ind: rural connectivity investment program · ind: rural connectivity investment program ... block...

Community Participation Plan

Community Participation Plan for West Bengal December 2011

IND: Rural Connectivity Investment Program

Prepared by West Bengal State Rural Development Agency for the Asian Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 6 June 2011)

Currency unit – Indian rupee (Rs) Rs1.00 = $0.0185683781

$1.00 = Rs 53.855000

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB – Asian Development Bank AE – Assistant Engineer AP – affected persons APL – Above Poverty Line ASHA – Acreditted Social Health Activist BDO – Block Development Officer BPL – Below Poverty Line CC – concrete cement CPF – Community Participation Framework CPP – Community Participation Plan DACS – District Aids Control Society DDP – Desert Development Programme DORD – Department of Rural Development DOSW/TD – Department of Social Welfare/Tribal Development DPR detailed project report DRDA – District Rural Development Agency EA – Executing Agency EAF – Environmental Assessment and Review Framework ECOP – Environmental Codes of Practice EE – Executive Engineer FGD – focus group discussion FHH – female headed household GOI – Government of India GP – Gram Panchayat GRC – Grievance Redressal Committee IA – Implementing Agency IAY – Indira Awaas Yojana JE – Junior Engineer LMC – Land Management Committee MORD – Ministry of Rural Development MOU – Memorandum of Understanding NGO – nongovernment organization NREGA – National Rural Employment Guarantee Act NRRDA – National Rural Roads Development Agency PHC – Primary Health Center PIC – Project Implementation Consultant PIU – Project Implementation Unit PMGSY – Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (Prime Minister‟s Rural Roads Program) PRI – Panchayati Raj Institutions PWD – Persons with Disability RD – Rural Development SC – Scheduled Caste

SE – Senior Engineer SES – socio-economic survey SHG – self-help group ST – Scheduled Tribe STA – State Technical Agency TSC – Technical Support Consultant WBSRDA – West Bengal State Rural Development Agency ZP – Zilla Parishad

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

km – kilometer m –

meter

sq. km – square kilometer

GLOSSARY

Affected Persons

– People (households) who stand to lose, as a consequence of a project, all or part of their physical and non-physical assets, irrespective of legal or ownership titles

Below Poverty Line

– A person or household whose personal expenditure (or income) or that of the household is below the poverty line (see below). The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project.

Detailed Project Report

– An engineering report detailing the technical project details

Encroacher – A person, who has trespassed government land, adjacent to his/her own land or asset, to which he/she is not entitled, by deriving his/her livelihood there. Such act is called “Encroachment.”

Encroachment – A trespass on Government land to which one is not entitled prior to the cut-off-date.

Gram – A village Kutcha

– A house which has walls and roof that are made of material

that includes grass, leaves, reeds, bamboo, mud, unburnt brick or wood.

Panchayat – An institution (by whatever name called) of self-government for rural areas constituted at the village, intermediate, and district levels under article 243B of the Constitution of India.

Panchayati Raj Institution

– Local self-governing body within the state. In this CPF, Panchayats at different levels are collectively referred to as PRIs.

Patwari – A Revenue Department official Poverty Line – The level of expenditure (or income), below which an

individual or a household cannot satisfy a certain minimum

consumption level. For the purpose of estimating the head count ratio of poor at the state level, the Planning Commission currently uses a minimum consumption expenditure, anchored in an average (food) energy adequacy norm of 2400 and 2100 kilo calories per capita per day, to define state specific poverty lines, separately for rural and urban areas.

Pucca – A house which has walls and roof that made of material that includes tiles, cement sheets, slates, corrugated iron, zinc or other metal sheets, bricks, lime and stone or RBC/RCC concrete.

Pucca Road – Asphalt concrete, bituminous asphalt concrete, cement concrete roads, which are considered to be strong and durable

Sarpanch – Elected head of the Gram Panchayat Scheduled

Caste – The lowest caste in the Hindu caste system

Scheduled Tribe

– One of the weaker sections of the Indian Population. Article 342 of Constitution of India on Fundamental rights defines ST‟s as „specific tribe or tribal communities or parts or groups within tribes or tribal communities‟. The Constitution also enshrines their rights taking into account their vulnerable status in the society.

Zila – A district which is the first administrative division at the state level.

NOTE

In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This community participation plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

S. No. Topic Page No.

1 Chapter One: Overview of The Project & Community Participation Plan 1

2 Chapter Two: Land Requirements and Methodology for Participatory Project Planning 6

3 Chapter Three: Transect Walk and Finalization of Road Alignment 10

4 Chapter Four: Consultations with Affected Persons (APs) 18

5 Chapter Five: Project Impacts 21

6 Chapter Six: Assistance/ Support to Vulnerable APs 42

7 Chapter Seven: Budget 48

8 Chapter Eight: Implementation Arrangements 50

9 Chapter Nine: Monitoring and Reporting Procedures 58

Annexure

Annexure 1: Memorandum of Understanding

Annexure 2: Stretch-wise Documentation of Transect Walks

Annexure 3: Stretch-wise List of Affected Households

Annexure 4: Stretch-wise List of Affected Assets

Annexure 5: List of Some Rural Development Schemes in West Bengal

Annexure 6: Monitoring Formats

Chapter One: Overview of The Project & Community Participation Plan

1.1. Description of the Project

1. The Rural Connectivity Investment Program involves the construction and upgrading of a

total of approximately 494.458 km of rural roads in the states of Orissa, Madhya Pradesh,

Chhattisgarh, West Bengal and Assam. The Program forms part of the nationally popular

program called Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (Prime Minister‟s Rural Roads Program or

PMGSY), which started in 2000, and aims to provide connectivity to hitherto unconnected

villages1 and promote access to economic opportunities and social services, including increased

agricultural incomes and employment/trading opportunities for the local villagers.

2. The Ministry of Rural Development (MORD) administers the PMGSY as a centrally

sponsored scheme in all the states and Union Territories. In the state of West Bengal, the West

Bengal State Rural Development Agency (WBSRDA) is implementing the PMGSY through the

Program Implementation Units (PIUs) established at the district level and the Panchayati Raj

Institutions (PRIs).

3. The Government of India (GOI) requested the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for

financing part of the Program. Under the multitranche financing facility, the ADB will extend

multiple loans, each to finance a subset of the Program (such subset will be hereafter be called

“Project”). Each Project will comprise subprojects, each forming a single or multiple contract

package(s) for civil works.

4. In the five project states, sample roads were taken for conduction of the socio-economic

survey, census survey and transect walk to get a holistic picture of the project areas, as well as

to assess the positive and negative impacts of the Project and to work towards minimizing

adverse impacts due to loss of assets incurred by households. Table 1.1 below provides details

of the roads covered in the five states:

Table 1.1 List of Roads covered in the Five States and Length in Km

S.No. State District Road Length (Km)

1. Orissa

Bargarh 53.244

Sundargarh 5.632

Bolangir 30.574

Jharsuguda 18.265

Sub-Total 107.715

2 Madhya Pradesh Sidhi 21.903

1 In 2000, about 40% of villages in rural India still remained unconnected by all-weather roads

2

Dhar 37.58

Sagar 2.023

Damoh 38.15

Sub-Total 99.656

3 Chhattisgarh

Bilaspur 19.79=6

Durg 42.852

Raipur 29.604

Sub-Total 92.216

4 West Bengal

North 24 Parganas 7.925

Burdawan 10.53

Jalpaiguri 20.384

Murshidabad 16.342

Bankura 39.23

Sub-Total 94.411

5 Assam

Kamrup 22.76

Morigaon 13.543

Nagaon 15.378

Golaghat 28.198

Jorhat 20.582

Sub-Total 100.46

Source: Transect Walk, 2010

5. The PMGSY employs a bottom-up approach for project planning and preparation. The

Core Network, from which the roads to be improved are selected, is prepared at the block level

in consultation with the concerned Panchayats and consolidated at the district level. The list of

roads to be taken up in each yearly allocation is first prepared by the PIU, approved by the Zilla

Parishad, and then forwarded to the state government for further approval.

3

6. Table 1.2 provides details of all the roads covered under the Project in the state of West

Bengal.

Table 1.2: List of Roads in West Bengal

District Road Name Length

(in Kms)

Bankura

Biborda to SH9 5.539

Goborda to Satpatta 11.82

Joypur to Gelia 11.893

T-10 (Dhengram to Bishanpur) 9.978

Sub Total 39.23

Burdwan Joy krishnapur to Gobindpur 7.83

Uttar laxmipur to Tanaghata Ferry Ghat 2.7

Sub Total 10.53

Murshidabad

Charpaikmari to Chardebipur 2.24

Kapasdanga bridge to Kapasdanga jitpur 1.264

Panchthupi to Molla 8.094

Putia to Jat Biswanath 1.3

Putia to Ramchandrapur 3.444

Sub Total 16.342

North 24 Parganas

Keothshah Bazar to Jasaikathi 5.7

Old Bangaon East to pratapnagar 2.225

Sub Total 7.925

Jalpaiguri

T05 at Bikasnagar to Rajfapri 3.354

T07 Lal school to Brazerkuthi 6.026

Ranicherra tea garden to Paschim damdim 3.138

T 14 at Sarkarpara to Munshipara 7.866

Sub Total 20.384

Grand Total = 94.411


1.2. Objectives of the Community Participation Plan (CPP)

7. The primary objective of the Community Participation Plan is to aptly document the

major findings and outcomes of the various stages undertaken in:

- Transect Walks including community consultations and finalization of road alignment

with the aid of active community participation;

- Identification of all APs being directly affected through the Project and recording the type and extent of loss being incurred by them;

4

- Profiling of vulnerable APs identified, across socio-economic parameters in order to understand the kind of socio-economic pressures that they may face as a result of the losses being incurred for the Project; and

- Discussions on perceptions of community and APs about the Project and its impacts.

8. The CPF guides the process to develop the Plan so as to address all social issues in the

ADB Rural Connectivity Investment Programme. The Plan is prepared based on the findings of

the Socio Economic Surveys (SES), Census Survey and Community Consultations held with the

stakeholders, in keeping with the detailed methodology specified in the „Community

Participation Framework„. Figure 1.1 highlights the standard approach adopted across all road

sections for each state in the preparation of the Community Participation Plan.

5

Figure 1.1: Stages in Participatory Project Planning

Finalization of

the Alignment

Survey to Identify Socio-

Economic Profile of APs &

Consultation with APs

Database of all

APs

Dissemination of Process of Land Transfer

& Support/Assistance Options

Database of

‘Vulnerable APs’

Submission of Written

Confirmation by Affected Persons

PIU (SE/EE), ZP, GP

PIU (SE/EE), ZP, GP

PIU

(A

E/J

E),

PIC

, Z

P,

GP

(S

arp

an

ch

), P

an

ch

ay

at

Me

mb

ers

,

Vil

lag

e C

ou

nc

il,

Rev

en

ue

Dep

art

me

nt

(Pa

twa

ri),

Oth

er

Dep

art

me

nt

Off

icia

ls (

fore

st,

etc

.)

PIU (AE/JE), GP

(SARPANCH)

Dissemination of Information on

PMGSY road under Core Network

Dissemination of Project Information to

Project Affected Community

Transect Walk & Consultations,

Road Safety Sessions

Identification of ‘Vulnerable’ APs

& Consultation with them

6

Chapter Two: Land Requirements and Methodology for Participatory Project Planning 2.1. Selection of Roads and Land Requirements

9. The selection of sample 94.411 Kms of subproject roads in the Project state of West

Bengal for improvement under the Project is from the PMGSY Core Network. The Core

Network, from which the roads to be improved are selected, is prepared at the block level in

consultation with the concerned Panchayats and consolidated at the district level thereby

entailing a bottom-up approach for project planning and preparation. The list of roads to be

taken up in each yearly allocation is first prepared by the PIU, approved by the District

Panchayat, and then forwarded to the state government for further approval. As per the CPF,

the following criterions were adopted while selecting these roads:

Adequate land width availability as specified in the Rural Roads Manual, Specification for Rural Roads 2004 and PMGSY Operations Manual 2005

The proposed alignment involves limited land loss and the remaining land and or/structures remain viable for continued use

In case impacts are unavoidable, the impacts will be minimized through one or more of

the following mechanisms:

a. Design modifications by reduction of land width, alignment shifts, and modifications in cross-sections etc, to the extent required from safety considerations;

b. Voluntary donation of land/assets by the land/asset owner by means of MOU to the PIU or the state government; and

c. Providing support and assistance to vulnerable affected persons (AP) as per eligibility through GP and rural development (RD) schemes and agreed mitigation matrix.

10. Roads for which no scope exists for addressing the social impacts through any of the mechanisms above shall not be taken up under the Project for that particular year. Such roads will be taken up after the social issues are resolved by the community and there is a demand made for the improvement of the roads by the community to the PIU.

11. Under the PMGSY, the existing revenue tracks have been taken up for construction to

the standards in the Rural Roads Manual and other relevant specifications as detailed above.

The available width of the existing tracks is not always sufficient to accommodate the proposed

improvements, as a result requiring additional land. As far as possible road improvements are

generally carried out along the existing tracks to avoid large extent of impacts on land,

structures and livelihood sources.

7

2.2 Land Donation Principle

12. Additional land required for the subproject road improvements under the PMGSY shall

be secured through voluntary donation by the land/asset owners. As per the transect walk

conducted, a total of 1482 Households will be required to donate their assets for the project.

Table 2.1 below provides details on the number of affected households per road stretch across

the project districts in the state of West Bengal.

Table 2.1: Stretch-Wise Number of Affected Households Donating Assets

District Road Name Affected Households

(Numbers)

Bankura

Biborda to SH9

50

Goborda to Satpatta 189

Joypur to Gelia 228

T-10 (Dhengram to Bishanpur) 59

Sub Total

526

Burdwan

Joy krishnapur to Gobindpur 125

Uttar laxmipur to Tanaghata Ferry Ghat 52

Sub Total

177

Jalpaiguri

T05 at Bikasnagar to Rajfapri 1

T07 Lal school to Brazerkuthi 117

Ranicherra tea garden to Paschim damdim 1

T 14 at Sarkarpara to Munshipara 193

Sub Total

312

Murshidabad

Charpaikmari to Chardebipur 76

Kapasdanga bridge to Kapasdanga Jitpur 0

Panchthupi to Molla 219

Putia to Jat Biswanath 10

Putia to Ramchandrapur 48

Sub Total

353

North 24 Parganas Keothshah Bazar to Jasaikathi

34

Old Bangaon East to pratapnagar 80

8

Sub Total

114

Grand Total = 1482


13. The Plan and its support provisions to vulnerable APs in the project districts follow the

ADB safeguard requirements listed below for projects involving voluntary donations:

(i) There is full consultation with landowners and any non-titled people on site selection;

(ii) Voluntary donations do not severely affect the living standards of affected people and are directly linked to benefits for the affected people, with community sanctioned measures to replace any losses that are agreed through verbal and written record by affected people;

(iii) Any voluntary donation will be confirmed through verbal and written record and verified by an independent third party; and

(iv) Adequate grievance redress mechanisms are in place.

14. The process of information dissemination on the process of land transfer and entitlement

provisions for the vulnerable shall also be undertaken in the subprojects based on which all

MOUs as per Annexure I will be taken from each affected person voluntarily donating the land.

2.3 Methodology Used Across Stages of Participatory Plan Preparation

15. The process of finalization of road alignment was undertaken through transect walks

along each sample road section by PIUs, including community participation.

16. Post transect walk, the methodology for obtaining information on APs, type and extent of

loss and socio-economic profile of households being affected, relevant to the CPP entailed:

- Covering 100% villages located along each sample road - SES (Socio-Economic Surveys) conducted for 20% households in each village located

along each sample road - This includes SES of all APs (if any) in each village located along the each sample road - Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with women and IPs on each sample road - Census Survey with 100% APs in each village located along each sample road - Consultation with each AP surveyed regarding loss incurred and corresponding

entitlements

17. As part of the census surveys, all households incurring an agricultural loss, structural-

including residential and commercial loss, loss of trees and other loss were covered, in order to

aptly understand the type and extent of loss incurred by the total APs. The socio-economic

surveys and FGDs undertaken on the subproject roads further enable an assessment of the

impacts of the Project on the lives of the households in villages situated along the road sections.

The objective of the surveys was to identify the affected households and generate an inventory

of social and economic impacts on them, the structures affected, socio-economic profile of the

project affected people, their perceptions about the project and rehabilitation and resettlement

9

options. Consultations with APs were also held during the survey process in order to make clear

communication on loss incurred and corresponding entitlement options, as well as to record

feedback from the APs, if any. Appropriate tools were developed collect the requisite data.

10

Chapter Three: Transect Walk and Finalization of Road Alignment

3.1. Process & Participants

18. The PMGSY guidelines require the PIU to conduct Transect Walks along project roads

before finalizing the alignment, to ensure active community participation, to select the

alignment that best suits the community’s needs and minimizes adverse social and

environmental impacts of the proposed improvement. The key objectives of the Transect

Walks may be specified as follows:

Finalization of alignment through consultations with the communities and their elected representatives

A joint on-site inventory, cross-checking and verification of the alignment (as per the revenue map)

Identification of grievances on ground and redressal of the same

Identification of APs and vulnerable groups among them

Acceptance of the Project and alignment by the community

Communication of Road Safety Measures and receipt of feedback from community

members

19. As part of the Rural Connectivity Investment Programme in the state of West Bengal,

Transect Walks were conducted on a total of 17 roads. The Transect Walks on each of the 17

subprojects was organized by the Domestic Resettlement & Social Development Consultants

team along with the respective PIU in close coordination with the PRIs. These transect walks

were organized in the months of February to March 2010.

20. The key objective of the Transect Walk was to finalize the road alignments in

consultation with the communities and their elected representatives. During the course of the

transect walk attempts were made to identify community grievances related to the project

alignment and especially to consult those getting affected by the project. All concerns,

recommendations and suggestions, as well as responses provided by PIUs were recorded at

the time of the transect walks.

21. The key stakeholders involved in the process of conduction of Transect Walks included:

community members including men, women, children, elderly, vulnerable groups such as those

below poverty line (BPL), Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), persons with

disability (PWD), females heading households, household members losing land, structure

and/or other assets, farmers and PRI members, along with Participants from the government

and PIU such as Revenue Officials, Executive Engineers, Land Managers, Assistant and Sub

Assistant Engineers, etc.

11

3.2. Community Consultations During Transect Walk

22. Before initiation of Transect Walks, consultations were held across the communities

being affected along the sample 94.411 Kms of subproject roads in West Bengal. All major

stakeholders including members of the affected communities and PRI members participated in

the consultations.

23. At the time of the Transect Walk, it was noted that the community‟s knowledge about the

PMGSY was rather low and that community members were largely unaware of the Project.

During the consultations therefore, the community was duly informed about the project,

especially with regard to PMGSY being a rural development scheme. Emphasis was laid on the

importance of the transect walk and how the participation of the community and their

suggestions were important in finalizing the alignment of the roads. It was explained to the

community members, that all stages in the planning and implementation of the Project required

constant support, cooperation and inputs from the community and that all concerns and

grievances should be openly discussed in order to generate suitable solutions.

24. With respect to the technical information on the Project, details were shared with the

community members regarding the processes involved in the construction of the road, material

used, dimensions of the road, costs involved and implementing authority. Such details were

noted to be of interest to all community members who wished to know as much about the

Project as possible.

25. While community members participated actively in the Transect Walks, owing to the

large number of people being affected by the Project in the state, a number of concerns were

also raised in the process. It can be noted, that while the roads are considered to be of high

importance in the state of West Bengal, which is adversely affected by monsoons year after

year, the people are just as hesitant to donate their land owing to the high density of the

population residing along the chosen road sections. Community members were therefore

forthcoming in their suggestions to reduce loss of assets for the APs, giving valuable inputs on

how sensitive locations and highly populated areas can be connected without incurring a major

loss.

26. Though fears regarding possible magnitude of loss were noted across the road sections,

community members also had a unanimous opinion regarding the absolute necessity of the

Project. All concerns regarding safety in heavily habituated areas and those pertaining to

avoidance of land loss were addressed by PIUs and suitable measures were discussed to be

included in the final designs. The suggestions on road alignment are discussed in detail in the

subsequent section.

3.3. Finalization of Road Alignment through Community Participation

27. As one of the main objectives, the Transect Walks also looked at the finalization of road

alignment through measurement of current tracks, specifying land required and procuring inputs

12

from the community. The process was carried out collectively by the community members,

government officials, PRI members and PIU present.

28. One of the major concerns brought forth by the community members during the process

was pertaining to the need for good quality and durable all weather roads. The state of West

Bengal is adversely affected by the monsoons every year, especially in the low lying rural areas

where the rains cause roads to remain submerged under water, often flooding even houses. A

number of suggestions were therefore made to try and also minimize the extent of water logging

and soil erosion by adopting measures such as providing broader pipes and culverts along the

roads, bamboo piling/ concrete walls along ponds and water bodies, and ensuring that drains

are constructed well and are broad enough. Community members have suggested that it would

be vital for them to participate in the Project execution phase; so that they could ensure that all

water logging and flooding related concerns are being suitably addressed.

29. Another area of concern is that a number of the road sections are heavy inhabited, due

to which the Project is affecting residential and agricultural land/assets on both sides of the

road. Further, a large number of these affected households also belong to SC/ ST groups. In

order to minimize the extent of loss of land and assets, suggestions have been made to try and

reduce road width or construct CC roads in areas with limited road width available. Also, as a

large number of people are known to have encroached upon the government land, it is

requested by the APs to first try and construct the roads only out of available government land,

or land that has been encroached upon, before looking at land donation from land/asset owners.

30. Other suggestions provided by the community during the transect walks include making

a bypass or shifting road alignment to avoid affecting sensitive locations including places of

religious importance such as temples and mosques, trees of religious significance, Hindu and

Muslim cremation/ burial grounds, etc.

31. With respect to road safety, requests have been made by the community members to

install sign board along sharp turns and curves, as well as provide speed breakers, especially

near schools, temples and highly inhabited areas. The possibility of extending the roads along

certain routes in order to benefit more villages was also considered during the transect walks

undertaken on certain road sections.

32. The Project area lies largely in the agricultural belt, therefore raising concerns among

APs regarding the extent of land loss in the Project. In keeping with the same, the community

members have further suggested that during the construction of the road, care should be taken

that earth required for raising the height of the roads should be brought in from outside of the

village and that minimum earth should be taken from the land lying adjacent to the roads as it

would reduce the fertility of the soil. Also, earth to be dug from within the villages should be

taken uniformly from different along the road rather than from any one location.

33. All decisions pertaining to the road alignments were made by taking in to account the

views and concerns of the community members, as well as social and technical experts in the

PIU. The reports of Transect Walks including record of key project related issues on each road

13

section and recommendations made by the community members, decisions taken by PIU and

other recommendations by social safeguard specialists on the chain-age wise road plans are

enclosed as ANNEXURE II.

34. In the course of the decisions made, measures were adopted to ensure that the loss

incurred by the APs was avoided or minimized. The following table 3.1. provides road wise

information on the number of households being affected before and after the transect walk,

measures adopted to reduce the loss being incurred and total households saved from being

affected as a result of the measures adopted.

Table 3.1: Measures Adopted to Minimize Loss during Transect Walk

District Name of

Road Section

Impacts on Affected Households

Remarks

Before Transect

Walk

After Transect

Walk

Bankura

Biborda to SH9

69 50

Residential land loss by 19 households and loss of commercial land by 3 households is avoided through construction of CC roads and by making a shift in road alignment. Agricultural land loss by 36 households, residential land loss by 2 households and loss of trees by 1 household was found to be unavoidable during transect walk.

Goborda to Satpatta

220 189

Residential land and structure loss by 31 households is avoided through construction of CC roads. Loss of agricultural land loss by 169 households, including 3 households also losing trees was found to be unavoidable during transect walk.

Joypur to Gelia

244 228

Residential land and structure loss by 16 households is avoided through construction of CC roads and by making a shift in road alignment. Loss of agricultural land by 165 households, residential assets by 15 households, loss of agriculture land + residential assets by 4 households, loss of agriculture land + trees by 2 households, loss of agriculture land+residential asset + trees by 1 household, loss of trees + residential assets by 3 households and loss of trees by 1 household was found to be unavoidable during transect walk.

14

District Name of

Road Section


Remarks

T-10 (Dhengram to

Bishanpur) 67 59

Residential land and structure loss by 8 households is avoided through construction of CC roads and by making a shift in road alignment. Loss of agricultural land by 34 households, residential land/structure by 17 households, commercial land/structure by 1 household and loss of trees by 1 households was found to be unavoidable during transect walk.

Sub Total 600 526

A total of 74 households were saved from incurring any kind of loss post the transect walks in the district.

Burdwan

Joy krishnapur to Gobindpur

150 125

Residential land loss by 25 households is avoided through construction of CC roads. Agricultural land loss to 110 households, residential land loss to 2 households and loss of residential land +trees of one household was found to be unavoidable during transect walk. (In case of 7 APs, they did not give consent for voluntary land donation)

Uttar laxmipur to Tanaghata Ferry Ghat

58 52

Residential land loss by 6 households is avoided through construction of CC roads and by making a shift in road alignment. Loss of agricultural land by 12 households, residential land/structure by 34 households, commercial structure by 1 household, residential land + trees by 2 households, residential land + agricultural land + trees by 2 households and loss of residential land + agricultural land by 1 household was found to be unavoidable during transect walk.

Sub Total 208 177


Jalpaiguri T05 at

Bikasnagar to Rajfapri

1 1 Commercial land loss by one household was found to unavoidable during transect walk.

15

District Name of

Road Section


Remarks

T07 Lal school to

Brazerkuthi 117 117

Agricultural land loss by 54 households, residential land/structure loss by 26 households, loss of trees by 5 households, loss of trees + commercial land by 1 household, agricultural + residential land/structure loss by 13 households, agricultural + residential + loss of trees by 2 households, trees + residential loss by 5 households, trees + agricultural loss by 10 households was found to be unavoidable during transect walk.

Ranicherra tea garden to

Paschim damdim

1 1 Commercial loss at the Ranicherra Tea Garden was found to unavoidable during transect walk.

T 14 at Sarkarpara to Munshipara

202 193

Residential land loss by 9 households was avoided through construction of CC roads. Agricultural land loss to 86 households, residential land loss to 78 households, commercial land loss by 1 household, loss of trees by 1 household, trees + residential loss by 1 household, loss of commercial structure by 1 household, trees + agricultural loss by 10 household, agricultural + residential loss by 9 households and trees + agricultural + residential loss by 4 households was found to be unavoidable during transect walk.

Sub Total 321 312


16

District Name of

Road Section


Remarks

Murshidabad

Charpaikmari to

Chardebipur 91 76

Residential land loss by 15 households and commercial land loss by 4 households could be avoided through construction of CC roads and by making necessary shifts in alignment. Agricultural land loss to 63 households, residential land loss to 6 households and commercial land loss by 1 household was found to be unavoidable during transect walk.

Kapasdanga bridge to

Kapasdanga Jitpur

23 0

Residential land loss by 21 households and residential structure loss by 2 households is avoided through construction of CC roads. As there is sufficient land for CC road construction, none of the APs are now getting affected. Certain shifts in alignment were also incorporated during the transect walk to prevent loss to mosques and id-gaha.

Panchthupi to Molla

219 219

Agricultural land loss by 166 households, residential land loss by 3 households, loss of agricultural land + trees by 1 household and loss of agricultural land + residential assets by 3 household was found to be unavoidable during transect walk. Damage to a graveyard could also be avoided due to construction of CC road.

Putia to Jat Biswanath

20 10

Residential land loss of 10 households could be avoided by construction of CC roads. Residential land loss to 7 households and agriculturaxl land loss to 1 household was found to be unavoidable during transect walk.

Putia to Ramchandra

pur 80 48

Residential land loss by 32 households was avoided through construction of CC roads and by making a shift in road alignment. Loss of agriculture land of 18 households, loss of commercial land of one household and loss of residential assets of 28 households could not be avoided. . (In case of AP, he did not give consent for voluntary land donation)

Sub Total 410 353

A total of 57 households were saved from incurring any kind of loss post the transect walks in the district

17

District Name of

Road Section


Remarks

North 24 Parganas

Keothshah Bazar to

Jasaikathi 41 34

Residential land loss to 7 households and loss of main residential structure by 1 household could be avoided by construction of CC roads. Residential asset loss to 6 households and agricultural land loss to 22 households was found to be unavoidable during transect walk.

Old Bangaon East to

pratapnagar 88 80

Residential land loss to 8 households could be avoided by construction of CC roads. Residential land loss to 54 households, loss of commercial asset by 1 household and agricultural land loss to 14 households was found to be unavoidable during transect walk.

Sub Total 129 114


Grand Total 1668 1482

A total of 186 households were saved from incurring any kind of loss post the transect walks across all districts of the project state of West Bengal.


35. The final road alignment designs incorporate the total number of all speed breakers,

culverts, and other specifications that were mutually decided upon by all participants of the

Transect Walk, with the help of technical inputs from the PIUs. During the course of all such

decision making, queries regarding length of the roads, width in case of CC roads, connectivity

being provided via the roads, placement of culverts, etc were answered by the PIUs. It was

explained that a minimum width of 3.75 meters is required in the built up areas from the safety

point of view however, if land was willingly donated the width of the road (through the village)

could be increased to 7.5 meters. The importance of community participation and involvement in

the entire process and voluntary land donation for successful implementation of the Project was

further emphasized.

18

Chapter Four: Consultations with Affected Persons (APs)

36. A number of consultations were held with the APs from the time of conduction of

Transect Walks up till the conduction of SES and Census Surveys. As has been noted in

chapter three, consultations held during transect walks mostly comprised of queries regarding

technical details of the Project, as well as concerns regarding loss of land and how the same

can be avoided. All such queries and concerns were aptly responded to by the team of PIUs

and an effort was made to ensure that all community members are adequately informed about

the Project, as well as feel free to participate in the process of alignment finalization in order to

avoid or atleast minimize loss of assets where possible.

37. The following series of consultations further bring to light some of the key issues that

were discussed in the course of the participatory project planning:

4.1. Initial Perceptions Regarding Project

38. Absence of good all weather roads implies lack of access to essential services, markets,

transport facilities and restricted mobility as well as lack of industrialization, limited employment

opportunities among others. Roads are a critical part of development as it means to connectivity

and access to services and products which translates into increased participation of people in

market economy and thereby improve their social and economic status.

39. During the Transect Walks, Socio Economic Survey (June to October 2011) as well as

Census survey, it was seen people were enthusiastic about the project and perceived the

impacts of the same as manifold. Access to improved educational facilities was seen to be one

of the most important results of the project. Currently it was seen that children especially girls

were either not educated or educated till primary level of school since good schools were at a

minimum distance of 3-8 km from the villages. During the monsoon, road conditions

deteriorated further. All this prevented parents from sending their children to access better

improved and higher level of education.

40. Similarly in case of medical situation or emergencies, traversing through the poor roads

added to the woes of the patient and family. It was found during discussions with the people that

they had to travel for 10 km to access good medical services. The long distance to medical care

facilities is aggravated by poor conditions of road. In case of emergencies such conditions may

prove fatal for the people.

41. Access to markets is also restricted due to poor road connectivity. Further it also restricts

the interaction between buyers and sellers in the villages itself. This has led to limited sources of

income and employment opportunities for people especially off farm employment. The major

sources of income for households were found to be wages learned from agricultural labour, non

agricultural labour and agriculture. Due to limited access to services, goods and restricted

mobility, diversification of sources of income has been found to be lacking in the project areas.

19

42. Thus the project had more than one positive impact on the lives of the people and for the

progress of their communities. However there were counter views on the impact of the project

by the people. Some people opined that there would be loss of income, livelihood and structural

losses by way of the project. Also many people especially women suggested that the project

would result in heavy vehicle movement posing a threat to the safety of their children and

domestic animals that may stray onto the roads.

43. Overall it can be said that the people perceived the project to be of paramount

importance to them as it was pivotal for their social and economic growth and development.

4.2. Road Safety Consultations

44. Consultations regarding road safety concerns were held in the project areas to assess

the issues and concerns of the APs regarding the same. This also aimed at ascertaining the

specific safety precautions that need to be adopted once the roads are constructed.

45. These consultations were usually held with members of the community which included

women, youth, teachers, members of local self government etc. In each of these consultations

there were 20- 30 members.

46. As per the consultations held with the community members it was seen that they

demanded construction of speed breakers in areas of habitation and schools. This demand rose

from the apprehension of the community regarding the heavy vehicular movement as a result of

the project. This would pose danger to the children and domestic animals that may stray onto

the roads.

47. In addition to the speed breakers, the community also requested putting up relevant road

sign boards along areas of habitation and schools.

48. Road Safety Leaflets translated in the local language (Bengali) were handed out to all

community members during the sessions, which they kept carefully with themselves.

4.3. Consultations with APs during Census Survey and Willingness to Donate Land

49. To raise awareness regarding the land being donated per household as well as the

extent of loss borne, to record feedback/concerns/suggestions of the APs, if any and to make

clear communication on the linkages with RD schemes in case the APs are eligible for the

same, consultations were held with vulnerable APs. The consultations were successful in

providing the APs with further clarity regarding the Project, and hence motivate the APs as well

build their confidence regarding the process of voluntary land donation.

50. Since such consolations and discussions were held with APs individually as well in

groups at each step of the project (transect walks, SES and other FGDs), the APs did not raise

many concerns regarding the project. They were convinced regarding the positive impact of the

project and considered that the losses that they would suffer would be minimal considering the

good for the larger community.

20

51. In majority of the road sections the APs were willing to donate their land voluntarily

except for APs in two road sections. These are the Joykrishnapur to Gobindpur (Burdwan) and

Putia to Ramchandrapur (Murshidabad).

52. In Joykrishnapur to Gobindpur road section, 7 AP‟s refused to donate their agricultural

land and hence census survey was not done with them. In Putia to Ramchandrapur 1 AP

refused to donate his residential land and belongings which would be affected by way of the

project. The land belongs to the Government and it has been used for squatting. It is pertinent to

note that during the census, discussions were held with these households as well as Sarpanch

and local leaders to discuss the refusal for land donation by them. It was agreed that the local

leaders and community members would convince these 8 APs to donate their assets for the

project as it meant good for the larger community. As a result, these two road sections were not

dropped from the purview of the project.

53. Overall it can be said that the community is eagerly waiting for the implementation of the

project. The community members feel that the preparation for the Project has been going on for

a long time now and have requested for the commencement of the civil works of the same.

21

Chapter Five: Project Impacts

54. The chapter discusses the major types of losses incurred by the APs, as well as the

socio-economic impacts the losses may have on the vulnerable APs. Accordingly a study is also

made of the mitigation measures that may be adopted as per the approved mitigation matrix.

5.1. Type of Loss Incurred by APs

55. According to the data from the census a total of 1482 APs were identified during the

Census that took place from June to October 2011 in West Bengal across the 5 project districts.

It is pertinent to note that of these 1482 APs, 151 APs were absent (visiting relative‟s house,

migrated etc) during the census and thus were not included in the census. Further 7 APs

residing along the Joykrishnapur to Gobindpur (Burdwan) and 1 AP along the Putia to

Ramchandrapur (Murshidabad) road section refused to donate their land for the project and

hence excluded from the project. Thus in total 1323 APs were surveyed during the census. The

following table (5.1) enumerates the type of losses incurred by the APs along 16 road sections.

No APs were identified along the Kapasdanga Bridge to Kapasdanga Jitpur (Murshidabad) road

section.

22

Table 5.1: Types of Loss Incurred by APs

Road Name AL

AL

+ R

(B

W

+ L

)

AL

+ R

(B

W)

AL

+ R

(L

)

AL

+ T

AL

+ T

+ R

(BW

+ L

)

AL

+ T

+ R

(BW

)

AL

+ T

+ R

(L)

C (

BW

)

C (

L)

C (

S)

R (

BW

+ L

)

R (

BW

)

R (

L)

R (

S)

RC

(S

)

T

T +

R (

BW

)

T +

R (

L)

T +

R (

BW

+

L)

T +

C(L

)

Gra

nd

To

tal

Biborda To Sh9 36

1

1

1

39

Charpaikmari To Chardebipur

63

1

6

70

Goborda To Satpatta

169

3

172

Joy Krishnapur To Gobindpur

110

2

1

113

Joypur To Gelia 165 3

1 2 1

8

7

1

3

191

Keothshah Bazar To Jasaikathi

22

6

28

Old Bangaon East To

Pratapnagar 14

1

54

69

Panchthupi To Molla

166

3

1

3

173

Putia To Jat Biswanath

1

7

8

Putia To Ramchandrapur

18

1

22

6

47

Ranicherra Tea Garden To Paschim Damdim

1

1

T 14 At Sarkarpara To

Munshipara 86 1

8 10

4

1 37

41

1

1

190

T05 At Bikasnagar To

Rajfapri

1

1

23

T07 Lal School To Brazerkuthi

54 6

7 10 1

1

4

22

3

5 2 1 116

T-10 (Dhengram To

Bishanpur) 34

17

1 1

53

Uttar Laxmipur To Tanaghata

Ferry Ghat 12

1

2

1 29 5

2

52

Grand Total 950 10 4 16 26 2 2 5 1 2 4 100 101 76 1 1 7 3 6 5 1 1323

Source: Census Survey, Rural Connectivity Investment Programme, 2011(Please note: AL= Agriculture Land, R=Residential, C=Commercial, RC=Residential cum

Commercial, S=Structure, BW=Boundary Wall, L=Land, T=Tree)

24

56. As seen from the table above, 72% (950 AP) of the 1323 APs are bearing an impact on

their agricultural land while 21% APs are losing their residential assets. In rural areas, majority

of the households own agriculture land which is usually outside the inhabited area of the village.

Adverse impacts of the residential assets have been avoided due to the construction of CC

roads. However impact on agriculture land cannot be avoided due to minimal availability of land

on existing tracks.

5.2. Vulnerability of APs

57. Asian Development Bank‟s Social Safeguard Policy Statement 2009 defines certain

sections of the society as vulnerable. These include especially those below the poverty line, the

landless, the elderly, women and children, and Indigenous Peoples, and those without legal title

to land. These groups of society by way of their socio economic characteristics are unable to

enjoy the benefits of infrastructure development. To avoid the same, these groups are identified

during Initial Poverty Social Assessment and Census and measures are taken to incorporate

special measures to address the issues that arise from their vulnerability status while planning

and designing the projects.

58. During the census, of the 1323 APs, 976 APs were found to be suffering from

vulnerability. As seen in table 5.2 below, 20.70% of the VAPs (Vulnerable APs) belong to

households (HH) headed by elderly while 16.39% are SC HH. According to the Census of India

2001 data, the total population of West Bengal is 80,176,197. Of these 18,452,555 persons is

SC, constituting 23% of the total population of the state. There are fifty nine (59) notified SC

which include the Rajbanshi, Namasudra, Bagdi, Pod, Chamar etc. However ST constitutes only

2.3% of the VAPs. It is important to note that nearly half of the VAPs (49.80%) suffer from

multiple vulnerabilities rendering them at greater risk of being marginalised and not getting

benefits of development.

59. Depending on the type and extent of household vulnerability among the APs, the Project

provides for assistance and support to be provided to all vulnerable APs as per the agreed

mitigation matrix. The mitigation measures would primarily aim at linking all vulnerable APs with

appropriate Rural Development Schemes that may enable them to minimize the adverse effects

of the losses being incurred by them.

60. The stretch wise list of APs is annexed as ANNEXURE III and the stretch wise detail of affected assets is annexed as ANNEXURE IV.

25

Table 5.2: Vulnerability of APs

Road Name

BP

L

BP

L +

D

BP

L +

D +

E +

SC

BP

L +

D +

E

BP

L +

D +

SC

BP

L +

E

BP

L +

E +

SC

BP

L +

E +

ST

BP

L +

SC

BP

L +

ST

D

D +

E

D +

E +

SC

D +

E +

ST

D +

SC

E

E +

SC

E +

ST

FH

H

FH

H +

BP

L

FH

H +

BP

L +

E +

SC

FH

H +

BP

L +

E

FH

H +

E

FH

H +

SC

FH

H +

ST

FH

H +

BP

L +

E +

ST

SC

ST

Gra

nd

To

tal

Biborda To Sh9 8 3 2 3 5 1 1 1 24

Charpaikmari To Chardebipur 10

1

7 1

1

18

1

1

10

50

Goborda To Satpatta 12

2 1

11 13 6 22 18 2 1 1 2

15 13 6

1 11 11 148


1 1 1 1 1

3

1 36 4 1

6

56

Joypur To Gelia 6

3 1 7

19 1 2 1

3 17 11

1 1

47

120


6 2

3 3

1

5

20

Old Bangaon East To Pratapnagar

1 14

24

2 9

4

11

65

Panchthupi To Molla 15

8

1 2

59

1

86


2

2

1

5

Putia To Ramchandrapur 5

7

14

1

1

28

Ranicherra Tea Garden To Paschim

1 1

26

Damdim

T 14 At Sarkarpara To Munshipara 16

1 7 23

68

1

2 3 9

3 3

44

180

T05 At Bikasnagar To Rajfapri

1

1

T07 Lal School To Brazerkuthi 22 1

1

11 6 1 12 5

10 7

2 2 2 1 2

1 17 2 105

T-10 (Dhengram To Bishanpur)

1 2 8 2 8 1

8

3

1 1

9 44

Uttar Laxmipur To Tanaghata Ferry Ghat 1

2

3 6

2

1 3

10 6

1

8

43

Grand Total 95 1 2 5 5 69 77 16 155 32 7 8 4 2 6 202 63 10 3 5 5 6 5 6 1 3 160 23 976

Source: SES & Census Survey, Rural Connectivity Investment Programme, 2011(Please note: D = Disabled, E = Elderly, FHH = Female Headed Household)

27

5.3. Type of Loss Incurred by Vulnerable APs

61. As seen in table 5.1 above, the majority of the APs lose their agriculture land. In the

case of VAPs too this trend has been observed wherein 66.60% of the VAPs would bear an

impact on the agricultural land. Apart from loss of agricultural land, VAPs are found to be

incurring loss of their residential, commercial and residential cum commercial assets along with

trees. 7.07% of the total VAPs lose more than one type of assets by way of the project. 8.91%

of the VAPs would bear an impact on the boundary wall of their residential assets while another

8.91 VAPs on the boundary wall as well as land. Only one VAP would incur impact on the

residential structure while 7.17% on their residential land alone. Further in case of 3.6% (35

VAPs) of the 976 VAPs, it has been seen that they would lose both their agricultural and

residential assets.

62. Only 5 VAPs are losing their commercial assets of which 3 would bear an impact on the

main structure itself, one each on the land and boundary wall. Only one VAP would lose their

Residential cum Commercial (main structure) asset. 48 VAPs would lose their trees due to the

project.

63. The mitigation matrix provides for assistance measures specific to the type of loss being

incurred.

28

Table 5.3: Type of Loss Incurred by Vulnerable APs

Road Name AL

AL

+ R

(B

W +

L)

AL

+ R

(B

W)

AL

+ R

(L

)

AL

+ T

AL

+ T

+ R

(B

W +

L)

AL

+ T

+ R

(B

W)

AL

+ T

+ R

(L

)

C (

BW

)

C (

L)

C (

S)

R (

BW

+ L

)

R (

BW

)

R (

L)

R (

S)

RC

(S

)

T

T +

C(L

)

T +

R (

BW

+ L

)

T +

R (

BW

)

T +

R (

L)

Gra

nd

To

tal

Biborda To Sh9 21

1

1

1

24


45

1

4

50

Goborda To Satpatta

146

2

148


55

1

56


8

6

1

2

120


16

4

20

Old Bangaon East To

Pratapnagar 11

1

53

65

Panchthupi To Molla

80

3

1

2

86


1

4

5


10

16

2

28


1

1

T 14 At 79 1

8 9

4

36

41

1

1 180

29

Sarkarpara To Munshipara

T05 At Bikasnagar To

Rajfapri

1

1


47 5

7 10 1

1

4

21

2 1 2

4 105

T-10 (Dhengram To

Bishanpur) 29

13

1 1

44

Uttar Laxmipur To Tanaghata

Ferry Ghat 9

1

2

1 23 5

2

43

Grand Total 650 8 4 15 22 1 2 5 1 1 3 87 87 70 1 1 6 1 4 2 5 976

Source: SES & Census Survey, Rural Connectivity Investment Programme, 2011(Please note: AL= Agriculture Land, R=Residential, C=Commercial,

RC=Residential cum Commercial, S=Structure, BW=Boundary Wall, L=Land, T=Tree)

30

5.4. Extent of Impact on Agricultural Land among Vulnerable APs

64. As seen in table 5.3 above, 707 VAPs are losing their agriculture asset of which 57

VAPs lose other assets as well. During the census attempt was made to gauge the extent of

loss of the VAPs who would lose their agriculture assets.

65. As seen in table 5.4 below, 42% of the VAPs would lose less than 1% of their total

agriculture land by way of the project. Further 37% of the VAPs would lose 1-5% of their asset

while 8% would bear an impact of 5-10% on their agriculture land. Further only 13% (89 VAPs)

would lose more than 10% of their agriculture land by way of the project.

31

Table 5.4: Extent of Agricultural Land Loss Incurred by Vulnerable APs

Road Name ≤1% 1-5% 5-10% More Than 10% Grand Total

Biborda To Sh9 7 9 1 3 20

Charpaikmari To Chardebipur 13 9 6 5 33

Goborda To Satpatta 51 43 7 7 108

Joy Krishnapur To Gobindpur 20 20 1 2 43

Joypur To Gelia 40 46 11 5 102

Keothshah Bazar To Jasaikathi 5 5 1 4 15

Old Bangaon East To Pratapnagar 14 13 3 12 42

Panchthupi To Molla 28 16 3 4 51

Putia To Jat Biswanath 1 1 1 3

Putia To Ramchandrapur 10 5 1 4 20


1

1

T 14 At Sarkarpara To Munshipara 52 51 9 26 138


1

1

T07 Lal School To Brazerkuthi 35 27 7 9 78

T-10 (Dhengram To Bishanpur) 6 9 4 4 23

Uttar Laxmipur To Tanaghata Ferry Ghat 14 9 2 4 29

Grand Total 296 265 57 89 707

Source: SES & Census Survey, Rural Connectivity Investment Programme, 2011

32

5.5. Ownership Pattern of Land/Structure among Vulnerable APs

66. During census in West Bengal it was seen that owners of three assets (residential and

commercial) were squatters while the owners of the rest of the assets were titleholders. Both

VAPs identified as squatters have been using the government land along the road section as

they do not own land by themselves in their villages. This implies that for majority of the VAPs,

the impact of the project would be on their owned asset. This implies impact on their livelihood

(especially in case of agriculture land, commercial and residential cum commercial assets) and

income. Table 5.5 below enumerates the land/structure ownership pattern.

33

Table 5.5: Land/Structure Ownership Pattern

Road Name

Titleholder Squatter Grand Total Agriculture Residential Commercial

Residential Cum Commercial

Residential Commercial

Biborda To Sh9 21 2

23

Charpaikmari To Chardebipur 45 4 1

50

Goborda To Satpatta 148

148

Joy Krishnapur To Gobindpur 55 1

56


121

Keothshah Bazar To Jasaikathi 16 4

20


11 53 1

65

Panchthupi To Molla 84 5

89

Putia To Jat Biswanath 1 4

5

Putia To Ramchandrapur 10 18

28

T 14 At Sarkarpara To Munshipara

101 91

192

T07 Lal School To Brazerkuthi 71 44 1

1

117

T-10 (Dhengram To Bishanpur) 29 13

1

43

Uttar Laxmipur To Tanaghata Ferry Ghat

12 33 1

46


1

1


1 1

Total 707 290 5 1 1 1 1005


34

5.6. Sources of Income among Vulnerable APs

67. Income earned through agriculture activities has been found to be the most important

source of income for 42.39% of the VAPs. In rural parts of the country, it has been seen that the

HH are dependent on agriculture for earning income. Hence even if the land holding size are

small, the main livelihood source for majority of the HH is agriculture. The other major source of

income for the VAPs has been found to be income earned from agriculture labour activities

(35.96% of the 976 VAPs). It is pertinent to note that 16.70% (163 VAPs) VAPs earn their

income from more than one source. Table 5.6 below presents the data for the various sources

of income of the VAPs.

35

Table 5.6: Sources of Income among Vulnerable APs

Road Name

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Ag

ricu

ltu

re &

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re &

All

ied

Ag

ricu

ltu

re A

cti

vit

ies

Ag

ricu

ltu

re &

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

Co

mm

erc

e &

Tra

de

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

An

y O

the

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

Ho

us

eh

old

In

du

str

ies

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

An

y O

the

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

Ho

us

eh

old

In

du

str

ies

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

All

ied

Ag

ricu

ltu

re A

cti

vit

ies

An

y O

the

r

Co

mm

erc

e &

Tra

de

Fo

restr

y

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b &

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ho

us

eh

old

In

du

str

ies

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

ral

Lab

ou

r

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

ral

Lab

ou

r &

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Pri

vate

Serv

ice

Pro

fessio

nal

Pvt.

Serv

ice &

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Skille

d L

ab

ou

r

Co

mm

erc

e &

Tra

de

+ A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Skille

d L

ab

ou

r +

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Gra

nd

To

tal

Biborda To Sh9 14 3 1 6 24

Charpaikmari To Chardebipur 25 4

18

1 2

50

Goborda To Satpatta 45 11

81

4

3

1

2

1

148

Joy Krishnapur To Gobindpur 39 6

6

1 1

1 1

1

56


54 1

2 7

2

4

120

Keothshah Bazar To Jasaikathi 6

10

1

1

1

1 20

Old Bangaon East To Pratapnagar 24

31

2 2

1 4

1

65

36

Road Name

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Ag

ricu

ltu

re &

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re &

All

ied

Ag

ricu

ltu

re A

cti

vit

ies

Ag

ricu

ltu

re &

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

Co

mm

erc

e &

Tra

de

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

An

y O

the

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

Ho

us

eh

old

In

du

str

ies

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

An

y O

the

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

Ho

us

eh

old

In

du

str

ies

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

All

ied

Ag

ricu

ltu

re A

cti

vit

ies

An

y O

the

r

Co

mm

erc

e &

Tra

de

Fo

restr

y

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b &

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ho

us

eh

old

In

du

str

ies

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

ral

Lab

ou

r

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

ral

Lab

ou

r &

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Pri

vate

Serv

ice

Pro

fessio

nal

Pvt.

Serv

ice &

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Skille

d L

ab

ou

r

Co

mm

erc

e &

Tra

de

+ A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Skille

d L

ab

ou

r +

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Gra

nd

To

tal

Panchthupi To Molla 39 13

25

1

3

4

1

86

Putia To Jat Biswanath 3

1

1

5

Putia To Ramchandrapur 8 2

10

1

1 2

4

28


1

1

T 14 At Sarkarpara To Munshipara 79 13 2

51

1

1 6

1

1 24

1

180


1

1

37

Road Name

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Ag

ricu

ltu

re &

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re &

All

ied

Ag

ricu

ltu

re A

cti

vit

ies

Ag

ricu

ltu

re &

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

Co

mm

erc

e &

Tra

de

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

An

y O

the

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

Ho

us

eh

old

In

du

str

ies

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

An

y O

the

r

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

Ho

us

eh

old

In

du

str

ies

Ag

ricu

ltu

re +

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

All

ied

Ag

ricu

ltu

re A

cti

vit

ies

An

y O

the

r

Co

mm

erc

e &

Tra

de

Fo

restr

y

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b &

Ag

ricu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Ho

us

eh

old

In

du

str

ies

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

ral

Lab

ou

r

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

ral

Lab

ou

r &

Go

vern

men

t Jo

b

No

n A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r +

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Pri

vate

Serv

ice

Pro

fessio

nal

Pvt.

Serv

ice &

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Skille

d L

ab

ou

r

Co

mm

erc

e &

Tra

de

+ A

gri

cu

ltu

re L

ab

ou

r

Skille

d L

ab

ou

r +

Ag

ricu

ltu

re

Gra

nd

To

tal

T07 Lal School To Brazerkuthi 66 2

25

3

9

105


1 16

1 1 1 1

1

3

1 1

44

Uttar Laxmipur To Tanaghata Ferry Ghat 9 5

17

2

1

2 6

1

43

Grand Total 404 79 2 1 1 351 1 3 1 1 1 2 6 4 21 8 1 5 1 5 59 1 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 976


38

5.7. Household Size of Vulnerable APs

68. As per the census, it has been seen that for 37% (373 VAPs) of the 976 VAPs the

annual income has been found to be less than Rs 25000. Additionally as seen in the preceding

sections (5.6), the dependence on agriculture and related activities is high among the VAPs. To

further assess the economic situation of the VAPs, attempt was made during the census to

ascertain the number of members each vulnerable HH has. It has been seen that in case of

60% (585 VAP HH) of the 976 VAPs, there are up to 5 members each. In the case of 32% (309

VAP HH) of the VAPs, it has been found that there are 6 to 10 members. Large families have

been found in 6% (57 VAP HH) wherein there are 11 to 15 family members and in remaining 3%

(25 VAP HH) there are more than 16 members. Table 5.7 below presents the HH members of

the VAP HH.

39

Table 5.7: Number of Members per Affected Vulnerable Household

Road Name 11 To 15 Members 6 To 10

Members More Than 16 Members Up To 5 Members Grand Total

Biborda To Sh9

10

14 24

Charpaikmari To Chardebipur 2 19 2 27 50

Goborda To Satpatta 13 49 3 83 148

Joy Krishnapur To Gobindpur 5 21 5 25 56

Joypur To Gelia 3 41 4 72 120

Keothshah Bazar To Jasaikathi 2 8

10 20

Old Bangaon East To Pratapnagar 6 19 2 38 65

Panchthupi To Molla 6 20 5 55 86


1 1 3 5

Putia To Ramchandrapur 5 10 2 11 28


1 1

T 14 At Sarkarpara To Munshipara 6 48

126 180


1 1

T07 Lal School To Brazerkuthi 2 34 1 68 105


26 44

Uttar Laxmipur To Tanaghata Ferry Ghat

4 14

25 43

Grand Total 57 309 25 585 976


40

5.8. Status of Literacy and Access to Health Facilities among Vulnerable APs

69. Literacy level among the 976 VAP HH has been found to be low with 27.7% of them

being illiterate. Further as seen in table 5.8.1 below, as the level of education goes higher, the

corresponding number of literates decreases. For instance 31.3% of the VAP HH members are

educated till the primary level while only 4.5% have studied till senior secondary. Only 0.4% of

the HH members have been found to be post graduates. Thus literacy level among the

respondents is jot very high and the most important reason attributed for the same is the long

distance to be travelled to access higher level of education. This is further aggravated due to

poor conditions of road, consequent poor transportation facilities and worsening of the situation

during monsoons.

Table 5.8.1: Education Level of Vulnerable Affected Household Members

Education Level Number of Household Members

% Household Members

Illiterate 1438 27.7

Primary 1622 31.3

Middle 1030 19.9

Secondary 671 12.9

Senior Secondary 231 4.5

Graduate 160 3.1

Post Graduate 20 0.4

No Response 10 0.2

Total 5182 100.0

Source: SES & Census Survey, Rural Connectivity Investment Programme,

2011

70. Access and use of another key facility which has been restricted due to poor condition of

roads and connectivity is the medical facilities. As seen in table 5.8.2 below, 78% of the VAPs

have opined that there are no proper medical facilities in their villages or in vicinity. Thus they

have to travel far distances for accessing the same. Among the rest 22% of the VAPs, different

types of facilities are available namely hospitals, nursing homes/dispensaries, health camps,

quacks and others.

71. The project has been perceived critical for the development of the villages by the

respondents. One of the key reason ofr the same is to access to educational and medical

facilities. The data from the census justifies the demands of the community.

Table 5.8.2: Availability of Health Facilities among Vulnerable APs

Road Name Any Other Health Camps

Hospital No Proper Facilities

Nursing Home/Dispensary

Quacks Grand Total

Biborda To Sh9

10

14

24


36 3 11 50

Goborda To Satpatta

9 1 137

1 148


1 1 44 9 1 56

Joypur To Gelia 1 3 1 107

8 120


11 9

20


11 26 18 10 65

Panchthupi To Molla

9 77

86


5

5


14

14

28

Ranicherra Tea Garden To

Paschim Damdim

1

1

T 14 At Sarkarpara To Munshipara

7

173

180


1

1


20

56 29

105

T-10 (Dhengram To Bishanpur)

5 2 37

44

Uttar Laxmipur To Tanaghata Ferry

Ghat

9 1 33

43

Grand Total 47 37 27 766 68 31 976


72. Detailed information on type and extent of loss per AP road section wise in the state of

West Bengal is provided as Annexure V.

42

Chapter Six: Assistance/ Support to Vulnerable APs

73. In accordance with the provisions of the Community Participation Framework, all

Vulnerable APs are entitled to assistance and support measures in order to ensure that they are

not adversely affected by the Project. The following categories of APs shall be entitled for

assistance/support as vulnerable APs:

Households Below Poverty Line2 (BPL) as per the state poverty line for rural areas;

Households who will become BPL as a result of loss to assets and/or livelihoods;

Households losing structure

Female Headed Households

Scheduled Castes

Scheduled Tribes

Disabled Person

Elderly

6.1. Mitigation Matrix

74. The support/ assistance would be provided to the vulnerable APs that have been

identified through the SES and Census Surveys in accordance with the Mitigation Matrix

provided in the Community Participation Framework. However it is important to note that even if

any VAP is suffering from more than one type of vulnerability, s/he would be considered for only

one vulnerability criterion for purposes of budgeting. This would be done to avoid duplication of

allowances.

75. The PIU will facilitate and coordinate the enrollment of vulnerable APs in rural

development schemes and delivery of entitlements as described in the agreed mitigation matrix.

Currently the RD schemes are implemented by Panchayats & Rural Development Department

in West Bengal. The PIUs will therefore coordinate with the respective government departments

and facilitate the enrollment to RD schemes.

