index no. 805017/2017 nyscef doc. no. 40 received …
TRANSCRIPT
IFILEDs NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2017 04:47 PM "O. 805017/2017NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Index#COUNTY OF NEW YORK Date Filed:
ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER, SUMMONSPlaintiffs,
-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHORE PLAINTIFF DESIGNATESHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGYASSOCIATES, P.C., and NEW YORK COUNTY ASI ir/^TVJAori i?d iva ia THE PLACE OF TRIAL.LEONARD KESSLER, M.D., THE BASIS OF THE
Dejendants. VENUE IS PLAINTIFFS'^ RESIDENCE/PRINCIPAL
PLACE OF BUSINESS.
Plaintiff, ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM, resides at 404 E. 79th Street, #28C, New York, New York10075; PlaintiffSCOTT WEINBERGER, resides at 305 East 63rd Street, Apt. 8-0, New York, New York,10065; Defendant SOUTH SHORE HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., a domesticcorporation, maintains offices for the transaction of business at 242 Merriek Road, Suite 301, Roekville Centre, NewYork 11570; Defendant IVAN ROTHMAN, M.D., a physician licensed in the State of New York, resides at 470Links Drive South, Roslyn, New York and maintains offices for the transaction of business at 242 Merriek Road,Suite 301, Roekville Centre, New York 11570; Defendant LEONARD KESSLER M.D., a physician licensed inthe State of New York, maintains offices for the transaction of business at 242 Merriek Road, Suite 301, Roekville
Centre, New York 11570.
TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS:
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the Complaint in this action and to serve acopy ofyour Answer ifany, or if the Complaint is not served with this Summons, to serve a Noticeof Appearance, on the Plaintiffs Attorney(s) within 20 days after the service of this Summons,exclusive of the day ofservice (or within 30 days after the service is complete if this Summons is notpersonally delivered to you within the State ofNew York); and in case ofyour failure to appear oranswer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded herein.
The relief sought is a judgment against you in favor of Plaintiffs substituting the PersonalRepresentative of the Estate of the Late Deborah W. Rothman, and additionally, for money damagesin an amount to be determined by a Jury at trial of this action, jointly and severally, together withcosts, interest and disbursements of this action for the physical injuries, damages and WrongfulDeath of the Late Deborah W. Rothman caused by the medical malpractice, recklessness, grossnegligence, lack of informed consent and other culpable conduct ofDefendants in and around9/1/2013 through date of 12/20/2013, in the medical care and treatment rendered to the lateDeborah W. Rothman at SOUTH SHORE HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C.,at 242 Merriek Road, Suite 301, Roekville Centre, New York 11570; and at her residence, 470Links Drive South, Rosyln, New York, 11576.
Upon your failure to appear, judgment will be taken against you by default for the reliefprayed and the costs of this action.
Dated: January 16, 2017Yours etc.,JOSEPH C. ANDRUZZI
Attorneyfor Plaintiffs,326 Broadway, Suite 200Bethpage,New York 1| 1714(516)433-8600
1 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Index#;COUNTY OF NEW YORK
XARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER VERIFIED
Plaintiffs,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff(s), ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and SCOTT WEINBERGER,
complaining of the Defendant(s) IVAN K, ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHORE
HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., and LEONARD KESSLER, M.D. by
their attomeys, JOSEPH C. ANDRUZZI, ESQS. allege upon information and belief as follows:
1. At all times hereinafter mentioned, PlaintifF(s) ARIELLE WEINBERGER
PAPADAM, was and still is a resident of the County ofNew York, to wit, residing at: 404 E.
79th Street, #28C, New York, New York 10075.
2. At all times hereinafter mentioned, Plaintif!][s) SCOTT WEINBERGER, was and
still is a resident of the County ofNew York, to wit, residing at 305 East 63rd Street, Apt. 8-0,
New York, New York, 10065.
3. At all times hereinafter mentioned the Defendant(s) are individuals and/or
Domestic corporations and maintain their principal place(s) ofbusiness in the State ofNew
York, County of Nassau, to wit:
Defendant(s) FVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., a physician licensed in the State ofNew York,
resides at 470 Links Drive South, Roslyn, New York and maintains offices for the transaction of
business at 242 Merrick Road, Suite 301, Rockville Centre New York 11570; Defendant(s)
1
2 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SOUTH SHORE HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.O., a domestic corporation,
maintains offices for the transaction of business at 242 Merrick Road, Suite 301, Rockville
Centre, New York 11570; Defendant(s) LEONARD KESSLER, M.D., a physician licensed in
the State ofNew York, maintains offices for the transaction ofbusiness at 242 Merrick Road,
Suite 301, Rockville Centre, New York 11570.
4. The late Deborah (Weinberger) Rothman, (hereafter, altematively
"Plaintiff(s')-Decedent," "Decedent," "Patient") died Testate on 12/20/2013 of
Cholangiocarcinoma at 57 years old.
5. Upon his own Petition, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN was appointed
Executor by Decree dated 1/23/2014 of the Estate of the Decedent by Order and Decree of the
Surrogate's Court for the County ofNassau, State ofNew York, in accord with Plaintiff(s')-
Decedent's Last Will and Testament, duly subscribed 11/30/2012.
6. Pursuant to paragraph "NINTH" of the Last Will and Testament, duly. Plaintiff
ARIELLE WEINBERGER was nominated as Successor Executor under circumstances where
Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN "for any reason, (should) fail to qualify or cease to act as
executor hereunder."
7. Plaintiff(s)-Distributees, pursue herein Wrongful Death, Conscious Pain and
Suffering and Lack of Informed Consent claims against Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN, a
physician, arising out of his medical care and treatment of the Decedent, their mother, and
accordingly, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN no longer qualifies, nor is eligible, to maintain
his appointment as Personal Representative of the Estate ofhis medical malpractice victim
Deborah (Weinberger) Rothman.
8. At all times relevant herein, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN and LEONARD
KESSLER M.D. undertook a course of medical conduct as agents, servants and/or employees of
Defendant(s) SOUTH SHORE HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C.
9. At all times relevant herein, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN leveled medical
3 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
conduct upon Plaintiff(s')- Decedentwith the facilitation agreementand cooperation of
Defendant(s) HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C. and LEONARD KESSLER,
M.D.
10. At all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant(s) held themselves out as duly
qualified and capableof renderingcompetent medical care and treatment to the generalpublic
including the Decedent.
11. At all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant(s) furnished and/or provided
doctors, nurses and other personnel to afford medical care, advice, referral and recommendations,
management and treatment to the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent.
12. In and around 9/1/2013 through 12/20/2013 and thereafter, Defendant(s), their
servants, agents and employees, did undertake medical treatment of Plaintiff(s')-Decedent and
accepted her as their Patient.
13. "Treatment" and medical conduct at issue herein was inflicted upon the late
Deborah (Weinberger) Rothman, both at the Defendant(s') IVAN K. ROTHMAN, LEONARD
KESSLER M.D. and SOUTH SHORE HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C.'s
practice offices located at 242 Merrick Road, #301, Rockville Center, New York 11570 and as
well in isolated confinement at Decedent's home.
14. Defendant(s) negligently and unskillflilly rendered medical care, advice, referral
and recommendations, management and treatment to the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent and negligently
undertook medical conduct; Defendant(s) mismanaged the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent, a patient in
their charge, causing Plaintiff(s')-Decedent physical injury, physical and mental trauma,
emotional and social stigma, pain, suffering, sickness, loss ofquality of life, loss of sentient life
in her terminal disease course and loss of dignity in death and caused the untimely death of
Plaintiff(s')-Decedent, and other injury, all as a result of Defendant('s) carelessness, negligence
and other culpable conduct.
15. The medical care and treatment rendered by the Defendant(s), their agents.
4 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
servants and/oremployees to Plaintiff(s')-Decedent wasrendered in a negligent andcareless
manner that departed from accepted standards of medical care, and they failed to use reasonable
care and skill in the care and treatment of Plaintiff(s')-Decedent.
16. Defendant(s) neglectedto heed the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent true condition(s); failed
to timelyand properlytreat Plaintiff(s')-Decedent; they rendered improperand harmful medical
care and treatment to the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent.
17. The treatment and management of the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent by the Defendant(s),
theiragents, servants andemployees wasperformed not in accordance withgoodand accepted
standards of medical care and practiceand causedthe untimelydeath of the patientand
Plaintiff(s) to sustain damages.
18. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from acceptedmedicalpractice in
secretlyundertaking a course of palliative care only without the Patient's knowledge or consent,
and he never had any intention of pursuing any medical options to extend her life.
19. Soon after her diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN admitted to Eric
Schenkel, M.D. that his treatment plan would not be revealed to the Patient and that he would
undertake "palliative care [only]" and "never had any intention of trying to research assistance to
extend her life."
20. From the earliest days ofher diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN
departed from good and accepted medical practice in undertaking a course of"treatment" of the
Decedent consisting ofa steady regimen ofdrugging to unconsciousness and which otherwise
rendered the Patient bed bound and sedentary with little if any physical activity permitted and he
departed from good and accepted medical practice in bizarre and radical departure in depriving
the Patient ofnutritional support which caused shocking physical wasting and hastened the
Patient's loss of sentient life and hasted her death.
21. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering oral mixtures and concoctions of morphine, lorazepam, zolpidem and
hydroxyzine and often wit|hout the Patient's consent or knowledge.
45 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
22. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering pain medications for no medicallytherapeutic or palliativepurpose or
effect, but rather, in a course of"treatment" to induce the Patient almost continuous
unconsciousness and which otherwise rendered the cancer Patient wholly sedentary and bed
bound.
23. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each of Stacy Abrams, 1962
Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566, Plaintiff Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, 404 East 79ty
Street, #28C New York, New York 10075, Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brookville, New
York 11545, Randi Levine, 426 Toflree Court North Hills, New York 11576, Toni Gad, 9801
Collins Ave Apt 15n, Bal Harbour, Florida, 33154 Susan Baum, Senior Clinical Specialist at
Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, residing at 1680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
18015 and Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 witnessed the
administration by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN ofconcoctions and mixtures ofMorphine,
Lorazepam, Zolpidem and Hydroxyzine in the Patient's drinks with Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN insisting that she consume them.
24. Each witnessed the administration of Morphine and other pain medications by
Defendant(s) FVAN K. ROTHMAN under circumstances where the Patient was not in pain or
otherwise uncomfortable.
25. Each witnessed the Patient's attempts to protest or resist the drugging in order to
remain awake and functional, with Defendant(s) FVAN K. ROTHMAN insisting and persuading
her to submit to the "treatment" time and time again.
26. Each witnessed the Patient routinely disoriented due to drugging, and witnessed
her struggling, unsuccessfully, to gain some control over her social interactions and some degree
of control and autonomy over her status and care, fighting the unconsciousness being continually
induced by the "treatment" inflicted upon her by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN.
27. In the first three-and-one-half weeks of Decedent's post-diagnosis disease course.
6 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
Stacy Abrams witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN's administration of high dose
Ativan, causing the Decedent to sleep 14 to 18 hours per day and during which period of time she
lost at least 30% of her body weight.
28. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN emphatically stated to Randi Levine that "it
was fine" for the Patient "to sleep and not eat."
29. On at least one occasion within the first three weeks after diagnosis, Randi Levine
witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN mix a drink ofAtivan, Ambien and Morphine and
insist that the Decedent drink it, in spite of her protests and communication that she was not in
pain, the "treatment" causing the Decedent to sleep continuously for days.
30. Randi Levine witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN administer high dose
unconsciousness inducing drugging over the Patient's protest on numerous occasions.
31. When questioned by Randi Levine as to the utility of such drugging in the
Decedent's care and treatment, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated on several occasions
"that [the Decedent] had no chance, she [was] doomed;" and additionally, that he was "already
making plans for his life without her."
32. Fran Gutleber suggested that Defendant(s) FVAN K. ROTHMAN administer less
drugging in order that the Decedent could be awake, functional, moving and eating, but he
dismissed Fran Gutleber stating "that [he] knew what she needed and there was nothing to
discuss;" "she was going to die."
33. When Fran Gutleber questioned Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN on the issue
ofMorphine administration as she had observed the Decedent to be comfortable and in no pain,
he again dismissed her, insisting that "[he] knew best."
