information sheetill~no~, file kl'hlber: 2005u1130 project rkview co31pleted: olfice yfielj approved...

45
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District APPLICANT: Whealon Bible Chruch PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Nonh of Roule 62 and West of Morton Road in Wayne Twp. DuPage County. Illinois FILE NUMBER: 200600269 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Ofice OField Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320.330) An approved I D is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331 2 ) Based on available information: There are ,ro waters on the project sitc. [XI There ore non-jurisdict~onal waters on the project sit?. There ore waters of the United States on the project slle. q Thereare both waters of the Unitcd States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States prcsenl on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use lo transpon interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to lhe ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters ofthe U.S.) (33 CFR 3283(a)(l)) q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (aj(2)j The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other waler o f the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (aj(5)j q The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for lhose wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(71) [XI The presence of an isolated waler (eg.. intrastate lakes. rivers, smearns (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway. Information Reviewed [XJ U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: WESTCH[CAGO. [XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atla: WEST(:HICAGO, HA 202. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for DuPage County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: WESTCHICAGO. 1993 q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Histonc Quadrangles: q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Histonc Quadrangles: [XI Aerial Pholographs (Name & Date):1999 & 2001 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: DUPAGE COUNTY.. q Site V~sit Conducted on: Other information: Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The wetland areas on rite were determined to be manmade ponds that do not appear to have a hydrological connection to a navigable waters of the US. Lateral Exlent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: clear, natural line imprerscd on the bank ndestruclion of terrestrial vegetation q the presence of litter and debris nshelving changes in the character of soil q other q wetland boundary Basis for Declining Jurisdiction: [XI n~hlc a1 it)lllir111 lh~ prc.(Cllii t,f ustcr, l~rtcd .!I 33 ('1.K 328 31311 1,. 328 3(~,(2,. ur 328 3!a,(.( lhr<ldgh 328 3tdlt71 W are^ uorlcr con\ilier~t~t,n IS Iihcl\ 11, nlrc hccn ~r1.J clio~trll under me-SW.\YC(' \11craton Bird RJIC crltcrtd -. Area under consideration is g$ likely have been jurisdictional unde; pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria q Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(aj(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale] Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries q Thib oftice concurs with your wetland delineation repon dated . prepared by This office does not confirm your wetland boundary. Recommended by: Date: /z-JC'-~~ Approved by: Dale: 'Wetlands are identifiedand delineated using the methods and criteria established in tlx Carps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) ( i e , a.cumncc of hydrophytic vcgewtian. hydric sails and wetland hydrology). Processes lor determining wetlands an agricultunl lands may vary fmm mcthodr described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (19871. Wetlands separated from other waters of the US. by man-made dikcs or barriers, natural river b m s . beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

Upload: others

Post on 10-Feb-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Whealon Bible Chruch PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Nonh of Roule 62 and West of Morton Road in Wayne Twp. DuPage County. Illinois

    FILE NUMBER: 200600269 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI O f i c e OFie ld

    Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320.330) An approved I D is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331 2 )

    Based on available information: There are ,ro waters on the project sitc.

    [XI There ore non-jurisdict~onal waters on the project sit?. There ore waters of the United States on the project slle.

    q Thereare both waters of the Unitcd States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States prcsenl on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use lo transpon interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to lhe ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 3283(a)(l)) q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (aj(2)j

    The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other waler o f the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (aj(5)j q The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

    except for lhose wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(71) [XI The presence of an isolated waler (eg.. intrastate lakes. rivers, smearns (including intermittent streams), mudflats,

    sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

    Information Reviewed [XJ U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: WESTCH[CAGO. [XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atla: WEST(:HICAGO, HA 202.

    USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for DuPage County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: WESTCHICAGO. 1993 q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Histonc Quadrangles: q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Histonc Quadrangles: [XI Aerial Pholographs (Name & Date):1999 & 2001 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: DUPAGE COUNTY.. q Site V~si t Conducted on:

    Other information:

    Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The wetland areas on rite were determined to be manmade ponds that do not appear to have a hydrological connection to a navigable waters of the U S .

    Lateral Exlent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by:

    clear, natural line imprerscd on the bank ndestruclion of terrestrial vegetation q the presence of litter and debris nshelving

    changes in the character of soil q other q wetland boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

    [XI n ~ h l c a1 it)lllir111 l h ~ prc.(Cllii t , f ustcr, l~rtcd .!I 33 ('1.K 328 31311 1 , . 328 3 ( ~ , ( 2 , . u r 328 3!a,(.( lhr

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS OF NO JURISDICTION FOR ISOLATED, NON-NAVIGABLE, INTRA-STATE WATERS RESULTING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN S O L D WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK

    COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FII.1; SLlhlBEK: 200600269

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Diedra Willis Dale: December 30,2005

    PROJECT REVIEW/DETERMINATION COMPLETED: In the oftice @IN3 Date: Deccrnber 30. 2005 At the project site (Y@ Date:

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: UIinois County: DuPage Center coordinates of site by latitude & longitudinal coordinates: 41-54-33.3543 & 88.7-25.1413 Approximate size of sitdproperty (including uplands B in acres): 46.7 acres Name ol waterway or watershed:

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    heckappropriate bores that hest describe tjpeaf isolated, "on-navigr

    Migratory Bid Rule Fsctars': If Known If Unknown Use Best Professional Judgment Predicted I Not E x w t d to 1 Not Able To Make

    I 1 ofcur 1 Determination Is or would bc used as habitat for birds protected by 1 u I u

    cross stare lines?

    Lnan-navigable, intra-slate aquatic resource area.

    TYPE OF DETERMINATION: Preliminary Or Approved [XI

    OPITIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUPPORTING NJD (e.g.. paragraph 1 -site eonditions: paragraphs 2-3 - - . - ~ - . rationale used lo determine NJD, including information reviewed to assess potential navigation or interstate commerce conneetions: and paragraph 4 -site information on waters of the U.S. occurring onsite):

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Chieago D~slriet

    APPLICANT: Ned Robertson PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Southeast of the Interseetion of Kahler Road und L)c.tcncr Kolad In l ' n .nu~~rp~~ra tcJ N i l l C,~unt!. I l l~no~ , FILE KL'hlBER: 2005U1130 PROJECT RKVIEW CO31PLETED: Olfice YFie l J

    Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

    Based on available information: [XI There are no waters on the oroject site.

    There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. There are waters of the United Stltes on the project site. There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use lo transpon

    $erstate b r foreign commerce, including all walers which are subject to the ebb and flow of thd tide (i.e.. navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) . . ..

    The p;e;ence of interstate waters (ineluding interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) The presence ofwetlands adjacen? ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 'CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g., inlrastatc lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats. sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadorus, playa lakes. or natural ponds). Other: Section I0 waterway.

    Information Reviewed (XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceNational Wetland Inrentory: SYMERTON. [XI U. S. Geolorical Survey Hvdroloaic Atlas: SYMERTON. 305. - - . . -

    I:SI>,i Ndturdl Kcsources Conscr\dt..,n Serbtcc S.8.I Sur\c! for WIII ('..unt! [XI 1' 5 Gsolo,!~c~l S u n o 7 5-hlinuts l o p o x r ~ p n ~ i hl.tpr Sl'hlERI OX. 1'191 - -

    U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15-Minute Historic Quadratlgles:

    IXI Aerials (Name & Date): Florence Township, 1997 Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: Site Visit Conducted 011: Other information:

    Rationale lor Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Thcre are no wetlands located on the subjeet property.

    Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indieated by:

    clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of lerrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris shelving changes in the character of soil other: wetland boundary

    Basis lor Declining Jurisdiction:

    (XI Unable to confirm the presence of waters listcd in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(1), 328.3(a)(2), or 3283(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdiclional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rulc eriteria

    (XI Area under considcration i s m likely have been juri

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps o f Engineers. Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Brandon Lemmons PROJECT LOCATIONTWATERWAY: Nonhu~est o f the lnterseelion o f Gorman Road and Harlem Avenue in Wil l County, Illinois F ILE NUMBER: 200501 160 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Oflice U F i e l d

    Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

    Based on available information: q There are no waters on the projeet site. q There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    There are waters ofthe United Stales on the project sile. [XI There are bolh waters o f the United States and non-jul.isdietional waters on the project site

    Basis o f Jurisdictional Determination:

    There are no jurisdictional waters o f the United States present on the project site. The presence ofwaters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use lo transport

    interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which arc subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(1))

    ihc prrsrncr. o i~n tc r> td~r udIr.rs(~ncluJ~ng .ntcrstalc uc~ lan j s ' j (33 CI-K J?8 3 (ajr?), W I he Drcscncc o i a t r .hut~n to -n lnlcrilalc ualcr or other ud:r olmc L'S 133 C'I:I< 328 3 1x11511 - . .. ..