76. The PIU will ensure the timely and fair disbursement of assistance through Panchayat

and proper enrollment of vulnerable APs in the RD schemes. The PIU will also liaison with other

line departments at the state and Panchayat level to facilitate smooth delivery and of RD

schemes in the subproject areas.

77. The Mitigation Matrix provided in the CPF may be viewed in Table 6.1.

2 The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criterions: a) Government list or BPL card b)

Community meeting, wherein the community confirms that an affected family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project.

Table 6.1: Mitigation Matrix for Support/Assistance to Vulnerable APs

Impact

Category

Mitigation Measures Responsibility

Loss of

Agricultural

Land

Willing transfer of land by means of MOU

Advance notice to harvest standing crops

For vulnerable affected persons (APs), assistance/support by means of (a) alternate land sites provided by GP, or (b) cash assistance as per replacement cost

3 by the Gram Panchayat (GP) to meet loss of land;

and inclusion as beneficiaries in the existing poverty alleviation/livelihood restoration programs.

For land involving traditional and tenurial rights, the legal provisions applicable of the central and state governments pertaining to transfer of land will be followed. Existing customary rights of the tribal communities on various categories of land shall be taken into account during the process of land transfer.

GP, PIU and

land revenue

department

Loss of

Structure

Provision of alternate plot of land and structure of equivalent quality and value to be provided as per AP‟s choice, or cash assistance by GP to meet the loss of land and structure allowing the AP to purchase land and rebuild structure of equivalent standard

For loss of boundary walls and fences, willing transfer by means of MOU. In case voluntary donation of such structures are not possible, cash assistance as per replacement cost by GP to meet loss of such structures, or provision of materials and/or labor by GP to allow the AP to replace/rebuild the same

For vulnerable APs, inclusion as beneficiaries in the rural development (RD) programs/housing schemes

For tenants, assistance to find alternative rental arrangements by GP, or cash assistance equivalent to advance payments made to the owner

For squatters, provision of alternative relocation site, or cash assistance as per replacement cost, or provision of building material and/or labor by GP, or inclusion as beneficiaries in the RD programs/housing schemes.

For land and structure involving traditional and tenurial rights, the legal provisions applicable of the central and state governments pertaining to transfer of land will be followed. Existing customary rights of the tribal communities on various categories of land shall be taken into account during the process of land transfer.

GP, PIU and

land revenue

department

Loss of

livelihood

For vulnerable APs, inclusion as beneficiaries in the existing poverty alleviation /livelihood restoration programs. In case of non inclusion in such programs, cash assistance to meet the loss of income during transitional phase and for income restoration.

Assistance for asset creation4 by community and Gram Panchayat.

GP and PIU

3 Replacement cost means the "cost" to replace the lost asset at current market value or its nearest equivalent, plus

any transaction costs such as administrative charges, taxes, registration and titling costs allowing the individual / community to replace what is lost and their economic and social circumstances to be at least restored to the pre-project level. 4 Assistance for asset creation shall comprise of assistance for creation of cattle shed, shop, production unit or any

other form of income generating asset that will enable the affected household in restoring their livelihood.

44

Impact

Category

Mitigation Measures Responsibility

Loss of

Assets such

as Trees,

Well, and

Ponds

Willing transfer of the asset by means of MOU.

For vulnerable APs, assistance for the loss of these assets through inclusion as beneficiaries in the existing poverty alleviation/livelihood restoration programs. In case of non inclusion in such programs, cash assistance by GP to meet the loss of assets and income.

GP, PIU and

land revenue

department

Loss of

community

owned

assets such

as temple,

wells,

ponds,

grazing land

etc

Relocation or construction of asset by GP with technical inputs from PIU

Consultations with the concerned section of the community in case of grazing land, etc

GP, PIU and

land revenue

department

Temporary

impacts

during

construction

Civil works contract conditions to include provisions to obligate the contractor to implement appropriate mitigation measures for the temporary impacts include disruption of normal traffic, increased noise levels, dust generation, and damage to adjacent parcel of land due to movement of heavy machinery to be included the Civil Works Contract

PIU

Other

impacts not

identified

Unforeseen impacts will be documented and mitigated based on the principles in the CPF.

Source: Community Participation Framework, Rural Connectivity Investment Programme

6.2. Rural Development (RD) Schemes

78. In order to mitigate project related losses and assist the vulnerable households, the

mitigation matrix provides the option of linking the vulnerable affected household with the on-

going rural development schemes available at the respective district levels.

79. The following table 6.2 provides some of the appropriate RD schemes that the

vulnerable APs may be linked with:

Table 6.2: Rural Development Schemes for Assistance to Vulnerable APs

Name of the Scheme Eligibility/beneficiary Kind of assistance

1. Indira Awaas

Yojana (IAY)

Prioritization of beneficiaries will be

as follows:

(i) Freed bonded laborers

(ii) SC/ST households

(iii) Families/widows of personnel

from defense killed in action

(iv) Non- SC/ST BPL households

(v) Physically and mentally

challenged persons

(vi) Ex-servicemen and retired

members of the paramilitary forces.

(vii) Displaced persons on account

of developmental projects,

nomadic/semi-nomadic, and de-

notified tribals, families with

physically/mentally challenged

members

The objective of the Indira Awaas Yojana is primarily to help construction/ upgradation of dwelling units

Funds available under the Scheme in a district are earmarked for various categories as under:

(i) At least 60% of the total lAY

allocation during a financial year

should be utilized for construction/ up

gradation of dwelling units for SC/ST

BPL households

(ii) A maximum 40% for non-SC/ST

BPL rural households

(iii) 3% houses reserved for BPL

disabled persons living in rural areas

If any particular category is

exhausted or not available in a

district, allocation can be utilized for

other categories as per priorities

given in the Guidelines after it has

been certified to this effect by the

Zilla Parishad/ DRDA concerned.

2. Credit-cum

Subsidy Scheme for

Rural Housing

Rural households (APL or BPL)

who could not be covered under

IAY and have annual income below

Rs. 32,000. Preference will be

given to BPL households, SC/ST

At least minimum 60% funds allocated under the scheme as subsidy to each state shall be utilized in financing construction of houses for SC, ST and freed bonded laborers.

Ceiling of subsidy under the Scheme Rs. 10,000 per household.

The upper limit of construction loan under this scheme will be Rs. 40,000 only.

3. Mahatma Gandhi

National Rural

Employment

Guarantee Act

(MNREGA)

Adult members who volunteer to do unskilled manual work may apply to GP

Enhancement of livelihood security of households in rural areas by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in every financial year

Wages to be paid as per Minimum Wages Act 1948

46

3. Swampoorna

Grameen Rozgar

Yojana (SGRY)

Includes rural poor (BPL and APL)

Preference given to poorest among

poor, and SC/ST

Wage employment in manual or unskilled work

4. Jawahar Rozgar

Yojana (JRY)

Includes rural poor with preference

to weaker sections SC/ST and

women

Wage employment during lean agricultural season

5. Swarnajayanti

Gram Swarozgar

Yojana (SGSY)

Includes poor families Organizing the rural poor into Self Help Groups (SHGs) through the process of social mobilization, their training and capacity building and provision of income generating assets.

6. National Social

Assistance

Programme (NSAP)

National Old Age

Pension Scheme

(NOAP)

Old persons who are destitute in

the sense of having no regular

means of subsistence from their

own sources of income or through

financial support from family

members or other sources.

Elderly Person provided financial assistance per month

Implemented by the Panchayats

Source: Rural Development Department, Government of Orissa & Planning Commission of India

80. A list of some of key rural development schemes in West Bengal is enclosed as

Annexure V

6.3. Due Diligence of RD Schemes

81. Consultations were held with PRI members on each road section regarding the various

Rural Development Schemes that are known to them and have been implemented in the

villages.

82. From the discussions held, it has been found that two most popular schemes

implemented across villages is the MNREGA and IAY schemes. Apart from these, several

pension schemes and sanitation schemes are implemented. However these were found to be

implemented in few villages only. Another scheme that is in the process of implementation is the

scheme for BPL card holders for free electricity supply.

83. With regards to MNREGA, a mixed reaction to the scheme has been found among the

participants of the consultations. In districts such as Bankura and Burdwan, the participants

opined that the scheme was actively implemented earlier but now it has ceased to function.

Widespread corruption in the implementation of schemes has been cited as the most important

reason for the same. On the other hand, participants in Murshidabad were extremely happy with

the implementation of the scheme and many of them were earning wages as per the scheme.

The type of work obtained by villagers under MNREGA comprised of labour work, required in

construction of roads, wells, buildings, canals etc, against a daily wage of Rs. 100 per day, for

100 days.

84. The Indira Awaas Yojana has been found to be implemented across all villages and in

the neighboring areas. Many HH in these areas are residing in houses constructed under the

scheme.

85. In some of villages especially those of North 24 Parganas, the sanitation scheme of the

Government is being implemented wherein toilets have been constructed in select HH.

86. Another popular scheme implemented among villages was the pension scheme. The

pension scheme is being implemented for three categories of persons namely elderly, widows

and Person With Disabilities. They get monthly pension of Rs 400 under this scheme.

87. On the whole it has been found that in most villages, the two schemes diligently

implemented are the IAY and pension scheme. Apart from these, the participants complained

that there are many schemes of the Government which are to be implemented but are not done

so. Even schemes such as MNREGA which were functional earlier have been stopped in many

villages.

88. Apart from the due diligence of existing RD schemes, the PRI members were also

informed that all scheme disbursals as part of the project would be taking place through them, to

which the PRIs have readily agreed.

48

Chapter Seven: Budget

89. The PIU is responsible for enrolling the vulnerable APs under the existing Rural

Development (RD) Schemes as per his/her vulnerability. The PIU will inform vulnerable APs on

the timeline of enrollment into a specific RD scheme. The states will acquire or make available

on a timely basis the land and rights in land, free from any encumbrances. Subsequent to award

of civil works contract under any subproject, no section or part thereof under the civil works

contract will be handed over to the contractor unless the applicable provisions of the CPF and

EAF/ECOP have been complied with.

90. The following is the budget for Cash assistance, alternate land, and replacement cost of

structure, if vulnerable APs cannot be linked to RD schemes:

Table 7.1: Budget

Item Unit

Rates

(Rs.)

Quantity Assistance (Rs.) Support Cost

A. Assistance

Transitional

Assistance for

Residential Loss (one

time assistance for

287 VAPs incurring

damage/loss to

residential land,

boundary wall and

main residential

structure)

Rs.

10,000 287 2,870,000.00

Transitional

Allowance for

Livelihood Losses

(one time allowance

for 724 VAPs losing

agriculture land and

commercial structure)

Rs.

25,000 724 18,100,000.00

Sub Total 20,970,000.00

B: Support implementation of CPP

PD PIU (on deputation)

RO in PIU (on deputation)

Item Unit

Rates

(Rs.)

Quantity Assistance (Rs.) Support Cost

Capacity building 2,00,000

Sub- Total 2,00,000

C: Consultation & Information Dissemination

Brochures 20 500 10,000

Pamphlets 5 5,000 25,000

Consultation 33 5,000 1,65,000

Sub-Total 2,00,000

D: Grievance redressal

Per meeting 5000 20 1,00,000

Sub Total 1,00,000

TOTAL OF ALL SUB TOTAL 21,470,000.00

Contingency (10%) 2,147,000.00

GRAND TOTAL

Rs. 23,617,000.00

50

Chapter Eight: Implementation Arrangements

8.1 Key Agencies: Roles and Responsibilities

91. The key agencies involved in implementation of this Framework are as follows:

Program Implementation Unit (PIU) with support of the Project Implementation

Consultant (PIC)

Panchayat Raj Institution (PRI)

State Implementing Agency: Orissa State Rural Roads Agency (OSRRA)

State Executing Agency: Rural Works Organisation

Ministry of Rural Development (MORD)/National Rural Roads Development Agency

(NRRDA)

92. Table 8.1 below summarizes the major tasks under the CPP and responsible agencies

for the tasks.

Table 8.1: Major Tasks as proposed under the CPF and Responsible Agencies

Project stage Task Target

Groups

Responsible

agency/Person Time Frame

Road

Selection

stage

Dissemination of PMGSY

road under Core network Community

PIU (EE/AE), ZP, GP

(Sarpanch)

After approval of

Core Network

Selection of Roads PIU (EE/AE), ZP, GP

Pro

ject

Pla

nn

ing

& D

esig

n S

tag

e

DP

R P

rep

ara

tio

n S

tag

e

Dissemination of Project

Information Community

PIU (AE/JE), GP

(Sarpanch), PIC

First week of

DPR preparation

Sensitization of community Community

PIU (AE/JE), GP

(Sarpanch), panchayat

Members, PIC

First week of

DPR preparation

Finalization of alignment

(Transect Walk, alignment

shifts & incorporation of

community suggestion)

Community

PIU (AE/JE), GP

(Sarpanch), Panchayat

Members, Revenue Dept

(Patwari), Other Dept

Officials (if required), PIC

First month of

DPR Preparation

Consultations with

Community/APs

Community/

APs

PIU (AE/JE), GP


Members, PIC

5th week of DPR

Preparation,

after alignment

finalization

Census for Profile of APs APs

PIU (AE/JE), GP


Members, PIC

5th to 6

th week of

DPR Preparation

Identification of vulnerable

APs

Vulnerable

APs

PIU (AE/JE), GP


Members, PIC

6th week of the

DPR preparation

Dissemination of process

of voluntary donation,

support/assistance options

and grievance procedures

APs

PIU (AE/JE), GP


Members, PIC

7th week of DPR

Preparation

Finalization of

support/assistance

Vulnerable

APs

PIU (AE/JE), GP


Members, DRDA, DoSW,

DoTW, PIC

8th week of DPR

preparation

Marking of Alignment -

PIU (AE/JE), GP



(Patwari), PIC

12 th week of

DPR Preparation

Incorporating impact

mitigation measures in

DPR

-

PIU (AE/JE), GP


Members, PIC

End of fourth

month of DPR

preparation

Scrutiny and approval of

DPR -

State Technical Agency

and TSC

Sit

e P

rep

ara

tio

n S

tag

e

Po

st

DP

R S

tag

e

Collection of MOUs APs

PIU (AE/JE), GP



(Patwari),

First month of

implementation

after approval of

DPR

Advance notice to farmers

with standing crops APs

PIU (AE/JE), GP


Members,

First month of

implementation

after approval of

DPR

Relocation/Shifting of

structures / Common

Property Resources

Community/ APs

PIU (AE/JE), GP



(Patwari),

By the 2nd

month

of

implementation

after approval

Provision of assistance Eligible APs

PIU (AE/JE), GP


Members,

Between 3rd

-5th

month of

implementation

after approval of

DPR

52

Enrollment into RD

schemes Eligible APs

PIU (AE/JE), GP


Members, DRDS, DoSW,

DoTW

From 3rd

month

of

implementation

after approval of

DPR

Physical possession of

land by PIU -

PIU (AE/JE), GP



(Patwari),

From 3rd

month

of

implementation

after approval of

DPR

Temporary impacts during

construction community

GP (Sarpanch),

Panchayat Members,

Contractors

From 4th month

of project

implementation

till completion of

construction

work

Po

st

DP

R S

tag

e

Health impacts including

HIV/AIDS Community

GP (Sarpanch),

Panchayat Members,

Contractors, PHC, DACS

From 4th month

of Project

implementation,

till completion of

construction

work

Co

nstr

ucti

on

sta

ge

Redressal of grievances Community/APs

PIU (AE/JE), GP



(Patwari),

Throughout

Project cycle

Unforeseen impacts Community

PIU (AE/JE), GP



(Patwari), Contractors

From 4th month

of project

implementation ,

till completion of

construction

work

MOU for local resources Community Contractor , GP

(Sarpanch)

From 4th month

of Project

implementation

till completion of

construction

work

Po

st

Co

nstr

u

cti

on

Sta

ge

Reclamation of temporarily

used land, borrow area,

water body, etc.

Community Contractor as per

contract conditions

Tree Plantation Community

GP (Sarpanch),

Panchayat Members,

Community

Monitoring Progress Internal: PIU (AE/JE)

External: TSC

PIU – Project Implementation Unit, GP – Gram panchayat, ZP – Zila Panchayat, DRDA – District Rural

Development Agency, DoRD – Department of Rural Development, DoSW/TD – Department of Social

Welfare/Tribal Development, DACS – District Aids Control Society, PHC – Primary Health Centre, TSC-

Technical Support Consultants.

8.2. Responsibilities of Key Agencies

93. The section provides a detailed description of the responsibilities of the agencies listed

above:

8.2.1. State Social Safeguard Cells:

94. In order to ensure effective implementation of social safeguard processes and

accountability of Social Safeguarding interests, procedures and documents post the

demobilization of the PIC, it is necessary to formulate state level Social Safeguard Cells. The

social safeguard cell is noted to be operational in the Project state of West Bengal and has the

following key responsibilities:

Coordinate all agencies involved in dealing with Social safeguards process

Assist the PIU and PIC in organizing social safeguard processes as mentioned in CPF

Ensuring documentation of all documents on time

Facilitate PIU/PIC for better linkage with APs

Monitoring PIU and PIC

8.2.2. Program Implementation Unit (PIU)

95. The PIU will play the key role of coordinating with other concerned agencies and

facilitating the entire process. The PIU will facilitate and coordinate the enrollment of

vulnerable APs in rural development schemes and delivery of entitlements as described in the

agreed mitigation measures matrix.

96. The PIU will ensure that no malpractices are involved during the disbursement of

assistance through PRI and during enrollment of vulnerable APs in the RD schemes.

(a) District Level (EE/SE)

Ensure disclosure of the Core Network by the Zilla Parishad and Gram Panchayats at

Panchayat offices

Oversee land availability for taking up proposed roads

54

Ensure that Transect Walks and subsequent community consultation are properly

conducted by AE/JE

Provide support to AE/JE in making revenue records and maps available before the

Transect Walk

Ensure that MOUs are signed and support/assistance provided on time

(b) Field level (AE/JE)

Disseminate Project information at various stages of the Project implementation as

envisaged in this Framework

Ensure availability of revenue records and maps prior to the Transect Walk

Organize the Transect Walk with the Gram Panchayat concerned and with participation

of Revenue Department officials and forest officials, if required

Finalize alignment through community participation giving proper consideration to road

safety and scope for future growth

Along with Patwari and PRI identify land to be additionally required and land/asset

ownership including customary rights in tribal areas

Verify ownership of impacted land parcels trough proof of ownership during census

Verify vulnerability of APs based on the criteria adopted

Coordinate with DRDA, DoTW, DoSW etc for finalization of support/assistance and

schedule for enrolments

Ensure provision of support/assistance as per schedule with support of PRI

Initiate process of land transfer and addressal of grievances involving the PRI

Collect MOU from landowners with support of PRI

Responsible for addressal of additional unforeseen impacts during construction

Ensure incorporation of social issues in DPR prior to approval from STA

Monitor the progress of Framework tasks during implementation in coordination with PRI

(c) Project Implementation Consultant (PIC)

97. At the PIU level the Social Development/Safeguard Specialist of the PIC will support the

PIU in every aspect of the implementation of the Framework provisions and identified impact

mitigation measures. He/she will also closely interact with the PRI and representatives of other

agencies at the village and district levels concerned with social safeguard aspects of the

Project. He/she will be a professionally trained expert with a Master‟s Degree in relevant

disciplines.

Assist the PIU in organizing Transect Walk for documenting the social features and

profile along the subproject roads

Undertake a detailed inventory of the land and structures getting affected along the

proposed alignment by means of a census covering the 100% affected households along

the alignment, and identify vulnerable APs among them

Based on the survey, prepare support/assistance options for the APs with particular

attention to vulnerable groups

Assist the PIU and the relevant panchayats in disseminating information on land transfer,

support/assistance options and grievance procedures

Assist the PIU and the concerned panchayat in preparing the documentation for land

transfer (MOU)

Assist the PIU in monitoring of the progress of mitigation measures during

implementation

(d) Role of NGO

98. If PIC are not hired or are delayed, the PIU will use the services of the local NGOs in

undertaking consultations, surveys and in the implementation of the CPP.

8.2.3. Panchayati Raj Institutions

(a) District Level (Zilla Parishad)

Display of Core Network at the Zilla Parishad and Gram Panchayat Office

Disseminate project information to the project affected community in coordination with

the PIU

Ensure establishment of a Land Management Committee at the village level and a

Grievance Redressal Committee at the district level for grievance Redressal

(b) Field level (Sarpanch and other Panchayat Members)

Display of Core Network at the Zilla Parishad and Gram Panchayat Office

Disseminate Project information to the community in coordination with the PIU

Facilitate finalization of alignment during Transect Walk along with PIU and Revenue

Department

Encourage community participation during Transect Walk and consultations

Organize consultations involving community and APs to disclose Transect Walk output

Encourage community/APs to voluntarily donate assets especially land

Facilitate the survey of profiles of APs

Facilitate identifying vulnerable APs and their verification

Facilitate finalization of procedure for land transfer and provision of support/assistance

Collect MOU from land owners and subsequently submit to PIU

Facilitate consultation by the civil works contractor with community prior to mobilization

of machinery

Supervise the mitigation measures during implementation and its progress in

coordination with PIU

56

8.2.4. State IA

Ensure that all DPR for subprojects are completed with the required formats on

community participation and social safeguard aspects

Ensure that the DPRs are reviewed by the Technical Support Consultants and also by

the State Technical Agency (STA)

Ensure that bidding document of civil works covers mitigation measures to address

temporary impacts during construction

Undertake routine monitoring on the implementation of mitigation measures and

grievances and advise PIUs in resolving grievances

8.2.5. State EA

Provide the State IA and PIUs with resources required to implement the CPF

Ensure that all CPF requirements are met by the State IA

Ensure that MOU are signed and support/assistance provided on time

8.2.6. MORD/ NRRDA

Undertake due diligence systematically for the implementation of the CPF.

Guide state agencies to resolve critical implementation issues and, if required, update

the Framework through review of the internal and external monitoring outputs.

Enforcement of all such changes will be carried forward with prior approval from ADB.

Required to submit the subproject proposals for the additional 100 km rural roads in the

state for ADB review prior to giving final approval. ADB will also conduct field review of

the implementation of the Framework provisions for the same subprojects. If ADB is

satisfied with the implementation of the core sample subprojects and additional 100 km

subprojects, further approval of subproject proposals will be by MORD.

8.3. Grievance Redressal Mechanism

99. Grievances, if any, will be resolved at the village level. A Land Management

Committee (LMC) consisting of all members of Gram Panchayat, Lekhpal of Gram Sabha as

Secretary, Pradhan, Up-Pradhan of Gram Panchayat will be the Chairman and Vice-Chairman

of the LMC. The LMC shall act as the village level grievance committee, and will meet for

addressing grievances once in a month until DPR approval and quarterly after initiation of the

construction work until completion of the construction work. Residual grievances shall be

addressed through a Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) at the district level, comprising:

(i) Executive Engineer of the PIU

(ii) Sub-collector of Revenue Department

(iii) Member of Zilla Parishad

(iv) Member of the grievance committee of the concerned GP

100. Representatives of APs will be active participants in the proceedings of grievance

redressal. Figure 8.2 below further represents the grievance redressal mechanism.

Figure 8.2: Grievance Redressal Mechanism

Agencies Involved

AE/JE, Sarpanch,

Other GP Members, Patwari

EE, Sub-collector,

Members of Zilla Parishad,

Members of LMC, Representatives

of AP

* AP- Affected Person, LMC- Land

Management Committee, GRC –

Grievance Redressal Committee, AE

– Assistant Engineer, JE – Junior

Engineer, EE – Executive Engineer

* AP- Affected Person, LMC- Land Management Committee, GRC – Grievance Redressal Committee, AE – Assistant Engineer, JE –

Junior Engineer, EE – Executive Engineer

Aggrieved Individual AP

LMC at Village Level

Grievance Redressal

YES NO

Written complaint to GRC

at District Level

Hearing by GRC

Decision by GRC

Grievance Redressed

58

Chapter Nine: Monitoring and Reporting Procedures

9.1. Monitoring System

101. The State IA shall be responsible for supervision of the Framework implementation. In

order to monitor the implementation of the Framework provisions, a two-tier monitoring system

will be followed:

a) Internal Monitoring b) External Monitoring and Evaluation

9.2. Internal Monitoring: 102. The Project Implementation Units (PIUs) will be responsible for the internal monitoring

throughout the implementation of the Project. The PIU shall collect the data as per the

monitoring indicators adopted and report them to the State IA. The data shall be later audited by

the Social Development Specialist of the Technical Support Consultant (TSC). The Junior

Engineer (JE) will communicate the report, on a monthly basis, to the Gram Panchayat to

enable a discussion on the same in quarterly meeting of the Panchayat.

9.3. External Monitoring and Evaluation 103. The Technical Support Consultant (TSC) will perform the task of the external

monitoring and evaluation. The TSC will have Social Development Specialist as part of the

team, who will be responsible for organizing tasks for monitoring and evaluation. The monitoring

cycle will be once in six months. The TSC will submit monitoring reports to the State IA,

NRRDA and ADB.

As external monitor, TSC will be responsible for the following:

i. Review DPRs for all additional subprojects prepared by PIUs to assess whether the

Framework requirements have been generally met during the planning and preparation

stages. Conduct verification on a sample basis of the information contained in the DPRs

through field visits to project affected communities.

ii. Review and verify the progress of the identified mitigation measures during

implementation on a sample basis.

iii. Based on the review and verification above, evaluate the effectiveness of the community

participation process defined in the Framework in mitigating adverse socioeconomic

impacts of the Project, and recommend improvements to the Framework procedures.

iv. Conduct on a sample basis monitoring of socioeconomic indicators associated with the

well-being of the project affected communities and persons, and evaluate if the

mitigation measures have brought about intended outcome.

104. The key formats for reporting and monitoring implementation of the plan are in Annex

VII. In addition, Gram Panchayat which is an independent legally constituted people‟s body will

be the independent third party monitor for the Project.

ANNEXURE

Annexure I: Memorandum of Understanding

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

(in case signing is done individually)

This memorandum of understanding is made on _____________day of _____ 2011 between

Sri/Srimati_______________________________ resident of______________________________

(hereinafter referred to as “the First Party”) and the Governor of (State) through

Sri/Srimati_______________________________(designation) _________________ (hereinafter

referred to as “the Second Party”).

THESE PRESENTS WITNESS AS FOLLOW:

1. That the First Party is landowners with transferable right of _______________acres of land

bearing khasra Nos_______________ in village __________________________ block

_______________, tehsil________________________, district _________________.

2. That the First Party has taken part in the transect walk conducted under the requirements of the

Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) and has been made to understand the benefits of

obtaining a rural road for the village under PMGSY.

3. That the First Party hereby grants to the Second Party, out of its free will, above said land for

the construction and development of PMGSY rural road in the village ___________ under

_______________Panchayat for the benefit of the villagers and the public at large.

4. That the First Party would not claim any compensation against the above said grant of land.

5. That the Second Party agrees to accept the above grant of land for the purposes mentioned in

Clause

6. That the Second Party shall construct and develop the PMGSY road and take all possible

precautions to avoid damage to land adjacent to PMGSY road.

7. That the First Party also assures the Second Party that the first party will not indulge in any

willful act of damaging the PMGSY road or obstructing the movement of public and vehicles on the

PMGSY road.

- 2 -

8. That both the Parties hereto agree that the PMGSY road so constructed/developed shall be

public premises.

9. That the provisions of the MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING will come into force and

effect from the date of signing of this deed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have signed this deed on the day and the year first

above written.

Signatures of the First Party Signature for and on behalf of the Second Party

________________________ ________________________

Witnesses: Witnesses:

1. ____________________________ 1. _________________________

2.____________________________ 2.__________________________

(Signature, name and address) (Signature, name and address)

Note: The witnesses will include the Panchayat head and the Junior Engineer conducting the

transect walk. More witnesses can be added – including NGOs, village elders etc.

- 3 -

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

(in case signing is done community-wise)

This memorandum of understanding is made on _____________day of _____ 2011 between the

persons listed below on the one part (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the First Party”), and

the Governor of (State) through Sri/Srimati ________________ (designation)

_______________________ (hereinafter referred to as “the Second Party”).

THESE PRESENTS WITNESS AS FOLLOW:

1. That the First Party is the landowners with transferable right of the respective acres (OR

OTHER UNITS AS APPLICABLE) of land bearing khasra Nos as listed below in village

__________________________, block _______________, tehsil________________________,

district _________________.

2. That the First Party has taken part in the transect walk conducted under the requirements of the

Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) and has been made to understand the benefits of

obtaining a rural road for the village under PMGSY.

3. That the First Party hereby grants to the Second Party, out of their free will, above said land as

detailed in the list below for the construction and development of PMGSY rural road in the village

___________ under _____ Panchayat, for the benefit of the villagers and the public at large.

4. That the First Party would not claim any compensation against the above said grant of land.

5. That the Second Party agrees to accept the above grant of land for the purposes mentioned in

Clause 3.

6. That the Second Party shall construct and develop the PMGSY road and take all possible

precautions to avoid damage to land adjacent to PMGSY road.

7. That the First Party also assures the Second Party that the first party will not indulge in any

willful act of damaging the PMGSY road or obstructing the movement of public and vehicles on the

PMGSY road.

8. That both the Parties hereto agree that the PMGSY road so constructed/developed shall be

public premises.

- 4 -

9. That the provisions of the MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING will come into force and

effect from the date of signing of this deed.

S.No: Name Description of land owned Description of land granted for

PMGSY rural road

(add as many more who are granting their land)

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have signed this deed on the day and the year first

above written.

Signatures of the First Party Signature for and on behalf of the Second Party

1.________________________ ________________________

2.________________________

3.________________________

…

(all the signatures of the First Party should be obtained)

Witnesses: Witnesses:

1. ____________________________ 1. _________________________

2.____________________________ 2.__________________________

(Signature, name and address) (Signature, name and address)

Note: The witnesses will include the Panchayat head and the Junior Engineer conducting the

transect walk. More witnesses can be added – including NGOs, village elders etc.

- 5 -

Annexure II: Stretch-Wise Documentation of Transect Walks

1. Bankura District

1) Name of Road: Biborda to SH-9

2) Villages: i. Lalthagura ii. Soralia iii. Pakudia iv. Nayabast v. Chandkudi

3) Gram Panchayat: Taldangra

4) Block: Taldangra

5) District: Bankura

6) Date; Time: 8th February 2010; 11 am to 4 pm

9th February 2010; 10:15 am to 4:30 pm

7) Total Number of Participants in the Transect walk: 61

8) Numbers of Participants falling in the following categories:

Female headed household: Nil

Scheduled Caste: 20

Scheduled Tribe: 08

Disabled: Nil

BPL: 08

Households losing structure: 02

Women in general: 12

9) Name & Designation of the Key Participants:

From Government: 1) Mr. Suman Roy ( Sub-Asstt. Engneer) 2) Mr. Bankim Basuki (Land Manager) 3) Mr. Gurudas Mukherjee (Revenue Inspector) 4) Mr. Sukumar Ghosh (Grade I Amin)

From Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI): 1) Mr. Ashit Ghoshal (Pradhan, Taldangra) 2) Mr. Dilip Majhi (PRI member, Taldangra G. P.)

10) Issues and suggestions raised by the Participants (issues to be also recorded

on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: The length of the road mentioned in the list submitted by the PIU was 9.96 kms. However during the transect walk it was found 5.840 kms. The PIU were unable to give reasons for the difference in the length of the road.

ii. Road width and land availability: Width of the existing road varies from 3.5 mtrs, at chainage 4+804, to 14 mtrs at 3+828.

- 6 -

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: Only 1 HH was identified as BPL (chainage 5+033).

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: In villages Nayabasat and Chandkudi, STs (mainly Santhals) were found in majority while SCs were found as dominating caste in Lalthagura. The vulnerable groups would bear an impact on the residential, commercial, and agricultural assets.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): The proposed road alignment passes through forest at chainages 0+000 to 0+871 and 3+048 to 4+687.

vi. Water-related issues (drainage lines, rivers and water crossings, irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): To address the problem of water logging and soil erosions, the PIU in consultation with the affected communities has suggested culverts and piling at various chainages. The culverts are proposed at 1+081, 1+944, 2+210, 2+391, 3+286, 4+726, 4+754, 5+272, and 5+539.

Piling has been suggested at chainages where ponds are located

adjacent to the road. These are 1+014 to 1+021 (L), 1+159 to

1+191 (L), 1+446 to 1+476 (R), 1+553 to 1+579 (L), 1+595 to

1+614 (L), and 5+329 to 5+369 (R).

vii. Road safety-related issues (major junctions, curves, bends, etc.): None.

viii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow pits, etc.): None.

11) Major Outcomes of the Transect Walk: (to be also recorded on revenue map)

i. Changes to be incorporated in the design: Considering the width

availability and also to avoid impacting the structures on both side of the existing road, the PIU have suggested CC road at various chainages i.e. 1+536 to 1+917, and 4+804 to 5+172. At chainages 1+242 and 2+920 the center line has been suggested to be shifted by 1.5 to 2 mtrs to the Left hand Side by the community as the residents are not ready to donate their land (RHS).

ii. Extent of land take and willingness/unwillingness of land owner/users for donation: People were ready to donate their land for the sake of road. However, differences were noticed in some places, at chainage 1+242 and 2+920, where people have already donated their land for the existing road and were not ready to donate again.

iii. Environmental issues to be resolved: Apart from the forest areas that would be affected (as mentioned above 10 .v.), the project would also impact a bamboo plantation at chainage 2+854 (LHS).

- 7 -

iv. Other issues: According to the community, concrete piling should be done instead of bamboo piling which is the common practice. This is because bamboo pilling wears out after a few years and water would then damage the road.

Details of the discussion took place during the Transect Walk:

Consultations were held with each of the affected villages before commencing the transect walk. The main objective of the consultation was to inform the community about the purpose of the transect walk and emphasis on the significance of community participation for finalizing the design. Further, information regarding PMGSY as a rural development scheme was disseminated.

The community shared their concerns regarding the lack of an all weather road which restricts their mobility and access to basic services of health and education during the monsoons.

Recommendations of the Social Safeguard Specialist:

The road should be constructed using available government land so as to minimize impact on private assets.

Countersigned (Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) (Name) CHAINAGE WISE LAND WIDTH AVAILABLE AND REQUIRED:

Chainage Existing Land Width

Additional Land

Required

Type of Loss Village Remarks/Suggestions

LHS RHS LHS RHS

0+000 6 -- -- -- --

LALTAGORAH

Forest land

0+871 7 3.25 3.25 Agricultural Land

Agricultural Land

Forest land ends here

0+910 7.5 1.5 1.5 Agricultural Land

Agricultural Land


Agricultural Land

1+014 6.25 3 3 Agricultural Land

Agricultural Land

Bamboo piling at RHS starts which ends at CH: 1+021

1+054 7 2 2 Agricultural Land

Agricultural Land

1+159 7 2 1


Residential Land

Alignment to be shifted to LHS by 1.5 to 2 mtrs as the displaced person is not willing to donate their land on the RHS

1+321 9 0 0 -- --

1+365 7 3 3 Residential Land

Agricultural (Uncultivated)

- 8 -

land

1+434 7 1.5 1.5 Electric pole

1+476 7 1.5 1.5 Electric pole

1+536 5.7 3 3 Residential land

-- If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

1+756 6 2.5 2.5 Residential

land

--

1+917 8 0 0 -- --


Agricultural Land

SORALIA

1+965 6.8 2 2

2+092 8 1.5 1.5 Agricultural

Land

Agricultural

Land


Agricultural Land


Agricultural Land

2+567 8 0 0 -- --

2+689 10.6 0 0 -- --

2+854 7 3 3 Bamboo plantation

Shops, Residential Land, trees

PAKUDIA

3+147 6.5 1.75 1.75 Residential Land

Trees

3+408 7.7 1 1 -- --

NAYABASAT

Forest Land

3+457 -- -- -- -- -- RHS forest land

3+727 5.5 -- -- -- -- Bridge proposed

3+828 14 -- -- -- -- Forest land on either side

4+089 8 - -- -- -- Forest land on either side

4+329 6 2 2 Trees and Residential

Land

Trees and Residential

Land

CHANDKUDI

4+726 4 1.75 1.75 Residential Land

Residential Land

If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the

- 9 -

1) Name of Road: Goborda to Satpatta

2) Villages: i. Panchma ii. Pechala iii. Tikarpara iv. Dumottor v. Shalboni vi. Ragunathpur vii. Akhopal vii. Baskona viii. Panchbari ix. Nepura x. Satpatta.

3) Gram Panchayat: Mandal Kuli and Dhanara

4) Block: Raipur


6) Date; Time: 11th February 2010; 10:15 am to 3:30 pm 12th February 2010; 11:00 am to 3:15 pm 19th February 2010; 10:45 am to 3:00 pm 20th February 2010; 11:15 am to 4:30 pm 24th February 2010; 11:00 am to 4:00 pm




Scheduled Caste: 08

adverse impact.

4+754 4.3 1.5 1.5


Shops

4+804 3.5 1.5 1.5 Residential Land and

shops

Residential Land and

shops

If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

4+883 5 .5 .5 -- --

4+291 6 1.5 1.5 -- --

5+005 5.3 1.75 1.75 -- --

5+017 4.5 .5 .5 -- --

5+033 2.8 -- 2 Residential Structure

5+172 6.2 1.5 1.5 -- --

5+272 5.3 2.5 2.5 Agricultural land

Agricultural land


Agricultural land

- 10 -

Scheduled Tribe: 19

Disabled: Nil

BPL: 07




From Government: 1) Mr. Suman Roy (S.A.E.) 2) Mr. Bankim Basuli (Land Manager)

From Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI): 1) Mr. Shankar Patro (PRI member) 2) Mr. Patal Banerjee (Shabhapati)

10) Issues and suggestions raised by the Participants (issues to be also

recorded on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: The total length of the proposed road under construction

has been found to be 13.032 kms during the transect walk. However as

per the list submitted by the PIU, the length of the road was 11 kms. The

excess length of 2.032 kms was decided by the PIU prior to the

commencement of transect walk.

ii. Road width and land availability: The existing width of the road varies

from 3.5 meters to 6 meters. Thus at certain chainages, private land was

required for the construction of the road.

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two

criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or

possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected

person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus

needs to be assisted under the Project: 7 Households.

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: The villages through

which the road is passing by is majorly inhabited by ST population (mainly

Santhals) followed by General and SC population. In the villages of

Pachama and Akhopal, the alignment passes through the area largely

inhabited by the Santhals while in the other affected villages, the assets of

the SC and general population would be impacted.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.):

Water-related issues (drainage lines, rivers and water crossings,

irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): The PIU in

consultation with the affected communities, have suggested piling at

certain chainages where ponds exist close to the existing road. These are

at chainages 0+446 (LHS), 0+551 (RHS), 0+786 (LHS), 1+580 (RHS),

1+667 (RHS), 1+881 (LHS), 2+473 (RHS), 4+114 (both sides), 4+563

(RHS), 4+936 (LHS), 5+225 (LHS), 6+722 (LHS), 9+247 (RHS), 10+168

- 11 -

(LHS), 10+199 (RHS), from 10+683 TO 10+770 (RHS), 11+548 (LHS),

12+348 (RHS), 12+691(RHS) and 12+974 (LHS).

Further the villagers proposed a causeway at chainage 0+000. Culverts

were also proposed at various chainages by the PIU and community.

These are at chainages 0+298, 0+349, 0+667, 0+786, 1+260, 1+496,

1+667, 1+714, 2+076, 2+230, 2+829, 3+230, 3+494, 3+732, 3+919,

4+495, 4+706, 5+314, 5+511, 5+725, 5+821, 5+956, 6+046, 6+199,

6+483, 6+739, 6+976, 7+036, 7+184, 7+728, 7+925, 8+400, 8+816,

9+183, 9+247, 9+347, 9+775, 9+834, 10+028, 10+279, 10+504, 10+683,

10+765, 10+872, 11+340, 11+381, 11+399, 11+548, 11+665, 11+714,

11+810, 12+418, 12+523, 12+592, 12+678, 12+691, 12+729, and 12+829.

At chainage 0+184 there is a Cross Drain which community has suggested

to be shifted to chainage 0+177.

vi. Road safety-related issues (major junctions, curves, bends, etc.):

None

vii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow pits,

etc.): None


i. Changes to be incorporated in the design: At several chainages, there

are residential structures on both sides of the road. To avoid impacting the

same, CC roads have been suggested. These chainages are 0+000 to

0+177, 0+317 to 0+372, 0+667 to 0+786, 1+438 to 1+592, 1+900 to

2+025, 2+493 to 2+829, 4+232 to 5+277, 6+739 to 7+168, 9+384 to

9+721, 10+420 to 10+786, and 12+829 to 13+032.

At chainage 2+313 to 2+493 (LHS), a pond is close to the exiting road.

The local community has suggested concrete piling here so that the water

from the pond does not damage the road. However, the PIU do not

consider this a viable option. Hence the community has suggested shifting

the alignment to the RHS by 5 mtrs.

ii. Extent of land take and willingness/unwillingness of land

owner/users for donation: The communities have expressed their

willingness to donate land for the purpose of road construction.

iii. Environmental issues to be resolved: Taking the environmental issues

in to consideration PIU has suggested piling at required places as

mentioned under the water related issues.

iv. Other issues: None


Community consultations were held with each of the affected communities, prior to the

commencement of the transect walk. The main objective of the consultations was to

disseminate information regarding the project especially about PMGSY as a rural

development scheme. Also emphasis was laid on the relevance of transect walk and the

- 12 -

community participation for the same so as to finalize the design of the proposed

alignment.

The community shared their problems due to lack of good condition road. This has

restricted mobility during the monsoons and accessing essential services very difficult.

Hence the community was extremely supportive of the project.

Recommendations of the Social Safeguard Specialist:

The suggestions of the PIU at various chainages (mentioned in 11.i) regarding

construction of CC roads with the available width due to extensive habitation on both

sides of the road should be considered while finalizing the design. This would be

necessary to reduce the adverse impact on people.

Countersigned (Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) (Name) CHAINAGE WISE LAND WIDTH AVAILABLE AND REQUIRED


Additional Land

Required


LHS RHS LHS RHS


Residential Land

PANCHAMA

The community has proposed for causeway at chainage 0+000. If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact. (from chainage 0 to 0+177 and 0+317 to 0+372)


Residential Land

0+298 5 4 3

0+521 8 2 1 Agriculture land


0+699 4.6 1 1 Agriculture land

Trees If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private

- 13 -

assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact. (from chainage 0+667 to 0+786)

1+077 5.6 2.5 2.5 Agriculture land

Trees



PECHALA

1+438 5.7 3.5 2.5 Residential Structure

Agriculture land


CC road has been proposed

1+564 5 0.5 0.5

1+714 5.3 2.5 2.5

1+758 5.3 3 3

1+881 5 3 3


2+076 5 3.5 3.5

2+114 5 1 2.5

2+230 4.5 4 4

2+313 5 3 3

2+341 5.5 3.5 3.5

2+545 5.8 1.5 Residential Land


Residential Land

2+649 4.5 2 3 Residential Land

Residential Land

2+869 5 3 3

2+936 4.4 3 3

3+024 5.4 2.5 2.5

3+235 6.4 2.7 2.7 4+232 to 5+277, 3+385 4.2 3 3

TIKARPARA

3+471 5 2.5 4.9

3+732 5.5 4 4

3+919 7.4 2 2

4+414 7.6 2.5 2.5


Residential Land

DUMOTTAR

4+876 4.3 1 3

SHALBONI

4+900 5 2 2


4+970 4.8 2.5 1.5

4+993 4 2.5 1.5


Residential Land

5+047 4.2 1 1 Residential Residential CC road has been

- 14 -

Land Land proposed

5+084 4 1 Residential Land

Residential Land


Residential Land


5+225 4 1 1

5+283 5.3 2 0.5 Agriculture Land



Agriculture land


Agriculture land


Agriculture land


Agriculture land


Agriculture land


Agriculture land


Agriculture land


Agriculture land


Agriculture land

RAGHUNATHPUR

6+739 4 3 3 CC Road has been proposed 6+769 4.4 1 Residential

Land

6+802 3.4 1 1 Residential Structure

Residential Structure

6+820 4.3 1 Residential Land

Residential Land


Residential Land


Residential Land


Residential Land


Residential Land

6+994 3.5 1 0.5 Residential Land

Residential Land

7+042 3 0.5 1 Residential Land

Residential Land


Residential Land


Agriculture Land

7+171 3.3 4 1 Agriculture Land

Agriculture Land

7+231 3.5 2 4 Agriculture Land

Agriculture Land

7+359 4 2 1 Agriculture Land

Agriculture Land

AKHOPAL


Residential Land

- 15 -

1) Name of Road: Joypur to Gelia

2) Villages: i. Joypur ii. Brindabanpur, lohar para iii. Prasadpur iv. Shamdaspur v. Shamnagar vi. Ruisahar vii. Digra viii. Bakchora ix. Holdu x. Chatarpur xi. Tanadighi

3) Gram Panchayat: i. Sholda

ii. Shamnagar iii. Rautkhanda iv. Hetia v. Gelia

4) Block: Joypur


7+584 5.5 1 1

7+734 3.5 1 3

7+796 5 2.5 2.5

7+899 5.1 2.5 4.5 Agriculture Land

8+242 5.2 5 5

8+816 5.2 3 3

8+883 6.8 3 3

BASKONA

9+050 6.4 4.6 3

9+309 5.8 2.1 2.1 CC road has been proposed 9+409 3.8 1 1


Commercial Land

9+705 4.6 0.50 0.50

9+775 9.5 1 1

PANCHBARI

9+812 6 5 2

10+090 5 4 4

10+316 4.8 6

NEPURA

10+496 4.3 1 1 CC road has been proposed 10+563 4.3 1 1

10+846 5 3 3

10+866 6.2 5 3.5

11+277 7 2 2

SATPATTA

11+340 7 2 2

12+350 3.8 4 4

12+523 6.4 3.5 3.5

12+759 8 1 1

12+829 5.7 1 CC road has been proposed 12+887 5 2 Residential

Land

12+980 4.4 1

13+032 4.4 1

- 16 -

6) Date; Time: 10th February 2010; 10:30 am to 4: 15 pm

13th February 2010; 11:00 am to 5: 30 pm









Scheduled Caste: 37

Scheduled Tribe: 15

Disabled: Nil

BPL: 06




From Government: 1. Mr. Suman Roy (Sub Asstt. Engneer) 2. Mr. Bankim Ch. Basuli (Land Manager)

From Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI): 1. Mr. Gour Paul (Gelia, Pradhan) 2. Mr. Niranjan Ganguli (Hetia, Pradhan) 3. Mr. Nirmal Roy (G.P. member Hetia) 4. Mr. LaxmiKanto Nandi (Panchayat Secretay) 5. Mr. Patal Banerjee (Shabha-pati, Joypur)


on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: The total length of the proposed road was 11. 40

kms. However during the transect walk, it was seen that the total length of the road was 11.893 km. The PIU has not been able to provide reason for the difference in the length of the roads.

ii. Road width and land availability: The land width available ranges

from 3.2 mtrs to 8 mtrs (Approx.) as found at chainages 2+850 and 9+960 respectively.

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per

two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 12 Households

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: In the affected

villages, SC is the main vulnerable group found. SC group constitute

- 17 -

80% of the population. During the transect walk it was seen that the vulnerable group would incur losses of agriculture land, residential land and structure and commercial assets.


At chainage 1+003, on the left hand side there is a temple while at the right hand side there is a residential structure. The available width at this chainage is 4 mtrs. Thus the community has proposed that the road to be constructed at this location should be of the same width that is available (4 mtrs) to avoid affecting either of the structures.

Two temples are located at chainages 4+395 and 4+472. Behind the temple on the RHS, there exists a pond. According to the community, the proposed road should be bypass the existing road and pass over the pond as they hold religious fair at this spot. Further they also added that if the road is constructed on the existing one then it may lead to accidents as the road is U shaped with an available width 5 mtrs.

There is a tree of religious importance located at chainage 4+886 on the RHS. To avoid impacting the same, the community has suggested shifting the alignment to the LHS by 3 mtrs.

At chainage 4+893, there is tree of religious importance on the RHS. In order to avoid the felling of the tree, the community has proposed to shift the alignment towards the left by 3 mtrs.

At chainage 5+138 (RHS), a temple is situated which would be affected by the project. To avoid the same, PIU has suggested piling on the pond at LHS.

At chainage 5+169, there is a temple located on the RHS. At this chainage the available width is 5 mtrs with a pond on LHS. In order to safeguard the temple villagers suggested that requisite land can be taken from LHS, over the pond.

From chainage 6+731 to 6+844, there is a Muslim Burial ground on the RHS. To avoid affecting the same, the community has suggested that the alignment be shifted to the left by 3 mtrs. Further they added that according to Mouza/revenue map government land is available at the LHS and shifting the alignment towards the left may reduce affecting private assets.

At chainage 7+924, there is a temple on RHS. To avoid impacting the same, the community has asked the road to be shifted to the LHS by 2 mtrs.

A Samadhi Sthan (Hindu cremation ground) would be affected on the RHS at chainage 9+795. To avoid the same, the community has suggested shifting the alignment to the LHS by 1.5 mtrs.

At chainage 10+191, a tree of religious importance is located at the LHS. At this chainage, people have suggested to shift the alignment by 1.5 mtr to 2 mtrs to the RHS in order to affecting the tree.

vi. Water-related issues (drainage lines, rivers and water crossings,

irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): Majority of the community members are dependent on agriculture and allied activities. Likewise water related issues were found of immense importance to them and were duly highlighted by them during Transect Walk.

Considering the concerns shared by the villagers, PIU has suggested Culvert at chainages 3+034, 3+596, 4+793, 4+942, 5+185, 5+574,

- 18 -

5+660, 5+763, 6+484, 6+668, 6+758, 7+505, 7+649, 7+746, 8+024, and 8+437.

Further, there were places where people asked for broader pipe and culvert, replacing the existing ones, in order to avoid the problem of water logging. These are at chainages 0+144, 0+535, 1+175, 2+025, 2+220, 2+555, and 0+587.

Piling was suggested at locations where there are ponds adjacent to the existing road so that the water from the pond would not overflow on to the road and thereby damaging the road. These are at chainages from 2+038 to 2+083 (RHS), 2+038 to 2+160 (LHS), 2+555 to 2+586 (RHS), 2+607 to 2+634 (RHS), 2+652 to 2+697 (RHS), 2+685, 2+737 to 2+760 (RHS), 2+762 to 2+815 (RHS), 2+760 to 2+815 (LHS), 3+040 to 3+ 128 (RHS), 3+870 to 3+882 (LHS), 4+061 to 4+274 (LHS), 4+293 to 4+362 (LHS), 4+362 to 4+375 (RHS), 4+395 to 4+472 (RHS), 4+464 to 4+566 (LHS), 4+504 to 4+527 (RHS), 4+553 to 4+613 (RHS), 4+726 to 4+738 (RHS), 4+835 to 4+855 (on either side), 4+952 to 4+962 (RHS), 5+138 to 5+226 (LHS), 5+173 to 5+210 (RHS), 5+614 to 5+629 (LHS), 5+694 to 5+740 (LHS), 6+505 to 6+542 (RHS), 6+581 to 6+731 (RHS), 7+780 to 7+823 (RHS), 7+823 to 7+864 (LHS), 7+913, 7+963 to 7+992 (RHS), 7+998 to 8+107 (RHS), 8+048 to 8+068 (LHS), 8+196 to 8+262 (LHS), 8+342 to 8+376 (LHS), 8+473 (RHS), 8+785 to 8+827 (RHS), 9+465 to 9+477 (RHS), 9+525 to 9+574 (RHS), 9+830 to 9+868 (RHS), 9+857 to 9+891 (LHS), 10+014 to 10+069 (LHS), and 11+585 to 11+706 (LHS).

Drains were also suggested by PIU after consultations with the villagers at chainages 2+964 to 3+228

vii. Road safety-related issues (major junctions, curves, bends, etc.):

Sign board especially near school along speed breakers at the beginning of all major habitation areas. These are at chainages 2+555 to 2+737, 3+882 to 3+937, 4+615 to 4+702, 5+574 to 5+763, 6+505 to 6+731, 7+649 to 8+682, 10+191 to 10+442, and 11+715 to 11+893.

viii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow

pits, etc.): The community has suggested that during the construction of the road, care should be taken by the project that the earth required for raising the height of the road should be brought in maximum from outside the village and minimum from the land lying adjacent to the existing road. Also, earth to be dug from within the village should be from all plots along the road rather than from any one location.


i. Changes to be incorporated in the design:

Considering the width availability and also to avoid affecting the permanent structure on both sides of the road, the PIU have suggested CC road at chainages 0+000 to 0+246, 2+555 to 2+737, 3+882 to 3+937, 4+615 to 4+702, 5+574 to 5+763, 6+505 to 6+731, 7+649 to 8+682, 10+191 to 10+442, and 11+715 to 11+893.

From chainage 0+007 to 0+246, there is government land on the LHS of the existing road, used for the purpose of agriculture. The available width here is 3.4 mtrs (average). The required width here is 2.5 mtrs on either side. The community has suggested that the requisite land be required from the LHS (government land) so that private assets are not affected.

- 19 -

At chainage 1+003, on the left hand side there is a temple while at the right hand side there is a residential structure. The available width at this chainage is 4 mtrs. Thus the community has proposed that the road to be constructed at this location should be of the same width that is available (4 mtrs) to avoid affecting either of the structures.

At chainage 2+178 to 2+195, there is a bridge on Kangsabati Canal with a width of 2.5 mtrs. Considering the fact PIU have decided to replace the existing bridge with a wider one of 7.5 mtrs of width. They also suggested a shift of existing road by 1 to 2.5 mtrs on LHS.

At chainage 3+938, there is a school (Chengdoba High School) on the RHS of the existing road while school’s play ground is situated on the LHS of the road. At this mentioned chainage villagers suggested to shift the existing road by 66 mtrs on the LHS in order to avoid accidents during school hours, as it is perceived by the villagers that the number of vehicles, using this road, will go high after construction of the same.

At chainage 3+937, the available width is of average 5 mtrs while the minimum road to be constructed would be of 7.5 mtrs. This would impact two temporary commercial structures and one residential structure, on LHS. To avoid the same, the PIU in consultation with the community has suggested construction of CC road at this chainage (as aforementioned).

Two temples are located at chainages 4+395 and 4+472. Behind the temple on the RHS, there exists a pond. According to the community, the proposed road should be bypass the existing road and pass over the pond as they hold religious fair at this spot. Further they also added that if the road is constructed on the existing one then it may lead to accidents as the road is U shaped with an available width 5 mtrs.

The alignment is to be shifted to the LHS by 3 mtrs to avoid impacting the religious tree at RHS at chainage 4+886.

At chainages 4+893 and 5+169 (both on RHS), two trees are located which are of religious importance to the local community. Accordingly they have proposed that the alignment be shifted towards the left by 3 mtrs and 5 mtrs respectively to avoid affecting the trees.

The alignment is to shift to the LHS to avoid affecting the temple on the RHS 5+138 (RHS). For the same, the PIU has suggested for pilling of the pond on LHS.

At chainage 6+170 to 6+302, villagers were of the view that the existing road should be shifted to LHS by 1.5 mtrs. This was so as government land is available at the LHS as well as to straighten the existing alignment.

From chainage 6+731 to 6+844, there is a Muslim Burial ground on the RHS. To avoid affecting the same, the community has suggested that the alignment be shifted to the left by 3 mtrs. Further they added that according to Mouza/revenue map government land is available at the LHS and shifting the alignment towards the left may reduce affecting private assets.

At chainage 7+924, there is a temple on RHS and to avoid affecting it, the community has suggested shifting the road alignment to the LHS by 2 mtrs.

The alignment to be shifted to the LHS by 1.5 mtrs to avoid impacting the Samadhi Sthan (Hindu cremation ground) on RHS at chainage 9+795.

The community has opined that the requisite land (2.8 mtrs) at chainage 10+087 be taken from the LHS as government land is available and to avoid affecting the agricultural land on the RHS.

- 20 -

At chainage 10+191, a tree of religious importance is located at the LHS. At this chainage, people have suggested to shift the alignment by 1.5 mtr to 2 mtrs to the RHS in order to affecting the tree.


owner/users for donation: The community has been supportive of the project and has expressed their willingness to donate their land for the construction of an all weather road. However, at chainages 0+007 to 0+246, 5+815, and 9+109 to 9+332, people were not ready to donate their land. At chainage 11+662, the land owner on the LHS has insisted that he would only donate 1.5 mtrs of his land though the required width is 2.5 mtrs on either side.

iii. Environmental issues to be resolved: None.

iv. Other issues: The proposed road gets linked with the pucca road at

chainage 8+682. The pucca road is connecting Hetia and Lokpur bypassing the villages namely Narayanpur, Hariharpur, Shamsundarpur and Chhatil of Hetia Gram Panchayat. The villages are majorly inhibited by SC communities. Here, primarily, the Panchayat members and the villagers of Hetia Gram Panchayat wanted the road to be constructed connecting the above mentioned villages. Considering the concern of villagers the road was visited during the Transect walk. The width of the existing road was collected, on a sample basis. On average the width of the road was found 4.5 mtrs in non-residential areas while it was 3.2 mtrs in habitation areas. Inhabitants of the villages are not ready to donate their residential land however they are ready to donate their agricultural land. Again, if the road is constructed, as suggested by the villagers, then it would be passing through the villages namely Narayanpur and Hariharpur while bypassing the rest of the mentioned villages. The length of the road is 5.211 Km, as measured with road meter.

Details of the discussion took place during the Transect Walk: Prior to the Transect Walk consultation was made with the communities of all affected villages. The major thrust of the discussion was to inform the community about the road to be constructed under PMGSY i.e. about the length of the road, width and the villages to be connected through this road. Also adequate information about PMGSY as a rural development scheme was disseminated among the affected communities along with the relevance of community participation during the transect walk for the finalization of the design.

