in the supreme court of ohio relator seeks an alternative writ as an emergency stay preventing judge...
TRANSCRIPT
y P
^Fa
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
IN RE SAMANTHA JOHNSPRO SE75 Woods Drive Apt. 1
West Milton, Ohio 45383(937)751-9893
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Supreme Court No
Relator,
V.
THE HONORABLE MARY L. WISEMAN
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
COMMON PLEAS COURT
41 N. Perry Street
Dayton, Ohio 45402
WARD BARRENTINE
KARINA KOROSTYSHEVSKY
HEATHERJANS
MATTHEW T. CRAWFORD
ASSISTANT PORSECUTING ATTORNEYS
Dayton-Montgomery County Courts Bldg.
P.O. Box 972, 301 W. Third Street
Dayton, Ohio 45422
(937)225-5757
ALYSIA A. GOSS
LAW OF PUBLIC DEFENDER
117 S. Main Street, Suite 400Dayton, Ohio 45422
(937)225-4652
* PETITION FOR ALTERNATIVE WRIT
* WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR
* OTHER APPROPRATE RELIEF*
*
*
* y
* t {.iN ^;^^ %sja^^`.s.
* ------------------------------------------------------------------
BOBBYJOECOX
ATTORNEY AT LAW
130 W. Second Street Suite 800Dayton, Ohio 45402(937)228-1975
RICHARD BUTCH BARNES J. ALLEN WILMES
ATTORNEY AT LAW ATTORNEY AT LAW
41 E. Main Street 7821 N. Dixie Drive
Enon, Ohio 45323 Dayton, Ohio 45414
(937)340-2226 (937)278-0652 Respondents,
PETITION FOR ALTERNATIVE WRIT, WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR OTHER
APPROPRIATE RELIEF
I. INTRODUCTION
Now comes, Samantha Johns (Harrison) Relator, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.01 through
12.10, Supreme Court under Article IV, Section 2. File this Original Petition for Alternative Writ,
Writ Of Prohibition or other appropriate relief. Under Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure 21, file
this Original action, requesting that this Court prohibit the Honorable Mary L. Wiseman, Judge
of the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court, from further participation in the case below,
State v. Samantha Harrison (Johns) Case No. 2012 CR 00138. S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05. Alternative
Writs. Unless the Supreme Court orders otherwise, issuance of an alternative writ in a
prohibition case stays proceedings in the action sought to be prohibited until final
determination of the Supreme Court.
Relator seeks an Alternative Writ as an emergency stay preventing Judge Wiseman from
proceeding with the trial in this case below, until the Writ of Prohibition is resolved. This court
lacks jurisdiction from proceeding any further.
Relator seeks Writ of Prohibition to prevent Respondent from preceding any further
from the case below, this relator has an unequivocal doubt she will not receive a fair a trial. This
court has already set the schedule for and how this trial wi/l be ran according to this courts
filed, ORDER AND ENTRY SETTING TIME LIMITS FOR TRIAL. This action in its self, shows the bias
this court has on this case. This court plans on holding Jury Selection in Chambers. Just one of
the many rule violations by this court.
Relator states that absent the granting of the Alternative Writ now sought, the court
could act in this Relators detriment and in violation of her Constitution Rights afforded her,
which this Relator has no adequate remedy at law. Relator also seeks the Writ of Prohibition
from this Court directing this lower court to vacate/cease or dismiss this case below.
IL INTRODUCTION
Petitioner, reasonably fears that the court, will not be impartial in the case below. The well-
founded fear that Relator, would not receive a fair trial is under scored by the extraordinary
issues in this case. This relator will provide a copy of this lower courts motion for ORDER AND
ENTRY SETTING TIME LIMITS FOR TRIAL, among the many things that are injustice about this
motion thus instilling she will not receive a fair trial. The very reason it is imperative this Court
grant this Emergency Stay of Proceedings and grant this Writ of Prohibition. "Injustice
anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" (Martin Luther King, Jr.) This trial will cause
continued great detriment to this relators health and well-being and an undue burden of the
tax payers of this County of Montgomery. This relator has also lost 3 jobs, due to these unlawful
acts, one being at the Wright Patterson Air Force Base. When the law is clear and unambiguous
does not lead absurd consequences, the law shall be applied as written and no further
interpretation may be made in search of the intent of the legislature. Acts 1987, No. 124, 1, eff.
Jan. 1, 1988. To hold nothing but contempt for human rights as resulted in barbarous acts
which this relator has had to suffer and endure at this courts mercy for almost a year now.
Which involve no less than the office of the Montgomery County Prosecutor; Ward Barrentine,
Karina Korostyshevsky, Heather Jans and Matthew T. Crawford. My court appointed counsel; J.
Allen Wilmes, Bobby Joe Cox, Richard Butch Barnes and Alysia A. Goss. Attorneys are expected
to represent their clients to the best of their abilities, using all reasonable, available, ethical and
legal means to achieve their client's goals. The court lacks jurisdiction in the case below, so it
has no authority to reach merits, but rather, should dismiss the action. The court has acted in
judicial misconduct in ways that are considered unethical and impartial conduct. These actions
include: conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of
the court. This court and my attorney's have been, for lack of a better term, builing,
threatening, and using cohesion to intimidate this relator. Treating this relator in a
demonstrably egregious and hostile manner. Violating other specific, mandatory standards of
judicial conduct; due process, the principle that an individual cannot be deprived of life, liberty,
or property with appropriate legal procedures and safeguards. Such as judicial rules of
procedure and evidence, acting outside the jurisdiction of the court. This court is guilty of
excessive bail. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and
unusual punishments inflicted. The point of bond (or bail) isn't to ensure that the defendant
cannot post it, but rather to ensure that he has enough invested in the posting of that bond
that it provides an incentive for him to return to court and thus avoid forfeiting that amount.
The courts performance of official duties that the conduct would have a prejudicial effect on
the courts among reasonable people. These prosecutor's have continued to prosecute this case
having full knowledge the state is without jurisdiction, and within the bounds of the law. They
are failing to provide exculpatory evidence that would exonerate this relator. Not one of this
relators attorneys have raised a Constitutional shield to protect my rights or amendment's.
They have aided in this injustice to violate this relator and condone this outrageous behavior
from this court. This relator has been deprived of her rights, under the United States
Constitution, to due process and equal protection of the law by all respondents in the case
below. This relator will also prove that these respondents have only brought this scandalous
case to cover up the heinous and atrocious behavior of Montgomery County Children Services
and The Montgomery County Common Pleas Court Juvenile Division. Whereas it is essential, if
man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and
oppression, that rights should be protected by the rule of law. The allegations in this Motion for
Emergency Stay and Writ of Prohibition are supported by the affidavit of Samantha Johns,
relator. This relator prays upon this Court to grant such other and further relief as the Court
deems equitable, just and proper. In that petitioner has no knowledge or background in such
extensive law, petitioner respectfully requests this Court to view this petition in a manner that
will most efficiently accomplish petitioner's stated objectives; whether that be this Emergency
Petition for Writ of Prohibition and Motion for Stay of Proceedings or otherwise.
Ill. INTRODUCTION
This unique and most extraordinary situation involving the closeness of this criminal
case and a civil custody case that involve my children. The United States demands strict
adherence to the Rules of Judicial Conduct. Where a judge's impartiality might reasonably be
questioned, disqualification is required, regardless of the judge's impartiality, or weather this
court would question the judge's impartiality, but instead, weather an ordinary litigant would
readably question the judge's impartiality. "A determination must be made as to whether the
facts alleged would place a reasonable prudent person in fear of not receiving a fair and
impartial trial." Livingston v. State, 441 So. 2d 1083, 1087 (Fla.1983). If ever there were a
situation which required the Appellate Court to strictly adhere to the standards long enunciated
in the opinions of the Courts of this state, that situation has arrived.
FACTS OF THE CASE
1. This relator will first try and show this Honorable Court how this investigation has
been done illegally. Please bare with me because this case starts with my civil case
that started in August 2012. It is imitative I prove that all the evidence in this
criminal case has been obtained illegally.
2. August 28, 2012 Civil Ex Parte Hearing at Montgomery County Juvenile Court
Detective Isaiah Keller Montgomery County Sheriff's Office, Unit Assignment Sex
Offenders/Internet Crimes and Pornography with Care House was present. This
relator was never told who this person was, during this hearing however. This man
was allowed to sit in this hearing and feed questions to the prosecutor Ann Gramza,
while this relator was on the stand testifying. I was not Mirandized in anyway. My
attorney asked for separation of witnesses before this hearing began. Everyone
agreed to this stipulation.
3. Detective Isaiah Keller was allowed to sit in the first 5 hearings that took place at
Montgomery County Juvenile Court. During these hearings he would feed questions
to Ann Gramza, prosecutor for Montgomery County Children Services. He also
attended every meeting that was with the Montgomery Count Children Service
Agency during this time. He would ask this relator many questions during these said
meetings. I was never Mirandized in anyway.
4. This Detective testify in 2 separate hearings and testified about the criminal
investigation. He also testified to being in said meetings. This detective also obtained
Medical record for a criminal investigation for this relators son, not only did he pass
my son's privileged and private medical records out to everyone involved, he
obtained medical records from Cincinnati Childrens Medical Center with no
subpoena or rights to said medical records. The Praecipe and Subpoena this
detective obtained from the Grand Jury was also obtained by the very doctor that
made false statements about me and my son, Doctor Bob Shapiro. This Subpoena is
dated July 26, 2012 The reason this date is so significant, is because this detective
testified he had no knowledge of this case until after Montgomery County Children
Services filed for the Ex Parte Order on August 27, 2012 (See Exhibit 1)
5. On October 23, 2012 Detective Isaiah Keller obtained an IN RE: ORDER AND
JOURNAL ENTRY for this relators bank records from Chase Bank. (See Exhibit 2)
Detective Keller's investigative supplement, on October 23, 2012 the Honorable
Judge Barbara Gorman approved the court order. This report is dated October 24,
2012. (Exhibit 3) These records where obtained illegally. These records where
obtained with false testimony from a doctor Bob Shapiro with Cincinnati Childrens
Medical Center. Then this detective broke the Rules of Evidence by distributing this
relotors bank records to Mongomery County Children Services, and their prosecutor,
the Gardian at Litem, Robin Traywick, my children's attorney Douglas Haun, and
everyone involved in the case. An officer who obtains a warrant through material
false statements which result in an unconstitutional seizure may be held liable
personally for his actions under 1983. Aponte Matos v. Toledo Davilla, 1st Cir. 1998)
6. On November 20, 2012, My Civil attorney Denny Gump asked the Court to dismiss
him from my civil case because I could not afford him any longer due to my case
getting out of control, and due to the Sheriff°s Office now talking about criminal
charges for fraudulent fund raising and or well-fair fraud. This is the first I had heard
anything about this.
7. January 28, 2013, My Civil, Court appointed attorney Shawn Hooks told me in a
meeting that I was being investigated by the Sheriff's Office for embezzling funds for
the fundraising and well-fair fraud.
8. March 5, 2013, My Civil, Court appointed attorney Marcy Vonderwell handed me my
application from Job and Family Services for cash and food assistance. She told me
that the Sheriff's office was investigating me for well-fair fraud. I started asking
questions about it and she said I can't tell you much but they had to provide this in
in the discovery packet. (See Exhibit 4)
9. Over the next year my caseworker on many occasions would not let me forget that I
was being investigated by the Sheriff's Office right in front of my 3 little boys.
10. On January 14, 2014 Montgomery County Ohio Clerk of Courts - Indicted Charges
Theft ($1000 But Less Than $7,500) ( By Deception) 2014 CR 00138 - STATE OF OHIO
vs SAMANTHA HARRISON (Exhibit 5)
11. On February 08, 2013, Detective Keller testified in my Civil Case, not only did this
detective commit Perjury on the stand after he was swore to tell the truth. He is also
the Detective on the criminal case below. He testified he did not become aware of
this case until after the sheriff's office assisted with removal of my children not once
but twice, he testifying to that fact. The subpoena for the Dayton Children Medical
records came back on July 26, 2012. This subpoena states: to call Detective Keller
when ready to be picked up 225-6296. 32 days before my children were removed
from my home. His testimony is imperative to this case because if he committed
perjury on the stand testifying and admitted to obtaining a subpoena for Medical
records, for criminal investigation purposes only, to find out if a criminal act had
been committed. Then admitted that the subpoena did not give him the permission
to give it out freely to whom ever wanted it, which he also admitted to giving it out.
However, he only obtained one subpoena for Dayton Children Medical Center only.
However, somehow this detective had received medical records from Cincinnati
Childrens Medical Center and had these in his possession, and distributed them as
well. When questioned about how this happened, he couldn't give an answer. Then
lied about the date he obtained the subpoena. He also admitted to conducting a
forensic interview on my child of 7 years old, without a parent or an attorney
present for approximately 45 minutes. This detective stated my son told him, "he
suffered from loss of balance, weakness, and dizziness" This is kind of ironic because
the school testified this 7 year old had the intellect of a pre-kindergartener, 3 to 4
years old, I would say those are some pretty big words. Detective Keller testified he
interviewed my 7 year old on August 31, before speaking to me or their (suspected)
father, he was asked by the prosecutor, and "did you know what he was referring to
when he said he got a hundred dollars for the fish fry?" This Detective said, "Yes, I
did." Then he was asked, "how were you aware of that fish fry?" He answered,
"from speaking to the (suspected) father, he said that there was a fish fry fund raiser
for him." But Mr. Rezabek caught him in this lie and he had to recant his statement.
His interview with the (suspected) father was just a few days before this hearing. He
also admitted to only starting the criminal investigation after his illegal interview
with my son, but then how did he obtain the subpoena on July 26th 2012, 36 days
before this interview? He also testified to evidence he obtained through his criminal
investigation, after my son's interview but the prosecutor failed to provide it in the
discovery stage. The prosecutor told the court that it was introduced in the ex parte
hearing on August 28, 2012, however, because this was evidence that this Detective
obtained after his interview with my son, following up on a lead my son told him. I
feel this detective had a moral obligation to tell this court that it was impossible
because that was well after his interview and the ex parte hearing, but he stood
silent and the judge allowed the evidence to stand. He also admitted to the criminal
investigation being open since August 27, 2012. This detective did not testify he had
any medical background what so ever. However, he testified to looking at my son's
medical records to see if he was diagnosed with a Mitochondrial Disease. He was
asked if he reviewed Doctor Bennett's records. He stated '1 subpoenaed Doctor
Bennett's records, or asked for them, but I was never sent them.'° This is also a lie
because Melissa Lowe (case worker with MCCS) testified she obtained Doctor
Bennett's medical records form Detective Keller. He was specifically asked "Okay, At
any point was it relayed to you that Doctor Bennett substantiated a diagnosis of
Mitochondrial Disease?" His answer was "I believe that doctor Bennett -there was
discussion that she was treating him for it or looked -looked at him for that. But, I
don't know as far as a diagnosis, no." The reason that this statement is so incredibly
valuable is because not only would this kind of proof have proven my case on the
civil side, because the state supposedly proved my son was not sick or diagnosed
with any kind of medical issues, thus the reason they said I was committing
Munchausen By Proxy and putting him through unnecessary medical procedures.
Emphatically stated he did not have or was ever diagnosed with a Mitochondrial
Disease. This is why today all 3 of my little boys have been permanently taken away
from me. These are only some of the illegal behavior of this supposed Law
Enforcement Officer.
12. But this is all one big lie, Detective Keller has full knowledge that my son was
diagnosed with a Mitochondrial Disease, and many other health issues. In his
criminal investigation below he obtained the records from the Job and Family
Services Department to try this very case of theft. And in these records from he has
obtained, and that he is failing to disclose to everyone, this (EXCULPITORY
EVIDENCE). Montgomery County Dept. Of Job And Family Services Participation
Ability Request Form - Primary Caregiver, this form states: Medical Practitioner
please complete the items below: PATIENT DIAGNOSIS: Mitochondrial Disease
(MELAS) (TERMINAL) Kidney reflux Disease, Dementia, Bleeding Disorder,
Syringomyelia Disorder (CYST IN SPINE) Enlarged Aortic Root, Prolonged QT Interval
Syndrome, Lactic Acidosis, Neurogenic Apathy (MUSCLE). 1. Does this Patient
require a relative to provide medically necessary, full care? YES, If yes, name of
caregiver: Samantha Harrison (Johns) 2. Does care for the patient prevent careRiver
from participatinR in the following: working, volunteering, training or attending
school? YES. If yes, please indicate onset of inability and for how long inability to
participate in the above activities will last: Onset: JUNE 2009 Duration: LIFETIME 3. If
patient is under the age of 6 , can the patient attend a child facility for at least 20
hours per week? N/A Practitioners Name (please print) Dr Barbara Bennett DO.
Specialty FP Physician Signature PLEASE NOTE THAT DR. BENNETT HAS SIGNED
THIS DOCUMENT WITH HER SIGNITURE Date 12-28-11 Address 8700 Old Troy Pike
Suite 50 Phone 937-233-4252 City Dayton State OH Zip Code 45424 via fax: 937-233-
7605 Please note her signature stamp is also on this form as well as her true and
factual signature. See (Exhibit 6)
13. This Detective Keller, also is failing to disclose a signed affidavit from Martin
Stringfellow, (supposed father) that reads: My name is Martin Stringfellow, I am the
father of Samantha Harrison's 3 children; Zachary Stringfellow, Samuel Stringfellow,
and Matthew Stringfellow. I do not live with them at 516 Caleb Drive Brookville,
Ohio. However, due to my name being on the house, I am allowing her and the
children to live there, rent free. I will pay the house payment and all utilizes. I will
also give her $150.00 a week to help take care of my boys. I also provide the primary
medical insurance for the boys, but none for her. If you have any questions, please
feel free to call me. I do work 3rd shift, so I may be a little hard to get a hold of. I will
do my best to get back to you as soon as possible. Sincerely, Martin Stringfellow.
PLEASE NOTE HIS SIGNITURE IS NOTIRIZED See (Exhibit 7)
14. On February 14, 2014, this relator was attending a Semi-Annual Review Meeting at
Montgomery County Children Services. During this meeting Kim Bayless (supervisor)
at Montgomery County Children Services and Vicki Carter (case worker), told me
that the Sheriff's office went to the Grand Jury and they indicted me and charged me
with felony theft. Kim Bayless stated she ran a police background on me and I was
charged, but stated she didn't know when. (Exhibit CD number 1)
15. April 30, 2014, Montgomery County Electronically filed, IN THE COMMON PLEASE
COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CRIMINAL DIVISION - CASE NO. 2014 CR
00138 SUMMONS TO APPEAR ON INDICTED dc/HEATHER N JANS 0084470E See
(Exhibit 8)
16. April 30, 2014, Montgomery County Electronically filed, DIRECT THE STATE OF OHIO,
MONTGOMERY COUNTY - This would be my INDICTMENT, however, I was never
served. See (Exhibit 9)
17. May 12, 2014, Montgomery County, Received my RETURN OF SERVICE REQUESTED
WITH MY FOWARDING ADDRESS ON IT. This notice was sent to: 516 Caleb Drive
Brookville, Ohio 45309. My return address came back to: P.O. Box 13 Brookville,
Ohio 45309. I have had a post office box for years because, I was a Police Officer
until the warrant was issued. The most gregarious thing about this is the fact that
the Detective Keller was sitting in the Montgomery County Common Pleas Juvenile
Court room in September of 2012, when Magistrate Paula Durden ordered me to
leave my home, and has full knowledge I moved out in October, 2012. He also has
been in subsequent Hearings and has personally asked me for my address, and has
full knowledge I have not lived in Montgomery County for almost 2 full years now.
See (Exhibit 10)
18. May 15, Montgomery County filed a separate motion for ENTRY AND ORDER FOR
FINGERPRINTING See (Exhibit 11)
19. May 16, 2014, Montgomery County Electronically filed IN THE COMMON PLEASE
COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CRIMINAL DIVISION - RE: ENTRY AND
ORDER FOR ARRAINMENT CONTINUANCE The Court hereby orders a continuance
sua sponte in the following matters from May 15, 2014, 2014 CR 00138 ST. v
SAMANTHA HARRISON Continue To May 29, 2014 CPC - DEFENDANT FAILED TO
APPEAR See (Exhibit 12)
20. May 29, 2014, Montgomery County Electronically filed IN THE COMMON PLEASE
COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO - WARRANT ON INDICTMENT See
(Exhibit 13)
21. May 29, 2014 Montgomery County Electronically filed IN THE COMMON PLEASE
COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO - ENTRY AND ORDER SETTING BAIL See
(Exhibit 14)
22. May 31, 2014, this relator checked her mail at the Post Office Box in Brookville, and
hand nothing form the court.
23. June 2, 2014, Went to Post Office Box to check my mail, and received a letter from
COURT OF COMMON PLEASE DIVISION OF COURT SERVICES This letter was
addressed to my Post Office however, the letter still had my previous address on it.
Dear Samantha Harrison, On May 15, 2014, you were scheduled for arraignment in
case number 2014 CR 00138 for Theft ($1000) (By Deception), for which you failed
to appear. Your new court date has been scheduled for May 29, 2014 at 8:30 A.M. at
the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court, 41 Perry Street, Dayton, Ohio 4522,
Courtroom #7, 4th Floor. Please be sure to check the display monitors in the lobby
for any change in the courtroom number. Failure to appear for this arraignment will
result in a warrant being issued for your arrest which may result in incarceration.
Sincerely, Tracy Geyer Pretrial Officer (937)496-3283. See (Exhibit 15). This relator
called Ms. Geyer and she stated I could come in on either Tuesday or Thursday and
go in front of the Judge.
24. Indictment by a Grand Jury.
FIFTH AMENDMENT
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a
presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or
in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be
subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled
in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just
compensation.
Due Process Motion as a motion to dismiss the Indictment pursuant to Federal Rule
of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(2). See United States v. Nguyen, 250 F.3d 643, 646 (8th
Cir. 2001) ("[T]his circuit has held that 'outrageous government conduct' should be
raised as a pre-trial motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of
the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure ...." (citations omitted)).
25. On June 5, 2014, I went to the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court to answer
to the indictment. I was in front of Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County,
Ohio Criminal Division, Judge Timothy N. O'Connell. Upon approaching the stand to
give my plea, an unidentified women was standing at the podium and spoke to the
judge on my behalf. From sitting in the court room listening to the proceedings, this
women was giving a speech to the court every time it called a defendant. Her speech
was giving up defendants' rights. "The defendant here within waives the
requirement that the case be tried or a preliminary hearing be held with the time
limits prescribed by Ohio Revised Code 2945.71. The first thing I said to this women
upon reaching the podium; DO NOT WAVE ANY OF MY RIGHTS, I AM PLEADING NOT
GUILTY TO ALL CHARGES AND HAVE THE RIGHT TO START THE TIME FOR A SPEEDY
TRIAL, AND THE STATE MUST PROVE THEIR CASE IN THE STATUTOR TIME LIMITS SET
BY THIS STATE. However, this court recorded, I stood mute on record. In the
statement made on this entry it states I plead not guilty. This also states I received a
copy of my indictment, however I did not. I did tell the judge I was indigence and
could not afford counsel. (See Exhibit 16)
26. Judge Timothy N. O'Connell, released me on PERSONAL OWN RECOGNIZANCE BAIL. I
was booked in and out of jail within the same day. I received a date June 12, 2014 to
come back in one week so I may inter my plea. Even though I accreted my rights to
enter a plea to start the speedy trial process.
27. June 12, 2014, returned to court, and was told to come back in one week, however, I
did meet my public defender Alysia Gross. Public defender Alysia Goss received my
(CCH) and 42 pages of discovery.
28. June 19, 2014, SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, went back to court in front of Judge
Wisemen, Public defender asked for more time so she might meet with me. Judge
set next hearing for July 3, 2014.
29. June 23, 2014, met with M. Goss, she explained to me that the state will not offer
diversion in this case, due to the fact my ex was a police officer, and the fact that I
am a certified police officer as well. Received a copy of the police report by her. She
asked me question of my residence and when I left my ex, and when I left my home.
I explained to her I could not give her the dates because it was a long time ago, that I
would have to look at my calendar. She did talk about me doing a program called
(ILC) Intervention In Lieu Of Conviction. This attorney did not ask me one question
about my side or if I was innocent, she only pressed me to do (ILC), I asked her, so
you are already saying I am going to be convicted, she said no, I am just giving you
your options. And I would have to plead guilty on the charge, and I would have up to
5 years to complete the process but a minimum of 1 year. I asked her if I did do this,
what would happen to my Police, EMT, Fire Certifications. She said she would have
to look into it. But if I was convicted, I would not have any of them. But even with
the (ILC) Police Dept. would still be able to see the conviction no matter what. This
women had full knowledge of my Police Certification before I told her anything
about it. Then she told me no matter what I choose to do my law enforcement
career is over. I told her in this meeting I didn't even know what the charges were.
She said that was the point of that meeting today. However, this was 18 days after
my arraignment. I told her I wanted to file a motion for a change in venue, she said
on what basis, I told her I was not going to get a fair trial or a fair hearing. She said
ok, that's something we can talk about. She asked me what started my case with
everything (meaning my children services case) I explained to her it started with a
Malpractice Law suit against a doctor, He filed a complaint 2% months after
discharging my son as a patient, the complaint accused me on Munchausen by
Proxy. She said Okay. I went on to explain to her the situation. She showed me the
police report was the very same police report that brought these criminal charges
against me, would be the very same police report that brought my civil case against
me. And that the prosecutor would be sending a bunch of medical records over to
her for this criminal case. And the Care House interviews of my children, from this
same Detective Keller. I said why? She said they are just giving me everything. So I
am not sure how this information would not bias the judge in her opinion. More
reason I told her I need a change in venue. She asked me if my service dog was mine
or my son's dog, I explained to her he was my service dog for seizures and diabetes.
She said Okay, I read somewhere that your son had a service dog. I will provide the
meeting by CD marked as (Exhibit CD Number 2)
30. July 3, 2014, SCHEDULING CONFERENCE with M. Goss, M. Goss made a motion to
excuse herself because she stated, "My client wants to go to trial, and does not want
to plead to this case. Due to my schedule I do not have time for a trial." So the judge
said Okay, and set the next hearing for July 10, 2014.
31. July 7, 2014, Record reflex I was in court that day and was appointed counsel.
However, this is not possible.
32. July 10, 2014, MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE TO APPOINT COUNCLE, I met Mr.
Richard Barns, as I was walking up to the podium when my name was called. He
asked the Judge for more time so he may meet with his client. (However, this courts
record reflects that this hearing did not take place on this date, the record reflects
that this hearing took place on July 7 , 2014. Because this attorney that was
appointed to me by this court let this attorney file a waiver of my Rights to a Speedy
Trial on July, 8, 2014, Stating The Defendant here within waives the requirement
that his case be tried on a preliminary hearing held with the time limits prescribed
by Ohio Revise Code 2945.71.) This is a total lie, how can this man enter this when
he was not yet appointed to me as my counsel. Let alone I was in Sandusky, Ohio for
a birthday party on this day. More proof this court is acting without legal authority.
33. July 4, 2014, R. Barns scheduled a meeting in his office, on this holiday, and when I
drove the 45 minutes one way to his office, he was not there. So he called me and
apologized and scheduled the appointment for, July 6, 2014. In my meeting this
attorney talked to me about my evidence and said he was eager to try my case.
34. July 7, 2014, Scheduling Conference at court, my attorney met me out in the hallway
just before court and wanted me to read and sign a paper he had prepared. He told
me if I do not sign it he could go no further with my case. After reading this letter my
attorney walked back up to me and said, "sign it now or else!" I said, "Or what!" He
said, "You will see!" So I told him I need a copy of it and he said I could have a copy
after I signed it. So I brought my phone out to take a picture of this letter, and he
tried hitting my phone out of my hand. I told him "I am not signing it!" So he said
"give me the letter, NOWI" I tried to hang on to it and a struggle ensued. But, he
took the letter from me anyway. I began to get scared because I didn't quite know
what his threat meant, and by his reaction to not letting me keep the letter, I just
knew it couldn't be good. The letter was a Waiver of Claims of Ineffective Assistance
of Counsel. We both then proceeded into the court room and I was called to the
podium, Mr. Barns told the court he could no longer represent me. The judge said
"Okay", didn't inquire as to why this attorney was quitting or wanting off my case.
This attorney had an obligation to have the record complete by 30 days. However,
he failed to do so. But so did Miss Goss, so it just must be in this courts habit to not
care about that. This attorney gave nothing in writing to this court either. The court
simple said I will set the next hearing for August 21, 2014.
35. August 19, 2014, I received a call from a Bobby Joe Cox, telling me he was my new
court appointed counsel. He stated he was in the Judge's chambers the other day on
a different case and the judge asked him if he would take my case, and he said sure.
He said she filled him in on my case with Children Service and that basically this case
just stems from that case. I asked him how is that, and he said "mama, it just is, just
what the judge told me. So he asked me to meet him outside the court room 15
minutes before the hearing on the August 21, 2014. I said, "Okay". Even though this
attorney told me he was just appointed a few days ago, the record today reflects he
was appoint on the same day Mr. Barns asked to be dismissed from my case.
However, that motion did not appear on the docking statement until I had brought
this point up 2 months later to my attorney in private.
36. August 21, 2014, HEARING FOR CONTINUANCE TO APPIONT COUNSEL, I was 25
minutes early for court, However, my attorney was 25 minutes late for court, so I
could not meet with him prior to going in front of this judge. Upon approaching the
bench when I was called the judge stated she was going to order me to have a
Psychological Evaluation because of my inability to keep counsel. I told the judge'°I
OBJECT!" She said "it is within her right to do so, so it is ordered!" I said but your
honor, how is this fair when Mr. Barns tried to get me to sign a waiver exonerating
him of any wrong doing to me. The judge read from a law book that stated, a judge
has the right to ask for such hearing anytime it sees fit, 2945.371 (G)(3) ect... She
ordered that the Forensic Psychiatry Center for Western Ohio examine me. Then she
begain to tell me if I did not take the PSY exam, that she will have me committed
indefinitely or a time she sees fit, or I take the test, which ever came first. I said
"your honor, I object!" She screamed at me and said "it is ordered, if you don't
show up to the evaluation and give your full cooperation, I will issue a warrant and
have you it in jail until you take it, get out of my court room, your next court date is
August 25, 2014!" My new attorney said we need to go, I will talk to you outside.
We went out in the hallway and sat down, he advised me she had every right to do
so and I must take it or go to jail. He began to ask me question that pertained to
Competency to stand trial. I answer all of his question and he said you got all of the
question right, you have nothing to worry about. He said you are a Police Officer this
should be a walk in the park to you. But I did not tell him I was a police officer. I also
asked him if I had to take the MMPI (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory)
He said no, that has nothing to do with competence, we just went over what they
are going to ask you, it is that simple and you got them all right, you are good to go.
Anything that has to do with anything else and you can plead the 5th. I said ®kay.
37. Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960)
Test of defendant's competency to stand trial is whether he or she has sufficient
present ability to consult with his or her lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational
understanding and whether he or she has a rational as well as a factual
understanding of proceeding against him or her; it is not enough that he or she is
oriented to time and place and has some recollection of events.
38. Cooper v. Oklahoma, 517 U.S. 348 (1996)
Oklahoma law presuming defendant is competent to stand trial unless he proves
incompetence by clear and convincing evidence violates due process because the
rule allows the State to try a defendant who is more likely than not incompetent.
39. O'Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 (1975), was a landmark decision in mental health law.
The United States Supreme Court ruled that a state cannot constitutionally confine a non-
dangerous individual who is capable of surviving safely in freedom by themselves or with
the help of willing and responsible family members or friends. Since the trial court jury
found, upon ample evidence, that petitioner did so confine respondent, the Supreme Court
upheld the trial court's conclusion that petitioner had violated respondent's right to liberty.
40. Clearly Erroneous Law & Legal Definition - An appellate Court should apply the clearly
erroneous standard in judging a trial court's in judging a trial court's treatment of factual
issues. A judgment becomes reversible if the factual issues are reviewed in a clearly
erroneous manor.
41. August 12, 2014, Bobby Joe Cox has record by way of Receipt for Electronic
Supplement Discovery of my evidence.
42. August 2, 2014 1:43, Received call from Bobby Joe Cox, I asked him if he could get
me the dates of the Grand Jury, when the case went to Grand Jury and when the
Grand Jury indicted me. He said, he would try and get but he is not sure. He acted
like he didn't know what the forensic evaluation was all about. He explained to me
that I was not served in this case, he went on to tell me about the grand jury process
and how I was not served in this case. He then went on to tell me that the clerk's
office picks and chooses who they want to send notices to, and if they don't like you
or you make them made, they will just say they sent it to you but then they never
do, and then you are made to suffer the consequences. Bobby Joe Cox "That's why
when I deal with the clerks all the time in all the courts over all these many years, I
always try and be polite and courteous to them and they will come in there because
I am an attorney that I'm more important than anybody else because if they really
want to jack me around they can inadvertently fail to send me a notice and say oh
yea, notice was sent to Mr. Cox and I don't know why he's not hear. You understand
what I am saying? Please listen to the CD that I will provide you with, because there `
is a lot more. I am running out of time to file this so please bare with me. See
(Exhibit CD 3)
43. September 2, 2014, I received the appointment notice to be at the forensic center. It
stated my appointment was to be on September 3, 2014, at 9:00 a.m... 12:35 p.m., I
called the forensic center to tell them I could not make it on such short notice, the
secretary said I have to call my attorney because it is court appointed they could do
nothing. 12:43 p.m., I called Mr. Cox and told him he said, Okay I will get back to
you. I explained to him, I can't believe I received it because the court sent it to the
wrong address. They sent it to P.O. Box 15, not P.O. Box 13. He asked me what
schedule do you have available for next week, I told him September 11, but it would
have to be in the morning because I have my visitation with my boys at 3:00. He
said, Okay I will call you back.
44. September 2, 2014, 2:48 Bobby Joe Cox, called me back and said on September 11,
was not available. September 12, 9:00 a.m. was available, so I took that. He asked
me my correct address Of P.O. Box 13, Brookville, Ohio, 45309. Mr. Cox said and one
more thing, I told her (women from the psy center) you had a service dig and she
said you must bring all of your paper work as to why you have a service dog. I
explained to him they cannot make me provide that to them. He said mama, I am
just telling you what they said you must do. He said I am only the messenger, I said
NO, you are my attorney. He said mama I am your attorney on a criminal case, and I
am trying to get you through it, I am not getting in a battle, if they just want the
papers, just show them the papers, you have a service dog so just take them and
show them. And do the simple little test they want. I said okay so I can plead the
fifth if they try and make me take the MMPI, he know started back tracking and
saying that I have to complete the examination be whatever it may be. Please see
the CD, for the full recording of the phone call. He said if I do not take their test I will
get locked up until you take the test, he also stated this is for Competency not a
psychological profile, you have not plead not guilty by reason of insanity or
temporary insanity, this is only are you competent to work with your lawyer, and
defend yourself, I said Okay. I asked him when are we going to get a competency
Hearing he said 5 weeks from the court date. I said that will be the hearing he said
there will be no hearing because you are competent so as long as I get a report from
a doctor saying you can work with me then, and we know we will because we know
you are competent. I tried to explain to him the law states I get a competency
hearing he said after the report. He said to bring it up to the court when we go back,
he was admit about we have to get a report first. Please listen to the CD of this
conversation, where he threaten me if I do not take the test, I will go to jail. He said
if I don't take these test the judge will throw me in jail so, if I don't take them then I
will pay the consequences if I don't. I brought up that they can't even try this case
because of time, the one year rule. He said the statue is 6 years except murder and
there is no statue on that. Then I quoted him 2901.13, he said Okay down the road
that might be a motion we need to file then. I said down the road, he said nothing is
going to happen until this competency hearing.
45. September 12, 2014, Bobby Joe Cox has record by way of Receipt for Electronic
Supplement Discovery of my evidence.
46. September 12, 2014 My appointment with the Forensic Psychiatry Center for
Western Ohio at 9:00, I sat down and the evaluator, asked me what I thought
brought me to her today, I explained to her my side and she said I was delusional
and paranoid because the judge and my attorney are only in place to help me, not
do anything that would ever go against me in anyway, at that point I just said okay.
She also said that my attorney was the one that raised the complaint to bring me to
her today, because he doesn't feel I am competent enough to work with him. At that
point I knew for sure I was not going to take their tests on the MMPI and the MMPI
2, So, she explained to me all the tests I would be taking, which 2 of the test were
called the MMPI and MMPI 2, then she asked me to sign a waiver to my rights for
previous mental health evaluations or providers and a Medical release of
information, when reading this form, she said that this information was for the
court. However, I realized the release had Montgomery County Children Services on
it. So I refused to sign this release because, Children Services has been wanting this
evaluation since September of 2012. So I was not about to sign this release to give
this information to that agency. So when I told this women, I refuse to sign this, she
said then we are done with this evaluation and you can deal with whatever the
judge does to you. I said okay, she said we are done with this evaluation.
47. During one of my supervised visits with my boys, the case worker said to me before
leaving, you will submit to the psy eval. I just ignored her and kept walking to my
truck to leave. But proving to me they were involved with this as well.
48. September 25, 2014, I filed a motion for MOTION TO DISMISS FOR INEFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSLE AND ABUSE OF DISCRETION ( See Exihibit 18) 1 asked the
judge about this motion during the hearing and she seemed at me and said it was
dismissed.
49. September 25, 2014 My Competency hearing, I spoke with my attorney right before
we went in, I asked him why he has not returned any of my calls and he said he has
been busy. He said well, since you didn't take the psychological exam she is very, I
mean very anger with you! I told him about the release and he said who care about
that, I told you to just do whatever they say. I said well, I am not doing a test that
this court has no right to ask me to take. If it was just about competency then I will
do it, but I called the Attorney General's Office and the lawyer I spoke to said I
should not give Children Services any information either. She also told me that it
should be biased on competency only and not an MMPI. He said so you called the
AG's office? I said, yes I did, why can I not do that? He said are you just trying to
really piss this judge off, trying to get other people involved? I said, you and I both
no this is not right, I have to do something. He said I will try and talk to the judge and
see if she will give you one more chance to take their tests. You are a nice lady and I
don't want to see you go to jail one something like this, especially because you are
fully capably to do this, hell, I bet you know more than half of the idiots in the
prosecutor's office. Then he began to tell me about an attorney that had my same
conviction about the law. She was put in jail because she would not take a
psychological and she went to jail for a year. I just sat there while he kept going on
and on. We went into the court room, and he was right the judge was really mad
and was actually screaming at me. (I tried to get the CD's of the hearings to give to
this Court but I was told no, not until this matter has come to an end.) The judge
gave me one more chance to take it, she said if I don't take it she will lock me up
indefinitely, so I better take it. Even my attorney started telling the judge in open
court that I called the AG's office and they told me I don't have to take her tests, but
of course that is not what I said. But with both of them yelling at me I didn't stand a
chance. So she set the next evaluation for October 10, 2014. See (exhibit CD 5 AG's
conversation, I spoke to her about my civil case, I didn't want to disturb the
recording so the criminal part starts around 12:20)
50. October 10, 2014, FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY INTERVIEW, I went to my meeting,
because I was actually really scared because the judge said she would lock me up
indefinitely, so I knew if that would happen I would not get my appeal filed in time
for my children. However, this time I was not asked to sign any release of
information. She asked me if I was willing to take the MMPI, and the MMPI 2, I told
her no, I am not but she is more than welcome to ask me anything about
competency to stand trial, and that I would answer any of those question for her.
She started with a list that was in front of her, I asked her where the questions came
from, my attorney? She said no, the court sent them over for you to answer. She
asked questions of: How many witnesses are you going to call on your side. Who are
these witnesses? What are these witnesses going to testify to? What are their
names? What kind of question are you going to ask them on the stand? What kind of
evidence do you have to fight these charges? What have you spoken to your
attorney about? What have you asked your attorney to file on your behalf? What
has your attorney advised you to do? ALL of these questions were extremely
inappropriate but my fear of going to jail was more, so I answered the best I could.
However, % of her findings in her report she had to get from some other source
other than me because I didn't answer hardly any the questions that she came to
her conclusions about.
51. October 30, 2014, COMPITINCY HEARING, I knew when I got to the court room, it
wasn't going to be good. When I walked in Captain Landis from the Sheriff's office
and a Sargent and 3 more deputies walked in right behind me and stood in the court
room, when normally there are only 2 court deputies. So a Captain and a Sargent
and 5 deputies were all stand in there with me. So the judge came in and instead of
the bailiff running down the docket, I was called first. I can't even begin to tell this
Court just how bad it was. Thank God I brought a friend with me because they had
me hand over my service dog. And proceeded to take me into custody. All 5 deputies
moved into me so they could take me into custody. This judge remanded me to jail
until I could pay bond then, I would be transferred to Summit Behavioral Health Care
Hospital for 21 days, or indefinitely if I didn't take the evaluation. My bond was
10,000 cash surety. My family posted bond almost immediately. While I was in jail, I
had gotten very sick in booking, and had a seizure, when I came out of my seizure I
was laying face down in a holding cell. The cell had blood and urine and feces
everywhere, the toilet was clogged up and over flowing onto the floor. When I came
to I realized I could hardly move my right arm. One of the girls in the cell with me
said I had a seizure and the nurse told the guard I was faking it, so he kicked me and
picked me up by one are because I was so limp I couldn't walk. He threw me in the
cell and one of my shoes came off, so she said he threw the shoe at me and hit me
with it. She said he was calling me a piece of shit and a faker and said I should be
ashamed of myself because there are real people with real disabilities in this world
and I was nothing but a fucking cunt for faking it. After seeing this deputies after I
had come out of my seizure he continued to call me names and was very derogatory
to me. It was so cold in the holding cell my body was purple. I finally got to go
upstairs for a few hours, but I had sat in the holding area, all day and all night, didn't
get to go up to a bed until wee hours in the morning, after getting there at 9:30
a.m.. See (Exhibit 19, 20, 21)
52. October 31, 2014, I was released from jail to go to Summit. On the drive down to
the Hospital from Dayton to Cincinnati the transport deputy refused to buckle me in
a seat belt and said I don't need one and made me sit all the way in the back of the
van, I was the only one in it.
