indonesia: dam operational improvement and …...final draft 3. scale of environment 4. screening 34...
TRANSCRIPT
INDONESIA: DAM OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENT AND SAFETY PROJECT - 1 (DOISP 1)
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF)
Main report
November 2008
E2017
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Final Draft
CONTENTS Page Definition Acronyms
1. Introduction 1.1. Description of the Project 1.2. Components of the Project 1.3. Purpose of the Project
2. Environmental and Social Screening Management
2.1. Scope of activity 2.2. Screening Methodology 2.3. Screening of Sub-projects Year 1 2.4. Public Consultation 2.5. Disclosure
3. Environmental Management
3.1. Environmental Management Procedure 3.2. Document Review and Amendment 3.3. Monitoring and Evaluating Performance 3.4. Environmental Input into the Design 3.5. Preparation of Further Studies for DOISP2
4. Community Development 4.1. Community Participation in Reservoir Management 4.2. Community Participation in Watershed Management
5. Capacity Building, Training and Technical Assistance Tables:
1. DOISP-1 Project Activities List 2. World Bank Policies for Environmental and Social Safeguards 3. Risk Assessment Matrix Overview of Safeguards Review and Approval
Mechanism 4. Screening Assessment for Initial 4 Dams 5. Roles and Responsibilities 6. Overview of Review and Approval Mechanism 7. Potential Environmental Impact and Possible Mitigation Measures 8. Tasks and Responsibilities 9. Capacity Building and Indicative Budget
Annexes: 1. List of Dams 2. Screening Mechanism
2
Final Draft
3. Scale of Environment 4. Screening 34 dams 5. Screening of IP 6. Mitigation Measures 7. Requirements of EMP 8. Mechanism Approval of Environment Document 9. Out-line for UKL/UPL 10. General Guidelines for Community Participation 11. Minutes of Public Consultation
3
Final Draft
DEFINITIONS
Terms Meaning Government The Government of the Republic of
Indonesia
Project Dam Operational and Safety Improvement Project 1 (DOISP 1) The propinsi government, headed by a governor or gubernur
Provincial government
Municipal (kota) government (headed by a mayor or walikota) or district or regency (kabupaten) government (headed by a district head/regent or bupati)
Local government
Sub-project Project component implemented at the central, provincial and/or kabupaten/kota level
4
Final Draft
ACRONYMS
Balai PSDA River Basin Management Unit (of the Provincial Administration)
Balai (B)WS / BBWS
River Management Agency (of the MPW)
Bapedalda Local Environmental Authority BAPPENAS National Planning Agency BDSF Basic Dam Safety Facility BKLH Local-government Environmental Office BPN Land Administration Agency DD Detailed Design DGWR Directorate General Water Resources DSU Dam Safety Unit EAP Emergency Action Plan EMP Environmental Management Plan ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework GOI Government of Indonesia ICOLD International Commission on Large Dams INACOLD Indonesian Commission on Large Dams (a Chapter of
ICOLD) IWRR Institute for Water Resources Research Kabupaten District MPW Ministry of Public Works NGOs Non-Government Organisations PIU Project Implementation Unit PMU Project Management Unit O&M Operational and Maintenance PIP Project Implementation Plan RCWR Research Center for Water Resources (Bandung)(formerly
Institute for Water Resources Research, IWRR) RLR (Agency) Local-government Section for River, Lake and Reservoir TA Technical Assistance TD Tender Document UKL/UPL Upaya Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Linkungan
(Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan) WBOJ World Bank Office in Jakarta
5
Final Draft
1. Introduction 1.1. The Government of Indonesia with the World Bank has an agreement to finance Dam Operational and Safety Improvement Project (DOISP). The DOISP is a long term project to substantially improve Indonesia’s dam operation, dam structures and other dam related infrastructure in order to ensure continued water supply for beneficial local community use.
The DOISP will consist of two separate scopes of works and funding, viz. DOISP 1 in the period 2009 to 2012 and DOISP 2 (tentatively) from 2013 to 2016. DOISP covers a shortlist of 65 pre-screened dam/reservoir sites of which DOISP 1 would fund preparation and implementation of 34, as well as the preparation of the remainder of sub-projects that will then be implemented under DOISP 2 funding.
The objectives of DOISP1 is to to (i) introduce new safety and operational management policies and regulations, and (ii) increase the safety and the functionality with respect to bulk water supply of 34 large MPW-owned reservoirs.
The components of the Project divided into 5 components:
1. Dam Operational and Safety Improvement Works
1.1. Dam Rehabilitation, Modification and Remedial Works
1.2. Dam Safety Assurance Interventions
1.3. Reduction of Spillway Discharge Risks
1.4. Emergency Action Plans
2. O&M Improvement and Capacity Building
2.1. Dam O&M Improvement
2.2. Dam Agency Capacity Building
2.3. Community Participation in Reservoir Management
3. Reservoir Sediment Mitigation Interventions
3.1. Reservoir Sedimentation Surveys
3.2. Reservoir Sedimentation Mitigation Interventions
3.3. Reservoir Watershed Management
3.4. Community Participation in Watershed Management
4. Dam Safety Assurance Institutional Improvements
4.1. Dam Safety Assurance Institutional Improvements
5. Project Management
5.1. Dam Operational and Safety Improvement
5.2. O/M Improvement and Capacity Building
6
Final Draft
1.2. The purpose of this ESMF is to clarify the principles, procedures and organizational arrangements to be applied to environmental and social management plan for DOISP 1 sub projects. The ESMF will guide i) the preparation of environmental management plan for the sub-projects under DOISP 1 for the first annual work plan, as well as for sub-projects identified in subsequent years and the EMPs and EAs (AMDAL) under DOISP 2; ii) design and implementation of community participation in reservoir and watershed management.
1.3. The ESMF will be included in the Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) for the Project. The ESMF serves as the Project's umbrella environmental and social impacts sub-projects.
1.4. Any sub-project that cannot be implemented according to the ESMF will not be funded under the Project.
1. This ESMF is applicable to DOISP1
2. Environmental and Social Screening Requirements 2.1 Scope of Activities.
The works under DOISP 1 have been scoped so as not to include any works with any major environmental or social impacts. Based on the pre-screening of potential sub-projects the potential adverse environmental impacts associated with these works and activities will mostly be construction-related and will be local, minor and easily reversible through the use of readily available and simple mitigation measures. Considering these aspects, all DOISP 1 subprojects are considered Category B Project by the Bank, and this category also applies to DOISP 1. All other works will be undertaken and as such assessed under DOISP 2. If, in the detail preparation and screening of the sub-projects under DOISP 1 unexpectedly a potentially major negative or irreversible impact relating to the environmental or social safeguards is identified, then this sub-project may be prepared under DOISP 1 but its implementation will be deferred to DOISP 2. This procedure will allow that such sub-projects will be subject of a separate appraisal of appropriate depth.
These restrictions will notably pertain to any decommissioning of dams, to larger-scale dredging and sludge removal (quantities above 500,000m3), and to activities that would imply involuntary land acquisition and impact to indigenous people.
7
Final Draft
Table 1: Project Activities List
Type of Activity Details
Rehabilitation of 34 Dams and Reservoirs sites (out of shortlist of 65)
Rehabilitation works include: - reinstatement of crest roadways, - reinstatement of rip-rap, - reinstatement of drainage lines, spillways, inlets and outlets and v-notch drains, - removal of vegetation growth on embankments which have a potential to impact on the integrity of the dam, - replacement of piezometers and other essential instrumentation, - repairs to electrical and mechanical equipment, etc
Investigations and design and analysis of dams to be rehabilitated under DOISP 2
Includes - embankment material investigations, - review of design reports and other information and engineering and economic analyses for design of rehabilitation works for DOISP 2
Community Participation in 20 Reservoir Management
Includes - community education programmes for communities living in areas surrounding the reservoir, - improving the income of the community by providing incentive schemes for promoting community participation in reservoir management, - implementing 20 community participation projects to benefit both the community and the reservoir – these will include projects such as green belt planting and provision of security to the dam and its environs, including the basic dam safety facilities (BDSF).
Sediment Surveys Terrestrial and hydrographic surveys of 30 selected reservoirs to determine extent of sedimentation and reduction in storage capacity of these reservoirs.
(Minor) Sediment Removal from Reservoirs
Removal of sediment in minor to moderate quantities (less than 500,000m3 in accordance with GOI environmental standards) in reservoirs in areas near intakes and outlets where these are blocked or their operating capacity has been reduced by sediment deposition.
These works will be targeted works with established and limited areas for works to ensure minimal impacts
Removal of Aquatic Removal of aquatic weeds in limited areas of the
8
Final Draft
Type of Activity Details
Weeds from Reservoirs reservoir near intakes and outlets where the operation of these are affected by aquatic weed growth.
Construction of Check Dams
Construction of check dams on streams to retain sediment and thus reduce sediment flows into reservoirs.
Implementation of River Bank Stabilisation Measures
Construction of river bank stabilisation measures such as gabion retaining walls, revetments, groynes and vegetative barriers to prevent river bank erosion.
Modification of Dam Operational Procedures to Reduce Sedimentation Impacts on Operation
Implementing modified operational procedures such as flushing during high reservoir inflows to prevent sediment build up of sediment near outlets.
Catchment Management Pilot Guidelines
Includes formulating a catchment conservation plan for selected reservoirs and initiating a long term coordinated effort to address incorrect land use, poor agricultural techniques, soil stabilisation and social forestry; preparing a local regulation for dam watershed conservation planning; carrying out community participation in watershed conservation planning for 4 selected pilot watersheds and applying watershed conservation measures such as construction of check dams, gully plugs etc and vegetative measures.
Community Participation in Watershed Management
Includes carrying out community participation in catchment conservation planning for 4 selected pilot watersheds and applying watershed conservation measures to improve village water management, introduce soil conservation techniques, and carry out small local activities inside river beds such as creation of small check dams and gully plugs, and promoting vegetative measures.
Changes in operational schedules of dams
May result in changes in water release to downstream water users. Changes from existing release schedules will be only of temporary nature to allow works to be conducted. Current operational schedules will be reviewed too and in some reservoir sites subject to minor water delivery changes to improve the supply reliability to the downstream water users, and to lower the risk of overtopping during heavy rainfall in the wet season (flood management).
9
Final Draft
2.2. Screening of DOISP 1 The environmental and social impacts of the activities have been limited by the scope of the proposed works.
The following sections detail an overview of the requirements to meet the objectives and to ensure that the environmental and social impacts associated with the project are minimised.
Screening of sub-projects is to DOISP 1 is to ensure that each sub-project is properly screened for the level of potential environmental and/or social impact. Based on this screening process, sub-projects that may present significant impact concerns are identified and subject to secondary screening or further detailed study. In addition to environmental screening, standard environmental management and monitoring measures provided under the project and its contract documents, the following detailed studies may be required for some sensitive sub-projects based on agreed screening criteria:
• Environmental Management and Monitoring Plans (UKL/UPL), • Full environmental assessment (AMDAL), Screening for the project will follow the directions of World Bank policies and Government Regulations – (i) environmental issue: Environmental Ministerial Decree No. 11, 2006, Ministerial Decree of Settlement and Regional Infrastructure No. 17, 2003 (KepMen Kimpraswil No. 17/2003), Environmental Ministerial Decree No. 86/2006; (ii) social issue: Presidential Regulations 36/05, 65/06 and BPN Decree 3/07 concerning land acquisition for public purposes (see Annex 2, 3, 4 and 5). Based on the pre-screening of sub-projects, there are no requirement to prepare AMDAL, LARAP, IPDP.
Each year the PMU will prepare its Annual Work Plan and budget for the subsequent year.
Table 2: World Bank Policies for Environmental and Social Safeguards
Safeguard Policy Policy summary and work required
Environmental Assessment (OP 4.01)
Process of assessing projects potential environmental risks and impacts, the breadth, depth, and type of analysis depending on the nature, scale, and potential environmental impact of the proposed project. EA also examines project alternatives, identifies ways of improving project selection, siting, planning, design, and implementation by preventing, minimizing, mitigating, or compensating for adverse environmental impacts and enhancing positive impacts, and includes the process of mitigating and managing adverse environmental impacts throughout project implementation.
Involuntary Resettlement and Land Acquisition (OP/BP 4.12)
The OP requires that an assessment is made of the likely social impacts of projects, particularly as they entail acquisition of land, relocation of people, loss of productive assets or access to services, both during the implementation and operational phases of project activities. The policy is intended to ensure that
10
Final Draft
resettlement activities should be conceived and executed as sustainable development programs, providing sufficient investment resources to enable the persons affected to share in project benefits, ensure that affected persons are meaningfully consulted and are provided, where possible, opportunities to participate in planning and implementation of resettlement and project activities. The basic objective is to ensure that affected persons are provided the means and resources to improve their livelihoods and standards of living, or at least to restore them in real terms, to pre-project levels.
Isolated Vulnerable People (OP/BP 4.10)
Goal is to (a) ensure that Indigenous People benefit form development projects, and (b) avoid or mitigate potentially adverse effects on Indigenous People caused by Bank-assisted activities. Special action is required where Bank investments affect IP whose social and economic status restricts their capacity to assert their interests and rights in land and other productive resources.
Movable or immovable property of great importance to the cultural heritage of every people, such as monuments of architecture, art or history, whether religious or secular; archaeological sites; groups of buildings which, as a whole, are of historical or artistic interest; works of art; manuscripts, books and other objects of artistic, historical or archaeological interest; as well as scientific collections and important collections of books or archives or of reproductions of the property defined above;
Cultural property (OP. 4.11)
Land and water areas where the ecosystems biological communities are formed largely by native plant and animal species and human activity has not essentially modified the area's primary ecological functions, with specific place or natural conditions in which a plant or animal lives.
Natural Habitat (OP 4.0.4)
Forestry resources which may be impacted on by activities of the project to ensure that they are protected or that the impacts are minimised.
Forests (OP 4.36)
Disclosure Policy (OP/BP 17.50)
All projects must disclose key information in country and through the Bank’s Infoshop
It is essential when determining the level of environmental assessment required as part of DOISP 1 to identify the environmental and social impacts based on the activities to be undertaken.
The assigned categories are based on a basic risk matrix of likelihood and severity of the consequence of impact and give a high, medium and low classification. These risks are
11
Final Draft
based on activities without the mitigation measures which will be addressed in the Environmental Management Plan for each of the sites (see Annex 6).
Table 3 : Risk Assessment Matrix
Severity of consequence of event Likelihood of event
High Medium Low
HH HM HL High
MH MM ML Medium
Low LH LM LL
HH = Extreme Risk HM = High Risk MH, MM, HL = Moderate Risk ML, LH, LM, LL = Low Risk
The work activities associated with DOISP 1 have been identified as part of site inspections and review of existing (partial) surveys, feasibility studies, etc., of each of the 34 dams. For each of the dam/ reservoir sites a separate Briefing Book was prepared featuring the technical and situational description of the site, and description of operational and safety issues. From these the environmental and social impacts have been identified to enable classification for assessment in accordance with Annex 3. Annex 4 details the activities and impacts associated with the project and determines the requirements associated with assessment. From the screening process it has been determined that all sub-projects within DOISP 1 will be assessed under UKL/UPL as there is a zero to moderate potential for significant environmental and social impact.
The sub-projects will be mostly located on Java (provinces of West Java, Central Java, and East Java), and some in the provinces of NTB, Lampung, East Kalimantan and South Sulawesi. Most catchments on the locations in Java are prone to severe erosion because of steep slopes and soil structure. All dam and reservoir sites have been established in their region for at least two decades, and in some case for nearly a century, and have shaped the local economy and human settlements. The downstream areas of the sites are under cultivation and economic development for prolonged times of several decades. Most of the water provision is directed at agricultural irrigation, and in some cases at local town and industrial water supply, drainage flushing, and occasionally limited aquaculture. The upstream catchments all consist of fallow, protected and (semi-)cultivated agricultural areas, consisting of production forests, rubber and wood plantations, dry and rain-fed agriculture, widely laid out hamlets and villages, and “hutan
12
Final Draft
masyarakat” (multi-canopy smallholder agriculture and silviculture). In a small number of the upper catchments protection forests are present, however, none of the reservoir sites is closer than 1-2km of such area, and the proposed activities cannot physically extend their reach to impact on these areas in a direct or indirect way. There are no downstream or adjacent protected forests or reserves. In one case, i.e. the Jatiluhur reservoir on the Citarum river (West Java), the upper catchment is extensive, and contains a major conurbation with industry (Bandung). Therefore, only this reservoir would trigger concerns about water quality changes due to changes in the operational schedule, and about chemical quality of the sediment in the reservoir. However, at the Jatiluhur site only very local works and studies will be funded under DOISP 1, however, none of these envisages dredging or changes in operational schedules.
Sub-projects on the dams/ reservoirs and the community-based activities will not require involuntary resettlement or acquisition of land. Since the sub-projects are associated with upgrading and minor remedial and rehabilitation of existing facilities there will be no significant alterations in the existing land use patterns. Investigations for design of rehabilitation works will also not involve any involuntary land acquisition or require resettlement.
Consider to the criteria of Indigenous people as described in OP 4.10, sub-projects activity either in Java or outside Java (see paragraph above) do not have any impact to IP. IP in Java can be identified clearly only in Banten Province, Kabupaten Rangkasbitung, the tribe called Badui Dalam. Outside Java in the provinces of NTB, Lampung, East Kalimantan and South Sulawesi also can be identified there are no IP there. According to Government of Indonesia IP means Isolated Vulnerable People. This term is more emphasized to geographical rather than way of life of the people as definition of IP in OP 4.10. However, in any project under World Bank loan, there is a consensus between Government of Indonesia and the Bank to use IVP term rather than IP. In this Project, social screening of sub-projects relate to IVP, PMU uses 2 references- (i) OP 4.10 and (ii) Ministry of Social Welfare on Data and Information of IVP, 2002. From the available maps, data from the Ministry of Social Welfare on locations of Isolated Vulnerable People and OP 4.10, it appears that no indigenous peoples are living in the wider vicinity of the 34 reservoir areas or the 4 (sub-)catchment management zones supported under DOISP 1 (Annex 5). Isolated Vulnerable People may be living in the same or the adjacent province, however, the physical distance to the project and the localized nature and size of the works on the dams, reservoirs and catchment sites are such that no impact can be generated that might affect the Isolated Vulnerable People in a direct or indirect way.
Although the assessment has taken into consideration upstream and downstream impacts associated with their activities it is not feasible to determine external activities which may have a future potential to impact on the dam sites (for example, future industrial or mining activities upstream of a reservoir which may start affecting its water quality), although from the reviews of the sites these risks are also considered to be low.
13
Final Draft
DOISP 1 will not fund any activity within natural habitats, declared forest and wildlife reserves and protected areas. Because its works and activities are restricted to the dam and reservoir site and existing rivulets and brooks in the upper catchment, without major downstream impacts, it would not have any adverse impact on environmentally and socially sensitive areas.
If during detail preparation of a sub-project such possible impact would be identified which may trigger any of the above safeguards, the sub-project may be prepared under DOISP 1, however, the implementation will be deferred to DOISP 2 to ensure separate in-depth appraisal of the sub-project. 2.3. Screening Assessment of Sub-projects Year 1. For the first year of works (2009) there are 4 dams/ reservoirs which will undergo rehabilitation. The initial sub-projects were screened based on the screening process and risk assessment detailed above. The sub-projects are:
Batujai located on Paraya raya Sub-District, Lombok Tegah District, West Nusa Tenggara Province.
Gondang located on Sugie Sub-District, Lamongan District, East Java Province.
Gembong located on Gembong Sub-District, Pati District, Central Java Province.
Krisak located on Selogiri Sub-District, Wonorejo District, Central Java Province.
Table 4 details the screening assessment for the initial 4 dams with the remaining screening addressed in Annex 4. The assessment is based on the information quantifying the extent of works which is covered in the PIP.
Note all activities detailed in Table 4 will have low risk impacts for:
Air pollution associated with vehicle and mechanical equipment use;
General waste generation associated with construction activities;
Natural resource depletion associated, fuel for vehicles and mechanical equipment, materials use for construction such as cement, masonry and asphalt;
Noise pollution directly associated with the activities
Soil and Water pollution associated with spills from mechanical equipment, especially if working adjacent to water bodies.
Disruption or change of water release schedule.
No land acquisition
No impact to IVP
It can be determined that the indirect and direct environmental and social impacts both upstream and downstream associated with the activities can be considered minimal.
Detailed mitigation measures for each dam site will be outlined in the site specific UKL/UPL documentation with an example of generic mitigation measures is detailed in Annex 6. The process associated with the preparation and approval of UKL/UPLs for
14
Final Draft
Table 4 : Screening Assessment for Initial 4 Dams
Activity Aspects Environmental & Social Impacts Level of Impact
KRISAK DAM Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems from material loss during transportationWater pollution – potential additional sediment load within water system from material spillage from trucks
Transportation of materials
Noise pollution – impacts from vehicle movements on local resident Excavation of damaged road Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and from
excavation worksPlacement and compaction of sub base material
No additional impacts
Repair of inspection road
Placement of Asphalt concrete (ATB)
No additional impacts
LOW
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and flora and fauna from construction activities
Installation of masonry retaining wall
Construction of wall
Water pollution – impacts from residual construction material run-off LOW
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems from material loss during transportationWater pollution – potential additional sediment load within water system from material spillage from trucks
Transportation of materials
Noise pollution – impacts from vehicle movements on local resident Excavation of masonry from damaged crest
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and from excavation works
Placement and compaction of sub base material
No additional impacts
Dam Crest Rehabilitation
Placement of Asphalt concrete (ATB)
No additional impacts
LOW
16
Final Draft
Activity Aspects Environmental & Social Impacts Level of
Impact
Drilling into embankment Waste – Spoil generated from bore holing for piezometers Stand Pipe Piezometer Instalment
Installation of pipe piezometer No additional impacts LOW
Removal of old staff gauge No additional impacts Staff Gauge repair Installation of new staff gauge No additional impacts
LOW
Excavation of soils Waste – Spoil generated from excavation Noise pollution – impacts from increased vehicle movements on local
d
Construction of Surface Movement
Installation of concrete blocks Water pollution – associated with concrete truck washout
LOW
Site inspection and office work No additional impacts Detailed Study or Seepage at Spillway Walls and Chute
Taking of core samples Waste – Spoil generated from excavation LOW
Placement of stop blocks No additional impacts Replace seals on intake gate No additional impacts
Routine maintenance – Replacement of seals on all gates
Removal of stop blocks Water pollution – residual wastes and materials left in flow paths from maintenance activities
LOW
Demolition of old masonry h l
No additional impacts No additional impacts – Note no additional waste as rocks from old channel will be used for the new channel, only mortar replacement
Repair of right channel with masonry
Construction of new masonry channel
Water pollution – residual wastes and materials left in flow paths from maintenance activities
LOW
17
Final Draft
Cleaning toe drain
Removal of vegetation by hand Waste – Generation of vegetative waste LOW
18
Final Draft
Activity Aspects Environmental & Social Impacts Level of
Impact
Waste – Building waste generation Demolition of old concrete Potential water quality impacts associated with overflows during works within a spillway Potential water quality impacts associated with overflows during works within a spillway Noise pollution – impacts from increased vehicle movements on local
dWater pollution – residual wastes and materials left in flow paths from maintenance activities
Repair of apron of the spillway with reinforced concrete Construction of new concrete
Water pollution – associated with concrete truck washout
MODERATE
Minor increased water flows which could impact on down stream users Sedimentation – potential increase in sediment laden water associated with the pump out which may impact on water quality and so aquatic fauna and flora
Pump out of waters from ool plunge p
Sedimentation – potential increase in sediment laden water associated with the pump out which may impact on water quality and so Waste – Building waste generation Demolition of old concrete Potential water quality impacts associated with overflows during works within a spillway Potential water quality impacts associated with overflows during works within a spillway Noise pollution – impacts from increased vehicle movements on local
dWater pollution – residual wastes and materials left in flow paths from maintenance activities
Repair of plunge pool by reinforced concrete
Construction of new concrete
Water pollution – associated with concrete truck washout
MODERATE
19
Final Draft
Activity Aspects Environmental & Social Impacts Level of
Impact
Demolition of old concrete Waste – Building waste generation Noise pollution – impacts from increased vehicle movements on local
dWater pollution – residual wastes and materials left in flow paths from maintenance activities
Repair intake with reinforce concrete
Construction of new concrete
Water pollution – associated with concrete truck washout
LOW
Disruption or change in water release
Will be of limited time (less than one week) and where deviating from historic pattern, will be accompanied by consultation with water users to minimize negative impact.
GONDANG DAM
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems from material loss during transportation
Transportation of materials
Water pollution – potential additional sediment load within water system from material spillage from trucksNoise pollution – impacts from vehicle movements on local resident
Excavation of masonry from damaged crest
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and from excavation works
Placement and compaction of sub base material
No additional impacts
Dam Crest Rehabilitation
Placement (ATB)
LOW
No additional impacts Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems from material loss during transportation
Transportation of materials
Water pollution – potential additional sediment load within water system from material spillage from trucksNoise pollution – impacts from vehicle movements on local resident
Access road repair by ATB
Excavation of masonry from damaged crest
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and from excavation works
LOW
20
Final Draft
Placement & compaction of base material
No additional impacts
Placement of ATB No additional impacts Disruption or change in water release
Will be of limited time (less than one week) and where deviating from historic pattern, will be accompanied by consultation with water users to minimize negative impact.
LOW
21
Final Draft
Activity Aspects Environmental & Social Impacts Level of
Impact
Weed Cleaning Non-chemical based removal of vegetation
Waste – Generation of vegetative waste LOW
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and flora and fauna from construction activities
Construction of parapet masonry wall
Construction of wall
Water pollution – impacts from residual construction material run-off
LOW
Construction of toe drain
Placement of stone for toe drain
No additional issues LOW
Removpanelling
al of old and damaged No additional issues Repair of wooden panelling for intake tower bridge
No additional issues LOW Replacement of panelling
Assessment of roof panelling Health impacts during sample collection Health impacts during removal of Water pollution – Asbestos fibres impacts to fauna and community Waste – Asbestos waste generation
Removal of roof panelling (if asbestos /cement sheeting
Air pollution - Asbestos fibres impacts to environment and community Removal of roof panelling No additional issues
Repair of intake tower roof
Replacement of roof panelling with metal sheeting
No additional issues
MODERATE
Access to fencing Minimal vegetation clearing potentially required to reach fencing Removal of wire mesh Waste – Material waste associated with fencing
Replacement of perimeter fencing
Replacement of wire mesh No additional issues
MODERATE
22
Final Draft
Activity Aspects Environmental & Social Impacts Level of
Impact
Placement of stock block No additional impacts Replace seals on intake gate No additional impacts
Hydro-mechanical intake gate repair of new seals
Removal of stock block Water pollution – residual wastes and materials left in flow paths from maintenance activities
LOW
Drilling into embankment Waste – Spoil generated from bore holing for piezometers Replacement of Stand Pipe Piezometer
Installation of pipe piezometer
No additional impacts LOW
Disruption or change in water release
Will be of limited time (less than one week) and where deviating from historic pattern, will be accompanied by consultation with water users to minimize negative impact.
LOW
BATUJAI – NUSA TENGGARA BARAT
Demolition of old masonry wall
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and flora and fauna from construction activities Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and flora and fauna from construction activities
Repair to the parapet wall and the hand railing Construction of new masonry
wall and handrail Water pollution – impacts from residual construction material run-off
LOW
Transportation of rock i l
No additional impacts Replacement of riprap along U/S slope
Placement of rock using excavator
No additional impacts LOW
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems from material loss during transportationWater pollution – potential additional sediment load within water system from material spillage from trucks
Dam Crest Rehabilitation
Transportation of materials
Noise pollution – impacts from vehicle movements on local resident
LOW
23
Final Draft
Excavation of masonry from damaged crest
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and from excavation works
Placement and compaction of sub base material
No additional impacts
Placement of (ATB) No additional impacts Disruption or change in water release
Will be of limited time (less than one week) and where deviating from historic pattern, will be accompanied by consultation with water users to minimize negative impact.
LOW
24
Final Draft
Activity Aspects Environmental & Social Impacts Level of
Impact
Toe drain repair New rock to be placed some mortar to bind
No additional issues LOW
Placement of stop blocks No additional impacts Replace seals No additional impacts
Replace Rubber Seal in the flushing gate
Removal of stop blocks Water pollution – residual wastes and materials left in flow paths from maintenance activities
LOW
Soil drilling into b k
Waste – Spoil generated from bore holing for piezometers Installation of Stand Pipe Piezometer
Installation of pipe piezometer
No additional impacts LOW
Excavation of soils Waste – Spoil generated from excavation Noise pollution – impacts from increased vehicle movements on local
d
Construction of Surface Movement
Installation of concrete blocks Water pollution – associated with concrete truck washout
LOW
Placement and removal of stock block
No additional impacts
Sandblasting of gate Waste – paint (potential lead impacts)
Sand blasting re-painting spillway gate
Repainting of gate No additional impacts
LOW
GEMBONG DAM
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and flora and fauna from construction activities
Construction of parapet wall on the D/S side of dam crest
Demolition of old masonry wall
Water pollution – impacts from residual construction material run-off LOW
25
Final Draft
Activity Aspects Environmental & Social Impacts Level of
Impact
Demolition of old masonry wall
Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and flora and fauna from construction activities Air pollution – Dust impact on human respiratory systems and flora and fauna from construction activities
Rehabilitation of V-notch
Construction of new masonry wall and handrail
Water pollution – impacts from residual construction material run-off
LOW
Excavation of soils Waste – Spoil generated from excavation Noise pollution – impacts from increased vehicle movements on local
d
Construction of Surface Movement
Installation of concrete blocks Water pollution – associated with concrete truck washout
LOW
Minor increased water flows which could impact on down stream Sedimentation – potential increase in sediment laden water associated with the pump out which may impact on water quality and so aquatic fauna and flora
Pump out of waters from spillway basin
Sedimentation – potential increase in sediment laden water associated with the pump out which may impact on water quality and so Waste – Building waste generation Demolition of old concrete Potential water quality impacts associated with overflows during works within a spillway Potential water quality impacts associated with overflows during works within a spillway Noise pollution – impacts from increased vehicle movements on local
dWater pollution – residual wastes and materials left in flow paths from maintenance activities
Spillway Basin Repair
Construction of new concrete
LOW
Water pollution – associated with concrete truck washout Repair electric wiring system
Electrical works No Additional Issues LOW
26
Final Draft
27
Activity Aspects Environmental & Social Impacts Level of
Impact
Generating set procurement & installation
Electrical Installation works No Additional Issues LOW
Placement of stop blocks No additional impacts Replace seals No additional impacts
Replacement of rubber seal of intake gate
Removal of stop blocks Water pollution – residual wastes and materials left in flow paths from maintenance activities
LOW
Placement and removal of stop blocks
No additional impacts Repainting of intake gate
Repainting of gate No additional impacts LOW
Final Draft
Figure 1: Indonesian Government Policies for Environmental Safeguard
Finish
Administrative Location of Residential and Settlement Development Activities
Appropriate with Law
Preparation of UKL & UPL
Bapedalda/BPLHD Kabupaten/Kota, if the activity are located on 1 (one) region of Kabupaten.Kota Bapedalda/BPLDH Province if the activity are located in more than 1 (one) Kabupaten/Kota Central Bapedalda, if the activity are located more than 1 (one) province or inter country
Proposed and Legalization of UKL &
Input/revision from Technical Team & Community
Representative Legalization of UKL &
UPL
Ministerial Decree of Settlement and Regional Infrastructure No. 17/2003 on Settlement Activities and Regional Infrastructure that required UKL and UPL . Ministerial of Environmental Decree No. 86/2002 on Implementation Guideline of UKL –UPL
Start
Type or Quantity of Dam Rehabilitation Plan
28
Final Draft
2.4. Public Consultation Community involvement (stakeholder) in preparation of UKL/UPL will be included during approval of UKL/UPL documents through consultation in the EIA/technical team commission. Input and suggestions from the related stakeholders will be used in perfecting the UKL/UPL documents for approval.
The EIA commission/technical team consists of permanent and temporary members. Permanent members are representative from Institutions appointed to manage the environment such as Forestry Agency, Health Agency, BPN, Social Agency and Human Resources Agency. The temporary members are representatives from institutions related to the project activities, such as Public Works Agencies, Mining Agency, and Farming Agency, Representative from the communities, NGOs and Environment experts.
