inspection data summary report prototype · pdf file*quintile 1 and 5 have a broader range of...
TRANSCRIPT
This is a prototype of Ofsted's Key stage 4 Inspection Data
Summary Report (IDSR). This will replace the previous
inspection dashboard. It shows the proposed layout and
content of the new IDSR. The data used is example data and
illustrative only.
The 2017 key stage 4 IDSR will be released on Analyse
School Performance in late November.
Inspection Data Summary Report Prototype
Floor Coasting
Progress 8 -0.30 (-0.5) (-0.25)
Below floor standards in 2017? No
School coasting as of (date) 2017? Yes
Coasting elements 2015 2016 2017
Key stage 4
Example School URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Areas to investigate
To be above the floor, the school Progress 8 score must be greater than -0.5 and not significantly below national.
A school will be identified as coasting if its performance falls below the definition for three consecutive years (see elements below).
Progress 8 was significantly below national overall, in mathematics and in the EBacc element.
Progress 8 in mathematics element was in the bottom quintile for the past three years. In 2017, all prior attainment groups were in the bottom quintile and significantly below national.
Total and repeated fixed term exclusions were above the national for the past three years (to 2016). Of the total fixed term exclusions, 86% were FSM pupils and 72% were SEN. There were nine permanent exclusions in 2016 and four in 2015.
Absence and persistent absence was below the national average.
The school deprivation indicator was in the top quintile. Prior attainment was below national for every year group and every subject.
Whole school context in 2016/17
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
School level trendsTop
20%
2015 2016 2017 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
% girls
School 52 50 47
National 50 50 50
Ethnicity % of pupils known to be eligible for FSM
School 73 72 67
National 29 29 29
% of pupils first language not/believed not to be English
School 30 31 31
National 14 15 16
% of pupils with SEN support
School - 19.4 16.8
National - 12.4 11.0
% of pupils with a SEN statement or EHC plan
School - 0.9 0.7
National - 1.8 1.7
% stability
School 86 89 90
National 92 92 92
School deprivation indicator
School 0.5 0.5 0.4
National 0.2 0.2 0.2
2017 Quintile
Example School
Bottom
20%
This school has 19 of the 20 ethnic groups. Those with 5% or more of the
cohort are shown in the pie chart below.
Phase of education: Secondary Local authority: Bristol
Headteacher: Julie Smith Admissions policy: non selective
Pupils: 936 Ages: 11-16
Gender: Mixed Denomination: NA
Special needs provision: Visual impairment
White British, 33%
Asian or Asian British
Pakistani, 15%
Black or Black British Black Caribbean , 12%
Black or Black British African,
10%
Other, 30%
Year group context in 2016/17
Characteristics
Number
on roll% girls Nat % FSM Nat % EAL Nat % SEN Nat
Year 7 182 46 50 65 29 32 16 14 13
Year 8 181 40 50 70 29 33 16 25 13
Year 9 171 46 50 69 29 25 16 19 13
Year 10 175 52 50 63 29 28 16 17 13
Year 11 174 54 50 69 29 33 16 18 13
Prior attainment Difference from the national average point scores
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Year 11
Underlined once: more than one standard deviation from national
Underlined twice: more than two standard deviations from national
Reading Writing Mathematics
% pupils with
no prior
attainment
Number of
CLA
Example School URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
2
3
2
6
5
-0.7
-1
-1.2
Year 11
Year 10
Year 9
Year 8
Year 7
-1.3
-1.4
-1.4
-1.6
-1.6
Year 11
Year 10
Year 9
Year 8
Year 7
-1.4
-0.9
-1.7
-0.9
-1.4
Year 11
Year 10
Year 9
Year 8
Year 7
10
8
3
2
5
4
Absence Persistent absence Destinations% sessions missed % pupils who missed 10% or more sessions % in sustained education, employment or training
2013 2014 2015
School % 85 96 93
131
96
100
National % 90 92
140100
Cohort 140
6.3
12.3National % 5.2 5.3 5.2
8.2
12.4
Key stage 4
Example School URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
School % 4.9 5.9 3.9 School %
Cohort 912 912 912
National %
Cohort
1
2
3
4
5
6
2015 2016 20170
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2016 20170
20
40
60
80
100
2013 2014 2015
Fixed term exclusions Permanent exclusions% of pupils excluded
Nat
2016 (2)
2015 (1)
School % 3.9 1.9 2.4 0.9 1.8
0.2
410
National % 0.5 0.2 4.3 0.2 0.5
Key stage 4
Example School URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
0.5
Number 10 4 13 8
0
1
2
3
4
5
2014 2015 2016
= 1 pupil
NationalTotal Repeat
Key stage 4
separate keys for 2015 and 16/17 to reflect shading/sigs?
