improving the control of liver fluke in cattle
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle
Professor Diana Williams
Veterinary Parasitology
University of Liverpool
![Page 2: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What is fluke?
• Fasciola hepatica • Flat worm (i.e. not a
roundworm) • Juvenile flukes migrate
through the liver • Adult fluke live in the bile
ducts • Found in temperate and
high altitude tropical regions throughout the world
![Page 3: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Liver fluke infects many different hosts
• Fluke affects sheep, cattle, horses, buffalo, rabbits, hares, deer...
• 2.5 million humans infected in South America, Iran, Egypt, Vietnam
![Page 4: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Disease
• Sheep are affected by acute fasciolosis, leads to death of sheep
• Both cattle and sheep can get chronic fasciolosis.
• Sub-clinical infections – reduced productivity, fertility & growth rates.
![Page 5: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Impact of fluke on production
• 600+ high yielding dairy herds in England, Wales, Scotland
• Improving their health and welfare
• Impact of fluke on production
• Prevalence – 80%
![Page 6: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Impact of infection on production
• No effect on butterfat or protein
• No effect on somatic cell count, bacterial count, services/conception or calving index
• Milk yield: – compared low (PP-33) with
high (PP-77)
– Reduction of 1140litres/cow/year
(853-1427)
Reduction in milk yield of 15%
![Page 7: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Fluke – a growing problem in Europe
• Increasing prevalence and distribution of fluke infection in UK • Effects of recent and projected
climate change
• EU Agri-environmental schemes
• Animal movements
• Rapid emergence of resistance to flukicide, triclabendazole
• Increased susceptibility to other diseases
Prevalence of fluke infection in cattle in the UK (APHA – VIDA)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
1975 1985 1995 2005 2015
![Page 8: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Sweden vs UK
• Similar production systems: • Cattle grazed during summer months (May-October)
• Dairy and Beef
• Prevalence higher in UK (~80% cf 25% in dairy herds) • But increasing in both UK and Sweden
• Mean herd size of dairy herds • ~80 in Sweden
• 100+ in UK
• Drivers of infection similar in UK and Sweden
![Page 9: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON PREVALENCE OF FLUKE
![Page 10: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Predicted changes in prevalence of fluke infection across Europe
F. hepatica antibody detection in bulk tank milk from dairy cattle sampled in the GLOWORM study area, modelled across Europe
C. Caminade et al. - Geospatial Health 9(2), 2015, pp. 301-308
![Page 11: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Conclusions
• Liver fluke infection is likely to become more prevalent and the transmission season is likely to be extended over the coming decades.
• What does this mean for control?
• Control currently relies on the use of flukicides (dewormers)
![Page 12: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
FLUKICIDES AND FLUKICIDE RESISTANCE
![Page 13: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Dewormers licensed for use against liver fluke (sheep and cattle)
Active ingredient:
• Triclabendazole (all stages)
• Closantel (6-8wks+)
• Nitroxynil
• Clorsulon (adults)
• Albendazole
• Oxyclozanide
• Flukicides have no residual activity
• Limited number of products available for use in dairy cows
• Fasinex 240 at drying off
• Albendazole 60hrs withdrawal
• Oxyclozanide 72hrs withdrawal
![Page 14: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Resistance to triclabendazole
• TCBZ first introduced onto the market in mid-1980’s
• Resistance to TCBZ first reported in 1995
• Resistance reported in S. America, Europe, Australia
• Closantel treatment failure in Sweden reported in cattle in 2015 (Novobilsky & Hoglund)
• Albendazole treatment failure reported in sheep in Sweden in 2016 (Novobilsky et al)
![Page 15: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
How widespread is TCBZ resistance?
• Developed a faecal egg count reduction test to evaluate drug failure (sheep, TCBZ)
• 20 farms recruited to represent typical farming conditions in NW England.
![Page 16: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Results FARM PRE
(epg) POST (epg)
% REDUCTION
A 2991 640 79
B 5316 1764 67
C 4492 2380 47
D 4062 2394 41
E 6380 4793 25
F 676 661 2
G 218 497 0
H 391 419 0
I 243 406 0
J 1545 3315 0
K 4376 7947 0
L 6954 13137 0
M 21664 65000+ 0
For a susceptible population the % reduction should be >90%
5 farms had partial efficacy
8 farms had evidence of drug failure
![Page 17: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
There is increasing evidence of resistance to triclabendazole resistance in the UK
• Triclabendazole resistance is emerging even in areas where fluke is not traditionally thought to be common.
• Farmers are aware and are increasingly moving to using closantel rather than triclabendazole
• Closantel resistance has been reported in Sweden
• The same parasite affects sheep AND cattle
• Reports of triclabendazole resistance in cattle in UK
![Page 18: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
DIAGNOSING FLUKE INFECTION
![Page 20: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Diagnosis of fluke infection
• Faecal egg counts
– High specificity (NB Rumen fluke)
– Composite samples*
– Poor sensitivity, laborious, only detects patent infection
• Copro-antigen ELISA
– No better than FEC
• Antibody detection ELISA – Milk or bulk tank milk, serum
– Detects historical infection
![Page 21: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Diagnosis of fluke infections
• Composite dung samples – Sample 10 cows – Create one composite sample – Count eggs in faeces – If negative, repeat count (spring,
autumn) – 95% confident that there is no
infection in the herd.