The General Guidelines for Stakeholder Consultation for DOISP 1 are outlined in the Project Implementation Plan Section 2.3 for community participation in reservoir management and Section 3.4 community participation in watershed management (see Annex 10). The draft ESMF and the draft UKL/UPLs were presented to national-level stakeholders as well as representatives from the regions where the four first sub-projects would be implemented, at a consultative workshop on August 5th, 2008 in Semarang, Central Java, a central project area. Minutes of the discussions are contained in Annex 11. Participants at the workshop were presented with copies in the Indonesian language, Bahasa. Discussions focused on:
Brief summary presentations on the overall project objective and the modus operandi.
Institutional arrangements for project implementation. A review of the list of potential sub projects in DOISP 1 and the rationale for their
selection. The list and brief description of the activities being proposed for each sub project. Status of project preparation. Key environmental and social challenges for the DOISP 1 project as a whole and
for individual subjects identified for implementation in Year 1. A review of the Indonesian UKL/UPL system as it would apply to this project. A brief review of the World Bank’s Environmental Assessment OP4.01 and how
it would apply to this project. The key provisions of the ESMF in terms of screening requirements, processes
and responsibilities, Sub project EA categorizations, preparation of EMP documentation, their review and approval process, etc.
Implementation of the EMP as part of the sub project implementation. • Standard proposed mitigation measures to manage the environmental and social
impacts. • Grievance mechanism for potentially affected people and communities to have
their voices heard should they feel that their concerns have not been heard. The discussions led to consensus regarding the positive appreciation for the DOISP1 as these reservoirs have played a positive role overall in terms of provision of water for the
29
Final Draft
local irrigation needs, and participants welcomed the opportunity for much need safety and operational improvements to ensure continued availability of the services being provided. The participants also expressed keen interest in ensuring that the provisions of ESMF were adhered to and that adverse impacts on individuals and communities should be addressed in a timely and adequate manner. The participants also emphasized that the project’s objectives and implementation need to be properly explained as many people had arrived at the meeting with the expectation that the project would actually build new reservoirs, which was considered potentially more contentious and problematic. The Bank Team and the DGWR will work closely together during appraisal to ensure the useful contributions from the participants are taken in consideration in the project design. In terms of involving public to participate in the EMP process, DOISP 1 will consult project-affected groups and local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) about the project’s environmental aspects and takes their views into account. Project proponent will continue the consultations as early as possible. Since local knowledge is important in designing and planning the implementation of practical mitigation measures, it is important that community participation is conducted during the preparation of the UKL/UPL. Such consultation for the four UKL/UPLs completed for the first year (2009) DOISP1 will be continued in parallel with project appraisal, and the comments expecting to be received will be included in the supplementary chapter for the relevant UKL/UPL.
2. 5. Disclosure After final revision of the ESMF and the four EMPs (UKL/UPL) are completed, and cleared by the World Bank, these documents will be disclosed locally in Bahasa in Indonesia, and the ESMF will also be disclosed at the Infoshop of the World Bank, Washington, DC. Further UKL/UPLs pertaining to the other sub-projects will be disclosed in due course each time they have been accepted for inclusion in the successive Annual Work Plans of DOISP 1.
3. Environmental Management
The DOISP 1 will provide resources for the following activities to support environmental management:
(1) Screening for DOISP 1 sub-projects
(2) Preparation of monitoring and management reports for DOISP 1 sub-projects
(3) Input into the design process for all sub-projects, including stakeholder consultation
(4) Refinement of the Environmental Management Plan
(5) Liaison with Bapedalda and other relevant stakeholders for all sub-projects
(6) Liaison and guidance on environmental and social matters among the consultants
30
Final Draft
(7) Preparation of further studies for DOISP 2 as necessary
3.1. Environmental Management Procedures To ensure that works associated with the project are undertaken in a manner that minimises impacts it is necessary to manage the environmental issues.
Approvals associated with all stages of preparation and works will be undertaken by BBWS/BWS (and, at no-objection level, the World Bank). see Annex 8- Mechanism Approval of Environment
Table 5: Roles and Responsibilities
Activity Implementing Agency Responsible
Monitoring Agency Responsible
1. Screening Impact BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS Remedial Work 2. Document Preparation a. Prepare Administration BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS b. Compose document BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS c. Approval Technical team
1. Project Operational Dam BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS Green Belt BBWS/BWS/PSDA
BBWS/BWS/PSDA BBWS/BWS/PSDA BBWS/BWS/PSDA Catchment Area
Report BBWS/BWS/PSDA RLR Agency/PSDA a. Project Implementer - Operational Dam BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS
- Reservoirs BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS -Catchment Area District Farming Agency District Farming Agency
Forestry Agency Forestry Agency Mining Agency Mining Agency Industrial Agency Industrial Agency BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS PW Agency PW Agency
-Report BBWS/BWS RLR Agency Coordination with related institution with the Management
PW Provincial Agency
b. Environment Monitoring Implementer
- Operational Dam BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS - Green Belt BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS
31
Final Draft
-Catchment Area District Farming Agency District Farming Agency Forestry Agency Forestry Agency Mining Agency Mining Agency Industrial Agency Industrial Agency BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS PW Agency PW Agency
-Report BBWS/BWS RLR Agency Coordination with related institution with the Management
PW Provincial Agency Bapedalda/BKLH/Provincial Environmental Agency
c. Implementer of Environmental Monitoring
- Operational Dam BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS - Green Belt BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS -Catchment Area District Farming Agency District Farming Agency
Forestry Agency Forestry Agency Mining Agency Mining Agency Industrial Agency Industrial Agency BBWS/BWS BBWS/BWS PW Agency PW Agency
-Report BBWS/BWS RLR Agency Coordination with related institution with the Management
PW Provincial Agency Bapedalda/BKLH/Provincial Environmental Agency
32
Final Draft
33
Box - 1 Summary of DOISP 1 Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Roles and
Responsibilities
Overall Environmental Objective of the Project: • Project will be implemented in accordance with the Environmental and Social
Management Framework (ESMF) and Loan Agreements Sub-Directorate related on Environmental Affairs, DGWR:
• Prepare the guidance and supervision of the project's environmental aspects. • Ensure/Coordinate with Kabupaten/Kota/Provincial/Central governments and the World
Bank, and other national and local government agencies.
Central Team Consultants (serves under the DGWR Technical Directorate of Rivers. Lakes and Dams [Sudawa]):
• Assist in establishing and ensuring compliance with the ESMF requirements, particularly during sub-project planning and assessment.
• Ensure close coordination with PDMUs including annual consultation and coordination workshops; needed training support and information dissemination.
Design and Supervision Consultants (DSCs; under DGWR Implementation Units [Balai (Besar) WS]): • Lead role during sub-project design reviews, monitoring and reporting on
implementation in coordination with the provincial/kabupaten and Central Consultants Team.
• Provide needed environmental guidance and field support during sub-project implementation.
• Support transport and other funding requirements of PDMUs sub-project monitoring visits and local consultation meetings.
DGWR Provincial Project Implementation Units (Balai BWS / Balai WS) • Lead role for project planning and supervision at the provincial level. • Serve as the official point of project coordination and communication with the
respective BAPEDALDA and other government institutions.
BAPEDALDA (Environmental Impact Management Agency; serves under local government at the provincial and/or kabupaten level):
Final Draft
3.2. Document Review and Amendment The completed UKL/UPLs of the sub-projects will be reviewed by safeguards specialists at national level (PMU) prior to formal submission to the local environmental authority (Bapedalda) and the World Bank for approval. This approval process with the Bank will take place annually at the occasion of the review of the Annual Work Plan submitted by the PMU. The Bank will be comment on UKL/UPL (EMP standard follow Annex 7) drafts provided during the semi-annual supervision missions to avoid that “final” EMPs would need to be re-drafted, which would require time and which might create constraints in sub-project implementation. Review and final approval of all required environmental will be a precondition for completion of detailed designs (DDs) and preparation of tender documents (TDs) by local governments. Local governments will have to demonstrate how environmental mitigation has been handled, and when required, integrated into detailed sub-project designs and bill of quantities. The PMU team will review and sign off on all completed DDs and TDs, including further safeguards review to ensure key impacts identified have been adequately addressed. This could include one or a mix of the following: structural measures to be incorporated into detailed engineering design; non-structural measures to be listed in specific conditions of contract; and Standard Operating Procedures environmental impact management integrated into bid documents and contracts. The World Bank will review a sample of completed DD/TDs, at least one for each participating local government.
34
Final Draft
Table 6: Overview of Review and Approval Mechanism
Subproject preparation and eligibility
sub project eligibility selection of subprojects preparation of selected subprojects subproject approval construction supervision and subproject management
Environmental procedures Application of criteria to
screen out high risk sub-projects (defer to DOISP2)
Environmental and social
screening of selected sub-projects
Implementation of UKL/UPL
as required Integration of study results
into DD/TDs Social and environmental
monitoring
Formal review and approval requirements
Screening results sent to local
environmental authority and World Bank
Province Bapedalda reviews
and approves UKL/UPLs World Bank reviews and
approves all UKL/UPLs Bank reviews a sample of
DD/TD packages Submission of bi-annual
monitoring reports to GOI and Bank
3.3. Monitoring and Evaluating Performance Internal monitoring on the implementation of the sub-components will be undertaken annually by the PMU. External monitoring and evaluation will be divided into two types. First, by the mid-term review, and second, by project closure. This activity will be based on TORs approved by the World Bank and conducted by an independent consultant/NGO/university to assess whether the process of participatory steps was implemented as per the technical guidelines, whether the empowerment, capacity building and the incentives have been effective, what benefit emerged for the community and for the project, and whether implementation still faces problems that require further assistance. A comprehensive process will be implemented for reporting on, and auditing the activities to meet the GOI and World Bank requirements based on the Annual Work
35
Final Draft
Plans for each sub-project. The UKL/UPL regulations require bi-annual work reporting, to ensure that the environment and social management and monitoring are being adhered to as per the UKL/UPL. This will include: • - A summary of activities undertaken over the past 6 months; • - The effectiveness of the mitigation measures to address impacts and potential
impacts as detailed in the UKL/UPL for each of the dam sites; • - Any incidents and non-compliances with the ESMF and UKL/UPL; • - The corrective actions undertaken to address non-conformances and there
effectiveness; • - Community complaints; • - Community consultation; • - Any changes to works and the approvals granted for the changes; and • - Any other issues relevant to environmental and social impacts and specific issues
covered in the UKL/UPLs.
It is essential that during the project the performance of works is kept in line with the requirements of the ESMF and the UKL/UPLs. As a result there is a need to monitor and evaluate project performance. From the screening assessment, site investigations and stakeholder consultation it can be determined that there are a number of environmental and social impacts which include:
a. Water Quality and Quantity Baseline water quality parameters which should be also examined include: turbidity, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), dissolved oxygen (DO), and temperature in water. Decrease in the water quality during dam gates rehabilitation and cleaning of the sediments could influence the water needs of the communities in the downstream and could have an impact on the social conflict, however these impacts are considered of short duration and manageable through consultation. The pre-screening has not indicated that any mining activity is taking place upstream of the reservoir sites (except for sand mining and quarrying) so no need is anticipated to conduct more comprehensive chemical analysis of water or sediment. In case such potentially nefarious industrial effluents would be detected, water quality analysis will be adjusted to assess the impact on the reservoir.
b. Transportation Disturbance Mobilization of heavy equipments and material will have an impact on the air quality (dust) and noises which could disturb the community in the residential area (near/direct border with the mobilization route)
Road user of the dam access during rehabilitation will have an impact on conflict of interest on the road infrastructure utilization.
c. Community Social and Economical Development
Social economy dynamic and community culture around the dam had lost the preservation area and did not receive direct benefit to for an attention. Community participation development around the dam based on the characteristic need attention such
36
Final Draft
as economy development relating to deforestation, traditional fisheries development, tourism development.
d. Construction Waste During the project period attention to construction waste, such as garbage, vegetation waste and domestic water waste, material waste, dam facilities replacement material waste and used oil from the heavy machineries will follow the 3R process (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) and waste will be disposed of to designated waste facilities and in accordance with the UKL/UPL.
From the assessment of the dams in DOISP 1 it was determined that there is very limited industrialisation upstream of the dams (with the exception of the Jatiluhur reservoir) and as a result it is not expected that sediment removed from the outlets and inlets in the dam will encounter contaminated sediment. If it is determined that sediment is contaminated then the material will be stockpiled separately away from any water body and covered to ensure that there is no run-off. The material will be analysed and appropriate disposal methodologies will be determined from the analytical analysis.
e. Historical Issues As the works associated with DOISP 1 are unlikely to effect or alter the operation of the 34 dams it is not considered necessary to address this issue, although if during the approval process or construction community issues associated with historical controversy then the issue will be addressed in accordance with the stakeholder consultation procedure and any works will cease until the issue has been resolved.
f. Water Delivery
Works associated with DOISP 1 are unlikely to effect normal operational activities. If however water delivery is affected, full community consultation will be undertaken prior to the works to ensure that there is minimal social and environmental impact
g. External Water Pollution Impacts DOISP activities are not likely to cause any significant impact on water quality. If however it is noted either visually or as a result of water quality monitoring that significant water pollution has occurred then works will cease and Bapedalda/PIU will be immediately notified.
h. Dredging
Dredging for DOISP 1 will be limited to removal of silt build up around the inlet and outlet pipes (Maximum 500,000m3). If the limit is required to be exceeded then the activity will be deferred to DOISP 2.
i. Construction Compound Establishment Some of the activities associated with the project may require establishment of a site compound for the construction team. If this occurs the following process for site placement will be followed:
a) be located within the dam land;
b) have ready access to the road network;
37
Final Draft
c) be located to minimise the need for heavy vehicles to travel through residential areas;
d) be sited on relatively level land;
e) be separated from nearest residences by at least 200 m;
f) not be within 100 m of a water body (with the exception of requirements for works associated with DOISP 1);
g) be located above the 20 ARI flood level unless a contingency plan to manage flooding is prepared and implemented;
h) not require vegetation clearing beyond that already required for the Project;
i) not impact on heritage sites beyond those already impacted by the Project; and
j) not affect the land use of adjacent properties.
It should be noted that these requirements are not extensive, with any additional requirements covered in the UKL/UPL for each individual site.
Implementation of EMPs (UKL-UPL) is the responsibility of contractors, as set out in bid and contract documents. Field-based environmental monitoring of EMPs to ensure contractor compliance is the primary responsibility of the supervising engineer assigned for each subproject by the relevant Dinas (local government agency). Additional support and spot-checking will be carried by the safeguards specialists assigned to the geographically based consultant teams funded under DOISP, in coordination with local environmental authorities. Field based environmental monitoring of EMPs (UKL/UPL) is the primary responsibility of local environmental authorities. As current capacity to fulfil these tasks is very low, monitoring will be carried out by safeguards staff assigned to the geographically based supervision teams. However special attention will be given to ensuring that local environmental authorities are able to participate. For example, the geographically based safeguards specialists will coordinate their monitoring missions closely with local environmental authorities ensuring that adequate transportation is available. The results of environmental monitoring will be collated on a six-monthly basis by geographically based safeguards staff and submitted to the PMU team on a biannual basis. Significant non-compliances will be noted in these reports, whether issues raised have been resolved and what corrective actions were taken. Six-monthly monitoring reports will be submitted by the PMU to the WBOJ as an input to supervision missions.
3.4. Environmental Input into the Design Process For the environmental process to be effective, it is essential that at various stages in the process there are opportunities for a review of the design to include measures to reduce or eliminate any potential environmental issues. It will therefore be essential for the Central Consultants Team and National PIU to be actively involved in the design review and checking process through close liaison with the engineering personnel of the various
38
Final Draft
consultant teams and members of the DGWR (refer to Annexes 2, 7 and 8).
Some of the environmental matters that can be considered during the design review and checking process are as follows:
Reviewing proposed improvement and rehabilitation requirements in relationship to existing structures and/or sensitive environmental areas,
Reviewing the quantity and treatment for cleanings and dredging to assess the off-site impacts of quarrying and transport requirements as well as concerns for erosion, landslides and general stability of cut and fill areas,
Ensuring that existing water courses, drainage patterns and any coastal habitats are properly considered in proposed activities, and
Ensuring minimum blockage of existing accesses to adjacent areas.
It will be essential for the Consultants/environmental specialists to visit all sub-projects that are identified as requiring detailed studies (UKL/UPL) to support their preparation of the Terms of Reference (TOR) based on actual conditions and local concerns. These site visits should be undertaken with local engineering specialists familiar with the proposed sub-project to provide needed information and clarification of design features.
3.5. Preparation of Further Studies for DOISP 1 If it is determined from the detailed screening that further, more detailed studies are needed, such as the need to prepare an AMDAL, resources will be provided under the DOISP 1. Additional external consultancy may be required to undertake these further studies. The Team of Consultants will be responsible for preparing the TOR for these studies and separate Indonesian consultancies can be appointed to conduct these special studies or technical assistance services as required and approved by the project. Works /activities that require an AMDAL will be scheduled under DOISP2.
4. Community Development Beside of mitigation of negative impacts on local communities, the project will actively support social development through community participation and CDD approaches in reservoir management (sub-component 2.3 on 20 locations) and watershed management (sub-component 3.4 in 9 sub-catchments within 4 dams).
4.1. Community participation in reservoir management. This sub-component will build upon the pilots conducted under DSP. Objectives are to (i) ensure community participation in maintenance and safety of reservoirs and dams and in controlling the use of the reservoir area by outsiders; (ii) ensure community participation in creating income-generating agricultural and silvicultural opportunities, utilizing the government-owned reservoir greenbelt zone whilst applying land use practices that stem erosion and shore damage; (iii) strengthen the capacity of local government institutions (district, sub-district and village) in working in a participatory approach. The community participation will take consideration of social diversity and gender. A CDD approach will be applied, with support from local
39
Final Draft
NGOs familiar with the area. An incentive scheme will be introduced to support the development of the income-generating activities, which would need to be continued (at a lower level of engagement) by the local government and NGOs to improve sustainability. The settlers would be allowed the usufruct and lease of the land, and no land acquisition would be involved. 4.2. Community participation in watershed management. This sub-component will replicate successful pilots carried out by Balai PSDA and local government in Central Java in other (sub-) catchments where demand and commitment have been documented. The objectives are to (i) ensure community participation in increasing and maintaining protective vegetation cover and land surface structures (e,g., drains and terraces) in the catchment, as well as in the rehabilitation and protection of river banks and beds that are prone to erosion and threaten local settlements, bridges, bathing places, etc.; (ii) stimulate community participation in using income-generating opportunities related to the erosion control measures (tree and crop growing) that do not damage the ecosystem or the vulnerable soils; and (iii) encourage capacity of local government in managing the catchment with a participatory approach. The activities comprise community organization, joint prioritization and planning, financial incentives and technical support, and capacity building. The activities may include small-scale land acquisition, with land donation from the community, under the provision that the donators get direct benefit from the activities and the land to be donated is of minor size and/or does not significantly affect their assets.
Implementation of the community participation approach needs 3 guidelines, viz.: general guidelines, technical guidelines and guidelines for implementation.
The General Guidelines (Annex 10) describe the project, regulations and mechanisms that should be followed in the implementation of community participation components in DOISP 1. Technical Guidelines describes in detail each step or series of activities to execute community participation components. The third guideline is the Implementation Guideline. These are a series of guidelines for each implementer concerned with basic principles and stipulates requirements needed to implement each role and work component (job). The serial guidelines for implementers consist of:
Guideline for Community Group Guideline for Community in Reservoir Guideline for Community in Catchment Guideline for Facilitator
To promote community development under DOISP 1, community participation will take place in reservoir and watershed management that can be occur on a voluntary and sustainable basis. The system that will be applied (empowerment, consultations, financial and institutional support, etc.) will replicate earlier pilots that have proven successful or relatively successful, notably the greenbelt management sub-component under DSP, and the Probolo (West Java) catchment management program initiated by the Provincial government in 2001 and currently replicated by a Netherlands Trust Fund. The community participation will be directed toward efforts to enhance community access and capacity in relation to the utilization of resources generated by the reservoir and the watershed. These efforts can be in the form of: 1) involvement of the whole targeted
40
Final Draft
community in the process of decision-making related to reservoir and watershed management; 2) improvement in access to public assets, infrastructure and facilities in order to take advantage of opportunities as result of better reservoir and watershed management; and 3) improvement of human resources capacity in order to strengthen empowerment to take advantage of the emerging opportunities. Annex 10 provides general guidelines and brief description of the project, regulation, and mechanism in the implementation of DOISP components of community participation (sub components 2.3 and 3.4) Technical guidelines and serial guideline for the implementer will be prepared by the executing agency and incorporated as standard operational procedure (SOP) In the Project Management Manual (PMM), which will be reviewed by the Bank as a condition of the loan effectiveness.
Guidelines are made for different interest groups according to each role, obligation and function. Briefly the benefits of guidelines could be described as follows:
1. Community member and Community Groups To understand opportunities offered by the DOISP 1 Understand rules which have to be followed in DOISP 1 implementation
2. Dam Communication Forum 3. Catchment Preservation Forum
Developed community participation Building transparency and accountability Organizational Operation Reference
4. Project Understand thoroughly on DOISP 1 programs Project Implementation Planning Project controlling including project implementation performance
assessment 5. Implementation Consultant
Arranging project implementation strategy Project Implementation Planning Monitoring and evaluation of project development Reference for rehabilitation or guideline revision
6. Central Government Understand thoroughly DOISP 1 components Policy input in order for integration and coordination also further policy
development 7. BBWS/BWS and PSDA
Understand thoroughly DOISP 1 components Creating a continuous implementation program Building coordination network at the implementer level Coordination reference
8. Care Group Social control Advocating Synergize
41
Final Draft
Organization network
5. Capacity Building, Training and Technical Assistance
The Project organisational team will be responsible for ensuring that the level of expertise associated with the Project is sufficient to undertake the tasks at hand. The UKL/UPL will ensure that there is a requirement for training of staff and that all project staff working at sites will be inducted in an environmental and social awareness training process. Capacity building, training and technical assistance for the project is detailed and broken down in Appendix B of the PIP.
Under the overall coordination by the MPW, each project implementing entity at the province and local government level is expected to take responsibility in ensuring that this framework is supported. The key tasks, responsibilities, related management actions required in supporting the framework are listed in the following table. Table 7: Tasks and Responsibilities for Environment Issue
Tasks Responsibility Required actions Development of training modules and materials, required standards and guidelines
− - Environmental consultant for environment issues (PMU)
- Training materials prepared in Indonesian for joint social and environmental training in three modules including:
− - General introduction to the safeguards framework (3 days) - Specialist training for project staff (2 days) - Specialist training for contractors (2 days) - Guidelines and formats for screening (including basic information required when local governments submit their Annual Investment Plans), review, monitoring and reporting.
General environmental safeguards orientation training for Project staff, and key local government counterparts (Bappeda, PU and Bapedalda)
Environmental consultant (PMU)
Delivery of 3x3-day training events
42
Final Draft
Specialist environmental training in screening, review and supervision procedures, for project staff and field supervision engineers
Environmental consultant (PMU)
Year 1 delivery of 3x2-day training Year 2 delivery 1 or 2 training events for newly recruiting staff.
Specialist environmental training for contractors focusing on implementation of EMPs (UKKL-UPL)
Provincial environmental consultant with guidance from the national consultant
Rolling training program to be provided for all contractors. Contractors to be issued with a certificate for renewal every 3 years.
Commission environmental and social studies (UKL/UPL) as necessary, including drafting of ToRs
National consultant on basis of formal requests from respective local governments. Provincial consultant draft TORs, reviewed by national consultant.
Based on request by respective local governments
Review and approval of UKL/UPL
Local environmental authority.
Formal review and approval of UKL/UPL by local environmental authority WBOJ to review at least
one from each participating local government.
For SOPs, field based supervising engineers supported by geographically based safeguard specialists
Monitoring and reporting
For UKL/UPL, local environmental authorities supported by provincial consultant
Supervising engineers complete field protocols, Monitoring data compiled by local project team into 6 monthly reports for PIU team and WBOJ
The main capacity needs and related budget items required to support implementation of this framework are provided in the following table.
43
Final Draft
Table 8: Capacity Building and Indicative Budget (Environment)
Item Needs Indicative budget Environmental safeguard support to the PMU
1 Senior Environmental Specialist
24 months, including 12 months continuous during year 1.
Development and delivery of modules to be prepared by PMU safeguards specialists
No additional cost Environmental safeguards training
Training budget US$7,000 per training event to cover costs of travel, accommodation for participations, room hire, consumables
Capacity building for local environmental authority
1 environmental specialist to be provided to Provincial Bapedalda to assist with routine monitoring.
Full time (36 months) at local government fee rates for a mid to senior level official
Composing UKL-UPL Year 2008: 4
UKL/UPL US$20,000 x 4 = US$40,000
US$20,000 x 30 = US$600,000 Year 2009: 30 UKL/UPL
Community Consultation Year 2008 – 2009 34 Subprojects x 250 people x IDR 250,000 = IDR 2,125M = US$ 240,000
Environmental Management Training for Dam activities
Year 2009 – 2010 34 Subprojects x 10 people x 3 days x IDR 1,000,000 = IDR 1,020M = US$ 115,000
Monitoring and reporting Travel costs US$25,000 to be allocated to each
provincial team
The Project organizational team will be responsible for ensuring that the level of expertise associated with the Project is sufficient to undertake the tasks at hand. The UKL/UPL will ensure that there is a requirement for training of staff and that all project
44
Final Draft
staff working at sites will be inducted in an environmental and social awareness training process. For more detailed estimated costs and extent of capacity building and training associated with the project can be found in Appendix B of the PIP.