34. Fran Gutleber witnessed Defendant(s) FVAN K. ROTHMAN actively
discouraging the Patient from getting out ofbed and walking around, telling her that she was "too
weak and should just stay in bed and rest."
7 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
35. On several occasions Toni Gad observed during visits that if she withdrew from
the Decedent's bedside for even a few momentsduring periods of lucidity and good
conversation, when she retumed, the Decedent was routinely dosed again, out of her presence,
and restored to a state ofdrug induced unconsciousness or semi-consciousness, all in accord with
the "treatment" regimen ordered and administered by, and otherwise at the direction, of
Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN.
36. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in that he failed to render full and reasoned medical judgment and excluded from
professional consideration the utility of second opinions or collaboration with available
sub-specialists in the field, despite the Patient's wishes.
37. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN stated and admitted to each of Stacy Abrams, PlaintiffArielle (Weinberger)
Papadam, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieldview Lane, Bethlehem
Pennsylvania 18015, Toni Gad, Susan Baum and Charleen Rhindress that he would not consider
second medical opinions or consultations with readily available sub-specialists in
cholangiocarcinoma.
38. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Randi Levine that she had "nerve"
to question his medical judgment.
39. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN repeatedly stated and claimed to Randi
Levine "that [he was] the best oncologist; [that he] knew more than any other doctor, [and that
he] should be left to do what he wished."
40. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Stacy Abrams on numerous
occasions "I'm the doctor and I know best for Debbie" despite Decedent's questions and protests
to being routinely medicated to unconsciousness from the very onset of the diagnosis in
September, 2013.
41. Despite the Patient being lead to believe early in her disease course that
8 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
sub-specialists (Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology) at ColumbiaPresbyterian Hospital were
being consultedfor her treatment plan and would follow up and participate in her care,
Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Randi Levine that he "was not going to follow
through with that;" that "[he] was not going to go through [an extensive disease course] with
another sick wife;" that he "would [only] keep [Decedent] comfortable but she had no chance of
beating this cancer;" "that [Decedent] Debbie [Rothman] would be gone within a few weeks,
maybe a month maximum;" that "[He] knew this because [he] was an expert."
42. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Stacy Abrams on numerous
occasions that he was "a much smarter physician than the Columbia doctors" and that he could
"administer the chemo [therapy treatments to Decedent] better than anyone."
43. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Susan Baum that the
"[sub-specialist] doctor(s) at Columbia are good, but I'm a much better oncologist."
44. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN declared to Eric Schenkel, M.D. that he
would be making all medical decisions for the Patient unilaterally and that he was "smarter" than
available sub-specialists in cholangiocarcinoma at Columbia Presbyterian; that he was "not open
to any ideas on clinical trials or other life saving measures."
45. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Eric Schenkel, M.D. that the
"[sub-specialist] doctor at Columbia is good, but I'm a much better oncologist."
46. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Fran Gutleber that "he knew what
she [the Decedent] needed and there was nothing to discuss," on the issues of Decedent's
management and regarding second opinions or collaboration with sub-specialists; declaring with
resignation that he "was the expert doctor and she was going to die."
47. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Charleen Rhindress that he "[didn't]
need another opinion" in the Patient's care and treatment and exclaimed that he was the "Doctor
and know[s] what she needs!" responsive to Charleen Rhindress' suggestion that he was "too
close to the situation to make these decisions alone."
8
9 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
48. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Plaintiff Arielle (Weinberger)
Papadam that the "no one is better at dealing with cancer than 1am!" and that he was "much
smarter" than sub-specialists at Columbia.
49. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Toni Gad "absolutely not" did he, or
would he, consider a second opinion to be ofutility as to any aspect of Decedent's care; that
"[he] was the best doctor out there" and that "[he] was giving Debbie every care she need[ed];
that he "was better than any other doctor."
50. Additionally, in September, 2013, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to
Toni Gad that "cancer grows with food;" and "you should not feed cancer" as an explanation for
the absence ofnutritional support and visibly accelerated wasting, telling Toni Gad that the
decedent was "at the end of her life and that it [death] would happen any day."
51. When Toni Gad broached the subject of seeking a second opinion or collaboration
ofother physicians, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN responded to her with a communicative
and aggressive facial expression seeking to cause her (and which did cause her) to withdraw
from the conversation immediately.
52. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
failing to follow even basic chemotherapy infusion protocols, including weight measurement and
the keeping of appropriate medical record(s) of the Patient's vital signs and weight, necessary to
properly manage chemotherapy doses.
53. Defendant(s) LEONARD KESSLER, M.D. departed from accepted medical
practice in failing to follow even basic chemotherapy infusion protocols, including weight
measurement and the keeping of appropriate medical record(s) of the Patient's vital signs and
weight, necessary to properly manage chemotherapy doses.
54. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice
administering non-therapeutic chemotherapy dosages to the Patient.
10 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
55. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN admitted to Eric Schenkel, M.D. that he
volitionally infused chemotherapy dosages to the Patient in excess ofaccepted therapeutic levels.
56. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
abandoning chemotherapy despite the fact that the Patient's serological tumor markers indicated
that the cancer was responsive to chemotherapy.
57. Defendant(s) LEONARD KESSLER, M.D. departed from accepted medical
practice in abandoning chemotherapy despite the fact that the Patient's serological tumor markers
indicated that the cancer was responsive to chemotherapy.
58. Defendant(s) LEONARD KESSLER, M.D. departed from good and accepted
medical practice in failing to inform the Patient that serological tumor markers indicated that the
Patient's cancer was responsive to treatment.
59. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in failing to inform the Patient that serological tumor markers indicated that the Patient's
cancer was responsive to treatment.
60. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
keeping the Patient rigidly sedentary, with consequential mismanagement ofagonizing pleural
effusion.
61. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN and LEONARD KESSLER, M.D. departed
from accepted medical practice failing to address psychological care needs of the Patient; in
failing to prescribe and provide assistive efforts to manage nausea and vomiting; in failing to
prescribe and provide appropriate nutritional management and support and physical therapy to
abate wasting; in failing to prescribe and provide steroid and other pharmacological treatment to
maintain appetite, amongst other things.
62. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
failing to inform the Patient of risks, benefits and altematives to the "treatment" being
10
11 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
undertaken by the Defendant(s); and in failing to inform her of her prognosis and treatment
options.
63. Efforts by friends and family to inform the Patient of altematives to the "care"
being leveled upon her by the Defendant(s) were met with threats and actionsby Defendant(s)
IVAN K. ROTHMAN to thwart any such communications and prevent information from
reaching the Patient.
64. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN's goal to prevent choice or consent on the
part of the Patient was perfected and furthered by a pattern of strong efforts to isolate her from
family, friends and personal support network and he threatened her family to submit to his
decision that the Patient remain uninformed and misinformed of her diagnosis, uninformed and
misinformed ofher medical treatment and status, at all points through death, under penalty of
being "cutoff from access to the Decedent in her terminal disease course.
65. These actions were taken with the knowledge of treating physician Defendant(s)
LEONARD KESSLER M.D., and with his acquiescence and facilitation.
66. In November 2013, the Decedent communicated to Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam
confusion regarding her medical status and stated that she was unaware of the fact that
Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN had terminated her chemotherapy, believing and desiring
that she would return to treatment the following week.
67. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN, without the Patient's consent, cancelled an
appointment in November, 2013 with Abby Siegel, M.D., a Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologist
at Columbia Presbyterian, and additionally, failed for many weeks prior to forward pertinent
records, as had been requested by the doctor in advance of the scheduled appointment, which the
Patient greatly desired.
68. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN admitted to Randi Levine that he cancelled
the Columbia appointment and was simply "not going to follow through" with consideration of
life extending treatment options because "he was not going to go through this again with another
11
12 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
sick wife," but rather, that it was his plan only to "keep her comfortable but she had no chance of
beating this cancer" and that she "would be gone within a few weeks maybe a month maximum."
69. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN admitted to Stacy Abrams that he cancelled
the Columbiaappointment, admitted to her that he dismissed any consideration of life extending
treatment from the beginningand admitted that the Patient would not be informedof this plan
despite her expressed desire to pursue such treatment.
70. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN also directed other care givers, including
hospice nurses, that the Patient remain at all times wholly uninformed that she was undergoing
hospice care, all the while the Patient believing that she was continuing chemotherapytreatment
and believing that she was continuing treatment pursuant to a plan recommended by
sub-specialists at Columbia Presbyterian, with whom she desired follow-up consultations and
with whom she believed she was scheduled for follow-up appointments.
71. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN instructed Randi Levine that "he did not want
any of her friends to tell [the Decedent] how sick she was."
72. Defendant(s) FVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Eric Schenkel, M.D. that he would
not inform the Patient how bad the diagnosis was and that he would make all the decisions about
the Decedent's care and not leave any choice up to her.
73. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN warned Stacy Abrams that she should
counsel Susan Baum to stop researching available clinical trials and cease efforts to inform the
Patient of treatment options, under threat that he would complain to Baum's employer, Genentech
BioOncology-Rituxan, and seek to influence them to fire her from her employment.
74. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN threatened Stacy Abrams that "if [she] ever
wanted to see [her] friend alive again [she] would tell Susan [Baum] to cease and desist."
75. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN admitted to Stacy Abrams that he purposely
failed to inform the Patient that her cancer had metastasized to bone and failed to inform the
12
13 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
Patient that her "PET scan lit up" "like a Christmas tree."
76. When the Decedent was made aware of some of these facts by third parties, she
protested to Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN her objections to his failure to keep her fully
informed of her status, to no avail.
77. Similarly, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN warned Kenneth M. Wolk soon
after the diagnosis, "Ifyou tell your sister anything, you will no longer be allowed in the house to
see her."
78. Defendant('s) concerted efforts to prevent the Patient from even limited autonomy
over her body and choice in her care was furthered by a relentless pattern of isolation of the
Patient from her fnends and family.
79. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each of Stacy Abrams, Plaintiff
Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum,
Toni Gad and Kenneth M. Wolk witnessed Defendant(s) FVAN K. ROTHMAN undertaking a
course ofmedical treatment, communication and conduct actively discouraging the Decedent's
physical movement, her reception of friends, family, well wishersand clergyand each witnessed
continuous interference with communications from her friends and family.
80. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN informed Charleen Rhindress that he
"banned" long time friends Susan Baum and Eric Schenkel, M.D. from the Decedent's home
during her convalescence and that he did not want the Decedent to talk to or see Fran Gutleber
and other friends.
81. On numerous occasions, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN communicated
refusals to the Decedent's requests for access to her cell phone and home phone in the presence
of Charleen Rhindress. The Decedent informed him that she wanted to speak to her friends. On
several occasions he replied, "You don't need to speak with them," in the presence of Charleen
Rhindress.
13
14 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
82. On several occasions, in the presence of Charleen Rhindress, Defendant(s) IVAN
K. ROTHMAN actively dissuaded Decedent from getting out ofbed to receive visitors in her
living room.
83. On many occasions Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN rebuffed Charleen
Rhindress' calls and requests to visit the Decedent during her disease course, answering
repeatedly, "It's not a good time."
84. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN requested and directed that Charleen
Rhindress remove herself from the Decedent's bedside and home when the Decedent started
asking Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN questions about her care and prognosis; Defendant(s)
rVAN K. ROTHMAN commanded "Charleen, I need you to leave now!"
85. In the presence of Fran Gutleber, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN refused the
Decedent's request that she be allowed downstairs to sit on the patio on a beautiful sunny day
and visit with her friend.
86. On many occasions Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN rebuffed Fran Gutleber's
calls and requests to visit the Decedent during her disease course, starting on repeated occasions,
"[she] was too tired, too sick," and "it would be for the best if [the Patient] would just die that
day."
87. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN refused to permit the Decedent to visit with
her brother Kenneth M. Wolk, 4705 Center Boulevard, Apartment 808 Long Island City, New
York 11109, other than under his personal observation and supervision.
88. When PlaintiffArielle (Weinberger) Papadam spoke with Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN about installing a chairlift which she offered to pay for, in order that the Decedent
be able to move about her home and have increased quality of life, Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN stated "I'm not doing it. It will destroy the walls and it is costly. She won't be using
it for that long anyway."
