improvements to the enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion technique
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Improvements to the enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion technique](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081810/575074de1a28abdd2e96ad4a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Improvements to the enzyme-developed radial
immunodiffusion technique
Jose Vidal*
School of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d’Hebron, 171, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
Received 21 December 2001; received in revised form 13 May 2002; accepted 15 July 2002
Abstract
An enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion technique, previously known as the diffusion-in-gel enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (DIG-ELISA), has been improved in two ways: (a) antibody-containing spots have been made larger and
more distinct by revealing them with a mixture of hydrogen peroxide, 3,3V-diaminobenzidine and nickel, and further
intensification of the ensuing spots with silver; (b) the reliability of the method has been enhanced by chemically coupling the
antigen to a layer of a polyamino acid (poly(lysine, phenylalanine)) adsorbed to the bottom of the polystyrene petri dish. The
usefulness of the improved technique is illustrated by reference to the measurement of serum concentrations of IgM and IgG,
and in the assessment of antibody levels against a particulate antigen (erythrocytes).
D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: DIG-ELISA; Silver enhancement; Diaminobenzidine; Poly(lys, phe); Immunoglobulin measurement
1. Introduction
The so-called diffusion-in-gel enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (DIG-ELISA; Elwing and Nyg-
ren, 1979) was developed as a sensitive, simple, and
inexpensive technique to measure antibody concen-
trations (Elwing et al., 1980; Cursons, 1982; Demat-
teis et al., 1989; Gunnarsson and Svedhem, 1998). In
this technique, the antibody diffuses in a gel over an
antigen-coated surface and areas of bound antibody
are revealed enzymatically: The diameters of the spots
are linearly related to the logarithm of the serum
dilutions. This technique is a variation of the radial
immunodiffusion technique, since areas of antibody
content are revealed not as precipitation rings but as
spots. Therefore, DIG-ELISA should more appropri-
ately be called ‘‘enzyme-developed radial immuno-
diffusion’’. In general, the system used to reveal the
spots has been peroxidase and a mixture of hydrogen
peroxide and p-phenylenediamine in a gel: The
insoluble product that results from polymerization of
p-phenylenediamine is trapped in the gel at the site of
antibody location and becomes visible as a brown
spot. Despite its simplicity, this procedure to reveal
spots has the following drawbacks when the antibody
concentration is low: (i) after moderate incubation
0022-1759/02/$ - see front matter D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S0022 -1759 (02 )00300 -9
Abbreviations: DIG-ELISA, diffusion-in-gel enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay; DAB, 3,3V-diaminobenzidine tetrahydro-
chloride dihydrate; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
* Tel.: +34-93-3125112; fax: +34-93-4021362.
E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Vidal).
www.elsevier.com/locate/jim
Journal of Immunological Methods 270 (2002) 163–170
![Page 2: Improvements to the enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion technique](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081810/575074de1a28abdd2e96ad4a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
(10–30 min), to avoid background emergence, the
spots have fuzzy contours, which makes diameter
measurement imprecise; (ii) if incubation proceeds
overnight (in an attempt to increase spot definition),
the spot contours become distinct, despite a high
background. However, the procedure is already
time-consuming (Gunnarsson and Svedhem, 1998),
and increased incubation times are undesirable.
Another peroxidase substrate, 3,3V-diaminobenzi-
dine (DAB), has been used, together with silver, in
immunohistochemistry to stain tissue sections (Mer-
chenthaler et al., 1989; Frigo et al., 1991) and to
reveal protein bands in immunoblots (Frigo et al.,
1991; Ludany et al., 1993). Therefore, the same
procedure could reveal antibody spots in the DIG-
ELISA and could overcome the abovementioned
drawbacks of disclosure with p-phenylenediamine.
As reported here, development with DAB–nickel
and silver yielded sharper, and larger, spots than
development with p-phenylenediamine.