    The presence o f wetlands adjacent' (bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US. except for those wetlands aujacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence o f an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs. prairie potholes, we1 meadows, playa lakes. or natural ponds). Other: Section I 0 waterway.

    Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: FRANKFORT. [XI U. S. Gcological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: FRANKI'ORT, 231. [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Wi l l County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Topographic Maps: FRANKFORT, 1990. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Historic Quadrangles: .

    U. S. Geological Survey 15-Minute Historic Quadrangles: [XI Aerials (Namc & Date):Grcen Garden, 1997

    Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: .. Site Visit Conducted on: Other information:

    Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The firmed wetland located on the subject property is isolated and therefore not jurisdictional. However, the subsurface tiled tributary located on the subject property drains into Forked Creek. Forked Creek flou~s into the Kankakee River, a navigable waters ol' the U.S.

    Lateral Extent ofJurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by:

    clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction o f tenestrial vegetation the presence o f liner and debris shelving changes in the character o f soil other: agricultural t i l e u~etland boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

    [XI Unable to confirm the presence o f waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(I), 3?8.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) [XI Area undcr consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule eriteria

    Area under consideration is oat likely havc been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 3283(a)(3) [attaeh copy o f HQ rationale]

    Confirmation ofwet land Boundaries [XI This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated July 26. 2005, prepared by LRMG

    This office does not confirm your wetland boundary c

    Recommended by: - 1 - Date: u! I OY

    Approved by: -5- Date: 3 / 2' r Fc 'Wetlandr are identilied and delineated using he methods and eritnta esta1,lished in he Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (i.e.. oceunence of hydromytic vegelatius hydric soils and wetland hydrology) Processes for determin~ng wetlandson agrieulhlral lands may vary hum methods described in the Carps Wetland Dclineal~on Manual (1987).

    Wetlands separated from other waters of rhe US, by man-made dikcs or Imrierr, narural river berms, beach dunes, and h e like are also adjacent.

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS O F N O JURISDICTION FOR ISOLATED. NON-NAVIGABLE, INTRA-STATE WATERS RESULTING F R O M U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION I N SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK

    COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago F ILE YIJMBER: 2ifilSul IOU

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Melyssa Navis Date: 20 Dee 05

    PROJECT REVIEW/DETERMINATlON COMPLETED: I n the oflice Y (YIN) Date: 20 Dec 05 A t the project site (YN) Date:

    PROJECT LOCATION 1NFORMI.TION: State: Illinois County: Will Center coordinates o l site by latitude & longitudinal coordinates: 41 24 53.37&8747 31.78 Approximate size o f sitelproperty (including uplands & in acres): Name of waterway or watershed:

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    I s or would be used as habitat by other migratory birds that cross slaw liner? I s or would be used as habitat for endan rred s ecier? IS used to irri ate cro s sold in interstate commerce? Cheek appropriate boxes that best describe potential for applicability =he Migratory Bird Rule la apply to onsite, "on-jurisdictional. isolated.

    1 nan-navipsble, intra-state aquatic resource area.

    Migratory Bird Rule Factors':

    I s or would be used as habitat lor birds prolrcted by

    TYPE O F DETERMINATION: Preliminary O r Approved

    OPITIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUPPORTING; NJD (ex., paraeraph I -site conditions; paraersohs 2-3 - - . . - . rationale used to determine NJD, including information reviewed to assess potential navigation or interstate commerce connections: and paragraph 4 -site information on waters ofthe U.S. occurring onsite):

    I f Known

    Yes

    I f Unknown Use Best Professional Judpneot

    No Predicted to Occur

    u 1 I l m Not Expected to

    Occur Not Able To Make

    Determination

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Lakes Region Sanitary District PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Northeast of Nippersink Road And Wilson Road In Unicorporated Lake County, lllinois(Section 25, T45N, R9E)

    FILE NUMBER: 200600120 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: rn Of ice BFie ld Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved J D is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

    Based on available information: There are no waters on the proiect site. 7h2rz are non-lurri~~ct!onai u>trri on ihs prqei l sate 7h2rzorz uJicrs tlfthc Ilnllcd hhtci on thu prolcct iltc . . There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project slte. The presenee of waters whieh are currently used, or were used in the pasr, or may be susceptible for use to transport

    interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters whieh are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I)) q The presence of inlerstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2))

    The presenee of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) The presence of wetlands adjaeen? ( bordering, conligucus, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, exeept for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

    q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermitlent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands. sloughs, prairie potholes. wet meadows, playa lakes, or natuml ponds). Other: Section 10 warenvay.

    Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: U. S. Geological S u r v q Hydrologic Atlas: . USDA Natural Resources Conservation Serviee Soil Survey for Lake County. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps:

    q I). S. Geological Survey 7.5 Mhute HistorieQuadr

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS O F NO JURISDICTION FOR ISOLATED. NON-NAVIGABLE, INTRA-STATE WATERS

    RESULTING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN SOLID WASTE AGENCY O F NORTHERN COOK COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY CORPS O F ENGINEERS

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FILE NUMBER:

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Paul Lemer Date: 12120105

    PROJECT REVlEWlDETERMlNATION COMPLETED: In the omce Y (Ym) Date: I2120105 At the project site ( Y W Date:

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Illinois County: Lake Center coordinates of site by latitude & longitudinal coordinates: 42 -21-6.4355 88 -8-22.7545 Approximate size ofsitelproperty (including uplands & in acres): Unkown Name o f w a t e m a y o r watershed: Fox

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    jurisdictional aquatic resource area.

    1 Miernlory Bird Rule Factors': ! LfKnown 1 IfUnknown I

    1 % 1 Use Best Professional Jud~rnent 1 1 Predicted 1 Not Expected to I Not Able To Make 1

    I Is or would be used as habitat for birds protected by

    Occur I Determination

    Migralory Bird Treaties? 1 1 1 1 - 1 Is or would be used as habitat by other migratory birds that 1 rn !a

    Ccrass s taa lines? 1 1 1 1 I Is or would be used as habitat lor mdsnpred species? 1 1 1 1 1 !a Is used to irrigate crops sold in interstate commerce? c

    I 'Chrrk appropriate bores that best describc potential far applicability of the Migratory Bird Rule to apply to onsite, non-jurisdictional, isolated, 1 Inon-nnvigable,intra-rtshatic resource area. 1

    TYPE O F DETERMINATION: Preliminary O r Approved [XI

    OPITIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUPPORTING NJD (ex.. paraerarh 1 -site conditions: ~ a r a e r a r h s 2-3 - - . . - . rationale used to determine NJD, including information reviewed to assess potential navigation or interstate commerce connections; and paragraph 4- site information on waters o f t h e U.S. occurring onsik):

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U S . Army Corps of Engineers. Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Pappas PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Greenwood, McHenry Co.

    FILE NUMBER: 200500837 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: Of icc m ~ i e l d

    Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD)(For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable aetion. (33 CFR 331.2). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

    Based on available information: There are no waters on the project site. There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. There are waters ofthe United Stales on the project slte.

    [XI There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters whieh are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be ruseeptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters whieh are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U S . ) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I)) The presenee of interstate waters (ineluding interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2))

    [SI The presenee o f a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) IXI The presenee of wetlands adjaeen? ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

    except for those wetlands adjacent toother wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) [XI The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats,

    sandflats. wetlands, sloughs. prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

    Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologie Atlas: HEBRCIN. HA 363. USDA National Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for McHenry County. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: HEBRON, 1963.

    [7 U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Mmute Historie Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

    IXI Aerial Photographs (Name & Date): 2001, 2004 IXI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: MCHENRY COUNTY..

    Site Visit Conducted on: [XI Other information: FEMA 1981 Firm Map, NRCS Swampbuster Map

    Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Wetland 1 and Wetland 2 are arsociated with the Nippersink Creek, whieh flows to the Fox River, a navigable waterway under Department of the Army jurisdiction. Wetland 3 and 4 are isolated and therefore not regulated by the Department of the Am:r..

    Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR3.28 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indieated by:

    clear, natural line impressed on the bank

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS O F NO JURISDICTION F O R ISOLATED, NON-NAVIGABLE, INTRASTATE WATERS

    RESULTING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN SOLID WASTE AGENCY O F NORTHERN COOK COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY CORPS O F ENGINEERS

    DISTRICT OFFIC'E: Chicago FILE 3CMBER: 200500837

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Kate Bliss Date: 12120105

    PROJECT REVIEWIDETERMINATION COMPLETED: In the office (Y/N) Date: At the project siteY (Y/N) Date: 7126105

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Illinois County: McHcnry Center coordinates of site by latitude & longitudinal coordinates: 42-23-34.6720, 88-24-38.6258 Approximate size of sitelproperty (including uplands & in acres): 159 Name of waterway o r watershed: Fox Rivcr

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    Migratory Bird Rule Factors': 1 If Known

    cross state lines? I I 1 I I Is or would be used ss habitat for endangered species? 1 1 i 1 1 €!4 IS used to irrigate crops sold in interstate commerce? 1 1 I rn 1 'Check appropriate bores that best describe potential far applicability of the Migratory Bird Rule to apply to onsite, non-jurisdiclional, isolated, nan-navigable, intra-state aquatic resource area.