45
ANNEX 1 LIST DAMS TO BE REHABILITATED ON DOISP PROJECT
Table Dams to Be Rehabilitated in 2009 (Year 1)
No Dam Name Risk Score Basin Province/ Owner Year
Built Height
(M) Volume of Reservoir
(m3) Hazard
Categories Purpose of the Dam
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Krisak 54 Krisak Bengawan Solo Central Java/ BBWS Solo 1943 20.00 3.717.000 3 Irrigation 274 ha
2 Gondang 47 Jurug Gondang East Java/ BBWS Solo 1986 22.00 25.900.000 4 Irrigation 10.500 ha
3 Batujai 47 Panunjak NTB/ BWS NT I 1982 16.00 23.500.000 4 Irrigation 3.350 ha
4 Gembong 45 Juwono Sani
Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1993 38.00 9.500.000 3 Irrigation 3.855 ha
Table Dams to Be Rehabilitated in 2010 (Year 2)
No Dam Name Risk Score Basin Province/ Owner Year
Built Height
(M) Volume of Reservoir
(m3) Hazard
Categories Purpose of the Dam
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Ir. H. Juanda (Jatiluhur)
78 Citarum West Java/ BBWS Citarum 1967 96.00 2.556.000.000 5
Irrigation 240.000 ha Electricity 350.000 MWH Water Supply 11 m3/sec
2 Wadaslintang 76 Serayu – Opak Central Java/ BBWS Serayu Opak 1987 125 440.000.000 4 Irrigation 31.634 ha
Electricity 92.000 MWH
3 Malahayu 72 Kabuyutan Central Java/ BBWS Cimanuk Cisanggarung 1940 30.00 39.880.000 3 Irrigation 18.456 ha
1
No Dam Name Risk Score Basin Province/ Owner Year
Built Height
(M) Volume of Reservoir
(m3) Hazard
Categories Purpose of the Dam
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 Cengklik 70 Suplesi Bendung Watu Leter Central Java/ BBWS – Solo 1931 14.50 9.773.000 3 Irrigation 1.578 ha
5 Penjalin 69 Penjalin Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1934 23.00 9.500.000 5 Irrigation 29.000 ha
6 Sempor 68 Petahunan Sempor
Central Java/ BBWS Serayu Opak 1967 42.00 39.963.000 4 Irrigation 17.000 ha
Electricity 6000 MWH
7 Selorejo 68
Konto Brantas East Java/ BBWS Brantas 1970 46 62.300.000 5 Irrigation 5.700 ha
Electricity 49 MWH
8 Karangkates 68 Brantas East Java/ BBWS Brantas 1973 96.00 343.000.000 4 Irrigation 34.000 ha Electricity 488.000 MWH
9 Ketro 65 Ketro Bengawan Solo Central Java/ BBWS Solo 1984 15 2.800.000 5 Irrigation 400 ha
10 Batutegi 64 Way Sangharus Way Sekampung
Lampung/ BBWS Mesuji Sekampung 2001 120.00 500.000.000 4 Irrigation 90.000 ha
Electricity 125.2 GWH
Table Dams to Be Rehabilitated in 2011 (Year 3)
No Dam Name Risk Score Basin Province/ Owner Year Built
Height(M)
Volume of Reservoir
(m3) Hazard
Categories Purpose of the Dam
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Cacaban 64 Cacaban Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1958 36.00 90.000.000 4 Irrigation 17.481 ha
2 Darma 64 Cisanggarung West Java/ BBWS Cimanuk Cisanggarung 1962 36.00 37.900.000 4 Irrigation 22.316 ha
3 Wonorejo 61 Wangi Gondang East Java/ BBWS Brantas 1999 100.00 122.000.000 5
Irrigation 7.540 ha Water Supply 8.02 m3/sec Electricity 6.02 MWH
2
No Dam Name Risk Score Basin Province/ Owner Year Built
Height(M)
Volume of Reservoir
(m3) Hazard
Categories Purpose of the Dam
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 Wlingi 60 Brantas East Java/ BBWS Brantas 1972 28.00 24.000.000 4 Irrigation 13.600 ha Electricity 188.000 MWH
5 Tempuran 59 Kedung Padas Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1916 18.00 2.143.000 3 Irrigation 923 ha
6 Kedung Ombo 58 Uter Serang
Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1989 61.00 723.000.000 4 Irrigation 59.645 ha
Electricity 22,5 MWH
7 Sengguruh Jawa Timur 58 Lesti-Brantas East Java/ BBWS Brantas 1982 33,00 23.000.000 3 Electricity 98,5 MWH
8 Nglangon 57 Nglangon Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1914 15.00 2.184.000 3 Irrigation 750 ha
9 Kalola 57 Walanae – Cenrenae
South Sulawesi/ BWS Pompengan Jeneberang 1995 34.80 70.000.000 3
Irrigation 6.803 ha Water Supply 14,219 m3/sec Electricity 0
10 Way Jepara 57 Lampung BBWS Mesuji Sekampung 1979 16.00 15.000.000 3 Irrigation 6651 ha
Table Dams to Be Rehabilitated in 2012 (Year 4)
No Dam Name Risk Score Basin Province/ Owner Year Built
Height(M)
Volume of Reservoir
(m3) Hazard
Categories Purpose of the Dam
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Kedung Uling 56 Bengawan Solo Central Java/ BBWS Solo 1917 8.00 900.000 3 Irrigation 569 ha
3
No Dam Name Risk Score Basin Province/ Owner Year Built
Height(M)
Volume of Reservoir
(m3) Hazard
Categories Purpose of the Dam
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 Pengga 56 Dodokan NTB/ BWS NT I 1994 33.00 27.000.000 3 Irrigation 3.589 ha
Electricity 0.4 MWH
3 Simo 55 Pemali – Juana Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1904 10.00 430.000 3 Irrigation 482 ha
4 Greneng 55 Central Java Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1918 13.00 2.300.000 4 Irrigation 251 ha
5 Plumbon 55 Baron Bengawan Solo Central Java/ BBWS Solo 1928 23.00 1.050.000 3 Irrigation 1.045 ha
6 Sampean Baru 55 Mandiro
Sampean East Java/ BWS Bondowoso 1983 26.00 1.500.000 3 Irrigation 9.800 ha
7 Merancang 54 Mahakam East Kalimantan/ BWS Kalimantan III 1995 8.00 20.000.000 4 Irrigation 3160 ha
8 Pacal 54 Pacal Bengawan Solo East Java/ BBWS Solo 1924 35.00 41.180.000 4 Irrigation 16.600 ha
9 Salomekko 54 Walanae – Cenrenae
South Sulawesi/ BWS Pompengan Jeneberang 1998 30.00 7.000.000 4 Irrigation 1742 ha
10 Sanggeh 53 Pemali – Juana Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1909 7.20 420.000 3 Irrigation 263 ha
Table Dams to Be Rehabilitated in DOISP 2
No Dam Name Risk Score Basin Province/ Owner Year
Built Height
(M) Volume of Reservoir
(m3) Hazard
Categories Purpose of the Dam
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Tiu Kulit 53 Sumbawa NTB/ BWS NT I 1994 26.40 11.000.000 4 Irrigation 1.800 ha
Electricity 0.075 MW
4
No Dam Name Risk Score Basin Province/ Owner Year
Built Height
(M) Volume of Reservoir
(m3) Hazard
Categories Purpose of the Dam
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5
2 Way Rarem 53 Rante Gowak Lampung/ BBWS Mesuji Sekampung 1984 32.00 72.400.000 3 Domestic water
supply
3 Prijetan 52 Prijetan Bengawan Solo East Java/ BBWS Solo 1917 23.00 8.750.000 3 Irrigation 4.600 ha
4 Nawangan 51 Central Java Central Java/ BBWS Solo 1976 25.00 800.000 3 Irrigation 354 ha
5 Pondok 51 Bengawan Solo East Java/ BBWS Solo 1996 30 25.300.000 4 Irrigation 3511 ha
6 Kedung Bendo 49 K. Bendo K. Madiun East Java/ BBWS Solo 1948 13.00 1.700.000 4 Irrigation 1430 ha
7 Lempake 49 Mahakam East Kalimantan/ BWS Kalimantan III 1970 9.00 N/A 5 Irrigation 550 ha
8 Klego 49 Kancil Serang
Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1989 14.00 2.740.000 3 Irrigation 874 ha
9 Gapit 49 Sumbawa NTB/ BWS NT I 1997 24.60 - 3 Irrigation 13300 ha Drinking water 15 l/s
10 Mamak 48 Sumbawa NTB/ BWS NT I 1992 41.50 30.000.000 1 Irrigation 5.428 ha
Electricity 0.55 MW
11 Ngancar 47 Jarak River Central Java/ BBWS Solo 1946 19.00 2.050.000 4 Irrigation 1.300 ha
12 Parang Joho 47 Jumok Kedung Padas Central Java/ BBWS Solo 1980 20.00 1.760.000 3 Irrigation 650 ha
13 Sumi 47 Sumbawa NTB/ BWS NT I 1999 45.00 16.300.000 4 Irrigation 2.272 ha Electricity 100 MW
14 Sepayung Dalam 47 Rode NTB/ BWS NT I 1993 17.00 1.600.000 3 Irrigation 501 ha
No Dam Name Risk Score Basin Province/ Owner Year
Built Height
(M) Volume of Reservoir
(m3) Hazard
Categories Purpose of the Dam
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
15 Batu Bulan 46 Sumbawa NTB/ BWS NT I 2002 39.00 53.600.000 4 Irrigation 5162 ha
16 Samboja 46 Mahakam Kalimantan/ BWS Kalimantan III 1979 8.2 3.720.000 4 Irrigation 1.000 ha
17 Telogo Pasir 46 Bengawan Solo East Java/ BBWS Solo 1931 14.50 2.673.000 4 Irrigation 1777 ha
18 Gunung Rowo 43 Gunung Wadi Jratun Seluna
Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1925 21.00 5.160.000 3 Irrigation 6.052 ha
19 Sermo 42 Ngrancah Serang
Yogyakarta/ BBWS Serayu Opak 1985 56.6 25.000.000 1 Irrigation 3.550 ha
20 Waerita 40 Flores NTT/ BWS NT II 1994 12.00 324.000 4 Irrigation 100 ha
21 Jero Waru 39 Sumbawa NTB/ BWS NT I 1999 13.00 N/A 3 Irrigation 263 ha
22 Klambu 37 Pemali -Juana Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1988 10.00 Barrage 3 Irrigation 38.300 ha
23 Manubulu 36 Rote NTT/ BWS NT II 1994 15.00 722.000 3 Irrigation 1101.5 ha
24 Way Tengkorak 35 Way Sekampung Lampung/ BBWS Mesuji Sekampung 1989 8.00 470.000 2 Domestic water
supply
25 Livuhahani 34 Rote NTT/ BWS NT II 1992 15.00 25.100 3 Irrigation 500 ha
26 Delingan 12 Tempuran Bengawan Solo Central Java/ BBWS Solo 1924 27.00 3.270.000 3 Irrigation
6
No Dam Name Risk Score Basin Province/ Owner Year
Built Height
(M) Volume of Reservoir
(m3) Hazard
Categories Purpose of the Dam
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
27 Cikuluk 39 Way Sekampung Lampung/ BBWS Mesuji Sekampung 1988 9.00 185.000 3 Domestic water
supply
28 Rawa Pening 33 Tuntang Jratun Seluna
Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1938 8.20 35.000.000 4 Irrigation 20.067 ha
Electricity 35 MW
29 Situ Patok * 59 Cimanuk West Java/ BBWS Cimanuk Cisanggarung 1927 27.30 14.000.000 2 Irrigation 1934 ha
30 Cipancuh1 * 42 Indramayu West Java/ BBWS Cimanuk Cisanggarung 1923 15.00 7.800.000 3
31 Banyu Kuwung 55 Batok Central Java/ BBWS Pemali Juana 1995 13.50 2.400.000 4 Irrigation
Drinking Water
7
1 * Dam yet to be inspected
Yes No
RENCANA KEGIATAN REHABILITASI DAM SUB-PROYEK DOSIP
Ketentuan OP.401
OP 4.01
E ir osial safeguard nv onmental & s
- OD. 420 : Indegenous People - OP. 404 : Natural Habitat ( Indegenous Species) - OP. 4.11 : Safequard cultural
propertily- OP. 4.12 : Involuntary Reseument
Bank Dunia
PEMERINTAH RI UU No. 23 / 1997 PP No.27 / 1999
PERMEN LH No. 11 / 2006
TIDAK BERDAMPAK BESAR DAN PENTING TERHADAP KOMPONEN LINGKUNGAN
KEPMEN LH No. 8 / 2002
UKL DAN UPL
BERPE
KOM
DAMPAK BESAR DAN NTING TERHADAP PONEN LINGKUNGANSOSEKBUD FISK – KIMIA
• • • BIOLOGI • KESEHATAN
MASYARAKAT
KEPMEN LH No. 86 / 2006
DAM REHABILITATION
RACTIVITY PLAN SUB-PROYEK DOISP1
Environment and Social Safeguards
- Category A - Category B
- Category C - Category F
- Category C - Category F
- OP. 4.10 : Indigenous People - OP. 4.04 : Natural Habitat (Indigenous Species) - OP. 4.11 : Safeguard cultural Property - OP. 4.12 : Involuntary Resettlement
World Bank
Environmental Impact
Assessment ( EIA)/ AMDAL
LAW No. 23 / 1997 GOV.REG No.27 / 1999
ENV.DECREE No. 11 / 2006
NO MAJOR AND CRITICAL IMPACT ON ENVIROMENT
COMPONENT
ENV.DECREE No. 8 / 2002
UKL DAN UPL (EMP)
MAJOR AND CRITICAL IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT, SOC and CULTURAL PHISIC – CHEMISTRY, BIOLOGI, PUBLIC HEALTH
ENV.DECREE No. 86 / 2006
GOI
Annex 2
Diagram (Screening) Environment Management
ANNEX – 3
Types of Activities should accompanied by ANDAL or UKL/UPL SCALE SECTOR AND ACTIVITY
ANDAL UKL/UPL Solid Waste/Desposal
a. Final disposal with control landfill system/sanitary landfill (non- hazardous waste)
- Area coverage, or > 10 Ha < 10 Ha
- Total capacity > 10.000 ton < 10.000 ton
b. Final disposal in tides area3
- Landfill coverage, or > 5 Ha < 5 Ha
- Total capacity > 5.000 ton < 5.000 ton
c. Final disposal with open dumping system All size -
Irigation and Drainage
a. Development of drainage in medium-sized city
- Primary drainage (length) > 10km < 10 km
- Secondary and tertiary drainage (length) > 10km 2 - 10 km
b. Development of drainage in small-sized city - > 5 km
Sediment Dredging
a. Medium-sized city
- Length, or > 10 km 3-< 10 km
- Volume of dredging > 500,000 m3 -
b. Check dams ≤ 15 m ≥ 15 m
New Construction for Resettlement
a. Number of persons removed, or > 200 households 50 - 200 households
b. Area coverage > 100 Ha 2 Ha - 100 Ha
1. See Decree of the State Minister of the Environment No. 17/2001 dated 22
May 2001 on Types of Activities that Need to be Accompanied by AMDAL 2. See Decree of the Minister of Settlements and Regional Infrastructure No.
17/KPTSl2003, dated 3 February 2003 on Types of Activities that Need to be Accompanied by UKUUPL
3. This applies for controlled landfill in tides area as well Sources: 1. Minister of Settlements and Regional Infrastructure Decree No. 17, year
2003 2. KepMen LH No. 11 / 2006 - Minister of the Environment Decree No. 11,
year 2006
Serial
1 JATILUHUR - West Java CIVIL WORKS
Local labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Detailed study to determine : Yes
O joint at junction between access gallery and morning glory a) the cause of movements and seepage associated Water Polution, Air Quality, √ √ √ √ √ √ √
tower is causing seepage problems with “0” joint in the access tunnel and Construction waste
Abnormal settlement of crest remains unresolved issue propose remedial measures Construction waste Organic Waste
Thereis a wet area next to left abutment that needs study b) the abnormal settlement of dam crest as reservoir
Saddle dams still showing distress water level goes down Water level of reservoir
Emergency spillway requires remodelling/relocation c) wet area near the left abutment Water quality
Seals of hollow jet valve have worn out d) stability problems associated with saddle dams Land utilitation (social Impact)
seals of intake gates have worn out and to study alternatives for redesigning/relocating Re-Settlement
draft tube gate is damaged the emergency spillway living Impact
the crane on spillway deck is old and out of order Electro-Mechanical
Replace the seals of 2 hollow jet valves Construction waste, used grease
replace the seals of 6 intake gates Construction waste
Provide automatic water level recorder for reservoir water level Turbidity Social Impact
Replacement of draft tube gate Construction waste, used grease
2 TIU KULIT - Nusa Tenggara Barat CIVIL WORKS
Local labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Construction of rockfill berm Construction waste Yes
seepage is emerging in uncontrolled manner at some places construction of a v-notch Construction waste
land slide ocuring in the reservoir periphery right in front of main dam Shotcreting of the land slide Construction waste
near right abutment animal traffic causes embankment degradation Provision of a steel gate Construction waste
repairs required to the electro-mechanical works INSTRUMENTATION- Construction of V-notch Construction waste
- Repair the hydraulic piezometer tubes and the Construction waste
monitoring system
Repair of v-notch Construction wasteSPILLWAY
200 m long, 1 m high masonry wall on the left abutment Construction waste
near spillway.
ELECTRO MECHANICAL- Minihydro and BFV repair Construction waste
- Replace generator set 80KVa Air Quality & Noise
Annex 4 ESMF Screening For 34 DAM on DOISP 1
LIST OF DAMS IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS PROPOSED REMEDIAL WORKS
IDENTIFIED IMPACT MAIN REHABILITATION WORKS SEDIMENTATION PROBLEMS REQUIREMENTS REGARDING UPGR
ADING FOR
HYDROMET STATI
ON
LAN
D
RECOMENDATION No. CONSTRUCTION
RELATEDNON-CONSTRUCTION
RELATED ON THE DAM ON APPURTENANT STRUCTURES IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS PROPOSED EIS
RES
ERVO
IR
DA
M R
AIS
ING
CO
MPE
NSA
TIO
NR
E-SE
TTLE
MEN
TC
OM
MU
NIT
Y
AMDAL
UKL - UPL
3 WAY RAREM CIVIL WORKSLocal labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
There is seepage occurring from left abutment near outlet Detailed study to determine cause of seepage from the No Impact sedimentation has
reduced approximate 30%
1. Need reservoir sediment survey to develop
Yes
Dam crest in poor condition left abutment near outlet. volume of reservoir but not become problem for
new Area-volume curve.
There are trees and shrubs on the dam body Rehabilitate dam crest with ATB layerTransportation reservoir operation as well
as for irrigation area2. Need sandtrape or check dam at river which
Trash boom damaged Clean trees and shrubs Organic Waste brings the sediment into reservoir.
Provide trash boom No ImpactV-notch damaged INSTRUMENTATION
Replace v-notch Construction wasteIntake roller gate damaged ELECTRICO-MECHANICALRubber seal of intake gate damaged Repair Intake roller gate Construction waste
Repair Rubber seal of intake gate Construction wasteBottom outlet damaged Repair Bottom outlet Construction wasteDistribution gate jet valve damaged Repair Distribution gate jet valve Construction waste
4 PRIJETAN - East Java CIVIL WORKSLocal labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Access road repair Yes
crest road is in poor condition Dam crest repair by ATB layerTransportation, Air Quality Acces Impact
slopes are covered by vegetation Weeds and shrubs cleaning Organic Waste surface movement monuments are broken INSTRUMENTATION
Construction of Surface movement monumentsConstruction waste
SPILLWAY
bridge over emergency spillway too narrow Construction of emergency spillway bridge (4x50 m2)Construction waste, Water Polution
Proper access to spillway missing construction of ladder to access spillwayConstruction waste
spillway repair (wing wall) with stone masonryConstruction waste
spillway concrete repair in chute and stilling basin
wooden planks of outlet bridge damaged INTAKE TOWER
Repairs required for slide gate, lifting gate and guard gate Bridge wooden plank repair Construction waste
Hand rails replacement for intake tower Construction waste
Outlet irrigation channel repair on D/S (stone masonry)Water Quantity & Quality
ELECTRO MECHANICALSlide gates repair Construction wasteLifting gate repair Construction wasteGuard gate manual repair Construction waste
Provide Generating Set 60 KVA Air Quality & Noise
5 NAWANGAN Detailed study to determine cause of seepage emerging in Riprap damaged by anglers outlet channel and the cause of wet area near v‐notch No
CIVIL WORKSLocal labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Dam crest in poor state Rehabilitate dam crest with ATB Construction waste
A concrete curb is required along the dam crest Construct the concrete curb along the crest of dam Construction waste
The embankment toe near the v-notch is unstable Provide gabions along The embankment toe near the v-notch Construction waste
There are trees and shrubs on the dam body Remove the trees and shrubs Organic Waste
Inspection stairway damaged Repair the damaged inspection stairway Construction waste
Outlet basin damaged Repair outlet basinWater Quantity & Quality
Wooden planks of intake bridge are damaged Replace wooden planks of intake bridge Construction waste
The following instruments are damaged: INSTRUMENTATION
18 surface movement monuments, Replace/repair the following instruments :
Nine stand pipe piezometers, 3 V-notches 18 surface movement monuments, Construction waste
Nine stand pipe piezometers, 3 V-notchesDrilling waste fluids, Water Polution
ELECTRO MECHANICALReplace the rubber seal of intake gate Construction waste
UKL - UPL
UKL - UPL
UKL - UPL
6 PONDOK CIVIL WORKSLocal labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Riprap damaged at places by anglers Repair riprap Construction waste Yes
There are trees and shrubs present over dam body Selectively remove trees and shrubs Organic Waste
Inspection stairway damaged Repair inspection stairway Construction waste
Spillway as well as outlet channel filled with vegetation Rehabilitate inspection road with ATB Transportation
Inspection Road (1 km) in poor state INSTRUMENTS
Nine stand pipe piezometers, one V-notch 6. Replace the following instruments:
A Generator is required Nine stand pipe piezometers, one V-notch Construction waste
SPILLWAY
Remove shrubs from Spillway as well as outlet channel Organic Waste
ELECTRO MECHANICAL
Provide a generator set Air Quality & Noise
7 0 CIVIL WORKSLocal labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Seepage is emerging way above toe filter and slopes showing Detailed study to determine cause of seepage No Impact No data
signs of creep. on D/S slope.
Access road in poor condition - Dam Crest Rehabilitation Construction waste
Dam crest in poor condition - Tree and shrubs Cleaning Organic Waste
Vegetation of both U/S and D/S slopes INSTRUMENTATION
Intake tower in poor condition - Stand Pipe Piezometer installation Construction waste
v-notch requires replacement - Replacement of V-notch Construction waste
stand pipe piezometers damaged Access road rehabilitation Transportation
sediments very close to intake OUTLET STRUCTURE
spillway bridge damaged - Outlet RepairWater Quantity & Quality
outlet flume on d/s filled with sediments - Removal of sediments around intake structureWater Quantity & Quality
- Sediment Excavation on the D/S from the flume Water Quantity & Quality
SPILLWAY
- Replacement of hand rail on bridge Construction waste
- Spillway Bridge Repair with concrete Construction waste
8 0 CIVIL WORKSLocal labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Access road is in poor condition Rehabilitate access road with ATB Transportation Sedimentation has reduced approximate 70%
1. Need to remove sediment with excavation
Dam crest is in poor state Rehabilitate dam crest with ATB Construction waste volume of reservoir but not become problem for
approximately 50.000 m3.
U/S Parapet wall shall be raised Raise U/S Parapet wall Construction waste reservoir operation as well as for irrigation area
2. Need sandtrape or check dam river which
Toe Drain missing Provide Toe Drain No Impact brings sediment into reservoir.
Guide wall of left side spillway damaged INSTRUMENTATIONSurface of right side spillway in poor state Construct 1 v-notch Construction waste
land on D/S of left side spillway being eroded away SPILLWAY
Houses on D/S of right side spillway require protection Repair of Guide wall by Reinforced Concrete (left side spillway) Construction waste
Instrumentation required since the dam is founded on soft clay. Rehabilitate the spillway surface with concrete Construction waste
Protection of land on D/S of left side spillway by Gabions Construction waste Raise height of gabions on D/S of right side spillway to protect houses Construction wasteReplace the suspension bridge Construction waste
9 KLEGO - Central Java CIVIL WORKSLocal labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Dam is facing seepage and stability problems Special study for seepage and stability problems No ImpactThere is vegetation on slopes Tree and shrubs cleaning Organic Waste access road is in poor condition - Access Road asphalt concrete overlay Transportationdam crest is in poor condition - Dam Crest Rehabilitation with ATB layer Construction wastetoe drain is damaged Toe Drain repair No Impact
seepage starts abnormally at certain water level Construction of concrete diaphragm wall Construction waste
riprap damaged by anglers Rip rap rehabilitation Construction wasteV-notch damaged INSTRUMENTATIONsurface monuments required V-notch repair Construction wastedistribution gate damaged - Construction of Surface Movement monuments Construction waste
ELECTRO MECHANICALHand rail bridge repainting Construction wastedistribution gate repair Construction waste
UKL - UPL
UKL - UPL
AMDAL
UKL - UPL
10 GAPIT - Nusa Tenggara Barat CIVIL WORKS
Local labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
- Construction of Filter and rockfill berm for Construction waste
Seepage water emerging at some places and stability problem D/S counterweight,
Drains are damaged Reconstruction of toe drains No Impactcrest road in poor condition - Dam Crest - Overlay RTB 5cm layer Construction waste
v-noteches andstd pipe piezometers damaged Access road Overlay RTB 5cm layer Transportation
cleaning of vegetation Organic Waste
Dam crest repair by ATB layer Construction waste
construction of toe drain from new berm No Impact
INSTRUMENTATIONReplacement of v-notches Construction waste
construction of stand pipe piezometers Construction waste
SPILLWAY
11 MAMAK CIVIL WORKSLocal labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Staff Gauge used for Reservoir water level is in poor condition. Detailed Study to determine the embankment stability Sedimentation has reduced approximate 20%
1. Need reservoir sediment survey to develop
under dynamic loading. volume of reservoir but not become problem for
new Area-volume curve.
reservoir operation as well as for irrigation area
2. To mitigate sediment problem:
Install Staff Gauge for Reservoir water level Construction waste a. Construct check dam at river which brings
Riprap damaged by anglers Replace Rip rap to fix the embankment slope Construction waste The Micro ElectricHydropower is broken.
sediment into reservoir.
Natural mound on the left side of Intake Structure showing Protect natural mound on the left side of Intake Construction waste b. Watershed must be conserved
signs of distress. Structure by Rip rap. Construction waste
Trees and shrubs present over dam body clean trees and shrubs Organic Waste
Flow from V-notch mixes with tail water from Power house Repair Construction waste
and as such v-notch is ineffective. INSTRUMENTATIONElectrical cable damaged Construct system for separating flow from V-notch and Construction waste
electrical Bulb missing tail water from Power house.
Generating Set 100 KVA required ELECTRO MECHANICAL1. Install JBW electrical cable Ø 5 mm (including cable protection) Construction waste
2. Provide electrical Bulb Provide Generating Set 100 KVA Air Quality & Noise
12 NGANCAR - Central Java CIVIL WORKS
Local labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Dam crest in poor condition - Dam Crest Rehabilitation Construction waste Sedimentation has reduced approximate 30%
1. Need reservoir sediment survey to develop
Vegetation of both U/S and D/S slopes - Tree and shrubs Cleaning Organic Waste volume of reservoir but not become problem for
new Area-volume curve operation.
Water channel immediately on D/S in poor state INSTRUMENTATION reservoir operation as well as for irrigation area
2. To protect and mitigate the sediment, it needs:
Intake tower in poor condition - Installation of Stand Pipe Piezometers Construction waste a. Constructed the check dam at river which
stand pipe piezometers damaged - Construction of Surface Movement monuments Construction waste brings sediment into reservoir
surface movement monuments missing OUTLET STRUCTURE b. watershed must be conservated
Intake gates require repairs and stop logs req. - Intake Tower Repair Construction waste
- Tower Roof Rehabilitation (wood) Construction waste
- Main Channel Rehabilitation (Masonry) Construction waste
ELECTRIC-MECHANICAL
- Intake Gate Rehabilitation Construction waste
- Stop Log Installation Construction waste
UKL - UPL
UKL - UPL
UKL -UPL
13 PARANG JOHO - Central Java CIVIL WORKS
Local labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
- Dam Crest Rehabilitation Construction waste Sedimentation has reduced approximate 70%
1. Need to remove sediment with excavation
Additional retaining wall is required Steel reinforcement for bridge Construction waste volume of reservoir but not become problem for
approximately 50.000 m3.
Dam crest in poor condition INSTRUMENTATION reservoir operation as well as for irrigation area
2. Need sandtrape or check dam river which
Water channel immediately on D/S in poor state - Installment of Stand Pipe Piezometer Construction waste brings the sediment into reservoir.
stand pipe piezometers damaged - Repairing Staff Gauge Construction waste
surface movement monuments missing - Construction of Surface Movement Construction waste
Bridge is not stable OUTLET STRUCTURE
Intake gate, flush gate and outlet gate require repairs - Removal of Sediments from the Outlet Channel Water Quantity & Quality
- Raise the Reinforced Concrete Retaining Wall in the Outlet Intake Construction waste
ELECTRO MECHANICAL
- Routine maintenance of all gates Water Quantity & Quality
- Replace Seals in the Intake Gate Construction waste
- Replace Seals in the Flushing Gate Construction waste
- Replace Seals in the Outlet Outlet gate Construction waste
- Replace the door of the Outlet Operation Room Construction waste
- Replacement of hand rails in the Outlet Tower Bridge Construction waste
SPILLWAY
- Raising of left side of Spillway Wing Wall with Stone Masonry Construction waste
- Provide Steel Pipe Hand Rail on the Left Side of Spillway Construction waste
14 0 CIVIL WORKS Local labour recruited, domestic waste
Local labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
crest road in poor condition - Dam Crest Rehabilitation Construction waste
slope near left abutment and spillway unstable - Tree and shrubs cleaning Organic Waste
Trees and shrubs o D/S slope Construction of berm on either side of v-notch to Construction waste
seepage occuring on D/S of toe prevent piping.
V-notches required shotcreting of left abutment near spillway Construction waste
existing v-notch flume needs repairs INSTRUMENTATION
Pneumatic piezometers can not be used since there - Seismograph Replacement Construction waste
is no nitrogen available - V-notch Installment Construction waste
Read out unit for settlement meters damaged Repair of existing v -notch Construction waste
seismograph damaged - Nitrogen cylender procurement Water Quality
rubber seals of irrigation valve defective - Read out meter procurement for settlement meters No Impact
electric motor for stop log device out of order SPILLWAY
transmission cable damaged - Extensometer installment Construction waste
ELECTRICO-MECHANICAL
- Replace electric motor for stop log lifting device Construction waste
-Replace transmission Cable Construction waste
- Replace batteries for genset 100AH Construction waste
- Replace rubber seal in Irrigation Valve Construction waste
AMDAL
UKL -UPL
15 SEPAYUNG DALAM - CIVIL WORKS Local labour recruited, domestic waste
Local labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Nusa Tenggara crest in poor condition - Dam crest repair by RTB layer Construction waste
toe drain choked and damaged repair of toe drain No Impactv-notch damaged replacement of V-notch Construction wasteleakage through spillway side walls and base clearing of vegetation Organic Waste
access road is in poor state construction of access road Transportation
agriculture fields require protection from flood water SPILLWAY
Grouting near spillway to stop leakage Construction waste
extension of spillway wing wall to protect agri. Fields
16 BATU BULAN - Nusa Tenggara Detailed Study to determine the embankment stability
under dynamic loading
CIVIL WORKSLocal labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Sedimentation has reduced approximate 30%
1. Need reservoir sediment survey to develop
Dam crest in poor state Rehabilitate dam crest with ATB Construction waste volume of reservoir but not become problem for
new Area-volume curve.
There are trees and shrubs on the dam body Clean trees and shrubs from dam bodyOrganic Waste reservoir operation as well
as for irrigation area2. To mitigate sediment problem:
Rip rap damaged at places Refurbish riprap wherever requiredConstruction waste a. Construct check
dam at river which brings
Rockfill on D/S slope settled Provide additional rockfill along D/S slope Construction waste sediment into reservoir
Trash boom damaged Provide new trash boom Solid Waste b. Watershed must be conserved
Outlet channel full of sediments Remove sedimentWaste sediment, water quality
The following instruments are damaged Replace the following damaged instruments Construction waste5 Surface movement monuments, 8 standpipe piezometers, 5 v
notches 5 Surface movement monuments, Construction waste
8 standpipe piezometers, 5 v notchesOUTLET STRUCTURE
Electrical cable damaged Clean outlet channelWater Quantity & Quality
ELECTRO MECHANICAL Replace damaged electrical cable Construction waste
Electrical bulbs for dam crest missing Provide electrical bulbs No Impact
17 0Detailed study to determine cause of dam distress
No Impact
U/S slope showing signs of movement as the parapet wall istilted and cracked. The U/S masonry protection also cracked atplaces
CIVIL WORKSLocal labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
Sedimentation and weeds have reduced
1. Need to remove sediment by excavation
Toe drain damaged at many places Repair the toe drainNo Impact approximate 70% volume
of reservoir but not for approximately 50.000 m3.
Erosion observed along D/S slope Repair D/S slopeConstruction waste become problem for
reservoir operation as well 2. need sandtrape or check dam river which
Erosion along the left abutment (D/S) Repair erosion Construction waste as for irrigation area. brings the sediment into reservoir.
Spillway joints need repairSPILLWAY Construction waste 3. need to remove weeds
for 325 Ha area of
Spillway structure in poor state Repair the spillway structure, Repair the joints of spillway structure Construction waste reservoir inundation.Dam instrumentation missing INSTRUMENTATION
Provide 11 surface movement monuments, Construction waste5stand pipe piezometers, 2 v‐notches Construction waste
ELECTRO-MECHANICAL
Right side intake gate damaged Replace the Right side intake gate Construction waste
UKL -UPL
UKL -UPL
UKL -UPL
18 TELEGO PASIR Feeder channel is damaged Repair the masonry work of feeder channel Construction waste
Inspection stairway is required Provide Inspection stairway Construction waste
Feeder channel fairly deep and requires cover for safety Cover the feeder channel with concrete slabs Construction waste
Sliding of stones occurring from one of the slopes along Install wire mesh on slope along feeder channel Construction waste
the feeder channel ELECTRO-MECHANICALRubber seals of intake gate defective Replace the Rubber seals of intake gate Construction waste
19 0 A natural slope near spillway unstable - Construction of Retaining wall between spillway and right abutment. Construction waste Sedimentation has reduced approximate 30%
1. Need reservoir sediment survey to develop
Dam crest in poor condition - Dam Crest Rehabilitation volume of reservoir but not become problem for
new Area-volume curve.
riprap not extended to crest in saddle - Extension Rip-rap up to the Saddle dam crest Construction waste reservoir operation as well as for irrigation area
2. To mitigate sediment problem:
Vegetation of both U/S and D/S slopes - Tree and shrubs Cleaning Construction waste a. Construct check dam at river which brings
Joints between conc. Slabs on D/S slope require - Joint Filler U/S & D/S slope Dam Rehabilitation Organic Waste sediment into reservoir.
repairs, similarly joints between stone masonry Construction waste b. Watershed must be conserved
on U/S require repairs INSTRUMENTATION
v notches are damaged - replacement of V-notch Construction waste
surface movement monuments missing - Construction of Surface monuments Construction waste
Bridge over spillway is weak repair to v-notch flume Construction waste
SPILLWAY
- addition of Beam Girders in spillway Bridge Construction waste
flush gate and valve in poor condition ELECTRO-MECHANICAL
- Intake Gate Repainting Construction waste
- Flushing Gate Replacement Construction waste
- Valve Repairing Construction waste
20 0 Rehabilitation of inspection road Transportation
Vegetation of both U/S and D/S slopes - Trees and shurbs cleaning Organic Waste
Riprap inadequate at some places - Rip-rap addition Construction waste
tunnel is damaged - Tunnel Repairing by shotcreting Construction waste
Inspection road in poor condition - Inspection Road Rehabilitation by Asphalt concrete Transportation
Floating debris may damage the structure - Trash boom installment Solid Waste
stand pipe piezometers damaged INSTRUMENTATION
trash rack is damaged - Installment of Stand Pipe Piezometer Construction waste
- Read out for electric piezometer No Impact
OUTLET STRUCTURE
- Intake Tower Stair Repairing Construction waste
ELECTRICO-MECHANICAL
- Trash rack repair Construction waste
- Installment Gen set 150 KVA Air Quality & Noise
21 0 Detailed study for dam raising No Impact
Access road in poor condition - Dam Crest Rehabilitation Construction waste √ √ √ √ √ √ √
dam crest in poor condition - Trees and shrubs Cleaning Organic Waste
Vegetation of both U/S and D/S slopes - Masonry Paraphet wall construction Construction waste
riprap missing construction of stairs on D/S slope Construction waste
toe drain damaged Hand rail for stairs Construction waste
stairs required to access the dam crest - Toe drain repair No Impact
intake struture choked provision of filter underriprap Construction waste
sediments deposited in the stilling basin riprap
stand pipe piezometers, v-notch and surface movement INSTRUMENTATION
monuments missing. - Construction of V-notch Construction waste
- Construction of Surface monuments Construction waste
- Installation of stand pipe piezometer Construction waste
Access road rhabilitation Transportation
- Construction of Box Culvert on access road Construction waste
surface drains along access road Construction waste
INLET STRUCTURE
- restoration of intake Water Quality
ELECTRO MECHANICAL
- Intake gate repair Construction waste
UKL - UPL
UKL - UPL
UKL -UPL
UKL - UPL
22 0 - Detail Design with special study for increasing dam No Impact
There is potential for raising the dam height
drainage shall be provided on both sides of spillway - Constr. Drainage Channel for water spring,right sideWater Quantity & Quality √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Access road in poor condition - Access road rehabilitation Transportation
crown wheel, handle valve are damaged - Construction of Access road drainage Construction waste
- Constr. Drainage Channel and v-notch, left side Construction waste
Electro Mechanical
- Replace of Crown wheel and handle gate Construction waste
- Replace of handle handle valve Construction waste
23 0 - Access Road Rehabilitation by Asphalt TransportationAccess road in poor condition - Inspection Road Rehabilitation by Asphalt TransportationInspection road in poor condition - Gabion Slope Protection Construction wasteA slope along inspection road is unstable INSTRUMENTATION
- Installation Extensometer for movement monitoring Construction wasteLocal labour recruited, domestic waste, sanitation
24 0 There is potential for dam raising and water is a precious - Detailed Study for dam raising and relocation of intake No Impact Sedimentation has reduced approximate 20%
1. Need reservoir sediment survey to develop
commodity in NTT. structure. volume of reservoir but not become problem for
new Area-volume curve. √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Access road in poor condition - Dam Crest Rehabilitation with RTB Construction waste reservoir operation as well as for irrigation area
2. To mitigate sediment problem:
Dam crest in poor condition - Dam Crest Drainage Repair Construction waste a. Construct check dam at river which brings
Vegetation of both U/S and D/S slopes - Tree and shrubs Cleaning Organic Waste sediment into reservoir.