53. 1 booked into summit, my clothes were taken from me and I was told I would have
to earn them back. I was examined by a doctor first, she was very concerned about
my right arm and asked if I would get an x-ray because she was worried the bicep
muscle was damaged, it was extremely swollen and black and blue. I asked if they
would take picture of it for me, however, they said no they could not do that. The
treatment I received at this facility was not much better than the jail. I had to have
my daughter contact the American Civil Liberties Union in my behalf, I made them
aware of all of my food allergies and was made to eat food that I was allergic to,
which I had a reaction to and had to have medication to stop the reactions. I was
only given 4 oz of water 3 times a day. Only when this hospital refused to allow me
to have my service dog with me did anything happen as far as my evaluation. The
ADA was threating if they did not allow me to have my dog, they were going to file a
Federal Lawsuit against the Hospital. So they did my evaluation in just a couple of
hours and released me on the 11t" day I had spent there. I can't even describe how
unbelievable the treatment was that I had to suffer through. It was quite ironic
however, that the evaluation I was put through had nothing to do with the MMPI
and the MMPI 2, the very tests I refused to take in the first place when all this
started. I asked the doctors at the hospital about these tests, and all the doctors said
the same thing. Those test were not used to measure competency. So it looked like I
was there for nothing, oh besides to try and miss my appeal to.
54. When I was placed into this facility I was trying to prepare my appeal to file through
the court. If I had to stay in this facility the whole time, I would have missed my
appeal, time to file.
55. November 20, 2014, 4:00 p.m. Hearing on the Psychological Evaluation. I was told
due to my service dog I could no longer have a public hearing, she said she was
taking me off of her docket and that my hearings would be at 4:00 so there was no
chance of any disruptions. I said but my dog has done nothing but be a perfect dog,
including when this court took me into custody. She said she was not going to take
any chances. The judge made a speech and said I was competent to stand trial. She
asked me if I wanted legal representation or I wanted to go Pro Se. I asked the new
lawyer she had standing there if he was going to help me in my defense and he said
yes. I said okay I will use him then. I asked for a copy of both psychological exams.
See (exhibits 22, 23, 24) 1 gave J. Allen Wilmes, gave me his card, I gave him my
phone number and address, he said he would call me next week.
56. After reading the first Psy exam, I was a little perplexed because all the questions I
had answered about the court process, I had answered all the right questions to
measure competency. The exact same questions that Summit had asked me. So the
big question is, why I was denied my right to due process when this court did not
hold a hearing to measure my competency. How did the first exam not answer to
the Competency to stand trial? Why were my Civil Rights to Freedom violated?
Obviously, this is more reason why this Court needs to hear and make a
determination on this case.
57. November 25, 2014, a letter from Mr. Wilmes my new attorney sent me a letter,
however, the postmark was dated December 10, 2014. I called and left a message,
but didn't get a call back. See (exhibit 25)
58. December 02, 2014, 4:00 p.m. Scheduling Conference, set dates for trial, the clerk
said I would be notified. Mr. Wilmes said he lost my number and my address, and he
said he didn't get my messages.
59. January 10, 2014, Letter from Mr. Wilmes, however, the postage was dated January
19, 2015. The letter said he cannot locate the address I had given him (in West
Miton) He enclosed 2 Motions he filed. Called and left another message for him.
Defendant Motion In Limine and Defendant's Motion for Bill of Particulars. Called
and, left message.
60. February 5, 2015, Status Conference, I failed to show because I had been sick and
had multiple seizures on this day and the next. I left a message for Mr. Wilmes with
no return call. It was the weekend so I thought I would call Mr. Wilmes Monday
morning. I was starting a new job at Wright Patterson Air Force Base on Monday and
had to be there at 8:30 so I was going to start calling him at 9:00.
61. February 9, 2015, during my process to get my security clearance, I was taken into
custody because I had a warrant for Larceny, with a $100,000.00 bond with home
detention.
62. I was arrested by people I see on a weekly basis, I lost my job that was going to pay
me almost 20.00 an hour also with great medical benefits.
63. I sat in jail for 3 days before my attorney came to see me and said well the judge will
agree to let you go if you start behaving, No more of this trying to do the law
yourself, just let me do my job. He asked me why I didn't show, I explained to him I
was sick and was having seizures and he said well let's just keep that between me
and you. Just tell the judge you are sorry, you forgot and we move toward the trial. I
asked him if she was going to reinstate my bail. He said I don't know, she may
reduce it back down to the $10,000.00, so you would just have to get another bond.
64. February 11, 2015, I was brought in front of Judge Wismen at 4:00, she said she
would reinstate my bail but I would go home on home detention, I asked for work
privileges, she said yes. However, because it was so late in the day, I wouldn't get
out until the next day. When I was questioned about my situation from Pre-trial
services, they told me I would have no way to have my dog unless I have someone
come walk him because I would not be able to leave to do so. Only for work 7:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m... They sent me back to my floor and didn't come get me until the
next day at 3:30 p.m.
65. February 12, 2015, pre-trial services came and got me, said I would be going home
with no home detention. And it would be a few hours before I could leave.
66. I had to go to see pre-trial service in Downtown Dayton, I was told to be prepared to
"drop" I was not familiar with this statement, so I had to ask her what she meant,
she said give urine. I said Okay.
67. When I got to my appointment the work was very scared of my dog so she did my
interview in the lobby because she refused to come to the other side of the counter.
She this person read my questions and answers out loud with people being in the
lobby to hear everything I had to answer. All of my private business, family,
relationships, and she reminded me I was to not be in possession of any firearms. I
asked her what about my Civil Rights, to bear arms, she said you have no Rights
because you committed a crime, I said what about my Rights to privacy, she said you
don't get it yet do you, you have no more Rights. I said what about the fact I have to
be convicted first, she said that's just a matter of time. This women didn't know me
nor my situation to judge me in such a manor.
68. February 03, 2015, Meeting with Mr. Wilmes, we talked about the pre-trial coming
up in a few days, he said he filed a couple of papers. And said the prosecutor
responded to the Bill of Particulars, and stated he feels he doesn't have to respond
to the Bill of Particulars. I asked him how about dates, when I was indicted when it
went to Grand Jury, he said that didn't matter. This attorney said they have 6 years
to indict me on a Felony Charge. I explained to him they only have one year to
investigate this crime he said it will be dismissed so don't plan on going anywhere
with that. He said he would raise that issue. I asked him why he had not asked me
for a witness list or anything, like evidence or my side or anything. He said because
he is no good, this whole meeting is totally unbelievable. I could give you another 6
pages on this meeting, however, it would just be best for you to listen to the
recording. Along with the letter, See (Exhibit 26, 27, 28, 29) (Exhibit CD 6)
69. February 5, 2015, Final Pre-Trial, my attorney brought up several motion to the
court including the time 2901.13 (A)(B)(1) Mr. Wilmes brought up these issues and
the judge denied all of my evidence.
70. February 10, 2015, met with Mr. Wilmes, he stated he will bring no witnesses to my
side, he will present no evidence to my side. This is also a recording that is totally
unbelievable. I could go on and on about how this attorney said he will not fight my
case and told me that the judge set the time limits for the trial and that is the way it
is going to go, including her choosing the Jury in her Chambers. The States Witness
list has the police officer that took my kids, the GAL, and the police officer that was
in some of my visitations and the detective that broke so many laws just to try this
case and my civil case. See the rest of the (Exhibits 30-38) (CD 7)
71. Now the court has set an ORDER AND ENTRY SETTING TIME LIMITS FOR TRIAL, this
judge has so ordered that this trial be done by schedule, down to the very last
second. See (Exhibit 39)
DR 6 - 102 (A) of the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility prohibits a lawyer
form attempting to exonerate himself or herself from liability for personal
malpractice.
DR 6 - 102 (A) A cause of action for legal malpractice is distinct from an action to
vacate a criminal judgment based on ineffective assistance of counsel. An action
based on ineffective assistance of counsel is not based on Constitutional guarantees
and seeks reversal of Criminal conviction.
IV. LAVV AND ARGUMENT
In order to discourage unreasonable delay in bringing criminal prosecutions, statutes of
limitations provide time limits for beginning such actions. These time limits begin to run when
the right to take legal action arises or when a crime is committed. In general, the unexcused
failure to start a case on time bars a court from hearing the case.
On March 05, 2015
2901.13 Statute of limitations for criminal offenses. Ohio Revise Code
(A)(1) Except as provided in division (A)(2) or (3) of this section or as otherwise provided in this
section, a prosecution shall be barred unless it is commenced within the following periods after
an offense is committed:
(a) For a felony, six years;
(b) For a misdemeanor other than a minor misdemeanor, two years;
(c) For a minor misdemeanor, six months.
(2) There is no period of limitation forthe prosecution of a violation of section 2903.01 or 2903.02
of the Revised Code.
(B)(1) Except as otherwise provided in division (B)(2) of this section, if the period of limitation
provided in division (A)(1) or (3) of this section has expired, prosecution shall be commenced for
an offense of which an element is fraud or breach of a fiduciary duty, within one year after
discovery of the offense either by an aggrieved person, or by the aggrieved person's legal
representative who is not a party to the offense.
The State had no right of claim to bring this case against me because they had full knowledge
this case was ripe. When 1 brought this up to the court, (through my attorney Mr. Wilmes) Judge
Wiseman said 1 have never heard of such a law, after Mr. Wilmes read it to the court. Then, she
simply looked at me and said it doesn't pertain to this case. This is also part of my basis
contending this court is lacking jurisdiction to even hear this case. The other reason would be
because I was never served with an indictment, this court has to properly serve me. Even though
all parties involved had full knowledge of my whereabouts every Thursday at 3:30 p.m. for my
supervised visitation with my boys at Montgomery County Children Services. This is the location
is where 1 was served with several court hearings notices.
State v. Thompson (1994), 97 Ohio App. 3d 183 -- To preserve the issue for appeal, a speedy
trial claim must be raised by motion prior to commencement of trial. Where counsel has failed
to do so, defendant must demonstrate a reasonable possibility that the motion would have
been sustained, had it been raised, in order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of
counsel.
"Abuse of discretion does not necessarily imply a willful abuse, or intentional wrong. In a legal
sense, discretion is abused whenever, in its exercise, a court exceeds the bounds of reason -- all
the circumstances before it being considered." Sharon v. Sharon, 75 Cal. 1 (Caf. 1888)
Subject matter jurisdiction. Questions of subject matter jurisdiction are reviewed de novo. Pillow
v. Bechtel Const., Inc., 201 F. 3d 1348, 1351 (11th Cir. 2000).
Determination that a case is not ripe. Reviewed de novo. Tamiami Partners, Ltd. V. Miccosukee
Tribe, 177 F.3d 1212, 1224 (11t" Cir. 2001)
State v. Young (1981), 2 Ohio App. 3d 155 -- Headnote: "The state bears the burden of proving
that the time when the crime was committed comes within the appropriate statute of
limitations. A five-month investigatory period will not be validated as a reasonable period of
time necessary for 'discovery of the offense' of welfare fraud for purposes of the one-year
saving provision of R.C. 2901.12(8)" Department had been slow in processing information
leading to filing of charges and unless this period could be excluded, time had run.
State v. Morris (1984), 20 Ohio App. 3d 321 -- Headnotes: "(1) A prosecution is not commenced
so as to toll the running of the statute of limitations merely by the issuance of a summons or
warrant, unless reasonable diligence is exercised to execute the same. (2) Where a summons is
sent to the defendant by first class mail and returned as undeliverable, the prosecution has not
exercised reasonable diligence to execute the summons within the contemplation of R.C.
2901.13( E ) . The prosecution is required to demonstrate that an effort has been made to serve
the summons in a manner provided by Crim. R. 4(D)."
Abuse of discretion occurs when a court does not apply the correct law or if it bases its decision
on a clearly erroneous finding of a material fact. A court may also abuse its discretion when the
record contains no evidence to support its decision. Abuse of discretion is one of the reasons a
court of appeals may use to reverse the trial court judgment.
State v. Brown (1994), 99 Ohio App. 3d 604 - Indictment, successive bills of particulars, and jury
instructions shifted somewhat as to specific conduct alleged to have constituted theft in a
Medicaid fraud prosecution, Compare majority and dissent analysis of whether nature and
identity of the offense was charged, and whether grand jury minutes should have been
examined to determine what conduct the grand jury meant to be for indictment.
State v. Stepp (1997), 117 Ohio App 3d 561, 564-567 - The State must supply specific dates in a
bill of particulars when it possesses such information. The failure to supply known dates is fatal
to a prosecution only if the absence of specifics prejudices the accused's ability to fairly defend
himself.
Subject matter jurisdiction. Questions of subject matter jurisdiction are reviewed de novo. Pillow
v. Bechtel Const., Inc., 201 F. 3d 1348, 1351 (11t" Cir. 2000).
Determination that a case is not ripe. Reviewed de novo. Tamiami Partners, Ltd. V. Miccosukee
Tribe, 177 F.3d 1212, 1224 (11th Cir. 2001)
An alternative writ operates as a stay of the judicial or quasi-judicial act sought to be
prohibited. Green v. Kubicki, 120 Ohio St.3d 1521, 2009-Ohio-698. "After the time for filing an
answer to the complaint or motion to dismiss, the Supreme Court will either dismiss the case or
issue an alternative or a peremptory writ, if a writ has not already been issued. ° St.Ct.Prac.R.
X(5). Although this Court "generally wait[s]for a response before rending this
determination . .. under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(4), a party may request emergency relief° State ex
rel. Stern v. Mascio (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 297,298, 691 N.E.2d 253. It is then a matter of
discretion whether a "case merits an expedited determination. " Id.
Because criminal prosecutions generally implicate a well-defined constitutional guarantee,
criminal discovery is much more focused on automatic disclosure principles, which if found to
be violated, will trigger the dismissal of the charges.
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Greene (1995), 74 Ohio St. 3d 13 -- Syllabus: "When a lawyer
intentionally misrepresents a crucial fact to a court in order to effect a desired result to benefit
a party, the lawyer will be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for an appropriate period
of time." Assistant prosecutor misrepresented reason for dismissing traffic ticket issued the
wife of a Highway Patrol officer.
State v. Walden (1984), 19 Ohio App. 3d 141 -- Headnote 4: "If the prosecution, prior to or
during trial, knows of the existence of exculpatory evidence and fails to provide it to defense
counsel despite a request for production of all exculpatory evidence, this prosecutorial
misconduct amounts to a denial of due process sufficient to support an R.C. 2953.21 petition
for relief after judgment."
State v. Lang (1995), 102 Ohio App. 3d 243, 252-253 -- When the prosecution has failed to
disclose a statement of the defendant during discovery, the statement should be excluded if (1)
the failure to disclose was wilful, (2) foreknowledge of the statement would have benefited the
accused in preparing his defense, or (3) the accused was prejudiced by admission of the
statement.
Brady v. Maryland (1962), 373 U.S. 83, -- As a part of the defendant's due process right to a fair
trial, the prosecution is under an obligation to disclose to the defendant any favorable evidence
that is material to either guilt or punishment. Also see Jencks v. United States (1956), 353 U.S.
657. For cases on remedies for Brady violations, see United States v. Agurs (1976), 427 U.S. 97;
Wagster v. Overberg (6th Cir. 1977), 560 F. 2d 735.
Kyles v. Whitley (1995), 514 U.S. 419 -- State's duty to turn over evidence favorable to the
defense extends to material which remained hidden in police files, not turned over to the
prosecutor. To warrant reversal, evidence withheld must have been material, meaning that it
negates guilt or mitigates the crime to the point that there is a reasonable probability that
disclosure would have produced a different result. Also see State v. Hesson (1996), 110 Ohio
App. 3d 845, 847-853.
"The term as used in the decisions of courts and in the books, implying, in common parlance, a
bad motive or wrong purpose, is not the most appropriate. It is really a discretion exercised to
an end or purpose not justified by, and clearly against, reason and evidence." Murray v. Buell,
74 Wis. 14 (Wis. 1889)
Abuse of discretion occurs when a court does not apply the correct law or if it bases its decision
on a clearly erroneous finding of a material fact. A court may also abuse its discretion when the
record contains no evidence to support its decision. Abuse of discretion is one of the reasons a
court of appeals may use to reverse the trial court judgment.
State ex rel. Stern v. Mascio ( 1998), 81 Ohio St. 3d 297 -- Under the current version of P.C.
2701.03 the mere filing of an affidavit of disqualification in the Supreme Court divests a judge
of authority to act in a case until the Supreme Court rules upon the affidavit, the only possible
exception being to determine a matter which does not affect the substantive rights of the
parties.
Code Of Conduct For United States Judges
Canon 2A. An appearance of impropriety occurs when reasonable minds, with knowledge of all
the relevant circumstances disclosed by a reasonable inquiry, would conclude that the judge's
honesty, integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge is impaired. Public
confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges. A judge
must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. This prohibition applies to both
professional and personal conduct. A judge must expect to be the subject of constant public
scrutiny and accept freely and willingly restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the
ordinary citizen. Because it is not practicable to list all prohibited acts, the prohibition is
necessarily cast in general terms that extend to conduct by judges that is harmful although not
specifically mentioned in the Code. Actual improprieties under this standard include violations
of law, court rules, or other specific provisions of this Code.
McMann v. Richardson (1970), 397 U.S. 759, 771 -- "(l)f the right to counsel guaranteed by the
Constitution is to serve its purpose, defendants cannot be left to the mercies of incompetent
counsel, and that judges should strive to maintain proper standards of performance by
attorneys who are representing defendants in criminal cases in their courts."
Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 687 -- Two part test for determining whether
defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel: "First, the defendant must show that
counsel's performance was deficient. This requires showing that counsel made errors so serious
that counsel was not functioning as the 'counsel' guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Second,
the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This requires
showing that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial
whose result is reliable. Unless a defendant makes both showings, it cannot be said that the
conviction or death sentence resulted from a breakdown in the adversary process that renders
the result unreliable." Also see State v. Lytle (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 391, 396-397; State v.
Johnson (1986), 24 Ohio St. 3d 87; State v. Brooks (1986), 25 Ohio St. 3d 144; State v. Decker
( 1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 137; State v. Bradley (1989), 42 Ohio St. 3d 136.
State v. Smith (1987), 36 Ohio App. 3d 162, 163 -- A properly licensed attorney is presumed to
execute his duties in a competent and ethical manner.
State v. King (1995), 104 Ohio App. 3d 434 -- Whether raised by written motion or in open
court, if a defendant questions the effectiveness of assigned counsel, the court must inquire, on
the record, into the merits of the complaint.
State v. Marinchek (1983), 9 Ohio App. 3d 22 -- It is the trial court's duty to balance the
defendant's right to counsel of his preferential choosing against the public interest in the
administration of justice. See 73 A.L.R. 3d 725.
State v. Moss, Hrometz, appellant, Stark App. No. 2003CA00218, 2003-Ohio-6053 -- Though the
prosecutor may believe a privately filed complaint is without merit, if the complaint is in proper
form the complainant is entitled to have probable cause judicially determined.
Code Of Conduct For United States Judges
Canon 2A. An appearance of impropriety occurs when reasonable minds, with knowledge of all
the relevant circumstances disclosed by a reasonable inquiry, would conclude that the judge's
honesty, integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge is impaired. Public
confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges. Ajudge
must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. This prohibition applies to both
professional and personal conduct. A judge must expect to be the subject of constant public
scrutiny and accept freely and willingly restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the
ordinary citizen. Because it is not practicable to list all prohibited acts, the prohibition is
necessarily cast in general terms that extend to conduct by judges that is harmful although not
specifically mentioned in the Code. Actual improprieties under this standard include violations
of law, court rules, or other specific provisions of this Code.
McMann v. Richardson (1970), 397 U.S. 759, 771 -- "(1)f the right to counsel guaranteed by the
Constitution is to serve its purpose, defendants cannot be left to the mercies of incompetent
counsel, and that judges should strive to maintain proper standards of performance by
attorneys who are representing defendants in criminal cases in their courts."
Read US v. Lopez and Hagans v. Levine both void because of lack of jurisdiction. In Lopez the
circuit court called it right, and in Hagans it had to go to the Supreme court before it was called
right, in both cases, void.
Challenge jurisdiction and motion to dismiss, right off the bat. If you read the Supreme Court
cases you will find that jurisdiction can be challenged at any time and in the case of Lopez it
was a jury trial which was declared void for want of jurisdiction. If it [jurisdiction] doesn't exist,
it can not justify conviction or judgment. ...without which power (jurisdiction) the state
CANNOT be said to be "sovereign." At best, to proceed would be in "excess" of jurisdiction
which is as well fatal to the State's/ USA 's cause. Broom v. Douglas, 75 Ala 268, 57 So 860 the
same being jurisdictional facts FATAL to the government's cause ( e.g. see In re FNB, 152 F 64).
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60. Relief from Judgment or Order below"Once
jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks
jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather, should dismiss the action."
Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026.A judgment rendered by a court without personal jurisdiction over
the defendant is void. It is a nullity. [A judgment shown to be void for lack of personal service
on the defendant is a nullity.] Sramek v. Sramek, 17 Kan. App. 2d 573, 576-77, 840 P.2d 553
(1992), rev. denied 252 Kan. 1093 (1993)."Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts
related to the jurisdiction asserted." Latana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York, 37 F
Supp. 150."The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it
must be proven." Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 ( 1980).
"Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time." and "Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be
assumed and must be decided." Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F 2d 906, 910.
"°Defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even on
appeal." Hill Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp., 478 So. 2d. 368 (Fla 2nd DCA 1985)
"Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist." Stuck v. Medical
Examiners, 94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 389.
"There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction." Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215.
"The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction." Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F2d 416.
"A universal principle as old as the law is that a proceedings of a court without jurisdiction are
a nullity and its judgment therein without effect either on person or property." Norwood v.
Renfield, 34 C 329; Ex parte Giambonini, 49 P. 732.
"Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of the subject matter on which it assumes to
act, its proceedings are absolutely void in the fullest sense of the term." Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P
"A departure by a court from those recognized and established requirements of law, however
close apparent adherence to mere form in method of procedure, which has the effect of
depriving one of a constitutional right, is an excess of jurisdiction." Wuest v. Wuest, 127 P2d
934, 937.
"Where a court failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due process of law,
court is deprived of juris." Merritt v. Hunter, C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739.
This court lacks jurisdiction, this usually means that the defendant was not served with
the legal papers by my rights to due process. State ex rel. Koren v. Grogan (1994), 68 Ohio st. 3d
590 - Through appeal might have furnished a remedy had the trial court determined its
jurisdiction "a writ of prohibition will issue where there is a patent and unambiguous restriction
on the jurisdiction of the court which clearly places the dispute outside the court's jurisdiction."
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right to a
speedy trial. Consequently, prosecutors cannot wait an inordinate amount of time before filing
charges or proceeding with the prosecution after filing charges. To create more precise rules for
ensuring a speedy trial, Congress passed the federal Speedy Trial Act, which requires that a trial
begin within 70 days of the prosecutor filing the indictment.
Due Process requires that criminal defendants receive a fair trial. In high-publicity trials, trial judges
have the responsibility to minimize effects of publicity, perhaps by implementing a gag-order on the
parties and to eliminate outside influences during the trial. An interesting question of outside
influence went to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2007 in Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70 (2006). After
the victim's family wore pictures of the victim on buttons during the trial, the jury convicted Musladin
of murder. The Supreme Court overturned the Ninth Circuit's grant of post-conviction habeas relief
for a lack of due process because no clear federal rule existed regarding spectator conduct.
Due Process further commands that defendants have the right to call their own witnesses, mount
their own evidence, and present their own theory of the facts. In order to properly mount a defense,
the prosecution must turn over all evidence that will be presented against the defendant and have
pre-trial access to depose all of the prosecution's witnesses.
Pre-trial would also be the point at which the defense might raise a defense of double jeopardy, if
such a defense existed in the particular case. The Fifth Amendment, through the Double Jeopardy
Clause prohibits states from charging the same defendant with substantially the same crime on the
same facts.
V. Conclusion
This relator prays upon this court to consider what injustice is being done by this
lower court and all the respondents. This Court can unequivocally see that this is not
only a case that violates my Constitutional guarantees, but that of the greater good
of public interest. Also, this Relator will not receive a fair trial. The lower court is not
acting by the laws that governs our great nation, but on a belief of her own set of
rules. That is why I am praying upon this Court the grant this Petition for Alternative
Writ, Writ of Prohibition or Other Appropriate Relief. This injustice would be to let
this court get away with such due regard of the law she took an oath to uphold. This
court has already alluded, in a pre-trial hearing said she is going to impose a jail
sentence in this case. With this courts prior history of maltreatment, I put nothing
past her despite that until this charge, I have been a stellar pillar of the community,
being a Police Officer, Emergency Medical Technician. I had my own construction
company. I had obtained an amazing opportunity to work at the Wright Patterson
Air Base, with great medical benefits. I have not so much as even receiving a ticket
on my driver's license. However, I have lost everything trying to fight this case in the
almost year that has pasted. To not grant this petition will succeed in this courts
attempt to prevent me from bringing my appeal in my civil case with Montgomery
County Children Services. Which has been this courts agenda this whole time. This
relator prays upon this Court to look at the totality of circumstances and grant this
petition and stop this lower court from proceeding on this case. Due to the
extraordinary circumstances of this case, I ask the court to allow me to file this
petition with more pages than the rule specify.
Respectfully submitted,
Samantha John
Petitioner, Pro Se
75 Woods Drive Apt. 1
West Milton, Ohio 45383(937)751-9893
^Ylnrf^--^r
C:<'t'sst'j t313 i1(! tr<; il
lii th: ; i [X di1'#' W 7,1,.,.. ,.,,,... ... _ . , . .. _ .....,. .... . ., ^
^^---.'..^NOt^r^^imrs Herc.^K^^.^^,Mj is t;.m
Oiane L. Tiieya,f.. Am' Ftx thw SWO Of ft
Mv Gommission Ex^^w--,->e z! 15). g® i
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Emergency
Petition for Writ Of Prohibition and Motion for Stay of Proceedings has been
served upon said Judge and Counsel of record listed below. By way of mail or by
personal service. Filing with the United States Supreme Court of Ohio on this
Friday, March 16, 2015.
JW4;Samantha Johns75 Woods Drive Apt.1
West Milton, Ohio
45383
0fte L^ Tiieyq (937)751-9893Nowypw*isorthe Stateof
iu^^ ' urtlmsssion Explres- ^^.F^nf^ •
sCaie af..,®^ f ,E ^ . ...
C:ocen{y of [v*r^QA^ ......_ ..,.....( ^_ .. ..,. .
Sulxsor+t>e and swam to (as aft^rmed} }7etore
rne canrth-isjte<iay ,... .. ._..,.
prrn=ed to rae on the basis of satisfae.tor,,ev{denc.etcs be i3?e Personfs) who appearedbefore me.
THE HONORABLE MARY L. WISEMAN
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
COMMON PLEAS COURT
41 N. Perry Street
Dayton, Ohio 45402
WARD BARRENTINE
KARINA KOROSTYSHEVSKY
HEATHERJANS
MATTHEW T. CRAWFORD
ASSISTANT PORSECUTING ATTORNEYSDayton-Montgomery County Courts Bldg.
ALYSIA A. GOSS
LAW OF PUBLIC DEFENDER
117 S. Main Street, Suite 400
Dayton, Ohio 45422
(937)225-4652
RICHARD BUTCH BARNES
ATTORNEY AT LAW
41 E. Main StreetEnon, Ohio 45323
(937)340-2226
BOBBY JOE COXATTORNEY AT LAW130 W. Second Street Suite 800Dayton, Ohio 45402(937)228-1975
J. ALLEN WILMES
ATTORNEY AT LAW
7821 N. Dixie DriveDayton, Ohio 45414
(937)278-0652 Respondents,
AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Affidavit of Indigence
do hereby. state that I amwithout the necessary funds to pay the costs of this action for the followingreason(s): [Note: S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.06 requires your affidavit of
indigence to state the reason(s) you are unable topay the docket fees andfor security deposit.Failure to state specific reasons that you are
unable to pay will result in your affidavit beingrejected for filing by the Clerk.]
Pursuant to Rule 3.06, of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, Iam requesting that the filing fee and secu it^ deposi^,a.if app(,^ ble, be waived.
^r-_
Affiant
Sworn to, or affirmed, and subscribed in my presence this '^ day of
^^^6' -, , 20 iI-S
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: 12011 2D11
T[Note: This affidavit must be executed not more than six months prior to beingfiled in the Supreme Court in order to comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.06. Affidavits
not in compliance with that section will be rejected for filing by the Clerk.]
L i iiey, Naiuyp*kFor tk Sto of
;.;«rnmission Explr",_ ^^DC.c 1; ^:^^^
1
il-
c^'(• +
ft
"'p'1 .^ `°^^`,10^•^' A.l
^"c^^€^ PLEAS ^,^^;:^ ":^,€x
^^°'wt-
^'A^^^,2 .'-'
.^^.c
s^^a ^ ^e-"^9^q"s^ '^^„+' , ^ ^.S ^IN THE COMMON^ ^^^.: .
1C^"^n
STATE OF OHIO
vs
JOHN DO`
CAS= N0. 2012 C^ : 000019
PRAE';9^'^ AND SUEFOE^NA
Gi `^ S °^ ^ IURY
{a-i A?-E OF OHIO, COUNTY OF 1r1ONTGOMER'-r`, SS;TO THE CILERK:
T f"ie undersigned, PrOsecU}Er1C, . Attorney con behalf of ;h",.--'. -Sf3i2 t.+'?"so, h;i"P bJ eJilpea- the issl3a,l:;e of the £Ol!Gw1n^
Subpoena(s) ?LJr the herein below named wi}ness1es; to apr,ucf in this Ca+l-1vt cs« the t1nne as ?aY fJi'i't4:
^......
__W$ a N^^^^S ADDRESSESOF^ TYPE
c^^t ^ T6 ^LLfiJ-Fc^a-\a^s^A^ T £-'E C H 6t.rR E ^N'S M E d'C'A a, .lE N , 6_t, ^F P, AS',;"O N
MANAG EMENT DEPy.IK.cEPEP 0 N E t..,t-{1.L:.'t-^.E ^ti' P^,.i-^3_'FS
OF RECC-)RDa DAYiON. OH 4W4
^UC;s^^J' Tt ^a^'i^ o - Dkt-,'t'3n Ppa°-? - -.3 1-7 any d?ia aIl iTaE s..a^ YE:,>„3 $a"ftrt+.''i9ii e periC3dil oi
_..e..._
YOU ARE HEREBY Q,* }'
birth to the preseii4 on pr:itier?t, Samuei St3 ingfe14^^ S. Addrss 51R ^ o©r^vi^9e^C. e 45309,,---
BY,P,ELEa^SIa^GSa^^5 9^i^£D'.^r^^'8ONTC3 D^,^'. €S''z 0$^?^'GOP;,AE2^.Y^'b T.;. lf 5^^:^Rfiy^^ OFFiCc, 3:0
WEST SECOND STREET, DAYa ONa OH 45402 (PHON .a , ^ .. PAY.:. 937-224-r YO^ ^ILL BEEXC?aSED FROM AT" ="^H"°y11"^ ^ ^^ ^RM-41l) JURY H, Azoen ^ .
Y'ou are required to be and appear be¢ore Xhe DA'°?TON M O3c a ^OMERY
COU NT°^ COURTS BU9LD6NG, Lower Levei, 30'i West Third Street, Daytvn, Ohio A'-J 7 8w3" A.M. to 1esticy
as a witness on behalf of the State of Ohio T1ainfi'sff in the a.bov^. -en:iiied cpase` and 'o not °pa.,-t from 1;-ie COURT witholit
leave 3,arzder pcNALT" OF LAW
aV,N-7'e'•.f^aC- FL HECK,
P9'^sp-1cuaEYag Attorney
Ta i^n, i9'^^'A;;'6"sic, ry a''+3i.fe:aj; `'«'+hiv
tTO THE SHERIFF OF AMON^`GO%^ER`^' COUNTY, OHIO
8y: RraA E"'i^'`.^' E M m "i-N n h?E-',Lt3''
Assistant Prossewutirla Attorney(937) 225-5757
You are Comil•iarlded so SEat"flr7lor': thP, witness(es) whose f"laii^e(s) and addrQss(r:'s) a°1- Sei forth above to be and
C^1^.i arlc ^^..^It,llt^.l 4o ORDER saidapp..-.a;,^ be3or'UR-' this Court aS lhe `irE^e Carlf' place ^iLl forth above for said 4fJll^i\."s /SG's) Zo p." ^
^v.^.^:
^nritness(es) NOT depa^safd^Coaart wiittout leave UNDER ^ENA1-`i-^` OF ^AVJ., e^^^
^P1^Tr^ESU my 7ar^d and tne seai of the saiu Cc;ur a^ Dayton, O";o inin __„_ O^^,^:^x ^ '' ._.7('^^ A. 20112:
'^REEV'LA;,RY A„ BRUSH, C:...E-FK
P;ionfi6or;nery County Cour; of Cor°li-Tion Pieas
E^^,^. . - .-- •
D E ?'tJT':'
NiKIClO'7-26-12
' ^ki .^!-• . ' . . . .^ { 1
TJ^k,ION`^^^TMERY CO7'^Y CO1^^^^I^.^N PLEAS ^.'OURT^ ^; MONTGOMERY COUNTY, 0^O
i ' _ _'4t °'
`L. hc^
^OF^^^^
IN RE; ^l^VESTIGATION
x^^^ ^ I
ORDER AND e^^FURN{?>-11 ENT RY
WHEREAS, this matter came before the Court on the motion. of the Mortgomory County u:3er;ff's Office scr anorder compeiiinq the fol:o9rrinQ business or s:aitity to producm records or moreof its customers or subscribers;
I. The co^pany or entity in possession of said recor dstand or information being sow:gb'a is:
Chase BankCustodian of Records Legal i:'s-oca.ss Departnqe:itI Chase Manhattan PlazaNew York, Ne-w York 1 00i35
18. The records being sought pY€tain to the eoiAowina account:
Bank Records forAcco,snt No: 3033736509Baak Records for AccQubet No: 752075127
IRi. The pedod focwbich these records ase being .souo t is:
Date the account was open through the present.
IV. The records being sought are:
Aii account hofidaa- information indi.5ding address and aii otghor idorsrq€n^ informatso ^aa;i' nanries; addressesand phone numbers associated to the account. : o also =a?cRuda any int'i^rm atiun on dates of rrione;y depositsand witta drawismada to the account.
WHEREAS, there appeared persosaas9y baFore me oria QE?^QTiVL I. KELLAR and svsRorp to the faac"bs setforth in an Afiidavit on iida with the Cou' in this matter.
WHEREAS, based upo; s speoitic facts aaicuia;ted to the Cv'ur', in the a.ffidaton.;°<e Cotiq'E finds :^at ta'-sera arereasonabla grounds to believe that the records andior i nfoz mat:on sought is or are relsvarA and ma.fedai toanongoing investigation of a Violatbon of the Ohio Revised Code.
WHEREAS, it is accoordirsgiy ordered and adiudged that Chase Bank sbaiN produce to Deteutiva' Kellar ofthe Montgomery County SfiierifPs Office, Dayton, Ohio, the records andCor in¢ormiatio:ri dps&,b4d above.
WHEREAS, it is accordingly ordered and ad;udgod that pursuant te a, afiticxai cdminal io-v : stigation beingconducted by the ^i?^aa^tgoa^e€y Coas^at^o, Ohio Si?ar'i^s Q^^, you afe aot to disc9oso a cf thisrequest. Any such disclosure could impede the i s^sasti^at€^^ being co^d^ <ad an d t^ ^^^^:b^ ^a:aibrceodeazt'of the law. f3^^ ^^^^
Dated the 23rd day of October, 2012. wrtp,g d
^`^^^^-
MY hand a4d seag this^- ^.^^ ^^
4, e^^S^i :[.i •JI S S^dcAA.A^^!ty CAl^s.^ 5
^
"mrn"^ V7 4A{4,j ,
^^ +^SP
. i. _ .. ,} . . .
. t- ^ ` .. " . . ^
{ ^ .~ ^^^^^. , ,.• ^ ^v{ t^.3E' ^^ ^
.... ^^^ ^4 {." C..
g^0 r 'S_.ou Y.FOAd..^iA)t°
^, ^.^1^TTER OF T^ ^TAN^^...^ O^'f^ ^;Q!ii?}. O?^^.^r^... ^'o:r^p^„!zng ; 4e Kee:^e: of Redoxc^s forC,^ase Ba*-,...egai Wo^!epaa'i<.^ieut, s Chase Marhatcs,.a i'd2J>a, New York-,Ne^w 'r3 <a, 10005 td rvteaseeertain zz^a?a^a^^^to the ;'oj?o^Ting accca^ts: f^eco;aaa^€ _i^io: iu33'73 ;S^)9.,Aeeo^ant ^To '?52075 iL i ^"
S TA."I'E i' OHIO, MC3NTGE^IO-T-RY COL?N . x' SS:^ 2 C R 06013 ^ A.
Before me, the undersigned Judge, personally appeared Detective Isaiah Kelia.r, -^v:ao being frs^ duIycautioned a.ad sw®zmz on oath, deposes atad says:
L That in Y. ae City of Brookville, Montgomery County, Obio, the Lz4m.ina.! C.feu,e = rheft asdefined by Ohio Revised Code sewiiop, 2913.x 32, has oc,-;4-red.
IL That Detective Isaiah a5:ellar recuestw the issuance of a Co-a-, Order FaorupP -li:;.g tnQ reF::ase of-eezt.a.in iasformadon speei-5calI;{ listed in paraggrapia n T ofthe Couft Oxr-fer :,r's €:is Matter, Tuisinivrmaiiusa is reiewaraE and mater.-ai to an ongointr crihinai irriestigayion beir-g conducted bythe Montgomery County, t °b io Sbe:iTs Ofn-ce.
Ill. The iaformation being sought is in the possession or custody of Chase saodkl I (1-:taseManhattan Plaza, New YorY, New York, i^0015e
I'V. That the facts upon which the A€fiaza,t bases said be;je3.s are:
TL-e Afflant is a swo_T'Zl, police offi^.erwii.h the State c ^ O-hi :bs and is J.'"esenitiy emp.:.oye$7.with
fne Mcsuttgoinery County Sheriff s Offiee, assigned tsa the Sp4eiax Invesdgrdons TJdk. `? heAffiant has been a Sworn i'ezt.ee Officer since 1997, a^er-;uty Sioer-^' -wi-fla MontgomeryCojmt-y Sheriff s O'Lfiee since 2001, and has been aDetecFive since 20,08. 'i _e j-4-fdano- hasreeekyeci speeiaiized training i.n th;, investigations of Violbn,. al°mes, Sev-7aily0niesziedCrimes, iutem e^ Ciiines againsL Cbiidre.T.jzCAC-IT, CbOd Obscenity an^; Exp:a=tador,Undercover Peer 2 Peer invesLigatio-as, Forensic Interviewing of Cbiid:een;. Pr,opeAly Cx;,,^esaad Narcotics Related ^.'^=es,
QnAug-^st 27, 20i2, Montgomery Ce^^^-ty ChI;&en Serviees Casewue,-er ^e^- ssa 3^®^ar^ receivedan Ex Parte Court Order frcsrr^ ^/Iantgotnerf Ce^^^^ Juvenile Court for removal of ZacharyStringxeliow, Sainaze^ S^^ello^r and I^1a^b.eX,^r S<:^gfel^ie=^r fro^ their p;e^^`s,^vf a^^Stringfellow and Samantha. H&rr'isou-^oh-?as; custody at 516 Caleb St, Brookvilie; Ohio, 45309,due to possible medical child abuse.
Montgemery County Sheriffs Office Road Flatrog Dep-ataes; Deputr R Brown, Deputy J Caito andDeputy M Williams and BrookviIlv Police Depafament assigLtd T6.%ontgeme,z:y7 County Ch-1dren'sSerr-3iees w?taa the removal of the C^ffld&°exi. The h•o^ the residence andplaced ^ ^ontgoine^^ County Childsen. Servyees Custody.