14
15 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
89. In addition to the failure to inform the Patient of the nature ofher condition or her
treatment options, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN made numerous statements to each of
Stacy Abrams, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum, Toni Gad and
Eric Schenkel, M.D. that the Decedent "wouldbe betterof dead"; that he wished she wouldjust
not wake up; that he "needed to get on with his life" and that althoughhe was acting as her
doctor, he was unwilling personally to participate in a lengthydiseasecourseas a spouse,
something he had experienced with the sickness and death ofa prior wife.
90. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Stacy Abrams that he wanted this
death to be different than his first wife's cancer and care and that "[He] wasn't about to relive
those 6 years all over again."
91. Similarly, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Randi Levine that he was
not prepared to deal with a lengthy illness and that he simply wanted the Decedent to die as
quickly as possible.
92. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Charleen Rhindress on at least two
occasions that "[he] just wish[ed] she wouldn't wake up again."
93. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Fran Gutleber that "it would be for
the best if [the Decedent] would just die that day."
94. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Susan Baum "she'd be better off
dead. It would be a blessing if she didn't wake up tomorrow."
95. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN admitted to Randi Levine that he mislead the
Patient about following-up with the Columbia treatment plan, and told Randi Levine "that he was
not going to follow through with that because he was not going to go through this again with
another sick wife;" that he "would keep her comfortable but she had no chance ofbeating this
cancer;" and that he "would start dating immediately."
96. Within days of the diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Randi
15
16 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
Levine that he had already "gotten over" her "impending death;" and that from "the moment [the
decedent] was diagnosed [that] she was terminal"; he declared that "there was no hope or help for
[her] and that she [would] be dead within weeks."
97. As a result of the foregoing, Plaintiff(s')-Decedentsuffered, resulting in her
death; was deprivedof the opportunityfor a cure; was deprived of treatment to afford a longer
life; was deprived ofher quality of life and dignity in death and the loss of the last precious
months of the late Deborah (Weinberger) Rothman's life.
98. Plaintiff(s) suffered pecuniary losses, special and general damages for the
Wrongful Death of Plaintiff(s')-Decedent.
99. The foregoing injuries and damagesof the Plaintiffs and Plaintiff(s')-Decedent
were caused solelyby virtue of carelessness and other culpable conducton the part of the
Defendant(s), their servants, agents, and employees and without any negligence on the part of the
Plaintiff(s), or Plaintiff(s')-Decedent, contributing thereto.
100. This action falls within one or more of the exceptions set forth in CPLR 1602.
AS AND FOR A FIRST STATUTORY AND COMMON LAW CAUSE OF ACTION TO
SUBSTITUTE A QUALIFYING PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OFTHE MALPRACTICE VICTIM TO PROSECUTE THE CLAIMS FOR THE BENEFIT
OF THE PLAINTIFF(S)-DISTRIBUTEES
101. Plaintiff(s) repeat and reallege each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1
through 100 above as if same were fully set forth at length herein.
102. Pursuant to N.Y. Const, art. VI, § 7 and N.Y. Const, art. VI, § 12 the Supreme
Court and Surrogate's Court have concurrent jurisdiction in matters involving decedents estates
and the Supreme Court maintains concurrent jurisdiction with the Surrogate's Court forproper
reliefuponan Application andcauseDisqualifying and Removing Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN as Executor of the Estate of his malpractice victim, pursuant to the N.Y. Est.
Powers & Trusts Law and otherwise at law.
16
17 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
103. Additionally, Pursuant to N.Y. Est. Powers & Trusts Law §§ 5-4.1 and N.Y. Surr.
Ct. Proc. Act Law §§ 707(2), 711(1) Plaintiff(s) are entitled to the appointment of a
Representative of the Estate for their benefit by Order of the Supreme Court herein, where as a
matter of fact and law, the existing Representative cannot and will not pursue malpractice claims
for the Distributees'-Plaintiff(s) benefit against himself.
104. Accordingly, Plaintiff(s) are entitled to an Order disqualifying and removing
rVAN K. ROTHMAN as Executor and/or removing him for the limited purposes of the
prosecution of the action herein and Duly Substituting Plaintiff ARIELLE WEINBERGER
PAPADAM as Personal Representative of the Estate in consonance with the Decedent's Last will
and Testament, generally and/or by Limited Letters and Plaintiff(s) are entitled to an Order
directing for Substitution of the Parties as appropriate.
AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WRONGFUL DEATH BY
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
105. Plaintiff(s) repeat and reallege each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1
through 104 above as if same were fully set forth at length herein.
106. By reason of the foregoing, Plaintiff(s) as next of kin of Plaintiff(s')-Decedent
have suffered pecuniary loss and have been deprived of said Decedent's support, comfort,
services, companionship, guidance, advice, love and affection all to their damage, in a substantial
sum of money which exceeds the jurisdictional limits of all lower courts which would otherwise
have jurisdiction of this action.
107. By reason of the above, the next of kin of the Decedent have sustained severe and
significant pecuniary loss in a substantial sum of money to be determined by Court and jury and
Plaintiff(s) are entitled to recover a Judgment against Defendant(s), jointly and severally,
therefore.
AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION FOR DECEDENT'S CONSCIOUS PAIN
AND SUFFERING
17
18 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
108. Plaintiff(s) repeatand reallege eachand everyallegation contained in paragraphs 1
through 107above as if same were fullyset forth at lengthherein.
109. Plaintiff(s')-Decedent suffered profoundconscious pain and suffering and loss of
qualityof life and dignityin death and the loss of the last preciousmonthsof the late Deborah
(Weinberger) Rothman life, under circumstances whereshe was deprived of the comfort of
friends and family, all due to the culpable conduct of the Defendant(s); all as a consequence of
Defendant(s') departures from good and accepted medical practice.
110. That as a result ofDefendant(s') culpableconduct, Plaintiff(s) have been damaged
in the amountsand manneraforesaid in a substantial sum ofmoneyto be determined by a court
and jury, including a punitive award, in excess of the jurisdictional limits ofall lower courts
which would otherwise have jurisdiction over this action and Plaintiff(s) are entitled to recover a
Judgment against Defendant(s),jointly and severally, therefore.
AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR LACK OF INFORMED
CONSENT
111. Plaintiff(s) repeat and reallegeeach and every allegationcontainedin paragraphs 1
through 110 above as if same were fully set forth at length herein.
112. At no time was the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent ever advised, either orally or in writing,
of the possible risks and dangersnor of the possibilityof hastened death or permanentdamage to
the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent's body with regard to the care and treatmentcourse being renderedto
her, nor was the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent ever advised that she may suffer severe personal injuries
and damages and hastened death or loss ofa chance for a cure or longer life, and had the
Defendant(s) or any of their agents, servants, employees and/or associates informed or advised
the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent of the possible risks involved, the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent would not
have been lulled into a false sense of security by their "treatment" and absolutely would never
have consented to the treatment rendered by the Defendant(s), all ofwhich resulted in the
hasteneddeath of Plaintiff(s')-Decedent, caused conscious pain and suffering, loss of the
Patient's autonomy, loss of sentient life in Decedent's terminal disease course and injuriesand
damages to the Pl|aintiff(s')-Decedent and the Plaintiff(s).
18
19 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
113. Defendant(s) failed to honor and act in accordance with the terms and
representations of any consent, informed or not, given by the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent.
114. By reason of the above premises, the medical "care" and "treatment" rendered and
afforded to the Plaintiff(s')-Decedent was without first obtaining an informed consent and, as
such, the Plaintiff(s) have been damaged in the amounts and manner aforesaid, in a substantial
sum of money to be determined by a court and jury, in excess of the jurisdictional limits of all
lower courts which would otherwise have jurisdiction over this action and Plaintiff(s) are entitled
to recover a Judgment against Defendant(s), jointly and severally, therefore.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff(s) ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and SCOTT
WEINBERGER demand Judgment against Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D.,
SOUTH SHORE HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., and LEONARD
KESSLER, M.D. on the First Cause ofAction and an Order removing Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN as Representative of the Estate of the Late Deborah (Weinberger) Rothman and
Substituting therefor Plaintiff ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM as Representative to
prosecute the claims herein; that the caption and Parties in these proceeding be So Substituted
and Amended in conformity with such Order; on each of the SECOND, THIRD and FOURTH
Causes ofAction in an amount to be determined by a jury at trial of this action, along with
punitive damages, jointly and severally, together with costs, interest and disbursements of this
action.
Dated: Bethpage, New YorkDecember 6, 2015
19
20 of 107
liSQS./l/or Pfainlijffls)
}26broadway.Suite2(MDclhpagc, New York 11714(S16) 942-0733
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
VERIFICATIONSTATE OF NEW YORK)
) SS.'COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM , beingswornsays;
I am the PlaintifFin the action herein; I have read the annexed Verified Complaint and know the contentsthereofandsame aretrueto myknowledge, except those mattersAcrein which arestatq44Qj)e alleged oninformation and belief, and as to those matters I believe them/fob^Ntrue.
ARIE EiNBERGER RAPADAM
SCOTT WEINBERGER, beingsworn saj«:
I am the Plaintiff in the action herein; I have read the annexed Verified Complaint and know the contentsthereof and same are true to my knowledge, except those matters therein which are stated to be alleged oninformation and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true.
SCOTT WEINBERGER
Sworn to BY AI^LLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and SCOTT WEINBERGER before methis December/',
NOTARY PUBLlt
I
rITi ft
STEVE XUNotary Public - State of New York
NO. 01XU6272758Qualified in Queens County
My Commission Expires Nnv iq 20I6
26
jsocntawpfiuzaNotey Pubic.
NeredAN69a94i^OwgadinlfiMiMwCiiWly
nflmmksiQnExpkas9/]9/ 2018.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
VERIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK)) SS.!
COUNTY OF NEW YORK)
ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM , being swom says:
I am the PlaintifTin the action herein; I have read the annexed Verified Complaint and know the contentsthereof and same are true to my knowledge,except those matters therein which are stated to be alleged oninformation and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true.
ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM
SCOTT WEINBERGER, being swom says:
I am the Plaintiff in the action herein; I have read th^annexed Verified Complaint and know the contentsthereofand same are tme to my knowledge, except those ma4 ;rs therein whijfh are st^d to be alleged oninformation and belief, and as to those matters I believe them io be inie
MO.0tHE61593814 OuaWWInBtonxCMTO\ -"'.-'i'Ti I F
Swom to BY.
this December 6,20IS
WEIIWERGI
SCOTT WEINBERGER before me
20
22 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ARIELLE WEINBERGER FAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER,
Plaintiffs,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.
X
X
Index#:
CERTIFICATE OF
MERIT
JOSEPH C. ANDRUZZI, an attorney duly admitted to the practice of law before the
courts of the State ofNew York Affirms under penally ofperjury:
1. I am associated with the offices of JOSEPH C. ANDRUZZI, ESQS., attorneys for
Plaintiff herein, am familiar with the relevant facts by review of Plaintiffs file and certify the
following pursuant to the provisions of Sec. 3012-a of the Civil Practice Laws and Rules:
2. I have reviewed the facts of this case and have consultedwith a physician licensed
to practicemedicine in the State of New York and who I believe is knowledgeable in the relevant
issues of this action.
3. I have concluded on the basis of such review and consultatiy! [i(s) that there isa
reasonable basis for the commencement of this action.
Dated: Bethpage, New YorkDecember 10, 2015
JOSEPH
23 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
2016--
2016-
2016-
2016-
2016-
2016-
2016-
2016-
-01.24-
-01.28-
-01.22-
-01.22-
-01.22-
-01.21-
-01.19-
-01.19-
•Exhib
•Exhib
•Exhib
•Exhib
•Exhib
•Exhib
•Exhib
•Exhib
t7...AFDCmplVerif(Abrams).pdf
t8...AFDCmplVerif(Levine).pdf
t9...AFDCmplVerif(Rhindress).pdf
t6...AFDCmplVerif(Gutleber).pdf
t5...AFDCmplVerif(Baum).pdf
t4...AFDCmplVerif(SchenkelMD).pdf
t11 ...AFDCmplVerif(Wolk).pdf
t10...AFDCmplVerif(Gad).pdf
24 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF NEW YORKARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER,
Plaintiff,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.
STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU ) ss.
X
Index#:|
AFFIDAVIT
VERIFICATION
AUx'm^o 1962 Lowell Lane Merrick, New York , • , , , ,MdCy ADrams , being duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. Reference is made to the Verified Complaint dated 12/10/2015.