- Construction of Saddle dam crest with ATB Construction waste b. Watershed must be conserved
v-notch requires replacement - Toe drain filter Repair No Impactsurface movement monuments missing Blanketing of saddle dam with clay layerRip-rap Rehabilitation filter under riprap and riprap provision on saddle dam Construction wasteRubber Seal in Intake require Replacement Access road rehabilitation TransportationsUrface monuments and piezometers missing INSTRUMENTATION
- Stand Pipe Piezometer Installation Construction wasteConstruction of V-notch Construction waste- Construction of Surface Movement monuments Construction waste- Construction of Box Culvert on the road Construction wasteELECTRICO-MECHANICAL- Intake gate remedial works Construction wasteSPILLWAY- Spillway Channel Repair Construction waste
AMDAL
UKL - UPL
AMDAL
25 WAY TENGKORAK Upstream slope concrete protection is only present in certain areas. Construction waste 1. Provide concrete protection everywhere on the upstream batter.
Downstream toe drains are blocked. No Impact 2. Rehabilitate the toe drains
Drainage channel on D/S of toe drain damaged Construction waste Repair Drainage channel on DSPILLWAY
Outlet channel damagedWater Quantity & Quality Repair Outlet channel Repair Spillway stilling basin
Spillway stilling basin damaged Construction waste Remove trees and Shrubs from the dam body.
Trees and shrubs are present on the dam body Organic Waste Rehabilitate Access road withELECTRICO-MECHANICAL
Access road in poor state Transportation Rehabilitate dam crest road wSand blast and repaint Intake gates. Crest road in poor state Construction waste Install hand rails on either side of crest road for safety
Hand rails should be constructed on both sides along the dam crest Construction waste Replace all mal functioning instruments
Following instruments defective/damaged Construction waste
2 V notch weirs Construction waste
8 Survey monuments Construction waste
26 0 Paint of Intake gates is in poor condition - Dam Crest Rehabilitation Access road rhabilitation
Dam crest in poor condition 1. Transportation - Trees and shrubs Cleaning
Vegetation of both U/S and D/S slopes 2. Domestic Waste - U/S concrete face repair SPILLWAY
u/s slope protection damaged 3. Construction waste - constrcution of Toe drain with stone masonry
- handrails for Stair way of Spillway(both side)
toe drain damaged 4. Water Quantity & Quality repairn to D/S slope with soil
spillway requires handrails 5. Local labour recruited
Construction of stairs on u/s slope INLET STRUCTURE
intake structure damaged 6. Land issue Repair to the plaster and concrete of intake structure
v-notch damaged 7. Organic Waste INSTRUMENTATIONstand pipe piezometers and surface movement monuments - Construction of V-notch ELECTRICO-MECHANICAL
missing. - Construction of Surface monuments - Intake remedial works
- Installation of stand pipe piezometer
27 DELINGAN - Central Java
- Detailed Study to determine the cause of seepage and
dam crest is in poor condition 1. Transportation D/S slope creep.
toe drain is damaged 2. Domestic Waste - Dam Crest Rehabilitation with ATB layer Electro-Mechanical
U/S slope protection blocks are damaged 3. Construction waste Toe Drain repair Crown wheel Intake gate repair
Trash boom is damaged 4. Water Quantity & Quality
Protection D/S slope by Sodding grass provide flushing gate
V-notch damaged 5. Local labour recruited
Repair to U/S concrete face blocks
Generating Set procurement 150 KVA
surface monuments required 6. Land issue installation Trash boomCrown wheel Intake gate damaged 7. Organic Waste
InstrumentationV-notch repair
sliding gate damaged - Installation of stand pipe piezometer
UKL - UPL
UKL - UPL
UKL - UPL
28 0 Stop logs missing totally damged, selected as model dam for
Crane required for handling stop-logs decommissioning
29 0 Fields surrounding the lake get submerged during floods - Water Weeds Cleaning
and a dike is required, sediment removal requested by 1. Transportation Construction of 40 km dike
client in addition to removal of acquatic weeds but 2. Domestic Waste Drainage along dike
all of these works are too expensive, project being moved to DOISP 2 3. Construction waste
4. Organic Waste 5. Local labour recruited 6. Water Quantity7. Water Quality 8. Land issue9. Compensation for society10. Air Polution
30 SETO PATOK Sedimentation has reduced approximate 30%
1. Need reservoir sediment survey to develop
volume of reservoir but not become problem for
new Area-volume curve.
Dam yet to be inspected by dam inspection team for civil works Not yet inspected reservoir operation as well as for irrigation area
2. Need sandtrape or check dam at river which To be determain after
brings the sediment into reservoir. inspection
31 CIPANCUH
Dam yet to be inspected but it is reported that the reservoir is filled with sediments and the dam ned decommissioning
32 BANYU KUWUNG Repair toe drainsThe toe drains are in poor condition 1. Transportation provide filter and rockberm as
counter weight SPILLWAY
Seepage is taking place at many places in uncontrolled manner 2. Domestic Waste at places where seepage and stability problem repair revetments of spillway
Similarly slope failure is taking place at many points 3. Construction waste Repair crest road
The top of crest is in a poor state 4. Water Quantity & Quality construct parapet wall
The “minimum”free board is less than 1 m 5. Local labour recruited
revetments on the D/S of spillway are damaged 6. Land issue INSTRUMENTATIONRepair V-notch flumes
Notes: * All works requiring reservoir drawdown, land acquisition, etc, listed below will be taken up under DOISP 2
For decommission the dam need AMDAL AMDAL
AMDAL
For decommission the dam need AMDAL
AMDAL
UKL - UPL
Sheet1
Dam Province District Village Screening Note
1 Kalola Kabupaten Wajo Kalola CP-Sub Comp 2.3 & 3.4
2 Salomeko Kabupaten Bone Ulubalang Rehabilitation- Sub Comp 2.1
3 Batujai Kabupaten Lombok Tengah Batujai CP-Sub Comp 2.3 & 3.4
4 Penggah Pelambik Rehabilitation- Sub Comp 2.1
5 Gondang Kabupaten Lamongan Gondang CP-Sub Comp 2.36 Selorejo Kabupten Malang Selorejo CP-Sub Comp 2.37 Sengguruh Kabupaten Malang Sengguruh Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.18 Karangkates Kabupaten Blitar Wlingi, Tumpang CP-Sub Comp 2.3
9 Wonorejo Kabupaten Tulungagung Wonorejo Rehabilitation- Sub Comp 2.1
10 Pacal Kabupaten Bojonegoro Tretes CP-Sub Comp 2.311 Wlingi Kabbupaten Blitar Tumpang Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.112 Gembong Kabupaten Pati Gembong CP-Sub Comp 2.313 Gunung Rowo Kabupaten Pati Siti Luhur CP-Sub Comp 2.314 Wadaslintang Kabupaten Kebumen Sumber Rejo CP-Sub Comp 2.315 Malahayu Kabupaten Brebes Malahayu CP-Sub Comp 2.316 Cenglik Kabupaten Boyolali Margorejo CP-Sub Comp 2.317 Krisak Kabupaten Wonogiri Pare CP-Sub Comp 2.318 Penjalin Kabupaten Brebes Paguyangan Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.119 Sempor Kabupaten Kebumen Sempor Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.120 Ketro Kabupaten Sragen Ketro Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.121 Cacaban Kabupaten Tegal Sirampok CP-Sub Comp 2.322 Tempuran Kabupaten Blora Tempuran Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.123 Kedung Ombo Kabupaten Purwodadi Geyer Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.1
Annex 5: Screening Availability of Indigenous People
1. South Sulawesi No indication of IP in the locations
2. Western of Indonesia (NTB)
No indication of IP in the locations
3. East Java No indication of IP in Java Province except in Banten Province, Kabupaten Lebak in forest habitat for Baduy Suku Dalam tribe
4. Central Java
Page 1
Sheet124 Ngelangon Kabupaten Purwodadi Ngelangon Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.125 Kedung Uing Kabupaten Wonogiri Mojopuro Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.126 Simo Kabupaten Purwodadi Simo Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.127 Greneng Kabupaten Blora Tunjungan Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.128 Plumbon Kabupaten Wonogiri Puloarjo CP-Sub Comp 2.329 Sanggeh Kabupaten Purwodadi Sanggeh Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.130 Banyukuwung Kabupaten Rembang Sudo CP-Sub Comp 2.331 Rawapening Kabupaten Semarang Asinan CP-Sub Comp 2.332 Parangjoho Kabupaten Wonogiri Demesan CP-Sub Comp 2.333 Wonogiri Kabupaten Wonogiri Danuarjo CP-Sub Comp 2.3
& 3.434 Jatiluhur Kabupaten Purwakarta Jatiluhur Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.135 Darma Kabupaten Kuningan Darma Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.136 Situpatok Kabupaten Cirebon Mundu CP-Sub Comp 2.337 Mrancang Kabupaten Berau Mrancang Rehabilitation- Sub
Comp 2.138 Samboja Kabupaten Kutai
KertanegaraWonotirto CP-Sub Comp 2.3
39 Batutegi Kabupaten Tanggamus Airnaningan CP-Sub Comp 2.3 & 3.4
40 Wai Jepara Kabupaten Lampung Selatan
Jepara Rehabilitation- Sub Comp 2.1
Note:
5. West Java
6. East Kalimantan No indication of IP in these locations
7. Lampung No indication of IP in these locations
Resource: Special Bulletin – Data and Information on Empowering Indigenous People, 2002
The red one is location of sub component 2.3 and 3.4 (in 4 dams)The green one is location of sub component 2.3 (in 17 dams)The black one is location of sub component 2.1 (rehabilitation in 19 dams)
Page 2
ANNEX 6
TYPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
No ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES
1 Transportation 1. The effect that could be caused by Mobilization of
heavy equipment a. Traffic Jam ?? b. Air Polution
2. Street Renovation / Repairement a. Traffic jam or Operational is delayed
• The traffic jam problem could be controlled by the traffic management or time
mobilization. ?? • Mobilization of equipment in the dry season, could be done by watering the
street that near from the people housing area. • Traffic Management or street user and people around the Dam.
2 Domestic Waste At the worker’s base camp location.
• Built of Septic Tank, for waste’s reservoir. Built of Trash Centre location Penanganan sampah dengan pembuatan TPS, the trash must be burned if minus of 0.5 M3/ day.
• 3R (reduce, reuse, recycle) Methodology Implementation
3 Construction Waste.
• Implementation of 3R (reduce, reuse, recycle) Methodology
4 Water Level of Reservoir • To communicate to the people around the area, to use the downstream water for the farming irrigation, it will have an impact on farming systems and finally also have an impact to the people’s income
5 Air Quality The Noise 1. Polluted Gas (Dust, Nox, Sox, CO)
• The prediction of construction activities will be impacted to the air quality, such
as material mobilization and equipment, average activities and land advance system. ’
• Watering the street to reduce the dust.
No ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES
6 Water Quality 1. Spilled oil from construction’s equipment and
workshop. 2. To replace the shell of electrical and mechanical
equipment. .
• To built special box for the spilled oli and oil trapment Membuat bak penjebak
minyak dan oli tercecer. • Used lubricant oil storage must be proper to the goverment regulation (used
lubricant oil is hold in box, then it given to Pertamina or Authorization Institution for the used oil processing).
• Shell waste handling and spilled oil.
7 Employee Recruitment. • Request of worker will be impacted to the Social
Envious.
• The socialization of worker needs and the local people klasification. It is to avoid
misunderstanding in worker recruitment definition. • The priority of local worker recruitment must be suitable as the qualification.
8 Land Utilitation • The Increase of Erotion
• Watersheed management and go green program or replant tree program to
damage or bare land, therefore this program can reduce quantity of sediment that inside of the Dam.
9 Restoration of Society Partisipation • Social Envious
• The Socialization’s aim of society partisipation through the village government.
Give the explanation to the people around the Dam’a area and how to manage the downstream area with the right way. And also how to take the advantages of Green Belt and Cachtment area.
10 Sediment and Drains Exploiter. • Snore of Water Qualitity
• Technology of Exploiter in order to reduce the level of water snore and sediment
distribution.
No ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MITIGATION MEASURES
11 Re – Housing Program. * • The happening of society worries about the
reimbursement process and changes of livelyhood.
• Giving the socilaization of work project’s program to all societty people. • Giving compensation that adjustable to people expectation. • Giving direction to the society people to find alternative livelyhood and find the
solution for their income’s problem.
Note : * DOISP 2 Implementation
ANNEX 7
DATA REQUIREMENTS IN PREPARING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS
IMPACT SOURCES IMPACT INDUCED DATA REQUIREMENTS DATA SOURCES
1. PRA CONSTRUCTION STAGE Survey & Investigasi Design
(SID) & Detail Engineering Design (DED)
No impact PIP
Coordination between related institution
No impact PIP
Delivering information/ Socialization
Perception and community response on Gondang Dam rehabilitation plan
Community Perception Site observation, interview
2. CONSTRUCTION STAGE a. Construction Preparation
Provide workforce
Job opportunity and related business and also local economy income.
Workforce specification % of local recruited
workforces Total of local workforce
RAB estimation
Village monography
Observation on local economy sector
Mobilization of heavy equipments & material
Well traffic, Air quality decrease,
noisy. Perception & response
from road users on mobilization route.
Mobilization route Number of ritasi Road class & number of
vehicle Early color of air quality &
noise at settlement on mobilization route.
Project manager, estimation
Site observation, air quality & noise sampling for lab analyses.
Base-camp & Waste construction Basecamp location Number of workforces in
the base-camp Time to stay (up to the end
of construction)
From project manager
Estimation of domestic waste & garbage
Provide clean water & fuel Proj Manager
b. Dam Rehabilitation Construction Road rehabilitation consists of
crest road and approach road rehabilitation with 10 cm raising (leveling). Road foundation with crushed stone and sands and also covered with asphalt. Each road rehabilitation have 1.800 m2
(total 3.600 m2) width.
Impact on the traffic, Air quality decrease &
noise comes from the operation of heavy equipment
Number of vehicle Traffic condition Early air quality color
Traffic estimation
Estimation of air quality pollution
Additional rip-rap with 200 m3
volume. Water quality Early color of dam water
quality
Clearing grass on 13.500 m2 area.
Organic waste Changes or decreasement of debit during clearing
Early color of water quality on dam outlet
Quantities: BWS Water quality: sampling & lab analyses
Cleaning of V-notch D/S channel for 200 m long.
No impact
Handrail work on both crest side for 2.000 m long.
Instrumentation work: dry drilling to replace standpipe piezometers for 15 unit.
No impact
Community participation development: around buffe-zone dam (in Gembong, Gondang & Batujai)
Community participation development: in watershed area of Batujai Dam
Community response Social conflict/ jealousy
Type of community development
Number of household head utilized buffer zone and/or watershed
Type of buffer zone land usage and/or watershed
BWS Local
village / district
Social team PRA result
Site observation
Watershed map, Google-earth
Deleted: mengapa hanya 2 lokasi yang mestinya 34 lokasi.
Annex 8: Institutional Arrangement for ESMF Implementation
PMU RLR Directorate
PIU BBWS/BWS/Dinas PSDA
Technical Istitution Related
Tim Teknis Propinsi (UKL/UPL)
BAPPENAS Landing Agency
1. Project Implementation
Guidance
Design
Screening of Impact
Document Arrangement UKL-UPL
Dam Operational
Approval
Environment Implementation
Green Belt Environment Implementation
Catchments Area Implementation Project
Report Environment Implementation
Related Technical Agency BAPEDALDA
BAPPENAS World Bank
Evaluation
PMU RLR Directorate
PIU BBWS/BWS/Dinas PSDA
Technical Istitution Related
Tim Teknis Propinsi (UKL/UPL)
BAPPENAS Landing Agency
2. Project Management 3. Project Monitoring
Dam Operational Environment Implementation
Green Belt Environment Implementation
BAPPENAS World Bank
Guidance
Evaluation
Catchments Area Implementation Project
Related Technical Agency BAPEDALDA
Report Environment Implementation
Evaluation
Guidance
Evaluation
Dam Operational Environment Implementation
Green Belt Environment Implementation
Catchments Area Implementation Project
Report Environment Implementation
Related Technical Agency BAPEDALDA
Evaluation BAPPENAS World Bank
ANNEX 9
Standard Outline for Environmental Management Procedures and Environmental Monitoring Procedures Report (UKL/UPL)
In accordance with the requirements as outlined refer to KepMen Kimpraswil No. 17 / 2003, UKL / UPL, Ministry of Environment Decree No. 08 Year 2006 (Guidence for AMDAL), and World Bank Policy. Studies are required for all projects likely to have some social and environmental impact but not significant enough to require an AMDAL (full Environmental Assessment). The main elements of a UKL / UPL will include: • Introduction, background, • Proponent Identify • Brief and concise existing environmental conditions. • Activity and proposed plan • General description of predicted impacts • Management plan and Mitigation • Monitoring plan • Capacity Development and Training • Implemantation Schedue and Cost Estimation • Integration of EMP with Project • Signing
Annex 10
Dam Operational Improvement & Security Project (DOISP)
Sub-Component 2.3
Community Participation in Dam Management
Sub-Component 3.4
Community Participation in Water Catchment Area
Management
GENERAL GUIDELINES
Dam Operational Improvement and Security Project through Community Participation (DOISP-CP)
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Annex 10
Introduction
The issue in the deterioration of dam operational performance and safety in
Indonesia currently is felt to be extremely urgent and calls for immediate
handling. One of the causes of the lack of maintenance of dam facilities is the
low level of community concern and participation around the dam to
participate in maintaining and supervising the existing dam facilities. Other
than that the cause for the high level of sedimentation in the dam is due to the
increasingly lack of community are in the upstream area to safeguard the
preservation of the water catchment areas.
The Indonesian Government – through the Department of Public Works – has
carried out various efforts to increase community participation in Managing
water catchment areas. One amongst such is implemented as a part of the Dam
Safety Project (DSP). From the results of implementation thereof, it appears
that community participation to safeguard the preservation of the water
catchment areas plays a significant role to maintain the operational
performance of the dam. However, the results of evaluation on various efforts
once carried out to improve community participation still indicate a low level
of sustainability in such community participation during the post project
period
Through this Dam Operational Improvement and Safety Project (DOISP), the
Department of Public Works shall improve the design for community
participation in joining in to safeguard the dam operational performance not
i
Annex 10
ii
only to improve community participation in managing water catchment areas,
but also to include community participation in Managing the dam facilities.
Additionally efforts towards improvement shall also be focused on the
development of the pattern of community participation which has a higher
level of post project period sustainability. In order to be sustainable in the
DOISP, community participation in dam management and maintenance of
water catchment areas shall also be balanced with the availability of actual
community participation to enjoy the benefits from dam management and
maintenance of water catchment areas.
With these several improvements, in the future it is expected that the
community shall no longer view their participation in maintaining the dam and
water catchment areas as a burden, but shall have already viewed such as a
‘need’ to support their welfare.
Jakarta, August 2008
Director General of Water Resources
Department of Water Resources
Annex 10
Table of Contents
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………
………….
Table of Contents … ………………………………………………………………
List of Abbreviations …………………………………………………………………
Pertaining to Guidelines of DOISP-CP ……………………………
Chapter-1 Preamble
1.1. Background
………………………………………………………………
1.2. Vision, Mission, Principles and Values
1.3. Objectives
………………………………………………………………………
1.4. Goals
………………………………………………………………………
1.5. Strategies and Approaches………………………………………
Chapter-2 Community Participation in Dam Management
2.1. Components
…………………………………………………………………
iii
2.2. Support for Implementation ………………………………………
Annex 10
iv
2.3. Implementation Steps
………………………………………………….
2.4. Performance
Indicators…………………………………………………..
Chapter-3 Community Participation in Water Catchment Area
Management
3.1. Components
…………………………………………………………………
3.2. Support for Implementation …………………………………
3.3. Implementation Steps
………….………………………………………
3.4. Performance Indicators
………………………………………………
Chapter-4 Project Management
4.1. Organizational Structure and Role Structure
4.2. Funding
…….…………………………………………………………………
…………
4.3. Monitoring and Evaluation ……………………………………
Chapter-5 Transparency and Accountability
5.1. Procedures for Organization of Transparency and Accountability
…………………………………………………………
5.2. Mechanism for Application of Sanctions …
Annex 10
5.3. Handling of Complaints and Settlement of Conflicts
………………………………………………………………………
ATTACHMENT
List of Abbreviations
BBWS River Area Head Office / lBalai Besar Wilayah Sungai
Water Resources Development Office / Balai Pengembangan
Sumber Daya Air BPSDA
BWS River Area Office / Balai Wilayah Sungai
cp-RM Community Participation in Dam Management
cp-WM Community Participation in Watershed Management
Water Resources Development Unit / Dinas Pengembangan
Sumber Daya Air Dinas PSDA
DOISP Dam Operational Improvement and Safety Project
Dam Operational Improvement and Safety Project through
Community Participation DOISP-CP
FKW Dam Community Forum / Forum Komunitas Waduk
Preservation of Water Catchment Area Forum / Forum
Pelestarian Water Catchment Area FPDTA
PIU Project Implementation Unit v
Annex 10
Pertaining to Guidelines for DOISP-CP
I. WHY ARE GUIDELINES FOR DOISP-CP NECESSARY?
Community participation in the Dam Operational Improvement and
Safety Project (DOISP-CP) constitutes a series of activities that are quite
complex and of quite lengthy durations (4 years). DOISP-CP involves
various parties; from various levels of the government (central, provincial
until village/kelurahan levels); various disciplines of science; as well as
various elements from the community and the business world. Through
DOISP-CP, the government of the Republic of Indonesia is also striving
to improve various approaches which have been applied all this time to
encourage community participation in Managing dams and water
catchment areas. Significant improvements are mainly related to changes
in the role structure and relationship structure existing between the
government and the communities in Managing dams and water catchment
areas. Hence, factors such as: the number of parties involved, the duration
of projects, as well as relatively new approaches for the actors are the
main challenges in Managing the DOISP-CP project.
In order that the implementation of DOISP-CP can generate optimum
results within the determined timeline, it is therefore necessary to develop
a guideline system (reference guideline system and coordination are
expected to be able to be utilized by the DOISP-CP actors to develop a
unity in understanding with regards the purpose, approach, role structure
vii
Annex 10
viii
and relationship structure, the steps to be taken, expected output and result
as well as the necessary form of coordination to be carried out.
II. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF PREPARING THIS GUIDELINE
MANUAL?
The purposes of the compilation of this Guideline Manual are the
following:
1. In order that the final purpose of DOISP-CP can be achieved
accurately and properly, with the established timeline.
2. In order to become guidelines/reference/ referral for the various
parties directly involved in the planning and implementation of
DOISP-CP.
III. WHO ARE THE USERS OF THIS GUIDELINE MANUAL?
The various parties involved in the DOISP-CP can take advantage of this
Guideline Manual for varying interests in accordance with their role, duty
and function. In brief, the use of this Guideline Manual can be observed in
the following table:
User Purpose?
Community residents and
Community Groups
• To understand the various opportunities offered by
DOISP-CP
• To understand the various rules of the game to be
Annex 10
ix
•
followed in implementation of DOISP-CP
To develop social control
Dam Community Forum
icipation
ility & Water Catchment Area
Conservation Forum
• To develop community part
• To develop transparency and accountab
• Reference for organizational operations
Project • To have an overall understanding of DOISP-CP
performance
• Planning for project implementation
• Project control including evaluation on
of project implementation
Executive Consultant • ntation strategy
ess in project
o
To compile project impleme
• Project implementation planning
• Monitoring and evaluation of progr
• Reference to carry out corrections and/or changes t
guidelines
Central Government • verall understanding of DOISP-CP
• y in the context of integration and
To have an o
components
Input for polic
coordination as well as further development of
policies
BBWS/BWS and • overall understanding of DOISP-CP
• ram sustainability
BPSDA
To have an
components
To create prog
Annex 10
x
implementation
• ce for coordination
• To develop cooperation network at
level
Referen
Concerned Parties
l networks
• To conduct social control
• To conduct advocacy
• To develop synergy
• To develop institutiona
IV. HOW IS THE SYSTEMATIC OF THIS GUIDELINE MANUAL?
Th
eral Guidelines; containing brief descriptions of the
2. by step
3. es for Actors: this constitutes a one book series of
for Actors series consist of:
is manual constitutes a part of a series (systems) of DOISP-CP,
consisting of:
1. Book 1: Gen
general outlines of the project, rules, provisions and mechanism to be
adhered to in the implementation of DOISP-CP components
Book 2: Technical Guidelines: containing overall step-
descriptions of activities in detail for the implementation of DOISP-
CP components
Book 3: Guidelin
guidelines for each respective player, containing clarifications
concerning the understanding, basic principles and provisions required
for implementation of their respective roles and duties. The Guidelines
Annex 10
xi
mmunity Forum;
Conservation; and
In addit are
various descriptions pertaining to topics
V. TO THE
GUIDELINES
Fo
its application, the DOISP-CP Guidelines provide the mechanism for
a) Guidelines for Community Groups;
b) Guidelines for Dam Co
c) Guidelines on Water Catchment Area
d) Guidelines for Facilitator.
ion to the Guidelines Manual, DOISP-CP PMU shall also prep
specific documents containing
related to dam and water catchment area management, for example:
Guidelines for Settlement Around the Dam Area, Guidelines for
Settlement within the Water Catchment Area, etc.
PROVISIONS FOR ADJUSTMENTS AND CHANGES
r various situations regarding local issues which shall be encountered in
improvement and adjustment of guidelines for several parts which are of
tactical and technical natures. Meanwhile the vision, mission, principles,
purpose, strategy and general provisions constitute a part that cannot be
altered and should be implemented as so-determined. In the diagram
hereunder procedures for amendment to DOISP-CP Guidelines are set
out.
Annex 10
Dam Communication/Water Catchment Area Forum Meeting attended by
Facilitator as resource person
Conflict in application of DOISP-CP in the field with DOISP-CP Guidelines
Letter of Proposal from Forum concerning
adjustments to Guidelines to PIU
PIU coordination meeting attended by Community Participation TA as resource
person Pertimbangan situasi khusus
dan/ atau karakteristik
lokal
Steering Team Meeting, PMU, attended by Community Participation TA as
resource person
Letter of proposal from PIU on adjustments to
Guidelines to PMU
Do the changes concern the vision, mission, principles, approaches and general
provisions?
Temb
usan
Do similar cases occur in many locations?
PMU
Special situation consideration and/or local
characteristics
Copy
NOYES
YES
File
PMU Circular Letter concerning changes in DOISP Guidelines for
certain areas
NO
Diagram Procedures for Adjustments & Changes to DOISP-CP
Guidelines
xii
Annex 7
Chapter 1. Preamble
DOISP-CP constitutes a development of efforts once carried out
pertaining to the increased participation of communities residing around
the dam and water catchment areas to join in the maintenance of
operational performance and safety of dams. Through DOISP-CP,
orientation of community participation which earlier emphasized more
on community participation in the stages of dam development and
maintenance of water catchment areas is further developed by providing
a balanced emphasis on community participation in taking advantage of
the results of dam development and maintenance of water catchment
areas. In the DOISP-CP, increased community access to available
opportunities within the environment of the dam and water catchment
areas is a pre-requisite for the establishment of community participation
joining in the maintenance and safeguarding of the dam and the water
catchment areas.
Efforts towards increased community participation in the DOISP-CP
should also become a part of efforts towards the achievement of social
development, namely: fair and sustainable development, which shall be
1 ‐ 1
Annex 7
achieved through three strategic outcomes covering: 1) social inclusion,
2) community empowerment and 3) protection towards community
assets. Hence, a large portion of success indicators of the DOISP-CP
shall be determined by the consistency in implementation of principles
of balanced community participation and consistency towards strategic
achievement of social development.
1.1 BACKGROUND
The Government of the Republic of Indonesia through DOISP intends to improve
operational performance and safety of dams in Indonesia. Through previously
conducted studies, it was discovered that several sources of causes to the
deterioration of operational performance and safety of dams, are: 1) the physical
condition dams that has deteriorated due to constraints in maintenance budgets; 2)
inadequate capacity of organization and HR on duty to manage the dams; 3) the
lack of concern of the communities living around the dams to participate in taking
care of and maintaining the dams; and 4) the high level of sedimentation due to
the lack of effectiveness in Managing water catchment areas.
To overcome the four above-mentioned issues, the Dam Operational
Improvement and Safety Project (DOISP) shall be implementing interventions in
the form of: 1) efforts towards physical repair of the dam and water catchment
areas; 2) efforts towards development of capacity of instance managing the dam
1 ‐ 2
Annex 7
and water catchment areas; and 3) efforts towards increased community
participation in Managing the dam and water catchment areas.
These Guidelines are related to the Dam Operational Improvement and Safety
through Community Participation (DOISP-CP) which constitutes a part of the
Dam Operational Improvement and Safety Project (DOISP). DOISP-CP covers
two DOISP sub-components namely
1) sub-component 2.3: Community Participation in Dam Management, which is
related to efforts in operational dam improvement and safety, which hereinafter in
these guidelines shall be abbreviated to cp-RM (Community Participation in Dam
Management),
2) sub-component 3.4: Community Participation in Managing Water Catchment
Areas, related to efforts for mitigation of sedimentation from water catchment
areas, which hereinafter in these guidelines shall be abbreviated to cp-WM
(Community Participation in Watershed Management).
1.2 VISION, MISSION, PRINCIPLES AND VALUES
1.2.1 Vision
The desired vision of DOISP-CP is the establishment of a community which
possesses concern, empowerment and capacity to participate in the
sustainable management of the developed environment and the surrounding
natural environment.
1 ‐ 3
Annex 7
1.2.2 Mission
Empowerment of the communities living around the dam and the water
catchment areas to participate in Managing the developed environment and
the surrounding natural environment of the dam and water catchment areas
through: 1) efforts towards capacity development; 2) supply of resources;
and 3)
1.2.3 Principles institutionalization of partnership culture among the
actors in development.
Efforts towards improvement in community participation in Managing dams
and water catchment areas shall be carried out based on the following
principles:
• Balanced participation: community participation is not only related
to community involvement in the development and maintenance
implementation phase, but community participation should also occur
in the planning phase as well as the phase for benefiting from results
of development and maintenance of the dams and water catchment
areas. Based on such balanced principles, community participation in
Managing dams and water catchment areas is expected to occur
voluntarily and in a sustainable manner. The concern and actions of
the community to willingly volunteer in maintaining and
safeguarding the dams as well as the water catchment areas in
1 ‐ 4
Annex 7
principle shall only occur if the community is aware of and can enjoy
the perceived benefits from their participation in maintaining the
dams and water catchment areas which are larger than the perceived
costs they have to shoulder.
Therefore, on one side efforts towards increased community
participation should be directed towards efforts to improve
community access and capacity in relation to the utilization of
results of dam and water catchment area management. These efforts
are conducted with the purpose that the community shall enjoy
increasing perceived benefits if they participate in maintaining and
safeguarding the dam and water catchment areas. Such efforts can be
in the form of: 1) involvement of the whole targeted community in
the process of decision making related to dam and water catchment
area management; 2) improvement in public assets, infrastructure
and facilities in order to take advantage of opportunities that emerge
as a result of dam and water catchment area management; and
accompanied by 3) improved capacity of human resources in order
to possess empowerment to take advantage of the emerging
opportunities.
On the other side, efforts towards increased community participation
should also be directed towards efforts to ‘reduce’ constraints and
obstacles felt by the community (decreasing perceived costs) if they
1 ‐ 5
Annex 7
desire to maintain and safeguard the dam and water catchment areas.
Such efforts can be in form of: 1) training in skills related to dam
and water catchment area management; 2) availability of conditions
that are conducive for the community in participating in dam and
water catchment areas management (this can be in form of supply of
tools and material, and technical assistance).
