inspire mig:
DESCRIPTION
Inspire MIG: - Technological developments - status and challenges: MIG-T activities, technology watch, technology watch, messages and interaction towards MIG-P. , 1.10. 2014, Norwegia Mapping Authority , Arvid Lillethun,. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Inspire MIG:- Technological developments - status and challenges: MIG-T activities, technology watch, technology watch, messages and interaction towards MIG-P
, 1.10. 2014, Norwegia Mapping Authority, Arvid Lillethun,
Klikk ikonet for å legge til et bilde
New work package for the MIWP?: Technological developments - status and challenges
• Suggestion posted on MIG site• Many narrow wp issues.
Decisions within WG+MIG-T may have huge implications (MS, org, users)
• Action to lift up tech+ impl discussions
• Mid-term review• An annual report from MIG-T?• Can be part of a regime for
interaction with MIG-P
New work package for the MIWP?: Technological developments - status and challenges
• Inspire is a directive/regulations specifying in very detail
• The MIG work programme focuses on narrow issues in extreme detail – necessary and highly appreciated work – more of this
• Do we need to accept existing Inspire specs and limits?
• Technology - moves quickly - we have to cope with it, else Inspire will be a dying directive
• Needed changes ….
New work package for the MIWP?: Technological developments - status and challenges
• The MIG-T should have a action working on the “high level” messages on
• Consumer trends– Observed and foreseen changes in consumer habits/
use profiles– Location everywhere – internet of things– Sharing
• Technological trends - solutions– Trends, “Open” ESDI & NSDI– Semantic techs, Linked data rdf, PID,– New formats - geojson, topojson, jsonLD, ….– New api’s/services - rest-api, …. – Sensors– Dynamics– integration of data sorurces– complex data structures - simlifying data– from geo to IT, – Should analyze to detect the most important changes/
adjustments to be done• Data
– Where to put focus – the large user communities, where to succeed
– Facilitate national needs, not only cross-border European
• Roles– Implementing strategies – we steadily develop - which
roles for whom?
Work in MIG-T – Annual report on tech and data implementation challenges
• Focus on users, benefits, ”quick wins” • Relate Inspire specs/techn/org to trends• Consequenses to continue as is / do
changes
• Meesage unclear – drowning in details • Generalise and prioritise tech issues to
understandable messages• Annual report• Report annually to MIG-P• Regime for interaction – MIG-T – MIG-P
Possible issueExample 1:
Inspire data models to cover needs of priority environmental reporting• The objective was to have data models covering
the full model of the main environmental reporting data
• The situation is that there is Inspire only covers part of the reporting data models
• EEA is following up two ways– EIONET community and reporting data flows– Inspire data
• This is waste of resources and confusing results with double data, continuing like this will not get support from technical tools/ work in Inspire
• The inspire data model should cover – all the needed features and be a 1:1 data
model– Or at least cover the reporting data model
• Should identify the reporting themes in question; wfd, ccda, air q, other
• Objective to change Inspire data models• How should this be debated in MIG-T• Mig-T should give signals to MIG-P on a solution
today
Wanted situation
Wanted situation
or
Reporting Inspire
Inspire implementation to be specific on data themes and priority actions
• Example geology• All kinds of priority themes?• Harmonise which data?• From bits and pieces to Pan-european
or regional• ”scales”• ELF
Possible issueExample 2:
European organisations to distribute Inspire datasets?
• Data reported to European organisations to be distributed by these organisations
• On behalf of the countries• Will build on existing data flows• Will be resource effective • Needed decisions• Needed agreements• E.g. Eurogeosurvey, Eurogeographics, Eurotat, EEA,
Eurocontrol….
Health care/services data + sources
• Eurostat – statistical data on nuts 1 or 2– Health care: resources and patients (non-expenditure data)
(t_hlth_care)– Practising physicians (tps00044)– Licensed physicians (tps00167)– Practising dentists (tps00045)– Hospital beds (tps00046)– Curative care beds in hospitals (tps00168)– Psychiatric care beds in hospitals (tps00047)– Discharges from hospitals (tps00048) – use of the different services– Health care: indicators from surveys (SILC, HIS round 2004)
(t_hlth_care1)– Self reported unmet need for medical examination or treatment, by
income quintile (tsdph270)
– Important• Space resolution, nuts 1+2+municipality• time resolution• Actual figures (number of doctors) or health expenditure
figures
Euro-stat
Health careHealth care: resources and patients (non-expenditure data) (reg_hlth_care)Health personnel by region - Absolute numbers and rate per 100,000 inhabitants (hlth_rs_prsrg)Hospital beds (HP.1) by region - Absolute numbers and rate per 100,000 inhabitants (hlth_rs_bdsrg)Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, total number – Total (hlth_co_disch1t)Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, total number – Males (hlth_co_disch1m)Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, total number – Females (hlth_co_disch1f)Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, per 100,000 inhabitants – Females (hlth_co_disch2f)
Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, per 100,000 inhabitants – Males (hlth_co_disch2m)Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, in-patients, per 100,000 inhabitants – Total (hlth_co_disch2t)In-patient average length of stay (ISHMT, in days) by region - Females (hlth_co_inpstf)In-patient average length of stay (ISHMT, in days) by region - Males (hlth_co_inpstm)In-patient average length of stay (ISHMT, in days) by region - Total (hlth_co_inpstt)Hospital days of in-patients (ISHMT) by region - Females (hlth_co_hosdayf)Hospital days of in-patients (ISHMT) by region - Males (hlth_co_hosdaym)Hospital days of in-patients (ISHMT) by region - Total (hlth_co_hosdayt)Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, day cases, total number – Females (hlth_co_disch3f)Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, day cases, total number – Males (hlth_co_disch3m)Hospital discharges by diagnosis (ISHMT) and region, day cases, total number – Total (hlth_co_disch3t)
Work in MIG-T – Annual report on tech and data implementation challenges
• Focus on users, benefits, quick wins • Relate Inspire specs/techn/org to trends• Consequenses to continue as is/ do changes
• Meesage unclear – drowning in details • Generalise tech issues to understandable messages• Only tech or also generalise from thematic clusters / all wp
actions?• Annual report• Report annually to MIG-P• Regime for interaction – MIG-T – MIG-P
National metadata validator Norwegian tecnical control tool/validatorbased on Inspire service • We are connecting
up to the validation service
• We get lots of “not accepted” metadata
• Why ? They are correct!
• Its because the Inspire validator is not only checking metadata
• But is also checking the wms! That’s not metdata
• Please split validation service into two