int13 - aa school homepage › downloads › briefs2017 › ... · sep 2017 aa intermediate unit 13...

Sep 2017AA Intermediate Unit 13

@ Architectural Associataion

Int13Computational OrnamentationTought by Soomeen Hahm

CONTENTS

Introduction

Theme • Computation• Material Computation• Ornamentation

Contextual Theme• Temporary Structure • Shared Space• Site

Course Structure• Module & Schedule• Expected Outcome• Field Trip• Bibliography• Calendar

Previous Year Review• Final Jury Panels• Photos

4 5 AA Int13 Computational Ornamentation | Soomeen Hahm

Introduction

“Architecture has, with some difficulty, liberated itself from ornament, but it has not liberated itself from the fear of ornament” Sir John Summerson, 1941

Ornamentation in architecture has long been debated on the basis of its suitability, its ability to be measured or controlled or on the distinc-tion between functional and non-functional ornamentation. Interme-diate 13 aims to challenge these traditional notions of ornament by looking at the way its shape, geometry and spatial qualities are driven by structural principles and architectural use – ie, ornament which is inhabitable, functional and rich in information, or in other words, intel-ligent.

In examining these ideas, the underlying conceptual methodology will be one informed by computational design thinking, in particular shifts in contemporary design paradigms towards non-standardised archi-tectural production, the avoidance of serial repetition and for mass customisation. In particular, by looking at the evolution and constant development of digital fabrication processes – such as 3D printing and robotic fabrication – which enables us to work at a pace and resolu-tion unimaginable just a few years ago. However, the manner in which these techniques have traditionally been utilized does not address the fixity of architectural space, the linearity of the building process and the complexity of fabrication procedure. With this in mind, Interme-diate 13 will research into systematic yet delicate and complex fab-rication methods which can not be simply produced by the generic robotic process but intelligent in its fabrication principle through the integration of material behavior and well thought-through human-machine relationship. Ideally, the proposed prototypes should be able to continuously automated and reproduced into different architec-tural or non-architectural elements.

Through a series of 1:1-scale prototypes, the unit will investigate a num-ber of design and fabrication techniques, driven by material behavior as well as by specific crafting techniques, both digital and analog. We will be constantly investigating the role of human, role of material and the role of computational power in design and fabrication process. Through a focus on geometry and materiality, we will constantly look to pursue unique spatial formations, where both interior and exterior experiences are informed by the specificity of applied processes. This will be achieved by using a number of computational and algorithmic design techniques, each corresponding to a unique material system. It is hoped that the resulting digital simulations will operate in constant feedback with the development of parallel material systems – an inte-grated model allowing computational techniques to be a fundamen-tal part of the design process, rather than merely a representation tool.

AA Intermediate 13

COMPUTATIONAL ORNAMENTATIONAlgorithmic . Generative . Computational

Img: Meta Elements (2017) by Igor Gola. Intermediate 136 7 AA Int13 Computational Ornamentation | Soomeen Hahm

THEME


COMPUTATION THEME I

Generative Design Strategy Multi-Agent System

Data Generation

Geometry Translation

Img: Hyper Volume (2014) by Shuying Mi. Tsinghua Parametric Design Workshop 2014

Traveling Agent Test SoftimageMay 2013

Wrinkle Study Maya/ Z-BrushApril 2013

Data Visualization ProcessingApril 2013, AA TS, Student work

Data Visualization ProcessingApril 2013, AA TS, Student work

H-Connection Multiple system connectionMay 2012, Soomeenhahm.com

Embodied Nature Nature inspired structureJan 2012, HanKyung Univ. & JK Studio

Fungus city Multiple physicsMay 2012, Soomeenhahm.com

Fabric Generative Tublar FormSep 2015, UCL Bartlett BPro RC6

Embodied Nature Nature inspired structureJan 2012, HanKyung Univ. & JK Studio

Embodied Machine Virus inspired structureOct 2013, Univ. of Belgrade

Embodied Pattern Digital form findingAug 2012, Soomeenhahm.com

Neuronic Pattern Information driven formMay 2012, Soomeenhahm.com

Similar to nature’s evolutionary process, we believe that the form is a mere result of a series of processes. Enabled by the increasing expo-sure to object oriented programming, designers can now control the shapes and form through controlling the series of rule sets of their bot-tom up logic. Unit13 will be developing series of small to large projects through the use of generative computational design strategy, heavily relies on computational and algorithmic design techniques. For this, apart from learning the basic CAD and 3D modeling software, students will be taught and expected to gain basic to advanced cod-ing skills. During the year, we will be using multiple platforms for com-putational design - with focus on scripting in Processing/JAVA, as well as 3D modeling techniques in Maya, Zbrush and Rhino/Grasshopper. The goal is to introduce students to techniques and methodologies of algorithmic design and procedural modeling.