2. I have read the annexed excerpt of the Verified Complaint and know the contents
of the paragraphs thereinspecifically identified on the attached and same are true to my
knowledge, except those matters therein which are stated to be alleged on informationand belief,
and as to those matters I believe them to be true.
Re^ectfidly Submitted,
/ Stacy Abrams
state of new YORK County of NASSAU ss:
On 1' ^ l| - before me, the undersigned, personally appeared Stacy Abramspersonally Imowi^ me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to tie the individual(s) vi/hose name(s) is(are) subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/theircapacify(les), and thatbyhis/her/theirsignature(s)onthe instrument, the individual(s), orthe personuponbehalfof\Mhichthe individuals) acted, executed the instrument.
(- —^: ^
(signature and acknowledgment)
NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK
No. 01G06003527
Qualified in Nassau County ^ ^-7..M . . M. 25 OE 107My Commission Exolro< Mnrrh no on lo
f!o 01G06003527a.joiineci in Co"n V ,°l„,.,.onExni-esMo.ch 09,20W
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Index#:COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER
Plaintiffs,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHORE
HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.X
1
Stacy Abrams, 1962 Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566 1 of 11
26 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
18. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
secretlyundertaking a courseofpalliativecare onlywithout the Patient's knowledge or consent,
and he never had any intention ofpursuing any medical options to extend her life.
20. From the earliest days of her diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN
departed from good and accepted medical practice in undertaking a course of"treatment" of the
Decedent consisting ofa steady regimen ofdrugging to unconsciousness and which otherwise
renderedthe Patientbed bound and sedentarywith little if any physical activitypermittedand he
departed from good and accepted medical practice in bizarre and radical departiue in depriving
the Patient ofnutritional support which caused shocking physical wasting and hastened the
Patient's loss ofsentient life and hasted her death.
21. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practicein administering oral mixtures and concoctions ofmorphine, lorazepam, zolpidem and
hydroxyzine and often without the Patient's consent or knowledge.
Stacy Abrams, 1962 Lowell l^ne Merrick, New York 11566 2of 1127 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
22. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering pain medications for no medically therapeutic or palliative purpose or
effect, but rather, in a course of"treatment" to induce the Patient almost continuous
unconsciousness and which otherwise rendered the cancer Patient wholly sedentary and bed
bound.
23. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each ofStacy Abrams, 1962
Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566,Plaintiff Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, 404 East 79ty
Street, #28C New York, New York 10075, Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brookville, New
York 11545, Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576, Toni Gad, 9801
Collins Ave Apt 15n, Bal Harbour, Florida, 33154 Susan Baum, Senior Clinical Specialist at
Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, residing at 1680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
18015 and Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 witnessed the
administration by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN ofconcoctions and mixtures ofMorphine,
Lorazepam, Zolpidem and Hydroxyzine in the Patient's drinks with Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN insisting that she consume them.
24. Each witnessed the administration of Morphine and other pain medications by
Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN under circumstances where the Patient was not in pain or
otherwise uncomfortable.
25. Each witnessed the Patient's attempts to protest or resist the drugging in order to
remain awake and functional, with Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN insisting and persuading
her to submit to the "treatment" time and time again.
26. Each witnessed the Patient routinely disoriented due to drugging, and witnessed
her struggling, unsuccessfully, to gain some control over her social interactions and some degree
ofcontrol and autonomyover her status and care, fighting the unconsciousness being continually
induced by the "treatment" inflicted upon her by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN.
27. In the first three-and-one-half weeks of Decedent's post-diagnosis disease course,
5
Stacy Abrams, 1962 Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566 3 of 11
28 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
Stacy Abrams witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN's administration ofhigh dose
Ativan, causing the Decedent to sleep 14 to 18 hours per day and during which period of time she
lost at least 30% of her body weight
6
Stacy Abrams, 1962 Lowell Lane Menick, New York 11566 4 of 11
29 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
37. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN stated and admitted to each of Stacy Abrams, Plaintiff Arielle (Weinberger)
Papadam, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieldview Lane, Bethlehem
Pennsylvania 18015, Toni Gad, Susan Baum and Charleen Rhindress that he would not consider
second medical opinions or consultations with readily available sub-specialists in
cholangiocarcinoma.
40. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Stacy Abrams on numerous
occasions "I'm the doctor and I know best for Debbie" despite Decedent's questions and protests
to being routinely medicated to unconsciousness from the very onset of the diagnosis in
September, 2013.
7
Stacy Abrams, 1962 Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566 5 of 11
30 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
42. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Stacy Abrams on numerous
occasions that he was "a much smarter physician than the Columbia doctors" and that he could
"administer the chemo [therapy treatments to Decedent] better than anyone."
8
Stacy Abrams, 1962 Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566 6 of 11
31 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
52. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
failing to follow even basic chemotherapy infusion protocols, including weight measurement and
the keeping ofappropriate medical record(s) of the Patient's vital signs and weight, necessary to
properly manage chemotherapy doses.
9
Stacy Abrams, 1962 Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566 7 of 11
32 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
63. Efforts by fnends and family to inform the Patient of alternatives to the "care"
being leveled upon her by the Defendant(s) were met with threats and actions by Defendant(s)
IVAN K. ROTHMAN to thwart any such communications and prevent information from
reaching the Patient.
64. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN's goal to prevent choice or consent on the
part of the Patient was perfected and furthered by a pattem of strong efforts to isolate her from
family, friends and personal support network and he threatened her family to submit to his
decision that the Patient remain uninformed and misinformed ofher diagnosis, uninformed and
misinformed ofher medical treatment and status, at all points through death, under penalty of
being "cutoff from access to the Decedent in her terminal disease course.
67. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN, without the Patient's consent, cancelled an
appointment in November, 2013 with Abby Siegel, M.D., a Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologist
at Columbia Presbyterian, and additionally, failed for many weeks prior to forward pertinent
records, as had been requested by the doctor in advance ofthe scheduled appointment, which the
Patient greatly desired.
Stacy Abrams, 1962 Lowell Lane Menick, New York 11566 8 of 11
33 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
73. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN warned Stacy Abrams that she should
counsel Susan Baum to stop researching available clinical trials and cease efforts to inform the
Patient of treatment options, under threat that he would complain to Baum's employer, Genentech
BioOncology-Rituxan, and seek to influence them to fire her from her employment.
74. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN threatened Stacy Abrams that "if [she] ever
wanted to see [her] friend alive again [she] would tell Susan [Baum] to cease and desist."
75. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN admitted to Stacy Abrams that he purposely
failed to inform the Patient that her cancer had metastasized to bone and failed to inform the
12
Stacy Abrams, 1962 Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566 9 of 11
34 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
Patient that her "PET scan lit up" "like a Christmas tree."
76. When the Decedent was made aware of some ofthese facts by third parties, she
protested to Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN her objections to his failure to keep her fully
informed of her status, to no avail.
78. Defendant('s) concerted efforts to prevent the Patient from even limited autonomy
over her body and choice in her care was furthered by a relentless pattern of isolation of the
Patient from her fnends and family.
79. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each of Stacy Abrams, Plaintiff
Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum,
Toni Gad and Kenneth M. Wolk witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN undertaking a
course of medical treatment, communication and conduct actively discouraging the Decedent's
physical movement, her reception of friends, family, well wishers and clergy and each witnessed
continuous interference with communications from her fnends and family.
13
Stacy Abrams, 1962 Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11586 10 of 11
35 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
89. In addition to the failure to inform the Patient of the nature of her condition or her
treatment options, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN made numerous statements to each of
Stacy Abrams, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum, Toni Gad and
Eric Schenkel, M.D. that the Decedent "would be better of dead"; that he wished she would just
not wake up; that he "needed to get on with his life" and that although he was acting as her
doctor, he was unwilling personally to participate in a lengthy disease course as a spouse,
something he had experienced with the sickness and death ofa prior wife.
90. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Stacy Abrams that he wanted this
death to be different than his first wife's cancer and care and that "[He] wasn't about to relive
those 6 years all over again."
15
Stacy Abrams, 1962 Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566 11 of 11
36 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF NEW YORKARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER,
Plaintiff,-against-
rVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D„ SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.
STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU )ss.;
Index#: |
AFFIDAVIT
VERIFICATION
Psnrii I m/inL' 426Toftree CourtNorth Hills, New York . . . , , ,Kanui Levine , being duly swom, deposes and says:
1. Reference is made to the Verified Complaint dated 12/10/2015.
2. I have read the annexed excerpt of the Verified Complaint and knowthe contents
of the paragraphs thereinspecifically identified on the attached and sameare true to my
knowledge, exceptthose matters thereinwhich are statedto be allegedon information and belief,
and as to those matters I believe them to be true.
Respectfully Subm
State of new YORK County of NASSAU ss:
On V^ ^ before me, the undersigned, personally appeared Randi Levinepersonally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is(are) subscribed to the within in^ment and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her^eircapacity(ies), and thatby his/hewwirsignaturefs) on the instrument, the individual(s), orthe person upon behalf ofwhichthe indlvidual(s) acted, execut^thq instrument.
(signature andoffice/of inaivldudytaking aclmowfedgment)
37 of 107
SUZANNE FASSBERGnotary PUBLiC-STATE OF NEW VORK
NO. 01FA6034978Quollfled in Queens County
MV CommUilon M\t9% December 20 J
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Index#:COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER
Plaintiffs,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.X
1
Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576 1 of 11
38 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
18. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
secretly undertaking a course of palliative care only without the Patient's knowledge or consent,
and he never had any intention of pursuing any medical options to extend her life.
20. From the earliest days of her diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN
departed from good and accepted medical practice in undertaking a course of"treatment" of the
Decedent consisting ofa steady regimen ofdrugging to unconsciousness and which otherwise
rendered the Patient bed bound and sedentary with little if any physical activity permitted and he
departed from good and accepted medical practice in bizarre and radical departure in depriving
the Patient of nutritional support which caused shocking physical wasting and hastened the
Patient's loss ofsentient life and hasted her death.
21. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering oral mixtures and concoctions ofmorphine, lorazepam, zolpidem and
hydroxyzine and often without the Patient's consent or knowledge.
Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Coi^ North Hills, New York 11576 2of 1139 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
22. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering pain medications for no medically therapeutic or palliative purpose or
effect, but rather, in a course of"treatment" to induce the Patient almost continuous
unconsciousness and which otherwise rendered the cancer Patient wholly sedentary and bed
bound.
23. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each of Stacy Abrams, 1962
Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566, PlaintiffArielle (Weinberger) Papadam, 404 East 79ty
Street, #28C New York, New York 10075, Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brookville, New
York 11545, Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576, Toni Gad, 9801
Collins Ave Apt 15n, Bal Harbour, Florida, 33154 Susan Baum, Senior Clinical Specialist at
Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, residing at 1680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
18015 and Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 witnessed the
administration by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN ofconcoctions and mixtures ofMorphine,
Lorazepam, Zolpidem and Hydroxyzine in the Patient's drinks with Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN insisting that she consume them.
24. Each witnessed the administration of Morphine and other pain medications by
Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN under circumstances where the Patient was not in pain or
otherwise uncomfortable.
25. Each witnessed the Patient's attempts to protest or resist the drugging in order to
remain awake and functional, with Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN insisting and persuading
her to submit to the "treatment" time and time again.
26. Each wimessed the Patient routinely disoriented due to drugging, and witnessed
her struggling, unsuccessfully, to gain some control over her social interactions and some degree
of control and autonomy over her status and care, fighting the unconsciousness being continually
induced by the "treatment" inflicted upon her by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN.
5
Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576 3 of 11
40 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
28. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN emphatically stated to Randi Levine that "it
was fine" for the Patient "to sleep and not eat."
29. On at least one occasion within the first three weeks after diagnosis, Randi Levine
witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN mix a drink ofAtivan, Ambien and Morphine and
insist that the Decedent drink it, in spite of her protests and communication that she was not in
pain, the "treatment" causing the Decedent to sleep continuously for days.
30. Randi Levine witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN administer high dose
unconsciousness inducing drugging over the Patient's protest on numerous occasions.
31. When questioned by Randi Levine as to the utility ofsuch drugging in the
Decedent's care and treatment, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated on several occasions
"that [the Decedent] had no chance, she [was] doomed;" and additionally, that he was "already
making plans for his life without her."
