initial information on site selection for uganda pig value chain projects
DESCRIPTION
Presented by Emily Ouma at the More Pork by and for the Poor Project Inception and Planning Workshop, Mukono, Uganda, 27-28 May 2014TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects
Emily Ouma
More Pork by and for the Poor Project Inception and Planning Workshop, Mukono, Uganda, 27-28 May 2014
![Page 2: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Site selection• Selection of potential sites for:
– CGIAR Research Program on Livestock and Fish.– Irish Aid funded Uganda smallholder pig project.
• ProcessStep 1: Geographical targeting using GIS characterization.Step 2: Stakeholder consultation of step 1 and definition of “soft” criteria.Step 3: Minimum checklist to gather data for more specific site selection (counties and sub-counties).Step 4: Analysis of steps 1-3 and final site selection.
• What is your contribution to this process?– Help us identify other non-GIS criteria for site selection (local knowledge).– Confirm whether the potential sites (GIS-characterisation and soft criteria
) are appropriate.
![Page 3: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
GIS Characterization • Based on 2 basic criteria:– Pig population density– Poverty levels
• Targets 3 types of pig value chains:Rural – urbanPeri-urban - urbanRural – rural Largely determined by market accessibility.
![Page 4: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Average herd density per district
Pig density per district-overall
Masaka
Mukono
Kayunga
Mpigi
Tororo
Rakai
Kumi Sironko
Pig population density
![Page 5: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Map A: Pig densities per district
Pig density per district-cut off
Rakai
Lyantonde
Kayunga
Tororo
Pig population density - cut off of 20 heads/Km2
![Page 6: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Percentage of population living on less than 1.25$ per day
Where are the poor?
![Page 7: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Map B: Percentage of people living on less than 2$ per day
Location of the poor – cut off 50 %
![Page 8: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Pork consumptionMost of the pig meat consumption is in the urban areas
Source: FAO livestock consumption data, 2012
![Page 9: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Map C: Combining A & B, districts with high poverty levels, and high pig densities
Target sites
![Page 10: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Travel time (hrs) to nearest city with more than 50,000 persons
Market access
![Page 11: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Districts with high potential for selection-based on GIS characterization
District RegionKayunga CentralMukono CentralBukedea EasternKumi EasternSoroti EasternTororo EasternKasese WesternHoima WesternKibaale WesternKabarole Western
![Page 12: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Other “soft criteria” for selection-not covered by spatial analysis
District Region Comment
Masaka Central Highest pig density in Uganda (>50 heads/km2)
Kamuli Eastern Pig density (10-20 heads/km2)
Gulu Northern - ASF project- High pork
consumption- Poverty
Lira or Pader
Northern - Source of pork for Gulu
• Potential partnerships during RRA.
• Others?
![Page 13: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Potential districts – scoring exerciseDistrict Region
Kayunga Central
Mukono Central
Masaka Central
Bukedea Eastern
Kumi Eastern
Soroti Eastern
Tororo Eastern
Kamuli Eastern
Kasese Western
Hoima Western
Kibaale Western
Kabarole Western
Gulu Northern
Lira/Pader Northern
![Page 14: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Activity• Define the “soft criteria” for site selection.• Propose list of eligible sites for the pig VC
matching with agreed criteria (soft criteria and spatial analysis).
![Page 15: Initial information on site selection for Uganda pig value chain projects](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081504/5587eee3d8b42a6d4b8b4719/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Next steps
• Site scoping visits by end of June 2014.• Adaptation and implementation of toolkit for Rapid
Value Chain Assessment (VCA) ready by end June 2014.
• Conclusions on project sites – mid July
• Baseline and diagnostic surveys at selected project
sites: Aug – Sept 2014.