Montgomery County Children Services began this investigation after bemg contx-,Ved by Dr. BobShapiro from Cincinnati Children's Hospitax. 'Dr. Bob Shapiro reported lklonwgomes: u CounlyChildren's Services that he was made aware of this case after sa,.^uei Nose,and Tbioat Specialist; Dr. Choo had e^ntaeted hi: with oe4eem-s about ^amnuel's, rnoyb:e4.Samantha Harrison-Johns. Dr. Choo repe.-ited Sauaantha -11-j^anisen-.^ohn's was being evasive andaanLraath-fuP with his medical practice regarding the medical history and medxeai.tre3tments ofSamuel Strin^eHow_ Dr. Shapiro eon-Lac$ed additional medical p-fovide<-s for Sarnue^S'Lri.ragfelle^ within 'Lhe C^°zeL^ati Cbild.rvja's Hospital Network to inves6gµte Dr. Choo'scomplaint fuitber. Dr. Shapiro reported atter speaking wRth additional medical p:rovzders forSainuel Staingfellow he was concerned because the subjecied ruediWall complaints made bySamantha.Hanison-John's were not substantiated by the clinical a-ad -meda ^^ ^^dings.
A4a'dit'Fotially, °aZF3a33tIa ^T5,yaSon-ao' hnS'laS Se°k5^"33e.'., --tMwA1+S Wb'--D TeSS
mvasi^e medical treatrner. vere r^^oomxz-acudc'd by the physaclans.
RDi1I'k^'ag'^f'3e c/.:i'"5e of tl3e investigation, o^gFS Mfianf ei^ information s"F^ ^had been opened f^s^u, Chase Ba.ak, Brookvxi;w,,> Ohio, to ass:^'L with the me^ica; forSamv.e1 Stz-,rig$'elicw, under the false Pre-tense 'a^ ^^nn.'e< vvas diagnos^-d with(1^F.^^ch£3F:d^-1alEa'1Cq€).uaxC'im--v43pa^llyy. This A ^'_fianne jaaS also received infsr^s'^aiz;;n that °r'?EiOi?SfundraaserS have been set up within ^^he MoF^tgomu rCo^^:-,,; Oh-do cormrnumkty; for donatz>zm s ofmedical equipment ne,ded for Saimuua Striu^,-^^How due to hi.s m°diwaA diagnoses.
FF.i?a.-aciai i11fOrmatiC1Y& is requested fi7oF.."^. -0he Chase baFsk acc^'S;.'sLitS of Sa7 Fli>°l ^^Aa'^^i r3^a a-r,dSa,..arAtha HarTison-JohnS, wb.^^h may ^onta,n. th-u do;nadipn;s ma.c.le to Samuel S` ingfex^^w f-or tiepurpast^ of paying for medical expenses und.°z a false medical d?a,"poses.
^
FuMrther.th&Affiant saith naught.
a. ^, ''• '?'V
IV9[`.
Eif
R Q
Y
{A^.
?^^-3''t _ ^..-^t ^^`?-&.c`°/^^. -
.,--rSwomtobefoge me and subscifb^^ ^^y-prespn05 - o;: or this d2..u3 /'v y 3L
f
^_=> -^--'- `----------_,f^
^^^F 4 ^^33^4SB. Pleas Court
^^.
^ ^ ^.a..,.^.
e
^..^
^^..s..x._ ^
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Suppierne,rt No^-8^^^ ^01^MONTGOMERY ^^^^rf ^^^ERIFF#^ ^^^ ^^^^^^
ReWwd Date330 ^ ^^cxz sT
9,.
DAYTON^ ^^^O 44:^^42.^ PMA?^ ^ECR
^i'. ..Vv^w-^ ^SAZA^'^.'9l. w
(937)225-•^v^^^i
(937) 496-71175.
^ , ^:- : :: ^. : . . , .vazs•^a.c P... ^ ` ..^ . ^ ^:^,,,.^^`x<- ..72?^ 'iH ^.9[i ,a^.,,. . ...
MOF-MMORY COUN^^ SEERIFF ° S 442012.....- ..._.... .... . . . . . .... ................... ^_._.^.w... ,M_....,T._...".
122400969 ^ ^y-acm
I,^^ s2
M ,.. ....^^ _,..... ^..._.,,.. _ , ._.....;M."_..,,qma. aeai rs ^-ccc ^r.i;^ (^-arim s ^s*^. i^^^^^^^^?^ ^^^^: 14^a9/w^^ g
ASS'E^7'âff^'ii2......._....-.. ..:.
^ ..`. ^ :^e3SiQS1CtiCTd'... ..,..m... ..; . . @ ^^'S'^ 3 . ... ......,...,..,_...._.........._.........",..".....,.,......:,....,...._._ .........................u.
MUMI5TIGRTIO25^ ^^STIGATIONS ... 7Lr^.......___..............,..,,.,.m,., ,......:i. .---,.,... ^ ^-.--,_...--.-..,,--..».,..-_..-..,...-._.-..,x ,...,.„.,^ > .z ;>z,a ez 4c.J7Q^s 3qctprosaE 4JatE ( ^^ _ ._ _
10/24/201
_ -...i^` ^ f .- . ! .. .. M , , . . ,.^.,.._
^^^^^^ ^'3GA '(g^^ SC" ME^^
On October 23, 2012, & met ^^^h Montgr^mr;^,ry QoL7ni; ^0 -^jmon ^'A^ Cc^^^, Hcno a, N^^ j^,^gA Saxb^:Aa Gc^r^^an;to receive approval on a cour'a order for ^^elfinepc¢a? ^^^^^^ of ^wrna;m;^a. H^^son-Johns and Samuel^^^ipgfei4o,Ws bank account is^^orrnatiOs^ th^^^^^i Chase ^ank. The bank a;6:>ou^t-c ^.yeree repc^^^^^^ s_'A up fordonations to purchase med^^l equipment for ^^^^eVs m_,ica^ issues.
Honorable Judge Barbara Gorman Pev4^we the court ^.3rlder end appro5.&dcsA!^;.^^ed ofs ^n C)Ctober 23; 2(3 2,1415 hours. The court order was sent to Chase ^^nk's, ^^^poeM:^ ^^ocaSs^rkg; 7610 'M Washington IstFloor, Indianapolis, In, 46231, to be ^^^^^^^ed by the begal de,^^rt imeqn..
Ow.ce, the financial information is received from Chase Ba,> k, ^^^ proper paperwork w,?.. i1 i^^ f^^^p^lefed.
Status: Pending
Detective ?, Ke4la; #489
14891MLLAR,1SA„"^^W.^ .... s."a1 y^28620' 3 €.9 : 3^a P^ge 3. a^^ 2.^ _" _ ...... _....w... ^_^ ^ ^ ........ _^
\^
t1J3i -fl...^^a.n...__.
I_. ^
Scarraec3 by 8v9cntgcrrte^iy Ccui~:ty JFS 4n gei Shepard 12f7712011 i1;04;58 A`=A
¢>^ .^` t^^` ^ ^ t d ^LQ f
^^^^^^ ^ ^^^ C A S 1q, F cD; .^^^^ ^ ^^^^01 A^ Ar ^ pm
If you a re rlot regts+ered to vote wtipr'c you rrvc itow,'„^ra! ^ou I;I<e to a€a it to v4hcra Y^^ay{^ YES, 1Vb ll? I91 ('qt`i4f to vote. [..,!fi J(> not vv^d ^i?ot'Gc7'ffiriO vCi^fS;
If yoti do iaot clieck a:$lher box, jrita yv;i Jbe coi sIdk:rcctd ho .,,R7<-doelc#ed €.oR to rog?sm€* ac vole ^:^: Ms ,tmm_.,....,.,,^., . , . ._.. . _
t" 3 K 3^omp€e'o this secFtron fQ, you or Por ^r ljcrscn ff^r <v:;cr ya cf rsp,alyfn{ . ^' ^ sf^
^First Name ^° ^di a lrltl4sf Dare to cu far r
i __...- _. .. . _ .._.. ,.. . . .. . ... ..... . ......... .. ;. 4..=.,G ;^3^IrlE.:tY. : ^ ^- ^..f` ^...f 9N^ .a.asfMfriE ...... ^ _. ... ,......
_,^.YpGn"Ji6{;.3 fc7oi: Aia Srt'ai2%e: I y 2ay Pkl.h_..^-^=_'t._.^"..._^•^....^_ _ _ __ _ .? i
Are you: Do ycta .rvza aFay caf t3io 3s dd*wrsnq sa rvlca>u? No
is;,ic'?!i}^ rP.1pfllrLG` L..^ 1rUprpr4t9fsr ^:hli(S i.".gs,j$ '^°&'?S ^`^DVisually
Hearing dmpairsa Styii i_.afaqUS:ga__^._ . . .. _..__..._ . ...._... . . . . .. . _. . . . . . . . . . ., ..._..._ .._.._.. .. . . ....... .... . . ,..... ,
t^^e^ ^C[3E^^ Cl e° YrJ€1 i? ^iP^G ^^3 ^t^l ^J^IU'I $'pcuaw3G.^C ds^l, '^oc i;z or Yd oU:ci9i ^" Ms t I Noli eS, hoG" t ^ ^ U`'ll'tc'f^ ^.^
V
. ^:. . , :^_ _ . . .. ., . .Complele fh3s sec4oon for you or for 2ho persorr, for wrrwm you are app1y[u___ - ._,.....Sts&rsf ^^'cfress ; ? Chack hare If yO>~ arO siuMalOss
...._ ,. _.1€y Cacarfy
......Phon e N:sr^ue, Oesl Time io Cart Add, ona' Phone Ntaar,bDr F"l u,o A d ira: s
» ._.^._-.. ^_.._. __..._._.__._.... _._.._._..... _. ._ :. _._._....^aai3irr^ ^ ;^ra^ss 3IY' ^i^f^rµns}
S#r®ci Address
_ __..._._.. ^
......,.. ?
_ .._.;.... _.__..__;
,VY'? (-'__..^._..__ . . .,.._... __..... __._ . ...., .^..... ___. .....__ __..... .,.. ._..... _. ._. ... ............( w^4rY3f
.-._... i ZI5
"54do
^
^
An au9hor1 ad r6presonfaYrva i s sornaona who ass;si.s r^ -siicar by compics appu.a4io', n .^. !r you , iltir'ip us ?o.mas an auki<orized rapreseniafivk, plaaso i'a€i oir, the '©l1cwina.__..^..__.____..^..__.^_...__........ _..._ ..____..^..,... ._ --- .__.. ^.. _., . ._... _ ..._ _.. ._ .. ._ _ ........ _ ..rsl afNSlddlU^` F; +.ilai ^ >~>v^ ,^Ia.'14^ ^
S 4_.._._^.^...m__._._^..._ .......... . ......:..._.. ... ........_...._....,....__-____._L... _ .._...._. _ .._:._.....___.._. .. .. ..._... .. .. . ^.. ... . .. . ..._ _,.,,._:...... . .__._._.._. ...:_._...____._Stfti°xr".dd;6s5
C 3:y
Phone Number
... ... ..__... i_...... ._ _.. . ^.. _.,..._ ._... ...... _...... _ _ . .._._ ._ __._^Cousaly e'ade1 + ^
..... ,. . . _.._._ r __ __. _ ,._ ___ . ...._ ... _.__,._._...... .....^...._i^esl T iian a 3Q Calf I €ada,-aryal 6or,cr iN unb ar ^^ rnari =adu_^®ss
pplicant or Ass€tiorPa6d RRpresenfa.ilue iprinY Nan:a
JFS 07200 i'Rtiv. i1'20U9;
# Lafs ^
t 5gv ;,?f4
PURSUANT TO SUP.R 45(C)(2), THISDOCUMENT OR PORTIONS OF THISDOCUMENT ARE NOT AVAII-ABLE
'I'[IROUGHREMOTE ACCESS .
S :an€^ed by Mont^om, er y County JFS Angel S?^^pas C , 2/712cl , 1 .115' a^ AM'
T k ^r
i x ^myans, 6t? year^ Of 200 or oldor?f Yes No
t'^c S, ^{T51h^F ^}d^ {^GStIORa in t7dIS St 0,i 3 t j" ^7G ^klf,sG sY^l^t ti7 f^^psilt7f' I
ks this Ee;s©rr{s} recei^airit
c^is^i^(Ptt 3^., 1 }3 ¢ ^^ - v4a t y^^`..i' f E1^'^., u.^3J. ...J b n'^„7V4^ . . ..._ .
If yGS, ,rorn what source?-- ._. ...__ ..... Y
tS .Ctr'a(s) k2r) u^;ls? to pre?^..<are ap^alS ^=_SL ¢S} c^ :^^3^ 3Y?;^v°% j yt, r ;^a...3I you urasv+PLS"ed "1"eS tt3 ho ii3si't7a^ ^ C d£ 4.atis, u}Fi^ Ehts ;2orSoaT0 ; sjai't tC, I-,scalSze at3od as$6statlct3
separadeIv f€'arn the Otrrer Poopir, aot., live V>,€h? !. yss No,:^__...-...._ __
. . _ ._ . .. .a
W6t yos., or the people Rn y^^u, hot,TD r'ocef 3 ia.c! n a ffiis mc ^ ^? l Ees N c ^ .. ^^
Inconne refers to aIE the money that you and the pea, r:. in your ^on^o rect)sve srlc,! ,,, 0nirtg4 from ernPloyrnsni,c^lE^dIS}7GtiSr.^^:`lT:^dlCi3^ SuEJ^7Qoi, d15i3`UI^I".Jf e)8E7C,'i)t'^, rA.,kar i:€i11;it ^}i;(1G(ii&, ^1}() k.C.'f;r ^{1PiT^^;d.aiTiln7r;, ^C7ct E? ^^.",q ,f;11rlt^`, SS#Jet^i^t,s Senefks, etc.
= ...f y3as,ptease cnipPate the kub€e tauiow-l:.. __.! __ ...^ # M ]f cu^t^ an^^rte ^ 3 c^ fSc a^s.0'ua4 I f
.._._.,^2^6Y^.._........ ......_. b^t7A3L`r6$'iiC4^GY7& ! f13.'3Pt^+^:^ f.^a ^ d A,;i^ ^l J^ t 3 1D:$1°u6,'tSr
^. _...__ . . _ .... .. .. .... ... .._^. _-...._._.,.__...J.. ..,.. ^hl r L..^. ^, Y .3C.U'^v^,*,^i ., ,,...._ .. . ... . . . . _.^..
____...^._........._.. __. .__. . ^ ... ......_- ... ..... , ........_ _ . ...... .._.. ! ....,. ..._. .._..... ..,..^. .... -_..... . .. ._...
{ {.... . . _ .. . , I_.._ . _.-._._... _. . ._ .. ,. . . _ - ... .: _ -.. .._ ... i. ..._. . _. ... . I ..,[..., . . __ ._ . . .._ . . -. . . ... . ,_. . .. . .:. . ..
^OV+lr7Iuch du you 'u,dl,d the people itt YOCtr hOFS'S.i s"?arre iri cas h, n 4 e St;t
r i..,.
r..`. :^^. . ._.. „ .
t ' c :r.: l^s ^ ^ "b.. ^'^v C as bst^tS?:.ar Urs$^t.Sdtr$.sj SloGks Crb o ,^5^^^ t ^
G1ve your b$si ast s°nate ofttTe ,oln! S-' . - ^T._. .,....^..... - . _.__. . __-._`."_..' ^ ._
.__^ .._ ._ _.,...,Jici ar'i;.tt;.da'' FI, 41'i'^i^r ^la^ri?S lC2ive a io^.l or :{ S^a u ,^wx' 4'Ti^n Y°^^e s.S° ^.^.^,! 3s utu e a _. .,.^ i L^11 VeS, who?
Yvt?r^tr^s'.sCfi? _.
(S aS'l"yftiTl2 irl VCt.BE` ho;pe oil stIf y+"s, wP?o;'
^ C8^ }T^Ip YYtdat c^ll^^ care costs, C2rrt8Gi }t4u" local t...D__?FS i43.Pl ch.!l.d_.Ca;e u;pp!__. . . ,. _ _....._t._ ...,. _ _.. .. _
^_. Cit.ldispoLrsallrnodir.at support
EsP;eTiatec# amaunt paid ;:er month: $
tivt , ri"uI^ ^.,'ak r ita •t3cK s iSi i178 ^ft tl^4;i% ior dacTBX^^l3s^_...^ ._._:.... ....^..._-- .._ .... _.._..... ,._.., .
3 ._ _ .............._._...... ..... _....., ._,. ..
c-^ { ^,i q/4^4,! Ti"^i 8 C°^' '>.+ Na'^3. !^ a ^i! kE
{.^ jl63 or other ,.:e^Iai^t.^wziCfi^Ca)
Estimated arncr^rt paid per nT;n•rh: $
o 4i; a
^lGUTxo K ^ ^J M^ •_^ s
.k,^,y'..^.`. ^
^1^Tich experaaes do y^r ar-^d t}^e ^ ^. ;
iRrMEd(cc^l ig?$p?I1SeS ff? tat?ia0 ?s a'.s a b l eba or u,38 60 O fdpr. TEz ..ce a GS^ fYpc-r`asxv5 SulCh as a71saaGHbills, prescriptions, P;ealth tsssurance p, eniiurfls, or ctrTa.• meoicaI se;^iccs, i?c .,o, ;n r^!r<de an^y ,1,Ad;c.:^l s;,;pF,,.,r; ,^mentsyou enkere^f in Bhe check box above, ^stir^aatec arn^^ nt paid per r lasY^r pa
_.._.....__..._._...._..._._._ .. _.., _. _......L'O Rerit / Wt€rt-tgae e paynierais - _ ;Estimated amount paid per morti:: S
_.^.4§ p y. -.._....... . f ..._ ......,_ ._._..... _..__.. ... ^l^t iia.es -^j^as^ cneGk ;hauEliltleS yoL, pay mr be:aw
Do you pay for heaf3r,.g andPor wair corxciiiican:ng? ^^ ^septar,k ^ r:v,°er
^, ^,..,
JFS 0'20C (r.t^•4' '.
^ ._. -Ye°
77777_
v JEr 3 OI 4
Scanned by iv,ortgr rrsery Coun'tvJFS Angei Shepard 12:7/2014 11.U5;^.s3 ANA
t By signing thiis app€,caflon,
1 uf3der5taPid the C{uesllQrt`i orj 'ti31s fo,,`'1 and certify, ta7Ut .:L I<eP:p Q! 3ci^t!ty, t.l s, :R ,a o. i.o :.eAm s azL> CGrrsrri andcomplete to ih,°. best Of; 4ykliC}weQ0 lTlclla"og 2.n,iCtm<Nt11 ko ,<k siew d44 e€! aEy ^.^.i'r7.s'tn smW.'', of c:rGh hGU.aetlqiC.^
mernr`aer appiyingfor assistance,
i sia[eaMe: penalty o#per;ury hava Msdamd exl! un".;::s and o.her ^^,,.ftar Einonmai f9svi::s in Wiwh { andlGd i?3y
spc;asa have any inteast.
!I?1d£$`M-^u'slC§ and "ugl'c?e to pfUillta'^, ', dL1f;i11i1.'3r is ';C have
EJnCfusmnC1 a.RO''s`.SreeGt1Elt ML ±F'C"aji S nu'y'oCmaG't $I., a?£`CGssE4fV p'JU`! of
my P-ligibit_Py and level of assistance,
I ui:Qey`$ts'i. t2d that by s2y?Gilftu this ap3::lICPitiilii allfa i c:CC`.v.,: ;(,3hii1 WiC3 f'ifS•i, e a93i aSSW.'1#ng to t,il? E`s3;C', ui 4.Jhlt`3 i,S[?y
fl;i?1's to ^,hiiEsf7o136a.( SUppQrf tflot is owed :G ::1f3 i1{"t`t?, ifk?'t tiilnd)r Ci1f[(i:"{,''I; !(1 iilc'. Assma?'Me g:ul1G d(aMG Stli; Oltitk
V'a'ork;sFirsf eEiaibi4s't f period.
tJRders$arYdttla$ i3}1 SdCy`37?flg Mlf. saj:=,piicil'".!C}i1 and reC V 1!y Mf?ii1C ili{, ( iaia ?*Ss,aRiri,.^^ ia ii1^'.. State of r3h3Q any rights to,
r,ledicai SUppari and any rlhts to ,a aymeiiis by a 1iaWs f lsrci p=;'iy for medical issis{x+r7ce owe;; tc F; c dndl7r to ;;;eIili'rfm f'.hlWmn fi? thex.ss6stan CG a,'MUiJ during the ?!l.gIii6itty pei3'„+d.
I uCIde+`'Barld that 1 r7'.+r,y i3e reqilired iw c(iC'pe.a,t; „?i!;; tk t:t'ISid SLipj;t;n o!+ff}d'Cs.rt1o; nCy i7; ?^t !°'s}?tf:Ck 7 iEi ??iy
or eszabIfSi71nG or enforcing a sLipLJ11 order. `i . a?, i':nQdC°u M cofape;Me 1M$f' d?ie . :: n >..ipp2a?i eti"o â 'c rne6S1 agency,
a m&PrM,'Eii bG' sUD3T,lt$edtp U,eaf4^.nyof3 m}+` k'}etl:'if dit3u Lls^} "3; aRL ^i?x., 1, °. , ' lti.. . K 7J7,''^a^ tC7 C2G 2+'^,[? filftrl
the child support enM:cz.ner;t ac,zenuy f:nay reques! abd supaar's sMNs es byFo. a ati°,g th:^ JFS 07076 "App18catiDfifor Child ;aupport Se;vices."I UtB.^.'rstir$1d that f^ sci1+: Bi7s'ia7(eCEt €ma; be iSsWC; t,;!' r +t.?Isd:1'1% i.'.? the L,i,lJi"a`. to tr.ax' vAa%?'`uEv/'.i GoCloC.t'.a af6''
necessary to determine my
(312)886-1907 t04t 752-0301 y'Eax).......,_ ..............._...... ..._.____._._.._._...-..^.___._..._._.__ __.__°_____.... .... ..--.... ._._L ..._.__..._.-....._.__....__...___.....,
Uc.'.',DA, HH,.'+. , <z[7UOvJ F-S a...(e wr:.aij:;i oP.7por's.if3lhy i.°.r.i?fi/S.^erS aP,d errijrioVf'rs.
¢:..:.._..____ ._.. ...:. . ._...._.,._....._ ................ .._...._.. .,...._._......_..... ___... .. f _....._
+..f
...
mr"b
...
ft
.. .,. . . . .... _..... ............ , ......._ ..,:^
^f a #
,
v s+'°
,, .^ _ _ ^,.^. ^ . .__. . _... .. . _.._._. ..... . _. _. _ ... _ ti _^._ !^^ f^ F^^^ ^3'{^^ 'LX
3.^^^^' , ry °` ^ ^^ 1 ^^
Y.` ... , . . . , i .,... , ,. . . .. .. ^rA?y . , . . ^ . , , ...
F£?C9eraI Ia+Jv'a.kldth? pUf(CIt.^s of ;ele U.S. 0 r`.p a rA^?e ni: o /tg r,^ ^ilire (li `Dt'k}, the !„k.S i ^(' >Ttt C?f ' ' e0lWi and idk,ill?aft
txServices ^HHS}, the (i`i:f0 Department C5i , or aiC?Ci Fari:,;y' Se, .lCes (f}ONS) arfdEia_ ,. Gp?rfia?P,rlt of Job
d'al3iliy Services {i DJFS) say that M!e must rt3i uibcr iirlfi;ale +n tt1e uaSis of m&z, vCz Cq nai.,n,.i o;?glii, sex, age, or
disability. USy4eqf't}'.e Food and n,'idtriti0fl Act and USDA p[)kYI, c7!_^ dr?e.ri„7.;p!i is pr{1i~b2d ?,.>v on le bmIc Of s"E"stt',Jim or
pC7E%a1 be68':s., , • °.-- ^ t t3 r a "''^: dis^rarr;^rat,o R curn^ a^r,^ ^kt^ car ^^s ^ ^ ^ S U^..: •^. ... __ _._ _. . .. .. _ .. .. . .. .... .. . . ..... ......_ .__.__...__._._ .__.___ . __... ... .. . .. . _..._ ..._ _________.__ t _
wrdta' or Call: IVrUs or Ca,1. 'ftx, t,o or CaT
USDA j H H,^ 0DJF8Director, 0 :,rce of Civil Rsghts Ra&n, V, 'r'.r::e of Qv7's f<;;ghls bu€'eas of CRi€ QV
:ve Suite 240 10 r Bic zd sR., yts FaoerRoom 3264V, kJUt~ !st'ten Building 233 N iV' ch q-.^^ :c
1400 Independence ,rti.verGe, S.W . ch!cagn lEkn0jS ^a0;Cf' Cow, nb_s Oki 43215
20253 ^u"'^eshingian, D.C. -,k^ 10 t t;,r3g8£^2;59 ,v^i.^^^ (614) 6a4 2t a3 lvlcay`I,,t?.s^.0-5e.}4 ('dQ1o tr a n d `v! TDE7) 7 a<21 92r wl !f' 3- 9 31 ,
,....;.y r. ;, V 060206363 ;eC^at,t, Z^ , ^Ifir:..' r ^rJS Y^k.1(«0n.
.lFS 07200 (3tiev I 1J1Cu7ts-) 5'E;.u ^ U( 4
j'".
Scanned bY Mcntgar;7eqa Ccau, iFFIS Jan Shaw "1s` s 5,`w0-11 3 3:52:55 PM
_...... . ..._._....-., . . ... _ _,... ... ., . _.... . .. .. r- . .. - .,,..^
1:t,^.` i;
....
^ti
.
f• , _.___----__._...._---'--._____.____ . _ ..._......._. _._ __._. .._ _.... .. .. ._. ......._....... ___.. ._.. ,,
.s_ - . _ _....,,......^_
sa}1 tiS :. _. L' t_= (i: ,
^ ^ }+;i;. t ,t^!;h^t l^allt !ir tcr'tsict^ In ^,^tU .
. . P. • p[3t! t}^9 i&ut c'^l41 C F^1:^d` E»1S, i?r 8 65 ^^. ^^i at1 ^ d4^t^' it 3&4 ,.t,.c^tE4; ^fo a.; $(^I- Pi2' W Fs+. +t ^ BrFt`+ . ER33a ._^^,_^._.^__.__._.__- .__..__, .^... __. . ... ....... .. . .. ... :._,.... ... ..._.. _ . _..._ .... . ...... ..,... . . .. _:.._... ....
^3 ,±t"s^i,^^^^^^'..°4e^, ^^ ^^ ^^^i.;^^H^IP-1 ;.^, Ij4.^^^. (._^^.^"^^5 AND ^.^$ki)
I_,._.______ . ._ .. ,. ._ . ..,._ . . . . . .. ... .... ... ...... ... ., ...... . . .i:1s: :.t:1v 4
5:i7c24l1S? _ . ... .. ._ __ .... _, ,_.. _ ,l{RtdtiEK 1 "s^ ^20s }8 Y Ja ^ F 'SJ^ !t' .,..... ,. .,.. .:.. .. .__,_, ^_,.__._, f
^^E'j'. ^; ^&'ei$4^^^^Id,' eBF^st El^^^.lt'at n'e s^}5` r Fa' sS3''d3 e}ts^ a5^ dj6. s1^^a^Y^ lakkt_^'sS t 9: ^^^^^.^^, ___ _ ..__. ._..__. __,. ^_:__ ....... _. . __ ._..._. ._.,.... .:. . t^t uu fatf<ik }YttinL,m9 .,tst itia^sa _ _ ' '
F e;, R15 ..h.
1 51,16 CP,LeE DK_,_ . . _.. . j ..... .......:.......... ......_._ . ._.._.....
S.)tj`Oata /,I, l :,,Cc . ... . , 71t 1 ,.i,ac E€3RQCKV1LLE
F i 9 C"M ^t ^^tY,iBi^(lt'i3: . P.. ...__.- ^;.__.._.._......, . ... . .._._.._: e5 eSc'attb9tetJC <!i ,L+e'S Yntdf' ^^CId4..SiS 1iL- i4i,1. s( 4i'ji:a } i*aFt':'!t. ,-.> Z't): ^1.. iiltl}'rd^se 'td'.' }?1 3.1jtf4^3e, t..,r ,;9..^ it tl^: ;t^.^ _`.
tili?ittitli tt, ^Nr;7C;it^
VI_'71, stiuE 7c'dtlF2} 10 AilG2 (tt Ol .<tMO7.5 Ut 1::", I(UOOYC'1 f!Mctt ,9).ti.0c.M ,;.,di:jcfOt. „lNi,,.' .kt
I ^ .
it'^ ls7c::l^ a4Sta.,tiiL^• 1(li^ ^t?fil', i^ 1i,•: u t,.F ^7-.+i'c.u ,-^)^„?calit^i'i )ta! 1^St ..i.'.S^ U.-^ :+P.,;)tt' I.t sr,t(SS3tS 4.^UI: +48h;ctv a1,tYit^,^ d:^4billf7ilC (ir
liFi^?^'^^^Ct^t 1' <f^iE^F<>ti;(,i tllCli „t, ,t: h, t;;C:1a:1'71tt;„ISt^ti tY,i7s;^ ;titl Hti•tiil:,Eftt(t E3It,>c,-,^,. u^fet.^ +..`Ui c...f llitJSt; i}llC1'iLitaY ltflt iat
iiBC^E E;> i1pd;RU Y,1[.'t .adM.:iJtt ,kl `^ ..lt;.^t.. ;• ^'^4di FE^:.'fCJE ,7; Y! . . ..: fdt :ita
_ -.--_ ..-...._,._.___._. . ' __ _ . . .. , . . .. , . . . _ . ........._. ,._ .,._t.ctS^. . .. . .. . . .. . . .^9cC{: ^tl.^^^£",}bC'2'1}ffli. Cf?E3Ft} t^^ .i^S:kC! Sar ' r. . s bl,
.._.....,,._.._._.-
^ ctnisss^tnFi^f uIt^IE'c:Etf^r a,sk^!'r;^etii, ,.u r .f;ia}. :I;t. : i7 ;a ,t,,^a:°.,^ t,;i ilFC t' ,: +^t_^.,.. IS .:ai :t?,.,• :. m ;uaci
:isti3( c f' to flYc- f'Us( OI Firi { l3oiiPc•clge Ft?c h-f6_2g 11;1{;, =it,.tln t, Wun ll.. N,.<ti,l:*!.],F ,,.thr.rtmckn toa'ii at,ul..t¢8u]:?^^:at;^ct r>,r.t,IQ}rY R:,t az:.t:,:;tucc•
^•.,v,-
1 Uf;ci4'fma11{{ ;Ipt at14^: EG, f ttt: td{t a9 d',„i73::cPtttn ?[i Ji^t;9^^:Ic: :E^i'.j^Itf i24 lfiiiu• , tutC - i ^`
a E}11t^W 7.. !_1.4 [i37.{ liLf 4C C(t;Ff S^tC t'a.FC^t`, !^w .i: ialc'!Il '^i".^ul: aiP^ . st:";i^1^E•. ^^,.:^M : ^ 77;i7•:i i IIY ,_, li6 h... ^,ifi^'i )) C'f^:i:j ;^f' 1
UCS'.dillila(;nI11 irY t917tt4S.41 i^:4: 1l^t;C.:;ti^^Y, ^)t^:ir1 cij I::F >^^illftiV„^ii, )C. ,•l'^ Ui .tal_F71:; (
u^tca;aF;Ftti c;i^:Fl>glaf)'.}
^ C;2^:CiCa^ a Ci1p; tt}', ,Nlci I li,ti c' {'c 'reJ. 1)iY fYY)t ; am ?"Yl11ti;h 1<flc^> 0}'S aP1ci ! fllat'PCy7il,"SiieJ t^izlS;d 1 o?g1C^.'. Iix stlMR d111'
j Ur7c7>`!\IC1Ci uftil[ :, i;a^.^ro..;i:7aU1 `A11^ 1;4 Lu#7titt^^ c':f 1^llti:u,t( c. l^c^ Fit ^'1TCa:, c,cllc^:, €1.:3k^1s`.:d^ ^
< ."? .E E F'^j ; . ^ . . . _ - .. . .i, .. .., . . . . .. . .- 1.^,6._,
_ _ _ _ -- __ _
{ ,.... .,, __ _ i _„. .;;. :"... .- ".-^.: ^,:^_. . .;. .. . -. _.. .,, . . .. ... ..;^' _ Y
.iFti 07204 tftstG 24Y1s1 ^
ii
^^"°ng:...^ ^`_^°..°,
^ ,
^._, ^ ^ .,^,F-^--^- ^^^ ^n,:,^d^-a.^.s^^"^ ^
1-^
ONC}-Ma_. F,
^S' ^ . . ... _Sr^'urs849n U
2014 CR'00138 - STATE O
DOBs 12-SEP-69-------------
ArresL €2at2: 05-JUN-14____..-.
,Ea:^^_ MARY U+?3SEfU:AN° „csrbs@^at^s^: e Dli-:
F@ie Date:09-,^AN-14Sta?aas: OPEN
Oefend M Ss:?AAt`3THA,t-.?i^RRf3C?a---------- _°»___-__-_-
rap&u=g 52'a.aaa: 516 CALEB°; ©R.BRCOKb?LLEt'-t-I 45309
Pvosect;car: t~icArF?E R N ,fANS__._
^@^; ivot DisQdaysci
THEFT ($1000 ButLess f har $7,500)
(By Gviceationj3
AA _ ^
r _.^
. .. . . . .. . . .. . ^,..`l:.i ,. . . '.. ' ,i;;;.._. . . ^ ' . ^ v'.S . .^ . .
. ... ... ^^ .. . l^..,.J
dc aMA'I .^R N JANS 00844'70L4
IN THE COMMON PLEAS CO'^^ OF t^^^^ ^ GOM.^^ ^ COUNTY3 ^^^^CRIMINAL .^I"V^^TON
STATE OF OHIO CASE NO. 2014 CR 00138
P ' tiff
VSm JUDGE MARY IM%E.AN
SAMANTHA HARRISON SUMMONS TO APPEARON INDICTED CH..^^^^^
Defendant
Surnmons is hereby issm', iri accordance with criminal rale 4 yD) :?dv?siil-9
SAMANTHA HA SON
516 CALEB DR.
BROOKVILLE, OH 45309
THAT SAMANTHA HARRISON has been andicte;^ by the Grand Ju^^ of Moritgo:sr^^ry County and thatthe person ^amed in the indictment is i:er^lby ordered to pel*sona.lay appear at 8:30 A.M. on. MAY 15,2014 before a Presiding Judge of the P^^ontgor^^^^ County Common Pleas Cu-uy'c, Coa:mra€^m A THYRDFLOOR, 41 North Pe^,= Street, Dayton, Ohio, and that FAILURE TO AI'PEr^.I^ WILL RESI_,T1:1- IN AWARRANT FOR ARREST, FORFEITURE OF BOUND,. IF ANY, OR ADDDI`I'IONAL CRIMINAI,CHARGES FOR. FAILURE TO APPEAR UNDER :^e--t^3n 2937.99, Os;.io Revised Code. I ^^er°tify tiiatthe attached indictrnent is a true copy ofthe original indictment or^ file in this officM. You have the rightto an attorney. If you are unable to hire an att€^rney; ^fl the Montgomery <ounty Pu.b^^^ ^^^ender°sO^°x^ at 2225 2 between the hours of 9.00 amnr and 4.00 pame t^ ^^^e,-i^^ if you qa^^^^^ forattorney services at no cost to voue I'^ ^ AS'E I?'RING THIS INDICTMENT TO COT-aT WITH YOU.
^^^^^ A. Brush,^^^^^^ Pleas Clerk of ^^urtsMontgomery County, Ohio
By: /s/ Gr^^^^ ^ hClerk of Couq
I ^xecut^. ihis Surn-m®ns by maiiiiig a copy oI'the within Lndictmes-it to t,b.e defendant(s) herein byCERTIFIED MAIL.
,°..a....,^ ^.d...^^,
'^-
I
^ ^.
^ ^)
^^
MDNTGOMERY COUNTY DEPT. OF JOB AlY.I} FAMILY SERVICES
Participation Ability Request Farrn - ff'm-imary Caregiver
°^---{
t- -_ - --"-
-t'afz: rt^ ^ ^ ^efa#^ores^z^ ^
W^^ .Id 1 r 5^3Z6^,^^^$v . , _- _-_ - -- - - ^^ ,
-. .--^---^. -_^ . .^-^-
_
lt is our goal to assist the MCDJFS client named above in preparing for his/her transition fromwelfare to work. This client states that he/she must serve as the primary caregiver for the patientnamed above and is therefore unable to participate as required. Please give careful considerationin completing this form. The information that you provide will be used to determine activitiesthis client may be able to parlicipate in and duties he/sh.e may be able to perform, even if thereare some limitations.
My signature below authorizes the release of medical data to the Montgomery County Dept. ofJob and Family Services.
Patient if
Medical Practitioner please comnlete the items below
18 years old):
tY1;}ockeo^^dr^al t^tiseas^ CmELAS -CQr,n^,1a K"^ r^c y r i^x seclzePat3entDlagnosis:kyrN e,n+:%.cL, 3leedrnt^^:,strd^r; ^^r,nr^^r^^^l+c^ ^liserde.r (c ysf
r-- ntOLr^^t^ Aork^e r^oci, ^rc`c:^c}^c^ ^t 1.n4-9,rvcLlsYndro^ne' l_c^c.k;c A c 'i c4os,5,
1. Does the Patient-require a relative to provide medically necessary, fufl-time care?q No.
^Yes. If yes, name of caregiver.Comments:
2. Does carang for the patient prevent caregiver from participating in the followzng:working, volunteering, training or attending school?
q No.
es. If yes, ple^se za cate anset o ilit3 a€ad foiha^t long f` participate ui tdie abc3veactsvittes ^ill last: Qnset^jV ^ - Dnration:. -. .. ^
3. If patient is :under the age_ of 6, can the patient attend a cliilldcare facaiiiy for af least 20 hours perweek?
0 No. Unable to attend months from this dateq Yes.V N/A
Practitioner Name (please print)Physician Signature
PhoneCiiy 1?Gc.lf ^1f'I State 8_ Zip CodePlease retwn this form to no later than
w^^ ,^937) *for ]b}- mail. 113onfgomen Cotan#t= Dep#, of Job andFHruitt sens-5ces 1 I I1 S. Fchs in C Moses Bh tL ^~-ton, QIl4 1^^"^ '-,i-' f^f^^.^ ':^.P^j•MCDJFS 10795 Rev. 9/2011
25"2 Ul
^`-N^r ^;° ..,^ ^
^'°^^ `^ti^^;
n^'?^ffi^,^z 'ao
THEFT ($1000) ;Bv Deception;i F5
A3^ ^^L
^4 . ^ mam. . . _.nr.^^xvrs+s.arrF+ ^^ ^
f (I^(4^7
^"j
Foreman of the Grand Jury
vLEu"TR^MCALLY F.^EDCOUR's," ^^^= '^ OM^^^^^ PLEASWet:nasdc t, .%Hpr s 30, 2014 2:24:04 PPe3';ASENUNNIBER; 2014 a,,^ 00 138 E_;ockei 0 : 19061148`°• R^o.a^...;^^d^<'a^°u tl_'^ . r ^': ^sRUS..CLERK Q.F s:..CURs S a Oh' e GOMERY COUNTY 0:IO
D€i'^^^T
THE S`^AT^ OF OH,10, ^^^^^ ^ GOME.^^^ ^^^^TY
2014 CR 00138THE COURT OF ^^^^^^^^^ ^^EAS
(January f`errrr in the year "NIVe Thousand and Fnu%feun)
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ss.
THE GRAND JURORS of the Ccunity of Mointgv mPrjr in the r,arnR, and by the
authority of the State of Ohio, upon :„ ^ef^ oaths do fs^d and Presunt ^^^at. SA;0ANT HA
HARRsSON, befiween the dates ^^^^^^riber 1, 2011 through October 31, 2012 in the
U:;vnzy of Montgomery, aforesaird, and State ci` Ohio, vvr z`h PE,,rpose to ni prWe the owner,
to-wit: Montg^me;°y County Job & Family Ser,Juev of property or Service^.^, did knowingly
and by deception, obtain or exeE i control over said owner's Prope; ty or services, Ao-wfz:
Cash ^s.^. en^^'its and/or f^'r^d a5SlsianGE: hfa`3inu a value di One Thousand "Do6{a3"s (-'^ 1,000) or
more bu'L less than $7,500; ;c^n'Lrary IL-o the form of the statute (in ^,;;.o;.atiorl ;^ ^eeLion
,ri^ee^, an,' against291 3.02(A;(3} of the Ohio Revised %Codle; r such case made and pa (,
the peace and dignity of the State of Ohio,
Respectfully subm:.ied,
'WF?H,5G^5 Fl. HECK, ".%R.a
P i ose cutin g Atio ,
Montgomery County, Ohae
By IS / M at'6heV1% T c't`awfor .,
Assistant P'rosecu}ing A`^omeyy^^^ u^de Court ^ C^08v;.;.<:^^'
..,^i
\ JE ^^ T^.__.^e^-^
- _^ ^^
December 27, 2011
To whom it may concern:
My name is Martin Stringfellow, I am the father of SamanthaHarrison's 3 children; Zachary Stringfellow, Samuel Stringfellow, andMatthew Stringfellow. I do not live with them at 516 Caleb Drive Brookville,Ohio. However, due to my name being on the house, I am allowing her andthe children to iive there, rent free. I will pay the house payment and allutilizes. I will also give her $150.00 a week to help take care of my boys. Ialso provide the primary medical insurance for the boys, but none for her. Ifyou have any questions, please feel free to call me. I do work 3rd shift, so Imay be a little hard to get a hold of. I will do my best to get back to you assoon as possible.
