initial environmental examinationfinal initial environmental examination date: july 2019 ind: madhya...

Initial Environmental Examination Document stage: Final Project Number: 42486-016 July 2019

IND: Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project - Water Supply Improvement in Bhedaghat, Katangi, Majholi, Panagar, Patan, Sihora and Tendukheda Package No: MPUSIP-5B Prepared by Project Management Unit, Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company, Government of Madhya Pradesh for the Asian Development Bank. This is a final version of the draft originally posted in October 2016 available on https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-documents/42486/42486-016-iee-en_11.pdf This final initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the ‘terms of use’ section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/project-documents/42486/42486-016-iee-en_11.pdf

Final Initial Environmental Examination Date: July 2019

IND: Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project Package 5B - Water Supply Improvement in Bhedaghat, Katangi, Majholi, Panagar, Patan, Sihora and Tendukheda Prepared by Project Management Unit – Safeguards Team Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Government of Madhya Pradesh for the Asian Development Bank Note: This Final Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) updates the Draft IEE for Package 5B which has been cleared by ADB on February 06, 2017 and disclosed on http://www.mpudc.co.in/safeguardpolicies.aspx

http://www.mpudc.co.in/safeguardpolicies.aspx

Final IEE Package 5B

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (As of March 26 ,2019)

Currency unit = Rupee (INR) USD 1.00 = INR 70.09

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB - Asian Development Bank APM - Assistant Project Manager CDO - Community Development Officer CTE - Cosent to Establish CTO - Cosent to Operate CWS - Clear Water Sump DBO - Design-Build-Operate DI - Ductile Iron DMA - District Metered Area DPM - Deputy Project Manager EA - Executing Agency EE - Executive Engineer EHS - Environmental Health and Safety EIA - Envirnmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environmental Management Plan FGD - Focus Group Discussions GOI - Government of India GOMP - Government of Madhya Pradesh GRC - Grievance Redress Committee GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism HDPE - High density poly ethelene IA - Implementing Agency IEE - Initial Environmental Examination IFC - International Finance Corporation MPN - Most probable number MPPCB - Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board MPUDC - Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company MPUSIP - Madhya Pradesh Services Improvement Project NH - National Highway O&M - operation and maintenance OHT - Overhead Tank PIU - Project Implementation Unit PMC - Program Management Consultant PMU - Program Management Unit PWD - Public works Department ROW - Right of Way SEMP - Site Environmental Management Plan SH - Sate Highway SO - Safeguard Officer SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement UDHD - Urban Development and Housing Department ULB - Urban Local Body WRD - Water Resource Department WSS - Water Supply Scheme WTP - Water Treatment Plant


3

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

oC - Degree Celsius Km - Kilometer lpcd - litres per capita per day M - Meter MCM - Million CubicMeter MLD - million litres perday mm - Millimeter sq.km - square kilometer


4

Table of Contents

I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 6

II. Updated Package Scope ................................................................................................. 7

III. Statutory Clearance Required for Package 5B ............................................................14

IV. Update on Baseline Environment Conditions ..............................................................15

V. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................................................18

VI. Consultations and Disclosure Conducted ....................................................................39

VII. Package-Specific Grievance Redress Mechanism ......................................................41

VIII. Package Specific Roles and Responsibility of MPUSIP Safeguard Team Foccal

Persons .................................................................................................................................51

IX. Monitoring and Reporting ............................................................................................54

X. EMP Implementation Cost ..............................................................................................54

List of Figures Figure 1: Sites and Alignments of Package 5B Components ............................................................ 9

Figure 2: Google Map Showing Proposed OHT and Pipe Alignments in Bhedaghat Town Within

the ASI Protected Monuments Regulated Zones ................................................................................ 17

Figure 3: Google Map Showing Proposed Pipe Alignments in Panagar Town Within the ASI

Protected Monuments Regulated Zones .............................................................................................. 18

Figure 4: Work Flow Diagram on GRM ................................................................................................. 46

Figure 5: Structure and Process of GRC .............................................................................................. 50

List of Tables

Table 1: Package 5B Components based on Detailed Engineering Design ..................................... 7

Table 2: Comparison of Components in the Preliminary and Detailed Engineering Design ........ 10

Table 3: Water Quality at the Proposed Intake Site (Samples taken from Narmada River) ........ 15

Table 4: Package Components in Bhedaghat Town within the ASI Protected Monument

(Chausath Yagini Temple) Regulated Zone ......................................................................................... 16

Table 5: Package Components in Panagar Town within the ASI Protected Monument (Vishnu

Varah Temple) Regulated Zone ............................................................................................................. 17

Table 6: Comparison of Impacts in the Draft IEE and Per Detailed Engineering Design ............. 19

Table 7: Design Phase Environmental Management Plan ................................................................ 32

Table 8: Pre Construction Phase Environmental Management Plan ............................................... 33

Table 9: Construction Phase Environmental Management Plan ...................................................... 35

Table 10: Construction Phase Environmental Monitoring Plan For Package 5B ........................... 38

Table 11: Status of GRC Formation Under Package 5B Subproject Towns .................................. 41

Table 12: List of GRC members as on 31st January 2019 ................................................................ 43

Table 13: List of Focal persons Responsible for Package 5B, MPUSIP Safeguard Team .......... 51


5

Table 14: EMP Implementation Cost .................................................................................................... 54

List of Appendices Appendix 1: Copies of WRD Clearance .............................................................................................. 56

Appendix 2: Copy of Clearance from ASI for Bhedaghat Town ........................................................ 66

Appendix 3: Copy of Clearance from ASI for Panagar Town ........................................................... 68

Appendix 4:: Letter Received from DFO, Jabalpur_Regarding the Forest Permission for Laying

Pipelines between Saraswati Ghat to Bhedaghat in Bhedaghat ...................................................... 70

Appendix 5: Letter Received from DFO, Jabalpur_Regarding the Forest Permission for Laying

Pipelines between Katangi to Majholi ................................................................................................... 72

Appendix 6:: Letter Recieved from DFO, Damoh_ Rgarding Forest Permission for Laying of

Pipelines between Patan to Tendukheda ............................................................................................. 74

Appendix 7: Narmada Water Quality Results at Proposed Intake Site Bhedaghat ...................... 76

Appendix 8: Drinking Water Standards ...................................................................................................... 77

Appendix 9: Site Specific Environmental Management Plan ............................................................ 79

Appendix 10: Monitoring Checklist Formate (1 to 11) Being Used at Work Sites .......................... 80

Appendix 11:Summary of Consultation with Stakeholders at Subproject Towns Under Package

5B ................................................................................................................................................................ 94

Appendix 12: Stakeholder Consultation Photogrphs & List of Participants ................................. 102

Appendix 13: Stakeholder Consultation photographs ...................................................................... 112

Appendix 14: Office Order of EA to Establish GRC at subproject town level ............................... 116

Appendix 15: Letter to PIU From MPUDC (IA) to Establish GRC at subproject town level ........ 120

Appendix 16: Letter to CMO From MPUDC (IA) to Establish GRC at subproject town level ..... 122

Appendix 17: GRC Established at Bedhaghat Nagar Parishad ...................................................... 124

Appendix 18: GRC Established at Katangi Nagar Parishad ............................................................ 126

Appendix 19: GRC Established at Majholi Nagar Parishad............................................................. 128

Appendix 20: GRC Established at Panagar Nagar Parishad .......................................................... 130

Appendix 21: GRC Established at Patan Nagar Parishad ............................................................... 132

Appendix 22: GRC Established at Sihora Nagar Parishad .............................................................. 134

Appendix 23: GRC Established at Tendukheda Nagar Parishad ................................................... 136

Appendix 24: Grievance Registration Form ....................................................................................... 138


6

I. Introduction

1. The project loan for Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project (MPUSIP) was approved in May 2017, and got effective in August 2017. Urban Development and Housing Department (UDHD) of the Government of Madhya Pradesh (GOMP) is the Executing Agency (EA); and Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited (MPUDC) is the Implementing Agency (IA). MPUDC established a project management unit (PMU) and five project implementation units (PIUs) to implement the project. A Project Management Consultant (PMC), centrally-based at Bhopal, and with field offices at PIUs are providing support to PMU and PIUs in implementing MPUSIP. PIU and PMC supervises and monitors the EMP implementation and reporting tasks, while PMU oversees the overall implementation and monitoring of safeguard tasks in the project ensuring compliance. 2. MPUSIP comprises 28 contract packages, which include 24 water supply and 4 sewerage packages. The water supply schemes may include creation of source, mostly based on surface water sources, treatment facility, transmission and distribution system, and individual house service connections. The sewerage infrastructure improvement may include sewage collection, conveyance, treatment and disposal facilities. A package/subproject may cover one or more towns (3 to a maximum of 7 towns) depending on the technical feasibility. The packages/subprojects being implemented on a design-build-operate (DBO) scheme, where in which contractor is responsible for detailed design, construction, commissioning and operation for a period of 10 years. 3. Categorization. MPUSIP is classified as Category B according to ADB SPS 2009 (some negative impacts but less significant than category A). Prior to award of contracts, the potential impacts of the packages/subprojects were assessed based on preliminary designs. The findings and recommendations to ensure that execution of the works will not cause significant impacts are reported in the Draft Initial Environmental Examination (IEE). To ensure the environmental safeguards are considered in the packages/subprojects, the Draft IEE is made part of the DBO bid and contract documents. The Draft IEEs are required to be updated/finalized once the detailed design is completed. The DBO contractors are required to submit site-specific EMPs to PIU to commencement of works. 4. Final IEE. This Final IEE for Package 5B covers water supply improvement in towns of Bhedaghat, Katangi, Majholi, Panagar, Patan, Sihora and Tendukheda. This Final IEE has been prepared based on detailed design and following the recommendations of the Draft IEE of Package 5B cleared by ADB on February 06, 2017. The Draft IEE has been disclosed on http://www.mpudc.co.in/safeguardpolicies.aspxand provided to PIU and stakeholders. The contract has been awarded on August 5, 2017 to M/s Indian Hume Pipe Company Ltd, Mumbai. 5. The objectives of this Final IEE for Package 5B are:

i. provide information on the detailed engineering design, significant findings, and recommended actions;

ii. provide information on national and local statutory requirements applicable to Package 5B;

iii. update information on environmental baseline conditions based on DBO contractors pre-works documentations;

iv. report on package’s impacts to physical, biological, socioeconomic and physical cultural resources if not yet covered in the Draft IEE;

http://www.mpudc.co.in/safeguardpolicies.aspx


7

v. report the mitigation measures, monitoring program, and any residual negative impacts that cannot be mitigated;

vi. describe engagement of stakeholders, information disclosure measures, and consultation plans during package/subproject implementation;

vii. describe the package/subproject‘s grievance redress mechanism for resolving complaints about environmental performance;

viii. submit the site-specific EMP; and ix. provide the costs and who is responsible for carrying out the mitigation and

monitoring measures.

II. Updated Package Scope

6. Package 5B covers the 7 towns of Bhedaghat, Katangi, Majholi, Panagar, Patan, Sihora and Tendukheda. These are small towns having the status of Municipal Council (Nagar Parishad). Improvement of water supply in these 7 towns will achieve safe and sustainable water services both in terms of services to customers and cost recovery by providing 100% coverage with continuous, pressurized and safe drinking water services. The subproject includes the civil works, project implementation and management and non-physical investments. 7. Based on detailed engineering design, Table 1 and Figure 1 show the civil works per town. The detailed engineering design has been reviewed by the PMC and approved by the PIU.

Table 1: Package 5B Components based on Detailed Engineering Design

Town Components Description

Common to 7 towns

Intake Well Narmada River at Lamheta Ghat WTP 31 MLD at Bhedaghat in Lamheta Village Raw water rising main

Length = 339 m of dia 600 mm DI K9 pipe. Raw water will be pumped from the Narmada River and supplied to proposed common WTP, where raw water will be treated.

Clear water rising main (total)

Length = 158,637 m of dia 100mm to 600 mm DI K9 pipes

1. Bhedaghat Clear water rising main


Overhead Tanks (OHTs)

02 Nos. RCC OHTs – (i) 200 KL OHT located infront of Bhedaghat Nagar Parishad in Ward No.4 (ii) 220 KL OHT located near existing OHT in Ward No. 13 in Lamheta Village

Clear water sumps 1147 KL capacity at WTP site Distribution network Length = 21,150 m of dia 110 mm to 200 mm HDPE pipes Bulk meters 08 Nos. Household connections

876 Nos.

2. Katangi Clear water rising main


OHTs 01 No. OHT – 120 KL capacity located in Ward No. 2, Katangi

Clear water sumps Not Applicable Distribution network Length = 38,958 m of dia 110 mm to 200 mm HDPE pipes Bulk meters 08 Nos.


8

Town Components Description

Household connections

3200 Nos.

3. Majholi Clear water rising main


OHTs Not required – Existing OHT will be utilized Clear water sumps 35 KL capacity Distribution network Length = 31,708 m of dia 110 mm to 250 mm HDPE pipes Bulk meters 10 Nos. Household connections

2800 Nos.

4. Panagar Clear water rising main


OHTs 03 Nos. RCC OHTs – (i) 200 KL capacity located in Ward no. 04, (ii) 600 KL capacity located in Ward No. 3 (iii) 700 KL capacity located in Ward No. 11,

Clear water sumps Not Applicable Distribution network Length = 54,897 m of dia 110 mm to 315 mm HDPE pipes Bulk meters 12 Nos. Household connections

3900 Nos.

5. Patan Clear water rising main


OHTs Not required - Existing OHT will be utilized Clear water sumps Distribution network Length = 36,228 m of dia 110 mm to 280 mm HDPE pipes Bulk meters 02 Nos. Household connections

3700 Nos.

6. Sihora Clear water rising main


OHTs 04 Nos. RCC OHTs – (i) 920 Kl capacity located in Ward No.4, (ii) 900 KL capacity located in Ward No. 11 (iii) 630 KL capacity located in Ward No. 17 (iv) 620 KL capacity located in Ward No. 13

Clear water sumps 245 KL capacity in Ward No. 9 Distribution network Length = 104,586 m of dia 110 mm to 315 mm HDPE pipes Bulk meters 10 Nos. Household connections

9120 Nos.

7. Tendukheda Clear water rising main


OHTs 02 Nos. RCC OHTs – (i) 300 Kl capacity located in Ward No.9, (ii) 325 KL capacity located in Ward No. 11

Clear water sumps 52 KL capacity Break Pressure Tank (BPT)

52 KL capacity

Distribution network Length = 40,923 m of dia 110 mm to 250 mm HDPE pipes Bulk meters 08 Nos. Household connections

2700 Nos.


9

Figure 1: Sites and Alignments of Package 5B Components


10

8. Table 2 provides the comparison of components in the Draft IEE (preliminary design) and components in the detailed engineering design. Table 2: Comparison of Components in the Preliminary and Detailed Engineering Design

Town Particulars Details of Proposed component as per DPR

Details of component as per DBO Contractor’s detailed engineering design

Any change recommended by DBO Contractor (If yes, reason/ justification)

Land Details with Khasra No. and Map (P-II form) of proposed Khasra

1. Bhedaghat Source Narmada River

Narmada River

No Change NA

2. Bhedaghat Single Intake Well cum pump house for all 7 towns

Intake capacity: 27.93 MLD, Tourist Spot in ward no. 4

Intake capacity: 27.93 MLD, Lamheta ghat, Bhedaghat

Yes, New location of intake shifted to Lamheta ghat, Bhedaghat. Earlier location of the intake well was left bank of Narmada River at Bhedaghat in ward no. 4, but later on during visit of ADB mission in Oct 2017, it was decided to change the location due to vast tourism potential. Now new proposed location is on right side of the bank of Narmada River near Lamhetaghat at Lamheta village.

Lamheta ghat, Bhedaghat

3. Bhedaghat Raw water rising main

330 m of 600mm dia

339 m of 600mm dia

Yes, location change and 9 m length is increased.

Lamheta Village Near Parmhance Ashram, Bhedhaghat

4. Bhedaghat Single WTP for all 7 towns

31 MLD WTP clear water sump (CWS) - 1147 KL in ward no. 4 near intake

31 MLD WTP CWS 1147 KL Khasra no. 171, 173, 175, 176 in Lamheta Village, Near

Yes, Location change

Khasra no. 171, 173, 175, 176 Location: Lamheta Village Near Parmhance Ashram, in Bhedhaghaton southern


11





site, Bhedaghat

Parmahance Ashram, Bhedaghat in ward no. 14

outskirts of the town near the intake.


5455 m 5826 m Yes, 371 m length is increased.

NA

6. Bhedaghat OHT- I OHT- I: 220 KL, Khasra No. 153/2

OHT- I: 220 KL, at Khasra No. 153/2

No Change Khasra No. 153/2 Location: Lamheta Village, near existing OHT at Lamhetaghat in Ward No. 13

7. Bhedaghat OHT- II OHT- II: 200 KL, Khasra No. 72

OHT- II: 200 KL, Khasra No. 72

No Change Khasra No. 72 OHT is proposed at Dendayal Park, (M.P. tourism Park) infront of Bhedaghat Nagar Parishad in ward no. 04.

8. Bhedaghat Distribution network

24114 m 21150 m Yes, 2964 m length is reduced.

NA

9. Bhedaghat Household Connections

862 Nos. 876 Nos. Yes, 14 nos. increased.

NA

10. Katangi OHT 120 KL with 12.0 m Staging, Khasra No. 136/3 & 137/3, Village- Kudan, Katangi

120 KL with 12.0 m Staging, Khasra No. 136/3 & 137/3, Village- Kudan, Katangi

No Change Khasra No. 136/3 & 137/3, Village- Kudan, Katangi



NA

12. Katangi Distribution network


NA

13. Katangi Household connections

1130 Nos 3200 Nos. Yes, 2070 nos. increased.

NA


12





14. Majholi Sump well 35 KL, Pola Road, Majholi, Khasra No. 401/21

35 KL, Pola Road, Majholi, Khasra No. 401/21

No Change Khasra No. 401/21, Pola Road, Majholi



NA

16. Majholi Distribution network

31378 m 31708 Yes, 330 m length is increased.