• Penside tests – Antibody detection – Lateral flow technology
• Penside test to aid in targeted treatments
• Test dairy cattle at drying
off • Test beef cattle at housing
• Sheep in the autumn
![Page 22: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Improving control of fluke
• How can we improve fluke control whilst relying less on drug treatments?
• Need to understand factors leading to high fluke risk
• Understanding the life cycle is critical
![Page 24: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
The life cycle of Fasciola hepatica
Eggs shed in the dung onto pasture
Eggs develop
Eggs hatch and swim through plane of water to find a snail
Fluke multiplies in the snail
Cysts on pasture are eaten by cows as they
graze
Adult fluke in liver of cattle
Intermediate host are mud snails
Flukes leave the snail and encyst on grass
![Page 25: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Fluke is a seasonal disease
• Dependent on weather – Rainfall
– Warm, wet summers
– Mild winters
• Complex life cycle – Transmitted through a mud
snail
• Disease risk highest in Autumn
![Page 26: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Rainfall single biggest explanatory variable
• Summer rainfall • Previous five years
• Temperature • Mild winters • Cool summers (= rainy)
• Physical factors • Altitude, slope, • soil type, • minerals
What factors drive the distribution of fluke?
Models explain about 78% of variation between post-code areas
![Page 27: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
What about at the farm level?
• Within a post code area there are big differences between farms, sometimes neighbouring farms
• Can we capture reasons for those differences?
5 – 27(negative)
27 – 50 (low positive)
50 – 100 (medium positive)
100 – 190 (high positive)
![Page 28: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Identification of on farm risk factors
• Identified area of England – farm to farm variation in exposure but same weather (rainfall)
• 195 farms were visited Oct 2014 –Apr 2015
• Detailed Questionnaires completed
• Data collected on – Demography and herd health
– Herd, pasture and farm management
– Cattle production and fertility
• 373 variables
![Page 29: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Main risk factors for fluke
• Buying in cattle (quarantine)
• Presence of sheep (reservoir of infection)
• Length of the grazing season (avoid flukey habitat)
![Page 30: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Presence of snail habitat
• 40 farms were revisited September 2016
• Bulk milk tank samples tested for fluke antibodies
• Snail habitat on those farms mapped
• Snails collected, species identified, infection status measured
• Soil chemistry, pH, plant community recorded
![Page 31: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Galba truncatula • The dwarf pond snail
• Warm and wet conditions
• Resistant to drought and frost
• They are tiny!
• Amplification of the parasite within the snail
![Page 32: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Identifying snail habitat
A mud snail (G. truncatula), on damp ground feeding on a thin layer of algae.
![Page 33: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Perfect snail habitat
Such areas include: • Depressions caused by tractor tyre ruts,
poaching, natural landscape features • Cleared drainage ditches • Banks on the sides of streams or ponds • Soft ground around leaking water taps
or pipes
• Wet (but not underwater) • Bare mud (but not recently
disturbed) • Open (not shaded by hedges, trees
or long vegetation)
![Page 34: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Conclusions
• Snails were found on infected farms
• Suitable snail habitats were very localised and could cover very small areas
• Snail habitats were not fully occupied
– How do snails move into new niches?
• Some farms had no fluke but did have snail habitat and snails.
![Page 35: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Controlling liver fluke
• Low numbers of cysts on pasture all year round. • Persist on grass for weeks/months/year, especially if it is cool • Peak pasture contamination:
– Summer infection of snails, cysts on pasture August-September – Winter infection of snails, cysts on pasture May-June
• Other animals can act as reservoirs of infection (sheep, cattle, rabbits, hares, deer)
• Quarantine ALL bought in animals (sheep and cattle) • No snails = no fluke
– Molluscicides – highly toxic, damage aquatic ecosystems – Drainage schemes, but affects whole ecosystems – Identify and fence off/avoid fluke habitat at dangerous times of year
![Page 36: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Four point plan
1. Pasture protection - don’t let the
snails get infected!
2. Reduce snail population - drainage,
topping rushes, improving poached areas etc.
3. Avoid high cyst challenge - graze
animals away from known/suspected high risk areas
4. Strategic treatment of ‘at risk’ animals - treat right animals at right time
with appropriate product
Spring
Summer
Autumn
Winter
![Page 37: Improving the Control of Liver Fluke in Cattle](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022043005/626b24803d2047461d18be1c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Acknowledgements • Farmers and vets collaborating in these studies • Uof L - John Graham-Brown, Nicola Beesley, Alison Howell,
Juriah Kamuludeen, Jane Hodgkinson, Matthew Baylis • Collaborators – Philip Skuce, Sue Tongue, Mattie O’Hare, • Roger Daniel, Rebecca Mearns, Tilly Stephens and Jane
Learmont, APHA • Funding from the EU, BBSRC, AHDB, HCC, QMS, Agrisearch
NI, Tesco, Norbrook, Merial. • http://www.cattleparasites.org.uk/ • Http://www.scops.org.uk/ • http://www.liv.ac.uk/infection-and-global-health/research/liver-fluke