The concerns of the villagers were majorly related to Borrow pits and the process through which land will be required, in order to prepare a road with a width of 7.5 meters.

Recommendations by the Social Safeguard Specialist:

During transect walk it was found that, as shared by the villagers, the people have encroached the government land at many locations. Hence the affected communities have suggested that the requisite land should be taken from the government land and then from the private land. Thus it would be suggested that efforts should be made to construct the road as per the mouza map, so that private assets are impacted minimally.

Drains and culverts are of immense importance to the villagers as they are mostly dependent on agriculture for their livelihood. Thus the participation of villagers

- 21 -

needs to be ensured during the execution phase so that they are constructed at locations which are most beneficial to them.

Countersigned (Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) (Name) CHAINAGE WISE LAND WIDTH AVAILABLE AND REQUIRED

Chainage

Existing Land Width

Additional Land

Required


LHS

RHS

LHS RHS

0+000 6 -- -- -- --

Joypur

If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact. From chainage 0+007 to 0+246, the community has suggested requiring land from LHS as there is government land available here and has refused to donate their land.

0+098 4

0+246 -- -- -- -- --

0+264 4 5 5 Agricultural land

Agricultural land

0+535 5.2 -- -- -- --

Brindaban pur, lohar

para

If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has

0+733 4.5 3.30

3.30

-- --

0+828 4

3.30

3.30

Residential land

Residential land

0+878 3.8 3.30

3.30

Residential loss

Residential loss

1+003 4 3.55

3.55

Temple Residential loss

1+074 4.8 3.3 3.3 Residential Residential loss

- 22 -

0 0 loss suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

1+121 3.8 3.30

3.30

Temporary structures

Agricultural land

1+175 3.2 4 4

1+195 3.2 4 4 Agricultural land

Agricultural land

Prasadpur


Agricultural land and Residential

Land


Water body, plants and Residential

Land


Agricultural land

Shamdas pur

2+555 3.7 0.5 0.5 -- -- If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

2+704 3.2 0.75

0.75

Water body Residential Land

2+737 4.5 3.00

3.00

Water body and

Agricultural land

Water body


Agricultural land


Agricultural land


Agricultural land and water body

3+371 3.7 4 4 Shamdas pur Shamdas pur

Shamnagar

3+421 4.2 3 3 Shamdas pur Shamdas pur

3+503 3.6 3.5 3.5 Play ground Agricultural land


Agricultural land


Residential Land


3+937 -- -- -- -- --

- 23 -

3+937 5 2 2 Cheng doba High school’s

Play ground(Govern

ment land)

--

Ruisahar

Villager wanted to shift the existing road on LHS by 66 meters in order to avoid accidents during school hours as the play ground is used by the students during school hours. If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact

4+080 3.5 6 0 Water body --

4+156 5.2 6 0 Water body --

4+307 7 3 0 Water body --

4+362 4.6 5 0 Water body

4+395 4 -- -- -- -- At this chinage villagers wanted the road to be build over the pond located behind the temple.

4+553 3.9 0 5 Water body Road may shift over the pond to avoid residential construction loss.

4+615 3.9 .5 .5 Residential Land

Agricultural land If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.


--

4+702 5 0 5 -- Water body Community has suggested taking the requisite land from water body.

- 24 -


4+722 6.5 0 4 -- Water body Community has suggested taking the requisite land from water body


Residential Land


Tree of religious importance

The alignment is to be shifted to the LHS by 3 mtrs to avoid impacting the tree of religious importance at RHS.

4+893 3 4 3 Tree of religious importance

The alignment is to shift to the LHS by 3 mtrs to avoid affecting a tree of religious importance on the RHS.


Water body, Residential

Land and trees


Agricultural land,

Residential Land

5+138 5 2.5 2.5 Water body Temple The alignment is to shift to the LHS to avoid affecting the temple on the RHS. For the same, the PIU has suggested for pilling of the pond on LHS.

5+229 5 2.5 2.5 -- -- According to villagers existing road need to be straighten. (please refer to the map) as vacant government land is available on LHS.


Agricultural land

5+574 3.5 1 1 Water body, Residential

Land

Residential Land

If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then

- 25 -


Plants residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.


Plants

Digra

6+170 -- -- -- -- -- Community has suggested shifting the alignment to the LHS by 1.5 mtrs as government land is available.

6+302 7 1.5 1.5 Agricultural land

Agricultural land

6+505 4.5 0.50

0.50

Residential Land

Residential Land and water

body

If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact. From chainage 6+731 to 6+844, there is a Muslim Burial ground on the RHS. To avoid affecting the same, the community has suggested that the alignment be shifted to

the left by 3 mtrs.


Muslim Burial Ground

6+844 4 3 3 Agricultural

land

Agricultural land

and Muslim

Burial Ground.


Agricultural land Bakchora


Agricultural land,

Residential Land

- 26 -


Residential Land


7+746 5 -- -- -- --

7+902 4.3 0 1 -- Water body

7+958 4.3 .7 .7 Residential Land

Residential Land and

Water body

8+342 5.5 -- -- -- --

8+682 -- -- -- -- --


Agricultural land, Water

body

Holdu


Pond Land owners from chainage 9+109 to 9+332, are not willing to donate the land

9+332 7.1 3 0 -- Agricultural land

9+599 9 1 1 Trees Shops (Temporary structure)

Shops are on Government land


--

Chatarpur

Residential Land is on Government land

9+733 13 -- -- -- Shops (Temporary structure)

Shops are on Government land

9+795 7 1.5 1.5 Samadhi Stan, Trees and water body

The alignment to be shifted to the LHS by 1.5 mtrs to avoid impacting the Samadhi Sthan (Hindu cremation ground) on RHS.

9+824 6.6 2 2 -- Water body According to villagers required land should be taken over the water body

9+868 6.2 2 2 Residential Land Water

body

Water body plants

10+087 7.2 0 2.8 -- Agricultural land

The community has opined that the requisite land be taken from the LHS as government land is available and to avoid affecting the agricultural land on the RHS.

10+191 5.5 0 0 -- --

Tanadighi

If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be

10+293 6.6 0 0 -- --

10+442 5.2 5.4 5.4 Agricultural

land

Agricultural

land

- 27 -

1) Name of Road: T10 (Dhengram)to Bishanpur

2) Villages: i. Dhengram ii. Shimuldanga iii. Korombera iv. Siterdanga v. Dundar vi. Bishanpur

3) Gram Panchayat: Sonagora and Dundar

4) Block: Raipur


6) Date; Time: 21st February 2010; 10:45 am to 3:15 pm

22nd February 2010; 11:15 am to 4:10 pm 23rd February 2010; 11:15 am to 4:30 pm


affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

11+041 10 0 0 -- --

11+498 7.6 2.2 2.2 Agricultural

land

Agricultural

land

11+662 4 2.5 2.5 Commercial

Land

The land owner on the RHS has insisted that he would only donate 1.5 mtrs of his land.

11+715 5 1 1 -- -- If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

11+819 5.2 0 0 -- --

11+888 6.2 0 0 -- --

11+893 Commercial

Land

Commercial

Land

- 28 -



Scheduled Caste: 17

Scheduled Tribe: 14 Disabled: Nil BPL: 02


Women in general: Nil


From Government: 1. Mr. Suman Roy (S.A.E) 2. Mr. Bankim Ch. Basuli, Land Manager, Bankura

From Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI):

1. Mr. Pashupati Mahato, Panchayat member, Dundar

10) Issues and suggestions raised by the Participants (issues to be also recorded on

Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: The total length of the road was found to be 10.04 kms during the transect walk though according to the list provided by the PIU, the length was 11.81. The PIU has not been able to provide any reasons for the difference in the lengths of the road.

ii. Road width and land availability: The width of the existing road varies from 7.4 meters at chainage 5+572 to 3.3 meters at chainage 9+681.


criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 2 households.

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: The vulnerable groups of people as found in affected villages are mostly SC while in villages namely Dhengram and Korombera is ST. The project would primarily bear an impact on their residential and commercial assets.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): The proposed

road is passing through forest areas at chainages 1+479 to 2+823 (on either side of the road), 3+400 to 4+062 (on either side of the road), and 4+508 to 4+765 (RHS).


irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): The PIU has suggested piling at chainages 9+999 (RHS), 9+894 (RHS), 6+553 (LHS), 6+437 (RHS), 5+325 (RHS), 0+470 (LHS), and 1+002 (RHS).

- 29 -

Also, at certain chainages the community has proposed for broader culverts. These are at 9+990, 9+960, 8+771, 7+058, 6+843, 6+623, 6+467, 6+464, 5+428, 5+392, and 5+285.

Drains have been suggested by the PIU at chainages 9+894 to 9+960 (RHS) and 9+960 to 10+044 (LHS).

PIU has suggested bamboo piling at chainages 9+999 (RHS), 9+894 (RHS), 6+553 (LHS), 6+437 (RHS), 5+325 (RHS), 0+470 (LHS), and 1+002 (RHS).

vii. Road safety-related issues (major junctions, curves, bends, etc.): At chainage 5+706 the existing road is turning on RHS. Villagers wanted to widen the curve in order to avoid accidents.

viii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow pits, etc.): None



There are certain locations where there are habitations on both sides of the road. If 7.5 mtrs wide road is constructed here as per PMGSY rules, it would adversely impact many households here. To avoid the same and minimize the impact, the PIU has suggested construction of CC roads using available width from chainage 8+064 to 8+160 and 9+554 to 9+834.

To avoid impacting the residential structure at the RHS at chainage 5+497, the community has suggested shifting the alignment by 2.5 mtrs to LHS.

At chainage 8+301 the center line to be shifted to the LHS by 3 mtrs in order to avoid residential structure loss at RHS.

ii. Extent of land take and willingness/unwillingness of land owner/users

for donation: The community has expressed their willingness to donate the land for the construction of proposed road.


iv. Other issues: Villagers have insisted for concrete guard wall rather than bamboo piling. They were of the view that bamboo piling would wear out in a few years and be rendered useless.


Prior to Transect Walk a consultation was initiated with each of the affected communities. In the same information regarding the PMGSY as a rural development scheme and the purpose of the transect walk was shared. The community shared that they faced many problems due to lack of a good condition road especially during the monsoon when they were rendered immobile and access to basic services was severed. Recommendations by the Social Safeguard Specialist: None.

The road alignment will be finalized with the best efforts to address the above issues. The next consultation with the likely affected persons will be on (date) at (Location). Countersigned

- 30 -

(Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) CHAINAGE WISE LAND WIDTH AVAILABLE AND REQUIRED


Additional Land

Required Type of Loss

Village Remarks/Suggestion

s

LHS RHS LHS RHS

0+000 6.75 1 1 DHENGRAM

0+019 4.5 2.25 2.25

0+047 5.5 2 1 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

TALDANGAPARA

0+176 4.4 2.4 1.4

0+227 4.2 3.5

0+256 4.8 3

0+320 4.6

3

0+356 4.3

3 3

0+422 5 3 3

0+459 5 1.5 2

0+526 5.5 1 2

0+587 3.7 2 3

BENIGORA PARA

0+626 4 1.5 5

0+725 5 3 3

0+793 4.8 2.5

0+838 6 3

0+854 6 1 2

0+879 5.5 1.5 1.5

0+975 6 2 2

1+087 3.8 2 4

1+147 5 3 3

1+521 5.5 2 2

1+879 5 3 3

2+489 6 2 2

3+289 6 1 3 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land KOROMBERA

GRAM

3+400 6 2 2

4+508 6 3

SORDAR PARA

4+765 5.5 3 Residentia

l land


al land Residentia

l land

4+798 5.5 1 2 Residenti

al land Agricultura

l land

5+256 4.2 5 3

SONAGORAHATE

5+392 4.3 5 3

5+497 5.5 2.5 2.5 Residential structure

To avoid impacting the residential structure on the RHS, the community has suggested shifting the alignment to the LHS by 2.5 mtrs.

5+543 7.4 1.2

- 31 -

5+572 7.4 2

5+631 6.4 1.5

5+659 4.6 2 2 Commer

cial structure

Residential land

5+676 5.3 3.5

5+706 6 1 2

5+729 6.3 1 1 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

5+754 5.5 2 2 Residential structure

Residential land

5+812 5 1 1 Commer

cial structure

Width needs to be restricted as suggested by villagers

5+861 6 1 1


al land

6+003 5 1 1

6+023 7 3 3

6+900 6.2 4

DUNDARA

7+581 5.5 1 1 Residenti

al land Tree

7+649 5.5 1 1 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land


al land

7+742 5.8 1 1 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land


al land Residentia

l land

7+819 4.5 1.5 1.5 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

7+832 3.7 1 1 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land


al land Residentia

l land

7+894 5 1.25 1.25 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

7+935 4.8 0.50 0.50

7+951 4.5 1.5 1.5 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

7+973 4.5 1.5 1.5 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

7+998 3.7 2 2 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

8+026 5.2 1 1 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

8+064 4 0.5 0.5 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC

8+116 4.4 0.5 0.5 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

8+160 4.2 0.5 0.5 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

- 32 -

2. BURDWAN DISTRICT

1) Name of Road: Joykrishnapur to Gobindpur

2) Villages: Barenda, Ukta, Pitchkuri and Govindpur

3) Gram Panchayat: Barenda and Ukta

4) Block: Ausgram I

5) District: Burdwan

6) Date: Time: 1st February 2010; 10:30 am to 1:15 pm

road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

8+223 5 1.25 1.25 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land


al land Residentia

l land

8+301 4 3 3 Residential Structure

The alignment is to be shifted to the LHS by 3 mtrs to avoid affecting the residential structure on the RHS


al land

8+572 4.5 1.5 1.5

8+825 4.6 1.5 1.5

9+554 5 1.5 1.5 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land



al land Residentia

l land

9+620 5.3 -- --

9+655 4 0.5 0.5

9+669 4.5 0.5 0.5 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

9+681 3.3 0.7 0.7 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

9+702 5.3 -- --

9+739 4.5 0.5 0.5 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

9+750 3.3 1 1 Residenti

al structure

Residential structure

9+764 3.4 1 1 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

9+779 3.5 1 1 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

9+794 4.5 0.5 0.5 Residenti

al structure

Residential land

9+809 3.8 1 1 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

9+834 4.6 0.5 0.5 Residenti

al land Residentia

l land

9+978 6 1 1

- 33 -

2nd February 2010; 10:15 am to 4:30 pm 3rd February 2010; 10:30 am to 5 pm



Female headed household: 01

Scheduled Caste: 40

Scheduled Tribe: 03

Disabled: Nil

BPL: 04




From Government: 5) Mr. Prasanjit Mukherjee (Senior Asstt. Engneer) 6) Mr. Chrandraketu Goswami (Senior Asstt. Engneer) 7) Mr. Shomsubhra Adhikari (Asstt. Engineer) 8) Mr. Mithun Mukherjee (Asstt. Engineer) 9) Mr. Rampapriya Chatterjee (Asstt. Engineer) 10) Mr. Nobokumar Ghosh (Land Manager) 11) Mr. Mithun Roy (Sub. Asstt. Engineer)

From Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI): 3) Mrs. Nilmuni Murmu (Pradhan Ukta G.P.) 4) Mr. Mozamil Haq Moli (PRI member Barenda G.P.) 5) Mr. Madhusudhan Chatterjee (Upo-Pradhan Barenda) 6) Mr. Chanchal Kumar Majhi (Panchayat Samiti member Pitchkuri) 7) Mr. Kamrul Sekh (PRI member Pitchkuri) 8) Mr. Netai Bagh (PRI member of Ukta G.P.) 9) Sekh Samsul Haq ( panchayat Samiti member Ukta G.P.)


on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: The total length of the proposed road for construction was 9 kms as per the list submitted by the PIU. However during the transect walk it was found to be 7.837 kms. The reason for the difference in lengths is because of the difference in the measuring devices used. The PIU had measured the road using the car (through milometer).

ii. Road width and land availability: The land available 3.5 mtrs to 8.5 mtrs (Approx.).

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of Economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 4 households.

- 34 -

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: Majority of the people who fall under the vulnerable category belong to SC and ST category. Four households (ST) would be affected falling between chainages 4+310 to 4+399. In addition, a shop belonging to a vulnerable household would be affected at the chainage 5+227.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): Three sensitive locations were found along the road side and all of them were Muslim Burial ground at the chainages 3+685 (R), 4+310 (L) and 5+128 (R). However among the three sensitive locations mentioned, the one located at chainage 4+310 is the most sensitive. This is so because the community does not want the burial ground to be affected as the existing road (half of it) is already built on the land belonging to the burial ground. Alternatively, if the road alignment is shifted to the right, four ST households would be affected. These households are using the government land (land belonging to the school) as they do not own land elsewhere. The PRI members opined that if these households were given land elsewhere in the village, then the road can be shifted to the RHS.

vi. Water-related issues (drainage lines, rivers and water

crossings, irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): During community consultations and transect walk, the community emphasized that proper drainage system needs to be constructed as the area under the project is largely flood affected. Hence the roads are damaged because of water logging.

Considering the same, cross drains have been suggested at various chainages by the PIU. These are at 0+236, 0+362, 0+519 (L), 0+681, 0+875, 0+908, 0+965, 0+972, 0+992 (L), 1+047, 1+241, 1+480, 1+600, 1+704, 1+830, 1+919, 2+014, 2+191, 2+305, 2+446, 2+571, 2+650, 2+770, 2+862, 2+965, 3+038, 3+122, 3+176, 3+291, 3+370, 3+444, 3+736, 3+826, 3+953, 4+000, 4+025, 4+122, 4+253, 4+274, 4+505, 4+930, 5+116, 5+273, 5+446, 5+562, 5+644, 5+686, 5+814, 6+023, 6+153, 6+474, 6+590, 6+760, 7+104, 7+436, 7+657, 7+733, and 7+819.

Similarly piling has been suggested at chainages 0+182 to 0+362 (L), 0+544 to 0+566 (L), 1+047 to 1+167 (L), 1+096 to 1+130 (R), 3+538 to 3+557 (R), 3+557 to 3+736 (R), 3+742 to 3+826 (R), 3+818 to 3+840 (L), 4+043 to 4+122 (R), 4+122 to 4+294 (L), 4+438 to 4+515 (R), 4+628 to 4+644 (L), 4+655 to 4+712 (R), 4+722 (R), 5+128 to 5+227 (L), 7+507 to 7+550 (L), 7+585 to 7+657 (L), and 7+630 to 7+646 (R).

Drains have been suggested at chainages 0+362 to 0+568 (L), 0+681 to 0+773 (on either side), 0+773 to 0+875 (L), 0+866 to 0+908 (R), 0+908 to 0+972 (on either side), 0+972 to 1+047 (R), 1+047 to 1+130 (L), 4+712 to 4+828 (R), 4+828 to 4+930 (L) and 7+657 to 7+716 (on either side).

Retaining walls have been suggested at chainages 7+185 to 7+220 (L) and 7+220 to 7+365 (on either side).

vii. Road safety-related issues (major junctions, curves, bends,

etc.): A speed breaker has been suggested to chainage 0+566 as there are residential structures on both sides of the existing road.

viii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow

pits, etc.): None.

- 35 -



CC roads (to be constructed with the available width) have been suggested by the PIU at various chainages to avoid impacting the habitation area on both sides of the existing road. These are from 0+692 to 1+167, 3+736 to 4+930, and 7+585 to 7+716.

At chainage 0+475, there is a drain on the LHS which would be affected by the project. The PIU has suggested shifting the drain by 1.45 mtrs to the LHS.

The community has suggested shifting the alignment at the following chainages: At 0+566 by 1 mtr to RHS in order to avoid affecting the

residential structure. At 3+363 by 1.5 mtrs to RHS in order to avoid affecting

residential structure on the LHS. The community has suggested shifting the alignment by 4 mtrs

to the RHS at chainage 3+517 to avoid affecting the residential land on the LHS.

At 3+685 by 2 mtrs to LHS in order to avoid affecting the burial ground on the RHS.

At 4+310, the alignment may have to be shifted by 1.5 mtrs on RHS in order to avoid affecting the burial ground on the LHS (consensus regarding the same was not achieved then).

At 7+507 by 2 mtrs to LHS in order to safe guard the pond on RHS.


owner/users for donation: The community has expressed their willingness to donate their land for the construction of the road.


iv. Other issues: None.


Prior to the commencement of the transect walk consultations were held with affected

communities. The main objective of the consultation was to inform the community about

the PMGSY as a rural development scheme and the details of the proposed road

alignment. Further the relevance and purpose of the transect walk and especially about

community participation to finalize the alignment.

The community shared that the road is of utmost importance to them for mobility and

accessing essential services like education, markets, and health services critical for their

social and economic well being. Since the project area is flood affected, the community

has requested that the road that would be constructed should be of excellent quality and

which could be used for many years.

Recommendations by the Social Safeguard Specialist: None.

The road alignment will be finalized with the best efforts to address the above issues. Countersigned

- 36 -

(Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) (Name) CHAINAGE WISE LAND WIDTH AVAILABLE AND REQUIRED:

Chainage Existing Land Width*

Additional Land


Village Remarks/Suggestions

LHS RHS

LHS RHS

0+006 7.50 4.70

Barenda

0+100 6.00 1.70

0+182 4.30 5.20 5.20

0+236 4.80 3.70 3.30

0+270 5.40 3.90 3.30

0+362 4.80 3.50 3.50

0+417 5.70

3.70 1.90

0+475 6.20

1.45 1.95 Drain

There is a drain on LHS which will be shifted by 1.45 mtrs on LHS

0+519 5.20 2.75

0+544 6.00 1.50 2.85

0+566 5.50 1 3.40 Residenti

al Structure

The alignment is to be shifted by 1 mtr to the RHS to avoid residential structure loss on the LHS. Speed breaker

0+681 5.35 2.15

0+692 4.50 If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact. Both side drains (chainage 0+692). Drain started on both the sides (chainage 0+866)

0+773 4.00 1.00 1.00

0+793 4.50 0.75 0.75

0+844 4.70 1.00 1.00

0+866 4.70 1.00 1.00

0+908

0+950 4.50 1.50 1.50 Drain Drain

0+965 4.50 1.50 1.50

0+972 4.70 1.00 1.00

1+000 4.20 1.00 Residentia

l Land

1+047 3.90 1.00

1+096 4.50 1.00 1.00

1+167 4.50 0.75 0.75

- 37 -

Renewal of the culvert is suggested (chainage 0+908)

1+241 4.80 2.00 2.00

1+393 8.50

1+480 5.35 3.90 4.10

1+600 5.30 3.30 3.30 Agricultur

al land Agricultura

l land

1+704 3.70 4.35 4.35 Agricultur

al land Agricultura

l land

1+830 3.40 4.50 4.50 Agricultur

al land Agricultura

l land

1+919 5.20 4.00 4.00 Agricultur

al land Agricultura

l land

2+000 5.00 3.80 3.80 Agricultur

al land Agricultura

l land

2+014 4.80 2 3

A new agriculture conduct is incorporated as suggested by PIU

2+191 3.80 4.20 4.20

2+305 4.00 4.00 4.00

2+368 4.00 4.10 4.10 Turning on RHS

2+446 4.00 4.10 4.10

Ukta

2+500 8.00 1.00 1.00

2+571 5.00 3.50 3.50

2+650 4.30 4.00 4.00

2+691 5.40 3.60 3.60

2+770 6.00 3.00 3.00

2+862 5.20 3.60 3.60

2+965 3.70 4.50 4.50

3+000 8.00 2.20 2.20

3+038 7.00 3.00 2.40

3+122 4.00 8.00

3+176 4.70 6.30

3+255 8.40 2.00 2.00

3+291 4.40 4.00 4.00

3+363 5.00 1.5 3.00 Residenti

al Structure

The alignment is to be shifted by 1.5 mtrs to the RHS to avoid residential structure loss on the LHS

3+370 5.00 6.00

3+388 5.00 6.00 6.00 If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse

3+444 5.50 3.50 3.50

3+517 5.50 4.00 3.00 Residenti

al land

3+557 5.40 4.00 3.00

3+685 6.00 4.50 2 Grave yard

3+736 3.00 2.40 2.40

3+826 5.35 3.50 3.50

3+953 4.50 0.85 0.85

4+122 4.8 0.60 0.60

4+253 3.60 2.40

4+253 3.60 2.40

4+274 5.60 2 2

4+310 5.60 2 2 Burial

ground

- 38 -

4+399 6.00 2.00

Residential land and

commercial land

impact. The community has suggested shifting the alignment by 4 mtrs to the RHS to avoid affecting the residential land on the LHS. (chainage 3+517) The alignment is to be shifted by 2 mtrs to the LHS to avoid affecting the grave yard (chainage 3+685) The alignment may have to be shifted by 1.5 mtrs on RHS in order to avoid impacting the burial ground. (chainage 4+310) Pond pilling ends on RHS (chainage 4+786)

4+414 4.30 2.00

4+505 4.50 0.75 0.75

Pitchkuri

4+590 3.70 1.20 1.20

4+655 4.30 0.75 0.75 Residenti

al land

4+712 3.80 1.20

4+786 5.90

4+800 5.90

4+828 5.70

4+930 6.00 3.00 3.00

5+116 4.20 3.00 3.00

5+128 5.00 1.50 1.50

5+227 5.00 1.25 4.00 Commer

cial structure

Railway land

5+256

5+273 3.50 2.00 2.00 Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

5+281 4.30 4.50 4.50

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

5+446 6.00 2.00 2.00

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

5+451 4.70 3.50 3.50

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

5+562 5.30 1.10 1.10

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

5+567 4.30 3.20 3.20

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

5+644 4.30 3.20 3.20

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

5+686 6.00 2.00 2.00

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

5+777 5.20 3.50 3.50 Agricultur Agricultura

- 39 -

al land l land

5+814 5.60 2.20 2.20

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

5+884 5.00 3.20 3.20

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

6+023 4.80 2.80 2.80

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

6+153 5.40 2.30 2.30

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

6+159 4.00 3.50 3.50

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

Govindpur

6+290 6.00 3.00 3.00

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

6+474 5.40 2.30 2.30

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

6+590 5.20 2.50 2.50

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

6+760 6.00 2.00 2.00

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

6+767 4.30 3.80 3.80

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

6+843 5.20 2.50 2.50

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

6+884 6.00 3.00 3.00

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

7+104 7.00 3.00

Agricultur

al land

7+117 5.20 6.00

Agricultur

al land

7+185 4.00 4.00 Agricultura

l land At LHS retaining wall is demanded

7+436 7.60 1.20 1.20

Agricultur

al land

Agricultura

l land

7+507 5.00 3.00 2.00

Agricultur

al land Pond

The alignment is to be shifted by 2 mtrs to the LHS to avoid affecting the pond.

7+577 5.60 5.00

Agricultur

al land

7+683 4.60 0.50 0.50

Residenti

al land

Residentia

l land

If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then

- 40 -

1) Name of Road: Uttar Laxmipur to Tangaghata Ferry Ghat

2) Villages: i. Laxmanpur Ghosh Para ii. Kamiktola iii. Mazida iv. Tangaghata Nutan Para

3) Gram Panchayat: Mazida

4) Block: Purbasthali

5) District: Burdwan

6) Date: Time: 5th February 2010; 10:30 am to 1:15 pm

7) Total Number of Participants in the Transect walk:

67 8) Numbers of Participants falling in the following categories:


Scheduled Caste: 17

Scheduled Tribe: 15

Disabled: Nil

BPL: 06




From Government: 1. Mr. Madhusudhn kumar (Sub Asstt. Engneer) 2. Mr. Nobo Kumar Ghosh(Land Manager)

From Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI): 1. Mrs. Basanti Das Koiri (Member of Zilla Parishad)

7+716 4.60 0.50

Residenti

al land

residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact. (from chainage 7+585 to 7+716)

7+733 10.00 1.00 1.00

Culvert

7+746 4.40 3.50 3.50 Agricultur

al land Agricultura

l land

7+819 5.60 1.00 1.00

7+830 5.50 3.50 3.50 Agricultur

al land Agricultura

l land

- 41 -

2. Mr. Chandra Biswas (PRI member of Mazida G.P.) 3. Mr. Biswajeet Soil (Upo-Pradhan, Mazida G. P.) 4. Mr. Joti Prakash Badai (PRI member of Mazida G.P.) 5. Mr. Anima Biswas (PRI member of Mazida G. P.)


on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: The total length of the proposed road for

construction was found to be 3.2 kms during the transect walk. However according to the list submitted by the PIU, the length of the same was 4 kms. The PIU has not been able to provide the reasons for the difference in the length of the road.

ii. Road width and land availability: The land width available is between 4.5 mtrs to 8 mtrs (Approx.) as found in at chainages 1+235 and 2+060 respectively.

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of Economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 6 households.

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: In the affected villages, it has been seen that the predominant vulnerable group is that of SC who constitute about 70% of the total population. Along the proposed road, the type of loss incurred by the vulnerable groups is largely of agriculture land, residential land and structure, and commercial.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): At chainage 0+825 a tree is located which is of religious importance to the local community. The community is not willing to fell the tree and have suggested that the alignment be shifted by 1 mtr on the left hand side to avoid affecting the tree. This was agreed to by the PIU.

vi. Water-related issues (drainage lines, rivers and water crossings, irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): The major problem faced by the local community is that of water logging and soil erosions especially during the monsoons.

The PIU after consultation with the community have suggested construction of culverts at chainages 0+002, 0+083, 0+418, 0+707, 1+048, 1+179, 1+824, and 2+144.

Piling has been suggested at chainages 0+019 to 0+069 (R), 0+257 to 0+418 (R), 0+418 to 0+910 (L), and 1+102 to 1+117 (R).

In addition to above a masonry surface drain was also suggested at chainage 0+191 in order to avoid water logging on the LHS.

vii. Road safety-related issues (major junctions, curves, bends, etc.): Sign board especially near school along speed breakers at the beginning of all major habitation areas. These include chainages 0+008 to 0+257, 1+235 to 1+458, and 2+144 to 2+194.

- 42 -



i. Changes to be Incorporated in the design:

Considering the width availability and also to avoid affecting structures along the side of the existing road, the PIU in consultation with the community have suggested CC road at chainages 0+008 to 0+257, 1+235 to 1+458, and 1+743 to 2+194.

At chainage 0+825, the alignment is to be shifted by 1 mtr to the left hand side to avoid affecting a tree which is of religious importance (on the RHS) to the local community.

From chainage 0+418 to 2+060 the embankment height is to be increased by 1 mtr.


owner/users for donation: People are ready to donate their land for the construction of road. However, differences were noticed in some places, at chainage 1+365 and 2+571, where people have already donated their land for the existing road were not ready to donate again.




Prior to the transect walk on the 5th of February 2010, consultation were held with affected

communities. The main objective of the consultation was to inform the community about

the PMGSY as a rural development scheme and the details of the proposed road

alignment. Further the relevance and purpose of the transect walk and especially about

community participation to finalize the alignment.

The community shared that the road is of utmost importance to them for mobility and

accessing essential services like education, markets, and health services critical for their

social and economic well being.


The road alignment will be finalized with the best efforts to address the above issues. Countersigned (Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) (Name) CHAINAGE WISE LAND WIDTH AVAILABLE AND REQUIRED:

Chainage Existing Additional Type of Loss Village Remarks/Suggestions

- 43 -

Land Width

Land Required

LHS RHS LHS RHS

0+000 8 0 0 -- -- LAXMANPUR GHOSH PARA

0+008 5.4 1.3 1.3 -- -- If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.


Residential Land


water body

KAMIKTOLA

0+418 6.5 1.5 1.5 Water body Agricultural land

PIU suggested to raise the height of the embankment by 1 mtr considering the concerns of the community.

0+445 4.8 3 7 Water body Agricultural land

0+500 6.3 3 1.5 Water body Agricultural land and

play ground

0+613 4.6 4 3 Water body Agricultural land and

Residential Land

0+707 5 2.5 3.5 Water body Residential Land

0+825 5.8 2.5 1 Agricultural

land

Tree of religious

importance

The alignment is to be shifted by 1 mtr to the left hand side to avoid affecting a tree which is of religious importance to the local community.

0+910 6.2 0 2 -- Residential Land

MAZIDA

Retaining wall suggested by PIU

1+102 -- -- -- -- -- Retaining wall ends

1+155 5.8 2 2 Residential

Land

Agricultural

land

1+235 4.5 1.5 1.5 Residential

Land

Residential

Land

If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road

1+365 4.8 1.5 1.5 Residential

Land

Residential

Land


Residential land

1+458 6.3 2.5 2.5 Residential Land water

body

Mango trees,

Residential Land

- 44 -

3. JALPAIGURI DISTRICT

1) Name of Road: T05 At Bikashnagar to Rajfapri

2) Villages: Kolachand Papri

3) Gram Panchayat: Dovegram

4) Block: Rajganj

5) District: Jalpaiguri

6) Date; Time: 26th March 2010; 2:30 pm to 6 pm

using the available width to minimize the adverse impact. At chainage 1+365, land owners are not willing to donate their land as they have already donated their land for the existing road and were not ready to donate again.

1+541 6.3 2.5 2.5 -- Shops Temporary shop is getting affected

1+619 6.5 1 1 -- Residential land

BPL family is being affected due to the alignment

1+743 6 1.5 1.5 Hand Loom Residential land


1+950 6 1 1 Commercial land

Residential land

2+060 8 1.5 1.5 Agricultural land

Agricultural land

2+095 -- -- -- -- --


Agricultural land


Agricultural land


Agricultural land


Agricultural land


Residential Land

TANGA

GHATA

NUTAN

PARA


Residential land

2+571 6.3 0.7 0.7 Residential land

Residential land

The PIU has suggested that BT road could be constructed with the available land as land owners were not willing to donate their land.

2+633 5 1 1 -- --

2+700 6.8 -- -- -- --

- 45 -

29th March 2010; 10:15 am to 3:45 pm

30th March 2010; 10 am to 2:30 pm



Female headed household: Nil Scheduled Caste: 19 Scheduled Tribe: Nil Disabled: Nil BPL: 17 Households losing structure: Nil



From Government: 1. Mr. Nikhil Mahato (A.E)


1. Mr.Nilkomal Mandal; Pradhan, Dovegram


Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: Total length of the road including extension from Khola Chandpur Bot Tola to Netaji more is 6.20Km as found during the transect walk. As per the list submitted by the PIU, the length of the road was 8.25 kms. The PIU were unable to provide any reasons for the difference in the lengths of the road.

ii. Road width and land availability: The carriage width of the existing road varies from 5.5 mtrs to 8 mtrs. However, according to the community, the existing road is 11 mtrs wide, all through, which was duly found during the Transect walk. Hence no one would be affected.

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: None.

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: None.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): The proposed

road passes through forest areas at chainages 0+120 to 1+296 (RHS), 0+376 to 0+870 (LHS), 3+354 to 4+753 (Both side), and 3+3246 to 4+714 (LHS; extension from Khola Chandpur Bot Tola to Netaji More)

vi. Water-related issues (drainage lines, rivers and water crossings, irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): The community have insisted on broader culverts at chainages 0+007, 0+618, 0+706, 0+802, 1+143, 1+540, 2+180, 2+863, 3+354, 3+400, 3+288, 3+830, 4+219, and 4+326.

- 46 -

Additionally, the PIU have suggested pilling at chainages 4+326 to 4+502

(RHS) and 4+717 to 4+753 (LHS).

vii. Road safety-related issues (major junctions, curves, bends, etc.): At chainages 1+082 and 1+847, the community has suggested speed breakers as there are schools located here.

viii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow pits, etc.): The community has requested that the earth required for raising the height of the road should be brought from outside the village.


i. Changes to be incorporated in the design: None

ii. Extent of land take and willingness/unwillingness of land owner/users for donation: Since the proposed road has 11 mtrs of available width, no private assets would be affected.




Prior to Transect Walk, consultations were held with communities along with the representatives from PIU and PRI. During the session villagers were informed about PMGSY scheme as a rural development scheme and the significance of transect walk. Recommendations by the Social Safeguard Specialist: None.

The road alignment will be finalized with the best efforts to address the above issues. The next consultation with the likely affected persons will be on (date) at (Location). Countersigned (Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) CHAINAGE WISE LAND WIDTH AVAILABLE AND REQUIRED:


Additional Land



s LHS

RHS

LHS RHS

0+018 7 0.5 0.5

Kolachand Papri

0+706 7 0.5 0.5

1+305 6.5 2 2

3+175 6 1 1

3+354 5.5 1 1 BSF camp

- 47 -

1) Name of Road: T07 at Lal School to Brazer Kuthi

2) Villages: i. Dakhin Parakota ii. Ravabasti iii. Brazer Kuthi iv. Borodurko v. Chengtimari

3) Gram Panchayat: Parokatha (Jalpaiguri)and Shalbari (Coochbehar)

4) Block: Alipurduar (Jalpaiguri) and Bakshi (Coochbehar)

5) District: Jalpaiguri and Coochbehar

6) Date; Time: 16th March 2010; 10:45 am to 2 pm

17th March 2010; 09:15 am to 4:50 pm 28th March 2010; 10:15 am to 3:15 pm



Female headed household: Nil Scheduled Caste: 16 Scheduled Tribe: 07 Disabled: Nil BPL: 05 Households losing structure: 02



From Government: 1. Bhabesh Karju (S.A.E) 2. Amar Bin (S.A.E)


1. Monoranjan Barman (Pradhan,Parokatha) 2. Neetish Sarkar (Upo- Pradhan, Parokatha) 3. Hemanta Das (Panchayat Member) 4. Ajit Das (Panchayat Member) 5. Nikhil Das (Panchayat Member)


on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: Total length of the road is 6.25 kms of which 1.5 km is falling in Cooch Behar district. As per the list submitted by the PIU, the length of the road was 4 kms. The PIU has been unable to provide the reasons for the difference in the lengths of the road.

ii. Road width and land availability: existing width of the road varies from 3.5 meters (at chainage 0+026) to 8.2 meters (at chainage 1+636).

- 48 -

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 4 households

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: The affected

villages namely Brazer Kuthi, Borodurko, and Chengtimari are majorly inhabited by SC population comprising of 75% to 80% of the total population. In Brazer Kuthi, 35% of total population belongs to SC category and another 35% are ST families. The vulnerable groups of people would largely bear an impact on the residential, commercial, and agricultural assets.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): A mosque is

located at chainage at 0+467 (RHS). To avoid impacting the Mosque, the community has suggested shifting the alignment to the LHS by 1 mtr.

vi. Water-related issues (drainage lines, rivers and water crossings, irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.):

The PIU has suggested piling at several chainages. These are 0+005 to 0+020 (RHS), 0+069 to 0+098 (LHS), 0+370 to 0+589 (Both side piling), 1+372 to 1+403 (RHS), 1+645 to 1+662 (RHS), 2+015 to 2+034 (LHS), 3+886 to 3+906 (RHS), 3+900 to 3+942 (LHS), 3+983 to 4+116 (LHS) and 5+101 to 5+132 (LHS).

At certain chainages the community has proposed for broader culverts. These are at 0+242, 0+374, 1+009, 1+895, 2+238, 3+953, 4+818, 4+518, 5+105, 5+602, and 6+031

vii. Road safety-related issues (major junctions, curves, bends, etc.): The

affected community has suggested construction of speed breakers at locations where there are habitations, to avoid accidents. These are at chainages 0+005, 1+295, 1+895, and 6+250.




Community has suggested shifting the alignment to LHS by 1 mtr to avoid affecting the Mosque at chainage 0+467 (RHS)

At chainage 1+507 there is a 5 meter span cross culvert with a width of 3.5 meters which the affected community has proposed to be built at chainage 1+500 with an extended width of 7.5 meters.

At chainage 2+409 (LHS), popularly known as Pagli Dham, there is a Hindu cremation ground. The affected communities have refused to donate land from the area and have suggested shifting the alignment to the RHS by 2.7 mtrs.

ii. Extent of land take and willingness/unwillingness of land owner/users for donation: The community has expressed their willingness to donate their land for the construction of the road. However, at chainage 0+750 land on either side of the existing road belongs to the same displaced person (DP). The land requirement is 3 mtrs on either side. However the DP has agreed to

- 49 -

donate only 1.5 mtrs on both sides. Similarly 1+111, 2.5 mtrs land is required on both sides of the road for the project. However the DP has agreed to donate only 1.8 mtrs on both sides.




A consultation session was organized with the affected communities prior to the

commencement of the transect walk. The consultation was attended by the

representatives of PIU and PRI along with the members of the affected communities.

During the discussion information relating to PMGSY as a rural development scheme and

the significance of community participation in finalizing the design for the construction of

the road was disseminated.

During the consultations, the communities shared the perceived benefits from the project.

According to them, an all weather road would help them access markets and sell their

agricultural produce at better rates. Further, it would also lead to better access and

communication with neighboring villages and market. During monsoon, the community

shared that to access hospital which is at a distance of 11 kms (at Kamakhaya Guri), they

faced tremendous hardships. Similarly, school going children too found it difficult to

school as the roads would be in a bad condition. Thus the project was welcomed

wholeheartedly by the communities.


The road alignment will be finalized with the best efforts to address the above issues. Countersigned (Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) CHAINAGE WISE LAND WIDTH AVAILABLE AND REQUIRED:

Chainage

Existing Land Width

Additional Land


Villages Remarks/Suggestions

LHS

RHS LHS RHS

0+005 6 1 3

DAKHIN PAROKATHA

0+026 3.5 1 3 Residential

Land

0+101 4.5 2.5 2.5 Agricultural

land

0+279 5 1.5 1.5 Residentia

l land Agricultural

land

0+359 5 1.25

1.25 Residentia

l land Residential

land

0+467 5 2 1 Mosque Community has suggested shifting the alignment to LHS by 1

- 50 -

mtr to avoid affecting the Mosque at RHS

0+607 4.3

3 3 Cemetery

0+631 4

2.5 2.5 Residentia

l land Residential

Land

0+750 4 3 3 Agricultural

land

The DP has suggested that only 1.5 mtrs be required from both sides.

0+778 4.5 3 3

0+912 5 2 2.6

0+949 4 2 2.6 Commerci

al land

0+968 6 2.5 2.5

1+111 7 2.5 2.5 DP has agreed to donate only 1.8 mtrs from both sides.

1+165 7.5 2 Agricultural

land

1+295 3.5 1.5 2 Residential structure

Residential Land

1+340 6.6 1.5 1.5 Hand pump

RAVABASTI

1+500 6.5 3 3

1+536 6.5 5.5 4

1+636 8.2

BRAZER KUTHI

1+655 6.5 5.5 4 Commerci

al land

1+664 6.5 5.5 4 House

wall

1+705 5.5 2 2

1+736 7.5 0.50

0.50 Residentia

l land Residential

land

1+763 5.5 2 2

Boundary wall is being

affected

1+783 5.5 2.5 2.5

1+821 5.5 2.5 2.5 Agricultura

l land Agricultural

land

1+945 5 2 2 Residentia

l land Post office

2+018 5.5 0.50 Residential structure

2+265 5.5 2.5 2.5 Agricultura

l land Agricultural

land

2+319 7 0.5 0.5

2+388 4.3 3 3

2+409 4 2.7 4

Pagli Dham (Hindu

Cremation Ground)

Community has suggested shifting the alignment to RHS by 2.7 mtr to avoid affecting the cremation ground at RHS

3+090 6.5 4 4 Agricultura

l land

BORODURKO

3+148 6.5 4 4

3+386 3 4 4


- 51 -

1) Name of Road: Ranichera Tea Garden to Paschim Damdim with extension from Betabarimore to Damdim more.

2) Villages: Bedbabri, Balabari and Damdim

3) Gram Panchayat: Damdim

4) Block: Mal


6) Date; Time: 22nd March 2010; 3 pm to 8 pm




Scheduled Caste: 10 Scheduled Tribe: 07 Disabled: Nil BPL: 16




From Government: 1. Mr. Swarnab Chakraborty (S.A.E)


1. Mr. Monoj Das, Pradhan, Damdim 2. Mr. Pairu Kujur, Panchayat Member 3. Mr. Indrajeet Das, Panchayat Member


on Revenue map)

4+076 5 1.5 1.5 Agricultural

land

CHENGTIMARI

4+176 5 1.5 1.5 Residentia

l Land

4+214 5 1.5 1.5

4+239 4.5 1.75

1.75

4+720 6 4 4

BRAZER KUTHI

5+540 6.2 1 1

5+684 6.2 1 1

5+781 5 3 3

6+206 3.5 3 3 Residentia

l land Agricultural

land

- 52 -

i. Road alignment: The total length of the road found during the transect walk is 3.67 km while according to the list submitted by the PIU it was 5.75 kms. The PIU has not been able to provide reasons for the difference in the length of the road. The proposed road passes through tea garden area of Ranichera Tea Estate and connecting Purbo Damdim and Damdim Hat.

ii. Road width and land availability: Existing width of the road varies from 3 meters (0+500) to 7.5 meters (0+201).


criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: None

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: None. Since the

road is passing through tea garden, there are no major habitations that would be affected and only land belonging to the Tea Estate would be affected.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): None.


irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): Broader culverts have been proposed at chainages 0+008, 0+729, 0+908, 0+990, 1+032, 1+143, 1+183, 1+289, 1+341, 1+755, 1+871, 2+682, and 3+087 .


People have suggested for speed breakers at chainages 2+320 and 3+800 where there exists a school and ICDS center respectively.



i. Changes to be incorporated in the design: None


for donation: As aforementioned, the land along the proposed road belongs to the Ranichera Tea Estate. The authorities of the Estate have agreed donate the requisite land for the project.

iii. Environmental issues to be resolved: None



Prior to conducting the Transect Walk, a consultation was carried out with the affected communities. In the consultation, information regarding the PMGSY as a rural development scheme and importance and purpose of transect walk was shared. The community opined that the proposed road was extremely important to them as it would minimize the distance to the nearby market by 2 km i.e. Damdim hat. Also it would help in accessing educational and health services of the area especially during the monsoons.

- 53 -

Recommendations by the Social Safeguard Specialist: None. The road alignment will be finalized with the best efforts to address the above issues. Countersigned (Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) CHAINAGE WISE LAND WIDTH AVAILABLE AND REQUIRED:

1) Name of Road: T14 at Sarkarpara to Munshipara

2) Villages: i. Sorkarpara

ii. Nogarpara


Additional Land



s

LHS RHS LHS RHS

0+008 9

BEDBABRI

0+201 7.5

0+500 3 4 4

0+647 5.5 3 3

0+729 5.5 3 3 Culvert proposed by the community

0+908 5.5 3 3

Culvert proposed by

the community

0+990 5.5 3 3

Culvert proposed by

the community

1+032 5.5 3 3

Culvert proposed by

the community

1+143 5.5 3 3

Culvert proposed by

the community

1+183 5.5 3 3

Culvert proposed by

the community

1+239 5.5 3 3

Culvert proposed by

the community

1+341 5.5 3 3

Culvert proposed by

the community

1+468 5 3 3

1+925 7

Defense land on RHS

2+423 7

2+695 7 BALABARI

2+778 7

3+087 7 DAMDIM

3+138 7

- 54 -

iii.Chaiouchanli Komath iv. Dhangpara v. Loharipara vi. Munsipara

3) Gram Panchayat: Bhadurpur

4) Block: Jalpaiguri Sadar


6) Date; Time: 21st March 2010; 11:45 am to 3 pm

22nd March 2010; 9 am to 4:15 pm



Female headed household: 01 Scheduled Caste: 28 Scheduled Tribe: Nil Disabled: Nil BPL: 24 Households losing structure: 07



From Government: 1. Mr. Swarnab Chakraborty, (S.A.E)


1. Mr. Pradeep Roy, Pradhan,Bahadurpur 2. Mr. Babul Deb, Panchayat Samiti Member 3. Mr. Amol Krishna Roy, Panchayat Samiti Member 4. Mr. Bharat Roy, Panchayat Samiti Member 5. Mr. Swapan Roy, Panchayat Samiti Member


on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: Total length of the proposed road found during the transect walk is 7.88 kms. However according to the list of provided by PIU, the length of the road was 8.3 kms. The PIU has not been able to provide any reason for the difference in the lengths of the road.

ii. Road width and land availability: The existing width of the road varies from 3 meters (at chainage 3+982) to 6 meters (at chainage 0+015).


criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 6 households

- 55 -

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: The land required for the construction of proposed road with a width of 7.5 meters is majorly owned by the people falling under the category of Schedule Caste with a negligible percentage of General caste people. In the affected villages of Satkhamar and Sarkarpara, the entire population belongs to the SC category while in Nagarpara and Charchandi Kamat it is 75% of the total population. In Dhengpara, Lahiripara and Munshi para, the SC population constitutes 90% of the total population. The vulnerable groups of people primarily stand to lose their residential, commercial, and agricultural assets.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): During Transect Walk three sensitive locations were identified. These are as follows:

At chainage 1+711, a temple is located on the LHS. To avoid affecting

the same, the community has suggested shifting the alignment by 3

mtrs to the right.

At chainage 2+037, there is a temple on RHS and residential structure

on the LHS. The community has suggested that at this chainage the

proposed road should be constructed using the available width i.e. 4

mtrs.

At chainage 4+760, a school (playground) would be affected at the

RHS. The school authorities have refused to donate the land for the

project and have insisted that the requisite land (1.5 mtrs) by taken

from the LHS.

There is Graveyard on RHS at chainage 5+863. The community has

suggested shifting the alignment to the LHS by 2 mtr to avoid affecting

the graveyard.


The PIU has suggested piling at chainages 0+000 to 0+015 (RHS), 0+109 to 0+120 (LHS), 0+182 to 0+213 (LHS), 0+221 to 0+236 (LHS), 0+360 to 0+380 (LHS), 0+369 to 0+384 (RHS), 0+412 to 0+439 (RHS), 0+462 to 0+474 (LHS), 0+534 to 0+547 (LHS), 0+678 to 0+695 (RHS), 0+796 to 0+802 (LHS), 1+139 to 1+164 (LHS), 1+186 to 1+190 (RHS), 1+199 to 1+235 (RHS), 1+292 to 1+310 (RHS), 1+295 to 1+303 (LHS), 1+318 to 1+325 (LHS), 1+385 to 1+395 (LHS), 1+432 to 1+444 (RHS), 1+466 to 1+485 (LHS), 1+566 to 1+587 (RHS), 1+820 to 1+828 (RHS), 1+899 to 1+997 (LHS), 2+048 to 2+066 (RHS), 2+095 to 2+125 (RHS), 2+225 to 2+248 (RHS), 2+273 to 2+302 (LHS), 2+495 to 2+470 (LHS), 2+551 to 2+566 (RHS), 2+594 to 2+608 (LHS), 2+693 to 2+648 (RHS), 2+648 to 2+657 (LHS), 2+447 to 2+857 (RHS), 3+013 to 3+025 (LHS), 3+221 to 3+233 (BOTH SIDE), 3+278 to 3+301 (LHS), 3+317 to 3+330 (LHS), 3+332 to 3+348 (RHS), 3+338 to 3+356 (LHS), 3+424 to 3+432 (LHS), 3+424 to 3+468 (RHS), 3+945 to 3+969 (RHS), 4+045 to 4+061 (RHS), 4+199 to 4+224 (LHS), 4+311 to 4+331 (LHS), 4+631 to 4+687 (RHS), 4+694 to 4+713 (RHS), 4+778 to 4+798 (LHS), 4+840 to 4+850 (LHS), 4+864 to 4+877 (RHS), 5+000 to 5+032 (LHS), 5+085 to 5+112 (LHS), 5+173 to 5+210 (RHS), 5+218 to 5+236 (BOTH SIDE), 5+246 to 5+264 (LHS), 5+863 to 5+985 (RHS), 6+325 to 6+365 (LHS), 6+530 to 6+581 (LHS), 6+618 to 6+631 (RHS), 6+621 to 6+643 (LHS), 6+657 to 6+689 (RHS), 6+837 to 6+847 (RHS), 6+849 to 6+870 (LHS), 6+934 to 6+950 (RHS), 6+971 to 7+014 (RHS), 7+014 to 7+038 (LHS), 7+048 to 7+058 (LHS), 7+088 to 7+114 (LHS), 7+140 to 7+154 (LHS), 7+552 to 7+576

- 56 -

(LHS), 7+650 to 7+699 (RHS), 7+693 to 7+763 (LHS), 7+760 to 7+780 (RHS), and 7+866 to 7+873 (RHS).

Broader culverts have been proposed by the community members at chainages 0+032, 0+384, 1+088, 1+235, 1+438, 2+150, 2+463, 2+989, 3+338, 3+875, 3+969, 3+982, 4+280, 4+376, 4+873, 4+950, 6+044, 6+131, 6+453, 6+552, 6+990, and 7+693.


None

viii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow pits, etc.): The proposed road for construction is passing through habitation areas and hence the affected communities have requested that the earth required for raising the height of the road should be brought in from outside the village.



To avoid affecting the temple located at chainage 1+711 (LHS), the

community has proposed shifting the alignment by 3 mtrs to the right.

At chainage 2+037, a temple is located on the RHS and there are

residential structures on the LHS. The community has proposed

constructing the road with the available width of 4 mtrs here.

At chainage 4+760, the school authorities of the school (RHS) that would

eb affected by the project have refused to donate land for the project and

have insisted that the requisite land (1.5 mtrs) be taken from the left.

To avoid impacting the graveyard at chainage 5+86 (RHS), the community

has suggested shifting the alignment by 2 mtrs to the LHS.

ii. Extent of land take and willingness/unwillingness of land owner/users for donation: The affected communities have expressed their willingness to donate land for the construction of the road. However at chainages, 1+945 and 6+325, the displaced persons were not willing to donate their land and have suggested that the road needs to be constructed with the available width.

iii. Environmental issues to be resolved: Considering the environmental

issues, the PIU have suggested bamboo piling over water bodies as mentioned under the heading of water related issues. However, the community proposed that concrete walls should be built since bamboo pilling would wear off in a few years and be rendered useless. This would in turn damage the roads due to overflow of water during the monsoons.



Consultations were held with affected communities before the transect walk was initiated.

The major stakeholders who participated in the consultations included the displaced

persons and representatives PIU and PRI. In the consultations, information relating to

road width, thickness of the road and PMGSY as a rural development scheme was

disseminated.

- 57 -

According to affected community members, the construction of proposed would provide

them better access to services especially during the rainy season.




Additional Land Required

Type of Loss Village

Remarks/Suggestions

LHS RHS LHS RHS

0+015 6 1.5 1.5

SORKARPARA

0+050 5.1 2 3

0+098 4.6 2 2

0+115 4.56 3 3

0+249 4.5 3 3 Residenti

al land

0+412 6.5 2.5 2.5

0+526 5.5

2.5 2.5

0+559 4

4 4

0+614 4 2.5 2.5

0+644 4.5 3 3


0+888 4 5.5 5.5

1+058 4 5.5 5.5


NOGARPARA

1+496 5.5 1 1

1+566 5.5 3 3

1+711 4.5 3 3 Temple Reside

ntial Land

The alignment is to be shifted to the RHS by 3 mtrs to avoid affecting the temple on the LHS

1+920 4.5 3 3

1+945 6.5 1.5 1 Reside

ntial Land

1+997 5 1.5 1.5

2+011 5 1.5 1.5

Residential

structure


al structure

Residential

structure

- 58 -


al land Templ

e

The community has suggested that the proposed road should be constructed using the available land width of 4 mtrs to avoid affecting the temple and residential structure.


al structure

Residential

structure

2+095 5 1.5 1.5

2+136 4 2 2 Commercial land


2+150 3.3 2 2

2+175 4 2 2 Reside

ntial land

2+252 4.5 2 2 Reside

ntial Land

CHAIOUCHANLI KOMATH

2+273 5.5 1.5 1.5 Reside

ntial Land

2+608 5.5 1.5 1.5

2+802 5 3.5 2 Reside

ntial Land

2+901 5 3.5 2 Reside

ntial Land

3+046 6 2.5 1.5 Reside

ntial land

3+190 6 2.5 1.5 H P

3+267 3.2 2.5 2.5

3+861 3 2.5 2.5

DHANGPARA

3+900 3 2.5 2.5 Reside

ntial Land

3+982 3 2.5 2.5

4+061 6 2 2

LOHARIPARA

4+100 3 2.25 2.25 Reside

ntial land

4+420 4.5 1.5 1.5 Reside

ntial land

4+884 4.5 1.5 1.5

4+594 4 2 2

MUNSIPARA

4+634 4 2 2

4+760 6.5 1.5 School

The school authorities have insisted that the requisite land (1.5 mtrs) should be taken from the LHS as they

- 59 -

4. MURSHIDABAD DISTRICT

1) Name of Road: Charpaikamri to Chardebipur

2) Villages: Charpaikamri, Debipur, Klainagar and Kantonagar.

would not donate land.

4+970 4 3.5 2 Reside

ntial land


al structure



al land

Residential Land


Residential Land

5+863 4 2 2 Gravey

ard

To avoid affecting the graveyard, the community has suggested shifting the alignment by 2 mtrs to the LHS.

6+355 4 3 3

Residential

structure

6+407 4.5 1.5 1.5

Residenti

al

structure

Reside

ntial

structu

re

6+581 4.5 1.5 1.5 Reside

ntial Land

6+652 4.5 1.5 1.5 Commerc

ial land

7+038 4 3 3

Commercial land & Reside

ntial Land

7+267 4 3 3 Reside

ntial Land

7+637 4 2 2

7+763 4 2 2 Reside

ntial Land

7+740 4 2 2 Reside

ntial Land

7+866 3 1 5

- 60 -

3) Gram Panchayat: Kantinagar

4) Block: Bhagwangola I

5) District: Murshidabad





Scheduled Caste: 01 Scheduled Tribe: Nil Disabled: 01 BPL: 02




From Government: 1. Mr. Utpal Barman (S.A.E)


1. Mr.Khush Md; Zilla Parishard Member 2. Abul Kasim; Pradhan, Kantnagar G.P 3. Nazbul; Panchayat Member


on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: The total length of the road was found to be 3.26 kms during the Transect Walk.

ii. Road width and land availability: The width of the existing alignment varies from 3.5 to 7.5 meters. However, according to the community, the actual width of the proposed road varies from 5.5 to 11 meters.