    If Unltnown Use Best Professional Judgment

    1 Is or would be used as habitat for birds .)roweled by hligratory Bird Treaties? Is or would be used as habitat by other migratory birds that

    TYPE O F DETERMINATION: Preliminary O r Approved [ql

    Yes I NO I Predicted 1 Not Expected la 1 Not Able To Make

    OPlTlONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUPPORTING NJD (e.g., paragraph 1 -site conditions; paragraphs 2-3 - rationale used to determine NJD, includine information reviewed to assess ~ o t e n t i a l navieation or interstate commerce - connections; and paragraph 4 -site information on waters of the U.S. occurring onsite):

    to Occur Occur Drtcrmination

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U S . Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

    APPLICASI': Sherman Hsal~h S) .t:ln PKO.IECI' LOCl\TIONA\',\TEKWW\Y: Propen) Icbi,tcd n,mh ~d Blp Tltnher R o d , south o i 1-90 and edrt ut Randall R m d In E ~ ~ I I I . Kane ('uunt). Ill~n,,~r rSc:t~u~~ 32. T1?N R8F,

    FILE NUMBER: 200500904 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Office [XIField

    Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

    Based on available information: There are no waters on the project site. There ore non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. There are waters of the United States on the project site.

    [XI There ore both waters of the United States and non-jur~sdictional waters on the project site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transpon

    interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are suhject lo the ebb and tlow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters ofthe US. ) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

    The pre,:n

  • 'Wetlands separated irom other waters of the IJS. hy man-made dikes or bmiers. nalurai river berms. beach dunes, and the like are also adjacenl.

    INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS O F NO JURISDICTION FOR ISOLATED, NON-NAVIGABLE, INTRA-STATE WATERS RKSl'I TIS(; FROM l'.S. Sl'I'KF.>lI~~ COl'U'l' DECISIOS I S SOI.LD H'ASTK .\(;ESCY OF S O R ~ k I E K S COOK

    COl'N'l'Y V. l'.S. .\RhlY CON'S O F KN(;INEKK'i

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FILE NUMBER: 200500904

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Jaimee Hnmmit Date: 12/15/05

    PROJECT REVlEW/DETERMINATION COMPLETED: In the oklice (Ym) Date: 12/lS/05 At the project site (Ym) Date: 09/15/05

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Illinois County: Kane Center cwrdinales of site by lalilude & longiludinal coordinates: Lat: 42-4-22, Lon: 88-19-53 Approximate size of silelproperty (including uplands & in acres): 60 acres Name of waterway or walershed: Tylcr CreeWFox River

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    Migratory Bird Rule Factors':

    cross slate lines? I I I I I Is or would beused as habitat for endan~ered species? I [XI 1 Is used to irripate crops sold in interstate commerce? 1 1 1 'Check appropriate boxes that best describe potential for applicability of the Miplory Bird Rule lo apply lo amite, om-jurisdictional, isalated, oon-navigable, inlra-slate aquatic resource area.

    If Known If Unlolown

    Yes

    Is or would be used as habitat for birds protected by Migratory Bird Treaties?

    TYPE O F DETERMINATION: Preliminary O r Approved [XI

    OPlTlONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUPPORTING NJD (e.g., paragraph 1 -site conditions; paragraphs 2-3 - ralionale used Lo determine NJD, including information reviewed to assess potential navigalion or inlerslale commerce connection^: and paragraph 4 -site information on waters of the U.S. occurring on~ite):

    u Is or would be used as habitat by other migratory birds that

    - r-yrp

    to Occur Occur Determination

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Enginecrs. Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Opus North Corporation PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: 29.5 Acre Properly Northeast of the intersection of Algonquin and Limeman Roads in Mount Prospect, t3ook County. Illinois (Section 23, T41N. R11 E).

    FILE NUMBER: 200501 109 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: OWee [XIField

    Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulilled under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

    Based on available information: There are no waters on the project site. There ore non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. There are waters of the United States on the project site.

    [XI There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transpon

    interstate or forcign commerce, including all waters which are :;ubjeet to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.c., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

    The presencc of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(Z)) [XI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) [XI The presence of wetlands adjacent' (bordering, contiguous. or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

    except for those wetlands adjacent toother wetlands. (33 (:FR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers, sbeamr (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadouis, playa lakes. or natural ponds). Other: Section I0 waterway.

    Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inxntory: ARLINGTON HEIGHTS.

    U S. Gcoloeieal Survey Hydroloeie Atlas: ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, HA 67. - . . 11S1),\ N\'jtur~I Kcsuurccs ( ' ~ n r c r r ~ t i o n Sen ice S,III Sur\r) for ('ook (:aunt)

    [XI I . S. Cicolocicdl Sur\c, 7 5 hlulutc l o n ~ ~ r r d n h ~ c hldps. AKL.IVCiI'UV IIFI(iII1S. !YY3 [XI U. S. Geological ~urve; 7.5 Minute ~i;to;ic ~uadra,;gles: ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, 1927.

    U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historie Quadrangles: [XI Aerials (Name & Date):Cook County 1998 and 2003

    Advanced Identifieation Wetland Maps: [XI Site Visit Condueted on: 27 September 2005

    Other information:

    Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes ehecked above): Wetlands 2, 3, 4, and 5 drain to an unnamed tributary, then eventually to the Des Plaines River. a navigable water under jurisdiction of this office. Wetland I does not appear to cxhibit a hydrologic surface connection to navigable waters and is not under jurisdiction of this offiee. Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329):

    Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by: clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of liner and debris shelving changes in the character of soil other:

    [XI wetland boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

    [XI Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2), or 3283(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) [XI Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    Area under consideration is not likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    Headquartcrs declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [anach copy of HQ rationale]

    Confirmation o fwe t l and Boundaries [XI This o f i ce concurs with yo11 wetland delineation report dated 30 August 2005. prepared by V3 Companies of Illiniois, Ltd.

    This office does not confirm your wetland boundary.

    / Recommended by: Date:

    Approved by: Date:

    Hrl!andi arc uent~lir'd and Jcl~ncacJusnng d r metnru, w J ; r ~ t r r ~ a ~ s l a b l ~ \ h ~ J in thc C' rp, W C I I ~ Dc ."CBUU~ htan~dl 187 f l iwud I c . c:uncn;c. f n)dr.,@)tl; \cgcl l l~c~~i n\dr; ,.,!la and uzlllnJ h \ J ru lda~ Pr.,czsie, I.,r del~nn~nlng usrt~nJa.,n ~~ro.ullu~ll lanJ, ma) ban from methods described in Ule Carps Wetland DelineationManual (1987)

    Wetlands separated horn other waters of the U S , by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and Ule like are also adjacent.

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS O F NO JURISDICTION F O R ISOLATED, NON-NAVIGABLE. INTRA-STATE WATERS

    RESULTING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN SOLID WASTE AGENCY O F NORTHERN C O O K COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY CORPS O F ENGINEERS

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FILE NChlBER: 2111151,l I O Y

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Gagnon Dale: 13 December 2005

    PROJECT REVIEWIDETERMINATION COMPLETED: In theoftice (YIN) Date: At the project site Y (Ym) Date: 27 September 2005

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Illinois County: Cook Center coordinates ols i te by latitude & longitudinal coordinates: 42 -2-8.4850. 87 -56-56.3330 Approximate size of sitelproperty (including uplands & in acres): 29.5 Name of waterway o r watershed: Des Plaines

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    OPITIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUPPORTINC; NJD (e.g., paragraph I -site conditions; paragraphs 2-3 - rationale used to determine NJD, including information reviewed to assess potential navigation or interstate commerce connections; and paragraph 4- sile information on waters of the U.S. occurring onsite):

    Migratory Bird Rule Factors':

    Is or would be usrdns habitat for birds protected by Micralory Bird Treaties? Is or would be used as habitat by other migratory birds thnt crass slate lines? Is or would he used 8s habitat for endangered species? IS used to i r r icat~ crops sold in interstate commerce?

    If Kn

    Yes

    E4

    'Check appropriate boxes that best describe potential for applicability of the Migratory Bird Rule to apply to onsite, non-jurisdictional, isolated. non-navigable, intra-slate aquatic resource area.

    TYPE O F DETERMINATION: Preliminary O r Approved

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT IJS. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Field Developoment, LLC PROJECT LOC.\TIONIWATERWAY: South of Church Road and East of Route 1 in Beecher, Will County, Illinois FILE NUMBER: 200600018 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: q Office NField Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulatec. under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

    Based on available information: There are no waters on the project site. There ore non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. There ore waters ofthe United States on the project sile.

