injection experience of short cicle biomass charcoal fines...

26
INJECTION EXPERIENCE OF SHORT CICLE BIOMASS CHARCOAL FINES IN BLAST FURNACE Eng. Paulo Afonso Gomes Eng. Marcelo de Matos Eng. Ricardo Luchese de Moraes Rio de Janeiro October 17th, 2012 1 2915 ISSN 2176-3135

Upload: hakhanh

Post on 21-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

INJECTION EXPERIENCE OF SHORT CICLE BIOMASS CHARCOAL FINES

IN BLAST FURNACE

Eng. Paulo Afonso GomesEng. Marcelo de Matos

Eng. Ricardo Luchese de Moraes

Rio de Janeiro October 17th, 20121

2915ISSN 2176-3135

THE INJECTION OF FINES IN SMALL BLAST FURNACES IS EXPECTED TO GROWTH

MAIN DRIVERS:

• INCREASE OF BLAST FURNACE PRODUCTIVITY• DEACRESE DEPENDENCE OF PLANTED FORESTS• NEED OF COST REDUCTION ON PIG IRON PRODUCTION

REALITY

• THE CHARCOAL PRODUCTION GENERATES ONLY 10% OF FINES• THE INCREASE OF INJECTION WILL CREATE A DEFICIT OF FINES

SOLUTION

• CHARCOAL FINES FROM SHORT ROTATION CROPS CAN BE THE ANSWER

2

WHY USE FINES FROM SHORT ROTATION CROPS?

2916ISSN 2176-3135

3

MATERIALS AND METHODS• THE CHARCOAL INJECTION EXPERIENCE, USING BIOMASS FROM BAMBOO WAS CARRIED

OUT IN JUN 2010 AT CIA SIDERÚRGICA VALE DO PINDARÉ BLAST FURNACE’S 3 AND 4, OWNED BY QUEIROZ GALVÃO GROUP IN AÇAILÂNDIA – MA, WHICH MAIN CHARACTERISTICS ARE DETAILED BELOW:

BLAST FURNACE

# 3# 3# 3# 3 # 4# 4# 4# 4

NET VOLUME m3

157 178

# TUYERES Unit 10 12

TUYERES

DIAMETERmm. 95 95

2917ISSN 2176-3135

THE BAMBOO USED FOR CHARCOAL FINE PRODUCTION WAS SUPPLIED BY AGRIMEX (COELHO NETO - PI)

SPECIES: ““““BAMBUSA VULGARIS””””

4

MATERIALS AND METHODS

2918ISSN 2176-3135

� BAMBOO PLANTATION

5

� BAMBOO HARVEST AND CHIP PRODUCTION

BAMBOO PLANTATION AND HARVEST

.

2919ISSN 2176-3135

CHIPPED BAMBOO STORAGE AT PINDARÉ PLANT

6

2920ISSN 2176-3135

CYLINDRICAL FURNACE USED TO CARBONIZE THE BAMBOO AT PINDARÉ MILL

7

2921ISSN 2176-3135

BAMBOO CHARCOAL AT THE END OF CARBONIZATION

8

2922ISSN 2176-3135

BAMBOO CHARCOAL FINES READY TO BE SENT TO INJECTION SYSTEM

9

2923ISSN 2176-3135

FINE INJECTION SYSTEM ON PINDARÉ’’’’S BLAST FURNACE

10

3% MOISTURE

2924ISSN 2176-3135

FINES INJECTION PLANT AT PINDARE PLANT

11

2925ISSN 2176-3135

PENDULUM GRINDER FINES INJECTION CONTROL

12

2926ISSN 2176-3135

C. VEGETABLE FINES MOISTURE GCV NCV UHV ASH

EUCALYPTUS % 1,00 6013 5912 5851 12,52

EUCALYPTUS % 1,61 6470 6368 6262 5,78

BAMBOO % 1,50 5882 5781 5691 21,61

BAMBOO % 1,57 5816 5715 5622 18,47

13

CARBONIZED BIOMASS ANALYSIS

SOURCE: LQCE- ESALQ – USP -2010

ASH INFLUENCE ON HEATING VALUE

GROSS HEATING VALUE X ASH CONTENT %

ASH CONTENT %

2927ISSN 2176-3135

NAMEWOOD CHARCOAL

(*) BAMBOO

(**)ELEPHANT GRASS

(**)

