instruments, ultrasound, and oils
DESCRIPTION
Instruments, ultrasound, and oils. Frank Podd Procter Department of Food Science University of Leeds 16/11/2002. Content. Background Ultrasound Velocity Ultrasound Spectrometry New Developments Single particle scattering theory Multiple particle scattering theory New electronics - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Instruments, ultrasound, and oils
Frank PoddProcter Department of Food Science
University of Leeds
16/11/2002
Content• Background
• Ultrasound Velocity
• Ultrasound Spectrometry
• New Developments Single particle scattering theory
Multiple particle scattering theory
New electronics
New cell design
Leeds Food Science
Eric Dickinson Emulsions
Brent Murray
Interfaces
Malcolm Povey
Ultrasound
Colloids
Bronek Wedzicha
Small molecule interaction
Food Processing
David Borrill
Biochemistry
Mike Morgan
Instruments within the colloids group• Rheometers,
• Brewster angle microscope, Langmuir trough, surface shear rheometers, bubble expansion chambers,
• Surface layers,
• Simulations,
• Confocal microscopy,
• Atomic force microscopy,
• Acoustic microscopy,
• Ultrasound creaming rig,
• Ultrasound velocity,
• Ultrasound spectroscopy.
1 m
micellesurfactantprotein
Liquid oil particle coated with surfactant Overall ultrasound
property depends on:
• Continuous phase• Dispersed phase• Surfactant• Droplet shape & its size distribution
Thermal propertyViscosityCompressibility
Ultrasound & Food Emulsions
v B
1
Bulk modulus
DensityAdiabatic compressibility
Ultrasound VelocityThe Wood equation
v j jj
j jj
1
, ,
2 1 2 11 1( ) , ( )
Phase volume of jth phase
Ultrasound Velocity Urick equation
1 1 1212
2
v v
a a
a
2 1
1
2 1
1
a a
a
2 1
1
2 1
1
2 12
12
23
RC C
C
p p
p
2
2 2
1
1 1
1
1 1
( )1 2 2
1 1
2CC Rp
p
Modified Urick Equation
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
1650
-10 0 10 20 30 40
Temperature / °C
Vel
ocity
/ m
s-1
I II III
Sound velocity in margarine
1400
1450
1500
1550
1600
1650
1700
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
Temperature (°C)
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Temperature (°C)
The velocity profile during crystallisation for virgin olive oil shows a smooth curve.
This adulterated virgin olive oil displays a spikier
velocity curve
Detecting adulteration in olive oil?
Figure 4: Plot of solids against temperature for 20.75% (v/v) WACB-in- w ater emulsions cooled at 5°C/hour (0.8% Tw een 20 & 1.0% sodium caseinate).
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
5 10 15Temperature (°C)
Sol
ids
SodiumcaseinateTween 20
Figure 7: Plot of solids against time for 20.75% (v/v) WACB-in-water emulsions (0.8% Tween 20) crystallised isothermally at 14.2, 15.0, 15.5 and 15.8°C. Heterogeneous volume particle size
distribution models are fitted.
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (minutes)
Sol
ids
14.2°CHet vol psd model15.0°CHet vol psd model15.5°CHet vol psd model15.8°CHet vol psd model
Crystallization in cocoa butter emulsions
1455
1460
1465
1470
1475
1480
1485
1490
1495
1500
0 5 10 15 20 25Temperature (°C)
Ultr
ason
ic v
eloc
ity (m
/s)
Sodium caseinate
Tween 20
Do surfactants affect crystallisation?Plot for 20% v/v WACB oil-in-water emulsion cooled at 5°C / hour. A three
stage process occurs with sodium caseinate during the crystallisation:
1. Bulk volume crystallisation initially,
2. Surface crystallisation (the sodium caseinate macromolecule protects the droplets more than Tween 20),
3. Instability stops the sodium caseinate from preventing droplet collisions, thus the crystallisation rate increases.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 5 10 15 20Time (days)
Sol
ids
(n-h
exad
ecan
e fra
ctio
n)
Mixing of emulsion droplets
Plot of solid content for an 32% v/v n-hexadecane oil-in-water emulsion crystallised at 6°C. In the first 7 days a dialysis tube was used as a barrier to prevent collisions between supercooled liquid and solid droplets. Thereafter, the contents of the dialysis tube were mixed with the liquid.