    IXI There ore both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    Basis ofJurisdictional Determination:

    There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or wcre ~ s e d in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

    interstate or foreign commerce, ineluding all waters which @re iubject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(1)) 17 The presence of interstate waters (ineluding interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [RI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or olher ,water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

    The presence of wetlands adjacen? (bordering, contiguo~~s. or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjaeent to other wetlands. (33 ICFK 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, ri.rers, streams (ineluding intermittent streams), mudflats. sandflats, wetlands. sloughs, prairie pothoies, wet meadovis, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

    Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Serviee National Wetland Inventory: TINLEY PARK.

    IXI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: TMLEY PARK, 152. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Will Count).. U. S. Geological Survey 77.-Minute Topographic MIPS: TlNLEY PARK. 1993. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5-Minute Historic Quadra~gles: U S. Geological Survey I j -M~nute Historic Quadra~~gles:

    IXI Aerials (Name & Date): Beecher, 1997 Advanced Identification Wetland Maps:

    [XI Site Visit Conducted on: October 11, 2005 Other information:

    Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Wetlends 1-7 are isolated and therefore notjurisdiclional. Trim Creek drains into the Kankakee River, a navigable waters of the U.!i.

    Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by:

    clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of liner and debris shelving changes in the character of soil olher: wetland boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

    Unable to confirm the prcscnce of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(I), 328.3(a)(2). or 3283(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7j fl Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under prc-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    Area under considcration is oat likely have been jurisdictional undcr pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    Headquarters declined to approvc jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

    Confirmation ofwet land Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation report clated , prcparcd by This office does not confirm your wetland boundary

    5 - Recommended by: Date: /3 & US- Approved by: - S - oate: / / f l 5 c r_r 'Wetlands are ident~fied and delineeled using the methods and criteria esrablished in the Corps Wetland Delineaoan Manual (87 Manual) ( i e , occurrence ofhydro~ytic vegetatioq hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for detem~ning wetlandsan agriculmral lands may vary from methods dereribed in Lhe Corps Wctland Delineation Manual (1987)

    'Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or b.rr!err. natural rivcr h c n s , beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS O F NO JURISDICTION FOR ISOLATED, NON-NAVIGABLE, INTRA-STATE WATERS

    RESULTING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN SOLID WASTE AGENCY O F NORTHERN COOK COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY CORPS O F ENGINEERS

    DISTRICT Ot FICE: Chicago FILE N L I B E R : 20l)hOl)OlR

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: MelyssaNavis Date: 13 Dec 2005

    PROJECT REVIEWIDETERMINATION COMPLETED: In the office (YIN) Date: At the project sile Y (YIN) Date: I I Oct ZOOS

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Illinois County: Will Center coordinates of site by latitude & longitudinal coordinates: 41 20'59.48" & 87 36' 10.16 Approximate size ofsitelproperty (including uplands Si in acres): Name ofwaterway o r watershed:

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    I I I tooccur 1 Occur 1 Determination Is or would be used as habitat for birds ~rotected bv I n 1 1 I 0 1 !z - - - Migratory Bird Treaties? 1 - Is or would be used as habitat by other migratory birds that I 1 1 l lXl

    If Unknown Use Best Professional Judgment

    Migratory Bird Rule ~ a c t o r d :

    ..""" ".".. ..... ". Is or would he used as habitn&lord~ngered species? 1 0 10 1 I q 1 lXl IS used to irrigate crops sold in interstate rommrrrr? 0 - 10 1 l iXl 'Chcrk appropriate boxes that best describe potential for ~pplirability of the Migratory Bird Rule to apply to onsite, "on-jurisdictional, isolated,

    Yes I No I Predicted 1 Not Expected to 1 Not AbleTo Make If Known

    TYPE O F DETERMINATION: Preliminary Or Approved

    OPITIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUPPORTINC: NJD (e.g., paragraph I -site conditions; paragraphs 2-3 - rationale used to determine NJD, including information reviewed to assess potential navieation or interstate commerce - - connections; and paragraph 4- site information on waters of the U.S. occurring onsite):

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chieago District

    APPLICANT: Andrew Corp PROJECT LOCATIONDVATERWAY: 100 Aere Properly at I0500 West 153rd Street in Orland Park, Cook County, Illinois (Section 17. T36N, RI2E).

    FILE NUMBER: 2OOSOl165 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: IXI OWce n ~ i e l d Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulateti under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

    Based on available information: [7 There ore no waters on the project site.

    There ore non-jurisdictional waters on the project site, There ore waters of the United Shtes on the project site.

    [yl There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the projeet site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

    interstate or foreign eommerce. including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the US. ) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

    The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) 1SI The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or otlier water of Ule US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

    The presenee ofwetlands adjaeent2 ( bordering, contiguois, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US. except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

    q The presence of an isolated water (e.g.. intrastate lakes. ribers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). Other:

    q Section I0 waterway. Information Reviewed

    IXI U. S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceNational Wetland Inventory: MOKENA. U. S. Geological Survcy Hydrologic Atlas: MOKEhA, 204. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey far Cook County. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute lopographic Maps: MOKENA, 1993. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

    q Aerials (Name & Date):Cook Counry 1998 Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: . Site Visit Conducted on: Other information:

    Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Wetlands A, B, C, and D drain to Spring Creek, which is tributary to the Des Plaines River, a navigable water underjurisdiction of this: office. Wetland E does not appear to exhibit a hydrologic surfaee conneetlon to navigable waters and is not under jurisdiction of this oflice.

    Lateral Extent ofJurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indieated by:

    clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation [7 the presencc of litter and debris 17 shelving

    changes in thc character of soil other: mwetland boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

    q Unable to confirm the presenee ofwaters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l), 328.3(a)(2). or328.3(a)(4) through 3283(a)(7) q Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    Area undcr consideration is likcly have been jurisdictional under prc-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    Headquarlcrs declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis o1328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

    Confirmation of\Vetland Boundaries This oftice concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by .

    IXI This oftice does not wntirm your wetland boundary.

    Recommended by: - 5- Approved by: Date:

    'Wetlands are identified and delineated using Vle methodnand critenaeslablished in h e Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) ( i t , occurrence of hydromytic vegetation hydric soils and wetland hydrology). Processes for delerm~ning wetlandson agr~culrural lands may vary from methods described in he Corps Wetland Dellnealion Manual (1987).

    * Wetlands separated rrom other waters o f the L I S by man-madr dlker or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes. and the like are also adjacenl.

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS O F NO JURISDICTION FOR ISOLATED, NON-NAVIGABLE. INTRA-STATE WATERS KESI 'LTI3G FROhl 1I.S. SIIPKGhlE COllKT DECISIOY IY SOLID \\ 4STE AGEYC\ O F NORTHEHh COOK

    COI 'YTI V. I'.S. ARhl\ CORPS O F EhGlhEGRS

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FILE NUMBER: 200501 165

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Cagnon Date: 23 December ZOO5

    PROJECT REVIEWIDETERMINATION COMPLETED: In the omce Y (YIN) Date: 23 December 2005 At the project site (YN) Date:

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: Stale: Illinois County: Cook Center coordinates of site by latitude & longitudinal coordinates: 41 -3646,6396; 87 -52-30.7737 Approximate size of sitelproperty (including uplands & in acres): 100 Name of waterway or watershed: Dcs Plaines River

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    Migralary Bird Rule Factors': IIKnm

    Yes

    Is or would be ured as habit81 far birds protected by Migratory Bird Treaties? Is or would be used as habitat by other migratory birds that crass state lines? Is or would be used as habitat for endangered species? IS used to i r r i ~ r o p s sold in intcntnte commerce? 'Check appropriate bores that besl describe pteulial lor applicability of the Migratory Bird Rule lo apply to onsile, nan-jurirdirtional, isolated. non-naviesble, intra-state aquatic resourrr area.

    TYPE O F DETERMINATION: Preliminary O r Approved (XI

    OPlTlONAL ADDITIONAL 1NFORMATION SUPPORTING NJD (e.g., paragraph 1 -site conditions; paragraphs 2-3 - rationale used to determine NJD, including information reviewed to assess potential navigation or interstate commerce connections; and paragraph 4 -site information on waters of the U.S. occurring onsite):

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engin,:ers, Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Kevin Charles Homes PROJECT LOCATIONM'ATERWAY: 5 Aere Property Located 114 Mile South Of IL Route 22 And East Of Prairie Road In Buffalo Grove, Lake County Illinois (NE 114 of Section 21, T43N. RI IE)

    FILE NUMBER: 200600144 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLE,TED: q Office m ~ i e l d Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

    Based on available informalion: q There are no waters on the project site. (XI There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    There are waters of the United States on the project rile. There are both waters of the United Stales and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    There are no jurisdictional waters of the United Stales present on the project site. The presenee of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past. or may be susceptible for use to transport

    interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters whieh are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., nav~gable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(1)) . . . .. ..

