insect walking robotics
TRANSCRIPT
WELCOME
TO
SEMINAR-1
ON
INSECT WALKING AND ROBOTICS
CONTENT
Introduction
Mechanism of leg movement
Coordination between legs
Sensory system of the leg and its role in walking
Brain control of insect walking
Importance of hexapod robots
Insect walking as a model of robots
Hexapod robot body architecture
Case studies
conclusion
INTRODUCTION
Mechanism of leg movement in walking arthropods
The cyclic movement of a walking leg consists of two
parts
Stance phase :
The leg is retracted
It moves backwards relative to the body, with the foot on the
ground
Propelling the body forwards
Swing phase :
The leg is protracted
So that it swings forwards with the foot off the ground
At low speed metachronal wave and at high speeds alternate
tripod
Crusie, 1990
Ripple gait
DIFFERENT WALKING PATTRENS
Huges, 1952
Stepping patterns of the legs
Central pattern generators : networks of neurons capable of
generating & alternating contractions of antagonistic muscles,
controls the stepping movements of individual legs present in
most of insects except stick insects
Interactions between the CPG's and sensory feedback from
the moving legs
Peripheral feedback provide information about leg load,
position, velocity, and acceleration, joint angles and foot
contact
Delcomyn, 1999
Coordination of legs
CPG's that control insect locomotion are not as well known
Some of the neurons are nonspiking
During leg movement, the nonspiking neurons alternately excite
and inhibit the motor neurons that control leg muscles
How the legs are coordinated with one another is still less well
understood
Experiments with crayfish, insects, and vertebrates suggest that
interneurons that run between adjacent ganglia provide
coordinating information
Delcomyn, 1980
Proprioreceptors : The position of the leg
segment &stance of the insect
Hair plates : Gravitational sense
Mechanoreceptors and chemoreceptors : Perception of environment
stimuli
Feedback from sense organs in the moving legs is critical to a properly
coordinated sequence of steps, during slow walking
Fast moving insects essentially ignore sensory input during fast running
The sensilla in different areas of the leg converge to separate
interneurons so that spatial information is maintained in the central
nervous system
Sensory system of legs and their role in walking
Cruse, 1979
Found on all six legs, especially near the joints
Typically arranged in compact fields consisting of 10 or more
individual cs.
Oriented in more or less the same direction, giving the entire
field a directional selectivity
Primarily responsible for adjustments in muscle activity
Campaniform sensilla
Delcomyn, 2008
SEM of campaniform sensilla
Brain Control of Insect Walking
Zill, et al., 2010
The brain not micromanage the movements but directs patterns of
activity
Rapid running can also guided by sensory inputs from the head
e.g. cockroaches that are startled by a puff of air to the abdominal
cerci will rapidly turn and run
It receives inputs from the from other multimodal sensory
interneuron's & influence motor by descending interneuron's
e.g. electrical stimulation of focal brain regions can initiate walking in
quiescent insects or cause turning in one direction or another
Experiments concluding that for walking promote mechanism
located in the subesophageal ganglion
Whereas centers that inhibit walking are located in the
supraesophageal ganglion
Experiments in brain structure disruption have yielded two
types of effects on walking
1) differences in the duration in episodes of walking
2) changes in the coordination of right and left sides
It is mainly due to disruption to the mushroom body
Most neurons recorded in the central complex changed when
animals ran or walked rapidly
The firing frequencies of more than half of the neurons were
correlated with the rate of walking
Bender et al., 2007
Two excitatory motor neurons control extension of the coxa–
trochanter (ctr) joint
Another two motor neurons slow motor neuron and fast motor
neuron control extension of the femur–tibia (fti) joint
The slow motor neuron is responsible for slower leg cycles
As the insect runs faster, the slow motor neurons are activated
at higher frequencies and in shorter bursts
The fast neurons not active in stationary insect
Pearson et al., 1971
Neurons involved in control of leg movement
At very fast running speeds, fast motor neurons are recruited.
Making the transition from stance to swing significantly shorter
Local control rules for each leg are coupled by a series of
“influences.”
For example, the controller for a middle leg would “influence”
all adjacent legs not to enter into swing while the middle leg is
in its swing phase.
Watson and Ritzmann, 1998
Damage to legs and its effect on locomotion
Slow-moving insects: If both middle legs are removed, the
insects immediately change their gaits
The front and rear legs now move alternately rather than
together hence maintaining mechanical stability.
Why it is happening ?