Picture 1.1FRAMEWORK OF PARTICIPATION
FOR COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT
PARTICIPATION IN TAKING ADVANTAGE OF VARIOUS
OPPORTUNITIES (PRODUCTION & CONSUMPTION) DUE TO RESERVOIR PRESENCE
PARTICIPATION IN PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF RESERVOIR
MANAGEMENT P
PROVISION OF ACCESS TO THE COMMUNITY TO VARIOUS
OPPORTUNITIES CREATED BY THE RESERVOIR
PROVISION OF PARTIAL AUTHORITY TO THE COMMUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN
PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT
IMPRSKILL
COM
FINA
IMPR
Documents on COMMUNITY
PARTICIPATION PLAN IN RESERVOIR
MANAGEMENT
COMMUNITYRESERVOIR
Comm
IMPROVEMENT IN KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS OF APPARATUS
IMPROVED GOVERNANCE
BUDGETING POLICY
Improved Capacity
Aspirations on the utilization of various opportunities around the reservoir
Capacity to contribute in the planning and implementation of reservoir management
Type and intensity of reservoir utilization permitted for the
community
Type and level of reservoir management authority to be
granted to the community
1 ‐ 6
Annex 7
Picture 1.2FRAMEWORK OF PARTICIPATION
FOR COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN WATER CATCHMENT AREA MANAGEMENT
PARTICIPATION IN TAKING ADVANTAGE OF VARIOUS OPPORTUNITIES
(PRODUCTION & CONSUMPTION) IN WATER CATCHMENT AREAS
PARTICPATION IN PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF WATER
CATCHMENT AREA MANAGEMENT
PROVISION OF ACCESS TO THE COMMUNITY TO VARIOUS EXISTING
OPPORTUNITIES IN WATER CATCHMENT AREAS
PROVISION OF PARTIAL AUTHORITY TO THE COMMUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF
WATER CATCHMENT AREA MANAGMENT
IMPROVED KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS OF HR
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
FINANCING AID
IMPROVED ASSETS
Document on COMMUNITY
PARTICIPATION PLAN IN WATER CATCHMENT AREA MANAGEMENT
COMMUNITYWATER CATCHMENT AREA
Community Empowerment
IMPROVED KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS OF APPARATUS
IMPROVED GOVERNANCE
BUDGETING POLICY
Improved Capacity
Aspirations on taking advantage of various opportunities in water catchment areas
Ability to contribute in planning and implementation of water catchment area management
Types and intensity of utilization of water catchment areas by the
community which are permitted
Types and levels of authority in management of water catchment
areas to be granted to the community
• Social Inclusion; to improve individual and group access – without
any exceptions – towards management as well as benefiting from
development, the DOISP-CP shall conduct efforts to eliminate/reduce
institutional segregation existing in the community which until now
has impeded the involvement of all layers and groups of the
community in decision making related to community participation in
dam and water catchment area management, such as: gender
segregation, social status segregation, religious segregation,
education level segregation and so forth. The elimination of such
segregations is accompanied by efforts to introduce community
1 ‐ 7
Annex 7
institutionalization that are inclusive in nature shall become the main
challenge of efforts towards community organization in the DOISP-
CP. Therefore, community participation institutionalization which
shall be developed in the DOISP-CP should systematically be able to
provide the widest possible access to all individuals and groups to
participate in the process of planning, controlling, supervision and
evaluation of community participation.
In line with this social inclusion principle, therefore the process of
community decision making to form/or not to form a community
participation institution, the process for formulation of criteria and
the form of institution they shall establish, as well as the process of
selection of leaders who shall administer such institution, should be
done in a democratic manner by involving all individuals and groups
with no exceptions.
• Empowerment; efforts towards establishing an inclusive community
institution needs to be accompanied with the application of
community empowerment principles in the form of improvement in
individual as well as group assets and capacity in order that they shall
be able to influence, functionalize, benefit and demand accountability
from the institutions influencing their lives. This shall be carried out
through activities in the development of community scope and skills
in implementing organization, as well as business management.
1 ‐ 8
Annex 7
Without any efforts towards empowerment in social inclusion the
community shall have no channels for application thereof.
• Protection: such improved community participation in dam and
water catchment areas should also be based on the principle of
increasing effectiveness in Managing various social risks arising
from physical rehabilitation as well as from activities in dam and
water catchment area management. Efforts to restructure interaction
between the community and the dam and the community and the
water catchment areas should be planned on the basis of the principle
to refrain from reducing the value of the assets and the income of the
community affected by the impact. If any risks are discovered and
recognized that threaten the community assets and lives, then risk
management should be implemented until rehabilitation activities or
restructuring of spatial utilization around the dam and water
catchment areas do not cause any losses for the community.
1.2.4 Values
Efforts towards improved community participation in dam and water
catchment area management shall be carried out based on the
following values:
1 ‐ 9
Annex 7
• Honesty. The process of decision making, fund and activity
management, as well as evaluation and utilization of results of the
DOISP-CP must be carried out honestly (without any engineering
and manipulation). The value of such honesty should be applied by
all parties involved in the DOISP-CP (project, provincial
government, city/district authorities and the community).
• Equality. The DOISP-CP is to be conducted without differentiation
towards the origins of the actors, religion, status, gender type and so
forth. All parties must be given the same opportunity to be involved
in decision making, implementation and utilization of results of
development.
• Concern. Community participation in the DOISP-CP should occur
without pressure from any outside party, but should occur based on
there being awareness and concern arising from each individual
pertaining to the importance of preserving the environment where
they live in.
• Voluntary. Participating in preserving the living environment should
not be observed as a burden for the community citizens, but should
be developed as a need for each individual. With the basis of such
voluntary value, then the stimulant funds provided by the DOISP-CP
should be taken as aid in resources necessary to the community to
1 ‐ 10
Annex 7
begin establishing their concern to participate in maintaining and
supervising the dam and water catchment areas. Hence, stimulant
funds do not constitute a pay off for the participating role of the
community in the DOISP-CP, but instead are resources to establish
community concern into actual actions.
• Unity. Community participation in the DOISP-CP shall be developed
as a joint movement involving various elements of the community,
the government and the business world. Activities in the DOISP-CP
do not belong to certain institutions or community groups, but instead
constitute activities that are open for each and every existing
individual and group. Hence, the process to re-build unity among the
development actors – in the context of maintaining the environment –
is one of the important focuses in the DOISP-CP.
1.3 PURPOSES
The general purpose of the Dam Operational Improvement and Safety
Program through Community Participation (DOISP-CP) is to improve
awareness, concern and capacity of the community to jointly prevent any
occurrences with the potential to cause deterioration in the operational
performance and safety of the dam.
1 ‐ 11
Annex 7
A specific purpose of the cp-RM is to improve awareness, concern and
capacity of the community to be able to – jointly with the technical
instances apparatus – manage and safeguard the environment around the
dam.
Meanwhile a specific purpose of cp-WM is to improve awareness, concern
and capacity of the community to be able to – jointly with the technical
instances apparatus – to manage and preserve the water catchment areas
(watershed management).
1.4 TARGETS
1.4.1 Community
The targeted community of cp-RM shall be all community residents living
within a distance of less than 500 meters from the outer boundary of the
green belt of the dam.
Meanwhile the targeted community of cp-WM shall be all community
residents living in one or more sub-water catchment areas of a dam.
1.4.2 Determination of Targeted Locations
The targeted locations of cp-WM shall be selected from 65 DOISP targeted
dams by using the following criteria:
1 ‐ 12
Annex 7
1) The level of existing residential settlements around the dam. Each
feasible dam becomes the targeted location for cp-RM if the
comparison between total families living within the distance of 500
meters from the boundary of the green belt of the dam exceeds 0.2
families/hectare.
Further, from the list of targeted locations, priority targeted locations are
determined pertaining to which among them shall first be handled, using the
following criteria:
2) When the plan for physical rehabilitation shall be carried out; dams
in the list of targeted locations shall first acquire physical
rehabilitation before the others, and shall be prioritized to obtain cp-
RM.
3) Level of damages experienced by the dam; dams with priority results
in accordance with the criteria of point 2 with the heaviest damages
shall be prioritized to obtain cp-RM.
4) Strategic and functional values of the dam; dams in the list of
priorities in accordance with criteria point 3 with the most strategic
value and with more functions shall be prioritized to obtain cp-RM.
Meanwhile targeted locations of the cp-WM are selected from dams that are
the targets of cp-RM by using the following criteria:
1 ‐ 13
Annex 7
1) Level of existing settlements in the main water catchments sub-
areas. Each dam where the population density in its main water
catchment sub-areas exceeds 0.5 families/hectare shall be included
as a targeted location of cp-WM.
Further, from the list of targeted locations, priority targeted locations are
determined pertaining to which among them shall first be handled, using the
following criteria:
2) When cp-RM shall be carried out for such dam. Dams in the list of
targeted locations that shall firs receive cp-RM compared to the
others, shall be prioritized to receive cp-WM.
3) Level of sedimentation experienced by the dam. Dams as results of
prioritization in accordance with the criteria of point 2 with the
highest level of sedimentation shall be prioritized to receive cp-WM.
4) Strategic and functional values of the dam. Dams as results of
prioritization in accordance with the criteria of point 3 with the most
strategic values and with more functions shall be prioritized to
receive cp-WM.
Thereafter for each respective dam selected as a target, determination of one
or more water catchment sub-areas to be the focus of location for cp-WM
activities shall be carried out by using the following criteria:
1 ‐ 14
Annex 7
5) Level of contributed sedimentation of each water catchment sub-
area; to determine two water catchment sub-areas to become the
location for cp-WM activities.
Picture 1-1 presents a mechanism for determination of dams to be targeted
DOISP-CP locations. By following the procedures as referred to in such
diagram, two lists of DOISP-CP target locations shall be produced, namely:
i. List of dams to obtain cp-RM intervention without cp-WM;
and
ii. List of dams to obtain cp-RM intervention with cp-WM.
1 ‐ 15
Annex 7
DOISP TARGETED DAMS (65 dams)
Ratio of families within 500m from the boundary of the green belt against dam surface area >0.2 families/
ha
List of dams that need cp-RM intervention
When the plan for physical
rehabilitation of dam shall be implemented
Level of damages experienced by
dam
Strategic value and function of dam
YES
NO
drop
List of priorities for dams to become targeted locations
for cp-RM
Population density in main sub water catchment areas
>0.5 families/ha
yes
List of locations of dams targeted for cp-RM
Availability of DOISP-CP funds
for cp-RM
no
List of dams targeted for cp-RM that need cp-WM
List of dams that obtain cp-RM intervention without cp-WM
When cp-RM shall be implemented
Level of sedimentation experienced by
dam
Strategic value and function of dam
List of priorities for dams targeted for c p-RM that
obtain c p-WM
List of dams obtaining cp-RM intervention with cp-WM
Availability of DOISP-CP funds
for cp-WM
Picture 1.1 Diagram on steps for determination of targeted locations for cp-RM
and cp-WM
1 ‐ 16
Annex 7
1.5 STRATEGIES AND APPROACHES
1.5.1 Strategies
The strategy to be applied in improving community participation in
dam and water catchment area management shall be: “Community
empowerment within the environment of the dam and water
catchment area in order to be in synergy with the technical instances
of the government in the matter of dam and water catchment area
management”, through:
1) Building community capacity in order to jointly create and
develop partnership (the community and government
instance) which is representative and accountable. This
institution shall thereafter become the umbrella for
community participation in the context of dam and water
catchment area management. Based on surveys/mappings
conducted independently by the community, the partnership
institution established shall compile a community
participation program on dam and water catchment area
management.
2) Availability of stimulant resources needed to establish
community participation programs in form of Partnership
Funds which shall be managed by the partnership institution
1 ‐ 17
Annex 7
(community and government instance) in a transparent and
accountable manner. These Partnership Funds constitute
assistance in resources provided to the partnership institution
to fund previously compiled community participation
programs.
1.5.2 Approaches
a) TRIDAYA approach:
The essence of the Tridaya approach is total human empowerment in
order to be able to bring out the three powers possesses by humans,
namely:
1) To bring out social capacity in order to create an effective
community;
2) To bring out building capacity in order the create a preserved
environment;
3) To bring out economic capacity in order to create a productive
community.
By using this TRIDAYA approach, therefore the success of the
DOISP-CP shall very much be determined by the executing
individuals, the advantages as well as other DOISP-CP actors. The
empowerment of such individuals is expected to enable critical
1 ‐ 18
Annex 7
awareness and positive as well as independent changes in behavior,
in relation to the management of the developed as well as natural
environments in a sustainable manner. Further these individual
changes shall become the basis for collective changes which in the
end shall bring about social empowerment, economic empowerment
and development empowerment while still maintaining a preserved
environment.
EMPOWERED HUMAN BEING
to encourageECONOMIC CAPACITY
in order to create a productive community
to encourageSOCIAL CAPACITY
in order to create an effective community
to encourage DEVELOPMENT
CAPACITYin order to create a
preserved environment
Picture 1.2 TRIDAYA approach
b) The Community Based Development Approach
1 ‐ 19
Annex 7
Implementation of the DOISP-CP is also based on the community
based development approach, where groups are developed based on
various unities (similar purpose, similar activities, similar living
areas) in an efficient and effective manner encouraged to grow and
develop their social capital.
Community groups in the DOISP-CP are “newly developed”
community groups in the context of implementing the DOISP-CP
and or existing community groups that are able to meet the criteria
for community groups as determined in the DOISP-CP.
Considerations to use the community based development approach
are based on:
In groups, the community residents shall be more dynamic in
developing activities based on the principles and values
promoted by the DOISP-CP.
The process of empowerment shall be more effective and
efficient.
The occurrence of a process of mutual teaching – mutual
caring among members of the community.
The consolidation of joint power among the weak, among the
strong as well as between the weak and the strong.
1 ‐ 20
Annex 7
In the DOISP-CP, the community based development approach is
mainly established in the decision making mechanism to handle the
various existing issues in the community while still being based on
group strengths through discussions among the members of the
community.
1 ‐ 21
Annex 7
Chapter 2. Community Participation in Dam Management
To achieve improvement in community participation in dam management, the cp-RM is divided into 2 components, namely:
A. Development of Communities Around the Dam; and
B. Availability of Partnership Funds
Dam Operational Improvement & Safety Project (DOISP) is a project carried out
with the purpose to improve the performance of operations and safety of dams in
Indonesia.
One of several important issues considered as a threat to the operational
performance and safety of dams is the low concern of the communities living
around the dam to join in the maintenance, supervision and safeguarding of the
dams. Almost all dams in Indonesia are located close to cultivated areas managed
by the general communities. A large part of the sides of these dams are adjacent to
the agricultural land of the residents, and also significant parts of the premises of
the dams are directly adjacent to the residential areas as well as commercial areas
owned by members of the communities. Residential settlements grow rapidly
around the dams due to the superiorities owned by settlement locations around the
dams, namely the closer the location to the dam the better the guarantee for
supply of water (for productive as well as consumptive purposes). And general
indications that occur in a large number of dams in Indonesia show that the
communities do not only carry out activities around the dam area, but also within
the premises of the dam. Communities around the dam in general make use of the
side bank areas, the dam construction, as well as the water areas of the dam as
2 ‐ 1
Annex 7
places to carry out recreational activities (such as: fishing, boating or just to enjoy
the view); which are further followed by the growth of various supporting
activities (such as: sales of food or souvenirs). In several dams, the surrounding
communities have for a long time taken advantage of the dam water fro various
productive activities, such as development of the fresh water fish cultivation
business. Additionally the land within the premises of the dam which dries up
during the hot season is also used by the communities for farming, grazing
livestock or as a source for excavating material (sand).
The pattern of interaction varies between the community and the dam which
emerges due to such closeness in location. In several cases, community activities
in the dam area can provide a positive impact towards the dam operations (such
as: sand excavation); in other cases however, there are activities that bring about
neither negative nor positive impacts (such as: farming on land piles emerging
during the dry season on the dam premises); however there are some parts with
the potential to cause a negative impact on dam operations. In many cases where
community activities in the dam area damage the dam operations, the cause is
often the lack of understanding of the community concerning types of activities,
as well as the intensity and what type of methods can be carried out by the
community in certain parts/areas of the dam (such as: the dam, the side banks, the
water and open land on the premises) without causing any impact on the dam
operations and safety. This indicates lack of communications between the dam
management and the surrounding communities with the result that until now there
2 ‐ 2
Annex 7
has never been any development of mutual agreement concerning the best pattern
of interaction between the dam and the community.
There being no references concerning the pattern of interaction mutual agreed
upon between the dam and the surrounding community also have an impact on the
low community participation in the maintenance, supervision and safeguarding of
dam operations and safety. The sense of ownership towards the dam by the
surrounding community is very low. This has caused a high level of vandalism,
theft of dam equipment and the illegal use of parts of the dam which not shall not
only cause deterioration in the performance of dam operations, but could also
endanger the dam and the community in general.
Cp-RM (Community Participation in Dam Management) is a social development
component in the DOISP with the purpose to improve participation of the
communities residing around the dam in efforts of maintenance, supervision and
safety of the dam. The desired results expected from implementation of this
component are:
1. improvement in community participation in the maintenance of the dam
and supervision over utilization of dam areas.
2. improvement in community participation in making use of opportunities
created due to the existence of the dam, within the limitations that do not
disrupt operations and safety of the dam.
2 ‐ 3
Annex 7
3. increased capacity in government instance apparatus assigned to manage
the dam, hence being able to apply a participative dam management
approach.
2.1 COMPONENTS
2.1.1 Community Development
a) Description
The Cp-RM supplies support for activities related to community
development around the dam in order to cooperate more effectively
with the dam management instance in the matter of dam
management.
Activities on the community development component covers a series
of activities that commence with: 1) building critical awareness of
the community concerning how to live side by side with the dam;
followed by, 2) organization of the community and formation of a
Dam Community Forum; 3) independent mapping concerning
interaction of the community with the dam; 4) participative planning
to compile a Community Participation Strategic Plan in Dam
Management; and 5) compilation of Yearly Action Plan for
Community Participation in Dam Management.
2 ‐ 4
Annex 7
Picture 2-1 hereunder shows the diagram of flow of activities of the
community development component. Activities 1.1 through 1.5
constitute main activities of the community development
component.
2 ‐ 5
Annex 7
101REFLECTION ON “LIVING
SIDE BY SIDE WITH A DAM”
103PEMETAAN SWADAYA
“INTERAKSI MASYARAKAT DENGAN WADUK”
102COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION & ESTABLISHMENT OF DAM
COMMUNITY FORUM
104COMPILATION OF
STRATEGIC PLAN FOR COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
IN DAM MANAGEMENT
106IMPLEMENTATION OF
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN DAM MANAGEMENT
105COMPILATION OF ANNUAL
ACTION PLAN FOR COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
IN DAM MANAGEMENT Picture 2-1ACTIVITIES IN IMPROVEMENT OF DAM MANAGEMENT THROUGH COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
YEARLY CYCLE
FIVE YEAR CYCLE
Financing support for this community empowerment component
covers: 1) costs for availability of facilitator to assist the community;
2) costs for preparation of material and implementation of
socialization; 3) costs for preparation of material and
implementation of training. In brief, the community empowerment
component consists of the five main following activities:
2 ‐ 6
Annex 7
1) Improved Community Awareness and Concern pertaining to:
“Living side by side with the Dam”
These activities constitute reflective discussions conducted by
small discussion groups within the community. First of all the
participants are directed to make an inventory of and reflect on
the attitudes and behaviors of each participant related to the
dam. Thereafter the Facilitator of Community Cadre shall assist
in showing the relationship between each attitude and behavior
with the point of view of each individual towards his/her
environment. Further several reflective questions shall be
submitted by the Facilitator or the Community Cadre to help
participants in bring back an authentic human ‘point of
view/way of perceiving’ regarding the relationship of each
individual and his/her environment, namely that the
environment is an ‘extension’ of the human body. Through
these discussions participants are expected to be able to perceive
concern towards the dam no longer as a burden but as a need. In
the end, it is expected that participant discussion can re-
formulate new point of view/way of perceiving, attitude and
behavior for each respective participant related to the dam.
Results of this phase shall be a type of ‘declaration’ prepared by
the discussion participants themselves concerning how they
2 ‐ 7
Annex 7
should live side by side with the dam. Reflection activities in
these small groups are estimated to need approximately 1 (one)
month’s time.
2) Community Organization and Formation of the Dam
Community Forum
After residents have the awareness and will to change their
attitudes from previously having no concern to having concern
towards dam management, the next step shall be to assist them
in organizing themselves in order that they can jointly create the
desired concerned behavior. In each D Zone Community Groups
are established, with membership of all residents residing there.
These Community Groups (Pokmas) are more in the form of
discussion groups to discuss issues related to their interaction
with the dam. The Facilitator and Community Cadre shall assist
the community in order to be able to develop discussion groups
which apply communication practices that are sound, inclusive
and open towards new and innovative ideas. The first discussion
will be for the purpose of bringing out community member
aspirations concerning community member interactions with the
dam that they want to discuss at Dam Community Forum level,
as well as the election of which community members shall
become their delegates in the Dam Community Forum.
2 ‐ 8
Annex 7
At dam level, the Dam Community Forum (FKW) is formed
consisting of delegates from the Community Groups (Pokmas)
(each community group shall send one delegate); Village Chief,
delegates from the related local community institutions; and the
institutional apparatus who have the formal job of managing the
dam (PSDA, BBWS or BWS units). The agenda for the first
discussion of this FKW will be to compile a declaration
concerning joint desires and commitments to improve
community participation in dam management. This declaration
shall further be set out into a work plan, where one of such plans
would be a plan for implementation of Independent Mapping.
These organizational activities of the community shall need
around 1 (one) month’s time.
3) Independent Mapping: “Community Interaction with the
Dam”
Independent Mapping constitutes a Pokmas activity with the
purpose to identify the existing potential and constraints with
the community (for example HR potential, community
institutionalization), as well as the potential and constraints
existing in the dam, as well as types and intensity level of
current utilization of dam by the community. This Independent
Mapping shall be carried out by each respective Community
2 ‐ 9
Annex 7
Group (Pokmas) together with the dam management apparatus
assisted by the Facilitator or Community Cadre.
The mapping of the existing potential and constraints in the
dam, can be carried out by method of community members
making visits to the dam construction or part of the dam around
their residential area to obtain clarification concerning technical
matters related to the dam construction and the dam. In this
opportunity, explanations are also provided concerning the
technical demands that have to be satisfied for the operation and
maintenance of the dam, hence residents can be expected to
acquire more understanding on operational and safety issues the
dam is facing.
The results of this individual mapping shall then be jointly
discussed at Pokmas level as well as at FKW level. The results
of discussions shall be in the form of understanding concerning
various potentials emerging from the current pattern of
interaction, as well as the potential and constraints for
implementation of community participation in dam
management. These activities are expected to be completed
within a period of 1 (one) month.
Picture 2-1 hereunder presents a division of interaction zones
between the dam and the community. Interaction zone A is the
2 ‐ 10
Annex 7
water body of the dam, while zone B is the land areas emerging
when the dam dries up during the dry season. Zone C constitutes
the green belt area of the dam, while zone D is the settlement
are adjacent to the green belt of the dam.
DAM
Interaction ZoneB
C
D
D
Pokmas 1
Interaction ZoneiB
Interaction ZoneA
Pokmas 2
Pokmas 3
Pokmas 4 Pokmas 5
Pokmas 6
boundary
boundary
bounda
ry
boundary
river
Picture 2-2COMMUNITY EXISTENCE AROUND THE DAM AND THE INTERACTION ZONES
Green belt
boundary
highest w
ater leve
l
lowest waterlevel
Interaction ZoneC
Interaction ZoneD
2 ‐ 11
Annex 7
4) Participative Planning to Compile a Strategic Plan for
Community Participation in Dam Management
Based on the results of Independent Mapping the community
shall than by level – commencing from Pokmas level – compile
an action plan of community participation which they want to
carry out within a period of the next 5 (five) years. Such results
of planning at Pokmas level shall then be discussed at FKW
level to produce a document of understanding concerning the
direction of development of participation during the next 5
years. The time required to carry out this activity is around 0.5
(half) a month.
5) Compilation of Annual Action Plan of Community
Participation in Dam Management
From the numerous participation action plans that are to be
carried out within a the next 5 years, members of the FKW
jointly – through a democratic process – compile priorities
according to level of urgency of each respective activity.
Thereafter activities to be carried out during such a period of
one year shall be determined. Funding sources for such
activities shall originate from the DOISP, community self-
2 ‐ 12
Annex 7
funding, the State Budget/Regional Budget and others. The
duration of this activity shall take around 0.5 (half a) month.
b) General Provisions
1) Who are defined as the community?
The definition of community around the dam in the cp-RM
constitutes all members of the community living within a
distance of 500 m from the outer boundary of the green belt of
the dam – whether rich or poor, minority members, original or
incoming residents -, whom after a process of empowerment can
be aware of and understand the environmental conditions
surrounding the dam and the issues which still have low
community participation in dam management, and agree to
organize themselves to participate actively in dam management.
2) Institutionalization which should be developed by the
community and dam management instances
Residents who are aware of the issues on dam performance and
safety as well as the potential of the community to actively
participate in such dam management should be able to form a
Community Group (Pokmas), with the following formula:
2 ‐ 13
Annex 7
“Community Groups (Pokmas) in cp-RM are groups of
community members formed based on similarity in settlement
locations around the dam. These groups are initiated and
managed independently by the residents themselves and are
established for the purpose to strive for joint interests, and to
solve issues concerning the utilization and management of the
environment surrounding the dam. The nature of Pokmas is
inclusive, deeply rooted, democratic while still maintaining
independent and autonomic natures towards government
institutions, politics, the military, family, religion and business”.
Communities around the dam can form Community Groups
(Pokmas), as well as empower the existing institutions through
improvement in their roles and functions, as long as such
institutions have fulfilled the criteria for community
organization based on the characteristics of autonomy,
voluntariness, equality, inclusiveness, democracy and
appreciating differences and peace. To lead these Community
Groups, a leader for each Community Group needs to be
elected, a person who can be trusted and is deemed to be able to
represent the aspirations of the community members during the
FKW dialogues.
2 ‐ 14
Annex 7
Further, the Pokmas Leaders, representatives of the PSDA Unit
and representatives of BBWS/BWS who are technically
designated to manage the dam, representatives from the
concerned Village Authorities, as well as representatives from
the local community institutions (PKK, religious groups and so
forth) to jointly establish a Dam Community Forum (FKW).
FKW is a form of communications between all existing
Community Groups and other community institutions around
the dam with the technical instances of dam management to
mutually agree on community participation programs in the
utilization and management of dams. Such mutual agreement
shall be poured into a Strategic Plan for Community
Participation in Dam Management, which each year shall be set
out in the annual action plan document.
2 ‐ 15
Annex 7
Community Group
….
Community Group
4
Community Group
3
Community Group
1Community
Group2
Picture 2.3FRAMEWORK OF INSTITUTIONALIZATION
FOR COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN DAM MANAGEMENT
DAM COMMUNITY FORUM
BBWS/BWS Apparatus
Village Chief
Community Institution Elements
delegatedelegate
delegate
delegate
PLAN FOR COMMUNITY
PARTICIPATIONIn Dam Management
2 ‐ 16
Annex 7
3) What role should be played by the Community Groups?
• Pokmas organizes community members in a participative
manner – beginning from grass root level – to exploitation
of community aspirations concerning forms of community
participation in dam utilization and management;
• To act as a decision making forum at community level for
matters pertaining to implementation of cp-RM specifically
and the utilization and management of the dam environment
in general;
• To increase community member concern towards active
participation in maintenance of the preserved environment
of the dam;
• To increase empowerment of community members in order
to be able to take advantage of various available
opportunities due to the existence of the dam, while still
paying due observance to the preservation of the
environment;
• To propose and carry out various community participation
activities in the utilization and management of dams.
2 ‐ 17
Annex 7
4) What role should be carried out by the Dam Community
Forum?
• FKW organizes all existing Community Groups, all other
community institutions, the related Village authorities –
together with the technical instances of dam managements –
to actively participate in dam management, as well as
sustainable utilization of the dam;
• To act as a decision making forum at dam level for matters
pertaining to implementation of cp-RM specifically and
utilization and management of the dam environment in
general;
• To improve effectiveness of communications among stake-
holders of dam management;
• To develop networks with existing FKW in other dams;
• To determine policies and supervise the process of
utilization of Partnership Funds by Pokmas;
• To propose and carry out community participation activities
involving more that one or all Pokmas at dam scale.
5) Assistance and community development
2 ‐ 18
Annex 7
• The Facilitator shall intensively facilitate Pokmas, FKW and
the community members in general in efforts towards
improvement of community participation in the utilization
and management of dams.
• Community cadres are selected from, by and for the
community. Community cadres voluntarily serve as local
community development agents. These Community Cadres
shall obtain training held by the Facilitator.
2.1.2 Availability of Partnership Funds
a) Description
The Partnership Funds component is implemented with the purpose
to open up access for communities around dams to capital resources,
which could directly be applied towards efforts of dam utilization
and management. The types of activities can be determined by the
communities themselves through discussions/dialogues with Pokmas
and FKW, based on the stipulations of cp-RM.
Partnership funds are in the nature of ‘grant’ funds from the
government to the communities around dams, for which control over
management therefore is entrusted to the FKW formed in a
democratic, participative, transparent and accountable manner.
2 ‐ 19
Annex 7
Partnership Funds can only be used for the interests of the
communities surrounding the dams in relation to the dam utilization
and management.
b) General Provisions
1) Allocation of Partnership Funds
The amount of Partnership Funds is determined based on total
families residing around the dam and the measurement of the
dam, therefore distribution of allocation of Partnership Funds
shall be as presented in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Distribution of Allocation of Partnership Funds
Dam Measurement Small Medium Large
CATEGORY 200 < and <
700 Ha < 200 Ha > 700 Ha
Low
< 200
Househo
lds
Rp. 300
mio - -
Total
Families
Around the
Dam Mediu
m
200 <
Households
< 500
Rp. 400
mio Rp. 600 mio Rp. 800 mio
2 ‐ 20
Annex 7
High
> 500
Househo
lds
Rp. 500
mio
Rp. 1,100
mio Rp. 800 mio
Total allocation of Partnership Funds for each respective
targeted dam shall be notified in a transparent manner for all
layers of the community.
The total to be allocated to each respective targeted dam shall
constitute the maximum amount which can be used. Meanwhile
total actual disbursement shall depend on the capacity of
management and preparedness of Pokmas and FKW to carry out
the community participation program in dam management, in
accordance with the purposes and stipulations of cp-RM.
If within a timeline determined by the community, the targeted
location is assessed as being unable to show any capacity and
preparedness to carry out the community participation program,
therefore the available allocation of funds – partially or wholly –
can be deferred or cancelled.
2) Distribution and Disbursement of Partnership Funds to the
Dam Community Forum
2 ‐ 21
Annex 7
Disbursement of Partnership Funds to FKW is carried out in
stages, namely stage 1 20%, stage 2 50%, stage 3 20% and stage
4 10% of total allocation of Partnership Funds for each
respective targeted dam, through the Bank accounted appointed
by FKW.
• Disbursement of funds stage 1 amounting to 20% of total
Partnership Allocation is carried out in the middle of the
first year. These first stage Partnership Funds are prioritized
(around 70%) to fund activity proposals with the purpose of
improving community participation in dam maintenance and
supervision. Included in this category are proposals for
Pokmas training pertaining to dam management, proposal
for restructuring of utilization of land surrounding the dam
by the community, and proposals for strengthening of FKW
capacity.
Meanwhile the remaining portion of the Partnership Funds
(approximately 30%) shall be used to fund activities with the
purpose to improve access of the dam surrounding
communities to available opportunities within the
environment of the dam. Include din this category are
proposals for training for the community around the dam
concerning businesses suitable for development around the
2 ‐ 22
Annex 7
dam, proposals for development of infrastructure and
facilities to improve community access to the benefits of the
dam, and proposals for strengthening of community business
capital around the dam.
The disbursement of stage 1 can be carried out if the FKW is
already established; a Strategic Plan for Community
Participation in Dam Management document and a First Year
Action Plan have been compiled. Proposals for activities at
dam scale are prepared and carried out by the Executive
Committee formed by FKW.
• Disbursement of funds stage 2 amounting to 50% of the
total Partnership Funds is carried out in the middle of the
second year. These second stage Partnership Funds are
partially (around 20%) to fund proposals for activities with
the purpose to increase community participation in dam
maintenance and supervision. In the meantime the remaining
large portion (around 80%) shall be used to fund activities
with the purpose to increase access for the community
around the dam to opportunities within the environment of
the dam.
2 ‐ 23
Annex 7
Disbursement of stage 2 funds can only be carried out if the
Pokmas and FKW have carried out all stage 1 activity
proposals, conducted evaluation towards implementation
thereof, and prepared Action Plan for the Second Year.
If based on the results of evaluation of the Project the
performance of FKW as well as Pokmas related to
implementation of the improvement in community
participation program for utilization and management of
dams in the previous stage are unsatisfactory, then the Project
can defer further disbursement. During such postponement,
FKW and Pokmas shall have to improve their performance in
accordance with the stipulations of cp-RM.
• Disbursement of funds stage 3 amounting to 30% of total
allocation of Partnership Funds is carried out in the middle
of the third year. Half of these third year Partnership Funds
shall be used to fund proposals on activities with the purpose
to improve community participation in the maintenance and
supervision of dams. Meanwhile the remaining half of the
funds shall be used to fund activities with the purpose of
improving access of the communities around the dam to
available opportunities within the environment of the dam.
