inee minimum standards assessment final report presentation location, date, 2012

24
INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Upload: ashlynn-warner

Post on 22-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

INEE Minimum Standards Assessment

Final Report PresentationLocation, Date, 2012

Page 2: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

• Purpose of Assessment & Methodology

• Respondent Profile• Findings & Key Observations• Discussion

Presentation Overview

Page 3: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

• “It is critical to understand who is aware of the INEE Minimum Standards, how they are being used, how they are institutionalized in plans and policies.” – Assessment TOR

• Question: What is the value added of the INEE Minimum Standards Handbook to date as a tool for: – Advocacy – Coordination– Program planning and response– Research – Institutional change

Purpose of Assessment

Page 4: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

• Three Elements:1) Literature Review2) Interviews (17 stakeholders) and Focus Groups (3 total – NY, DC, Beirut)3) Online Survey in English, French, Arabic, Spanish, Portuguese and Urdu

Methodology

Page 5: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Respondents

North America

10% S/ Cent America

5%

Lat Am3%

East Africa14%

West Africa10%

Central Africa

6%North Africa

1%

Southern Africa

2%Europe

11%

Middle East14%

Asia11%

Central Asia12%

Australia1%

National NGO13%

Gov/MoE11%

Interna-tional NGO

30%

UN Agency20%

Donor 2%

Found2%

Academic Institution

12%

Other4%

No org affil7%

• 701 Respondents from 117 Countries• 46% work at national, 22% at international and 14% at

regional levels• 52% affiliated with the Education Cluster

Page 6: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Awareness of INEE MSOverall: Good – 45%, Basic – 40%, Limited – 15%

Good 48%

Basic 36%

Limited 16%

Chart Title

3 years or less

4-6 years

Good32%

Basic54%

Limited 14%

National NGO Government/MoE

International NGO

UN Agency Academic Institu-tion

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Good Basic Limited

% R

espo

nden

ts

Page 7: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Ed Cluster Member

Ed Cluster Co-ordinator or

Info Mgr

Member of the Global Ed Cluster

Not affiliated with the Ed

Cluster or any other Cluster

Member of another Clus-

ter

56%74% 64%

43% 49%

44%26% 36%

57% 51%

National NGO

Government/M

oE

Intern

ational NGO

UN Agency

Academic

Institu

tion

47% 59% 55% 62% 54%

53% 41% 45% 38% 46%

Yes No

Key Observations

• Little over half of the respondents trained

• UN Agency most trained, National NGOs least

• Education Cluster coordinators/Info Managers have had most training.

“Have you participated in an INEE MS Training?”Overall: Yes – 53% No – 47%

Page 8: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Training by Region & Frequency of Use

N. Americ

a

S/C Americ

a

E Africa

W Afri

ca

C Africa

Europe

Middle East

Asia

Central A

sia

57% 50% 47% 56% 59% 57% 66%40%

57%

43% 50% 53% 44% 41% 43% 34%60%

43%

Yes No

Regularly Sometimes Rarely Never0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Trained

Not Trained

How often do you use the INEE MS?

Page 9: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Usage: “In what context have INEE MS been most used?”

Conflict 32%

Natural Disaster 24%

Both Conflict & Disaster

19%

Neither 13%

Other 12%

Key Observations

Used more in Conflict exclusively than in Natural Disaster

Not completely skewed to one context

‘Other’ responses include:

Prevention and Mitigation

Academic settings Policy Level, Post-

Conflict

Page 10: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Usage: “At what stage of response have INEE MS been most used?”

Key Observations

‘Choose all that apply’ question

Used most during Preparedness stage

Not used as often at Acute Response stage

Prepare

dness

Acute Resp

onse

Chronic/

Protra

cted Emerg

ency

Early Reco

very

Development P

hase

245

152167

208192

Number of Responses

Page 11: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Usage: “How often do you use INEE MS when planning/implementing

work?”Overall: Regularly – 29%, Sometimes – 42%, Never –

13%

National NGO Government/MoE

International NGO

UN Agency Academic Institu-tion

37%

27%31% 34%

23%

29%45%

49% 40%

29%

19%14%

14%18%

18%

14% 14%6% 8%

29%

Regularly Sometimes Rarely Never

Key Observations

National NGOs and International NGOs use them most frequently

Academic Institutions use less frequently

Overall, usage is high

Page 12: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Usage: “How useful have they been?”Overall: Very Useful – 38%, Useful – 57%, Not Useful – 5%

National NGO

Government/M

oE

Intern

ational NGO

UN Agency

Academic

Institu

tion

47.9%41.0%

32.8%39.3%

48.9%

47.9%54.1%

62.3%56.4%

44.4%

4.2% 4.9% 4.9% 4.3% 6.7%

Very Useful Useful Not Useful

Key Observations

Similar profiles across agencies – High levels

For International NGOs, not as useful

National NGOs and Academic Institutions ranked them ‘Very Useful’ significantly higher than overall response

Page 13: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Most frequent uses of the INEE MS

• Advocacy for EiE and recognition of education as a key hum. Response (264)• Disaster/emergency preparedness planning (112)• Monitoring and Evaluation (102)• Training and Capacity Development purposes (102)• Proposal Development (95)• Project Design (93)• Teaching and Learning about EiE (90)• Coordination of Education Activities (81)• Research (72)

Top 9 most frequent uses from 17 possible answer choices.

