infrastructure investment in international comparison

21
Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Upload: carlos-lynch

Post on 28-Mar-2015

223 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Page 2: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

The standard story

• UK under-invests, though this occurs elsewhere too.

• “The CBI has found that 70% of senior business figures consider the UK’s infrastructure to be poor” (Policy Exchange 2009).

• Some truth that UK tends to low end of economic infrastructure investment.

• But more useful to look more closely, as the OECD data does, though this is still imperfect, both in terms of disaggregation and in length of time series. ITF recommends caution on international data.

Page 3: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Government total investment spending 1960-2006

Page 4: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Trends in overall public investment as % of GDP, 1970-2004

Page 5: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

ITF data for West European countries, in global comparison

Page 6: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

ITF Trends 1995-2008

Page 7: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Overall investment in economic and social infrastructure 1970-2006

Page 8: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

GFCF - Electricity, gas and water supply

Page 9: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

GFCF – Post and telecommunications

Page 10: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

GFCF – Transport and storage

Page 11: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

OECD 1970-2006, electricity, water and gas

Page 12: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

OECD 1970-2006 transport, storage and communications

Page 13: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Energy production investment 1990-2008 (Germany, UK, France, Netherlands, top to

bottom)

Page 14: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Air transport 1990-2008 ((UK, Germany, France, Netherlands top to bottom)

Page 15: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Transport and storage 1970-2008 (Germany, France, UK, Netherlands top to bottom)

Page 16: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Transport, storage and communications 1970-2008 (Germany, Spain, France, UK, Netherlands,

top to bottom)

Page 17: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Collection, purification and distribution of water 1990-2008 (France, Germany, UK, Netherlands

top to bottom)

Page 18: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Overall Australian GFCF data

• Generalised decline in most sectors (not post and telecoms) from mid 1980s.

• UK always low on these graphs, around 1% of GDP for energy and water, 1 to 1.5% for transport.

• Most European countries somewhat higher, especially France, in this data set running to 2003.

Page 19: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

OECD STAN data summary

• Germany is highest on energy, transport and water investment, normally by large amount.

• UK top on airports investment, others far behind.

• France and UK often around similar levels on energy, transport and water, though on balance France higher.

Page 20: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Overall picture

• Not a fully conclusive picture in comparing these European countries.

• GFCF data puts UK consistently low and often lowest since 1970.

• But neither OECD nor STAN data make this so striking. There aviation as UK growth sector, and not that much behind France on others.

• Germany always strong on STAN data – reunification as powerful element of this since 1990.

Page 21: Infrastructure investment in international comparison

Conclusions

• Many countries have invested more than UK in these decades, but always hard to say what “appropriate” level of infrastructure investment is.

• Australian analysts have tussled with this, but no “objective” answer reached.

• It depends on your goals...• So, in my view, we should be very careful with

CBI, ICE etc type judgements of “infrastructure gaps”. Statistics cannot prove this.