2 ‐ 24
Annex 7
• Disbursement of funds stage 4 amounting to 10% of total
allocation of Partnership Funds is carried out in the middle
of the fourth year. Half of these Partnership Funds shall be
used to fund proposals on activities with the purpose of
improving community participation in the maintenance and
supervision of dams. Meanwhile the remaining half of the
funds shall be used to fund activities with the purpose of
improving access of the communities around the dam to
available opportunities within the environment of the dam.
• Cancellation of distribution of Partnership Funds.
Distribution of Partnership Funds for the project could be
cancelled wholly or partially, if there should be one of the
following indicators:
‐ No establishment of a number of Community Groups
that at least cover 70% of families residing around the
dam.
‐ FKW is not established, or its performance is
ineffective after one year of implementation of cp-RM.
‐ Indications of mis-appropriation of Partnership Funds
are discovered.
2 ‐ 25
Annex 7
3) Mis-Appropriation of Partnership Funds
• What may not be financed by Partnership Funds
Fundamentally Partnership Funds can be used flexibly while
being guided by the Strategic Plan for Community
Participation in Dam Management as well as at the discretion
of the community members in order that the results thereof
can truly provide benefits for the targeted communities as
well as the performance and safety of the dam. In spite of
this, various activities may not be funded by the Partnership
Funds, namely:
• Purchase or business of narcotics;
• Financing activities that are related to politics (such as:
campaigns);
• Military or semi-military activities (such as: purchase of
fire arms);
• Deposits or such placements related to efforts to
generating savings interest;
• Land clearance and evacuation;
• Construction of religious places of worship;
• Construction of government office buildings or FKW
offices;
2 ‐ 26
Annex 7
• Products that damage the environment;
• Gambling business and businesses contrary to morality
and ethics as well as religious values;
• Activities with negative impact on the environment,
indigenous population and preservation of local culture;
and
• What may be financed by the Partnership Funds
1) Participative Dam Management
a) Improvement in knowledge, motivation and capacity
of the community around the dam to participate in
dam management, such as in form of:
‐ Socialization and publication concerning
community participation in dam maintenance
and supervision.
‐ Appreciation for community members
participating in dam maintenance.
‐ Procurement of complementary equipment to
maintain and supervise the dam.
2 ‐ 27
Annex 7
b) Activities pertaining to restructuring of utilization of
areas around the dam by the communities, for
example in form of:
‐ Relocation of public facilities available around
the dam.
‐ Relocation of commercial facilities available
around the dam.
2) Improvement of community access to opportunities
around the dam.
a) Strengthening of capital and community skills
around the dam for the development of businesses in
conformity with the dam environment, for example
in form of:
‐ Capital aid for development of livestock
business
‐ Capital aid for development of agricultural
business
‐ Capital aid in the development of business in
trading of goods/services
‐ Training in business development for
community members
2 ‐ 28
Annex 7
b) Improvement in infrastructure and facilities of the
residential settlement around the dam, for example:
‐ Construction of new roads within the
environment
‐ Improvement in quality of roads within the
environment
‐ Improvement in transportation facilities
‐ Procurement of public hydrants
‐ Construction of bath, wash, toilet facilities
(MCK)
‐ Reparations on educational infrastructure and
facilities
‐ Procurement of electricity
‐ Procurement of public telecommunications
facilities
2.2 SUPPORT IN IMPLEMENTATION
To implement cp-RM to achieve the expected purposes, PMU shall contract
consultants and facilitators to manage implementation of the project, mainly
since c p-RM needs active and intensive presence and assistance in the field
both at Pokmas as well as FKW levels.
2 ‐ 29
Annex 7
Basically the support for project implementation covers financing of all
management projects that shall enable PMU to possess: 1) proper quality of
cp-RM performance; ii) technical support in the field for Pokmas and FKW;
as well as iii) proper evaluation and monitoring towards the impacts of cp-
RM implementation.
Hence, support for implementation of cp-RM covers therein matters
pertaining to:
2.2.1 Technical Assistance for Implementation and Monitoring
• Procurement of Technical Assistance Team for Community
Development at both PMU and PIU levels, and Facilitator at dam
level. The following table presents allocations for Facilitators for
each respective dam determined by the measurement of the dams
and the population living around the dams.
Table-2.2 Facilitator Allocation
Dam Measurement Small Medium Large
CATEGORY 200 < area< 700
Ha < 200 Ha > 700 Ha
Total Families
living around
the Dam
Low < 200
households 1 Facilitator - -
2 ‐ 30
Annex 7
Mediu
m
200 <
households <
500
1 Facilitator 2 Facilitators 3 Facilitators
High > 500
households 2 Facilitators 3 Facilitators 3 Facilitators
• Socialization and coordination at national, provincial and dam
levels as well as the stages of planning, implementation and
monitoring.
2.2.2 Technical Assistance for Evaluation
Procurement of Evaluation Consultant at PMU level to carry out a
baseline survey, mid-term review, impact survey and case study in
accordance with needs.
2.3 STEPS OF IMPLEMENTATION
2.3.1 Preparation Phase
Table 2.3 Activities and Actors in the Preparation Phase
No
. ACTIVITY ACTOR RESULTS NOTES
1.
Communication BBWS/BWS, TA concerning the location,
Workshop for
Orientation of
Organizer: PSDA Unit.
Participants: BPSDA,
• Similarity in
understanding
• Implemented in
every dam
2 ‐ 31
Annex 7
Participation in
Dam
Management.
,
GO
h
ll
ously
op
)
Community
Development
Universities, N
purpose, target,
strategy, approac
and phases of
activities as we
as each respective
role
simultane
with the Worksh
for Orientation of
Community
Participation in
Managing Water
Catchment Areas
(Watershed
Management
2. Facilitator
Training
Organizer: TA
Community
Development
Participants:
Facilitators
• Facilitators who
are ready to assist
the communities
to participate in
dam management
•
intly
Areas
•
m
Carried out
regionally, jo
with Facilitators
for Water
Catchment
Training Modules
are compiled by
the Technical
Assistance Tea
for Community
Development at
Central level
2 ‐ 32
Annex 7
3.
Social Mapping
Executor: Facilitators
• Plan for assistance
nities that
•
ion of
y the
Team
Manual for
Implementat
Social Mapping
Manual is
compiled b
Technical
Assistance
for Community
Development at
Central level
to the
commu
is in accordance
with the local
constraints and
potential
of Communities
Around the Dams
4.
Discussions on
Organizer: Facilitator
ents
• Communities
• Implemented in
around the dam
understand the
purpose, target,
phases and
activities of cp-
RM which they
are carrying out
Socialization to
the Communities
Around the Dams
and Selection of
Community
Cadres
Participants: all
community resid
around the dam
each settlement
group around the
dam
5.
Training of Executor: Facilitator •
re
e
• Carried out in each
• g Modules
Community
Community
Cadres
Resource person: TA
Community
Cadres who a
ready to assist th
dam
Trainin
2 ‐ 33
Annex 7
Development
Participants: al
l
es
m Community Cadr
communities to
carry out cp-RM
activities
are compiled by
the Technical
Assistance Tea
for Community
Development at
Central level
2.3.2 Implementation Phase
Table omponents in Community Development 2.4 Activities and Actor C
No ACT Y IVIT ACTOR RESULTS NOTE
1.
FGD concerning
“Living Side By
Side a Dam”
Executor: Community
Cadres
Facilitator: Facilitator
Participants: all
members of the
communities
• Identification of how
•
• awareness
maintaining the
• FGD mented
hs,
he
ed
• Manual on
one should live side by
side a dam according to
community perception
Community awareness
of being a part of the
developed and natural
environment around
them
Community
of the importance of
is imple
according to social
groups of: adult
males, adult
females, yout
farmers, livestock
breeders, etc., in
accordance with t
results of social
mapping conduct
by the facilitator
2 ‐ 34
Annex 7
environment of the da
Formulation of re
needed to improve
m
• sources
•
s
d by
r
l
community participation
in dam management
Mutual agreement
concerning further step
Implementation of
FGD compile
the Technical
Assistance Team fo
Community
Development at
Central Leve
2.
Establishment of
Community
roups
am
Executor: Community
Cadres
nts: all
ation
,
• riteria
e
• Manual on
Implementation of
nt of
r
l
Participation
Community G
(Pokmas) in D
Management
Facilitator: Facilitator
Participa
members of the
communities
• Establishment of
community group
(Pokmas) handling
community particip
in dam management
approved by all
community members
Formulation of c
for leaders of Pokmas
• Election of leaders of
Pokmas who shall also
Establishme
Pokmas compiled
by the Technical
Assistance Team fo
Community
Development at
Central Leve
become members of th
Dam Community Forum
3.
Establishment of
Dam Community
Executor: Pokmas
delegates, instance
ity
•
the FKW handling
• Manual on
Implementation of
nt of
The establishment of
Forum (FKW) delegates, commun community Establishme
2 ‐ 35
Annex 7
institution delegates
Village Chiefs
Facilitator: Facilitator
,
, mutually
•
/Budget of
scussed and
y
l
participation in dam
management
agreed upon by all
delegates
Articles of
Association
Dam Community
Forum compiled b
the Technical
Assistance Team for
Community
Development at
Central LeveFKW are di
mutually agreed upon
by all members
4.
Training for Dam
Community
Executor: Facilitator
Facilitator: Technical
FKW
• FKW is ready to carry
out its role and duties
• Training Module for
Dam Community
l
Forums
Assistance Team for
Community
Empowerment
Participants:
members
Forum compiled by
the Technical
Assistance Team for
Community
Development at
Central Leve
5.
Independent
Executor: Community
r: Facilitator
bers
• Map & profile of
community interaction
• s
ance
•
ity
Interaction with
Mapping:
“Community
Interaction with
Dams”
Cadres
Facilitato
Participants: all
community mem
with the dam
Map & profile of matter
on dam mainten
• Map & profile on
Manual on
Implementation of
Independent
Mapping
concerning
“Commun
2 ‐ 36
Annex 7
opportunities
surrounding the da
Map & profile
each Pokmas
m
• on HR in
iled by
for
t
Dams” comp
the Technical
Assistance Team
Community
Development a
Central Level
6.
Compilation of
Strategic Plan for
Community
Executor: FKW
Facilitator: Facilitator
Participants: all Forum
• Indications of medium
term program on
community participation
•
l
for
t
Manual on
Compilation of
Strategic Plan by
the Technica
Assistance Team
Community
Development a
Central Level
Participation in
Dam Management
Members in dam management
7.
Compilation of
lan
nt
Executor: FKW
tator
•
activities of community
participation in dam
•
an
ces
thereof
•
l
Formulation on type of
management to be
carried out within the
following year
Classification &
agreement on action pl
and funding sour
Manual on
Compilation of
Yearly Action P
of Community
Participation in
Dam Manageme
Facilitator: Facili
Participants: all Forum
members
Annual Action Plan
by the Technical
Assistance Team for
Community
Development at
Central Leve
2 ‐ 37
Annex 7
- pure community
dependence
Partnership Funds
in
-
- Independent +
Partnership Funds
Table 2.5 Activity and Actor Components of Partnership Funds
No ACTIVITY ACTOR RESULT NOTES
1. Preparation of
Activity Proposal
Executor: FKW
facilitator: facilitator
Participants: Pokmas and
Executing Committee
• Activity Proposal
Pokmas, or
Community Forum
Committee
• Manual on the
Formulation of
Activity Proposal
pre entral
•
scale
all be
g
pared by C
Community
Development
Technical
Assistance Team
For Activity
Proposal at the
of the dam sh
made by Executin
Committee
2. Meeting on the
Determination of
Executor: FKW
facilitator: facilitator
• List of rank of
priority of Activity
•
Determination of
Manual on the
2 ‐ 38
Annex 7
the Priority of
Activity Proposal
Participants: Pokmas, the
community, Community
Cadres, Executing
Committee
Proposal the
Central
Priority of
Activity Proposal is
prepared by
Community
Development
Technical
Assistance Team
3. Verification of
Activity Proposal
Executor: Provincial
Community Development
Technical Assistance
Team
•
roposal is
considered is
considered as
having applied the
• spect
ing.
• Manual on the
Verification of
Activity Proposal is
prepared by Central
The formulation of
Activity P
principles and
values of DOISP-
CP
Ensuring the a
of the continuity of
the activity,
institution and
fund
Community
Development
Technical
Assistance Team
4.
Application for the
Disbursement of
Partnership Funds
Executor: FKW
facilitator: facilitator unds
• Request for the
disbursement of
Partnership F
2 ‐ 39
Annex 7
to PIU, attached
with Activ
ity
f
of
Proposal, result o
the Verification
Activity Proposal,
5.
Disbursement of
Partnership Funds
into the Account of
Dam Community
Forum
Executor: KPKN
facilitator: facilitator, PIU
• nds is
Partnership Fu
available in the
account of FKW
6.
Disbursement of
Partnership Funds
to Pokmas or
Executing
Committee
Executor: FKW
Participants: Pokmas and
Executing Committee
facilitator: facilitator and
Community Cadres
• Partnership Funds
received by Pokmas
dan Executing
Committee
7. Utilization of
Partnership Funds
: FKW • Partnership Funds
are used for
Activity Proposal in
a transparent and
accountable manner
Responsible party
Executor: Pokmas and
Executing Committee
facilitator: facilitator and
Community Cadres
2.4 NCE INDICATORS PERFORMA
2 ‐ 40
Annex 7
Table 2.6 cp-RM Performance Indicators
End of year-
N
o Component
1 2
3 Source
4 of
Inform
ation
I. COMMUNITY DE VELOPMENT
1. The holding of the meeting for the socialization of cp-RM Ya - - - Report
2. The minimum percentage of adults who understand the objectives of cp-RM 25% 35% 4 5 Su 5% 5% rvey
3. The minimum amount of FGD “Living Adjacent to Dam” which is held per 200
adults 4 - - - Report
4. g Adjacent to Dam” held particularly for young
2 - - - Report The minimum amount of FGD “Livin
generation
5. The minimum percentage of adult females attending FGD “Living with Dam” 40% - - - Report
6. 25% 35% 45% 55% Survey The minimum percentage of adults who understand how to “Live with Dam”
7. ablishment of Pokmas of Dam Community Participation Ya - - - Report The est
8. Ya - - - Report The establishment of Dam Community Forum (FKW)
9. m percentage of females being members of FKW 20% 25% 30% 35% Report The minimu
1
0.
The minimum percentage of adults ever attended Pokmas meeting 25% 35% 45% 55% Report
1
1.
The minimum percentage of Pokmas' delegates attended the establishment of FKW 75% - - - Report
1 The minimum amount of FKW meeting - 4 4 4 Report
2 ‐ 41
Annex 7
2.
1
3.
The minimum percentage of Pokmas' delegates attending the meeting to resolve the
Dam Community Participation Strategic Plan - 75% 80% 80% Report
1
4.
The minimum percentage of adults who know the contents of Dam Community
Participation Strategic Plan 3 5- 25% 5% 5% Survey
1
5.
The minimum percentage of Pokmas' delegates attending the meeting to resolve the
Annual Action Plan 7 7 8 85% 5% 0% 0% Report
1
6.
The minimum percentage of the community who know the contents of the Annual
Action Plan 25% 35% 45% 55% Survey
II
.
PROVISION OF PARTNERSHIP FUNDS
1. Percentage of Pokmas submitting proposal on the use of Partnership Funds - 70% 70% 70% Report
2. The minimum percentage of Partnership Funds allocated for Community
Participation in Dam Management 70% 20% 50% 50% Report
3. he maximum percentage of Partnership Funds allocated for the
to the benefits of the dam
30
%
80
%
50
%
50
%Report
T
improvement of the community access
4. The percentage of the holding of Community Participation in Dam
Management
30
%
100
%
100
%
100
%Survey
5. ility of community access to the benefits
SurveyThe percentage of the availab
of the dam
30
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
2 ‐ 42
Annex 7
Chapter 3. Community Participation in Managing Water Catchment Area
Dam Operational Improvement & Safety Project (DOISP) is a project held with
an aim to improve the operational performance and security of the dams in
Indonesia.
One of the problems that threatens the operational performance and security of the
dam shall be the high level of sedimentation of the dam which derives from
upstream river flow. This is mainly due to the practice of vegetation cutting that
is uncontrollable on the hills/mountains, and the practice of agriculture land
management that is inappropriate in the upstream area. besides, the practice of the
development alongside the river that does not comply with the requirements has
also resulted in the increased sediment content in the river water flowing to the
dam.
Cp-WM (Community Participation in Watershed Management) is a component of
social development in DOISP which aims to improve the participation of the
community residing in the area of water catchment in reducing the level of
To improve Community Participation in Managing Water Catchment Area, cp-WM comprises two components namely:
A. Water Catchment Area Community Development
B. Provision of Partnership Funds
3 ‐ 1
Annex 7
sedimentation of the river water flowing to the dam. The expected output of the
implementation of this component shall be:
1. the increased Community Participation in the maintenance of vegetation
dam, or the condition of the riverside flowing into such dam, in that the
2 h Participation in the utilization of opportunities
3. the increased capacity of the government institution tasked to manage
water catchment area, so that they are able to apply Management of Water
Catchment Area approach in a participative means.
3.1 COMPONENT
Cp-WM provides support for activities relating to Community
Development Water Catchment Area so as to be able to cooperate
and the condition of the land surface at the area of water catchment of a
level of sedimentation occurring in the river will be as low as possible.
. t e increased Community
available in the area of water catchment, within such boundaries that do not
disturb the preserved ecosystem in the water catchment area.
3.1.1 Community Development in Water Catchment Area
a) Description
more effectively with officers from technical institutions in terms of
Management of Water Catchment Area.
3 ‐ 2
Annex 7
These Community Development component activities cover a series
of activities which shall be started with: 1) building the critical
ater
Catchment Area; 4) participative planning to formulate the Strategic
Plan on Community Participation in Managing Water Catchment
Area; and, 5) the formulation of the Annual Action Plan of
Community Participation in Managing Water Catchment Area.
Picture 3-1 below depicts the flow chart on the activities of
Community Development component. Activities 2.1 through 2.5
constitute the main activities of Community Development
component at Water Catchment Area.
awareness of the community on how to live in the nature; continued
with, 2) the organizing of the community in the form of Pokmas and
Forum of Preservation of Water Catchment Area; 3) Independent
Mapping on the interaction between the community and W
3 ‐ 3
Annex 7
SOCIAL PLANNING F
MAPPING & ACILITATION
201CTION ON
NATURE”REFLE
“LIVING IN
203
“UTILIZATION AND PRESERVATION OF WATER
COMMUNITY”
INDEPENDENT MAPPING ON
CATCHMENT AREAS BY THE
202
& ESTABLISHMENT OF NATURAL PRESERVATION
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
FORUM
204
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
COMPILATION OF STRATEGIC PLAN FOR
IN MANAGEMENT OF WATER CATHCMENT AREAS
206
IN MANAGEMENT F WATER
IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
CATCHMENT AREAS
205COMPILATION OF YEARLY
ACTION PLAN FOR COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT OF WATER
CATCHMENT AREAS
FIVE YEAR CYCLE
Picture 3.1FLOW OF ACTIVITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT IN MANAGEMENT OF WATER PARTICIPA
YEARLY CYCLE
Financing support for Community Development component covers:
1) the cost for the provision of facilitator to provide assistance to the
community in Water Catchment Area; 2) the cost for the preparation
of the materials and implementation of socialization; and, 3) the cost
for the preparation of the materials and implementation of training.
In short, this Community Development component shall consist of
five main activities, as follows:
CATCHMENT AREAS THROUGH COMMUNITY TION
3 ‐ 4
Annex 7
1) Re-strengthening the Community's awareness on : “Living in
Nature”
This activity is a reflective discussion conducted in small
discussion groups. First, the participants shall be directed to list
and contemplate their own behavior and attitude in relation to
nature. Further, the facilitator or Community Cadre helps to
show the relationship between the behavior and attitude arising
in the discussion by way of the perspective of each individuals
towards the surrounding nature. Further, several reflective
questions are asked by facilitator or Community Cadre to help
participants to resurrect human's authentic ‘perspective’ on the
relationship between each individual and the nature where he
lives in, namely the nature being an ‘expansion’ to human's
ticipants of the discussion
themselves on how they ought to live in nature. This reflective
body. At this stage participants shall be able to see that the
awareness of the nature is no longer a burden, but more of a
need of every human being. At the end, it is expected that the
participants of the discussion could reformulate new
perspective, behavior and attitude or each participant in
connection with nature. The result of this stage shall be a sort of
‘declaration’ made by the par
3 ‐ 5
Annex 7
activity is expected to consume a period of approximately 1
2) The organizing of the Community and the Establishment of
F
After the community has the awareness and willingness to
change their behavior to be cautious and caring of preservation
of the nature, then the next step shall be to help them organize
themselves so they could jointly realize their awareness
behavior that they expect. At each Zone A, community groups
shall be established, which shall have all the community
residing therein as members. These Kelompok Masyarakat
(Pokmas) is more of a discussion group being the venue to
discuss issues pertaining to their interaction with nature.
Facilitator and Community Cadres help the community so that
they could develop discussion groups that implement
communication practices that are healthy, inclusive and open
towards new and innovative ideas. The first discussion aims to
gather the community's aspirations in relation to the interaction
of the people with Water Catchment Area which is to be
discussed at the level of the Forum of Water Catchment Area
Conservation, and the selection of whom of the community who
shall become the delegates at such Forum.
(one) month.
orum of Water Catchment Area Conservation
3 ‐ 6
Annex 7
At each sub-water catchment area being a target, a Forum of
Water Catchment Area Conservation (FPDTA) shall be
Village; delegates of the related local community institution ;
and officers of institutions formally assigned to manage Water
Catchment Area (Units of PSDA, BBWS or BWS, and
BPSDA). The agenda of the first discussion of FPDTA shall be
to formulate the declaration on the joint intention and
commitment to implement programs of Community
Participation in Managing Water Catchment Area. This
declaration shall then be provided in a work plan, where one of
which shall be the plan on the implementation of Independent
Mapping. This activity will require approximately 1 (one)
month period.
established, which shall consist of delegates from Pokmas (each
community group shall be required to send a delegate); Head of
3 ‐ 7
Annex 7
RESERVOIR
Interaction
river
Picture 3.2EXISTING COMMUNITES IINTERACTION ZONES
zoneB
N WATER CATCHMENT AREAS & THE
Interaction zoneB
Sub Water Catchment Area
zone
Pokmas
Interaction
A
Interaction zoneA
1
Pokmas 2
tion and Preservation of Water 3) Independent Mapping: “Utiliza
Catchment Area by the Community”
Independent Mapping is an activity of Pokmas which aims to
learn of the potentials and obstacles present on the part of the
community (such as, human resources potentials, community
institutions), or the potentials and limitations on the part of sub-
water catchment area, and the types and intensity of the
utilization of Water Catchment Area by the people at the
3 ‐ 8
Annex 7
moment. This Independent Mapping is conducted by each
Pokmas with the assistance of facilitator or Community Cadres.
In connection with the mapping of the potentials and limitations
on the part of sub-water catchment area, the people shall obtain
an explanation from the counsel on technical matters pertaining
to nature preservation. At this instance, it was also explained the
technical demands that must be met for preserving Water
Catchment Area.
The result of this Independent Mapping shall then be discussed
at both Pokmas and FPDTA levels. The result of the discussion
in the form of the understanding on various impacts, potentials,
obstacles and limitations for the implementation of Community
Participation in Managing Water Catchment Area. This activity
4) Participative Planning for Formulating Strategic Plan on
Partic
Based on the result of Independent Mapping FPDTA then
formulates the Community Participation program and activity
plans to be carried out within the next 5 (five) years period. The
period required for this activity shall be approximately 0.5 (half)
a month.
is estimated to be completed within 1 (one) month.
ipation in Managing Water Catchment Area
3 ‐ 9
Annex 7
5) C
P
ded by the community, APBN/ APBD, and
c) Gen
1) Who is the community?
The meaning of the community of the Water Catchment Area in
sub-
urce of dam
ontinued diminishing awareness and Community
ompilation of Annual Action Plan of Community
articipation in Managing Water Catchment Area
From the many participative plans to be carried out within the
next 5 years, FPDTA –through a democratic process- formulates
the priority according to the levels of urgency of each activity.
Activities to be carried out within the next year shall then be
agreed upon. The source funding for such activities may derive
from DOISP, fun
others. The duration of this activity shall be approximately 0.5
(half) a month.
eral Conditions
cp-WM shall be all the people residing in one or more
Water Catchment Areas being the most dominant so
sedimentation –be it poor or wealthy, minority, native or
immigrants-, whom after going through the process of
empowerment are able to realize and understand the condition
of the environment of Water Catchment Area and the problem
of the c
3 ‐ 10
Annex 7
Participation in the preservation of the nature, an
organize themselves to be able to participate in a m
d agreed to
ore effective
2) I
The people that is aware of the importance of the preservation of
Water Catchment Area and the potential of the community to
actively participate in Managing Water Catchment Area must be
able to establish Community Group (Pokmas), dunder the
following formula:
“Pokmas in cp-WM shall be group of the people established
under the basis of residential location similarity in a sub-water
catchment area. This group shall be initiated and managed by
es, which shall be established for the
manner in in Managing Water Catchment Area.
nstitution that must be developed by the community
the community themselv
purpose of fighting for joint needs, and to resolve joint problems
relating to the utilization and Management of Water Catchment
Area. The nature of Pokmas shall be inclusive, rooted,
democratic, by still maintaining independency and autonomy
towards institutions of the government, politics, military,
family, religions and business.”
The community/people of Water Catchment Area may establish
Pokmas, or utilize the existing institutions by way of improving
3 ‐ 11
Annex 7
the role and functions thereof, insofar as such institutions have
complied with the criteria of community organization which
shall be based on the characters of autonomous, voluntary,
equal, inclusive, democratic, and respectful towards dynamism
and peace. To lead this Pokmas, a Chairman shall be elected,
Chairmen of Pokmas, representatives of Units of PSDA,
BPSDA, and representatives of BBWS/BWS who are
technically assigned to manage Water Catchment Area,
who shall be a trustworthy individual and considered competent
to lead the community.
representatives of the related Village Government, and the
representatives of the local communities(PKK, pesantren, and
others) shall jointly establish a Forum of Water Catchment Area
Conservation (FPDTA) .
3 ‐ 12
Annex 7
Community Group
1Community
2
Community
….Group
Community Group
4
Community Groupt
3
Group
Picture 3.3MEWORK OF INSTITUTIONS
FOR COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN MANAGEMENT OF WATER CATCHMENT AREAS
FRA
PRESERVATION FORUM WATER CATCHMENT AREAS
BBWS/BWS,
Apparatus
Village Chief
BPSDA, PSDA Unit
delegatedelegate
Community Instittution Elements
delegate
delegate
Plan for Community Participation
In management of Sub Water
FPDTA is a communication means between Pokmas and other
community institutions at Water Catchment Area with the
technical agency managing Water Catchment Area to agree
upon the programs of Community Participation in the utilization
and Management of Water Catchment Area. Such agreement is
provided for in the Strategic Plan on Community Participation
Catchment Areas
3 ‐ 13
Annex 7
in Managing Water Catchment Area, which is annually
described in the annual documentation.
What role to be played by the Community Group?
• Pokmas organizes the community in a participative manner
–from the grassroot level- to formulate the people's
aspirations on the form of Community Participation in the
utilization and Management of Water Catchment Area;
• acting as decision maker forum at the community level for
matters relating to the implementation of cp-WM in
particular and the utilization and management of Water
Catchment Area in general;
• increasing the people's awareness to actively participate in
preserving nature;
• increasing the people's ability so that they could further
3)
utilize various opportunities available at the Water
Catchment Area, by still observing nature preservation;
• proposing and carrying out various activities of Community
Participation in the utilization and Management of Water
Catchment Area.
3 ‐ 14
Annex 7
4) W
A
s, all other
continuously;
•
water catchment area for matters pertaining to the
management of sub-water catchment area in general;
•
stake-holders of Management of Water Catchment Area;
•
• the
•
scale of sub-water catchment area which
coverage includes more than one Pokmas' working areas.
hat role to be carried out by Forum of Water Catchment
rea Conservation?
• FPDTA organizes all the existing Pokma
community organizations, the relevant Village government,
to be able to –along with the technical agency managing
Water Catchment Area- participate actively in the
management or utilization of Water Catchment Area
acting as the decision making forum at the level of sub-
implementation of cp-WM in particular and utilization and
improving the effectiveness of the communication between
developing network with FPDTA at other targeted dams.
determining policies and supervising the process of
utilization of Partnership Funds by Pokmas;
proposing and implementing the activities of Community
Participation at the
3 ‐ 15
Annex 7
5) Assistance in Community Development
• Facilitator team shall intensively facilitate Pokmas, FPDTA,
•
munity. These Community Cadres shall
3.1.2 Provision of Partnership Funds
a) Description
Partnership Funds component shall be held with the purpose of
opening the access by the the community of water catchment area to
capital resources, which could imm
utili i
activity h Pokmas' and
FPDTA'
Partners
commun ch
shall be entrusted to FPDTA to be managed democratically, in a
and the community in general in an effort to increase the
community participation in the utilization and management
of Water Catchment Area.
Community Cadres shall be selected from, by and for the
community and voluntarily act as agent of development of
the local com
receive training as held by facilitator.
ediately be used for efforts of
zat on and management of Water Catchment Area. The types of
could be determined by the people thoug
s meetings, based on cp-WM provisions.
hip Funds are ‘grant’ from the government to the
ity of a sub- Water Catchment Area, the control of whi
3 ‐ 16
Annex 7
participative manner, transparently and accountably. Partnership
Fun m
water c
such sub
b) General Provisions
1) Allo
The
the er catchment area and
e size of such sub-water catchment area, in that the allocation
ership Funds for each sub-
water catchment area will be informed transparently so that all
layers of the community are aware of such.
of Pokmas and
FPDTA to implement the programs of Community
Participation in the management of water catchment area,
according to the purposes and provisions of cp-WM.
ds ay only be used for the needs of the community of a sub-
atchment area relating to the utilization and management of
-water catchment area.
cation of Partnership Funds
amount of Partnership Funds shall be determined based on
Total Families residing in a sub-wat
th
distribution of Partnership Funds shall be as per Table 3.1.
The amount of the allocation of Partn
The amount allocated for each sub-water catchment area
becoming a target shall be the maximum amount that could be
utilized. Whilst the amount of the actual disbursement shall be
dependent on the ability to manage and readiness
3 ‐ 17
Annex 7
If within the predetermined period, the people at the target
location is considered unable to show their ability and readiness
to implement programs of Community Participation in
Managing Water Catchment Area, then the allocation of the
available funds –partially or entirely- could be deferred or
a
cancelled.
Table 3.1 Allocation Distribution of Partnership Funds
Sub-water catchment areSmall Medium Large
CATEGORY Area < 500
Ha
500 < area <
1000 Ha
Area > 1000
Ha
Low KK <
250
Rp. 4.5 M - -
Mediu
m
250 < KK
< 500 Rp. 5.0 M Rp. 7.5 M Rp. 10.0 M
Total
milies at
b-water
Fa
su
catchment
area High KK >
500 Rp. 5.5 M Rp. 8.0 M Rp. 10.5 M
2) Distribution and Disbursement of Partnership Funds to the
Forum of Water Catchment Area Conservation
3 ‐ 18
Annex 7
The disbursement of Partnership Funds to FPDTA shall be
made in phases, namely phase 1 amounting to 20%, phase 2
amounting to 50%, phase 3 amounting to 20%, and phase 4
amounting to 10% of the total allocation of Partnership Funds
for cp-WM of each target dam, through the Bank specified by
FPDTA.
• Disbursement of funds of phase 1 amounting to 20% of
ddle
of the first year. Phase 1 Partner
m 0%) for th A
aiming to improve the Community Partic the
maintenance and supervision of Water Catchment Area.
Included in this category shall be the proposal on Pokmas'
training on preservati osa ar
replantation, and the proposal on the strengthening of the
capacity TA
Whilst the remaining of such Partnership Funds (around
10%) shall be used to fund activities which aim to improve
ble
category shall
be a proposal for training for the target community on the
appropriate business to be developed at Water Catchment
total allocation of Partnership Funds is made in the mi
ship Funds is prioritized
ainly (around 9 e funding of ctivity Propo
ipation in
sal
on the nature, prop l on critical ea
of FPD .
the access of the target community to opportunities availa
in the Water Catchment Area. included in this
3 ‐ 19
Annex 7
Area, the proposal for the development of residential basic
facilities and infrastructure, and the proposal for the
strengthening of the community's business capital.
