industry perspectives on ferc standard market...
TRANSCRIPT
Industry Perspectives on FERC Standard Market Design
By Dr. Roberto F. Paliza
Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
IEEESummer MeetingJuly 23, 2002Chicago, IL
3
MISO Markets Effort
• Market implementation moving forwardLate 2003 is target date
• Combined MISO/SPP market150 GW peak load144,000+ miles of transmission lines20.9 million customers
• Markets include five TransCos within MISOWisconsin ATC, METC, ITC plus
TRANSLink, GridAmerica (not yet operational)
4
Scope (with SPP)150 GW peak load144,000+ miles of transmission lines20.9 million customers
Midwest Markets
5
MISO Markets Effort
• Developing Midwest markets for MISO/SPP footprintProject is underwayWill be operational by the end of 2003
• Market rules under development will be compliant with FERC SMD
Energy marketsAncillary servicesTransmission rightsInter-RTO coordination
• Working with PJM on single market to be implemented by 2005
6
The Single Market
• 213 GW peak load
• 236 GW generating capacity
• 158,000 miles of transmission lines
• 300 members; 33 million customers
• 1.5 million + square miles
7
FERC Standard Market Design
• Goal: Competitive, efficient marketsProvide a level playing field & standard rules of the road andTransparent operation and prices for energy & transmission usage
• Each region’s market must be compatible with SMD (NOPR to be issued on July)
Aspects not fully resolved yet:o Regional differenceso Transitional issueso Markets Coordination
• MISO is committed to implementing the SMDBased on LMP and Financial Transmission RightsWill include balanced market rules Will provide flexibility to market participants
8
SMD Benefits to RTOs
• Enhanced reliabilityBid-based security constrained dispatchSimultaneous balancing of the system and enforcement of constraint limits on a short time interval basisCritical functions are centralized at the RTO level
• Transparency of operations and energy prices Aids in the understanding of the systemIncentives the right behavior
• Scheduling integrated with energy markets
9
SMD Benefits to RTOs
• Market monitoring is performed at regional level• Coordinated transmission expansion planning
In addition to traditional planning function:o Forecast LMPs based on markets simulationo Address congestion issues
• Regional energy and ancillary marketsShort-term marketsAdministered by the RTO
• Mechanisms for inter-SMD coordination remains to be addressed
Implementation of SMD is a first good step
10
SMD Markets
• Day-ahead and Real-time markets VoluntaryBid-based security-constrained dispatch that minimizes cost-as-bid to serve load DAM is financially bindingRTM settles based on deviations from day-ahead market
• Ancillary servicesReserves and regulation
• Financial Transmission RightsPoint-to-point rightsFlowgate rights
• Capacity markets (ICAP) ?
11
MISO Current Challenges
• Inter-RTO coordination before and after implementation of SMD in the Midwest
• Intertwined configuration with ComEd, IP, and AEP as a result of their decisions to join PJM
• Single market will help resolve many issues• Transition to single market will require tight
coordination with PJM
12
MISO Market Effort Progress
• Stakeholder driven• High level design completed• Working on the detailed design and infrastructure• Implementation alternatives are being studied in
parallel with the design• Staged approach to achieve ultimate goal
13
Increment 1 Functionality
Day Ahead Market(Based on scheduled hourly quantities and day-ahead hourly prices)
• Security Constrained Unit Commitment• Security Constrained Economic Dispatch• LMP calculation using generation offers, demand bids, and bilateral
transaction schedules.
Participant Readiness
FTRs(A financial contract that entitles holder to a stream of revenues –or charges - based on the hourly energy price differences across the path)
• Request processing• Simultaneous deliverability feasibility testing• Approval processing
Settlements
&
Billing
Publish
Market
Data
FUNCTIONAL AREAS SUPPORTINGPROCESSES
Real-Time Energy Market(Based on actual hourly quantity deviations from day-ahead schedule hourly quantities and real-time prices)
• Security Constrained Centralized Economic Dispatch• LMP calculation using real-time SE values
Stakeholder
Process
• Communications Plan• Define Membership
Requirements• Manage Customer Registration
• Manage Customer Relations• Manage Training• Perform Market Trials
14
Market Rollout Options
Option 1• Phased Geographic Rollout
Option 2• Full MISO Footprint (Rapid Rollout Approach)
Option 3• Expand From PJM West
15
MISO Staff Recommendation
MISO Staff Recommends proceeding with Option 2 - Implementing the rapid rollout approach across the entire MISO footprint from West to East.