NA

17. Majholi Household connections

2800 Nos. 2800 Nos. No Change NA



NA

19. Panagar OHT- I OHT- I: 700 KL, Khasra No. 344/1,344/2 Ward-11

OHT- I: 700 KL, Khasra No. 344/1,344/2 Ward-11

No Change Khasra No. 344/1,344/2 Ward-11

20. Panagar OHT- II OHT- II: 600 KL, Khasra No. 1112, Ward No. 04

OHT- II: 600 KL, Khasra No. 1112, Ward No. 04

No Change Khasra No. 1112, Ward No. 04

21. Panagar OHT- III OHT-III: 200 KL, Khasra No. 1421/2, Ward No. 04

OHT-III: 200 KL, Khasra No. 1421/2, Ward No. 04

No Change Khasra No. 1421/2, Ward No. 04

22. Panagar Distribution network


NA

23. Panagar Household connections

2400 3900 Nos. Yes, 1500 nos. increased.

NA



NA

25. Patan Distribution network


NA

26. Patan Household connections


NA

27. Sihora Clear water sump well/ groundlevel

Capacity 245 KL

Capacity 245 KL



13





service reservoir

28. Sihora OHT- I OHT-I: 1020 KL, Khasra No. 287/2

OHT-I: 900 KL, Khasra No. 1488/2 Ward No. 11

Yes, Capacity of OHT is reduced from 1020 KL to 900 KL; and New location of OHT is Khasra No. 1488/2

Khasra No. 1488/2 Ward No. 11

29. Sihora OHT- II OHT-II: 920 KL, Khasra No. 230/1, Ward No. 11

OHT-II: 920 KL, Khasra No. 230/1, Ward No. 11


30. Sihora OHT- III OHT- III: 620 KL, Khasra No- 287/1

OHT-III: 620 KL, Khasra No- 197/2 Ward No. 13

Yes, Location Change

Khasra No- 197/2 Ward No. 13

31. Sihora OHT- IV OHT- IV: 630 KL, Khasra No. 275/1, Ward No. 17

OHT- IV: 630 KL, Khasra No. 275/1, Ward No. 17




NA

33. Sihora Distribution network

81588 m 104586 m Yes, 23006 m length is increased

NA

34. Sihora Household Connections

9147 Nos 9120 Nos. Yes, 27 nos. reduced.

NA

35. Tendukkheda Sump well Capacity 52 KL

Capacity 52 KL Khasra No. 80

No Change Khasra No. 80

36. Tendukkheda Break pressure tank (BPT)

Capacity 52 Kl

Capacity 52 KL Khasra No. 23/377

No Change Khasra No. 23/377

37. Tendukkheda OHT - I OHT- I: 300 KL, Khasra no. 685/30, Ward No. 09

OHT- I: 300 KL, Khasra no. 685/30, Ward No. 09

No Change Khasra no. 685/30, Ward No. 09


14





38. Tendukkheda OHT- II OHT-II: 325 KL, Khasra No. 579/1, Ward No. 11



39. Tendukkheda Clear water rising main


NA

40. Tendukkheda Distribution network


NA

41. Tendukkheda Household connections


NA

III. Statutory Clearance Required for Package 5B

9. Water abstraction permit/clearance. Clearance required from Water Resources Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh for water abstraction and construction of intake in Narmada River has been obtained for Package 5B on October 23, 2017 (Refer Appendix 1). 10. Consent to establish. Consent to establish (CTE) from Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board (MPPCB) which is mandatory for the WTP. The application was submitted to MPPCB on May 14, 2019 and is under approval process. Construction of the WTP will not commence until the CTE is obtained. 11. Environmental Compliance Certificate. The Package is not included in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification Act’s Schedule 1 thus environmental clearance is not required. 12. ASI Clearance. Archeological Survey of India (ASI) clearance is required for (i) laying of pipeline and construction of one OHT in Bhedaghat and (ii) laying of pipeline in Panagar town. The ASI clearance for Bhedhaghat town has been issued on February 19, 2019 (Refer Appendix 2). While the ASI clearance for Panagar town is also issued on December 24, 2018 (Refer Appendix 3) for Panagar town. 13. Forest Clearance. No objection certificate (NOC) from Forest Department is required for (i) laying clear water rising main from Sarsawati Ghat to Bhedahghat Thana within right of way (RoW) of existing Public Works Department (PWD) road (Refer Appendix 4); (ii) from Katangi to Majholi within the RoW of existing PWD road (Refer Appendix 5); and (ii) from Patan to Tendukheda within the RoW of MPRDC i.e. SH-15. NOC is also required (Refer Appendix 6) although the road is under the jurisdiction of PWD and Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Limited (MPRDC). However, as the pipe alignments pass through forest areas, for obtaining NOC from forest department, application has been been submitted to the (i) Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) Jabalpur for Bhedhaghat, (ii) for pipe laying from Katangi to Majholi to the


15

DFO Sihora and (iii) for pipe laying from Nunsar to Patan and Patan to Tendukheda to DFO - Damoh. (Refer Appendix 4 to Appendix 6). Pipe laying work will not be started in this stretch until forest clearances are obtained.

IV. Update on Baseline Environment Conditions

14. The baseline environmental conditions as reported in the Draft IEE are still applicable as there are no significant change in locations and alignments. The package components are not located within nor adjacent to environmentally-sensitive areas. Portions of the water supply pipes will pass thru ASI regulated zones as there are project beneficiaries located in these area. However the required ASI clearances have been obtained or being obtained and pipelaying works will not commence until the archaeological experts have been engagaed to monitor execution of works in ASI regulated zones. 15. Water Source. Sihora, Katangi, Panagar, Patan, Majholi, Bhedaghat and Tendukheda towns are having acute water problem. Sustainable source is not available near to these towns. As the water table is depleting all over, therefore, now it is not a reliable source for a permanent scheme in all the 7 towns. Reliable source for Panagar, Bhedaghat town is River Narmada near Jabalpur. Reliable source for Patan town is River Narmada. Both towns are approximately 25 km from Jabalpur. Sihora is approximately 25 km from Panagar, Majholi is approximately 20 km from Sihora, Katangi is 20 km from Majholi and Tedukheda is nearly 20 km from Patan. 16. An alternative source analysis has been conducted to select a feasible and sustainable source of water supply to meet the ultimate design demand. As the subproject towns are located near to each other (approx. 50-60 km maximum) there was possibility of a combined source/ bulk water scheme. Therefore, combined water supply schemes are proposed for all these 07 towns based on the most feasible water source (Narmada River) considering techno- economic and environmental considerations. The requirement of towns is miniscule in comparison with the river flow. It is assessed to be unlikely to have any significant issue of source sustainability. 17. Water quality is good and as per MPPCB Narmada river water quality comes under category ―’B’ Rriver and there are no potential pollution sources in the vicinity that could affect the water quality. As per sampling done by DBO Contractor “M/s Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited” presented in the Table 3 below and also Refer Appendix 7, all the parameters of water quality in comparison with drinking water standards are much below the drinking water standards, except turbidity and pH value which are well within the limits in comparison with the drinking water standards. Conventional water treatment and disinfection which is proposed in project is adequate to make the water usable for drinking purposes.

Table 3: Water Quality at the Proposed Intake Site (Samples taken from Narmada River) Parameters Unit Narmada River (Water

Quality Results) Drinking Water

Standards*

Temperature OC 21 - Turbiditv NTU 5.0 5-10 Colour - Colourless 5-25 Odour - Unobjectionable Electrical Conductivity µmho/cm 340.0 750 – 2000 pH - 8.34 6.5-8.5 Total Alkalinity mg/l 12.0 - Total Hardness (as CaCO3) mg/l 148.0 300-600 Calcium mg/l 2.199 75-200 Magnesium mg/l 0.0723 30-100


16

Parameters Unit Narmada River (Water Quality Results)

Drinking Water Standards*

Chloride mg/l 14.99 250-1000 Dissolved Solids mg/l 326.0 500-2000 Suspended Solids mg/l 300-600 Nitrate (NO3, ) mg/l 0.36 45-100 Flouride mg/l 0.3 1-1.5 B.O.D. ( 3 days- 27 "C\ mg/l 1.4 C.O.D. mg/l 24.0 Sulphate ( as SO+ ) mg/l 11.6 200-400 Chromium ( Cr+6 ) mg/l Iron ( Fe ) mg/l 1.06 0.3 – 1.0 Total Coliform MPN/I00m1 10 Feacal Coliform MPN/I00m1 Source: Sampling Done by DBO Contractor

* standards prescribe lower and higher values for parameters, except pH; lower value is the „desirable limit‟ while higher value is the „permissible limit in the absence of alternate source‟; there is only lower value for parameters which have no relaxation.

18. Forest Areas. Areas owned by the Forest Department are defined as “forest areas”. The 7 towns are surrounded by forest areas but these are not areas identified for biodiversity conservation (e.g. protected areas, national parks, important bird areas, etc.). None of the subproject components are located within the forest areas except the alignments of the clear water rising main from Sarsawati Ghat to Bhedaghat Thana and from Patan to Tendukheda town. However these alignments are within RoW of existing PWD and MPRDC roads, respectively. No NOC required from Forest Department but MPUDC still provided information to the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Department in Damoh Jabalpur. 19. Social and Cultural Resources. Bhedaghat and Panagar are historical town, and any work involving ground disturbance can uncover and damage archaeological and historical remains. No components are located within any of the ASI protected monuments core zones. However, due to presence of project beneficiaries within the 300-m ASI regulated zone, the following components will be constructed: (i) in Bhedaghat, feeder main and distribution lines and one OHT of 200 KL capacity; and in Panagar, feeder main and distribution lines. Tables 4 and 5 provide the detailed components and Figures 2 to 3 show the alignment per distance from the ASI monuments. In Bhedaghat, the OHT site is 170 m from the ASI-protected Chausath Yagini Temple. No other suitable government land is available in the town. The allocated land parcel is approximately 10.21 hectares, half of this area comes under 300-m ASI regulated zone while the other half comes outside. Hence, as design consideration based on mitigation measures in the Draft IEE, it has been ensured that only boundary wall of the OHT is constructed in the 300-m zone and other components of OHT are constructed on the other half of the plot. 20. Prior permission from the ASI is required. No works will be conducted until (i) ASI clearance has been obtained; and ASI clearance already obtaind (Refer Appendix 2 to Appendix 3); and (ii) archaeological expert/s engaged to monitor execution of works.

Table 4: Package Components in Bhedaghat Town within the ASI Protected Monument (Chausath Yagini Temple) Regulated Zone

Bhedaghat Town

S. No. Components Within 100 m Radius Within 100 - 300 m Radius Within 100 m & 100 - 300 m Radius (Grand Total)

Diameter Length Diameter Length Length (m


17

1. Proposed OHT 200 KL

- - OHT is 170 m away from ASI Protected Monuments

2. Feeder Main 150 mm 170 m 150 mm 650 m 820 m 600 mm 550 m 550 m Sub Total 170 m Sub Total 1200 m 1370 m

3. Distribution Lines 110 0 110 4355 4355 125 0 125 1308 1308 140 0 140 860 860 160 0 160 48 48 200 365 200 0 365

Sub Total 365 Sub Total 6571 6936 Grand Total 8306 m

Figure 2: Google Map Showing Proposed OHT and Pipe Alignments in Bhedaghat Town

Within the ASI Protected Monuments Regulated Zones

Table 5: Package Components in Panagar Town within the ASI Protected Monument (Vishnu Varah Temple) Regulated Zone

Panagar Town S.

No. Components Within 100m

Radius Within 100 -

300m Radius Total Within 100m & 100-300m Radius

1. Feeder Main Diameter Length Diameter Length Grand Total (Length)

- - 200 mm 280 m 280 m - - Sub Total 280 m 280 m

2.

Distribution Lines 110 3941 110 2627 6568 140 126 140 295 421 160 20 160 376 396 180 0 180 0 0 200 0 200 110 110 250 233 250 26 259


18

280 0 280 174 174 4320 3608 7928

Grand Total 8028

Figure 3: Google Map Showing Proposed Pipe Alignments in Panagar Town Within the

ASI Protected Monuments Regulated Zones

V. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures

21. The Draft IEE cleared by ADB assessed all potential impacts of the package/subproject based on preliminary design. The Draft IEE concluded that the package/subproject will cause any significant adverse impacts due to: (i) schemes are relatively small and their effect will be local and site-specific which is manageable and controllable and (ii) impacts are site-specific and likely to be associated with the construction process and are produced because the process is invasive, involving excavation and earth movements. 22. Table 6 provides the assessment of the potential impacts of components based on detailed engineering design. Based on the results, the potential impacts identified in the Draft IEE are similar in nature and remains as not significant. The findings have been verified by the PIU and PMC. The table also shows specific mitigation measures used in developing the site-specific EMPs (SEMP).


19

Table 6: Comparison of Impacts in the Draft IEE and Per Detailed Engineering Design Town Particulars Details of

Proposed component as per DPR (preliminary

design)

Details of component as per DBO Contractor

Any change recommended by

DBO Contractor (If yes detail of that

subcomponent with approval)

Land Details with Khasra No. and

Map (P-II form) of proposed Khasra

Whether any new impacts due to

changes/impacts that were not

assessed in the draft IEE

Mitigation measures

1. Bhedaghat Source Narmada River

Narmada River

No Change Not applicable (n/a)

n/a n/a

2. Bhedaghat Single Intake Well cum pump house for all 7 towns

Intake capacity: 27.93 MLD, Tourist Spot in ward no. 4

Intake capacity: 27.93 MLD, Lamheta ghat, Bhedaghat

Yes, New location of intake shifted to Lamheta ghat, Bhedaghat Earlier Location of the proposed Intake well was left bank of river Narmada at Bhedaghat in ward no. 4, but later on during visit of ADB mission in Oct 2017,it was decided to change the location due to vast tourism potential. Now new proposed location is on right side of the bank of Narmada River near Lamhetaghat at Lamheta village

Lamheta ghat, Bhedaghat

No additional impacts. Location has been changed after the objection of ADB Environment Safeguard Expert due to vast tourism potential & boating at earlier proposed site

Location has been changed to avoid the potential impacts. Construction of intake well in Narmada River at the identified siteunder the control of Water Resources Department, GoMP. Intake well cum pump house will involve construction within the water body. An enclosed area (about 10 m dia) will be created at the selected site using temporary barriers like sand bags or sheet piles and the water will be pumped out to make the area dry for construction. Once this is created, the rest of the construction will follow the general construction procedures to create a Reinforced Cement


20

Town Particulars Details of Proposed

component as per DPR (preliminary

design)










Mitigation measures

Concrete(RCC) well of size 6 m diameter. Once the work is over, the temporary barriers will be removed.

3. Bhedaghat Raw water rising main

330 m of 600mm dia

339 m of 600mm dia

Yes, location change and 09 m length is increased.

Lamheta Village Near Parmhance Ashram, Bhedhaghat

No additional impacts. Assessment in the Draft IEE is still applicable. There is no forest land within the prescribed limit of the town.

Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing road from proposed Intake well to proposed WTP.

4. Bhedaghat WTP WTP- 31 MLD & CWS - 1147 KL Common for all 7 town, in ward no. 4 near intake site, Bhedaghat

WTP - 31 MLD and CWS – 1147 KL, Common for all 7 town, Khasra no. 171, 173, 175, 176 in Lamheta Village, Near Parmahance Ashram, Bhedaghat in ward no. 14

Yes, Location Change Khasra no. 171, 173, 175, 176 Location:Lamheta Village Near Parmhance Ashram, in Bhedhaghaton southern outskirts of the town near the intake.

No additional impacts. Assessment in the Draft IEE is still applicable. Location has been changed after the objection of ADB Environment Safeguard Expert due to vast tourism potential & within the 300 m of ASI protected monuments at earlier proposed site near the old intake site on left bank of river Narmada at Bhedaghat in Ward No. 4, which were proposed in DPR.

Location has been changed to avoid the potential impacts Constructionwater treatment plant at the identified site on government owned barren land.


21



design)










Mitigation measures

There is no ASI protected monuments at the new proposed site.



n/a Yes, the components are near the Chausath Yagini Temple. Alignment is now within the 300-m ASI regulated zone Clear water rising main will be mostly laid along the main roads. Pipes will be laid underground. The transmission main (600 mm dia of 550m long & 150mm dia of 650 m) leading to Bhedaghat OHT 200 Kl comes within the boundary of 300 m of ASI protected monument. Feeder mainfrom Sarsawati Ghat to Bhedaghat Thana of 900m length will be laid along an existingroad of PWD, that comes under Forest areas. The pipeline will be laid in the road right

However, pipeline laying works near the monuments (within 300m) can only be conducted with prior permission of NMA. Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing PWD road Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing PWD road.. However construction activities will be confined to the identified sites, and will not encroach into the forests as these are clearly demarcated and separated by existing boundary fences.


22



design)










Mitigation measures

of way, and will notencroach into the forest. As road is under PWD jurisdiction,therefore NoC from Forest department not required for laying of pipeline.However for kind information prior to start of laying works of above mentioned pipeline, a letter to forest department under DFO Jabalpur has been subletted to Divisional Forest Officer, forest department, Jabalpur from concerned PIU Jabalpur

6. Bhedaghat OHT- I OHT- I: 220 KL, Khasra No. 153/2

OHT- I: 220 KL, at Khasra No. 153/2,

No Change Khasra No. 153/2 Location: Lamheta Village, near existing OHT at Lamhetaghat in Ward No. 13

No additional impacts. Assessment in the Draft IEE is still applicable.

Construction OHT at the identified site on government owned barren land.

7. Bhedaghat OHT- II OHT- II: 200 KL, Khasra No. 72

OHT- II: 200 KL, Khasra No. 72

No Change Khasra No. 72 OHT is proposed at Dendayal Park, (M.P. tourism Park) infront of Bhedaghat Nagar Parishad in ward no. 04.

Yes, proposed OHT comes under Corridor of Impact of ASI monument called “Chausath Yagini Temple” .Hoever Proposed 200 KL OHT



23



design)










Mitigation measures

siteislocated approx. 170 m away from ASI Protected monument. OHT and ASI monuments both are on opposite direction, so there will be No additional impacts. Assessment in the Draft IEE is still applicable. on protected monuments due to construction of OHT.