Fiction Academy
Trends over time
Progress quintiles displaying percentile rank
Maths P8 element
Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1* Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1* Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1* Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1*
2015 (130) 45 2015 (130) 50 2015 (130) 84 2015 (130) 39
2016 (148) 49 2016 (148) 52 2016 (148) 85 2016 (148) 55
2017 (150) 61 2017 (150) 56 2017 (150) 91 2017 (150) 59
2015 (39) 55 2015 (39) 75 2015 (39) 91 2015 (39) 55
2016 (40) 45 2016 (40) 65 2016 (40) 90 2016 (40) 45
2017 (43) 42 2017 (43) 85 2017 (43) 88 2017 (43) 49
2015 (70) 58 2015 (70) 75 2015 (70) 71 2015 (70) 61
2016 (75) 82 2016 (75) 70 2016 (75) 70 2016 (75) 52
2017 (81) 39 2017 (81) 45 2017 (81) 84 2017 (81) 39
2015 (30) 75 2015 (30) 42 2015 (30) 78 2015 (30) 55
2016 (30) 82 2016 (30) 61 2016 (30) 69 2016 (30) 35
2017 (26) 82 2017 (26) 82 2017 (26) 90 2017 (26) 45
2015 (30) 75 2015 (30) 75 2015 (30) 79 2015 (30) 57
2016 (30) 82 2016 (30) 65 2016 (30) 75 2016 (30) 58
2017 (26) 81 2017 (26) 61 2017 (26) 91 2017 (26) 55
Note: 2015 quintiles and percentiles are based on value added meaures; 2016 and 2017 quintiles and percentiles are based on Progress 8 measures.
*Quintile 1 and 5 have a broader range of scores, see here for quintile boundaries
() Cohort
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Open P8 element
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Overall
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
High at KS2
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Disadvantaged
Low at KS2
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Middle at KS2
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Bottom 20% Top 20% Bottom 20% Top 20%
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Overall English P8 elementBottom 20% Top 20% Bottom 20% Top 20%
Change in methodology or calculationsSignificantly below national Significantly above national
Key stage 4
separate keys for 2015 and 16/17 to reflect shading/sigs?
Fiction Academy
Trends over time
Progress quintiles displaying percentile rank
Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1* Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1* Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1* Q5* Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1*
2015 (130) 84 2015 (55) 8 2015 (85) 11 2015 (125) 39
2016 (148) 75 2016 (50) 12 2016 (88) 59 2016 (130) 55
2017 (150) 81 2017 (54) 13 2017 (92) 63 2017 (137) 59
2015 (39) 91 2015 (4) 8 2015 (11) 64 2015 (30) 55
2016 (40) 90 2016 (8) 9 2016 (10) 13 2016 (30) 45
2017 (43) 67 2017 (5) 5 2017 (7) 66 2017 (36) 49
2015 (70) 71 2015 (30) 75 2015 (45) 72 2015 (88) 61
2016 (75) 70 2016 (30) 43 2016 (59) 52 2016 (85) 52
2017 (81) 45 2017 (36) 47 2017 (60) 52 2017 (77) 39
2015 (30) 91 2015 (12) 25 2015 (30) 72 2015 (30) 55
2016 (30) 90 2016 (20) 31 2016 (30) 80 2016 (30) 35
2017 (26) 82 2017 (13) 19 2017 (25) 91 2017 (24) 45
2015 (30) 75 2015 (30) 42 2015 (30) 78 2015 (30) 55
2016 (30) 98 2016 (30) 61 2016 (30) 69 2016 (30) 35
2017 (26) 82 2017 (26) 31 2017 (26) 93 2017 (26) 45
Note: 2015 quintiles and percentiles are based on value added meaures; 2016 and 2017 quintiles and percentiles are based on Progress 8 measures.