Sincerely,
,^• ^
Martin Stringfellow
^vbab MiA aMS* b NK s. ^,#ya df e's^r . #^
^l
-_i^>< -a
r
^^
^, ^.r.J L^°3^f 5d^1r-I_i YJ'^^ CiiL'u^ :;s.a,. .9_a+ -^ F
tA^^ U r
2 ^ PPI
C4 ERK OF COURMONTGC.MERY CO rum.
Mdd^
ifSus^e..^f^^ 1Pf ^......i!.:.sar.;,.-:..ar.aK..... ^
7104 223D 1690 2153 6350
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^R7^, ^, ° ^^ ^ ,.^ CEIP^^ ^^S^? ^D
BR-00z^.`•,t ILE E L±!'; 45v03
^^^316 ^^433095049. }.913 .f$^iT^bTO c"<3^'a^7?.'^..,'.
^^^^ov-pv sox ;.^ ^ ^ ^Baoo^,^'v:^z^ aa 0;^'^^'°.^ ^`^^...
RETU`^'.^j To ^^^^^a ^s A t p a^
05107M
- . .: A....^ ...^..^..---^"-- . ^
£SP Si^II 'a7's F Sf^f:? f^ #â az#^:sxt ,xi'p r^.
^ . ,. ^
Ftm
q
2PM TMaA`^ ^ 5i peg 31 N,
^a-
4f°_r ..^'k'^
^^^RrK LIF COURTS11
11ONTGOMr,E, RcY• Cu. -+ ON9OPLEAS
^ 7 ^
i!'^:.^E^.^ ^.,f^0^^^^5^'e°'. ii ^.^i"3.
g^
.9i ^,' ;4i'`^^ T`'..G^.JkSE•.`s,YCOUN}. OHIO^^ ^,
STATE OF 01-110
Pla;;:^iff,
c°
0E
E
0
^
^
^
vy,TR
S!^:6'V9ANE Hd'•.. S'iP'2,Ae.CaI:3ON
Def';nd=t.
C'-A^ E'NO. 21^14CR00I 38J1; ^^E MARY WISEMAN
The c^eft-ndanw is hereby OPbDEP-^7: 70 m: xz;r- Monkgawer^ Cogsn4r S:^^^ ^ ^ ^ffgcg; 330 WS°^,°ou°P.^.d ..`^1~t?'eet, Pr37:fl^ Offi/s:S~:&', on $h .01. ? vs the p'..r,nposG^s 433' 3ia:g^.'P,36`^3''tfl^:s
photographing and other F".^^''u7m^,'^Zt^^'aA^24 ^k . .. . . ??' ;p.., .^ i ¢° ^ ^ 3^w32 . dd^'e?^ " 6'
action ffake^ by the Grand .^ury:Ti2d;. defendant w9.43 be ?eqaE4.aed to oasS eh5w3u^h sec$?i uty, rz"0.ec.k5 pnor to processing.
F?s.3^^re to appear way result in ^he 'SMM^e OCZ 'W%- the ^^len£'AMR$9S 36"re-3^^
50'?RDEP,ED:
-:r- .^...^.^.SA '`^'.'^i"tF^,.^i^^'.^E^•5aa i±
Arresting Agency M^'JAr'tgo^'4:i.r'^'i"'a°-_'a?.'.'.^'.4:y :J.h%«6'[ff'b'. 1`%a"r^,'..^,',,.' Date
On __ i fiys^erpyijarec_"a and ^^ ^^jogrF phe d bi3^ defendant as Orde.k ed'^^ the ^^^^for record-kFePznS Purposes.
On the d?Kwf7da$3Y ha'1'$t"'kg been LidAm-a to appear fbr nwqgLm3'fl;2tbEig,w'.s not
fingerprinted for the faiko-^^^^ ^eason°
Preyaous^^^ Fingerprinted, Ia'N
Did not Appear for P^-igerpr=$_?tanr
ORAL
cc; Pres;eca^tor',^ Ofi-ice
Pbil Plummer, SheriffMoa^^go-n^rycou:¢°;, On io
-^
. . . . . . . ^. F F
. ,. . .-. , . ^ .. . .. ..,. ^^.:! , . .^ . ,. ..
.. .'.^-. ^- .^ . . .e t ^ ^. . . ^ .. . ' ^^ r ._ ....., . n ^... . ^
IN THE C01&IAeION PLEAS C-aJURT O. '+ MONTGOMERY OHIOC:^^TNA^ ^IVISION
REm ENTRY A iN^ ORDER FOR a°a^^GiNMENT CONTINUANCE
T^^ Couz°c ixee°eby a-a°dece°^ a cendnuar.ace sum apent^ In the fa^^^orving s^^aVee^^ ^rodsx May 15, 2014
Case a'aumber ggkol^a.se '^o Rwton
2014 CR 480543 S z.v. ADAM. C KINCADE May 22, 20 14 CPC -^O, N'T.W6J&D -DF^^EN33,ANT TO
2034 CRQQ i 3& ST, v. Sa'aNf r1N'EI3A. HA,k'tRiSOt^3
2014 CR 00954 ST. ^a BFtELN-A'f A JOiNES
2014 C£t 00964 A ST. ^. TA3ATHA R. DEN4OREST
2014 CR 4DU96412 ST. ^. aglsEC'iAN E WTAVER
May 29, "24S i 4
May 29, 2014
May 29, 2034
iviay 29; 2014
RETAat+? COUPdSFL,
CK-S3ErEP8D!NT FA:LEfiDT29 APPEs6&
4'PC :3MPlb69.t+1T F:a9LED TO APPEAR
: P^-M 'F33DANT PAZLFf3'^O APPPAR
CPC-OeFP2vDAS f¢' FRSLED TO APPE,AP
2014 CR 00981 ST. v. AMAaRJO;ME Ni. NELSON
2014 CR 01165 Sn a. .^k-MY S. RB^MHART
2014 CR 01313 ST. v. C9i5tffSTOmHEE$. Be^'^.R
msay 29, 20+^.d
iv9a}r 29,2014
May22, °^^14
(`n -i3Ef -t KL?AN°t" FA ff.,P€8 TO caPPFA R
CRC•DEFEN8>A?PEra6SUD TO APPEAR
LF'i.°-¢?EFENk}:3a"Y Fra&E.EG3 YO @PP'e"A4$
SO ^^ERED:. . . . .sa...-.sa....n>^
JUDGE
â S9.'2Q07
^^^f,.,.^.^„^a
^
^`'°"` _ ^ ^ ° m...^°^°^-^,
^^.^^ 4^^^ ^ ^o
I^ ^
1=-,
Redacted by 1-42rk of Coasri'. , OUR';' , : '7 M 4 PLEASJ14 12:^:^3 PM
`'AS E , 3 a . iit ;,a CR e,0138 Do&e^ ^^`'e. 19GR fi„"
CLERK ^ ^GVFi'TS 'MOIN MO^EPY C^UN17Y
iN THE COMMIiN PLEAS COIJRa OF ^^IONA 4 <i'j5ER'Y CIOx:3INN,T `' O'HIO
0^
E
E
02
m
C
00^
0
0:2,
STATE OF ^MHHO.
.-'Vc..
SAMAI`I'IHA HARRISON,
D f:3 Cnd a il' V`s j.
T 0 AN Y s1AW ENT :+i.R, C E 'M'^ F N T 0 fl F I C^^ 0 F Y0 N '3`;^CB4 E aY C 0 wiNI "e, Q..:2H 10,
Whereas, a3`v IndiL'.n'e?`'3'e£ Ci:f`'i f.3c.5., ir€'."'13n3oC'}., a !.',63py of's^Ii Es,'l^â, ,.i e'^i. qai;fed hereto, r,: earg3Blfi that the
a°f3ft'<J^,°-IIr`,met2 defendant committed tt .... (Dffe n: <F'.,`^a i of i (F5) SA4
set out=n &.,e as.a>~hea'tent;
YOU ARE sL .'n9MMIAND"L.'D to ?AvT(:si i"t; '.elmFt-it-a.'a "43^G^F ^,v t in this `3i' 2i1i^ ^5.dj^3^"ix_.,i^'^'C, county
2t"'1 '^Vhi^°£ vL?E^. sh^,lp ^{fllG.^i d^'f€ae''^.«i7t e£n^% `3Taa;,g .^k f ^ 31^3? x b^'s^.^3 hIs £^^f'.' (,^ ? s^:^er uri£^ £+te^'s^ 35^;^(c) se5
forth OA''s, :b i;n_ad dcaFfl,.da?'ii be aE23Ind Lx_ a_2y +r£.,,efl^ thwT rfirS or an aidji) , .,i;.; ..ou... ^, "_'Cr ^m.,- sE and take said
defendant l3t.ZP3Py6.',, a co?.iBi of ri.ct^3,,,^`'^t i''i'"a^::ext. having jdi.E:;Ci.c,n2C21 of ^'a3 5 . r d,^; t:ee.d+.F'w^iE^? according $o
law, ^R.Yl*'.^ to do i?x`^"5^^ t2°t^.',.°'r u%rtSl^'i3d.FC'an^.^i] cej.;a°"y C."o'ia'.
Given ^^^er mg^ ^^nd ^^s 29TH &ya° --.: A',,.'
C ^P;;orv A. z T-,,.:.h,Com-ms_?n P;va: >vicr?>: of Co'.:rt,,,°,!?:{'M`i1 ,^a:F"`t t..^^?t:.P;f.^7, Ohio
^rT^Ni ER. F g;rz;?ale
97Y- ^.Cp..1 'e^y!^'^
B? v',^r{!: E` :S. B3.70Yin
3NVE9 i IGA.TO'd2.S1Pi?1.,aC^ AGENCY: .'u'tON?'r'aOiAEid Y ^ OUi'•iTY `aHrRF 1-"'SFXTRA DIa iO1'+TS: (X) 1. ( ) AS ( ) NW
C ^A S F N(i. 2 0 ^ 4 uy''' rZ) ^^ 3 c^',
z; W1 ^a i' .'^.{ ;?t^A?Y ^E A?tAN
J^r.. t^^i^v A. B -ms3i ^
C 'Is# "r> [fiY ;`,^,i3 I
ID^'+.' Na :FI<, RSNAMB S): ^amakx^.^^ 11,xmsen RACE: C-aa:casmraL:^STKN0VVNA_I,_)`,_^RES:4:;^^^AL SECURP?"'j NO.: 7
DOB. ^n-.W2s'a969 ^'sEa:sH , . S` W' s30 Aflk:Iri3Ei'*3TIFYrNCn MARKS O.T-s.' PHYS iCAL WFOR'v4A {.?;yi^'.:
E M 's^i_,0 y E ?::
cc: MCSOVIiara-a.r.£ Sevtian, (3)pr<ssecutsJr's ar .ce
PR^ta,tii$(4,'^,
^a!^ ^,3!^.° Ii i.^?^;'^?.^iUs`'dT
TAF
_,
C^_\ I
^ -?;-.
_._.f\ __'
.._._.._, ^
\ A_.-^^ ^^
^_ ^-
^_.. ^a.r^^^.^^^ - -^--^-^.®.,^.^;
.. . . _..'^.,/{^. ..e.i-:....... . r •.
.- J ^ r .. . .. 1 ^^' _. . ._
. .. ... . . . . . .. . .. ^ :^ ^:
.. .. ` . 3 .3 .t ^ .. . .. , ^ £^.J^^ . ^ 'x ^
IN rAE CO-Mle[ON PLEAS COURT ^^ ^ONT^^ERY COUNTY, ^°a^^^
^
0
^
0
0 CD
L0E0
0
STA A E OF OHIO
^laintz^°.-i•s-
S^^ANU^ ^ HARRISON
Defen&at
CASE NO. 2014 CR 00138
,9UDG^: MASA.j^^ WiS$.". MAN
ENIRY A^^ ^^^ER. SETTIN-G RAIL
On this 29TH DAY OF MAY, 2014 the ^^our, ORDERS 'cakl set for ^^^e abwve-umz^ed :^ef^ndant, in this case,as follows:
®wn R%g °zance of the accused, ^^^er 4 .. C. 293°,'.22-9.(Notice: Facduse to ^ppear as ^^qvixed stiafl ^^onsa^^^e an etfense su^gect to pepalr)
Bail BondUnsecured in the amount of ^Secured ^^^ 10IN, deposit in the -. a^tou-nt of S
x Sua^tv b^a^a^ nnta^ ^^^un.^ o-f $ ,,,5orG
'llic fbi^o^Mng cc^nditioixs of bail are inap-nsGd:
Pretrial EHDP p S11 RLC C^^^mu^ity ControU'Probation
Special Conditions: You are to subm:tao D^iA collection.
Any warrant/capias pa°eviously issued ^..^ to this Defendant and t1lus case is hereby a^^thdrawn,
rI' IS HEREBY ORDERED A WAIRRA.iNT BE ^^^UE^ UPON VIOLATION OF RE^EAS' ^OND&TIONS
AP:^ROVED;
^;15711 - -
cc Montgomery CountyPaos^cutor's Office
TAF
I ^i . . . . ^N
f ^
]_ ^
}
Va31;:SS<i ti.'wter
Deputy ClJLlrt
/°idti2 irt?Si[;3tUr
^^^^^^^^ ^ ^^ C..d-fin `no^'t;I, vz ;i?;'ii, s..i`aliSi(.?N
b1:lN. C;(3i'3ta_ AY (:^E.)f Iid' i"?'
DI VISION 01i CO OR T SER VIC'ES
Pi"e6"iak SC;rb'fiC.E',S
N/1t)L:tgs?6i cfl+/CiDll2?ty Common Pleas Court
N W4st Fourth StTect, Suite 700$.7ax id:rr, Oi^io 45422
^AMiAINi i'^ ^^ ^IA:ZRiSON..! '. 4D i. A .i... i .J{O.
BROOrzVIL-LE, 01-; 453og9
Delki Samantha Harrssoji
COURT Si:;RVIi:'FSR€ 1t3(y1,07rii i=LOOfZ
4 i Notrth Pex'r'v Street
ko<,rn 103
i N;,ton, OII ia 45422-2 100
(937) ^^^-3481___,
::c;\ (07) 225-4925
51:ay 15, 2`k14.
i^^for t ^e^'tOn May hJ., 2014 j'U'L1 were scheduled fdr 'sPli'<tag:'tnL';3" in ('an ':'_clT*f''.P ! CR 00138 x^
(S 1000) (By Deceptionl, for which you ffirled;o, apFaear"
Your diC;`e4% Lxi.irt Ca3te has been 5t;he,r.L^EYd for ^,A:^^ 29, 2^ii^ , ?ik`. ?^:^±^'t ,^.1^^. at ig"^5: I"f^o',1t^?€^3?ti?"y County
Common ^ 7 ^ ^ ^^^ yo,i's Ohio 45421 ^ v ? ^ ^ tr / , ^-s 1-, Floor. n ^ 9 .e v n^i; a{)L^.i'f., ^-? N. Perry .`L3°C^.^`, ti'.^3.,}/.,, ':1fle '0~'.^3^1^"")"+;i.l,?, `^d^.^'^M ^^ sure W^.^ f ^ c`1S
ciEG°e^a" the d8spla2 imEAnhGFrs in the iobby for any changes in the cou'sbroQ)ni ok,Lye?ben FatP.:?:Ye to appear .Or
` .^ ^tle^iJL '1^ t3^^iGil.r.vao/^,KJn..ih1.5 3a'."a37; et13e31^: will "aCSt1ik: ilt a ^^8:iai:i kDel^i'_? 2.StE.:c^...; f^RN ^i..'^t?s: arrest U ^! i ^'.,'s _ k?",^G1yM1.^ rC'.^3L^f: in P t
.
C"C ^ _^sstCuc_y,
zuS. c €i=Z
Tracy ;jeyMr
6Ga :i
(937)496- i 2('i3
>
I
/
3
^^^,-! C _^'^.'
..:4•k'.:9^'^,^il'^ . ^::R:,'> 0 . ,. 14 ;^,^s>$:.E.. FM,
Cia.SFE ^^R OC138 Docket ID: 19155364^R E 2`°-C,^R`? ^ ;j sVLERK OF F >.Jffs ^ MONa ^`^'.OMERY COUNTY OHIO
^ r;'^IN TffE Ca NE'vPOI"^ PL EAS CO^ R:d" a.21•6.+^.^j'?'A''`', ^. ..^..1
s:;-i^ ^ W, iN A L D i a , ° ^ ('-,'N
$4E
^Pn.s:AD ;^OT aWILT's' - STOOD MU3E
Cisi June 05, 2014, the defendants below appsaredin opas, uourt anid efttP; waived 'he syd-±rg or tl?e ^da ",en;, had ;B read
by the Court, or the subssance of the chaige %m'as saa:rc, ane! received a = olpy os ,he is:d30nent, gMsred a piea of m`; utAty,and had bond sn°.
2013 r? 02848
11^33 C ;11JJif1 3
210a4 CR 0007t}!7
20:4 (2 k,';0 128
2P 'd:;R' fir, 138
2014 CR <10637
2,03 4 CR i.3^'^+7 7 ^
2 t?4vR 00548
21?14 wIR 00964 /?
2iJ14 t'ft 03^'53
2 Sr' S4 i.. t'e 0 1073
2014 <;120.J83
ST X.t^rA^ t3HM`'Ys. ''ritz H;:A5' t A; ; E;
STAt t OF OHIO vs. aO 1 x D5.:•` K, JilY.^iA
STr,'?':^. {',^' 011s10 vs. A?vSrt:"ai::i: :K7N'F
S?;iT'7FC3H`3;s. St3s:Yiii riN,:RT<iSt?
SI'.; IVE t?^-'OH'0 3°s. ,<3.^.-$i:N;ir: ;sF'Lt.
STr','s'F'ii a)£SI0-s. r"1':z'€' f-iUa:0N
S'f•r i :.., ';E' Ox f tQ- .,. B2.ANJC;-" ;k; i ..^..
STs°x':': OF 03 H1:3 vs. z; 111_7A4''z;K
S'TA`1'f; ,,')F i:,tik. vs.
S`T r` Ts: fJN 0 i-I3i1 v s. C ';tZ{:Y A . 11EA :) E^. sA,' ,'..
S1"t,'TTE OF 01?10 vs. KFN; If:'':i M}:17
2014 CR 01 73O STATE OF OH;t)','s. Si•.Aid;;Ls.'.N C's..F'.R'z{.
2WWR(31kJ8 STATE C1=On't'IO vS. F^5".it',':9A tiW^.' .nMNMN i.'MS
204 Ci+'i'rl359 STA:LC3F'7ii3O'..,, ^1? v<.=ii:3t^: ":
2014 CR :}N69 STATE (W O'd't10 vs. ,'"<{ii;f`'si,t) '..^OL..,i':Z
2W4 CR OM02 7ih;'r, OF (33i10 vs. .;g..)f3'1 Ll. 3,+!U- Y
2014 CR 0577 STA"1'<; i?FOMOv.>.
204£''a`',.vgG?2 STATE OF O}:FOva ;:•t'.L HIA%=z. Lr Nf;z;^^ AWAFtDWEE
2t2 â 4Ct', (3N47 S'FAT',F OF OHIO vs.Ts: iv I°; a:. .-rtit;%.?tia 0101),
Ni-'. i.I? MM;> STATE ,F Os:Irf vs. 4"df"Ml-.ki, r`. .2 N .":'':^:r
2W4 CR (DM> f ,ci"!', S EOF:Jf-!IOC's. STEPHEN a`".O.. i-.R7Se 3}.C:;.F..t1;`i1j
2fi)34 ., F$ ^lzi^r^ C.6S i f STATE OF^L ti; `^? s^}^ ,.n , ^',L?'rfI'? vs. s ^:;rs ^i +^:. iRrs
2014 CR 0080 STATE OF OHIO vs. SFAN ?":iF3N°AS PLESS
20W CR0t6ci'U' STATE OF 0'.-110 o-s. CUR#'i5 r_.s)'tVATSL's<.
2M4CRON17;: S`''A"i'r°uF' JH1E3vs. f?t`.R.f.Nz..STAR;s;:LL
2014 CR 01917 i2 STATE OF t3-Hi`3,-s. MAk'IT? D. :R3^^`1'
-- ^ • ^^ ...-^ ^
--;_,^
.^
^ i
^ ^+,}`it19^ Ft^}•j,
^^ .,^ .t °,^¢^_-^^° 1
ti^ ^ • `' _":.^'"" a
_ ^.^,^ '^i. ^°
^'^'^^. ^c^°^
^^°^'^e^^ ^a, ?^^;^^ ^^,^^r ^^^"a^^^^^ ^^^^^^
^B..,T^"r. ^ ? 3'S^.J6^kP,%u.^ &.,6.., 9 ^e 2&.,g'..7.a7
°^+,:^^' ^ ^' d`e^ '''^ ? .^y'a^ ^y ^p
^. ^ •.^,'i ^'hs ^,'^^^ b ' I^ ^'t^,^Ei. ^7.^ 3^iYe.ll
;-?^. F^?^ ^€^^^^ a^^^^^^ ^^rt ^?^^^^^?'^
c^ ^' ^^ ^ ^^^ ^z^ 9 ^^'3^^^^^ ^^@.^^^°^ ^^^^
. . -^,.,^^.• . ^. ^.^ ^^`^f^^-^^ ^^^ s^^' : `.,
^^^^^^i ^^.^.^^^^.^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^':^.^.: ^:'
^^^^ ^^ ^^^^
^^n
^^^^.^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^ ^^E ^`^.^_^^` ^^^^ ^^^^^^
M.-:" .. . _ . . ..,, J'u .. :I,`-^ ^
,"^5^^s^¢^`°s^^^ ^'':;. :`:9^f^ ^>^^^^^^^,^
s^^^^"^^ ^ ^s ^^^ ^ ^^'^^">^.^`^'^
^ ;^^ ^a^^^^^^^^^^ ^:^^^^^^^ ^^^ ^^?^ ^^^^,r^-^^^^^ ^^ F^^=^^;^^ ^^^^ ^^^^^yy .,^^;^.^^^^^^=a^s^^^^^'3^^ ^3t,i^'^^e^. "m'^ E^ i<S"^^"E^^'3.u; ^€.^d^ ai°.°^'a ^s$^ ^. "'^^ ^C'aw^^ ^^'..3"`'£'-r^c3 s^^^^^ss^a5 ,'sc^%^a ^"s^ ^'^c'^^^ u^^^^^ ^a^^ ^r^^^^^e^ ^^a^ ^^^^^^^ ^.^^^^^?;
^ ^i^3i"s^"i,Ii^9"^^^-^'i# ^::i^sll^e"^4 h^,^'.ar^.C3n 1 ; :+^^i;7 '.%?' ^^;^°^.'.^a-^x'?s: d ^v^e:'^?;:e3'? ^ ^^`>''+ "' ^ca :°^2r.'}^C;a6^ ^^^t"^iF^ .,+' . x +..,ca.s. -c'"E^:., ^^^+.^;^^^::^.. '^s^L^!`
^^'€^ o;' p^u^Q^ra^k:^s:
^^Ct^r€'^p^i°, S^:ca$^3"Si^?^?^i^S'^ ^^ ^^?^^;"S^aaE"^i, ^,n^^^¢^"'c»^e^?'^i^S) ;^a:" 'a^i,«'^^.^,fF?S^ ,E^S^ ^cz?3"^c;4S'y c3^'14^'^^^^^s^}: -
^e^^r^^!^;^ a^ ^? ^ ^.ais^s^, . €sss^r ;i ^^5. ^^:^^^ r^r^^: ,^, ;^^v^i^y;:
^ ^:3$th^r it^^s t^^^ ^:^^r±^,^x ^ ^^^^ ^^^-^u#^^;ri^:,aysl; s^> l^^+t ^ ;; ;v^ ^ ; ^t?; %^g^^ ^as^s'^^?€^^rr^^; u^^ro^#y ^^;;:-^.^`^ ^?^;^:^ .-^^c^^< ^;^ z^^:^;^ {`^€.^^^}^^:^^; ;s ^^^^^;>.;3 f^ _^^r:^;y-^a^^;} ss^c^a.^r^a^ ^^^c^r^^ ^r^^ ^rti^ ^^;^ ^rc^^r^^, ^^a. ,^,.:;^^ ^:^^^P^^, ^ ^t #s^;^^ f^^+r^r, ^ep.^^; ^2^^'[ ! .^^ad s ^ia^`t,
^ ^^^^^y^^te: ^^^ ^w
,^^^^ ^^ ^ ^ ^^..^^ g -^- : '^..__..._ _.._.:__^.^-____
^r^^a'a:^':'^'^ r ^^ ^ .
^^^^ 3^^^^^^^ ^z^^^ ^3^.. ^A °^^^ ^K`> ^ ^^_,^ ^
..^. -^,..^ ^^ ^^^ ^^ ^ ^^^^^z^^C^^3 ;^^p "^'^ r^.^"^^^r^'^'^ ^` ^ ^,€^^'H£^s^.^e..
^ ^^^^^ ,^ ^^ ^ q ^^ {^ z 4^^._ _ ^,; • «,.^^-r^ '^:a^ . yo £^x ^^^^^^^^
^ L ^ ^\^
`°-^--------^---•-^-.^^^^_.__? ^,
CCiJ'_; 4 9:12o02 AM
%C: : 00 1 38 Docket ID; 19157281£;zCfi..&R : ::Os.^^TGOMERY CO$3Nr. OHSO
COMMON-^ r- r^: F-,U ^ ^. -r --r^^ ,,w'n^'«^ THE ^1 ^^.^^">,^ ^ ^".^^-*^ r-° ^^^^r^°^ ^ ^ :^^ ^. ^^^^N^i^^, ^^IO
h....n 3^^°`^'^^^^°^^A^_ D"^,^" ^ds^>:^ ^',: a^ a ^
STATE O^'- OHIO `
PbP.:'.iii8.sitl';. ^ C, A ,,°"i' N 0,2 14 --CR fi•:,d§'?
^
vs-
SAMA^ ^HA HARRISON, N.0^^ECE A17..",^R^.^EY
^Defendant.
Now comes cou .s'vJ or, ber:ak$ of De+e%`:^ant her^in.q and enters
as t^'0aI a^o ^^s s^..^P^ ^^y tr ^prG^?^ee^A,^:.^^^^ tt°3e 4:appearance ^^ the ^'^ 'r: a
R^.'^w--'Pa°w",.''',A^f ; su^`;nn;tt?d,
LM.AV ,^F F ? 11-- -€ . 0 F T H E
^:.^z^^^, ^^' _.-°^^s^,^^J^^^ ^^p I^ DEFENDER
6YeE^^^ JP A . G-os°;,
ALR^,'- D rA A.GO®3^.."^^'
Ii 7 & ^"1%a4-. St9e^'. i., Suite 400
D%^^r^^'''"^^Gu, ^:^+e si^^,+ 45422(937° ^x25' 4652^
rr•;..^ d"or Defendant
,,
C _ ^ ;^ 1 ^',> -^ -^----
` ^o^
i"^.^""m
r ,'a0;^`D^q ^ ^
LL ^ ^°1 e^ ^. ^^^ ^ (^v^..^.^^ ^ 3 ^ ^° S ° ^^ 3 f ''T
.A. 7 ^"``a/ i....e11i..;
'_° ^
! .^^. ^ lL> dl_'b^}^ r l^J .^ L.,^ ,...
NAME: S A.^^ATN^"^..1^^ _ ^ ^ ^.^ S ^^ fi^,^. ^. x.. t^.a
CASE NO(S): 2014-^R-
JTLTDGE, WISEMAN
THE COURT HAS ^^^^^ ^^^ YOU TO AP;^EA.-,,,,- ^ EFO^" .; ^^D^^^,, .^.^
WISEM ..^.^d^ AT THE CO^3 ^^^J?NTPL^,i^ S ^.:s^^^..`^`S B L^ ^^aD^:NG, ^ ^ NORTH
PERRY STRIEET IN D .^ ^ ^ ^^ ON `^ HAURS.^ AY, ^^ ^ NE & 9.. !91^, A ^r
2e00PoMa IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR, THE COURZo W^^ ^^^ UEA
WA^AINT FOR YOUR ARREST.
YOUR ATTORNEY: ALYSIA GOSS
PHO^TE NUMBER: 2 :^^^^^^^^^^
^^DRESSA I 1 1 SOUTH MAIN STREET. SUITE 4005 °, '^'^^ ^ ^^' ^^Nn OHI O ^^ ^' -.^,^,^.?. ^ s ^ 2^
Y
^
^..
^
^.ji:f-
ELFCTRQp^;;'.^"ALLY FfLEDCOURT OF COMMON PLEASTI^uasda''.', 6'aepeembea 25, 2014 9:42:53 AM
2,^.^s1`€ CR00138 [email protected] ^De 19460267
. x;f s€ S MONTGOMERY COUNTY OHgO
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF ; :O^ ^ ^ O1,4 JER''^ COUNTY , OHIO
SAMANTHA HARR z^^^
Defendant
_vsp
STATE OF OHI^'a
^lainziff
v.^^.^S E ,tiri. 2=:) 14 C R 00'A 3 8
JUDGE lvfiARY ^^^ zSEhIAN
"Pk M^^^F'; TJ < T
`w FIDR:CO^=s ^EL
Y,^g.,
,^ . . --. .. ^. ..^.^.,.. . ,:. , ... ,> >^ ..sa.c^.'... m.
MO ^X EON TO DRS.t AsSS FOR ^t.^''u'^f i kCTIVt.'', .rnSs^'`,1::::^^N`^.(E OF "a^.^OU7,^0'18.`.^Wa, AND ABi1 ^,^.3E OF''^,,'?./.4 .3s, a ET19N
Samantha Har'ison ^,°^"^og.3es a"'xe Court to °''7,k'Y:a?Ss alb °'en.R`as Lg dh^^^^^ apin*t the Defendant
for ineffecti6^^ assistance of cow-isei a.;ad den:ai ox her. Fi^^sG t`,a s^ ^^,^y tpia'l ii'n' dh bavmrs
A. Ineffective Assis°^iceof 5.,o"^.sel
a^',,la&ms of HY"ae'a''ti?+p- assistance of counsel areiev.eweed ^^^^^xa, two-panmne (1) ^.
demonstration that "e^l below an objec"^ives
ori pTer'o3nirig gerofessit2nctill nomi,.^^ asid (2) a showing %h^s ', ^ffiw d•'^c:-nt S: vs"dz^'a°'' . in
prejudice. This requires showing ^"^k counssel'°J" ea'^'ors wen H so sedo4a as ^^ dep'ri've the de'^s"Eda. '^9t
of a fair trial, whose result is reliab!e. citing Stricki^id v. 466 a.;e ;o 668, 687®889 ^^4
&tit. 2052, 80 LEd.2d 674 (1994);.
(^) A DEMONSTRATION ^ KAT:OUNSEL' ^ ^ER-F^..^ RIVIA.^4CE FELL KILOOW ^ ^^.^_
68BJAp,.m•Cf$ L^ 1p G ^y OF ;{4 y°,3'e'''^. ^.a^S e^..t^r,^,^s^^ ^ 'a^ ^'^' ON "'^,t `'^"^^'^N^`" FTy ^ 7^"'
n.^^ '^A+" T^ .V d*^^^^^^.^J ^y^' ^a 2^.Nw A >^.54^ .m..^^%.x.,?^.3.f t. 4^a^e ^`A^hF..r^V^^ad
PROFESSIONAL ^ORr,,1S
'^^ Defendant had Ll-zMe p3x£3!kc R.d^n'.A9ers ass&^a.ed to represent &,' s,!^fen:'mt In :-hi s maner.
^ fi$'^a. "^defender ^.s ired by ^^> .^a^ e Ti^;^^v.^`z„, ^,i 't%Y'^.1^ ' a .. ' '^ ^ ix^^^`^^ c t^ a y^. a The S „.8t public ^"^? ^y
public defender assigned by Judge Mary Wiseman was R ^ch?u'dd, Barns , public `v^^,^;^'^'•itde:'
assigned by Judge Mary Wflsemk's.bs was B'..';bt3;y Joe '^^^..ox. The legal a;>i vcce p;o? idcd by ^'h. p.R. °'ssaic
Defender's fell below an objective standard of reasonableness based on
a. Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct- Rule 1,1
"C^^^^^^^ handling of a particc.^ley matter M^^lud^^ ^^qiui^u ^^as^ anb anaaysis of :he :.acti^l
and I e,^^ ^^^^^^ ^ oltrthe pz^o ble-TY1a &-id use of ^^thods and p-m-,e^.^uums :. ;,^d"ard:^ of
com$etgna practitioners. 'kt also s^cWed adequate prep^:^^aion. The v^ ^^ten^^ioi and
prepae'atfio3i ar^P' determined in part b'? -Mhw,.c. is a. 'i stake; major litigation txzn=s''..ti'..l'^''is
ora^^nwily require more ex^^^^ive treamNnt Uhan -m:^^ers of ^asnr co:s^piexi°y and consequence."
During the p^^od, of ^^^re^^^^tawn by G oss, Barns w3d CoX, :a B.iefevdwk^ Ina^ -i£'st hatil any
dasca3,ssil^"^' n vdith eEt.^er GossY Bam. s and Cox, ^ona::'bri`43^''i.^ ^^e 'iat'1e.;.> before av:^ ±..-E ;,&^: in any detail,
neither Goss, Barns or Cox 1„ave ^::^^^^^^ed ^.^,e Derea ^^^^t w^^^^^. zzy In,^^rmas3^^ cMnx:.emanq -f'^ctual
.;%a,.^a . a^ ^'^' ,,, ^?.^2 a., ^^;ti.s« ^ ^.or legal elements of t1he bh&rges asserted .^^^^^ ^ the 2e^ ^^ not o^ .3xe 5, 2014
or provided ^^ Defendant ^th the ^^^^^^^ or ^^^ced:rb^ to be used :mehe defen;^^^ of the charges.
The Defendant zs indigent w^^ entidpei tz hand"Affig ;; the cha--ge:;^s asseried agx;.s3
her. T-he public dek^^^^m assigned to the ^ef^^darit's c^.. ^ hpnm . ^.^t hnquinf^-,d of the De&x^danz
concerning e"i^^^ facts re l ated to th^.' cha?'g'a,'^.s. have no6. GSaquf'.redl, ^'..'., dw „ za ^Lhe W::`na,ss°s
necessary for vi&! to 4^su, ^ ^ ` aes. e»fl.e^ ^. ,^fi ^.a, ^^- ^ ^^t c^^°s ^"..,.^tMn.P^ a 3s $ >s the ^s ar .z^,,r.z5.dams. ^ ^> ^"wa,^ ei^a ^`^^,Yk.^?^:, f ° ;;^ u a^°.^..^ ^
Vv^^.esses necessary ^^^ the trial of ths^ ^^aner. T^ e Defendant has 'been dertz.e,'
effective assistance of ^^unse° as neither >3oss, ^^^s x, Cux '^ave -a knowledge of
the basic a^^qua^eraen^ of the Ohio Rux^^ of Profe:,^^^nal Coxdu,,x,G as, tl^^ Defe:dama has not receive
*ie benefit of the public ^ef^^^^^ ^erno:^^^^^^^ the ability of ^e Publi; de:^^^^^^ to In.and3e tl,,e
Defendant's case as ne3d^c£' Goss, ,.''^fian "s. a.'. r ^.'^.,ox, have knquA2e4z. of ^.s.a° D.^'efe''F^dzmi Kh', [^crd^^ issues
regarding the charges ol- explained to ,Ah,^ De'gendeE''s'; ^'^e legal ^'rz:^enns of vle Q-'?^:^`ges^ A^,'o>ti3St `'s ie
Defendant.
b. Oh.a^ Rules of Professional ^^^^wo----- Rule L2
â9 4 n ^.^. ls''^'tsi^'yeY shal l abide b^' a client's -s'^^3:^2t^Eu^'s,^ c^,?;;e",--m angtae objectives and,
as required by Rule 1,4g shall consult 'vriQ^^^ dhe client z, tio dhe a^^anis b'f' ^-y are to be
ps.LN, u^',£d. A law;°^°s^ st^^ j ^?^^ such s'"sr^^k& ^^ ^ ^^ ^ â^;. ^ , ^ G^,^'y a ^ t•.. w ^e len } of the m. a.3.rin^g^^'s, .,3"^ ^ ^sacp^.^fl..^,.hai r^'M^.,,^%^i3^"'3^ ,^',<.3 ',+' ^^ ^
out the representation. A lawyer sha%^ abide by a client's decflsi:^.^^ wh.exhed I;, zN''s"^^^ a. maneR4 In a
a p^a^9."Y^..-0s"&^.n case, the lawyer shall E4P,e5kd'"' by t:.^w 06w'.^t'"s:5s diYb`,Rs?`;n,^ aftea om^^im.;Psc:;, with the Sari'^ye:"y as
4'^" ^i:S 9 5 tr nr,'^'p +` d ` p r", `.P^a a plea to be e^E2e g^,3s^, ^r e^a^eT to a^.ve a3, ^,-y ,^^^ and ^z ^,m^: eY ^h ^?a; a^ I>: n: ^ ^^t.:^^ the
period of ^^pres^^^^^^on. ney&.er Goss, ^^ ^^^ or e o;^^ lilmls^ ^onf^^:^d w^th, the in$
the objectives of representation or ffie means b;^ W'Plia:h a.he of Tek+rese;wu.<t3o,^ ^^^ to be
^umed. 'rne D'^^^^^^^ ^^ been ^eWe €^ Immpiied'Va au^..^:n-Ti^e Coa, ^o 'd^s
anything as there is no F,ortact bet..a^mr, _be Defendant and Cox.. Furffipr, mnµtiw^ filed bv Ctie
Proa^ctitS3r or NS 'ou'» are appro,"--ld or 's^...oyp"med, by a3 ^id! the
Defendant.
i. Rule 3.4. F;emesss to Opposing
"^ lawyer shall not ¢alls`^^ evidence; co-^^^^ or assist a wr'Lnes to ^
inducement to a Vi^^^^ that is prohibited by ^^^^C` ^^^ ^^^^^^^^ acqu;sm^ ^^^orm:n the`
evidence presented ^y Clie Pxosec'^^^r C^^ ^ernt:^^ ^ ^^ ^ IdnV,. "'D.V° ^ds6; ^^ Yn' ^M °a_..^,.... . ^ ._._.... ^ ^;s,.^. :^^..8s ^?^^
^' ^n ° ^ $&:^"€^s &,?^'^:as^^^d'4` ^^' ^'^ ^"E^:k:^:false 6'p,'-1. .",r^. di '"^`-w to lQ`^0sy,^oa =:.^ 43?° ^;^.^i4;'^'^' of 1'.i `^'rc5^.^^^£ ° n+.< t^...^'TM En ''^.^'-^"o,,,^^3 '^`a}^t.^r"r'
the 3nllbr.^^'`^kation was presented as w'"AaWn the prose;':uloa a,v'r-,:I rn<+es'.:.Sanor ''m-3 LV or should
have kftown t°'k ;° testimony waz' N^^ -De 'M,'^..`?v-1, Sr^t bo':.^'ui. ^'r%' i""^^,^a d to ^ede.zc^' D:, x^t°^ based the^^°'' , on .
false ^^^on-nata^^ supplied by 0^.e Prose:uf^r ay^ :^.^ ^nvestiigmtor,
On J3..s1'8.e 5, 21014 1 ap^-,neS°n^^ in front of Jandgm'a. O' CoLr-ei"u''e to ra ? 49%^ ^nd%. en°,a. that^^
I received via ^^l titroug^^a my post ofr6ce boz on i'nn 1, 2014. '11e lene. I n=:3;ed stated,; a-Al
^Mfaa :5, 2014 you wb'= scIned-uae,d% for amaj mmenc Hn. case s'x=vtr 2^14 CR 00138 x^s'''" '^'^ ^fen.,.su
^¢? ^ 'd3001' ,t i'^' a Deception), 3.d^, „.a ,^( ." ." .. '. . ' a^' f ..
.. ?:.+.^a Y.„ r^,.,4:^.:,1 t]"f,iA'^ e^^ . has ^ s'' +,s+.Lb.cnamt..o^a'^''r^^''P''^^'da 't d ^ ° ^'"Sa.St^`.. '4^ i.,,.,'„ . . "4^;^
for May ^9, 2014 ^ '!9ncfigs t,}Q'"$@`^a^' ^.^.°•^F
;^a'^v^' dn.sa z.r °.` v^'y.,^y'. $},
l^a..^ ^.^ou`^ «3u ^s';•° ,^ Wa,, at k t^ 3^ y. a^i, and ^^i^'e^'^ t^
^dress,.. Fc"^r.3'luG"e to appear worth:ts :J.7?^,i"' ,Me:%l wi^^ ^^sul" 8.^:
whac`^'a ^^^^ result in incarceration.