MATERIAL COMPUTATION THEME II

The manner which current digital fabrication techniques have been utilized does not incorporate complexity of the crafting process. In this unit, we will be investigating how digital fabrication, latest machines, and material technology can be inspired by material behavior and tra-ditional crafting methods in order to achieve complexity our of sim-plicity.

Images on the right show our last year student projects as selective examples of materials and crafting techniques we have been dealing with. The “material” ranges from digital material to physical material. The “method/ technique” includes a hybridized mixture of digital fab-rication and hand crafting methods. The main idea is to experimenting on certain provocative ways of human-data, the human-machine col-laboration which requires creative thinking and deep understanding of on going research in computational design field and digital fabri-cation industry. This process also requires creative ways of consider-ing the role of human, role of material and the role of computational power in design and fabrication process.

Crafting

Kyungjoo Min Ceramic prototypeMaterial: Light-weight component network coated b Plaster, Ceramics

Alister Low Column structure prototypeMaterial: 3D Printed Mesh filled with expanding foam

Pierre Vaubourg Twisted bundles generated in-ternal volume studyMaterial: Foam Tube

Serlin Arisal High density field study enabled by CPU computingMaterial: Digital Drawing

Anna Aleshkina Wrinkle surface density studyMaterial: Foam sheet with hardening coat

Agi Permatasari CA vased urban designMaterial: CA driven digital model

Yulia Bykova 3D Shibory, Cloud like structureMaterial: Memory Fabric with resin

Igor Gola Paper pulp prototypeMaterial: Paperpulp casted with ridges designed through structural principle driven ornament

Karolina Leszkowicz Object AggregationMaterial: Ceramic Slip Cast

Natasha Ng Stretched plastic structure studyMaterial: Streched Plastic

Luke Decker Deformable Skin studyMaterial: Liquid Latax casted on textured mould

Gordon Chan Expandable 3D printed object studyMaterial: 3D print without structure


ORNAMENTATION THEME III

Ornamentation in architecture has long been debated on the basis of its suitability, its ability to be measured or controlled, functional or non-functional. Intermediate 13 aims to challenge these traditional notions of ornament by looking at the way its shape, geometry and spatial qualities are driven by structural principles and architectural use – ie, ornament which is inhabitable, functional and rich in information, or in other words, intelligent.

In our unit, we are interested in the geometry/ form/ and structure which is based on structural or architectural principle as well as provid-ing other needs - such as atmospheric or aesthetic - which is hardly measurable. We will be investigating on the discussion regarding the discrepancies and harmony of the notion of “functional” vs “non-func-tional”, looking at the combination of highly functional elements and ornamental elements and try to seek for the meanings and the meas-urable values of ornamentation.

Ornament based on Principle

ZHA Code 3D Printed Chair

Zaha Hadid Architects Culture and Art Center of Qingdao City

Zaha Hadid Architects Sleuk Rith Institute, CambodiaJoris Laarman Bone Chair

Img: examples of harmonious existance of ornamentation in tradi-tional vault structures


CONTEXTUAL THEME


TEMPORAL STRUCTURE THEME IV

It is not surprising to know that there is majority of our spacial expe-rience we are gaining in an urban environment is through temporal structures. Such as signage, scaffold, pavilion, temporal installation, pop-up store, markets... they are all playing a very important role within a city responding to the needs of flexibility in an urban environment.

Apart from meeting programmatic requirements, a temporal structure often gives an opportunity of creative experimentations. Also by the nature of the temporariness, it is often light in building mass and low in impact to the environment which makes it sustainable. However, the ways in which this type of structures is currently constructed within our cities are often under designed, the provided spacial experiences are limited. This year, we will be focussing on the issue of the tem-porariness of physical structure which can provide flexibility in social programs as well creative architectural and urban spaces.