8. Bhedaghat Distribution Network

24114 Mt 21150 Yes, 2964 m length is reduced.

n/a No additional impacts. Assessment in the Draft IEE is still applicable

Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing ULB road

9. Bhedaghat House Hold Connections

862 Nos. 876 Nos. Yes, 14 nos. increased.

n/a n/a n/a

10. Katangi OHT 120 KL with 12.0 m Staging, Khasra No. 136/3 & 137/3, Village- Kudan, Katangi

120 KL with 12.0 m Staging, Khasra No. 136/3 & 137/3, Village- Kudan, Katangi

No Change Khasra No. 136/3 & 137/3, Village- Kudan, Katangi

No additional impacts. Assessment in the Draft IEE is still applicable

Construction OHT at the identified siteon government owned barren land.



n/a No additional impacts. Assessment in the

Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing PWD//ULB road


24



design)










Mitigation measures

Draft IEE is still applicable

12. Katangi Distribution Network




13. Katangi House Hold Connections


n/a n/a n/a

14. Majholi Sump Well 35 KL, Pola Road, Majholi, Khasra No. 401/21

35 KL, Pola Road, Majholi, Khasra No. 401/21

No Change Khasra No. 401/21, Pola Road, Majholi


Construction of sump at the identified site on government owned barren land.




Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing PWD//ULB road

16. Majholi Distribution Network

31378 m 31708 Yes, 330 m length is increased.



17. Majholi House Hold Connections

2800 Nos. 2800 Nos. No Change n/a n/a n/a



n/a Feeder main for Panagar will be laid within 300 m Radius of protected monuments. Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing PWD/ULB road with the permission of ASI. Water from this pipeline will

Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing PWD road However, pipeline laying works near the monuments (within 300m) can only be conducted with prior permission of NMA.


25



design)










Mitigation measures

also be provided to ASI premises

19. Panagar OHT- I OHT- I: 700 KL, Khasra No. 344/1,344/2 Ward-11

OHT- I: 700 KL, Khasra No. 344/1,344/2 Ward-11

No Change Khasra No. 344/1,344/2 Ward-11



20. Panagar OHT- II OHT- II: 600 KL, Khasra No. 1112, Ward No. 04

OHT- II: 600 KL, Khasra No. 1112, Ward No. 04

No Change Khasra No. 1112, Ward No. 04



21. Panagar OHT- III OHT-III: 200 KL, Khasra No. 1421/2, Ward No. 04

OHT-III: 200 KL, Khasra No. 1421/2, Ward No. 04




22. Panagar Distribution Network



Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing ULB road However, pipeline laying works near the monuments (within 300m) can only be conducted with prior permission of NMA.

23. Panagar House Hold Connections

2400 3900 Nos. Yes, 1500 nos. increased.

n/a n/a n/a




Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing PWD road

25. Patan Distribution Network



Pipeline will be laid underground within


26



design)










Mitigation measures


RoW of existing ULB road

26. Patan House Hold Connections


n/a n/a n/a

27. Sihora Clear Water Sump well (GLSR)

Capacity 245 KL

Capacity 245 KL




28. Sihora OHT- I OHT-I: 1020 KL, Khasra No. 287/2

OHT-I: 900 KL, Khasra No. 1488/2 Ward No. 11

Yes, Capacity of OHT is reduced from 1020 KL to 900 KL; and New location of OHT is Khasra No. 1488/2

Khasra No. 1488/2 Ward No. 11


Construction of OHT at the identified site on government owned barren land.

29. Sihora OHT- II OHT-II: 920 KL, Khasra No. 230/1, Ward No. 11





30. Sihora OHT- III OHT- III: 620 KL, Khasra No- 287/1

OHT-III: 620 KL, Khasra No- 197/2 Ward No. 13

Yes, Location Change Khasra No- 197/2 Ward No. 13



31. Sihora OHT- IV OHT- IV: 630 KL, Khasra No. 275/1, Ward No. 17

OHT- IV: 630 KL, Khasra No. 275/1, Ward No. 17







Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing PWD road

33. Sihora Distribution Network





27



design)










Mitigation measures


34. Sihora House Hold Connections

9147 Nos 9120 Nos. Yes, 27 nos. reduced. n/a n/a n/a

35. Tendukkheda Sump well Capacity 52 KL

Capacity 52 KL Khasra No. 80

No Change Khasra No. 80 No additional impacts. Assessment in the Draft IEE is still applicable


36. Tendukkheda Break Pressure Tank (BPT)

Capacity 52 Kl

Capacity 52 KL Khasra No. 23/377

No Change Khasra No. 23/377 No additional impacts. Assessment in the Draft IEE is still applicable

Construction of BPT at the identified site on government owned barren land.

37. Tendukkheda OHT - I OHT- I: 300 KL, Khasra no. 685/30, Ward No. 09

OHT- I: 300 KL, Khasra no. 685/30, Ward No. 09

No Change Khasra no. 685/30, Ward No. 09



38. Tendukkheda OHT- II OHT-II: 325 KL, Khasra No. 579/1, Ward No. 11





39. Tendukkheda Clear water rising main


n/a No additional impacts. Assessment in the Draft IEE is still applicable. However, feeder main from Patan to Tendukheda will be laid along aroad of MPRDC i.e. state highway (SH) No. 15, that comes under Forest areas

Pipeline will be laid underground within RoW of existing MPRDC road i.e. SH -15.. However construction activities will be confined to the identified sites, and will not encroach into the forests as these are clearly demarcated and separated by


28



design)










Mitigation measures

and will not encroach into the forest. The pipeline will be laid in the road wthin right of way (RoW), and will notencroach into the forest. As road is under MPRDC jurisdiction, therefore NoC from Forest department not required for laying of pipeline. However for kind information prior to start of laying works of above mentioned pipeline, a letter to forest department under DFO Damoh has been subletted to Divisional Forest Officer, forest department, Damoh from concerned PIU Jabalpur

existing boundary fences.

40. Tendukkheda Distribution Network




41. Tendukkheda House Hold Connections


n/a n/a n/a


23. Mitigation Measures Considered in the Detailed Engineering Design. Package 5B water supply schemes considered the location of the nearest surface water body i.e. Narmada River. which is perennial and largest river of in Madhya Pradesh as the subproject towns are located near to each other (approx. 50-60 km maximum). Clearances required from Water Resources Department for water abstraction and construction of intake in Narmada River have been obtained. A regular water quality regime needs to be established for checking the raw water quality. The water supplied to the consumers at all-time must meet the drinking water standards (Refer to Appendix 8). 24. The intake well in the river may lead to degradation of water quality due to increase in turbidity and chemical contamination from fuels and lubricant used in construction work. Increase in silt content and water turbidity, chemical quality can affect the aquatic life, silting/chocking of spill ways/ canals etc., Though there are no notable aquatic life, to ensure that any negative impacts are mitigation, the following are considered in the design:

• Construction methodology selected is least disturbing, and appropriate for the in-situ soil condition.

• Construction works have been scheduled during low water level period – late winter months to pre monsoon (February – June/July).

• Schedule will ensure works are completed to prior to onset of monsoon. • Close coordination with upstream Bargi dam authorities on release of water and

ensuring works are avoided during water release period. • Temporary barriers will be constructed to form enclosed area to minimize disturbance • Allow adequate time settle the distributed solids toprior to pumping out water; only

clear/clarified water shall be pumped back into the reservoir; any silt laden water should be pumped to a siltpond

25. As the WTP will generates sludge from sedimentation, chemical flocculation, residuals of excess chemical dosage, plankton etc; and wastewater from rinsing and back washing of filter. Final IEE includes design measures for proper management of sludge and wastewater. Wastewater will be collected and recirculated, resulting in zero waste discharge, and settled sludge will be dewatered, dried, and disposed by land filling/reused in beneficial purposes. Final IEE includes various design, operational and institutional measures to prevent groundwater source contamination. Various pollution prevention measures included in IEE for construction phase to control dust, noise, emissions from construction vehicles, silt-laden surface runoff during rains etc. 26. For the proposed WTP, enhancement measures like proper wash water recovery, sludge management, chlorine safety facilities and quick leak detection and rectification to save the resources, etc. are included are already included in the designs. CTE from MPPCB is mandatory for the WTP. Application has been submitted. Works in the WTP will not commence until the CTE is issued. 27. Alignments in forest area have been clearly demarcated and separated by existing boundary fences. The design of the components ensured minimal disturbance on existing vegetation and confine the works within the RoW of existing roads. Although NOC from Forest Department is not required, PIU informed the DFO on the activities within the forest areas. 28. Alignments and OHT in the ASI regulated zones have been clearly demarcated and designs have been optimized to ensure minimal disturbance to the area. No works will


commence until (i) ASI clearances have been obtained, and (ii) archaeological experts are engaged to monitor the execution of works. Local representative of ASI in Bhedaghat and Panagar have been considered as project stakeholders. The DBO contractor, with the assistance of the ASI representatives developed a protocol1 for use by the construction workers in conducting any excavation works. The protocol will ensure that any chance finds are recognized and measures are taken to ensure they are protected and conserved. The workers and supervision staff will undergo awareness training and instructed to stop work immediately to allow further investigation if any finds are suspected. 29. Mitigation Measures Considered in the Construction Phase. Although construction activities will be confined to the identified sites, the construction works and presence of workers and vehicles may damage/disturb forest areas. Necessary precautionary measures are suggested to avoid any impacts:

• No construction material storage/ancillary works shall be conducted in the forest area; this shall be limited to actual construction area and the access roads

• No labour camps shall be located near forests (maintain minimum 1km buffer) • Limit the work to daylight hours only; no work after sunset • No workers /personnel shall enter forest areas; it is the DBOC responsibility to

take necessary precautions & prevent workers removing/damaging trees/vegetation, hunting animals

• Create awareness among workers on environment &safety • No high noisy works shall be conducted • Barricade the construction area properly so that no wild animals entre the work

area 30. The roads in the core area of the towns are very narrow and congested with pedestrians and vehicles, while the roads in outer areas are wide. Civil works include linear excavation for laying pipes along the roads, placing pipes in the trench and refilling with the excavated soil. The trenches will be of 0.4 m – 0.7 m wide and 0.8 to 1 m depth.. Earth work excavation will be undertaken by machine (backhoe excavator) or manually and include danger lighting and using barricades at every 100 m. As trenches are a maximum of 1.2 m, there is no risk of collapse of trenches or risk to surrounding buildings. Once they are laid, pipes will be joined as per specification and then tested for any cracks of leakages. 31. Sufficient care will be taken while laying so that existing utilities and cables are not damaged and pipes are not thrown into the trenches or dragged, but carefully laid in the trenches. 32. The minimum working hours will be 8 hours daily, the total duration of each stage depends on the soil condition and other local features. 33. About 95% of the excavated soil will be used for refilling the refilling the trench after placing the pipe and therefore residual soil after pipe laying and refilling is not significant. This excess soil shall be used for construction.

1 Proper procedures (protocol) under the supervision of local ASI representatives for referred towns is being used by the DBO contractor in conducting any excavation work, to ensure that any chance finds are recognised and measures are taken to ensure they are protected and conserved.


34. Road reinstatement will be undertaken by the contractor as part of the civil works 35. Other civil works in the subproject include construction of intake well in the River, water treatment plant, water tanks, pumping stations, at the identified sites. These works will be confined to sites, and construction will include general activities like excavation for foundation, construction of foundations, columns, walls and roof in cement concrete and masonry, and fixing of mechanical and electrical fixtures, etc. Intake well cum pump house will involve construction within the water body. A temporary enclosed area (about 10 m dia) will be created using appropriate material and the water will be pumped out to make the area dry for construction. Once this is created, the rest of the construction will follow the general construction procedures to create a RCC well of size 6 m diameter. Once the work is over, the temporary structure will be removed. 36. Although construction of these project components involves quite simple techniques of civil work, the invasive nature of excavation and the project locations in the built-up areas of the town where there are a variety of human activities, will result in impacts to the environment and sensitive receptors such as residents, businesses, and the community in general. The mitigation measures are discussed in the SEMP. 37. PMU, with assistance of PMC, has developed generic SEMP, which has been shared with all DBO Contractors. This generic SEMP includes generic mitigation measures and monitoring checklists applicable to construction activities common in all Phase 1 works. The contractors of package 5B have prepared the SEMP with site specific information and site specific mitigation measures.Refer Appendix 9 for Site Specific EMP prepared by Contractors with help of PIU- PMC/PMU. 38. The SEMP given here includes the design measures for (i) selection of construction methodology near protected monuments in discussion with the ASI, having the excavation observed by person with archaeological knowledge for chance finds, etc.; (ii) wash water recovery for the WTP to reduce effluent to be discharged; (iii) safe disposal of sludge coming out of wash water tanks from WTP (iv) beneficial use of treated sludge; and (v) energy efficient pumping equipment and (vi) quick leak detection and rectification to save the resources, etc. During execution phase, the EMP includes mitigation measures such as (i) implementation of traffic management plan in coordination with local traffic police to minimize traffic impacts (ii) awareness campaigns and consultations to inform residents and businesses of potential disturbances; (iii) provision of walkways and planks over trenches to ensure access will not be impeded; (iv) use of noise-dampening measures in areas with sensitive receptors such as hospitals, schools, places of worships and other silence-zones; (v) use of dust-suppression methods such as watering and/or covering of stockpiles; and (vi) finding beneficial use of excavated materials to extent possible to reduce the quantity that will be disposed off. As for the O&M phase, facilities will need to be repaired from time to time, but environmental impacts will be much less than those of the construction period as the work will be infrequent, affecting small areas only. The design of the WTP includes dewatering and drying areas as part of sludge management. The EMP includes mitigation measures and monitoring plan to ensure compliance to environmental standards during O&M phase. 39. Environmental standards (IFC’s EHS Guidelines): The Final IEE and SEMP provides specific information on how DBO contractor (i) applies pollution prevention and control technologies and practices consistent with international good practices as reflected in


internationally recognized standards such as the World Bank Group’s Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines and (ii) adopts cleaner production processes and good energy efficiency practices. If less stringent levels or measures are appropriate in view of specific project circumstances, the DBO contractor will provide full and detailed justification for any proposed alternatives that are consistent with the requirements presented in ADB SPS. 40. The Final IEE and SEMP shows how (i) design provides for pollution prevention from WTP, prevent contamination of groundwater sources, and (ii) how dust noise, air emissions, and water pollution will be controlled during the construction. Also the Final IEE and SEMP provides specific information on (i) how DBO contractor will implement occupational health and safety. 41. The Final IEE and SEMP includes more detailed checklists such (i) contractors twice a week EHS Checklist; (ii) contractors monthly SEMP Implementation Report; and (iii) PIU environmental safeguards compliance. The subproject will not add any incremental impacts to the environment. Site monitoring checklists and formats are given in Appendix 10. 42. A copy of the approved SEMP will be kept onsite during the construction period at all times. The EMP included in the bid and contract documents. Non-compliance with, or any deviation from, the conditions set out in this document constitutes a failure in compliance. 43. For civil works, the contractor will be required to (i) carry out all of the mitigation and monitoring measures set forth in the approved SEMP; and (ii) implement any corrective or preventative actions set out in safeguards monitoring reports that the employer will prepare from time to time to monitor implementation of this IEE and SEMP. The budget has been allocatedfor compliance with these SEMP measures, requirements and actions. 44. The following tables show the anticipated environmental impacts, proposed mitigation measures and responsible agencies for implementation and monitoring.

Table 7: Design Phase Environmental Management Plan (These are to be implemented and complied by DBO Contractor During the detailed Design

Phase) Anticipated Impact Mitigation Measures

Design of water supply system -Unsustainable source; resource & energy use

• Discontinuation of current unsustainable groundwater source and creating new comprehensive group water supply system based on a nearest surface water sources i.e. Narmada River for all 07 subproject towns under package 5B. • Recovering wash water from treatmentprocess • Treatment and reuse of sludge from treatmentprocess • Minimizing water losses from pipelines by perfect jointing and alignments using appropriatetechniques(HDPE pipes up to 150 mm dia joined by electro fusion couplers using on-site electro fusion welding, and all higher dia pipes by on site butt welding) • Minimizing Overall resource use by combinig bulk water facilities for all 07 subproject towns under package 5B • Designing the entire system to maintain optimal flow and terminal pressure, and optimizing the overall energyusage • Reducing the incidence of water borne diseases by providing 100% population including urban poor with potable watersupplies • Improve water use efficiency and reduce water wastage at household level by recording and monitoring the water usage, and charging the consumers as per usage; due consideration to urbanpoor • Minimize unaccounted for water (UFW) losses using district metered area approach with flow meter and pressure logging arrangements to identify and rectify the leaks, and unauthorizedconnections


• Using low-noise and energy efficient pumpingsystems • During the design, construction, and operation of the project, apply pollution prevention and control technologies and practices consistent with international good practice, as reflected in internationally recognized standards such as the World Bank Group’s Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines (IFC’s General EHS Guidelines2 and Sector Specific (Water and Sanitation) Guidelines3).

Source sustainability & water use conflicts - Water abstraction from Narmada River

• Obtain permission from Water resources department,GoMP

Environmental pollution- Waste generation from WTP operations

• Obtain consent from MPPCB for WTP at Bhedaghat town prior to start ofconstruction

Chlorine usage as disinfectant at WTP - Chlorine handling & application risk – health & safety risk to workers and general public

• Provide the following measure at the chlorine applicationunit: ▪ Chlorine neutralization pit with a lime slurryfeeder ▪ Proper ventilation, lighting, entry and exitfacilities ▪ Facility for isolation in the event of major chlorine leakage (if needed) ▪ Personal protection and safety equipment for the operators in the chlorine plant ▪ Provide training to the staff in safe handling and applicationof ▪ chlorine; this shallbe included in the contract of Chlorinatorsupplier ▪ Supplier of Chlorinator equipmentshall provide standardoperating manual for

safe operation and as well as maintenance and repairs; preferably these shall be provided both in English and Hindi Languages

Socio cultural resource - Encroachment / damage to protected monuments and chance finds

• Obtain ASI permission for laying of water pipelines within 300 m of protected monuments prior to start ofbidding • Include ASI as project stakeholder, local representative of ASI should be included in the town levelcommittee • Proper procedures (protocol) shall be used by the construction contractors in conducting any excavation work, to ensure that any chance finds are recognised and measures are taken to ensure they are protected and conserved. This shouldinvolve:

▪ Having excavation observed by a person with archaeological field training; contractor should employee a person with a formal certification course in archaeology from recognized (such as Institute of Archaeology, ASI, Delhi) during the ground excavationactivities

▪ Conduct awareness training to contractor &supervision staff prior to start of excavation Stopping work immediately to allowfurther

▪ investigation if any finds aresuspected; ▪ Calling in the ASI if a find is suspected, and taking any action they require to

ensure its removal or protection insitu • OHTsite in Bhedaghat is located approx. 170m away from Protected monument. Clearance of ASI have been obtained. The site selected is best suitable for proposed OHTand no other suitable governmentland is available in the town. Both are on opposite direction, so there will be no impact envisaged. Hence, as mitigation measures during construction, it will ensured.

