indiana conservation partnership region 5 model load reductions · 2019-07-25 · indiana...
TRANSCRIPT
Indiana Conservation Partnership Region 5 Model Load ReductionsIntroduction MethodologyThe Ind iana Conse rvation Partne rship is c om prise d of e ight Ind iana age nc ie s and organizations who share a c om m on goal of prom oting c onse rvation. To that e nd , the m ission of the Ind iana Conse rvation Partne rship is to provid e te c hnic al, financ ial and e d ucational assistanc e ne e d e d to im ple m e nt e c onom ic ally and e nvironm e ntally c om patible land and wate r ste ward ship d e c isions, practic e s and te c hnologie s.In 2013, m e m be rs of the Ind iana Conse rvation Partne rship (ICP) be gan using the Environm e ntal Prote c tion Age nc y’s (EPA) Re gion 5 Nutrie nt Load Re d uction M od e l to d e te rm ine the im pact of installe d c onse rvation practic e s im ple m e nte d by the ICP Conse rvation De live ry Te am s on Ind iana's wate r quality.The ICP ad opte d the Re gion 5 Nutrie nt Load Re d uction M od e l to analyze c onse rvation practic e s fund e d by state program s suc h as the Ind iana State De partm e nt of Agric ulture 's Cle an W ate r Ind iana Program and the Ind iana De partm e nt of Natural Re sourc e s' Lake and Rive r Enhanc e m e nt Program , as we ll as fe d e rally fund e d program s inc lud ing EPA's Se c tion-319 Program and U SDA’s Farm Bill Program .The Re gion 5 Nutrie nt Load Re d uction M od e l, e stim ate s annual re d uctions of se d im e nt, as we ll as nitroge n and phosphorus tie d to se d im e nt e rosion (brown, gre e n and blue m aps, re spe c tive ly). The se re d uctions c ontinue for the life of the practic e s m od e le d (e .g., grasse d wate rways are d e signe d to be 10-ye ar practic e s, while c ove r c rops are 1-ye ar practic e s, e stablishe d annually). Re ductions in d issolve d nutrie nts, suc h as d issolve d re active phosphorus (DRP) and nitrate (NO3), are not ac c ounte d for by the Re gion 5 Nutrie nt Load Re d uction M od e l. In ad d ition, ICP c onse rvation practic e s not assoc iate d with se d im e nt loss, or not c ove re d by the Re gion 5 Nutrie nt Load Re d uction M od e l, are not analyze d . This e ffort d oe s not inc lud e the m any unassiste d practic e s d e signe d and installe d sole ly by a private land owne r without ICP assistanc e . Ind iana is the only state in the c ountry to ad opt a m od e l am ong so m any partne rs to e stim ate c onse rvation im pact on a state wid e scale . As part ofInd iana’s Nutrie nt Re d uction Strate gy, this m od e ling e ffort illustrate s the c ontinue d suc c e ss and c halle nge s of c onse rvation and se rve s as a tool to he lp se t wate rshe d priority and re d uction targe ts, m anage c onse rvation re sourc e s, and to furthe r stake hold e r involve m e nt at all le ve ls of gove rnm e nt within and ac ross Ind iana.For m ore inform ation about Ind iana's Nutrie nt Re d uction Strate gy, visit the Ind iana State De partm e nt of Agric ulture 's we bsite athttp://www.in.gov/isda/2991.htm .