The phase 1 disbursement may be carried out if FPDTA had
been established, the Strategic Plan on Community
Participation in Managing Water Catchment Area has been
f
f
m
a
a
F
•
ormulated, and the First Annual Action Plan has been
ormulated. Activity Proposal at the scale of Pokmas shall be
ade and implemented by Pokmas, whilst Activity Proposal
t the scale of sub-water catchment area shall be prepared
nd implemented by Executing Committee established by
PDTA.
Disbursement of funds of phase 2 amounting to 50% of
the total allocation of Partnership Funds shall be made in the
middle of the second year. Part of Partnership Funds of
phase 2 (approximately 90%) shall be for the funding of
Activity Proposal which aims to improve the Community
Participation in the management and supervision of Water
Catchment Area. Whereas the remaining part
(approximately 10%) shall be used for funding activity
which aims to improve the access of the target community to
opportunities available at the Water Catchment Area.
3 ‐ 20
Annex 7
The disbursement of phase 2 may only be made if Pokmas
and FPDTA have performed all the Activity Proposal of
phase 1, have carried out the evaluation on the
ent of the Partnership Funds until a specified
p
d
t
•
ivities
implementation thereof, and have generated the Second Year
Annual Action Plan.
If based on the result of the evaluation of the Project it
appears that the performance of FPDTA or Pokmas in
executing the program of the improvement of Community
Participation in the utilization and Management of Water
Catchment Area in the previous phase is considered non-
satisfactory, then the Project could postpone the next
disbursem
eriod of time. During the postponement of such
isbursement, FPDTA and Pokmas must be able to remedy
heir performance pursuant to the provisions of cp-WM.
Disbursement of funds of phase 3 amounting to 20% of
the total allocation of Partnership Funds shall be made in the
middle of the third year. Approximately 90% of the
Partnership Funds of phase 3 shall be used to fund Activity
Proposal which aims to increase Community Participation in
the management and supervision of Water Catchment Area.
The remaining 10% shall be used for funding act
3 ‐ 21
Annex 7
aiming to increase the access of the target community to
opportunities available at Water Catchment Area.
Disbursement of funds of phase 4 amounting to 10% of
the total allocation of Partnership Funds shall be made in
the middle of the fou
•
rth year. Approximately 90% of phase
•
the
‐ FPDTA is not established, or its performance is
ineffective after one year of implementation of cp-WM
4 Partnership Funds shall be used for the funding of Activity
Proposal aiming to increase the Community Participation in
the maintenance and supervision of Water Catchment Area.
Whereas the remaining 10% shall be used for funding
activities aiming to increase the access of the target
community to opportunities available at Water Catchment
Area
Cancellation of distribution of Partnership Funds.
Project is entitled to cancel the disbursement of Partnership
Funds, partially or entirely, in the presence of any of
following indicators:
‐ insufficient Pokmas established which shall cover 70%
families in the sub-water catchment area.
3 ‐ 22
Annex 7
‐ there shall be an indication of misuse of Partnership
Funds
3) U e
• What cannot be funded by Partnership Funds
Basically, P
reference to the Strategic Plan
Managing Water Catchm
in tha
or the preservation of sub-Water Catchm
Nonetheless, several activities m
Partnership Funds, such as:
ilitary (such as: purchase of fire
w
• D ring savings'
inte
• L
• Construction of religious houses;
s of Partnership Funds
artnership Funds could be used flexibly with
on Community Participation in
ent Area and the people's judgment
t the result could actually benefit the target community
ent Area.
ay not be funded by using
• Purchases or business of drugs;
• Financing of activities relating to politics (such as:
campaign);
• Military or semi m
eapon);
eposit or those relating to efforts to gathe
rest;
and clearing and containment;
3 ‐ 23
Annex 7
• C
of FPDTA;
ent;
• ntrary to
the norm and morality and religious values;
• Activities with adverse impacts to the environment,
native and the preservation of the local culture; and
•
1) Management of Water Catchment Area in a
Participative manner
a) The improvement of knowledge, and capacity of the
target company to participate in Managing Water
Socialization and publication of Community
ater Catchment Area.
aintenance of Water Catchment Area.
nt for the maintenance
atchment Area.
onstruction of government office buildings or offices
• Products that damages the environm
Gambling businesses and other businesses in co
What can be funded by Partnership Funds
Catchment Area, in the form of, for example:
‐
Participation in the maintenance and supervision
of W
‐ Rewards to the community participating in the
m
‐ Procurement of equipme
and supervision of Water C
3 ‐ 24
Annex 7
b) The activity of preserving Water Catchment Area, in
the form of, for example:
ter Catchment
Area, for example in the form of:
ent of
husbandry business
‐ Capital assistance for the development of
agriculture business
‐ Capital assistance for the development of
goods/services trading
‐
b)
infr
‐ Replantation of critical areas.
2) The improvement of the community;'s access to
opportunities at Water Catchment Area
a) The strengthening of capital and skills of the target
community to develop appropriate businesses
according to the environment of Wa
‐ Capital assistance for the developm
Business development training for the people
The improvement of residential facilities and
astructure, for example:
‐ construction of new environment roads
3 ‐ 25
Annex 7
‐ improvement of the quality of environment
roads
‐ improvement of transportation facilities
munication
3.2 IMPLEMENTATION
To implement cp-WM to a jectives, PMU shall engage
various consultants an f of the
project, especially due to th nt of cp-WM requires the
presence and field-ass an
Pokmas or FPDTA.
In principle the suppor f the project covers all
the management of the project which would allow PMU to have: i) good
component performance quality 3.4 ; ii) field technical support for Pokmas
‐ procurement of public hydrants
‐ construction of MCK
‐ improvement of educational facilities and
infrastructure
‐ procurement of electricity
‐ procurement of public telecom
facilities
SUPPORT
chieve the desired ob
d acilitator to manage the implementation
e fact that the compone
ist ce that is active and intensive at the levels of
t for the the implementation o
3 ‐ 26
Annex 7
and FPDTA; and iii) g d f the
implementation of cp-WM
Therefore, the suppor o include
matters pertaining to:
3.2.1 Technical Assistance for Impl
• The procurem unity Development Technical
Assistance T m , and facilitator at the
level of sub n the
following table n of facilitator for each sub-water
catchment area is presented, based on the area of sub-water
ea
oo evaluation and monitoring on the impact o
t f r the implementation of CP-WM shall
ementation and Monitoring
ent of Comm
ea at PMU and PIU levels
-water catchment area and the community. I
allocatio
catchment area and population.
Table-3.2 Allocation of facilitator
Area of sub-water catchment arSmall Medium large
CATEGORY Area < 500 Ha
500 < area < 1000
Ha
Area > 1000
Ha
Low KK <
250 1 facilitator - -
Mediu
m
250 < KK <
500 1 facilitator 1 facilitator 2 facilitators
Total Families
500 cilitators
at sub-water
catchment
area High
KK > 1 facilitator 2 facilitators 2 fa
3 ‐ 27
Annex 7
• Socialization and coordination at national, provincial and dam
level, be it at the phase of planning, implementation and
tance for Evaluation
The procurement of Evaluating Consultants at the level of PMU to
conduct baseline survey, mid-term review, impact survey, and
e
3.3 IMPLEMENTATION
3.3.1 Pre
Tab f Preparation Phase
monitoring.
3.2.2 Technical assis
sp cial study according to needs.
STEPS
paration Phase
le-3.3 Activity and Actor o
NoACTIVITY ACTOR RESULT NOTES
.
1.
Orientation
Workshop on
Community
Participation in
Managing Water
Catchment Area.
Organizer: PSDA.
Participants: BPSDA,
BBWS/B
Community
Development,
understanding on
ses,
strategu, approach
ties
roles of each party
e
of target dam, along
with Orientation
Workshop on
Community
Participation in Dam
Management
• H ld at each location
WS, TA
Universities, LSM
• Aligned
the purpo
and activi and
2. Facilitator training Organizer: TA • facilitator who is • Held regionally, with
3 ‐ 28
Annex 7
Community Development
Participants: facilitator
sub-wat
ready to assist the
community to
Dam f
• Trainin
er catchment area participate in
Managing Water
Catchment Area
acilitator
g Module
prepared by Central
Community
Development
ical Assistance Techn
Team
3.
Social Mapping of
sub-water
catc
community
litator
• Community
assistance plan that
is in line with the
local obstacles and
• Manual on the
Implementation of
Social Mapping is
prepare by Central
Community
Development
Technical
Ass am
hment area Executor: faci
condition
istance Te
4.
Socialization
Meeting for sub-
water catchment
area community
and Election of
Community Cadres
Organizer: facilitator
Participants: all the
residents of sub-water
catchment area
• The target
ty
t,
s
•
at
ea
communi
understands the
purposes, targe
phases and activitie
of cp-WM to be
conducted
Held at each
residential group
the sub-water
catchment ar
5. Community Cadres Executor: facilitator • Community Cadres • Held at each dam
3 ‐ 29
Annex 7
Training Source: TA Community
Development.
the
who are ready to
ities
tral
m
• Training Module
prepared by Cen
Participants: all
Community Cadres
assist the
community to
implement activ
of cp-WM
Community
Development
Technical
Assistance Tea
3.3.2 Implementation Phase
Table-3.4 Activity and Actor of Community Development Comp eon nt
No ACTIVITY ACTOR RESULT NOTES
1. FGD on “Living in
Executor: Community
Cadres
facilitator: facilitator
Participants: all
• Th
ho
acc
co erception
• Community is aware of
being part of the
surrounding natural
environment
• the community is aware
of the importance of
preserving the nature
• Form
required for improving
•
p:
ult
h,
according to the
result of the social
•
of
FGD is prepared by
Central Community
e identification of
w to live in nature
ording to the
mmunity's p
Nature”
residents of the
community
ulation of resources
FGD held according
to social grou
adult males, ad
females, yout
farmers, etc.,
mapping conducted
by facilitator
Manual on the
Implementation
3 ‐ 30
Annex 7
Development Community
Ma
Ca ea
• agreement on the next
steps
Technical
Assistance Team
Participation in
naging Water
tchment Ar
2.
Est
Pokmas
Community
Participation in
Managing Water
Catchment Area
Executor: Community
Cadres
facilitator: facilitator
Participants: all
• Community Group that
deals with Community
Participation in
Managing Water
estab greed
nts
•
l also
ual on the
Implementation of
the Establishment of
is prepared by
Technical
ablishment of
residents of the
community
Catchment Area is • Man
lished and a
upon by all the reside
The formulation of the
criteria of head of
Pokmas
• The election of head of
Pokmas who shal
become members of
Forum Water
Catchment Area
Conservation
Community Groups
Central Community
Development
Assistance Team
3. Establishment of Executor: delegates of • • FPDTA dealing with Manual on the
3 ‐ 31
Annex 7
Forum of Water
Catchment Area
Conservation
(FPDTA)
Pokmas, agencies,
community
institutions, Village
Head
facilitator: facilitator
Participants: all the
residents of the
community
ater
is
reed
• RT FPDTA was
ent
ervation
Central Community
Development
Technical
Assistance Team
Community
Participation in
Managing W
Catchment Area
established and ag
upon by all the
delegates
AD/A
discussed and agreed
upon by all members
Implementation of
the Establishment of
Water Catchm
Area Cons
is prepared by
4.
rea
Executor: facilitator
facilitator: Community
Development
Technical Assistance
Team
Participants: members
of FPDTA
•
• Training Module of
Team
Training of Forum
of Water
Catchment A
Conservation
FPDTA is ready to
carry out its role and
duties
Forum of Water
Catchment Area
Conservation is
prepared by Central
Community
Development
Technical
Assistance
5.
Independent
Mapping:
“Utilization and
Conservation of
Water Catchment
Executor: Community
Cadres
facilitator: facilitator
Participants: all the
residents of the
•
er
•
Implementation of
Independent
Mapping on
“Utilization and
Map & profile of
utilization of sub-wat
catchment area by the
community .
Manual on the
3 ‐ 32
Annex 7
Area by the
People”
community • of
ent area by
•
ms
• ile of
•
of each Pokmas
Conservation of
sub-water
map & profile
conservation of sub-
water catchm
the community
map & profile of
conservation proble
of sub-water catchment
area
map & prof
opportunities at sub
Water Catchment Area
map & profile of SDM
catchment area by
the People”
prepared by Central
Community
Development
Technical
Assistance Team
6.
The formulation of
Strategic Plan on
TA
ants: all
• Indication of medium
ation in
Managing Water
Catchment Area
•
Community
Participation in
Managing Water
Catchment Area
Executor: FPD
facilitator: facilitator
Particip
members of the Forum
term program of
Community
Particip
Manual on the
Formulation of
Strategic Plan is
prepared by Central
Community
Development
Technical
Assistance Team
7. Compilation o
Annual Ac
f
tion Plan r: facilitator
Executor: FPDTA
facilitato
• Formulation of type of
Community
• Manual on the
Compilation of
3 ‐ 33
Annex 7
on Community
Participation in
Managing Water
Catchment Area
m
n
nt of sub-
rea to
Participants: all
members of the Foru
Participation activities i
the manageme
water catchment a
be carried out in the n
year
Classification &
ext
•
- independently by the
-
-
Partnership Funds
n Plan
ity
agreement on the
activity plan and its
source of funding
community
Partnership Funds
Independently +
Annual Actio
is prepared by
Central Commun
Development
Technical
Assistance Team
Table-3.5 Activity and Actors of
Partnership Funds Component
No ACTIVITY ACTOR RESULT NOTES
1. Activity Proposal
Participants: Pokmas and
Executing Committee
osal
Committee
• e
oposal is
Community
Preparation of
Executor: FPDTA
facilitator: facilitator
• Activity Prop
Pokmas, or
Executing
Manual on th
Formulation of
Activity Pr
prepared by Central
3 ‐ 34
Annex 7
Development
Technical
Assistance Team
• For Activity
scale Proposal at the
of sub Water
Catchment Area is
prepared by
Executing
Committee
2.
Meeting on the
Determination of
Priorities of
Activity Proposal
Executor: FPDTA
facilitator: facilitator
Participants: Pokmas, the
residents, Community
Cadres, Executing
Committee
ies of
osal
• the
Priority of Activity
Proposal is
formulated by
Central Community
Development
Technical
Assistance Team
Manual on
Determination of
• List of priorit
Activity Prop
3. Verification of
al
Executor: Provincial
Community ment
e
• Formulation of
Activity
ed the
• Manual on the
Verification of
al is
tral
Activity Propos
Develop
Technical Assistanc
Team
Proposal is
considered as
having appli
Activity Propos
prepared by Cen
3 ‐ 35
Annex 7
principles a
values of DO
nd
ISP-
CP
• Ensuring the
aspects of
continuity of the
activities, institution
and financing.
m
Community
Development
Technical
Assistance Tea
4.
Submission of
Disbursement of
Partnership Funds
Executor: FPDTA
facilitator: facilitator
• Request for
disbursement of
Partnership Funds
to PIU, attached
with -Activity
Proposal, the result
of the Verification
of Activity
Proposal,
5.
t of
into the Account of
FPDTA
cilitator, PIU
•
available in the
account of FPDTA
Disbursemen
Partnership Funds Executor: KPKN
facilitator: fa
Partnership Funds
6. Disbursement of
ds
Executor: FPDTA
nd
• Partnership Funds
mas
Partnership Fun Participants: Pokmas a received by Pok
3 ‐ 36
Annex 7
to Pokmas or
Executing
Committee
nd
unity Cadres
Executing Committee
facilitator: facilitator a
Comm
and Executing
Committee
7. Utilization of
Partnership Funds
Responsible party:
FPDTA
Executor: Pokmas and
Executing Committee
facilitator: facilitator and
Community Cadres
•
l be utilized for
accountable manner
Partnership Funds
shal
Activity Proposal in
a transparent and
3 ‐ 37
Annex 7
3.4 formance Indicator s
le 3 ce Indic o
Per
Tab .6 Performan at rs of cp-WM
End of Year -
N
o Component
1 2
3
Source
of 4
Inform
ation
I. COMMUNITY DEVELO PMENT
1. the holding of socialization cp-WM Ya - - - Report meeting on
2. The ntage of ses of cp-WM 25% 35% 45% 55% survey minimum perce adults aware of the purpo
3. The FG d per 200 4 - - - Report minimum amount of D “Living in Nature” hel adults
4. The minimum amount of FG r young 2 - - - Report D “Living in nature” held fo generation
5. The minimum percentage of adult females attending FGD “Living in Nature” 40% - - - Report
6. The mi um percentage of adults who understand how to “Live in Nature” 25% 35% 45% 55% survey nim
7. The establishment of Pokmas of Community Participation Water Catchment Area Ya - - - Report
8. The establishment of Forum of Water Catchment Area Conservation (FPDTA) Ya - - - Report
9. The minimum percentage of female in the membership of FPDTA 20% 25% 30% 35% Report
1
0.
The minimum percentage of adults ever attended Pokmas meetings 25% 35% 45% 55% Report
1
1.
The minimum percentage of delegates of Pokmas attending the establishment of
FPDTA 75% - - - Report
1
2.
The minimum amount of FPDTA meetings - 4 4 4 Report
1 The minimum percentage of delegates of Pokmas attending the resolution on the - 75% 80% 80% Report
3 ‐ 38
Annex 7
3 ‐ 39
3. ic in Managing Water Catchment Area Strateg Plan on Community Participation
1
4.
The minimum percentage of adults aware of the contents of the Strategic Plan on
Community Participation - 25% 35% 55% survey
1 The minimum percentage of delegates of Pokmas attending the resolution on the
Plan 75% 75% 80% 80% R t
5. Annual Actionepor
1
6.
The minimum percentage of the population who knows the contents of the Annual
Action Plan 25% 35% 45% 55% survey
II
.
PROVISION OF PARTNERSHIP FUNDS
1. Percentage of Pokmas submitting the proposal on the utilization of Partnership - 70% 70% 70%
Funds Report
2. 90% 90% 90% 90% Report The minimum percentage of Partnership Funds allocated for Community
Participation in Managing Water Catchment Area
3.
The maximum percentage of Partnership Funds allocated for the improvement of the
t 1 1 1community's access to the benefit available in the surrounding of Water Catchmen
Area
10% 0% 0% 0% Report
4. n Managing
Water Catchment Area
100 100 100The percentage of the implementation of Community Participation i30%
% % % survey
5. atchment Area
100 100 100The percentage of the availability of the community's access to the benefit available
at the Water C30%
% % % survey
Annex 7
Chapter 4. Project Management
AL STRUCTURE AND ROLE STRUCTURE
zational Structure
The project organizational structure shows the overall project handling
pattern from the head office up to the target location which will be
clarified hereunder.
The Public Works Department through the Directorate General of Water
Resources (Ditjen. SDA) shall be responsible for th
implementation of DOISP. The SDA Directorate General shall establish
a Project Management Unit (PMU), led by a chief who has some staff,
subordinate to him. The head of the PMU has obtained a full mandate
and shall be directly responsible to the Directorate General of SDA in
implementing the project tasks of DOISP, including those related to
DOISP-CP. Especially for the implementation of DOISP-CP, PMU shall
contract some individual consultants, who shall have the t s the
Community’s Development Technical Assistance Team in the level of
the Head office.
4.1.ORGANIZATION
4.1.1 Organi
e overall
ask a
3 ‐ 40
Annex 7
PMU shall coordinate with the Directorate of Rivers, lakes and Dams,
that shall have an active role in: 1) producing a climate, supporting the
effort for the increase of the Community’s participation in managing the
a institutional
mechanism that guarantees the realization of communication,
the government with the aspiration
and need of the community.
(PIU)that shall act on behalf of PMU subject to the
authority awarded by PMU, to arrange the DOISP management in a
province, including also that which is related to the DOISP-CP. In
n, a Community’s Participation Working Group will be
established consisting of the three elements of those technical agencies.
dams and the area for water catchment; ii) making
coordination and integrity between
For the implementation of the location, PMU shall establish a Project
Implementation Unit
particularly for the implementation of DOISP-CP, PIU shall contract
some individual consultants, who will have their tasks as the
Community’s Development Technical Assistance Team in the Province
level.
PIU will coordinate with the River Area Head Office (BBWS) or Water
Resources Development Office (BWS) and Water Resources
Development Office (BPSDA) as the technical Agency Office (BPSDA)
that manages the dams or the area for water catchment. At the level of
the target locatio
3 ‐ 41
Annex 7
The task of this Working Group is to become the representative of the
government in FKW or FPDTA.
Every dam or sub-area for the water catchment will be assisted by a
Facilitator. The number of facilitators will be adjusted to the width of the
target location. These facili
tators will be under contract and will be
directly accountable to PIU.
Picture 4.1 An Organizational Structure Diagram of DOISP-CP.
4.1.2 Role Structuring
a)
Beside, each Community’s settlement group must choose 2 volunteers,
who later will be trained by the Facilitator to become the Community’s
Cadres. The Community’s cadres will have the role as development
agent and shall cooperate with the people as volunteers in order to
increase the Community’s participation in managing the basis or sub-
area for water catchment.
Project Management Unit (PMU)
3 ‐ 42
Annex 7
f the DOISP (included herein DOISP-
CP) and shall have his address at head office. PMU shall be the person
who implements and simultaneously represents the Public Works
mentation to protect the implementation
quality of DOISP-CP, PMU shall give the task to the Community’s
Development Technical Assistance Team to act for and behalf of PMU at
To be responsible in general towards the smoothness of the technical
implementation and administration of DOISP-CP to the Department
To decide the number and names of the dams being the target of
DOISP-CP.
To arrange the DOISP-CP manual.
To arrange the Terms of Reference (TOR) – for the Community’s
eam in the level of Head office.
To direct, monitor and evaluate the performance of the Community’s
Development Technical Assistance Team at the level of Head office.
The Head of the PMU shall have the role as the general responsible
person for the implementation o
Department as the agency of the general foreman.
For the accountable imple
the location – pursuant to the limited authority given-. The position, role
and function of PMU shall be arranged through a decree from the
Minister of Public Works. The accountability and the main tasks of the
PMU related to DOISP-CP are:
of Public Works.
Development Technical Assistance T
3 ‐ 43
Annex 7
To implement nationally the socialization of the DOISP-CP.
To prepare and be responsible towards dealing with the conflict
resolution.
To process the procurement and payment of the Community’s
Development Technical Assistance Team at the level of Head office.
office level.
level shall implement the tasks and authority given by PMU in the
implementation of DOISP-CP, especially in controlling the project
directly accountable to PMU.
Therefore, the Community’s Development Technical Assistance Team
shall coordinate, supervise and control the tasks implemented by the
overall Community’s Development Technical Assistance Team
implem of its performance is guaranteed.
Generally the task of the Community’s Development Technical
Assist level shall comprise planning,
coordination, monitoring and supervision (control), reporting and to deal
with several difficulties arising in the implementation of DOISP-CP.
This Technical Assi
b) The Community Development Technical Assistance Team at Head
The Community Development Technical Assistance Team at Head office
implementation quality, and shall be
ented so that the quality
ance Team at Head Office
stance Team has also the task to build and develop
3 ‐ 44
Annex 7
the system of dealing with difficulties and conflicts regularly, starting
The
office level shall also be responsible to compose the manuals for the
implementation of activities and training modules for the Facilitators, the
Community Cadres, and FKW/FPDTA.
c) Project Implementation Unit (PIU)
and function of PIU shall be arranged through a decision of PMU. The
accountability and main tasks of PIU related to DOISP-CP are:
from the Community’s level up to the level of PMU.
Community Development Technical Assistance Team on the Head
The Head of the PIU shall have the role of the general responsible person
for the implementation of DOISP-CP, including herein the DOISP-CP
at province level. In order to protect the quality of the DOISP-CP
implementation, PIU appointed the Community’s Development
Technical Assistance Team at Province level to act for and on behalf of
PIU at the location – pursuant to the authority given. The position, role
To be generally responsible towards the smoothness of the technical
implementation and administration of DOISP-CP in his province to
PMU.
3 ‐ 45
Annex 7
To prepare the Terms of Reference of the Community Development
Technical Assistance Team at the Province level.
To direct, monitor and evaluate the performance of the Community’s
Development Technical Assistance Team at the level of the
m at the Province level and
the existing Facilitators under its command.
. The Community Development Technical Assistance Team at
Province level.
task this
Technical Assistance Team shall be directly accountable and shall be
subordinated to PIU.
Esp the Community Development Technical Assistance Team of
the Province level shall have the role of:
Province.
To implement socialization of DOIS-CP at the Province level.
To do the procurement and payment process of the Community
Development Technical Assistance Tea
d
The task of the Community Development Technical Assistance Team of
the Province level in general is to endeavor the participation of DOISP-
CP agents in the region. Therefore this Technical Assistance Team shall
make preparations for the planning, implementation, coordination,
monitoring, supervision and reporting the overall activities of DOISP-CP
in the province, which shall become his task. In executing its
ecially
3 ‐ 46
Annex 7
Securing the realization of the exact community participation
Securing vision, mission, purpose, strategy, target and approach that
DOISP-CP can be consistently implemented pursuant to the
guidelines of DOISP-CP.
Coordinating with the regional government and regency and
mayoralty in the framework of completing several existing
difficulties and conflicts.
d) Facilitator
The main role of the Facilitator is to implement the role of PIU at the
level of the community/the people:
unity to formulate and implement DOIS-CP
activities.
tasks of PIU are as follows:
through precise management and facilitation to Facilitators.
As project general foreman, including to write down every project
development and to report it to PIU, and
As community strategy including socializing the community on
participation in managing the dams and water catchment areas, to
interfere in the framework of urging community participation and
assisting the comm
Details of the main task of Facilitators as project general foremen and
3 ‐ 47
Annex 7
• To implement DOISP-CP pursuant to the provisions decided in the
General Guidelines, Technical Guidelines and Facilitator Guidelines.
•
, and
While the main tasks of the Facilitator as agent to urge the community to
participate are as follows:
ks, among others:
• To spread information on DOISP-CP as a community participation
increase program in managing dams and water catchment to all
• ples and values which were
•
problems need to be dealt with in an organized and
planned manner.
• To protect the project against the wrong target and wrong handling.
To note down the progress of the project on the location pursuant to
the format arranged by PIU
• To report the data of the progress of DOISP-CP to PIU.
a) To implement socialization tas
people where they operate.
To spread vision, mission, purpose, princi
struggled for by DOISP-CP.
Together with the Community Cadres, through a series of FGD, to
develop the community’s critical awareness in order being able to
identify natural and mental environment problems around them,
which said
3 ‐ 48
Annex 7
• To motivate the role and involvement of the community to conduct
social control towards the implementation of the DOISP-CP in their
regions.
• To facilitate development and social capital development as a
condition needed for the endeavor to manage environment.
b)
articipate in the community. Including herein
the basic training, on the job training, and intensive assistance.
To strengthen and develop the capacity of Working Groups as
ent of groups,
communication umbrella
c) To implement and urging community participation activities, among
others:
To implement training activities, which among others are:
To strengthen and develop the capacity of the Community Cadres as
agents for urging to p
dynamic groups. Including herein the establishm
knowing opportunities, composing proposals’ activities, and easy
financial management. Including among them: on the job training,
and intensive assistance.
To strengthen and develop FKW and FPDTA capacities as a
community participation stakeholder
organization in managing dams or water catchment areas. Among
them basic training, on the job training, and intensive assistance.
3 ‐ 49
Annex 7
Community organization together with Community Cadres, to
facilitate the existing community organization evaluation process or
establish a new community organization as Working Group.
anaging
Dams or Catchment Areas.
Together with the Community Cadres to facilitate Working Groups
to identify business opportunities, the need to establish means and
infrastructure, and preparing them in order that they are able to serve
atic
stablishing networking among all agents.
Facilitator Qualification Requirements of DOISP-CP.
To be willing to live in a strategic location to achieve assistance
have commitment and a high taking sides towards the poor
community.
To facilitate the composition of Strategic Planning and the
Community Participation Annual Action Planning in m
them in a proper proposal form.
To introduce several simple innovations in organization
management, including transparency, the process of democr
decision-making, and administration.
To facilitate and guide intensively the community in order that they
are able to follow the provisions in the DOISP-CP guidelines in the
overall implementation activities.
Lawyers, mediation and e
location being his accountability during the period of his contract.
To
3 ‐ 50
Annex 7
To have commitment and care towards the natural conservation.
To possess a concept and proper care in respect of Community Based
Development.
rs, and those having preference are those
4.2.FUNDING
4.2.1
Fun
1. Loans from the World Bank, through
2. State Budget or Revenues and Expenditures (APBN)
4.2.2
above sources shall be used to finance following
by
ed by loan resources from the World Bank.
To possess proper community facilitation skill.
To have as minimal education the strata -1, with a working
experience of minimal 3 yea
having experience in community urge participation.
Fund Resources
d Resources for DOIS-CP originates from:
Fund Allocation
Funds from
components:
a) Community Development
Community development costs that are assistance costs
Facilitator, the implementation of workshops and training, which
shall be fund
3 ‐ 51
Annex 7
b) Preparation of Partnership Funding.
g shall originate from loans from the World
Bank, while the Government of Indonesia shall allocate funds for
the Operational Costs for managing the distribution of Partnership
Funding.
c) Support for the Implementation or Technical Assistance.
Support for the implementation or technical assistance will be fully
financed by loan funding sources from the World Bank, especially
s, non personnel direct costs,
nage this fund,
the Central Government shall allocate funds for technical
assistance operational costs, which extent shall be decided
according to requirement.
4.2.3. Managing Project Financing
a) Channeling of the Funds
PIU shall be accountable in the administration process of releasing
the Partner Funds. PIU will submit the Letter for the requirement
Partnership Fundin
allocated for personnel direct cost
socialization activities, and training. In order to ma
3 ‐ 52
Annex 7
of payment (SPP) to the local KPKN office, that will further
publish the Letter with the Instruction to Pay (SPM) to the local
Bank Indonesia. Bank Indonesia will distribute the Partner Funds
to each FKW or FPDTA account in the bank appointed by each
Forum. Drawing 4.2 shows the way and the distribution
mechanism of the Partner Funds.
FKW / FPDTA
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT
KPKN Branch Office Local State bank
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TEAM FOR COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Request f
n to pay
Application for Disbursement of Funds
sal of
2.
3.
Reporting on Use of Funds6.
orting.
At each FKW and FPDTA every cost shall be noted down and
reported by using a simple accounting system.
Verification & Approval of PropoActivities1.
or Payment
Instructio
Use of Funds
4.
5.
b) Accounting and Rep
3 ‐ 53
Annex 7
4.3 MONITORIN
• The Community Development Technical Assistance Team at the head office
level shall be accountable towards the planning and monitoring implementation
of DOISP-CP. The monitoring shall be conducted to analyze and correct the
project management. The result of the monitoring shall be used as the basis of
project, the mid term review and final review and in-depth research towards the
impor is
• While the overall project impact evaluation shall be focused on the cp-RM and
cp-WM bas
Table 3.6. The result of thi
Bank.
G AND EVALUATION
the decision making of the management.
• The Community Development Technical Assistance Team at the Head office
level shall also be accountable for developing and managing the Management
Information System (SIM) of DOISP-CP, as one of the strategic tools to
monitor the project development from the community level up to the provincial
management and central government. The result of SIM – after the monthly
evaluation and verification shall be reported to PMU copied to the World Bank.
• The evaluation of the impact of DOISP-CP will be conducted by a special
consultant, who further will be called the Evaluation Consultant. This
consultant must not be influenced by the DOISP-CP project management so
that he can conduct the evaluation as objective as possible. The DOISP-CP
evaluation consultant will conduct the baseline survey at the beginning of the
tant sues of DOISP – CP.
ed on the performance indicators as was explained on Table 2.6 and
s evaluation will be reported to PMU and the World
3 ‐ 54
Annex 7
Chapter 5. TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY
5.1. TH ETHOD OF IMPLEMENTING TRANSPARENCY AND
ACCOUNTABILITY.
E M
3 ‐ 55
Annex 7
5.1.1.Transparency
Transparency shall be applied by giving access to all parties having an
interest to know the information in respect of the concept of DOISP-CP,
policies and decision-making, development activities and finance, and
other information from the agents of DOISP-CP, both at Project level, as
well as on community.
All information related to activities and finance of the DOISP-CP
assistance financial funds will be published and disseminated and
exhibited to all people and other related parties through possible
information boards, bulletins, and several media. At the level of the
community, minutes of meeting, policies, FKW or FPDTA financial
reports, the kind of activities proposed, and others must be disseminated
to the community and must be glued to information boards at strategic
places.
OISP-CP agents it is
hoped that as early as possible it can prevent violations through the
community awareness to conduct social control, to avert
ize the attitude of accountability as well as criticize the
Through consistent transparency application by D
misunderstanding, to encourage the learning process of the community,
to institutional
3 ‐ 56
Annex 7
choice of decision and activities implemented, and to develop confidence
of all parties to the implementation of DOISP-CP.