While the author of this report was measuring
immunoglobulin concentrations in human serum, it
became evident that the DIG-ELISA was unreliable;
i.e., two measurements of IgG concentration, in the
same 22 samples, were poorly correlated (Pearson
r = 0.36), as were two measurements of IgM concen-
tration in 21 samples (Pearson r =� 0.15). Accord-
ingly, a method to increase the reliability of the
technique is described here. In this method, a copoly-
mer of lysine and phenylalanine was adsorbed to a
plastic petri dish, and thereafter the antigen was
covalently bound to the copolymer (Wood and
Gadow, 1983; Hobbs, 1989). This procedure
increased the reliability of DIG-ELISA so that for
IgG the Pearson r = 0.80 and for IgM the correlation
was r= 0.90.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Reagents
1,4-Phenylenediamine was obtained from Aldrich
(Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain), 3,3V-diaminobenzidine
tetrahydrochloride dihydrate (DAB) was from Fluka
(Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain), and the following
reagents were from Sigma (Alcobendas, Madrid,
Spain): phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 10 mM phos-
phate, 2.7 mM potassium chloride, 0.137 M sodium
chloride, pH 7.4), suberic acid bis(N-hydroxysuccini-
mide ester), poly(lysine, phenylalanine) hydrobromide
(lysine/phenylalanine = 1:1, molecular weight
20,000–50,000), ethanolamine hydrochloride, affin-
ity-purified goat antibodies to human IgG (g chain-
specific), affinity-purified goat antibodies to human
IgM (A chain-specific), peroxidase-conjugated affin-
ity-purified goat antibodies to human n light chain,
peroxidase-conjugated affinity-purified goat antibod-
ies to human E light chain, peroxidase-conjugated
affinity-purified goat antibodies to mouse IgG (g
chain-specific).
2.2. Animals and immunizations
Female mice of the CD1 strain, of approximately 3
months of age, were housed four mice per cage and
received food and water ad libitum; the temperature of
the room was 21F1 jC. The mice were injected
intraperitoneally with erythrocytes from a rat of the
Long Evans strain (4.8� 107 erythrocytes/mouse in
PBS). A booster immunization of 4.2� 107 erythro-
cytes was performed 10 days later. Plasma levels of
erythrocyte-specific IgG antibodies were measured, 8
days post-booster injection, by DIG-ELISA as modi-
fied in this report.
2.3. Human blood samples
Students, most of them women, from the Univer-
sity of Barcelona volunteered to donate a few drops of
blood, which were drawn from the fingertip by a nurse
in the campus health center. The blood, anticoagulated
with heparin and preserved with 0.01% thimerosal,
was kept in a refrigerator (4 jC) until assayed.
2.4. Enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion tech-
nique (DIG-ELISA)
This technique was a modification of that
described by Elwing et al. (1980). For the measure-
ment of immunoglobulin content, polystyrene petri
dishes of 13.6-cm internal diameter (Nunc, Ros-
kilde, Denmark), were coated with poly(lysine,
phenylalanine) by overnight incubation with a 40
Ag/ml solution thereof in PBS, 20 ml/dish. After
three washes with water, lysine residues were
J. Vidal / Journal of Immunological Methods 270 (2002) 163–170164
![Page 3: Improvements to the enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion technique](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081810/575074de1a28abdd2e96ad4a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
activated for 15–30 min by adding 1 mM suberic
acid bis(N-hydroxysuccinimide ester), 20 ml/dish, in
a mixture of PBS and dimethyl sulfoxide (1.5:1, v/
v). The dish was then washed twice with a mixture
of PBS and dimethyl sulfoxide (2:1) and once with
PBS. Immediately thereafter, 20 ml of a solution of
antibodies to human IgM, or IgG, in PBS, 15 Ag/ml,
was added to each dish and kept there for 30
min at room temperature. After two washes with
PBS, unreacted residues were inactivated by the
addition of ethanolamine (1 mg/ml in PBS), 20 ml/
dish, for 30 min. The dishes were then washed
twice with PBS, once with PBS–Tween (0.05%
Tween 20 in PBS) and once with saline before
processing immediately or storage in the refrigerator
for up to 2 weeks. Twenty ml of 1% agar in PBS
containing gelatin (1 mg/ml, final concentration)
was added to each dish. While the gel was still
liquid, a template with 26 two-mm-diameter pins
was inserted and left there until the gel solidified.
