in the heat of the mobility revolution how …...handelsblatt online – 07/19 years of...
TRANSCRIPT
In the heat of the mobility revolutionHow automotive suppliers can master the industry's transformation
3In the heat of the mobility revolution
Cove
r pho
to: b
gton
/iSto
ck
The automotive industry is changing rapidly, driven by the MADE trends (new Mobility, Autonomous driving, Digitalization and Electrification).
The pace of change continues to accelerate and the impact on industry players is becoming increasingly noticeable, hitting businesses' bottom lines. Production volumes have been falling worldwide for about a year now, and many automotive suppliers are seeing their returns shrinking. There is currently no recovery on the horizon for 2019 – on the contrary, the economic pressures on suppliers are growing and so are the challenges.
For OESs, this means taking action now to turn things around before it's too late. As the transformation is having a tangible impact on their revenues and even more so on their margins, suppliers will need to come up with strategies and measures to enable them to still be competitive in the market in 5–10 years' time.
This is all the more relevant in view of the conflicting objectives companies are caught between. On the one hand, they need to bring costs down, as all OEMs are already driving serious cost reduction programs and passing their own pressure on up the supply chain. And then they also need to invest in future technologies, which hold new growth potential but also have their risks.
Automotive suppliers therefore need to be proactive in responding to the changes wrought by MADE and future-proof their business models and strategies.
4 In the heat of the mobility revolution
"Weakening sales – Automotive economy
cooling down."
Handelsblatt Online – 07/19
Years of record-breaking results come to an abrupt haltThe scale of this development has come as a surprise to automotive suppliers. After the financial crisis was over, the industry's players just kept going in one direction. That direction was up. One record-breaking year followed the next from 2010 through 2017. Despite environmental issues and the industry's transformation being the subject of broad social debate, many suppliers still did not react. Their focus was firmly on their day-to-day business and they determined for the time being that nothing much was actually changing and the numbers were good.
Against this backdrop, many OESs failed to address structural weaknesses and position themselves for the future. Relying on promising growth forecasts, they even expanded their capacities. Now the slump in China, which is partially but not exclusively attributable to trade policy tensions with the USA, is causing particular headaches in the industry. The fact that the market is stagnating in North America and slightly declining in Europe exacerbates the problem. Some suppliers are seeing 60 to 70 percent of their newly built capacities standing idle as a result.
The decline in vehicle demand is evident across the globe this year. In the first half of 2019, the number of units produced totaled 46 million, 5 percent less than the same period in 2018. And the trend is likely to continue, as most suppliers do not expect a positive turnaround in the second half of the year.
5In the heat of the mobility revolution
Global light vehicle production volume
H1/18 vs. H1/19 [m units]1
Others
Japan/South Korea
South America
NAFTA
Europe2
China3
Source: IHS Automotive, Lazard, Roland Berger
1 Global light vehicle production volume 2 Excluding CIS and Turkey 3 Greater China
H1/2018
48.4
46.0
H1/2019
12.413.5
11.2
11.9
8.6
8.7 1.7
1.7
6.5
6.6
5.6
6.0
-5%
6 In the heat of the mobility revolution
Revenue growth [%]
Indexed [2012=100]
Key supplier performance indicators, 2012-2019e (n=~600 suppliers)
5 7 6 62 3
1
100
107
113
123
120
127126
YoY [%]
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019e
Automotive suppliers' KPIs(global industry average)
Source: Company information, analyst forecasts, Lazard/Roland Berger supplier database
~120-125
The development of revenues confirms this trend. While companies saw their sales grow seven years in a row since 2012, rising by more than a quarter overall, growth went into reverse in 2019, falling by about 5 percent.
The slump in demand for passenger cars is thus clearly reflected in the industry's key figures. And profitability is suffering even more than revenues: while suppliers recorded an EBIT margin of 7.2 percent on a global industry average in 2018, the expectation for 2019 is just 6.0 to 6.3 percent. This marks the first time since 2012 that EBIT has dipped below 7 percent.
To understand which players are especially affected by this development, it's worth taking a look back at the past year. Automotive suppliers based in China were able to defend their well above average EBIT margins in 2018 (9 percent on average). They benefit from their proximity to OEMs old and new, who are producing more and more cars in China. The slump of recent
-5%
up to -5%
7In the heat of the mobility revolution
Source: Company information, analyst forecasts, Lazard/Roland Berger supplier database
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019e
EBIT margin [%]
6.8
7.27.3
7.17.17.27.2
~6.0-6.3
months, particularly severe in their home market, will affect them all the more. Nevertheless, we expect companies from China to reframe the competition in the medium term. Ranking the global suppliers by revenue reveals that more and more Chinese companies have been graduating to the leading group for the past decade or so.
In North America too, automotive suppliers achieved above average profitability in 2018 (EBIT margin of 8.4 percent). By contrast, European OESs saw margins fall (EBIT margin of 7.1 percent). The negative impact came from declining volumes and the problems caused by the introduction of the new WLTP fuel economy standard. Only South Korea (EBIT margin of 6.6 percent) and Japan (EBIT margin of 6.1 percent) performed worse. The market slump in 2019 is expected to cause a further decline in profitability in these regions.