*Quintile 1 and 5 have a broader range of scores, see here for quintile boundaries
() Cohort
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Languages VA
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Top 20%
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------Disadvantaged
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Overall
Low at KS2
---------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Ebacc P8 element Science VA Humanities VABottom 20% Top 20% Bottom 20% Top 20% Bottom 20% Top 20% Bottom 20%
Change in methodology or calculationsSignificantly below national Significantly above national
GCSE and equivalent results
Pupils achieving grade 4+ and 5+ in English and mathematics
School % National % Cohort
% of cohort
entered
40 63
21 45
Low at KS2 2 11
0 3
Middle at KS2 52 63
34 42
High at KS2 85 96
71 72
Disadvantaged 43 63/70
30 45/51
Pupils achieving grade 4+ and 5+ in mathematics
School % National % Cohort
% of cohort
entered
46 63
56 45
Low at KS2 2 11
0 3
Middle at KS2 52 63
34 42
High at KS2 85 96
71 72
Disadvantaged 43 63/65
30 45/50
43 84
80 96
All
100
26
117 93
95
50
90
97
60117
164
43
81
26
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
All 164 94
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percentage
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percentage
Grade 4+ Grade 5+ National for
all pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other national
Grade 4+ Grade 5+ National forall pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other national
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
GCSE and equivalent results
Pupils achieving grade 4+ and 5+ in English language
School % National % Cohort
% of cohort
entered
40 63
21 45
Low at KS2 2 11
0 3
Middle at KS2 52 63
34 42
High at KS2 85 96
71 72
Disadvantaged 43 63/66
30 45/49
Pupils achieving grade 4+ and 5+ in English literature
School % National % Cohort
% of cohort
entered
46 63
56 45
Low at KS2 2 11
0 3
Middle at KS2 52 63
34 42
High at KS2 85 96
71 72
Disadvantaged 43 43/46
30 21/27
All 164
43
81
26
117
80 96
26 100
117 93
95
50
90
97
60
43 84
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
All 164 94
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percentage
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percentage
Grade 4+ Grade 5+ National for all
pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other national
Grade 4+ Grade National forall pupils
Prior attainment
nationalOther
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
GCSE and equivalent results
Pupils achieving the English Baccalaureate*
School % National % Cohort
% of cohort
entered
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged
Non GCSE average attainment
School
average
points
National
average
points Cohort
% of cohort
entered
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged93
* A pupil is considered to have ‘achieved’ the English Baccalaureate if they got a grade 4/C or better in the following subjects: English, maths, sciences, a language and either
history or geography.