6
Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576 4 of 11
41 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
37. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN stated and admitted to each ofStacy Abrams, Plaintiff Arielle (Weinberger)
Papadam, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieldview Lane, Bethlehem
Pennsylvania 18015, Toni Gad, Susan Baum and Charleen Rhindress that he would not consider
second medical opinions or consultations with readily available sub-specialists in
cholangiocarcinoma.
38. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Randi Levine that she had "nerve"
to question his medical judgment.
39. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN repeatedly stated and claimed to Randi
Levine "that [he was] the best oncologist; [that he] knew more than any other doctor, [and that
he] should be left to do what he wished."
41. Despite the Patient being lead to believe early in her disease course that
7
Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576 5 of 11
42 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
sub-specialists (Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology) at Columbia PresbyterianHospital were
being consulted for her treatment plan and would follow up and participate in her care,
Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Randi Levine that he "was not going to follow
through with that;" that "[he] was not going to go through [an extensive disease course] with
another sick wife;" that he "would [only] keep [Decedent] comfortable but she had no chance of
beating this cancer;" "that [Decedent] Debbie [Rothman] would be gone within a few weeks,
maybe a month maximum;" that "[He] knew this because [he] was an expert."
8
Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576 6 of 11
43 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
63. Efforts by friends and family to inform the Patient ofaltematives to the "care"
being leveledupon her by the Defendant(s) were met with threats and actions by Defendant(s)
IVAN K. ROTHMAN to thwart any such communications and prevent information from
reaching the Patient.
64. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN's goal to prevent choice or consent on the
part of the Patient was perfected and furthered by a pattem of strong efforts to isolate her from
family, fnends and personal support network and he threatened her family to submit to his
decision that the Patient remain uninformed and misinformed ofher diagnosis, uninformed and
misinformed ofher medical treatment and status, at all points through death, under penalty of
being "cutoff from access to the Decedent in her terminal disease course.
67. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN, without the Patient's consent, cancelled an
appointment in November, 2013 with Abby Siegel, M.D., a GastrointestinalMedical Oncologist
at Columbia Presbyterian, and additionally, failed for many weeks prior to forward pertinent
records, as had been requested by the doctor in advance of the scheduled appointment, which the
Patient greatly desired.
68. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN admitted to Randi Levine that he cancelled
the Columbia appointment and was simply "not going to follow through" with consideration of
life extending treatment options because "he was not going to go through this again with another
11
Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576 7 of 11
44 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
sick wife," but rather, that it was his plan only to "keepher comfortable but she had no chance of
beating this cancer" and that she "would be gone within a few weeks maybe a month maximum."
71. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN instructed Randi Levine that "he did not want
any of her friends to tell [the Decedent] how sick she was."
12
Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576
45 of 107
8 Of 11
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
76. When the Decedent was made aware of some ofthese facts by third parties, she
protested to Defendant(s) IVANK. ROTHMAN her objections to his failure to keep her fully
informed ofher status, to no avail.
78. Defendant('s) concerted efforts to prevent the Patient from even limited autonomy
over her body and choice in her care was furthered by a relentless pattem of isolation of the
Patient from her friends and family.
79. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each of Stacy Abrams, Plaintiff
Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum,
Toni Gad and Kenneth M. Wolk witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN undertakinga
course of medical treatment, communication and conduct actively discouraging the Decedent's
physicalmovement, her receptionof friends, family, well wishers and clergyand each witnessed
continuous interference with communications from her friends and family.
13
Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576 9 of 11
46 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
89. In addition to the failure to inform the Patient of the nature of her condition or her
treatment options, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN made numerous statements to each of
Stacy Abrams, Charieen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum, Toni Gad and
Eric Schenkel, M.D. that the Decedent "would be better of dead"; that he wished she would just
not wake up; that he "needed to get on with his life" and that althoughhe was acting as her
doctor, he was unwilling personally to participate in a lengthydisease course as a spouse,
something he had experienced with the sickness and death of a prior wife.
91. Similarly, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Randi Levine that he was
not prepared to deal with a lengthy illness and that he simply wanted the Decedent to die as
quickly as possible.
95. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN admitted to Randi Levine that he mislead the
Patient about following-up with the Columbia treatment plan, and told Randi Levine "that he was
not going to follow through with that because he was not going to go through this again with
another sick wife;" that he "would keep her comfortable but she had no chance of beating this
cancer;" and that he "would start dating immediately."
96. Within days of the diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Randi
15
Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11676 10 of 11
47 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
Levinethat he had already"gottenover" her "impending death;" and that from "the moment[the
decedent] was diagnosed [that] she was terminal"; he declared that "there was no hope or help for
[her] and that she [would] be dead within weeks."
16 '
Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576 11 of 11
48 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF NEW YORKARIELLE WEINBERGER PAFADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER,
Plaintiff,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.
STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK )ss.
Index#:!
AFFIDAVIT
VERIFICATION
11 Arden Court Melville,New York < j • ^ .Cnarieen Rhindress , beingdulysworn, deposes and says:
1. RefCTence is made to the Verified Complaint dated 12/10/2015.
2. I have read the annexed excerpt of the Verified Complaint and know the contents
of the paragraphstherein specifically identified on the attached and same are true to my
knowledge,except those matters therein which are stated to be alleged on informationand belief,
and as to those matters 1 believe them to be true.
state of new YORK County of SUFFOLK
R^ectfully Submitted,/II I J 'tjKffhxJjl/A .kJu iCharleen Rhindress
ss;
On o// l>efore me, the undersigned, personally appeared Charleen Rhindresspersonally knownto me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the individua](s) whose name(s) is(are) subscribed to the wittilninstmment and acknowledged to me that he/she/lhey executed the same in his/her/theircapacity(l88),andthatbyhts/her/theirsignature(s)on the Instrument,the indlvldual(s),or the person upon behalf ofwhichthe tndividual(s) acted, executed the Instrument.
(signature an^ of Individuai taKlndiidtnowtedgment)
49 of 107
NMCrjSCARMGaiANOWirMucsrAiEOPNeiinaK
WSSNIOOUNIYUC.iffljSOB22Stfl3
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Index#:COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER
Plaintiffs,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.X
1
Charieen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 1 of 9
50 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
18. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
secretly undertaking a course of palliative care only without the Patient's knowledge or consent,
and he never had any intention of pursuing any medical options to extend her life.
20. From the earliest days ofher diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN
departed from good and accepted medical practice in undertaking a course of "treatment" of the
Decedent consisting ofa steady regimen ofdrugging to unconsciousness and which otherwise
rendered the Patient bed bound and sedentary with little if any physical activity permitted and he
departed from good and accepted medical practice in bizarre and radical departure in depriving
the Patient of nutritional support which caused shocking physical wasting and hastened the
Patient's loss of sentient life and hasted her death.
21. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering oral mixtures and concoctions ofmorphine, lorazepam, zolpidem and
hydroxyzine and often without the Patient's consent or knowledge.
Charieen Rhindress, 11 Arden^ourt Melville, New York 11741 2of 951 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
22. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering pain medications for no medically therapeutic or palliative purpose or
effect, but rather, in a course of"treatment" to induce the Patient almost continuous
unconsciousness and which otherwise rendered the cancer Patient wholly sedentary and bed
bound.
23. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each of Stacy Abrams, 1962
Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566,Plaintiff Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, 404 East 79ty
Street, #28C New York, New York 10075, Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brookville, New
York 11545, Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576, Toni Gad, 9801
Collins Ave Apt 15n,Bal Harbour, Florida, 33154 Susan Baum, Senior Clinical Specialist at
Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, residing at 1680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
18015 and Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 witnessed the
administration by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN ofconcoctions and mixtures ofMorphine,
Lorazepam, Zolpidem and Hydroxyzine in the Patient's drinks with Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN insisting that she consume them.
24. Each witnessed the administration of Morphine and other pain medications by
Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN under circumstances where the Patient was not in pain or
otherwise uncomfortable.
25. Each witnessed the Patient's attempts to protest or resist the drugging in order to
remain awake and functional, with Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN insisting and persuading
her to submit to the "treatment" time and time again.
26. Each witnessed the Patient routinely disoriented due to drugging, and witnessed
her struggling, unsuccessfully, to gain some control over her social interactions and some degree
ofcontrol and autonomy over her status and care, fighting the unconsciousnessbeing continually
induced by the "treatment" inflicted upon her by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN.
5
Charieen Rhindress. 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 3 of 9
52 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
37. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN stated and admitted to each of Stacy Abrams, PlaintiffArielle (Weinberger)
Papadam, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieldview Lane, Bethlehem
Pennsylvania 18015, Toni Gad, Susan Baum and Charleen Rhindress that he would not consider
second medical opinions or consultations with readily available sub-specialists in
cholangiocarcinoma.
7
Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melvllle. New York 11741 4 of 9
53 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
47. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Charleen Rhindress that he "[didn't]
need another opinion" in the Patient's care and treatment and exclaimed that he was the "Doctor
and know[s] what she needs!" responsive to Charleen Rhindress' suggestion that he was "too
close to the situation to make these decisions alone."
8
Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741
54 Of 107
5 Of 9
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
63. Efforts by fnends and family to inform the Patient of altematives to the "care"
being leveled upon her by the Defendant(s) were met with threats and actions by Defendant(s)
IVAN K. ROTHMAN to thwart any such communications and prevent information from
reaching the Patient.
64. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN's goal to prevent choice or consent on the
part ofthe Patient was perfected and furthered by a pattem ofstrong efforts to isolate her from
family, friends and personal support network and he threatened her family to submit to his
decision that the Patient remain uninformed and misinformed ofher diagnosis, uninformed and
misinformed ofher medical treatment and status, at all points through death, under penalty of
being "cutoff" from access to the Decedent in her terminal disease course.
67. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN, without the Patient's consent, cancelled an
appointment in November, 2013 with Abby Siegel, M.D., a Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologist
at Columbia Presbyterian, and additionally, failed for many weeks prior to forward pertinent
records, as had been requested by the doctor in advance of the scheduled appointment, which the
Patient greatly desired.
Charieen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 6 of 9
55 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
76. When the Decedent was made aware of some ofthese facts by third parties, she
protested to Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN her objections to his failure to keep her fully
informed ofher status, to no avail.
78. Defendant(*s) concerted efforts to prevent the Patient from even limited autonomy
over her body and choice in her care was furthered by a relentless pattern of isolation of the
Patient from her fnends and family.
79. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each ofStacy Abrams, Plaintiff
Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum,
Toni Gad and Kenneth M. Wolk witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN imdertaking a
course of medical treatment, communication and conduct actively discouraging the Decedent's
physical movement, her reception of friends, family, well wishers and clergy and each witnessed
continuous interference with communications from her friends and family.
80. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN informed Charleen Rhindress that he
"banned" long time friends Susan Baum and Eric Schenkel, M.D. from the Decedent's home
during her convalescence and that he did not want the Decedent to talk to or see Fran Gutleber
and other fnends.
81. On numerous occasions, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN commimicated
refusals to the Decedent's requests for access to her cell phone and home phone in the presence
ofCharleen Rhindress. The Decedent informed him that she wanted to speak to her friends. On
several occasions he replied, "You don't need to speak with them," in the presence ofCharleen
Rhindress.
13
Charleen Rhindress. 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 7 of 9
56 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
82. On several occasions, in the presence ofCharleen Rhindress, Defendant(s) IVAN
K. ROTHMAN actively dissuaded Decedent from getting out ofbed to receive visitors in her
living room.
83. On many occasions Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN rebuffed Charleen
Rhindress' calls and requests to visit the Decedent during her disease course, answering
repeatedly, "It's not a good time."
84. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN requested and directed that Charleen
Rhindress remove herself from the Decedent's bedside and home when the Decedent started
asking Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN questions about her care and prognosis; Defendant(s)
IVAN K. ROTHMAN commanded "Charleen, 1need you to leave now!"
14
Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 8 of 9
57 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
89. In addition to the failure to inform the Patient of the nature of her condition or her
treatment options, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN made numerous statements to each of
Stacy Abrams, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum, Toni Gad and
Eric Schenkel, M.D. that the Decedent "would be better ofdead"; that he wished she would just
not wake up; that he "needed to get on with his life" and that although he was acting as her
doctor, he was unwilling personally to participate in a lengthy disease course as a spouse,
something he had experienced with the sickness and death of a prior wife.
92. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Charleen Rhindress on at least two
occasions that "[he] just wish[ed] she wouldn't wake up again."
15
Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 9 of 9
58 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF NEW YORKARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and AinnnAvrrSCOTT WEINBERGER,
Plaintiff,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M,D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.
Index#:
VERIFICATION
STATEOF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU )SS.:
E:»^n 87 FruWedge Road Brookville, New York , . . , . ,rran VjUtieDer ^^5^5 , being duly sworn, deposesand says:
1. Reference is made to the Verified Complaint dated 12/10/2015.
2. I have read the annexed excerpt of the Verified Complaint and know die contents
of the paragraphs therein specifically identified on the attached and same are true to my
knowledge, except those matters therein which are stated to be alleged on information and belief^
and as to those matters I believe them to be true.
Respectfully Submitted,
Fran Gutiroer
state of new YORK County of NASSAU ss:
On jTci/lUd/y before me, the undersigned, personally appeared Fran Gutleberpersonallyknown to me or provedto me on the tjasis of satisfactory evidence to be the indlvldual(8) whose namefs) is(are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/herAheircapacity(les), and that byhis/her/their signature(s)on the Instrument,the Individual(s), or the person upon behalfofwhichthe individual(s) acted, executed the instrument
•nature(signature and office of individual taking acknowiedgment)
ANGELA MADURANotaiy Public. State of New Voik
No. 0fMA6330427Ouaflfied in Nassau County; A
Commlsakin Ejqpiraa S/MiMLlj
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Index#:COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER
Plaintiffs,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.X
1
Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brookville, New York 11545 1 of 10
60 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
18. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
secretly undertaking a courseof palliativecare onlywithout the Patient's knowledge or consent,
and he never had any intention ofpursuing any medical options to extend her life.
20. From the earliest days of her diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN
departed from good and accepted medical practice in undertaking a course of"treatment" of the
Decedent consisting of a steady regimen ofdrugging to unconsciousness and which otherwise
rendered the Patient bed bound and sedentarywith little ifany physicalactivitypermittedand he
departed from good and accepted medical practice in bizarre and radical departure in depriving
the Patient ofnutritional support which caused shocking physical wasting and hastened the
Patient's loss of sentient life and hasted her death.
21. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administeringoral mixtures and concoctions ofmorphine, lorazepam, zolpidem and
hydroxyzineand often without the Patient's consent or knowledge.
Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Rgad Brookville, New York 11545 2of 1061 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
22. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering pain medications for no medically therapeutic or palliative purpose or
effect, but rather, in a course of"treatment" to induce the Patient almost continuous
unconsciousness and which otherwise rendered the cancer Patient wholly sedentary and bed
bound.
23. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each ofStacy Abrams, 1962
Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566,Plaintiff Arielle (Weinberger)Papadam, 404 East 79ty
Street, #28C New York, New York 10075, Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brookville, New
York 11545, Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576, Toni Gad, 9801
Collins Ave Apt 15n, Bal Harbour, Florida, 33154 Susan Baum, Senior Clinical Specialist at
Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, residing at 1680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
18015 and Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 witnessed the
administration by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN ofconcoctions and mixtures ofMorphine,
Lorazepam, Zolpidem and Hydroxyzine in the Patient's drinks with Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN insisting that she consume them.
24. Each witnessed the administration of Morphine and other pain medications by
Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN under circumstances where the Patient was not in pain or
otherwise uncomfortable.
25. Each witnessed the Patient's attempts to protest or resist the drugging in order to
remain awake and functional, with Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN insisting and persuading
her to submit to the "treatment" time and time again.
26. Each witnessed the Patient routinely disoriented due to drugging, and witnessed
her struggling, unsuccessfully, to gain some control over her social interactions and some degree
ofcontrol and autonomy over her status and care, fighting the unconsciousness being continually
induced by the "treatment" inflicted upon her by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN.
5
Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brookville, New York 11545 3 of 10
62 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
32. Fran Gutleber suggested that Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN administer less
drugging in order that the Decedentcould be awake, functional, moving and eating,but he
dismissed Fran Gutleber stating "that [he] knew what she neededand there was nothing to
discuss;" "she was going to die."
33. When Fran Gutleber questioned Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN on the issue
ofMorphineadministration as she had observedthe Decedent to be comfortable and in no pain,
he again dismissed her, insisting that "[he] knew best."
34. Fran Gutleber witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN actively
discouraging the Patient from gettingout ofbed and walking around, telling her that she was "too
weak and should just stay in bed and rest."
6 ^Fran Gutleber, 87 Frultledge Road Brookville, New York 11545 4 of 10
63 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
37. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN stated and admitted to each ofStacy Abrams, PlaintiffArielle (Weinberger)
Papadam, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieldview Lane, Bethlehem
Pennsylvania 18015, Toni Gad, Susan Baum and Charleen Rhindress that he would not consider
second medical opinions or consultations with readily available sub-specialists in
cholangiocarcinoma.
7
Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brookvllle, New York 11545 5 of 10
64 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
46. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Fran Gutleber that "he knew what
she [the Decedent] needed and there was nothing to discuss," on the issues ofDecedent's
management and regarding second opinions or collaboration with sub-specialists; declaring with
resignation that he "was the expert doctor and she was going to die."
8
Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brookviiie, New York 11545 6 of 10
65 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
63. Efforts by friends and family to inform the Patient ofalternatives to the "care"
being leveled upon her by the Defendant(s) were met with threats and actions by Defendant(s)
IVAN K. ROTHMAN to thwart any such communications and prevent information from
reaching the Patient.
64. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN's goal to prevent choice or consent on the
part of the Patient was perfected and furthered by a pattem of strong efforts to isolate her from
family, friends and personal support network and he threatened her family to submit to his
decision that the Patient remain uninformed and misinformed ofher diagnosis, uninformed and
misinformed ofher medical treatment and status, at all points through death, under penalty of
being "cutoff from access to the Decedent in her terminal disease course.
67. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN, without the Patient's consent, cancelled an
appointment in November, 2013 with Abby Siegel, M.D., a Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologist
at Columbia Presbyterian, and additionally, failed for many weeks prior to forward pertinent
records, as had been requested by the doctor in advance of the scheduled appointment, which the
Patient greatly desired.
11
Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brcokville, New York 11545 7 of 10
66 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
76. When the Decedent was made aware of some ofthese facts by third parties, she
protested to Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN her objections to his failure to keep her fully
informed of her status, to no avail.
78. Defendant('s) concerted efforts to prevent the Patient from even limited autonomy
over her body and choice in her care was furthered by a relentless pattem of isolation of the
Patient from her fnends and family.
79. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each of Stacy Abrams, Plaintiff
Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum,
Toni Gad and Kenneth M. Wolk witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN undertaking a
course ofmedical treatment, conununication and conduct actively discouraging the Decedent's
physical movement, her reception of friends, family, well wishers and clergy and each witnessed
continuous interference with communications from her friends and family.
13 '
Fran Gutleber, 87 Fmitledge Road Brookville. New York 11545 8 of 10
67 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
85. In the presence of Fran Gutleber, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN refused the
Decedent's request that she be allowed downstairs to sit on the patio on a beautiful sunny day
and visit with her fnend.
86. On many occasions Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN rebuffed Fran Gutleber's
calls and requests to visit the Decedent during her disease course, starting on repeated occasions,
"[she] was too tired, too sick," and "it would be for the best if [the Patient] would just die that
day."
14
Fran Gutleber, 87 Frultledge Road Brookville, New York 11545 9 of 10
68 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
89. In addition to the failure to inform the Patient of the nature of her condition or her
treatment options, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN made numerous statements to each of
Stacy Abrams, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum, Toni Gad and
Eric Schenkel, M.D. that the Decedent "would be better ofdead"; that he wished she would just
not wake up; that he "needed to get on with his life" and that although he was acting as her
doctor, he was unwilling personally to participate in a lengthy disease course as a spouse,
something he had experienced with the sickness and death ofa prior wife.
93. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Fran Gutleber that "it would be for
the best if [the Decedent] would just die that day."
15
Fran Gutleber, 87 Frultledge Road Brookville, New York 11545 10 of 10
69 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF NEW YORKARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER,
Plaintijf,-against-
IVAN K ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNTY OF LEHIGH ) ss.:
Index#:
AFFIDAVIT
VERIFICATION
Susan Baum1680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem,Pennsylvania 18015 , being duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. Reference is made to the Verified Complaint dated 12/10/2015.
2. 1have read the annexed excerpt of the Verified Complaint and know the contents
of the paragraphs therein specifically identified on the attached and same are true to my
knowledge, except those matters therein which are stated to be alleged on information and belief,
and as to those matters 1 believe them to be true.
Respectfully Submitted, W
Susan Baum
ssLenHflMstate of PENNSYLVANIA County of
On before me, the undersigned, personally appeared Susan Baumpersonallyknown to me or provedto me on the basis of satisfactoryevidence to be the indivldual(s) whose name(s) Is(are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/theircapacity{ies)^aR^albyhis/herfthelrsignature(s)on the instrument, the Indivldual(s), or the person upon behalfofwhichtheIndividual acted, executed theinstrument.
'' I
^findiviMal takingacknowledgment)
/70'of 107
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
NOTARIAL SEALTeresa A Oartouzos. Notaiy Public
HeHertown Boro, Northampton CountyMyCommission Expires May17. 2017
(EUBER. PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF NOTARIES
\
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Index#:COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER
Plaintiffs,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.X
1
Susan Baum. Senior Clinical Specialist. Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, 1 of 101680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
71 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
18. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
secretly undertaking a course of palliative care only without the Patient's knowledge or consent,
and he never had any intention of pursuing any medical options to extend her life.
20. From the earliest days ofher diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN
departed from good and accepted medical practice in undertaking a course of"treatment" of the
Decedent consisting ofa steady regimen ofdrugging to unconsciousness and which otherwise
rendered the Patient bed bound and sedentary with little if any physical activity permitted and he
departed from good and accepted medical practice in bizarre and radical departure in depriving
the Patient of nutritional support which caused shocking physical wasting and hastened the
Patient's loss of sentient life and hasted her death.
21. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering oral mixtures and concoctions ofmorphine, lorazepam, zolpidem and
hydroxyzine and often without the Patient's consent or knowledge.
Susan Baum, Senior Clinicai Special^t, Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, 2 of101680 Fleldvlew Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
72 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
22. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering pain medications for no medically therapeutic or palliative purposeor
effect, but rather, in a course of "treatment" to induce the Patient almost continuous
unconsciousness and which otherwise renderedthe cancerPatientwhollysedentary and bed
bound.
23. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each ofStacy Abrams, 1962
Lowell Lane Merrick,New York 11566, PlaintiffArielle (Weinberger) Papadam,404 East 79ty
Street, #28C New York,New York 10075, Fran Gutleber,87 FruitledgeRoad Brookville, New
York 11545, Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576, Toni Gad, 9801
CollinsAve Apt 15n,Bal Harbour, Florida, 33154 SusanBaum, SeniorClinicalSpecialist at
Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, residing at 1680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
18015 and Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 witnessed the
administration by Defendant(s) IVANK. ROTHMAN ofconcoctions and mixturesofMorphine,
Lorazepam, Zolpidem and Hydroxyzine in the Patient's drinks with Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN insisting that she consume them.
24. Each witnessed the administration ofMorphine and other pain medications by
Defendant(s) IVANK. ROTHMAN under circumstances where the Patient was not in pain or
otherwise uncomfortable.
25. Each witnessed the Patient's attempts to protest or resist the drugging in order to
remain awake and functional, with Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN insisting and persuading
her to submit to the "treatment" time and time again.
26. Each witnessed the Patient routinely disoriented due to drugging, and witnessed
her struggling, imsuccessfully, to gain some control over her social interactions and some degree
ofcontroland autonomy over her status and care, fighting the unconsciousness being continually
induced by the "treatment" inflicted upon her by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN.
Susan Baum, Senior ClinicalSpecialist, Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, 3 of 101680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
73 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
37. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN stated and admitted to each of StacyAbrams,Plaintiff Arieile (Weinberger)
Papadam, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieldview Lane, Bethlehem
Pennsylvania 18015, Toni Gad, Susan Baum and Charleen Rhindress that he would not consider
second medical opinions or consultations with readily available sub-specialists in
cholangiocarcinoma.