    I he presence ol'tntcrst~te udters (.ndlud~ng inler.t~te uct a d s ' , 133 Cl K 328 3 (a,(?)) n Inc orrsence o f a iributm I ~ I dm m l ~ r ~ t ~ t c s a e r or olhur ,.vdlcr nfthc I'S. 133 C'I.I< 328 3 1~1t51I - , ,, ,, q The presenee of wetlands adjacenr' ( bordering, contiguolls, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US.

    except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) q The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, riiers, streams (including intermittent streams), rnudflats,

    sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, we1 meadows. playa lakes, or natural ponds). q Other: q Section I0 waterway.

    Information Reviewed q U. S. Fish and Wildlife Serviee National Wetland In\,entory: q U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:

    USDA Natural Resources Conrer\~ation Service Soil Survey for Lake County. U. S. Geologieal Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: . U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historie Quadrangles: Aerials (Name & Date): Advanced identification Wetland Maps:

    [XI Site Visit Conducted on: Augun l I, 2005 Other information:

    Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Wetland A and the off-site wetland to the north, as identified in your delineation report, do not exhibit a hydrologic conneetion to a navigable water and are therefore considered isolated.

    I.ateral Exlenl of.lurisdiclion (33 CFR 328 and 329): UrJ.ndn l l ~ e h Waler h l ~ r l . ~nd .c~ ted h?

    clear, nat"ral Ytne impressed on the bank- ndestruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris nshelving changes in the eharaeter of soil other wetland boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

    a I nablc to conl.m the prcrende oiualcr i lliled in 31 CFK 328 3(31( 1 I. 338 3("1(?,. or 1?X 3(a,( I ) through 328 3r~,('1 ,\re3 under conr.Jcrx.on I S lil.c.l\ 10 h&c been 'ur isJ~a~ondl ~ n d e r nre.SM AUCC t l s r ~ t o n IIlrJ K ~ l e crllcrl3 - . Area under consideration is oat likely have been jurisdictional unde; pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis uf 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

    Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries I h ~ s o l f i x ddncurs ulth !our \re1 and Je n e ~ l ~ ~ n report d x e J . prcpdrtd b! I h ~ s ulfidc d ~ u , not ulnfirm !our uctlmd naunddr)

    Recommended by: v Date: - Approved by: -5 - Date: 1) / ~ 7 / / @ 6 H'ctlalJs ale Jr.nlllrJ and Jsl~ncdcJ uplg mc mclncdj and ;rllerta tilaol ihcd . rmc i'urpr H'eI.3d Ucl!nrdu.ln hl.mudl ,R7 hlanual I r. .

    ~.;uncrt;< ol n)Jr. @)I!; vegct>t~ n II)J.I. 3.1 13 md u:llanJ n)Jrolog, I'r. ;r.,,r.r 1.1, Jvl:rm.nlng xcllanjson agr1.u turd1 ImJi ma) v r , Ir ,rn rncthoJr Jrr.r~oeJ ~n the i'.,tpr H'cllanJ Oc:!nrai.on hlanurl , I Jb - ,

    Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S. by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent.

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS OF NO JURISDICTION FOR ISOLATED, NON-NAVIGABLE, INTRA-STATE WATERS

    RESULTING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY CORPS O F ENGINEERS

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FILE NUMBER:

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Paul Leffler Date:

    PROJECT REVlEWmETERMlNATlON COMPLETED: In the oflice (Y/N) Date: At the project site Y (YIN) Date: Augusl 11,2005

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Illinois County: Lake Center coordinates of site by latitude & longitudinal coordinates: 42 - 1 1-37.7129 87 -57-15.3870 Approximate sire of ritrlpropcrty (including uplands & in acres): 5 Name ofwaterway or watershed: Des Plaines

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    Migralary Bird Rule Factors1:

    Is or ~ o u l d bc used 8s habitat for birds protected by Migatory Bird Treaties? Is or vould be used as habitat by olher migratory birds that cross state lines? Is or would be used as hnbitsl far endanerred species? Is used toirrigatecrops raid in interstarc commerce? 'Check appropriate boxes that best describe patenlial for applicability nun-navizablr, i n t r a ~ q u a t i c resource area.

    TYPE OF DETERMINATION: Preliminary Or Approved

    OPITIONAL ADDITIONAL IYFORMATION SUPPORTIN(; NJD (e.g., paragraph 1 -site conditions; paragraphs 2-3 - rationale used to determine NJD, including information reviewed to assess potential navigation or interstate commerce connections; and paragraph 4 -site information on waters of the U.S. occurring onsite):

  • APPROVED JURlSDlCTlONAL DETERMlNATlON DECISION DOCUMENT US. A m y Corps o f Engin,:ers, Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Michael Noonan PROJECT LOCATIONIWATE,RWAY: 1.3 Acre Properly at 8800 131st Street in Palos Park. Cook County. illinois (Section 34, T37N. RI2E).

    F ILE NUMBER: 200600224 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: rn Oflice n ~ i e l d Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulate11 under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

    Based on available information: [XJ Ihrrr arc n., uater.; on the project i t c . n rrlurr ars n~,n-iur~sd.~~.ona WII:O on the n r o i ~ i l j.te . ,

    Thrre are waters of the United States on the pro,ect site. q There are bolh waters o f the United States and non-ju-isdictional walcrs on lhe project site

    Basis olJurisdictionsl Determination:

    [XI There arc no jurisdictional waters of the United Statcs prt:senl on the projeet site. q The presence o f waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreien commerce. includine all watcrs which are subiect to lhe ebb and flow o f the tide (i.e.. navieable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

    -

    n The oresence o f intcrstate waters (tncludine lnlerstate werlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (ai(2)) , . . , . .. a The bresenee o fa tributary to an iterstatewater or other water o f the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) q The presence o f wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US,

    except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) q The presence o f an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, ri.iers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats.

    sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). q Other: q Section I 0 waterway.

    Information Reviewed U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: PALOS PAR);.

    rn U S ( i u o l o g ~ ~ l l S J W ~ I!! Jrolog~u Atlas I'AlOS PARK 145 L'sL)A halura! Rcsuw;:s i'~,,l\unation Sun i:c Son

  • APPROVED JURISDlCTlONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps o l Engineers. Chicago District

    APPLICANT: LK, LLC PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Property located west of Route 31, south of Red Gate Road and north of Crane Road in Saint Charles. Kane County, Illinois (SW I14 of Section 15, T40N R8E)

    FILE NUMBER: 200501045 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Ofice [XIField

    Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320.330) An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

    Based on available information: [7 Thrrr ore !lo waters on the project site. [XI There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project sitt:.

    There ore waters of the United States on the project site. There are both waters of the United States and non-j~~risdictional waters on the project site.

    Rasis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project sire. The presence of waters which ore currently used, or werr used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport

    intersrate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and tlow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the US. ) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l)) [7 The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 378.3 (a)(?))

    The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5)) The presence of wetlands adjacent' ( hordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except lor those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

    [XI The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, rivers. streams (including intermittent streams]. mudflats, sandtlats. wetlands, sloughs. prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds).

    Other: Section 10 waterway.

    Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Sewtce National Wetland Inventory: GENEVA. [XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: GENEVA, HA 142. [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservalion Service Soi. Survey for Kane County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topoeraphic Maps: GENEVA, 1993. - . .

    I S ( i r o l t ~ g ~ c ~ l Surbc) 7 5 \Ilnute H~\lo , l i Q-dr:.np.r., - . [XI 1 5 ( i c o l o e i ~ l Sur\e, I5 \I~nutr. Hlslollc O u ~ J r ~ ~ ~ r l e \ C;EUEV.\. 1932 [XI Aerial ~hot&raphr ( ~ i m e & Date): ~ i g i ~ i r y ~ a l l 20b4

    Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: - [XI Site Visit Conducted on: October 6, 2005 by Iaimee W. Hammit of the USACE, Chicago Dlstncr [XI Other information: The Wetland Delineation Report. dated Apnl 1. 2005 (revised April 27. 2005), prepared by

    INDEVCON. Inc.

    Ralionale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): The on-site ditch tlows west and enters into the stormsewer system within the Red Gate subdivision. Htstorically, there was a tributary west ot'the propeny and it flowed south and eventually into the Fox River. Currently, this mbutary no longer exists on the surface and the on-site tributary cannor be traced on the surface to the Fox River either, Therefore. the on-site tributary is not under tlte jurisdiction of the U S . Army Corps of Engineers.