6 5
6 5
All 164
43
81
26
94
84
96
100
117
16 15
42 55
18 22/24
6 5
5 6
5 5/6
80 96
26 100
117 93
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
All 164 94
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
43 84
16 22
2 1
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percentage
0 2 4 6 8
Average points
National forall pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other national
National forall pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other national
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Overall Progress 8 Overall Progress 8 scatterplot
Bottom 10% Top 10%
P8 score National
Number of
pupils
included
-0.2 150
-0.4 43
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Middle at KS2
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
All
Low at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged -0.3 110
-0.2 81
-0.6 26
0.0/0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0
Average Progress 8
Pro
gre
ss
Key stage 2 prior attainment
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Other national
Significantly below national and in bottom 10%
Significantly above national and in top 10%
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Ke
y s
tag
e 4
Pro
gre
ss
Girls SEN = bold black border
Boys OtherDisadvantaged
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Overall Attainment 8 Overall Attainment 8 scatterplot
A8 score National
Grade
difference Cohort
0.0 81
164-0.7All
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
29 29Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged
45 50
-1.1/-1.5 117
48 52 -0.2 117
58 64 -0.7 26
47 50/59
0 20 40 60 80
Average Attainment 8
Ke
y s
tag
e 4
att
ain
me
nt
Key stage 2 prior attainment
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
National forall pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other nationalSchool
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Girls SEN = bold black border
Boys OtherDisadvantagedNational
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
English element of Progress 8
Bottom 10% Top 10%
P8 score National
Number of
pupils
included
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged
0.0
0.0/0.3
English Progress 8 scatterplot
150
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
-0.5 26
-0.1 110
-0.1 43
0.0 81
All -0.1 0.0
0.0
0.0
-2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0
Average Progress 8
Pro
gre
ss
Key stage 2 prior attainment
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Other national
Significantly below national and in bottom 10%
Significantly above national and in top 10%
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Ke
y s
tag
e 4
Pro
gre
ss
Girls SEN = bold black border
Boys OtherDisadvantaged
English element of Attainment 8 English Attainment 8 scatterplot
A8 score National
Grade
difference Cohort
% of
cohort
entered
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
99
99
7 7 0.3 43
Disadvantaged
10 10 -0.4 164All
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2 12 13 0.6 26 99
10 10 0.0 81 99
10 11/13 -0.7/-0.9 117 99
0 5 10 15
Average Attainment 8 Key stage 2 prior attainment
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
National forall pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other nationalSchool
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Ke
y s
tag
e 4
att
ain
me
nt
Girls SEN = bold black border
Boys OtherDisadvantagedNational
Mathematics element of Progress 8
Bottom 10% Top 10%
P8 score National
Number
of pupils
included
43
-0.6 26
-0.4 110
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged
-0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0/0.1
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
All
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
150
-0.8 81
-0.5 0.0
0.0
Mathematics Progress 8 scatterplot
-2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0
Average Progress 8 Key stage 2 prior attainment
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Other national
Significantly below national and in bottom 10%
Significantly above national and in top 10%
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Ke
y s
tag
e 4
Pro
gre
ss
Girls SEN = bold black border
Boys OtherDisadvantaged
Mathematics element of Attainment 8 Mathematics Attainment 8 scatterplot
A8
score National
Grade
difference Cohort
% of
cohort
entered
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
8 10 -0.4 164 94
9 10 -0.5 81 99
11 13 -0.6 26 100
8 10 -0.3 164 94
All
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged 8 10/13 -1.4/-1.6 164 94
0 5 10 15
Average Attainment 8Key stage 2 prior attainment
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
National forall pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other nationalSchool
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Ke
y s
tag
e 4
att
ain
me
nt
Girls SEN = bold black border
Boys OtherDisadvantagedNational
EBacc element of Progress 8 Ebacc Progress 8 scatterplot
Bottom 10% Top 10%
P8 score National
Number
of pupils
included
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
All -0.6 1500.0
0.0-0.5Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged
43
81
26
110
-0.5
-0.5
-0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0/0.4
-2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0
Average Progress 8
Ke
y s
tag
e 4
Pro
gre
ss
Key stage 2 prior attainment