As yoL^ can ima.gA:ne I was ve^^ al^ed .'^^^a this &ez^^en x got ^^ 'ibe County PRO
System and I ^^ntfi^ed I had a warr-f.r.3 a^suzed *ba r'n-Y -arest. ^:Rhz, als' ww the fact
that just two days prior to this I wn, fired s s5-rn cn, r" ?avi en<o rm;mec t x o tvo:;. F,,z- a pehs^ ^ officer
th^u&h my police department ^..^d gi ve^'i ne exp4^:^a^i^+°... e".^7. ^as ^f rf -, ^F o;^:w y'^ n.w 'i^ ^^^^^¢^^^ +^`"#,^. .
Onq June 5, 2'Sr`..^ ^ 4 E'.Sr^^ my ^C^a?^FgS..t°A'^4.^,^,.^?^q/- ^ I plead'^ t a^Y^' ^ '^^.L^J^.^.yx dA1`^r'C9 ^t'"rY, /"'^' 9-F^^r r i,.'3'&H^ ^^.L(.?:6`nw^KAriSM S.. .hn^:'^W^n ^s,.,^a,{ ^• ^^5,^ f1 ^f^^^.hd that^' g 4'^' wasry not
the time for r:"&^ to 'Ei's,er i:Ci.^° ple^., I ee+r,iiaib^e^n o-s.^^ k^^i^a. &a-. e ^Ja r.' 'a :»" ^0 ^'' "x h pR ead r9e'^ ^^^$^^`'sl^
because that -wher a den^n.dan€ ini&ns their Ple<^ th^.'^. starts the prwsea'3.xsa.^Ps tL :x.`.^ fo?' a Speedy Trial.
libe pu°^'ik Defender tried to -waim7e rr,?n.y dghas to `s °il! i.he tLme zzia^9 I s'+^;"^rs^:; her d a d her. to.^.aa.^^ .5 and
waive not one of rny ragb4si The on.^^^ ^^^^ I -wanv^^^ ^^as, the reainPT ofi:.^.^ ndfi€;^^e-w., and meivcd
^b:^e cof the 3ndi^;^eat ^d e^te^ ^^ ^e ^x of z^*b^;. ,.,y^,c^ i ls^ ^ .^^^ E^ a^:r'^.r^,^--^r, k,^ ¢. €^ 3copy ^C.; ^e^.^ plea ^ects kh-c€t, I
ofstood mute. ^is Co^..^ has also miss :-e "^^a.^y ^ e^F oa" ^^^^^^gs, by .^^^^^^g to provide the
m^' reason the hearing -w-a-c aelip5_7 hMld„ Like ;rdlher s ^.;^ c "rwR;€ ted and
., .n
.A^ Qu-^;'^_„`.`
also sdischarged. 1 ^^',^,%^,s.etTC•s took ;^a^`.^t^ !s
^^
s,.^^ 'c^,F,E3^^ ' ^'.^a ^%^^ !^s°^i^: ^.KAS^^s, ^^A^.'^'"°^' ^^^
my second attorney t,; file a T.zvnc Waiver for Discovery ^^^^^ ^,;.is court --)n July 8. 2014. Vs^^ ir,
fact on July }''r' 3 we were an. fi'o2st oy Judgt'; Mary W'^^^^^ and '- i< I , -. arr,-,; jF,,s`^^d this ^oun, to be,
c r' ^sa. °^^f ^' ^'^^. Theerfr,.c^ °°^ e ^ ^^^s^;a °n^'^ ^u - this is t1^s^t^.'"'^. ' m" "w^. ^s to ^^^ ' ^'a&^}.: > a1 ut 'N"rT^vf°'-^.'i ^z"^v^", ^^T* na^ c_ ^. ',.^',^ A `^3;i^r
and all &"uTo's"^g doings on his ^'*.am Thic^?,k^,ge^i^iowed to be ^.:xcaased, off v'^,-ny ,;!:aae, So how ^, fia
^ouxt aa1owed him u) i2le this as a 3ixoz aios9. of ,^,; Dae P3"1 "ss i ig, . ePs z?^^^n as kkAeffec's2ve
''^a,ounsele The next tim'^., I was aa, `:"Aonb of r'hvsa was August :iay . . ^ wx ^^ I uw^t my ^;e&ia•.^
publ ic d.a^''.t,esd^
.er Coi'^, ^.^'i.. '^.^^r"^;^:
. 9 ^^d^
,^r^^9^Zr ^':`^°'^F^' i.^..,,^'S °p^,^ R^' ^ ^ ° '^ $ ..,..: ^. ° '^'^^' _ r,^ '^2,.,^u .» ^ 1: ^^,^'.^`•.. _.^:^,^ ^a ,^ r ^,^ ^.,:+^ a,r,r , ^ c`a" veY'y
from Bawns. This a^.oun0l2)wedthe 4xv ?ixuan+",^,.'' N wew':kse?'..^ ,r,-. :^' have a .. ..^ ^^°<'3^^ I^;,.,ss k^ 3
seem to not bp- able to ^^^^ ^^^^^^^ I olqjcc ^^d,: to order dk^ ^::ng, 4^-^^e
It is an ^ ^^'{^,,na^" 2 +...^io,1iA`k'^£ to S^^uS. s..^":°: ,aca+.^c^Es lAaa+v "^ "'^G"?c ` ^^ .^ . i^^"'s
L.^•en4,^av, v re^^^^'^ ^Y ^^.v"6.r^"v^tufl"^ ^Od w:ikx•" ^," « '^Tx-^..e . ^.k^.^'r'.,a"" ,£9 .c..v.a ^:n Y^ii 7.-Py part
tthetwarnavwd this f^^n2 offc^,.:M*^io^'ae Also to, pJioav nn;;r '^o d.' x,t.' f^,-,ess Gasbera I assyned vnR'
of compeeercy to not hold a hewin?g so I c^^'y' Psesen° e* idle3,°.• .,^' Z"Aq Also it vaaa :,^'a`; abuse
e^ allow this ^otm to y^^^ the ti,,n,-- to oU>v^d^ such a
^°"6`^@e ^.,otut has ^'sppo %^^ed tAgree ^^e ^ ^E :he^f^' dery to :.epre yrP M ^ D ,n s. ^^ w D"n,_avS"^R:. a^d^.^'
has be"^A9 FTef^^:se^^.,^^.^" served by the a"..'>•3u1.sca. ?^^ 2aE^`^'^a 'r ^d ^°^^'4f °.
o a,r^A^R^ to Aa.A^s^a'^Ss
the Hndic°'^`'kPent where Lhe grand jw7° was overy^chs';d -w31 deA't i *Ted ?r a sig:ik^can'L manner by the
Prosecutor.
^es,=^'"^;a^^^ suba^^^ed by,
ei.,.r, go n/
P.O. °^^^ ^ ^
^^^^ kvslle9 Ohio
45309
n.ERTIFICAT.+."'~^°U^i'F -^3-ER^VICE
I hereby certafy a copy of the foregoa^ g was hand deli•^^^^ to ^^on adl pandi^^ or ^ownsel of
4'.^kshd%S^T^'' ' E: 34r?s nW . ^ ^^^41
And Bobbd Joe Cox
My QbI^^ Ddend^^ A, handed a copy tka hinm
A ii:
°
"^.
^ .i
^-- ( ^,
--^
__ C-A
I
Cct, 10. 2414 125 PM,
t. c - -
•- r°^,^i ^^ ^s^f ^b ^sd,^s P^^..^,f^.,
No, -78! P. i
^^^^ ^^^ 3 110 ^H M 01^^T^^ ^^^^^N PUEAS COURT O° ^^^ ^ ^ONIER°; ^H'10
@ ^( e' ^. n ^,^ L ^^A
^y^^^^^ ^^^^8^ ^^^^^.^g:a°h^+
^.;4..'^il^ OF ^e^^^ ff9 Ta2
MONT? faMPRv
^, ^^AZE ¢OoSTATE OF OHIOfi
pI^^nfiffe
L^^'^?,•F,^z,/,g^tf ^^^,^.^ ^^s`:^-ps,;/^.^s f^^8-a-^.,.
^^^^^^^^^t,
The 'State of ^^^^^ ^^^^g=M-Y COUab/, ss,
^^ ^^^
^rincipq1, ^3^^ ^ --a-Qas surety, pos^^na^^^ appeared ^^^^^^the State of Ohio the ^^^ afl$^^attelsE 12nds and tensmenta, f d^^^
The ^^^^^^^^^ ^^ ^^^g rer-09ViZ^before the ^^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^ur'- bTofp and then arsd r^^^^ answer ^^ ^^the Judgment of ^^^^ ^^urtg ^^^^^ not d'ibe void; ^^^^^^^^ ^^ shalE aamar^ ^^ ^^^^^^^ ^ewsed Coda^
^^f L'^L3fC ^.y'^^^^^ ^^1 r
Addff ^s-9 -L;,j X I/ tI
i% -
^emulty Noo
AddreM z,^
- Te„^^ ^^^n-,;
^ p^wRf^ w4
^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ awuorg their goods,
pp,l peraonally appearsPasp is fiPal$y ftp^^^^
and ^^^dehA^ ^ ^^^ ^^izance shaais^^ns 223722, Weacj.R
lde Shul, A
,^cn
I hereby cert^fy tha'^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ^emp^^^^^^^^ ^^^ ^^^^een and ^^knic^,4r^^^^^^ ^^ ^^^^ ^^ ^^d t^e
secufty approved th6s -"30 dev of 20D
d$ ^p B ^., yq ..F^,, pte'3 r,^a•^^' ^^ P^Gre '"§.,+-,a9 ^^,' <-'a2 ,^C^.'a
7 , n 9 ^,.
si By°
31-g^^ ^^+^-^^y+^^'^^ •.4Jltl^f9lQ anAe"^j,^^i° ^^
^ ^•^^^ ^ ^^^RE^^^^"^^e E(^^^^^ Or, - 7 .)
^{-
;
^^ -
d'^ ®Ope 6NaCa ^ ^q^y°'°
^^a®F6A37a,972A9P^
Oet. 30. 2014 119: 56PM
: i. . ,
a-.
Ma syb^^ ^^I i-a g21:3STdID. hlaL•3g'".Z
3 da ^ ^' ,orlEr, 3'flg.tklg
^i ^ ^F^ I ^ ^^ PY t^;^-`ii' t^^^.`. ^^^ ,.. ^ ^^ ^^^ ^ ^ ^" as^a ^ m, I, :j:-V TM:
i^°^.^.^^.^'^0.^^R_l:`
Ca^ 6;..^^..^f ari^ r ^c;^^^ r ^^^^^^^i.^^
i;P
^^, 35 P) 1 P. 3
COLMUS) BUMDLNG14 "V FouT.^ ST^m.7T
S=2 'i0Cfaky-jaN, OPiO 45422-21 50
(937)225-34 c 9^AX(M)^^5°492S
T 'S p"'9 S•^rt rn. ".^+y .MO^ i
Tl7Y
G'b`).I+OoP}^^^
C O^^1,„ ^^ : z ^^,^.V°. 11-1
^. ^`^'^^: ^"^ F .^.^ ^i:^^^ ^^^^^ ^ ^ OF ^ ^ ^ ^^ a^^ ^^ Ef^ ^.'^^` ^,^ ' ;^, ^M.
^^R de as ^D at f,- L ^ . ^ L Cpa
Yo-o fare r^'?;'^ ^.P- to y:Tn^^.` by
__to evt.u.^ jv'3^,^ 'a'^xw "-ro^+^'ti'j- a^.^l &"°^ c^ ^ ^^,o
date^
_ , ; . .
^^ilu r e t o d o y^ ^^^ ^ ^^^^t in. ^^si-ag y ki ux s' 0 m7 t d .^^^ ^^bl;lh ;^ aq A^l?, s^0 ^-,a 0 f M^* -a r b a 11 ^n d.
*. 4 f r tl r' '{{" ^\ i
^-'sa (^a ^^, ^" '^ ^s6'^`•, *,, ' .•;as '^r'
y ^^^ U` ..,..J^ 7^ a^^-- ^^^g/^a^'^ ^ . ^'"--- /^d'
f% .'^ '`. ^i' ^ ^ ^^^.^d'^ ,•^^ ^.^^ ^J/
Vrivnvsvcd by. ^^^^tuze, bye ^igmamoz^
A '<., ^v.es. 14 °^!^n 5_ .^".,«.e. ,J s^" ''^" ^ eLP
€^^opoitso ,.,ounL,v jP.r.etjj;fl Se^. C, 4,.;^^ae's8 '^.^^.a^.^^+ i.d,
Dayton, Ohio 454,22
S !N^a1?''. St^c^e'C,
1 ot4 Plooza Day^on, Ohio 45422 iff ih-i s :.s a, Pr^b at^^^ ^^olod= Cae le.
PLEASE F.^ ^^^^^EMED FORM TO PREE`P_^All',
^_.. F -.
- . _^:..^.-p ....^ .
4 3.
* -\^^
^
^
_^
IN i ;. ^IE ^. ..OzJR r'Ok P;_..^^.^.%, S OH10
0E
E0on
00
E0
02
THE,.^3v STATE OF v:flO,
t'4a3aGesr.^f,
..vcs_
SAt^ .ANTHA HARRISON,
D e fic't'd. a raa..
^S : ; N 0 . 2 0 4 f. R , Q ^
:Je.. ^^ fi ^$t.=^^'^'^.x'^i'.^f^'/ 9 ^" F":^^^^^'i„ k^^ s ^ _<^;',
EMM-, NTAL
lf ^^^ OMPEa EN
The Court finds ihat, the Dw,eeie fim; ha..> <bY the Grand Jury o`+::^$iS''..omunt',' on the charge
of THEF'^ ^^OOOI Y DEC^^ ° IW^'?^(0q'g'^ m ;;a6a:ion o: Sectio~!M 2110V w.l o3 .to z rh o Revised Code.
ai?U '.mp6ir^ theCi;a..Frt's <'`1w4'i ^not:F:G l3a's so'6 ;r,'; t.he i ..J7.c a .id' yD.a.x .- ?:% ... ..e U) . _.'32x,
The ^ ^ '' ° 2^^ ^ ^ ,..^' ^, t_*p ^^^^: ^ ^;^^^±-^^.,, ^^:^^^r Sect ion t f' . j r e (G)(3) of ^.^^. ,_ ^^^ ^•..^.^ E.^^,. Y^ . de, K3;zi the Forerasic
Psychiatry Center for We5U,-r' i't Ohio ex'u'°saai33e th.? Defendant apd_a°,tu3:: a :.dn. iF"3eiiFig;, to ia'i° i.3vldt^, The i'e^3£)"-
i.s to i&""sdS.i.id+^ facts found by th e ^xc d??aa.esq'-'i. „ ts ^i";e.eaPons, and conclusions aa t^^ the De%enG'ias0.t`^
Ca'3i^petei?ea $t? stand "raa^ ai'^^ee present ^.iza?e. °:^:^.€i^^s,^c4 '° ep:i^s that `c;i,c ; ^e?^^;33dar.z: is pi'eSir^3^i^^
mcompeP+renty qA.^^e opinEorK should b,- IDiL ,^. '?'.i Qi' ule 'a:°f :?:hs ^aife..h.'P,-^tZ^ cor1^'t.ietvnt to stand
g y pY,rfiG;^
t^Ii'^i^. '^i5i^m. ^{ D 3^a'>c^L3' c:d Ad sf tN,}M .t^ +„'r" m;.'0.itGr°.ifly A a;C;.. . . . . -"^, '3 ^i£ the report 3.Se`^. ^ t,^o^ ' ^.!'>,
b €.' forwarded to the d eFe i'As n..', vsi1n :3^,'b Tn d. 3,P' t'a,'s. ;s.°'s^`y^4' iZ to r^%Ss wa.^ =^..^_
I.^'wNpoin:.men4.s set by v,na For^.^^''sn`^JE °v 'E' 4.}k Wvstei'u Jp$i p ^a- xjc., e:z noLed 4ii^v the
the Adult Probation Department is b.. b-z :s.-.;;rmea Anariedlatc€v. 37he F : can p-resan^^^^ be reached
Pg P.O. BOX 15 BRQOKVa$.LE, 0H 4530,33
S ; g.--l .• , ,._ ,-<.._,^ .,"^ ^a ii ^- :;i..
a UDG' -IM AR'° ^ Y "i EM. N
ce: .'orP:asPc p, cllia:; ::,fat,.r'r.rr Ves:c;,Y.'?h:cs. 6)t) .. ;, .., , bnc? D<.y:ors, Olt?;c iSZE:i 36-r9^3
^^SPOSIT iON DATE: 109./25f ^ 4 DUE TO 00UfZT : 09118,114
`^ ^.., _..®..^..^-,• ^""_..^. .^ _ ^.^
A.--
1
°LECYtaa^''aitaiOFw'. Y FiL?-D
C Os^R T ^s^^ C d?n 3:,^^ P L E A SFriday, Now 0:7, 2014 3:16:34 PMC rSE °'.,^ CR 00138 Docket 0; 1957GRE ^ s .i,LF-RK OF ^ ..`. -3MON3°^^^^^^Y COUNTY 0
;.,•..''vl'v T s^ 3k^i s^` 5
C R ':^MIN .r.,^ D JV :S;CYN
^
^
0
E
00a;ESw
E
^
^
STh' i'F OF OHIO, CASi=; :"dO.. 2014CR00i 3s
P lai nt?f;(s)., JUDGE PVIA? `z' V,liv^:iVIA:N
-vS_
SAMAItiiTHA HARRISON,ORP,ER F'G.'R APP,EAIi^,N^''E
Deteindainf(s).
Defezadar?t Samantha Harr?sen:s ordered to appear in. Cc .,: { o, t^retvf;:? c:- 20, 2014 at 4:.00pam. :-or a
hearing on a forensic report regarding ci'ii!a.'iei.e?1ce and Stix?e:"_'+tJ.fii'i, .
Defendarz'L is required to be present aT ±:ne date and tirre speei ied :n i'.f"Ie coa?-troor?n ofJudge MarY
Wiseman, C®UYtS'®odnn 8. MiC'titi,nt;me"'v County Ct",.<E3s`l.A`S^vi:,Se, 41 :''•i^viL: Perry S',;°ei., Da)i.o'I., Oi31.'3. 45422.
^.' O s.^i'RDE i ;L, D:
J: `D'.^3 E iVAR':r i,h,t;.SEEMAN
This document is eleetron;eally fiiad byusi7ngtrhe Clerk of Courts e-Filing system. Thesystem w^l', post a record of the filing to t;`4e, e-T?i3ng a;cS",^'.^ur.t "FNot1fac ^io°3.s" tab ^,?i'l.he following
case pa.rtie t^an^.s:
HEATHERNANSA^^^STANT PRO^EC'UTTtt^^G ATz ORM5 "'(937)A225-575571
Attorney for Plajnti^^
BOBBY JOE COXATTORNEY AT LAWi 30 Wr1^ ^ SECOND S ;. RLET , SUITE 800DAYTON, OH 45402
.r'^..:...EH.n TRC^` .- .. Y b.`';l F-!D
:.O'Rp '3F m,x;. N PLEAS
F s°yd a; , No m ,u ^, 2014 a° n6:,^^ ^IMCASE Nm,6 ; 2034 OR O^IYS Docket M, 19575:REGOR;^ A F-'-;.sSHCLERK OF C01..°^ ^ ^ il,,'0NTGWMERY COUNTY 01-
IN THE COMMON PLs-^:AS ^:O^ i:^ A OF iw^ON^';; GCi,!;.^R°;' L `ti;UN : Y, OHIOCRsM;iyiAx., D. I;,S: O?ti
^
r
^
^
^
^
a0
SiA"f^ OF OHIO,
Piains?ff(s),
- ds-
SANiAN € HA. HARRiSON,
i; s -.., i+,^ ^. ^. `3 ;;^! i S^^ i^-i?''^
ORd^^^ R FOR APPEE;.RANCEDef eC3dai1t(s).
Deferdar +_ Samantha liarrison is o-de:-ed to ap;?ear f-7. Cot,n. oPx Nove:-nbeµ 2nq 201.4 a-, 400 p,m. for a
heaiixs£^,' on a fod°,"-.I1s1.^', repor, regarding ;otTl^'Iei.et Ce and scs'^edU.9%f14.
Deferadant ^s :oq:.^ired to'^e p:^-ser; al the ciaie a3.d n?.t,e specified .p `:i ^fl'w^ro<r:^ of,^^^dge N'a;y
Wisemari, Courtroom 8. Montgo?r^er ^ Co,.^ntiy Cou~tr3.ouso, 41 `.^> om::. ;Peu1 ^,.:Aer Dayton, Ohio 45422.
^^OORDERED:
This doCi.il.iAent is e;PctiC7i21"aflkj' :?4e`",s b 3 us i ng the Cl o f '^r..•w:?"?5 ^. ^:aing system. Thesys'Leia"1 Wi;.i'°a.,'sr'sa 2. rae..o°Y.°Li of"L`°A^.E fi"sxng to the e--Hfli g acr`ou:' ' ^:C :^:.•c; K{ r.^ raiiof :?i-- foll.?w4ng
case participants:
.i U.s,^iGE YP.t^' .. RY ^.'^3 G S Ei'"f .('., i'V
Hz,A:'HERJANSASSISTAN T ?RO^ECuf^!G ATTORNEYf93 ;1-225-5 /57
Attorrae-v for Plaintiff
UASENO., 204'4 : R00138
BOBBY JOE COXA'fT ORNEY AT i AV,%13O WvS, SECONF) S"RrEf SUITE 800DAYTON., OH 45402
(937)-228- : 975Attoney for Defenda-nt, Sarnantha Ha>-iser,
TANDI DANKLEF, Bailiff (937) 225-4384da.,sklP,t cv%monfeourt.,3rg
-Th
^ ^- --_-;.
.
► ^ - ^ _ ----
^
.i^
^. ^..-- ., .>^ , . _. . . .,.^.:^^ ^`,`^^^ <. • - ^
O^^ober 29, 20' 4
The Honorable Mary L. '0,!isemanMom,gomery `"loun:;^ Common Pleas I.-our=41 N, Perry StreetDayton, OH 45402
RE Samantha M. HasdmonCCN: 20149CRe00138
Dear judge Vifisemam
Attached, please find a report detailing h^ results ofk ;he <^^^^^^^,nc;; t^."u Stand Trial
°val:,?atd®n completed in the rC"e"°nG: d case. Rea;;.e d;z ;;s;ta"e to contact
me if yQlA have any q^.,^estIGB?s regarding fls'e „€tach°,^'a r£-',}:;ort'
We would be happy to make the examiner avaf;aNe for any upcor^^^^g hearings,should he/>h-- be subpoenaed to provide testimony. "{;vi'eVe"; vie 1ti%ouiv apprpCBaie :^i
if this pifice coijld be contacted during the scheduianN p;owess so r:^at, we can verifyfhe examiner's avaglabilrty.
Thank you fC)i` this r eferral. ^ hope ii Ea"', the attached re -pGY': i;, of a:,sl,^tar's.-I`e to ; oi.E.
Respectfully,
Kara E.A. Marciani, Psy.D., F^BPPLicensed PsychologistBoard Certified in Forer,sY^ PsychologyDirector of Forensic Serv€uea
KEAMii Ir
uC: File
^^NR'^^^^^^^AL
'F07RENSd C I--VA'-UATQN
NAIME: Samantha M. Harrison
DATE OF BgRTH: 9/1 2,`1969 (45 years)
"IO^^T CASE NO: 2014-CR-00'r 38
COUNTY. N`ion6gomerv
/; f ^-5 ^^VrYS4i.^t;T,."ii5 ;,.iar'...!'+nA. Be9gifjCln, Ph.D.
DATE OF 'EVALUA7 s u /'i 0/14
^4^P"^•$^''4 ^"+. r '-""' c^. *
^ ^ { ^ #^
JUDGE : 'e.^'aP-^^4 g >rfV^C_ e!l-PGn
^,"'. F^ ^{^ ^ p° y.."'
k.:,,,
a ^ '? y aY TO
„/ '^,. ,."'"+._.q he A^^ ^ ,ryq '•" "^' ^ .'^:G% . q ^ ^^ e^ p f ^^'b1 3 c"9 ^ G'^'2'M1' ^Ea^.v^' i 7^' '^" ^b,PlL*n^..e. ,Q^., ^G^".1 fvs v! ^S ?^ ^ i'sp,^^! C k^q` 9 w, )r4s?
October 2 9, /_ i' ", z
Ms. Harrison, a 45-year-o:d sinw^^ Caucasian feanaye, vras referred to the ForensicPsychiatry ;enier :'`or Western a " i:3 by -tse H:38 orabir ',?'iary L. ^lVisei;^an, judg° of the
^'^onigomery County t,c^^g^<o^ Plea--o^;^°'. ^,ursuar"^ to :; ^.^^. ?:34a.^7i0'3';),J^i'^'+A`
Competency to Stand Trial. ^^'95. fic.a^os p :s ;,s"ar»^,°^ 'ed ^?'1:^^^'°: one 'uo,.fi`-^'.,. a ^ t I' 1,0^ r,.'a0^ ?"`-'" ^fi ^
C^eC;v^s" tiC^?^1(F5) and is currently fii^'^ £::"! bond, awaiting ^^ic-,;^os^aix3" tni, xe- --usE'.
Mis. Harrison was wvaaua[ed at the officles oft4e Forensic ^syE, r-:ial.: yOhio on 10!110114 ^^^ approximately two ""OL,;r:.
T h^ evaluation consisted of an :r,tie Y;^tecn' ^^.,.,9n;;ca;^ ..Ikerv'Ievv, ,. Mentai Status
. ^ S-'r";: a n;^',u , c^. ^^ "+, t^r ;,^ a ^:and ^,, telephoneExamination, aa ^ '^'^".^,rrEpe":t'^.-'3"w ;!
corsultaaion w9th deserAse ;^^ ^sel on 9112i`14- and on ^10l10E141
^^^^^MA^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^D
,{^ 5; V ^^^tl^ ia l Ex `^ ^ i `^ ^'
au^i3 ^{" .. ;l.:^t`9^3i^f L. V^e^+Q,i C^.fiP^'.^f£ Q.r^i.i.fe.lif ,,.r;} p3 e.,. ^,^.,tj. ^.?1 . Entry ^.^.f
(^'+pGS,,i e 9r ^ fp ^'^ •
(8/26/14).2. 8n d a; L m e n t (4 /3 F11'14}.`? r' `Z,u^3. Appo i n tment letter %'' ij r°'a^^^t t.! ^ °;^;. ^'.f, ^ rr i 1 ^^^^ro^^ ; 8! !2LJp I 1' ; 3'+^,^,t 9!",^r'4;.4. Mcantcornetlry CodaF n< ri^ 's O^ ' .;.,^r R_,^.;^,_F"^^^,^^*,, . and :^ t ,°,'/^;: R od ^ A. Brown^^ ^^^,"" ^,_^ ' ^,^^^x^ S
(8l2ff12).^°. 3$ (^y/y 'ry?[^^
^y Coun ty 1 ^3tr^{ ,e ^ /°/ r
fi ^;f'`0 (6? ^`'
^^qofy: Vard ^^^^'l!`s.k,i.3i,'^' .• *3 t/S. ^^p^9r^'^ii/^, Y
^lL ] iG1 e '0 Office^.w" ^ ;/,i' A . e3`^'^?.^I^;,."^'.^P:7Lk...-,,,7
(9/4/12).
c. Montgomery County Sher;fii'';, Off,ce Rupo: an'-14 NarracGv;; ^s&2h' VV. Kellar19041112, 9F7112, 9i14I12, 10/4/12. 10,241'12, 10129r`1^2, 1,%29/1'3, 2l^!-13, 2r1`x3113,2/26/13, 9i24113, 10/28/13, and r 1i's 4/ i •:3}.
7 . Montgomery County Sheriff ' s Office ^^po^^ zari' Nar;-afi;>re ' He;;^eq H. ThornWn(9/4/12).
COMPETENCY TO STAND TRJALSamantha M. ^^rftQnPage 2
8. Telephone contacts with defense c;aumsei.9. Mental Saatus Examination +1'>:sh, Ms. 'sa:'Pas^s"? s `=0l1N;` §41,
10. CScreen i ng i l te^. V -; e''^1 v i.lf^,i ^v^
°1rbs. . C7, 9 ^9 • rs 4.• r ^ 11 .J.% ^ u^1 's. i^.`rs..:.Competency ,
INF^^MED CONSENT
P r i or to G 9Pf,i xn..%^ 1n:.fi^ , i^:11t?, the 3^r ' ^;.;s' ^..^ee^n„ , S ,^"'^l ''<' o3" ^_' ' '.s+.''sqst..:Qs''-r ^.BJf' aI:y.lC11 o^" ^^'(v pa rameters, ^'r ^._ and ,.^ ' .. of 4 S^«.
evaluation were eXQ.9ained to Ms. Hai i"9 ;Qti. She 'i sd<cat;^d Qomoi eh'a nsiQCo of the
information presented and indicated 10hat she w,'.s; Ed proceed .Ali'" i the evaluation,
bQQaL<SQ she was "th,^"ec` ,te3"3E..'d b4° the Ji,i'' .,a3Q." :^h''- sE^-,&: `h=s: zagenia?'s ^F`1fQ:"meCJ
Participation Statement following the explanation Qffe, Qd by the examiner and wrote
underneath her signaaut'e: In no way am € waiving ^r-iy feg;°;ts bv, siQnrn:, t: 6;:!"
BACKGROUND ^^FORPOAq ^ON
^^^^^^^^fiwl Circumstances
Ms. Harrison offered as hQr address a post office box 4n. :'SrQQ k'^^i^'Q, 01-'.o. 'si'b°hQn asked
'^aQG^% :Q; 4Uy" she has iP'J'- „Q ii , her E.;a:rr.^'Qi;. ^t lQ+^.?^iaQ she ;' ^ ^^ ^ '^i?^ she ff 3c^c . alone and
ha ...°' lived ?n her current residence ;^or one vv<;c:{. &he adf:'sed that whe re ss!-_ iives Es "nQt
^^ l '^ ^ ^si +^ YQ C? ^ ss^(C% ;.^: ^<. r about f ry^'i Q^' ^ ^ ^tsj vels ^ ' ^ ^^dAA.s, N^ ^n, ysQ; ^11,11as re luctantYins ^^'d?`^sE'a^r'.r^'. d ^ , i s ^F ^;s-^'s^ k ^T °.^. ^'^^; ..
'e'.,.¢
to provide any specific 4i'i'?Qi m',^,tt1:en. but sfa£Qd that sh e a'..a+„k i;`t ^'`^'. er, a previous ^?:;, ;^..^iQC'E
'sFoi nine months and that before living at that =:Qcatiib"', she had ;:ve'd at a different
location with her grandmother for some mo.rs'ths. NIs. Harrison ^ ^po; ^^^ that she wasborn and raised in the Dayton area.
^^^^^y Hastory I
^ey4 ^hel^. asked^'0'^ about her parents, lir ...^"+! s. S"`^^`%^' ^ ^"^;..d ..t^C.i^. ,`^.`.c f.C':S e :^'`,, °Z ez sdf ir ^'l^,.^i 9 1vv`^° stated r in ° ^...+'c.,:^^'
?ha$ her mother lives in t the Dayton area. She reported thal her priQa ;s" s dR".fQmQd whQ',"'s
ahP, was a ChilCi, but that she does not i€3Qw the Yea;aos, ': }`•`;e dl^N:!"i:e_ Fo?3s,rw!;"3g the
divorce, '^ r ar^"!;;Q^'? was in the.`sc;,euEQQ^p of sle', ;?"y, a„^: and st^s's"^a- had.5s.^a., V^v".^..^^ :J:, r.. some
QQe't(?.Qt with her noncustodial fal:heE•, bu' ,,h.at it was jo: ie-uxar. She s+csttQ; that her
mother rer nareieU wtl !.en, Mi..^.>. HS.i1i r£so,waiJ ani w?uu°t @, VvrtFen Chskl¢,.,.A. xais, i viaa4r`lshi,J^,r'
bQtNQQn her biological ^,,',areit}s whQn t"?e4' were to gether, she s e.:^^,'^ th,.,' they did 's'1Qt
`n h.'ux pase-ItS dur i ngget along. She c'?a"'s.,'Q.E^ that there was ,^" .QiiiQstE;.; ti;iok; oc^..' bQ ,v%e.
her childhood years.
At that pQ=ntin the interview, Ms, Harrison stated thaf .:he did inQt believe that any of thatinformation wouid have anything hQ do with her cQrn;:,e-ten:y to stand trial and declinedto proceed Wl'Lh the clinical interview. She ais:' added that "a"?t' S`a,^,e t=,i'so,uney General's
Office had `Qlr.,? her ?.''^a¢ M'Q ^,r'sx' +r,.^^ ? ^'t^ °V, v^(^..,Qe^,?.'^,9c..^i.3 ^^e:t!;`^ ^ Ft^ `'^' f e ^.^,°^ a^^^s^^.; r\r ^% order fo r ^ ana that3 tl s
Q\ialR°ats0o! of her CQ^pe'QV^iv` to saaf1.Q i;'FGi. 1 3f^s, s3 ; Csi ;F ^:Q,'`.^' '`wa`^; tihe was :';?` `f,dilsing
COMPETENCY TO STAND TMALSamantha M. HarrisonPage 3
^1AL
^-^;._.,^
to take the psych c,og ica l test tlh.at is ^ou°,+nei^ ^dminxste; ed , , fioFe::;^^c afuat;ons ;fiheMinnesota Mi,3ltepisaS€c Pe, so6°a?IT: 4 i`3ventos"y-2j.
COLLATERAL €^^^^MA^ ^^^
^,n?C°^sfi^,3a^^or's Reports
The same investigator an°sEesilgatev the current criminai case and the Fai"gatpons of child
abuse by lMunuhauaei: by Proxy in'vo€tf^;g obtaining med;CaE pT°oc :?^i:rea and medical
equipment by reporting sympforns of mediuaE p^^i^lem^ (which later We„e shown byi»EedicaE kes?s to not e?'ist). As a. resu5 of 'h;: ch:^^ abuse a°ie <;r,^'rns ^;z:e hiid Gn V41es"e
3 hom e ^'' P6^^^^^^ :' ^^ r care. The is ^a°es i^, ye`3df„^^ of thr^ i^^dei^Ww f d^^^^.5 from 1^^ii s^i^^ and have ^^^; : '^'+; .
offense indicated ap*scat;on ^`or benefits with no report c.,f':'rie f.,a'.her a ;-i;,ome - althoughthe parents had a J^oip^ bank account.
Consult With Attorney
Bobby Joe ^..''.ox, defense ci unsei, was consulted br'eli,' via, te?ep`';o:-e. He indicated
^,+s. t a^,^'ci.^1^:!;s J. ' ^.r^ G. i"^that Ms. Harrison liaz a hsMtoS"v of c°°^'^'^"`^l`s°^,'S',: i3"i t +.a 4 ° '^'^e1 t" J'..^L t^i'^i r` ^. bo "i in the
p('e,",er;t cas-^.-^ and i:n a pre`®ivl;s case d#R,s:)M;n^'up,. he^ d.:^h?sdren. F=e ha; eXpla3n:°'d zhe
purpose and process of a co;-r;p^^ency IL'o stand tria: pva!±a`:on and ts;.e reason that theraS'^e.^i'iSr^^4; '•^1d'^n ^i`^.e previouss5`ud^e ordered €t and Ms. Hariis'L°ii3 'v.'6'a: very hG;9^fl£?. He i^
attorneys. The second aztanney v4Fas apeempti,jg t1o discuss wi?l-^ Ms. ^-Earrison a pleabargain ^^^^^d by the Prosecutor -s wh9ch g,jaYa: ^^eed Pr^^aVor ^ and Ms. Harriso;^threate4^ed to sue him so he withdrew irom t€`^e case. T '.'e ti"s} a''ztemptev to
e,;pla;r, to 11-5er about an ofFer of Diversion ^ a-id Ms. Har: ;, tr,^siste^- on f a ^ria;. M.r. C.ox
sent a mi::t9()C; ^o the eXaF"i'?Enef' ''t'{ ia^ s11€s. ,--lat"i"3son had »5weg' ai°';; ^. ^a. -I thE,-' mot1on,
she accused ^,he (-'oui^ olf abuse of discretion because the judge ordered the
competency ev^luatiC'srn over IMa. ^'ca"'?uC;^n's, "ob,€ecvoz;.,, ih,";, '`^ros^'^`^,uu.^o''3 of supplying
<<a"su.^'a^ ^e i37po4'r'?aE^^"^,^ ,^ a'b"
^:'-^.. ^'i.fae he did not exercise ;i.a^; «.z'd the f^ef::C"i .i8JE'^, +^
attorneys of ineffective ass;stan; e of coumses (^^^ausc- 'the,: have not !;stened to hererpianatioris),
g^^^ ^ ^^ STATUS ^^^ANUNATr.ON
Ms. Harrison was a small, slender Caucasian female d"'^^^^d neatly in : asuaI clothing.
She was accompanied by a hafn'ssed German Shep€";ef^ ^er^f§^^ dog. 110s. Harrison
'In$G;racts d woth the exai"nEi ie'' in a suspicious, guarded ?"nar4ner uos itr'JiaeC$ 'Lh°
process of the evasi.cs'L€on by refusing "4o i:3ar-icipa"P ir, cOmmon piou^^^"'u"e:;a. The ^,^,YP9'a^^
effect was one of Qbstrd.dctio"Bism. She a,.stifiyd her 1bsti"Saw^tPo?:"1isi",''` u . ta^ii'.g ',.;?at ih^.'
.^t'corney General's office toFd her that such procedures (C,lir;:ca^nte;view andpsychol+?gi:a0 testing) were "no, necessary bo d8d;+.^.'m.n-e coif.putE;nGy ta stand trial."
^^^^^^^CY TO STAND 3^^ALSamantha M. ^^rnsodPage 4
V^ Ec ... , -, . . . , . . ..e Cl/y^
.... ffl-.
s^,^s. Harrison ap^;eared to be oriented, "i..!: ^ei awa r eness of ^;eC .e° rent si 7ua^ic^^;Cls^ p yY ._ `ud w^ ^ be distorted ^^'.l/'Y her ^e,^^y^ ^ }`'"' '^'^'^• She •,^!^,, ^a.^i ^, r ti.'^.3J^ `it9.F'%5 ^''4r6 lz:'•^i.J'r/R..'t1^^ N^i °^9
procedures that she uei"^•ao:`iaiEy dwemed necessary. S-: o,ror)^; ta'y^, contact and
displayed average activity le ue?. She appeared preoc.;;: ^.: :°.°?h vsew that she isbeing treated unfairly and that her ^^ghts are be=ng ;asoiate.-'. She app^^a;°ed to be unableto take ai NC?she8''s view in order to ,r deistsao?d the actions a" $ i e s !'son ; of her att orney
and the judge.
Although Ms. Harrison's view of Ehe current situation was di t^^^ed by her
sUsp'c9okisness, she expressed he, :'+.°k;?E;aN€-As s"n a ^o,^icaf, cow+^leni m40n"'"^r for the most
,t,^,art. There did not appear 'io be a s0i°i"?a! ':is;.:+ugh?` aa.so,,-;s t(„ e f.ius^':tns} or ., ",^`^3ssl
do.1VN tA43 i.eiA t! 1'4i5.l,gi :^4 pr"ali^'^Gsw. E^1 tS./kg; 89^ lf^+.ln°."•t 3!, ?i Y som e i,^^i . , e e3ss 'CP"XS.^ji.i odd ^ da8h. L1./4L §^s^.
Harrison's distorted views of sI'[ua:.i. € °:s as:,'s°,bli ig 64> mrdf'v'id? .3als
er"'dp^oylng common p>m bedur^^ pr3ct?ce:, However , sil%c .i d.iu.qht C,.o? sa";"'^t ^,%k'as not
noted.
Mood appeared to be even and contm°'^d w;th ;r,s^^iv anxious affec' . -3.yed. T herewas no observation or 6-^por 6 of qmssF'w dEs?orte^.^. o^`;rceps, ri
ha9pucinateons).
Met;^or4 funcicons <^',G'uk^^ not be asses:sed, since Mls. Harr',.aori istioi,:Bd-1 i?--} participate in an
interview about he$ ^^^^^^^ound.
intellectual functioning was estirric:tei - b^'sed of s -c.,nis., .d obiv;"rat. ios"s of a^'`^^tral-t
thinking and manner oi +ferbai c£'im?'?r#uniCaS's^o4i - to be iC3the aveiaC,... :ange.
Judgment appears to be impaired by i'v1s. ? :a`s ' Svn 'a SU5QK.,s0US.ness and ''.:"iies that she
is being treated unfairly.
Mental Status Summar;l^
Present meE 6tr l status e'a" Bi3 3a4.so3 was ,C;;:oE c;::l^'i' ;i^ sr"a'ti ca € a ext c^i information was
s.^'3rss&ng d^'^'.'^.' to Ms. Harrison's ?"^l'usa' to fully cooperate we:s? the evaiua:`on". Thus, a
diagnostic formulation c;ou-Id not be :madle.
