infrastructure responses to sdps evaluation of priority areas

10
Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas (“Priority Areas” – Released for Development 2010-2015) July 2009

Upload: yvon

Post on 17-Jan-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas (“Priority Areas” – Released for Development 2010-2015) July 2009. Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas Spatial Development Plan. Tongaat Residential. Infrastructure Responses to SDPs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas

Infrastructure Responses to SDPs

Evaluation of Priority Areas(“Priority Areas” – Released for Development 2010-2015)

July 2009

Page 2: Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas

Infrastructure Responses to SDPsEvaluation of Priority Areas

Spatial Development Plan

Page 3: Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas

Mpumalanga

KwaXimba

BartlettsEstate

Cato Ridge /Harrison Flats

Hammarsdale

Shongweni

Bridge City

Canelands

Cornubia

DubeTrade Port

TongaatResidential

iQadi

Redcliffe

Molweni

FredvilleTongaat

Industrial

Zwelibomvu

Hillcrest

Craigieburn

Umgababa

Lovu

Inwabi

Folweni

Adam’s Mission

Amanzimtoti

Umlazi

Infrastructure Responses to SDPsEvaluation of Priority Areas

Priority Areas

Page 4: Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas

Infrastructure Responses to SDPsEvaluation of Priority Areas

North

Bridge City

TongaatResidential

Redcliffe

Cornubia

TongaatIndustrial

DubeTrade Port

Canelands

Green:Development can, in principle,

occur immediately,as there is capacity available

Orange:Development can takeplace following some

“simple” interventions

Red:Lack of infrastructure

will be a “showstopper”

Page 5: Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas

Infrastructure Responses to SDPsEvaluation of Priority Areas

North

Bridge City

TongaatResidential

Redcliffe

Cornubia

TongaatIndustrial

DubeTrade Port

Canelands

95 0

Tongaat ResidentialR123m

18 0

Sewer: Orange indicates“Simple” Interventionsrequired to release development.Total sewer infrastructurecost for full developmentfootprint = R95m

Water: Red indicates lack ofwater infrastructure will bea “Showstopper” to release ofdevelopmentTotal water infrastructurecost for full developmentfootprint = R18m

Roads: Green indicatesno additional bulk roadinfrastructure required to release development.Total additional bulk roadsinfrastructure cost for full development footprint = R0m

Electricity: Green indicates noadditional bulk electricityinfrastructure required to release development.Total additional bulk electricityinfrastructure cost for full development footprint = R0m

Red Outline indicates overallinfrastructure index of “Showstopper”.

R123m represents totalinfrastructure cost to service full development footprint

Page 6: Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas

Easy wins- infra capacity present for devt up to a cut-off after which high costs kick in

Rates Return/Infra Spend Social Rank Economic Rank Revenue Generating vs Non-revenue

generating land uses. Bringing in ratios.

Page 7: Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas

Infrastructure Responses to SDPsEvaluation of Priority Areas

North

Bridge City

TongaatResidential

Redcliffe

Cornubia

TongaatIndustrial

DubeTrade Port

Canelands

95 0

Tongaat ResidentialR123m

18 0

0 0

Tongaat IndustrialR0m

0 0

25 210

Dube Trade Port – Phase AR289m

32 22

428 405

Dube Trade Port – Phase BR863m

30 0

453 615

Dube Trade Port – All Phases

R1 152m

62 22

0 20

Canelands– Phase AR45m

25 0

4 10

Canelands– Phase BR14m

0 0

4 30

Canelands– All PhasesR59m

25 0

35 0

RedcliffeR73m

0 38

0 105

Cornubia– Phase AR209m

52 52

147 260

Cornubia– Phase BR459m

0 52

147 365

Cornubia– All PhasesR668m

52 104

0 0

Bridge CityR60m

0 60

Page 8: Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas

Infrastructure Responses to SDPsEvaluation of Priority Areas

Outer West

Zwelibomvu

BartlettsEstate

ShongweniHammarsdale

Mpumalanga Hillcrest

Molweni

iQadi

Fredville

KwaXimba

Cato Ridge /Harrison Flats

100 0

Cato Ridge – Phase A

R168m (w/o Eskom)

68 Eskom

10 700

Cato Ridge – Phase BR710m

0 0

50 5 000 (?)

Cato Ridge – Phase C

R5 090m (?)

40 0

80 0

Cato Ridge – Phase DR84m

4 0

240 5 700 (?)

Cato Ridge – All Phases

R6 052m (?) (w/o Eskom)

112 Eskom (?)

48 250

Bartletts EstateR328m (w/o

Eskom)

30 Eskom (?)

0 0

KwaXimbaR4m (w/o Eskom)

4 Eskom (?)

92 0

FredvilleR104m (w/o

Eskom)

12 Eskom (?)

147 10

HammarsdaleR187m (w/o

Eskom)

30 Eskom (?)

0 10

MpumalangaR10m (w/o

Eskom)

0 Eskom (?)

0 0

MolweniR42m

42 0

0 0

ZwelibomvuR75m

0 75

15 0

iQadiR15m

0 0

21 0

HillcrestR21m

0 0

104 250

Shongweni - Phase A

R354m (w/o Eskom)

0 Eskom(?)

21 0

Shongweni - Phase BR21m

0 0

125 250

Shongweni – All Phases

R375m (w/o Eskom)

0 Eskom (?)

Page 9: Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas

Infrastructure Responses to SDPsEvaluation of Priority Areas

South

Amanzimtoti

Inwabi

Craigieburn

Golokodo

Lovu

Umgababa

Umbumbulu

Umlazi

0 0

UmlaziR0m

0 60

23 0

InwabiR23m

0 0

23 0

GolokodoR61m

0 38

0 0

UmbumbuluR38m

0 38

0 0

AmanzimtotiR0m

0 0

43 0

LovuR55m

12 0

33 0

UmgababaR45m (w/o

Eskom)

12 Eskom (?)

105 0

Craigieburn – Phase A

R117m (w/o Eskom)

12 Eskom (?)

6 0

Craigieburn – Phase BR34m

28 0

24 0

Craigieburn – Phase CR24m

0 0

135 0

Craigieburn – All Phases

R175m (w/o Eskom)

40 Eskom (?)

Page 10: Infrastructure Responses to SDPs Evaluation of Priority Areas

Infrastructure Responses to SDPs

Evaluation of Priority Areas(“Priority Areas” – Released for Development 2010-2015)

July 2009