    Lateral Extent of Jurisdiclion (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Waler Mark indicated by: [7 clear, natural line impressed on the hank destrucuon of terrestrial vegetation

    the presence of litter and debris shelving [7 changes in the character of soils other: [7 wetland boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

    [XI 1 nahc to~~,nl::m tttc prr.\encc t ~ i uater, I~r tcJ .n 33 ('tH 3?r( ?!a) I r . 32X.31~. If, ur 328 3 1 ~ 4 , through 328 3 d,r7 W \re3 undrr cuwoeratlon I \ Ille.\ I,, Iid\e hrrn lurmv.lillond. ~ n d e r nre-SH'\N('C' \ I ~ ~ : a t o n Ulrd K ~ l c crl.erls - - ,

    Area under cons~derat~on 1s oat llkely have beenlun\dlcr~onal under pre-SWANCC Mtgratory Blrd Rule crtterta

    Headquarters decltned to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

    Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries Thls office concurs wlth your wetland del~neat~on report dated , prepared by Th15 otfice does not confirm your wetland boundary

    C -- Recommended by: ---- Date:

    I Approved by: - r - Date: /7 '7 / x'r$- 'Weflands are identified and dclinraled using the melhuls and eriteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) (LC.. wcurrencc of hydrophytic uegewlion, hydric soils and wetland hydrology) Proeerscs for determining wetlands on agricultural lands may vary from methwls described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

    Wetlands separated from other waters of (he I ! S by r n a n m d e dikes or barriers, nalural rover berms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjacent

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS OF NO IURlSDICTION FOR ISOLATED. NON-NAVIGABLE. Ih'TRA-STATE WATERS RE~ULTING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IY SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK

    COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FILE NUMBER: 200501045

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Jaimee Hammit Date: 12/20/05

    PROJECT REVIEW/DETERMINATION COMPLETED: In the office ( Y N Date: 12/20/05 At the project sile ( Y N Date: 10/06/05

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Illinois Counly: Kane Cenler coordinates of site by lalilude & Iongitndinal coordinates: Lut: 41-56-39, Lon: 88-19-10 Approximate size of sitdproperty (including uplands & in acres): 3 acres Name of waterway or watershed: Fox River

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    1 Type a l aquatic resource' I 0-1 ac 1 1-3 ae 1 3-5 ac i 5.10s~ 1 10-25 ac 1 25-50ac 1 > 50ac 1 Linear 1 Unknown I 1 Lake 10 U I l l I U I u 1 I u I I u

    River 0 10 10 I n 1 n I n I I n I 1 I n 1 I n 1 I n 1

    Mudnat

    Prairie pothole

    Natural pond

    dilch I 'check appropriate bores that best describe type of i~olated, non-navigable, intra-state water praent and best estimate for size of non- jurisdictional aquatic resource area.

    Migratory B i d Rule Factors':

    cross statc Lines? I I I I Is or would be used as habilat for endan~ered species? bused lo irrigate cmps sold in interstate commerce? 111 'Check appropriate boxes that best describe potential far applicability rlf thc Migratory Bird Rule to apply lo onsite, non-jurisdictional, isolated, non-navigable, inlra-stale aquatic resource area.

    Is or would be uscd as habitat for bids protected by Mi~ratory Bird Treaties? Is or would be used as habilat by other mi~ratory birds that

    TYPE OF DETERMINATION: Preliminary O r Approved [XI

    1f Known

    OPITIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUPPORTING NJD (e.g., paragraph I -site conditions; paragraphs 2-3 - rationale used to delermine NJD. inclndine information review~d to assess nolentiaI navieation or intenlale commerce

    If Unknown Use Best Professional Judgment

    u

    - . - - connections; and paragraph 4 -site informalion on waters of the U.S. occurring onsite):

    Yes I No 1 Predieted 1 No1 Expcfted to 1 Not Able To Make

    U -

    to Occur €4

    Occur Determination

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT US. Army Corps of Engineers. Chicago District

    APPLICANT: IAS & Associates, Inc. PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: 30-acre parcel located south of Pleasant Drive and west of Coombs Road in Rutland Township, Kane County, Illinois (SE 114 of Section 35, T42N R7E)

    FILE NUMBER: ?00501031 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Office [XIFidd

    Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

    Based on available information: There are no waters on the project site.

    [XI There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. There are waters of the Uniled States on the project site. There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    There are no jurisdict~onal waters of the United Slates przsent on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptihle for use to transport

    interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are suhject to the ehb and How of the tide ( i e . , navigable waters of the US.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

    The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) The bresence of a tributary to an tnlerstatewater or other water of the US (33 CFR 328 3 (a)(5))

    n The oresence of wetlands adlacent' i borderwe, contleuous. or nelrhbortnr) to interstate or other waters of the US - exceb~ for those wetlands a iacent to other wetlands. i33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

    [XI The presence of an isolated water (e.g., intrastale lakes. rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudtlats. sandllats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows. playa lakes, or natural ponds).

    Other: Section 10 waterway.

    Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: PINEGREEGROVE. [XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: PINGRIZE GROVE. HA 232. [XI USDA Natural Resources Conscrvalion Service Soil Survey for Kane County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: PINGREEGROVE. 1992.

    U. S. Ccological Survey 7.5 Minulc Hlstoric Quadrangles: U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

    [XI 4erl.d Pht,u,gr~phr U,~nc. & D ~ r e ,t,ur

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS OF NO .lURISDICTION FOR ISOLATED. NON-NAV1CABI.E. INTRA-STATE WATERS ~ ~~ ,- -~ ~~- ~ RESUI.TING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN SOLID WASTE AGEYCY OF NORTHERN COOK

    COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY COWS OF ENGINEERS

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FILE NUMBER: 20050103 1

    REGUI.ATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Jaimee Hammir Date: 12/20/05

    PROJECT REVIEWIDETERMINATION COMPLETED: In the office Y Date: 12/20/05 At the project site ( Y N Date: 09/27/05

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: Slate: Illinois County: Kane Center coordinates of site by latitude & Iongitudinal coordinates: Lal: 42-4-25. Lon: 88-22-42 Approximate size of sitelproperty (including uplands & in acrra): 30 acres Same of waterway ar watershed: Pingree CreeWFox River

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    -------- --- l i ~ ~ n o w n

    N O

    I r u ~ o w o Use Bet Professional Judgment

    Not Ahk To Make - Determination

    for birds prolected by I u I Mi-catics'! 1 1 I Is or would he used as habitat by other migratory birds that U crnu tOLe line

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT US. Army Corps of Engit~eers, Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Legat Architechts PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: McHenry County

    FILE W M B E R : 2006001.51 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Ofice OFie ld

    Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD)(For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2). An approved JD is an appealable aclion. 133 CFR 331.2)

    Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site. [XI There ore non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. q There are waters of the United Statcs on the project slte. q Tl~ere are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    q There are no jurisdictional waters ofthe United States present on the project sitc. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be suscepl~hle for use to transport

    interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow o l the ttde (ie. , navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 328.3(a)(I))

    q The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) q The presence of a trihurary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (aK.5)) q The presence o l wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguous, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US.

    except for those wellands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) [XI The presence oran isolated water (e.g., intrastate lakes, r:vers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudtlats.

    sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes. or natural ponds). q Other: 13 Section 10 waterway.

    Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory WOODSTOCK. W I S I S u c I l o l o g A W O O D S I ~ C K , I I A 256 W IJSDA \ 3 : 1 8 ) r 1 ~ l Kc\,~urics Car~~cr t . i l . \~n Sert~:c S#,I S ~ r r c , lor \liIIcnr\ C\~urll> - [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: WOOD STOCK,.^^^^. .

    U. S. Geologtcal Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: [XI U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadrangles: MCHENRY, 1944. [XI Aerial Photographs (Name & Date):1939,2001,2002,2004 [XI Advanced ldenlificatton Wetland M a ~ s : MCHENRY COUNTY..

    Site Visit Conducted on: [XI Other information: FEMA FIRM map[

    Halionalc for baris tappl~r.$ to any h~~re. ; checked ahme): Two isol*teJ uctlmd\ C . ~ I > I i,n the projea S I ~ C S ~ t c I ~ n d S ~ t c ? A > reicrcn~~crl In t t~c Wct..~nrl Dcllr1e311~)rl Rcl)ort d ttcd U t o n c ~ 20 21105 1s prepared h) \ldnnarrl C~~rl~ulur lg . I r l ~

    I.aleral Fxlml 111 Juri~diction 133 CFH 328 and 3291: Ord,uarr Illen W llci \!dl& .nrll.'d cd h, . - q clear, natural line impressed on the bank q destruction or terrestrial vegetation q the prcscnce of litter and debris q shelving q changes in the character o l soil q other: [XI wetland boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

    [XI Orlahlc 11, ,~ ,n i l rn~ the p r c x n ~ c ~ ~ i u ~ t : r , It\l~.rl in 33 C t R 328 )\a,! 1 . 328 3t t,r?.. or ??a 3 4 14 th lo~gh 328 3 31\70 W Arc& ulidcr

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS OF NO JURISDICTION FOR ISOLATED, NON-NAVIGABLE, INTRA-STATE WATERS RESULTING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK

    COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY COIU'S OF ENGINEERS

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FILE NUMBER: 20060015 1

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Kate Bliss Date: 121 14/2005