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 1 household

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: The affected

villages are majorly inhabited by General caste people with a 10 to 20% SC population. The vulnerable groups of people would primarily bear an impact on their residential, commercial, and agricultural assets.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): None.


irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.):

- 61 -

Piling has been suggested at various chainages by the PIU. These are at 0+102 to 0+133 (RHS), 0+500 to 0+524(RHS), 0+510 to 0+547 (LHS), 2+500 to 2+542 (RHS), 2+513 to 2+548 (LHS), and 3+213 to 3+237 (RHS)

The community has insisted for broader culverts at 0+520, 0+801, 1+393, and 2+513.


None

viii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow pits, etc.): The community have suggested that the earth required for raising the height of the road should be brought in from outside and not borrowed from the plots next to the road alignment.


i. Changes to be incorporated in the design: The PIU have proposed CC roads from chainage 2+586 to 3+195 as this location has habitation on both sides of the road. Hence to avoid affecting the same, CC roads has been proposed to be constructed with the available width.


for donation: The community has expressed their willingness to donate their land for the construction of the road.

iii. Environmental issues to be resolved: At chainage 1+636, a bamboo garden would be affected on the RHS.

iv. Other issues: None Details of the discussion took place during the Transect Walk:

Consultations were held with the affected communities before starting the transect walk.

The main objective of the same was to share the goals and objectives of PMGSY as a

rural development scheme and to emphasis on the significance of community

participation in finalizing the design for the proposed road.

The community welcomed the project and shared that an all weather road was critical for

the development of the entire community.

Recommendations by the Social Safeguard Specialist: The suggestions of the PIU at

various chainages (mentioned in 11 .i) regarding construction of CC roads with the

available width due to extensive habitation on both sides of the road should be

considered while finalizing the design. This would be necessary to reduce the adverse

impact on people.

Countersigned (Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) CHAINAGE WISE PLAN:

- 62 -


Additional Land



s LHS

RHS

LHS RHS

0+004 6.5 1 5.5

JANOKIBUF

0+102 4 4 8

0+136 5 1.5 1.5 Residentia

l land Commerci

al land


l land

0+177 8.5

0+231 6 4

CHONBALIPUR

0+241 6

9.5

0+264 6

4 4 Commerci

al land Commerci

al land

0+406 9 0.6 Commerci

al land


l land Commerci

al land

0+471 8.6

0+486 7.7

0+502 4.9 2 2

0+536 4.5 3 3.5 Residentia

l land

0+554 5.3 4.5 Residentia

l Land

0+568 4.7 2 5 Commerci

al land Residentia

l land

0+604 5.3 4

0+606 5.3 4

0+761 5.5 1 1

0+801 3.5 1 1

0+860 3.5 3 3 Agriculture

land

0+873 3.5 3 3 Agriculture

land

0+994 5.5 4


1+121 3.7 3.5 3.5 Agriculture

land Agriculture

land

1+158 5 4

1+186 5 4

1+189 6 1.5 1.5

1+323 6.5 1.5 1.5

1+393 5 5 5

1+439 5.5 3 3 TALTOLA DEBIPUR

1+636 4.5 4.5 2 Bamboo garden

1+663 5.6 1 1 Commerci

al land

1+677 6.5 0.5 0.5 Commerci

al land Commerci

al land

1+721 6.5 0.5 0.5 Agricultura

l land Agricultura

l land

1+749 55 3 3


l land Agricultura

l land

- 63 -

1) Name of Road: Kapasdanga Bridge to Kapasdanga Jitpur

2) Villages: Kapasdanga

3) Gram Panchayat: Kapasdanga

4) Block: Beldanga


6) Date; Time: 11th March 2010; 10:15 am to 3:30 pm




Scheduled Caste: 08 Scheduled Tribe: Nil Disabled: 01 BPL: 07




From Government: 1. Mr. Tapas Ranu (A.E)


There was no representation from PRI. However ex-PRI members were there in the Transect Walk.

2+513 5 5

KANTINOGOR

2+586 45 5 If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

2+590 4.5 5 Residential structure


l Land Residentia

l Land

2+728 5.5 1.5 1.5

2+753 5.5 3

2+810 8.5

2+900 6.5 Residentia

l land Commerci

al land

2+950 6 Residentia

l land Commerci

al land


l land

3+075 6

3+195 6.3

3+213 6.3 5

3+244 7 0.25

0.25

- 64 -


Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: The total length of the road found during the transect walk was 1.53 kms though according to the list submitted by the PIU it was 2 kms. The PIU has not been able to provide any reasons for the difference in the lengths of the road.

ii. Road width and land availability: The width of the existing alignment varies from 3.5 to 8 meters. However according to villagers the actual width of the proposed road varies from 5.5 to 11 meters. The chainage wise information provided by the community is as follows:

Sl. No.

Chainage Existing width in

mtrs

Actual Width in mtrs (as per the

community)

Additional width left in mtrs (as per

the community)

Remarks

1. 0+298 5 9 4 (LHS)

2. 0+315 7 10.5 3.5 (LHS)

3. 0+343 8.5 10.7 2.2 (LHS) If 2.2 meters is acquired from LHS then it would affect the boundary wall of a household.

4. 0+380 7.5 10.2 2.7 (LHS) If 2.7 meters is acquired from LHS then it would affect the boundary wall of a household.

5. 0+402 5.5 9.9 4.5 (LHS)

6. 0+436 5.5 10 4.5 (RHS) If 4.5 meters is acquired on RHS then residential assets of a household may get affected.

7. 0+493 4.5 9 4.5 (RHS)

8. 0+525 6 8 2 (LHS)

9. 0+542 5.5 9 3.5 (RHS)

10. 0+631 5.8 8.5 2.5 (LHS) If 2.5 meters is acquired from the LHS, then it may affect the residential structure here.

11. 0+681 3.5 6 2.5 (RHS) If, 2.5 meters is acquired on RHS then it may affect the Commercial and residential structures of families belonging to BPL category.

12. 0+989 4.2 4.7 0.5 (RHS)

13. 1+024 6 7 1 (RHS) If 1 meter is acquired on RHS then it would affect the boundary wall of a household.

14. 1+071 4.5 5.5 1 (LHS)

15. 1+264 4.5 6.5 2 (RHS)

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 2 households

- 65 -

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: None


At chainage 0+440 and 0+895 there are Mosques located on the LHS. In order to avoid impacting the same, the community has proposed to shift the alignment to the RHS at these chainages by 1.5 mtrs and 1 mtr respectively.

At chainage 1+115, an Id Gaha is located at LHS. The community has insisted that the requisite land be required from the RHS to avoid affecting the same. Thus they have suggested shifting the alignment to the RHS at this chainage by 0.5 mtrs.

Similarly at chainage 1+264, there is an Id Gaha located at RHS but it is not used by the community. However, the requisite land (1.5 mtrs) cannot be taken from the LHS as there are residential structures there which are affected by the project. Hence the community has opined to construct the road using the available width (4.5 mtrs).

vi. Water-related issues (drainage lines, rivers and water crossings, irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): The PIU has suggested piling at chainages 0+000 to 0+307 (Both sides), 0+337 to 0+393 (LHS), 0+393 to 0+760 (RHS), 0+935 to 1+015 (RHS), and 1+092 to 1+264 (RHS). Culverts have been proposed by the community at chainages 0+307, 0+393, 1+289, and 1+530.


None

viii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow pits, etc.): The community has insisted that the earth required for raising the height of the road should be brought in from outside the village than borrowed from the plots lying adjacent to the existing road as it affects the fertility of the soil.



The PIU has suggested construction of CC road from chainage 0+000 to 1+264, 0+493, 0+935 to 0+ 968, and 1+071 to 1+154 as there is habitation on both sides of the road. To avoid impacting them, CC road should be constructed.

At chainage 0+440 and 0+895, the alignment is to be shifted to the RHS by 1.5 mtrs and 1 mtr respectively to avoid impacting the mosques located here on the LHS.

Similarly at chainage 1+115, the alignment is to be shifted to the RHS by 0.5 mtrs to avoid affecting an Id gaha located on the LHS here.

At chainage 1+264, there is an Id gaha on the RHS and residential structure on the LHS. To avoid impacting both, the community has suggested constructing the road using the available width of 4.5 mtrs here.


for donation: The villagers have expressed their willingness to donate their land for the project.

- 66 -


iv. Other issues: None. Details of the discussion took place during the Transect Walk:

Consultations were held with the affected communities prior to commencing the Transect

Walk. The purpose of the transect walk and significance of community participation in

finalizing the design along with details of PMGSY as a rural development scheme was

shared with the community. The main participants in the consultations included members

of the affected communities along with representatives of the PIU. No PRI member were

present during the consultation though ex members were present.

Recommendations by the Social Safeguard Specialist: The suggestions of the PIU at

various chainages (mentioned in 11.i) regarding construction of CC roads with the

available width due to extensive habitation on both sides of the road should be

considered while finalizing the design. This would be necessary to reduce the adverse

impact on people.

Countersigned (Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) CHAINAGE WISE LAND WIDTH AVAILABLE AND REQUIRED:


Additional Land



LHS

RHS

LHS RHS

0+001 4.8 1.5 1.5 Residentia

l land Commerci

al land



l Land

0+048 5 1.5 1.5 Home wall

0+061 5.3 1 1 Commerci

al land Commerci

al land

0+085 6.2 1 1 Commerci

al land Residentia

l land

0+116 7.4 0.5 0.5

0+146 6.5

0.5 0.5

0+167 6.8

0.5 0.5

0+199 6.8 0.5 0.5 Residentia

l land

0+213 9.1

0+250 13.2

0+264 10

0+298 5 4 Residentia

l land

0+315 7 3.5 Commerci

al land

0+343 8.5 2.2 Commerci

- 67 -

al cum Residentia

l

KAPASDANGA 0+353 9

0+402 5.5 4.5 Residentia

l land

0+436 5.5 1 Residentia

l land

0+440 5 1.5 1.5 Mosque

The community has suggested shifting the alignment by 1.5 mtrs to the RHS to avoid impacting the mosque.

0+447 5 1.5 1.5 Toilet


l land

0+475 7.5

0+493 4.5 4


0+526 6 2

0+542 5.5 3.5

0+582 7.2

0+631 5.8 2.7

0+649 5 2.5

0+665 5.5 3.5

0+681 5.5 3.5

0+694 5.5 3.5

0+715 4.7 1.5 1.5 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land

0+737 7 0.5 0.5 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land

0+768 6.5 The community has suggested to shift the alignment by 1 mtr to the RHS to avoid impacting the mosque

0+895 6 1 1 Mosque

0+935 4.9 1.5 1.5 Commerci

al land

If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing

0+968 3.8 1 1

- 68 -

1) Name of Road: Panchthupi to Molla (Mahadebbati)

2) Villages: i. Panchthupi ii. Muniadihi iii. Molla iv. Bohora v. Laxmanpur vi. Koemba vii. Bhandira.

3) Gram Panchayat: Jasohari Anokha I, Jasohari Anokha II and

Panchthupi

4) Block: Kandi, Bharatpur I and Burwan

road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.


l land

1+071 4.5 1 1 If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact. The community has suggested to shift the alignment by 0.5 mtrs to the RHS to avoid impacting the Id gaha at chainage 1+115

1+115 4.5 0.5 0.5 Id -Gaha

1+154 5 0.5 0.5

1+213 8

1+221 6.8 1 1

1+245 4.2 1.5 1.5 Residentia

l land

1+264 4.5 1.5 1.5 Residential Structure

Id gaha

The community has suggested constructing the road using the available width of 4.5 mtrs here

1+299 6 4

- 69 -



6th March 2010; 10 am to 3 pm




Scheduled Caste: 23 Scheduled Tribe: Nil Disabled: Nil BPL: 04

Households losing structure: Nil



From Government: 1. Mr. Tapas Ranu (A.E) 2. Mr. Prasana Chakraborty (S.A.E)


1. Mr. Dhananjay Ghosh; Zilla Parishad Member 2. Mr. Prasanto Ghosh, Panchayat Member,Jasohari Anokha II 3. Mr. Prabir Ghosh, Pradhan, Jasohari Anokha I 4. Mr. Rajen Choudhury; Member of Jasohari Anokha I 5. Mr. Apurbo Dutta; Member of Kandi Panchyat Samiti


on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: Total length of the road as found during the transect walk is 8.1 kms though as per the list submitted by the PIU was 8 kms. The PIU has not been able to give the reasons for the difference in the lengths of the road.

ii. Road width and land availability: The width of the proposed road varies from 8 (at chainage 2+605) mtrs to 4.5 (at chainage 6+140) mtrs.


criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 3 households.

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: In the affected

villages of Bhandira and Molla the vulnerable groups (mainly SC) constitute 25% of the total population while in Bohora and Laxmanpur they constitute 60% and 45% respectively. In Koemba the entire population belongs to SC category while in Muniadihi and Panchthupi they constitute only 10% of the total population.

- 70 -

The vulnerable groups of people would largely incur losses of residential

assets and agricultural land.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): Following are some of the sensitive locations found along the existing alignment which would be affected by the project:

From chainage 1+869 to 1+913, a Pirtola (place of religious importance) and Id gaha is located on the LHS and RHS respectively of the existing road. The available width at this chainage is 5 mtrs (average). The community has insisted that land from the sides of the road should not be affected as they are of religious importance to the entire community. Hence in consultation with the PIU, they have suggested construction of CC road with the available width here.

At chainage 1+914 to 2+360 there is a Muslim grave yard on LHS of the existing road. The community has insisted that the requisite land be taken from the RHS by shifting the alignment to by 2 mtrs (average) throughout.

At chainage 4+960, a temple locally known as Radha Bot Tola is located on the RHS. The community has suggested shifting the alignment to the LHS by 3.5 mtrs.

At chainage 7+105, a temple would be affected on the LHS. The community has suggested that the alignment be shifted to the RHS by 4 mtrs.


The PIU has suggested bamboo piling at chainages 0+303 to 0+334 (RHS), 2+430 to 2+519 (on either side), 2+965 to 2+973 (LHS), 2+980 to 2+990 (LHS), 3+882 to 3+842 (RHS), 3+986 to 3+997 (RHS), 5+252 to 5+427 (LHS), 5+286 to 5+466 (RHS), 7+098, 7+940 to 7+976 (LHS), and 7+989 to 8+006 (LHS).

Further PIU has also suggested cross drains at chainages 0+030, 0+288, 0+612, 0+651, 0+916, 1+234, 1+270, 1+416, 1+525, 1+694, 1+769, 2+447, 2+831, 2+875, 3+123, 3+298, 3+490, 3+625, 3+702, 3+864, 4+192, 4+252, 4+456, 4+797, 4+960, 5+746, 5+912, 5+998, 6+169, 6+306, 6+599, 7+025, 7+199, 7+227, 7+299, 7+ 367, 7+437, 7+592, and 7+944.

The community has insisted on construction of new culverts at chainages 1+467, 5+386, 5+512, 6+066, and 8+100.


None

viii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow pits, etc.): The community have proposed that the earth required for raising the height of the road should be brought in from outside and not borrowed from the plots lying adjacent to the existing road. According to them, borrowing it from the plots would decrease the fertility of the soil and since the community is a farming community, this would adversely impact their source of livelihood. Also they opined that concrete guard walls should be constructed instead

of bamboo piling as the latter wears off in a few years and is rendered

useless. This then damages the road as water overflows to the road.



- 71 -

PIU have suggested construction of CC road from chainage 1+869 to 1+913 as there are places of religious importance on both sides of the road (Pirtola on LHS and Id gaha on RHS). The available width here is 5 mtrs (average).

From chainage 1+914 to 2+360, the alignment is to be shifted to the RHS by 2 mtrs (average) in order to avoid impacting the Muslim graveyard located on the LHS.

At chainage 4+960, another place of religious importance (Radha Bot Tola) is located on the RHS. To avoid affecting the same, the alignment is to be shifted by 3.5 mtrs to the LHS.

To avoid impacting the temple located at chainage 7+105 (LHS), the community has suggested shifting the alignment by 4 mtrs to the RHS

ii. Extent of land take and willingness/unwillingness of land owner/users for donation: The community is willing to donate their land for the project.


iv. Other issues: None Details of the discussion took place during the Transect Walk:

Prior to the Transect Walk, a consultation was organized with the affected community. The main participants in the same were members of the affected communities along with representatives from PIU and PRI. The main objective of the consultation was to share with the community the purpose of the transect walk and relevance of community participation in finalizing the design for the proposed road as well as about the PMGSY as a rural development scheme. The community shared that if the project is duly implemented, it would reduce the distance to the nearby market and hospital by 8 kms which is situated at Pancthui. Currently the distance is 18 kms. Recommendations by the Social Safeguard Specialist: None.



Additional Land



s LHS

RHS

LHS RHS

0+030 5.3 4 4

PANCHTHUPI

0+159 5 4 2

0+282 5.5 3.5 3.5

0+544 5.5 3.5 3.5 MUNIADIHI

0+612 5 3 3

- 72 -

0+764 6 3.5 3.5 Agricultura

l land Agricultura

l land

0+854 4.5

4.5 3

Agricultura

l land

Agricultura

l land

0+942 4.5

3 3


1+158 6 3

1+234 4 3 5.5

1+869 5 Pirtola Id gaha Community has suggested construction of CC road here with the available land width to avoid impacting the land on either side.

1+879 5 1.5 1.5 -do- -do-

1+913 7 0.25

0.25 -do- -do-

1+914 7 0.25

0.25 Muslim

Graveyard

The community has suggested that the requisite land be taken from the RHS (2 mtrs average)

2+281 5 2.5 2.5 -do- Agricultura

l land

2+360 9 do-

2+519 5.5 4

2+605 8 2

2+788 5.5 3 3


l land Residentia

l land

3+298 5 3.5 3.5

3+490 6.5 3 3 MOLLA

3+590 4.5 3.5 3.5

3+760 6 3.5 3 Agricultura

l land Agricultura

l land

BOHORA

3+901 7.5 3.5 3.5 Agricultura

l land Agricultura

l land

4+960 7.5 3.5 3.5 Temple

Community has suggested shifting the alignment to the LHS by 3.5 mtrs to avoid impacting the temple on the RHS.


l land Agricultura

l land

5+955 5 4.5 4.5 Agricultura

l land Agricultura

l land

6+140 4.3 3.5 3.5 Agricultura

l land Agricultura

l land

6+306 6 3.5 3.5

6+936 4.3 5 5

BHANDIRA

7+025 5.7 4 4

7+105 5.7 4 4 Temple

The community has suggested shifting the alignment to the RHS by 4 mtrs to avoid affecting the temple on LHS.

7+158 4 4 4 Agricultura

l land Agricultura

l land

7+309 4.2 4.5 4.5 Agricultura

l land Agricultura

l land

7+437 4 4 4

- 73 -

1) Name of Road: Puthia to Jat Biswanath

2) Villages: Borjumla, Math Para, and Katakhali

3) Gram Panchayat: Shekalipur

4) Block: Raghunathganj II



9th March 2010; 10:15 am to 4:50 pm




Scheduled Caste: Nil Scheduled Tribe: Nil Disabled: Nil BPL: 04

Households losing structure: Nil



From Government: 1. Mr. Nishit Sarkar (S.A.E.) 2. Mr. Utpal Barman (S.A.E.)


1. Mr. Somnath Singh Roy; MCD Zilla Parishad


Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: The total length of the road found during the transect walk is 1.5 kms though as per the list submitted by the PIU the length of the road is 6 kms. The difference in the length of the road is because rest of the road has been eroded by River Padma. The proposed road is not connecting the village Jat Biswanath as it is situated on the other side of the river.

ii. Road width and land availability: The width of the proposed road varies from 3.7 mtrs (at chainage 0+551) to 10 mtrs (at chainage 1+300).

7+552 4.5 4.5 4.5

7+854 4 6.5 6.5


l land Agricultura

l land

7+944 6.5 3 3

8+025 5.3 3 3

8+094 5.3 5

- 74 -

However according to the community, there are certain locations along the existing alignment where the available land width is 12 mtrs. From chainage 1+109 to 1+238 the existing width of the proposed road varies from 4.4 meters to 5 meters as found during the transect walk but according to the community is 12 meters.

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 1 household

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: The predominant

groups of people in the affected villages are Muslims. The losses incurred by them would largely be in terms of residential assets and agricultural land.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): At chainage

0+724 a Mosque is located on the LHS of the road and the existing width of the road is 4.8 meters. According to the community, the Mosque is built on Government land but it should not be affected because of the proposed construction of road. Thus they insisted that the road should be constructed using the available width here.

vi. Water-related issues (drainage lines, rivers and water crossings, irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): The PIU has suggested piling at chainages 0+177 to 0+211 (LHS), 1+034 to 1+109 (RHS), 1+178 to 1+188 (LHS), 1+199 to 1+236 (RHS), and 1+210 to 1+236 (LHS). The community has proposed construction of broader culverts at chainages 0+089, 0+433, 0+558, and 1+217.


None




From chainage 0+000 to 0+486 and 0+602 to 1+260, the PIU has suggested construction of CC road with the available land width as there is habitation on both sides of the road. This would minimize adverse impacts on the people.

At chainage 0+724, there is a Mosque located on the LHS built on government land and on the RHS the displaced person are not willing to donate their land for the project. Thus it was suggested that the road should be constructed using the available width (4.8 mtrs) here.

ii. Extent of land take and willingness/unwillingness of land owner/users for donation: According to the community, government land is available on both sides of the road but has been encroached and used by people especially from chainage 0+000 to 0+486. Thus they opine that the project should use the government land primarily including the encroached land and then only require private land for the project. Impact on private assets should

- 75 -

be kept to the minimum. Also, if the government land both vacant and encroached is not used for the project, then the road should be constructed using available land width. Hence the community did not permit to measure the additional land requirement throughout the alignment.


iv. Other issues: The earth required for raising the height of the road should be brought in from outside and not borrowed from within the village according to the community. Borrowing land from within the village especially from plots lying adjacent to the existing road decreases the fertility of the soil.


Prior to the Transect Walk, a consultation was held with the affected community. It had participation from the affected community along with the representatives from PRI and PIU. During the consultation, the community was informed about the purpose of the transect walk as well as the details of the PMGSY as a rural development scheme. Recommendations by the Social Safeguard Specialist: None.



Additional Land



s LHS

RHS

LHS RHS

0+008 4.5

MATHPARA COLONY

The community has insisted that for the purpose of the project, the requisite land should be taken from the government land and then from those who have encroached government land (from chainage 0 to 0+486). Only after these land are used for the project, should the private land should be used. Also, if government land both vacant and encroached is not used for the project, then the proposed road should be

0+036 4.6

0+049 4.6

0+061 4.6

0+068 4.7

0+077 4.7

0+089 4.5

0+125 4.5

0+136 4.5

0+160 4.5

0+192 4

0+217 4

0+239 4

0+313 4

0+367

0+413 5

0+418 5

0+477 5 RAMCHANDRAPUR 0+492 7.4

- 76 -

1) Name of Road: Puthia to Ramchandrapur

2) Villages: Borjumla and Ilimpur

3) Gram Panchayat: Shekalipur and Nasirpur

4) Block: Raghunathganj II and Lalgola





Female headed household: Nil Scheduled Caste: Nil Scheduled Tribe: Nil Disabled: Nil BPL: 05 Households losing structure: 02



From Government: 1. Mr. Bhabesh Karju (S.A.E.)

From Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI): 1. Mr. Sadek Shek; Panchayat Karmadhakya 2. Mrs. Neena Jain; Shabhapati Panchayat Samiti

0+551 3.7

KATAKHOLI

constructed using the available land width. Hence the community did not permit to measure the additional land required for the project along the alignment. The community has suggested that to avoid affecting the residential land on the RHS at chainage 0+677, the requisite (3mtrs) land should be taken from the LHS where government land is available.

0+558 3.7

0+602 5.9

0+608 6

0+620 6.5

0+658 5.8

0+677 5.3 Residentia

l land

0+724 4.8 2 Mosque

0+757 6.1

0+772 7.5

0+798 5.5

0+814 5

KATAKHOLIPARA

0+867 7

0+881 4.9

0+920 4.6

1+010 4.6

KATAKHOLI BOTTOLA

1+052 5.5

1+109 4.4

1+128 5.1 2 2

1+159 5

1+217 6

1+271 8

1+300 10

- 77 -

3. Mr. Jahangir Kabir; Panchayat Member 4. Mr. Jiaul Haq; Panchayat Member


on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: The total length of the road as found during Transect Walk is 3.495 Km against the proposed 4 kms as per the list submitted by the PIU. The PIU has not been able to provide the reasons for the differnec in the lengths of the road. The proposed road starts from Puthia and ends at Chamakpur More instead of Ramchandrapur.

ii. Road width and land availability: The available land width varies from 2.9 mtrs (at chainage 0+000) to 15 mtrs (at chainage 3+324). From chainage 1+209 to 1+820 the available width varies from 5.2 to 7.5 meters as found during the transect walk. However the community insisted that the available width is 16 mtrs which was duly found as per the mouza (revenue) map.

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 2 households.

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: The land in the

affected villages largely belongs to the Muslims who would incur losses of their residential assets and agricultural land.


3+444, there is a Muslim Graveyard on the RHS of the proposed road. To avoid impacting the graveyard, the community has suggested shifting the alignment to the LHS by 2 mtrs.

vi. Water-related issues (drainage lines, rivers and water crossings, irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): The PIU has suggested cross drains at chainages 0+360, 0+585, 0+516, 0+457, 0+409, 0+635, and 0+694.

At chainages 1+511, 1+580, and 2+938, the community has proposed for broader culverts.

Similarly at chainages 1+357, 1+388, 1+606, 1+790, 2+790, 1+610, 1+679, 1+699, and 1+731, the community has insisted on construction of new culverts.

The PIU has suggested piling at chainages 1+482 to 1+491 (RHS), 1+594 to 1+610 (RHS), 3+324 to 3+355 (LHS), 0+959 to 0+977 (RHS), and 1+159 to 1+180 (LHS).

vii. Road safety-related issues (major junctions, curves, bends, etc.): None




- 78 -

From chainages 0+000 to 1+209, the PIU have proposed for construction of CC roads with the available width of 3 mtrs (average). The area on both sides of the existing road is inhabited and the people have refused to donate their land.

At chainage 3+444, the alignment is to be shifted to the LHS by 2 mtrs to avoid impacting the Muslim graveyard on the RHS here.


for donation: The community has refused to donate their land for the construction of the road as they have opined that existing government land should be used for the same with minimally affecting the private assets. From chainage 0+000 to 1+209 which is densely inhabited on both sides, the available width varies from 2.9 to 3.1 meters. The people have refused to donate their land. Similarly from chainage 1+820 to 2+844 the existing road is constructed on private land with an available width of 3 meters and the owners are not ready for further donation of land. Hence the community only allowed measuring the existing land width and not the additional land width required.




A consultation was organized with the affected communities prior to transect walk. The

key stakeholders who participated in the consultations included the members of the

affected communities along with representatives from PRI and PIU. During the

consultation, details of the PMGSY as a rural development scheme along with the

purpose of the transect walk was shared.

The community expressed that they required an all weather road but they wanted that the

project used the existing government land to construct the road and not the private assets

of the people.




Additional Land



s LHS

RHS

LHS RHS

0+017 3.9 2 2 Commerci

al

BORJUMLA NO. 7

- 79 -

structure From chainage 0 to 0+ 209, the people have refused to donate their land. For the rest of the chainage, the community has insisted that government land should be used for the project with minimum impact on private assets. In case available government land is not used, then the road should be constructed using the available width. Hence the community did not permit to measure the additional land required and only allowed to measure the existing land width.


l land Residentia

l land

0+111 4.3 1 3

0+163 3.4 3 1.6 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land

0+209 3.1 2 2.9 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land

0+266 3.1 3 1.9 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land

0+360 3.1

3 1.9 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land

0+409 3

Residentia

l land Residentia

l land

BORJUMLA NO. 9

0+457 3.1 3 1.9 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land

0+516 3.1 3 1.9 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land

0+585 3.1 3 1.9 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land BORJUMLA NO. 10

0+635 3 2.5 3 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land

0+694 3 2.5 3 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land

BORJUMLA NO. 11

0+762 4.8 2 1.3 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land


l land Residentia

l land

0+867 3.5 1.8 3 Residentia

l land Residentia

l land


l land Residentia

l land


l land Residentia

l land


l land Residentia

l land


l land Residentia

l land


l land Residentia

l land


l land Residentia

l land


l land Residentia

l land

1+511 5.2

2 1 Agricultura

l land Residentia

l land

1+580 5.2

3 2 Agricultura

l land Residentia

l land


l land Residentia

l land


l land Residentia

l land

1+787 7.5 1

1+820 3 3 3

ILIMPUR


l land

2+156 4.7 Agricultura

l land

2+313 4.2 5 5

2+611 4 5 5

2+663 3 5 5

- 80 -

5. NORTH 24 PARGANAS

1) Name of Road: Keostsah Bazaar to Jasaikathi

2) Villages: Atlia and Jaisakathi

3) Gram Panchayat: Jasikathi(Attahgarah) and Ramchandrapur Uday

4) Block: Baduria

5) District: North 24 Parganas

6) Date; Time: 29/01/2010; 12:15 pm to 03:30 pm




Scheduled Caste: 70

Scheduled Tribe: 01

Disabled: 00

BPL: 15




From Government: 12) Mr. Pranabesh Roy (Asstt. Engineer) 13) Mr Bhakti Bhushan Sharma (Land Manager) 14) Mr. Bikash Ch. Dutta (Junior Engineer)

From Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI): 10) Mr. Ainul Haq Mandal (Member, Jasaikathi) 11) Mr. Rabiul Haq (Pradhan, Ramchandrapur) 12) Ms. Jhulan Bachar (Member, Ramchandrapur) 13) Mr. Sudarshan Bassar (Member, Jasaikathi)


on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: Total length 5.7 km (5+700). The road length as submitted in the list to ADB has been mentioned as 3.50 Kms and to the list provided

2+844 10 The community has suggested shifting the alignment to the LHS by 2 mtrs to avoid affecting the Muslim graveyard at chainage 3+444.

3+184 15

3+319 15

3+324 15

3+367 8.3

3+422 4.1 1.5 2

3+444 4.1 1.5 2 Muslim

graveyard

- 81 -

prior to transect walk as 7 kms. The reason for the difference in the length of the roads has not yet been specified by the PIU.

ii. Road width and land availability: The land available has been found to be

5.5 mtrs to 7.5 mtrs (Approx.)

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project: 2 Households

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: It has been found that

the vulnerable group of people would largely incur loss of homestead land, residential structure (at Chainage 0+587), residential cum commercial structure (at Chainage 0+587) and agriculture land. Majority of the vulnerable people were Schedule caste (65% appox.) with a negligible percentage of ST.

v. Sensitive locations (forests, cultural properties, etc.): there are mainly

three such locations along the road namely the following:-

There is a temple at chainage 1+474 on LHS. According to the community, the alignment should be shifted 2 mtrs to the RHS so as to avoid affecting the temple.

At chainage 3+142 there is an Id-gaha on RHS. It has been built on donated land and the residential structure of the donor is right opposite the Id Gaha. According to the donor of the land, the alignment of the proposed road should be shifted by 2 mtrs on the LHS so that his structure would not be affected and only the land of the ID Gaha would be affected.

There is a mosque at chainage 4+575 on RHS. According to the community and as suggested by the PIU, the alignment should be shifted by 1.5 mtrs to the Left Hand Side in order to avoid affecting the said mosque.


irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): The community has suggested that piling should be done on all ponds falling on the alignment at chainages, which are 1+131, 1+530, 3+393 to 3+517, 4+444 to 4+575, and 4+817 to 4+927.

vii. Road safety-related issues (major junctions, curves, bends, etc.): A sign

board especially near Atlia School, (at chainage 2+970), along with speed breakers in habitation areas have been suggested by the community.

viii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow pits, etc.):

None

11) Major Outcomes of the Transect Walk: (to be also recorded on revenue map) i. Changes to be incorporated in the design:

The alignment to be shifted by 2 mtrs to the RHS at chainage 1+474 to avoid affecting the temple located on LHS.

Alignment to be shifted by 2 mtrs to the LHS at chainage 3+142 as an Id gaha is located here on the RHS.

- 82 -

To avoid impacting the mosque at chainage 4+575 on RHS, the alignment to be shifted by 1.5 mtrs to the LHS.

To avoid impacting habitation on both sides of the road, the PIU has suggested construction of CC road with the available width where area adjacent to the existing road is populated. These are at chainages 0+889 to 1+675 (at village Buruz), 3+042 to 3+517 (at village Atlia) and 4+444 to 4+927 (at Jasaikathi)


owner/users for donation: The villagers have already given their written consent through a letter, duly signed by them, to the concerned department, agreeing to voluntary land donation.




A transect walk was undertaken on the 29th of January 2010 from Buruz More after a brief discussion with community along with the PRI members. The major thrust of the discussion was to inform the community about the PMGSY as a rural development scheme and about the road to be constructed under PMGSY i.e. about the length of the road, width and the villages to be connected through this road. The purpose of the discussion was also to inform then that the alignment would be finalized on the day of the transect walk along with the community.

Later in the day another discussion was held with the local residents at Atlia Primary School of Atlia and also at Buruz. The discussions were attended by 110 people along with the school teachers. The villagers shared the problems faced by them during the monsoon season which renders the road unfit for use. This affects their daily activities of accessing essential services (education, health, markets etc) as well as basic mobility. All the basic services/institutions of health, education etc are situated at a distance of 8 to 12 kms and hence poor conditions of road makes it extremely difficult to commute to such distant places. Teachers too opined that they find it difficult to commute to the school during the rains and also cited incidences of them slipping on the road and hurting themselves.

According to a doctor from the village, the proposed road was extremely important to connect at least 18-20 villages to access basic services of health, education, government institutions etc.

The women of the community opined that the construction of the proposed road would help minimize their problems related to accessibility to markets, collecting water from the public stand post and health issues especially in cases of maternal emergencies. The proposed road would also help them to sell the agricultural produce for better prices which would enhance their economic conditions. Further, it would also improvise their social life as it would be easier for them to visit their relative’s place.

Recommendations by the Social Safeguard Specialist: To avoid impacting large number of people residing adjacent to the existing road, the project should consider constructing CC roads at such chainage (already indicated in the report). Countersigned

- 83 -

(Signature & name) (Signature & name) Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) (Name)

CHAINAGE WISE PLAN:


Additional Land



LHS

RHS

LHS RHS

0+587 7.5

ATLIA

Encroached Residence & commercial land is getting affected at LHS.

1+011 6.5 0.5 0.5 Alignment to be shifted to RHS to avoid affecting the temple by 2 mtrs at chainage 1+474. If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

1+474 5 1.5 1.5 Temple

1+660 6.5 0.5 0.5

1+675 7.5

3+042 7.5 Community has suggested shifting the alignment to LHS by 2 mtrs to avoid affecting the Id gaha at chainage 3+142. If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has

3+142 5.2

1.5 1.3 Id Gaha

3+517 7.5

- 84 -

1) Name of Road: Old Bangaon East to Pratapnagar

2) Villages: Old Bangaon Pauri Para and Pratapnagar

3) Gram Panchayat: Kalupur Gaon Panchayat

4) Block: Bangaon

5) District: North 24 Parganas

6) Date; Time: 30/01/2010; 12 pm to 3:45 pm



Female headed household: 02 Scheduled Caste: 67 Scheduled Tribe: 00 Disabled: 00 BPL: 04 Households losing structure: 02



suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

3+618 5.45

4+366 8.3

JASAIKATHI

4+545 5 1.5 1.5 Alignment to be shifted to LHS by 1.5 mtrs to avoid affecting the Mosque at chainage 4+575. If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

4+575 5 1.5 1.5 Mosque

4+927 4.75 1.5 1.5

5+700 12

- 85 -

From Government: 1. Mr. Bikash Ch. Dutta (JE) 2. Mr. Pranabesh Roy (AE)


1. Mr. Ashok Biswas (Bangaon Block Member) 2. Mr. Bidyut Biswas (Puratan Bangaon Member)


on Revenue map)

i. Road alignment: Total length of the road is 2.47 kms as found during the transect walk. However as per the list submitted by PIU, the length of the road was 3.50 kms. The PIU has not been able to provide reasons for the difference in the length of the roads.

ii. Road width and land availability: The width of the road varies from 3.5 to

8 meters as recorded during transect walk.

iii. The determination of BPL households under the CPF will be as per two criteria: (a) written verification (entry in the Government list of BPL or possession of a BPL card) or (b) community confirmation that an affected person/family falls in the category of economically weaker section and thus needs to be assisted under the Project. None.

iv. Land owned/used by vulnerable groups of people: The type of assets

that would be affected is residential, agriculture, and commercial. The vulnerable group majorly includes Schedule Caste.


0+522, a tree would be affected which the community worships occasionally. However, they are willing to cut the tree if required for the construction of the road.


irrigation water courses, other water bodies, etc.): A water body locally called the “Baor” is located between chainages 0+233 and 0+758 and ponds at chainages 1+682, 1+984 and 2+225. Bamboo piling has been suggested by the community with regards to these.


Speed breakers have been suggested at chainages 0+865 to 1+560 from where the habitation starts. Also sign boards at turnings and ways leading to nearby villages, containing information about the distance and directions have been suggested.

viii. Other suggestions (such as regarding cattle crossing, borrow pits,

etc.): None.



At 0+100 center line shifts to be shifted left hand side by 1.5 mtr.

At 0+137, there are low lands which needs to be raised with a slope maintaining ratio of 1: 1.5, on the left hand side;

- 86 -

At 0+863, the alignment to be shifted on the right hand side by 3mts (approx.) in order to avoid affecting the residential structures

From 0+865 to 1+560, CC road was proposed by PIU in order to avoid affecting the residential structures on both sides of the existing road.

At chainage 1+585, the center line to be shifted to the left hand side by 1 meter to avoid affecting the residential structure on the RHS.


for donation: People are willing to donate their land for the construction of road. During the consultations with local residents it was seen that they face lots of hardships during the monsoon as the road becomes muddy. This in turn affects their daily activities and mobility. Access to hospitals, markets etc are interrupted

iii. Environmental issues to be resolved: None


Discussion That Took Place During the Transect Walk A transect walk was undertaken on the 30th of January 2010 from the old Bangaon East to Pratapnagar. Prior to the transect walk a consultation with the villagers was held at Pratap nagar Purva para. The primary objective of the discussion was to inform the community about the PMGSY as a rural development scheme and about the road to be constructed under this scheme. This included details about the length of the road, width and the villages to be connected through this road. The purpose of the discussion was also to inform the community that the alignment would be finalized only after the transect walk was undertaken along with the community. Thus it was imperative for the community to actively participate in the transect walk.

During the consultation, the community shared their need for road and problems face by them. The people said that the hospital, Panchayat office, school, and the market are at far distance so it becomes difficult to reach there. Especially during rainy season the road becomes muddy and slippery. It is very difficult to have access to market which causes commercial loss. As they find it hard to reach the market and for which the goods remains at home for a long time and get spoiled because the buyers can’t come to the village to purchase the same, due to road condition. So in order to earn their livelihood they had to sell their product in cheaper rate.

In case of health related issues the villagers suffer a lot as the hospital is situated at distance of 6 km and it become difficult for them to avail health services during rainy season as the road becomes muddy. In many instances it has happened that the patient dies on their way to hospital.

The students find it difficult to reach their schools during rainy season and accordingly it hinders their education.

Being encountered with the too many problems villagers are ready to donate their land for the road as it has become a basic necessity for them. Recommendations by the Social Safeguard Specialist: To avoid impacting large

number of people residing adjacent to the existing road, the project should consider

constructing CC roads at such chainage (already indicated in the report).

(Signature & name) (Signature & name)

- 87 -

Sarpanch/Secretary, Gram Panchayat AE/JE, PIU (name) CHAINAGE WISE PLAN:


Additional Land

Required


LHS RHS LHS RHS

0+000 6 2 3 -- Residential Land OLD

BANGAON PAURI PARA

0+100 6 2 3 -- -- Alignment to be shifted to LHS to by 1.5 mtrs.

0+265 8 -- -- -- --

0+785 6 0 3.5 -- Agricultural land

Govt land is available on RHS

0+865 3.7 0 2 -- Agricultural land and

Residential Land

PRATAP NAGAR

At chainage 1+128, community has proposed to straighten the existing road. If 7.5 mtrs wide road as per PMGSY would be constructed, then residential, commercial, and other private assets of the people would be affected as there is habitation on both sides of the existing road. Thus PIU has suggested construction of CC road using the available width to minimize the adverse impact.

1+128 3.7 0 2 -- --


Residential Land

1+560 6.5 1.5 1.5



Community has suggested shifting the alignment to LHS by 1 mtr to avoid affecting the residential structure on the RHS.

2+225 5.1 3 3 Agricultural land and

Residential Land

Agricultural land,

Residential Land, play

ground and water

body

- 88 -

Annexure III: Stretch-Wise List of Affected Households

Table 1 District- Bankura

Road Name: Biborda To SH9 Length of the Road: 5.539 km

Total Number of APs- 39 Absentees-11

Sr No Name Of The

Registration Holder Name Of The

Village Type Of Loss Vulnerability

1 Kajol Kole Baromisa Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly

2 Manik Kole Laltyagura

Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line

3 Assini Kole Laltyagura


4 Badal Roy Laltyagura


5 Sisir Kole Laltyagura


6 Badal Roy SoNAgara

Agriculture Land Elderly +SC

7 Sudir Kole Laltyagura

Agriculture Land No Vulnerability

8 Tarini Mondal Laltyagura


9 Gopal Kole Laltyagura


10 Aditya Kole Laltyagura


11 Vaskor Roy Laltyagura


12 Ajit Mondal Laltyagura


13 Tarun Mondil Laltyagura

Agriculture Land Female Headed Household

14 Bhaskar Lohar SoNAgara

Agriculture Land SC

15 Arun Mondal Laltyagura


16 Helaram Ghosh Soraliya


17 Rubanni Mulla Soraliya


18 Rakhohari Kole Baromisa

Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly

19 Bidyut Dhak Baromisa

Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + SC

20 Ajit Kole Baromisa


21 Sunil Lohar Baromisa

Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly + SC

22 Mahadve Dhak Baromisa


- 89 -

23 Ranjit Kole Baromisa


24 Ajit Ghosh Soraliya


25 Ronjon Roy Soraliya


26 Kallol Ghosh Soraliya


27 Sristi Ghosh Soraliya


28 Samal Mondal Soraliya


29 Durgapada Ghosh Soraliya


30 Sunil Ghosh Soraliya


31 Anil Kole Baromisa

Agriculture Land Elderly

32 GaNApoda Kole Baromisa


33 Ranjan Dhak Baromisa


34 Gorachand Ghosh Soraliya


35 Debidas Mukharjee Soraliya


36 Robi Ghosh Soraliya


37 Sukumar Roy Sonagara Residential Asset (Boundary Wall)

Below Poverty Line + SC

38 Madan Lohar Sonagara Residential Asset (Main Structure)

Below Poverty Line + Elderly + SC

39 Mdaan Mozumder Chandkuri Trees Elderly

Table 2 District: Bankura

Road Name: Gobarda to Satpatta Length of Road: 11.82 Km Total Number of APs- 172

Absentees-17

Sr No Name Of The

Registration Holder Name Of

The Village Type Of Loss Vulnerability

1 Krishnapaddananadi Purulkha Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

2 Pintu Bera Penchala Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

3 Mohansoren Purulkha Agriculture Land Female Headed Household

+Below Poverty Line + Elderly + ST

4 Sambhu Murmu Purulkha Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line + ST

5 Purukha/A5 Purulkha Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

ST

6 Ranjit Mandi Purulkha Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

- 90 -

7 Krishna Maji Borpol Agriculture Land


8 Podmu

Lochanmnurmu Borpol

Agriculture Land Elderly + ST

9 Asitbera Penchala Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

10 Gayan Murmu Borpol Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly+

ST

11 Subolmajhi Borpol Agriculture Land


12 Jamadhar Mumu Borpol Agriculture Land

Elderly + ST

13 Ramapada Maji Borpol Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

14 Joginda Mmaji Borpol Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

15 Kalidas Saren Panchbaria Agriculture Land


16 Aratisoren Panchbaria Agriculture Land


17 Lal Mohan Soren Panchbaria Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly+

ST

18 Baidyanath Baske Kamala Dagal

Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + ST

19 Banamali Kamala Dagal


20 Babulal Murmu Kamala Dagal


21 Tapas Goswami Salbani Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

22 Khudiram Mondal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

23 Gobinda Mandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

24 Baidyanath Mande Penchala Agriculture Land


25 Shayamapada Singha Penchala Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

26 Raju Mandi Penchala Agriculture Land


27 Rabindranath Singha Penchala Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

28 Banamali Patra Dumurtor Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

29 Subal Layak Kumaradah Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

30 Bijoy Gorai Kumaradah Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

31 Mether Gorai Kumaradah Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

32 Joti Lohor Salbani Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

33 Arun Mandal Salbani Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

34 Sunil Dolal Salbani Agriculture Land


35 Rakhohari Mandal Salbani Agriculture Land


36 Habu Mandal Salbani Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

- 91 -

37 Romes Meta Salbani Agriculture Land


38 Kartick Dolai Salbani Agriculture Land

Disabled + Elderly + SC

39 Renu Pada Katol Salbani Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

40 Muruli Borai Salbani Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line + Elderly

41 Kinki\Or Lohar Salbani Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly+

ST

42 Bablu Sodder Salbani Agriculture Land


43 Salku Dolai Salbani Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

44 Rupen Roy Salbani Agriculture Land


45 Anadi Dolai Salbani Agriculture Land


46 Profullaroy Salbani Agriculture Land


47 Asoke Dolai Salbani Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Disabled

+ Elderly+ SC

48 Probodh Dolai Salbani Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

49 Sudhangsu Dolai Salbani Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

50 Niranjandolai Salbani Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Disabled

+ Elderly+ SC

51 Ajit Mandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

52 Fakir Gorai Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

53 Dayal Mandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land


54 Rupchand Gorai Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

55 Ranajit Layak Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

56 Guiram Mandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

57 Ganga Dhar Mandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

58 Sadan Gorai Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

59 Jaydeb Sarkar Kumaradah Agriculture Land


60 Tapas Gorai Kumaradah Agriculture Land


61 Ashok Mondal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

62 Aakhohan Mondal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

63 Sibu Mandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land


64 Bipad Ranjan Paulo Baksona Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

65 Sadhu Mandi Baksona Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly+

ST

66 Madan Pal Baksona Agriculture Land


- 92 -

67 Prabod Ghosh Satpatta Agriculture Land


68 Paban Patra Satpatta Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

69 Habul Kadma Satpatta Agriculture Land


70 Pratima Gosh Satpatta Agriculture Land


71 Sannnti Kadma Satpatta Agriculture Land


72 Aditya Ghosh Satpatta Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

73 Dulala Hazari Satpatta Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

74 Sitanath Goosh Satpatta Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

75 Migen Paul Satpatta Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

76 Sudhangorai Kumaradah Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

77 Rupchand Parta Satpatta Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

78 Sitel Bera Penchala Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

79 Nirmalpatra Dumurtor Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

80 Raghu Gorai Kumaradah Agriculture Land

Disabled

81 Sukchand Mandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

Disabled

82 Subal Nandi Purulkha Agriculture Land

Elderly

83 Rabindrapatro Dumurtor Agriculture Land

Elderly

84 Durbolovhrn Patro Dumurtor Agriculture Land

Elderly

85 Sanatan Layak Kumaradah Agriculture Land

Elderly

86 Nitananda Paul Baksona Agriculture Land

Elderly

87 Pollad Paul Baksona Agriculture Land

Elderly

88 Arjun Paul Baksona Agriculture Land

Elderly

89 Tripuralohar Salbani Agriculture Land

Elderly

90 Kalipada Mondal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

Elderly

91 Satta Sardar Salbani Agriculture Land


92 Aditaya Roy Salbani Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

93 Tapan Dolai Salbani Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

94 Sachi Nando Kundu Purulkha Agriculture Land

Elderly

95 Nara Fingha Nandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

96 Parimalmandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

- 93 -

97 Bhim Paul Baksona Agriculture Land

Elderly

98 Sudhan Mandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

99 Bansipatra Dumurtor Agriculture Land

Elderly

100 Nanlalapatro Dumurtor Agriculture Land

Elderly

101 Ram Sahu Raghunath

Pur Agriculture Land

Elderly

102 Ranjit Mandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

103 Manik Dolai Salbani Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

104 Sukumar Mandal Kumaradah Agriculture Land

SC

105 Pralad Gorai Kumaradah Agriculture Land

SC

106 Mohan Patra Satpatta Agriculture Land

SC

107 Aditya Mondal Satpatta Agriculture Land

SC

108 Modhan Gosh Satpatta Agriculture Land

SC

109 Miloin Patra Satpatta Agriculture Land

SC

110 Trilochon Dolai Salbani Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

111 Arun Sadder A Salbani Agriculture Land


112 Nilkamal Mandal Salbani Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

113 Tarapada Mandal Salbani Agriculture Land


114 Sibu Dolai Salbani Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

115 Ganesh Mathi Borpol Agriculture Land


116 Madan Dolai Salbani Agriculture Land

SC

117 Madhusudan Meta Salbani Agriculture Land

SC

118 Aditya Mandal Thakurapata Agriculture Land


119 Niranjan Patro Satpatta Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

120 Chinmoy Kadma Satpatta Agriculture Land


121 Kalidas Soren Panchbaria Agriculture Land


122 Shankar Pal Satpatta Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

123 Ganudhar Mandal Satpatta Agriculture Land


124 Santi Patra Satpatta Agriculture Land

SC

125 Late Gopal Gosh Satpatta Agriculture Land

SC

126 Shamanandasingha Penchala Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

- 94 -

127 Rabinadramaji Borpol Agriculture Land


128 Kisanlal Murmu Borpol Agriculture Land

ST

129 Golak Murmu Borpol Agriculture Land

ST

130 Kalipadapatra Dumurtor Agriculture Land


131 Swapan Mukherjee Dumurtor Agriculture Land


132 Kartickpatra Dumurtor Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Disabled

+ Elderly

133 Gorchand Murmu Raghunath


Elderly + ST

134 Swapan Murmu Raghunath


Elderly + ST

135 Hapan Hemron Raghunath


Disabled + Elderly + ST

136 Sibil Soren Raghunath


Elderly + ST

137 Badal Todu Raghunath


Elderly + ST

138 Nirmal Bag Raghunath



139 Sadhan Mukherjee Dumurtor Agriculture Land


140 Sukumar Murmu Raghunath


Disabled + Elderly + ST

141 Jagadish Mandal Salbani Agriculture Land

ST

142 Tarapada Besra Akhopal Agriculture Land


143 Jogaswar Murmu Akhopal Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly+

ST

144 Gopal Murmu Akhopal Agriculture Land


145 Rupchand Murmu Akhopal Agriculture Land


146 Surya Singhg Raghunath


Elderly+SC

147 Chitta

Ranjanmukherjee Dumurtor


148 Mongalmandi Panchbaria Agriculture Land


149 Sanatan Murmu Kamala Dagal

Agriculture Land SC

150 Subodh Patra Dumurtor Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

151 Sarup Murmu Akhopal Agriculture Land


152 Rabon Murmu Akhopal Agriculture Land


153 Bipan Mummu Akhopal Agriculture Land


154 Baidyanath Hembrem Raghunath


ST

155 Pion Murmu Raghunath


ST

156 Karmo Todo Raghunath


ST

- 95 -

157 Khilip Baske Raghunath


ST

158 Raghunath Murmu Raghunath


ST

159 Dharamdas Tudu Raghunath


ST

160 Bharat Murmu Raghunath


ST

161 Durgacharan Murmu Akhopal Agriculture Land

ST

162 Khipodrana Panchmoulli Agriculture Land


163 Probhaod Baz Panchmoulli Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

164 Jugal Rana Panchmoulli Agriculture Land


165 Milan Baz Panchmoulli Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

166 Jotidrabez Panchmoulli Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

167 Okulrana Panchmoulli Agriculture Land


168 Abodhi Baz Panchmoulli Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC

169 Mukti Padapatra Dumurtor Agriculture Land

Elderly

170 Bidya Pada Nandi Purulkha Agriculture Land

+ Trees No Vulnerability

171 Sajal Mandal Borpol

Agriculture Land

+ Trees Disabled + Elderly

172 Adhibasrana Panchmoulli

Agriculture Land

+ Trees Below Poverty Line + Elderly


Road Name: Joypur to Gelia Length of Road: 11.893 km Total Number of APs- 191

Absentees-37

Sr No Name Of The Registration

Holder

Name Of The Village

Type Of Loss Vulnerability

1 Janardan

Chakrabati Jamsola


2 Nawul Roktit Ruisahar Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

3 Kartik Rokhit Ruisahar Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

4 Nawul Roktit Ruisahar Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

5 Sunil Pal Raj Sole Agriculture Land

Disabled

6 Dabi Prasad

Mondal Gelia

Agriculture Land Disabled

- 96 -

7 Niohan Sokha

Dey Das Dighi


8 Asoke Dey Das Dighi Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

9 Ananta Mondal Das Dighi Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

10 Shankar Sadra Holdu Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

11 Sanatan Santra Holdu Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

12 Rasomay Roy Jamsola Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

13 Sukumar Pal Jamsola Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

14 Prouakhar Paul Chatrapara Agriculture Land

Disabled + Elderly

15 Madan De Chatrapara Agriculture Land

Elderly

16 Tarak Bag Digra Agriculture Land


17 Milan Bag Digra Agriculture Land

Disabled + SC

18 Shayamapada

Bag Digra


19 Gouri Shankar

De Chatrapara


20 Bolo Hari Dey Chatrapara Agriculture Land

Elderly

21 Rabiyal Sk Digra Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

22 Manas Kole Sujargad Agriculture Land

Elderly

23 Nironjon Pal Raj Sole Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

24 Bonsi Pal Raj Sole Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

25 Krishnpada

Ghor Ijjatpur


26 Anil Lohar Dharampur Agriculture Land


27 Bhairab Lohar Dharampur Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

28 Sanatan Lohar Sujargad Agriculture Land


29 Haradhan Lohar Sujargad Agriculture Land


30 Biswanath Lohar Sujargad Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

31 Nitai Lohar Sujargad Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

32 Dilip Chakarbarti Sujargad Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

33 Aditya Pal Tanadighi Agriculture Land

Elderly

34 Shamal Mondal Ijjatpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

35 Krishnapada

Mondal Ijjatpur


36 Dulal Khan Ijjatpur Agriculture Land


- 97 -

37 Gunakar Mondal Ijjatpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

38 Biren Ghor Ijjatpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

39 Sanjib Bonrakha Ijjatpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

40 Chitaranjan

Lohar Bindabonpur


41 Jitan Lohar Bindabonpur Agriculture Land


42 Gangadhar

Lohar Bindabonpur


43 Santi Lohar Bindabonpur Agriculture Land


44 Sukumar Dea Bindabonpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

45 Manoranjan Dey Bindabonpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

46 Kartik Dallal Bindabonpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

47 Matur Lohar Bindabonpur Agriculture Land


48 Mohon Nandi Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

49 Saran Nandi Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

50 Renu Nandi Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

51 Sital Kundu Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

52 Mritunjoy Kundu Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

53 Panchanan

Kundu Gelia


54 Biswajit Pal Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

55 Rabi Lochan

Khan Gelia


56 Dibakar Pal Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

57 Sanatan Singha Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

58 Chinmoy Bit Jujur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

59 Bhairob

Benerjee Jujur


60 Sadhan Roy Jujur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

61 Asit Bit Jujur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

62 Asoke Benerjee Jujur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

63 Abani Mohan

Middya Tanadighi

Agriculture Land Elderly+SC

64 Swapan Nandi Tanadighi Agriculture Land

Disabled + SC

65 Nimai Mondal Das Dighi Agriculture Land

Elderly

66 Subhash Patre Chatrapara Agriculture Land

Elderly

- 98 -

67 Susanta Pal Chatrapara Agriculture Land

Elderly

68 Mono Ranjan

De Tanadighi


69 Pasupati Middya Tanadighi Agriculture Land

Elderly

70 Sunil De Ruisahar Agriculture Land

Elderly

71 Ranjan Kumar

De Ruisahar


72 Dilip De Ruisahar Agriculture Land

Elderly

73 Sudhakar De Ruisahar Agriculture Land

Elderly

74 Madahab De Ruisahar Agriculture Land

Elderly

75 Arun Chakarbati Jamsola Agriculture Land Female Headed

Household

76 Ninai Paul Chatrapara Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

77 Gorachand Bag Digra Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

78 Madan Bag Digra Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

79 Lalu Mondal Chatrapara Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly

80 Balaram Pal Chatrapara Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

81 Uttpal Mondal Ghat Sahor Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

82 Sanjit Mondal Ghat Sahor Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

83 Rabi Mondal Ghat Sahor Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

84 Buda Mondal Ghat Sahor Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

85 Rabi Pramanik Sujargad Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

86 Mahadeb Ghor Ijjatpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

87 Sashanka

Mondal Ijjatpur


88 Subhash Dalla Bindabonpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

89 Sattakinkor Paul Bindabonpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

90 Dilip Nandi Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

91 Perulal Kundu Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

92 Ashok Bag Digra Agriculture Land

SC

93 Raihan Sk Digra Agriculture Land

SC

94 Manik Bag Digra Agriculture Land

SC

95 Ajit Nand Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

96 Sadhan Nandi Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

- 99 -

97 Santi Nandi Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

98 Nepal Nandi Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

99 Rakhal Nandi Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

100 Madan Kole Dharampur Agriculture Land

SC

101 Modan Nandi Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

102 Anirudha Pal Gelia Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

103 Samsundur

Singha Gelia


104 Shambhu Nath

Lohar Sujargad

Agriculture Land SC

105 Panchanan Dey Jujur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

106 Kali Das Lohar Bindabonpur Agriculture Land

SC

107 Biswanath Lohar Bindabonpur Agriculture Land

SC

108 Jitan Lohar Bindabonpur Agriculture Land

SC

109 Talu Lohar Bindabonpur Agriculture Land

SC

110 Gour Nandi Gelia Agriculture Land

SC

111 Gayatri Tanadighi Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

112 Gour Dey Tanadighi Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

113 Haripada Sardar Tanadighi Agriculture Land

SC

114 Gopal Sardar Tanadighi Agriculture Land

SC

115 Pabir Rokit Ruisahar Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

116 Nepal Maji Ruisahar Agriculture Land


117 Ranajit Rokhit Ruisahar Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

118 Shamal Majhi Ruisahar Agriculture Land

Disabled + SC

119 Vadu Pal Ruisahar Agriculture Land


120 Haradhan Pal Ruisahar Agriculture Land


121 Mritu Mjaya

Pakre Ruisahar


122 Panchanan

Pakre Ruisahar

Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Disabled + SC

123 Jaganath Pakre Ruisahar Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

124 Ananda Dey Ruisahar Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

125 Shambhu Pakre Ruisahar Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

126 Kamai De Ruisahar Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

- 100 -

127 Sandip De Ruisahar Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

128 Pawan Phavar Holdu Agriculture Land

SC

129 Gunakor Lohar Dharampur Agriculture Land

SC

130 Baul Lohar Bindabonpur Agriculture Land

SC

131 Manoranjan

Midday Tanadighi

Agriculture Land SC

132 Dibakar Sardar Tanadighi Agriculture Land

SC

133 Balai Bag Tanadighi Agriculture Land

SC

134 Jaydeb Sardar Tanadighi Agriculture Land

SC

135 Shayamapada

Sardar Tanadighi

Agriculture Land SC

136 Chadicharan

Sardar Tanadighi

Agriculture Land SC

137 Uttam Maji Ruisahar Agriculture Land

SC

138 Badal Santra Ruisahar Agriculture Land

SC

139 Sadhon Pal Ruisahar Agriculture Land

SC

140 Ashok Pakre Ruisahar Agriculture Land

SC

141 Balai Pakre Ruisahar Agriculture Land

SC

142 Kartik Malik Ruisahar Agriculture Land

SC

143 Manmoto Pakre Ruisahar Agriculture Land

SC

144 Manda Pakre Ruisahar Agriculture Land

SC

145 Gautam Bani Ruisahar Agriculture Land

SC

146 Murali Pakre Ruisahar Agriculture Land

SC

147 Ananda Pakre Ruisahar Agriculture Land

SC

148 Bhaskar Santra Shyamdaspur Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

149 Kartick Santra Shyamdaspur Agriculture Land

Below Poverty Line

150 Kabil Mandal Bogsora Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

151 Amar Lohar Shyamdaspur Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

152 Pasupati Santra Shyamdaspur Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

153 Biswanath Roy Shyamdaspur Agriculture Land

Elderly

154 Shivdas Shikari Shyamdaspur Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

155 Tapan Shikari Shyamdaspur Agriculture Land


156 Sudhir Lohar Shyamnagar Agriculture Land


- 101 -

157 Rabindranath

Guin Shyamnagar


158 Alok Chakarbarti Shyamnagar Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

159 Debiprasade De Shyamnagar Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

160 Amol

Chakrabarti Shyamnagar


161 Jaladhar Lohar Shyamdaspur Agriculture Land

SC

162 Mathur Lohar Shyamdaspur Agriculture Land

SC

163 Sunil Lohar Shyamdaspur Agriculture Land

SC

164 Mahadeb Sikari Shyamdaspur Agriculture Land

SC

165 Suduangsu

Dara Shyamnagar

Agriculture Land SC

166 Prasanta Bit Jujur Agriculture Land + Residential Assets

(Boundary Wall + Land) No Vulnerability

167 Mahadeb Majhi Ruisahar Agriculture Land + Residential Assets

(Boundary Wall + Land) SC

168 Fatik Bani Ruisahar Agriculture Land + Residential Assets


169 Bhutnath Nayak Ruisahar Agriculture Land +

Residential Assets (Land) No Vulnerability

170 Subhsh Mondal Ijjatpur Agriculture Land + Trees No Vulnerability

171 Dilip Ghosh Bogsora Agriculture Land + Trees No Vulnerability

172 Habala Chandra

Bit Jujur

Agriculture Land + Trees + Residential Assets


173 Bijali Lohar Sujargad Residential Assets

(Boundary Wall + Land) Elderly+SC

174 Madan Lohar Bindabonpur

Residential Assets

(Boundary Wall + Land) Below Poverty Line +

Disabled + SC

175 Basudeb Khan Jujur

Residential Assets


176 Samapada

Madday Jujur

Residential Assets


177 Netta Pakre Ruisahar

Residential Assets

(Boundary Wall + Land) Below Poverty Line + ST

178 Tarok Nath

Pakre Ruisahar

Residential Assets

(Boundary Wall + Land) Below Poverty Line + SC

179 Santi Roy Jujur

Residential Assets


180 Rosomoy Bayen Ruisahar

Residential Assets


181 Renu Bala

Ghosh Ijjatpur

Residential Assets (Land) Female Headed Household + Below

- 102 -

Poverty Line

182 Donnjoy Lohar Bindabonpur Residential Assets (Land)


183 Sakti Lohar Bindabonpur Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line +

Disabled + SC

184 Gour Karmakar Ruisahar Residential Assets (Land)

No Vulnerability

185 Bonsi Lohar Bindabonpur Residential Assets (Land)

SC

186 Donnjoy Dey Bindabonpur Residential Assets (Land)

SC

187 Milan Pakre Ruisahar Residential Assets (Land)

SC

188 Joshana Khan Jujur Trees SC

189 Sanatan Dey Jujur

Trees + Residential Assets


190 Sankar Roy Jujur



191 Jajti Majhi Ruisahar




Road Name: T-10 (Dhengram To Bishanpur) Length of Road: 9.978 km Total Number of APs- 53