Susan Baum, Senior CtinlcaiSpecialist, Genentech BioOncology-Rltuxan, 4 of 101680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
74 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
43. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Susan Baum that the
'[sub-specialist] doctor(s) at Columbia are good, but I'm a much better oncologist.
8
Susan Baum, Senior Clinical Specialist, Genentech BicOncology-Rituxan,1680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
75 of 107
5 Of 10
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
52. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
failing to follow even basic chemotherapy infusion protocols, including weight measurement and
the keeping of appropriate medical record(s) of the Patient's vital signs and weight, necessary to
properly manage chemotherapy doses.
Susan Baum, Senior ClinicalSpecialist, Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, 6 of 101680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
76 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
63. Efforts by friends and family to inform the Patient ofaltematives to the "care"
being leveled upon her by the Defendant(s) were met with threats and actions by Defendant(s)
IVAN K. ROTHMAN to thwart any such conununications and prevent information from
reaching the Patient.
64. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN^s goal to prevent choice or consent on the
part of the Patient was perfected and furthered by a pattem of strong efforts to isolate her from
family, friends and personal support network and he threatened her family to submit to his
decision that the Patient remain uninformed and misinformed ofher diagnosis, uninformed and
misinformed ofher medical treatment and status, at all points through death, under penalty of
being "cutoff' from access to the Decedent in her terminal disease course.
67. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN, without the Patient's consent, cancelled an
appointment in November, 2013 with Abby Siegel, M.D., a Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologist
at Columbia Presbyterian, and additionally, failed for many weeks prior to forward pertinent
records, as had been requested by the doctor in advance of the scheduled appointment, which the
Patient greatly desired.
11
Susan Baum, Senior Cilnlcai Specialist, Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, 7 of 101680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
77 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
73. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN warned Stacy Abrams that she should
counsel Susan Baum to stop researching available clinical trials and cease efforts to inform the
Patient of treatment options, under threat that he would complain to Baum's employer, Genentech
BioOncology-Rituxan, and seek to influence them to fire her from her employment.
74. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN threatened Stacy Abrams that "if [she] ever
wanted to see [her] friend alive again [she] would tell Susan [Baum] to cease and desist."
12
Susan Baum, Senior Ctinicai Specialist, Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, 8 of 101680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
78 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
76. When the Decedent was made aware of some of these facts by third parties, she
protested to Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN her objections to his failure to keep her fully
informed of her status, to no avail.
78. Defendant('s) concerted efforts to prevent the Patient from even limited autonomy
over her body and choice in her care was furthered by a relentless pattern of isolation of the
Patient from her fnends and family.
79. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each ofStacy Abrams, Plaintiff
Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum,
Toni Gad and Kenneth M. Wolk witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN undertaking a
course of medical treatment, communication and conduct actively discouraging the Decedent's
physical movement, her reception of friends, family, well wishers and clergy and each witnessed
continuous interference with communications from her friends and family.
80. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN informed Charleen Rhindress that he
"banned" long time friends Susan Baum and Eric Schenkel, M.D. from the Decedent's home
during her convalescence and that he did not want the Decedent to talk to or see Fran Gutleber
and other fnends.
13
Susan Baum. Senior Clinical Specialist, Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, 9 of 101680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
79 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
89. In addition to the failure to inform the Patient of the nature of her condition or her
treatment options, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN made numerous statements to each of
Stacy Abrams, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum, Toni Gad and
Eric Schenkel, M.D. that the Decedent "would be better of dead"; that he wished she would just
not wake up; that he "needed to get on with his life" and that although he was acting as her
doctor, he was unwilling personally to participate in a lengthy disease course as a spouse,
something he had experienced with the sickness and death ofa prior wife.
94. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Susan Baum "she'd be better off
dead. It would be a blessing if she didn't wake up tomorrow."
15
Susan Baum, Senior Clinlcai Specialist, Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, 10 of 101680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
80 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF NEW YORKARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER,
Plaintiff,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D.. SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.
STATE OF Pennsylvania , COUNTY OF Lehigh
Index#:
AFFIDAVIT
VERIFICATION
) ss.:
ERIC SCHENKEL , being duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. 1am a physician licensed to the practice of medicine in the State of Pennsylvania.
2. Reference is made to the Verified Complaint dated 12/10/2015.
3. 1have read the annexed excerpt ofthe Verified Complaint and know the contents
of the paragraphs therein specifically identified on the attached and same are true to my
knowledge, as opinions are so stated within a reasonable degree of professional certainty, except
those matters therein which are stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those
matters 1 believe them to be true.
Respectfully Submitted.
ERIC SCHENKEL, M.D.
State of Pennsylvania . County of Lohi^ ss; /fjr-
On '7A''uA''y 2-1, zc>(f before me, the undersigned, personally appeared ERIC SCHENKEL. M,D,personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
lndividual(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/theyexecuted the same In his/her/their capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their slgnature(s) on the instrument, the individual(s),or the person upon behalf of which the individual(s) acted, executed the instrument.
(signature and officeof individual taking acknowledgment)
81 of 107
COMMONWEAI.THQP PEKN8YLVANIAULTHOPI
NOTARliksBALSusn S. DoOgKomy Public
BctfaldicmTwpbNortm^Coo Oom^MycommltriDa explrts luN 11,2019
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Index#:COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER
Plaintiffs.-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.X
1
Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieldview Lane, Bethlehem Pennsylvania 18015 1 of 10
82 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
18. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
secretly undertaking a course of palliative care only without the Patient's knowledge or consent,
and he never had any intention of pursuing any medical options to extend her life.
19. Soon after her diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN admitted to Eric
Schenkel, M.D. that his treatment plan would not be revealed to the Patient and that he would
undertake "palliative care [only]" and "never had any intention of trying to research assistance to
extend her life."
20. From the earliest days of her diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN
departed from good and accepted medical practice in undertaking a course of"treatment" of the
Decedent consisting ofa steady regimen ofdrugging to unconsciousness and which otherwise
rendered the Patient bed bound and sedentary with little if any physical activity permitted and he
departed from good and accepted medical practice in bizarre and radical departiue in depriving
the Patient of nutritional support which caused shocking physical wasting and hastened the
Patient's loss ofsentient life and hasted her death.
21. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering oral mixtures and concoctions ofmorphine, lorazepam, zolpidem and
hydroxyzine and often without the Patient's consent or knowledge.
Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fleldview]jane, Bethlehem Pennsylvania 18015 2of 1083 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
22, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering pain medications for no medically therapeutic or palliative purpose or
effect, but rather, in a course of"treatment" to induce the Patient almost continuous
unconsciousness and which otherwise rendered the cancer Patient wholly sedentary and bed
bound.
5
Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fleldvlew Lane, Bethlehem Pennsylvania 18015 3 of 10
84 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
37. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN stated and admitted to each of Stacy Abrams, PlaintiffArielle (Weinberger)
Papadam, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieldview Lane, Bethlehem
Permsylvania 18015, Toni Gad, Susan Baum and Charleen Rhindress that he would not consider
second medical opinions or consultations with readily available sub-specialists in
cholangiocarcinoma.
7
Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieldview Lane, Bethlehem Pennsylvania 18015 4 of 10
85 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
44. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN declared to Eric Schenkel, M.D. that he
would be making all medical decisions for the Patient unilaterally and that he was "smarter" than
available sub-specialists in cholangiocarcinoma at Columbia Presbyterian; that he was "not open
to any ideas on clinical trials or other life saving measures."
45. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Eric Schenkel, M.D. that the
"[sub-specialist] doctor at Columbia is good, but Vm a much better oncologist."
8
Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fleldvlew Lane, Bethlehem Pennsylvania 18015 5 of 10
86 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
52. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
failing to follow even basic chemotherapy infusion protocols, including weight measurement and
the keeping ofappropriate medical record(s) of the Patient's vital signs and weight, necessary to
properly manage chemotherapy doses.
9
Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieldview Lane, Bethlehem Pennsylvania 18015 6 of 10
87 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
63. Efforts by friends and family to inform the Patient of altematives to the "care"
being leveled upon her by the Defendant(s)were met with threats and actions by Defendant(s)
rVAN K. ROTHMAN to thwart any such communications and prevent information from
reaching the Patient.
64. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN's goal to prevent choice or consent on the
part of the Patient was perfected and furthered by a pattem of strong efforts to isolate her from
family, friends and personal support network and he threatened her family to submit to his
decision that the Patient remain uninformed and misinformed ofher diagnosis, uninformed and
misinformed ofher medical treatment and status, at all points through death, under penalty of
being "cutoff from access to the Decedent in her terminal disease course.
67. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN, without the Patient's consent, cancelled an
appointment in November, 2013 with Abby Siegel, M.D., a Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologist
at Columbia Presbyterian, and additionally, failed for many weeks prior to forward pertinent
records, as had been requested by the doctor in advance of the scheduled appointment, which the
Patient greatly desired.
1
1Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fleldview Lane, Bethlehem Pennsylvania 18015 7 of 10
88 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
72. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Eric Schenkel, M.D. that he would
not inform the Patient how bad the diagnosis was and that he would make all the decisions about
the Decedent's care and not leave any choice up to her.
12
Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fleldvlew Lane, Bethlehem Pennsylvania 18015
89 Of 107
8 Of 10
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
76. When the Decedent was made aware of some ofthese facts by third parties, she
protested to Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN her objections to his failure to keep her fully
informed of her status, to no avail.
78. Defendant's) concerted efforts to prevent the Patient from even limited autonomy
over her body and choice in her care was furthered by a relentless pattern of isolation of the
Patient from her friends and family.
80. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN informed Charleen Rhindress that he
"banned" long time friends Susan Baum and Eric Schenkel, M.D. from the Decedent's home
during her convalescence and that he did not want the Decedent to talk to or see Fran Gutleber
and other friends.
13
Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieidvlew Lane, Bethlehem Pennsylvania 18015 9 of 10
90 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
89. In addition to the failure to inform the Patient of the nature ofher condition or her
treatment options, Defendant(s) FVAN K. ROTHMAN made numerous statements to each of
Stacy Abrams, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum, Toni Gad and
Eric Schenkel, M.D. that the Decedent 'Vould be better ofdead"; that he wished she would just
not wake up; that he "needed to get on with his life" and that although he was acting as her
doctor, he was unwilling personally to participate in a lengthy disease course as a spouse,
something he had experienced with the sickness and death of a prior wife.
15 '
Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fleldview Lane, Bethlehem Pennsylvania 18015 10 of 10
91 Of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPR£M£ COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ARIELLE WEINBERGER FAFADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER,
Plaintiff,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, F.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.
STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS ) ss.:
Index#:
AFFIDAVIT
VERIFICATION
4705 Center Boulevard, Apartment 808 . • , i j »Kenneth M. Wolk (.»/, n». yoa iiios . being duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. Reference is made to the Verified Complaint dated 12/10/2015.
2. 1have read the annexed excerpt of the Verified Complaint and know the contents
of the paragraphs therein specifically identified on the attached and same are true to my
knowledge, except those matters thereinwhich are statedto be allegedon informationand belief,
and as to those matters I believe them to be true.
Respectfully ^bmitted,
Kenneth M. Wolk
state of new YORK County of QUEENS ^ ' ss:
On I'i before me, the undersigned, personally appeared Kenrteth M. Wolkpersonally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satlsfoctory evidence to be the Indtvldual(s) whose name(s) is(are) subscribed to the vdthin Instrument and acknowledsed to me that he/she/they executed the same In his/her/theircapacity(ies), and that byhis/her/their slgnature(s) on the instrument, the individual(s).orthe person upon behalf ofwhichthe indi^lduai(s)^acted, executed the Instrument.
V'>>^gnature and altakt cknowledgment)
92 of 107
ESTHrn JIMENEZ CAPONotary Public • State ol New York
NO. 0lJI6t3317|7Oual.tied in Bronx ciunty
'•'•r CoTrrifs'iic.i Expires
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Index#:COUNTY OF NEW YORK
XARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER
Plaintiffs.-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHORE
HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.X
1
Kenneth M. Wolk, 4705 Center Boulevard, Apartment 808 Long Island City, New York 11109 1 of 6
93 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
20. From the earliest days of her diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN
departed from good and accepted medical practice in undertaking a course of"treatment" of the
Decedent consisting ofa steady regimen ofdrugging to unconsciousness and which otherwise
rendered the Patient bed bound and sedentary with little if any physical activity permitted and he
departed from good and accepted medical practice in bizarre and radical departure in depriving
the Patient ofnutritional support which caused shocking physical wasting and hastened the
Patient's loss of sentient life and hasted her death.
21. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering oral mixtures and concoctions ofmorphine, lorazepam, zolpidem and
hydroxyzine and often without the Patient's consent or knowledge.
Kenneth M. Wolk, 4705 Center Boulevard, /^^rtment 808 Long Island City, New York 11109 2of 694 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
22. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering pain medications for no medically therapeutic or palliative purpose or
effect, but rather, in a course of"treatment" to induce the Patient almost continuous
unconsciousness and which otherwise rendered the cancer Patient wholly sedentary and bed
bound.
23. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each ofStacy Abrams, 1962
Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566, Plaintiff Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, 404 East 79ty
Street, #28C New York, New York 10075, Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brookville, New
York 11545, Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576, Toni Gad, 9801
Collins Ave Apt 15n, Bal Harbour, Florida, 33154 Susan Baum, Senior Clinical Specialist at
Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, residing at 1680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
18015 and Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 witnessed the
administration by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN ofconcoctions and mixtures ofMorphine,
Lorazepam, Zolpidem and Hydroxyzine in the Patient's drinks with Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN insisting that she consume them.
26. Each witnessed the Patient routinely disoriented due to drugging, and witnessed
her struggling, unsuccessfully, to gain some control over her social interactions and some degree
of control and autonomy over her status and care, fighting the unconsciousness being continually
induced by the "treatment" inflicted upon her by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN.
5
Kenneth M. Wolk, 4705 Center Boulevard, Apartment 808 Long Island City, New York 11109 3 of 6
95 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
63. Efforts by fnends and family to inform the Patient ofaltematives to the "care"
being leveled upon her by the Defendant(s) were met with threats and actions by Defendant(s)
IVAN K. ROTHMAN to thwart any such communications and prevent information from
reaching the Patient.
64. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN's goal to prevent choice or consent on the
part ofthe Patient was perfected and furthered by a pattem of strong efforts to isolate her from
family, friends and personal support network and he threatened her family to submit to his
decision that the Patient remain uninformed and misinformed ofher diagnosis, uninformed and
misinformed ofher medical treatment and status, at all points through death, under penalty of
being "cutoff from access to the Decedent in her terminal disease course.
67. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN, without the Patient's consent, cancelled an
appointment in November, 2013 with Abby Siegel, M.D., a Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologist
at Columbia Presbyterian, and additionally, failed for many weeks prior to forward pertinent
records, as had been requested by the doctor in advance of the scheduled appointment, which the
Patient greatly desired.
Kenneth M.Wolk, 4705 Center Boulevard, Apartment 808 Long Island City, New York 11109 4 of 6
96 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
76. When the Decedent was made aware of some of these facts by third parties, she
protested to Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN her objections to his failure to keep her fully
informed of her status, to no avail.
77. Similarly, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN warned Kenneth M. Wolk soon
after the diagnosis, "Ifyou tell your sister anything, you will no longer be allowed in the house to
see her."
78. Defendant('s) concerted efforts to prevent the Patient from even limited autonomy
over her body and choice in her care was furthered by a relentless pattern of isolation ofthe
Patient from her fnends and family.
79. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each of Stacy Abrams, Plaintiff
Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum,
Toni Gad and Kenneth M. Wolk witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN undertaking a
course ofmedical treatment, communication and conduct actively discouraging the Decedent's
physical movement, her reception of friends, family, well wishers and clergy and each witnessed
continuous interference with communications fi-om her friends and family.
13
Kenneth M. Wolk, 4705 Center Boulevard, Apartment 808 Long Island City, New York 11109 5 of 6
97 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
87. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN refused to permitthe Decedent to visitwith
her brother Kenneth M. Wolk, 4705 Center Boulevard, Apartment 808 Long island City, New
York ill 09, other than under his personal observation and supervision.
14 '
Kenneth M. Woik, 4705 Center Boulevard,Apartment 808 Long Island City, NewYork11109 6 of 6
98 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF NEW YORKARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER,
Plaintiff,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHOREHEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.
STATE OF FLORIDA (ouNTY OF Broward ) ss.
X
Index#:
AFFIDAVIT
VERIFICATION
Ton i Gdd being duly swom, deposes and says:Hollywood, Fl 33019
1. Reference is made to the Verified Complaint dated 12/10/2015.
2. I have read the annexed excerpt of the Verified Complaint and know the contents
of the paragraphs therein specifically identified on the attached and same are true to my
knowledge, except those matters therein which are stated to be alleged on informationand belief,
and as to those matters I believe them to be true.
Respectfully Submitted,
State of FLORIDA County of Broward ss:
On /// Ijefore me. the undersigned, personally appeared Ton! Gadpersonallyknown to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactoryevidence to be the individual(s) whose name(s) is(are) subscribed to the within instrumentand acknowledged to me that he/sheAheyexecuted the same inhis/herAheircapadty(lesLan<thatbyhisAierAhelrsl9nature(s)on the instrument,the individual(s), or the person upon behalfofwhichthe individj/^(s) a^ed.executed the instrument.
h-(signature and officeof individua taking acknowledgment)
99 of 107
LAWRENCE M.KERSHWCommission#EE 162756ExpifK April 9,20169arartThniTioyFa(Bh*n<*»K*W!S-'0i$
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Index#:COUNTY OF NEW YORK
ARIELLE WEINBERGER PAPADAM and
SCOTT WEINBERGER
Plaintiffs,-against-
IVAN K. ROTHMAN, M.D., SOUTH SHORE
HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., andLEONARD KESSLER, M.D.
Defendants.X
1
Toni Gad, 201 Van Buren Street, unit103, Hollywood, Fi 33019 1 ®
100 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
18. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from accepted medical practice in
secretly undertaking a course of palliative care only without the Patient's knowledge or consent,
and he never had any intention ofpursuing any medical options to extend her life.
20. From the earliest days of her diagnosis, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN
departed from good and accepted medical practice in undertaking a course of"treatment" of the
Decedent consisting ofa steady regimen ofdrugging to unconsciousness and which otherwise
rendered the Patient bed bound and sedentary with little if any physical activity permitted and he
departed from good and accepted medical practice in bizarre and radical departure in depriving
the Patient of nutritional support which caused shocking physical wasting and hastened the
Patient's loss of sentient life and hasted her death.
21. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering oral mixtures and concoctions ofmorphine, lorazepam, zolpidem and
hydroxyzine and often without the Patient's consent or knowledge.
... 2 of 8• 4 •
101 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
22. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN departed from good and accepted medical
practice in administering pain medications for no medically therapeutic or palliative purpose or
effect, but rather, in a course of"treatment" to induce the Patient almost continuous
unconsciousness and which otherwise rendered the cancer Patient wholly sedentary and bed
bound.
23. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each ofStacy Abrams, 1962
Lowell Lane Merrick, New York 11566, Plaintiff Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, 404 East 79ty
Street, #28C New York, New York 10075, Fran Gutleber, 87 Fruitledge Road Brookville, New
York 11545, Randi Levine, 426 Toftree Court North Hills, New York 11576, Toni Gad, 9801
Collins Ave Apt 15n, Bal Harbour, Florida, 33154 Susan Baum, Senior Clinical Specialist at
Genentech BioOncology-Rituxan, residing at 1680 Fieldview Lane Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
18015 and Charleen Rhindress, 11 Arden Court Melville, New York 11741 witnessed the
administration by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN ofconcoctions and mixtures ofMorphine,
Lorazepam, Zolpidem and Hydroxyzine in the Patient's drinks with Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN insisting that she consume them.
24. Each witnessed the administration of Morphine and other pain medications by
Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN under circumstances where the Patient was not in pain or
otherwise uncomfortable.
25. Each witnessed the Patient's attempts to protest or resist the drugging in order to
remain awake and functional, with Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN insisting and persuading
her to submit to the '^treatment" time and time again.
26. Each witnessed the Patient routinely disoriented due to drugging, and witnessed
her struggling, unsuccessfully, to gain some control over her social interactions and some degree
of control and autonomy over her status and care, fighting the unconsciousness being continually
induced by the "treatment" inflicted upon her by Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN.
3 of 8
102 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
35. On several occasions Toni Gad observed during visits that if she withdrew from
the Decedent's bedside for even a few moments during periods of lucidity and good
conversation, when she returned, the Decedent was routinely dosed again, out ofher presence,
and restored to a state of drug induced unconsciousness or semi-consciousness, all in accord with
the "treatment" regimen ordered and administered by, and otherwise at the direction, of
Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN.
37. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, Defendant(s) IVAN K.
ROTHMAN stated and admitted to each of Stacy Abrams, PlaintiffArielle (Weinberger)
Papadam, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Eric Schenkel, M.D. 1680 Fieldview Lane, Bethlehem
Pennsylvania 18015, Toni Gad, Susan Baum and Charleen Rhindress that he would not consider
second medical opinions or consultations with readily available sub-specialists in
cholangiocarcinoma.
4 of 8
103 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
49. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to Toni Gad "absolutely not" did he, or
would he, consider a second opinion to be ofutility as to any aspect of Decedent's care; that
"[he] was the best doctor out there" and that "[he] was giving Debbie every care she need[ed];
that he *Svas better than any other doctor."
50. Additionally, in September, 2013, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN stated to
Toni Gad that "cancer grows with food;" and "you should not feed cancer" as an explanation for
the absence ofnutritional support and visibly accelerated wasting, telling Toni Gad that the
decedent was "at the end ofher life and that it [death] would happen any day."
51. When Toni Gad broached the subject ofseeking a second opinion or collaboration
of other physicians, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN responded to her with a communicative
and aggressive facial expression seeking to cause her (and which did cause her) to withdraw
from the conversation immediately.
5 of 8
104 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
63. Efforts by friends and family to inform the Patient of alternatives to the "care"
being leveled upon her by the Defendant(s) were met with threats and actions by Defendant(s)
IVAN K. ROTHMAN to thwart any such communications and prevent information from
reaching the Patient.
64. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN's goal to prevent choice or consent on the
part ofthe Patient was perfected and furthered by a pattem of strong efforts to isolate her from
family, friends and personal support network and he threatened her family to submit to his
decision that the Patient remain uninformed and misinformed ofher diagnosis, uninformed and
misinformed ofher medical treatment and status, at all points through death, under penalty of
being "cutoff from access to the Decedent in her terminal disease course.
67. Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN, without the Patient's consent, cancelled an
appointment in November, 2013 with Abby Siegel, M.D., a Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologist
at Columbia Presbyterian, and additionally, failed for many weeks prior to forward pertinent
records, as had been requested by the doctor in advance of the scheduled appointment, which the
Patient greatly desired.
6 of 8
105 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
76. When the Decedent was made aware of some ofthese facts by third parties, she
protested to Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN her objections to his failure to keep her fully
informed of her status, to no avail.
78. Defendant('s) concerted efforts to prevent the Patient from even limited autonomy
over her body and choice in her care was furthered by a relentless pattern of isolation of the
Patient from her friends and family.
79. Over the period of the Decedent's disease course, each of Stacy Abrams, Plaintiff
Arielle (Weinberger) Papadam, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum,
Toni Gad and Kenneth M. Wolk witnessed Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN undertaking a
course of medical treatment, communication and conduct actively discouraging the Decedent's
physical movement, her reception of friends, family, well wishers and clergy and each witnessed
continuous interference with communications from her friends and family.
13
7 of 8
106 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017
89. In addition to the failure to inform the Patient of the nature of her condition or her
treatment options, Defendant(s) IVAN K. ROTHMAN made numerous statements to each of
Stacy Abrams, Charleen Rhindress, Fran Gutleber, Randi Levine, Susan Baum, Toni Gad and
Eric Schenkel, M.D. that the Decedent "would be better of dead"; that he wished she would just
not wake up; that he "needed to get on with his life" and that although he was acting as her
doctor, he was unwilling personally to participate in a lengthy disease course as a spouse,
something he had experienced with the sickness and death ofa prior wife.
15
8 of 8
107 of 107
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2017 11:05 AM INDEX NO. 805017/2017
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2017