Table 8: Pre Construction Phase Environmental Management Plan

(These are to be implemented and complied by DBO Contractor prior to start of construction work)

Anticipated Impact Mitigation Measures Preconstruction Phase

2https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/554e8d80488658e4b76af76a6515bb18/Final%2B-%2BGeneral%2BEHS%2BGuidelines.pdf?MOD=AJPERES 3https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/e22c050048855ae0875cd76a6515bb18/Final%2B-%2BWater%2Band%2BSanitation.pdf?MOD=AJPERES


Unsatisfactory compliance to EMP

• Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Supervisor will be mobilized to carryout environmental safeguard tasks

• Updated IEE / site specific EMP will be submitted Utilities on sites (electric, telephone lines, water pipes etc.)

• Location of utilities and respective operators will be identified, and measures to avoid damage/disruption will be implemented

• Contingency plan will be prepared and implemented in case of service disruption

Guidelines to be followed for laying of pipelines works around forest areas and removal of trees, vegetation and erosion at work sites

• Minimize removal of trees, vegetation on along Patan to Tendukheda MPRDC Road - SH-15; undertake replantation of the sites as far as possible immediately after the construction • All the cut and open surfaces shall be properly consolidated and protected with surface pitching /grass turfing etc as appropriate to avoid any surface erosion in the hill slopes • Avoid removal of trees and vegetation along the roads best pipeline alignments and layout planning of reservoirs and facilities, however, if this cannot be avoided fully, undertake compensatory tree plantation (10 trees to 1 tree removed)

Construction materials

• Construction materials will be obtained only from government approved quarries

• All clearance/license copies of quarries / borrow areas will be provided to PIU for prior approval

• A monthly report will be submitted to PIU on construction material quantity (sources-wise)

• No new borrow areas / quarries will be created for the work Approvals, permission, insurances, licenses, etc., for construction work

• All necessary permissions will be obtained prior to start of works

• Copies of all permission/approvals will be submitted to PIU prior to start of work

Training to staff & workers

• Staff and key workers will be trained (in construction methods, safety, EMP, EHS policy) prior to start of work

Guidelines to be followed for establishing construction camps / labour camps

• Camp sites shall be away from residential areas (100 m), sensitive areas (schools, hospitals, etc. 250 m,), water bodies (500 m) and forests (more than 1 km) • Use unused, vacant lands; no trees shall be cut • Provide a proper fencing/compound wall • Prepare a site layout plan & display at the site; uniformly label (name boards) all the places in the facility • Entire site/facility area shall be provided with hard leveled surface as appropriate; no loose soil, slush, water logging etc., • Living quarters and construction camps shall be provided with standard materials; no shacks or huts • Adequate lighting and ventilation • Provide drinking water, water for other uses, and sanitation facilities; drinking water should be regularly tested • Provide clear pathways for safe movement • Provide cooking fuel (cooking gas); and a separate safe place to cook; fire wood not allowed • Construct septic tanks and soak pit arrangement for wastewater disposal • Solid waste shall be properly manager – provide separate bins, compost biodegradable waste; sell recyclable waste • Camp sites shall be cleared and restored to original after completion of work, all debris, wreckage cleared

Work site management

• Provide a proper fencing/compound wall • Prepare a site layout plan & display at the site; uniformly label (name boards) all the places in the facility • Entire site/facility area shall be provided with hard leveled surface as appropriate; no loose soil, slush, water logging etc., • Provide clear pathways (for workers/staff) and roads (for vehicles) for safe movement in the work site


Worker amenities at all work sites

• A temporary rest area for workers (for resting in break time, protection against rain/sun, eating etc.,) • Drinking water • Wash area, toilets (separate for women); mobile toilets for linear work • Septic tank and soak pits for waste dispoal • First aid

Table 9: Construction Phase Environmental Management Plan

(These are to be implemented and complied by DBO Contractor during construction work) Anticipated Impact Mitigation Measures Pollution of Narmada River due to Intake works in River bed

• Do not disturb river bed except the actual work area; no equipment,machinery shall be operated outside the workarea • Select a construction methodology that is least disturbing, and appropriate for the in-situ soil condition, and able to complete the construction work prior to onset of monsoon • Schedule the construction works during low water level period – late winter months to pre monsoon (February – June/July); ensure that works are completed during the same period to prior to onset of monsoon; confirm with dam authorities on release of water; avoid scheduling the works during water release period. • Erect temporary barriers to form enclosed construction area with least disturbance • Allow adequate time settle the distributed solids to prior to pumping out water; only clear/clarified water shall be pumped back into the reservoir; any silt laden water should be pumped to a silt pond • Avoid/minimize use of fuels, chemicals and lubricants; ensure no spillage • Clean up the area after the completion & prior to the onset of monsoonflow

Dust Control • Dust screen will be provided around work sites (OHT, GLSR, WTP, intake etc.,)

• Loose soil on work sites, vehicle and worker movement areas will be properly rammed and stabilized to minimize dust generation; it will be ensured that no loose soil surface at working places

• Water will be sprinkled adequately (at least daily 3 times in dry weather) to maintain surface in stabilized and damp condition

• Prior to any leveling or earth moving activity, water will be sprinkled to avoid dust

• Material stocks will be covered with tarpaulins/covers at the sites

• Access to work area will be controlled; unnecessary movement of vehicles, workers and public in work areas will be controlled to minimize soil disturbance

• Loose material (soil, sand, aggregate etc.,) will be covered with tarpaulins to when transported by open trucks;

• Loose material from trucks will be unloaded in a barricaded area and with water sprinkling

• Wheels and undercarriage of haul trucks will be cleaned prior to leaving construction site

Dust control from pipeline works

• Construction area will be barricaded on both sides using hard barricades of 2m height

• Site clearance and excavation work will be commenced only after barricading the site

• Works and all associated activities (material, soil, debris, equipment, machinery) will be confined to barricaded area

• Excavated soil storage will be removed from the site immediately & stored/disposed at identified site

• Work will be undertaken section wise (100-500 m) at various places; these sections will be demarcated and barricaded and trench filled

• Work will be conducted work sequentially - excavation, pipe laying, backfilling; testing section-wise (for a minimum length as possible) so that backfilling, stabilization of soil can be done


• Excavated soil will be removed section-wise, and used for filling the previous section, this is to avoid stocking of excavated soil

• Road restoration will be taken up immediately after backfilling by proper consolidation

Noise control • Noisy works will be avoided in the night

• Proper noise control apparatus (silencers, mufflers etc.,) will be ensured for construction equipment

• Maximum sound level of 75 dBA at a distance of 10 m from source will be ensured

• Before undertaking work with heavy noise/vibration, surrounding area/buildings will be surveyed to identify any old / sensitive buildings at risk, and necessary precautions will be taken to avoid any risk

• Drivers will be trained to avoid usage of horns unnecessarily

• Noisy works will not be conducted near sensitive places (hospitals, schools, etc.,) and at sensitive times (festivals etc.,); works will be scheduled accordingly

Vehicle emissions • Al the construction equipment, machinery will be fitted with pollution control devises

• Pollution under control (PUC) certificate will be obtained for all vehicles, equipment, and records maintained

Water pollution / works in rainy season

• No earthwork will be conducted during rainy season

• Stockpiles of earth will be covered by tarpaulins or plastic sheets

• Excess soils, debris and materials will be reused in the construction works

• Disposal sites will be selected prior to start of construction following the EMP guidelines

• Temporary silt traps or sedimentation basins will be provided to control water pollution

• Storage areas for fuels and lubricants will be located away drainage lines & water bodies

• Fuels, construction chemicals etc. will be stored on an impervious floor, and carefully handled to avoid spillage; spill collection arrangement will be provided

• Wastes generated by construction activities will be disposed only in designated sites

• Surface water quality monitoring will be conducted as per the EMP

• Temporary drains or bunds will be created around the periphery of work area to avoid flooding, and entry of runoff

• Accumulated water in work areas / excavated pits will be pumped to a temporary ponds/sedimentation basins; only clarified water will be disposed into drains

• Safety measures will be undertaken to avoid any risk of collapse due to water entry

Traffic management / access during pipeline works

• Pipeline work implementation plan will be prepared for each road; works will not be conducted in all roads at once in a locality; alternative roads for traffic movement will be ensured

• A simple traffic management plan will be prepared in consultation with traffic police for each road, and displayed on site; one-week prior notice will be provided

• Temporary diversions will be provided as required, with prior public information

• Work area will be properly defined, barricaded; minimum strip of land will be used

• Material / waste / soil will not be stocked obstructing the traffic, pedestrian etc.,

• Trench width will be minimized as much as possible by adopting best construction methods with proper shoring/bracing

• Work site will be kept free from all unnecessary obstructions

• Public information boards, sing boards, caution boards will be provided along with contact numbers


• Prior to start of pipeline work, information will be provide to the public through media – newspapers and local cable television (TV) services

Access to houses/business during pipeline works

• Gaps/wooden or metal planks will be provided on excavated trenches for access

• Access to any house, business or property will not be blocked completely, at least safe pedestrian access will be maintained

• Local/affected people/business will be informed 1-week in advance about the work and access restrictions

Material transport using heavy trucks

• Material haulage vehicles will main/wide roads as far as possible

• Transportation / hauling activities will be conducted during non-peak hours

• Proper entry and exits to facilities will be provided facilities at low traffic places

• Drivers will be trained to drive vehicles in a considerate manner and following all traffic rules

Local employment • Local labours will be employed as far as possible Safety at work sites • Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) Policy/ plan will be established

• Site will be prepared and maintained to create safe working conditions; workers will be provided with safe work areas, elevated platforms, steps, ladders, walkways /access to work areas and amenities

• Deep excavations (more than 1 m) will be properly protected to avoid collapse (safety measures such as / shoring / safe slopes)

• Hard barricading will be provided around deep trenches / pits of more than 1.5 m deep

• All necessary precautions will be taken to avoid collapse of trench/pit, and damage to surrounding structures

• Proper personnel protection equipment will be provided to all workers / staff; and its use will be ensured

• Proper audible back-up alarms will be ensured for all moving equipment/machinery

• All installations will be properly secured; hazardous locations will be properly marked

• All work sites will be properly secured, barricaded to avoid unauthorized public/traffic entry

• Provide road signs and flagman to regulate traffic / pedestrians / road users, of on-going trenching activities

• Provide safety sign, caution, information boards on site for workers and staff awareness, follow up

• Health and safety orientation training will be provided to all workers

• First aid, and staff with training in first aid will be made available at all sites

• Site safety orientation will be provided to all visitors to the site

• Drinking water, sanitation, washing and resting facilities will be provided at all sites; separate sanitation facilities for women

• Emergency procedures and contact information will be provided on all sites

• Accidents will be promptly registered and reported; register will be maintained at every work site

• Public compliant box and compliant register will be provided at every work site

Construction waste / debris disposal

• Construction waste management plan will be prepared

• Excess soil / debris will be utilized in construction / useful purposes to avoid disposal

• Excess soils/debris will be removed from site on regular basis to avoid stockpiling at site

• Disposal site will be identified prior to start of work following EMP guidelines

• Domestic waste generated at camp sites will be properly segregated; biodegradable waste composted in impervious pit at site; recyclable waste will be sold in market


• Residual and hazardous wastes such as oils, fuels, and lubricants will be disposed via licensed agencies by MPPCB

• Burning of waste will not be allowed

• Sites will be managed neatly; waste collection bins will be provided, awareness will be created among workers, staff in site cleanliness

• All camp/work sites will be restored to original condition after the completion of work

Socio cultural resources and chance find protocol

• Include ASI as project stakeholder, local representative of ASI should be included in the town level committee

• Proper procedures (protocol) shall be used by the construction contractors in conducting any excavation work, to ensure that any chance finds are recognised and measures are taken to ensure they are protected and conserved. This should involve:

o Having excavation observed by a person with archaeological field training;

o Conduct awareness training to contractor & supervision staff prior to start of excavation

• If any chance find is suspected during excavation/works, work will be immediately stopped, and report to PIU/PMU and PMC

• Necessary action as suggested by concerned authorities will be undertaken

AC pipes • Location of existing/old AC pipes will be identified prior to excavation for new pipes

• Underground AC pipes will left as it is in the ground without disturbing / touching

• Awareness will be created among workers and supervisors on AC pipes Post construction clean up

• All spoils wreckage, rubbish, or temporary structures (such as latrines) will be removed

• All excavated roads will be reinstated to original condition

• All disrupted utilities will be restored

• Any spillage of substances like oils, paints etc., will be cleaned up

• All hardened surfaces in work/camp areas will be ripped, all materials removed, and top soiled

• Restoration to original will be documented and reported to PIU

Table 10: Construction Phase Environmental Monitoring Plan For Package 5B

(This is to be carried out by DBO Contractor as per the frequency given below) Monitoring field

Monitoring Location Monitoring Parameters Frequency

Ambient air quality

Total eight (8) locations in seven (7) towns Bedhagat (2 no.) 1. WTP 2. OHT / pipeline work sites Katangi (1 no.) 3. OHT / pipeline work sites Majholi (1 no.) 4. Pipeline work sites Patan (1 no.) 5. Pipeline work sites Panagar (1 no.) 6. OHT / pipeline work

PM10, PM2.5 NO2, SO2, CO • Once prior to star of work • Quarterly during construction


sites Sihora (1 no) 7. OHT / pipeline work sites Tendukheda (1 no.) 8. OHT / pipeline work sites

Ambient Noise

Total eight (8) locations in seven (7) towns Bedhagat (3 no.) 1. WTP 2. OHT / pipeline work sites Katangi (1 no.) 3. OHT / pipeline work sites Majholi (1 no.) 4. Pipeline work sites Patan (1 no.) 5. Pipeline work sites Panagar (1 no.) 6. OHT / pipeline work sites Sihora (1 no) 7. OHT / pipeline work sites Tendukheda (1 no.) 8. OHT / pipeline work sites

Noise Level – 24 hours – hourly measurements – day and night time noise levels

• Once prior to star of work

• Quarterly during construction

Surface water quality

1 location(down Stream /upstream of work site in Narmada near intake site)

pH, Cl, F, NO3, TC, FC, Hardness, Turbidity COD, DO, Oil & grease, total alkalinity, heavy metals

• Once prior to star of work

• Monthly during intake construction

VI. Consultations and Disclosure Conducted

45. The active participation of stakeholders including local community, NGOs/CBOs, and the media in all stages of project preparation and implementation is essential for successful implementation of the project. It will ensure that the subprojects are designed, constructed, and operated with utmost consideration to local needs, ensures community acceptance, and will bring maximum benefits to the people. 46. Most of the main stakeholders have already been identified and consulted during preparation of this IEE, and any others that are identified during project implementation will be brought into the process in the future. Primary stakeholders of the subproject are: residents, shopkeepers and business people who live and work alongside the roads in which network improvements will be provided and near sites where facilities will be built (WTP and water


tanks), and government and utility agencies responsible for provision of services in subproject towns. 47. The stakeholders were involved in developing the IEE through discussions on-site and public consultation at several places in the town, after which views expressed were incorporated into the IEE and in the planning and development of the project. The IEE has been made available at public locations and disclosed to a wider audience via MPUDC and PMU websites. The consultation process has been continued and expanded during project implementation to ensure that stakeholders are fully engaged in the project and have the opportunity to participate in its development and implementation. 48. During implementation of the subprojects, an extensive consultation program is carried out with different type of stakeholders such as respective ULBs, other line departments, general public, vendors and land owner etc., in line with the requirements pertaining to disseminate the project information, in particular agreed resettlement framework. General public, business owners mainly shopkeepers and likely to be affected people were informed about the possibility of disruption due to subproject. The consultation is focused on about subproject and on entitlement matrix of the project and compensation receiving procedure. The tools used for consultations were stakeholder workshops and meetings, interviews and focus group discussions (FGD). These consultations provided inputs for identification of the felt needs of the communities, and the relevant stakeholders. Meaningful consultations have been continued with local inhabitants which include all section of society 49. PMC experts and field staff conducted various consultations with the public to understand their views on existing water supply status. At the same time, the communities were informed about the MPUSIP project in detailed along with proposed water supply infrastructure in their town. During consultations, community enquired about the perceived benefits of water supply scheme. During implementation period (April 2018 to December 2018), there has been consultations on project design, features, implementation procedures, sewerage scheme, health and sanitation, formation of GRC, land transfer, rehabilitation of affected households, Possible positive & negative impacts of the project and other social safeguard issues. There is great acceptance of the project as there is only positive impact on the life of community. The people mainly raised the issue of sanitation which will be resolved after availability of safe water. 50. Stakeholder Consultation/s was held in respective municipal offices. Several other meetings also conducted at ward level with communities and in market areas. Consultation meetings were conducted in all the seven subproject towns i.e. (i) Bhedaghat in April 2018 & December 2018 (ii)Katangi in May 2018 & December 2018 (iii) Majholi in July 2018 & December 2018 (iv) Panagar in May 2018 & December 2018 (v) Patan in July 2018 & December 2018 (vi) Sihora in May 2018, October 2018 & December 2018 and; (vii) Tendukheda in June 2018 & December 2018 in all the sevensubproject towns. Besides, several other meetings also conducted at ward-level with communities, and at market with street vendors and hawkers. The details of consultation are provided in (Appendix 11 to Appendix 13). In all 145 stakeholders participated in the consultations (male = 50, female = 95) 51. During the consultation/s the following queries were raised by the local communities and it was responded by the Concerned PIU/ PMC and DBO Contractors.


• All stakeholders were very supporting of the project, and extended full cooperation during the works as the activities are proposed to improve the water supply service levels and the living standards.

• Stakeholder expressed their concern regarding water charges, affordability, disturbance and loss of business due to the work in market areas, dust, road closure etc.).

• Water logging during rains, damage to existing utilities during excavation, disturbance to shops, traffic etc.,

• Stakeholders also indicated that a public notice on works, and awareness programs to be conducted

• The project team explained the proposed mitigation measures to mitigate / minimize such issues. Attention of stakeholders drawn to the EMP, and explained to them how the construction phase issues by avoided, minimized or mitigated and managed.