When the template was removed, it left 26 regularly
distributed holes in the agar, the holes being 2 cm
apart. Each hole was filled with 5 Al of serum
diluted in PBS (addition of some trypan blue to
PBS yielded a deep blue solution, which facilitated
the filling of the holes). After diffusion time (1 day
for IgG, 2 days for IgM), the gel was removed, the
dish washed 3 times with PBS–Tween, and perox-
idase-labeled antibodies to human n and E light
chains were added (20 ml per dish of a 1:4000
dilution in PBS–Tween with gelatin, 4 mg/ml final
concentration). After a 2-h incubation the dish was
washed three times with PBS–Tween and the spots
were developed by silver intensification of DAB
spots (see below).
For the measurement of the concentration of
antibodies to rat erythrocytes, polystyrene petri
dishes (13.6-cm internal diameter; Nunc) were
coated with poly(lysine, phenylalanine) and acti-
vated with suberic acid bis(N-hydroxysuccinimide
ester) as described above. Each dish received 20 ml
of a 1% erythrocyte suspension (previously washed
three times with PBS) and was left undisturbed for
45–50 min at room temperature. Then, the eryth-
rocytes were carefully resuspended and discarded.
The erythrocyte monolayers were thoroughly
washed with saline and lysed by the addition of
PBS diluted 1:10 in water; the stroma layers were
repeatedly washed with saline until the washing
fluid no longer was pink. Inactivation of the
unreacted lysine residues was achieved with etha-
nolamine as described above. After inactivation,
peroxidase activity of the stromata was quenched
by incubation with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in PBS
for 15 min (15 ml per dish) and three washes with
saline. Addition of agar gel and sample dilutions
was as above. After incubation, the gel was
removed and the plate incubated for 2 h with
peroxidase-labeled antibodies to mouse IgG. The
spots were developed by silver intensification of
DAB spots (see below).
2.5. Methods to reveal antibody-containing spots
Polystyrene petri dishes of 9-cm diameter, divided
in two equal halves by a plastic strip (Bibby Sterilin;
Stone, Staffs, United Kingdom), were used. Both
halves of each dish were coated with antibodies to
human IgM or IgG (by overnight incubation with a
solution of each in PBS (10 Ag/ml), 4 ml in each half),
washed with PBS–Tween, and 3 ml of 1% agar
containing gelatin (1 mg/ml) was laid on each half
of the dish. Thereafter, two holes were punched in
each half of the dish and filled with 4 Al of IgM
solution in PBS (5 Ag/ml or 100 Ag/ml) or with 4 Al ofIgG solution (0.5 Ag/ml or 20 Ag/ml). After a 1-day
incubation (for IgG), or a 2-day incubation (for IgM),
the gel was removed, the dishes washed with PBS–
Tween, and peroxidase-labeled antibodies to human nand E chains were added. After 1 h and 40 min, spots
in each half of the dish were revealed by one of the
two methods given below.
(a) With p-phenylenediamine: This is the method
described by Elwing et al. (1980). A mixture of warm
agar solution (1% in PBS), 1,4-phenylenediamine (1
mg/ml final concentration) and hydrogen peroxide
(0.01% final concentration) was added to one side
of the dish (5 ml/side), and the enzymatic reaction was
allowed to proceed for 35 min.
(b) By silver intensification of DAB spots: This is
the method described by Ludany et al. (1993) to
reveal spots on nitrocellulose membranes. A solution
of 3,3V-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride dihydrate
(0.2 mg/ml), nickel chloride hexahydrate (0.5 mg/ml)
and hydrogen peroxide (0.002%) in 50 mM Tris–HCl
buffer, pH 7.6, was added to one side of the dish
J. Vidal / Journal of Immunological Methods 270 (2002) 163–170 165
![Page 4: Improvements to the enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion technique](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081810/575074de1a28abdd2e96ad4a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
(5 ml/side). After 20 min, the dish was washed three
times with distilled water. Thereafter, the physical
developer described by Ludany et al. (1993) was
added (5 ml/side); the reaction was allowed to con-
tinue for 10 min and was terminated by three washes
with distilled water. The physical developer was
prepared using 1 ml of ascorbic acid (2 mg/ml), 1
ml of sodium tungstate (50 mg/ml) and 8 ml of the
following mixture: sodium acetate (160 mg/ml), acetic
acid (7 Al/ml), silver nitrate (0.125 ml of 1% silver
nitrate/ml), cetylpyridinium chloride (0.0125 ml of
1% cetylpyridinium chloride/ml), Triton X-100
(0.075 ml of 1% Triton/ml).