COMPETENCY ^^^^^^^^^ INTERV^Eu^^
Comprehension of Charges and Poss^^le, ^^^aREes
Ms. Harrison was abie to state the cha3 ae aga:nst ; s ;r as Jv FG au.d. A
feiony of the fifth de^"acee ;" VVhe?i asked as.;-oi,;t the 4s e:;:i'ce b^.'tAnre':'" a. f"^^od"'?i an^'' a
h"^ds §°>demeanoa , ^+fkS. Harrison ^u^,"..^ teu tha tc the differen ce r' is in +''and "`^, thedegree, i s. he
sentencing. She stated that $^lori3es u'oui."`,+. carry a. sPnteF,ce of Mjpriso„ment and the
sentence fnY a misdemeanor would be "a ^esser degree „
^°,^^^^PE9 ^^CY TO SIFAN^ ^RIIA:^^^^^^^^^^a M.Page 5 <
` ° ^ ^,.^^ of the^ charge ' " ^'f ;i^ inhere nt EsFaP'an .^^ 1^s;, asked about the ^E^^^iEiC^ ^ i?^ c "ii^a ; E^ •r^ ^i"^'.E. ^r€ ^:^^"S2f3n, Ms.
Harrison rc^^or-ted that the aCGusaEioc" is that st'.c obt?;n,,etii benefits io^rr her and her
child^^^ from Montgomery ^OUn*v Job and Family Serv^:(,-es by ^^^eptici-i, "A°her, askedwhy she was charged W3^^ the offense, Ms. ^^arr'sson. Ent:iaisy stated 'a'ai her attorney has
not explained anythi'ig about the case t'aa her. Hoi{:aevei, whe7^. -ior her
undes"standing of the current cs 9. -'1.s"ce, Ms. Harrison ^ ep;,e^.,^.`s: B'^^.cawse saying the
kids' fathEMs- flv®";; with. me when I app;'^ed for the ^enya^ts-.
.^^`::^" asked what c'^9,,ld happen if ^;s1.^.^. . convicted of :°?s-„ ,N"i^^i"g^;, . , a°s'^so 5t^^^^ a
that she has already had consequences , s;:s^e- - as scon as a warrant for he: arrestwas issued ^ the polic; department where she was work;n, ^ed he.M. ^zhe also add^^that if convicted of the charge, she '.rvo'S.'id n^.? €Ui3ger be able I; be a a::°?EiC;e off;4;er and
wCx ^s4 her EMT-^ certification, the r,^5,^^,s;' ^^^^^ °""r.i^^ lose ^^'"u', o^-"`'i asked ^^?++,^ ^,,^ ^ ,,. 3 ^r;o ^+.^-ti'=. involved if?
a conviction for the charge, Ms. H.a''c"€son said there cou''d '?e fines and ;ai^ ^ensei"€Ce,
but she was faot aware of the length of ,^.. p:'ssib@C, ;a!^ ^en`es;cE', She aiso ti'~^ted: "D°.,,',£.?
to ^bama's legislation, I wcauldn'k be ;^^^^^^--." 'V^i Een asked aboi 3; the meaning of a
Suspended Sentence, Ms. Harrison repfled: I'^ entai^; PrC) ;at:^v€°e. They suspend the
sentence in lieU of Probation. if you do uo"'P°thii;g el;.e. 's'3ey caE`' apply th,,e s°,,"ze'rce,;
^,., said:When asked for am exp5anaf.9e?i"G oi Viu concept of Pt'ob" i"€^. ^i;.; ^^;"; s^3rs:
have to be 2cco4antab1e "t'^'°i the Court and the laws. if you u;o `'s seV can, come
back and you wQuhLn be f^'^,ced wrEth the suspended senf^.rce "
^omprehe>^^^^^ of Various Possible ^^^^s
Ms. Harrison was able to s;l,tir.Eabn the Q=ffe;°e?'?ce bEa•?:wce;? .. G,..';E^'° .^ x: Not GuE?';.y1 plea.
Her ^.'XplG',i"+,a}iGi's of a pyer': of No C-or, l y '^ st 'M n L^p i°-s '•,$ m is gt.;EIE.. 3^lCi,"^r^' f Nor
are t19^ s ^ s
s.e"il {,'a. ,A Ar °U ' e ^li?i$^':G toA ,,,^y
s:,' r''^^-,^' gives+w you ^13.s,.^".. you're v not ^^ 3 ,.^`u^;^.14 E:E d t,^t%^
''^^.u?;.^^? of °?`^a^^s2^'^V,16o^°." ^%4I^t^'€? asked to ^x;^3aEs^ the i+eck"!€?.^ of a plea G ` "^^ol G^3r'''^, by
Ms. Harrison .Sa€d: "It rneai"HS it's a ty.,^"'ie of defense - by s'ea so? i of Msa;'s?;y." 101hen asked
to explain the tei m "bC?^an?ty " Ms. HaY"'si,Yi r .. 'a€d: `6ac mua"'sa ^,t^e Ce^elnd.a''C s^ incapafJ9e of
standSng trial rjr of c;ompi^er,end;ng the sit;.;ation."
When asked aboua hier €; yiei eded P!ea, Ms. Harrison waz, abR':., to s 1.;, "^ s^ Ds°ea. T'Ue?^ she
^'y
^ e^'^ sJJu^ .^
'*, a E E' e to E gX +.^''sl a;E^ ^^ i"'^` i i '.^.h^`. to °^':^ (^.ai ^^4E^ to enter and ^i ^E'^ 1^ ;^^«" c^i fa? c^ ^ +^6a•',31".^,F° E °.' io" the
intended plea. °AfheiE asked if her at±orrie" agrees 'flzEV;^^ her p6ea, -she rep';ied "?'ve notspoken 'C rn,y at'^oa n^,^ ^2'", 0 r°^^°,.3 ai'.r ^` "_ ' V'^C Pe s f3s re+..^^. .. .. ; ; b and her :;attoa ney have
d€s< assa d any other E ^ea, AAs. Hsx: ,' on srt es . ` 1-ie rse; • m:9 be ^^:, ,,, ^ cic into
court. He haan't- met with me ;sukside of ;'°,. 'ur`f:. He hasn 't Ki:ed an ;! mo4:uns. ? have
asked h im ,a i^s a nd for a ^ ,s;1 a^,:'r"e of ^ ,^ ^, C n ^ is^a"7^ to file a B ill of Pa rt i cu l a rs ^^^:^ s^w^.^- the ^^'^4being unreasonable or biased. a'i^^^e are seve ra^ i71o':€o^s ,.:a` ° , e wai",ted him to file,
but they're at home."
^^^^^PE^^^^^Y TO SRANID THA'..^^^^^^h"a M. ^arrisor:.,Page 6
T:.::...
When asked if she ^^^F^, aware of what coN?µh„^pp;n .fth>; Judge w^u,., find a ^^^eridantto be Not Gui^^^ by Reason of ^i3san?ty. Ms. Harrison stated that she has stud i ed ih^ law
books ^ th'^.,.°' U.D. La1(4' i.'bi"ap"y aiid 4s a+luare x,raathe uisd,^'4;e P,.;a4 ^ .^ .. ;he ;,`teienuant
;nt^,"^°i ^'r.tie a"i.tfii{{e's uus:ody &or Po s sqbFe ^d ^^p^P L^ ^:^6.^ '^^ a s9`'e?lt^ii
Wi i^^ ^^lked about the concept of a `=';ea Bai`gaiP :'vI,:. Hai: ^. ^; ;'"' define - ,, ^'-i -^": ,£^s Barg ai nu 7et^^ x,: i that the ^, offers^^ ^'^'v°.w^^'^^ ^. .^ ^) s^ p s;e ^,3..:f a ^sr^?i A ^..,d ^'i^^ . i^ i'^.'^^• ih., R z^"`Fas ^^.^ r''i"3"'^ '''.,.^^,' P^'^ or ^s^^t'^k;ed°i',^
e;^?stds::( ^:^,^°uid enter a ^^94;'^ )! ^''u,. .L^'r,; J She6nSZead of a maximum s. .,^sentence. ^ ','^k^
added: "Ther'ra not offering ^.o expunge r'` ^;: 4"u.,^.fd, ^,"'on't i"eme` n u'i the " ^^. r tha`F, ' f'^s" te
p0ose4.katof made. BU"" ;"aidY? s: do ?t a3,; ha"+le -.'^.-`./idenf.,,, that 9 dP'- i,^? ., .;c, ?a, so "''?"i not
going to accept a PEea BaYgain,,.
CE:^^prehenslon of the Ada^er^ar s^ PD,f?icess
Ms. Har'oison i'epi.i'lted i."'Eai ther-- was a .'<r`JS'^ran$ fo9 her aTr°s$ ...ww;t:d ,.^ir, 4i29r'14.
n rs °'a ^-'.,,,^'r^ 'r.' ' -..'` ^' ^rih, i.«^°::,d Y a^;b <^ ^€^^^ she ^ ^ c ^ ^^^d r had not ^.C^ s ., ^^ G! i, .. .^ ^ ;^'. ? ^& ^1 f ^ ^ ' a-L she
en sh.`. w• .D her Chief^G E E6Pylv JtS.BViA L the w:...?t rCld ps, uui. B;.Ebcu'. l YLehdid 4 3o pti
of '^^^i^c who "^^^^ her that she was S^^ '^1 :a'1k.,; 'sio.. ^ei`: ^?e: 'if;^;"iv and o€^i'}? iii1.a^'
she wo°;.i:d i'eceive "u ^ett::". She stated ^u'., .a did ge«. a :e%fei' from^°'"_ , ^ :; ^'f''P_s'^.'` ah^r'1s a
"^5Court y
after she was fired. The letter i..dica$a,i tr¢a : she had i"zo',; appeared for a court date and
as there oQu ^ ^ be a `eJ^ '^ ^ s^ i^ . She ss.^,.e, 'if t,^,M G she .C;gg'"+..ed .stv^i.., ^,^sbn'^^o"i^Pey'
Couzisy system and Pourid a warran,. ;';cco. d,na to k1s. she ro a€ied C=ey k'sOffice and ;f1fa5 told that she ccf €4C appear t 'u4 . She .; . . ; i t^?at ^Eti; went to Judge
^'Co€;nell's courti°oo:^ and said that s:-!e . . ^i^'/ to ^ ^ r f° ':,a; ^t }^'° . d tta,,.,'r'fn a fs'^i'^ t^:' +u3..9F ^,, ^^'.+ .t...^.k'^..1 ^' .
Harrison, this occurred on 5/5/14. She u4 K:^r SN'?e, was `°booKed M. az Frd booked out"and was given an OR bond.
According to Ms. Harrison, when first . aLoYi'1e`+,' 4c, E,'k . -c:,'nC} out t'^"'''sa'.
X '^'' ^r ^' '^',^-M {; Not ' tt^^ and $'^es t'^^ to -ri, P .3ia ff ^'' ^` - e^^€^ had p l ed ^^^^in# ^r^^s ^,. go ^e; .^., ^ ^,.,?.,; ; ¢^°^ ^^; ^ s ,-.:^^ k^ ^^^; F^ ^M ^ r^t6 ^s'%.ds. %.^a, ,st:^. s .'es: -'d wi`ii^t t:l?e i...^Cius'.'^the ^se, beccause t^'?a atb^''r^'i^9^^ e^ ^ ;;doe^Y^``^,.at f" „ ' ?;3'0,^"." s ^^,
"+.. i', a second '^ .i'^i^! i ^ the i:. ^' :^a'"i^' a;. ^`17',.!'v+^Y^e:^, 7,'' ca , ^`^i"ric a: also^ii^b.i^1yi^ .a^'^ „F^ ^: ^ ' ^:^.' ^.i,, F_.^6 has
removed himsels,ror;i'^^^ case an^ she ha> a .h, ; a..ornt.:y, ^^bby .;c: Cox. Ho'YrreveP° >
she ss:ate£^ ^^at :re has "fi$; G'i. a `rru`'oc i ;; o e
'sNhei4 a5^^d. how many times she has met 4•1,^.i : ef pae`bc:n'; atto,`."e°f s`he stated 'tha¢
she hi:as 31ad a telephone cC94"dv:'r;aa`oi~i ^iim as'°'sG e?as r',.e1 w'.rt .s;r whiF'n st1e haa
gone to court. °VViieda asked how i ;f?g he hc3.s, uec'F3;,, her ^^to6'n^esl, P'.:,.. Harrison stated
ihei'Fsh:V does noP, i"eCa^a how long 'l..i`'sa;^ been fai"sd her notes vtl^';s^^: F.'l ;^so ti-^.
Ms. Harrison was able to P;"o4'ide ?.icv'.,Js ".:^.c:r^ ,^^., ;-^;9i° ^ `" i3^. ^ ^'^'' roles "^;1 ; .,^^.i^iK°i^J.s^'*., 9, s .!",? functions of
Defe nse Atiorney, Judge, ^, r^,}9^c,"+;'.m "^^ the F'.^ r^ . ;^ ^`T was ..xi,. ,. ^ ... ^a^ '^^...f exp la i n thec.^',.''^' ^^b^^, ^ ^f: ., .^.^^ ^ ,,t,purpose of sa ti-'sal and w^.s able to `;aieaci'G+N:e si,cc S.:GtiV` What b ckPpess at ;t i%:sl.
C0^PETENCY TO STAND TMAa^^^aretlia FA. HarrisonFtge 7
^ ..,
7 'z^'"hen asked if there woudd b'^.' any wfli. eeises aga.r:st i'ie!, Harrison saad: "May:;+e thede's`,eu'c'.ve." ViffaeE^ asked what, she thinks the d£ ee.r';9!.re ! €v it say R ' "-.Fs te' eif :or§4'- sh^',,^r'a^ C}°^r^ : `^^ have c, ^ of She then.a€ ,€^'. 94riz^,:^. f €R^^^^?'^ seen any ^: ^. -,^ E<''.,^t;C9id^;. ^^ he"` ''^d that sheJ ,. .
has .`'a'ven a por`ct: s"`-p^s^,oi:. 'wh"scis referenced her ' fo; .,i''Nb a^.2and ^er^ i ^'.' `'.>?o9
benehts for 2011 to 201Z ShEt Wso added that .i,°'. ^ ^ ^^: ^sC. i,.°" a. ^,:i.^.#,^. ? re1.: i. c'` "..r! ! a^r 4Sst:7ren'ta
case with CSB." t1 :%hp"r asked w#"Eti.s she , iyht AonE her attorney tc MaA as a w€tI'^es`.a oni
her behalf, Ms. Hara €^on said: I don't ^^ow..,
Ms. Ha€"'$sCr, was aware tat she could ?"'sot. be i„:C?mpeR;':;^ to ans'tPPe" quesi.iwns at her
own trial because of the Fifth Am^^^^^nt She a'so, =;aas a'o?ar^ ^^nat !yang under oathconstitutes the crime of Pee il.€ty. ,rVhen a?led whaf, w'^'.. v,' ouicl dio if she thought one of
the other witnesses %ms i;'°k 2g or making a 9"s"Yl.."g':ake in their testimony, € e",,,^,^^a ,^o ^? .a^^ was^as
(1° would convey it to the attorR:e;'.'
lMs. Ha."; Eson was able to g ive an r'3ccu; „ t: aepla..,"' i`scn y'f ;Ne concept , f
to Elaa 8d T€"Faa° and was We to spec:uiate as to m..at t .,u,.. ;? ..nce CMLP.#u . endi:.a a ^;., ^ ^';^^ ^"^, ^^ ^.
to be ft"1GoN•mpw'te'4a'. 'o stand triai. lB^ acJdto€ , she a! C,,:;`::;3re^1 stated tha t d,?e j5..:&" ge could
a person to a "."Y?, f°'^$^^ F^ %.:osend ^^ ^i'^., ^a ""`v t ^" '+s":Ci ^^ '^ r .s f frv' `3^^^... ^'1 t o {`. be
3^a R^;t'.?; q'€:^^
pef^;^r;s a
ss^^^ trial.
3Sr^'^'^ eR ,^v asked ^ she ha s ^ ever a^.vY 9 Pe3°B ^:•...^^»¢^ }_i e L,' €:rB ^^ r a,a^ ^^f ^, '"â, a, ^srsi'^ ^^ s4er.:^^^ ^^ d that she€ €^9 i R ^ / ^^n^ ;.^r ^"., et^ i . ;. ^:_ ^`,e
was a federal employee in a G.h'^° past c.nG'' was ':`+Z3'i;;,^ted :^' ';1z to 7 years ago ,r..,'k €o" to
^et;.ed'i,,.. the iob. She aus: stated that ah: ei i.es eu the Po°€*"e A°:adep" 1f .n 2000 and was
evW:,°ed°d as part of the application. Add€'.'fo: ia.€jr`, Pv's. - 3 ;,rr;s^.'°; sxa<;eC,,,at she had a
u^^^^^^ogta€ evW^abmi about 9 years auo ddF fng 7, 7 - ^endencj, cF arvth tier `5-^'?`e+r24^r'6l3SA i7V i. R.dC.i'a. stated that she does r6'4 L ^em4s1: En.'er . 5y- 3?ng .,H6-- w u,..ti .%t evWuabL'sn.
She then s stated that the sheri^^^^ off; ;e has tr ;e report the e'iak^at"?n which was
.,o€^^^^^^^ 9 years ago. She s ,bed that =rhe Chi`s.^^en SeC;.r Fwar„ „en-. the repc;^„s^^^^eHy" to D^^^ct^^e Ka&Gaq who had younger c€:dren
^ ^, ^ i-' ^and ads+'^ 4^;^' s?o was €i"'°^t?.^a^^s''^c^.€E"?; ^:,^`^e .>,.?^^±€'^^r§; c^^`., ag^.^.^^.. her. ."hwn asb,^iedl how she
^k^ievv that Dexects5,ie Ke;?aP $^aci the r^^^^rt s€:e said xha, he made that s.ata€^^enn: on thewlbn n.^.o'is s6£slh.d,
Relationship w.^,"i Attorney ^Abi;ity ip C^ wn^ell,,
During the B^'^'°sent el^c l;..ic^f€',.^, , ^^;'.s. F-,a ^. °°iis^'.i? ^i^:3m^:a^is^c^ v'C,i^ rE^.. ^ k^ E.".5^, express `"^6'^ ^
,s Rg' a,^{6
verbally in an effen%^€°^fe manner. She 'u'41v3, -^',^e to<-. 6 „^'-^a€o 3^^?^'use^.,, ^nsfocused ^";.: was able^'''4 >.^,r ^ ^ o
con,cent;a6c on th e ips o" ^ ti^.3n at e .c, -^s.t e; :a`ci al a ^. i ?^'we ^?.F- J^^^'^^r; i^.,. ,^ ehU"'',ld€S `^^.!', a^ ^ ^ : ~^ ior was
appr^pMate.
However, during the present evalua t ion, ^',,/i.;, Hat"s€s:n res:>i:ted to engage in ;^r€°oc^.'t.^^'Ei"?s
which a3''^,°' common to any psa1C'hr ogica, evaluai;on, A Cibn€ca^ lrn#:ed°'",e'vv (in oi de€° to
provide background P^formalt€om; and p:ayclr-.oRog:cal testing (to ;myi^ de :,3fo'r, iatifan about^; clear :^ ., ^.^pr.ych;^^o&al aurictto^."^€^;;a. She ^.' ..,^^ ts.^',^ide;^ ^. it'n ^;,.x^.,'^.nr e "'^ €:^ .^ f ",^-^ e rea,^ c^ra ^'
^OM^^ ^^^^ TO STAND TRJALSamantha M. ^arrisonPage 8
that the ex-:mirer needed 14he :;;T^ra..to, N,^^at would be prus?d^d "by ;;Fod,edures)in order to render an opinion "n 1ega„";3 %o competency to stand 4 :,. €`"ov4ev;',€', .'he
i4 ststed that 3 ^ A^^r y ^ s '^^ e r^ ,A e r ?^s^ : , f r° re ?:^s e^ 4^^..^^^ ^.^a^s ^a'^' ^ , ^^, ^ ^ 's'^. ^;^ ^ a^. not d 2^,cessat yto d;lerm?ne competency to stand tr;aE,'
Ms. Harrison's reactions to attorneys who have represented her at various points in 'Lhpcurrrtint case (as described by her current ar.`{or ney; P uv-= been 6 qu r w u,usuar and evenseif-defeating, (Le. refus;ng D3lpers;on, and ahreatenano to sue h^ atto;ney whopresented her with the Prosecutor's PiAe'v2 Bargain bdffp9 of "qF.a:Jnveud PrSJ2.{ab64FiC."l!
Threatening to sue the attorney who presented laer w,t;, a v+rr'^ten stae^.:";^en., regardingthe offered Plea Barga:n, appears to be Mf: <^^^^^-,na' M,500;nse. ..,in:;: attor;Se^J ^ offeradvice and
* a ^..
;4^:^ ^ ;r has .i^•^^^^_.^ -.-^' Y^'^ ..`^i ^`",..A ^t•^" 3eY i. 3tl s. ? ^.r? cs^.a ^ ^ ' to c 4..^u ,s;e. ^^^^;^ ..d ith hostilitywhen he e,Y 4aI'9^,'i^ to °s?f;r e^:essits! of ci s"i'i°^'"1 y^:g `^;1^'st+^''the ^ : ^.:§^ ^ "^ for the^ the i° ^ ^i ^ ^ ^ , a,^r ,^r ^compete€^c^p evaluation.
SUMMARY AND DISCUSSiON
Present ^^^luatiQr.. i9-id6uates that N11s. Harrison appears :o regard commo n, reasonable-rprocedures em?lUyeC a f pE ose5si` ; ^^ls !i:vv ^jed in ti^i^. a; i€l ?? !j1?i great
o cio ' lac e s GIF.p : r i^^a=P'f ^f^s a ti3 i.'ti .^ ^' ^3se sfr' . ^ f ; ^ ^ ,- g. v ^ ^ "`.^^^^7 4^ and ""Et. ;'+p t^sarrf^ - ^ ^,r^;^ ^l 'niuaeher in some way. As a. result, she refuses to cooperate. T .f•a`, he r and needto protect herself °,nhib;' professicna.°;^ ^rors' ^s.^^i; eXcc.^ ing 4.";ei^ fu"'.c`...o€ : r,, 'the process,which has ground to a halt.
: ^ the cas^,. ca. ^case of `h-C^ c^9 r ^^'^'"'t c ^'?^,mp^.,^^^. f`^r{"^'^"6"',^yf ao s '.a, r" ^ ^sr ' r i ::,zF'G ej a l7ir. r t ,.; a,r soy^;^ . ..,, :^ ^ ^^ ,^ `^ ..^ h asobstructionistic f if'^f is f°- ,^'.^ n, `"'is£^.n ^. '^!eti^'. f'a3'..' :at t.:"f^ of behavior€^^v f which ^+i thatexhibited obseru .€'rt'oni.^'.t.t^ 4.+
she ^'Er^a.'s '"t^ a^}%'"bl°^^ © '^s ''d ^^t6"4 her ^^^ 0r ^ e^.t^'+ vvi th, f^- o°^
i`ca.^
. S-sv<` s `i'T.`^ t and 1(" s ^ th e (^'^..f^.^ E t..A 0v. 4'e.^JI >^^btd^`i^ aA. .,.- ! .'k .t 5 9A+.+ . C. . ifl b.^^,
^ Y ^'f-:^ rr ^ ° ' beC? th e 6".,C^sen` Pvc°^Ei.%atis^^', sh^':F^ `^'J: s • some fa cto rs ti"9a^ ca me to (i,^, s i' - ^^d^"i„^`r c ouldin'Lerpreted as sian.^ of a ^enta'd.^^^^er - such as .av:^^; Pa post office box in a Itlownwhere she does not reside, i nsisting that he.; c?"9,,;d ,:as a de..^'sp"ste
medical evidence to the contd ary, implying that she was °:".ror rk;ng a s a ^ ^^ officer evenepilepsy^though sh^,. has a s-ensice O'o T, ^ (due to - a^.`or"C^s"°' told,q °^;ss-,e t.her
attorney), and reacting To reasonable expectations as ' V.ne}' vve!`e ne"u s.'"s.`s.;a. From the
standpoint of a psychologist, suo^h lf;;acao;v cannot be 'el3aao.tiy § , er;.,.etied without a
°vontei'+.f.^. (whi& is o8"oY9faed by a C't6n':e,..?l %iit°rvie':P+l) ::ind/o; w .no%..; ^rmaG'.3- p rovided
by resu lts of psVch^iogEcaf gestl +:^. Othe r c.,s°.^^^s" i rr;? .^r;^',4;^ "^^,% have
been s c deY3tIfie i;f theie i?a•,''F'. ^ees°"+. Pa. +,..s'inIC;ai s"i".'<..i"'a:'+ibf.
^.q,,^ r^'ra! f£"^y.+i 0. ^.^^ ° r^..^'^^'^' i r^nt ^'\fal~ric"$^:(°^°i, '£^ 1^..' undersigned e^,cai`4`?i: e°' e.^ p:c^ned to Ms. H arr.s s;'n how
sC?ps'9e of the ab. '.eVe-";"?en"tlQned factors cx)'<.dld reflect i.:;r^',^;"at^4?,.,. HowE:ve v^l;L1"1ouf further
context provided by C;inical :i^^^rv;ew and results a'f psrchosogioai te:;fi,^g, a diagnosticformulation r-oudd not b-, made. She was Pcov;dec„ a;; exp'anafio; of ^^e I^elevarce of adiagnosis aQ a competency to stand :a; evaluation. The e;am;ner a€:^ ^^^^essed to
COMPET ENCY TO STAND J €^^^ ^^^^^ni-ha M. ^^^^^^or,Foge 9
^^her the 6dE'a that the difference beibm^.'en her s^''^°;`!4' '^` i the ,^^, .^':°; ^ s^ ':a pi o^^e s wi °^5 cas.p:.
- .
te'+Pri of the situation forms *he bc ts of te question as.^^+^.-$ thei" C ;'?'"4p`a"c'.,^ r,a nc°y •
However, Ms. Harrison remained steadfas: in her relsa' to co^.;^pe;°a9`e fi:,;^y with^^^^^^api procedures for the ^^mphton of t&e compexano:'J to s ^ aia_aatzo'^;cr r^ ^.°'sf s`^.
°F"8 c,^f.ndE °.s^."''in, although no U`.eTsn,°s'.;`+fe diefg"`:os;s can be Ma"r?^.%'-^E : . - ^as^ ds.Y'g Ms. ;-^^'a; ='isoT^3';^.
psychapatric men tai status, it was ev„,."ynt thR'oug ; t ;"it,:i"acacso'; o.'ish i v's that she is 3'^o',,.. .^^^^3s.i^J^'l^yr' impc^i!"ed. Also -".,,..'itideC`dce from the ^.^^`pe;^;^a;^y ^.;ys"e.'-'^^[^g ^3,;rti?^'r„%'s.?:°i is ts'''^ Y , tha t
Harrison has both a faa:.ia± anc} a rational us^^^e rstandrng, of Ahi^ legas process inwhich she is involved.
Ii`4 at i"dtoR what was etdpnM1 toni the Sgese5"st eva€uaton 'an.'ca;^ that M& Ha, r?soi`; has notexhibited G?`?e capacity to work with a4'3 attorney in order to Ci;'VES°:3'Y) a defense cw Ea
resoiuption to the criminal charge. Vpdhat was not MhNf;d by the evak1at;;^n wasthe question of whekes due to a munta^ sxInMss she is . o`_, ap:ibse of with her
K^'..a^i^ a ? x ^ r `atoi^Z'ie°y' andfC3r is not $ U ;, ^ of s..z^^;;^.13.^a^ii g in the :e'^^„'" ^,^t '^ ,.;^.,^ ia s a `^''ecs`#'^ii^ ,su°W
manner.
^^^^^^N
On the basis of F s£,' ps"u:ser' tievc,.aua$9on' the offered 'ft ath:i i'°a
able degree of ^syvhologicas ^..'erl:ai;"t, :
1. Ms. Harrison p4esenty appears not to be a ` menluidlv a.Gg:vda^d ,nd^viduai, as^. 1specified in O.R.C. 2;^'5. .^7^i;;^^;;,^;
2. No definitive diagnostic sts: ^%;ern^'a '^t 'a v '^sY. ^':a^ s ^ .,ay. ' ,.3"^., made^'3^.r reg ardi ng ^< ^,^~p"^,^'sets^r 9 sv,>> as
r ee by O.R.C. 2945.3ea, ,);`..,
^^edi i;
3. Pre,^'aqG1tIV, Ms. Harrison is ! wpab^>' of :js^aG`ers"^G w&'g lt ^e "^"r•Y' w ad, s','rioi:isT?es5
of the:^!a` r-e'a;"g'; aga?3 isi hei.
4 PMs. sra! E^r:s4'^41^i is ,.,'.^,..... °
^a^s.."s^.^i^„ of'^ ',.^^ .."r,t"'a. ^xB^:srel ..-.^ `Presently, r<a+f^^:sEn, t;?e nature a"3C„ t.'"ibjece^v°'s
of the €uga€ proceedings.
5. Presently, Ms. Har^ison iias n. w exNbRed the ^apW6, to 'J^, 3 .i, k'^^^^ an attorney,but an opinion cannot be rendered regarding whether she is rl. , +. ^^^^aNe due to a^^^tt iNness.
6. PmE.'senty, an opinion cannot be rendered as to Ms. `'azi'is"'J:t'a capacity toparticipate I"? ^, M"'seai'6ing3'ui manne r in'i±iF' w'ega's pCc-G-£,-'„L.
COMPETENCY TO STAND ^PiALSamantha M. HaFrizonPage 10
in Gonclusion, b^Cai.B:F' Ms. Haids;n ef;.:;aed to paFtlcipar`;^ fuiiy ?s; tq`':^ evaiuation
process, . there can be no C?p.^,;:l'C^'^ Yek3;`.?3"e^ -° 't^^raQ „"ai,. a '^`^';^s^ti`rs ,r,^.' '4e degree ^'rif. . ,^?s^(chol,^tgi^:al ie^`ta3n'?; - as tio whether she does or tao3,s s'";; w , eet :n, Ohio Gaw to
be adjudicated as clsmpe'^en6 to stand "€.i";"^"'i,^.
^^^^^^^uU^ ^^bmitie-01
^^ ' . 'X ^ i f^ ^^3-'° ^:..h,..-jit;•', ^ ^''; ^^.
Barbra A. Bergman, ?h.D.Clis,@capiForensic Ps;rchorogis"L
C
^ ^
; n ` )l
i< ._.^
^
4 12 ^ 35 F ROM- . -? 2.3 P0002/0008 F-7533
^^^^^
a.^ - ^..110.
,.., .^.^.^.. ^.^...m^ .^ .^.^.^„
(.5 ; ar ^^° 3G'^'a^ si^ f^ su; a+^M Y,^'•:^' `,7. (u ^i..vl ^^^ .^G&G xc X' dt's`c'3i b3^ a&?2^. SOa1 Y^g,^
S .N ®i'^rk Yb 10 , 27`':i14
Th^i lionvrub4.r A?dge z3'."na ,'
16+.5:^t"gos.'d.E'.?'y co-u,.nt,y cvvv, J^.^'5^.,`'^ , .:v .. ...,
301 Third StreetDayte^^^, Ohio 45402
RE: Sz^A^^a-niha Ha:.-dsoszCase # 201s^ ^:^4 00s:; c^"
"'"fiu : H o n mo, r;
Sp.-mun^h'a 11_m76so::1 is c`7a.1-''3 tx` ` p,r:Ym -faci33tr e. C^RR V
2945,38B -zors6va'M3o„ FC
Allrtaiitei: please daa".S a N}Jp^n^,'`^,Cx 4+ ,^:2^,^, %.,... .'^, 'i^A.licavd.^'a tyS.^^t
^Oiqso^ <,,,f i^^ ovaluabax, V HaiA6a° ^a Ai ;bie a4.. e..,.:1w2^...^.4r +.qz 5 ^y
na:Lum and 'ec^". ^de ^`i.^A Vr ^ ^.'?..t_ Zz^'>hof ^^ ^ ^y`^, ".n ^^°^ tCg^,t_^^^"bst .r^ ..'^'.rT^C. ^; _y.i.^ ^. r" rv idiaF J a^,
at9.'iirkf;y s.n, 'nZeS o+F:fMn fkN.''A3:r11's;^-
eas
.^ .t.
-;J
,. -. ,
.S ^'
.,£.' 3'".'^i:.^ ^i^ 1^.riYew^s Y^^^._ ^?, ..^Mt rn .t°^ fh 1.._ ;^i7^stF'p^.F^' . ., "tAY^a.a. e^F:.
a^hm.i^i,•i.
^,,^,/r. v
^Dc^^glav,`he-11hrer, M DChief Clinical offiloer
CC: fileMedical re;=v.3 rd:;
T-223 P0003,'0003 JF-753
.^.r .z. ^_. c ,`r ..^OMP" `^'P' a.".-^T :^^'^^ ST^n."' ") T^"'^..^ ..^r a ^._ :.r.^^ ^ ^'^.s^^'^r^^^`'^^ •.es:Zt:.: 2945.371 (^.`'^3 ;3;
x4oYJy^.^^er 10, 2014
Doft of Dir3.k.i:. 9/1 2/ 3 9'!'-`3'.
^?w",^i Qi'v+f AdwiPys$oo: 1 r{3 i /2 3 i='r
^^^^^^^^d Nuimber; 7,169037Leg`r^'sl Sta7.u5: ORC 2'945 ,.:7 , (G)
Court: P ^.^^?,'6^ ¢^r r t^ ^'vJLS.;.t ^ r^ x'y- V I,'' ...} -S..Lu/^^^o .nAY+..AJbAbf^ 'A vn ^ `n^'. 3 '+s^^Y.1 S . ^1,F .tS h _
Judge: r lAo aTi rt,^°.3'6bl i "fa3` y Vwll^. Y"':anC.^^^ Numb;r9 `'`sFG^- C R,- ,.'';'_ ^^cho.&°ge; Th •.-ft bcJ De..ep ' a
Coiirt
^ (3 ws^ek^^^4 C3-5.^rliyu Lee, ?r,dD
^ S ;T h 6}'" o ga:.ry'"
Ssrn6) 5ti ha .:-^^arrws-s :ty FS ..6^ ^ A_, ^r^.,b/. ' -^^^ ^as:^ b yd/ k. /^,
Iy^iA, ^J`!I3/.ry
.^'',.,'^44.:^^+^.^ :. ^^aa ^ - j-F%^p ^^: s
,"L4 3"w.1 d^ t ^i }.r :-A3^^,is°" *^.aA^x^ ^s'..'Ni i .-^....,^+.uxa'..i^u.
^
x^:^ ^) for a,r'^, t '^,^-,-'".a^3^! iaf
C5 ^Ysd:lil1':e^.^..+.:C^'''rd to Summit,.^ .^^Al
^vw`,^^^3^f,^`^"i , .+:a9°>r- ^ ^ r i "' Y^ ° T^ ^ '1 ^" 7 ^^'3 ^ ^,3r ^ g^ 3 r' :^q x ^^y_
k^y.'i3Y;ris(3n's CDzSe'G:e, cG°i%+_p=n.;; J +o ,.,K•.3`l^'Ar' ^^... ^:CGl, k.^a ..ix„^^^f '^"'S, t^.i.?8_s 7: ,a}.av s i3x...... ..yr a
'4"1ys., +;a7 ^h.,; ^
. . ^,a. . .o-, ,.^^J. °.•;T`^C^.'^^R
b1v =.F?.the ^`^'_d;^-' 3'a '^^D?
s^`r^ tg'2" y
J.^,'^^^^1^^'o,f. 4^. 3^ ^ 1: . f . _:;^"l.^.i.^<. ^.3 '`;. ^s`ix OL'A. °a
.. '^^.y '^: 3r7.^i^ 's x.,^:.a,. r. a4.e°vez^ ya^s •,. '^7r
^^i..l^^^i^ D ^.a °^B^. Pr,"}:i -f.rr,.3 k'$.*,.- Jne.aa..^N;.^^,`'Ty +A^.^ ^^.,.^
. .^i^ _ :Ad..• - ^, , , ... ,, •
e^%2a,^°."^.t^^^L4n,t'^Y^-ti't:" al'TJ'-..e",^i _^ ,i.Lvls..i 'Tirx5r....r, Sh.u i d:., zte4.5 he: ;it?.deyrt T3d .g z^ ^^^i'wi , w63. . a6it3S^,^
^iox2fidcY9.fiality, and it ... ;fkr ^2:^ ,.xFF^^S ofti?^i uum t,.iutign,rd r±':15 :' aly .? ^'r)?'+: ^.^tthesu i.++x53.hs,
Yrii`!?$`matiC}n was a`YaFlabii^ Fmis "-VF.evvS°'d '= §' ^3 ^ r s,. ,, 3..o,.cs ..,ea1. ^^^bha^aa-iY .^^aritn^ava, ^tD.Pnsy-tiataRt y. S^^1-^;^
2. Dionn4, Roylj s. PEI), Psychol,,^^st ., . D D:3, Greg Longeivuwy, LISW, Coozda.n^..^ow yt 3B,"4, .£..ei"'i.a,% ^':!A' ^'.^lsha -Le,"',a;'^d "' ^'F`9^st ^b:
5, f°c 7al>r-r.^^' BaF°e7n.^ .^''^'°^-^.°,"^'vwd,., , ss^'s {t`7r2 ^.^`!.^'aeTi,a:e.^^
ks.v 3rk'' .,^.vd+,o-a^^a^
6> .^'i.es';.^W o.s^. an c^vs''^'.tpeu#^sAcy ;+" .at,m,T4 trial e`,rab-a."s.u",3 .^ ,^:n.E?'ad by 8a»3rss Bergman,
.k^'x°^, i syfhologksfg dc'^.E'd i o,ov'^. 24Dg 2: 14,
7. Records ha6,"m s-. ^^v "^lo? tgo'.'net o cou.^-'a..y 1^1 O.,:O"w dated'Y z&^s
8., ^ew^.o:'S ^^om, thr rMfa33.z^ a3 x^ f 4ar, „ s.hy Jai l ^:a "^ 2^,^'r'.,€;F',,-.^ ,^. ,
9, Review of tht,- chj -q at SBF '; riYA^-v _^ . The ^r^s^^^t,^o^^.:y County ^.,.ef;i of Cow n«^; 5^f^ c-l^:J ^flbsite.
11_'1L+-'1r1r, "i%rv'..1--i R4.,M- -F-22^ ^0004/0008 F-753
&^^^J^^^9^E . ^ ,^ ,^ a^3 ^ a ^^,.^'°s.^^ a, ,. n.2^^xdx^,S^^^ ^:. ^.t'^tu^, .^..:^, t:.stl"#^^S^ix ^ 4i,aS:?aTl
fv^I''ral'^'' who i`'^^` curdenLLv 45 yra:.s of .i°l1s _xV tv^ par-r:X^?^^'3'te 't^3. this
°" 7sinc'^i' she is ^. f^ b ST'tJ^a ^i^A^r2^° ^ ^ 1 4^^spi6 Y 4'" of^l k.+ 1 :.` K''.^.g,. ^'1^'is .s
app^`.'ar.>°.nC.°e ar?,^''d, hygiene were a^lPK"oa^x'^.at^" v."..;^ ^ ^«ls. '^.si'aS.'^^ ;.s^,?a'P "'Er t,A:] y.`"%+-'',Jtv^ r.,eA9^ ,Y/ - Sa]eabCv p. iA-ry 0&Ad^ t
he ¢LS^A ofY yr1°hW od
our r3"it£:Tv:€ew, She rel9tx;.^.^. ?n stiTi a,iaa, and poli;.^ n"^'^ ,^. a
.'".':^'^^3 was able to^r
; `..^,ntaa ^
3"espe^'xd all i^^ip-st3t?T:?S; and 3h^e was abl^= to ;^e-,'-c^,t f"°eces :, a`ld: rviuh f::zan±y. MI30Ha^. -r4&un, rqrQrted, tlh.tt^ she has neY^^.^ ^, s ^'3+_.Ai s,,z i ^ ¢ ^ ^ ^^ _ v: S'!'Pils.^' l2 .fhi^1 ^' '3Itf^4 17 such as
dexiwsions, or thoi)^ f suicide , ' ^iC ^.^v^ra^ no^:^ry*^ J^ also ^ [^ af,^,soWe'Ra3S ^'o ;^.-ft J.;tancr z;er Thes^^f-,'s^dant ack..7Rowled,^ed, IuIUM she is .at'heA• depress^'', a.:d. s1he WIdYba:e. .h^^ To custody ofar'+^iu k^''L'_`ee a?'ouriQesF: Mm HsazshsoG a,s'4:1 b-IHUVG:s I+?3e fI'-Ut"1. ",'''uM^: formn ofPz..SD,»
refou1ng to wtn,ess s"„k'.,.JV.;e'i,.•h, b^-,ca'w3f„ f <^ n . of 3,^,,s'u";^- .r^sr. t'aa,^ tA f a, -.c^^ ^.^ '.'t< 5!^"3 ^'4-^^'^" Li'^. f ol' herAeraCa'^^..Edin-n. Ms. Flaw"r%5un :'"epcxE^d uhai bu
^ zs^ her sjp,;3ai?^ app €;ze .k
*+ z-_ad^r^'^i.2W. Shu'nd3cafed thathas
_^^^ .^ar j ^ steC^ Fa=r9 ,.{ r3,il tn ti, ^,..f, '^eu aR+...^,,.x^-^ Z i^2a^Sx
y'_P
^;. aY7dr, ^a'l^,+Tk^, } '^T e .7. ;,.rf,.ck P y 5^^el^$'^.'d t^'' :3.eA
hosp.^^^izayto.^ as havi^g by^zi "not a pz.,nyc." IN4S. 3art-ison app°a-cs to 'u~r. oj' ^mt ..ea^^ averageintelligence, if not ioxnoYVh2bt 'SA "+»ei al G" ^gh r'. .^ a was not f3yp t2 ll^ X^,^^ r vssess-d , Wk^^^ ^^,,ked4 Y^
s.11v ^.^?mig^a she had be'^^ ho;SpRaia^ed ),.ciSr . e: e..a.rd .Asµ, c: Ya:;t7atio,. . i 'v. .iYI:,3.f.E JVdl. J^.Y^^:, N^ rr,T, p a Y p/ ^;
^hY.a^.^5^k3
ttTAI+..j'6.3dg^.' oed$r'r^,.'d a Qorn^etwZ;.4::y'' {4,^ st^.'d,n- d trial evah,>."''i.t<{`J':,k. The ''ErS£ `v°i.?e iUas^x't satisfactory." As
a ©:e^. abQ^1e, sls, Ha3's':s;^^^^ °^^,'a5 cvv^`'- ^,t,.^a;^'^^?F the '" ^ ^`e,^ ^ &c sa.s^^^aP^_? f on,S^ c^,.'t^ aitr. ,^;«hNw tht,, gi^3iu°dand oppositional '^eehrv^or,-a^^^^ ^^^ Dr. B;:rgna: in her re.^^
Social ^^^^ory, I%.s. Httrrison r^poo;^^^ that she ttivm bo;'a ixe D^^°on, ^`,^e Yf^^' ^hger ;•°lwf childrenR3''a her family oF.^or:.g"rs^ ti`^eF lvreM`°e.;; dls ,To;'^^,-d jI,2en she was 8 y'^?.:ti vx they ,,^^^5 : t,,^p^^'Y :^^
Y.,'L^,^i"k^.^ ?9^'^)a^i> .5.^c.^.^r.iv'4i.^ re^5ok1ed i^^s reported ^ ^tii'i^'^ h;xu. ^ a? P2d 1^ ^ ^'C.^.'^a.^ '^e!
sL`c.'ag<,.r".'a.^4^?L^L from ^?3^.rt^v,^ .', ^)Sr"'we,^%r^`^' in the }.1.c '^Y^' v'..^. '^^» ^ ^ is '<.''" r-, }^. 1 ^f.iS^¢^. .7.'^"f
wG' > ... ^i..S..';. '^u. ? .. tld'..-; _.