ISDA/SWCD DATA
CREP & CWIIndianapolis
DEB FAIRHURST
NRCS DATAFARM BILL*Washin g ton D.C.CHRIS MORSE
IDEM DATAEPA –319Indianapolis
LOU RENSHAW
FSA DATACRPSU SAN
HOVERMALE
DNR DATALAREIndianapolis
DOUG NUSBAUM
DATA CONSOLIDATION& QU ALITY CONTROLDEB FAIRHU RST
ISDA
SPRING/FALLTILLAGE TRANSECTDATA***
http://www.in .g ov/isda(Tillage Trends By County)
(Separate Data Flow Process)
ICP FINANCIAL REPORTSWEB APPLICATION***
http://www.in .g ov/isda/icpreports/(Total Funding By County)
(Separate Data Flow Process)
ANNU AL ICP CONSERVATION WORKLOAD REPORT***(By County)
FSA DATACRP
Kansas CitySUSAN
HOVERMALE
QU ARTERLY (CY) EPA REGION 5 LOAD
REDU CTION MODELING**ISDA STAFF
ANNU AL REGION 5 MODEL LOAD REDU CTION MAPS***
(By Watershed)
REGION 5 MODEL DATA
CONSOLIDATION & QU ALITY CONTROLDEB FAIRHU RST
ISDA
PU BLISHED TO ISDA & ICP WEBSITES
http://www.in .g ov/isdahttp://iaswcd.org/icp/
PU BLISHED TO ISDA & ICP WEBSITES
http://www.in .g ov/isdahttp://iaswcd.org/icp/
*Data Sharing Privacy Agreements are in place** http://it.tetratech-ffx.com/steplweb/models$docs.htm***Incorporated into the Indiana Nutrient Reduction Strategy Last updated 9/25/14
In dian a Con se rvation Partn e rship An n ual (CY) Workload Accoun tability Data FlowOriginal Data SourceData Server LocationAgency Point of Contact
Indiana's Soil and Water Conservation Districts
Data Provided By:
Analysis Conducted By:De b Fairhurst, ISDA Program M anage rM ay 19, 2015
ICP W e bsite : http://ic p.iaswc d.orgISDA W e bsite : http://www.in.gov/isd aIDEM W e bsite : http://www.in.gov/id e mNRCS W e bsite : http://www.nrc s.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrc s/site /in/hom e
LAKE63
ALLEN263
JAY219
KNOX91
VIGO59
WHITE102
CASS169
JASPER148
RUSH177
CLAY121
PIKE1,176
LAPORTE75
GREENE114
PARKE105
GIBSON640
PORTER329
MIAMI319
RIPLEY118
OWEN64
POSEY553
NOBLE973
GRANT67
BOONE440
PUTNAM241
HENRY7 WAYNE
269
PERRY30
DUBOIS106
JACKSON73
CLARK47
WELLS137
SHELBY141
DAVIESS224
PULASKI178
MARION11
ELKHART456
MADISON65
BENTON154
WABASH100
KOSCIUSKO385
FULTON466
ORANGE655
SULLIVAN131
HARRISON78
CLINTON67
MONROE149
ADAMS140
NEWTON208
MORGAN74
DEKALB686
MARTIN21
ST JOSEPH440
WARREN118
WARRICK325
MARSHALL63
RANDOLPH189
BROWN608
LAWRENCE349
TIPPECANOE282
FOUNTAIN124 HAMILTON
432
DECATUR283
FRANKLIN51
CARROLL195
WASHINGTON256
STARKE232
WHITLEY371
JENNINGS92
DELAWARE160
TIPTON103
HENDRICKS45
LAGRANGE430
STEUBEN128
JOHNSON130
HOWARD330
JEFFERSON49
HANCOCK325
CRAWFORD163
UNION134
FAYETTE63
SPENCER89
MONTGOMERY552
HUNTINGTON65
SCOTT70
DEARBORN391
BARTHOLOMEW558
FLOYD196
VERMILLION380
OHIO116
SWITZERLAND149
VANDERBURGH134
BLACKFORD158
2014 Conservation AccomplishmentsTotal Practices
7 - 106114 - 232241 - 391430 - 686973 - 1,176
January 1 thru December 31, 2014Conservation Practices Completed - 21,012Conservation Practices Underway - 1,076
M arc h 20, 2015De b Fairhurst, ISDA Program M anage r
Imple
mente
d by I
ndian
a Con
serva
tion P
artne
rship
2014
India
na C
onse
rvatio
n Acc
ompli
shme
nts
Data: Provid e d by Ind iana State De partm e nt of Agric ulture ,Ind iana De partm e nt of Environm e ntal M anage m e nt, Ind iana De partm e nt of Natural Re sourc e s, Ind iana's Soil and W ate r Conse rvations Distric ts and U SDA Natural Re sourc e s Conse rvation Se rvic e .