At first glance, the figure of around 6 percent still looks like a generous margin. But appearances are deceptive: at 6.0 percent, suppliers are approaching a place where both self-financing and refinancing on the capital market become more difficult. Car manufacturers expect their suppliers to invest heavily in relevant future technologies. The problem? The new investment projects do not meet the proven financial return logic of the past. The necessary level of spending often represents an uncertain bet on the technology of the future for OESs.
-17%
Key supplier performance indicators, 2012-2019e (n=~600 suppliers)
8 In the heat of the mobility revolution
Source: Lazard, Roland Berger
Current developments within the automotive industry
Prerequisites for electric vehicles constantly getting better, e.g. further emission regulations and ICE city bans, decreasing battery costs or improving infrastructure
Besides new forms of mobility, the mobility mix itself is changing
Uncertainty remains over technical development path and legal framework for autonomous driving
Data-based and digital business models enable new business potential
Sales potential for certain products likely to fall dramatically
Customers continue to push suppliers for cost reductions
New players entering the automotive business across the entire value chain
The required employee skill set is changing dramatically
Access to capital is becoming tougher given the declining relative attractiveness of the automotive sector
The new car industry ecosystemWhat is special about the current situation is that the scale and speed of developments, as well as their economic consequences for companies, are unprecedented and unforeseeable. At the moment it is hard to predict which of the market trends will prevail in 15 years or what the most promising business models will be.
Phot
o: d
arek
m10
1/G
etty
Imag
es
Market trends
Impacts
MSP
OEM
OES
2019
10 In the heat of the mobility revolution
Source: Lazard, Roland Berger
MSPs1
Traditional OEMs
New OEMs
OESs
New OESs
All in all, these factors combined will lead to considerable shifts in the automotive industry ecosystem over the next decade. New mobility providers will occupy positions of increasing strength. For incumbent OEMs, this means they will have no choice but to establish new business models. If they fail to gear themselves up properly, their role in tomorrow's mobility world will be secondary or, in the worst case, non-existent.
OEMs' path toward a mobility ecosystem scenario 2030+
1 MSP = Mobility Service Provider
2030
MSP
OEM
OES
11In the heat of the mobility revolution
Railway companies
OEMs with mobility service
offerings
Established premium/sports
car OEMs
Traditional suppliers and volume OEMs
Technology suppliers
Selected traditional suppliers
and OEMs
Traditional
Pure MSP
Integrated MSP
CaaS lifestyle brand
Device manufacturer
Service enabler/ component
manufacturer
New mobility ecosystem 2030+
Sample candidates
Ø out of business
Ride hailing
providers
Consumer electronics
manufacturers
New xEV OEMs
Semi-conductor or battery
manufacturers
New
In 10 years, it's quite conceivable that the scenario could involve customers buying not just a vehicle but a certain form of mobility adapted to their needs. Assuming this is no longer just the vehicle itself, then the OEM becomes the primary supplier – possibly of a tech company – and the current OESs slide one rung down the ladder. Not only transforming the supply chain, but also exerting further pressure on the margins of today's automakers and suppliers.
13In the heat of the mobility revolution
Source: Lazard, Roland Berger
Negative impact on business↓
↓OEM/OES
business 2019
↓New MaaS business slower than expected to ramp up
Fierce competition due to new entrants with
advantages over established players
Late to follow up: Traditionally leading OEMs in follower
position
Strong need for investment into automated driving,
artificial intelligence and to scale up
Decreasing brand loyalty and design relevance
New mobility concepts
2025
More intensive competition due to new entrants with advantages
over established players
Falling margins due to electrified vehicles
Lower EBIT due to rising costs and portfolio shifts
Heavy investments in powertrain electrification and
new technologies
High costs associated with personnel transformation
Traditional core
business
Pressure on traditional OEMs
OEMs are under growing pressure... For incumbent automakers, the changes in the industry present a double challenge. New emission limits and the threat of fines, as well as electrification, are weighing on earnings in the core business. At the same time, new Mobility-as-a-Service offerings are becoming established and the future profit pool of OEMs is shrinking. The pressure on automobile manufacturers is therefore growing on several sides simultaneously.
Phot
o: fa
njia
nhua
/Get
ty Im
ages
14 In the heat of the mobility revolution
"Automotive suppliers feel the impact of OEM crisis."
Automobil-Industrie – 08/2019
...and they're ramping up the pressure on suppliers To meet these challenges, OEMs have launched cost-cutting programs to shave billions off expenditures. In addition to in-house efficiency measures and changes to the product portfolio, the reduction of material costs is almost always a core issue. Manufacturers are thus passing on the pressure they are feeling to their suppliers to an even greater extent than before. For OESs, this means they have to develop and implement their own strategies and measures to protect their profit margins. They need to cut costs in order to meet the OEMs' demands but they also have to make investments in future technologies, which represent attractive growth potential but come with significantly higher risks than before.