-^'Y.ai.4^^. ^k^i^'1vh^f^,l 1',Iiito13
. lives.^.^r)°^_er8y i'^^^ ia Belize. As ^ child, I"vEv a.Awmi ;^n3 g1°V ::. ii. '^y ` ' !. '3^' and noted .^% ^^v `^ ^ 1 5^ *a,zG .a'^'C.^x,z' x ..Ar^.
hu
R {^ r^^, }¢ fia^+. ,c
toA^ ^i^d4%,J Lf^a,..'4.bYr &4x4^vS.
^*
the
a{^ ^b
.......au atSL^6^^^.^^\id. £.a^3.^?, ^^^ ia^,g^ pg`.{S^, L`L i,J
/
^ .4i, Y yy^iFate
Y,^n r]
rwtCL^
grarzdpxm.:2ts ^vs'^o 1'xolped ru^ her, 7vh;^^n qu .stion^ya aESow lvfls smted that herr *r.' y^,^father disciplined her hars-bly 9 and this was &;.^^ , d s av ^'^ b c,.9 z tTe. After 9 lik. n ^ ^'^i ^. ? o«r`^1'elt£i'',1d^%^
^^nisC}.3 reported that ^s`1- was :^^' Qa'.t:i.,o."`u'.z ,T f ^.3R?'ls.tis'.4',^"` ~^ Y.^. r ..Ps ^c f r's`1i 'Pts, ^. s ^.a,. ...
"'"..,.^ b ^^ii3{Bd
^onter around family vacairtonS. ra.s toz vvh?t :h.f.^ ;..:^^ tO -,;JhTng-e aivouk her c,oalildhood, iMs,H~rison wishes sh4 had s:^t more1^^ x „^T.Cl f ^.^. 3° ^ txse.. ° ^ ^, ^.^^; .'i^v •r'J . ^. ^ )d3+r++xr'^ ^,!?.ses ?a-,d dCIgs; Thedefendant vXxas, reas'".ed; ?rt the *a..''a:jptY.St fa.ti i rcriN o"«3'xo;?,tzyr ^^^axMt c rb as Word of
i azth,
^:^'^i^.rdl ^^g her ed^^.?da^„t^? 9 $ ^ t ,Ms. Harrison d" "?s.Dt ^ ^.,U i^3"vi N^'a^ ^rSi,^'^^ r ^ w r r;io> K ^ v1 +^ . ^ ^^^^^^^c^^ HighSchool iF?' 2 98"', She i^^.^.^p,'t'.rted that `:h` ,.,uxfe.`..:d ^;^DS:1 ^^v5!''.^,.h_E^. a:.a+^ '^aV'.s gi'uz'F` y in ^ :'3i3^,ft ^y *; d'i' ^ . b.^.K ;. p^P.. a.S.m.^,4 ^
^la,'.:ses ''ti^tti^.1 her 3^nioF` year. At flh,"',t ^I3,e vr'ts.7'C3iled iri a k'as. H°uF'ri5(3i1
jokin,glyT °^''^^es^''iri-b'^.°-d .n,^°r3elf as ha+/i.'.'t'`',' sba,- sa'r,'w'?a.. ^.;r?' 1^'^f:.;^'^ r - nn^, {.e ^ that 3i. .A c,.^ af4a i s'^4,°.^''.1
a4.°+adQ.^dA ic wor', a.klx'^i^"s"^ :1^e„' .^i. d^'t: ^^`^i.?e. dx3 S%?^, ='e' '^.w^, ^ a^ ^ ^ good x,^.>..... ^- '^'' w'^. t, a^^`c^€v^d w^^^so^"icer, St5f'cc3ali, track, axLd os`5e^.^^c.:eadih?ag, :`'fS. 111vrr:is-ara rep vAttd ihy ah.,^ a3'r.V C.cr°das, ^^.`A^OUrS
from, Srliczakr Commumsty Coilego, 0-he rep;r:e^: trsa^ she r^^y the of a 10achelor^sdeg=feo, pramaY'3lv coAAsa'.st;.ng of ;oi.^..^:'ties ::r? _ a^.^i^^'3., and s^°:^ ^_ ^.sse^i^,.^ ^u's cz^r. ° .^ ^^"' .^ et 1ncriminai justice ir^i 2006. Ms. R^' °riso:^ -mc o _rF^eX=oLfied that she a.rs in fae &a^^^^^Y ^'' y s )'u ^ ^library at thoU^iversity of Dayton.
^r
1^-1 ' 14 12; 3c FROM- ; -'23 ?0005/0Jo8 °s=-753
;.." tenms of ^^^^^ynnent, lAs, ]Harmisvn, a'qcosi^^ ^^^^ ^ p- has wrjr-k-ed in em,-^Dzce^^^-^ as ap{3r^kv+^- officer and ^.^.^bt^^ ^+' : She re^'^^'31rCd ^<Ni she p?e4;1z4'^5!^i ^d?'odk^"...^ ?^.^'^^.,^..L;'.^ s..:i r^?"n 7ik; °.^1aia^'3..dtf but
^ disGha:'gl^d ^,T'u:-- Lo y:3eI' 17,-armt Oa aTge. Mts. H.?tmii ; n Z;vpa.Led fiTa=; she o4r``JPs l3„l^a o;r3JFI
conSLsucw3oIk'^omap-..^' .ny, t'T..id Lb^ ^^lz-'s.^lT;p i r, s, 1"'iumSo i i%5%an%s to .'?"..ov':-' ,1u -sh"o "`epoi°'Ced
S?^,`,,r't y^r
0r , t, fr ^. r e^etkk'C3t Jhe has a 4ocat1on'L-,q r`.'^•.'`.. a 'S b^.^ i.a:. € .•. i£3a v^ =.^.'r ^^^ she ^^oyss MS,3'
: F ^ f^" w1`^aj-:I.S'oES. l'ekev to Lraib dr+,x°gs. T::-Iv .+,s d^f_!^.Ae.t^i r „•iy^u__C5t..C,.,.
hr.f.s, 14'a?a.:S^)dz rep"iwte+...3..'Cl:zt 5h^.^'iwaa> . mia.."Sa.,.^.x. f%,'.° t:"isb`_cS^'r-^,) wi^t,.: .^''`'",r".. er °^ ^- ^ ^ ^^ ^ : ^3. . i wo^`^c.A c'^auggi".xie:y u,ia',nLiy "'i''3.+,^-^",. a °70n3 bL^^ 2-,. ^%5;^.u ^'., . t^.: .,.>..v m.,, Ha^;
r., up?^'.^,+pox5.
.^
e^.'i bhlaL shi^ was '4':'7i.L^^'T ffic fatp.,.cr o1 f:e.. 1v-"^'-."'e`-a, ^^?'"=3iti^Z.^('',r%i^ 'i.:Eka^.A'^;` n.r ^^',:ox.fs5^.,,6",r'J .^.^a,'d'^SvT.^'id°^..
Y°vY"^^`^ Hvd Sons 9r.^ a''.,8:s .7^ 8, m^.r'.D, 11 . Nil.^'i. Bmi^.sct::?,..'s'pY `^^'^c ^=a ^." $ pi w x rt : P :s A O''4^d Lcom
S1er czistod v 42 A 27, 7.k4r....Nii A 2, ^r'^ 4d';, "'L'.f.... 'j^ar-r°'r`''fnf,.d.7a^,osi '' s.x9 l i>^'?I ^-.3.y s' e
^•t> s^a she
. August ^^v^ua..a.br. _. r^J^'^.4.{a ^..^:^s, u.^..'t+ vie^ to sm=v' s.^
physician regarding. oxA' of :12. so':'+.,^_ at L3".2^': ^L.^'.;_d t rc:: : a..:Aw"^^ ^ k'S'x'..+"''^3 G^:.^, hospitals
to^^. ^^^att,,r ^^^.s repor M1.+/^'+H .r} ^ [^ `^ (-^-/C^<4"--5v Y SL" ^t`trce^' iL'^FA.3ytA EYdj^r^yy ^°y Co x`y. ^' 1s. Ha^'s" ^^d sepo^z4^ ' ^^/ ^Y^^.ti4
that her paLem 91 `z1gI2$s wt,,3',, "i^xe2iAnaG£'d o<1 Nove3„'3b5'.r .J, 2034" .^."`iifiA to t;:,as, >3hv had pa-r°aL3s."2g
Lr3'z:de with her chEl(A&rez? on a w^eA^ v ^Fa3A;^ 5 ^:,n ^ ; so ^asL saw her F d1 /^ ^ 23 , ^ x Jpz0.e Lryy^^.^4?^ N xlVMbV 3gs^ o.r`'"S^
d^"ay^ drcm apparently wei^ prev3ou5ly b _-caoed .., g`%SLQI- ^a,ie, bva, tr?y axe ^"^laGed ^^'4^.cL^^. W.t^°.^.^'A
fother. ki.p'ecord3 av?iia'E:'a.e for re?%:4e"r i--nd?Cate flha, ' s...kf ^^sS^k bj proxy
coaAl.!erzidy^ UB.'N, Had?.isc^,^ ^G4^^%^ b^a.•r.^!. r r^'^^-,.^ ^, ^^;Trd^3^g .3 .ki' sA .:^a.. / 'a.vrx^_ Tz '4 4^ u ^f ^c^i.her? 2aL for Z3^^: of her ^io^S a.Cs: ^.ibt:n tL;.uL ^z ^^ =3. ^ ^^ ^s.Ta?l + r 3'^ 3^.;Cr 7^`3.c'. . 3
w,-,a"e taught to ?a?2°x'i by his m.,ofl'„v:i'.
Leg.ll Nkakwry; 11'49° rv:t'E t^.ssysi.ck?'i.
-n- 'aLo^'s ^^fi.-^. q?::es,;;,o^'F:^3^^ a.^'^Du ra ^u %v^ 9 c'v^ky-'^"^.,_,. ±`/^^. :^£a^.So a?_ z "§1 a"LS d L^3^L she has
a seizure disorder and also s^'Ys'-iers -fr:}l diabetes. S11.0 r°i ti...'`0 i,t,, 'i e^s!•+`%, r- °^ dog z. s^^d+^ 'i^. 4'J` x ^,. JZs;-.H og SY.no can
p^'b^;e$^J`^' "i^".^i?.^in she is F±s^.lrdti; to h^'e'^N a sci^:`t^'^. 3'f::^e ^x^.Y'i-ss^v'3? is ^.^a ^:^ ^a°S^^AU^^ ^^T^^^i&^.
Review of her chars ^. . ^
^?^ tiz f^...^'^^ Lbu; ;Y._u. 1"._ :^,v:3 a:'das .".'^:;; :""e;= %;:^edr=^al !'^z3.Ge^°^:u of^.^z "h.sa,!.'_.^.I:mPzoAna ^ pafP.2s°a1v:4.,'I3S, '^.' fsL; ° _^^% '^g °a.^e.r..r''r''p 1..1.,r_«" s y ° ."'^n-'^e?/' v'^"^ic' C},'.,. 2s%',9,
Substance Use Ms. !-.x_Fa:"kS^ E3i2eL s^t^ ^^^ she. g;..-. yu.^?.°'^ * a^._ary r^ .
was younger, i i^^', s^..'°r' r^±^.`E.'L.'w' re;T.tid .^''^ 3..'.vi: 'i,::s...aa" wir.7'v
^.'^jc1T.a°`fory< Qa°.AIRe adCJ.'d"E anuly .^^^Lake^ tha, s^"`s',''r A ;.i`a' no"« ^''s a ^'i_ .^'r. ^.`^ ^^.
'x,^e'.^':^'al i^^s ^.a^'fh ^.iwt^''a'q a^i^',^,r3,ws^xi:^' ^°.. A uA ^i^w.^^'z !Z^atrs ^i?t,- iVIs, s azJi,:.u=ve.. s"eca:l„rd t: :.t. she
parLiS.^ a:^..^id liZP yoFa3 s^liZEr- ^'u- ^ MS.n^i`v+^'f„^da.t.:`^ ii.^:i i.^.'l^A^w:t: ^on ^ -: :aY. ,^ ^rr r °zs`.^ '' vz%,xs "'ciiiftg I^gal
pro^.'^lvms and the local S;hi-We:''> ^,,-svt: :t^e.Y, ^;?e^.uc, ..` ^^.e a C 4.a`s, .i `^'^'l .^_ ^ ^^^^^:^i^. what shQ r^fe.^-e^. ¢^ as ^''^^^^sty{a^
PdS. ^Farr3.,,€'i7}sS cs..?u'l's-l of -ffeaL.mex?w .^i.,i: S."^'s^.t'. reV'4..'-0.^^'r Li:as`, She has r;,o4 ^xhib:a.y^'' ^rrs".o4.3„g symptoms
of ^^^'^"^^Ri ili3e+,u, Nt'erif's.e'.^..^5y Y^'E"+x^'^?i.^^vn* itr. z "" ...' .6'ir^^.^"'^,c^ ^3 .^eT' e "1 er^^.'r ^ -'^= ^, ^s, ^sz i ^. 'a, , 'E^. saZ^ has not
displ^.yed any ;^^sycax;^LS^: s^^p#o^^ss a..^d ^:he iv ^oj p^mcejv^Pd °> ^=^_j.T z' QT^.>;^, d ^, pT e;;seda.e^xio^+, r'.,,r'q Rather, ?`^ tiE:. 31^' x^ ^F .^i: ^ax.i%TS ...n ^ ^ri ,^^,s<," .4^^..^, f`i' f-'-a3. ^',5`+-^E r^^ , ; `^^7 ^s.".:rr , ^s^i^43^. . x 4 t, ^,,,e. s;^ch's'es aY
^'
/. v4+rcis+)3,wfdy ?YAt. %ona?^oy 9.l4soGdeE Os. .'L:o..LC.,-.'.li.b- DA.:1Of dv,., hA, . ...^.^dTh).5"SSihas aisc been
t -enp s^%Cei'Ied by Sosate z3Ee t^d^ets of . A ^1 :k:^as
11-1 0-' 14 12 36 FROM- T-223 P0008/0008 F-753
.^isc^r^^r. 1A: .^a^; .soa_ :^°'^ :a ^, PsNrc^aol ogist,to administer v ^ $ r ^i ^.:^'"i ^ .^.... C c•..t^.T.:4"f-,^ to ^^,•^'.'3. _:.L:n A^o-f
_"J,fv _.,he . -'.« '^'d^se'.kP'. to
• ^+'+3 -^S..R.^+^3.^L^.^^'. . . ...-^K1.kS^ .^^-s
Rest^'^aa j . r.°.,'"'; , . ^^`^> ^r,^ ^f..t3^c.3'4^L^, ^'Vib 3 .$
(4
was
^ (^ (}^ 1
^ "^^ . ^' A+,t... . ^.. d^
to ^:^-±,^.ie ?,.'^^^i' '^' et';ige ip.;tA-r+,.:ntR^ ^ove? yd ,'egf?.'^.l3.aE h>'°'.T, and s.r"+.. 3i yvS.u..,d ,:, d'. ^ _ . s1 and un'F-ior.9t^mu;%q1ae
a^'iw^w?^.t of her idb deaStanC'ii g of why vI'+ wa^ c;,sa ^• ; S'" ', . ... q S°.sf44. -.{ ub+^xsb ,-S^ ^ °r„^«ya^.^'^,e^' ^,^ t '" ^.s ^s5.
between- a masde^^anor and a felony, si"(!s. ^^'.,.^,.ao . h ^'^3RsW.. ` T!_ ^ ^,d ^ ,_eA^, s.^"d e A,3c?..._ ^A^ ,,i 8ol^'sf2yis more see 3. ^^,^^,
Wsa^^ questi43Ei£'.fl. ^bo3g the sf3ls^ 's_Eh TA^"ie D^.^,XeI3.Sy AilC9raey; Ms. 1-112G:...3:.^,'o', st':^^, ?'s ..SY defense
s°zw.Goyy an.^i°. pleads rny side of +'.,^v^',se. I ^.k^>d a :,4Ao^a+',^?° to ^^_,e ^^k^^. ° /'^C.+ ^'- ' y2
r± my1 the y^ ro+,.^.w ^4}.^J.^L`Y^
^9 ^"c^s, .c^'A^^''/4.n then `¢f.^l.fi^'wa
the
1t , ,'^v s `^ `u5. s.,'^^y'r x ^^,N fAs^"'.^'z . o&
c.4.^ec pro ^ r '5 ^ p^ °^'^Ga _:.. t 1 , ^,^ '6' Y d 1^z^ ^ ^+^.,.^ ^`or ^1`t° xV[S.Hairfso%'x ddP1nl.1fi^^'a t^^.' 'xrob,-' of .:ae Proq_^_-^.,asa.zg Asto_.ney ^:a`u GF^'',^ pr^,.?v,, ,. .,"^e ^'xd prove A^eg'SJi^"+w;^.sa She sta¢p'^. t^?h; the J: i^;" cti'.siuSa.s 'fo +^^r^3i : ..adew ._ *'.s^ '^ r 'vi,-'^ a ,A. ^^ : a ,v v, sr hfti, Ha d3o:kkcn.ew there aA e, ty^.^A^''i°dt''..&.Ay fw°-3it•J,. t.^is.,aviduFZU °vJn:. a .:ua`°+ ia:%'.&a :':r both :7ird`°:i and64rddda,Jn a jU'edg1SALfSt,•9 3a".3$^.^la .= ^ ^,l^.l.:si"lj^ a5wFb8:lew ^w^...k4, a ^'?'yk e 's v " , ^^~4 s.^A ,^5M i:7^. ^u^f., ^ ^•.: ia ^x,. t,: vr..^.ia.i' for the^ ^y e
S=y:ose^v'^i.ryr.i(3^Y or %.E;^ dkfd:^'^+^ %a She 7^s^..AadA^^t^',.^.4. n;'.:,i.]T ;v x:hQ
R.adgW)dnh"^g her a^nde^standeb3.^ ^^^^^^ (TuBty ~'bc , 7vl^^, ^.azas.:^,h: s,.cs.x-^,a,, G$.. .ez`'3a 8;,^Jx.,. ^: 1^'ou.^,^'€ ^F^:wthe ^}^'+ndsh^"A?u^?^.'s She i.^ne^t$3Re_; ';3e "4^^ '`
.° *' J+ ^
.L
'Ae
a ,c. . ^1 hers the as dR,,
u;1de^'^aid5ri`y' of the I'-o Ci?ntiet.., -P c:i:a w °a'.d, J{ ...a ^noa. ^ ,ng to rp^^ad" gWl^a^^y o^
innooent. B,^.szoall..- ask the co^^:^. to decide svh:k x`4: ^S' ^ ^o,7i "a^^ ^m .^',^ ,. v+:^na^` cg;. to indicate t-haZ sheLind.^ti'I"stoCYd piev'id,'.Ftg fl^.^i' clorL?Sti iS bcs°.s:a adaa:ssson of the faots ::?th4 ,.sO; lyls, Har4'is5:31
yixe iNy1u't .^3'uiRy by R,F9aS'`Jr; `^..^.f :y;i ailteJ' P iew as "Yo.a. a? ^ m;.o' ri right Ms.nd 'gi t1he*Ldme of a+x.^'v ^°^,.«^i ^c^i.id1.S.x^-} ^.^^^A3^+^+^3's^ of ^ a .... _.+^^^^Vn ^' i^>°g.3, ^^s^ +'`°i3HaiTisd,.^. +'At^'+r. ,+;^ ^ ^-1 a ^. stated,
"Something 11-ie Pnoseuraor ^omes up MA4 ? to gx'te y o'u', s'at.%^+ e C/ sys,3^..'^s ,;' ^ s 4PP'a ^p 9^ak^ wFf
n.hl^d 4^'ih2^i^g^"i's, e a plea^ to it, ^ln4.^. 4^a^'l. +r.^''i ^I'a= '^ti+i a ';^ehd. ^ -"x ^
..
e'ss Ci:.3i^ _-,- 1a41v, m aa...:. E ^:Jxt the3:-i pm °.^r °a bded
a good .`r'xid^'fap ; 'v o1. 'wtil..of rv"^.'^,s+^iii... ^,' ". ^J:,x^v " s„ ,^`>, s y,^,A:f,>,] 7^, °'a;^.t.:v^nt ,/ls.^9^y^j Ma.s. ^., ,^r. '^°1 ,.^',^^•,!,.?^„y ^s._ bafvY?u'
°=1'Ihed ^^ you have t'^''+ '^^-.' piFn H a.6^'i a ^.1^ ^3 si+^;,v.o:..r, :"7 d^ u't'^ e. ^ i ti.rr ,r oc ^'^-^,R.^.: 5'^` E^.. .L ^,''r' y.,iP.y . . ^ ^ . . arve toit '^'^^',^ 9:w^
.^ostAktl.^..i^,tion_ Thej/ watch t b1P -yC3"t,e° ' _C4^'tJ^, to s . " _qk ,. ^.^. ..k^_^ ^ ? a^J "U n^ ^P._^ ., C:^.^3^"l^^sotibs ofpxobw^on= "
^i!3. Yh)zriSoi ^`^.^ows to be,eav, 'n a d r^a*^•s;^i 4^r4. •. a ^ .^J,FBE.^R'^v-* Y. ^1 . .d..+y^â L-^ '^^-,-,J e Li%'^T
-(^
mcU.^^^ ^. [
.SS is alB^^^:iYV
/e to^} 4 5 ^.uei^ry+
Spo'G^a.k rzk iCo-'Us°°t "Whi,^'.Z's KrS^aS^:.`t"'e ..^},S^x?^tis or ..?^.f'af:;i^ ?sai> to ..d^^x " ifs ^.'^^ ^ "C3i?rt 3",^+.4:^"?y. r. E`^S;i'a7'aC3^`3^1
^^eA.^. ok^feT^'a„ in °^.^...^Sla".1.^£, e^ iYis, ^^-a _,e?JCT^ Le''a'rr," aa Y s..II„e: 9.h.: i "4i r Qr, k^ 6i> ,:` ;3I.°.e fl^^.'^E. .^ .. ' } ^ a•^ •.^i'. x
thva?gA
^.i .^^3i' a ^'^:om e^.k ^•S"^ added, .wS^'T?3 ^ t4{^ y.JS'^.e to tell ^+ ; ^f 5 a .r l.y,,Ae ti9
^xy ., qyp21.`tF^4}riV speak
:^ ^^ ^^V[`^^^ ^ ^ ^tJ w ! ^1r ^yri&d`e
b y A a.
up NP^ ^,, ^ h4 h "Y^p for yotiw," ,^.^^5, .^"^^aten"k h. ,.;Nt.^'^^;`^.y^ to x:s^' ax^ft n.'^o,?^aeyl ^°ru, -,•,:sy .;w,,dgy wq;lG`'fi notallow ihiS, As ^'€•U'E{,,i.^ ^bcwe3 sxyv'". is g lan^.^.,,ng r 'a. b.^£' :^exi h;aa,S3;,g, Whenqwsfio.^ed do^^^ ^-, -wo? s; ^^enazk) rega€°dii;ka ;.^:" a..3cb^.F. :zx^sr^ ;^,^^d wf H ,^r x^ t; ,, S`z^tubd t.,^ °^ ,^. . ..,. ^^she is.A^3 planning file for W
;'^d"♦ >
<yqxy ^a'+.ISl.L^x^^`;,'^ ^
'^ -^41aa ^ , if vJi,llL '' r y 'J'^7^'r ^'^ to i:ik'b '^: `^:^S^S+/ w.i%" ^.^.^tNr $!^ se
hc-r 6:aree^. She ^^ew?fl.Qs,°'.t. t!'°ae most fa,bt rd.bl",t, fJ.if'('.v.'nex.. axw bc"i;wqg .(i, gtn3, it 's':u-au €.'.^^.^.^snai.v,id
Y.^gatqiilj` custody of h.Ci.r ultdldna5.:,
Cofia,t^.^:^l ^.nf^^rm^.^^^-r; _iA^Sb ^a^.^.i^^ f:21 4,/a ^ ^ ,7- FF«_vr. . .. :. 4.^i .^•^J:3, s^i.r."S,'^^.rdz u .L k,r ,..L_^ss
has exhibited a"Ao o°^,'^^rt sdqnpi.f'"ns of no^ow:%s d,-,AAq wesC',
4
11-10-' 14 12; 37 E ROM- i 22„ P0007/0008 €--753
-mi'' ed S1hL''it rti'+n'^A^,`0, may f?-^:^i^^ b' .vvAa, 4`y'.irTetss.^Sg s^J°;9:.e x`.>..e-:.( t`s:31Aur'.''4^ p^i'^ ^ tM6,1:..: v a,^-" +^ ca^>ai',^r^ y
bwas
,C. A the but*
this YYs°'^a.,^t to be 'ibu ^,z f%E.^'Jre to -.1.5..-, u:n.s,f rlcf 'axA active nni'my.T%x:_ flu"n e`..s.3, C43n.r6i:.f^V Wvre
also ^a^..^eted tffia:`, Fvj'v: Fgaxr.isun e12a^? ^.3' 1;3.f N. Y of :sx.i
,g 5^on,'^,.mayJ a''..,ISS?Ps; pmvsd^--ti iw"-2e''veu.^imr''L. at >t` '°.7.`^. I°bj.f;. I.,or2ge ^7^^^; ^'y
dS3vc1"3b#^^ ^^5. Harrison ^J bt ime 3 -a,a o ^ g"uE..s .r,^, ;r 0 .i , 3 i. d^k q ,.,^
^i ^^^Y'v ^^ia.Z^::w
uyS$e,.-,2a, 11,-5pi'ie 'hei a°3gy?', Ivis, PaA.._so... has vvns,Stei bl.^ to di5^c'u,^^ C'oLfI°'moo?'n
Summa y^ amd Ogy^.",9a<3`t)-i: &mmaw... "?a JI-I'a?''.: o; a hJ' 1^ .'.'2%^'g4r^ '`.^`r1ts.. $.t z 4'1^ H ,,/."f +f h ;- by DP.'icpjptGoY2a vt+Ns
m&nmd to Summit Behavioral >'^^e.. _Va•„a'^, _^., a,, 20 r4l"`^+"y c _ .aa C'ej:.^s ;.BG%. "un,
Regarding her ".^'S.is%o:iya M "'s.. F'-^f ,ri,afirl ti.^*,J s..4,,,, she wz:, ^'.â '.'',^ - ,a3'"`-'«' ^ . ^,f'e,^7 up' .^„
^ z z `^^, ^ ^w, as. er West
ca'=`'^^. l4''r^'r m .. `r'^' p^Gr.,,^x^a^:rr ¢^ :^f_1^3.:^,..^^' ^ "^ n^' c.t`(>f, ^? a ^.^, i' '`'f ,^r^^.^ .?t i^ls. ^,^« ^I^'^^a^' .o „ ^^,^x .^^x ,^ ^ ._ ^_. ^= ^yJ^... F%t+... her1
^r`'io4„be' ^,'tslho Pvs;J'"%^."^,;"% is..is¢f':,'Ar^ Gw child rt, •ya "..n: s.. "^ .^'..^. . , ,+.7''fi,.^.' y^ " .' 'I^^' :: .- ..,,.^^_.,^..., ^1-att h(,'s'
fau2^,-r could be physi.calily +`"7.F a .;^ , ' ^ 1-s,f .„Ger ^` v^ ta n^;- ^^`:, ^ J% ( rC.t.k .. -^.a°^ v . ^..3^ ^^F
i'q^I;^a^.,s'^.^`^1a /v.
^l.= a ,+ S.^.L1,a
laoweveh, t.".°.Wt s.^'f^a° sxks.+".'ae5 shL had spe f r , a, ; wh- vY? u g h;).^ses and dogs.
•Roga.'',A^ing her ed..xed^.^iny ^4I.t'7 ^em^`.ik,1=.J..s n ^^.}^^i`l:^.3>;d ,.t ,^:.-.- . fs..7.:!"J. litg-h s':r:v01 i1i. ."ai7l^97.v, _
She 'ii'ta^ra'f^`.aia^,'^.^ diligently 3.t^2 s.m"i^A1,f,.". ^`.L.v :,., ^^.y '^ .,"^ ^^^:3- .tr'^5.1,'S g' ._ 16 ^4 s:.i.^.^"v ^-p ^ e.c:Sd
^T"sr 3 iJ.,, e^^ / ab^^ to&V
pardcPp3le itt a"3.ig.abe7°k+em«E'+wb.o.$i, e'.n'('S.?'e.°<,i..i:^^ an amoyna°s',' ..ss dek^r^'w: 's') M; ^.'.^u'^".... T-^e d '^f `y" ^ .„7 -:r ::a'A^S.ds,.....''^r
f'epir3^,{a that Sh° has b'vors ^--d in yzaiSm.Wsmeaz w:xd as an, NTI, 1 il. j F . also '^orted that^(-2(+^ pd . Y T
^.7'4^W kI'^/h^.ASV ^OJ.L^ 11^9fYL1 ..i^'./Sl^?u1^'iJ..v°µ1V^ ^yV^=. iY.c4'^f. yfi/w.:. ?...L..r^^x^2:J^^4.n Y'^/1^41'-Li'`:^.^. LY:^ ^^Nt^ .^;/+ " r,c-•.Al Ff.\i`^yjAe).Ai.J^^ ^^Jh^
ada:'7E. of ^,•i? 13cSkprou.ut%o^,U; tvbri''J ^'^hAx.dtL^f: .Ah. ..^v .,2^?^!i EJ'.d's..^.^^^`^, ^. tx+ A; :p y"xa,.?"^s, ti .d^ ^cbffldz^n vdht3 e3,h^:' currently :^^^^vn;•^^-', '^'A^.s^. ^^',^.. .^c`#..ll.a,.:, AS. Hwi 's,.sin. vc:, r.-. J..^r ^h^,- has lYeen.
ii:.vt's..Ay7ed vv@th vhF local el2:%drtn f t'`9,a',,u` z°^.o:i'1.&, , ,e'f ..s.h,` -rs ^.. .- te
concerns ° ^ aE:-^($'v C (^/.c^n,^1?sei ;ys L`^'ia:^`^^.r°, Js, _. „ .^.e .. :♦c^i^ 3 .: 1^: .<^ yK: r. tmia5 s.^^%{ls ^Y k ^
, y,^^,,. .ttiL'•^_Ai°dc'".t'Sd _°..., .^.°°7 ,.^C^y'a^'._Tr?^ea 3, 2014, and sho i^"'w':°.F i^. to f 5^"'J:C ux ^.,..l:^v w^.:y.i^i^ir^.,._ , , ^
iv-fs. Harrison's :o-u.isi: of i , '.a^.^,.> ?Lr r', "^t^x3 , --) c^ft
a'a,Nve in^uM3: jl%nwwJ: Conc«Nrdh;: tsas w be'z .-:i: i..sups° n i'''^ ^.^ t
.'r:tK".^i2t to '':'I,' t .." ch, she :i$7.e,,,I1 her acco.'".t_,l',.:. h .,.w..s.ts. r".^a,y
emd, t3-o r>Cher psyohotropic
In response to the S':cfbisa.^ questh;w, this evai'.aa>=^^ fo;...',°td `hw"
c^'^aaA^e o^.^rmzl^ly le'`I^,-Ied ^.taia?.^t .ai":z', r^s+.^ ir., ^she :^.s ^ ^'rr^. :: -}& '°^.^^C'r^^ n ,:^^ D?' ^as^' ¢^ ,^ as^ a`3 s,. r^ ^r of ^^°^a^^^xe^.a^^.^e:^, S^-:e is ab^e t^:E u^i.r^'s2.u':^ ,^2^` "7.,_ ,^s^^^^i (`"y ?I.i^..,a` ^ v . ^- " + ^^ 1 .^^f,^ ! ,
^r tih,,^' z , ^ .a ^ ra.,._^ e»'^ua;i^ ^. r.2 r ^% atr
°- k7ry^y bt- k^ ^ ,^^ ^, }" ^ z .t s.i..ty^t3- .,^ ^n..
chooses to do so. AN Ela::.,v^.an is ,,.v'wxe of dm hnk,. of va. ^^. ^ ,^°'^, ° a.s ^^$a includingAtiea t.^3 ..a^ .,3^u^.,^" ^^u ^3°^< v
th;, aS,E-v^.-?'saCZ2l nature of si As. H".r Ji:$osr. c; <s ^3 ?, G va;.-AM p^.':i'?%''?mi4
-mows :s"^')garry^rizg the %l;a%gv: M:.1s°: She is ? ;:.`_? 4+,.s;..if ..cb4,sarlly au'.-?d p ' e3 S' eA
bS7hnwssts'..^'i. The defePkdar i:3 s'l.hi+. ^:. :vonk ir', :. an G,.c "''wy 'x ^d ^ -t, 3d3 ws . ,. N ,., She 1 i able r• to
'^a'Fkdfus¢axDC .' ins$f"^+.G%iC:a^'Ati and eV t saxom^^^b D a ,c^:. ;:`^^M,. ^.^,a. v.z, ^• d'.y'^^^r; ^,^„' ei^ ;-' ;.'^^;33: is d:lGtz'd':;:,., _Qf a :^ii1,..,.:`bi'^^,^
outc,o32dG, e^1'^S:ad .9'hc knows t,.? 7ehowe ti'',..t.iprop.i°v, lt? s_ o7t%t iE A i . ^ S^3 a"n"C.'t+^' SF'a^'rx . . ;^ ^a'° $,^^.^ ^
stx ^^s,-Df a trial or hea1'3'3.g,
F
Based 'opo33 ttd^; :.i2Fui'3:.ga=;io", ^t^ ^^ ^F; , ss:. ^ s C;2 .;w.E :}b.,(^s.^ E ^..,^.?_aâ . ^.'4 ^^,.f^:^ ^^v w., ° ^^ f ^
with ry, rF:aS^.'A12bRe d^gf e^ ,3'- p^iy^`^2?l^?g;.^.';, ae r a?.t;^;'^;
11-10_'14 12^37 FROh;- ,-ii^ ^0008;`0008 F-753
a personality style ^tr^t3.^t tyJ a , ..,a.:,ennrl by _,na .ct? ..a, and
2. Ms. Harrison is ti1.ot in'ildA^ mentally s:^fo;csed;
3.. Mi:- x'^"larr9.G'.8: I' f'air"'s^.''inT5y ..u ^Y:'`°ab'x^.'. of a..,.C,,Asz ,j },.,:^.v .r firae-
" ..^. + sC '^.. ti.
,ai ^3.^,.z:.. :' Js
4.,t^i'; ^^^r..'^,i.^i^%e o+.
[?
.^
p.^^^ei^dzn,g3 against her;4. Ms. HaaF"s5f3TZ is ^^urr,^Tltiy Yc,; afrx" of ^..vu..:^^'in,^ .^i ^..> ^:,.. ^ ^ ..e.^ ^n f^F4"k^cs^1ofs^•r=^ to^ ,' ^.u! x. 4 ^ ss ^ ^5 o
do so as w1his is ^.and^r hek ^^^^ i tr ^;4.^ ° z^a ,. , vs an.' , :3.ot al 'Pna.ss;andY -
^. ^-u^. ^".yk^;^ad'x.a i raiY'e^^iy` ^.osvTi^':P^. ^.,;'`T `v syal:(, tr,,.a^,
C ^^,^^^s L^C, E^ %^^y^,hoxog;wt
^
ti7 ^
,i
J. ALLEN ^^^^^^^ATTOR^^^ AT LAW
7821 NORTH ^^^^^ DRIVEDA^ON, OHIO 45414e4694
-----------------
(937) 278-0652
November 25, 2014
Ms,Saa^antha Harrison
?n re: State vs. Harrison
DearMse Harrison:
As you know, e have been appoan'ced as your ^^^rth. a1b.^^^ey^n theabav€^: matter. 9 would be happy tomeet with you -to discuss facts and strategies for defending you ^ r, ffio5 matter, :f you wis€ caIl andschedule an appointment to mee witVi me at my office.
Thank you for your cooperation in this ^auer,
Sincerely,
;^^ .^` `F » ^i.i , 3fd ^ ''^ i ^.
J^All^n WilmesAttorney at Law
^^:
7821 a ^,, °t^:^'^ Jr _^ T ^' r'a`j° ^^^+^ i^I v
r r-qOJ^"^
;a -^ OH ^5^^ ^
yt.4-
c%^ ^ ,^ ^^^^
---------------
^ ^^^^^ 2`e 8-065^-^.-^.
Ms. Samantha Harrison^O Box 13Brookeaille, OH 45309
i%. a"b^ State Illss,rn:on
Casp No. 2u 1 4m CR- ° v 8
D+^.^'ar Ms. Harri.c)on.
w ,. ud ^. +. '.3^6 ^i ca.s'1ixoti s"G3^'^.^^.,' your ^'vy^.e^" ^lq^,.`^`"^,'s.*. (in '13^^ .:s, F:va<),`^:s i n:-r. aV3x.,ssr y'?^. rPGa^;:4Zt^' ;^;^k: ^ as I have
not heard ^xu;rE.^s yoa.'t sEkflce the 112;ut- OU^_e
Enclosed please fin^. copies oi ^°^^ zi ^k i1cx k,^ :.iw^^'^'1.. ^% :n(...«: mo'¢.xon in i1imine),
;3^' `+ihâc:^. I have filed on ^'4^dA., ' case. I °^^/o.^f ^. ;.:.k^' x,^^? discuss t^.t^^. - cl'?^M^'^'xr . s as f Ve;.l as strategies
of d^,'Zeiise with you at your earliest s tjx?>1'eEii?:'cce.
11y^,^anPhg^i
, attentionyou ^'..^`3./^^^
^(^
^":JA% L.i`., matter.
n .
t3 micerP jy.,
AtE o'V.''i ,, u' -v at %1av !
^
^..