    PROJECT REVIEWlDETERMINATION COMPLETED: In the OIT~CP Y (YN) Date: 12/14/2005 At l l~e projeel site (YN) Date:

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Illinois County: McHenry Center coordinata of site hy latitude & longitudinal courdinates: 42-21-4.2198.88-25-298066 Approximate size of sitdpropcrty (including upIands &in acres): 120 Name of waterway or watershed: Fox

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    TYPE OF DETERMINATION: Preliminary Or Approved [X1

    OPITIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUPPORTING NJD (c.e., paragraph I -site conditions; paragraphs 2-3 - - . - . . - . rationale used to determine NJD, including information reviewed to asses potential navigation or interstate commercc connections; and paragraph 4 -site information on waters of the U.S. occurring onsite):

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U S . Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Lutheran Church Missouri Synod PROJECT LOCATION/WATERWAY: North of Hafenrichter Rosd ~ n d uc\t ~ ~ i s o r m n n t o u n Road ~n :\urora. WIII ( ' o ~ n t ) , Illnri )tr FI1.E NC\lBER: 2W60UOfA PROJECT RE\'lt:\l'CO\lPI.I.:I El): [XI Office UFie ld

    Approved Jurisdictionat Determination (JD) (For Sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-3301. An approved I D is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

    Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site. [XI There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project sit

  • INFORMATION SHEET DETERMINATIONS O F NO JURISDICTION FOR ISOLATED, NON-NAVIGABLE. INTRA-STATE WATERS

    RESULTING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN SOLID WASTE AGENCY O F NORTHERN COOK COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY CORPS O F ENGINEERS

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FILE NUMBER: 200600064

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Melyssa Navis Date: 14 Dec 2005

    PROJECT REVIEWlDETERMINATION COMPLETED: In the office Y (Y/N) Date: I4 Dec 2005 At the project site (YIN) Date:

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Illinois County: Will Center coordinates of site by latitude & longitudinal coordinates: 41 43' 0.44 Xr 088 14' 32. 77 Approximate size of sitelproperty (including uplands & in acres): Name of waterway o r watershed: Des Plaines

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    I I I I I I I I 1 I '

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U S . Army Corps of Engirteers. Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Aldi. Inc. PROJECT LOCATIONIWATERWAY: Approximately 60-acre property located south of Fabyan Parkway and east of Kirk Road in Batavia, Kane County. Illinois (Section 13, T39N RSE)

    FILE NUMBER: 200500988 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: [XI Office n ~ i e l d

    Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 33 1.2)

    Based on available information: q There are no waters on the project site. [XI There are non-jurisdiclional waters on the project sit?. q There are waters of the United States on the project slte.

    There are both waters of thc United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The prcsence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past. or may be susceptible for use to transport

    interstate or foreign commerce. including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.c .navigable waters of the U.S.) (33 CFR 3283(a)(l))

    The presence of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) The presence of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. 133 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

    q The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contiguc~us. or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US. except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

    [XI The presence of an isolated water ( e g , intrastate lakes, rtvcrs. streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats. sandflats, wetlands. sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows. playa lakes, or natural ponds).

    Other: Section I0 waterway

    Information Reviewed [XI U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory: AURORA NORTH. [XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: AURORA NORTH. HA 70. [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Kme County. [XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: AURORA NORTH, 1993

    U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles: - U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadra~gles:

    [XI Aerial Photographs (Name & Date): no source or kite W Advanced Identification Wetland Maos: KANECOUNTY

    Site Visit Condueted on: [XI Other information: Wetland Delineation Report, prepared by Applied Ecological Services (AES), daled July 25.

    2005

    Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Wetlands 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 and 5 do not have a surface water tributary system connection and are isolated. Therefore. the wetlands delineated on-sire are not under the iurisdiction of the U.S. Army corps of Engineers. A quick tield check revealed any apparent surface connection would currently be piped under the induskd wark to the south and east. I snoke with reoresentativcs of the Citv oPBatavia to see if I could eet a man of the stormsewer system, but they said the industrial development was conslructed before any local stormwater ordinance was in place. Therefore there is no map showing how the water tlows ( i f it does at all) rhrough pipes to the tributary located south of the property.

    Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 32.8 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by:

    clear, natural line impressed on the bank destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris shelving changes in the character of soils other: wetland boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

    [XI Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(l). 328.3(a)(2). or 328.3(a)(4) lhrough 3283(a)(7) [XI arc^ Lnucr ~ ~ , n \ . d < r d ~ ~ , n I, IILcI! to !I;\: hwn ,url~u..l~ondl dndcr prc-S\\'A\CC hllgraor) B~rd Ku.e :rllcrld p Arc4 ~ n d c r .~,ns~dcr.t t~c~n I , l ~ ~ r . l ! h ~ \ c hccn ,urlrrll:l~~,nsl undcr prc-S\\'A\CC hllprawr! Blrd Kulc -rl:crl.!

    Headquarters deelined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale]

    C o d ~ r m a t i o n of Wetland Boundaries T h ~ s office coneurs wtth your wetland dellneatton report (lafed , prepared by

    q T h ~ s office does not contirm your wetland boundary

  • ' Wellandr sepanlcd from other wafers of l h ~ . U S . by man-made dikes or banien, natural river berms. beach dunes, and the like are also adiacent.

    INFORMATION SHEET I)ETEILMINATIONS OF NO .IURISDlCTION FOR ISOLATED. NON-NAVIGABLE. INTRA-STATE WATERS - - -- ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~-~ - - - RESULTING FROM U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION IN SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK

    COUNTY V. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGlNJ3ERS

    DISTRICT OFFICE: Chicago FILE NUMBER: 200500988

    REGULATORY PROJECT MANAGER: Jaimee Hammil Date: 12/13/05

    PROJECT REVIEW/DETERMINATION COMPLETED: In the ollice ( Y N Dale: 12/13/05 At the project site (YN) Date:

    PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION: State: Illinois County: Kane Center coordinates of site by latitude & longitudinal coordinates: Lat: 41-52-6, Lon: 88-16-25 Approximate size of sitdproperty (including uplands & in acres): 60 acres Name of waterway or watershed: Fox River

    SITE CONDITIONS:

    type of isolaled, man-navig;able, intrastate water present and besl atimale For size jurisdictional aquatic resource area.

    Migratory Bird Rule Farton : Use Rest Professional Jud men1

    Determination Is or would be used as hsbilat for birds proteeled by

    , - CIII\ slate line,'! - -- -- Ls or ~ a u l d he wed as khabital f-ered spwirr'!

    I 7 - 1 , p u\cd to i--o~ inter\va~e rnmm~'rcc~! -I1XI1OJTCI- Check anon,~nale k,xcs that h n t ~I .FcT~Iw onlcnlial For aoolirnbililr (Kllc UieraIur$ Bird Wulr lo a o ~ l r 18, onsitc. non.iurkdittinoa1. isolatkd. .. . . . . .. . ~ . - I "an-navizahlr, intra-state aquatic resource area.

    TYPE O F DETERMINATION: Preliminary Or Approved

    OPITIONAL ADDITIONAL INE'ORMATION SUPPORTING NJD (e.g., paragraph 1 -site conditions; paragraphs 2-3 - ralionaIe used to determine NJD. includine information renewed to assess ootential navieation or interstate commerce conneclions; and paragraph 4 -site information on waters of the U.S. occurring onsite):

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT US. Army Corps of Engireers, Chicago District

    Al'Pl.1C1\S'r: Rohsrl . \ r th~r LrtJ ('ompm! 1'ROJEC'f I.OC.\'rIOSn\'ATEH\V,\Y: 55-s.re p.u.c. lu,vcd ndnh ,ti Plank R d u . sdst d i rouls 47 and r%~ulh l n t c r ~ l ~ t c ?(I n c u LII) Lake. K.nc C , I I I ~ ~ ) . Il,.n,~l> ISE 114 ot walon 5 . T J I S R7E,

    FILE NUMBER: 200.501001 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: IXI Office n ~ i e l d Approved Jurisdictional Determinalion (JD) (For sites regulate~i under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved ID is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

    Based on available information: [XI There are no waters on lhe projecl sile. q There ore non-jurisdiclional waters on the project site. q There ore waters of the United States on the project site. q There ore both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    q There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States pn:sent on the project site. q The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport inlerstate or foreign commerce. including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable waters of the US.) (33 CFR 3283(a)(l))

    The presenee of interstate waters (including interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) 17 The presenee of a tributary to an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(S))

    The presence of wetlands adjacent2 ( bordering, contigucus, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, except for those wetlands adjacent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7)) The presence of an isolated water ieg. . intrastate lakes. rlvers, streams (ineluding intermittent streams), mudflats.

    sandflals, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes. wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds). q Other: q Section I0 waterway.

    Information Reviewed IXI U. S. Fish and Wildlile Service National Wetland Inventory: PINEGREE GROVE. IXI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: PINGREEGROVE, HA 232. [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Kane County.