Page 14: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Public messages by key opinion leaders

have been informed by the INEE MS

The INEE MS have contributed to policy

decisions

Used the INEE MS to advocate with

governments and donor agencies to prioritize

and fund Education in Emergencies.

30.8%

41.4%

11.3%

16.5%

41.4%

43.7%

7.4%

7.6%

48%

36%

7%

10%

Agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree DisagreeAdvocacy

Page 15: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

INEE MS incorporated into advocacy message

Country Description

Afghanistan

Joint 2010-2013 UNICEF/MoE cooperation for Annual Workplans

Swaziland Disaster Risk Reduction National Action Plan - 2008 to 2015

DRC Gender-sensitive teacher recruitment

Haiti Access to quality education for displaced children

Burkina Faso

Flash appeal to mobilize funds for Education sector after floods

Cote d’Ivoire

Re-opening of schools/temporary learning spaces

Liberia Provision of school feeding for Ivorian refugees

Page 16: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

The INEE MS have been used as a guide for coordination of Education stakeholders in a

humanitarian setting.

Agree54%

Somewhat agree 37%

Somewhat disagree

6%

Disagree3%

The INEE MS have been used as a reference for assigning /targeting/ directing resources.

Agree48%

Somewhat agree32%

Some-what

disagree14%

Disagree6%

INEE MS as a guide for Coordination

Page 17: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Use of the Minimum Standards# times selected

(all choices in descending order)

As reference when developing project implementation plan 209

Incorporated into project proposal 172

Developed a M&E framework with guidance from INEE MS 136

INEE MS incorporated into work with Ministry of Education 99

Checked against the INEE MS before finalizing project design for additional project ideas 88

Incorporated in project design linkages and components related to other sectors with guidance from the INEE MS 71

An existing project has been redesigned to incorporate MS 42

Requested additional funding to redesign projects to meet INEE MS 30

“How were the INEE MS used for Programming?"

Page 18: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

“To what extent were the INEE MS used in the following areas?”

Assessment and setting priorities

Negotiate/resolve program challenges

Program design

Implementation guidance

Monitoring framework

Conducting evaluations

Training and capacity development

Ideas on engaging children and youth

Ideas on engaging communities, PTAs

21.7%

15.6%

26.8%

25.5%

23.9%

24.5%

36.8%

20.9%

25.0%

63.2%

54.0%

60.5%

57.4%

54.4%

53.2%

50.8%

53.5%

56.7%

15.1%

30.5%

12.7%

17.1%

21.8%

22.3%

12.4%

25.6%

18.3%

Primary framework Reference Not used

Page 19: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

“Have you ever used the INEE MS for Research

Purposes?”Yes: 31% No: 69%

“Used as a conceptual and/or organizing

framework for report, paper, article”Yes: 30% No: 70%

“Cited in report, paper, article”

Yes: 47% No: 53%

Key Observations

Less used for research purposes

Academics score highest

Used mainly for:• Theses/ Dissertation• Donor Application/

Proposal • Project/ Progress/

Activity Reports• Internal Reports/

Evaluations• TORs• Guidance Note on DRR

Research

Page 20: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Key Observations

Intl. NGOs and UN Agencies – higher levels of commitment

Most commonly cited reasons for not committing:

Institution lacks funds

No capacity or trained staff to support implementation

No Education and/or EiE Strategy/Policy.

“Has your organization committed to using the INEE MS?”

Overall: Yes: 85% No: 15%

National NGO

Government/MoE

International NGO

UN Agency Academic Institution

73% 68%

94% 92%

67%

27% 32%

6% 8%

33%

Yes No

Page 21: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

National NGO

Government/MoE

International NGO

UN Agency Academic Institution

45% 42% 45%56%

18%

55% 58% 55%44%

82%

Yes No

Key Observations

Many have committed to using – less have formally adopted into org. policies

UN higher than others

“Have the INEE MS been formally adopted into the policies/procedures of your organization?”

Overall: Yes: 42% No: 58%

Page 22: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

55%36%

6%3%

Agree

Somewhat agree

Somewhat disagree

Disagree

Led to an increase in organizational capacity to prepare and respond to emergency education.

37.7%

39.4%

11.8%

11.0%

Incorporated as a key component to

professional/capacity development

Institutional Change: Capacity Building

Page 23: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Respondent Recommendations

• Online training tools• Included case studies• Contextualized Standards• More specific and quantitative

Page 24: INEE Minimum Standards Assessment Final Report Presentation Location, Date, 2012

Discussion1) What are the takeaways from this Assessment

relative to you and your organization or agency?2) What actions can you or your organization take to

strengthen your education in emergency programs given the data presented in the Assessment?

For more information:• www.ineesite.org/standards • www.ineesite.org/toolkit • Please email your feedback, questions and comments to

[email protected] • If you are currently not a member of INEE and would like to

join, please visit www.ineesite.org/join