indiana update 2013 tri-state electric utility environmental meeting may 15, 2013

33
Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management 1

Upload: deanna-mcbride

Post on 31-Dec-2015

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013. Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management. IDEM’s Mission. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

Indiana Update2013 Tri-State Electric Utility

Environmental MeetingMay 15, 2013

Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, CommissionerIndiana Department of Environmental Management

1

Page 2: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

IDEM’s MissionProtecting Hoosiers and Our Environment

While Becoming the Most Customer-Friendly Environmental Agency

IDEM’s mission is to implement federal and state regulations to protect human health and the environment while allowing the environmentally sound operations of industrial, agricultural, commercial and government activities vital to a prosperous economy.

2

Page 3: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

Performance Metrics March 2013Result Target Comments

Quality of Hoosiers' Environment

% of Hoosiers that live in counties that meet air quality standards

94.92% 100% 80%Muncie Lead; Ozone in Clark, Floyd, Greene and Laporte Counties

% of CSO Communities with approved programs to prevent the release of untreated sewage

98.15% 100% 90%97+9 (106) out of 99+9 (108). Not Gary or Mishawaka

% of Hoosiers that receive water from facilities in full compliance with safe drinking water standards

99.34% 99% 95%  

Permitting EfficiencyTotal calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute*

Land 24,581 36,159 40,413 42,450 statutoryAir 46,040 50,360 56,285 59,247 statutoryWater 33,381 58,446 65,322 68,760 statutory

* Places emphasis on back logged permits

ComplianceTotal percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards*

Inspections 97.28% 97% 75%  Self reporting 96.29% 99% 95%  

Continuous monitoring (COM) 99.83% 99.9% 99.0%  

* Tracks observations and not just inspections 3

Page 4: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

4

Performance Metrics June 2005Quality of Hoosiers' Environment Result Target Comments

% of Hoosiers in counties meeting air quality standards

61% 100% 80%12 counties & 2,408,571 of 6,195,643 above standard

% of CSO Communities with approved programs to prevent the release of untreated sewage

4% 100% 20% 75% by 2007 is goal

Permitting Efficiency Total calendar days accumulated in issuing environmental permits, as determined by state statute*

Land 100,013 66,565 86,864

Air 511,000 207,000 385,000

Water 301,000 48,000 200,000

* Places emphasis on back logged permits

Compliance Total percentage of compliance observations from regulated customers within acceptable compliance standards*

Inspections 95.46% 97% 75%

Self reporting 97.11% 99% 95%

Continuous monitoring (COM) 99.19% 99.90% 98.95%

* Tracks observations and not just inspections

Organizational Transformation Budgetary agency dollars spent on key outside contracts for core agency functions.

Dollars spent on outside services per year $6,179,367 $0 $3,447,017

Page 5: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

5

IDEM Backlogs Eliminated

• On January 10, 2005, there were 263 administratively extended NPDES permits and 289 unissued Title V permits. All of those have been issued and IDEM now issues permits using less than 85% of the statutorily allowed days.

• On January 10, 2005, there were 250 unresolved enforcement cases over 2 years old. Now the oldest referral on our tracking list is June, 2010.

Page 6: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

6

Permits--Percent of Statutory Days

0

50

100

150

200

250

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Percentage of allowable days

Page 7: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

7

Water Quality

Page 8: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

Why is the Economy Important to the Environment?

8

Page 9: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index

Yale Center for Environmental Law & PolicyYale University

Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)Columbia University

http://www.yale.edu/epi/

9

Page 10: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

10

Page 11: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

• Wealth matters. • The Environmental Health scores, in particular, reveal a significant relationship with GDP per capita. • EPI scores more generally also correlate with wealth, although there is a diversity of

performance within every level of economic development.

Policy Implications of the 2012 EPI

11

Page 12: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

New Air Quality Standards

• Since the end of 2009, new air quality standards have resulted in U.S. EPA designating the following new nonattainment areas:– Lake and Porter Counties Ozone (2008 standard)

– Lawrenceburg Township (Dearborn County) Ozone

– City of Muncie Lead

12

Page 13: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

New Air Quality Standards

• All monitors in Indiana currently meet the 100 ppb short term NOx standard established in 2010.

• A number of townships in five counties will likely be designated as nonattainment for the 1-hour, 75 ppb SO2 standard established in 2010.

13

Page 14: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

14

Page 15: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

15

Page 16: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

New PM2.5 Standard

• The new annual standard is 12 micrograms per cubic meter which is a 20% reduction from the previous 15 micrograms per cubic meter standard.

• Standard became effective March 18, 2013.• New nonattainment designations likely in

early 2015.

16

Page 17: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

17

Page 18: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

18

Protection of Downwind States

• In April, 2005, U.S. EPA had designated 474 counties in the eastern U.S. as nonattainment for the ozone standard and 208 counties as nonattainment for the PM2.5 air quality standards.