Absentees-6


Holder

Name Of The Village


1 Sankar Dule Sonagara Agriculture Land


2 Chobi Ram

Mondal Sonagara

Agriculture Land Female Headed Household + ST

3 Ananada Mondal

Sonagara Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

4 Aditya Kalindi Sonagara Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

5 Jagannath

Mondal Sonagara


6 Uttam Mohoto Dunder Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

7 Baglo Mohoto Dunder Agriculture Land


8 Tinku Mohoto Dunder Agriculture Land


9 Krisnapada

Mohoto Bishanpur


10 Aboni Mohoto Bishanpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

11 Bhim Mohoto Bishanpur Agriculture Land

Disabled

- 103 -

12 Mohipal Mohoto Dunder Agriculture Land

Elderly

13 Bhadratanu

Mohoto Bishanpur


14 Pravanjan

Mohoto Bishanpur


15 Satyaban Mohoto

Bishanpur Agriculture Land

Elderly

16 Roshorai Mohoto

Bishanpur Agriculture Land

Elderly

17 Bibhuti Mohoto Bishanpur Agriculture Land

Elderly

18 Rohini Mohoto Bishanpur Agriculture Land

Elderly

19 Jagannath

Mohoto Dunder


20 Haripoda Mohoto

Dunder Agriculture Land


21 Susil Mohoto Bishanpur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

22 Paritosh Mohoto Dunder Agriculture Land

ST

23 Anath Mandal Dunder Agriculture Land

ST

24 Satyo Mohoto Dunder Agriculture Land

ST

25 Sanathan Mohoto

Dunder Agriculture Land

ST

26 Gorachand

Sardar Sardarpara

Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Elderly + ST

27 Bankim Sardar Sardarpara Agriculture Land


28 Jadunath Mondal

Sonagara Agriculture Land

ST

29 Amit Mohoto Dunder Agriculture Land

ST

30 Laxmi Mohoto Dunder Agriculture Land

ST

31 Kesto Mohoto Dunder Agriculture Land

ST

32 Sunil Soren Korambera Agriculture Land


33 Devi Todo Korambera

Agriculture Land Female Headed Household +Below

Poverty Line + Elderly + ST

34 Nirmal Sardar Korambera Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + ST

35 Sonathan Mondal

Sonagara

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line + SC

36 Ananda Murmu Sonagara

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall) Elderly + ST

37 Rabi Mohoto Dunder

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line + ST

38 Biswanath

Mohoto Bishanpur

Residential Asset No Vulnerability

- 104 -

(Boundary Wall)

39 Samadodo

Mahato Bishanpur

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall) No Vulnerability

40 Bolabhandra

Hemron Dhengram

Residential Asset


41 Baidyanath

Soren Dhengram

Residential Asset


42 Shivnath Patro Dhengram

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall) Elderly

43 Abani Paul Dunder

Residential Asset


44 Akul Mohoto Bishanpur

Residential Asset


45 Jiten Hemron Dhengram

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly+ ST

46 Tanaki Soren Dhengram

Residential Asset


47 Atul Hemron Dhengram

Residential Asset


Elderly + ST

48 Loso Hembram Dhengram

Residential Asset


Elderly + ST

49 Dhanakrishna

Hemron Dhengram

Residential Asset


Elderly + ST

50 Kesob Hemron Dhengram

Residential Asset


51 Bablu Murmu Korambera

Residential Asset


Elderly + ST

52 Baren Kisku Sonagara Residential cum

Commercial Asset (Main Structure)

Below Poverty Line + Elderly + ST

53 Sanjay Mahat Dunder Trees ST

Table 5 District: Burdwan

Road Name: Joy Krishnapur To Gobindpur Length of Road: 7.83 km Total Number of APs- 113

Absentees-5 (7 APs did not give their consent for Voluntary land donation)

- 105 -


Holder

Name Of The Village


1 Sadananda

Ghosh Baranda


2 Sibu Garai Baranda Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

3 Dababrata

Ghosh Baranda


4 Skirahamatulla Baranda Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

5 Rabindranath

Mondal Baranda


6 Fani Vusan

Sarder Baranda

Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line + Disabled + SC

7 Ajit Mondal Baranda Agriculture Land

Disabled + Elderly

8 Narayan Ghosh Baranda Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

9 Dilip Ghosh Baranda Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

10 Dayal Hari

Ghosh Baranda


11 Saday Ghosh Baranda Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

12 Bansi Badan

Ghosh Baranda


13 Nabakumar Pal Baranda Agriculture Land

Disabled + Elderly

14 Nemai Boura Baranda Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

15 Samsul Faruki Baranda Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly

16 Manab Boura Baranda Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

17 Enayet Sheikh Ukta Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

18 Baidayanath

Garai Ukta


19 Kalipada Tudu Ukta Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + ST

20 Sk Mehar Ukta Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

21 Sajidur Mondal Ukta Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

22 Bllal Mirja Ukta Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

23 Rahim Molla Ukta Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

24 Mitai Pandit Ukta Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

25 Sk Mofijur Ukta Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

26 Ratan Majhi Govinda Pur Agriculture Land

Disabled + SC

27 Bablu Majhi Govinda Pur Agriculture Land

Elderly+SC

- 106 -

28 Rokata Mondal Govinda Pur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

29 Nirmol Mondal Govinda Pur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

30 Tarun Mondal Govinda Pur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

31 Narayan Ghosh Govinda Pur Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

32 Sabhunath

Majhi Govinda Pur


33 Durgaprasad

Mondal Govinda Pur


34 Samsul Mallik Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

35 Sk Badra Alam Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

36 Lutai Shah Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

37 Sk Surab Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

38 Badre Alam

Mallik Pichkuri


39 Kazi Ajijur Rahaman

Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

40 Sk Md Musa Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

41 Abdul Sattar

Mallik Pichkuri


42 Ab Salam Mallik Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

43 Rashid Shiekh Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

44 Badrul Mallik Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

45 Sairjul Mallik Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

46 Sk Abdul Azim Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

47 Sk Asrof Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

48 Monirul Ahque

Mallik Pichkuri


49 Ismail Shiekh Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

50 Anish Mallik Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

51 Subodh Mondal Baranda Agriculture Land

Elderly

52 Sitanath Mondal Baranda Agriculture Land

Elderly

53 Jagadish Mondal

Baranda Agriculture Land

Elderly

54 Asim Mondal Baranda Agriculture Land

Elderly

55 Memai Mondal Baranda Agriculture Land

Elderly

56 Asim Ghosh Baranda Agriculture Land

Elderly

57 Sanatan Ghosh Baranda Agriculture Land

Elderly

- 107 -

58 Sadhan Ghosh Baranda Agriculture Land

Elderly

59 Mohadeb Mondal

Baranda Agriculture Land

Elderly

60 Sannasi Mondal Baranda Agriculture Land

Elderly

61 Baidayanath Pal Ukta Agriculture Land

Elderly

62 Sk Hamid Ukta Agriculture Land

Elderly

63 Samsur Mirja Ukta Agriculture Land

Elderly

64 Sk Insan Ukta Agriculture Land

Elderly

65 Alauddin Mondal Ukta Agriculture Land

Elderly

66 Sk Anich Ukta Agriculture Land

Elderly

67 Fatik Mondal Govinda Pur Agriculture Land

Elderly

68 Rafk Shiekh Pichkuri Agriculture Land

Elderly

69 Buran San Pichkuri Agriculture Land

Elderly

70 Amir Ali Shiekh Pichkuri Agriculture Land

Elderly

71 Sk Sirjul Pichkuri Agriculture Land

Elderly

72 Madu Mallik Pichkuri Agriculture Land

Elderly

73 Anarul

Haqmalah Pichkuri


74 Sk Sambir Ali Pichkuri Agriculture Land

Elderly

75 Manik Mondal Baranda Agriculture Land

Elderly

76 Ragu Nath

Mondal Baranda


77 Akbar Shiekh Ukta Agriculture Land

Elderly

78 Samsul Alam Ukta Agriculture Land

Elderly

79 Rustam Mondol Ukta Agriculture Land

Elderly

80 Narayan Gharai Ukta Agriculture Land

Elderly

81 Udoy Mondal Govinda Pur Agriculture Land

Elderly

82 Samsunder

Mondal Govinda Pur


83 Tarak Ghosh Govinda Pur Agriculture Land

Elderly

84 Asraf Sk Pichkuri Agriculture Land

Elderly

85 Abdul Hamid Sk Pichkuri Agriculture Land

Elderly

86 Yusuf Sk Pichkuri Agriculture Land

Elderly

87 Durjadhan Kormokar

Baranda Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

SC

- 108 -

88 Nurul Sheikh Baranda Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

89 Nemai Boura Baranda Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

90 Gour Ghosh Baranda Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

91 Uttam Ghosh Baranda Agriculture Land

Disabled + Elderly

92 Hemanta Ghosh Baranda Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

93 Bipodatrani

Boura Baranda


94 Mongla Tudu Ukta Agriculture Land

Elderly + ST

95 Ajit Mete Ukta Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

96 Kanchan

Chaudhury Ukta


97 Nowsad Mollkk Ukta Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

98 Mahadev

Bhattachariya Ukta


99 Mohiuddin Mirja Ukta Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

100 Ismail Shiekh Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

101 Sk Asgar Ali Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

102 Eusuf Mallik Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

103 Serajul Shiekh Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

104 Sahidulla Mallik Pichkuri Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

105 Gautam Majhi Govinda Pur Agriculture Land

SC

106 Ajit Majhi Govinda Pur Agriculture Land

SC

107 Sukumar Meta Baranda Agriculture Land

SC

108 Pachai Sheikh Ukta Agriculture Land

SC

109 Sk Rafik Ukta Agriculture Land

SC

110 Kuddu Pramanik Pichkuri Agriculture Land

SC

111 Miitunjoy Bakshi Govinda Pur

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

112 Sk Abdur Hai Ukta

Residential Asset


113 Sk Hanai Ukta Trees + Residential Asset


- 109 -


Road Name: Uttar Laxmipur To Tanaghata Ferry Ghat Length of Road: 2.7 Km Total Number of APs- 52

Absentees-0

New S.No

Name Of The Registration

Holder

Name Of The Village


1 Muthun Sarkar Tamaghata Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall+ Land) Below Poverty Line

2 Radhacharan

Roy Tamaghata

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall+ Land) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

3 Sankar Kundu Tamaghata

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall+ Land) No Vulnerability

4 Gopal Sarkar Tamaghata

Residential Asset


Elderly

5 Sunil Kirtaniya Tamaghata

Residential Asset


6 Shamacharan

Roy Tamaghata

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall+ Land) Elderly+SC

7 Ganesh Mondal Tamaghata

Residential Asset


8 Sachin Biswas Tamaghata

Residential Asset


Disabled + Elderly

9 Pairag Mondal Tamaghata

Residential Asset


10 Karana Sen Tamaghata

Residential Asset


11 Vim Biswas Tamaghata

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall+ Land) Disabled + Elderly + SC

12 Bothnath Kittyania

Tamaghata

Residential Asset


Disabled + Elderly

13 Haripada Sarkar Tamaghata

Residential Asset


14 Sudir Biswas Tamaghata

Residential Asset


15 Kalipada Mondal Tamaghata

Residential Asset


Elderly

- 110 -

16 Sufal Biswas Tamaghata

Residential Asset


17 Ram Gopal

Biswas Tamaghata

Residential Asset


SC

18 Dinobondhu

Kirtaniya Tamaghata

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall+ Land) Elderly

19 Bhaba Sarkar Tamaghata

Residential Asset


20 Gopal Sarkar Tamaghata

Residential Asset


21 Ramprasad

Mondal Tamaghata

Residential Asset


22 Mahadev Biswas

Tamaghata

Residential Asset


23 Sital Biswas Tamaghata

Residential Asset


24 Narayan Pal Tamaghata

Residential Asset


25 Paresh Ch Sen Tamaghata

Residential Asset


26 Uttam Mondal Tamaghata

Residential Asset


27 Noni Gopal Roy Tamaghata

Residential Asset


28 Jotai Kittyania Tamaghata

Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall+ Land) Disabled + Elderly

29 Mohdev Biswas Tamaghata

Residential Asset


30 Bishaka Ghosh Laxmipur Residential Asset (Boundary Wall)

Female Headed Household + Elderly

31 Charan Sarkar Alunirmath Agriculture Land + Trees +

Residential Asset (Boundary Wall)


32 Dasarath Mondal

Alunirmath Residential Asset (Boundary Wall)


33 Thakurdas

Mondal Alunirmath

Agriculture Land + Trees + Residential Asset (Boundary Wall)


34 Subal Mondal Alunirmath Agriculture Land + Residential Asset (Boundary Wall)

Disabled + Elderly + SC

35 Ramprasad

Mondal Alunirmath



36 Sunil Mondal Alunirmath Residential Asset Below Poverty Line +

- 111 -

(Boundary Wall) Elderly + SC

37 Parsh Chandra

Mondal Alunirmath Agriculture Land Disabled + Elderly + SC

38 Nitai Ghosh Laxmipur Agriculture Land Elderly

39 Naresh Mondal Alunirmath Trees + Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

40 Suryakanta

Mondal Alunirmath


SC

41 Bapi Sarkar Alunirmath Agriculture Land SC

42 Niranjan Sarkar Alunirmath Trees + Residential Asset

(Boundary Wall) SC

43 Mittunjoy Sarkar Alunirmath Agriculture Land

SC

44 Kamal Roy Mazida Agriculture Land

SC

45 Babu Roy Mazida Agriculture Land

SC

46 Kartik Roy Mazida Agriculture Land

SC

47 Ramprasad Rajbonshi

Mazida Agriculture Land

SC

48 Saied Mallick Mazida Commercial Assets (Main

Structure) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly

49 Ayub Shek Mazida Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

50 Anup Kumar

Ghora Mazida


51 Santi Raj Bonshi Mazida Agriculture Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

52 Rahim Shek Mazida Agriculture Land

No Vulnerability

Table 7 District: Jalpaiguri

Road Name: T05 At Bikasnagar To Rajfapri Length of Road: 3.354 Kms


Sr No Name of

Respondent Name Of The

Village Type Of Loss Vulnerability

1 Usha Saha Kolachand

Pahari Commercial Assets (Main

Structure) Below Poverty

Line + SC


Road Name: Ranicherra Tea Garden To Paschim Damdim Length of Road: 3.138 km Total Number of APs- 1

Absentees-0


Holder

Name Of The Village


- 112 -

1 Bablu Topo Balabari Commercial Assets (Boundary Wall) ST


Road Name: T 14 At Sarkarpara To Munshipara Length of Road: 7.866 Km Total Number of APs- 190

Absentees-3


Holder

Name Of The Village


1 Anaruddin

Haque Chetnai Tola Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

2 Rowson Ali Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

3 Umar Ali Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

4 Barun Roy Satkhamar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

5 Afijuddin Chaur Chandi Kamat

Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

6 Khirul Haque Amtola Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

7 Samsul Rehman

Amtola Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

8 Hafizul Haque Amtola Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

9 Ajijul Haque Amtola Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

10 Kabul Hussain Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

11 Muzibor Rehman

Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

12 Moinul Haque Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

13 Bimal Barua Baruapara Agricultural Land Disabled

14 Dhiru Pati Roy Nagarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

15 Montu Roy Nagarpara Agricultural Land Elderly+SC

16 Lakhindar Roy Munshipara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

17 Sunil Roy Amtola Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

18 Solaman Ali Amtola Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

19 Jainul Haque Amtola Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

20 Samsuddin

Ahamed Fautiwapara Agricultural Land Disabled + SC

21 Chandra

Mohan Roy Fautiwapara Agricultural Land


22 Keshab Roy Chetnai Tola Agricultural Land Elderly+SC

23 Akbar Ali Chetnai Tola Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

24 Deben Roy Chetnai Tola Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

25 Kalipada Barua Baruapara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

26 Chitan Roy Dangpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

- 113 -

27 Hiran Roy Dangpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

28 Prosonna Roy Dangpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

29 Samiruddin Md Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

30 Bata Md Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

31 Samiul Haque Sarkarpara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

32 Makbul

Rehman Sarkarpara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

33 Sunil Sarkar Satkhamar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

34 Anath Das Satkhamar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

35 Pramila Roy Satkhamar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

36 Dullal Roy Satkhamar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

37 Akbar Ali Chaur Chandi Kamat


+ Elderly

38 Dipak Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat


+ SC

39 Prasanna Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

40 Kalu Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

41 Balen Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

42 Jatin Roy Munshipara Agricultural Land Elderly

43 Ramkumar Roy Munshipara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

44 Ukil Roy Amtola Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

45 Susil Roy Amtola Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

46 Irshad Ali Amtola Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

47 Suresh Roy Baruapara Agricultural Land SC

48 Kanai Roy Baruapara Agricultural Land SC

49 Nirendra Nath

Roy Baruapara Agricultural Land SC

50 Niren Barua Baruapara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

51 Kirendra Roy Baruapara Agricultural Land SC

52 Thanaswar Roy Dangpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

53 Hasina Bewa Sarkarpara Agricultural Land

Female Headed Household + Below

Poverty Line + Elderly

54 Ganesh Roy Satkhamar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

55 Md Gulger Ali Sarkarpara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

56 Pulen Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

- 114 -

57 Minu Roy Lahiripara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

58 Gulzar Md Sarkarpara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

59 Jagdish Roy Lahiripara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

60 Ranga Lal Roy Lahiripara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

61 Tarun Roy Lahiripara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

62 Khagen Roy Satkhamar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

63 Gopal Roy Dangpara Agricultural Land SC

64 Anash Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat


+ SC

65 Niran Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

66 Balin Roy Dangpara Agricultural Land SC

67 Jotish Roy Dangpara Agricultural Land SC

68 Haren Roy Satkhamar Agricultural Land SC

69 Niren Roy Satkhamar Agricultural Land SC

70 Bhabesh Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat

Agricultural Land SC

71 Karen Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat


72 Tuleswar Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

73 Paritosh Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land SC

74 Heren Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

75 Pravat Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

76 Bires Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

77 Naresh Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land SC

78 Taposh Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land SC

79 Sadananda

Roy Nagarpara Agricultural Land SC

80 Sabindar Roy Dangpara Agricultural Land SC

81 Dipak Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land SC

82 Hari Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat


83 Ashutosh Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land SC

84 Bimol Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land SC

85 Probal Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land SC

86 Paresh Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land SC

87 Jotirinda Nath

Roy Baruapara

Agricultural Land + Residential Assets (Boundary Wall + Land)

Elderly+SC

88 Bhupen Roy Munshipara Agricultural Land + Residential

Assets (Land) Elderly+SC

89 Asharu Roy Lahiripara Agricultural Land + Residential

Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

- 115 -

90 Brindeswar

Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat

Agricultural Land + Residential Assets (Land)


91 Mahesh Roy Lahiripara Agricultural Land + Residential


+ Elderly + SC

92 Satyendra Nath

Roy Satkhamar


Elderly+SC

93 Satyen Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat



94 Binoy Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land + Residential


+ SC

95 Dhinesh Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land + Residential


+ SC

96 Ajier Rehman Amtola Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

97 Korimuddin Md Amtola Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

98 Kanai Roy Satkhamar Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

+ SC

99 Saimul Haque Chaur Chandi Kamat

Agricultural Land + Trees No Vulnerability

100 Avoy Roy Dangpara Agricultural Land + Trees SC

101 Mukul Roy Dangpara Agricultural Land + Trees SC

102 Gopal Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

+ SC

103 Moden Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land + Trees SC

104 Horokumar Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land + Trees SC

105 Kashities Roy Sarkarpara Agricultural Land + Trees SC

106 Rani Bala Satkhamar Agricultural Land + Trees + Residential Assets (Land)



107 Sapan Deb Munshipara Agricultural Land + Trees + Residential Assets (Land)

Elderly

108 Mul Dhan Roy Nagarpara Agricultural Land + Trees + Residential Assets (Land)

SC

109 Dulal Sarkar Satkhamar Agricultural Land + Trees + Residential Assets (Land)


110 Dinesh Saha Baruapara Commercial Assets (Main

Structure) No Vulnerability

111 Kartick Srakar Satkhamar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall

+ Land) Below Poverty Line

112 Porola Roy Munshipara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall

+ Land)


Poverty Line + Elderly + SC

113 Saroda Mohan

Roy Munshipara

Residential Assets (Boundary Wall + Land)


114 Bhabesh Roy Fautiwapara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

115 Bindyashari

Roy Fautiwapara




116 Profulla Roy Fautiwapara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ Elderly + SC

117 Noronjon Roy Fautiwapara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

- 116 -

118 Diran Roy Fautiwapara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

119 Ranajit Roy Fautiwapara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

120 Dina Bandhu

Roy Chetnai Tola



121 Akalu Roy Baruapara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

122 Subha Ch Roy Baruapara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

123 Lalit Roy Dangpara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

124 Prasad Roy Dangpara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

125 Ramaprasad

Sarkar Satkhamar


Elderly+SC

126 Bhaba Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat



127 Minati Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat




128 Saha Dev Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat



129 Nazbul Haque Chaur Chandi Kamat



130 Supen Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat



131 Dhiren Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat



132 Lalit Roy Sarkarpara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

133 Mohes Roy Sarkarpara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

134 Narain Roy Sarkarpara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

135 Ajijul Md Sarkarpara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall

+ Land) Elderly

136 Kopijan Bewa Amtola Residential Assets (Boundary Wall

+ Land)



137 Chameswar

Roy Fautiwapara



138 Dijendranath

Roy Munshipara


SC

139 Bharat Roy Munshipara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall

+ Land) SC

140 Sukumar Roy Chetnai Tola Residential Assets (Boundary Wall

+ Land) SC

141 Manaranjan

Roy Chetnai Tola


Disabled + SC

142 Aminar

Rehman Chetnai Tola


No Vulnerability

143 Ramani Roy Baruapara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall Below Poverty Line

- 117 -

+ Land) + SC

144 Babul Md Sarkarpara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ Elderly

145 Purna Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat



146 Parbati Roy Munshipara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall

+ Land) SC

147 Ratan Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat


SC

148 Ranjan Sarkar Satkhamar Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

149 Ajimul Haque Chaur Chandi Kamat

Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

150 Parameswar

Roy Nagarpara Residential Assets (Land)


151 Duku Roy Nagarpara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

152 Prafulla Roy Chetnai Tola Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

153 Dilip Roy Chetnai Tola Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

154 Sushil Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

155 Prabhat Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

156 Sailen Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

157 Bhupati Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ Disabled + SC

158 Briksheswar

Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land)


159 Chandra Kanta



160 Khirprashad



161 Jagat Roy Dangpara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

162 Kali Mohon

Roy Dangpara Residential Assets (Land)


163 Baren Roy Dangpara Residential Assets (Land) Elderly+SC

164 Dinesh Roy Satkhamar Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

165 Ganesh Sarkar Satkhamar Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

166 Bimal Roy Satkhamar Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

167 Susen Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat


+ Elderly + SC

168 Nilkantha Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat


+ Elderly + SC

169 Purnadev Roy Chaur Chandi Kamat


+ SC

170 Hari Roy Munshipara Residential Assets (Land) SC

171 Gobind Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

- 118 -

+ SC

172 Trailakyo Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

173 Gopal Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

174 Bhabo Roy Dangpara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

175 Tirthadeb Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) SC

176 Bidyamon Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) SC

177 Satyendra Nath

Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) SC

178 Madan Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

179 Suren Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

180 Tapan Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

181 Bupen Roy Dangpara Residential Assets (Land) SC

182 Nitish Barma Dangpara Residential Assets (Land) SC

183 Fulen Roy Dangpara Residential Assets (Land) Elderly+SC

184 Jyotish Roy Lahiripara Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

185 Dilip Barma Dangpara Residential Assets (Land) SC

186 Nabin Roy Satkhamar Residential Assets (Land) Elderly+SC

187 Pabitra Roy Dangpara Residential Assets (Land) SC

188 Makhon Roy Dangpara Residential Assets (Land) SC

189 Shiren Roy Dangpara Trees SC

190 Sushil Sarkar Satkhamar Trees + Residential Assets (Land) SC


Road Name: T07 Lal School To Brazerkuthi Length of Road: 6.026 Km Total Number of APs- 116

Absentees-1

S.No Name Of The Registration

Holder

Name Of The Village


1 Dulal Dey Chentimari Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

2 Akhil Pal Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

3 Shayamal Kar Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

4 Kedar Ali Parokata (South)


5 Paritosh

Chowdhury Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

6 Indrajit Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

7 Amulya

Bhaumik Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

8 Himanshu Bhaumik

Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

9 Sila Das Borodorko Agricultural Land Female Headed Household + SC

10 Hatan Dakua Borodorko Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

- 119 -

11 Sukumar Das Borodorko Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

12 Biswajit Das Borodorko Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

13 Digen Dutta Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Elderly

14 Mukul Dutta Parokata (South)

Agricultural Land Elderly

15 Madhab Das Parokata (South)


16 Safidul Miya Parokata (South)


17 Safiur Rehman Parokata (South)


18 Manoranjan

Biswas Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land


19 Digen Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

20 Ramesh Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Elderly+SC

21 Safali Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Female Headed

Household + Below Poverty Line

22 Nani Gopal Choudhary

Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

23 Satananda Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

24 Namal Charaya Parokata (South)


+ ST

25 Rabeda Bewa Parokata (South)

Agricultural Land



26 Narayan Dutta Parokata (South)

Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line + Disabled + Elderly

27 Nesaruddin Mia Parokata (South)


+ Elderly

28 Abdul Miya Parokata (South)


+ Elderly

29 Haren Roy Borodorko Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ SC

30 Parimala Borodorko Agricultural Land



31 Bhakta

Debnath Chentimari Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

32 Ratan Roy Chentimari Agricultural Land Elderly+SC

33 Kanika

Debnath Chentimari Agricultural Land

Female Headed Household + Elderly

34 Rabindra Barman

Chentimari Agricultural Land SC

35 Kripanath Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Elderly+SC

36 Nur Iaslam Mia Parokata (South)


+ Disabled

37 Jugal Bhowal Parokata (South)

Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

38 Monirul Miya Parokata (South)


39 Sukumar Das Parokata (South)

Agricultural Land Elderly+SC

40 Mangal Das Parokata Agricultural Land SC

- 120 -

(South)

41 Sukumar Das Parokata (South)


42 Sunil Rava Parokata (South)


+ ST

43 Fakuruddin Mia Parokata (South)


44 Jiten Das Chentimari Agricultural Land SC

45 Keshab Mondal Chentimari Agricultural Land SC

46 Loko Dakuwa Chentimari Agricultural Land SC

47 Netai Dutta Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

48 Anil Paul Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

49 Tapan Sarkar Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

50 Dilip Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land SC

51 Kamala Kanta

Das Parokata (South)


52 Akhil Das Parokata (South)


53 Harish Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land SC

54 Chtaranjan

Rava Parokata (South)

Agricultural Land ST

55 Raj Bala Das Borodorko Agricultural Land + Residential Assets (Boundary Wall + Land)

Female Headed Household + SC

56 Nironjan Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Residential Assets (Boundary Wall + Land)


57 Rangaluchandr

a Das Borodorko


SC

58 Sachin Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Residential Assets (Boundary Wall + Land)

SC

59 Ratan Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Residential Assets (Boundary Wall + Land)

SC

60 Kader Ali Parokata (South)


No Vulnerability

61 Rakhal Pal Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Residential


62 Mohoor Uddin Parokata (South)


Below Poverty Line

63 Ramjan Ali Parokata (South)


Below Poverty Line

64 Argina Bewa Parokata (South)




65 Lalit Roy Chentimari Agricultural Land + Residential


+ SC

66 Mozibur Miya Parokata (South)



67 Gobinda Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Residential


+ SC

68 Nirmal Kar Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

69 Ajoy Kar Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

70 Dulal Pal Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

71 Gopal Pal Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

72 Trapru Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Trees Elderly+SC

73 Azmat Miya Parokata (South)

Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

74 Sailendra

Chandra Paul Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Trees Elderly

75 Susil Pal Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Trees Elderly

- 121 -

76 Safaruddin

Miya Parokata (South)

Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

77 Pradip Kar Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

78 Dinesh Das Brajer Kuthi Agricultural Land + Trees +


Elderly+SC

79 Sudhir Rava Parokata (South)

Agricultural Land + Trees + Residential Assets (Land)

ST

80 Buben Das Borodorko Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

81 Niranjan Das Brajer Kuthi Residential Assets (Boundary Wall


+ SC

82 Sadhu Miya Parokata (South)



83 Govt Land Parokata (South)


Female Headed Household +Below

Poverty Line + Elderly + ST

84 Office Miya Parokata (South)


85 Kazrul Miya Parokata (South)


86 Mozidul Miya Parokata (South)


87 Asger Miya Parokata (South)


88 Nurulley Miya Parokata (South)


89 Nisikanta

Nama Das Chentimari Residential Assets (Land)


90 Dhanapati Das Brajer Kuthi Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

91 Chipen Das Brajer Kuthi Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

92 Nipen Das Brajer Kuthi Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

93 Dhiren Rava Parokata (South)


+ ST

94 Rosidul Haque Parokata (South)


+ Elderly

95 Hasna Bewa Parokata (South)

Residential Assets (Land) Female Headed


96 Andaru Rava Parokata (South)


+ ST

97 Katik Rava Parokata (South)


+ ST

98 Ajijur Miya Parokata (South)

Residential Assets (Land) Elderly

99 Narayan Dey Chentimari Residential Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

100 Hira Lal Barman

Chentimari Residential Assets (Land) No Vulnerability

101 Samsuddin



+ Elderly

102 Niresh Rava Parokata (South)


+ Elderly+ ST

103 Gobinda Das Brajer Kuthi Residential Assets (Land) SC

104 Chitaranjan Brajer Kuthi Residential Assets (Land) SC

- 122 -

Das

105 Gobinda Das Chentimari Residential Assets (Land) SC

106 Jagadeep Pal Chentimari Trees Below Poverty Line

107 Chandan Kar Brajer Kuthi Trees Below Poverty Line

108 Bijoy Dutta Brajer Kuthi Trees Elderly

109 Dabesh Das Brajer Kuthi Trees Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

110 Bablu Pal Brajer Kuthi Trees No Vulnerability

111 Subhas Biswas Brajer Kuthi Trees + C (L) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

112 Sushil Roy Borodorko Trees + Residential Assets (Land) Elderly+SC

113 Momin Miya Parokata (South)

Trees + Residential Assets (Land) Elderly

114 Aloka Roy Chentimari Trees + Residential Assets (Land)



115 Sujit Sarkar Brajer Kuthi Trees + Residential Assets (Land) No Vulnerability

116 Mukul Das Brajer Kuthi Trees + Residential Assets (Land) SC

Table 11 District: Murshidabad

Road Name: Charpaikmari To Chardebipur Length of Road: 2.24 Km Total Number of APs- 70

Absentees-6


Holder

Name Of The Village


1 Jamsed Sk Kupkandi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

2 Tazmahal

Haque Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

3 Abdul Mamin Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

4 Abdul Ahadul Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

5 Abdul Ahaad Dibipur Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

6 Abdul Salam Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

7 Tamiz Uddin Kupkandi Agricultural Land Elderly

8 Subhan Sheikh Kupkandi Agricultural Land Elderly

9 Sanarul Shaikh Kupkandi Agricultural Land Elderly

10 Md Abdullah

Hazi Kupkandi Agricultural Land Elderly

11 Anish Uddin Kupkandi Agricultural Land Elderly

12 Tahasan Mondal

Kupkandi Agricultural Land Elderly

13 Raisuddin Kupkandi Agricultural Land Elderly

14 Adil Sk Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Elderly

15 Talim Uddin Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Elderly

16 Jakar Ali Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Elderly

17 Fajal Sk Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Elderly

18 Sariful Islam Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Elderly

19 Anoaar Ali Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Elderly

20 Dukari Mondal Dibipur Agricultural Land SC

- 123 -

21 Dulal Mondal Dibipur Agricultural Land SC

22 Biran Mondal Dibipur Agricultural Land SC

23 Kajol Mondal Dibipur Agricultural Land SC

24 Bakkar Sk Kupkandi Agricultural Land SC

25 Mustakim Kali Nagar Agricultural Land SC

26 Sadin Mondal Dibipur Agricultural Land SC

27 Jotish Mondal Dibipur Agricultural Land SC

28 Kasinath Mondal

Dibipur Agricultural Land SC

29 Ainul Shaikh Kupkandi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

30 Jasimuddin Kupkandi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

31 Raisuddin Kupkandi Agricultural Land Female Headed

Household + Elderly

32 Adir Mondal Dibipur Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC

33 Jabbar Kupkandi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

34 Md. Ismail Kupkandi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

35 Rejaul Haque Kupkandi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

36 Najrul Islam Kupkandi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

37 Kurban Shaikh Kupkandi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

38 Sabidul Kupkandi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

39 Taibali Shaikh Kupkandi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

40 Baitullah Kupkandi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

41 Fazal Shaikh Kupkandi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

42 Abdul Kuddus Kali Nagar Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

43 Abdul Ohab Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

44 Naksad Ali Kali Nagar Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

45 Mamtaj Ali Kali Nagar Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

46 Nazir Sk Kali Nagar Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

47 Maidul Sk Kali Nagar Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

48 Iialis Hazi Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

49 Sk Majibur Dibipur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

50 Masdar Kali Nagar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

51 Eunush Ali Kali Nagar Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

52 Angora Baya Dibipur Agricultural Land Female Headed


53 Taieb Charbalipara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

54 Md Salim Sk Charbalipara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

55 Momen Charbalipara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

56 Mozibor

Rehaman Charbalipara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

57 Abdul Bari Charbalipara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line + Disabled + Elderly

58 Md Nefazuddin Charbalipara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

59 Soheb Ali Charbalipara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

- 124 -

60 Panchu Sarkar Charbalipara Agricultural Land Elderly

61 Afazuddin Charbalipara Agricultural Land Elderly

62 Asuruddin Charbalipara Agricultural Land Elderly

63 Sultan Charbalipara Agricultural Land Elderly

64

DIBIPUR Commercial Assets (Land) Below Poverty Line

+ SC

65 Jahagir Sk Kali Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly

66 Banamali Mondal

Dibipur Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) SC

67 Aminul Islam Kali Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) No Vulnerability

68 Md Dulal Sk Charbalipara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line

69 Mohiruddin Sk Charbalipara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) No Vulnerability

70 Asiruddin Sk Charbalipara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

Table 12

District: Murshidabad Road Name: Panchthupi To Molla

Length of Road: 8.094 Km Total Number of APs- 173

Absentees-46


Holder

Name Of The Village


1 Kashinath

Mondal Akta Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

2 Milan Mondal Akta Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

3 Suken Ghosh Goshbati Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

4 Chinmoy Ghosh

Goshbati Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

5 Dilip Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

6 Daiyal Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

7 Goutam Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

8 Bhagadar

Ghosh Dhengapara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

9 Golok Ghosh Dhengapara Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

10 Basudeb Ghosh

Bhandora Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

11 Sapan Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

12 Nidhu Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

13 Kanai Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

14 Nikil Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

15 Narayan Das Sinserda Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

16 Arati Das Sinserda Agricultural Land Female Headed

Household + Elderly

17 Kudu Mondal Mahadia Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

18 Bablu Ghosh Mahadia Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

19 Santosh Mondal

Mahadia Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

20 Madhu Mondal Mahadia Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

- 125 -

21 Pagol Mondal Akta Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

22 Kantinal Bittar Akta Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

23 Abul Mirja Muniadihi Agricultural Land Disabled

24 Duthkumar

Mondal Akta Agricultural Land


25 Kalyan Mondal Goshbati Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

26 Apurba Ghosh Goshbati Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

27 Buddhadeb

Ghosh Goshbati Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

28 Benu Kar Dhengapara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

29 Nitai Mondal Marura Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

30 Parikit Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

31 Sujit Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land Disabled + Elderly

32 Sanatan Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

33 Ananda Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

34 Jramru Mukesh Bhandora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

35 Amar Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

36 Balok Chand

Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

37 Chnadakanta


38 Mahadeb


39 Santo Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

40 Lakoman


41 Nanda Kumar


42 Bipan Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

43 Sapan Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

44 Jaganath Pal Bhandora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

45 Monchora

Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

46 Kachu Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

47 Debnarayan

Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

48 Aita Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

49 Subrata Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

50 Ranajit Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

51 Barun Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

52 Bisu Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

53 Prasanta Ghosh

Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

54 Manik Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

55 Basudeb Ghosh

Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

56 Chetan Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

57 Tarun Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

58 Rajja Dhar Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

59 Mustakim Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

- 126 -

+ Elderly

60 Kanu Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

61 Mohiquddin Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

62 Dhanu Mallik Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

63 Betar Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

64 Fakir Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

65 Bhupati Mondal Sinserda Agricultural Land Elderly

66 Dilip Mondal Mahadia Agricultural Land Elderly

67 Kanchan Mondal

Mahadia Agricultural Land Elderly

68 Dhanu Mondal Mahadia Agricultural Land Elderly

69 Akhai Mondal Akta Agricultural Land Elderly

70 Noni Mondal Akta Agricultural Land Elderly

71 Behari Mondal Akta Agricultural Land Elderly

72 Adhir Mondal Goshbati Agricultural Land Elderly

73 Manab Ghosh Marura Agricultural Land Elderly

74 Sachita Mondal Marura Agricultural Land Elderly

75 Madhab Mondal

Marura Agricultural Land Elderly

76 Sattaban Ghosh

Bhandora Agricultural Land Elderly

77 Additta Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land Elderly

78 Kuber Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land Elderly

79 Kartick Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land Elderly

80 Parameswar

Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land Elderly

81 Khonon Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land Elderly

82 Naba Kumar


83 Ratik Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land Elderly

84 Subad Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land Elderly

85 Hiran Mirja Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

86 Khaoda Box Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

87 Kalu K Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

88 Fajul Rahaman

Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

89 Jamiruddin Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

90 Dula Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

91 Angur Mirja Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

92 Buddhadeb

Mondal Goshbati Agricultural Land Elderly

93 Kanika Mondal Marura Agricultural Land Elderly

94 Baburam Mondal


95 Amar Das Sinserda Agricultural Land Elderly

96 Uttam Ghosh Dhengapara Agricultural Land Elderly

97 Narayana Chandra Mondal

Mahadia Agricultural Land Elderly

98 Baburam Pal Dhengapara Agricultural Land Elderly

- 127 -

99 Sufal Mondal Mahadia Agricultural Land Elderly

100 Janardan


101 Arati Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land Elderly

102 Pasupati Mondal

Bhandora Agricultural Land Elderly

103 Manik Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land Elderly

104 Hosen Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

105 Jamsed Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

106 Golam Mostofa Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

107 Bonoy Dhar Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

108 Daud Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

109 Kamrul Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land Elderly

110 Jamuna Ghosh Marura Agricultural Land Elderly

111 Harayan Mondal


112 Asis Tribidi Bahora Agricultural Land Elderly

113 Dalim Mondal Bahora Agricultural Land Elderly

114 Madhab Mondal

Bahora Agricultural Land Elderly

115 Godadhar

Mondal Bahora Agricultural Land Elderly

116 Bijoy Mondal Bahora Agricultural Land Elderly

117 Chku Babu Bahora Agricultural Land Elderly

118 Shakti Das Bahora Agricultural Land Elderly

119 Chandbadan Bahora Agricultural Land Elderly

120 Amar Ghosh Sinserda Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

121 Sukumar Mondal

Mahadia Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

122 Monojit Mondal Mahadia Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

123 Subodh Mondal Akta Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

124 Meghnath

Mondal Akta Agricultural Land


125 Apurba Ghosh Goshbati Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

126 Bapan Ghosh Dhengapara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

127 Anayan Bagdi Sinserda Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

128 Tarun Ghosh Dhengapara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

129 Parbati Mondal Sinserda Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

130 Barun Ghosh Dhengapara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

131 Bhupati Mondal Sinserda Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

132 Dibakar Ghosh Dhengapara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

133 Ranjt Mondal Mahadia Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

134 Dasarat Pal Dhengapara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

135 Kanai Pal Dhengapara Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

136 Sonat Mondal Mahadia Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

137 Baishaki Das Sinserda Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

138 Benu Kar


139 Bindaban Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

- 128 -

Ghosh

140 Uttam Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

141 Kokon Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

142 Kalam Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

143 Angur Mirja Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

144 Islam Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

145 Tapas Dhar Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

146 Bijoy Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

147 Kartik Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

148 Patal Mirja Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

149 Tapash Pal Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

150 Maharul Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

151 Adir Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

152 Amar Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

153 Tena Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

154 Mohim Sk Muniadihi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

155 Makti Ghosh Shakti Pur Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

156 Sidhartha Mondal

Marura Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

157 Balaram Mondal

Marura Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

158 Tapan Mondal Marura Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

159 Adhor Ghosh Bahora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

160 Nanda Mondal Bahora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

161 Ajay Mondal Bahora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

162 Milan Mondal Bahora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

163 Bulok Bahora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

164 Ananda Mondal Bahora Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

165 Gonesh Ghosh Bhandora Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

166 Jagabath


167 Minati Mondal Marura Agricultural Land + Residential

Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly

168 Biduyut Mondal Marura Agricultural Land + Residential


169 Chaya Mondal Marura Agricultural Land + Residential


170 Brindabon

Mondal Marura Agricultural Land + Trees Below Poverty Line

171 Chand Md Sk Muniadihi Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) No Vulnerability

172 Jatadhari Mondal

Molla Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Disabled + Elderly

173 Sniti Pal Marura Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly


Road Name: Putia To Jat Biswanath Length of Road: 1.3 Km Total Number of APs-8

- 129 -

Absentees-2


Holder

Name Of The Village


1 Munsur Sk Katakali Agricultural Land Elderly

2 Serender Sk Katakali Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly

3 Tafajall Haque Katakali Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) No Vulnerability

4 Md Akber Ali Katakali Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) No Vulnerability

5 Safiul Alam Sk Katakali Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) No Vulnerability

6 Kolomdar Sk Katakali Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

7 Kasim Sk Mathpara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

8 Mameda Bewa Mathpara Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Female Headed

Household + Elderly

Table 14 District- Murshidabad

Road Name: Putia To Ramchandrapur Length of Road: 3.444 Km Total Number of APs-47

Absentees-0 (1 AP did not consent for voluntary donation)

New S.No


Holder

Name Of The Village


1 Fajrul Rehman Borjumla

Ward No 12 Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

2 Ansar Ali Borjumla

Ward No 12 Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

3 Samsur Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 Agricultural Land Elderly

4 Sahade Sk Borjumla


5 Kuddes Sk Borjumla


6 Muslim Sk Borjumla


7 Fazrul Sk Borjumla


8 Sonadhi Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

9 Mofizul Islam Borjumla


10 Prasanta Saha Borjumla


11 Mofijuddin

Mondal Borjumla

Ward No 12 Agricultural Land


12 Amirul Sk Borjumla


- 130 -

13 Sk Jakriya Borjumla


14 Amir Hossion Borjumla


15 Amu Mistri Borjumla


16 Fazal Sk Borjumla


17 Afajuddin Sk Borjumla



18 Mazur Moral Borjumla



19 Dubu Roy Borjumla

Ward No 12 Commercial Assets (Land) No Vulnerability

20 Ajij Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 Residential Assets (Boundary Wall +

Land) Below Poverty Line

21 Atabul Sk Borjumla



22 Rehan Sk Borjumla



23 Abdul Bari Borjumla


Land) Elderly

24 Tapan Das Borjumla


Land) Elderly

25 Mozibur Sk Borjumla


Land) Elderly

26 Salim Sk Borjumla


Land) Elderly

27 Nazrul Sk Borjumla


Land) Elderly

28 Jitten Das Borjumla


Land) Elderly

29 Abdul Rakib Borjumla


Land) Elderly

30 Ahalla Das Borjumla


Land)



31 Aiowan Sk Borjumla


Land) No Vulnerability

32 Nagen Bhaskar Borjumla



+ Elderly

33 Haibul

Rahaman Borjumla



+ Elderly

34 Sasanka Das Borjumla



+ Elderly

35 Kaimuddin Sk Borjumla



36 Basir Sk Borjumla



37 Latif Sk Borjumla



38 Abadul Borjumla



39 Alauddin Sk Borjumla



+ Elderly

40 Motiwar

Rehaman Borjumla



41 Amina Bibi Borjumla


Land) Female Headed

Household + Below

- 131 -

Poverty Line

42 Abani Saha Borjumla

Ward No 12 Residential Assets (Land) Elderly

43 Dhanapati Das Borjumla

Ward No 12 Residential Assets (Land) Elderly

44 Md Jiaul Haque Borjumla

Ward No 12 Residential Assets (Land) No Vulnerability

45 Ketabul Sk Borjumla


46 Fajlu Sk Borjumla


47 Aafiz Sk Borjumla


Table 15 District: North 24 Parganas District

Road Name: Keothshah Bazar To Jasaikathi Length of Road: 5.7 Km Total Number of APs-28

Absentees-6

New S.No


Holder

Name Of The Village


1 Abusam Mandal

Jasaikathi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

2 Rafiquel Islam Jasaikathi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

3 Jamila Begum Jasaikathi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

4 Daidur Dafadar Jasaikathi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

5 Govinda Mandal


+ Elderly + SC

6 Abu Bakara

Mandal Jasaikathi Agricultural Land


7 Karim Bask

Majni Jasaikathi Agricultural Land


8 Safikul Islam Jasaikathi Agricultural Land Elderly

9 Jamat Ali Jasaikathi Agricultural Land Elderly

10 Shiv Nath Mandal

Jasaikathi Agricultural Land Female Headed

Household

11 Sunil Mandal Jasaikathi Agricultural Land SC

12 Subal Mandal Jasaikathi Agricultural Land SC

13 Fakir Mondal Jasaikathi Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

14 Darbask Mandal

Jasaikathi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

15 Monajat Mandal


+ Elderly + SC

16 Liakat Ali Jasaikathi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

17 Haran Das Jasaikathi Agricultural Land Elderly+SC

18 Abdul Waheb Jasaikathi Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

19 Abusam Mandal

Jasaikathi Agricultural Land Elderly+SC

20 Pulin Mandal Jasaikathi Agricultural Land SC

21 Uttam Mandal Jasaikathi Agricultural Land SC

22 Banamali Jasaikathi Agricultural Land SC

- 132 -

Mandal

23 Panchkori

Mandal Jasaikathi Residential Assets (Boundary Wall)


24 Esahak Ali Jasaikathi Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) No Vulnerability

25 Mahadev Pal Jasaikathi Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

26 Nazrul Islam Jasaikathi Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly

27 Karim Mondal Jasaikathi Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly

28 Najrul Islam

Laskar Jasaikathi Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) No Vulnerability

Table 16 Road Name: Old Bangaon East To Pratapnagar

District: North 24 Parganas District Total Number of APs-69

Absentees-11

SrNo Name Of The Registration

Holder

Name Of The Village


1 Subol Ghosh Old Bongaon Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

2 Dulal Mondal Old Bongaon Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

3 Khitis Pathak Pratap Nagar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

4 Khokan

Mazumdar Pratap Nagar Agricultural Land


5 Shanti Mandal Old Bongaon Agricultural Land Elderly

6 Gobinda Mandal

Old Bongaon Agricultural Land Elderly

7 Sukumar Biswas

Pratap Nagar Agricultural Land SC

8 Tapan Sarkar Pratap Nagar Agricultural Land SC

9 Dulal Ghosh Old Bongaon Agricultural Land No Vulnerability

10 Rabindernath

Mandal Pratap Nagar Agricultural Land SC

11 Govindo Mondal

Old Bongaon Agricultural Land Female Headed Household + SC

12 Sadhan Biswas Pratap Nagar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line +

SC

13 Baidyanath

Mandal Pratap Nagar Agricultural Land


14 Sushil Biswas Pratap Nagar Agricultural Land Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

15 Parturam Majhi Old Bongaon Commercial Assets (Main Structure) Below Poverty Line +

SC

16 Robin Sana Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) No Vulnerability

17 Dutta Biswas Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly

18 Sonal Halder Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

19 Khudi Ram Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

20 Debananda

Sona Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall)


21 Nepal Dalapati Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

- 133 -

SC

22 Swasti Sarkar Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

23 Haripada Biswas

Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

24 Asit Pathak Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

25 Satish Mitra Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

26 Makhan Biswas Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

27 Ashok Das Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

28 Promila Biswas Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

29 Bikash Roy Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

30 Karik Biswas Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

31 Sunil Biswas Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

32 Nisikanta Mandal

Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

33 Premchand Boi

Ragi Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall)


34 Sadhan Malik Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

35 Bhadesdwar

Mitra Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

36 Karun Das Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

37 Satya Mandal Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

38 Kanai Sarkar Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

39 Kalpana Mondal


SC

40 Kartik Mandal Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

41 Haridas

Mazumdar Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

42 Dulal Paul Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

43 Narayan Mandal


Elderly + SC

44 Bolai Kha Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) SC

45 Subod Biswas Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) SC

46 Susanta Mandal

Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) SC

47 Nabad Mondal Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) SC

48 Sunil Haldar Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) SC

49 Sukshant Bhatt Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) SC

50 Tapas Dalawati Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

51 Late Rampada

Biswas Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall)


52 Bijay Mallik Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

53 Santosh Biswas


Elderly + SC

54 Parimal Biswas Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

- 134 -

SC

55 Posu Gopal

Miitra Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) SC

56 Birendra Nath

Mandal Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Elderly+SC

57 Dulala Rani

Pathak Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) SC

58 Lalita Kha Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Female Headed Household + SC

59 Kumar Haldar Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

60 Nepal Dalapati Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

61 Debjani Bisale Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Female Headed Household + SC

62 Bireswar Biswas


Elderly + SC

63 Sarojit Kha Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

SC

64 Kabita Biswas Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Female Headed Household + SC

65 Dhiren Sarkar Old Bongaon Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

66 Dulal Mondal Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

67 Niran Mitra Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

68 Bimal Bhoragi Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

69 Binod Roy Pratap Nagar Residential Assets (Boundary Wall) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

- 135 -

Annexure IV: Stretch-Wise List of Affected Assets

Table 1 District- Bankura

Road Name: Biborda To SH9 Length of the Road: 5.539 km


Type of Vulnerability

BPL 8

BPL + E 3

BPL + E +SC 2

BPL + SC 3

E 5

E + SC 1

FHH 1

NV 15

SC 1

Grand Total 39

Type of Loss

AL 36

R (BW) 1

R (S) 1

T 1

Grand Total 39

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 39

Grand Total 39

Type of Land (in case of Agriculture Land)

Irrigated 36

Grand Total 36

Extent of Loss (in case of Agriculture Land)

≤1% 20

1-5% 13

6-10% 1

More Than 10% 2

Grand Total 36

Extent of Loss (in case of Residential Assets)

1-5% 1

More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 2

Source: Census Survey, Rural Connectivity Investment Programme, 2011(Please note: AL= Agriculture land, R(L)= Residential land, R (BW) =Boundary Wall, T= Tree, R(S)= Residential Structure, C(L)= Commercial Land, C(S)= Commercial Structure) (Please note: BPL = Below Poverty Line, D = Disabled, E = Elderly, FHH = Female Headed Household,

NV=No Vulnerability, SC= Scheduled Caste, ST = Scheduled Tribe)


Road Name: Gobarda to Satpatta Length of Road: 11.82 Km

- 136 -



BPL 12

BPL + D + E 1

BPL + D + E +SC 2

BPL + E 11

BPL + E +SC 13

BPL + E +ST 6

BPL + SC 22

BPL + ST 18

D 2

D + E 1

D + E + SC 1

D + E + ST 2

E 15

E + SC 13

E + ST 6

FHH + BPL + E + ST 1

NV 24

SC 11

ST 11

Grand Total 172

Type of Loss

AL 169

AL+T 3

Grand Total 172

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 172

Grand Total 172


Irrigated 172

Grand Total 172


≤1% 52

1-5% 57

6-10% 19

More Than 10% 44

Grand Total 172




Road Name: Joypur to Gelia Length of Road: 11.893 km Total Number of APs- 191

- 137 -

Absentees-37


BPL 6

BPL + D + SC 3

BPL + E 1

BPL + E +SC 7

BPL + SC 19

BPL + ST 1

D 2

D + E 1

D + SC 3

E 17

E + SC 11

FHH 1

FHH + BPL 1

NV 71

SC 47

Grand Total 191

Type of Loss

AL 165

AL + R (BW + L) 3

AL + R (L) 1

AL + T 2

AL + T + R (BW + L) 1

R (BW + L) 8

R (L) 7

T 1

T + R (BW + L) 3

Grand Total 191

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 191

Grand Total 191


Irrigated 172

Grand Total 172


≤1% 74

1-5% 66

6-10% 18

More Than 10% 14

Grand Total 172


1-5% 3

5-10% 2

More Than 10% 18

Grand Total 23

- 138 -




Road Name: T-10 (Dhengram To Bishanpur) Length of Road: 9.978 km Total Number of APs- 53