There is no magic formula for balancing these conflicting objectives; each supplier will have to come up with the right strategic approach for their own situation and market position. Roland Berger and Lazard have subdivided the supplier ecosystem into six archetypes to make it easier for companies to determine where they currently stand and assess the need for action:
15In the heat of the mobility revolution
SUPPLIER ARCHETYPES
NEED FOR CHANGE
STRATEGIC MISSION
MISSION STATEMENT
Small traditional
player
Cost optimization throughout the entire
organization is key
SUrvival of the fittest
Aftermarket player
Compensate for negative business implications from e-mobility trend
Eat or be eaten
Global commodity
leader
Process excellence is the basis to generate capital and to ensure
long-term success
Defend current
positioning
Global newentrant
with new technologies
Leverage existing know-how to generate
new business within automotive industry
If you can think it, you can
do it
Traditional diversified
player
Focus on cost efficiency or proactive portfolio transition to
future growth segments
Offense is the best
defense
Technology system
integrator
Make the company irreplaceable for OEMs
and leverage positioning to move into new fields
Remain system relevant
Source: Lazard, Roland Berger
Summary: Strategic directions per supplier archetype
HighLow
16 In the heat of the mobility revolution
By first determining their position, companies can derive an individual approach for how they should deal with the current challenges in the market. Below is an example of a turnaround program (real Roland Berger project for a leading German automotive supplier):
Roland Berger performance improvement program
Problem/initial situation• Decreasing margins• Partly loss-making business• Increasing capital
requirements
• Declining equity ratio• Commoditized portfolio• Portfolio adaption and growth strategy
failed
Result/achievements• 4% absolute EBIT improvement over 3 years• More than EUR 100 m of working capital improvement• More than 2,000 individual improvement measures• Sustainable turnaround
The selected company acknowledged that it was increasingly struggling with the erosion of its EBIT margin. This situation was triggered by its acquiring businesses at a loss for strategic reasons, coupled with inadequate performance in the plants and startup problems, alongside a commoditized product portfolio in a competitive market. As a countermeasure, the company first initiated a performance program for a large problem plant and, following sustained success, expanded it in two stages, first for one region and then worldwide. Finally, more than 2,000 measures with an absolute EBIT effect of +4 percentage points over the next three years were developed within the overall program. This example shows that sustainable performance improvement is even possible with traditional product portfolios.
Source: Lazard, Roland Berger
Roland Berger program focus
One focus plant
Starting point
Multiple focus plants
Program extension
Company-wide focus plants
Full-scale program
Region
>5 plants
Country
1plant
Global
>50plants
17In the heat of the mobility revolution
Take the transformation of the industry seriously!
Performance programs are a must for many suppliers – for small businesses they're vital.
Structural measures will be essential for suppliers to cope
with the growing pressure on margins through 2025.
The broader your product portfolio, the easier it will be to master the challenges.
Acquisitions are recommended for large and financially
strong OESs; smaller suppliers should consider selling, merging or increasing their equity.
Protect your financial flexibility in the
medium and long term!
For investments in innovative areas with good growth prospects, seeking venture capital providers or cooperation with partners
is recommended to share the burden.
Lasting success requires employees with skills and qualifications that are fit for the future.
There is no "one size fits all" strategy – but the following
message applies to all:
ACT NOW!
Source: Lazard, Roland Berger
Key recommendations for automotive suppliers
Suppliers have to act now in order to remain successful in the future
Felix Mogge Senior Partner+49 89 [email protected]
Ken Oliver Fritz Managing Director+49 69 [email protected]
Florian Daniel Principal +49 89 [email protected]
Thomas Schlick Senior Partner +49 69 [email protected]
Christof Söndermann Managing Director+49 69 [email protected]
Roland Berger:
LAZARD:
18 In the heat of the mobility revolution
Phot
os: R
olan
d Be
rger
Gm
bH; L
azar
d
If you would like to know more about the transformation of the automotive industry and our recommendations for dealing with the challenges, download our detailed presentation on the subject: www.rolandberger.com/AutomotiveSuppliers2019
Your contacts
Roland Berger, founded in 1967, is the only leading global consultancy of German heritage and European origin. With 2,400 employees working from 35 countries, we have successful operations in all major international markets. Our 52 offices are located in the key global business hubs. The consultancy is an independent partnership owned exclusively by 230 Partners.
Phot
os: R
olan
d Be
rger
Gm
bH; L
azar
d
Lazard, one of the world's preeminent financial advisory and asset management firms, operates from 43 cities across 27 countries in North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Central and South America. With origins dating to 1848, the firm provides advice on mergers and acquisitions, strategic matters, restructuring and capital structure, capital raising and corporate finance, as well as asset management services to corporations, partnerships, institutions, governments and individuals. For more information on Lazard, please visit www.lazard.com. Follow Lazard at @Lazard.
RB
_SA
L_19
_022
_FLY
This publication has been prepared for general guidance only. The reader should not act according to any information provided in this publication without receiving specific professional advice. Roland Berger GmbH shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any use of the information contained in the publication.
© 2019 ROLAND BERGER GMBH. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
PublisherRoland Berger GmbHSederanger 180538 MunichGermany+49 89 9230-0