52. Executive summary of the IEE has been translated in Hindi and made available at the offices of PMU, PIU, Nagar Parishad offices, and also displayed on their notice boards. Hard copies of the IEE will be accessible to citizens as a means to disclose the document and at the same time creating wider public awareness. Electronic version of the IEE in English and Executive Summary in Hindi has been placed in the official website of the MPUDC, PMU after approval of the IEE by ADB. Stakeholders will also be made aware of grievance register and redress mechanism. 53. Local communities has been continuously consulted regarding location of construction camps, access and hauling routes and other likely disturbances during construction. The road closure together with the proposed detours will be communicated via advertising, pamphlets, radio broadcasts, road signage, etc. 54. The PMC/PIU and DBO Contractor will continue meaningful consultations and information disclosure during the construction phase. DBO Contractor will include records of consultations, issues/concerns, attendance sheets, and resolutions to the progress report to be submitted to PIU. This will be included by PMU in the environmental monitoring report to be submitted to ADB on a semi-annual basis.

VII. Package-Specific Grievance Redress Mechanism

55. The GRM is envisaged to provide a time bound and transparent mechanism to voice and resolve social and environmental concerns linked with the project. In this regard, MPUSIP had issued an official order along with the guideline to all PIUs and ULBs to establish grievance redress committee (GRC) at all awarded subproject towns. Copy of government order to form GRC at each subproject towns is enclosed as Appendix 14 to Appendix 16. Copy of GRC established in the subproject towns under package 5B is enclosed as Appendix 17 to Appendix 24. Status of the formation of GRC & List of GRC members at town level (subproject towns) is as follows in the Table 11 and Table 12.

Table 11: Status of GRC Formation Under Package 5B Subproject Towns Sl. No. Package No. Name of the Town Status of GRC Formation

1

5B

Katangi GRC formed on 11.10.2017 2 Bhedaghat GRC formed on 10.07.2017 3 Majholi GRC formed on 12.05.2017 4 Panagar GRC formed on 10.07.2017


Sl. No. Package No. Name of the Town Status of GRC Formation

5 Patan GRC formed on 30.11.2017 6 Sihora GRC formed on 24.11.2017 7 Tendukheda GRC formed on 12.06.2017


Table 12: List of GRC members as on 31st January 2019 S. No

Package Town Project Manager MPUDC

Elected Member Nominated by Mayor in Council/President in Council

Social Worker nominated by Mayor in Council/President in Council

Commissioner / CMO/Community Organizer of ULB

Community Deployment Officer of related PIU

Gender -Male (Nos)

Gender -Female (Nos)

Date

1 5B Katangi Mr. A K Nanda

Mrs. Preeti Swapnil Agrawal

Mr. Rajesh Chakrawati

Mrs. Neelam Chauhan

Mrs. Rashmi Tiwari

2 3 November, 17

2 Bhedaghat Mr. A K Nanda

Mr. Kishore Dube Mrs. Shela Sunil Jain

Mr. A.K. Ravat Mrs. Rashmi Tiwari

3 2 October, 17

3 Majholi Mr. A K Nanda

Mr. Jakir Khan Mr. Aajad Sahu Mr. Sarib Kosar Mrs. Rashmi Tiwari

4 1 December, 17

4 Panagar Mr. A K Nanda

Mr. Rakesh Sahu Mrs. Reena Aanand Jain

Mrs. Jayshree Chauhan

Mrs. Rashmi Tiwari

2 3 October, 17

5 Patan Mr. A K Nanda

Mrs. Neera Krishna Behure

Mr. Rajendra Singh Rathor

Mr Rajendra Singh

Mrs. Rashmi Tiwari

3 2 November, 17

6 Sihora Mr. A K Nanda

Mr. Alok Pandey Mrs. Sushila Chourasiya

Mr. Satendra Kumar Shalvar

Mrs. Rashmi Tiwari

3 2 November, 17

7 Tendukheda Mr. A K Nanda

Mrs Sunita Rishabh Singhai

Shri Shyam Sundar Jain

Shri Shashank Shendey

Mrs. Rashmi Tiwari

3 2 December, 17


A) Structure of GRM and its Functions 56. The GRM will have a three- tier decision making process. The first tier which is at the town level aims to resolve all construction related grievances which require quick and efficient action. The second tier which is at the project implementation unit (PIU) will handle complaints that could not be resolved by the first- tier level and/or grievances related to land acquisition and compensation. The third tier which is at the project management unit (PMU) or state level will handle complaints which are over and above the scope for the first and second tier and/or complaints which could not be resolved by the first and second tier levels. 57. Contact numbers of GRC Chair-person and members, CDO and contractor’s focal person will be placed at appropriate locations like construction sites, ULB office etc. 58. The three-tier Grievance Redress Mechanism under MPUSIP is described below: 1st tier (At Town Level): Composition of the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC):

• A representative of Chief Municipal Officer associated with Urban Local Body, Chairperson;

• CDO of ULB designated/nominated by ULB. • Field Engineer of Project Management Consultants; • Focal person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective town; • Field Engineer of concerned ULB designated by the respective PIU, Secretary;

Major Functions:The major functions of town level GRC is as follows:

• Registration of Grievances by the Local person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective townSorting of Grievances by Focal person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective town and Chairperson;

• Forwarding grievances to concerned authorities i.e. Site Engineer for resolution;

• Information to the complainant on the decision taken to address registered complaint and expected time to resolve issue;

• Resolution of issues emerged due to construction; • Feedback to the complainant on action completed against registered complaint

and seeking complainant feedback on level of satisfaction; • Closure of grievances by CDO-ULB or forwarding of complaint to PIU GRC if

grievance remains unresolved. 2nd Tier {At PIU Level}: Composition of the PIU level GRC:

• Project Manager, associated with Project Implementation Unit (PIU) of Madhya Pradesh

• Urban Development Company Limited - Chairperson • An elected member nominated by Mayor in Council/ President in Council of

associated • Urban Local Body (ULB). • A Social Worker nominated by Mayor in Council/ President in Council of

associated UrbanLocal Body


• Commissioner of associated Urban Local Body/Chief Municipal Officer or Community

• Development Officer/Community Organizer of Urban Local Body. • Community Development Officer CDO-PIU - Secretary

Major Functions:The following functions will be performed by the PIU level GRC:

• Registration of complaints by CDO-PIU from the 1st tier GRC and/or affected people;

• Eligibility assessment of grievances by the GRC Chairperson; • Information to the complainant about eligibility of the complaint; • Grievance Redress Committee meetings to discuss grievances and action

required; • Ensuring collection of detailed information about the eligible complaint; • Assessment of complaint, draw conclusion from discussions and make

recommendations; • Develop action plan outlining activities required to implement the

recommendations; • Ensuring implementation of recommendations by stakeholders or concerned

authorities; • Monitoring actions of the recommendations in view of timeline; • Feedback to the complainant on action completed against registered complaint

and seeking complainant feedback on level of satisfaction; • Closure of grievances by CDO-PIU or forwarding of complaint to PMU GRC if

grievance remains unresolved. 3rd Tier {At PMU-State Level} Composition of State Level GRC:

• Engineer in Chief, MPUDC – Chairperson • Deputy Project Director (T) • Deputy Project Director (A) (Secretary) • Project Officer • Community Development Officer CDO-PMU • PMC TL or representative Advisor

Major Functions:The state level GRC will be responsible to performthe following functions:

• Registration of complaints received from GRC PIU and/or affected people; • Information to the complainant about eligibility of the complaint; • Eligibility assessment of grievances by the GRC PMU chairperson with support

of the • Secretary of state GRC- – whether grievance is eligible for consideration or not

at the state level; • Ensuring collection of required information about the eligible complaint; • Assessment of complaint to draw conclusion from discussions and make

recommendations; • Develop action plan outlining activities required to implement the

recommendations; • Ensuring implementation of recommendations by stakeholders or concerned

authorities; • Monitoring actions of the recommendations in view of timeline;


• Closing complaint after all actions taken as per recommendations and feedback to the complainant.

• Advise to complainants about approach /appeal to the concerned department in case the complainant is not satisfied or complaint is beyond the scope of the GRC PMU.

Figure 4: Work Flow Diagram on GRM

B) Action Plan for the formation of the GRM

S.No Action Plan Time Line A Action required at PMU/PMC A1 Letter for formation of GRC and follow up Pre -construction A2 Development of GRM Manual Pre -construction A3 Orientation of GRC members by integrating with

training/workshops/meetings Construction

Grievance

Redress

Mechanism

Step 1: Receiving Grievances /

Complaints and its Registration at

Step 2: Review

of Grievances,

Sorting,

Information and

Ste

p 3

: E

lig

ibil

ity

an

d P

rep

ara

tio

n f

or

GR

C M

ee

tin

g (

3 D

ay

s)

Step 4:Assessment of the

Grievance, Meeting and Plan of

Step 5:Implementation of

Action

Ste

p 6

: M

on

ito

rin

g a

nd

Re

po

rtin

g

(Mo

nth

ly)

Ste

p 7

: C

losu

re o

f th

e

Co

mp

lain

t

Step 8:Appeal to the

State Level GRC


A4 Integration of GRC topic in BCC – like availability of GRC and its procedure

Construction

A5 Review of functioning of GRC by integrating with meetings and visits Construction B Action at Town level B1 Formation of GRC at town level and inform to the PMU/PMC Pre -construction B2 Information to All ULB Officials/Public about existence of

GRC, its committee members and their function Construction

B3 Orientation of all GRC members during visit of PMU and PMC officials Construction B4 Tracking of complaint registered and its status Construction B5 Sharing status of grievances with PIUs with the help of GRC person Construction B6 Training of selected women to maintain grievances at customer service

center (Educated Prerak (Motivator) may be considered) Construction

B7 Complaint management Operation and maintenance phase

C) Process of Grievance Redress Mechanism 59. The following process shall be adopted for receiving complaints and addressing received complaints: Step 1: Receiving Grievances/ Complaints and its Registration at town Level

• All grievances, complaints, concerns shall be submitted verbally or in writing to CDO contractor’s focal person or any GRC members – by filling the Complaint Registration Slip and putting into the complaint box placed at construction sites or ULB office.

• Received complaints shall be recorded, compiled and Registered(Grievance Number) in a register (database) placed at the ULB by CDO with support of the contractor’s focal person on a daily basis (24 hours). Each grievance shall be given a number to track status.

Step 2: Review of Grievances, Sorting, Information and Forwarding (24 hours)

• Registered grievances shall be reviewed by the CDO with support of the contractor’s focal person.

• Based on type of grievances, CDO shall sort out grievances with support of the contractor’s focal person.

• CDO (ULB) shall inform the GRC Chairperson about all grievances either by phone or in writing. At that time, CDO may suggest grievances can be managed by the site engineer to the GRC Chairperson;

• GRC Chairperson will determine eligibility of the complaints. Inconveniences caused by minor construction related issues shall be referred to the site engineer to resolve immediately or within 24 hours. For example -site engineer shall be instructed to resolve grievances associated with construction at the town such as restoration of road, obstruction in accessing house/shop or any place due to dumping of construction materials, dust etc. Site engineer will be responsible to respond to the complaints immediately. On the other hand, issues which cannot be resolved by the site engineer and if it is complex in nature shall be referred to GRC.

• CDO shall receive acknowledgement from concerned authorities (site engineer) on receipt of the grievances shared with them. CDO shall inform complainants regarding eligibility of their complaint and action to be taken by the concerned authority (site engineer/ GRC) within (24 hours). If the grievance is ineligible, complainants should be informed of the reasons;


Step 3: Eligibility and Preparation for GRC meeting (3 days)

• GRC Chairperson shall receive eligible complaints (copy of written complaint document or verbally recorded messages) from the CDO (ULB) and review details; GRC Chairperson may ask to collect baseline information about the grievances registered, if required.

• GRC Chairperson shall share list of documents with the GRC Secretary to collect baseline information on selected grievances to be addressed.

• The GRC Secretary shall arrange all documents with the help of CDO-ULB, CDO-PIU or the contractor’s focal person in a proper way to present in front of GRC.

• GRC Chairperson shall call a meeting as per convenient date and time of the committee members.

Step 4: Assessment of the Grievance, Meeting and Plan of Action (7 days)

• If necessary, the GRC shall consult and seek relevant information about complaint from the concerned parties.

• On basis of the collected evidences, GRC shall draw conclusions and make recommendations for a solution.

• GRC Secretary shall keep record of the proceedings and decisions taken by GRC members to further track the status as per decided time line.

• The GRC shall agree on the action plan required to be implemented according to the recommendations made. The action plan shall include detailed activities along with timeline.

• GRC Secretary shall inform to the complainant about the decisions taken by the committee members and expected date of resolution of the grievance.

• If the complaint is complex, the GRC may request for additional time and resolution after proper assessment or refer the complaint to the GRC-PMU Level.

• Step 5: Implementation of Action (30 days)

• The concerned parties shall be responsible to implement action plan according to recommendations of the GRC.

• The GRC members may arrange field trip and interact with the concerned persons, if needed before reaching the conclusion.

Step 6: Monitoring and Reporting (Monthly)

• CDO (ULB) shall be responsible to track and record status of all complaints -whether forwarded to site engineer or GRC in the database as follows – Grievance registered, Grievance in process to be resolved, Grievance addressed and closed, and Grievance forwarded to concerned authorities.

• CDO (ULB) shall be responsible to report/inform status of the complaints (received, addressed and forwarded) to the contractor for further reporting to respective PIU.

• Overall GRC chairperson shall be responsible for effective management of complaints at the town level.

Step 7: Closure of the Complaint


• GRC Secretary shall prepare a summary of the findings and share with GRC members.

• On agreement of all GRC members, GRC Secretary shall provide information to the complainant about decisions taken in writing/verbal on the registered complaint and seek feedback of the complainant about the decisions taken. A copy of the letter shall be kept as record with GRC Secretary and CDO (ULB).

• Complaint shall be considered closed if all actions have been taken and the complainant satisfied with the resolution.

• GRC Secretary shall prepare a closure report of the grievances handled by GRC members and the closure shall be documented by the CDO (ULB) in his register.

Step 8: Appeal to the State level GRC

• In the event that GRC PIU cannot make a decision on how to resolve the complaint, or if a complainant is not satisfied with the actions taken to resolve the complaint by the GRC (PIU), an appeal can be made to state level GRC (PMU) either by the GRC Chairperson (PIU) or complainant directly.

• GRC Chairperson (PIU) or complainant shall submit an appeal in writing to the state level GRC established at PMU.

• The state GRC Secretary shall register the case in consultation with Chairperson and provide a number of the grievances to be tracked.

• The state GRC Secretary shall acknowledge the registration of the grievance to the complainant in writing.

• The Secretary of the GRC shall review the registered grievances and collect required evidences from relevant parties to present case to the GRC.

• The state GRC Chairperson shall call a GRC meeting to review the complaint. GRC members shall get information about the meeting in advance to ensure their availability in the meeting.

• The state GRC shall draw conclusions and recommendations based on the evidence in the meeting. At the same time an action plan shall be developed for implementation with a timeline.

• The state GRC Secretary shall communicate decisions of the State GRC to the complainant in writing. The copy of the communication shall be kept with the state GRC Secretary as record.

• The recommendations shall be implemented immediately • Upon completion of the recommended actions, the state GRC Secretary shall

prepare a report on the closure of the complaint which will be signed by the complainant and state GRC Chairperson. A copy of the same shall be kept for record.

60. The structure and process of GRM is presented below for detailed understanding


Figure 5: Structure and Process of GRC

D) Monitoring and Evaluation systems of GRM 61. All grievances, concerns and complaints received shall be recorded by concerned authorities to be tracked. The status of the grievances shall be discussed in the review meetings organized at PIU and PMU level. The following indicators shall be monitored and recorded

• Number and type of complaints received; • Number and % of complaints that have been resolved; • Number and % of complaints that are unresolved;

62. The State GRC shall review grievance related data on monthly basis to evaluate the functionality of the system, as well as to note the followings:

• Failures to follow GRM procedures; • Delays in complaint resolution, particularly those that can affect project

construction; • Most frequent types of grievances and complaints; • Location(s) producing the most grievances and complaints;


VIII. Package Specific Roles and Responsibility of MPUSIP Safeguard Team Foccal Persons

63. Implementation Arrangements. Project Officer (Environment) at PMU and Assistant Safeguard Officer (ASO) at each of the PIU will be responsible for environment safeguards tasks, and will be supported by PMC. At PMC’s environmental safeguards staff include an Environmental Specialist Consultant located centrally in Bhopal, and will be responsible for all safeguard tasks, and he/she is supported by an Environmental Engineer in each PIU. Contractor personnel will include an Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) supervisor. The DBO Contractor requires mobilization of an Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) supervisor. 64. Safeguards tasks at PMU are coordinated by Technical Officer designated as Project Officer (Environment), who is supported by an Environmental Engineer and a Social Specialist. PMU designated an Assistant Project Manager (APM) / Deputy Project Manager (DPM) in PIUs as Assistant safeguards officer for supervision all safeguard tasksat PIU level. PMU also assigned safeguard tasks to Civil Engineers posted in project towns for supervision all safeguard tasks.PMC environmental safeguard personnel comprise an Environmental Specialists, stationed at Bhopal, and five environmental engineers has been placed in each of the five PIUs.At the time of submission of this updated IEE, Environmental Specialist at Bhopal has been appointed in PMC, also Environmental Engineer has been appointed in PIU PMC - Jabalpur. EHS supervisor is also mobilized by DBO contractor“M/s Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited”. Deployment details of focal persons for package specific and their roles & responsibility is depicted below in the Table 13.