Density (kg.m-3) 420 a 480 191,70 123,82

Volatile Matter (%) 19,16 15,65 14,22

Ashes (%) 7,32 5,89 13,36

Fixed Carbon (%) 72,47 71,77 67,39

Moisture (%) 1,05 8,03 5,04

Impurities(%) N/A 13,83 15,32

Size (mm.) <0,15 32,18 27,33

CHARCOAL FINES ANALYSES FROM DIFFERENT BIOMASSS

14

•After drying in the mill** After carbonization

2928ISSN 2176-3135

NAMEBEFORE MILL PROCESS (%)

PROCESS MILL

REJECT(%)

AFTER MILL PROCESS (%)

Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3

Volatile Matter 10,33 1,77 8,76 17,13 11,44

Ashes 18,88 91,44 18,38 14,91 13,11

Fixed Carbon 59,84 6,44 70,95 66,64 76,12

Moisture 10,95 0,35 1,91 1,32 2,43

SiO2 (Ashes) 64,56 53,58

FeO (Ashes) 16,02

VARIATIONS IN BAMBOO FINES CHARACTERISTICS IN GRINDING PROCESS

15

2929ISSN 2176-3135

DAY

MOISTURE(Mill Process

Entrance)%

MOISTURE(Fines)*

%

SIZE(%< 0,15mm)

DENSITY(kg/m3)

June 22, 2010

8,02 1,74 94 429

June 23, 2010

8,64 1,51 88 442

June 24, 2010

8,11 1,61 92 443

June 25, 2010

8,29 1,84 95 432

INJECTED BAMBOO FINES CHARACTERISTICS AND PROPERTIES

16* After drying

2930ISSN 2176-3135

DAYPRODUCTION(t Pig Iron/Day)

INJECTION RATIO(kg of fines/t pig iron) *

June 22, 2010 332 53

Juse 23, 2010 377 46

June 24, 2010 367 47

June 25, 2010 328 33

LEVELS OF INJECTION OF FINES AT BLAST FURNACE 4

17

* The injection rate is limited by the flame temperature;* The QG Group is investing on an oxygen plant, pursuing an increase injection ratio

(aim: until 110 kg/t pig iron)

2931ISSN 2176-3135

18

BAMBOO EXPERIMENTAL PLANTATION AREA AT PINDARÉ MILL

� AGE – 04 MONTHS � AGE – 09 MONTHS

2932ISSN 2176-3135

19

ELEPHANT GRASS (MISCANTHUS) EXPERIMENTAL PLANTATION AREA AT PINDARÉ MILL

AGE – 4 MONTHS AGE – 9 MONTHS

2933ISSN 2176-3135

20

ARUNDO DONAX EXPERIMENTAL AREA AT PINDARÉ PLANT

� AGE – 4 MONTHS � AGE – 9 MONTHS

2934ISSN 2176-3135

CONCLUSIONS

21

• THE CHARCOAL FINES PRODUCED FROM BAMBOO MAY BE INJECTED IN BLAST FURNACESIN QUANTITY EQUIVALENT TO THAT OF EUCALYPTUS CHARCOAL FINES.

• THE SUBSTITUTION RATIO IS THE SAME AS THE CHARCOAL FINES FROM EUCALYPTUS ASLONG AS IMPURITIES ARE NOT INCORPORATED ON THE CARBONIZATION PROCESS;

• THE QUEIROZ GALVÃO GROUP, AFTER THIS SUCCESSFUL INJECTION EXPERIENCE, HASSTARTED EXPERIMENTAL PLANTATIONS OF BAMBOO, ELEPHANT GRASS AND ARUNDODONAX, AIMING BIOMASS PRODUCTION FOR CARBONIZATION AND AS WEL, AIMING TOINCREASE THE INJECTION RATES ON BLAST FURNACES AND, IN THE FUTURE, TO USE THEMIN THE IRON ORE SINTERING PROCESS;

• THE SHORT ROTATION BIOMASS PRODUCTION COST IS CURRENTLY SIMILAR TOEUCALYPTUS, BUT IT CAN BE REDUCED;

• THE START OF ““““PROJETO DE FOMENTO”””” AT THE PINDARÉ MILL’S INFLUENCE ZONE COULDDECREASE THE CURRENT BIOMASS PRODUCTION COST AND FURTHER INCENTIVE IN THEUSE OF SHORT ROTATION BIOMASS FINES.