Temporal vs Permanent Longon Olympic Temporary Structures

Pop-up Stores Serpentine Pavilion


SHARED SPACE THEME V

Together with the shifting notion of the basic structure of a corporate body and family based on the changing trend of how people live and work nowadays, there has been massive shift recently on the need for flexibility in working and living environment. Responding to these needs, co-working and co-living facilities such as we work, Hackspace, Fablab, Hyundai smart house, share house LT Josai etc.. has been evolved.

In this unit, we are going to look into issues about co-working and co-living through a deeper understanding of the shifting trend in the fundamental concept of a corporate and a family structure. We will be looking at the issues of individuality vs community in working and living environment to see whether individuality can be expressed through mobility or temporariness of an actual space/ actual physical structure.

For more over, we will be also looking into the relationship between living and working environment to understand the differences and similarities between the two and to see how to respond to the needs of flexibilities between the two types.

Co-working, Co-living Co-working, Co-living

Share: Individual vs Community

Wework

KLM Christmas Dinner Table Project

Hackspace

Hyundai Smart House

Fablab

Share House LT Josai by Naruse Inokuma Architects

Img: Civil Partnership - Notion of a family structure


SITE THEME VI

London is one of the most economically active international cities in the world where attracts a lot of young practices and individuals de-velop their career. It is a unique city where individuality and multiplicity of cultural dynamics are well accepted and received. London has also been an out most incubator of young and creative businesses. Today, under the unique historic situation with Brexit with the mas-sive shift in the notion of understanding of the structure of traditional economic and social structure, we will be questioning where London’s economy and cultural structure is shifting towards and how it is going to affect the way people live and work, and how architects and urban planners should respond to this shift.

Img: Brexit - a unique economic state

London

img: Bedford Square Area 3D Map Generated through GIS mapping technique by Chloe Heantjens (SD ltd).


COURSE STRUCTURE


MODULES & SCHEDULE

//Design Tutorials Project #1 Multi-functional ObjectWeekly Design TutorialsWeekly Design AssignmentsMidterm and Final term crit

Project #2 Spacial ProposalWeekly Design TutorialsWeekly Design AssignmentsMidterm and Final term crit

Project #3 Urban ProposalWeekly Design TutorialsWeekly Design AssignmentsMidterm and Final term crit

>> OutcomeSeries of Design Projects

//Theoritical TutorialsModule #1 Theory ClassBi-weekly Reading and Writing AssignmentBi-weekly Seminar and DiscussionWriting Hackathon

Module #2 Film EveningBi-weekly Film Evening (lecture, tutorials, films)

>> OutcomeSeries of shot papersSeries of presentations and discussions

//Skill Tutorials Module #1 Computational Tooling up3D modeling, Scripting, VR & Interaction

Module #2 Scripting WorkshopProcessing

Module #3 Digital Fabrication Workshop3D printing, CNC to Robotic workshop

Module #4 Compatible Crafting Technique WorkshopBasic Crafting (Casting, Vacuum Forming etc)

>> OutcomeSeries of physical & digital prototypes

PROCESSINGRHINO + GRASSHOPER

Python, VB, C++

MAYA

GENERATIVE

MODELLING

DEFORMATIONS

KEYSHOT ZBRUSH

POSTPRODUCTION

Img: Pavilion by ICD - reference example of a design prototype shift from prototype to multiple application scenario

Img: Architectural Speculation -Karolina Leszkowicz (AA Int13, 2016)

Theoritical Seminar

Programmes Digital Fabrication Human Data Interaction

Film Night


EXPECTED OUTCOME

Project #1 Multi-functional Object

Transformable Element (no aggregate & combine)The contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

Phase Changing MaterialThe contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

Generative FormThe contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

Digital FabricationThe contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

>> Outcome1:1 Physical modelDigital model illustrating transformation (ie. a Chair to an Outfit)Descriptive animationDescriptive portfolioSet of DrawingsShort paper (1500 ~ 2000 words)

//Project Outcome

Project #2 Spacial Proposal

Transformable Spatial Unit (before aggregation & combination)The contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

Combinatorics (Aggregation, Combination)The contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

>> Outcome1:1 physical model as part or whole of the spatial unitSet of architectural drawingsDigital model illustrating transformation of the unit(ie. Commertial to Residential)Digital model illustrating aggregation and combination of unitsDescriptive animationDescriptive portfolioShort paper (1500 ~ 2000 words)