Table 13: List of Focal persons Responsible for Package 5B, MPUSIP Safeguard Team Name Designation/Offi

ce Email Address Contact

Number Roles

1. PMU Mr. PL Barange PO (Environment) [email protected] 798722797

4 Overall Responsible for environmental safeguard tasks and EMP Implementation at PMU level

Ms. Sukhpreet Dhanoa

Environment Engineer

[email protected] 7224888889

Assisting PO (Environment) for EMP Implementation & safeguard issues at PMU level

Mr. Girish Nair

Community Development Officer

[email protected], 9993646487

Assist PO (Environment), for social safeguard issues/monitoring at PMU level

2. PIUs (PMU) - Jabalpur Mr. Umesh Jain AssisstantSafegu

ard Officer (ASO) [email protected] 898267681

5 Responsible for environment safeguards


tasks to ensure mitigation of negative environmental impacts due to the subproject, if any at PIU level and report to PO (Environment) at PMU

Mrs. Aprajita Mishra

Community Development Officer


Assist Social & Gender Officer at PMU and PIU / ULBs for compliance of social safeguard requirements of the Program Safeguard System (PSS at PIU level

Ms. Monika Pawar

Sub Engneer (Civil)- Assigned for Safeguard Tasks


Assigned safeguard tasks to Civil Engineers posted at PIU Jabalpur& Assist ASO Jabalpur, for social & environmental safeguard issues/monitoring and EMP implementation at PIU level

Mr. Pranesh Agarwal

Sub Engneer (Civil )- Assigned for Safeguard Tasks


3. Consultants (PMC) - Bhopal Mr. Rajeev Sharma

Safeguard Expert-Resettlement

[email protected],

9310103101

Assist PMU / PIU / ULBs for compliance of social safeguard requirements of the Program Safeguard System (PSS)

Mr. Md. Qamruzzaman

Safeguard Expert- Environment


Assist PMU / PIU/ contractor to ensure compliance with environmental requirement of the Program Safeguard System (PSS)

Dr. Savita Jain Gender and Communication Expert

[email protected]

9131200746

Assist PMU/PIU for implementatio


n monitoring and reporting of gender activities as per the PAP and DLI and ensure a gender-sensitive communication plan is designated and implemented

4. PIU (PMC)- Jabalpur Mr. Apur Thakur Environment

Engineer [email protected]

6261679202

Assist Environment Expert in the work and responsible for implementing and monitoring safeguards compliance activities at PIU level and report to PM/ASO at PIU.

Mr. Pankaj Dixit Resettlement Coordinators

[email protected]

7999734385

Assist the Resettlement safeguard Expert in performing all works as per requirements of the Program Safeguard System (PSS) at PIU level

Mr. Chandra Prakash Pandey

Communication Assistant


Assist Gender and Communication Expert in the work at PIU level

5. Contractor EHS staff_ M/s IHPL_Package 5B Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra

EHS Supervisor [email protected]

9131927624

6. Contractor Safety Steward Town Wise_ M/s IHPL_Package 5B 1. Subham Yadav

Safety Steward - Bhedaghat

6261119291

Identified safety stewards at town level.Safety steward with the guidance of EHS supervisor to conduct daily tool box briefing sessions, implementing

2. Arpit Agarwal

Safety Steward - Katangi

7999759351

3. Birendar Khori

Safety Steward - Majholi

8251898784

4. Sayoung Sahu

Safety Steward - Patan

755699703

5. Abhishek singh

Safety Steward - Sihora

9893835784

6. Mahendra Singh

Safety Steward - Panagar

9981854287

7. Parsottam Pathak

Safety Steward - Panagar

8518842378


EHS aspects, and maintaining records at each site

IX. Monitoring and Reporting

65. PMU, with assistance of PMC, has developed standardized site wise inspection Checklists and SEMPs, which has been shared with all DBO Contractors. This standardized site wise Inspection checklist / SEMP includes specific mitigation measures and monitoring checklists applicable to construction activities common in all Phase 1 works. Monitoring formats shall be filled by the contractor EHS supervisor as per the requirement; photographs of site, DBO Contractor’s EHS supervisor to fill checklist twice a week and PMC Environmental Engineer/Field Engineer to check weekly once. Contractor to submit this checklist on 5th of every month for the preceding month along with site photographs, on site consultations with workers and local people should be documents, and these shall then form part of SEMRs. Any non-compliance shall be immediately be brought to the notice of Environmental Specialist of PMC, and Team Leader of PMC, and PMU safeguards officer, and corrective actions shall be initiated. 66. Site wise checklist are being submitted by DBO Contractor “M/s Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited” and it is closely monitored by respective PMC PIU Jabalpur – Environmental Engineer. Corrective actions, if required are immediately provided by PIUs and PMC. 67. The contractors “M/s Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited” of Package 5B has submitted SEMP. Refer Appendix 9 for SEMPs prepared by Contractors with help of PIU- PMC/PMU.

X. EMP Implementation Cost

68. Most of the mitigation measures require the contractor to adopt good site practices (such as dust and pollution control, community and occupation safety, labour welfare etc.,), which are part of their normal procedures already. The costs which are specific to EMP implementation include staff costs and ambient environmental quality monitoring to be conducted via an accredidated laboratory.These are given in the following table.

Table 14: EMP Implementation Cost

Particulars Stages Unit Total Number

Rate (INR)

Cost (INR)

Costs Covered By

A. Implementation staff

1 EHS Supervisor Construction per month

24 40,000 960,000 DBO contract

Subtotal (A) 960,000

B. Mitigation Measures

1 Consent for establishments & consent for operation from MPPCB

Pre construction

Lump sum

60,000 Project costs


Particulars Stages Unit Total Number

Rate (INR)

Cost (INR)

Costs Covered By

Subtotal (B) 60,000

C. Monitoring Measures 1 Air quality monitoring Construction / sample 72 5,000 360,000 DBOC 2 Noise levels monitoring Construction / sample 72 1,500 108,000 DBOC 3 Surface water monitoring Construction / sample 7 5,000 35,000 DBOC Subtotal (C) 503,000

Total (A+B+C) INR 1,523,000 4 Water and sludge Operation LS / year - - 50,000 DBOC


Appendix 1: Copies of WRD Clearance

(i). Copy of WRD Clearance of Narmada River for Bhedaghat Town (ii). Copy of WRD Clearance of Narmada River for Majholi Town


Summary Translation in English: WRD Clearance

(i). Bhedaghat Town

Translation of letter No 1109 dated 23.10.2017 by Secretary of Empowered

Committee, Water Resource Department regarding allocation of 0.32 Million Cubic

Meter Water for water supply scheme Bhedaghat, District Jabalpur

As per decision taken in the meeting of empowered committee of Water Resource

Department (WRD), dated 23.09.2017, the permission to allocate 0.32 Million Cubic

Meter water for WSS Bhedaghat is granted on following conditions:

• A contract will be signed in between Executive engineer, WRD, Hiran, Jabalpur

and nominated officer of the Nagar Parishad Bhedaghat in the prescribed format

‘7’ (K) for 0.32 MCM abstraction of water annually from Narmada River. • Nagar Parishad Bhedaghat will regularly pay the water rate for abstraction of 0.32

MCM from Narmada River to Executive engineer, WRD Jabalpur, as decided by

government.

• Payment of the water rate will be affected from the day of Contract

• WRD will not be responsible for any expenditure related to water allocation.

• Nagar parishad Bhedaghat will bear the expenditure of civil and mechanical works,

but prior approval of design and drawings of the related works structures is

required from Chief Engineer, WRD.

• Purpose of the abstraction of water from Narmada River will not be changed.

Contract can be terminated, if there is any fundamental breach of Contract by

Nagar parishad Bhedaghat.

• Installation of the automatic equipment for the measurement of discharge from

water source will be borne by Nagar Parishad Bhedaghat, but prior approval from

Executive Engineer (Mechanical), WRD Jabalpur is required.

• WRD will not be compelled to discharge the water from U/S Dam to proposed

source location in Narmada river during the non-availability of water in the river in

summer season.

• WRD, Government of Madhya Pradesh will not bear any financial liabilities for

water supply schemes, of respective ULB.

• ULB shall pay water tax decided by Government of Madhya Pradesh from time to

time.


(ii). Majholi Town



Meter Water for water supply scheme of ULB Majholi, District Jabalpur



Meter water for WSS Majholi is granted on following conditions:


and nominated officer of the Nagar Parishad Majholi in the prescribed format ‘7’ (K) for 0.489 MCM abstraction of water annually from Narmada River.

• Nagar Parishad Majholi will regularly pay the water rate for abstraction of 0.489


government.



• Nagar parishad Majholi will bear the expenditure of civil and mechanical works, but

prior approval of design and drawings of the related works structures is required

from Chief Engineer, WRD.



Nagar parishad Majholi.


water source will be borne by Nagar Parishad Majholi, but prior approval from




summer season.




time.


(iii). Copy of WRD Clearance of Narmada River for Panagar Town

(iv). Copy of WRD Clearance of Narmada River for Patan Town

(v). Copy of WRD Clearance of Narmada River for Katangi Town


(iii). Panagar Town



Meter Water for water supply scheme Panagar , District Jabalpur



Meter water for WSS Panagar is granted on following conditions:


and nominated officer of the Nagar Parishad Panagar in the prescribed format ‘7’ (K) for 1.789 MCM abstraction of water annually from Narmada River.

• Nagar Parishad Panagar will regularly pay the water rate for abstraction of 1.789


government.



• Nagar parishad Panagar will bear the expenditure of civil and mechanical works,





Nagar parishad Panagar.


water source will be borne by Nagar Parishad Panagar, but prior approval from




summer season.




time.


(iv). Patan Town



Meter Water for water supply scheme Patan, District Jabalpur



Meter water for WSS Patan is granted on following conditions:


and nominated officer of the Nagar Parishad Patan in the prescribed format ‘7’ (K) for 0.49 MCM abstraction of water annually from Narmada River.

• Nagar Parishad Patan will regularly pay the water rate for abstraction of 0.49 MCM

from Narmada River to Executive engineer, WRD Jabalpur, as decided by

government.



• Nagar parishad Patan will bear the expenditure of civil and mechanical works, but





Nagar parishad Patan.


water source will be borne by Nagar Parishad Patan, but prior approval from




summer season.




time.


(v). Katangi Town


Committee, Water Resource Department regarding allocation of 0.63MCM Water for

water supply scheme Katangi, District Jabalpur



Meter water for WSS Katangi is granted on following conditions:


and nominated officer of the Nagar Parishad Katangi in the prescribed format ‘7’ (K) for 0.63 MCM abstraction of water annually from Narmada River.

• Nagar Parishad Kaangi will regularly pay the water rate for abstraction of 0.63


government.



• Nagar parishad Katangi will bear the expenditure of civil and mechanical works,





Nagar parishad Katangi.


water source will be borne by Nagar Parishad Katangi, but prior approval from




summer season.




time.


(vi). Copy of WRD Clearance of Narmada River for Sihora Town (vii). Copy of WRD Clearance of Narmada River for Tendukheda Town


(vi). Sihora Town



Meter Water for water supply scheme Sihora, District Jabalpur



Meter water for WSS Sihora is granted on following conditions:


and nominated officer of the Nagar Parishad Sihora in the prescribed format ‘7’ (K) for 2.82 MCM abstraction of water annually from Narmada River.

• Nagar Parishad Sihora will regularly pay the water rate for abstraction of 2.82 MCM

from Narmada River to Executive engineer, WRD Jabalpur, as decided by

government.



• Nagar parishad Sihora will bear the expenditure of civil and mechanical works, but





Nagar parishad Sihora.


water source will be borne by Nagar Parishad Sihora, but prior approval from




summer season.




time.


(vii). Tendukheda Town



Meter Water for water supply scheme Tendukheda, District Damoh



Meter water for WSS Tendukheda is granted on following conditions:


and nominated officer of the Nagar Parishad Tendukheda in the prescribed format

‘7’ (K) for 0.50 MCM abstraction of water annually from Narmada River. • Nagar Parishad Tendukheda will regularly pay the water rate for abstraction of

0.50 MCM from Narmada River to Executive engineer, WRD Jabalpur, as decided

by government.



• Nagar parishad Tendukheda will bear the expenditure of civil and mechanical

works, but prior approval of design and drawings of the related works structures is




Nagar parishad Tendukheda.


water source will be borne by Nagar Parishad Tendukheda, but prior approval from




summer season.




time.


Appendix 2: Copy of Clearance from ASI for Bhedaghat Town


Summary Translation in English: ASI Clearance_Bhedaghat

NoC obtained by Chief Municipal Officer, ULB Bhedaghat from Archeological

Survey of India (ASI) for Construction of OHT in Bhedaghat:

Format 4 (Rule- 12)

The permission for the construction/reconstruction/renovation/ maintenance in the area

regulated as preserved monuments/archeological sites/remains and declared of national

importance under ancient monument and archeological sites and remains act 1958.

ULB has requested permission to construct OHT in the regulated area near Chousath

Yogini Temple, Khasra No 74, Infront of ULB-Bhedaghat, District Jabalpur and assured

the compliance of ancient monument and archeological sites and remains act 1958 in

regulated area. Based on the approval/recommendation of National Archeological

Authority under the rule 20D, section 4, Myself, shri Madan Singh, Empowered officer

permit construction of OHT in Khasra No 74, Infront of ULB-Bhedaghat, District Jabalpur.

This permission is granted on following conditions:

• No construction shall be allowed in prohibited area.

• The height of structure constructed should not be more than the permitted height.

• Other than permitted area, no new area should be included in construction work.

• On the completion of proposed construction work, the office of ASI should be

informed so that it can be inspected.

• During the above construction work, all the rules of Government of India and

Government of Madhya Pradesh should be followed.

• The violation of the provisions under ancient monuments and archeological sites

and remains act 2010 and above terms will result as termination of permission and

the whole matter will be handed over to court for legal process.

• The undersigned or his representative may inspect the site during or after the

construction.

• In the noncompliance of the conditions of permission, the appropriate action will

be taken as per SRS rule 2011, section 19.

• Prior to construction work, it is necessary to obtain permission/no objection

certificate of related agencies as per the rule.

• Any dispute related to ownership of proposed land will leads to withdrawal of the

above permission.

The above permission is non-transferable and valid for 3 years from the date of

permission (total 36 months)


Appendix 3: Copy of Clearance from ASI for Panagar Town

Summary Translation in English: ASI Clearance_Panagar

NoC obtained by Chief Municipal Officer Panagar, District Jabalpur from

Archeological Survey of India (ASI) for laying of pipeline in Panagar

Format 4 (Rule- 12)

The permission for the construction/reconstruction/renovation/ maintenance in the area

regulated as preserved monuments/archeological sites/remains and declared of national

importance under ancient monument and archeological sites and remains act 1958.

ULB has requested permission for laying pipeline in the regulated area near Large Effigy

of Vishnu Chouraha, , Khasra No 1070/1, and other nearby Khasra ,Panagar, District

Jabalpur and assured the compliance of ancient monument and archeological sites and


remains act 1958 in regulated area. Based on the approval/recommendation of National

Archeological Authority under the rule 20D, section 4, Myself, shri Madan Singh,

Empowered officer permit the laying of pipeline in Khasra No 1070/1 and other nearby

Khasra in Panaar, District Jabalpur. This permission is granted on following conditions:

• Permission is granted for the laying of pipeline outside the periphery of buffer zone

of 100 m in regulated area.

• The above work of laying of pipeline shall be done in the supervision of ASI.

• No construction shall be allowed within the boundary of prohibited area of

preserved monument.

• The height of construction work should not be more than the permitted height.

• Other than permitted area, no new area should be included in construction work.

• On the completion of proposed construction work, the office of ASI should be

informed so that it can be inspected.

• During the above construction work, all the rules of Government of India and

Government of Madhya Pradesh should be followed.

• The violation of the provisions under ancient monuments and archeological sites

and remains act 2010 and above terms will result as termination of permission and

the whole matter will be handed over to court for legal process.

• The undersigned or his representative may inspect the site during or after the

construction.

• In the noncompliance of the conditions of permission, the appropriate action will

be taken as per SRS rule 2011, section 19.

• Prior to construction work, it is necessary to obtain permission/no objection

certificate of related agencies as per the rule.

• Any dispute related to ownership of proposed land will leads to withdrawal of the

above permission.

The above permission is non-transferable and valid for 3 years from the date of

permission (total 36 months).


Appendix 4:: Letter Received from DFO, Jabalpur_Regarding the Forest Permission for Laying Pipelines between Saraswati Ghat to Bhedaghat in Bhedaghat

(i). Letter Submitted to Divisional Forest Officer (DFO), Jabalpur Regarding Forest Permission for Laying of Pipeline of 900m Length along Existing PWD Road within RoW between Sarsawati Ghat to Bhedaghat Thana

(ii). Letter Received from DFO, Jabalpur_Regarding Forest Permission for Laying of Pipeline of 900m Length along Existing PWD Road Within RoW From Sarsawati Ghat to Bhedaghat Thana

(iii). Letter from PIU PMU, Jabalpur to DBO Contractor “M/s Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited”_Regarding submission of Forest NOC Fees required by DFO, Jabalpur for laying of pipelines between Saraswati ghat to Bhedaghat Thana in Bhedaghat


Summary translation in English: Letter received from DFO, Jabalpur_Regarding the

Forest Permission for Laying Pipelines between Saraswati Ghat to Bhedaghat in

Bhedaghat

Letter No. 2035 dated 10.06.2019 by Forest Officer, Jabalpur regarding Laying of

pipeline in seven sub project towns under package 5B of MPUSIP Project

In the above-mentioned subject, please refer letter No 900 dated 12.03.2019 in which

Chief Conservator of Forest Central Zone Jabalpur demanded Certificate along with

survey report of non-availability of minimum forest land and any other option for laying

the pipeline in Bhedaghat town from Saraswati ghat to Bhedaghat Thana. Till date, we

have not received the certificate.

The applicant, under the forest protection act,1980 has submitted online application and

demanded the information. It is therefore requested to provide the information on

following points:

1. The applicant will conduct joint survey with the institution and submit the proof of

non-availability of minimum forest land and other options.

2. To complete form 2 along with attachment

3. Listing the trees in the area, summary and the plan of tree cutting

4. Information of endangered/ extinct species

5. Please attach the site inspection report of proposed area

6. Please submit any other information related to the proposal (if any)

Copy to:

Project Manager, MPUDC Jabalpur. It has been observed in your proposal (point no

D-I) that you have not mentioned any reason for laying the pipeline in forest land.

Please fulfill the above requirement and submit the revised proposal in copies along

with registration of Rs. 5000 and processing fee of Rs. 25000, total of Rs 30,000

through demand draft on the name of forest officer, and also cooperate in joint

inspection of the area.


Appendix 5: Letter Received from DFO, Jabalpur_Regarding the Forest Permission for Laying Pipelines between Katangi to Majholi

(i). Letter Received from DFO, Jabalpur_Regarding Forest Permission for Laying of Pipeline of 4km Length along Existing PWD Road Within RoW between Katangi to Majholi

(ii). Letter from PIU PMU, Jabalpur to DBO Contractor “M/s Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited”_Regarding submission of Forest NOC Fees required by DFO, Jabalpur for laying of pipelines between Katangi to Majholi


Summary translation in English: Letter received from DFO, Jabalpur_Regarding the

Forest Permission for Laying Pipelines between Katangi to Majholi

Letter No. 2036 dated 10.06.2019 by Forest Officer, Jabalpur regarding Laying of

pipeline in seven sub project towns under package 5B of MPUSIP Project

In the above-mentioned subject, please refer letter No 898 dated 12.03.2019 in which

Chief Conservator of Forest Central Zone Jabalpur demanded Certificate along with

survey report of non-availability of minimum forest land and any other option for laying

the pipeline in Katangi- Majholi town. Till date, we have not received the certificate.