• At that time, U.S. EPA projected that, in the absence of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), over 100 eastern U.S. counties would still not meet standards by 2012.

Page 19: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

19

Protection of Downwind States

• CAIR was issued in May 2005 to address the impacts of transported air pollution in 28 eastern states.

• The CAIR regulation was remanded to U.S. EPA in December 2008 and was replaced by the more stringent Cross States Air Pollution Regulation (CSAPR) in August, 2011.

• CSAPR’s projected compliance costs exceeded CAIRs by $800 million per year.

Page 20: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

20

Protection of Downwind States

Ozone PM2.5

EPA Designated Nonattainment Counties, April 2005 474 144EPA predicted 2010 Nonattainment Counties without CAIR or CSAPR (based upon 2005 Air Quality)

40 79

EPA predicted 2010 Nonattainment Counties with CAIR 32 28Measured Nonattainment Counties in 2010 (both influenced by local sources) 1 1

Page 21: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

21

Air Quality Compared to CSAPR Goals 2008 to 2010

Attains

Does Not Meet the PM Standards

Does Not Meet the Ozone Standard

Does Not Meet Ozone and PM Standards

Location of the State Capitals

State Boundaries

Page 22: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

22

Protection of Downwind States

• Actual measured air quality demonstrates that CAIR, with an estimated annual cost of $1.6 billion per year, adequately addresses transported air pollutants for the air quality standards that existed in 2010.

• The additional $800 million per year that CSAPR is estimated to cost is an unnecessary burden on U.S. utility ratepayers, and the courts have overturned CSAPR.

Page 23: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

23

Protection of Downwind States

• CAUTION!!! While CAIR adequately addresses the air quality standards that existed when it was developed, U.S. EPA has since lowered both the ozone standard (now 0.075 ppm) and the PM2.5 standard (now 12 micrograms per cubic meter).

• The next maps show how the lower ozone standard compares to the measured air quality—since the new PM2.5 standard did not become effective until 2013, its impact does not show on these maps.

Page 24: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

24

State of the Air Status 2008 to 2010

Attains

Does Not Meet the PM Standards

Does Not Meet the Ozone Standard

Does Not Meet Ozone and PM Standards

Location of the State Capitals

State Boundaries

Page 25: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

25

Attains

Does Not Meet the PM Standards

Does Not Meet the Ozone Standard

Does Not Meet Ozone and PM Standards

Location of the State Capitals

State Boundaries

Ozone and Particulate Air Quality 2009 to 2011

Page 26: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

26

CO2 (Greenhouse Gasses)

• In April 2012, U.S. EPA proposed New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions for certain Electric Utility Generating Units (EGUs). The rules only apply to large new fossil fired Electrical Generating Units in the continental United States.− Simple cycle gas turbines are exempt (even though

the more efficient ones currently meet the rule).

Page 27: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

27

CO2 (Greenhouse Gasses)

• Combined cycle gas turbines will meet the rule.

• Coal fired units will not meet the rule without using carbon capture and storage.

• Carbon capture and storage:− is not yet commercially available,− has not yet been demonstrated at commercial

scale, and− is likely to be prohibitively expensive.

Page 28: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

28

CO2 (Greenhouse Gasses)

• Is a rule which effectively prohibits the construction of new electrical generating facilities that use coal in the United States going to make a significant difference in emissions?

The National Academy of Sciences report, “America’s Climate Choices” recommends that actions be taken now to start reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions to levels between 50% and 80% below 1990 levels.

Page 29: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

29

Page 30: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

CO2 (Greenhouse Gasses)

• In the spring of 2012, the Environmental Council of the States (ECOS) passed resolution 12-1, “Challenges of Achieving Significant Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Reductions.” A copy of this resolution is available at:

www.ecos.org/files/4711_file_Resolution_12_1_Challenges_of_GHG_reductions.doc

30

Page 31: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

31

CO2 (Greenhouse Gasses)

• The resolution requests that the U.S. EPA develop one or more scenarios that will produce an 80% reduction in GHG emissions nationally, from a 2005 baseline, in 2050 or beyond; and to conduct an analysis of the costs and the benefits associated with each such scenario along with an estimate of the costs and benefits of not obtaining these GHG reductions.

Page 32: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

32

CO2 (Greenhouse Gasses)

• U.S. EPA has decided not to spend the resources required to develop the requested scenario, but rather to develop rules to reduce GHG emissions, even if these rules do not materially reduce U.S. emissions.

• The NSPS for EGUs effectively bans new coal fired facilities in the U.S. without any public plan to actually reduce U.S. (or world) GHG emissions to the levels advocated by the National Academy of Sciences.

Page 33: Indiana Update 2013 Tri-State Electric Utility Environmental Meeting May 15, 2013

33

Questions?

Tom EasterlyCommissioner

Indiana Department of Environmental Management(317) 232-8611

[email protected]