improving the life cycle of tutoring content

1
Authors see common errors in the builder Collaboration between: Improving the Life Cycle of Tutoring Content Shane Almeida in collaboration with Leena Razzaq, Jozsef Patvarczki, Manasi Vartak, Mingyu Feng, Neil Heffernan, and Kenneth Koedinger Sponsored by: Free researcher, student, and teacher accounts at http://www.assistment.org Model-tracing, rule-based tutors provide effective learning environments in a variety of domains but have important limitations: •Developing content for a single hour of instruction can take between 100 and 1000 hours •Creating cognitive tutors requires considerable knowledge in the domains of cognitive psychology and computer science, particularly artificial intelligence rule-based programming High cost and level of expertise required have resulted in very few systems being built and consequently adopted by educators Assistment Project Freely-available, web-based assessment system that tutors middle- and high-school students in mathematics Currently used by 3000 students and 50 teachers Funded by Office of Naval Research to to explore ways of reducing the cost of making intelligent tutoring systems •Eliminated the need for experience in computer science or cognitive psychology •Reduced creation time for a single hour of instruction to 10 to 30 hours •Support the full life-cycle of content 128 Authors create initial content Students interact with the tutor Students and teachers submit comments Authors view comments Teachers see student errors in reports Traditional Tutors Authors refine content to address common errors Authors refine content to address user concerns This work has been submitted to the International Journal of AI in Education - Special Issue on Authoring Systems for ITSs

Upload: wing-mcknight

Post on 30-Dec-2015

20 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

128. Improving the Life Cycle of Tutoring Content. Assistment Project. Authors create initial content. Students interact with the tutor. Authors view comments. Authors see common errors in the builder. Students and teachers submit comments. Teachers see student errors in reports. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Improving the Life Cycle of Tutoring Content

Authors see common errors in the builder

Collaboration between:

Improving the Life Cycle of Tutoring ContentShane Almeida in collaboration with Leena Razzaq, Jozsef Patvarczki, Manasi Vartak, Mingyu Feng, Neil Heffernan, and Kenneth Koedinger

Sponsored by:

Free researcher, student, and teacher accounts at http://www.assistment.org

Model-tracing, rule-based tutors provide effective learning environments in a variety of domains but have important limitations:

•Developing content for a single hour of instruction can take between 100 and 1000 hours

•Creating cognitive tutors requires considerable knowledge in the domains of cognitive psychology and computer science, particularly artificial intelligence rule-based programming

High cost and level of expertise required have resulted in very few systems being built and consequently adopted by educators

Assistment ProjectFreely-available, web-based assessment system that tutors middle- and high-school students in mathematics

Currently used by 3000 students and 50 teachers

Funded by Office of Naval Research to to explore ways of reducing the cost of making intelligent tutoring systems

•Eliminated the need for experience in computer science or cognitive psychology

•Reduced creation time for a single hour of instruction to 10 to 30 hours

•Support the full life-cycle of content

128

Authors create initial content

Students interact with the tutor

Students and teachers submit comments

Authors view comments

Teachers see student errors in reports

Traditional Tutors

Authors refine content to address common errors

Authors refine content to address user concerns

This work has been submitted to the International Journal of AI in Education - Special Issue on Authoring Systems for ITSs