//Seminar Outcome

Reading & Writing Computational Design HistoryThe contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

Digital Fabrication & Performantive ArchitectureThe contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

Urban ReadingThe contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

>> Outcome1500 ~ 2000 Short Paper For Project #11500 ~ 2000 Short Paper For Project #21500 ~ 2000 Short Paper For Project #3

Project #3 Urban Proposal

SynthesisThe contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

>> Outcome1:1 partial physical model1:1000 representitive physical modelSet of architectural drawingsDigital model illustrating transformation of the unit(ie. Commertial to Residential)Digital model illustrating aggregation and combination of unitsDescriptive animationDescriptive portfolio

//Skill OutcomePart1. 3D Modeling AutoCAD MayaThe contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

Rhinoceros 3DThe contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

ZBrushThe contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital


Part2. Generative Scripting & Procedure Modeling Processing (JavaScript)The contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital

Grasshopper + PythonThe contemporary design paradigm has shifted towards non-standardised architectural production, avoiding serial repetition of parts and allowing for mass customisation. The ideal scenario suggests a file-to-factory digital



FIELD TRIP BIBLIOGRAPHY

Core TextsSean Alquist & Achim Menges, ‘Introduction’, in A.Menges, S.Alquist (eds.), Computational Design Thinking, AD Reader (2011), pp. 10-29Kevin Kelly, ‘Hive Mind’, Out of Control: The new biology of machines, social systems and the economic world, (1994) pp. 9-27Neri Oxman & Jesse Louis Rosenberg, ‘Material-based Design Computation: An Inquiry into Digital Simulation of Physical Material Proper-ties as Design Generators, in Jose Pinto Duarte, Vassillis Bourdakis (eds.), IJAC: International Journal of Architectural Computing, Vol 5, Issue 1, (2007), pp. 25-44Makoto Sei Watanabe, Induction design : a method for evolutionary design, The Information Technology Revolution in Architecture, Birkhäuser Basel, June 1 2002, 93p.Ian L. Mc Arg, Design with natureChristopher Alexander, The nature of Order (book 1 to 4)Michio Kaku, The future of the mind, February 25 2014Steve Johnson, Emergence, the connected live of ants, brains, cities and software, 2001

Theoryitial ReadingsDonella H. Meadow, Thinking in systemJoel de Rosnay, The macroscope toward a global visionAntoine Picon, SmartCities : A spatialised intelligence Tom Verebes, Masterplanning the adaptative cityChristopher Alexander Notes on the synthesis of Form, 1974Matthew Poole, Manuel Shvartzberg, The politics of parametricism : digital technologies in architecture

Technical ReadingsDaniel Davis, Modelled on software engineering : flexible parametric models in the practice of architecture, PhD paperRick Smith, Technical notes from experiences and studies in using parametric and BIM architecture software, Virtual Build Technologies, 2007

The field trip destination is New York City and Boston. We will be visit-ing academic institutes including Harvard GSD, MIT & Columbia Uni-versity and get exposed to cutting edge ongoing research projects. We will be also visit ACADIA conference which will be hosted by MIT this year where a lot of researcher and architects gather and present their work. As part of this academic visit, we will also visit New York City and ex-plore the lively urbanized modern city to experience the co-living so-cial environment and shared urban spaces.

New York & Boston


Term01 (12 weeks, 25th Sep ~ 15th Dec)

September 2017Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

18 19 20 21 22 23 24

25 26 27 28 29 30 1

October 20172 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

November 201730 31 1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

December 201727 28 29 30 1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24

25 26 27 28 29 30 31

January 20181 2 3 4 5 6 7

Term02 (11 weeks, 08th Jan ~ 23rd Mar)

January 2018Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

February 201829 30 31 1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

March 201826 27 28 1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30 31 1

April 20182 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

* AA Close 16th Dec ~ 2nd Jan

* AM - Abel Maciel FS- Francesca Silvi MS- Mattia Santi CH- Chloe Haentjens* AA Close 28th Mar ~ 15th Apr* All schedules are subject to change