3. Results
3.1. Spot development
In the studies described, development with DAB–
nickel and silver yielded sharper, and larger, spots
than development with p-phenylenediamine. The left
side of Fig. 1 shows the IgG spots obtained with
DAB–nickel–silver, while the right side shows the
spots with p-phenylenediamine after 35 min of color
development: The DAB–nickel–silver spots were
larger and better defined, especially the spot corre-
sponding to the lower IgG concentration (0.5 Ag/ml;
top spot).
The left side of Fig. 2 shows the IgM spots
obtained with DAB–nickel–silver, while the right
side shows the spots with p-phenylenediamine after
35 min of color development: Again, the DAB–
nickel–silver spots were larger and better defined,
especially the spot corresponding to the lower IgM
concentration (5 Ag/ml; top spot).
3.2. Parallelism of the regression lines of several sera
To be able to measure the antibody content of
several sera from a reference serum, a plot of
diameter vs. logarithm of dilution should yield par-
allel lines for all the sera. This was verified with the
improved DIG-ELISA described in this report: Five
dilutions of each of four human plasma samples
were assayed and the corresponding (IgG) diameters
were plotted against the logarithm (to the base 10) of
the dilutions. This was done in duplicate, in two
different petri dishes. Table 1 gives the intercept and
the slope of the regression lines. For each plasma
sample, the diameters were linearly related to the
logarithm of the dilutions (the correlation coefficient
of any regression line was z 0.990). Furthermore,
the regression lines were approximately parallel (test
for homogeneity of the slopes in dish 1: F(3,12) = 2.89,
p = 0.079; test in dish 2: F(3,12) = 1.11, p = 0.38), and
the slopes in dish 1 and dish 2 were of similar
magnitude (t test for repeated measures: t(3) = 0.097;
p = 0.92).
The same measurements were performed with
IgM, and the results were similar (results not
shown).
3.3. Reliability of the enzyme-developed radial
immunodiffusion technique (DIG-ELISA)
The IgM concentration of 21 human plasma sam-
ples was measured twice, each time in a different petri
dish, and the paired concentrations exhibited a poor
correlation (Pearson r =� 0.15; p>0.10). Similarly,
the IgG concentrations of 22 plasma samples were
also poorly correlated (r = 0.36; p>0.10). These meas-
urements were performed with the technique
described by Elwing et al. (1980), although the dis-
closure of spots was performed using the DAB-nickel-
silver method.
It was thought that this unreliability might be
caused by differing efficiencies of adsorption of
antigen on different dishes. To correct this, chemical
binding of antigen on to adsorbed poly(lysine,
phenylalanine) was attempted (Wood and Gadow,
1983; Hobbs, 1989). To check the reliability of the
IgG measurement, the IgG content of 19 human
plasmas was measured twice, each time on a diffe-
rent petri dish. The IgG concentrations (mg/ml)
(meanF standard error) were: 7.04F 0.58 in dish A,
and 7.37F 0.58 in dish B with a correlation
coefficient of 0.80 ( p < 0.0009). The intraassay and
interassay coefficients of variation could be estimated
from the reference sample and both were comparable
(7.5%).
To assess the reliability of the IgM measurements,
the same test was performed with 20 human plasma
samples. The IgM concentration (mg/ml; mean
F standard error) was 1.78F 0.21 in dish A and
2.08F 0.24 in dish B with a correlation coefficient
J. Vidal / Journal of Immunological Methods 270 (2002) 163–170166
![Page 5: Improvements to the enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion technique](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081810/575074de1a28abdd2e96ad4a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
of 0.94 ( p < 0.0009). The intraassay and interassay
coefficients of variation, estimated from the reference
sample, were similar (10%).