^^,,,..^.•--...._a
^t EAS
07, 20 15 Z29:28 Prvl _,R 00138 D^ac^cei.D: 19%12796
'.: ^ 7ti0R 'v` A .. , , i
_ Lts.^ ^F C^^ ^'a .'.^ N3ONTGOMER .' COUNTY OHIO
V^I THE ^;OT^i^;^I^^I PLEAS COURT ;:°;^R 'a/Oi^ :i^f^^ai,.; ay s '0.II^• T. ° 0^^^CR0lE$NA.'1 IIDWrr',S' O;^'
STATE OF OHIO Case No. '4CR:38
P ;aflntlff
vs.SAiVIANTFIA HAR?a.^SON,
^ ^FE'T-^^AN-,"S MOTf^N FOR^i.'AI JJ^ Pf\
F-.f
^^^^^ ^aii,
C'cfdli::v.+s Li(`1JNY Defendant, by and L^9AY,:u.,^^ y5^: /.l'+,Connby f(u) of
ch^ Ohio Rules of Criminal Prooz^dur;s Fa..O rn^ ve`^ t-hiis ^ . a B';.3 o< _ -.3 _i^^laa"s
stat3rg, specifically, alA ^eta?ls ; lens^nts, facts aD^ ^^^^ ^^ .s .9c i .: s ,^,st°A
^.^,,
_ •^F. .s :.^ .^. Cs.f^zase ^..?;
TF`"s.eft (F5) for reaSoiis contained in t:s,^' MFt?"oia3.dunn aiian. a,'. ha,°_'efl'x3_
M ,^'d O5^af^ N D'w l^ . S U POa^a 'F ^Qe ^^
Ohio Rude of C;i3mna^ Procedure 't ti ; s^^^^s'"When ihe DqfCre/,...fXYFl m/„y'.,f£'^ !x'3vo"WFr?'"iquGs,i , . ^^'E jz d`T^?.3!e{3°^^^^% ^./^J. f eP'
arraignment 'Out not later ^f'i.aYs a;ef<T/°v or Ufp r,,`.`,3.?ur .n"?e pYo3eE'?tli31g
aet®1^d'6,^;31 ,3h(ll£ ^^',€3^FZ[Se^.`?B^ee t^^^A^2s'^C^^3'Yco.` 34'^R^ ^Z .e'^^I ?r ' ^i .p P' ^C/11'1% the
nature of the offense. 4 .:^Te'.?` i0 svcih,
conditions as 7fst1ce P'eouZY2s.
lp accordance wit^ Ruqe '% (E) and the due process ^.i^.,wye c? ^.;. - S. ^C^sf;fiLMtion(6th and 14th Amendments), ^^Defendant ^.".^-vs this Cs4f .urt to o'^'.c tir: a.s and, ^^ > r`"" ^,,.^'^ d 2^3^ata ^ ' 'xa^°xtj1 ta' ^ 2aa.F^i ^.F'i t:^.b ° ^.;i..s,.$r..A^..w <"^. vtJ,s^•` 2s3^ . ^..p^..^ °s ?^^^ with ;^^._^ ^..'^'.r^`3a. 5. :^^>;^ :.M. ^ ^^' , ^a^^b .^ •^; ^.s ^.;"sc exact
location which consfitute'^^e above 361 which :..x; ..- :^d:n* c. ^4^.:7 ^.- d a.3r ,^• , n . s aJy£tl p1,4i6.i..
Defendant seeks ali detazis as to t..u :;pi;,Ai?s, acts :o: W?;:' J® S;la is charged Wtth t3"3e
al:^^^^ offense.r
R e a^+.o^E "v Sub F'nF ^c j,
/Sf J ALLEN WI LMES.
A iSen ;^Ifa s a{° s' ° n.t^i . ^.'.^,^:± it^a,^i^ $ ^, J'
A r.!-;-Q'Scn.i%'i,.
782R :`4 ^-Jh D:oveD'2G.yton,, Ohio 454 , %k°4 f,97'-u
' 937J 27 8-0652
CE" 11° ^^^ TSE OF S^, RVI'`±.I here?Jv der",".fj a cort?v on ah° z:?^e4g ;:a^ fi?aS ^.:^^,w°r '^xi
^Ptosecuto8, by de1t.areringa copy to rt.^^ ^^ ^^ s a.:4 e ate Jz ^ :.n.i r W 1 iV 's_, ^s.
,. , ^'>, ^ P.^^.r. ^^f^"/^ 1.^^e' ds :=Y C1^+ni' ^ 2 'i:t''^;
.w._^--.. - ......_.-- ..._ ^..,""^. ,...- ---
..A_ ^ ^ ^ .....^.
`.n-^,o...^^ £^1L/
^a^
U
f^.^... . rv''^^:+3'•ssr.;.^ia.i_e..'. ^': ^^5
snsas",1^ ?r'
^.e 1:- A^oz;,
i .,.E... :+5-UM B ."^, .ni'f, : s.^;. ¢i0,138" ^i; " '" 3 •o.;.X,^ ^%+C'( A Syt:: .
1 r "K •^)r.: A ..^..^C:, a ^'ifw.,te•'.a^^ t4'! a,..ce' :'^e^ ^<.^:^`^'
I^,T THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONr^ ^^^^RY COLTIN-STY, OHIOCRIMINAL DIVISION
STATE OF OH10A
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2014 CR 138
JUDGE MAR)' La WISEMAN
VSn
S,A.iMANTHA HARRISON, BILL OF PARTICULARS
Defendant
The State of Ohio, by and lhroi=g^ };3^p^ office of the! Prase-l-Lzsina Att4,-cafey for Tv'jontgornery
County, hereby responds, purtiup-nt to Criiyi. R. r(E)of the OhA;o Ra,sae5 of 0ii-ninaa Procedure and
to the Defendant's request for a Bill of Pa^^^cu^ars, ^^ also-; Dsscov'erv ^r.cabeti^ and additional
discovery provided to Defendant detaalia^g dz^ oft ;;-n:;g^(u ).
The Defendant has requested a BiI? of Particulars pursuanit to x,'rifins'na^ Rule 7(E).
Cnminal Rule i(E) states ix^^ pP^irjen^ ^art:
shall &,..fiaAsl9 i.Ed:e
dvfe.nd`...&. °.^i?.Ei. a bil-f of^^.^^."",kticu1axs sE'tiffi"l-1'19 3lp '?'Y^u.,e,.;tiic:dlly
0.^0.Jp ^^¢5,l.d ^^a^i 4l,r,y>
A^i ^,4^i+^ ^^
/a^
'-h 6J
+. 4F1the of reir^.^.T^W "u1k^,
^+ ^A1 t.i:.`,"s
,o^
ci]
y
5.1d^'J.S.a' +J'f
the defendant alleged to ;.-^^ ^^^.:^ye ?:i-ie o^.^ense,(Emphas is A^^edj
The State, however is not requifed^o J(a.s:;(ose in a bA^l of particulars its ;vidence
supporting an element of the ^^^ens=u, Stayce v Sd3r:enchlk, ;1997; ^^^ OhJ;o App.3d 30,
36.
The State would assert that tlEe ind°,dtni°nt ki?. this w s€ fls sufficient to coi V y the
natuxe of the charges pending agafi,isG the Der.mdxnt.. Moreuv,,r., tih.e State ;.r^ ^^^^ case has
.^._.^
>\iC,
^ -Fi.' i'F^i^^^ .`r,^ L^ ^asr^. ^ ^! k1;^^^^ u^
^ - . > R '" .g ^ ^; ` r AI. - ^"f;`? ..+ ^c - + > _ '
7821
^ .. q-^,^ ^ •-•.-^. 7 .^.'^ ^,of,. ^ -,-vS^! ,^% f V.. i_ ^ r'{ /-'
.^..!°iE y, ., P^;^ T ^ ,/ .
J^P: ^^^0 i i
S• .i^_ 4,,,i^ .A ^ ^^^ m }i 0 S'^e.5`^'i^e .`s^'0 1,H]
^,i^'!^^ 2784,511552
February 23, 2015
SAi^'AAi! ^^ ir?L^`n d''i`3_i``+Tti
75(l) WOODS DR^W E ,a ^1AIM$ T 0 N C) <-r 4-53' 83
_ Harrison^r ^x^S d^i. a3 4.4'1.a.^ ^.^..
^^^^' / ry Rw ^ ^
Dear Sar4^.ant.ha,
P
^'.^i^'fosed a.^ N•^:i e,;`±% 1"_F.,y b f% _^P^ ^^'^.awe. As
you c^.?a ."^,^e, +.^?^s is .^^.'^^ ^"^5.^,'^.s `^?, .°% `r^a^'n- , ^ .^_:,n+.^ ^,,'° ^ s ^.-^;a" `''^° 'i ^^..i,ri ^'" are ^^3cZ^E Si. n^. ..^ .. ...4, I^. 4 . ^o,..,'...^ ^.n^^^ ^
ySJ•eA'A-^
Y5CGL/+3Q,i+^,
l of ^,'^f,^/f
a1KJE. 1 6, 2 iy14 S.Lr^9e
4^..1.^tl^
: . ,^i^z ,
As d i ^a^6 n have1 V _1d U.'',; ^l !^ f.^..x. a f. ,na ...:rk^^^ence set ' 'r March 5^ 20,14 at
4 00d^,"'m, It waSi:.ld b':, adv..sabsc _6 r yo.n. s:. ^ ^tx: a F: o •e_ . . ^A9 to ,n.. ;^:t with
-.m.° a3?d to ^r"^^cu,^s defenses and 'L"a.al SE,<ate ^e.^°Fa ; as sat'^:? 'ti: 11.aMi'^.^le.
j_ fya:.
at Law
T .k
% '^-.^ .^ ^°i7 . -,}'1
1'F^ _:^. ^ ^ _ ; .:v1 ^r'a u' f
7821 IT-ti DIXIE DR
D1°L. C b^`''^^, g ^'^ .^3 . ;.Z fe,l^g ^r1 dk d'^` ^'^^`:^^+^^ .^.^ .,^ ad ^ "-2
.^93 `'^ ^
.fr!
^r,^^ Ra^'^^ ?
^ ,
J%az'^h 4.: ^...)
SAMANT".-' .tA HARR ; S Oi,j >^ OHNS.75 (:.)"WOODS DRIVEWEST ^^IL5'ON, 011 45383
i:'_ rea
' , ai e t ` "T v Q . 14- CR° 1 3 8
^^ai- Samantha:
k^+J^ s ing final ly nn ^a^^ 73 el, wF7^' c^ wZ^'es -yA ,.^.', av ^r ^a; ? % s'j 'r' v^.^^^ ^::aa•rr jIG.>> r ^"v ^ .. ?x prosecution of%
your dufeiise 9 1 h^a.v^ ^orne concerns ^.,. C'iou.: . l 5Y ..^,r, and the Yaj r .,,U,=^o n «. se.: F , -- ^ your , ;^r' u ^.k..a_ f .,, f. i s,a+1eno
p.^6?^til^:^f making TMs2ot'^^.?^.;.s to t^e ^,o^. '^ .^^:^':^.>s ; .:.:.t ._? ; %^^ a ?aj ^y% ^sii db ^^^i
ind:ctz'"2ent affte?' the grand iury v< t.,,d a:"3,' PJ ^^ basi, s , ; ," 17011j,. :. ., s;,.b on withr%t^ ai. ^g^a'-^ rthe ag^,.
i^& e^k' bill of particulars. Ht^vlP;i"'er, as I advised -,.s u, ^ arn, a ' C Q - vti. „ a s` "^ ^`'kaa.^«._ ^b^S ^6^,.
success on those motions.
YC)^,+T do have a right to remain s3ient but st '."'^.a.y be a ch^,°;.re ts? be =n.ade alltex 'yoas hear
What the Sta,^e witnesses l°Aa:Ie to say a-bou; you al'idi whet:l-e:- you ha^^ a response --- especiallysince you have no cr;nnana' ;^^oru,
My b^.^°^^',^'ii concern s'.^'i the ai^^'°+ of Yl:l"«a'4.^.''ss^-:? you ^,^'^v.:. i^.^,n.i..a. at`°'^_a^.. ^' F ,F„ /^ ^ , t^^1 a^, e., ..,. ^F ,. + v s " r^^^^ ^^^^ h t
.
^n ^o r ;a c x„o ^^ v F' ^^ ^ Mti^
,.._ _^ ^V^ ` ^._ '^'^IZ i Y e.. £ / t` ...v': @^.^;i.. to " v ^¢
.,...,. a v S: ^^: 3: ^ a S z" rauf..^ ^u c ^tiv
bacs{a reS. FurAteY, calling m u?t3pic doc;.ozs to _e,,^^if^ to 'hs :gs you!s%4ia r s.d `i?eis about Rr ho^de^ ^.^? "^,,,AS..^. ^. J' !n 4.a :F*i{° ^l ^s ^^i"^S you rsa^; ar.'^ C.^' and j ^,s^ in^.''^^:ssi .^;.y a . z.^so ^ith<^_ ^.iv 7°es ;eU^^,>^, ; '^p ro^essio:^a:
services and schedules. %"r^3^.i;''', `iz7;; :ii2.^'a ^Io f1{ ;eR? hard ^,.f .ze'_c^S°a:e ?^^e y^.^s::"ges 4:^^^inst you so as to^
keep out P^a,n^^ of your -hYs"or;f v"',th c,..flldre;^^^ ^^i-vycy3 of your _,o4ata^^^^ ^ffraudraising charitable monies. Ivkeda.caF vAit,:.essPJ mr..y ,°;en doors .oJ JHow r. :.^ay is.,=;:e;'> 1'r-
Likew8se, I strongly you ;o; .ry.xz,g to '.?o'si% _i county d eputxeS to show your
huSband'S absence 'a^^ ^^frou^^^^^ousia; ^^po3 6i-2g :.%pm to the _.;. . visioz: s.^.w^o.ls foi ^el-I p:ay and
J. ALLEN WILMESATTORNEVAT LAMi'
7821 NORTH DIXIE DRIVE. ^^ ^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ 45414
(937) ^^^^^^^^
^^^c-b: 4, 2 0 15
SAMANTHA HA I SO^T ^ OHNIS'75 (I) WOODS DRIVEWEST MILTON, OH ^^ ^^^
In re: State vs. 1-larrison
CaseNo.. A ^-CRm 138
Dear Ms. Johns:
E-ncls^^^^ please find the list oI°px^^ecutorial witnesses -,xhicch. you ::`ace next week. Itis my understanding what the State will introduce statements fh,3t aroF,s. ^i.ave signed ;'.a^^^^^ noinccsme. Then, they will produce proof $hat Marty, Strzri^^^^^ow3s was deposite: directly_^^^^ your account. `I'I-^ey may also i.ntrod-:a.ce y0a:^^ credit caxd' records to show that you were^^^endsng money I'rora soriie scsurce^
Since you declan-e to testify, after the Cou^'a, ove^^^^^ zqfl of my motions to excludeevidence, I do ii®t see any reb-attal or response to the Stage'^ ch.a;-ges. I-^convxyted, you may iaotreceive prisor, b^^^ would receive a felony on ;^^ij-r record ^.^d have ^^ sulbn`air t^ the nales ofprobation.
Even now, the prosecutor and the Court ,vould consider you eligible for (ILC)Intervention I.n Lieu OI'^^nvaction (and Canyel the t^. °ial) if you ad,..-nat to :ailalbg ro report income.II'^ou are willing to do this ^-nd ^e assessed for possible treaf^^.eriM a^^ therapy you may o^^taii, adismissal of your case and iio crArninal record in this nnatten°
Ir- my opinion, the option ddswrgresq^oux serious consideration sinceih: evidence againstyou appears strong and yo-ar position t^izat za:j.^s evidence °'v3ol^. ^;es ; o';^x Coffss.at 1?onal rights" and
^-nust be suppressed or excluded is uzi^^elv To be s usEa=sned by tb.e Court.
S xrl 0 c re ty,
J. A^^^n WilmesA.q,- on4 o v a t a.,cw
-^-^---^-^.-
^ a ^ _ ^.-^
^ ^fl`^ ^'
2\ C
:`" P^...Se.`'-.. 7 R ..iK . -d.,Y F' "
^O IIRT C - D:'; -^.AS
3 s :^^a 3t ." 24:04 P11038 Doeke#:D; 19861617
a , 0 r :: MONTGOMERY COUNi4° OFM
S^^ THE COMMON PLEAS^`afa, iaOy ^^ ^" OF C1q3 d,C^"^'^a.. ' g ';^ e''+.,dsu '^)°....il',..1&.9 a s t.,a < L. . ^e.e L . p"s,dt
c R, E %0 2 f°•,^.A%n S..d 7 V t+.'°. 1 0 ^ 'v°.
STATE OF OH9C)
P4aint6ff,
-v_q.,
SAMAa^ ^ ^^^ ^ARRa^ON
d^^^ndant.
^^^ ^x^ r+.^CA^^ s^'+. '.,°, 2014 R 138
^ ^ 4 m^`°
a ^° :.^ G E s.'E s^^;` E J. LA '^ s:.;^^^
STATE C` '.,^^QP^w:
VVRiTTE ",°.T
Comes no^a the SLate of0,.^;^. ery :^ounty Ohio,and ^^re'^^^^^ ^^rn9shesa ;€st of va?it^"?esx ,. . . ^ . . <. ;^ .a . . a: am^nded.
KEEPER OF RECO;'aEDS, sV'90.'*. ;?0r,4E.R•"r.• AND FMkLy
P..^^.E R V iC E: S; 111 " S. E ? . 1 .°^ °: C. M+,.1Ss,:..S B, L V,..y. D, A Y , 4s^N, `>.^..^4"F!0, 45 4 2 2
2.
3.
4.
5.
^.
7.
a.
9.
I&
^ey /
;"e. .HEg. F
,fl^-. ^-^; -^, ^^ e,^
44.^^^
r.^_".+...^.^°+
tl'^^ ^"^..,k{'ye"^. s...,a^(?i.%`:St..; ^"r^";'9t3`^:^^'iF ' ^3^r^°3«1E^,
1111 S. EDW;N C. i=K . -S ^LVD. D'AY9 ON. OH ^1 0 45422
lA.-.^^ EPC,...a-^ p°-c r^^ {°^^^ ^ '^°"' ^i .^^^^^ b,,'^^'s ^:? !^ +.r " q:t-a: fP1^ ? °_,. +J1r
@'+,r„;,C^1y;?t ^ ^+, '^^ ^°•„ ^, ,^
^y a. OF R ECO RDS, s.^^ ,^ , • ^,.lk' . . .a°;r.J ".`^rp v;r
^,"`'fc^^ty^i ! 0.i''7'^` ST,
:^^^^A^^^^OIUS" iN 462-35
KEEPER OF P"*.^'^=^°`"^`^^€'^4Jr.Ja.aR...rS. Q,e LC"s-'^' "^^^^WKe sp'^^a.,^u' 'i ^"` P w,.^-..
i.. .., ..^ ^ ` , 21 774> L a+. "^ .'' 4 i°3:,b..^3^ W .
HOLTS EAST RD GENOA; '0^'H;O 43430
MI/'°cR fY Sc RiN+;"'ELL°..F^''i`e"rV, 5i^,' ;+ALE., ^R.. S^'^6.)O4'^aV,._LE, 451309
ROBYN C ^P`R4B "•:Aa iC^^^, '^^`,' 5 ,^.: . L"', , .R.,,ir-i w., T, ^'t.^.y..^e.. SFOOSra; ,.^e ^e3' 45305
Ti'^E3a.ip°y. iy", :'R.R°'!=..^i'„ ^A G Si ^ ^2A ^^ pe'^^^'`r.sr.^?^Ta^'a^.9f^^itt..^..±F ^^ ^^ ^, ^^. ^ ^^ , . ;."u^'... ^e^..^ tl I ^^^y„,^^^^v d ^^^^ ^ s s'y`^^ xw*+d'^./^^AI,; 5^ '1i, '+, °' + ^^B ' E^.a6^.;
345 VV 2r<a --T. DA,'TON, OHxO 454,22
DEPUTY ^AFM, MON^ ^i'vIERa`CO^.^N?"`^ SH^,.^FR?FF"S OFF<C-E, 2""' ST.DAYTON, OHM 45422
DEPUTY ROD R-ROWN, : ; "a SH6^'...r...F F', 'S OFFiCE, 345 W
^^^ ST. DA`Y"'ON, OH'^O 45422
DEP;R;T`f M. W'.7 IAIMS3_^ 45vv2 ND ST. DAYTOi'a, OH'^^^ 45422
tl 1 Y.... G'^-.,:,^,.'0°° P` EAS
2015 3:3 ?e27 PM
J 'a MONTGOMERY COUNTY Cj€-^
1 N TT".iE C-0 Rv9.Mm>'' ?. ^A^v .^?: T Lt . ^ P f K ^_ 0::1 T't , 01-d^^^d 9
CR;. !?r`;. a N^`; L D.kV I:^ ^ ON
^^
f: $
^
^
^
0
M
STATE OF OHIO,
-vs-
SAMANTHA ^ARRiSO1'.,
; A S ti, i i 0.. l 0`1 4 R 0 E : 3 S
',f Ar.Y ::_`'+;EP,4AN
Ai
^^_^ . . 3 IAa
^ j ''4ii .s,f^ P^,°,_ ^ F. .!-d^ 4^
... , . . - J r ^RULING IN PART
'{AF G%X17"^ Of.^ON IN LI?kIINE
Th-C.,' C43LflT-i grants Dw'fe%3da-:?t'5 a'ry0603"3 +"4 .,T'"i.Fi'?e as is, ,Ja:4'Z•.<i'3s vo ',^e ey:isoP that Defendant lost
^m'::i'p34°,M2P'.y or peit?anent c'e.i: `;?d.f of her dh=^die,"s e^:3a3ms. i.31' ?:lY.,ot3yPoa9:i 3f cg:Ylds"e^ being harT3,_a. e^''. by
medical abuse or MuZ3a;a2haEx6^m's by pi•:)xy; a'2G, i."E ; use r vr ^ c1 '^ or firauduIe;ti claims in 1id ;dfu'.,SiiA6.
f.ri/ financial d^.'^ a or informa!?o9i, x't)vweetei iVfl: `3G: a>',^ : _:ile.
' 0 0 `''.^+5"_r'E ^'wE D:
'.JDG;`, t'?laAR ": WISEMAN
This c^^current is electro,,n;.svalny ;. Iex^ blv 9 s.ng te ^^edk :;' coe F Fgie:g system. Thesv^^^m, wii^ a record .^."i.^^P filing the e- F'GS^^ r^. c .;te,. i ^.z^-..^<^,t f c:^^ ,. ' ^post ^, °^^. a^^ . k^?^'^:n tai e,
„. the iolk'v'wing
case Dart^^^^ants:
WARD BARb.^^' Nh INE,.'tbAIRINIA K^.^i^^STYSHTE a%SK"^7ASSeSTANk PROU:ECUx'IN^^ AT':,r,sR.N^'Yyi937)-225-575 7A.ttornQys for Plaintiff
J ALLEN WILMESATTON (^E Y AT LAWW(937)-278-0652Attorney fi3i Defendant, 9am?i's:sth2. l- F^%.3 i ESvrY
?'AND; L''i.ANK^ EF Ba.iiaz-f(937),
i
-^ i -,--,X IiII3r
^ ^J
N st:- l^,E D•^;`.PLEA$
2015 3;31:04 PiVI3^.` CR 00,:38 ^^^^^t 0; 19
.^ ..- . 9 'Me .... . ,. -
^.Z, K ¢.sF ^.::0 ;,^ ;'el ON IF %G ONE F?°r C 0 U iN c't'
1N A Hi: "i_.(-)Ii^lalaJeO!^ O'." MCON7 0:il'vh^,^:^"t^a r.' C'a^.-^UN^ ^ ., Oi 4lc_^i'
+ RUV^91wiAL 0 V .^^Ji
^
^
yrl
E; ;5
^
a^+
^
^
^i
STATE OF OHIO,
F'fai nt ."^
mvsr
S^.^+IANTHA HARRISON,
`t.^c Ap td, a iit.
C A SE '' t'r"., 2v?4 C ^<' '^rOi3 is
.I '.J DG L jY S /- RY YW "+.r.7 E i S1A I''ii
N,rp^ ;^r , a^' REa COUR$.'ROOi^^ v A OF` Sn,RVe CE DOG AND
u; U ,i''ATk 9+JE ACCOMMODATIONS
TiC' trial of 'L1C:1s ?x:de,V..;,'.° .,ay^` o.a. c3. i':e:i3t i,Q. ScE. S.'a3x 6, :T; +8 /,^x 5. D:,'1`^l.Y''a^;..te? appears e:n court
?AJi:h a :. °'nISce ^ i"o&
The presence v f ds^'ie Ps";diwi'^ ^ '.^i'?t3 ^E,e.: c ZA^. T Sl } ` + s ^3 y to the3 ^ ^ . «... .. i:k4.iC 'i^^rt.+..I^.. a ^J .^G4.La^ai Sk^S..leY^..^ii^'^^^.^'E ^L!fair
znd orderly adm?,snSti^acio-n. 1^0' 0r"c^, . ^ r ^ ^d ^ ` k^ F,x ^^ s, ." 3%1:. _,^ a. . .. ,_ ^l.i asvJ practices. 's^ , Siv ev e ?i
that the service daoye^'x[uS uu.i2 v;'"^:^,-.3.^,.r-..iu.. a_7^'t(.^s .. . r. t ° °v ^^^ y.^..?wF..6:.P, ^..c fi4+..ji9i'y, iSeco1:"3^.'S a
distraction °ii^v S^^ ^k`3..'â'aei2t^., to tE3e z%.xi 2^i"i?: o3v.A%'^^' ^:c'a,:.t;:"(iSti"A?i.^,e°' Zâ "p+."^iG*^, ^.?^i i"s,9;'^S°e,z9tS a 8dgf:>Licu:+
(aett'1 â'nenti ti 52i^rn.y and aei:urii,v, f.°3C; C;tii,.^' 'Js/iuj be id..i:iived i'ff;sa`mn the il;iarS.roor"i" OR.f<^'.i'4diI14^ canine
conduct includeM but ... -ov$ .:msfed, te, exC°6,.iSi`«Je '?o-Vern, ,. ^ "`s';' ei^;.. .I::..1.,^_ excessivey.>,.^..r. -t'^i S°.^:vn of
3it3iSe (inJhintI3' ^T^C3°^i'3 :<a ^ f^^.C",ik^,.;, i)a"3R 'lig, , iM ) Also, in ` v ' , t ^an +F^^; b' ^, ?.s`"^w , 3 ;=Y^ _ 6^: ^ cannot ^a^ seated .^^e tO
prospective ,tkrvi'Sbe..ng or at.e1;?rK to a' .^'of?,s, .wI.' z..,, .::o, ;/ ^"".• , t^,..ov. from.'.,:? ` IR t'f'te courtroom and- c
alternative accommodations Pa. ap1.c9-y'°','. !s: any $i:Chl. ax.:!f.?,_tivC; %:c, 1mi:iQd°c1t1s?S25 will be
provided to Defendant.
i'irst, Defendarx, mayv rRma r. ,^7 r r .:^i^ .,^"a. s.he dGg. b,%"st have ¢a.he Cio- present i t2 ohi
hallway or other p1.Pjii11:w: space :)_,,.s;.u.e of vva°` :,.76'^I'3?, °rSFj::dtid- 4.^ , v;/ ,y's responsible adult "r3.S to whom thF'
dog VV1z: o-buy b: hav3?orar cornr:;ards 'i a.3£'J,s a; : f^., pub.kc U3.;^r, Defie':d,.'?t 2?"1ay interact with the dog on
.>ch+°.C3IieeU'.'C9i'eaSKS a31d, request a.rzf2i;=`.1o:nai breaks <o- 32_r,;iG4ta.Y.<' .:,iJ's?.ad. '?d6a,h , sY%g. Second, Defendant may
5 `': 584 03 AtMsr C 4R 00138 Docket M. 19862322
^ ^^^^ TGv^z'EPY^OUN: `'` rjHiO'I N 4. 9F^ !^ C d"A^^'R`bL'^^,g^ y^ ^ ^ PL:sr"^' ' F^.s"^ac^^" ^'^ t r^^,'s^'As(a9?'",^T r1-1 .' f" r^y^.^^2^,.^ 3
5^•
STATE OF ^^^^
vs
SAMANTHA H.^^ RRMON
Nr'-_CER A', N, G. . ^ -, ^.^JJA^-^^g^^ g^^.3c"^''7.../&^.,.,., k` E
;:.;. T;. `^i^ U.
STATE OF OHIO, ^05JNTY OFTO T^^^ CLERK:
C AS;^ P 201^' CR 00138^^'u W- RY WISEMAN
^ ^^J F5 ^"^E N .^
The undersSgned. Prosecuting Aft°Jrnt:Sd^.^.) e38; iJe"c.-F of ; 5 of ^,^,^'^°^3, ^"'e:u%^i^ ^.;, ._ ^ `?^ sauc^^^e af the fo9lo4lf6CEs^Subpoena for the hered^. bedaw .^^^^d w^tnes5 4'-0 a z?a.^ea5 ;hi_ ;,^ua at the t^m: as set
Mlarty St€'&ng@e4iow CaiebX, B rookv.^^e;.'.rhso 45309,^^
You are required to be and appear tc^,o n ii Ae„ D'^^SV, tNl t`.rmc. Cv rZnnis.'iaE P$^^s Court, 4tl°d Hoa3',^+. gn.^ay rr,^a3,* eb'6. ^V19'6 x/r^i'nxy
r .#8 , &^'8
q^ ryv^ ^,^2,d^F! G
M
GA,9
{ y
^Y79
^
ERAyY1°al'p^
b°^"'^f G„7N`
( + p ^^ ^ ^
ET^N '^s' e^R1^2 '^ _^ 4; N!')r^,t^a ^^Yfi+. t i, i, 6 °i> £.5:.^ ; i i^ the 1^^^?^'4, u9^^oa^da^ f RFc^^^ ^ ^1^ a^ 9e00 A.M. 'tn te^t^;f a. : 'i^ ^ . ^ ^. ba "f ^f ^ : N^: y ^ ,^ (,r'aii r^`.^ i 4 the abave-en;^^^^^
^^^^^ and do not der,C3aEl from th^.' CGuE';' §A{;$'oF+, g'.^F.a'+le under P"ti.' ALTY OF i 41R'`r
Please call 937-225 -6757 ;30 a ' m. ^^ Q-cdaeduwed to appear; ^^ ^^^do not need to appear, a :-:,a41 so ^.^^%.^Psen '.,aye '.y M C 25-5757 be^sy- -er ^ ^^ ^.^,and 4.30 p.mn and ask for aha prwse;utos.
`
+3i:zi7o '
`^^ THE ^^^^^FF OF lRdION°^^ON, IER°^ ^OVINTY,You are coPnmc'1nded to su 'nmon ncr"'Ea a : ; . ^ set '^°ar"'2 abc';"e to be and appear before
1nis Court at fiho- t:me and place set forth above t; said rvitness:^^ ^ppp-^ , rto-ae,' said witness not depart saidCourt without Ieavb UNDER .^^NAL "( 01= ,'LA.a,/a.
WITNESS rnhand and the sea6 of t^ : sc^lC ^'£^i,i t at ' . ^ ^ ^ ,^".1 ^,sar."^k'.1^ r, 4 F6.^ 'c3,., 5 1'^'.4.» 20 1 5 .J . e11^t""'1"u, .IC$,.E,^+.) ..2:2l . ''.;re
; 5+,.3' ro',^'go {,aG f.., . . h C e S k
N'^t^^ r 0° ' ", ud ^oi ®.w';3' E ymo('0 P?ec3.s
KS 3;6/2G'5
5 9.57:05 ACR 00138 Docket ^^.^. 19862313
t"RE OP•.F;Xu^- JSi^0"^NTG0ME^,'Y 1--0UN7Y +0..a°H0
^^ THE COMMON PLEA,$ '`.^^^PT 0FfA0 g u g GOMIE ^ ' ^' ..^
STATE OF 0HIO
vs
SAMANTHA H^RRBON
T ,° .r^'^r*.d
VVIT;'^ YOU.
STATE OF OHI^^, COUN`^°' CaR ! ^° `TO Ta^^ CLERK:
^ 2 3 .. . 20,14CR00?38; y 9^^^^^^^AN'
^^'Uut&n
^ ^... . . ^^^ ^ ^g^BPC^ENA
The ^ndersigned, Prosecuting A.so,ney's} or, behaff uf the St.^'e of O'hio, , e,ebU rec"J-'s.:: the issuance of the followingSubpoena foethe hermEr, below ra, t ied witness appear in nis Court at the time azz^ ;e^ ^amh:
^^y
^,mn^r RecoC"ds; ^^i ^r: .^d.. ^ . . . .^ iAir <d. . ^.w ^a E4, .,1^' lu .', y p7 e, Ct C'Ey ^ v d 4L
^'iPv^iiraFaV'6.UE^ i St., ^ Y5r ^':?V`^P, .r%^ea iQ,r. IP"i^•^'M, ^,.^'2„^ ,;:.^e°'i ^ $ IO ^, ;^
*DUCES TECa^^^ R0. • '''' . .
You are Yp-Ciuired to be and a
'
ppeaa before tUhe CRHMBNA cr N the -i3 ". o"t Pleas Court, 4th Fl€3or,Courtroom #8, MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS BUsLs.a{NG, 41 Ss.rees. ^a;smn, Ohio during the week a,IVlonc^^ , ^a^^ ^^, 2015 at ^? ^ ^ ^ fir of ;r.,m^ Ge^^d A z, id^ ^tc'^f^`'t a s a ^?rE &^t^ss on ^3es a^` of ^a^' {& k : ;:153 ,^i^i;^^3'Fr in the r^^'is^sty^°^54^iCEc^case) and dN not depart firom se.afry z,.nda., ,F^IE INWLTs OF ._,WV
Piease ca^^ 937-225-5757 be•^^^en 4-30 p.m, and,3,30 a.m, th,- ya ^.;^^ ^^^a-d:^^^d to appear; if youdo not need to appear„ a rew^rdMg wyfll so aj,r^se. I ^^^a^= z{??ve any a.' oa s, 2Z5 -37^7 be^^^;^a-9 ^;^0 ^.^a.and 4^30 p.m. and ask for ^he, assg^dled po" svc,tor.
'?, 9 ^'^g ^ ^ ^•`F&G°as'^^
pp^ '^Y
. . - -... - ..^,.
Y0,087317
TO THE SHERIFF OF MARION COUNTY, OH:Yfil,d are commanded to sta"nmo; he wit^^s zs whose 'ia ne and add, re< are : ''tf ab^3.le 3:?? be and auyd3ec'3Y''E.3C?sore
'thi^ Court at i de time and p6ace sa"'Cs?"I' above Tr.)r Said W€in°,^aS c,, ` s .'rt"`' jtafR3ess not depart : saidCcaurt x^Athout leave UNDER PENALTY OF L,
VVffNE"vvS my5' hand and 'E:he se^i 'l7:the a:ar" 9sJ r +s+. i''" a ^e ..J'^">" S'E C? s. ,^`cF"^,^J ^'1 ^ , 20 1,.1'.
'Gregyr o-'y A . Birush,
f1srpr,':er^ `uixmti4t oe Ccdn6f or Pleas
KS ?!6t2-G15
/y^^^'^^^ ,^^ A4 ^
'.e.""d ^ ^ _s ^-°`-"--=-a=m.®.>^
.^^!'
..
o-^^ ^^ -^_,. ^,m^.^....,^„w`"",..- ,'
'^.,.^..®,-""" 'r . '.^'' _ ,.. ^ .^
3g
^'._ 0`°4^
f ,.^,,^^ ^
^^i ^
ELECTRONICALLY F1LEC?COURT OF COMMON PLEASFriday, March 06, 2015 2:54:21 PMCASE AiUi^^ER: 2094 CR 00138 Docket ID: 1SGREGORY A BRUSF!CLERK OF COURTS MONTGOMERY COUNTY
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COLrRT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIOCRIMINAL DIVISION
0^
U)
G?
GL
0
E 0
0 .5
ar00^
^E0L39.^.+C0m
STATE OF OHIO,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO.: 2014 CR 00138
JUDGE MARY WISEMAN
-vs-
SAMANTHA HARRISON,
Defendant.ORDER AND ENTRY SETTINGTIME LIMITS FOR TRIAL
This matter will be tried to conclusion during March 16, 17, 18, 2015. For purposes of court
economy and efficiency in the management of the court's docket, the following maximum time limits and
resulting approximated schedule is established.
Monday March 16, 2015 Trial Day 1
8:45 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Conference/Record made if needed of pretrial matters
9:05 a.m. - 9:40 a.m. Voir Dire by Court
9:45 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. Voir Dire by State
11:00 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. Voir Dire by Defense
12:15 p.m. - 12:40 p.m. Jury Selection in Chambers
12:45 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Jury Swom and Juror Orientation
2:15 p.m. - 2:45 p.m.
2:15 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.
3:30 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
State Opening Statement
Defense Opening Statement
State's Evidence
Conclude Day 1
Tuesday March 17, 2015 Trial Day 2
8:45 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Conference/Record made if needed of trial/evidence issues
9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. State's Evidence (15 minute comfort break will occur)
12:00 p.m. - 1:15 p.m. Lunch
1:.15 p.m. - 3:15 p.m. State's Evidence
3:15 p.m. - 4:15 p.m. Defendant's Evidence (if any)
Conclude Day 2
Wednesday March 18, 2015 Trial Day 3
8:45 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Conference/Record made if needed of trial/evidence issues
9:00 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Defendant's Evidence (if any)
10:30 a.m. - 10:45 a.m. Break
10:45 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. Defendant's Evidence (if any)
12:15 p.m. - 1:15 p.m. Lunch
1:15 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Defendant's Evidence (if any)
3:30 p.m. - 3:45 p.m. Break
3:45 p.m. - 4:15 p.m. State's Closing (Time Includes Rebuttal)
4:15 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. Defendant's Closing
4:45 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. Jury Instructions
In summary, each side is provided the following maximum time allotments:
Voir Dire 1.25 hours each
Openings .50 hour each
State's Case 6.25 hours
Defendant's Case 6.25 hours(if any)
Closing Arguments .50 hours each
Unused time cannot be reserved by a party. The court may use or allot unused time as it deems
appropriate and fair. Unused time likely will inure to the benefit of breaks and getting to jury deliberations
2
earlier. The Court reserves the right to modify the time limits as needed for the fair and efficient
management of the trial. The time limits apply even if Defendant opts to proceed p ro se. The time limits and
approximated start and end times may be adjusted as needed to accommodate unforeseen circumstances.
The court may adjust the time limits to account for cross-examination exceeding a reasonable length,
objections, side bars, and other activities.
SO ORDERED:
JUDGE MARY WISEMAN
This document is electronically filed by using the Clerk of Courts e-Filing system. Thesystem will post a record of the filing to the e-Filing account "Notifications" tab of the followingcase participants:
WARD BARRENTINEKARINA KOROSTYSHEVSKYASSISTANT PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS(937)-225-5757Attorneys for Plaintiff
J ALLEN WILMESATTORNEY AT LAW(937)-278-0652Attorney for Defendant, Samantha Harrison
TANDI DANKLEF, Bailiff (937) [email protected]
3
^
C ^
a
i
ELECTRONICALLY FILEDCOURT OF COMMON PLEASWednesday, March 11, 2015 3:10:24 PMCASE NUMBER: 2014 CR 00138 Docket ID: 19875151GREGORY A BRUSHCLERK OF COURTS MONTGOMERY COUNTY OHIO
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIOCRIMINAL DIVISION
STATE OF OHIO
Plaintiff,
-vs-
SAMANTHA HARRISON
Defendant.
CASE NO. 2014 CR 00138
JUDGE MARY WISEMAN
First Amended STATE OF OHIO'SWRITTEN LISTOF WITNESSES
Comes now the State of Ohio, by the Prosecuting Attorney of Montgomery County,Ohio, and herewith furnishes a list of witnesses, in accordance with Local Rule 3.03 IIf Aas amended.
2.
3.
4.
5.6.
8.
9.
10
1112
MIRACHEL FIELDS, Montgomery County Job and Family Services, 1111South Edwin C. Moses Blvd., Dayton, Ohio 45422;KEEPER OF RECORDS, Montgomery County Job and Family Services,1111 South Edwin C. Moses Blvd., Dayton, Ohio 45422;KEEPER OF RECORDS, JP Morgan and Chase National, 7610 WashingtonSt. Indianapolis, IN 46231;KEEPER OF RECORDS, Clay Township Police Department, 8207 ArlingtonRd., Brookville, Ohio 45005;MARTY STRINGFELLOW, 516 Caleb Dr., Brookville, Ohio 45309;ROBYN TRAYWICK, 45 West Franklin St., Bellbrook, Ohio 45305;DET. ISAIAH KELLER, Montgomery County Sheriffs Office, 330 WestSecond Street, Dayton, OH 45402;DEP. CAITO, Montgomery County Sheriffs Office, 330 West Second Street,Dayton, OH 45402;DEP. WILLIAMS, Montgomery County Sheriffs Office, 330 West SecondStreet, Dayton, OH 45402;DEP. ROD BROWN, Montgomery County Sheriffs Office, 330 West SecondStreet, Dayton, OH 45402.MELISSA LOWE, Care House, 410 Valley Street, Dayton, Ohio 45404VIKKI CARTER, Montgomery County Children Services, 3304 N. MainStreet. Dayton, Ohio 45405
In addition to the above, the State reserves the right to call all persons required toestablish chain of custody of the evidence and any witness listed in the discovery providedto the Defendant.
Respectfully submitted,
MATHIAS H. HECK, JR.Prosecuting Attorney
By: /s/ Karina KorostyshevskyWARD BARRENTINE 0074366E,KARINA KOROSTYSHEVSKY 0087317EAssistant Prosecuting AttorneyDayton-Montgomery County Courts Bldg.P. O. Box 972, 301 W. Third StreetDayton, Ohio 45422(937) 225-5757
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on March 11 , 2015 I electronically filed theforegoing with the Clerk of Court using the Electronic Criminal Filing system, which willsend notification of such filing to the following: J ALLEN WILMES, Attorney for Defendant.
By: /s/ Karina KorostyshevskyWARD BARRENTINE 0074366E,KARINA KOROSTYSHEVSKY 0087317EAssistant Prosecuting Attorney
SDK 3.6.15