MISO Staff Recommends proceeding with Option 2 - Implementing the rapid rollout approach across the entire MISO footprint from West to East.
16
Program ScheduleCritical Path Schedule
4Q’03Conceptual Design
Market Rule DefinitionDevelop and Release Rev 1Develop and Release Rev 2
ConstructionMarket Model Development
Develop and Release Network Model For DevelopmentDevelop and Release Release Network Model – Int. TestDevelop and Release Network Model – Market Trials
Technology DeploymentSystem Development
RequirementsDesignConfigurationSystem Test
System Integration Test
Testing and ImplementationMarket Trials ExecutionMarket Implementation
Area 1 CutoverArea 2 CutoverArea 3 Cutover
Milestones/Projects 3Q’02 3Q’032Q’031Q’034Q’02
17
Program ScheduleMISO Project Schedule
Market Rules for System Development
System Design Sign-Off
Approve System Test Plan
System Development /Test Complete
Integration Test Complete
Market Trials Complete
Go-Live
4Q’03Startup
Establish & Maintain PMOStakeholder Communications
Conceptual DesignMarket Rule Definition
Detailed DesignBusiness Practice Development & ImplementationRegulatory AffairsSeams Coordination
ConstructionFinancingParticipant Readiness & RegistrationTraining Development & DeliverySystem Operation ReadinessMarket Network Model DevelopmentTransmission Rights ConversionTechnology Deployment
Testing & ImplementationMarket TrialsMarket Implementation
Major Milestones
Milestones/Projects 3Q’02 3Q’032Q’031Q’034Q’02
18
Cutover Approach
ConsProsAlternative Approach
• Possible Market Gaming opportunity between market and non-market zones
• Increased complexity in scheduling rollout across control areas
• Mid Month Settlements • Creates internal footprint “Market
Seams” issues • Complexity of doing business with
market and non-market regions (tariff, tagging, etc)
• Aids in controlling reliability concerns• Market MW-size similar to markets
implemented to date• Incrementally increases the MISO
load under the markets• Allows for a minimum stabilization
period, i.e. new flows, and new constraints
• Reduce risk of market-wide catastrophic failure
“Rapid Rollout” Approach *
• Rapid rollout from West to East
• MISO operators not familiar with unit characteristics across region
• 120,000 MW Market implementation – market magnitude never tried to date
• Reliability concerns• Loss of market confidence in the
event of failure
• Eliminates internal footprint “Market Seams” issues
• Reduces roll out scheduling complexity with control areas
• Equity to participants – everyone starts at the same time
• Just completed footprint-wide market trials – just keep going…
“Big Bang” Approach• Entire footprint implemented
at one time
* MISO Recommended Approach
19
MISO/PJM/SPP Single Market
• To develop a single market for the combined MISO/PJM/SPP region
• Single market may be implemented as a single dispatch across the entire region
One real-time marketOne day-ahead marketOne set of financial transmission rightsOne set of business practices
• Single tariff?
20
Single Market Development
Coordination ActivitiesOwnerDescriptionIncrement
• On Going CoordinationJoint• Fully shared Market and data services between MISO/SPP and PJMIncrement 3
• Align common business rules and practices with PJM
• MISO-PJM Technical Assessment
• Enhanced Market Portal Project
Joint• Addition of the Ancillary Services markets • Security Constrained Unit Commitment to
NewCo market (early in Increment 2)• Enhancements to meet Standard Market
requirements• Enhanced Market Portal
Increment 2 (Shared
Data Services)
• Seam Coordination Project within Market Initiative
MISO/SPPMidwest Market Initiative on NewCo Footprint• Real time Energy Markets based on Location
Marginal Pricing• Financial Transmission Rights allocation and
auction• Day Ahead Energy Market
Increment 1 (Midwest Markets)
21
Single Market Effort
ConceptualDesign
DetailedDesign
Func
tiona
lity
DataExchangeStandards
& ProtocolsEstablished
EnhancedMarketPortal
Implemented
Shared Market ServicesIntegrated with
Shared Data Services
Bulk DataTransfers
Multi-RegionalParticipant Market Interaction
Transparency
2002 2003 2Q03 2004 2Q04 2005 4Q05
Increment #1 Increment #2 Increment #3