, personality,
charisma
• Reward Power: ability to give or
withhold incentives, capital, etc.
• Punitive Power: impose penalties
18
Gilson Leadership ScaleWays Leaders Make Decisions
• Tell: Identify the problem, discern the
alternatives and make the decision
• Persuade: Add “sell” to above
• Discuss: Identify the problem, discern the
alternatives, propose a tentative solution,
gather input from those who will need to
implement the solution, make the final
decision
• Consult: Present the problem and background
to the group, solicit alternative ideas and
solutions from the group, leader makes the
final decision
19
Gilson Leadership Scale (Continued)
Ways Leaders Make Decisions
• Join: Manager participates as a member of
the group in identifying the problem and
alternatives, while agreeing, in advance, to
carry out the decision of the group
20
Matching Leadership Styles and Power
Bases
• Tell Legal, Expert, Punitive
• Persuade Reverent, Reward
• Discuss Reverent, Reward
• Consult Expert, Reverent
• Join Expert, Reverent
The Council Model: “Partnership” Led
Network Operations Council (NOC)• Composition
– Physician Chair
– Physician representation from Primary Care Clinics,
Medical Specialty Clinics, Surgical Specialty Clinics &
Hospital-based Services
– Executive Team representation: Executive VP/COO,
SVP/Chief Legal Officer, SVP/CFO, SVP/CMO &
SVP/Network Executive
• Purpose
– Provide governance for overall physician network
– Determine the strategic direction of the physician
network
– Make clinical/quality, operational, financial, strategic &
policy decisions globally for the physician network
• Value
– Decision-making forum for the entire physician network
that inherently has credibility & buy-in from other
network providers
• Tools
– Agenda comprised of standing reports from subcommittee
chairs & SVP/Network Executive, a review of monthly
financial performance & new business.
– Supporting information: dashboards, Net 1, Net 2
Financials, action plans, policies, etc.
22
Network
Operations
Council
Practice
Operations
Council
Practice Operations Council (POC)• Composition
– Physicians within the practice
– Mid-level providers within the practice
– Practice Leadership Team: Practice Manager, Supervisor,
Regional Director & SVP/Network Executive
• Purpose
– Provide governance for the practice
– Determine the strategic direction of the practice
– Determine how to adopt & execute NOC-approved
directives
– Make clinical/quality, operational, financial & strategic
decisions for the practice
• Value
– Provider engagement with decision-making for the
operations of the practice
– Provider awareness: operations, policies, performance,
initiatives, challenges, etc.
– Accountability
• Tools
– Site-Specific Action Plans
– Net 1, Net 2 Financials
– Supporting materials: dashboards, policies, presentations,
etc.23
Network
Operations
Council
Practice
Operations
Council
Network Operations Council
Subcommittees
24
•PURPOSE: Focuses on establishing & enforcing the expectations of being an employed provider within the physician network
•PURPOSE: Focuses on evaluating & improving the financial performance of the overall physician network
•PURPOSE: Focuses on enhancing our EMR system & its associated workflows & leveraging technology to provide optimal care
•PURPOSE: Focuses on achieving clinical compliance, ensuring quality & evaluating new clinical services
CLINICAL QUALITY & INNOVATION
SUBCOMMITTEE
AMBULATORY PHYSICIAN
INFORMATICS SUBCOMMITTEE
PERSONNEL RELATIONS
SUBCOMMITTEE
FINANCE SUBCOMMITTEE
The Extension of the Physician Governance
Model into General Operations
25
Clinical Shared Governance Team
Employee Engagement Council
Managed Care Contracts Committee
North Oaks
Physician Group
Governance Structure
Horizontal Governance
The Limits of “Pay for Performance”
• Mind or heart?
• When you pay for everything you get,
you get only what you pay for…
• From incentive to entitlement
• Upping the ante…
• Stifles innovation
27
Horizontal Integration
• A common interest
– Chronic disease
– Episode of care
– Referrals
• Clear and compelling vision
– Common cause is the glue
– “An offer too good to refuse”
– Overcomes tactical disagreement
28
Horizontal Integration
• Shared tenets (ground rules)
– Clinical quality
– Service quality
– Productivity
– Collaboration
– Cost per unit
– Process efficiency
– Utilization
– Financial viability29
Horizontal Integration
• Working together
– Individual roles
– Shared commitments*
– Performance targets
– Performance management
– Individual accountability
– Joint accountability
– Appropriate incentives/rewards
30
Shared Commitments…
• N,W,P’s
– Needs (clinical)
– Wants (preferences)
– Priorities (constraints)
• Written Service Commitments
– Extension of PCP
– Referring physicians/providers/staff
– “Their” patients
31
Shared Commitments…
• Clinical integration
– Chronic
– Complex Chronic
– Episode of Care
• Clinical protocols/processes
– Clinical Management Teams
– Care Management Teams
– Standards of care
– Best practices
32
Shared Commitments…
– “Certification”
• Clinical outcomes
– Effectiveness
– Efficiency
• Critical nature of self-reporting
33
Questions and Answers…
34