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Other national
Significantly below national and in bottom 10%
Significantly above national and in top 10%
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Girls SEN = bold black border
Boys OtherDisadvantaged
Ebacc element of Attainment 8 Ebacc Attainment 8 scatterplot
A8 score
Nationa
l
Grade
difference Cohort
Average
entries for
EBacc slots
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
11 14 -1.1 164 2.4
6 6 -0.2 43 1.8
15 19 -1.2 26 2.9
12 13 -0.5 81 2.6
All
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged 10 14/16 -1.1/-1.3 117 2.4
0 5 10 15 20
Average Attainment 8
Att
ain
me
nt
Key stage 2 prior attainment
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
National forall pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other nationalSchool
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Ke
y s
tag
e 4
att
ain
me
nt
Girls SEN = bold black border
Boys OtherDisadvantagedNational
Open element of Progress 8
Bottom 10% Top 10%
P8
score National
Number of
pupils
included
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
0.1 150All 0.0
Open Progress 8 scatterplot
High at KS2
Disadvantaged 0.0/0.4
0.0
0.00.2
0.1 43
0.0 110
260.0
Low at KS2
81
-0.1
Middle at KS2
-2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0
Average Progress 8
Pro
gre
ss
Key stage 2 prior attainment
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Other national
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Significantly below national and in bottom 10%
Significantly above national and in top 10%
Ke
y s
tag
e 4
Pro
gre
ss
Girls SEN = bold black border
Boys OtherDisadvantaged
20
Open element of Attainment 8 Open Attainment 8 scatterplot
GCSE
A8
score
Non-
GCSE A8
score
A8
scoreNational
Grade
differenceCohort
Average
entries
for Open
slots
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
-0.5Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged 9 5
81 2.9
12 6
117
19 19 -1.2 26 3.0
2.815 14/15 -1.1/-1.2
15 14
10 6
Low at KS2 12
16 13
All
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
-0.2 43 2.7
-1.1 164 2.8
6
9 6
7 5
0 5 10 15 20
Average Attainment 8
Key stage 2 prior attainment
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
National forall pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other nationalSchool
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Ke
y s
tag
e 4
att
ain
me
nt
Girls SEN = bold black border
Boys OtherDisadvantagedNational
21
Science Value Added Science % attained grade C or above
Bottom 10% Top 10%
School % National
%
Number of
pupils
difference
Cohort% of
cohort
entered
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
93 -5 25 96
1614 0 7
59
74
52 69/71 -11/-12 69 59
49 69 -13 97
45 57 -7 60
Disadvantaged
All
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged
13
0.2 42
5
0.1 36
0.3
0.3
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2 72
0.0
0.0
14
0.0/0.2
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
Number
of pupils
included
NationalVA
score
0.0 54
2.0
All
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percentage
-3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
VA score
Other national
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
Significantly below national and in bottom 10%
Significantly above national and in top 10%
National forall pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other nationalSchool
Languages Value Added Languages % attained grade C or above
Bottom 10% Top 10%
VA score
Number
of pupils
included
School % National %
Number of
pupils
difference
Cohort% of
cohort
entered
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
71 69 -13 58 35
60 14 0 5 9
64 57 -7 36 44
92 93 -5 13 50
70 69/80 -11/-13 44 3867
All
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
High at KS2
Disadvantaged
7
60
25
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
-0.4All 92
National
0.0
1.0
Disadvantaged
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
0.0
0.0
High at KS2
-0.4 0.0/0.4
-0.3
0.0-0.8
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percentage
-2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0
VA score
Significantly below national and in bottom 10%
Significantly above national and in top 10%
Other national
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
National forall pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other nationalSchool
Humanities Value Added Humanities % attained grade C or above
Bottom 10% Top 10%
VA
score
Number
of pupils
included
School % National %
Number of
pupils
difference
Cohort% of
cohort
entered
Note: humanities includes geography, history and ancient history
URN: 123456 LAESTAB: 1234567
24
-0.6
92
37 64/80 -33/-36 103 88
71 91 -4 24
3 16 -4 36
43 56
9036
77
148
84
95
0.0
0.0/0.2 98
-10
64 -40
High at KS2
Key stage 4 in 2017
Example School
National
0.0-0.6 137
Disadvantaged
All
Low at KS2
Middle at KS2
All
High at KS2
Middle at KS2
Low at KS2 0.0
0.0
Disadvantaged
-0.4 36
-0.6 77
-1.0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percentage-3.00 -2.00 -1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00
VA score
Significantly below national and in bottom 10%
Significantly above national and in top 10%
Other national
Note: Disadvantaged nationals are shown as all/other
National forall pupils
Prior attainment
national
Other nationalSchool