The loss of support by the middle legs
The most likely cause of the switch is the altered input
delivered to the central nervous system by the cs in the legs
Fast-moving insects :
If most of both middle legs are removed, the insects do behave
same at slow walk behave differently as their speeds increase
The front and rear legs begin to move more and more in
synchrony
Their legs are moved forward and back quickly enough that the
insect does not have time to fall over when the legs are lifted
Why it is so happening ?
The ability of the central nervous system to modulate the
strength of a sensory signal during high-speed walking
A robot is an automatic, servo-controlled, freely
programmable, multi-purpose manipulator with several
degrees of freedom. Variably programmed operations make
possible execution of a multiplicity of tasks.
‘‘ROBOT’’
ISO DEFINITION
Robots needs to be stability
There are two kinds of stability:
Static
Dynamic
A statically stable robot can stand still without falling over.
This is a useful feature, but a difficult one to achieve
It requires that there be enough legs/wheels on the robot to
provide sufficient static points of support.
IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS FOR ROBOT
• For example, people are not statically stable
• In order to stand up, which appears effortless to us, we are
actually using active control of our balance
• Achieved through nerves and muscles and tendons
• This balancing is largely unconscious
• It must be learned
• So that's why it takes babies take time learnt it
Locomotion mechanisms found in nature
Types of Locomotion in robots
Legs (for walking/crawling/climbing/jumping/hopping)
Wheels (for rolling)
Arms (for swinging/crawling/climbing)
Flippers (for swimming)
Many kinds of effectors and actuators can be used to move
a robot around
Legged locomotion is a very difficult robotic problem,
especially when compared to wheeled locomotion
Insects walking as model for walking robots
Insect walking exhibits three features
Autonomy : Present method of choosing the path by robots ?
alternative method ?
An insect can select a suitable path to traverse any terrain, no
matter how complex, using only its own sensory receptors and
nervous system.
Complete autonomy of action can be desirable in a walking
robot so that no human guidance is required for path selection
Delcomyn, 2014
Agility : How insects achieved so agile in walking ?
Insects walk with agility over any rough or rugged surface, no
matter how large or small the particles, or how steep the surface
insect walking is extraordinarily robust by using sensory system
Robustness : How insect are compensating damage to legs ?
Insect can sustain considerable physical damage, even lose
several legs, without impairing its ability to walking by using
remaining sense organs
Robot, especially one that is expected to operate in remote
places far from human contact it is most desirable
Why Chosen Legs?
Better handling of rough terrain.
Less energy loss
Potentially less weight
Legs do less damage to terrain
Potentially more maneuverability
Omni directionality
Can easily walk on a slope ,stairs, over obstacles and sandy
terrain
Body rotations without changing its footprints
Walking Robots Body Architecture
There are two basic architectures of hexapod robots
Rectangular :
Six legs distributed symmetrically along two sides, each
side having three legs
Hexagonal :
Legs distributed axi-symmetrically around the body, in a
hexagonal or circular shape
Require a special gait for turning action
Need four steps in order to realize a turning action
Depends on the application
Factors like terrain form, workspace, payload
Different leg types employed for hexapod walking robots.
All have advantages and disadvantages
Kinematic Architectures of the legged robots
perpendicular
to the
advancement
of the legs
position
parallel to
the robot
legs
move in any
direction
Electric rotating motors: the majority of hexapods is
actuated by this type
They are relatively cheap, easy to control
Pneumatics actuators
Hydraulics actuators: able to supply very high force
Heavy weight will added to engine suitable for larger sized
hexapod robots
Actuator Types for walking robots
Walking Algorithm of hexapod robot
Step 1
– legs 1,4,and 5 down,
legs 2,3 and 6 up.
Step 2
– rotate torso 7 and 9
counter-clockwise,
torso 8 clockwise.
Step 3
– legs 1,4 and 5 up,
– legs 2,3, and 6 down.
Step 4
– rotate torso 7 and 9
clockwise, torso 8
counter-clockwise.
