d w

OBDl202 - INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING PROCESS

EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER

3/15/2009 SUNS1 checklist complete and exam docs to ADAMS

Ref Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals

Z// 7/4 6- SUNS1 checklist to LA

3/15/2009 d!A b\El Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 9, Supp 1, Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1

November I O , 2008

FROM:

TO:

Ryan Lank

Tom McKernon Chief Examiner, Operations Branch

SUBJECT:

You have been assigned as Chief Examiner of b a n Onofre, Units 2 and 3, r e t a i t i a l licensing ex The examination has been scheduled to be admin k you for contacting the San Onofre facility to finalize the details of the examination. Please ensure that the RPSAP system is updated for this activity, including accuracy of the assigned examiners and candidate numbers. In addition, you are reminded that only qualified examiners are permitted to conduct any part of the examination.

I N IT1 AL OPE RAT0 R LI CENS I NG EXAM I NATl ON ASS I G N M ENT

S :\DRS\OB\OB-ON LYMDM I NMSS I G N M ENT SH EETS\CY'OS\FE BO9-SONGS-ASS I G NM ENT MEMO-TM.DOC

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2

~~

Facility: Date of Examination:

Item I Task Description

1. w

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(?.) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

R I

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all WA categories are appropriately sampled.

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. ..I.. , I , I

1 d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected WA statements are appropriate. Nk I I I I - 2.

S I

M U L A T 0 R

- 3.

W I T

*',I 1

a. Using Form ES-301-5. verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures. technical specifications, and major transients.

~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applKcacants' audit test@), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outllne(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

/b& 1

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks

distributed among the safety function6 86 specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specitied on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test@) (4) h e number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on lhe form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria

on b e form. b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: (I) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine fthere are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no ilems are duplicated on subsequent days.

orities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropliate iob level (RO or SRO). I M l a Ylt

a. Author b. Fzcility Reviewer r) c. NRC Chief Examiner d. NRC Supervisor

Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial ikms in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. * Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

ES-201, Page 26 of 28

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3

1. General Criteria a

Facility: ,$s/v L < Date of Examination: 2.2 -09 Operating Test Number: /yA I

b" c#

3. Simulator Criteria

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

a. The operating test conrorms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). dq 4 74

1

_ _ -- _ _ .q& &

b. There is no day-to-day repetition behiveen this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

2. Walk-Through Criteria -_ -- _ _ I I I

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: initial conditions - initiating cues

* - references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation i f deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include: - -

- - - -

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

II Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor

NOTE: * #

The facility signatun, is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

Page 1 of 4

0Z1012009

Report 21

Region: 4

12:59:47

Phase Code: 5

Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 1[u01/2008 To 09/30/2009

I Candidates Examiners Assigned h 12/01/2008 San Onofre IO5000361 I 2009301

TAC #: X02454

12/01/2008 San Onofre 105000362 12009301 TAC #: X02455

02/03/2009 San Onofre IO5000361 I TAC #: X02454

02/03/2009 San Onofre / 05000362 I TAC #: X02455

SROl - 1

SROl - 1

SROl - 1

SROl - 1

Adrnin

Adrnin

FFF MCKERNON, THOMAS 0. MCKERNON, THOMAS 0. OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

FFF MCKERNON, THOMAS 0. MCKERNON, THOMAS 0. OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

FFF MCKERNON, THOMAS 0. MCKERNON, THOMAS 0. OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

FFF MCKERNON, THOMAS 0. MCKERNON, THOMAS 0. OSTERHOLTZ, CLYDE C.

Sites: SANO Orgs: ALL Exam Author: FFF

ES-201 Examinatlon Security Agreement Form ES-ZO? -3

I. Pre-Examin ation

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 2-2 -09 of my signature. I agree that I will not kncrwingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have noi been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those appliwnts scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date unlil completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e& acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator Is acceptable i f the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee’s procedures) and unterstand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of [he examinations andfor an enforcement action against me or thefacitity licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

as of the date

2. Post-Examination

To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week@) of 2-17 -07 . From h e date that I entered into lhis securilly agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not inslruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback lo those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSISiLITY SIGNATURE (1) OATE SIGNATURE (2) OATE NOTE

!

-r( P, X .I

ES-201, Page 27 of 28

ES-20 1 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Exami n ati on

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC lrcensing examinalions scheduled for the wesk(s) of F7/ 2i 8 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not bee aut orized by the NW chief examiner. I undershnd that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered thew licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specificalfy noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g.. ading as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training mnlent or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of Ihe physical security measures and requiwments (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and uMerstand lhat violation of t h e conditions of this agreement may result in cancellafion of the examinatlons andlor an enforcement action against me or thefacility licensee. I will immediately report to facilily management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Enamination

To Ihe best of my knowledge, I did not aivulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during [he week@) of 2-2 4?' , From the date that I entered into this security agreemenl until the completion of examination administration, I did not inslruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinalions, except as specifically noted below and aulhorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME

1 GGUG BEU , . 2: 3. 4. 5. 6 . 7. 8. 9. in I u,

11, 12. 13. 14, 15. NOTES:

71 m ;a-

W 0 OJ

ES-201, Page 27 of 28