Upper White18,746
Kankakee40,119
Tippecanoe53,459
Lower White67,953
St Joseph (MI)72,428
Whitewater15,938
Patoka62,459
Sugar26,272
Driftwood7,863
Wildcat33,260
Eel (WFWR)43,220
Blue-Sinking80,262
Iroquois18,174
Lower East Fork White131,969
Muscatatuck31,858
Upper Wabash25,983
Eel (WR)97,986
Middle Wabash-Little Vermilion64,879
Mississinewa5,951
Salamonie6,499
Middle Wabash-Busseron36,543
Lower Wabash32,824
Flatrock-Haw6,437
St Marys6,841
Lower Ohio-Little Pigeon73,475
St Joseph (OH)27,335
Middle Ohio-Laughery44,797
Upper East Fork White52,973
Middle Wabash-Deer8,438
Silver-Little Kentucky21,162
Highland-Pigeon26,421
Little Calumet-Galien1,680
Maumee3,208Auglaize
495
Vermilion1,342
Chicago0
Vermilion1,342
Lower Great Miami904
Upper Great Miami441
Lower Great Miami904
Alle n
Lake
Knox
Jay
W hite
V igo
Jaspe r
Laporte
Cass
Parke
Rush
Clay
Gre e ne
Pike
Grant
Riple y
Gibson
Noble
Pe rry
Clark
Porte r
Elkhart
Pose y
W e lls
Boone
He nry
Owe n
Jac kson
Putnam
Dubois
M iam i
Pulaski
She lby
Harrison
Sullivan
M arion
Fulton
W ayne
Clinton
Be nton
Kosc iusko
Carroll
Davie ss
Orange
M ad ison
M onroe
M organ
M arshall
M artin
Ne wton
W abash
W arric k
W arre n
Franklin
De Kalb
Brown
Spe nc e r
Rand olph
Ad am s
Lawre nc e
De c atur
Starke
Fountain
Ham ilton
W ashington
W hitle y
Tippe c anoe
St. Jose ph
Je nnings
De laware
M ontgom e ry
He nd ric ks
Lagrange
Tipton
Je ffe rson
Ste ube n
Johnson
Howard
Huntington
Hanc oc k
Sc ott
Crawford
De arbornBartholom e w
Faye tte U nion
Floyd
Switze rland
Ohio
V e rm illion
V and e rburgh
Blac kford
2013
-14 C
umula
tive N
utrien
t Loa
d Red
uctio
ns
Based on Region 5 Model analyses conducted on 15,042 conservationpractices installed by the Indiana Conservation PartnershipJanuary 2013 thru December 2014. This effort does not include the many unassisted practices designed and installed solely by a private landowner without ICP assistance.
M ay 18, 2015De b Fairhurst, ISDA Program M anage r
Phosphorus Reduction (pounds)1 - 25,00025,001 - 100,000100,001 - 175,000No Re porte d Re d uctions
Phos
phor
us
A total reduction of 1,250,592pounds of phosphorus statewide.
Re duc tions in d issolve d nutrie nts, suc h as d issolve d re active phosphorus (DRP) and nitrate (NO3), are not ac c ounte d for by the Re gion 5 M od e l.
Upper White37,399
Kankakee80,019
Tippecanoe106,569
Lower White135,400
St Joseph (MI)151,113
Whitewater32,113
Sugar52,628
Driftwood15,787
Patoka126,113
Wildcat66,621
Eel (WFWR)87,497
Blue-Sinking159,829
Iroquois36,411
Lower East Fork White263,762
Muscatatuck64,089
Upper Wabash51,962
Eel (WR)197,097
Middle Wabash-Little Vermilion131,586
Mississinewa11,917
Salamonie12,972
Middle Wabash-Busseron72,942
Lower Wabash65,727
Flatrock-Haw12,855
St Marys15,617
Lower Ohio-Little Pigeon147,236
St Joseph (OH)54,659
Middle Ohio-Laughery90,899
Upper East Fork White105,090
Middle Wabash-Deer16,851
Silver-Little Kentucky42,133
Highland-Pigeon52,647
Little Calumet-Galien3,350
Maumee6,431Auglaize
992
Vermilion2,718
Chicago0
Vermilion2,718
Lower Great Miami1,810
Upper Great Miami852
Lower Great Miami1,810
Alle n
Lake
Knox
Jay
W hite
V igo
Jaspe r
Laporte
Cass
Parke
Rush
Clay
Gre e ne
Pike
Grant
Riple y
Gibson
Noble
Pe rry
Clark
Porte r
Elkhart
Pose y
W e lls
Boone
He nry
Owe n
Jac kson
Putnam
Dubois
M iam i
Pulaski
She lby
Harrison
Sullivan
M arion
Fulton
W ayne
Clinton
Be nton
Kosc iusko
Carroll
Davie ss
Orange
M ad ison
M onroe
M organ
M arshall
M artin
Ne wton
W abash
W arric k
W arre n
Franklin
De Kalb
Brown
Spe nc e r
Rand olph
Ad am s
Lawre nc e
De c atur
Starke
Fountain
Ham ilton
W ashington
W hitle y
Tippe c anoe
St. Jose ph
Je nnings
De laware
M ontgom e ry
He nd ric ks
Lagrange
Tipton
Je ffe rson
Ste ube n
Johnson
Howard
Huntington
Hanc oc k
Sc ott
Crawford
De arbornBartholom e w
Faye tte U nion
Floyd
Switze rland
Ohio
V e rm illion
V and e rburgh
Blac kford
2013
-14 C
umula
tive N
utrien
t Loa
d Red
uctio
ns
Based on Region 5 Model analyses conducted on 15,042 conservationpractices installed by the Indiana Conservation PartnershipJanuary 2013 thru December 2014. This effort does not include the many unassisted practices designed and installed solely by a private landowner without ICP assistance.
