infographic: the bottleneck in patient recruitment

1
Priorities Viewpoints Implications Clinical trials involve five main groups, each with different views and motivations. Here’s what they’re saying about clinical trials: Patients Sponsors Investigators Site Coordinators FDA Faster patient recruitment leads to fewer delays in clinical trials, which means getting drugs on the shelf quicker. So why do only 2% of sponsors rank patient recruitment strategy as the most important when selecting a service provider? 47% of clinical development decision-makers would prefer a 30% lower clinical trial cost than 10% faster patient recruitment Cost of an average Phase II Study. Length of an average Phase II Study. The growth rate of compounds in development far exceeds population growth and the number of investigators remains mostly flat. Because of this, patient recruitment for clinical trials functions as a bottleneck in the process. The industry has to increase its focus on Patient Recruitment. 30% savings of an average Phase II Study. $1,111/day Revenue generated per day by The 100th best selling drug in 3Q2012 (Stelara) $1,885,000/day $1.5-$2M 18-24 months What would 30% lower costs mean? What would 10% faster patient recruitment mean? vs. 69% 233% 70% 76% said they have not participated in clinical trials because they were not made aware of any trials. said the hardest part of patient recruitment is finding the right investigators. said they are involved in the right amount, or too many clinical trials. said that inclusion/exclusion criteria have the single biggest impact on patient recruitment success. increase in patients required per NDA from 1500 in the 1970s to more than 5000 today. of sites in a given trial fail to enroll a single patient of sites in a given trial under-enroll of sites in a given trial meet their enrollment targets of sites in a given trial exceed their targets 11% 37% 39% 13% The patient recruitment methods with the highest value, tend to be the more traditional methods: Dr. Referral Poster in Doctor’s Office Local Newspaper Mail from Doctor Custom Website Affinity Groups Radio sources: clinicaltrials.gov, Tufts, ISR Reports Data Copyright 2013 Industry Standard Research | ISRreports.com | [email protected] 28% Patient Recruitment in

Upload: industry-standard-research

Post on 22-Nov-2014

839 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The growth rate of compounds in development far exceeds population growth and the number of investigators remains mostly flat. Because of this, patient recruitment for clinical trials functions as a bottleneck in the process. The industry has to increase its focus on Patient Recruitment. Copyright Industry Standard Research.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Infographic: The Bottleneck in Patient Recruitment

Priorities

Viewpoints

Implications

Clinical trials involve five main groups, each with di�erent views and motivations. Here’s what they’re saying about clinical trials:

Patients SponsorsInvestigatorsSite Coordinators FDA

Faster patient recruitment leads to fewer delays in clinical trials, which means getting drugs on the shelf quicker. So why do only 2% of sponsors rank patient recruitment strategy as the most important when selecting a service provider?

47%

of clinical development decision-makers would

prefer a 30% lower clinical trial cost than

10% faster patient recruitment

Cost of an average Phase II Study.

Length of an average Phase II Study.

The growth rate of compounds in

development far exceeds population

growth and the number of investigators

remains mostly flat. Because of this, patient

recruitment for clinical trials functions as a

bottleneck in the process. The industry has

to increase its focus on Patient Recruitment.

30% savings of an average Phase II Study.

$1,111/day

Revenue generated per day by The 100th best selling drug in 3Q2012 (Stelara)

$1,885,000/day

$1.5-$2M 18-24 months

What would 30% lower costs mean?

What would 10% faster patient recruitment mean?

vs.

69% 233%70%76%

said they have not participated in clinical

trials because they were not made aware

of any trials.

said the hardest part of patient recruitment is

finding the right investigators.

said they are involved in the right amount, or too

many clinical trials.

said that inclusion/exclusion criteria have the single

biggest impact on patient recruitment success.

increase in patients required per NDA from

1500 in the 1970s to more than 5000 today.

of sites in a given trial fail to enroll a single patient

of sites in a given trial under-enroll

of sites in a given trial meet their enrollment targets

of sites in a given trial exceed their targets

11% 37% 39% 13%

The patient recruitment methods with the highest value, tend to be the more traditional methods:

Dr. ReferralPoster in Doctor’s O�ceLocal Newspaper

Mail from Doctor Custom Website

A�nity GroupsRadio

sources: clinicaltrials.gov, Tufts, ISR Reports Data Copyright 2013 Industry Standard Research | ISRreports.com | [email protected]

28%

Patient Recruitmentin