Go to step 1
CASE STUDIES
Robot name Year of
manufacture
Total DF Purpose
Ambler 1989 12 Planetary
exploration
ASV 1989 15 Navigate on
uneven terrains
Tum 1989 19 Hexapod
following
biological
principles
Hannibal 1989 19 Planetary
exploration
Biobot 2000 18 Locomotion on
rough terrain
Hamlet 2001 18 Testing force
&position
control
Sprawlita,
Gregor I
2002&2006 12,16 Robots inspired
by cockroach
Overview of development hexapod robots
Tedeschi and carbone, 2014
Athlete 2006 36 Navigate on the
rough soil of the
moon
Aqua II 2010 6 Under water
hexapod robot
Comet IV 2011 24 Multitasks on
outdoor
environment
CR200 2013 18 Walk on the land
or underwater in
the turbelent surf
zone
Mantis 2013 18 Entertainment
RiSE is the first legged machine capable of locomotion on both
the ground and a variety of vertical buildings at speeds up to 4
cm/s
Interlocking solutions claws or spines generate a combination
of pull in &propulsive forces against gravity e.g. Cats and bears
Bonding mechanisms generate adhesion via suction, chemicals,
capillary forces, or vanderwaal forces e.g. Lizards, frogs, and
insects
RiSE uses both interlocking mechanisms and is thus capable
of climbing both rough and smooth surfaces
Spenko et al., 2008
Biologically Inspired Climbing with Hexapedal Robot- RiSE
DYLEMA: Using walking robots for landmine detection and location
Gonzalez, et al., 2005
Mobile platform
Manipulator
GPS antenna
Magnetic compass
Sensor head
Goldschmidt, et al., 2013
AMOS II hexapod robot
Body flexion
Com elevation
Local Leg Reflexes
Reactive Backbone Joint Control (BJC)
Leg Reflex Control (LRC)
Neural Locomotion Control (NLC)
AMOS II negotiated obstacles with a height up to 13 cm 75% of
its leg length with a success rate of 100 per cent
LAURON is biologically-inspired by the stick insect
Because of the flexible behavior based Control system, LAURON
is capable of adapting to unknown situations very well
Roennau, et al., 2014
Lauron V
A series of hexapods named LIMBED EXCURSION MECHANICAL
UTILITY ROBOT
using for robots repair and maintenance in near-zero gravity on
the surface of spacecraft
Kennedy, 2005
LEMUR
This capable of walking in any direction without turning i.e. perform
manipulation tasks with its six feet including typing on a computer
keyboard
It is suited for space and could do inspection and maintenance tasks
in zero-gravity
Sticky, gecko-like technology on its feet would keeps it anchored
Showlater, 2009
MARS (MULTI APPENDAGE ROBOTIC SYSTEM)
(All terrain hex limbed extra terrestrial explorer)
Ability to roll rapidly over flat smooth terrain and walk carefully
& on fixed wheels over irregular and steep terrain.
Useful for unloading bulky cargo from stationary landers and for
transporting it long distances.
NASA
ATHLETE
AQUA
An amphibious hexapod robot developed with six
independently-controlled leg Actuators.
Able to switch from walking to swimming gaits when it is
moving from a sand beach or surf-zone to deep water
Georgiades, 2005
Can climb in rock fields, mud, sand, and vegetation, across
railroad tracks, up telephone poles, slopes, and stairways.
Controlled remotely at distances up to 700 meters, and ir
cameras and illuminators provide front and rear views from the
robot
Using for
military service
Inspired by the
cockroach
Sarnli, et al ., 2001
RHex
Forest Walker Hexapod
Mantis is a hexapod robot hydraulic powered
It stands nearly 3 m tall and weighs about 2 tons; at present, it is
one of the biggest hexapod robots in the world
It is operated by piloted or wifi enable
HECTOR (Hexapod Cognitive autonomously Operating Robot)
The robot developed by inspiring stick insect walking
algorithms
HECTOR uses a new type of bioinspired, self-contained,
elastic joint drive exoskeleton made of carbon fiber reinforced
plastic
Which makes up only around 13 percent of the robot's body
weight, but allows it to carry loads many times
Hector the ability to learn and plan ahead, which will enable
it to make its way through unfamiliar territory and carry out
exploration tasks autonomously.
Schneider, et al., 2012
Swarm robotics
Biologically inspired by social insects
Emergent complex behaviour from simple agents
Swarm Intelligence Principles:
Autonomous control
Simple agents
Fast and flexible responses
Local communication
Decentralised
applications :
Cleaning up toxic waste
Exploring an unknown planet
Surveillance
Military application
Tiny Robots, Swarms
STRIDE II, which uses footpads for high lift, stability
This robot uses the repulsive surface tension force on its
footpads as the dominant lift principle
The robot propel quickly and power efficiently on the water
surface by the sculling motion of their two side-legs, which
never break the water surface completely
could be used in water surface monitoring, cleaning and
analysis in lakes, dams, rivers and the sea
STRIDE II: A Water Strider-inspired Miniature Robot
Ozcan, et al., 2014
CONCLUSION
THANK YOU