The applicant, under the forest protection act,1980 has submitted online application and

demanded the information. It is therefore requested to provide the information on

following points:

1. The applicant will conduct joint survey with the institution and submit the proof of

non-availability of minimum forest land and other options.

2. To complete form 2 along with attachment

3. Listing the trees in the area, summary and the plan of tree cutting

4. Information of endangered/ extinct species

5. Please attach the site inspection report of proposed area

6. Please submit any other information related to the proposal (if any)

Copy to:

Project Manager, MPUDC Jabalpur. It has been observed in your proposal (point no

D-I) that you have not mentioned any reason for laying the pipeline in forest land.

Please fulfill the above requirement and submit the revised proposal in copies along

with registration of Rs. 5000 and processing fee of Rs. 25000, total of Rs 30,000

through demand draft on the name of forest officer, and also cooperate in joint

inspection of the area.


Appendix 6:: Letter Recieved from DFO, Damoh_ Rgarding Forest Permission for Laying of Pipelines between Patan to Tendukheda

(i). Letter Submitted to DFO, Damoh_Regarding Forest Permission for Laying of Pipeline of approx. 8km Length along SH-15, MPRDC Road within RoW through Forest Areas From Patan to Tendukheda

(i). Letter Received from DFO, Damoh_Regarding Forest Permission for Laying of Pipeline of 8km Length along along SH-15, MPRDC Road within RoW through Forest Areas From Patan to Tendukheda

ii). Letter from PIU PMU, Jabalpur to as per instruction of DFO, Damoh_Regarding Submission of Hard Copy of Online Registration Regarding Forest Permission for Pipe laying


Summary translation in English: Letter received from DFO, Damoh_Regarding the Forest

Permission for Laying Pipelines between Patan to Tendukheda

Letter No 1661 dated 24.03.2018 of District Forest Officer Damoh regarding laying

of pipeline in the towns of package 5B

In the above-mentioned subject, we have received the letter for the permission of laying

of pipelines in the forest area of package 5B towns of MPUSIP project. You are therefore

requested to conduct joint inspection of the proposed forest area and submit detail report

through Deputy Forest Officer along with signatures and Map so that the further action

could be taken. The report should include following points:

1. The length and width of pipeline in proposed project and the route of pipeline.

2. Whether the work under proposed project will have any negative impact on trees

and forest animals.

3. The distance of proposed work from Nauradehi Sanctuary and Rani Durgawati

Sanctuary

Copy to:

PIU, MPUDC Jabalpur for information and necessary action. It is requested to

coordinate with Circle officer, Tendukheda for joint inspection/visit of proposed site

in the forest area and submit the report with joint signatures, Panchnama and map.

Translation of letter No 754 dated 17.01.2019 of Project Manager, PIU Jabalpur to

District Forest Officer Damoh regarding submission of hard copy of online

registration

In the above-mentioned subject, it was requested by APCCF(LM) through email dated

07.01.2019 to submit the hard copy of online registration No FP/MP/WATER/37836/2018.

Accordingly, the hard copy of online registration is being submitted in 4 copies for

necessary action. Please provide the acknowledge of the same so that APCCF(LM)

Bhopal may take necessary action.

Copy to: Collector District Damoh for informaton


Appendix 7: Narmada Water Quality Results at Proposed Intake Site Bhedaghat


Appendix 8: Drinking Water Standards

S.No Parameters,

unit

WHO Drinking Water standards

IS-10500:2012

Requirement acceptable limit

Permissible limit in the absence of alternate source

1 Color, Hazen Units

None 5 15

2 Odour None Agreeable Agreeable 3 Turbidity None 1 5 4 pH None 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5 5 Total hardness

as CaCo3,mg/l None 200

600

6 IRON as Fe, mg/l

- 0.30 0.30

7 Chloride as Cl, mg/l

250 250 1000

8 Total Dissolved Solids, mg/l

- 500 2000

9 Calcium as Ca, mg/l

- 75 200

10 Copper as Cu, mg/l

2 0.05 1.5

11 Manganese as Mn, mg/l

0.4 0.1 0.3

12 Sulphate as SO4, mg/l

- 200 400

13 Alkalinity mg/l - 200 600 14 Magnesium as

Mg, mg/l - 30 100

15 Mercury as Hg, mg/l

0.006 0.001 0.001

16 Cadmium as Cd, mg/l

0.003 0.003 0.003

17 Selenium as Se, mg/l

0.04 0.01 0.01

18 Arsenic as As, mg/l

0.01 0.01 0.05

19 Lead as Pb, mg/l

0.01 0.01 0.01

20 Zinc as Zn, mg/l - 5 15 21 Chromium as

(Cr), mg/l 0.05 0.05 0.05

22 Boron as B, mg/l

2.4 0.5 1.0

23 Fluoride, mg/l 1.5 1.0 1.5 24 Nickel as Ni,

mg/l 0.07 0.02 0.02

25 Sodium as Na, mg/l

- -

26 Potassium as K, mg/l

- - -


S.No Parameters,

unit

WHO Drinking Water standards

IS-10500:2012

Requirement acceptable limit

Permissible limit in the absence of alternate source

27 Cobalt as Co, mg/l

- - -

28 Aluminium as Al , mg/l

- 0.03 0.2

29 Coli form bacteria/100ml

0 0 -

30 Barium (as Ba), mg/l, Max

0.7 0.7 0.7

31 Free residual chlorine, mg/l,

5.0 0.2 1

32 Molybdenum (as Mo), mg/l, Max

0.07 0.07 0.07

33 Nitrate (as NO3), mg/l, Max

50 45 45


Appendix 9: Site Specific Environmental Management Plan

(SEMP is attached separately)


Appendix 10: Monitoring Checklist Formate (1 to 11) Being Used at Work Sites


Checklist 7: Accident Reporting Cum First Aid Form Sr. No.

Name of Town

Date of the Accident and Time

Nature and Extent of Injury

Number of Persons injured/Died

Action Taken

Date reporting to PIU/PMU/PMC and time

Remarks

Checklist 8: Grievances Reporting Format Stage - 1 Contractor Level Stage-2 PIU level Stage-3 PMU level Remarks

Sr. No.

Name of

Town

Date of Grienvance

reported

Name of Person/Address/Mob.

No.

Type of Grievance

Action Taken

(Yes/No)

Whether resolved

or not

If not resolved (Date of

Forwarding to PIU)

Date of Grievance received

Type of

Action taken

Result of Action

(Resolve or not

resolve)

If not resolved (Date of

Forwarding to PMU)

Date of Grievance received

Recommendation of Committee

Date of

Action Taken

Checklist 9: Change of Location of Subproject Components and its Impact Sr. No.

Name of Town

Particulars Details of Proposed component as per DPR

Details of sub-component as per DBO Contractor

Any change recommended by DBO Contractor (If yes detail of that sub component with approval)

Design Submit/Approved

Land Details with Khasra No. and Map (P-II form)

Photograph Whether any Negative Impact on community/person reported (Impact Assessment/Trasict walk required)

Source Weir/Anicut/Reservoir Intake Well cum pump house Raw water pipe line Water Treatement Plant Clear water sump well


Checklist 9: Change of Location of Subproject Components and its Impact Sr. No.

Name of Town

Particulars Details of Proposed component as per DPR

Details of sub-component as per DBO Contractor

Any change recommended by DBO Contractor (If yes detail of that sub component with approval)

Design Submit/Approved

Land Details with Khasra No. and Map (P-II form)

Photograph Whether any Negative Impact on community/person reported (Impact Assessment/Trasict walk required)

Clear water pipe line Storage Structure

(OHT/GSR/Sump Well)

1- 2- 3- Distribution Network House Hold Connections

Checklist10: Details about Unanticipated Environment&SocialImpact on Property, Livelihood, Environment etc. reported during Construction Sl. No. Name

of the Town

Subproject component Any Impact Reported: Yes/No

Type of Impact: Pemanent or Temporary

In case of Temporary Impact: (i)on property or structure, (ii)on livelihood, (iii) any other, specify………

Whether such type of Social Impacts are reported to PIU/PMU/PMC (Yes/No)

What type of Assistance or Compensation given to affected assets

Details about affected assets or Affected Persons

Checklist 11: Capacity Building Sr. No. Orientation of subproject with regard to ADB Safeguard policy Status (Yes/No) Provide Details with evidence

(Date, Venue, Photographs and signature of participants)

Number of Participants (Male/ Female)

1 ULB staffs and elected body 2 Other Stakeholders (town level NGO/Govt Department etc.) 3 Public Consultation During Execution by DBO Contractor 4 Community Consultation 1 Community Consultation 2 Community Consultation 3 Community Consultation 4 Community Consultation 5


Appendix 11:Summary of Consultation with Stakeholders at Subproject Towns Under Package 5B

Date Location No. of Participants

Participants Topics Discussed Issues

10 Dec 2018

Ward No. 15, Bhedaghat

Total=14 M=05, F=09

ST Community

• Present drinking water supply source and its condition

• Need of improvement of the present situation

• Briefing on project objectives probable implementation procedures

• Briefing about mitigation measures for local people during construction like-

▪ Construction area will be demarcated on both sides using hard barricade.

▪ Excess excavated soil storage during pipe lines work will be removed from the site immediately & disposed from the roads.

▪ Road restoration will be taken up immediately after backfilling by consolidation.

▪ Dust screens will be provided around work sites.

▪ Water will be sprinkled adequately in case of excess dust generated during pipe line work.

▪ Noisy works will be avoided in the night.

• Land use and area to be covered under the project

• Objective of Door To Door Survey

• Nagar Parishad is operating the water supply system for the town, but capacity to be further built.

• The Chairman of the ULB expressed need for the project and willingness to take it up;

• The Nagar Parishads do not have capacity or resources to be party to sharing the loan repayment.

• The prime concern and apprehension of the ULB Chairman regarding the project was whether it will be a financial burden on the Nagar Parishad.

• Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation;

• The official from revenue department gave consent of speedy allotment for required land for project.


09 Dec 2018

Ward No. 01, Katangi

Total=17 M=00, F=17

ST Community









• Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation

• Experiences sharing on - livelihood activities, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, women empowerment, tribal development, health, education, convergence with existing government social security schemes etc.

• Grievance redress procedures

• None of the people knew about the proposed project. On learning about the project, they expressed that they were happy that the entire community would be benefited from the upgraded water supply.

• Slum dwellers showed willingness to take water connections but demanded relaxation in user charges.

• People were briefed about the complaint redress mechanism.


16 July 2018

Ward No. 06, Majholi

Total=13 M=04, F=04

Local Community people










• Experiences sharing on- livelihood activities, Resettlement and

• Rehabilitation, women empowerment, tribal development, health, education, convergence with existing government social security schemes





08 Dec 2018

Ward No. 05, Majholi

Total=17 M=11, F=06

ST Community • Knowledge of project

• Present water supply situation: only half an hours of supply alternate day








• Drinking water user charge

• Women had heard about the proposed project and welcomed it as women are facing many problem in fetching water for hours.

• Some participants did not have water connections. The women were happy to learn about the proposed project.

• Possibility of exempting the poor and vulnerable from user charge payment.

03 May 2018

ULB office, Panagar

Total=08 M=06, F=02

Elected Representatives, ULB Officials, CDO/PRO, Engineer- TCE & IHP

• Present drinking water supply source and its condition

• Need of improvement of the present situation









• Nagar Parishad is operating the water supply system for the town, but capacity to be further built.

• The Chairman of the ULB expressed need for the project and willingness to take it up;

• The Nagar Parishads do not have capacity or resources to be party to sharing the loan repayment.

• The prime concern and apprehension of the ULB Chairman regarding the project was whether it will be a financial burden on the Nagar Parishad.

• Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation;

• The official from revenue department gave consent of speedy allotment for required land for project.



• Land use and area to be covered under the project

• Objective of Door To Door Survey etc.

• Grievance Redress procedures

09 Dec 2018

Ward No. 13, Panagar

Total=15 M=04, F=11

ST Community

• Status of existing drinking water supply system;

• Need for improvements to present system;

• Relevant information of the upcoming project and benefits of the project.









• Ensuring no income loss

• The area has insufficient and inadequate drinking water supply. Water from two tube wells is presently supplied to the area/community. The area faces severe water crisis during the summer season when the ground water level drops.

• The community welcomed the project and expressed need for it. However, they were apprehensive that their economic condition would prevent them from paying water user charges.



06 July 2018

Patan Total=08 M=00, F=08

Local Community people

• Knowledge of project

• Present water supply situation: only half an hours of supply alternate day

• Drinking water user charge







• Noisy works will be avoided in the night.

• Women had heard about the proposed project and welcomed it as women are facing many problem in fetching water for hours.

• Some participants did not have water connections. The women were happy to learn about the proposed project.


09 Dec 2018

Ward No. 04, Patan

Total=16 M=12, F=04

ST Community

• Status of existing drinking water supply system;

• Need for improvements to present system;

• Relevant information of the upcoming project and benefits of the project.








• The area has insufficient and inadequate drinking water supply. Water from two tube wells is presently supplied to the area/community. The area faces severe water crisis during the summer season when the ground water level drops.

• The community welcomed the project and expressed need for it. However, they were apprehensive that their economic condition would prevent them from paying water user charges.




• Ensuring no income loss 08 Dec 2018

Ward No. 13, Sihora

Total=19 M=07, F=12

ST Community

• Experiences sharing on - livelihood activities, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, women empowerment, tribal development, health, education, convergence







• Noisy works will be avoided in the night.




09 Dec 2018

Ward No. 09, Tendukheda

Total=18 M=01, F=17

ST Community














• Experiences sharing on - livelihood activities,

• Resettlement and Rehabilitation, women empowerment, tribal development, health, education, convergence with existing government social security schemes


Appendix 12: Stakeholder Consultation Photogrphs & List of Participants 1. At Subproject town Bhedaghat with ST community in Ward No. 15, Bhedaghat


2. Stakeholder Consultation Photograph & List of Participants at Subproject town Katangi with ST community in Ward No. – 1, Katangi


3. Stakeholder Consultation Photograph & List of Participants at Subproject town Majholi with Local Community in Ward No. – 06.


4. Stakeholder Consultation Photograph & List of Participants at Subproject town Majholi with ST Community in Ward No. – 05, Majholi


5. Stakeholder Consultation Photograph & List of Participants at Subproject town Panagar with ULB officials and Elected Representatives at ULB, Panagar


6. Stakeholder Consultation Photograph & List of Participants at Subproject town Panagar with ST Community in Ward No. – 13, Panagar


7. Stakeholder Consultation Photograph & List of Participants at Subproject town Patan with Local Community in Patan


8. Stakeholder Consultation Photograph & List of Participants at Subproject town Patan with ST Community in ward no. 04, Patan


9. Stakeholder Consultation Photograph & List of Participants at Subproject town Sihora with ST Community in ward no. 13, Sihora


10. Stakeholder Consultation Photograph & List of Participants at Subproject town Tendukheda with ST Community in ward no. 09, Tendukheda


Appendix 13: Stakeholder Consultation photographs

Stakeholder Consultation Photographs at subproject town Tendukheda with Local community in June 2018 (Total=10, M=03, F=07)

Stakeholder Consultation Photograph at Subproject town Bhedaghat with CMO-Bhedaghat in April 2018 (Total= 04, M=04, F=00

Stakeholder Consultation Photograph at Subproject town Katangi with Ward Parshads in May 2018 (Total=07, M=07, F=00)

Stakeholder Consultation Photograph at subproject town Sihora with CMO in May 2018 (Total=08, M=08, F=01)


Stakeholder Consultation Photographs at subproject town Sihora with MLA, Chairperson- ULB and Local people in Oct 2018. Katangi


Maholi

Patan


Appendix 14: Office Order of EA to Establish GRC at subproject town level


Summary Translation in English - Office Order of EA to Establish GRC at subproject town

level

(i) Letter No 1108 dated 23.06.2017 signed by EnC, MPUDC To

Commissioner/Chief Municipal Officer, All ULBs regarding formation of

Grievance Redressal Committees

Ref.: Order No 3934 dated 06.03.2017 of Directorate of Urban Development

In compliance of the above office order, the Grievance Redressal Committees to be

formed in all the externally funded projects during operation, implementation and maintenance

phase in the chairmanship of Project Officer, Project Implementation Unit (PM, PIU), MPUDC. In

the above committee, following members from the ULBs will be nominated:

• An elected member nominated by Mayor in Council/ President in Council of associated Urban Local Body (ULB).

• A Social Worker nominated by Mayor in Council/ President in Council of associated Urban Local Body

• Commissioner of associated Urban Local Body/Chief Municipal Officer or Community Development Officer/Community Organizer of Urban Local Body.

It is therefore requested to nominate above members with immediate effect for form GRC.

(i) Office Order No 3934 dated 06.03.2017 signed by Commissioner, Urban

Administration and Development, Madhya Pradesh

a. The Grievance Redressal Committees to be formed in all the externally funded projects

to resolve the public grievances during operation, implementation and maintenance

phase. In the above committee, following members will be nominated:

• Project Officer, Project Implementation Unit (PM, PIU), MPUDC will be chairman and Nodal Officer of the committee




• Community Development Officer (CDO), Project Implementation Unit (PM, PIU), MPUDC will be chairman and Nodal Officer of the committee

Committee should have at least one-woman member.

b. The process of grievance redressal should be as follows: 1. Complain shall be registered by affected person at – office of urban local body/or

PIU/or Contractor through personal visit /or telephonically by disclosing his/her identity or address.

2. Damage/or loss of livelihood/property/quality of services affected during construction/or operations and maintenance period of the project shall be resolved by


the Grievance Redressal Committee. Only Corruption related issues will not fall under the preview of Grievance Redressal Committee to be resolved.

3. Compliance shall be addressed to the Project Manager of Project Implementation Unit. Site Engineer and Public Relation Officer will be responsible to ensure compliance as per instructions of the Project Manager.

4. Grievance shall be resolved within two days of registration of complain by affected person. Complainant should be informed if Grievance Redressal is taking time due to any technical reason.

5. Complainant can appeal to Grievance Redressal Committee with relevant documents in case grievance is neither resolved within two working days nor affected person is informed about the delay in process.