Int13 2017-18

Kick Start

Kick Start Meetup

Mid Term

Writing Hackathon

Final Crit

Crit

Wriring Workshop Scripting Workshop

Mid-Term

Y2 Table

TS Interim

Y3 Table

Int13 PT

AAVS Beijing

Int13 Field Trip

w0 Register

t1w1 Intro, Choice PT + Interview

t1w2 First Meet Up

t1w3 Tutorial

t1w4 Tutorial

t1w5 AA Mid Term

t1w6 Field Trip (AA open week)

t1w7 Tutorial / Writing Hackathon by AM

t1w8 Tutorial

t1w9 Tutorial

t1w10 Tutorial

t1w11 Final Crit

t1w12 Intro to P2

t2w1 Writing by AM & Scripting workshop by FS & MS

t2w2 Kickstart Crit

t2w3 Tutorial

t2w4 Tutorial

t2w5 Tutorial (AA open week)

t2w6 AA Mid-Term

t2w7 Tutorial

t2w8 Tutorial

t2w9 Tutorial / Y3 TS Interim

t2w10 Y2Table

t2w11 Y3Table

Term01 (12 weeks, 25th Sep ~ 15th Dec)

September 2017Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

18 19 20 21 22 23 24

25 26 27 28 29 30 1

October 20172 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

November 201730 31 1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26

December 201727 28 29 30 1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24

25 26 27 28 29 30 31

January 20181 2 3 4 5 6 7

Term02 (11 weeks, 08th Jan ~ 23rd Mar)

January 2018Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

February 201829 30 31 1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

March 201826 27 28 1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28 29 30 31 1

April 20182 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

* AA Close 16th Dec ~ 2nd Jan

* AM - Abel Maciel FS- Francesca Silvi MS- Mattia Santi CH- Chloe Haentjens* AA Close 28th Mar ~ 15th Apr* All schedules are subject to change

Int13 2017-18

Kick Start

Kick Start Meetup

Mid Term

Writing Hackathon

Final Crit

Crit

Wriring Workshop Scripting Workshop

Mid-Term

Y2 Table

TS Interim

Y3 Table

Int13 PT

AAVS Beijing

Int13 Field Trip

w0 Register

t1w1 Intro, Choice PT + Interview

t1w2 First Meet Up

t1w3 Tutorial

t1w4 Tutorial

t1w5 AA Mid Term

t1w6 Field Trip (AA open week)

t1w7 Tutorial / Writing Hackathon by AM

t1w8 Tutorial

t1w9 Tutorial

t1w10 Tutorial

t1w11 Final Crit

t1w12 Intro to P2

t2w1 Writing by AM & Scripting workshop by FS & MS

t2w2 Kickstart Crit

t2w3 Tutorial

t2w4 Tutorial

t2w5 Tutorial (AA open week)

t2w6 AA Mid-Term

t2w7 Tutorial

t2w8 Tutorial

t2w9 Tutorial / Y3 TS Interim

t2w10 Y2Table

t2w11 Y3Table

Term03 (9 weeks, 23th Apr ~ 22nd Jun)

April 2018Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

23 24 25 26 27 28 29

May 201830 1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13

14 15 16 17 18 19 20

21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Jun 201828 29 30 31 1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Int13 2017-18

* All schedules are subject to change

Final Crit

Show Open

Y2 Table

Y3 Table

External

TS Finalt3w1 Tutorial / TS Final

t3w2 Tutorial

t3w3 Tutorial

t3w4 Final Jury

t3w5 Tutorial

t3w6 Tutorial

t3w7 Y2 Table

t3w8 Y3 Table

t3w9 RIBA Exam (Tue) / Exhibit Open (Fri)

Int13 Computational Ornamentation

CALENDAR 2017-18Weekly Schedule


PREVIOUS YEAR REVIEW


PROJECT SNAPSHOTS INT13 2016-17Selected Final Jury Panels

Lisf of students

Yulia BykovaAlister LowAgi PermatasariLuke DeckerGordon ChanIgor GolaKarolina LeszkowiczPierre VaubourgNatasha NgSerlin arisalAnna AleshkinaKyungjoo Min


PHOTO SNAPSHOTS INT13 2016-17Public events

Img: From Int13 2016-17 Final Jury & Project Review Exhibition


Tought by Soomeen Hahm

COMPUTATIONAL ORNAMENTATIONAA Intermediate 13

Int13

int13 - aa school homepage › downloads › briefs2017 › ... · sep 2017 aa intermediate unit 13...

Documents