M ay 18, 2015De b Fairhurst, ISDA Program M anage r
Nitrogen Reduction (pounds)1 - 50,00050,001 - 200,000200,001 - 300,000No Re porte d Re d uction
Nitro
gen
A total reduction of 2,513,693pounds of nitrogen statewide.
Re duc tions in d issolve d nutrie nts, suc h as d issolve d re active phosphorus (DRP) and nitrate (NO3), are not ac c ounte d for by the Re gion 5 M od e l.
Upper White15,875
Kankakee34,920
Tippecanoe45,909
Lower White74,955
St Joseph (MI)60,080
Whitewater15,462
Patoka69,168
Sugar23,796
Driftwood6,840
Wildcat26,961
Eel (WFWR)43,539
Blue-Sinking86,713
Iroquois14,212
Lower East Fork White147,585
Muscatatuck28,975
Upper Wabash20,376
Eel (WR)80,207
Middle Wabash-Little Vermilion59,952
Mississinewa4,541
Salamonie4,962
Middle Wabash-Busseron34,909
Lower Wabash35,602
Flatrock-Haw4,916
St Marys5,209
Lower Ohio-Little Pigeon82,355
St Joseph (OH)26,811
Middle Ohio-Laughery44,755
Upper East Fork White46,501
Middle Wabash-Deer6,804
Silver-Little Kentucky21,829
Highland-Pigeon28,463
Little Calumet-Galien1,275
Maumee2,807Auglaize
360
Vermilion1,027
Chicago0
Vermilion1,027
Lower Great Miami831
Upper Great Miami275
Lower Great Miami831
Alle n
Lake
Knox
Jay
W hite
V igo
Jaspe r
Laporte
Cass
Parke
Rush
Clay
Gre e ne
Pike
Grant
Riple y
Gibson
Noble
Pe rry
Clark
Porte r
Elkhart
Pose y
W e lls
Boone
He nry
Owe n
Jac kson
Putnam
Dubois
M iam i
Pulaski
She lby
Harrison
Sullivan
M arion
Fulton
W ayne
Clinton
Be nton
Kosc iusko
Carroll
Davie ss
Orange
M ad ison
M onroe
M organ
M arshall
M artin
Ne wton
W abash
W arric k
W arre n
Franklin
De Kalb
Brown
Spe nc e r
Rand olph
Ad am s
Lawre nc e
De c atur
Starke
Fountain
Ham ilton
W ashington
W hitle y
Tippe c anoe
St. Jose ph
Je nnings
De laware
M ontgom e ry
He nd ric ks
Lagrange
Tipton
Je ffe rson
Ste ube n
Johnson
Howard
Huntington
Hanc oc k
Sc ott
Crawford
De arbornBartholom e w
Faye tte U nion
Floyd
Switze rland
Ohio
V e rm illion
V and e rburgh
Blac kford
2013
-14 C
umula
tive N
utrien
t Loa
d Red
uctio
ns
Based on Region 5 Model analyses conducted on 15,042 conservationpractices installed by the Indiana Conservation PartnershipJanuary 2013 thru December 2014. This effort does not include the many unassisted practices designed and installed solely by a private landowner without ICP assistance.
M ay 18, 2015De b Fairhurst, ISDA Program M anage r
Sediment Reduction (tons)1 - 25,00025,001 - 100,000100,001 - 175,000No Re porte d Re d uctions
Sedim
ent
A total reduction of 1,209,756tons of sediment statewide.
Re duc tions in d issolve d nutrie nts, suc h as d issolve d re active phosphorus (DRP) and nitrate (NO3), are not ac c ounte d for by the Re gion 5 M od e l.