Absentees-6


BPL + E 1

BPL + E +SC 2

BPL + E +ST 8

BPL + SC 2

BPL + ST 8

D 1

E 8

E + ST 3


FHH + ST 1

NV 9

ST 9

Grand Total 53

Type of Loss

AL 34

R (BW) 17

RC (S) 1

T 1

Grand Total 53

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 53

Grand Total 53


Irrigated 34

Grand Total 34


≤1% 18

1-5% 10

6-10% 2

More Than 10% 4

Grand Total 34


1-5% 3

5-10% 5

More Than 10% 9

Grand Total 17

- 139 -

Extent of Loss (in case of Residential Cum Commercial Assets)

≤1% 1

Grand Total 1




Road Name: Joy Krishnapur To Gobindpur Length of Road: 7.83 km Total Number of APs- 113

Absentees-5


BPL + D + SC 1

BPL + E 1

BPL + E +SC 1

BPL + E +ST 1

BPL + SC 1

D + E 3

D + SC 1

E 36

E + SC 4

E + ST 1

NV 57

SC 6

Grand Total 113

Type of Loss

AL 110

R (BW) 2

T+ R (BW) 1

Grand Total 113

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 113

Grand Total 113


Irrigated 110

Grand Total 110


≤1% 60

1-5% 31

6-10% 13

More Than 10% 6

Grand Total 110


1-5% 1

5-10% 1

- 140 -

More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 1




Road Name: Uttar Laxmipur To Tanaghata Ferry Ghat Length of Road: 2.7 Km Total Number of APs- 52

Absentees-0


BPL 1

BPL + D + E 2

BPL + E 3

BPL + E +SC 6

BPL + SC 2

D + E 1

D + E + SC 3

E 10

E + SC 6

FHH + E 1

NV 9

SC 8

Grand Total 52

Type of Loss

AL 12

AL + R (BW) 1

AL + T + R (BW) 2

C (S) 1

R (BW + L) 29

R (BW) 5

T + R (BW) 2

Grand Total 52

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 52

Grand Total 52


Irrigated 15

Grand Total 15


≤1% 3

1-5% 7

6-10% 1

More Than 10% 4

Grand Total 15

- 141 -


1-5% 9

5-10% 14

More Than 10% 16

Grand Total 39

Extent of Loss (in case of Commercial Assets)

More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 1




Road Name: T05 At Bikasnagar To Rajfapri Length of Road: 3.354 Kms



BPL + SC 1

Grand Total 1

Type of Loss

C (S) 1

Grand Total 1

Ownership Pattern

Squatter 1

Grand Total 1


More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 1




Road Name: Ranicherra Tea Garden To Paschim Damdim Length of Road: 3.138 km



ST 1

Grand Total 1

Type of Loss

C (BW) 1

Grand Total 1

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 1

Grand Total 1

- 142 -


More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 1




Road Name: T 14 At Sarkarpara To Munshipara Length of Road: 7.866 Km Total Number of APs- 190

Absentees-3 Type of Vulnerability

BPL 16

BPL + D + SC 1

BPL + E 7

BPL + E +SC 23

BPL + SC 68

D 1

D + SC 2

E 3

E + SC 9

FHH + BPL + E + SC 3

FHH + BPL +E 3

NV 10

SC 44

Grand Total 190

Type of Loss

AL 86

AL + R (BW + L) 1

AL + R (L) 8

AL + T 10

AL + T + R (L) 4

C (S) 1

R (BW + L) 37

R (L) 41

T 1

T + R (L) 1

Grand Total 190

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 189

Squatter 1

Grand Total 190


Irrigated 109

Grand Total 109

- 143 -


≤1% 64

1-5% 37

6-10% 4

More Than 10% 4

Grand Total 109


≤1% 1

1-5% 29

5-10% 23

More Than 10% 39

Grand Total 92


More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 1




Road Name: T07 Lal School To Brazerkuthi Length of Road: 6.026 Km Total Number of APs- 116


BPL 22

BPL + D 1

BPL + D + E 1

BPL + E 11

BPL + E +SC 6

BPL + E +ST 1

BPL + SC 12

BPL + ST 5

E 10

E + SC 7

FHH + BPL 2

FHH + BPL + E + SC 2


FHH + BPL +E 2

FHH + E 1

FHH + SC 2

NV 11

SC 17

ST 2

Grand Total 116

Type of Loss

- 144 -

AL 54

AL + R (BW + L) 6

AL + R (L) 7

AL + T 10

AL + T + R (BW + L) 1

AL + T + R (L) 1

R (BW + L) 4

R (L) 22

T 3

T + C(L) 1

T + R (BW + L) 2

T + R (L) 5

Grand Total 116

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 115

Squatter 1

Grand Total 116


Irrigated 79

Grand Total 79


≤1% 47

1-5% 28

6-10% 3

More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 79


≤1% 5

1-5% 18

5-10% 11

More Than 10% 14

Grand Total 48


More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 1




Road Name: Charpaikmari To Chardebipur Length of Road: 2.24 Km Total Number of APs- 70

Absentees-6


BPL 10

- 145 -

BPL + D + E 1

BPL + E 7

BPL + E +SC 1

BPL + SC 1

E 18

FHH + BPL 1

FHH + E 1

NV 20

SC 10

Grand Total 70

Type of Loss

AL 63

C(L) 1

R (BW) 6

Grand Total 70

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 70

Grand Total 70


Irrigated 63

Grand Total 63


≤1% 48

1-5% 10

6-10% 4

More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 63


1-5% 4

5-10% 1

More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 6


More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 1




Road Name: Panchthupi To Molla Length of Road: 8.094 Km Total Number of APs- 173

Absentees-46


BPL 15

- 146 -

BPL + E 8

D 1

D + E 2

E 59

FHH + E 1

NV 87

Grand Total 173

Type of Loss

AL 166

AL + R (BW) 3

AL + T 1

R (BW) 3

Grand Total 173

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 173

Grand Total 173


Irrigated 170

Grand Total 170


≤1% 71

1-5% 75

6-10% 21

More Than 10% 3

Grand Total 170


≤1% 1

1-5% 2

5-10% 1

More Than 10% 2

Grand Total 6




Road Name: Putia To Jat Biswanath Length of Road: 1.3 Km Total Number of APs-8

Absentees-2


BPL + E 2

E 2

FHH + E 1

NV 3

Grand Total 8

- 147 -

Type of Loss

AL 1

R (BW) 7

Grand Total 8

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 8

Grand Total 8


Irrigated 1

Grand Total 1


≤1% 1

Grand Total 1


≤1% 1

1-5% 2

5-10% 1

More Than 10% 3

Grand Total 7



Table 14 District- Murshidabad

Road Name: Putia To Ramchandrapur Length of Road: 3.444 Km Total Number of APs-47


BPL 5

BPL + E 7

E 14

FHH + BPL 1

FHH + BPL +E 1

NV 19

Grand Total 47

Type of Loss

AL 18

C (L) 1

R (BW + L) 22

R (L) 6

Grand Total 47

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 47

Grand Total 47


- 148 -

Irrigated 18

Grand Total 18


≤1% 7

1-5% 11

Grand Total 18


1-5% 5

5-10% 5

More Than 10% 18

Grand Total 28


More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 1



Table 15 District: North 24 Parganas District

Road Name: Keothshah Bazar To Jasaikathi Length of Road: 5.7 Km Total Number of APs-28

Absentees-6


BPL + E 6

BPL + E +SC 2

E 3

E + SC 3

FHH 1

NV 8

SC 5

Grand Total 28

Type of Loss

AL 22

R (BW) 6

Grand Total 28

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 28

Grand Total 28


Irrigated 22

Grand Total 22


≤1% 1

1-5% 2

5-10% 1

- 149 -

More Than 10% 17

Grand Total 22


1-5% 4

5-10% 1

More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 6



Table 16 Road Name: Old Bangaon East To Pratapnagar

District: North 24 Parganas District Total Number of APs-69

Absentees-11


BPL + E 1

BPL + E +SC 14

BPL + SC 24

E 2

E + SC 9

FHH + SC 4

NV 4

SC 11

Grand Total 69

Type of Loss

AL 14

C (S) 1

R (BW) 54

Grand Total 69

Ownership Pattern

Titleholder 69

Grand Total 69


Irrigated 14

Grand Total 14


≤1% 1

1-5% 5

5-10% 1

More Than 10% 7

Grand Total 14


≤1% 3

1-5% 19

5-10% 15

- 150 -

More Than 10% 17

Grand Total 53


More Than 10% 1

Grand Total 1



ANNEXURE V: ROADWISE LIST OF AP, TYPE AND EXTENT OF LOSS

I. BANKURA DISTRICT

Table 1: Road Name: Biborda To SH9 ; District- Bankura Total Number of APs- 39

Absentees-11

Sr

No

NA

me O

f T

he

Reg

istr

ati

on

Ho

lder

Nam

e O

f T

he V

illa

ge

Typ

e O

f L

oss

Vu

lnera

bilit

y

To

tal L

an

d H

old

ing

To

tal L

an

d L

oss

% O

f L

oss

Fru

it B

ea

rin

g T

rees

Fu

rnit

ure

/In

du

str

y/T

im

ber

Tre

es

To

tal R

esid

en

tial L

an

d

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Resid

en

tia

l L

an

d

% O

f L

oss

To

tal R

esid

en

tial

Str

uctu

re

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Resid

en

tia

l S

tru

ctu

re

% O

f L

oss

1 Kajol Kole Baromisa Al Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.32 0.011 3.44 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

2 Manik Kole Laltyagura Al Below Poverty

Line 0.33 0.005 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

3 Assini Kole Laltyagura Al Below Poverty


4 Badal Roy Laltyagura Al Below Poverty


5 Sisir Kole Laltyagura Al Below Poverty


6 Badal Roy SoNAgara Al Elderly +SC 0.24 0.014 5.83 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

7 Sudir Kole Laltyagura Al No Vulnerability 1.33 0.014 1.05 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

8 Tarini Mondal Laltyagura Al No Vulnerability 3.33 0.009 0.27 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

9 Gopal Kole Laltyagura Al No Vulnerability 2 0.013 0.65 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

10 Aditya Kole Laltyagura Al No Vulnerability 4 0.008 0.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 152 -

11 Vaskor Roy Laltyagura Al Below Poverty

Line 2 0.027 1.35 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

12 Ajit Mondal Laltyagura Al Below Poverty

Line 5 0.03 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

13 Tarun Mondil Laltyagura Al Female Headed

Household 3.33 0.002 0.06 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

14 Bhaskar Lohar SoNAgara Al SC 0.66 0.005 0.76 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

15 Arun Mondal Laltyagura Al No Vulnerability 3.33 0.005 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

16 Helaram Ghosh Soraliya Al

Below Poverty Line 1.65 0.021 1.27 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

17 Rubanni Mulla Soraliya Al Below Poverty


18 Rakhohari

Kole Baromisa Al Below Poverty Line + Elderly

0.495 0.004 0.81 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

19 Bidyut Dhak Baromisa Al Below Poverty

Line + SC 0.06

4 0.003 4.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

20 Ajit Kole Baromisa Al No Vulnerability 1 0.008 0.80 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

21 Sunil Lohar Baromisa Al

Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.07

2 0.008 11.1

1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

22 Mahadve

Dhak Baromisa Al Below Poverty Line + Elderly 1 0.004 0.40 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

23 Ranjit Kole Baromisa Al No Vulnerability 0.16 0.003 1.88 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

24 Ajit Ghosh Soraliya Al No Vulnerability 2 0.008 0.40 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

25 Ronjon Roy Soraliya Al Below Poverty

Line + SC 0.33 0.006 1.82 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

26 Kallol Ghosh Soraliya Al No Vulnerability 2 0.019 0.95 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

27 Sristi Ghosh Soraliya Al No Vulnerability 1 0.029 2.90 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

28 Samal Mondal Soraliya Al No Vulnerability 1.65 0.004 0.24 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

29 Durgapada

Ghosh Soraliya Al No Vulnerability 1.33 0.017 1.28 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

30 Sunil Ghosh Soraliya Al No Vulnerability 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

31 Anil Kole Baromisa Al Elderly 0.17 0.007 3.98 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 153 -

6

32 GaNApoda

Kole Baromisa Al Elderly 1 0.11 11.0


33 Ranjan Dhak Baromisa Al Elderly 4 0.008 0.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

34 Gorachand

Ghosh Soraliya Al Elderly 2.64 0.02 0.76 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

35 Debidas

Mukharjee Soraliya Al No Vulnerability 4 0.027 0.68 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

36 Robi Ghosh Soraliya Al No Vulnerability 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

37 Sukumar Roy SoNAgara R (Bw) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2003.

27 47 2.35

38 Madan Lohar SoNAgara R (S)


SC NA NA NA NA NA 259.0

08 45 17.37 61.3 22.5 36.70

39 Mdaan

Mozumder Chandkuri T Elderly NA NA NA NA 100 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Source: Census Survey, Rural Connectivity Investment Programme, 2011

As seen in table 1 above, there are 39 APs along this road of which 36 APs would bear an impact on their agriculture land while 2 APs on their

residential assets (boundary wall and main structure). Rest 1 AP would lose his trees (100 bamboos). Of the 39 APs only 15 APs do not suffer from

any vulnerability. In case of APs losing agriculture land, only two of them were found to be lising more than 10% of their land. These 2 APs own less

than 1 acre of land and suffer from vulnerabilities. In the case of APs losing their residential assets too, it has been seen that they would lose more

than 10% of their assets and are vulnerable APs.

Table 2: Road Name: Gobarda to Satpatta ; District- Bankura Total Number of APs- 172

Absentees-17

Sr No

Name Of The Registration Holder

Name Of The Village

Type Of Loss Vulnerability Total Land

Holding

Total Land Loss

% Of Loss

Fruit Bearing Trees

Getting Affected

Furniture/Industry/Timber Trees

- 154 -

1 Krishnapaddananadi Purulkha AL No Vulnerability 0.066 0.009 13.64 NA NA

2 Pintu Bera Penchala AL Below Poverty Line 0.3 0.02 6.67 NA NA

3 Mohansoren Purulkha AL Female Headed Household

+Below Poverty Line + Elderly + ST

0.16 0.007 4.38 NA NA

4 Sambhu Murmu Purulkha AL Below Poverty Line + ST 0.32 0.004 1.25 NA NA

5 Purukha/A5 Purulkha AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

ST 1.33 1 75.19 NA NA

6 Ranjit Mandi Purulkha AL No Vulnerability 0.58 0.014 2.41 NA NA

7 Krishna Maji Borpol AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.16 0.1 62.50 NA NA

8 Podmu Lochanmnurmu Borpol AL Elderly + ST 0.33 0.3 90.91 NA NA

9 Asitbera Penchala AL Below Poverty Line 0.048 0.027 56.25 NA NA

10 Gayan Murmu Borpol AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly+

ST 0.66 0.2 30.30 NA NA

11 Subolmajhi Borpol AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.1 0.01 10.00 NA NA

12 Jamadhar Mumu Borpol AL Elderly + ST 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA

13 Ramapada Maji Borpol AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.465 0.002 0.43 NA NA

14 Joginda Mmaji Borpol AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.465 0.17 36.56 NA NA

15 Kalidas Saren Panchbaria AL Below Poverty Line + ST 1 0.033 3.30 NA NA

16 Aratisoren Panchbaria AL Below Poverty Line + ST 1.33 0.01 0.75 NA NA

17 Lal Mohan Soren Panchbaria AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly+

ST 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA

18 Baidyanath Baske Kamala Dagal

AL Below Poverty Line + ST 0.049 0.009 18.37 NA NA

19 Banamali Kamala Dagal


20 Babulal Murmu Kamala Dagal


21 Tapas Goswami Salbani AL Below Poverty Line 1.66 0.006 0.36 NA NA

22 Khudiram Mondal Kumaradah AL Below Poverty Line 0.66 0.0132 2.00 NA NA

- 155 -

23 Gobinda Mandal Kumaradah AL Below Poverty Line 0.05 0.007 14.00 NA NA

24 Baidyanath Mande Penchala AL Below Poverty Line + ST 0.66 0.009 1.36 NA NA

25 Shayamapada Singha Penchala AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.025 7.58 NA NA

26 Raju Mandi Penchala AL Below Poverty Line + ST 0.66 0.019 2.88 NA NA

27 Rabindranath Singha Penchala AL No Vulnerability 1.6 0.18 11.25 NA NA

28 Banamali Patra Dumurtor AL No Vulnerability 8.25 0.012 0.15 NA NA

29 Subal Layak Kumaradah AL Below Poverty Line 0.64 0.001 0.16 NA NA

30 Bijoy Gorai Kumaradah AL Below Poverty Line 1 0.014 1.40 NA NA

31 Mether Gorai Kumaradah AL Below Poverty Line 0.03 0.008 26.67 NA NA

32 Joti Lohor Salbani AL Elderly+SC 0.33 0.009 2.73 NA NA

33 Arun Mandal Salbani AL Elderly+SC 1.65 0.19 11.52 NA NA

34 Sunil Dolal Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.825 0.01 1.21 NA NA

35 Rakhohari Mandal Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.66 0.007 1.06 NA NA

36 Habu Mandal Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.66 0.007 1.06 NA NA

37 Romes Meta Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + SC 2.64 0.011 0.42 NA NA

38 Kartick Dolai Salbani AL Disabled + Elderly + SC 1.65 0.005 0.30 NA NA

39 Renu Pada Katol Salbani AL Elderly+SC 0.24 0.006 2.50 NA NA

40 Muruli Borai Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.165 0.01 6.06 NA NA

41 Kinki\Or Lohar Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly+

ST 0.495 0.009 1.82 NA NA

42 Bablu Sodder Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA

43 Salku Dolai Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.425 0.007 1.65 NA NA

44 Rupen Roy Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.01 0.009 90.00 NA NA

45 Anadi Dolai Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.02 0.005 25.00 NA NA

46 Profullaroy Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.66 0.018 2.73 NA NA

47 Asoke Dolai Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + Disabled

+ Elderly+ SC 0.05 0.007 14.00 NA NA

- 156 -

48 Probodh Dolai Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.24 0.009 3.75 NA NA

49 Sudhangsu Dolai Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 1 0.016 1.60 NA NA

50 Niranjandolai Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + Disabled

+ Elderly+ SC 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA

51 Ajit Mandal Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 1.65 0.037 2.24 NA NA

52 Fakir Gorai Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 0.01 0.005 50.00 NA NA

53 Dayal Mandal Kumaradah AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 10.192 0.002 0.02 NA NA

54 Rupchand Gorai Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 0.066 0.016 24.24 NA NA

55 Ranajit Layak Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 0.03 0.002 6.67 NA NA

56 Guiram Mandal Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 1.65 0.003 0.18 NA NA

57 Ganga Dhar Mandal Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.011 1.67 NA NA

58 Sadan Gorai Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 1 0.014 1.40 NA NA

59 Jaydeb Sarkar Kumaradah AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.03 0.001 3.33 NA NA

60 Tapas Gorai Kumaradah AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA

61 Ashok Mondal Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 1.32 0.007 0.53 NA NA

62 Aakhohan Mondal Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.005 0.76 NA NA

63 Sibu Mandal Kumaradah AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.06 0.001 1.67 NA NA

64 Bipad Ranjan Paulo Baksona AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.13 39.39 NA NA

65 Sadhu Mandi Baksona AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly+

ST 0.28 0.17 60.71 NA NA

66 Madan Pal Baksona AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.33 0.002 0.61 NA NA

67 Prabod Ghosh Satpatta AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 1 0.14 14.00 NA NA

68 Paban Patra Satpatta AL No Vulnerability 0.495 0.01 2.02 NA NA

69 Habul Kadma Satpatta AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.08 0.003 3.75 NA NA

70 Pratima Gosh Satpatta AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.16 0.11 68.75 NA NA

71 Sannnti Kadma Satpatta AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.08 0.004 5.00 NA NA

72 Aditya Ghosh Satpatta AL Elderly+SC 0.04 0.012 30.00 NA NA

- 157 -

73 Dulala Hazari Satpatta AL Elderly+SC 4 0.01 0.25 NA NA

74 Sitanath Goosh Satpatta AL Elderly+SC 3 0.022 0.73 NA NA

75 Migen Paul Satpatta AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 4 0.006 0.15 NA NA

76 Sudhangorai Kumaradah AL Below Poverty Line 0.16 0.008 5.00 NA NA

77 Rupchand Parta Satpatta AL Below Poverty Line 4.25 0.16 3.76 NA NA

78 Sitel Bera Penchala AL Below Poverty Line 0.192 0.014 7.29 NA NA

79 Nirmalpatra Dumurtor AL Below Poverty Line 1.65 0.02 1.21 NA NA

80 Raghu Gorai Kumaradah AL Disabled 0.495 0.017 3.43 NA NA

81 Sukchand Mandal Kumaradah AL Disabled 0.66 0.005 0.76 NA NA

82 Subal Nandi Purulkha AL Elderly 1.65 0.036 2.18 NA NA

83 Rabindrapatro Dumurtor AL Elderly 0.05 0.004 8.00 NA NA

84 Durbolovhrn Patro Dumurtor AL Elderly 0.03 0.017 56.67 NA NA

85 Sanatan Layak Kumaradah AL Elderly 0.16 0.16 100.00 NA NA

86 Nitananda Paul Baksona AL Elderly 1.32 0.02 1.52 NA NA

87 Pollad Paul Baksona AL Elderly 0.3 0.01 3.33 NA NA

88 Arjun Paul Baksona AL Elderly 0.33 0.018 5.45 NA NA

89 Tripuralohar Salbani AL Elderly 0.825 0.003 0.36 NA NA

90 Kalipada Mondal Kumaradah AL Elderly 1.65 0.007 0.42 NA NA

91 Satta Sardar Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + ST 1.32 0.018 1.36 NA NA

92 Aditaya Roy Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.16 0.1 62.50 NA NA

93 Tapan Dolai Salbani AL Elderly+SC 0.66 0.007 1.06 NA NA

94 Sachi Nando Kundu Purulkha AL Elderly 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA

95 Nara Fingha Nandal Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 0.3 0.26 86.67 NA NA

96 Parimalmandal Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 2.64 0.27 10.23 NA NA

97 Bhim Paul Baksona AL Elderly 0.2 0.005 2.50 NA NA

98 Sudhan Mandal Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 6.6 0.002 0.03 NA NA

- 158 -

99 Bansipatra Dumurtor AL Elderly 0.45 0.006 1.33 NA NA

100 Nanlalapatro Dumurtor AL Elderly 13.2 0.12 0.91 NA NA

101 Ram Sahu Raghunath

Pur AL Elderly 3 0.038 1.27 NA NA

102 Ranjit Mandal Kumaradah AL No Vulnerability 2.64 0.17 6.44 NA NA

103 Manik Dolai Salbani AL Elderly+SC 5 0.01 0.20 NA NA

104 Sukumar Mandal Kumaradah AL SC 0.8 0.1 12.50 NA NA

105 Pralad Gorai Kumaradah AL SC 1 0.008 0.80 NA NA

106 Mohan Patra Satpatta AL SC 1 0.009 0.90 NA NA

107 Aditya Mondal Satpatta AL SC 0.495 0.009 1.82 NA NA

108 Modhan Gosh Satpatta AL SC 0.16 0.015 9.38 NA NA

109 Miloin Patra Satpatta AL SC 5 0.014 0.28 NA NA

110 Trilochon Dolai Salbani AL Elderly+SC 1.32 0.007 0.53 NA NA

111 Arun Sadder A Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.02 0.006 30.00 NA NA

112 Nilkamal Mandal Salbani AL Elderly+SC 1 0.056 5.60 NA NA

113 Tarapada Mandal Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.33 0.1 30.30 NA NA

114 Sibu Dolai Salbani AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.24 0.009 3.75 NA NA

115 Ganesh Mathi Borpol AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA

116 Madan Dolai Salbani AL SC 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA

117 Madhusudan Meta Salbani AL SC 0.495 0.14 28.28 NA NA

118 Aditya Mandal Thakurapat

a AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 10 0.012 0.12 NA NA

119 Niranjan Patro Satpatta AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.12 0.004 3.33 NA NA

120 Chinmoy Kadma Satpatta AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.16 0.008 5.00 NA NA

121 Kalidas Soren Panchbaria AL Below Poverty Line + ST 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA

122 Shankar Pal Satpatta AL Elderly+SC 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA

123 Ganudhar Mandal Satpatta AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.495 0.19 38.38 NA NA

- 159 -

124 Santi Patra Satpatta AL SC 0.1 0.018 18.00 NA NA

125 Late Gopal Gosh Satpatta AL SC 3.3 0.21 6.36 NA NA

126 Shamanandasingha Penchala AL No Vulnerability 0.05 0.004 8.00 NA NA

127 Rabinadramaji Borpol AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.495 0.018 3.64 NA NA

128 Kisanlal Murmu Borpol AL ST 0.33 0.1 30.30 NA NA

129 Golak Murmu Borpol AL ST 0.465 0.009 1.94 NA NA

130 Kalipadapatra Dumurtor AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.66 0.018 2.73 NA NA

131 Swapan Mukherjee Dumurtor AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.166 0.1 60.24 NA NA

132 Kartickpatra Dumurtor AL Below Poverty Line + Disabled

+ Elderly 0.05 0.014 28.00 NA NA

133 Gorchand Murmu Raghunath

Pur AL Elderly + ST 1 0.003 0.30 NA NA

134 Swapan Murmu Raghunath

Pur AL Elderly + ST 2 0.02 1.00 NA NA

135 Hapan Hemron Raghunath

Pur AL Disabled + Elderly + ST 1.65 0.02 1.21 NA NA

136 Sibil Soren Raghunath

Pur AL Elderly + ST 1.151 0.36 31.28 NA NA

137 Badal Todu Raghunath

Pur AL Elderly + ST 0.66 0.041 6.21 NA NA

138 Nirmal Bag Raghunath

Pur AL Below Poverty Line + ST 1 0.008 0.80 NA NA

139 Sadhan Mukherjee Dumurtor AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.16 0.1 62.50 NA NA

140 Sukumar Murmu Raghunath

Pur AL Disabled + Elderly + ST 1 0.02 2.00 NA NA

141 Jagadish Mandal Salbani AL ST 0.05 0.005 10.00 NA NA

142 Tarapada Besra Akhopal AL Below Poverty Line + ST 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA

143 Jogaswar Murmu Akhopal AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly+

ST 1.32 0.012 0.91 NA NA

144 Gopal Murmu Akhopal AL Below Poverty Line + ST 0.825 0.006 0.73 NA NA

145 Rupchand Murmu Akhopal AL Below Poverty Line + ST 1 0.003 0.30 NA NA

146 Surya Singhg Raghunath AL Elderly+SC 2.31 0.001 0.04 NA NA

- 160 -

Pur

147 Chitta Ranjanmukherjee Dumurtor AL No Vulnerability 5 0.002 0.04 NA NA

148 Mongalmandi Panchbaria AL Below Poverty Line + ST 0.33 0.023 6.97 NA NA

149 Sanatan Murmu Kamala Dagal

AL SC 0.66 0.03 4.55 NA NA

150 Subodh Patra Dumurtor AL No Vulnerability 0.05 0.002 4.00 NA NA

151 Sarup Murmu Akhopal AL Below Poverty Line + ST 0.495 0.003 0.61 NA NA

152 Rabon Murmu Akhopal AL Below Poverty Line + ST 0.66 0.02 3.03 NA NA

153 Bipan Mummu Akhopal AL Below Poverty Line + ST 1 0.008 0.80 NA NA

154 Baidyanath Hembrem Raghunath

Pur AL ST 0.495 0.037 7.47 NA NA

155 Pion Murmu Raghunath

Pur AL ST 1 0.008 0.80 NA NA

156 Karmo Todo Raghunath

Pur AL ST 2 0.003 0.15 NA NA

157 Khilip Baske Raghunath

Pur AL ST 2.64 0.002 0.08 NA NA

158 Raghunath Murmu Raghunath

Pur AL ST 4 0.011 0.28 NA NA

159 Dharamdas Tudu Raghunath

Pur AL ST 2 0.01 0.50 NA NA

160 Bharat Murmu Raghunath

Pur AL ST 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA

161 Durgacharan Murmu Akhopal AL ST 3 0.006 0.20 NA NA

162 Khipodrana Panchmoulli AL Below Poverty Line + SC 0.08 0.004 5.00 NA NA

163 Probhaod Baz Panchmoulli AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 24 2 8.33 NA NA

164 Jugal Rana Panchmoulli AL Below Poverty Line + SC 8 0.014 0.18 NA NA

165 Milan Baz Panchmoulli AL Elderly+SC 0.066 0.012 18.18 NA NA

166 Jotidrabez Panchmoulli AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.016 0.009 56.25 NA NA

167 Okulrana Panchmoulli AL Below Poverty Line + SC 39 12 30.77 NA NA

- 161 -

168 Abodhi Baz Panchmoulli AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.24 0.01 4.17 NA NA

169 Mukti Padapatra Dumurtor AL Elderly 2.64 0.005 0.19 NA NA

170 Bidya Pada Nandi Purulkha AL + T No Vulnerability 0.132 0.01 7.58 NA 10

171 Sajal Mandal Borpol AL + T Disabled + Elderly 0.12 0.017 14.17 NA 3

172 Adhibasrana Panchmoulli AL + T Below Poverty Line + Elderly 24 0.029 0.12 NA 1


As seen in table 2 above, there are 172 APs along the Gobarda to Satpatta Road section. All the 172 APs are incurring loss of their agriculture land.

Further of these 172 APs, 3 APs would also lose their trees. 24 of the 172 APs were found to be suffering from no vulnerability.

44 of the 172 APs would lose more than 10% of their assets with one of the APs (elderly as well) would lose 100% of his agriculture land. The 3 APs

who would bear an impact on the trees as well, would suffer loss of furniture/timer tree and no fruit trees are affected.

Table 3: Road Name: Joypur to Gelia ; District- Bankura Total Number of APs- 191

Absentees-37

Sr No


Holder

Name Of The Village

Type Of

Loss Vulnerability

Total Land Holding

Total Land Loss

% Of Loss

Fruit Bearing Trees

Furniture/Industry/Ti

mber Trees

Total Residential Land

Total Affected

Residential Land

% Of Loss

1 Janardan

Chakrabati Jamsola AL Below Poverty Line 0.128 0.001 0.78 NA NA NA NA NA

2 Nawul Roktit Ruisahar AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.002 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA

3 Kartik Rokhit Ruisahar AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.002 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA

4 Nawul Roktit Ruisahar AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.002 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA

5 Sunil Pal Raj Sole AL Disabled 0.66 0.008 1.21 NA NA NA NA NA

6 Dabi Prasad

Mondal Gelia AL Disabled 0.256 0.01 3.91 NA NA NA NA NA

7 Niohan Sokha Das Dighi AL No Vulnerability 2.33 0.002 0.09 NA NA NA NA NA

- 162 -

Dey

8 Asoke Dey Das Dighi AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA NA NA NA

9 Ananta Mondal Das Dighi AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.005 0.38 NA NA NA NA NA

10 Shankar Sadra Holdu AL Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC 0.96 0.16 16.67 NA NA NA NA NA

11 Sanatan Santra Holdu AL Elderly+SC 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA NA NA NA

12 Rasomay Roy Jamsola AL Elderly+SC 0.64 0.004 0.63 NA NA NA NA NA

13 Sukumar Pal Jamsola AL Below Poverty Line +


14 Prouakhar Paul Chatrapara AL Disabled + Elderly 1.33 0.007 0.53 NA NA NA NA NA

15 Madan De Chatrapara AL Elderly 0.005 0.005 100.0

0 NA NA NA NA NA

16 Tarak Bag Digra AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 0.24 0.03 12.50 NA NA NA NA NA

17 Milan Bag Digra AL Disabled + SC 0.16 0.03 18.75 NA NA NA NA NA

18 Shayamapada

Bag Digra AL


0.495 0.03 6.06 NA NA NA NA NA

19 Gouri Shankar

De Chatrapara AL Elderly 0.01 0.007 70.00 NA NA NA NA NA

20 Bolo Hari Dey Chatrapara AL Elderly 2.14 0.038 1.78 NA NA NA NA NA

21 Rabiyal Sk Digra AL No Vulnerability 0.256 0.007 2.73 NA NA NA NA NA

22 Manas Kole Sujargad AL Elderly 2.33 0.005 0.21 NA NA NA NA NA

23 Nironjon Pal Raj Sole AL No Vulnerability 2.33 0.006 0.26 NA NA NA NA NA

24 Bonsi Pal Raj Sole AL No Vulnerability 2.5 0.005 0.20 NA NA NA NA NA

25 Krishnpada Ghor Ijjatpur AL Elderly 0.66 0.015 2.27 NA NA NA NA NA

26 Anil Lohar Dharampur AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 0.49 0.004 0.82 NA NA NA NA NA

27 Bhairab Lohar Dharampur AL Below Poverty Line +


28 Sanatan Lohar Sujargad AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA NA NA NA

29 Haradhan Lohar Sujargad AL Below Poverty Line + 0.064 0.004 6.25 NA NA NA NA NA

- 163 -

SC

30 Biswanath Lohar Sujargad AL Below Poverty Line +


31 Nitai Lohar Sujargad AL Below Poverty Line +


32 Dilip Chakarbarti Sujargad AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.009 2.73 NA NA NA NA NA

33 Aditya Pal Tanadighi AL Elderly 0.495 0.009 1.82 NA NA NA NA NA

34 Shamal Mondal Ijjatpur AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.004 1.21 NA NA NA NA NA

35 Krishnapada

Mondal Ijjatpur AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.01 6.25 NA NA NA NA NA

36 Dulal Khan Ijjatpur AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 0.33 0.02 6.06 NA NA NA NA NA

37 Gunakar Mondal Ijjatpur AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA

38 Biren Ghor Ijjatpur AL No Vulnerability 1 0.003 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

39 Sanjib Bonrakha Ijjatpur AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.01 0.75 NA NA NA NA NA

40 Chitaranjan Lohar Bindabonpur AL No Vulnerability 0.288 0.016 5.56 NA NA NA NA NA

41 Jitan Lohar Bindabonpur AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 0.66 0.002 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

42 Gangadhar Lohar Bindabonpur AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 0.33 0.007 2.12 NA NA NA NA NA

43 Santi Lohar Bindabonpur AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 0.16 0.007 4.38 NA NA NA NA NA

44 Sukumar Dea Bindabonpur AL No Vulnerability 0.4 0.002 0.50 NA NA NA NA NA

45 Manoranjan Dey Bindabonpur AL No Vulnerability 4 0.002 0.05 NA NA NA NA NA

46 Kartik Dallal Bindabonpur AL No Vulnerability 3 0.001 0.03 NA NA NA NA NA

47 Matur Lohar Bindabonpur AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 1 0.002 0.20 NA NA NA NA NA

48 Mohon Nandi Gelia AL No Vulnerability 2.33 0.004 0.17 NA NA NA NA NA

49 Saran Nandi Gelia AL No Vulnerability 115.5 0.01 0.01 NA NA NA NA NA

50 Renu Nandi Gelia AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA

51 Sital Kundu Gelia AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.003 0.45 NA NA NA NA NA

- 164 -

52 Mritunjoy Kundu Gelia AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.004 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

53 Panchanan

Kundu Gelia AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.002 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

54 Biswajit Pal Gelia AL No Vulnerability 2.66 0.003 0.11 NA NA NA NA NA

55 Rabi Lochan

Khan Gelia AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.009 0.54 NA NA NA NA NA

56 Dibakar Pal Gelia AL No Vulnerability 5 0.005 0.10 NA NA NA NA NA

57 Sanatan Singha Gelia AL No Vulnerability 1 0.008 0.80 NA NA NA NA NA

58 Chinmoy Bit Jujur AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.005 0.76 NA NA NA NA NA

59 Bhairob Benerjee Jujur AL No Vulnerability 2.33 0.015 0.64 NA NA NA NA NA

60 Sadhan Roy Jujur AL No Vulnerability 0.02 0.005 25.00 NA NA NA NA NA

61 Asit Bit Jujur AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.003 1.88 NA NA NA NA NA

62 Asoke Benerjee Jujur AL No Vulnerability 2.33 0.002 0.09 NA NA NA NA NA

63 Abani Mohan

Middya Tanadighi AL Elderly+SC 4.66 0.013 0.28 NA NA NA NA NA

64 Swapan Nandi Tanadighi AL Disabled + SC 0.006 0.002 33.33 NA NA NA NA NA

65 Nimai Mondal Das Dighi AL Elderly 1.33 0.003 0.23 NA NA NA NA NA

66 Subhash Patre Chatrapara AL Elderly 0.01 0.004 40.00 NA NA NA NA NA

67 Susanta Pal Chatrapara AL Elderly 0.04 0.001 2.50 NA NA NA NA NA

68 Mono Ranjan De Tanadighi AL Elderly 0.004 0.001 25.00 NA NA NA NA NA

69 Pasupati Middya Tanadighi AL Elderly 0.007 0.002 28.57 NA NA NA NA NA

70 Sunil De Ruisahar AL Elderly 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA

71 Ranjan Kumar De Ruisahar AL Elderly 0.66 0.014 2.12 NA NA NA NA NA

72 Dilip De Ruisahar AL Elderly 0.66 0.023 3.48 NA NA NA NA NA

73 Sudhakar De Ruisahar AL Elderly 1.66 0.005 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

74 Madahab De Ruisahar AL Elderly 0.33 0.03 9.09 NA NA NA NA NA

75 Arun Chakarbati Jamsola AL Female Headed

Household 0.33 0.001 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

76 Ninai Paul Chatrapara AL No Vulnerability 0.824 0.013 1.58 NA NA NA NA NA

- 165 -

77 Gorachand Bag Digra AL Elderly+SC 0.66 0.007 1.06 NA NA NA NA NA

78 Madan Bag Digra AL Below Poverty Line +


79 Lalu Mondal Chatrapara AL Below Poverty Line +

Elderly 0.096 0.004 4.17 NA NA NA NA NA

80 Balaram Pal Chatrapara AL No Vulnerability 1.65 0.006 0.36 NA NA NA NA NA

81 Uttpal Mondal Ghat Sahor AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.006 3.75 NA NA NA NA NA

82 Sanjit Mondal Ghat Sahor AL No Vulnerability 0.49 0.015 3.06 NA NA NA NA NA

83 Rabi Mondal Ghat Sahor AL No Vulnerability 0.49 0.01 2.04 NA NA NA NA NA

84 Buda Mondal Ghat Sahor AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.005 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA

85 Rabi Pramanik Sujargad AL No Vulnerability 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA NA NA NA

86 Mahadeb Ghor Ijjatpur AL No Vulnerability 1 0.003 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

87 Sashanka

Mondal Ijjatpur AL No Vulnerability 1 0.013 1.30 NA NA NA NA NA

88 Subhash Dalla Bindabonpur AL No Vulnerability 3 0.02 0.67 NA NA NA NA NA

89 Sattakinkor Paul Bindabonpur AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.013 8.13 NA NA NA NA NA

90 Dilip Nandi Gelia AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.002 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA

91 Perulal Kundu Gelia AL No Vulnerability 1 0.009 0.90 NA NA NA NA NA

92 Ashok Bag Digra AL SC 0.33 0.012 3.64 NA NA NA NA NA

93 Raihan Sk Digra AL SC 0.825 0.02 2.42 NA NA NA NA NA

94 Manik Bag Digra AL SC 0.08 0.008 10.00 NA NA NA NA NA

95 Ajit Nand Gelia AL No Vulnerability 0.825 0.003 0.36 NA NA NA NA NA

96 Sadhan Nandi Gelia AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.001 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA

97 Santi Nandi Gelia AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.005 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

98 Nepal Nandi Gelia AL No Vulnerability 0.825 0.005 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA

99 Rakhal Nandi Gelia AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA

100 Madan Kole Dharampur AL SC 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA NA NA NA

101 Modan Nandi Gelia AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA

102 Anirudha Pal Gelia AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.002 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

- 166 -

103 Samsundur

Singha Gelia AL No Vulnerability 0.825 0.019 2.30 NA NA NA NA NA

104 Shambhu Nath

Lohar Sujargad AL SC 0.144 0.01 6.94 NA NA NA NA NA

105 Panchanan Dey Jujur AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.004 1.21 NA NA NA NA NA

106 Kali Das Lohar Bindabonpur AL SC 0.66 0.007 1.06 NA NA NA NA NA

107 Biswanath Lohar Bindabonpur AL SC 0.08 0.002 2.50 NA NA NA NA NA

108 Jitan Lohar Bindabonpur AL SC 0.5 0.001 0.20 NA NA NA NA NA

109 Talu Lohar Bindabonpur AL SC 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA

110 Gour Nandi Gelia AL SC 0.224 0.012 5.36 NA NA NA NA NA

111 Gayatri Tanadighi AL Elderly+SC 0.001 0.0001 10.00 NA NA NA NA NA

112 Gour Dey Tanadighi AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.005 0.38 NA NA NA NA NA

113 Haripada Sardar Tanadighi AL SC 0.096 0.007 7.29 NA NA NA NA NA

114 Gopal Sardar Tanadighi AL SC 0.33 0.006 1.82 NA NA NA NA NA

115 Pabir Rokit Ruisahar AL No Vulnerability 0.495 0.002 0.40 NA NA NA NA NA

116 Nepal Maji Ruisahar AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 0.495 0.006 1.21 NA NA NA NA NA

117 Ranajit Rokhit Ruisahar AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.002 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA

118 Shamal Majhi Ruisahar AL Disabled + SC 0.66 0.02 3.03 NA NA NA NA NA

119 Vadu Pal Ruisahar AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 0.16 0.01 6.25 NA NA NA NA NA

120 Haradhan Pal Ruisahar AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 0.825 0.01 1.21 NA NA NA NA NA

121 Mritu Mjaya

Pakre Ruisahar AL Elderly+SC 4 0.007 0.18 NA NA NA NA NA

122 Panchanan Pakre Ruisahar AL Below Poverty Line +

Disabled + SC 0.66 0.012 1.82 NA NA NA NA NA

123 Jaganath Pakre Ruisahar AL Elderly+SC 4 0.009 0.23 NA NA NA NA NA

124 Ananda Dey Ruisahar AL No Vulnerability 3.33 0.02 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA

125 Shambhu Pakre Ruisahar AL Elderly+SC 0.825 0.018 2.18 NA NA NA NA NA

126 Kamai De Ruisahar AL No Vulnerability 2.33 0.009 0.39 NA NA NA NA NA

- 167 -

127 Sandip De Ruisahar AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.001 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

128 Pawan Phavar Holdu AL SC 0.192 0.008 4.17 NA NA NA NA NA

129 Gunakor Lohar Dharampur AL SC 0.66 0.005 0.76 NA NA NA NA NA

130 Baul Lohar Bindabonpur AL SC 0.16 0.012 7.50 NA NA NA NA NA

131 Manoranjan

Midday Tanadighi AL SC 0.33 0.004 1.21 NA NA NA NA NA

132 Dibakar Sardar Tanadighi AL SC 0.495 0.003 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA

133 Balai Bag Tanadighi AL SC 2 0.006 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

134 Jaydeb Sardar Tanadighi AL SC 0.33 0.003 0.91 NA NA NA NA NA

135 Shayamapada

Sardar Tanadighi AL SC 0.66 0.002 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

136 Chadicharan

Sardar Tanadighi AL SC 0.096 0.008 8.33 NA NA NA NA NA

137 Uttam Maji Ruisahar AL SC 0.128 0.008 6.25 NA NA NA NA NA

138 Badal Santra Ruisahar AL SC 8.33 0.14 1.68 NA NA NA NA NA

139 Sadhon Pal Ruisahar AL SC 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA NA NA NA

140 Ashok Pakre Ruisahar AL SC 0.24 0.008 3.33 NA NA NA NA NA

141 Balai Pakre Ruisahar AL SC 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA NA NA NA

142 Kartik Malik Ruisahar AL SC 7.33 0.03 0.41 NA NA NA NA NA

143 Manmoto Pakre Ruisahar AL SC 0.16 0.008 5.00 NA NA NA NA NA

144 Manda Pakre Ruisahar AL SC 3.33 0.018 0.54 NA NA NA NA NA

145 Gautam Bani Ruisahar AL SC 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA NA NA NA

146 Murali Pakre Ruisahar AL SC 2.33 0.019 0.82 NA NA NA NA NA

147 Ananda Pakre Ruisahar AL SC 0.495 0.012 2.42 NA NA NA NA NA

148 Bhaskar Santra Shyamdaspur AL Below Poverty Line 0.056 0.007 12.50 NA NA NA NA NA

149 Kartick Santra Shyamdaspur AL Below Poverty Line 0.16 0.002 1.25 NA NA NA NA NA

150 Kabil Mandal Bogsora AL No Vulnerability 0.08 0.001 1.25 NA NA NA NA NA

151 Amar Lohar Shyamdaspur AL Below Poverty Line +


- 168 -

152 Pasupati Santra Shyamdaspur AL Elderly+SC 0.032 0.01 31.25 NA NA NA NA NA

153 Biswanath Roy Shyamdaspur AL Elderly 1.33 0.003 0.23 NA NA NA NA NA

154 Shivdas Shikari Shyamdaspur AL Elderly+SC 0.495 0.01 2.02 NA NA NA NA NA

155 Tapan Shikari Shyamdaspur AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 0.192 0.013 6.77 NA NA NA NA NA

156 Sudhir Lohar Shyamnagar AL Below Poverty Line +

SC 1 0.02 2.00 NA NA NA NA NA

157 Rabindranath

Guin Shyamnagar AL No Vulnerability 0.825 0.009 1.09 NA NA NA NA NA

158 Alok Chakarbarti Shyamnagar AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.03 9.09 NA NA NA NA NA

159 Debiprasade De Shyamnagar AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.02 6.06 NA NA NA NA NA

160 Amol Chakrabarti Shyamnagar AL No Vulnerability 1 0.013 1.30 NA NA NA NA NA

161 Jaladhar Lohar Shyamdaspur AL SC 0.495 0.01 2.02 NA NA NA NA NA

162 Mathur Lohar Shyamdaspur AL SC 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA

163 Sunil Lohar Shyamdaspur AL SC 0.66 0.009 1.36 NA NA NA NA NA

164 Mahadeb Sikari Shyamdaspur AL SC 0.16 0.001 0.63 NA NA NA NA NA

165 Suduangsu Dara Shyamnagar AL SC 0.33 0.016 4.85 NA NA NA NA NA

166 Prasanta Bit Jujur AL + R (BW +

L) No Vulnerability 1.33 0.004 0.30 NA NA 809.4 12 1.48

167 Mahadeb Majhi Ruisahar AL + R (BW +

L) SC 1.33 0.006 0.45 NA NA 161.88 30

18.53

168 Fatik Bani Ruisahar AL + R (BW +

L) SC 0.825 0.004 0.48 NA NA 64.752 14

21.62

169 Bhutnath Nayak Ruisahar AL + R

(L) No Vulnerability 3.33 0.02 0.60 NA NA 323.76 7.5 2.32

170 Subhsh Mondal Ijjatpur AL + T No Vulnerability 0.112 0.011 9.82 NA 10 NA NA NA

171 Dilip Ghosh Bogsora AL + T No Vulnerability 0.24 0.002 0.83 NA 2 NA NA NA

172 Habala Chandra

Bit Jujur

AL + T + R

No Vulnerability 0.14 0.006 4.29 2 NA 40.47 16.5 40.7

7

- 169 -

(BW + L)

173 Bijali Lohar Sujargad R (BW

+ L) Elderly+SC NA NA NA NA NA 518.01 25.5 4.92

174 Madan Lohar Bindabonpur R (BW

+ L) Below Poverty Line +

Disabled + SC NA NA NA NA NA 259.008 39

15.06

175 Basudeb Khan Jujur R (BW

+ L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 202.35 37

18.29

176 Samapada

Madday Jujur

R (BW + L)

SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 16 39.5

4

177 Netta Pakre Ruisahar R (BW

+ L) Below Poverty Line + ST NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 19.5

48.18

178 Tarok Nath Pakre Ruisahar R (BW

+ L) Below Poverty Line +

SC NA NA NA NA NA 80.94 27

33.36

179 Santi Roy Jujur R (BW


61.77

180 Rosomoy Bayen Ruisahar R (BW


35.52

181 Renu Bala Ghosh Ijjatpur R (L) Female Headed


NA NA NA NA NA 129.504 21 16.2

2

182 Donnjoy Lohar Bindabonpur R (L) Below Poverty Line +

SC NA NA NA NA NA 259.008 18 6.95

183 Sakti Lohar Bindabonpur R (L) Below Poverty Line +

Disabled + SC NA NA NA NA NA 64.752 6 9.27

184 Gour Karmakar Ruisahar R (L) No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA 101.17 12 11.8

6

185 Bonsi Lohar Bindabonpur R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 60.705 17 28.0

0

186 Donnjoy Dey Bindabonpur R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 129.504 27 20.8

5

187 Milan Pakre Ruisahar R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 129.5 18 13.9

0

188 Joshana Khan Jujur T SC NA NA NA 3 NA NA NA NA

189 Sanatan Dey Jujur T + R (BW +

No Vulnerability NA NA NA 7 NA 28.32 9 31.7

8

- 170 -

L)

190 Sankar Roy Jujur T + R (BW +

L)


NA NA NA NA 1 60.705 22 36.2

4

191 Jajti Majhi Ruisahar T + R (BW +

L)


NA NA NA NA 10 60.705 32 52.7

1


A total of 191 APs were found along the Joypur to Gelia road section. Of these total APs 15 APs would lose more than one of their assets. These

include agricultural land, residential assets (boundary wall and land) as well as trees. Majority (172 APs) would bear an impct on their agricultural

land.

Further only 71 APs were found to be suffering from no vulnerability. 15 APs would lose more than 10% of their agricultural land and of these 1 AP

would lose all his land.

Table 4: Road Name: T-10 (Dhengram To Bishanpur) ; District- Bankura Total Number of APs- 53

Absentees-6

- 171 -

Sr

No

Nam

e O

f T

he R

eg

istr

ati

on

Ho

lder

Nam

e O

f T

he V

illa

ge

Typ

e O

f L

oss

Vu

lnera

bilit

y

To

tal L

an

d H

old

ing

To

tal L

an

d L

oss

% O

f L

oss

Fru

it B

ea

rin

g T

rees

Fu

rnit

ure

/In

du

str

y/T

imb

er

Tre

es

To

tal R

esid

en

tial

Str

uctu

re

To

tal A

ffecte

d R

esid

en

tial

Str

uctu

re

% O

f L

oss

To

tal A

ffecte

d C

om

me

rcia

l

Lan

d (

Resi C

um

Co

mm

)

To

tal A

ffecte

d C

om

me

rcia

l

Lan

d (

Resi C

um

Co

mm

)

% O

f L

oss

To

tal C

om

merc

ial

Str

uctu

re

(Resi C

um

Co

mm

)

To

tal A

ffecte

d S

tru

ctu

re (

Resi

Cu

m C

om

m)

% O

f L

oss

1 Sankar Dule Sonagar

a AL

Below Poverty

Line + SC 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

2 Chobi Ram

Mondal Sonagar

a AL

Female Headed

Household + ST

1.32 0.002 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

3 Ananada Mondal

Sonagara

AL

Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + SC

1 0.08 8.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

4 Aditya Kalindi Sonagar

a AL


Elderly + SC

0.01 0.002 20.0

0 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

5 Jagannath

Mondal Sonagar

a AL



6 Uttam Mohoto Dunder AL No

Vulnerability 1 0.012 1.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 172 -

7 Baglo Mohoto Dunder AL Below

Poverty Line + ST

0.07 0.01 14.2


8 Tinku Mohoto Dunder AL Below

Poverty Line + ST


9 Krisnapada

Mohoto Bishanp

ur AL

No Vulnerability


10 Aboni Mohoto Bishanp

ur AL

No Vulnerability


11 Bhim Mohoto Bishanp

ur AL Disabled 4 0.007 0.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

12 Mohipal Mohoto

Dunder AL Elderly 0.82


13 Bhadratanu

Mohoto Bishanp

ur AL Elderly 2 0.027 1.35 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

14 Pravanjan

Mohoto Bishanp

ur AL Elderly 3.33 0.007 0.21 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

15 Satyaban Mohoto

Bishanpur

AL Elderly 2.66 0.007 0.26 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

16 Roshorai Mohoto

Bishanpur

AL Elderly 2.66 0.004 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

17 Bibhuti Mohoto

Bishanpur

AL Elderly 2 0.007 0.35 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

18 Rohini Mohoto Bishanp

ur AL Elderly 6.66 0.03 0.45 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

19 Jagannath

Mohoto Dunder AL

No Vulnerability


20 Haripoda Mohoto

Dunder AL Below

Poverty Line + ST


21 Susil Mohoto Bishanp

ur AL

No Vulnerability


22 Paritosh Mohoto

Dunder AL ST 6.6 0.023 0.35 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

23 Anath Mandal Dunder AL ST 0.66 0.23 34.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 173 -

5

24 Satyo Mohoto Dunder AL ST 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

25 Sanathan Mohoto

Dunder AL ST 1.33 0.002 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

26 Gorachand

Sardar Sardarp

ara AL


Elderly + ST

0.16 0.03 18.7


27 Bankim Sardar

Sardarpara

AL Below

Poverty Line + ST


28 Jadunath Mondal

Sonagara

AL ST 1.65 0.012 0.73 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

29 Amit Mohoto Dunder AL ST 1 0.003 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

30 Laxmi Mohoto Dunder AL ST 1 0.004 0.40 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

31 Kesto Mohoto Dunder AL ST 2.64 0.009 0.34 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

32 Sunil Soren Koramb

era AL

Below Poverty

Line + ST

0.128

0.011 8.59 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

33 Devi Todo Koramb

era AL

Female Headed

Household +Below Poverty Line +

Elderly + ST

0.112

0.002 1.79 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

34 Nirmal Sardar Koramb

era AL


Elderly + ST


35 Sonathan Mondal

Sonagara

R (BW)

Below Poverty

NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 0.7 1.73 NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 174 -

Line + SC

36 Ananda Murmu

Sonagara

R (BW)

Elderly + ST

NA NA NA NA NA 202.3

5 28

13.84

NA NA NA NA NA NA

37 Rabi Mohoto Dunder R

(BW)

Below Poverty

Line + ST NA NA NA NA NA

60.705

30 49.4

2 NA NA NA NA NA NA

38 Biswanath

Mohoto Bishanp

ur R

(BW) No

Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA

202.35

17.5 8.65 NA NA NA NA NA NA

39 Samadodo

Mahato Bishanp

ur R

(BW) No

Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA

202.35

32 15.8

1 NA NA NA NA NA NA

40 Bolabhandra

Hemron Dhengra

m R

(BW) Elderly +

ST NA NA NA NA NA

242.82

42 17.3

0 NA NA NA NA NA NA

41 Baidyanath

Soren Dhengra

m R

(BW)

Below Poverty


121.41

20 16.4

7 NA NA NA NA NA NA

42 Shivnath

Patro Dhengra

m R

(BW) Elderly NA NA NA NA NA

202.35

14 6.92 NA NA NA NA NA NA

43 Abani Paul Dunder R

(BW) No

Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 15

37.06

NA NA NA NA NA NA

44 Akul Mohoto Bishanp

ur R

(BW) No

Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA 80.94 13

16.06

NA NA NA NA NA NA

45 Jiten Hemron Dhengra

m R

(BW)


Elderly+ ST


6 42

12.97

NA NA NA NA NA NA

46 Tanaki Soren Dhengra

m R

(BW)

Below Poverty


121.41


47 Atul Hemron Dhengra

m R

(BW)


Elderly + ST

NA NA NA NA NA 1335.

