insurer responsible for practical joke taken badly by: kyon johnson
TRANSCRIPT
INSURER RESPONSIBLE FOR PRACTICAL JOKE TAKEN
BADLY
By: Kyon Johnson
KEY WORDS
General Liability- The legal exposure under common
law, Statute or Civil law, to act as a reasonably prudent
person would, or would not, under the circumstances.
Duty to Defend- The insurer appoints defense counsel
and assumes the defense of a covered claim.
Tort- a wrongful act or an infringement of a right
(other than under contract) leading to civil legal liability.
KEY WORDS 2
Practical Joke - a trick played on someone in order
to make them look foolish and to amuse others.
Dental Practice- the practice of dentistry
DECISION
A reversed decision, during a dental procedure this
is against general liability policy. Creating a problem
to both he customer and the policy of the dental
performance. Especially since it was non intently
and or was an accident it creates a hassle subjecting
the patient to increased injury if the doctor was
being careless.
SUMMARY
Woo, an oral surgeon, was performing a dental procedure on his employee, Tina
Alberts, whose hobby was raising potbellied pigs. While Alberts was under
anesthesia, Woo put some fake pig tusks in her mouth and took a picture. He
then completed the dental procedure. Woo did not give Alberts the picture, but
the office staff did at her birthday party. She quit work and sued Woo for mental
distress and many other torts. Woo’s general liability carrier refused to defend
the suit on the grounds that the incident did not arise out of the provision of
dental services. Woo defended the suit and paid Alberts $250,000 to settle the
matter. Woo then sued his insurer for breach of duty to defend. The jury awarded
Woo $750,000, the $250,000 he paid Alberts, plus attorney fees. The court of
appeals reversed and ordered the suit dismissed. Woo appealed.