Periodically PMU and PIU shall be obliged to discriminate
DOIS-CP through various media, among others: radio,
CP to the targeted community, and as far as it can be reached.
PMU shall be obliged to develop and manage a website, which
can easily be accessed by all people having an interest to
e use of the DOISP-CP funds by FKW or FPDTA in order that it
been known by all people, both said Forums shall be obliged to
disseminate the decisions taken, the strategic Planning and Annual
a) At project organizer level of.
television, and newspapers, on whatever is prepared by DOIS-
obtain the newest drawing from the development of DOISC-
CP.
b) At Community level
In order to guard against transparency of managing activities and
th
Planning of the Community’s Participation, the organizational
development and the activities of the Forums, the financial position
report, proposals from the activities of the Working Group agreed
upon, The Foremen committee and his members, and other
information by method of:
3 ‐ 57
Annex 7
Sticking on information boards at strategic places, minimal at
each settlement group.
groups and the population.
Dissemination through letters to the Working Group.
Making and disseminating leaflets or bulletins.
5.1.2 Accounta
The p c
shall be o
accountab
parties interested to conduct an audit, to ask and or accuse the
accountability of those decision makers, both at project level as well as
For the level of community, the accountability shall be conducted
throug
a) Public Consultancy
ning and the Annual Community
Routine meetings with Working
bility
ro ess of decision-making and managing activities and finance
bliged to be conducted based on accounting principles. The
ility in DOISP-CP shall be applied by giving access to all
of the community.
h:
In the case of FKW or FPDTA decision-making related to the
people’s interest (for example: community’s interaction map with
dams, the Strategic Plan
3 ‐ 58
Annex 7
Participation Planning, the release of the Partner Funds), the
decision decided must be consulted with the community through
dissemination and gluing said decision at strategic places, prior to
become valid.
Within a ementation of
public consultancy, the Forum shall convene a meeting of decision
to decide as a binding decision or complemented before
DTA shall be obliged to hold quarterly coordination
meetings by inviting all representatives of the Working Groups,
agency and community institution to forward the development of
activities, to discuss difficulties and to submit development
activities and to plan the following quarterly activities.
5.2. THE MECHANISM TO APPLY SANCTIONS.
5.2.1 Sanct
maximum of two weeks after the impl
evaluation
based on inputs of the community.
b) Quarterly Coordination Meetings of FKW or FPDTA.
FKW and FP
ions
3 ‐ 59
Annex 7
Sanct
and/o
decisi
of Association of FKW or FPDTA.
5.2.2. Dec
The a
the up
those who are wrong and to grow the feeling of accountability from
several parties in the implementation of DOISP-CP.
) Decision and application of sanctions by the Government.
The Government can decide and apply sanctions in the form of:
ent levels,
consultants, members of FKW or FPDTA, and the members of
the community, pursuant to the prevailing legislation
regulations, towards the effort and/or misuse of funds,
corruption actions, misuse of authority for private interest as
rtain group interests.
ions shall constitute legal treatment towards violation of provisions
r decisions decided in the Guidelines of DOISP-CP as well as
ons decided by the community, as entered in the Bye Laws/Articles
isions and the application of Sanctions
pplication of sanctions shall constitute a logical consequence from
holding of accountability principles that have the purpose to punish
a
A legal sanction that may be applied to the governm
well as for ce
3 ‐ 60
Annex 7
The sanction for the cancellation/withdrawal of the Partner
Funds, that is a form of sanction by canceling/not allocating
the Partner Funds for the following year.
b) The applying of sanctions by the Community.
s ridiculing or not
appreciating the respected person, etc.
The formal decision and application of sanctions mechanism may
be conducted through discussion by the community. In the case the
ue
becoming the basis of DOISP-CP by members of FKW or FPDTA,
representing a Working Group, the community of the Working
Group members shall have the right to withdraw their
representative in the Forum and replaces him through the
community’s discussion mechanism. Through the discussion this
person may be decided to undergo a social sanction or a legal
sanction, i.e. by handing over the person having done the violation
to the authorities.
Sanctions applied by the community can be formal, meaning
constituting a decision/ the result of a discussion of the community
or having a non-formal character in the form of a sanction applied
by the community person by person, such a
community has seen the violation of principles and the val
3 ‐ 61
Annex 7
5.3 DEALING
5.3.1 The Principl
The system to deal with complaints applied by DOISP-CP basically must
l following rules:
F
co
as
Fast, accurate and to attentively note. Complaints submitted must
be dealt f
must note down attentively every complaint received, including
through the newspapers.
U
m
S
gu
WITH COMPLAINTS AND CONFLICT SETTLEMENTS.
e of dealing with complaints.
follow severa
acilities. The community must obtain facilities to submit its
mplaint, from the physical, funding as well as administration
pect.
ast and correct. The authorities dealing with the complaint
nbarred. The process of receiving and dealing of every complaint
ust be unbarred for the general public who want to know them.
ecret and Safe. The dealing of complaints must give a secret
arantee and a safe feeling for those, who report the case.
3 ‐ 62
Annex 7
5.3.
Box especially for receiving
complaints related to the implementation of DOISP-XP. Said address
must be put at every notification, poster, bulleting spread by the
agents of DOISP-XP.
Every FKW or FPDTA shall be obliged to make available a
Complaint Box at a location easily seen and accessed by the
mechanism, which is seen in the diagram hereunder.
2 Complaint Management
Every PIU shall be obliged open a PO.
Community.
Dealing with a complaint shall be conducted according a complaint
dealing
Picture 5.1 Complaint Handling Mechanism
3 ‐ 63
Annex 7
DAM /WATER CATCHMENT ARES COMMUNITY FORUM/
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UINT(Provincial PSDA Unit)
Facilitator
PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT
Can this be settled?
COMMUNITY MEMBERS
Complaint Box
PO-BOXDOISP-CP
Can this be settled?
Can this be settled?
LEGAL PROCESSNO
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
Village Chief/ Kelurahan
3 ‐ 64
Annex 7
ATTACHMENT - 1
Table L-1 Plan for Allocation of Partnership Funds 2010
Community Participation in Dam Management
Dam LocationRiver Are
(BBWS/Ba
WS) Dame of Dam City/District. Sub-DIstrict Village
Surface of Dam (Ha)
Related BPSDA
Total Targeted Communi
ty Families
Total Partnership
Funds (Rp.)
Cimanuk - Cisanggarung 1. Setu Patok Cirebon Mundu Setu Patok 100 Cimanuk -
Cisanggarung
2. Cacaban Tegal Slawi Sirampok 790 Pemali
3. Malahayu Brebes Banjarharjo Malahayu 70 Pemali
4. Cengklik Boyolali Ngemplak Margorejo 253 Seluna
5. Gunung Rowo Pati Gembong Siti Luhur 75 Seluna
Pemali – Juana
6. Gembong Pati Gembong Gembong 110 Seluna
Serayu – Opak 7. Wadas Lintang Kebumen Wadas
Lintang Sumber
Rejo 1.320 Probolo
8. Ngancar Wonogiri Batu Warno Ngancar 34 Bengawan Solo
9. Parangjoho Wonogiri Eromoko Demesan 200 Bengawan Solo
10. Plumbon Wonogiri Eromoko Puloarjo 121 Bengawan Solo
11. Wonogiri Wonogiri Wonogiri 7.360 Bengawan Solo Bengawan Solo
12. Gondang Lamongan Sugiho Gondang 544 Bengawan Solo
Brantas 13. Selorejo Malang Ngantang Selorejo 400 Bango Gedangan
Mesuji - Sekampung 14. Batutegi Tanggamus Air Naningan Air Naningan 1.700 Seputih Sekampung
15. Batu Bulan Sumbawa Moyo Hulu Batu Bulan 640 Sumbawa
16. Batujai Lombok Praya Barat Batujai 390 Lombok
17. Pengga Lombok Praya Barat Pengga 533 Lombok Nusa Tenggar 1
18. Sumi Bima Sape Mangga 155 Bima
a
Kalimantan 3 19. Sam Samboja Wonotirto 197 Mahakam boja Kutai
Pompengan - Jenebrang 20. Kalola Wajo Maniang Pajo Kalola 1.330 Walanae Cenranae
L ‐ 65
TRANSLATION NO. HLM06AUGUST08 Page: 1�
ANNEX 11: MINUTES OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING ABOUT ESMF ON 5 AUGUST 2008
On this Tuesday, 5th August 2008, a Public Consultation Meeting about Environmental and Social Management Framework in DOISP (ESMF-DOISP) was held and attended by some related agencies and stakeholders with the following conclusions: 1. A Dam Safety Project took place from 1995 to 2002 and made achievements in:
- Institutional development by establishing a Dam Safety Unit, - Establishing a dam monitoring unit, - Establishing a dam safety regulation, - Preparing an Emergency Plan, - Preparing Database, - Installing dam behavior monitoring instruments, - And so on.
2. DOISP is planned to consist of five components: 1) Improvement in dam operation and safety, 2) Operation and Maintenance Improvement, 3) Reduction in reservoir sedimentation 4) Institutional improvement in dam safety guarantee 5) Project Management.
3. Things to be done: - Strengthening of dam management units, - Skill upgrading in dam engineering and management, - Guarantee for the safety of government & privately owned dams - Dam maintenance - Implementation of Emergency Plan, - Sedimentation reduction, - Establishment of repair and O&M budget priorities
4. Responses/suggestions and inputs from participants: - The DOISP environmental and social safeguard management framework is a
reference for the project implementer to carry out activities in the context of environmental and social safeguards,
5. There is a need for a unit assigned to manage and monitor environmental and social aspects. These tasks should be carried out by the dam management unit.
6. Draft UKL/UPL should be revised, 7. The organization structure of the executing agency in relation to implementation,
supervision and reporting in the DOISP framework should be improved or completed.
8. Rewards should be given to upstream (catchment) areas through a participatory or economically intensive mechanism. Motto: Solving problems by achieving an added value.
9. Communities should be convinced that the activities they are carrying out are useful for themselves and for their groups.
10. Inputs from this consultation should be a reference in the DOISP implementation. Semarang, 5 August 2008
TRANSLATION NO. HLM06AUGUST08 Page: 2�
QUESTIONS AND SUGGESTIONS Consultation for Environmental and Social Safeguard Management Framework
(ESMF) in the Implementation of Dam Operational Improvement and Safety Project (DOISP)
Semarang, 5 August 2008: Novotel Hotel Name: Agus Jatiwiryono Position: Dam KSD Questions: - Is it possible to make ESMF a requirement for carrying out physical activities but not a
prerequisite so that ESMF may run in parallel with the physical/remedial work? - Is there some process of research for an environmental document? Suggestions: - Because DOISP is basically postponed OM and eventually accumulated that make its
costs seem high. We suggest that the environmental and Social Management Document be part of the OM Manual.
- It is necessary to immediately establish a Dam Management Unit in each region.
TRANSLATION NO. HLM06AUGUST08 Page: 3�
QUESTIONS AND SUGGESTIONS Consultation for Environmental and Social Safeguard Management Framework
(ESMF) in the Implementation of Dam Operational Improvement and Safety Project (DOISP)
Semarang, 5 August 2008: Novotel Hotel Name: Ir. Indah Sulistyowati/081325531991 Position: Head of River, Reservoir and Coastal Development and Conservation, PSDA Dinas, Central Java Province/(024) 7608201 ext. 131 Questions: - It is necessary to consider a simple reservoir operation pattern for easy operation
because the managing personnel are increasingly limited in capacity and availability. - In the case of personnel funding/pay, it is necessary to reach an agreement on which
institution will be responsible for the funding. - It is necessary to program not only O&M but also conservation in the reservoir area
although the fruits of this will be enjoyed after at least 2 or 3 years (long-term plan) - Spare parts of the instruments used should be obtained easily. Suggestions: - A kind of MOU should be made between related agencies - It is necessary to socialize the program and raise make the public’s awareness in a
continuous and integrated way to prevent any conflict of interest. - Domestic instruments should be used.
QUESTIONS AND SUGGESTIONS Consultation for Environmental and Social Safeguard Management Framework
(ESMF) in the Implementation of Dam Operational Improvement and Safety Project (DOISP)
Semarang, 5 August 2008: Novotel Hotel Name: Lalu Muhammad Asgar, ST Position: Technical Controller of OPSDA I, BWSNT I, NTB Questions: 1. Is there any DOISP program related to the purification of greenbelt boundaries
particularly at the Batujai Dam, with problems of water-area border stakes removed by the community thus reducing the area of water? At the Batujai Dam, these problems arise from a Greenbelt not affected by the area of water.
2. Is there any DOISP program to safeguard catchment areas (DAS) to prevent sedimentary flow into dams, e.g. greening, etc. to minimize the entry of sediment into dams, particularly Batujai dam?
Suggestions: 1. To support the improvement of dam O&M, particularly Batujai dam, training should
be provided for dam O&M staff, such as dam O&M training or mechanical and electrical training in order to safeguard/facilitate dam O&M.
2. It is expected to prepare a DOISP program to improve the performance of dam O&M, particularly the Batujai dam, such as procurement of auxiliary and operational tools to improve the performance of dam O&M.
QUESTIONS AND SUGGESTIONS Consultation for Environmental and Social Safeguard Management Framework
(ESMF) in the Implementation of Dam Operational Improvement and Safety Project (DOISP)
Semarang, 5 August 2008: Novotel Hotel Name: Joko Mulyono
TRANSLATION NO. HLM06AUGUST08 Page: 4�
Position: Eastern Section Head, Sub-Directorate of Dams Suggestions: There are often problems with licensing in preparing an environmental impact analysis (AMDAL). In our experience, the AMDAL in the Ministry of Environment may take more than 2 years. We suggest that the fund allocation should be prepared for more than one fiscal year and its amount should be able to be checked or considered.
TRANSLATION NO. HLM06AUGUST08 Page: 5�
QUESTIONS AND SUGGESTIONS Consultation for Environmental and Social Safeguard Management Framework
(ESMF) in the Implementation of Dam Operational Improvement and Safety Project (DOISP)
Semarang, 5 August 2008: Novotel Hotel Name: Rochadi Masyhadi Position: Kabid. PJSA BB – Bengawan Solo Questions: Many programs are financed by many funding sources, particularly recently related to river basin management. How can we identify such programs to prevent overlap between them? Suggestions: 1. RKL & RPL should be disseminated to community leaders and the easy/clear
procedure for disseminating information should be facilitated. 2. The quality monitoring of chemical elements should be classified in 5, 10 or more
elements. Not all elements apply to all locations. 3. RKL & RPL should also be presented to bupati/mayors and Regional Houses
(district/city or provincial DPRD). 4. A dam management unit is established in the most appropriate institutions to prevent
organizational swelling for greater efficiency.
TRANSLATION NO. HLM06AUGUST08 Page: 6�
QUESTIONS AND SUGGESTIONS Consultation for Environmental and Social Safeguard Management Framework
(ESMF) in the Implementation of Dam Operational Improvement and Safety Project (DOISP)
Semarang, 5 August 2008: Novotel Hotel Name: R. Boddy Pribantoro H., SP Position: Section Head, Bengawan Solo River Resources Management Center, Bojonegoro (East Java) Questions: - UKL & UPL were made just for the Gondana reservoir in the Lamongan District. In
our area, there are two more large reservoirs i.e. Pacal Reservoir in Kab. Bojonegoro and Prijetan Reservoir in Lamongan. I think these are in category 3. Therefore, I suggest that the first priority should be Pacal reservoir in Kabupaten Bojonegoro, the second should be Prijetan-Lamongan, and then the third Gondana for rehabilitation. We would like to inform you that the current sediment rate of Pacal reservoir is ± 50% and its flushing gate has been covered with sediment since 2006 so that it is feared that the sediment will clog its intake gate.
Suggestions: Particularly after completion of this dam project (in order to minimize the sedimentation/erosion rate in dams/reservoirs): - Environmental management and monitoring efforts (UKL & UPL) should be made
consistently in line with the authority and responsibility of each institution and therefore integrated treatment is necessary. It is important to make MOU on sharing of manpower, infrastructure and costs.
- In addition to raising the public’s awareness, it is also important to build the capacity of the management dinas’ human resources and infrastructure.
- There should be a synergy of programs between dam management dinases and river basin (DAS) managers.
- An integrated natural resources (SDA) management team should be established with the tasks from planning, implementation, monitoring to evaluation and with the members from all related dinases and stakeholders under a Gubernatorial Decree for routine, regular and active communication.
- Consequently, a budget for the activities should be made available routinely and regularly according to the scale of priority and centralized with each related management dinases.
TRANSLATION NO. HLM06AUGUST08 Page: 7�
MINUTES OF MEETING SESSION I PUBLIC CONSULTATION ON ESMF DOISP – Semarang, 5 August 2008
PRESENTER: SUKISWO PRIYADI MODERATOR: HARI SUSANTO OVERVIEW OF DOISP By Agus Jatiworyono (Head of Sub-Directorate of Dams)
HISTORY OF DAM SAFETY GUARANTEE IN INDONESIA 240 large dams 214 owned by Public Works Ministry [PU], Directorate General of Natural
Resources (Ditjen SDA) or Provincial Dinas a) H>15m, V>100,000 m3 b) H<15m, V>150,000 m3
Damage and flaws: - Potential collapse or safety degradation - Potential loss of benefits for the general public - Potential dangers to communities around the downstream area of dams
In 1992: Inspecting and evaluating the safety status of dams under PU In 1993: starting
a) Dam Safety Guarantee Program b) Organization: Dam Safety Commission (DSC) and Dam Safety Unit (DSU)
In 1995-2003: Dam Safety Project In 2007-2008: Bridging Program from DOISP Plan in 2009: Early Implementation of DOISP
DOISP → Dam operation and safety improvement Component 1: Dam Safety Improvement Component 2: O&M Improvement and Capacity Building Component 3: Reservoir Sedimentation Mitigation System Component 4: Institutional Improvement in Dam Safety Component 5: Project Management DOISP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2009-2011 Component 1 – Dam Safety Improvement 1.1 Rehabilitation, Modification and Repair of Dams
a. Category I [21 dams] (with Detailed Inspection and Survey, and Design Investigation)
b. Category II [20 dams] c. Category III [18 dams] (Location investigation, design contract preparation) d. Category IV [6 dams] (Location investigation, design contract preparation)
1.2 Dam Safety Interventions (categories 1 & 2) 1.2.1 Dam Safety and Supervision Improvement
a. Repair and improve BDSF instruments and Monitoring System b. Revise and update O&M Manual c. Flood Warning System Installation and Feasibility Study d. Hydrology Data Collection and Processing
1.2.2 Dam Break Analysis and Emergency Plan a. Preparation of DBA b. Preparation of RTD
Component 2 - O&M Improvement and Capacity Building 2.1 Dam O&M Improvement
a. O&M Budget b. Implementation of Dam Asset Management System
2.2 Dam Capacity Building Agency a. Training of DSU and Ditjen SDA staff b. Training of DMU and PDMU staff c. Career Development and Institutional Strengthening d. Legal Framework Implementation
TRANSLATION NO. HLM06AUGUST08 Page: 8�
e. Building Project Facilities for DOISP Implementation 2.3 Community Participation in Reservoir Management
a. Community Incentive Scheme Development b. Community Education Program Development c. Community Participation Program Development
Component 3 - Reservoir Sedimentation Mitigation System 3.1 Reservoir Sedimentation Survey
a. Bathometric Survey (30 dams) 3.2 Reservoir Sedimentation Mitigation Interventions
a. Review of Reservoir Operating Procedure b. Riverbank Stabilization c. Check Dam d. Terracing and Slope Protection
3.3 Reservoir Watershed Management a. Watershed Conservation Plan b. Preparation of Regulations and Guidelines c. Community Participation
Component 4 - Institutional Improvement in Dam Safety 4.1 Institutional Improvement in Dam Safety
a. Institutional Strengthening b. Repair Work Certification c. Involvement of Puslitbang and Dam Safety Panel
Component 5 – Project Management 5.1 Dam Location Support, office supplies 5.2 Provincial Project Office Support 5.3 National Office Support 5.4 Consultant
IMPLEMENTATION MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
MPW
TA TEAM-1 PMUi i
TA TEAM-2
PIU PIU PIU
PIU
BPSDA
Kabupaten
Reservoir Community
PIU
BBWS
PIU
BWS
ESMF (Environmental and Social Management Framework in DOISP by Sukiswo Priyadi Environment ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) – DOISP Objective
TRANSLATION NO. HLM06AUGUST08 Page: 9�
To socialize and get DOISP-related inputs from stakeholders in meeting regulatory policies on environmental and social management to show concern about the environment and social conditions.
1. Recommend procedures and practical methodology for preparing environmental and social management documents in the DOISP implementation
2. Clarify objectives & processes of the procedures for environmental and social management and explain the policy plan and work plan
3. Make those with the authority over environmental and social management a requirement for program implementation/planning rather than burden or obstacle
4. Promote the value of public consultation as a way to process comprehensive evaluation and planning.
The environmental and social management framework contains: 1. Review of the project implementation plan 2. Screening of Environmental Management Programs 3. Screening/identification of environmental management procedures 4. Approach to Environmental Management 5. Supervision Implementation 6. Regulation & Institutional Capacity References and procedures for environmental management 1. Indonesian regulations and laws 2. World Bank recommendations and guidelines 3. Approach to environmental study financed by the World Bank 4. Approach that can be adopted to institutional strengthening in environmental management
financed by the World Bank. DOISP has identified 65 currently operating dams subject to rehabilitation/repair to ensure dam operational safety and life. The five concepts as the basis for rehabilitation are: 1. Dam operational safety improvement 2. O&M Improvement and Capacity Building 3. Reservoir sedimentation mitigation 4. Institutional Improvement in dam safety estimate 5. Project Management in DOISP I may produce the results:
a. Improving the estimated performance of neglected dams b. Reducing negative impacts related to sedimentation c. Preparing an institutional framework to reduce erosions in dam watershed d. Local government involvement program in public participation improvement e. Effective and sustainable dam safety institution f. Directorate General of Natural Resources and PUPs Dinases should ensure that dam
operational and monitoring units work in a sustainable and effective way. Project planning for remedial work CATEGORY I: Minor design of documents and ready tender administration for 21 dams CATEGORY II: Safety improvement, in-depth investigation of locations, survey and detailed design and construction 2010-2012 for 20 dams CATEGORY III: Preparation such as Category II with some modifications; location investigation, stakeholders’ involvement, detailed design, land acquisition and issue addressing for 28 dams. CATEGORY IV: Large-scale special project, dam heightening & diversification of commercial use for 6 dams. Screening A. Features as impact sources:
1. 65 dams are operational 2. Rehabilitation/remediation to be done ranges from minor to major level.
B. Identification of compliance in environmental management and project 1. Dams have environmental management documents (SEMDAL, AMDAL, UKL-UPL)
and implement management.
TRANSLATION NO. HLM06AUGUST08 Page: 10�
2. Dams have environmental management documents but do not yet implement RKL/RPL or UKL/UPL documents
3. Dams do not have environmental management documents 4. Dams carry out monitoring based on technical interests.
C. Environmental management policies referred 1. Environmental Management Law No. 23 Year 1997 2. Government Regulation on AMDAL No. 27 Year 1999 3. Regulation of the Minister of Environment No. 11 Year 2006 4. Decree of the Minister of Environment No. 12 Year 2007 5. World Bank EIA Regulations
TRANSLATION NO. HLM06AUGUST08 Page: 11�
Recommended Procedures for Environmental Management under DOISP Project No. Type and Size of Activity Holding Environmental management documents Recommended Procedures for
Environmental Management 1 Very minor rehabilitation or beyond
environmental regulation No. 11/2006 Environmental documents available and implemented SOP for rehabilitation
2 Minor rehabilitation related to Environmental Minister Regulation No. 11/2006
Environmental documents available and implemented UKL/UPL
3 Minor rehabilitation related to Environmental Minister Regulation No. 11/2006
Management documents not implemented DPPL
4 Minor rehabilitation related to Environmental Minister Regulation No. 11/2006
Not available DPPL
5 Major-category rehabilitation based on Environmental Minister Regulation No. 11/2006
Documents available and implemented Revised RPL/RPL
6 Major-category rehabilitation based on Environmental Minister Regulation No. 11/2006
Documents available and not implemented DPPL/AMDAL
7 Major-category rehabilitation based on Environmental Minister Regulation No. 11/2006
No environmental management document available DPPL/AMDAL
TRANSLATION NO. HLM04AUGUST08 Page: 12�
Environmental Management Supervision It is necessary to note: Management of impact sources Sensitive environmental components - Physical: Erosion; Waste - Biological: Basin vegetation cover; Mangrove ecosystem degradation; Ecosystem type
change - Social: Social, economic and cultural dynamics - Public Health: Waterborne diseases
2. Related institutions 3. Public involvement Funding for preparing environmental documents The budgets for preparing environmental and social documents are estimated as follows: Year 2008: Preparation of 3 UKL-UPL x USD8,000 = USD24,000 Year 2009: Preparation of 38 UKL-UPL/DPPL x USD20,000 = USD760,000 Year 2010: Preparation of 18 UKL-UPL/DPPL x USD30,000 = USD540,000 Year 2011: Preparation of 6 AMDAL x USD50,000 = USD300,000 2008-2011: Public Consultation: 65 Dams x 100 persons x IDR 75,000
Training 20 institutions x 10 persons x 3 days x IDR 1,250,000
TRANSLATION NO. HLM04AUGUST08 Page: 13�
Regulations and institutional capacity 1. Include procedures for environmental management in the project design 2. Adjust to revised environmental management policies 3. cooperation and consultation with environmental agencies in each province/district/city 4. ESMF becomes a guideline for consultant partners. INPUTS FROM PUBLIC CONSULTATION PARTICIPANTS PHASE I ERVAN MARYONO from LP3ES • Environmental documents are just a formality. DOISP programs should include public
consultations from the beginning, rather than just a formality as attachment to environmental documents.
• The essence of this framework is to anticipate impacts → properly → involving the public (as dam supervisor) → giving information (appropriate to the public, such as RPL/UPL) → making a mechanism (Public Complaint Unit)
• Concept of public participation KETUT ARSA from BBWS Bengawan Solo Programs to be implemented: • Have a relationship with previous programs • Improve reservoir management in the field (should be synchronized with lower institutional
levels) • In the scheme presented, there was a missing link (should not remove the existing institution) SUKO RAHARDJO from Advisory Team of the Dam Safety Unit • Conform to existing regulations on environment (PP, Permen, etc) • The government should pay greater attention after this reform due to environmental
degradation • New government policies → DOISP is part of new government policies • There should be a relationship with the existing programs, particularly in capacity building • CONTINUITY SEQUENCE → SUSTAINABILITY ZAINAL from BBWS PEMALI-JUANA • Is this program included in the monitoring or only its management? • How to implement the environmental documents? In BBWS’ experience, the documents are
prepared very well, but still lack implementation. • What about the pattern? Form of the pattern? It must be appropriate to the watershed. • Problems with safeguarded areas are worthy of note. • Pattern and master plan should be different. The pattern is the framework of a master plan (that
can be developed by all regions, in community development including overall explanation of the program)
• Public participation in DOISP? • DOISP must be integrated UNS (Universitas Sebelas Maret) SOLO • The main problem of dams is sedimentation. • UNS has a software program that can simulate Land Erosions and Sediment Transportation • Before going to the field, a Trial and Error mechanism should be established to make clear the
objectives and activities carried out in the field. • UNS can help DOISP with the software for Land Erosion and Sediment Transportation
simulation. PHASE II GUNTORO • Organizational structure of DOISPO should be revised • The DOISP background in relation to environmental treatment should be more focused • Screening should take such a form as community → participation → understanding →
socialization
TRANSLATION NO. HLM04AUGUST08 Page: 14�
• The methodology of environmental documents should be socialized to the public and dam stakeholders
• Public complaint unit • Dam monitoring community AGUSTONO from UNRAM (Universitas Mataram) • In UPL, outdated data is still used • How are monitoring and control managed? MASDUKIN from BAPEDALDA NTB • Amdal and its preparation • In NTB, all dams have RTDs • What should be done after construction? Institutions involved in environmental problems? • BAPEDALDA should be strengthened to handle public complaints and empowered to correct
the government. • There are mostly no implementation and reports concerning Amdal. AGUS from BBWS PEMALI JUANA • Documents are complete but not implemented • The public mindset is subject to change • The DOISP program is not supported by strong regulations on dams. RPP? • There should be cooperation with Regional Governments in preparing Spatial Structure to
address environmental and social issues. AGUNG This program should be: • Target-Appropriate → at whom is this activity aimed? • Timely → when will this activity be implemented? • Content-Appropriate → is this appropriate to the needs? • Cost-Effective → in the field? LIES NAINGGOLAN from the World Bank • Documents should not only be a formality. • UKL/UPL? Should or not be disseminated to the public, dissemination (in a language easily
understandable to the public); existing data and declared programs are not consistent with the reality
• Framework? BAPEDALDA & DOISP • Training from DOISP for relevant institutions? • Institutional capacity (there is a need for review of existing institutions and post-construction
monitoring) • The framework requires a clear mechanism for each province with environmental and social
emphasis. • Mechanism? PMU BBWS BWS PDMU BAPEDALDA??? • Costs? SUKO RAHARDJO Why do many dams not have complete documents? ROHADI from BBWS BENGAWAN SOLO • Public consultation should be more intense • UKL/UPL Matrix? ILHAN ABLA from the World Bank • Flowchart? Budget Flowchart? • Necessary to prepare a framework for BBWS • How to implement the existing regulations in the framework? • After construction? Which institution will be responsible for UKL/UPL management?
Application of budget for O&M?
TRANSLATION NO. HLM04AUGUST08 Page: 15�
Minutes of Meeting Session II SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN DOISP
“Improving Reservoir Operational Performance and Safety through Public Participation”
Presenter : Ir. Tri Yuwono MT. Moderator : Drs. Suko Rahardjo From the materials presented, the following inputs, suggestions and questions are obtained: 1. Agustono Setiawan/Perguruan Tinggi Lombok NTB
- Participation around reservoirs with catchment areas - Boundaries between reservoirs and communities in the greenbelt - 2 forums are integrated between the greenbelt and catchment
2. Ketut Arsa from BPSDA Bengawan Solo - Suggestion for forward stressing, the main cause: sample catchment in Keduang,
Wonogiri - Factor in low participation: low value of reservoirs to the public concerning
solutions - Opportunities for the public to participate in dam OM should be limited in order
to prevent them from being arrogant. The example is OM related to technology. - Involve the oldest public institutions that can match/work in synergy with the
DOISP program. 3. Masdukin, Bapedalda NTB
- There is a need for management costs, continuous socialization and persons that can facilitate needs.
4. LSM Persepsi - In Wonogiri, there are latent social conditions: 7 months of drought, 5 months of
rain. During a drought, the public have to buy water at Rp 110,000 per 5 cubic meters.
- 5% of DAU should be for the public - There should be communication between upstream and downstream communities
for mutual understanding between them. - Economic dimensions: Are there any processes to encourage the public to be
productive economically? - Fund mobilization should be related to environmental services; in terms of school
season, social funds and pre-harvest time. - Upon establishment of groups, do not leave them alone. Set up networks to make
communities self-reliant. 5. Erfan Maryono
- The public should be protected against any risks of reservoirs - Public participation should take into account poverty or land ownership in order
to avoid the perception that advantage were taken of the public to conserve the environment.
- There should be some economic incentives; - Socioeconomic solution: the public should have a chance to improve themselves
thus allowing them more easily to conserve the environment → incentive scheme 6. TRI BAYU AJI, SDW
- Sermo, Dawuhan, DSP successful: cacao harvest - Assistance
Conclusions from responses, inputs, suggestions and questions are as follows:
TRANSLATION NO. HLM04AUGUST08 Page: 16�
- Delineation of greenbelt and catchment areas is situational if the community in the greenbelt area and the community in the catchment area can be separated or integrated.
- It is worth noting that when the public are to be involved we should ask ourselves “What is our right to involve the public?”
- In any circumstances, the public must be involved in seeing costs and benefits. Benefits: with the existence of reservoirs, the water level in their wells will go up. They already know but do not want or they want but do not have ability (no money) → training.
- External factors: supported by regulations, appreciation from others. - Existing institutions serve as a vehicle for activities. - Before commencement of activities, the community should be trained to see their
potential → - Economic incentives: slope rehabilitation, check dam, the community can be involved
in these activities - Solve problems without problem - Sincere participation - Convince the public to solve their problems on their own. - GNKPA; DOISP-related moral movement.