51 15 1.12 NA NA NA NA NA NA

48 Loso

Hembram Dhengra

m R

(BW)




- 175 -

Elderly + ST

49 Dhanakrishna

Hemron Dhengra

m R

(BW)


Elderly + ST


2 52.5 8.11 NA NA NA NA NA NA

50 Kesob

Hemron Dhengra

m R

(BW) Elderly +

ST NA NA NA NA NA

161.88

22 13.5

9 NA NA NA NA NA NA

51 Bablu Murmu Koramb

era R

(BW)


Elderly + ST



52 Baren Kisku Sonagar

a RC (S)


Elderly + ST

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.008 0.00

1 12.5

0 15 0.001 0.01

53 Sanjay Mahat Dunder T ST NA NA NA NA 30 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA


II. BURDWAN DISTRICT

Table 5: Road Name: Joy Krishnapur To Gobindpur ; District- Burdwan Total Number of APs- 113

Absentees-5 (7 APs did not give their consent for Voluntary land donation)

Sr No

Name Of The Registration Holder

Name Of The Village

Type Of Loss

Vulnerability Total Land

Holding

Total Land Loss

% Of Loss

Fruit Bearing Trees

Furniture/Industry/Timber

Trees

Total Residen

tial Structur

e

Total Affected Residenti

al Structure

% Of Loss

1 Sadananda Ghosh Baranda AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.008 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA

2 Sibu Garai Baranda AL No Vulnerability 3.33 0.008 0.24 NA NA NA NA NA

- 176 -

3 Dababrata Ghosh Baranda AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.009 5.63 NA NA NA NA NA

4 Skirahamatulla Baranda AL No Vulnerability 3.33 0.01 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

5 Rabindranath Mondal Baranda AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.008 1.21 NA NA NA NA NA

6 Fani Vusan Sarder Baranda AL Below Poverty Line

+ Disabled + SC 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA NA NA NA

7 Ajit Mondal Baranda AL Disabled + Elderly 3.33 0.005 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA

8 Narayan Ghosh Baranda AL No Vulnerability 1.65 0.007 0.42 NA NA NA NA NA

9 Dilip Ghosh Baranda AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.01 6.25 NA NA NA NA NA

10 Dayal Hari Ghosh Baranda AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA

11 Saday Ghosh Baranda AL No Vulnerability 0.49 0.01 2.04 NA NA NA NA NA

12 Bansi Badan Ghosh Baranda AL No Vulnerability 0.14 0.003 2.14 NA NA NA NA NA

13 Nabakumar Pal Baranda AL Disabled + Elderly 8.66 0.09 1.04 NA NA NA NA NA

14 Nemai Boura Baranda AL No Vulnerability 5 0.004 0.08 NA NA NA NA NA

15 Samsul Faruki Baranda AL Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly 1.66 0.01 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA

16 Manab Boura Baranda AL No Vulnerability 1 0.016 1.60 NA NA NA NA NA

17 Enayet Sheikh Ukta AL No Vulnerability 2 0.011 0.55 NA NA NA NA NA

18 Baidayanath Garai Ukta AL Elderly+SC 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA NA NA NA

19 Kalipada Tudu Ukta AL Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + ST 0.33 0.05 15.15 NA NA NA NA NA

20 Sk Mehar Ukta AL No Vulnerability 1 0.03 3.00 NA NA NA NA NA

21 Sajidur Mondal Ukta AL No Vulnerability 2 0.02 1.00 NA NA NA NA NA

22 Bllal Mirja Ukta AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.009 1.36 NA NA NA NA NA

23 Rahim Molla Ukta AL No Vulnerability 0.28 0.01 3.57 NA NA NA NA NA

24 Mitai Pandit Ukta AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.02 6.06 NA NA NA NA NA

25 Sk Mofijur Ukta AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.03 2.26 NA NA NA NA NA

26 Ratan Majhi Govinda Pur AL Disabled + SC 0.08 0.007 8.75 NA NA NA NA NA

27 Bablu Majhi Govinda Pur AL Elderly+SC 0.24 0.009 3.75 NA NA NA NA NA

28 Rokata Mondal Govinda Pur AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.003 0.18 NA NA NA NA NA

- 177 -

29 Nirmol Mondal Govinda Pur AL No Vulnerability 1 0.012 1.20 NA NA NA NA NA

30 Tarun Mondal Govinda Pur AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.016 0.96 NA NA NA NA NA

31 Narayan Ghosh Govinda Pur AL No Vulnerability 1.32 0.006 0.45 NA NA NA NA NA

32 Sabhunath Majhi Govinda Pur AL Elderly+SC 0.04 0.003 7.50 NA NA NA NA NA

33 Durgaprasad Mondal Govinda Pur AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.007 0.42 NA NA NA NA NA

34 Samsul Mallik Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 2.66 0.008 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

35 Sk Badra Alam Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 0.24 0.24 100.0

0 NA NA NA NA NA

36 Lutai Shah Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 3.33 0.002 0.06 NA NA NA NA NA

37 Sk Surab Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 4 0.021 0.53 NA NA NA NA NA

38 Badre Alam Mallik Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 0.27 0.019 7.04 NA NA NA NA NA

39 Kazi Ajijur Rahaman Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 2 0.01 0.50 NA NA NA NA NA

40 Sk Md Musa Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 4.33 0.012 0.28 NA NA NA NA NA

41 Abdul Sattar Mallik Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 5 0.029 0.58 NA NA NA NA NA

42 Ab Salam Mallik Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 6.66 0.008 0.12 NA NA NA NA NA

43 Rashid Shiekh Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 0.5 0.003 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA

44 Badrul Mallik Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 5 0.02 0.40 NA NA NA NA NA

45 Sairjul Mallik Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 4 0.009 0.23 NA NA NA NA NA

46 Sk Abdul Azim Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 3.33 0.009 0.27 NA NA NA NA NA

47 Sk Asrof Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 3.33 0.012 0.36 NA NA NA NA NA

48 Monirul Ahque Mallik Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 4.33 0.072 1.66 NA NA NA NA NA

49 Ismail Shiekh Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.005 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA

50 Anish Mallik Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 0.82 0.006 0.73 NA NA NA NA NA

51 Subodh Mondal Baranda AL Elderly 5.66 0.03 0.53 NA NA NA NA NA

52 Sitanath Mondal Baranda AL Elderly 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA

53 Jagadish Mondal Baranda AL Elderly 3.33 0.008 0.24 NA NA NA NA NA

54 Asim Mondal Baranda AL Elderly 1.66 0.01 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA

55 Memai Mondal Baranda AL Elderly 2.66 0.001 0.04 NA NA NA NA NA

- 178 -

56 Asim Ghosh Baranda AL Elderly 0.64 0.004 0.63 NA NA NA NA NA

57 Sanatan Ghosh Baranda AL Elderly 4.29 0.007 0.16 NA NA NA NA NA

58 Sadhan Ghosh Baranda AL Elderly 0.73 0.009 1.23 NA NA NA NA NA

59 Mohadeb Mondal Baranda AL Elderly 2.33 0.031 1.33 NA NA NA NA NA

60 Sannasi Mondal Baranda AL Elderly 2.33 0.02 0.86 NA NA NA NA NA

61 Baidayanath Pal Ukta AL Elderly 1.15 0.03 2.61 NA NA NA NA NA

62 Sk Hamid Ukta AL Elderly 1 0.031 3.10 NA NA NA NA NA

63 Samsur Mirja Ukta AL Elderly 1 0.01 1.00 NA NA NA NA NA

64 Sk Insan Ukta AL Elderly 2.66 0.01 0.38 NA NA NA NA NA

65 Alauddin Mondal Ukta AL Elderly 0.24 0.008 3.33 NA NA NA NA NA

66 Sk Anich Ukta AL Elderly 0.74 0.01 1.35 NA NA NA NA NA

67 Fatik Mondal Govinda Pur AL Elderly 3 0.008 0.27 NA NA NA NA NA

68 Rafk Shiekh Pichkuri AL Elderly 0.5 0.003 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA

69 Buran San Pichkuri AL Elderly 0.16 0.01 6.25 NA NA NA NA NA

70 Amir Ali Shiekh Pichkuri AL Elderly 1 0.005 0.50 NA NA NA NA NA

71 Sk Sirjul Pichkuri AL Elderly 0.24 0.006 2.50 NA NA NA NA NA

72 Madu Mallik Pichkuri AL Elderly 1 0.008 0.80 NA NA NA NA NA

73 Anarul Haqmalah Pichkuri AL Elderly 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA

74 Sk Sambir Ali Pichkuri AL Elderly 0.82 0.004 0.49 NA NA NA NA NA

75 Manik Mondal Baranda AL Elderly 5 0.01 0.20 NA NA NA NA NA

76 Ragu Nath Mondal Baranda AL Elderly 2.31 0.01 0.43 NA NA NA NA NA

77 Akbar Shiekh Ukta AL Elderly 0.08 0.004 5.00 NA NA NA NA NA

78 Samsul Alam Ukta AL Elderly 8.33 0.006 0.07 NA NA NA NA NA

79 Rustam Mondol Ukta AL Elderly 5 0.018 0.36 NA NA NA NA NA

80 Narayan Gharai Ukta AL Elderly 3 0.039 1.30 NA NA NA NA NA

81 Udoy Mondal Govinda Pur AL Elderly 6.66 0.001 0.02 NA NA NA NA NA

82 Samsunder Mondal Govinda Pur AL Elderly 3.33 0.016 0.48 NA NA NA NA NA

- 179 -

83 Tarak Ghosh Govinda Pur AL Elderly 0.72 0.009 1.25 NA NA NA NA NA

84 Asraf Sk Pichkuri AL Elderly 0.12 0.007 5.83 NA NA NA NA NA

85 Abdul Hamid Sk Pichkuri AL Elderly 1 0.006 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA

86 Yusuf Sk Pichkuri AL Elderly 0.49 0.01 2.04 NA NA NA NA NA

87 Durjadhan Kormokar Baranda AL Below Poverty Line

+ SC 3.33 0.018 0.54 NA NA NA NA NA

88 Nurul Sheikh Baranda AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.001 0.06 NA NA NA NA NA

89 Nemai Boura Baranda AL No Vulnerability 4 0.005 0.13 NA NA NA NA NA

90 Gour Ghosh Baranda AL No Vulnerability 0.09 0.005 5.56 NA NA NA NA NA

91 Uttam Ghosh Baranda AL Disabled + Elderly 0.16 0.007 4.38 NA NA NA NA NA

92 Hemanta Ghosh Baranda AL No Vulnerability 0.73 0.005 0.68 NA NA NA NA NA

93 Bipodatrani Boura Baranda AL No Vulnerability 3.33 0.001 0.03 NA NA NA NA NA

94 Mongla Tudu Ukta AL Elderly + ST 12.8 0.036 0.28 NA NA NA NA NA

95 Ajit Mete Ukta AL Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC 0.33 0.02 6.06 NA NA NA NA NA

96 Kanchan Chaudhury Ukta AL No Vulnerability 0.69 0.01 1.45 NA NA NA NA NA

97 Nowsad Mollkk Ukta AL No Vulnerability 3.33 0.02 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA

98 Mahadev

Bhattachariya Ukta AL No Vulnerability 0.27 0.017 6.30 NA NA NA NA NA

99 Mohiuddin Mirja Ukta AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.005 0.76 NA NA NA NA NA

100 Ismail Shiekh Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 0.24 0.03 12.50 NA NA NA NA NA

101 Sk Asgar Ali Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 2 0.005 0.25 NA NA NA NA NA

102 Eusuf Mallik Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.008 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA

103 Serajul Shiekh Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.017 10.63 NA NA NA NA NA

104 Sahidulla Mallik Pichkuri AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.012 0.72 NA NA NA NA NA

105 Gautam Majhi Govinda Pur AL SC 0.24 0.009 3.75 NA NA NA NA NA

106 Ajit Majhi Govinda Pur AL SC 0.08 0.007 8.75 NA NA NA NA NA

107 Sukumar Meta Baranda AL SC 0.032 0.005 15.63 NA NA NA NA NA

108 Pachai Sheikh Ukta AL SC 0.16 0.03 18.75 NA NA NA NA NA

- 180 -

109 Sk Rafik Ukta AL SC 2.33 0.008 0.34 NA NA NA NA NA

110 Kuddu Pramanik Pichkuri AL SC 1.66 0.019 1.14 NA NA NA NA NA

111 Miitunjoy Bakshi Govinda Pur R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA NA NA 121.41 24 19.77

112 Sk Abdur Hai Ukta R (BW) No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA 445.17 35 7.86

113 Sk Hanai Ukta T + R (BW)

No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA 15 1335.51 66.25 4.96


Along the Joykrishnapur to Gobindpur road section, 113 APs were surveyed. Of these 113 APs, 57 did not suffer from any vulnerability while 14

suffered from multiple vulnerabilities. Further only 3 APs bore an impact on their residential assets (boundary wall) while only 1 would lose trees. Rest

of the 110 APs would bear an impact on their agriculture land. Only 6 APs would bear an impact on more than 10% of their land. Further one of the

AP from Pichkuri village would lose 100% of his agriculture land. He does not suffer from any vulnerability. Table 5 above enumerates the data for

APs along this road section.

Table 6: Road Name: Uttar Laxmipur To Tanaghata Ferry Ghat; District- Burdwan Total Number of APs- 52

Absentees-0

- 181 -

New

S.N

o

Nam

e O

f T

he R

eg

istr

ati

on

Ho

lder

Nam

e O

f T

he V

illa

ge

Typ

e O

f L

oss

Vu

lnera

bilit

y

To

tal L

an

d H

old

ing

To

tal L

an

d L

oss

% O

f L

oss

Fru

it B

ea

rin

g T

rees G

ett

ing

Aff

ecte

d

Fu

rnit

ure

/In

du

str

y/T

imb

er

Tre

es

To

tal R

esid

en

tial L

an

d

To

tal A

ffecte

d R

esid

en

tial

Lan

d

% O

f L

oss

To

tal R

esid

en

tial

Str

uctu

re

To

tal A

ffecte

d R

esid

en

tial

Str

uctu

re

% O

f L

oss

To

tal A

ffecte

d C

om

me

rcia

l L

an

d

To

tal A

ffecte

d C

om

me

rcia

l L

an

d

% O

f L

oss

To

tal C

om

merc

ial

Str

uctu

re

To

tal A

ffecte

d S

tru

ctu

re

% O

f L

oss

1 Muthun Sarkar Tamaghata R (BW + L) Below

Poverty Line


52 32.1

2 NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

2 Radhacharan

Roy Tamaghata R (BW + L)


Elderly + SC

NA NA NA

NA NA 445.17


NA NA NA

3 Sankar Kundu Tamaghata R (BW + L) No

Vulnerability

NA NA NA

NA NA 485.64


NA NA NA

4 Gopal Sarkar Tamaghata R (BW + L)


NA NA NA

NA NA 647.53


NA NA NA

5 Sunil Kirtaniya Tamaghata R (BW + L) No

Vulnerability

NA NA NA

NA NA 647.52


NA NA NA

6 Shamacharan

Roy Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly+SC NA NA

NA NA NA

453.26


NA NA NA

- 182 -

7 Ganesh Mondal Tamaghata R (BW + L) No

Vulnerability

NA NA NA

NA NA 242.82

28.5 11.7

4 NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

8 Sachin Biswas Tamaghata R (BW + L)


Disabled + Elderly

NA NA NA

NA NA 194.27


NA NA NA

9 Pairag Mondal Tamaghata R (BW + L) No

Vulnerability

NA NA NA

NA NA 259.008

34.5 13.3

2 NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

10 Karana Sen Tamaghata R (BW + L) No

Vulnerability

NA NA NA

NA NA 323.76


NA NA NA

11 Vim Biswas Tamaghata R (BW + L) Disabled + Elderly +

SC NA NA

NA NA NA

323.76


NA NA NA

12 Bothnath Kittyania

Tamaghata R (BW + L)


Disabled + Elderly

NA NA NA

NA NA 129

5 30 2.32 NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

13 Haripada Sarkar Tamaghata R (BW + L) No

Vulnerability

NA NA NA

NA NA 194.26


NA NA NA

14 Sudir Biswas Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly+SC NA NA NA

NA NA 194.26


NA NA NA

15 Kalipada Mondal

Tamaghata R (BW + L)


NA NA NA

NA NA 323.76

48 14.8

3 NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

16 Sufal Biswas Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly+SC NA NA NA

NA NA 260 22.5 8.65 NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA

17 Ram Gopal

Biswas Tamaghata R (BW + L)

Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA

NA NA NA

1036.032


NA NA NA

- 183 -

18 Dinobondhu

Kirtaniya Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly NA NA

NA NA NA

485.64

51 10.5

0 NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

19 Bhaba Sarkar Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly NA NA NA

NA NA 687.99


NA NA NA

20 Gopal Sarkar Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly NA NA NA

NA NA 2003.26


NA NA NA

21 Ramprasad

Mondal Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly NA NA

NA NA NA

194.25


NA NA NA

22 Mahadev Biswas

Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly NA NA NA

NA NA 647.52


NA NA NA

23 Sital Biswas Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly NA NA NA

NA NA 194.26

30 15.4

4 NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

24 Narayan Pal Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly NA NA NA

NA NA 194.27


NA NA NA

25 Paresh Ch Sen Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly NA NA NA

NA NA 388.51


NA NA NA

26 Uttam Mondal Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly NA NA NA

NA NA 129.5

36.75 28.3

8 NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

27 Noni Gopal Roy Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly+SC NA NA NA

NA NA 445.17

63 14.1

5 NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

28 Jotai Kittyania Tamaghata R (BW + L) Disabled +

Elderly NA NA

NA NA NA

647.52


NA NA NA

29 Mohdev Biswas Tamaghata R (BW + L) Elderly+SC NA NA NA

NA NA 1335.51


NA NA NA

30 Bishaka Ghosh Laxmipur R (BW)

Female Headed

Household + Elderly

NA NA NA


8 2.47

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

31 Charan Sarkar Alunirmath AL + T + R

(BW)


Elderly + SC

0.33 0.13

39.3

9 NA 30 NA NA NA 194.26

68 35.00

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

- 184 -

32 Dasarath Mondal

Alunirmath R (BW) Below

Poverty Line + SC

NA NA NA


62 51.07

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

33 Thakurdas

Mondal Alunirmath

AL + T + R (BW)


Elderly + SC

0.24 0.04

6

19.1

7 NA 3 NA NA NA 121.41

72 59.30

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

34 Subal Mondal Alunirmath AL + R (BW)

Disabled + Elderly +

SC 1.66 0.18

10.8

4 NA NA NA NA NA 647.52

87.75

13.55

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

35 Ramprasad

Mondal Alunirmath R (BW)


Elderly + SC

NA NA NA


42 12.97

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

36 Sunil Mondal Alunirmath R (BW)


Elderly + SC

NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA 129.

5 52

40.15

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

37 Parsh Chandra

Mondal Alunirmath AL

Disabled + Elderly +

SC 2.33 0.01

0.43 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

38 Nitai Ghosh Laxmipur AL Elderly 3.3 0.02

2 0.67

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA

39 Naresh Mondal Alunirmath T + R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA

NA 30 NA NA NA 121.41

40.5 33.36

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

40 Suryakanta

Mondal Alunirmath R (BW) SC NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

453.27

64 14.12

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

41 Bapi Sarkar Alunirmath AL SC 0.33 0.03

2 9.70


NA NA NA

42 Niranjan Sarkar Alunirmath T + R (BW) SC NA NA NA

NA 30 NA NA NA 1092.7

80 7.32

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

- 185 -

43 Mittunjoy Sarkar Alunirmath AL SC 0.33 0.00

7 2.12


NA NA NA

44 Kamal Roy Mazida AL SC 0.33 0.00

9 2.73


NA NA NA

45 Babu Roy Mazida AL SC 0.33 0.01

2 3.64


NA NA NA

46 Kartik Roy Mazida AL SC 0.16 0.00

6 3.75


NA NA NA

47 Ramprasad Rajbonshi

Mazida AL SC 0.02 0.01

50.0


NA NA NA

48 Saied Mallick Mazida C (S)


NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 27 10

37.04

27 10 37.0

4

49 Ayub Shek Mazida AL No

Vulnerability

1 0.00

9 0.90


NA NA NA

50 Anup Kumar

Ghora Mazida AL

No Vulnerabilit

y 0.33

0.009

2.73 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA NA

51 Santi Raj Bonshi

Mazida AL


Elderly + SC

0.33 0.00

9 2.73


NA NA NA

52 Rahim Shek Mazida AL No

Vulnerability

0.66 0.00

9 1.36


NA NA NA


As seen in table 6 above, there are 52 APs which were identified along this road section. Of these 52 APs, only 15 of them are losing their

agricultural land. Further 4 APs would lose more than 10% of their land. 39 APs would lose their residential assets while one AP would lose

commercial asset (main structure). Except for 9 APs rest of the APs were found to be suffering from various type of vulnerabilities.

- 186 -

III. JALPAIGURI DISTRICT

Table 7: Road Name: T05 At Bikasnagar To Rajfapri; District- Jalpaiguri Total Number of APs- 1

Absentees-0

Sr No

Name Of The

Registration Holder

Name of Respondent

Name Of The Village


Total Commerci

al Structure

Total Affected Structure

% of Loss

1 Govt Land Usha Saha Kolachand Pahari C (S) Below Poverty

Line + SC 20 20 100


As seen in table 7 above, there is only AP along this road section who would bear an impact on their commercial asset (main structure). The AP

stands to lose 100% of their asset. It is important to note that the land on which this asset is constructed belongs to the government.

Table 8: Road Name: Ranicherra Tea Garden To Paschim Damdim District- Jalpaiguri


New S.No Name Of The Registration

Holder

Name Of The

Village

Type Of Loss

Vulnerability Total

Commercial Structure

Total Affected Structure

% of Loss

1 Bablu Topo Balabari C (BW) ST 27 6 22.22%


Only 1 AP would be affected along the Ranichera tea Garden to Paschim Damdim road section. As seen in table 8, the AP belongs to ST group and

would lose the boundary wall of his commercial asset.

- 187 -

Table 9: Road Name: T 14 At Sarkarpara To Munshipara District- Jalpaiguri


Sr No

Name Of The

Registration Holder

Name Of The Village


Total Land

Holding

Total Land Loss

% Of Loss

Fruit Bearin

g Trees

Furniture/Industry/Timber Trees

Total Reside

ntial Land

Total Affecte

d Reside

ntial Land

% Of Loss

Total Commercial Struct

ure

Total Affecte

d Struct

ure

% Of

Loss

1 Anaruddin

Haque Chetnai

Tola AL Below Poverty Line 2 0.002 0.10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

2 Rowson Ali Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.003 0.91 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

3 Umar Ali Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line 3.33 0.01 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

4 Barun Roy Satkhamar AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.008 2.42 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

5 Afijuddin

Chaur Chandi Kamat AL Below Poverty Line 3.33 0.008 0.24 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

6 Khirul Haque Amtola AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.15 45.4


7 Samsul Rehman Amtola AL Below Poverty Line 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

8 Hafizul Haque Amtola AL Below Poverty Line 0.66 0.005 0.76 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

9 Ajijul Haque Amtola AL Below Poverty Line 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

10 Kabul

Hussain Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line 0.66 0.03 4.55 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

11 Muzibor Rehman Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.002 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

12 Moinul Haque Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.005 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

13 Bimal Barua Baruapara AL Disabled 0.33 0.007 2.12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

14 Dhiru Pati

Roy Nagarpara AL Below Poverty Line

+ SC 1 0.003 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 188 -

15 Montu Roy Nagarpara AL Elderly+SC 1.66 0.01 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

16 Lakhindar

Roy Munshipara AL Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC 2.66 0.005 0.19 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

17 Sunil Roy Amtola AL Below Poverty Line

+ SC 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

18 Solaman Ali Amtola AL No Vulnerability 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

19 Jainul Haque Amtola AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.016 4.85 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

20 Samsuddin

Ahamed Fautiwapar

a AL Disabled + SC 4.66 0.02 0.43 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

21 Chandra

Mohan Roy Fautiwapar

a AL Below Poverty Line


22 Keshab Roy Chetnai

Tola AL Elderly+SC 3.33 0.01 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

23 Akbar Ali Chetnai

Tola AL No Vulnerability 3.33 0.009 0.27 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

24 Deben Roy Chetnai

Tola AL Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC 1 0.01 1.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

25 Kalipada

Barua Baruapara AL Below Poverty Line


26 Chitan Roy Dangpara AL Below Poverty Line


27 Hiran Roy Dangpara AL Below Poverty Line


28 Prosonna

Roy Dangpara AL Below Poverty Line


29 Samiruddin

Md Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly 0.33 0.001 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

30 Bata Md Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly 0.33 0.001 0.30 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

31 Samiul Haque Sarkarpara AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.003 0.91 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

32 Makbul Rehman Sarkarpara AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.001 0.08 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

33 Sunil Sarkar Satkhamar AL Below Poverty Line


- 189 -

34 Anath Das Satkhamar AL Below Poverty Line


35 Pramila Roy Satkhamar AL Below Poverty Line


36 Dullal Roy Satkhamar AL Below Poverty Line


37 Akbar Ali

Chaur Chandi Kamat AL

Below Poverty Line + Elderly 2 0.008 0.40 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

38 Dipak Roy


Below Poverty Line + SC 1 0.001 0.10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

39 Prasanna

Roy Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line


40 Kalu Roy Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line


41 Balen Roy Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line


42 Jatin Roy Munshipara AL Elderly 0.33 0.004 1.21 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

43 Ramkumar

Roy Munshipara AL Below Poverty Line

+ SC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

44 Ukil Roy Amtola AL Below Poverty Line


45 Susil Roy Amtola AL Below Poverty Line


46 Irshad Ali Amtola AL Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly 1 0.004 0.40 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

47 Suresh Roy Baruapara AL SC 0.33 0.009 2.73 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

48 Kanai Roy Baruapara AL SC 4.33 0.01 0.23 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

49 Nirendra Nath Roy Baruapara AL SC 4.33 0.004 0.09 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

50 Niren Barua Baruapara AL Below Poverty Line


51 Kirendra Roy Baruapara AL SC 4 0.007 0.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

52 Thanaswar Dangpara AL Below Poverty Line 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 190 -

Roy + SC

53 Hasina Bewa Sarkarpara AL


Poverty Line + Elderly 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

54 Ganesh Roy Satkhamar AL Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC 2 0.01 0.50 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

55 Md Gulger

Ali Sarkarpara AL No Vulnerability 4 0.001 0.03 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

56 Pulen Roy Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line


57 Minu Roy Lahiripara AL Below Poverty Line


58 Gulzar Md Sarkarpara AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.005 0.38 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

59 Jagdish Roy Lahiripara AL Below Poverty Line


60 Ranga Lal

Roy Lahiripara AL Below Poverty Line


61 Tarun Roy Lahiripara AL Below Poverty Line


62 Khagen Roy Satkhamar AL Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC 0.01 0.007 70.0


63 Gopal Roy Dangpara AL SC 2.33 0.003 0.13 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

64 Anash Roy


Below Poverty Line + SC 0.24 0.01 4.17 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

65 Niran Roy Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line


66 Balin Roy Dangpara AL SC 2.33 0.009 0.39 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

67 Jotish Roy Dangpara AL SC 1.33 0.015 1.13 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

68 Haren Roy Satkhamar AL SC 1.33 0.008 0.60 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

69 Niren Roy Satkhamar AL SC 0.66 0.009 1.36 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

70 Bhabesh

Roy Chaur Chandi AL SC 0.66 0.02 3.03 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 191 -

Kamat

71 Karen Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat AL SC 3.33 0.004 0.12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

72 Tuleswar

Roy Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line

+ SC 1 0.1 10.0


73 Paritosh Roy Sarkarpara AL SC 1.66 0.02 1.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

74 Heren Roy Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line


75 Pravat Roy Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line


76 Bires Roy Sarkarpara AL Below Poverty Line


77 Naresh Roy Sarkarpara AL SC 6 0.03 0.50 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

78 Taposh Roy Sarkarpara AL SC 3 0.01 0.33 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

79 Sadananda

Roy Nagarpara AL SC 0.33 0.006 1.82 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

80 Sabindar

Roy Dangpara AL SC 1.33 0.009 0.68 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

81 Dipak Roy Sarkarpara AL SC 1.33 0.003 0.23 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

82 Hari Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat AL SC 3 0.004 0.13 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

83 Ashutosh

Roy Sarkarpara AL SC 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

84 Bimol Roy Sarkarpara AL SC 1 0.02 2.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

85 Probal Roy Sarkarpara AL SC 3.33 0.007 0.21 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

86 Paresh Roy Sarkarpara AL SC 3.33 0.04 1.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

87 Jotirinda Nath Roy Baruapara

AL + R (BW +

L) Elderly+SC 0.08 0.003 3.75 NA NA 647.52 18 2.78 NA NA NA

88 Bhupen Roy Munshipara AL + R

(L) Elderly+SC 3.33 0.008 0.24 NA NA 667.7 17 2.55 NA NA NA

- 192 -

89 Asharu Roy Lahiripara AL + R

(L) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC 8.75 2 22.8

6 NA NA 1335.5

2 46.5 3.48 NA NA NA

90 Brindeswar

Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat

AL + R (L)

Below Poverty Line + SC 2 0.003 0.15 NA NA

1335.51 18.75 1.40 NA NA NA

91 Mahesh Roy Lahiripara AL + R


+ Elderly + SC 2.66 0.013 0.49 NA NA 1335.5

1 62.5 4.68 NA NA NA

92 Satyendra Nath Roy Satkhamar

AL + R (L) Elderly+SC 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA 647.52 46 7.10 NA NA NA

93 Satyen Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat

AL + R (L)

Below Poverty Line + SC 0.66 0.005 0.76 NA NA

1335.51 22.5 1.68 NA NA NA

94 Binoy Roy Sarkarpara AL + R


+ SC 1.33 0.007 0.53 NA NA 80.94 18.75 23.1

7 NA NA NA

95 Dhinesh Roy Sarkarpara AL + R


+ SC 1 0.006 0.60 NA NA 121.41 12.5 10.3

0 NA NA NA

96 Ajier

Rehman Amtola AL + T Below Poverty Line 0.66 0.02 3.03 7 20 NA NA NA NA NA NA

97 Korimuddin

Md Amtola AL + T Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly 0.66 0.011 1.67 3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

98 Kanai Roy Satkhamar AL + T Below Poverty Line

+ SC 1 0.01 1.00 NA 10 NA NA NA NA NA NA

99 Saimul Haque

Chaur Chandi Kamat AL + T No Vulnerability 0.33 0.02 6.06 NA 20 NA NA NA NA NA NA

100 Avoy Roy Dangpara AL + T SC 3.33 0.01 0.30 NA 5 NA NA NA NA NA NA

101 Mukul Roy Dangpara AL + T SC 5 0.018 0.36 NA 20 NA NA NA NA NA NA

102 Gopal Roy Sarkarpara AL + T Below Poverty Line


103 Moden Roy Sarkarpara AL + T SC 1.66 0.01 0.60 NA 5 NA NA NA NA NA NA

104 Horokumar

Roy Sarkarpara AL + T SC 2.66 0.006 0.23 NA 10 NA NA NA NA NA NA

105 Kashities

Roy Sarkarpara AL + T SC 3.33 0.01 0.30 NA 15 NA NA NA NA NA NA

106 Rani Bala Satkhamar AL + T + Female Headed 0.33 0.01 3.03 2 NA 1335.5 97.5 7.30 NA NA NA

- 193 -

R (L) Household + Below Poverty Line +

Elderly

1

107 Sapan Deb Munshipara AL + T +

R (L) Elderly 3.33 0.01 0.30 2 NA 161.88 36.25 22.3

9 NA NA NA

108 Mul Dhan

Roy Nagarpara AL + T +

R (L) SC 0.15 0.01 6.67 NA 3 526.11 17 3.23 NA NA NA

109 Dulal Sarkar Satkhamar AL + T +

R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC 0.49 0.01 2.04 2 NA 647.52 75 11.5

8 NA NA NA

110 Dinesh Saha Baruapara C (S) No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 12 12 100.00

111 Kartick Srakar Satkhamar

R (BW + L) Below Poverty Line NA NA NA NA NA 566.58 27 4.77 NA NA NA

112 Porola Roy Munshipara R (BW +

L)


Poverty Line + Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 25

61.77 NA NA NA

113 Saroda

Mohan Roy Munshipara R (BW +

L) Below Poverty Line

+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 485.64 19.5 4.02 NA NA NA

114 Bhabesh

Roy Fautiwapar

a R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 121.41 15 12.3

5 NA NA NA

115 Bindyashari

Roy Fautiwapar

a R (BW +

L)


Poverty Line + Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 24

59.30 NA NA NA

116 Profulla Roy Fautiwapar

a R (BW +


+ Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 80.94 37.5 46.3

3 NA NA NA

117 Noronjon

Roy Fautiwapar

a R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 80.94 15 18.5

3 NA NA NA

118 Diran Roy Fautiwapar

a R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 80.94 10 12.3

5 NA NA NA

119 Ranajit Roy Fautiwapar

a R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 121.41 19.5 16.0

6 NA NA NA

120 Dina Bandhu

Roy Chetnai

Tola R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 1335.5

1 17.5 1.31 NA NA NA

121 Akalu Roy Baruapara R (BW + Below Poverty Line NA NA NA NA NA 890.34 29.75 3.34 NA NA NA

- 194 -

L) + SC

122 Subha Ch

Roy Baruapara R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 12 29.6

5 NA NA NA

123 Lalit Roy Dangpara R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 18.75 46.3

3 NA NA NA

124 Prasad Roy Dangpara R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 121.41 30 24.7

1 NA NA NA

125 Ramaprasad

Sarkar Satkhamar R (BW +

L) Elderly+SC NA NA NA NA NA 647.52 55 8.49 NA NA NA

126 Bhaba Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat

R (BW + L)

Below Poverty Line + SC NA NA NA NA NA 323.76 22.5 6.95 NA NA NA

127 Minati Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat

R (BW + L)


Poverty Line + Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 242.82 20 8.24 NA NA NA

128 Saha Dev

Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat

R (BW + L)

Below Poverty Line + SC NA NA NA NA NA 161.88 25

15.44 NA NA NA

129 Nazbul Haque

Chaur Chandi Kamat

R (BW + L)

Below Poverty Line + Elderly NA NA NA NA NA 323.76 37.5

11.58 NA NA NA

130 Supen Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat

R (BW + L)

Below Poverty Line + Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 80.94 37.5

46.33 NA NA NA

131 Dhiren Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat

R (BW + L)

Below Poverty Line + Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 667.75 15 2.25 NA NA NA

132 Lalit Roy Sarkarpara R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 121.41 57 46.9

5 NA NA NA

133 Mohes Roy Sarkarpara R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 12 29.6

5 NA NA NA

134 Narain Roy Sarkarpara R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 647.52 15 2.32 NA NA NA

135 Ajijul Md Sarkarpara R (BW +

L) Elderly NA NA NA NA NA 80.94 32 39.5

4 NA NA NA

- 195 -

136 Kopijan Bewa Amtola

R (BW + L)


Poverty Line + Elderly NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 27.5

67.95 NA NA NA

137 Chameswar

Roy Fautiwapar

a R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 80.94 12.4 15.3

2 NA NA NA

138 Dijendranath

Roy Munshipara R (BW +

L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 242.82 15 6.18 NA NA NA

139 Bharat Roy Munshipara R (BW +

L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 388.51 72 18.5

3 NA NA NA

140 Sukumar

Roy Chetnai

Tola R (BW +

L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 647.52 37.5 5.79 NA NA NA

141 Manaranjan

Roy Chetnai

Tola R (BW +

L) Disabled + SC NA NA NA NA NA 323.76 26.25 8.11 NA NA NA

142 Aminar

Rehman Chetnai

Tola R (BW +

L) No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA 323.76 37.5 11.5

8 NA NA NA

143 Ramani Roy Baruapara R (BW +


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 2671.0

2 45 1.68 NA NA NA

144 Babul Md Sarkarpara R (BW +


+ Elderly NA NA NA NA NA 930.81 34 3.65 NA NA NA

145 Purna Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat

R (BW + L)

Below Poverty Line + SC NA NA NA NA NA 667.75 37.5 5.62 NA NA NA

146 Parbati Roy Munshipara R (BW +

L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 161.88 15 9.27 NA NA NA

147 Ratan Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat

R (BW + L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 323.76 12.5 3.86 NA NA NA

148 Ranjan Sarkar Satkhamar R (L) Below Poverty Line NA NA NA NA NA 647.52 15 2.32 NA NA NA

149 Ajimul Haque

Chaur Chandi Kamat R (L) Below Poverty Line NA NA NA NA NA 667.75 20 3.00 NA NA NA

150 Parameswar

Roy Nagarpara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 10 24.7

1 NA NA NA

151 Duku Roy Nagarpara R (L) Below Poverty Line NA NA NA NA NA 647.52 10 1.54 NA NA NA

- 196 -

+ SC

152 Prafulla Roy Chetnai

Tola R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 687.99 6.25 0.91 NA NA NA

153 Dilip Roy Chetnai

Tola R (L) Below Poverty Line


154 Sushil Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 15 37.0

6 NA NA NA

155 Prabhat Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line


156 Sailen Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 25 61.7

7 NA NA NA

157 Bhupati Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ Disabled + SC NA NA NA NA NA 526.11 38.75 7.37 NA NA NA

158 Briksheswar

Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 80.94 37.4 46.2

1 NA NA NA

159 Chandra

Kanta Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 15 37.0

6 NA NA NA

160 Khirprashad


+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 15 37.0

6 NA NA NA

161 Jagat Roy Dangpara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 667.75 17 2.55 NA NA NA

162 Kali Mohon

Roy Dangpara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 80.24 10 12.4

6 NA NA NA

163 Baren Roy Dangpara R (L) Elderly+SC NA NA NA NA NA 121.41 15 12.3

5 NA NA NA

164 Dinesh Roy Satkhamar R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 1335.5

1 97.5 7.30 NA NA NA

165 Ganesh Sarkar Satkhamar R (L)

Below Poverty Line + SC NA NA NA NA NA 242.82 30

12.35 NA NA NA

166 Bimal Roy Satkhamar R (L) Below Poverty Line


167 Susen Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat R (L)

Below Poverty Line + Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 323.76 21 6.49 NA NA NA

168 Nilkantha

Roy Chaur Chandi R (L)

Below Poverty Line + Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 667.75 12.5 1.87 NA NA NA

- 197 -

Kamat

169 Purnadev

Roy

Chaur Chandi Kamat R (L)

Below Poverty Line + SC NA NA NA NA NA 323.76 20 6.18 NA NA NA

170 Hari Roy Munshipara R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 667.75 46.25 6.93 NA NA NA

171 Gobind Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line


172 Trailakyo



173 Gopal Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 18 44.4

8 NA NA NA

174 Bhabo Roy Dangpara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ SC NA NA NA NA NA 80.24 12.5 15.5

8 NA NA NA

175 Tirthadeb

Roy Lahiripara R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 202.35 12 5.93 NA NA NA

176 Bidyamon

Roy Lahiripara R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 242.82 16.25 6.69 NA NA NA

177 Satyendra Nath Roy Lahiripara R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 485.64 31.5 6.49 NA NA NA

178 Madan Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line


179 Suren Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 1011.7

5 42 4.15 NA NA NA

180 Tapan Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly + SC NA NA NA NA NA 485.64 52.5 10.8

1 NA NA NA

181 Bupen Roy Dangpara R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 80.94 31.24 38.6

0 NA NA NA

182 Nitish Barma Dangpara R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 1335.5

1 31.25 2.34 NA NA NA

183 Fulen Roy Dangpara R (L) Elderly+SC NA NA NA NA NA 40.47 12 29.6

5 NA NA NA

184 Jyotish Roy Lahiripara R (L) Below Poverty Line


185 Dilip Barma Dangpara R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 161.88 13 8.03 NA NA NA

186 Nabin Roy Satkhamar R (L) Elderly+SC NA NA NA NA NA 1335.5 55 4.12 NA NA NA

- 198 -

1

187 Pabitra Roy Dangpara R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 647.52 12.5 1.93 NA NA NA

188 Makhon Roy Dangpara R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 121.41 37.5 30.8

9 NA NA NA

189 Shiren Roy Dangpara T SC NA NA NA NA 5 NA NA NA NA NA NA

190 Sushil Sarkar Satkhamar T + R

(L) SC NA NA NA 6 5 1335.5

1 97.5 7.30 NA NA NA


Along the T 14 at Sarkarpara to Munshipara road section, a total of 190 APs were found. Of these total APs only 10 were found to be suffering from

no vulnerabilities. Further 116 APs of the remaining 180 APs suffer from more than one type of vulnerability. The majority of the APs (109 APs) would

bear an impact on their agricultural land while one AP bears an impact on his commercial asset (main structure). 92 APs would suffer loss of

residential assets as seen in table 9 above. Only 4 APs would lose more than 10% of their agriculture land and they all suffer from vulnerability. 39

APs would lose more than 10% of their residential assets.

Table 10: Road Name: T07 Lal School To Brazerkuthi District- Jalpaiguri


S.N

o

Nam

e O

f T

he

Reg

istr

ati

on

Ho

lder

Nam

e O

f T

he

Villa

ge

Typ

e O

f L

oss

Vu

lnera

bilit

y

To

tal L

an

d

Ho

ldin

g

To

tal L

an

d

Lo

ss

% O

f L

oss

Fru

it B

ea

rin

g

Tre

es

Fu

rnit

ure

/In

du

s

try/T

imb

er

Tre

es

T

ota

l

Resid

en

tia

l

Lan

d

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Resid

en

tia

l

Lan

d

% O

f L

oss

T

ota

l

Resid

en

tia

l

Str

uctu

re

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Resid

en

tia

l

Str

uctu

re

% O

f L

oss

T

ota

l A

ffecte

d

Co

mm

erc

ial

Lan

d

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Co

mm

erc

ial

Lan

d

% O

f L

oss

T

ota

l

Co

mm

erc

ial

Str

uctu

re

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Str

uctu

re

% O

f L

oss

1 Dulal Dey Chentimari AL Below Poverty

Line 2 0.007 0.35 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

2 Akhil Pal Brajer Kuthi AL Below Poverty


NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

3 Shayamal

Kar Brajer Kuthi AL Below Poverty


NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

- 199 -

4 Kedar Ali Parokata (South) AL

Below Poverty Line 1.33 0.02 1.50 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

5

Paritosh Chowdhur

y Brajer Kuthi AL Below Poverty

Line 0.4 0.003 0.75 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

6 Indrajit

Das Brajer Kuthi AL Below Poverty

Line 0.33 0.007 2.12 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

7 Amulya Bhaumik Brajer Kuthi AL


NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

8 Himanshu Bhaumik Brajer Kuthi AL


NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

9 Sila Das Borodorko AL Female Headed Household + SC 0.66 0.006 0.91 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

10 Hatan Dakua Borodorko AL

Below Poverty Line + SC 0.165 0.008 4.85 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

11 Sukumar

Das Borodorko AL Below Poverty

Line + SC 1 0.01 1.00 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

12 Biswajit

Das Borodorko AL


SC 3.33 0.006 0.18 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

13 Digen Dutta Brajer Kuthi AL Elderly 3 0.003 0.10 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

14 Mukul Dutta

Parokata (South) AL Elderly 3.33 0.003 0.09 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

15 Madhab

Das Parokata (South) AL Elderly 2 0.01 0.50 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

16 Safidul Miya

Parokata (South) AL Elderly 1.66 0.01 0.60 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

17 Safiur

Rehman Parokata (South) AL Elderly 1.33 0.02 1.50 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

18 Manoranjan Biswas Brajer Kuthi AL

Below Poverty Line + SC 0.33 0.02 6.06 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

19 Digen Das Brajer Kuthi AL Below Poverty

Line + SC 0.1 0.03 30.00 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

20 Ramesh

Das Brajer Kuthi AL Elderly+SC 4 0.005 0.13 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

- 200 -

21 Safali Das Brajer Kuthi AL

Female Headed Household +


NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

22

Nani Gopal

Choudhary Brajer Kuthi AL No Vulnerability 2.66 0.001 0.04 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

23 Satanand

a Das Brajer Kuthi AL Below Poverty

Line + SC 1 0.03 3.00 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

24 Namal

Charaya Parokata (South) AL

Below Poverty Line + ST 0.16 0.01 6.25 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

25 Rabeda Bewa

Parokata (South) AL


Below Poverty Line + Elderly 1.66 0.01 0.60 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

26 Narayan

Dutta Parokata (South) AL

Below Poverty Line + Disabled

+ Elderly 0.66 0.008 1.21 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

27 Nesaruddi

n Mia Parokata (South) AL


NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

28 Abdul Miya

Parokata (South) AL

Below Poverty Line + Elderly 5 0.02 0.40 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

29 Haren Roy Borodorko AL

Below Poverty Line + SC 4 0.01 0.25 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

30 Parimala Borodorko AL



SC 0.66 0.007 1.06 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

31 Bhakta

Debnath Chentimari AL No Vulnerability 2 0.009 0.45 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

32 Ratan Roy Chentimari AL Elderly+SC 4 0.01 0.25 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

33 Kanika

Debnath Chentimari AL Female Headed

Household + 1 0.01 1.00 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

- 201 -

Elderly

34 Rabindra Barman Chentimari AL SC 2 0.004 0.20 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

35 Kripanath

Das Brajer Kuthi AL Elderly+SC 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

36

Nur Iaslam

Mia Parokata (South) AL

Below Poverty Line + Disabled 1.33 0.003 0.23 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

37 Jugal

Bhowal Parokata (South) AL No Vulnerability 2.66 0.01 0.38 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

38 Monirul

Miya Parokata (South) AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.01 0.75 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

39 Sukumar

Das Parokata (South) AL Elderly+SC 2 0.009 0.45 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

40 Mangal

Das Parokata (South) AL SC 1.33 0.01 0.75 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

41 Sukumar

Das Parokata (South) AL SC 6.66 0.04 0.60 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

42 Sunil Rava

Parokata (South) AL

Below Poverty Line + ST 0.08 0.007 8.75 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

43 Fakuruddi

n Mia Parokata (South) AL No Vulnerability 2.66 0.02 0.75 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

44 Jiten Das Chentimari AL SC 0.33 0.007 2.12 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

45 Keshab Mondal Chentimari AL SC 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

46 Loko

Dakuwa Chentimari AL SC 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

47 Netai Dutta Brajer Kuthi AL


NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

48 Anil Paul Brajer Kuthi AL No Vulnerability 2.33 0.009 0.39 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

49 Tapan Sarkar Brajer Kuthi AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

50 Dilip Das Brajer Kuthi AL SC 3 0.02 0.67 NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

- 202 -

51 Kamala

Kanta Das Parokata (South) AL SC 5 0.005 0.10 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

52 Akhil Das Parokata (South) AL SC 1 0.02 2.00 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

53 Harish Das Brajer Kuthi AL SC 2.33 0.007 0.30 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

54 Chtaranjan Rava

Parokata (South) AL ST 4 0.05 1.25 NA NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

55 Raj Bala

Das Borodorko

AL + R (BW +

L) Female Headed Household + SC 8 0.07 0.88 NA NA

4046.86 12.5

0.31

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

56 Nironjan

Das Brajer Kuthi

AL + R (BW +

L)


SC 0.66 0.001 0.15 NA NA 121.41 40

32.95

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

57

Rangaluchandra

Das Borodorko

AL + R (BW +

L) SC 1.33 0.03 2.26 NA NA 333.87 22.5

6.74

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

58 Sachin

Das Brajer Kuthi

AL + R (BW +

L) SC 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA 40.4

7 25

61.77

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

59 Ratan Das Brajer Kuthi

AL + R (BW +

L) SC 1 0.005 0.50 NA NA 647.52

18.75

2.90

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

60 Kader Ali Parokata (South)

AL + R (BW +

L) No Vulnerability 2 0.009 0.45 NA NA 323.76 15

4.63

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

61 Rakhal

Pal Brajer Kuthi AL + R

(L) Below Poverty

Line 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA 1335.51 6.25

0.47

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

62 Mohoor Uddin

Parokata (South)

AL + R (L)

Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.006 1.82 NA NA

1335.51 37

2.77

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

63 Ramjan

Ali Parokata (South)

AL + R (L)

Below Poverty Line 0.825 0.02 2.42 NA NA

667.75 39

5.8

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

- 203 -

4

64 Argina Bewa

Parokata (South)

AL + R (L)


Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA

80.94 27

33.36

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

65 Lalit Roy Chentimari AL + R

(L) Below Poverty

Line + SC 0.33 0.005 1.52 NA NA 453.26 35

7.72

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

66 Mozibur


AL + R (L)

Below Poverty Line + Elderly 1 0.009 0.90 NA NA

323.76 16.5

5.10

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

67 Gobinda

Das Brajer Kuthi AL + R

(L) Below Poverty

Line + SC 0.08 0.001 1.25 NA NA 323.76 30

9.27

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

68 Nirmal Kar Brajer Kuthi AL + T Below Poverty

Line 2.66 0.007 0.26 NA 30 NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

69 Ajoy Kar Brajer Kuthi AL + T Below Poverty

Line 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA 11 NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

70 Dulal Pal Brajer Kuthi AL + T Below Poverty

Line 1.33 0.003 0.23 4 NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

71 Gopal Pal Brajer Kuthi AL + T Below Poverty

Line 0.66 0.02 3.03 NA 10 NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

72 Trapru

Das Brajer Kuthi AL + T Elderly+SC 1.66 0.003 0.18 4 NA NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

73 Azmat Miya

Parokata (South) AL + T

Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.66 0.005 0.76 8 NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

74

Sailendra Chandra

Paul Brajer Kuthi AL + T Elderly 6.66 0.006 0.09 NA 10 NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

75 Susil Pal Brajer Kuthi AL + T Elderly 0.224 0.01 4.46 NA 11 NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

76 Safaruddi

n Miya Parokata (South) AL + T

Below Poverty Line + Elderly 2 0.02 1.00 NA 20 NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

77 Pradip Kar Brajer Kuthi AL + T Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.66 0.009 1.36 NA 20 NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

78 Dinesh Brajer Kuthi AL + T Elderly+SC 5.33 0.03 0.56 5 NA 667. 72 1 N NA N N N NA N NA NA

- 204 -

Das + R (BW +

L)

75 0.78

A A A A A

79 Sudhir Rava

Parokata (South)

AL + T + R (L) ST 5 0.01 0.20 NA 4

2671.02 57

2.13

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

80 Buben Das Borodorko

R (BW + L)

Below Poverty Line + SC NA NA NA NA NA

80.94 25

30.89

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

81 Niranjan

Das Brajer Kuthi R (BW

+ L) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA NA NA 777.02 34

4.38

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

82 Sadhu Miya

Parokata (South)

R (BW + L)

Below Poverty Line + Elderly NA NA NA NA NA

323.76 21

6.49

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

83 Govt Land Parokata (South)

R (BW + L)

Female Headed Household

+Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

ST NA NA NA NA NA 0 0

#DIV/0!

300

16.25

5.42

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

84 Office Miya

Parokata (South) R (L)

Below Poverty Line NA NA NA NA NA

121.41 24

19.77

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

85 Kazrul Miya



80.94 52.5

64.86

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

86 Mozidul

Miya Parokata (South) R (L)


323.76 30

9.27

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

87 Asger Miya



667.75 30

4.49

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

88 Nurulley

Miya Parokata (South) R (L)


80.94 50

61.

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

- 205 -

77

89 Nisikanta

Nama Das Chentimari R (L)


SC NA NA NA NA NA 667.75

16.25

2.43

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

90 Dhanapati

Das Brajer Kuthi R (L)



10.50

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

91 Chipen

Das Brajer Kuthi R (L) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA NA NA 777.02 30

3.86

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

92 Nipen Das Brajer Kuthi R (L)



1.93

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

93 Dhiren Rava


Below Poverty Line + ST NA NA NA NA NA

647.52 30

4.63

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

94 Rosidul Haque



1335.51 60

4.49

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

95 Hasna Bewa




364.23 15

4.12

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

96 Andaru Rava



323.76 17.5

5.41

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

97 Katik Rava



121.41 24

19.77

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

98 Ajijur Miya Parokata (South) R (L) Elderly NA NA NA NA NA

667.75 27

4.04

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

99 Narayan

Dey Chentimari R (L) Below Poverty Line + Elderly NA NA NA NA NA

4046.86 39

0.9

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

- 206 -

6

100 Hira Lal Barman Chentimari R (L) No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA

4046.86 15

0.37

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

101 Samsuddi

n Miya Parokata (South) R (L)


2671.02 21

0.79

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

102 Niresh Rava


Below Poverty Line + Elderly+

ST NA NA NA NA NA 323.76 25

7.72

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

103 Gobinda

Das Brajer Kuthi R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 121.41 15

12.35

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

104 Chitaranja

n Das Brajer Kuthi R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 667.75 49.5

7.41

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

105 Gobinda

Das Chentimari R (L) SC NA NA NA NA NA 647.52 30

4.63

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

106 Jagadeep

Pal Chentimari T Below Poverty

Line NA NA NA NA 20 NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

107 Chandan

Kar Brajer Kuthi T Below Poverty

Line NA NA NA NA 10 667.75 18

2.70

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

108 Bijoy Dutta Brajer Kuthi T Elderly NA NA NA NA 20 NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

109 Dabesh

Das Brajer Kuthi T


SC NA NA NA 10 NA 40.4

7 30

74.13

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

110 Bablu Pal Brajer Kuthi T No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA 10 NA NA NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

111 Subhas Biswas Brajer Kuthi

T + C (L)

Below Poverty Line + SC NA NA NA NA 7 NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

35

14

40.00

35 14

40.00

112 Sushil Borodorko T + R Elderly+SC NA NA NA NA 7 230. 53.7 2 N NA N N N NA N NA NA

- 207 -

Roy (L) 67 5 3.30

A A A A A

113 Momin Miya

Parokata (South)

T + R (L) Elderly NA NA NA 8 NA

323.76 70

21.62

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

114 Aloka Roy Chentimari T + R

(L)



SC NA NA NA 5 NA 518.01 22.5

4.34

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

115 Sujit

Sarkar Brajer Kuthi T + R

(L) No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA 7 4046.85 42.5

1.05

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA

116 Mukul Das Brajer Kuthi T + R

(L) SC NA NA NA 7 NA 333.87 15

4.49

NA NA

NA

NA

NA NA

NA NA NA


Among the 116 APs surveyed along this road, only 11 of them do not suffer from any vulnerability. Further 54 APs suffer from more than one type of

vulnerability. 79 APs would bear an impact on their agricultural land while 56 APs on their residential assets. Also 23 APs would lose their trees by

way of the project. Table 10 above enumerates the type of loss of APs along the T07 Lal School to Brazerkuthi road section.

IV. MURSHIDABAD DISTRICT

Table 11: Road Name: Charpaikmari To Chardebipur District- Murshidabad


- 208 -

Sr

No

Nam

e O

f T

he

Reg

istr

ati

on

Ho

lder

Nam

e O

f T

he V

illa

ge

Typ

e O

f L

oss

Vu

lnera

bilit

y

To

tal L

an

d H

old

ing

To

tal L

an

d L

oss

% O

f L

oss

To

tal R

esid

en

tial

Str

uctu

re

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Resid

en

tia

l S

tru

ctu

re

% O

f L

oss

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Co

mm

erc

ial L

an

d

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Co

mm

erc

ial L

an

d

% O

f L

oss

To

tal C

om

merc

ial

Str

uctu

re

To

tal A

ffecte

d S

tru

ctu

re

% O

f L

oss

1 Jamsed Sk Kupkandi AL Below

Poverty Line 0.33 0.005 1.52 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

2 Tazmahal

Haque Kali

Nagar AL Below


3 Abdul Mamin Kali

Nagar AL Below


4 Abdul Ahadul Kali

Nagar AL Below


5 Abdul Ahaad Dibipur AL Below


6 Abdul Salam Kali

Nagar AL Below


7 Tamiz Uddin Kupkandi AL Elderly 1.66 0.004 0.24 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

8 Subhan Sheikh Kupkandi AL Elderly 8.66 0.01 0.12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

9 Sanarul Shaikh Kupkandi AL Elderly 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

10 Md Abdullah

Hazi Kupkandi AL Elderly 0.096 0.002 2.08 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

11 Anish Uddin Kupkandi AL Elderly 1 0.01 1.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

12 Tahasan Mondal Kupkandi AL Elderly 0.74 0.005 0.68 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

13 Raisuddin Kupkandi AL Elderly 0.33 0.004 1.21 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

14 Adil Sk Kali

Nagar AL Elderly 2 0.005 0.25 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

15 Talim Uddin Kali AL Elderly 1 0.001 0.10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 209 -

Nagar

16 Jakar Ali Kali

Nagar AL Elderly 0.16 0.009 5.63 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

17 Fajal Sk Kali

Nagar AL Elderly 1 0.004 0.40 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

18 Sariful Islam Kali


19 Anoaar Ali Kali


20 Dukari Mondal Dibipur AL SC 2.33 0.004 0.17 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

21 Dulal Mondal Dibipur AL SC 2 0.004 0.20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

22 Biran Mondal Dibipur AL SC 2.33 0.009 0.39 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

23 Kajol Mondal Dibipur AL SC 1 0.005 0.50 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

24 Bakkar Sk Kupkandi AL SC 0.66 0.006 0.91 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

25 Mustakim Kali

Nagar AL SC 0.66 0.003 0.45 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

26 Sadin Mondal Dibipur AL SC 1.66 0.004 0.24 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

27 Jotish Mondal Dibipur AL SC 0.02 0.002 10.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

28 Kasinath Mondal Dibipur AL SC 2 0.01 0.50 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

29 Ainul Shaikh Kupkandi AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 5.33 0.01 0.19 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

30 Jasimuddin Kupkandi AL No

Vulnerability 0.33 0.003 0.91 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

31 Raisuddin Kupkandi AL

Female Headed

Household + Elderly 0.74 0.006 0.81 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

32 Adir Mondal Dibipur AL


+ SC 0.24 0.001 0.42 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

33 Jabbar Kupkandi AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.16 0.005 3.13 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 210 -

34 Md. Ismail Kupkandi AL No

Vulnerability 3 0.003 0.10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

35 Rejaul Haque Kupkandi AL No


36 Najrul Islam Kupkandi AL No


37 Kurban Shaikh Kupkandi AL No


38 Sabidul Kupkandi AL No


39 Taibali Shaikh Kupkandi AL No


40 Baitullah Kupkandi AL No


41 Fazal Shaikh Kupkandi AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 0.33 0.006 1.82 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

42 Abdul Kuddus Kali

Nagar AL No


43 Abdul Ohab Kali

Nagar AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly 1.32 0.006 0.45 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

44 Naksad Ali Kali

Nagar AL No


45 Mamtaj Ali Kali

Nagar AL No


46 Nazir Sk Kali

Nagar AL No


47 Maidul Sk Kali

Nagar AL No


48 Iialis Hazi Kali


49 Sk Majibur Dibipur AL No


50 Masdar Kali


51 Eunush Ali Kali

Nagar AL No


- 211 -

52 Angora Baya Dibipur AL

Female Headed

Household + Below Poverty

Line 0.16 0.006 3.75 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

53 Taieb Charbalip

ara AL Below


54 Md Salim Sk Charbalip

ara AL Below


55 Momen Charbalip

ara AL Below


56 Mozibor

Rehaman Charbalip

ara AL No


57 Abdul Bari Charbalip

ara AL


Disabled + Elderly 5.66 0.002 0.04 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

58 Md Nefazuddin Charbalip

ara AL No


59 Soheb Ali Charbalip

ara AL No


60 Panchu Sarkar Charbalip

ara AL Elderly 1.65 0.13 7.88 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

61 Afazuddin Charbalip

ara AL Elderly 2 0.002 0.10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

62 Asuruddin Charbalip


63 Sultan Charbalip


64 DIBIPUR C (L)


SC NA NA NA NA NA NA 22 4 18.1

8 22 4 18.18

65 Jahagir Sk Kali

Nagar R

(BW) Elderly NA NA NA 283.2

9 14 4.9

4 NA NA NA NA NA NA

66 Banamali Mondal Dibipur

R (BW) SC NA NA NA

121.41 17

14.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 212 -

67 Aminul Islam Kali

Nagar R

(BW) No

Vulnerability NA NA NA 647.5

2 7 1.0

8 NA NA NA NA NA NA

68 Md Dulal Sk Charbalip

ara R

(BW) Below

Poverty Line NA NA NA 323.7

6 12 3.7

1 NA NA NA NA NA NA

69 Mohiruddin Sk Charbalip

ara R

(BW) No

Vulnerability NA NA NA 161.8

8 12.5 7.7

2 NA NA NA NA NA NA

70 Asiruddin Sk Charbalip

ara R

(BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly NA NA NA

202.35 8.75

4.32 NA NA NA NA NA NA


As seen in table 11 above, a total of 70 APs were found along this road section. Of these 70 APs, 20 do not suffer from any vulnerability. Majority of

the APs (63 APs) would lose their agricultural land due to the project. Only 1 AP would lose 10% of their landholding. 6 APs would bear an impact on

their residential assets (boundary wall) while one AP on their commercial asset (land).