6. Nodal officer can organize grievance redressal meeting to solve one or more problems but they have to avoid unnecessary delay in resolving the problem. Complain will be presented by the project manager to review by the committee members and their decision shall be discussed against each complain. Proceedings of grievance redressal meeting shall be documented. Decision to the complainant will be informed in writing. Execution of decision should be performed either directly by PIU or with the support of contractors.


Appendix 15: Letter to PIU From MPUDC (IA) to Establish GRC at subproject town level


Summary Translation in English - Letter to PIU From MPUDC (IA) to Establish GRC at

subproject town level

Letter No 1881 dated 31.05.2018 signed by EnC, MPUDC to Project Managers,

PIUs(all), MPDUC Regarding formation of Grievance Redressal Committees


In compliance of the above office order, the Grievance Redressal Committees to be formed in all

the externally funded projects to resolve the public grievance during operation, implementation

and maintenance phase.

In compliance of above, please ensure formation of Grievance Redressal Committees in the sub

projects where contract have been awarded. This should be followed for all the future sub

projects awarded.


Appendix 16: Letter to CMO From MPUDC (IA) to Establish GRC at subproject town level


Summary Translation in English - Letter to CMO From MPUDC (IA) to Establish GRC at

subproject town level

Letter No 2349 dated 15.11.2017 signed by EnC, MPUDC To Commissioner/Chief

Municipal Officer, All ULBs Regarding formation of GRC(Reminder)


In compliance of the above office order, the Grievance Redressal Committees to be

formed in all the externally funded projects during operation, implementation and maintenance

phase in the chairmanship of Project Officer, Project Implementation Unit (PM, PIU), MPUDC. In

the above committee, following members from the ULBs will be nominated:




It is therefore requested to nominate above members with immediate effect for form GRC.


Appendix 17: GRC Established at Bedhaghat Nagar Parishad


Summary Translation in English - Letter to GRC Established at Bhedaghat Nagar

Parishad

Letter No 792 dated 07.10.2017 Regarding formation of GRC in Bhedaghat

In compliance of order no 3934, dated 06.03.2017 the Grievance Redressal Committees

has been formed for externally funded project MPUSIP during operation, implementation and

maintenance phase. The members of the committee are as follows:

S. N. Name Designation Post in GRC 1 Shri Shanti Swaroop

Khare PM, PIU Jabalpur Chairperson

2 Smt Shaila Sunil Jain Chairman, Nagar Parishad Bhedaghat

Member

3 Shri Kishore Dubey Social Worker Member 4 Shri A.K. Rawat CMO, ULB Bhedaghat Member 5 Ms. Rashmi Tiwari CDO, PIU, Jabalpur


Appendix 18: GRC Established at Katangi Nagar Parishad


Summary Translation in English - Letter to GRC Established in Katangi Nagar Parishad

Letter No 993 dated 10.11.2017 Regarding formation of GRC in Katangi






2 Smt Priti Swapnil Agrawal Chairman, Nagar Parishad Katangi

Member

3 Shri Rajesh Chakrawarti Social Worker Member 4 Shri Neelam Chouhan CMO, ULB Katangi Member 5 Ms. Rashmi Tiwari CDO, PIU, Jabalpur Member


Appendix 19: GRC Established at Majholi Nagar Parishad


Summary Translation in English - Letter to GRC Established in Majholi Nagar Parishad

Letter No 1304 dated 05.12.2017 Regarding formation of GRC in Majholi






2 Shri Ajad Sahu Chairman, Nagar Parishad Majholi

Member

3 Shri Jakir Khan Social Worker Member 4 ShrSharib Kausar CMO, ULB Majholi Member 5 Ms. Rashmi Tiwari CDO, PIU, Jabalpur Member


Appendix 20: GRC Established at Panagar Nagar Parishad


Summary Translation in English - Letter to GRC Established in Panagar Nagar Parishad

Letter No 887 dated 07.10.2017 Regarding formation of GRC in Panagar






2 Smt Reena Anand Chairman, Nagar Parishad Panagar

Member

3 Shri Rakesh Sahu Social Worker Member 4 Smt Jaishri Chouhan CMO, ULB Panagar Member 5 Ms. Rashmi Tiwari CDO, PIU, Jabalpur Member


Appendix 21: GRC Established at Patan Nagar Parishad


Summary Translation in English - Letter to GRC Established in Patan Nagar Parishad

Letter No 1008 dated 30.11.2017 Regarding formation of GRC in Patan




S. N. Name Designation Post in GRC Shri Shanti Swaroop


Smt Neera Krishna Behure

Chairman, ULB Patan Member

Shri Rajendra Rathore Social Worker Member Shri Rajendra Singh CMO, ULB Patan Member Ms. Rashmi Tiwari CDO, PIU, Jabalpur


Appendix 22: GRC Established at Sihora Nagar Parishad


Summary Translation in English - Letter to GRC Established in Sihora Nagar Parishad

Letter No 4224dated 24.11.2017 Regarding formation of GRC in Sihora






SMt Sushila Chorasia Chairman, Nagar Parishad Sihora

Member

Shri Alok Pandey Social Worker Member Shri Satyendra Kumar

Shalwar CMO, ULB Sihora Member

Ms. Rashmi Tiwari CDO, PIU, Jabalpur

Updated Final IEE Package 5B

Appendix 23: GRC Established at Tendukheda Nagar Parishad


Summary Translation in English - Letter to GRC Established in Tendukheda Nagar

Parishad

(i) Letter No 493 dated 06.12.2017 Regarding formation of GRC in

Tendukheda






SMt Sunita Rishabh Singhai

Chairman, Nagar Parishad Tendukheda

Member

Shri ShyamSundar Jain Social Worker Member Shri Shashank Shende CMO, ULB

Tendukheda Member

Ms. Rashmi Tiwari CDO, PIU, Jabalpur Member


Appendix 24: Grievance Registration Form


Summary Translation in English – Grievance Registration Form

1. For Complainant

Date of Complain Registration

Place of Complain registration Name of the Project Town

Personal Details Name Sex (M/F) Age (in completed years) Home Address: Contact Number: E mail (if any): Complain/Grievance details

How do you want us to update you on the grievance registered with us: Phone / SMS/ Letter/ E-mail/Personal Interaction

2. For Office use Only

Registered by (Name of grievance registered officer) Mode of Communication – Personal visit/ Phone/ SMS/Letter/Email Reviewed by -Name and position of personnel reviewed grievance Action taken: If action not taken then forwarded to: Whether action taken disclosed-Yes/No Means of disclosure: Phone / SMS/ Letter/ Email /Personal interaction

SAUW IEE Review - Information Log Instructions: Provide information based on IEE submitted by Project Management Unit (PMU). This IEE log sheet will serve as record of the review findings, comments, and/or further actions required during implementation. A copy of the IEE log sheet should be (i) provided to PMU for their record and guidance on actions during implementation; (ii) attached in the cleared IEE to be disclosed; (iii) used as reference for review of updated/final IEE and (iv) inputted in the SARD Safeguards Compliance Tracking System. Project:

Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project

Loan No.:

42486-IND Package No.: MPUSIP – 5B

Components:

Bhedaghat, Katangi, Majholi, Panagar, Patan, Sihora, and Tendukheda (7 project towns), with a common bulk water system)

(i) Intake Well in River Narmada (10 m diameter and 14 m height) and raw water pumping station

(ii) Raw water main: 330 m (600 mm diameter) (iii) Water Treatment Plant (WTP): 31 MLD capacity (iv) Sump well at WTP: 850 KL capacity (v) Overhead tanks (OHTs):

− Bhedaghat -2 (200 KL and 225 KL)

− Katangi – 1 (120 KL)

− Panagar – 3 (200 KL, 700 KL and 600 KL)

− Sihora - 4 (920 KL, 1020 KL, 630 KL and 620 KL)

− Tendukheda - 2 (300 KL and 325 KL) (vi) Clear water main: 153,166 m (100 – 600 mm diameter) (vii) Distribution network:

− Bhedaghat – 24,144 m (110 mm diameter)

− Katangi – 30,548 m (110 – 250 mm diameter)

− Majholi – 31,378 m (110 – 250 mm diameter)

− Panagar – 42,573 m (110 – 250 mm diameter)

− Patan – 21,085 m (110 – 280 mm diameter)

− Sihora – 81,138 m (110 – 250 mm diameter)

− Tendukheda – 37,196 m (110 – 250 mm diameter) House connections with meters: 21,945 numbers.

Contract Type:

NCB – DBO Contract package

Date of IEE:

March 2019

Draft IEE? Updated/Revised IEE? Others No Yes -

Activity Status Detailed Comments and

Further Actions Required 1. Environmental

assessment has been satisfactorily conducted based on ADB REA Checklist and scoping checklist.1

Yes No MPUSIP Cat B project. IEE is required. Draft IEE was prepared during project preparation and approved by ADB. Draft IEE is now updated as per the detailed engineering design of the subproject and Final/Updated IEE is submitted for ADB approval.

√

2. Environmental assessment based on

Yes No IEE is based on detailed engineering design carried out by the Contractor (DBO Contract)

√

1 ADB Rapid Environmental Assessment Checklist for screening and categorization. Scoping Checklist (“No Mitigation Scenario” Checklist) for scope of IEE, identification of impacts and development of environmental management plan.

Activity Status Detailed Comments and Further Actions Required

latest project components and design

3. Statutory Requirements2

√ Forest Clearance Required for laying of three pipelines along existing roads, which are passing through forest areas. Although pipelines are proposed within the road right of way, Forest Department permissions is required. Application submitted to forest department, and Forest Department is in process to issue permission.

- No Objection Certificate Not applicable.

- Site Location Clearance Not applicable.

- Environmental Compliance Certificate

Not applicable, the components are not listed in the Schedule 1 of the EIA Notification Act and its rules and regulations.

√ Permit to Construct (or equivalent)

Consent to establish (CTE) for WTP from MPPCB.

Application submitted for CTE and is in process with MPPCB.

√ Permit to Operate (or equivalent)

Consent to operate (CTO) for WTP from MPPCB This is due prior to start of operation. Application will be submitted after completion of construction, and operation will be started only after obtaining CTO.

√ Permit for water abstraction and intake

Permission obtained from Water Resources Department (WRD) on October 23, 2017

-- Others – Tree Cutting Permit No tree cutting is required for the subproject

5. Policy, legal, and administrative framework

Adequate Not Adequate Law on EIA not applicable. Subproject/components are not listed in the Schedule 1 of the EIA Notification Act and its rules and regulations. Though equivalent environmental legislations (national and local) are adopted in this subproject, it is clearly mentioned in the Draft IEE, that the PMU and PIU should adopt stringent measures as specified in the World Bank Group’s Environment, Health and Safety Guidelines.

√ Included discussions and requirements of the:

√ National regulation/law on EIA √ Environmental agency - Relevant international

environmental agreements √ Environmental standards (IFC’s

EHS Guidelines)

6. Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures

assessed impacts and risks:

mitigation measures included:

All the impacts discussed in the draft IEE are relevant and still applicable. Although there are changes in location of some components during the detailed design, these changes are

Yes No n/a

2 If applicable, include date accomplished or obtained.


effected manly to avoid the potential impacts, therefore there are no new/additional impacts.

- Biodiversity conservation

√ Not applicable. Endangered species and habitats not present in subproject area.

√ Pollution prevention and abatement

√ WTP generates sludge from sedimentation, chemical flocculation, residuals of excess chemical dosage, plankton etc; and wastewater from rinsing and back washing of filter. Final/updated IEE shows inclusion of WTP design measures for proper management of sludge and wastewater (wastewater collection and recirculation, resulting in zero waste discharge, and settled sludge will be dewatered, dried, and disposed by land filling / reused in beneficial purposes). Final IEE also included various pollution prevention measures included in IEE for construction phase to control dust, noise, emissions from construction vehicles, silt-laden surface runoff during rains etc.,

√ Health and safety

√ The Final/updated IEE and SEMP includes information on implementation of health and safety by DBO contractor. SEMP includes EHS (environment-health- safety) implementation information. DBO Contractor has also appointed Site EHS supervisor. Detailed description of construction impacts and mitigation measures provided in the IEE /, EMP tables. Health and safety impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures included for operation stage.

√ Physical cultural resources

√ Applicable. There are protected monuments in Bedaghat and Panagar Towns. Permission obtained from ASI for construction of components in regulated area (permission issued by ASI on December 24, 2018 for Panagar, and February 18, 2019 for Bedaghat. Appropriate mitigation measures provided.

X Cumulative impacts

Not applicable. The subproject will not add any incremental impacts to the environment.


X Transboundary impacts

Not applicable. The subproject is small-scale, site-specific and short in duration to have potential transboundary impacts.

7. Impacts from Associated Facilities3

Addressed Not Addressed

Not applicable

Not applicable, there are no associated facilities under this subproject/package. √

8. Analysis of Alternatives Yes No Not required for Cat B and no need to include in IEE. √

9. EMP budget included Yes No EMP costing is provided in the updated IEE separating cost items for DBO Contractor and the costs to be borne by project.

√

10. EMP implementation integrated in FAM/PAM and bid documents

Yes No (i) MPUSIP Phase 1 Project Administration Manual (PAM) includes sections on environmental safeguards. Information in the PAM has been referred in the preparation of the final IEE.

(ii) MPUSIP Phase 1 EARF also provides detailed requirements on EMP implementation and necessary formats. These are included in the Draft IEE.

Contract document mentions that IEE and EMP forms part of the contract. IEE and EMP provided to contractor, and contractor duly updated the IEE as per the detailed design and submitted

√

11. Consultation and Participation

Yes No The PIU and DBO Contractor continued meaningful consultations and information disclosure during detailed design/construction. Consultation (town-level) meetings were conducted in all the seven subproject towns during the detailted design/implementation i.e. (i) Bhedaghat in April 2018 and December 2018 (ii)Katangi in May 2018 and December 2018 (iii) Majholi in July 2018 and December 2018 (iv) Panagar in May 2018 and December 2018 (v) Patan in July 2018 and December 2018 (vi) Sihora in May 2018, October 2018 and December 2018 and; (vii) Tendukheda in June 2018 and December 2018. In all 145 stakeholders participated

√

3 ADB SPS (Appendix 1 para 6) defines associated facilities as not funded as part of the project (funding may be provided separately by the borrower/client or by third parties), and whose viability and existence depend exclusively on the project and whose goods or services are essential for successful operation of the project.


in the consultations (male = 50, female = 95). Several other meetings also conducted at ward-level with communities, and at market with street vendors and hawkers.

• All stakeholders were very supportive of the project, and extended full cooperation

• Expressed concern regarding water logging, damage to utilities due to excavation, construction nuisance and disturbance to traffic and shops, and suggested to provide prior public notice about the works

Attention of stakeholders drawn to the EMP, and explained to them how the construction issues will be managed by implementing mitigation measures. All necessary measures as per EMP will be taken by contractor to avoid/minimize construction disturbances. Action Required: The PIU and DBO Contractor will continue meaningful consultations and information disclosure during construction and O&M stages. DBO Contractor will include records of consultations, issues/concerns, attendance sheets, and resolutions to the progress report to be submitted to PIU. This will be included by PMU in the environmental monitoring report to be submitted to ADB on a semi-annual basis.

12. Grievance Redress Mechanism

Yes No GRM established in MPUSIP 1. GRM established in each project town and at PIU level. Detailed information on GRM is included in the final/updated IEE.

√

Description of GRM: GRM description Included in IEE. This is as per the GRM approved by ADB

GRC members identified: Included in final/updated IEE.

GRM established and notified? Yes, and information included

in IEE; GRC formed in all 7 subproject towns


13. Disclosure Endorsement to disclose on ADB website

Draft IEE disclosed. Disclosure of Final/updated IEE will be requested when the final/updated IEE has been cleared by ADB.

Disclosed on project website Draft IEE disclosed. Disclosure of Final/updated IEE will be requested when the final/updated IEE has been cleared by ADB.

Relevant information available to stakeholders and affected people in language and form they understand.

This will be requested when the final/updated IEE has been cleared by ADB.

14. Mobilized PMU Environment Specialist

Yes No Mobilized √

15. Mobilized PIU Environment Specialist

Yes No An Assistant Project Manager (APM) in PIU is designated for coordinating on safeguards at PIU level

√

16. Mobilized PMC Environment Specialist at PMU level


17. Mobilized PMC Environment Engineer at PIU level


18. Confirm bid and contract documents and/or EMP include requirement for the contractor to appoint EHS supervisor and/or nodal person for environment safeguards

Yes No √ DBO contractor appointed EHS

Supervisor, additional safety stewards are notified in each town Details of EHS supervisor and safety stewards are included in the updated IEE / SEMP.

19. If contract awarded already, confirm contractor’s appointment of EHS supervisor and/or nodal person for environmental safeguards

Yes No √ EHS supervisor mobilized by the

Contractor

20. Awareness training on compliance to safeguard requirements

Yes No Conducted by PMU. Action required. Awareness programs and training to continue during the implementation phase. Participants should also include PIU, and PMC supervision staff, ULB staff, and GRC members. This will be included by PMU in the environmental monitoring report to be submitted to ADB on a semi-annual basis.

√

21. Monitoring and Reporting

Yes No Final IEE and SEMP includes detailed work-specific checklists to verify on-site compliance.

√


22. Others/Remarks Specific comments for further follow up: - Obtain CTE from MPPCB; WTP works should not be conducted until CTE is

obtained from MPPCB - Obtain permission from Forest Department for laying of three pipelines; works

should not be conducted until permission is obtained - This IEE needs further update if there are any further changes in location, design

of components during the execution - Cleared final/updated IEE to be disclosed on project website (PMU). - The relevant information in the final/updated IEE should also be disclosed to

stakeholders and affected people in a timely manner in language/form they understand.

- Continuous meaningful consultations including information dissemination on project-GRM should be conducted during construction and if required, until O&M.

Reporting of SEMP/s implementation and environmental safeguards should be: (i) DBO contractor to PIU to be done on the monthly basis; (ii) PIU to PMU to be done every three months; and (iii) PMU to ADB every six months

Prepared by: (name, designation and date)

Achyutha Rao Aleti, Safeguards Consultant, ADB June 25, 2019

Noted and Checked By: (name, designation and date)

Ninette Pajarillaga, ADB Environment Specialist 18 July 2019

Documents/References:

Final/updated IEE for Package 5B - Sent by PL Barange, Safeguards Officer, PMU to ADB (June 24, 2019)