2935ISSN 2176-3135

THANK YOU

22

2936ISSN 2176-3135

BIOMASS COST (R$/t Dry Basis)

23

BIOMASS CULTIVATION HARVEST FREIGHTTOTAL (CASH)

FINANCIAL COST

TOTAL (CASH +

FIN.)

LANDCOST

CASH + LAND +

FIN.

CONVENTIONAL EUCALYPTUS 39.34 34.19 7.00 80.53 11.00 91.53 20.40 114.07

SHORT ROTATIONEUCALYPTUS

62.86 44.56 7.00 114.42 15.48 129.90 18.60 148.51

ELEPHANT GRASS 36.57 46.05 8.56 91.17 0.00 91.17 15.14 106.31

BAMBOO 33.75 53.66 4.53 91.94 2.08 94.01 23.44 117.46

2937ISSN 2176-3135

CULTIVATION COST

CONVENTIONAL EUCALYPTUS

S. ROTATION EUCALYPTUS

ELEPHANT GRASS

BAMBOO

Formation (R$ / ha) 4.679 5.540 3.083 3.973Maintenance (R$ / ha) 559 821 1.074 73Conducting (R$ / ha) 2.221 2.431 0 946

Cycle (years) 14 9 14 14Cycle Formation 1 1 1 1

Maintenance per Cicle 12 6 13 8Regowth per Cicle 1 2 0 6

Yield (t dried / ha / Year) 24,70 27,09 33,30 21,.50Production (t dried/ ha / Cicle) 345,80 243,84 466,20 301,00Cultivation Cost (R$/ha/Cicle) 13.604 15.328 17.047 10.232Cultivation Cost (R$/ha/Year) 972 1.703 1.218 731Cultivation Cost (R$/t dried) 39,34 62,86 36,57 33,75

24

BIOMASS COST (R$/t Dry Basis)

2938ISSN 2176-3135

25

HARVEST COST + FREIGHT

CONVENTIONAL EUCALYPTUS

S. ROTATION EUCALYPTUS

ELEPHANTGRASS

BAMBOO

Harvest + Chipping (R$ /ha) 5.911,00 3.621,69 1.533,47 2.307,25

Average Harvested Volume (BDMT / ha) 172,90 81,28 33,30 43,00

Harvest / BDMT* 34,19 44,56 46,05 53,66

Freight (10 km) per GMT* 3,85 3,85 3,85 3,85

Moisture 45% 45% 55% 15%

Freight per BDMT* 7,00 7,00 8,56 4,53

BIOMASS COST (R$/t Dry Basis)

* BONE DRY METRIC TON** GREEN METRIC TON

2939ISSN 2176-3135

26

FINANCIAL + LAND COST

CONVENTIONAL EUCALYPTUS

S. ROTATION EUCALYPTUS

ELEPHANTGRASS BAMBOO

Cycle Financial Cost (R$/ha) 4.542 3.775 0.00 625

Cycle (yers) 14 9 14 14

Yield (BDMT* /ha / Year) 24,70 27,09 33,30 21,50

Financial Cost (R$ / BDMT*) 13,13 15,48 0,00 2,08

Land Price (R$/ha) 4.200 4.200 4.200 4.200

Land usage % 50% 50% 50% 50%

Land Price + Legal Reserves + PPAs** 8.400 8.400 8.400 8.400

Land Cost (% - Real) 6% 6% 6% 6%

Annual Land Cost (R$/ha) 504,00 504,00 504,00 504,00

Yield (BDMT* / ha / Year) 24,70 27,09 33,30 21,50

Land Cost (R$/BDMT) 20,40 18,60 15,14 23,44

BIOMASS COST (R$/t Dry Basis)

* BONE DRY METRIC TON** PERMANENT PRESERVATION AREAS

2940ISSN 2176-3135