Table 12: Road Name: Panchthupi To Molla District- Murshidabad


Sr No


Holder Name Of

The Village

Type Of

Loss Vulnerability

Total Land

Holding

Total Land Loss

% Of Loss

Fruit Bearing Trees

Total Residenti

al Structure

Total Affected

Residential Structure % Of Loss

1 Kashinath

Mondal Akta AL Below Poverty Line 1 0.003 0.30 NA NA NA NA

2 Milan Mondal Akta AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.02 6.06 NA NA NA NA

3 Suken Ghosh Goshbati AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.018 5.45 NA NA NA NA

4 Chinmoy Ghosh Goshbati AL Below Poverty Line 0.66 0.008 1.21 NA NA NA NA

5 Dilip Ghosh Bhandora AL Below Poverty Line 1 0.002 0.20 NA NA NA NA

6 Daiyal Ghosh Shakti Pur AL Below Poverty Line 0.16 0.005 3.13 NA NA NA NA

7 Goutam Ghosh Shakti Pur AL Below Poverty Line 1 0.005 0.50 NA NA NA NA

8 Bhagadar

Ghosh Dhengapara AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.003 0.91 NA NA NA NA

- 213 -

9 Golok Ghosh Dhengapara AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.003 0.91 NA NA NA NA

10 Basudeb Ghosh Bhandora AL Below Poverty Line 1.33 0.003 0.23 NA NA NA NA

11 Sapan Ghosh Shakti Pur AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA NA NA

12 Nidhu Ghosh Shakti Pur AL Below Poverty Line 0.08 0.007 8.75 NA NA NA NA

13 Kanai Ghosh Shakti Pur AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.004 1.21 NA NA NA NA

14 Nikil Ghosh Shakti Pur AL Below Poverty Line 0.33 0.008 2.42 NA NA NA NA

15 Narayan Das Sinserda AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.002 0.61 NA NA NA NA

16 Arati Das Sinserda AL Female Headed

Household + Elderly 0.66 0.002 0.30 NA NA NA NA

17 Kudu Mondal Mahadia AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA

18 Bablu Ghosh Mahadia AL No Vulnerability 0.36 0.006 1.67 NA NA NA NA

19 Santosh Mondal Mahadia AL No Vulnerability 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA NA NA

20 Madhu Mondal Mahadia AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.012 7.50 NA NA NA NA

21 Pagol Mondal Akta AL Below Poverty Line

+ Elderly 0.41 0.001 0.24 NA NA NA NA

22 Kantinal Bittar Akta AL Below Poverty Line


23 Abul Mirja Muniadihi AL Disabled 4 0.007 0.18 NA NA NA NA

24 Duthkumar

Mondal Akta AL Below Poverty Line


25 Kalyan Mondal Goshbati AL No Vulnerability 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA NA NA

26 Apurba Ghosh Goshbati AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.02 6.06 NA NA NA NA

27 Buddhadeb

Ghosh Goshbati AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.018 1.35 NA NA NA NA

28 Benu Kar Dhengapara AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.006 0.36 NA NA NA NA

29 Nitai Mondal Marura AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.002 0.30 NA NA NA NA

30 Parikit Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 2 0.008 0.40 NA NA NA NA

31 Sujit Ghosh Bhandora AL Disabled + Elderly 0.14 0.002 1.43 NA NA NA NA

32 Sanatan Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 1 0.009 0.90 NA NA NA NA

33 Ananda Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 3 0.002 0.07 NA NA NA NA

- 214 -

34 Jramru Mukesh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.01 6.25 NA NA NA NA

35 Amar Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.01 6.25 NA NA NA NA

36 Balok Chand

Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 2.64 0.001 0.04 NA NA NA NA

37 Chnadakanta

Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 1 0.004 0.40 NA NA NA NA

38 Mahadeb Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.007 1.06 NA NA NA NA

39 Santo Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.001 0.30 NA NA NA NA

40 Lakoman Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 3.33 0.004 0.12 NA NA NA NA

41 Nanda Kumar

Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.007 2.12 NA NA NA NA

42 Bipan Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA

43 Sapan Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.008 0.60 NA NA NA NA

44 Jaganath Pal Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 2 0.006 0.30 NA NA NA NA

45 Monchora

Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA NA NA

46 Kachu Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA NA NA

47 Debnarayan

Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 2 0.009 0.45 NA NA NA NA

48 Aita Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.017 5.15 NA NA NA NA

49 Subrata Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.14 0.01 7.14 NA NA NA NA

50 Ranajit Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.014 1.05 NA NA NA NA

51 Barun Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.24 0.01 4.17 NA NA NA NA

52 Bisu Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.005 1.52 NA NA NA NA

53 Prasanta Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 1 0.017 1.70 NA NA NA NA

54 Manik Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.007 1.06 NA NA NA NA

55 Basudeb Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 1 0.008 0.80 NA NA NA NA

56 Chetan Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 3 0.01 0.33 NA NA NA NA

57 Tarun Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.24 0.012 5.00 NA NA NA NA

58 Rajja Dhar Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA

- 215 -

59 Mustakim Sk Muniadihi AL Below Poverty Line


60 Kanu Sk Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA NA NA

61 Mohiquddin Sk Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 0.44 0.003 0.68 NA NA NA NA

62 Dhanu Mallik Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 1 0.009 0.90 NA NA NA NA

63 Betar Sk Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 0.11 0.003 2.73 NA NA NA NA

64 Fakir Sk Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 0.44 0.004 0.91 NA NA NA NA

65 Bhupati Mondal Sinserda AL Elderly 1.33 0.002 0.15 NA NA NA NA

66 Dilip Mondal Mahadia AL Elderly 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA

67 Kanchan Mondal Mahadia AL Elderly 0.24 0.013 5.42 NA NA NA NA

68 Dhanu Mondal Mahadia AL Elderly 0.74 0.002 0.27 NA NA NA NA

69 Akhai Mondal Akta AL Elderly 2.66 0.006 0.23 NA NA NA NA

70 Noni Mondal Akta AL Elderly 0.16 0.006 3.75 NA NA NA NA

71 Behari Mondal Akta AL Elderly 1 0.009 0.90 NA NA NA NA

72 Adhir Mondal Goshbati AL Elderly 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA

73 Manab Ghosh Marura AL Elderly 0.14 0.007 5.00 NA NA NA NA

74 Sachita Mondal Marura AL Elderly 0.41 0.002 0.49 NA NA NA NA

75 Madhab Mondal Marura AL Elderly 0.4 0.007 1.75 NA NA NA NA

76 Sattaban Ghosh Bhandora AL Elderly 0.01 0.002 20.00 NA NA NA NA

77 Additta Ghosh Bhandora AL Elderly 1.65 0.01 0.61 NA NA NA NA

78 Kuber Ghosh Bhandora AL Elderly 0.66 0.02 3.03 NA NA NA NA

79 Kartick Ghosh Bhandora AL Elderly 0.33 0.006 1.82 NA NA NA NA

80 Parameswar

Ghosh Bhandora AL Elderly 0.66 0.014 2.12 NA NA NA NA

81 Khonon Ghosh Bhandora AL Elderly 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA NA NA

82 Naba Kumar

Ghosh Bhandora AL Elderly 1 0.005 0.50 NA NA NA NA

83 Ratik Ghosh Shakti Pur AL Elderly 1.66 0.005 0.30 NA NA NA NA

- 216 -

84 Subad Ghosh Shakti Pur AL Elderly 0.16 0.01 6.25 NA NA NA NA

85 Hiran Mirja Muniadihi AL Elderly 1 0.008 0.80 NA NA NA NA

86 Khaoda Box Sk Muniadihi AL Elderly 0.16 0.002 1.25 NA NA NA NA

87 Kalu K Muniadihi AL Elderly 0.41 0.003 0.73 NA NA NA NA

88 Fajul Rahaman

Sk Muniadihi AL Elderly 1 0.002 0.20 NA NA NA NA

89 Jamiruddin Sk Muniadihi AL Elderly 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA NA NA

90 Dula Sk Muniadihi AL Elderly 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA

91 Angur Mirja Muniadihi AL Elderly 0.66 0.005 0.76 NA NA NA NA

92 Buddhadeb

Mondal Goshbati AL Elderly 1 0.018 1.80 NA NA NA NA

93 Kanika Mondal Marura AL Elderly 0.16 0.002 1.25 NA NA NA NA

94 Baburam Mondal Marura AL Elderly 0.41 0.005 1.22 NA NA NA NA

95 Amar Das Sinserda AL Elderly 1 0.002 0.20 NA NA NA NA

96 Uttam Ghosh Dhengapara AL Elderly 0.66 0.007 1.06 NA NA NA NA

97 Narayana

Chandra Mondal Mahadia AL Elderly 0.49 0.004 0.82 NA NA NA NA

98 Baburam Pal Dhengapara AL Elderly 3.33 0.14 4.20 NA NA NA NA

99 Sufal Mondal Mahadia AL Elderly 1.33 0.023 1.73 NA NA NA NA

100 Janardan Ghosh Bhandora AL Elderly 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA NA NA

101 Arati Ghosh Bhandora AL Elderly 0.16 0.01 6.25 NA NA NA NA

102 Pasupati Mondal Bhandora AL Elderly 1 0.01 1.00 NA NA NA NA

103 Manik Ghosh Bhandora AL Elderly 0.16 0.01 6.25 NA NA NA NA

104 Hosen Sk Muniadihi AL Elderly 0.66 0.008 1.21 NA NA NA NA

105 Jamsed Muniadihi AL Elderly 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA NA NA

106 Golam Mostofa Muniadihi AL Elderly 0.33 0.002 0.61 NA NA NA NA

107 Bonoy Dhar Muniadihi AL Elderly 0.16 0.001 0.63 NA NA NA NA

108 Daud Sk Muniadihi AL Elderly 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA NA NA

- 217 -

109 Kamrul Sk Muniadihi AL Elderly 0.44 0.007 1.59 NA NA NA NA

110 Jamuna Ghosh Marura AL Elderly 0.16 0.003 1.88 NA NA NA NA

111 Harayan Mondal Marura AL Elderly 0.16 0.005 3.13 NA NA NA NA

112 Asis Tribidi Bahora AL Elderly 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA

113 Dalim Mondal Bahora AL Elderly 0.41 0.005 1.22 NA NA NA NA

114 Madhab Mondal Bahora AL Elderly 1.66 0.005 0.30 NA NA NA NA

115 Godadhar

Mondal Bahora AL Elderly 2 0.005 0.25 NA NA NA NA

116 Bijoy Mondal Bahora AL Elderly 0.33 0.006 1.82 NA NA NA NA

117 Chku Babu Bahora AL Elderly 1.33 0.019 1.43 NA NA NA NA

118 Shakti Das Bahora AL Elderly 0.16 0.005 3.13 NA NA NA NA

119 Chandbadan Bahora AL Elderly 0.16 0.016 10.00 NA NA NA NA

120 Amar Ghosh Sinserda AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.004 0.61 NA NA NA NA

121 Sukumar Mondal Mahadia AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.009 1.36 NA NA NA NA

122 Monojit Mondal Mahadia AL No Vulnerability 0.49 0.02 4.08 NA NA NA NA

123 Subodh Mondal Akta AL No Vulnerability 1 0.002 0.20 NA NA NA NA

124 Meghnath

Mondal Akta AL Below Poverty Line


125 Apurba Ghosh Goshbati AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.016 4.85 NA NA NA NA

126 Bapan Ghosh Dhengapara AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA

127 Anayan Bagdi Sinserda AL Below Poverty Line


128 Tarun Ghosh Dhengapara AL No Vulnerability 1 0.003 0.30 NA NA NA NA

129 Parbati Mondal Sinserda AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA

130 Barun Ghosh Dhengapara AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.002 1.25 NA NA NA NA

131 Bhupati Mondal Sinserda AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.01 1.52 NA NA NA NA

132 Dibakar Ghosh Dhengapara AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.01 0.75 NA NA NA NA

133 Ranjt Mondal Mahadia AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.005 0.76 NA NA NA NA

- 218 -

134 Dasarat Pal Dhengapara AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.008 1.21 NA NA NA NA

135 Kanai Pal Dhengapara AL No Vulnerability 2.66 0.019 0.71 NA NA NA NA

136 Sonat Mondal Mahadia AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.006 1.82 NA NA NA NA

137 Baishaki Das Sinserda AL No Vulnerability 0.44 0.004 0.91 NA NA NA NA

138 Benu Kar Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.006 1.82 NA NA NA NA

139 Bindaban Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.08 0.004 5.00 NA NA NA NA

140 Uttam Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.01 0.60 NA NA NA NA

141 Kokon Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.01 3.03 NA NA NA NA

142 Kalam Sk Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 1.33 0.006 0.45 NA NA NA NA

143 Angur Mirja Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 0.1 0.001 1.00 NA NA NA NA

144 Islam Sk Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.003 0.18 NA NA NA NA

145 Tapas Dhar Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 2 0.002 0.10 NA NA NA NA

146 Bijoy Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.08 0.01 12.50 NA NA NA NA

147 Kartik Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 2 0.03 1.50 NA NA NA NA

148 Patal Mirja Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.004 2.50 NA NA NA NA

149 Tapash Pal Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 5 0.007 0.14 NA NA NA NA

150 Maharul Sk Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 0.41 0.004 0.98 NA NA NA NA

151 Adir Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 1.66 0.008 0.48 NA NA NA NA

152 Amar Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 1 0.005 0.50 NA NA NA NA

153 Tena Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 1 0.007 0.70 NA NA NA NA

154 Mohim Sk Muniadihi AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.003 0.91 NA NA NA NA

155 Makti Ghosh Shakti Pur AL No Vulnerability 0.16 0.01 6.25 NA NA NA NA

156 Sidhartha Mondal Marura AL


157 Balaram Mondal Marura AL No Vulnerability 0.41 0.002 0.49 NA NA NA NA

158 Tapan Mondal Marura AL No Vulnerability 2 0.004 0.20 NA NA NA NA

159 Adhor Ghosh Bahora AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.008 1.21 NA NA NA NA

160 Nanda Mondal Bahora AL No Vulnerability 0.33 0.009 2.73 NA NA NA NA

- 219 -

161 Ajay Mondal Bahora AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.007 1.06 NA NA NA NA

162 Milan Mondal Bahora AL No Vulnerability 0.24 0.02 8.33 NA NA NA NA

163 Bulok Bahora AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.02 3.03 NA NA NA NA

164 Ananda Mondal Bahora AL Below Poverty Line


165 Gonesh Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 0.66 0.001 0.15 NA NA NA NA

166 Jagabath Ghosh Bhandora AL No Vulnerability 1 0.01 1.00 NA NA NA NA

167 Minati Mondal Marura AL + R (BW) Elderly 0.4 0.009 2.25 NA 323.76 10 3.09

168 Biduyut Mondal Marura AL + R (BW) Elderly 0.12 0.004 3.33 NA 1295.04 10 0.77

169 Chaya Mondal Marura AL + R (BW) Elderly 0.4 0.004 1.00 NA 323.76 10 3.09

170 Brindabon

Mondal Marura AL + T Below Poverty Line 0.66 0.004 0.61 7 NA NA NA

171 Chand Md Sk Muniadihi R (BW) No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA 80.94 16.25 20.08

172 Jatadhari Mondal Molla R (BW) Disabled + Elderly NA NA NA NA 121.47 21.25 17.49

173 Sniti Pal Marura R (BW) Elderly NA NA NA NA 194.25 10 5.15


Along the Panchthupi to Molla road section (table 12 above), 173 APs were surveyed of which 166 APs are bearing an impact on their agricultural

land, 3 APs on their agricultural land as well as residential asset (boundary wall), one AP on trees and agricultural land and remaining 3 APs on their

residential assets only (boundary wall). Among the 173 APs, 87 APs do noy suffer from any vulnerability and all of them except one are losing part of

their agriculture land. Only 3 APs were found to be losing more than 10% of their landholding of which one AP does not suffer from any vulnerability

while the remaining are elderly HH.

Table 13: Road Name: Putia To Jat Biswanath District- Murshidabad Total Number of APs-8

Absentees-2

- 220 -

Sr No Name Of The

Registration Holder

Name Of The

Village

Type Of Loss

Vulnerability Total Land

Holding

Total Land Loss

% Of Loss

Total Residential Structure

Total Affected Residential Structure

% Of Loss

1 Munsur Sk Katakali AL Elderly 10 0.01 0.1 NA NA NA

2 Serender Sk Katakali R (BW) Elderly NA NA NA 40.47 7 17.30

3 Tafajall Haque Katakali R (BW) No Vulnerability NA NA NA 7770.24 32 0.41

4 Md Akber Ali Katakali R (BW) No Vulnerability NA NA NA 40.47 7 17.30

5 Safiul Alam Sk Katakali R (BW) No Vulnerability NA NA NA 121.41 13 10.71

6 Kolomdar Sk Katakali R (BW) Below Poverty Line +

Elderly NA NA NA 283.29 20 7.06

7 Kasim Sk Mathpara R (BW) Below Poverty Line +


8 Mameda Bewa Mathpara R (BW) Female Headed

Household + Elderly NA NA NA 971.28 20 2.06


As seen in table 13 above, 8 APs were surveyed along this road of which only 1 AP is losing their agricultural land (less than 1%). Rest 7 APs are

bearing an impact on their residential assets (boundary wall). Of these 7 APs, 3 of them would lose more than 10% of their assets. Only 3 APs were

found to be suffering from no vulnerability.

Table 14: Road Name: Putia To Ramchandrapur District- Murshidabad

Total Number of APs-47 Absentees-0

(1 AP did not consent for voluntary donation)

- 221 -

New

S.N

o

Nam

e O

f T

he

Reg

istr

ati

on

Ho

lder

Nam

e O

f T

he V

illa

ge

Typ

e O

f L

oss

Vu

lnera

bilit

y

To

tal L

an

d H

old

ing

To

tal L

an

d L

oss

% O

f L

oss

To

tal R

esid

en

tial

Lan

d

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Resid

en

tia

l L

an

d

% O

f L

oss

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Co

mm

erc

ial L

an

d

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Co

mm

erc

ial L

an

d

% O

f L

oss

To

tal C

om

merc

ial

Str

uctu

re

To

tal A

ffecte

d

Str

uctu

re

% O

f L

oss

1 Fajrul

Rehman Borjumla

Ward No 12 AL

Below Poverty Line

0.66 0.003 0.45 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

2 Ansar Ali Borjumla

Ward No 12 AL

Below Poverty Line


3 Samsur

Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 AL Elderly 0.66 0.003 0.45 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

4 Sahade

Sk Borjumla


5 Kuddes

Sk Borjumla


6 Muslim Sk Borjumla


7 Fazrul Sk Borjumla


8 Sonadhi

Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 AL No Vulnerability 2.66 0.004 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

9 Mofizul Islam

Borjumla Ward No 12

AL No Vulnerability 0.08 0.002 2.50 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

10 Prasanta

Saha Borjumla


11 Mofijuddin

Mondal Borjumla

Ward No 12 AL



12 Amirul Sk Borjumla


13 Sk Jakriya Borjumla


- 222 -

14 Amir

Hossion Borjumla


15 Amu Mistri Borjumla


16 Fazal Sk Borjumla


17 Afajuddin

Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 AL


0.176

0.002 1.14 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

18 Mazur Moral

Borjumla Ward No 12

AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly


19 Dubu Roy Borjumla

Ward No 12 C (L) No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA NA 15 4

26.67

15 4 26.67

20 Ajij Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW

+ L) Below Poverty

Line NA NA NA 80.94 36

44.48

NA NA NA NA NA NA

21 Atabul Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW

+ L) Below Poverty


49.42

NA NA NA NA NA NA

22 Rehan Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW

+ L) Below Poverty


32.12

NA NA NA NA NA NA

23 Abdul Bari Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW

+ L) Elderly NA NA NA 161.88 28

17.30

NA NA NA NA NA NA

24 Tapan Das

Borjumla Ward No 12

R (BW + L)


NA NA NA NA NA NA

25 Mozibur

Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW


12.97

NA NA NA NA NA NA

26 Salim Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW


10.50

NA NA NA NA NA NA

27 Nazrul Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW

+ L) Elderly NA NA NA 161.88 8.75

5.41

NA NA NA NA NA NA

28 Jitten Das Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW


10.71

NA NA NA NA NA NA

29 Abdul Rakib

Borjumla Ward No 12

R (BW + L)


NA NA NA NA NA NA

30 Ahalla Das

Borjumla Ward No 12

R (BW + L)



NA NA NA 388.51 20 5.15

NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 223 -

31 Aiowan Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW

+ L) No Vulnerability NA NA NA 80.94 23

28.42

NA NA NA NA NA NA

32 Nagen

Bhaskar Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW

+ L) Below Poverty Line + Elderly

NA NA NA 388.51 32 8.24

NA NA NA NA NA NA

33 Haibul

Rahaman Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW


NA NA NA 161.88 21 12.97

NA NA NA NA NA NA

34 Sasanka

Das Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW


NA NA NA 728.46 15 2.06

NA NA NA NA NA NA

35 Kaimuddin

Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW


51.89

NA NA NA NA NA NA

36 Basir Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW


5.51

NA NA NA NA NA NA

37 Latif Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW


29.65

NA NA NA NA NA NA

38 Abadul Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW


33.36

NA NA NA NA NA NA

39 Alauddin

Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW


NA NA NA 728.46 42 5.77

NA NA NA NA NA NA

40 Motiwar

Rehaman Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW


21.00

NA NA NA NA NA NA

41 Amina Bibi Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (BW

+ L)


Below Poverty Line

NA NA NA 40.47 10.5 25.95

NA NA NA NA NA NA

42 Abani Saha

Borjumla Ward No 12

R (L) Elderly NA NA NA 518 20 3.86

NA NA NA NA NA NA

43 Dhanapati

Das Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (L) Elderly NA NA NA 647.52 20

3.09

NA NA NA NA NA NA

44 Md Jiaul Haque

Borjumla Ward No 12

R (L) No Vulnerability NA NA NA 80.94 24 29.65

NA NA NA NA NA NA

45 Ketabul

Sk Borjumla

Ward No 12 R (L) No Vulnerability NA NA NA 80.94 26

32.12

NA NA NA NA NA NA

46 Fajlu Sk Borjumla


11.74

NA NA NA NA NA NA

47 Aafiz Sk Borjumla


17.30

NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 224 -


47 APs were surveyed along the Putia to Ramchandrapur road section. Of the 47 APs, 18 would bear an impact on tehri agricultural land, one on

commercial assets (land) while remaining 28 on residential assets (land and boundary wall). No APs would lose their trees along this road section.

Among the APs losing their residential assets, 18 of them would lose more than 10% of their assets. 28 APs were found to be suffering from various

types of vulnerabilities.

V. NORTH 24 PARGANAS DISTRICT

Table 15: Road Name: Keothshah Bazar To Jasaikathi District- North 24 Parganas District


New S.No


Holder

Name Of The Village

Type Of

Loss Vulnerability

Total Land

Holding

Total Land Loss

% Of Loss

Total Residential Land

Total Affected Residential Land

% Of Loss

Total Residential Structure

Total Affected


% Of

Loss

1 Abusam Mandal Jasaikathi AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly

0.5 0.18 36.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA

2 Rafiquel Islam Jasaikathi AL No Vulnerability 0.32 0.004 1.25 NA NA NA NA NA NA

3 Jamila Begum Jasaikathi AL No Vulnerability 1.12 0.217 19.38 NA NA NA NA NA NA

4 Daidur Dafadar Jasaikathi AL No Vulnerability 1.67 0.35 20.96 NA NA NA NA NA NA

5 Govinda Mandal Jasaikathi AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.4 0.008 2.00 NA NA NA NA NA NA

6 Abu Bakara

Mandal Jasaikathi AL


97.124 55 56.63 NA NA NA NA NA NA

7 Karim Bask

Majni Jasaikathi AL


1982.96 84 4.24 NA NA NA NA NA NA

8 Safikul Islam Jasaikathi AL Elderly 0.33 0.2 60.61 NA NA NA NA NA NA

9 Jamat Ali Jasaikathi AL Elderly 1.33 0.15 11.28 NA NA NA NA NA NA

10 Shiv Nath Jasaikathi AL Female Headed 0.24 0.17 70.83 NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 225 -

Mandal Household

11 Sunil Mandal Jasaikathi AL SC 0.256 0.02 7.81 NA NA NA NA NA NA

12 Subal Mandal Jasaikathi AL SC 3318.41 33 0.99 NA NA NA NA NA NA

13 Fakir Mondal Jasaikathi AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly

0.66 0.2 30.30 NA NA NA NA NA NA

14 Darbask Mandal Jasaikathi AL No Vulnerability 2.33 0.3 12.88 NA NA NA NA NA NA

15 Monajat Mandal Jasaikathi AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 1.33 0.18 13.53 NA NA NA NA NA NA

16 Liakat Ali Jasaikathi AL No Vulnerability 1.16 0.19 16.38 NA NA NA NA NA NA

17 Haran Das Jasaikathi AL Elderly+SC 0.67 0.27 40.30 NA NA NA NA NA NA

18 Abdul Waheb Jasaikathi AL No Vulnerability 453.24 62 13.68 NA NA NA NA NA NA

19 Abusam Mandal Jasaikathi AL Elderly+SC 0.23 0.2 86.96 NA NA NA NA NA NA

20 Pulin Mandal Jasaikathi AL SC 0.192 0.12 62.50 NA NA NA NA NA NA

21 Uttam Mandal Jasaikathi AL SC 1.52 0.8 52.63 NA NA NA NA NA NA

22 Banamali Mandal

Jasaikathi AL SC 0.512 0.22 42.97 NA NA NA NA NA NA

23 Panchkori

Mandal Jasaikathi R (BW)


NA NA NA NA NA NA 582.74 30 5.15

24 Esahak Ali Jasaikathi R (BW) No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA NA 1335.47 44 3.29

25 Mahadev Pal Jasaikathi R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA NA NA NA 2670.9 110.25 4.13

26 Nazrul Islam Jasaikathi R (BW) Elderly NA NA NA NA NA NA 647.5 24 3.71

27 Karim Mondal Jasaikathi R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly

NA NA NA NA NA NA 1335.47 46 3.44

28 Najrul Islam

Laskar Jasaikathi R (BW) No Vulnerability NA NA NA NA NA NA 453.247 46

10.15


Of the 28 APs identified along this road section (table 15 above), 22 of them would lose their agriculture land while remaining their residential assets

(boundary wall). No trees would be impacted along this road section. Only 8 APs were found to be suffering from no vulnerability among the 28 APs.

- 226 -

It is important to note that among the 22 APs losing their agriculture land, 17 of them would lose more than 10% of their land. Among these 17 APs

only 5 do not suffer from any vulnerability.

Table 16: Road Name: Old Bangaon East To Pratapnagar District- North 24 Parganas District


SrN

o

Nam

e O

f T

he R

eg

istr

ati

on

Ho

lder

Nam

e O

f T

he V

illa

ge

Typ

e O

f L

oss

Vu

lnera

bilit

y

To

tal L

an

d H

old

ing

To

tal L

an

d L

oss

% O

f L

oss

To

tal R

esid

en

tial

Str

uctu

re

To

tal A

ffecte

d R

esid

en

tial

Str

uctu

re

% O

f L

oss

To

tal A

ffecte

d C

om

me

rcia

l

Lan

d

To

tal A

ffecte

d C

om

me

rcia

l

Lan

d

% O

f L

oss

To

tal C

om

merc

ial

Str

uctu

re

To

tal A

ffecte

d S

tru

ctu

re

% O

f L

oss

1 Subol Ghosh Old Bongaon AL No Vulnerability 0.83 0.52 62.6

5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

2 Dulal Mondal Old Bongaon AL No Vulnerability 0.38 0.007 1.84 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

3 Khitis Pathak Pratap Nagar AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.272 0.005 1.84 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

4 Khokan

Mazumdar Pratap Nagar AL



5 Shanti Mandal Old Bongaon AL Elderly 0.08 0.02 25.0


6 Gobinda Mandal

Old Bongaon AL Elderly 0.33 0.1 30.3


7 Sukumar Biswas

Pratap Nagar AL SC 0.056 0.023 41.0


8 Tapan Sarkar Pratap Nagar AL SC 0.33 0.011 3.33 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 227 -

9 Dulal Ghosh Old Bongaon AL No Vulnerability 0.718 0.2 27.8


10 Rabindernath

Mandal Pratap Nagar AL SC 0.83 0.1

12.05

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

11 Govindo Mondal

Old Bongaon AL Female Headed Household + SC


12 Sadhan Biswas Pratap Nagar AL Below Poverty

Line + SC 0.08 0.006 7.50 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

13 Baidyanath

Mandal Pratap Nagar AL


0.32 0.144 45.0


14 Sushil Biswas Pratap Nagar AL Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC 0.33 0.011 3.33 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

15 Parturam Majhi Old Bongaon C (S) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA NA NA NA 44 20 45.45 44 22

50.00

16 Robin Sana Old Bongaon R (BW) No Vulnerability NA NA NA 453.264

42 9.27

NA NA NA NA NA NA

17 Dutta Biswas Old Bongaon R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly

NA NA NA 130 14 10.77

NA NA NA NA NA NA

18 Sonal Halder Old Bongaon R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA 122.

5 30

24.49

NA NA NA NA NA NA

19 Khudi Ram Old Bongaon R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

550.39

32 5.81

NA NA NA NA NA NA

20 Debananda

Sona Old Bongaon R (BW)


NA NA NA 453 20 4.42

NA NA NA NA NA NA

21 Nepal Dalapati Old Bongaon R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

971.28

40 4.12

NA NA NA NA NA NA

22 Swasti Sarkar Old Bongaon R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

226.63

32 14.12

NA NA NA NA NA NA

23 Haripada Biswas

Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

161.28

30 18.60

NA NA NA NA NA NA

24 Asit Pathak Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

80.94

26 32.12

NA NA NA NA NA NA

25 Satish Mitra Pratap Nagar R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA 28732.63

114 0.40

NA NA NA NA NA NA

26 Makhan Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty NA NA NA 388. 38 9.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 228 -

Biswas Line + SC 49 8

27 Ashok Das Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

445.15

375 84.24

NA NA NA NA NA NA

28 Promila Biswas Pratap Nagar R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA 849.83

20 2.35

NA NA NA NA NA NA

29 Bikash Roy Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC NA NA NA

607.02

40 6.59

NA NA NA NA NA NA

30 Karik Biswas Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

647.41

82 12.67

NA NA NA NA NA NA

31 Sunil Biswas Pratap Nagar R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA 1335.46

54 4.04

NA NA NA NA NA NA

32 Nisikanta Mandal

Pratap Nagar R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA 4046.85

56 1.38

NA NA NA NA NA NA

33 Premchand Boi

Ragi Pratap Nagar R (BW)


NA NA NA 323.74

152.5

47.11

NA NA NA NA NA NA

34 Sadhan Malik Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

388.5

20 5.15

NA NA NA NA NA NA

35 Bhadesdwar

Mitra Pratap Nagar R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA

323.76

30 9.27

NA NA NA NA NA NA

36 Karun Das Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

323.74

24 7.41

NA NA NA NA NA NA

37 Satya Mandal Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC NA NA NA

647.52

42 6.49

NA NA NA NA NA NA

38 Kanai Sarkar Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC NA NA NA

1375.1

36 2.62

NA NA NA NA NA NA

39 Kalpana Mondal

Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

161.88

26 16.06

NA NA NA NA NA NA

40 Kartik Mandal Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC NA NA NA

582.77

46 7.89

NA NA NA NA NA NA

41 Haridas

Mazumdar Pratap Nagar R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA

809.37

40 4.94

NA NA NA NA NA NA

42 Dulal Paul Pratap Nagar R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA 971. 40 4.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 229 -

28 2

43 Narayan Mandal

Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC NA NA NA

1230.29

36 2.93

NA NA NA NA NA NA

44 Bolai Kha Old Bongaon R (BW) SC NA NA NA 1011

7 14

0.14

NA NA NA NA NA NA

45 Subod Biswas Pratap Nagar R (BW) SC NA NA NA 453.264

27.5 6.07

NA NA NA NA NA NA

46 Susanta Mandal

Pratap Nagar R (BW) SC NA NA NA 1165.41

56 4.81

NA NA NA NA NA NA

47 Nabad Mondal Pratap Nagar R (BW) SC NA NA NA 647.52

38 5.87

NA NA NA NA NA NA

48 Sunil Haldar Old Bongaon R (BW) SC NA NA NA 260 46 17.69

NA NA NA NA NA NA

49 Sukshant Bhatt Pratap Nagar R (BW) SC NA NA NA 1497.39

22 1.47

NA NA NA NA NA NA

50 Tapas Dalawati Old Bongaon R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

97.128

22 22.65

NA NA NA NA NA NA

51 Late Rampada

Biswas Pratap Nagar R (BW)


NA NA NA 2428.11

98 4.04

NA NA NA NA NA NA

52 Bijay Mallik Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

1618.74

148 9.14

NA NA NA NA NA NA

53 Santosh Biswas


SC NA NA NA

1780.61

50 2.81

NA NA NA NA NA NA

54 Parimal Biswas Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

2711.39

98 3.61

NA NA NA NA NA NA

55 Posu Gopal

Miitra Old Bongaon R (BW) SC NA NA NA

122.504

16 13.06

NA NA NA NA NA NA

56 Birendra Nath

Mandal Pratap Nagar R (BW) Elderly+SC NA NA NA

1335.47

64 4.79

NA NA NA NA NA NA

57 Dulala Rani

Pathak Pratap Nagar R (BW) SC NA NA NA

1392.11

40 2.87

NA NA NA NA NA NA

58 Lalita Kha Old Bongaon R (BW) Female Headed Household + SC

NA NA NA 101175

37 0.04

NA NA NA NA NA NA

59 Kumar Haldar Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty NA NA NA 1335 27 2.0 NA NA NA NA NA NA

- 230 -

Line + SC .47 2

60 Nepal Dalapati Old Bongaon R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

259.008

32 12.35

NA NA NA NA NA NA

61 Debjani Bisale Pratap Nagar R (BW) Female Headed Household + SC

NA NA NA 849.84

32 3.77

NA NA NA NA NA NA

62 Bireswar Biswas


SC NA NA NA

2428.11

74 3.05

NA NA NA NA NA NA

63 Sarojit Kha Old Bongaon R (BW) Below Poverty

Line + SC NA NA NA

129.504

42 32.43

NA NA NA NA NA NA

64 Kabita Biswas Pratap Nagar R (BW) Female Headed Household + SC

NA NA NA 283.29

46 16.24

NA NA NA NA NA NA

65 Dhiren Sarkar Old Bongaon R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC NA NA NA

122.504

46 37.55

NA NA NA NA NA NA

66 Dulal Mondal Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC NA NA NA 0.67 0.19

28.36

NA NA NA NA NA NA

67 Niran Mitra Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC NA NA NA

485.62

30 6.18

NA NA NA NA NA NA

68 Bimal Bhoragi Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC NA NA NA

453.24

30 6.62

NA NA NA NA NA NA

69 Binod Roy Pratap Nagar R (BW) Below Poverty Line + Elderly +

SC NA NA NA

647.49

42.5 6.56

NA NA NA NA NA NA


A total of 69 APs were identified along the Old Bangaon East to Pratapnagar roads section. Of these total APs only 14 of them are losing their

agriculture land while remaining APs incur an impact on their commercial assets (1 AP) and residential assets (53 APs). 66 APs suffer from various

types of vulnerabilities of which 52 APs suffer from multiple vulnerabilities.

50% of the 14 APs losing their agriculture land would bear an impact on more than 10% of their assets. In case of APs losing residential assets, 17 of

them would lose more than 10% of their assets.

Annexure VI: List of Some Rural Development Schemes in West Bengal

(A) Employment Oriented Schemes

National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA): The Mahatma Gandhi National

Rural Employment Guarantee Act aims at enhancing the livelihood security of people in

rural areas by guaranteeing hundred days of wage-employment in a financial year to a

rural household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work. NREGA is

the first ever law internationally, that guarantees wage employment at an unprecedented

scale. The primary objective of the Act is augmenting wage employment. Its auxiliary

objective is strengthening natural resource management through works that address

causes of chronic poverty like drought, deforestation and soil erosion and so encourage

sustainable development. The process outcomes include strengthening grassroots

processes of democracy and infusing transparency and accountability in governance.

Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY): The basic objective of the scheme is

to bring the assisted poor families (swarozgaris) above the poverty line by providing them

income generating assets through a mix of bank credit and government subsidy. Credit is

the critical component of the scheme whereas the subsidy is an enabling element. The

scheme involves organisation of the poor into Self Help Groups (SHGs) build their

capacities through a process of social mobilization, their training, selection of key

activities, planning of activity clusters, creation of infrastructure, provision of technology

and marketing support, etc. Under the scheme focus is on the group approach. However,

individual Swarozgaris are also assisted. The SGSY is being implemented by the District

Rural Development Agencies (DRDAs) with the active involvement of Panchayati Raj

Institutions (PRIs), banks, line Departments and the Non-Government Organisations

(NGOs). the scheme is implemented in two phases, (a) At the District and Intermediate

Panchayat along with the Zila Parishad and (b) At the village Panchayat and Gram

Panchayats through DRDAs/Zila Parishads.

Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojana (SGRY): The scheme provides wage employment

in rural areas along with the food security, creation of durable community, social and

economic assets and infrastructure developments. It includes the rural poor (BPL and

APL) who are in need of wage employment and are willing to take up manual or unskilled

work. Preference is given to the poorest among the poor, Scheduled Castes/ Scheduled

tribes, and parents of child labour, withdrawn from hazardous occupation. This scheme

includes the earlier initiated Employment Assurance Scheme for assured wage

employment during the lean agriculture season.

Jawahar Rozgar Yojana (JRY): The programme is directed to provide wage

employment to the rural poor during the lean agricultural season. It also aims to provided

employment and create rural infrastructure through the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs).

The National Rural Employment Programme (NERP) and Rural Landless Employment

Guarantee Programme (RLEGP) are also merged with the scheme. Safeguards for

weaker sections (Scheduled Castes/ Scheduled Tribes, freed bonded laborers and

parents of child laborers withdrawn from hazardous / non – hazardous occupation for

employment, women) of the community are covered under the scheme.

- 232 -

(B) Rural Housing Schemes

Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY): The IAY is being implemented as an independent scheme

since 1996. It aims to provide assistance for construction / upgradation of dwelling units

to the Below Poverty Line (BPL) rural households, with special emphasis on SCs, STs

and freed bonded labor categories. A maximum assistance of Rs 35,000 per unit is

provided for construction in plain areas and Rs 38,500 per unit for hilly/difficult areas.

Rs15000 is given for upgradation of a dwelling unit for all areas. The funding of IAY is

shared between the Centre and State in the ratio of 75:25. District Rural Development

Agencies (DRDAs)/ Zilla Parishads on the basis of allocations made and targets fixed

decide Panchayat-wise number of houses to be constructed under IAY, during a

particular financial year and intimate the same to the Gram Panchayat. Thereafter, the

Gram Sabha selects the beneficiaries restricting its number to the target allotted, from the

list of eligible households, according to IAY guidelines and as per ascertained priorities.

Credit-cum Subsidy Scheme for Rural Housing: Covers households (below the

poverty line and above it) who could not be covered under Indira Awas Yojana, as either

they do not fall within the range of eligibility or due to the limits imposed by the available

budget. The target group covered under the scheme is rural households having an annual

income of up to Rs 32000/- only. However, Below Poverty line Rural Households shall be

given preference. 60% of the funds allocated under this Scheme as subsidy to each

State, is utilized in financing the construction of Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and

freed bonded laborers. Identification of beneficiaries under the scheme is the sole

prerogative of the States. The Implementation Agency may be the State Housing Board,

State Housing Corporation, specified Scheduled Commercial Bank, Housing Finance

Institution or the DRDA/ ZPs and shall be left to the State Government.

National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP): NSAP was launched with the aim to

provide social assistance benefit to poor households in the case of old age, death of

primary breadwinner and maternity. The programme supplements the efforts of the State

Governments with the objective of ensuring minimum national levels of well being and the

Central assistance is an addition to the benefit that the States are already providing on

Social Protection Schemes. It provides opportunities for linking the social assistance

package to schemes for poverty alleviation and the provision of basic needs. The scheme

is implemented by the Panchayats so as to make it responsive and cost-effective.

Panchayats are encouraged to involve voluntary agencies to the extent possible in taking

these benefits to the poor households for whom they are intended.

(C) Land Related Schemes

Land Reforms: It covers the landless poor and involves restructuring agrarian relations

to achieve an egalitarian social structure, elimination of exploitation in land relations;

realizing the age-old goal of land to the tiller; increasing agricultural productivity and

production and infusing equality in local institutions. Abolition of intermediary tenures;

Tenancy reforms; Ceiling on agriculture holdings and re-distribution of surplus land; and

Updating and maintenance of land records are the main objectives. These include the

main legal provisions enacted in protecting the ownership and tenurial rights of the

population.

Drought Prone Areas Programme: The scheme has been initiated to tackle the

problems in areas that are constantly affected by severe drought conditions. The basic

- 233 -

objective of the programme is to minimize the adverse effects of drought on the

production of crops and livestock and productivity of land, water and human resources

there by ultimately leading to the drought proofing of the affected areas. The programme

also aims at promoting the overall economic development and improving the socio-

economic condition of the resources poor and disadvantaged sections inhabiting the

programme areas. DRDA/ Zila Panchayat are the nodal Government agencies at the

district level to act as facilitator and provider of finances technical mechanism for effective

participation of the local people and the Panchayati Raj Institutions at all stage of project

management is covered.

(d) Schemes for Tribal Development

Integrated Tribal Development Project: The main objective of ITDP is socio-

economic development of tribal communities through income generating schemes allied

with Infrastructure Development programmes and protection of the tribal communities

against exploitation. The ITDA project areas are generally contiguous areas of the size of

a Tehsil or Block or more in which the ST population is 50% or more of the total. The

Project recognizes that the tribals are relatively less endowed, compared to their non-

tribal counterparts in terms of technical, financial and institutional capabilities. (Ref:

Integrated Tribal Development Agency)

Special Central Assistance & Grants Under Article 275 (I) of the Constitution: It aims

to supplement efforts by the Government in tribal development through Tribal Sub-Plan

through family-oriented income-generating schemes in the sector of agriculture,

horticulture, minor irrigation, soil conservation, animal husbandry, residential schools,

hostels, roads, culverts, minor irrigation, forests, education, cooperatives, fisheries,

village and small scale industries and for minimum needs programme. Grants are also

given to meet the costs of projects for tribal development and for raising the level of

administration of Scheduled Area.(Ref: Ministry of Tribal Affairs)

Scheme of Development of Primitive Tribal Group: A scheme for overall development

of primitive tribal groups under which financial assistance is made available to integrated

Tribal Development Projects, Tribal Research Institutes and Non-Governmental

Organisations for undertaking projects/ activities not covered by any of the existing

schemes. The funds under the Central Sector Scheme for the development of Primitive

Tribal Groups (PTGs) would be available only for those items/activities which though very

crucial for the survival, protection and development of Primitive Tribal Groups (PTGs), are

not specifically catered to by any existing schemes, State or Central or by Guidelines

governing the utilization of funds under Special Central Assistance to Tribal Sub-Plan and

Article 275(1) of the Constitution. (Ref: Ministry of Tribal Affairs)

Vocational Training in Tribal Areas: Developing the skills of the tribal youth in order to

gain employment / self-employment opportunities by setting up of Vocational Training

Centers (VTCs) is the main objective of the scheme and implemented through State

governments and NGOs. (Ref: Ministry of Tribal Affairs)

Technical Training through Training cum Production centers (TCPC): The less

educated tribal youth are trained in different trades of production like carpentry,

blacksmith, pottery, etc. and also produced such articles on supply orders, which increase

their earning while also getting trained.

- 234 -

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Finance and Development Corporations:

The scheme for assistance to the scheduled Castes Finance and Development

Corporation and the establishment for the National Scheduled castes/ Scheduled Tribes

Finance and Development Corporation (NSFDC) are important measures for economic

development of SC & ST. These Corporations function not only as guarantors and

promoters but also play a very important role in the context of attracting credit from

financial institutions. These Corporations identify the target families and motivate them to

undertake economic development schemes besides sponsoring the cases of financial

institutions for credit support. These Corporations also extend margin money loan to the

beneficiaries at concessional rates of interest out of share capital assistance as also

subsidy from the Special Central Assistance.

SCHEMES UNDER MINISTRY OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT

The Norwegian Agency for International Development (NORAD) offers assistance on

a sustained basis for poor and needy women in rural areas. The main emphasis of the

programme is on income generating activities with the aim of achieving self-reliance on

sustained basis. The department of Women and Child Development would provide

financial assistance for the stipend that will be given to the trainees with an attendance

record of 75 percent and above.

Support to Training and Employment Programme For Women (STEP): A scheme

ensuring security of women in the traditional informal sector with an objective of

extending training for up gradation of skills & sustainable employment. The Scheme

covers 8 traditional sectors of employment, viz Agriculture, Small Animal Husbandry,

Dairying, Fisheries, Handlooms, Handi – crafts, Khadi and Village Industries and

Sericulture, Social Forestry and Waste Land Development. Employment will be provided

on a project basis by mobilizing women in viable groups, improving skills, arranging for

support services, providing access to credit, awareness generation, gender

sensitization, nutrition education, sensitization of project functionaries.

The target group covered includes the marginalized, asset less rural women including

wage laborers, unpaid daily workers, female-headed households, migrant laborers, tribal

and other dispossessed groups. The beneficiaries under the projects will be poor or asset

less maginalised women with special focus on SC/ST households, women headed

households and families below the poverty line. The Scheme implemented through Public

Sector Organisations, District Rural Development Agencies, Federations, Co-operatives

and Voluntary Organizations – Non-Governmental Voluntary Organizations working in

rural areas.

Swawlamban (NORAD) Scheme implemented by the Department of Women and Child

Development with partial assistance from Norway. Its basic objective is to provide training

and skill to women to facilitate them obtain employment or self-employment on a

sustained basis. The target group under the scheme are the poor and needy women,

women from weaker sections of the society, such as Scheduled Castes and Scheduled

Tribes, etc. Financial assistance is provided to undertake training programmes for women

in both traditional as well as non-traditional trades. The State Women Corporations

(WDCs) are the nodal agencies for the implementation of the scheme mostly through the

voluntary organizations of the State. Financial assistance is provided to Women

Development Corporations/Public Sector Corporations/ Autonomous bodies and

registered voluntary organizations. Wherever the State Women Development

- 235 -

Corporations do not exist the scheme is implemented through the State Social Welfare

Advisory Board.

SWAYAMSIDHA aims at holistic empowerment of women through awareness

generation, economic empowerment and convergence of various schemes:

Indira Mahila Yojana (IMY)

Balika Samriddhi Yojana (MSY)

An integrated scheme for women’s empowerment

Based on the formation of women into Self-Help Groups (SHGs)

The main implementing district/intermediary level panchayat institutions along with NGOs

or Government departments/ organizations.

Swadhar, Scheme of women in difficult circumstances: The scheme addresses the

specific vulnerability of each of group of women in difficult circumstances through a

Home-based holistic and integrated approach. It is aims to support the women socially

and economically through provision of shelter, food, clothing and education to rehabilitate

them. Awareness, skill up gradation and personality development through behavioral

training are also ingrained components of the scheme. The main target groups included

widows deserted by families, women survivors of natural disasters, mentally challenged

or handicapped women etc. the main implementing agency is Social Welfare/ Women

and Child Welfare Department, NGOs, Women Development Corporations.

Political Representations of Women by People’s Rural Education Movement has

promoted rural women to represent their villages in the Panchayat (village council) and

currently more than 30% of the seats in the Panchayat are filled by. It also conducts

different activities as money saving, adult literacy etc. which helps tribal women to come

out from their cocoon. It will also help tribal women in that area to become aware of and

accept different activities as money saving, adult literacy etc. which helps tribal women to

come out from their cocoon. It will also help tribal women in that area to become aware of

and accept different health practices for their improvement.

Self-help groups (SHGs) as an alternative employment model have been set covering

BPL persons have found employment under the self-employment schemes. The SHG

experiment has taken off largely among women. The SHGs provide inter-loaning for small

economic activities to the members of the group. These SHGs are also eligible for loans

from institutions such as NABARD, Rashtriya Mahila Kosh and the nationalized banks. A

related project has established marketing linkages for the SHGs. Rural markets or

grameen haats are sought to be created in this project. Some of the SHGs were also in

charge of preparation of the mid-day meals in schools across the State, which helps them

earn an additional income.

Rashtriya Mahila Kosh: The main objective of RMK is to facilitate credit support or

micro-finance to poor women, as an instrument of socio-economic change and

development. RMK mainly channelises its support through Non-Governmental

Organizations, Women Development Corporations, Women Cooperative Societies, Indira

Mahila Block Samities under the Indira Mahila Block Samities under the Indira Mahila

- 236 -

Yojana and suitable State Govt. agencies. It encompasses several other in built and

ongoing schemes under MoRD to provide easy access to credit for women.

OTHER SOCIAL WELFARE SCHEMES

Annapurna: A MoRD scheme covering the old age people under the National Old Age

Pension Scheme, for distribution of food for the poor pensioners who will be eligible for

10kg of rice every month. According to the Govt of Orissa, the district administration will

issue separate ration cards in distinct colors to the Annapurna scheme beneficiaries. The

Principal Commissioner for Revenue Administration oversees the implementation. In

villages, panchayats will distribute free rice. The names and addresses of all beneficiaries

will be displayed at the panchayat offices.

The center is to introduce a comprehensive insurance scheme for people living below the

poverty (BPL) line, i.e., poorest of poor to be covered by insurance through LIC in the

country.

Jan Shri Bhima Yojana: A comprehensive social security scheme for sub-poverty line

families at subsidized premium (50 per cent) rates.

- 237 -

Annexure VII: Monitoring Formats

Form Title Frequency Preparation Audit/Verification

Summary Monitoring

Sheet

(Form M-1)

Monthly PIU TSC

Verification of Ownership

of Land and Assets

(Form M-2)

Once for each

project road

before start

collecting

MOU

Information collected

and verified by PRI

and Revenue

Department, and

compiled into the form

by PIU

TSC

MOU Collection and

Grievance Redressal

(Form M-3)

Monthly Information to be

collected and verified

by PRI and Revenue

Department and

compiled into the form

by PIU

TSC

Progress of Distribution of

Support/Assistance

(Form M-4)

Monthly Progress monitored

by PRI and compiled

into the form by PIU

TSC

External Monitoring and

Evaluation

(Form M-5)

Every six

months

TSC -

PIC: Project Implementation Consultant, PIU: Programme Implementation Unit, PRI:

Panchayati Raj Institution, TSC: Technical Support Consultant.

- 238 -

Form M-1: Summary Monitoring Sheet (monthly)

(as of end (month, year))

State: District: Block: Village:

Name of Subproject Road: Road No.:

Project stage Task Time Frame Completed

(Date)

Outstanding

tasks

Time frame for

completion

Road

Selection

stage

Dissemination of PMGSY

road under Core network

After approval of

Core Network

Selection of Roads

Pro

ject

Pla

nn

ing

& D

esig

n S

tag

e

DP

R P

rep

ara

tio

n S

tag

e

Dissemination of Project

Information

First week of DPR

preparation

Sensitization of community First week of DPR

preparation

Finalization of alignment

(Transect Walk, alignment

shifts & incorporation of

community suggestion)

First month of DPR

Preparation

Consultations with

Community/APs

First month of DPR

Preparation, after

alignment

finalization

Survey for Profile of APs 5th to 6

th week of

DPR Preparation

Identification of vulnerable

APs

6th week of the DPR

preparation

Dissemination of process of

voluntary donation,

support/assistance options &

grievance procedures

7th week of DPR

Preparation

Finalization of

support/assistance

8th week of DPR

preparation

Marking of Alignment 12 th week of DPR

Preparation

Incorporating impact

mitigation measures in DPR

End of fourth month

of DPR preparation

Scrutiny and approval of DPR

Sit

e P

rep

ara

tio

n

Sta

ge

Po

st

DP

R S

tag

e Collection of MoU First month of

implementation

after approval of

DPR

Advance notice to farmers First month of

implementation

- 239 -

with standing crops after approval of

DPR

Relocation/Shifting of

structures / Common

Property Resources

By the 2nd

month of

implementation

after approval

Provision of

support/assistance

Between 3rd-5

th

month of

implementation

after approval of

DPR

Enrollment into RD schemes From 3rd month of

implementation

after approval of

DPR

Physical possession of land

by PIU

From 3rd month of

implementation

after approval of

DPR

Co

ns

tru

cti

on

sta

ge

Redressal of grievances Throughout Project

cycle

Unforeseen impacts From 4th month of

project

implementation , till

completion of

construction work

Tree Plantation

Note: This form will be prepared monthly by the PIU for each village.

240

Form M-2: Verification of Ownership of Land and Assets

(as on (date, month, year))



S.No. Name

of the

AP

Category of

AP

(Titleholder,

Tenant,

squatter,

Encroacher

and others)

Vulnerable

AP

Khasra

No.

Type of

Land

affected

(sq m)

Type of

Structure

affected

(Residential,

Commercial,

and Resi +

Comm) (sq

m)

Trees,

wells,

CPR and

other

losses

Livelihood

losses

Verified (Y/N) Remarks

241

Note: This form will be first prepared during Transect Walk and further refined during consultation with affecter persons/households. Ownership will

be verified during consultation and census survey. Information on ownership will be collected by PRI and Patwari, and compiled by PIU.

242

Form M-3: MOU Collection and Grievance Redressal (monthly)




S.No. Name of the Eligible

APs / community

Verification and Collection of MOUs Grievance Redress

Ownership verified

by Revenue official

(Date) and PIU

MOU

signed

prior to

date of

contract

award

MOU Signed

and collected

by PIU (Date)

Remarks Any

Grievance

reported

Reason for

the

grievance

Grievance

resolved /

unresolved

by LMC

Grievance

resolved /

unresolved by

GRC

Time taken

to resolve

the

grievance

Remarks

243

Note: Information for this form will be provided by PRI. This form will be filled out by the PIU.

244

Form M-4: Progress of Distribution of Support/Assistance (monthly)




S.No. Name of

the Eligible

APs /

community

Support/Assistance for Vulnerable APs

Alternate land Site Cash

assistance

for land or

structure,

trees,

wells and

other

assets

Inclusion

in

housing

/ RD

schemes

for IR

Provision

of

alternate

plot and

structure

Cash

assistance

for

livelihood

losses /

linkage to

RD

schemes

Material &

labor for

rebuilding

structures

Alternate

rental

arrangements

for tenants

Replacement

and

Relocation

of CPR

Advance

notice

for

crops

Remarks

245

Note: Distribution of support/assistance is monitored by PRI. This format will be prepared by PRI and compiled by PIU.

246

Form M-5: External Monitoring and Evaluation (bi-annually)

(for the period covering the six months from (month, year) to (month, year))

State: District: Block: Number and Name of Sample Villages:

Name of Subproject Road Road No.: Total Number of Sample Households (APs and Non-AP households):

Monitoring and Evaluation Indicators Description

A. Adequacy of Budget

(i) enrollment of APs in RD schemes

(ii) Funds allocated for cash assistance, relocation, legal process of land transfer and other

support costs

B. Severity of Impacts

(i) % of APs losing less than 5% and more land, % of vulnerable APs losing less than 5%

and more

(ii) % of APs having residual land below district average

(iii) No. of structures and CPRs affected.

(iv) No. of affected structures and CPRs relocated.

(v) Variations in the number of APs and that in DPR

247

C. Social Infrastructure Development Indicators

(i) Increased ownership of production assets (agricultural implements, tractors etc)

(ii) Increased asset ownership such as two-wheelers, bicycle etc

(iii) Reduction in travel time and cost to basic services such as educational, medical facility

etc (iv) Frequency of bus services (v) Number of children born in PHCs; (vi) Enrollment in

schools; (vii) Improved road safety; (viii) Role of Women in decision-making

D. Economic Indicators

(i) Source of income, (ii) Number of earners per household; (iii) Average number of days of

employment in month/year; (iv) Increase in wage rates (Rs/day); (v) Alteration in agricultural

practices (Method and intensity of cropping, use of HYV etc); (vi) Number & frequency of

migration of work

E. Adequacy Of Mitigation Measures

(i) percentage of APs actually enrolled in RD and government housing schemes; (ii)

percentage of AP continuing with schemes; (iii) Percentage of APs who perceive to have

benefited from the schemes; (iv) percentage of APs receiving alternate land and assistance

for relocating and rebuilding structure or assistance for land and structure; (v) percentage of

APs receiving assistance for rebuilding structure on existing land not requiring relocation; (vi)

others

E. Adequacy Of Mitigation Measures

(i) percentage of APs actually enrolled in RD and government housing schemes; (ii)

percentage of AP continuing with schemes; (iii) Percentage of APs who perceive to have

benefited from the schemes; (iv) percentage of APs receiving alternate land and assistance

for relocating and rebuilding structure or assistance for land and structure; (v) percentage of

APs receiving assistance for rebuilding structure on existing land not requiring relocation; (vi)

248

others

F. Adequacy Of Land Transfer Documentation

(i) percentage of plots identified for land donation ; (ii) percentage of cases where

deeds/mutation has been done

G. Grievance Redressal

(i) No. of grievances per APs in each corridor; (ii) Percentage of grievances redressed; (iii)

any time for redressal of grievance existence and effectiveness of GR mechanism

H. Realism Of Work Schedule

(i) No. of activities which has exceeded time limit; (ii) Any time spell over

Note: This report will be prepared by TSC for each district based on a sample assessment of affected and non-affected households.

ind: rural connectivity investment program · ind: rural connectivity investment program ... block...

Documents