    U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Mdps: PINGREEGROVE. 1992. U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

    q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Mtnute Historic Quadrangles: [XI Aerial Photographs (Namc & Dnte):DigiAir 1999 & 2001. AirPhoto USA 2002 & 2004 [XI Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: KANECOUNTY

    Site Visit Conducted on: [XI Other inlormation: FEMA FIRM, V3 Companies W~:tland Delinealion Report, dated August 2,2005

    Rationale for Basis ( app l i s lo any boxes checked above): There are no u,aters of the United States including wetlands on the subject property.

    Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary Hieh Warer Mark indicated by: . -

    clear, natural line impressed on the bank q desttuction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and debris shelving changes in the character of soils other: wetland boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

    q Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3(a)(1), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 3283(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule cnteria Area under consideration is @ likely have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basis of 3283(a)(3) [attach copy of H Q rationale]

    Confirmation of Wetland Boundaries This office concurs with your wetland delineation replrt dated prepared by . , This office does not confirm your wetland boundary.

    / '7- .> .-- Recommended hy: Date: / 1 1 ' '

    -1 - I Approved by: Date: / 2 *'( 3 .- -J- 'Wetlands are identilied and delineated using the methals and criteria established in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (87 Manual) ( i e . occurrence of hydmphytic vegctalian, hydnc soils and wetland hydralagyl Prwerses for delemining wetlands on ag"cu1tural lands may vary fnlm methods described in the Corps Wetland Delineation Manual (1987).

    Wetlands separated from other waters of the US. by man-made d~ker or b.~rrien, natural "ver berms, beach dunes, and the likc are also adjacenr.

  • ~ - .~~ ~ ~.

    APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago O~strlcr

    APPLICANT: Howard Ludwig PROJECT LOCATION/WATEltWAY: 121 Acre Properly Northeast of Silver Fox Drive and 131st Street in Lemont, Cook County, lllino~s (Section 35. T37N. Rl IE).

    FILE .WMBER: 200501022 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLIITED: Office [XIField

    Approved Jurisdictional Determinalion (JD) (For Sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-3301. An approved I D is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

    Based on available iolbrmation: Therr are no walers on the project site. Therr are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site.

    q There are waters of the United States on the project site [XI There are hath watcrs of h e United States and non-juri!d~ctional walers on the project site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determinalion:

    There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States prest:nt on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were uied in the past, or may he susceptible for use to transport

    interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are stlbject to the chb and flow of the tide (i.e., navigable watcrs of the US.) I33 CFR 328.3(a)(l))

    7he presence of interstate waters (~ncluding interstate wetl;mdsl). (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(2)) [XI The presence o f a tribulary lo an Interstate water or other aater ofthe US. (33 CFR 328.3 (aj(5))

    The presence of wetlands adjacent2 (bordering, contiguou:;, or neighboring) to interstate or olher waters of the US. exccpt for thasc wetlands adjacent to other wetlands (13 CFR 3283 (a)l7))

    The presence of an isolated water (e.g.. intrastate lakes, rlvers. streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs. prairie potholes, wet meadow;, playa lakes. or natural ponds). Other: Section 10 waterway.

    Idormalion Reviewed [XI U. S. Flsh and Wildlife Service National Wetland 1nvr:ntory: SAG BRIDGE. (XI U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atla: SAG BRIDGE, 149. [XI USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Cook County.

    U. S. Geolog~cal Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Malls: SAG BRIDGE, 1993. q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrangles:

    U. S. Geologicd Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadran::les: [XI Aerials (Name & Date).Cook County 1998 and 2003

    Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: [XI Slle Vlsit Conducted on: 5 Oclobcr 2005 q Other informanon:

    Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked ahnve): Small ntermittenl stream on the property is apparent on the 1993 topo quad, aerial photos, and the hydrologic atlas. In the field the drainage exhibited defined bed and bank and continued offsite into the neighborhood to the south. From there it flows into Long Run Creek, then eventually into the Den Plaines River, a navigable water undcr jurisdiction of this office. Other wetlands and channels ldentified on the property did not appear to exhibit hydrologic surface connections to navigable waters.

    Lateral Exlent of Jurisdiction (33 CFR 328 and 329): Ordinary High Water Mark indicated by:

    q clear. natural line impressed on the hank destruction of terrestrial vegetation the presence of litter and dehns shelving

    q changes in the character of soil other: nwctland boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdicllon:

    [XI Unable to confirm the presence of waters listed in 33 CFR 328.3la)(l). 328.3(a)(2j, or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) [XI Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdict~onal under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria q Area under consideration is not likely have been luri:dictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    q Hedqumers declined to approve jurisdiction on h e basis of328.3(a1(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale] Confirmalion of Wetland Boundaries

    q This office concurs with your wetland delineation report dated , prepared by (XI 7his office does not confirm your wetland boundary.

    Recommended by:. Date:

    Approved by: Date:

    'Wetlands are iden~ified and delinealed using the methods wd cnlena erlahlished in ihe Carps Wetland Dclinealion Manual (87 Manual) ( i e . uceurrcnce of hydraphytic vegetation, hydrtc soils and wetland hydrulogy) Rocesser for delcrmining wetlands on agicullur81 lands may vary from methali described in the Corps Wetland Dclincalian Manual (19x7).

    ' Wetlands separated from other waters of the U.S by man-made dikes or lrmien, natural river bcrms, beach dunes, and the like are also adjaeent.

  • INFORMATION SHEET I)k~I'k:R\llS.\'I'IOSS OF S O J1'RISI)ICI'IOS FOR ISOl..

  • APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION DECISION DOCUMENT U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District

    APPLICANT: Primestor 119, LLC PROJECT LOCATIONNATERWAY: 38 Acre Property Northwest of Marshfield Avenue and 119th Street in Chieago, Cook County, Illinois(Seetioi 19, T37N, R14E).

    FILE NUMBER: 200501 171 PROJECT REVIEW COMPLETED: Office HFie ld

    Approved Jurisdictional Determination (JD) (For Sites regulated under 33 CFR 320-330). An approved JD is an appealable action. (33 CFR 331.2)

    Based on available information: There are no waters on the projeet site.

    (XI There are non-jurisdictional waters on the project site. q There are waters of the United States on the project slte. q There are both waters of the United States and non-jurisdictional waters on the projeet site.

    Basis of Jurisdictional Determination:

    (XI There are no jurisdictional waters of the United States present on the project site. The presence of waters which are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be suseeptible for use to transport

    interstate or foreien commerce. ineludine all waters which are subiect to the ebb and flow of the tide (i.e.. navigable waters - , . . of the U.S.) (33 ~ F R 3283(a)(I)) n The Dresence of interstate waters (includine interstate wetlands'). (33 CFR 328.3 la)(21) - - , , , ,, ,. q The presence of a tributary ro an interstate water or other water of the US. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(5))

    The presenee of wetlands adjaeent2 ( bordering, eontigucus, or neighboring) to interstate or other waters of the US, exeept for those wetlands adjaeent to other wetlands. (33 CFR 328.3 (a)(7))

    q The presenee of an isolated water (e.g., intraaate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meddows, playa lakes, or natural ponds).

    q Other: q Section 10 waterway.

    Information Reviewed q U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory:

    U. S. Geological Survey Hydrologie Atlas: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey for Cook County.

    (XI U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Topographic Maps: BLUE ISLAND, 1993 q U. S. Geological Survey 7.5 Minute Historic Quadrhngles: q U. S. Geological Survey 15 Minute Historic Quadraigles: H Aerials (Name & Date):Cook County 1998

    Advanced Identification Wetland Maps: . q Sire Visit Conducted on:

    Other information:

    Rationale for Basis (applies to any boxes checked above): Wetlrmd I, as identified in the wetland field reconnaissance, does not appear to exhibit a hydrologic surfaee conneetion to navigable waters and is not under jurisdiction of this office.

    Lateral Extent of Jurisdiction (33 C F R 328 and 329): Ordinary High Watcr Mark indicated by:

    q clear, natural line impressed on the bank q destruction of terrestrial vegetation q the presenee of litter and debris q shelving q changes in the character of soil other: nwet land boundary

    Basis for Declining Jurisdiction:

    (XI Unable to confirm the presenee of waters listed in 33 CFR. 328.3(a)(I), 328.3(a)(2), or 328.3(a)(4) through 328.3(a)(7) Area under consideration is likely to have been jurisdictional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    q Area under consideration i s m likely have been juri~dietional under pre-SWANCC Migratory Bird Rule criteria

    q Headquarters declined to approve jurisdiction on the basir of 328.3(a)(3) [attach copy of HQ rationale] Confirmation o fwe t l and Boundaries

    This office coneurs with your wetland delineation report dated ,prepared by This office does not mnfirm your wetland boundary.

    Recommended by:

    Approved by:

    'Wetlands are identified and delineined using the methods and criteria