indy butany desouza consumer benefits from the competitive provision of energy services and the...
DESCRIPTION
Centrica’s Origins British Gas Corporation British Gas plc Centrica plc Privatization Demerger Competition & diversification BG plc Key Facts Today US$22bn annual turnover US$17bn market capitalization Over 31 million customer relationships 33,000 employees - of which 5000 in North America Long term credit rating A2/A +TRANSCRIPT
Indy Butany DeSouza
Consumer Benefits from the Competitive Provision of Energy Services and the Ontario Smart
Meter Implementation
Outline
Centrica and Direct Energy. Factors Contributing to the Decision for
Smart Meters in Ontario. Consultation Process for the
Implementation of Smart Meters in Ontario.
Consumer Benefits from the Competitive Provision of Energy Services.
Specific Conditions Required to Achieve Those Benefits.
Summary.
Centrica’s Origins
British GasCorporation
British Gas plc
Centrica plc
Centrica plc
Privatization
Demerger
Competition &diversification
1985
1997
1997-2003
BG plc
Key Facts Today US$22bn annual turnover US$17bn market
capitalization Over 31 million customer
relationships 33,000 employees - of which
5000 in North America Long term credit rating A2/A
+
Direct Energy in North America
Over 5 million customers in North America.
Energy provider in: Ontario; Alberta; Manitoba; Texas; Ohio; Pennsylvania; Michigan; New England; Connecticut; and, Rhode Island.
Approximately 1.9 million households served in Ontario.
Electricity generation and natural gas production asset ownership.
Our Perspective
“We deliver fresh thinking to help you manage your energy costs.”
A competitive energy retailer. Electricity + Natural Gas + Services Very strong focus on customer care
and customer satisfaction. Committed to competitive energy
markets and to promoting customer choice throughout North America.
Factors Contributing to the Decision for Smart Meters in
Ontario
Tightening power supply.
Increased demand for power.
The desire to retire coal-fired generation facilities as early as 2007.
Summary of Consultation Process for the
Implementation Plan April 2004 – The Minister of Energy in
Ontario announced aggressive targets for the deployment of smart meters.
July 2004 – The Minister of Energy issued a directive to the regulator to submit by February 2005 an implementation plan.
Fall 2004 – Stakeholder consultation process.
Summary of Consultation Process for the
Implementation Plan (2) January 2005 – The regulator
submitted its proposed implementation plan to the Minister of Energy.
Next steps – The government is critically evaluating the proposed implementation plan, will review alternatives and issue the final plan.
Private Sector Involvement in Smart Meters
Consumer benefits from the competitive provision of energy services include:
Transfer of risk arising from investment in new technology, products and services from municipalities/taxpayers and ratepayers to investors
Economically efficient allocation of resources and expertise
Private Sector Involvement in Smart Meters (2)
Clear incentives for responsiveness to consumer needs and preferences
Product innovation and differentiation
Enhanced consumer choice
Investment in customer service and satisfaction
Private Sector Involvement in Smart Meters (3)
Competitive entities, acting under ordinary commercial incentives, are better placed than central government/regulated institutions to deliver these benefits while assuming and managing risk.
Preconditions for Achieving These Consumer Benefits
Minimum meter and related system specifications.
Unbundling of metering services and related charges.
Data collection and availability.
Preconditions for Achieving These Consumer Benefits (2)
Equal access to smart meter data.
Retailer involvement in planning and communications.
Preconditions for Achieving These Consumer Benefits (3)
Shared information on deployment schedule for smart meters.
Regulatory oversight to ensure compliance.
Summary
There are significant consumer benefits from the competitive provision of energy services.
Competitive entities, acting under ordinary commercial incentives, are better placed than central government/regulated institutions to deliver these benefits while assuming and managing risk.
Consumer tailored value-added goods and services are the result.