Does crystallisation occur due to micelle transport?
Ultrasound spectroscopy has opened a new dimension in food emulsion study
• Rheology• Component analysing• Stability monitoring (flocculation, creaming, coalescences, etc.)• Particle sizing ( particle size distribution, PSD)
US spectroscopyParticles scatter ultrasound…
The effect of scattering can be a frequency dependence in the ultrasonic velocity and attenuation
New Developments @ Leeds(in the ultrasound group)
New stable scattering theory with known error bounds.
Multi-particle theory enabling an estimation of particle spacing.
New US instrumentation New US sensors
Later Epstein and Carhart Later Epstein and Carhart (J. Acous. Soc. Am. 1953)(J. Acous. Soc. Am. 1953) and Allegra and Allegra and Hawley and Hawley (J. Acous. Soc. Am. 1972)(J. Acous. Soc. Am. 1972) developed a model for the developed a model for the attenuation of sound through a suspension of attenuation of sound through a suspension of isolated spheres due to thermal and viscous effects.isolated spheres due to thermal and viscous effects.
Ultrasound propagation was first formulated by Ultrasound propagation was first formulated by Lord Rayleigh Lord Rayleigh (The Theory of Sound 1892) .(The Theory of Sound 1892) .
Although the theory is exact it is prone to numerical Although the theory is exact it is prone to numerical difficulties and so an alternative solution technique difficulties and so an alternative solution technique is required.is required.
Scattering background
Magnitude of error knownMagnitude of error knownWell conditioned numericallyWell conditioned numericallyNot constrained to geometryNot constrained to geometry
Results of new single particle Results of new single particle scattering theoryscattering theory
Single Particle SystemSingle Particle SystemIncident plane waveIncident plane wave
Reflected waveReflected wave
Thermal fields.Thermal fields.11M particle at M particle at 11MHz generates a MHz generates a thermal field of thermal field of 11M depthM depth
Single oil droplet suspended in mediumSingle oil droplet suspended in medium
Transmitted waveTransmitted wave
The Multiple Scattering Problem
Oil particle(1 m diameter)in water
Thermal field ( 1 m thick in water at 1 MHz) generated by particle pulsation in the presence of the excitation field
Multiple scattering of the thermal field is different to multiple scattering of the acoustic field. If the particles stay together for the period of the wave
thermal fields will scatter coherently. If the particles move in less than this time then the thermal scattering will be incoherent.
Enables the determination Enables the determination of inter-particle spacing?of inter-particle spacing?
Results of new multiple particle Results of new multiple particle scattering theoryscattering theory
New Cell Design
• Small sample volume (2ml)
• Low coefficient of thermal expansion
• Small heat capacity
• High thermal conductivity
• Cell designed for high pressure experiments
• Choice of transducers - 1MHz to 30MHz frequency range
Designed for crystallisation experiments
New Electronics
• Measure the pulse amplitude in addition to the group velocity
• Velocity and attenuation spectrometry
• Accurate temperature measurement – detect heat from crystallisation?
• Aiming for inline use
• Low cost!
The Acoustiscan builds up a profile of property differences along the cell height. It uses both pitch catch and pulse-echo techniques
Colloidal stability can be quantifiably determined using the Acoustiscan. A major factor in colloidal stability is the particle size distribution. This can also be determined ultrasonically, by using the FSUPER for example.
Monitoring stability and creaming
The FSUPER has several advantages, such as:- Rapid and accurate measurement Wide frequency range (1-15MHz) A small amount of sample required ( ~ 15ml)
FSUPERThis type of characterisation can be peformed by the Frequency Scanning Ultrasound Pulse Reflectometer (FSUPER)
The particle size distribution can be estimated from the analysis of the frequency dependent ultrasonic velocity and attenuation data. The system can also monitor emulsion stability, measure the amount of surfactant covering the emulsion droplets and identify substances spectroscopically.
The method has the potential to characterise emulsions on-line, and in real time.
Many thanks go to Malcolm Povey, Scott Hindle, and Toni Crosthwaite for supplying
data and providing help and advice.
Acknowledgements