The reference sample could also be used to
estimate the sensitivity of the technique (i.e., the
minimal concentration of immunoglobulin that
Fig. 1. Development of IgG spots with diaminobenzidine–nickel–silver vs. development with p-phenylenediamine. Left side: Spots obtained
with DAB–nickel–silver; right side: spots obtained with p-phenylenediamine after 35 min of color development (development of DAB–
nickel– silver spots required 30 min). IgG concentrations, from top to bottom: 0.5 and 20 Ag/ml.
J. Vidal / Journal of Immunological Methods 270 (2002) 163–170 167
![Page 6: Improvements to the enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion technique](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081810/575074de1a28abdd2e96ad4a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
could be reliably measured) and this was 0.1 Ag/ml
for IgG and 1.1 Ag/ml for IgM.
3.4. Performance of the enzyme-developed radial
immunodiffusion technique (DIG-ELISA) with a
particulate antigen (erythrocytes)
As shown above and previously (Wood and
Gadow, 1983; Hobbs, 1989), soluble proteins can be
covalently bound to poly(lysine, phenylalanine)
although it has not been shown that particulate anti-
gens (e.g., cells) can also be bound. An experiment
was therefore conducted to ascertain whether the
technique could be used to measure antibodies to
erythrocytes. The plasma of five mice, immunized
twice with rat erythrocytes, was serially diluted and
the level of specific IgG antibodies was determined by
the technique described in this report. Table 2 shows
that (a) the diameters of the five dilutions of each
plasma sample were linearly related to the (base 10)
logarithm of the dilutions (lowest r>0.99; (b) the lines
corresponding to the five plasmas were approximately
Fig. 2. Development of IgM spots with diaminobenzidine–nickel–silver vs. development with p-phenylenediamine. Left side: Spots obtained
with DAB–nickel– silver; right side: spots obtained with p-phenylenediamine after 35 min of color development (development of DAB–
nickel– silver spots required 30 min). IgM concentrations, from top to bottom: 5 and 100 Ag/ml.
Table 1
Parallelism of IgG curves
Dish 1 Dish 2
Intercept Slope r Intercept Slope r
Plasma 1 25.53 4.06 0.996 25.84 4.15 0.990
Plasma 2 24.64 3.73 0.997 24.89 3.71 0.996
Plasma 3 22.94 3.57 0.999 23.47 3.69 0.999
Plasma 4 25.23 4.15 0.997 24.54 3.93 0.999
Five dilutions of four human plasma samples were assayed. The
IgG spots were revealed by the modified DIG-ELISA described in
this report and the spot diameters were plotted against the log (to the
base 10) of the dilutions. The assay was performed in duplicate, in
two different petri dishes.
Equations are of the form diameter (mm) = intercept+(slope*log10dilution).
r is the correlation coefficient of the regression line.
J. Vidal / Journal of Immunological Methods 270 (2002) 163–170168
![Page 7: Improvements to the enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion technique](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081810/575074de1a28abdd2e96ad4a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
parallel (test for homogeneity of the slopes in dish 1:
F(4, 15) = 2.35, p = 0.10; test in dish 2: F(4,
15) = 0.37, p = 0.83); (c) the slopes in dish 1 were
comparable to the slopes in dish 2 (t test for repeated
measures: t(4) = 1.40; p = 0.23).
4. Discussion
In the enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion
technique (or DIG-ELISA), the development of anti-
body spots with DAB–nickel and intensification with
silver was found to offer some advantages over the
former development with p-phenylenediamine: (i) it
was more sensitive, i.e., it yielded larger spots, espe-
cially at low antigen concentrations (Figs. 1 and 2);
and (ii) it produced more distinct spots (Figs. 1 and 2),
which made measurement of diameters more precise.
One disadvantage of DAB over p-phenylenediamine
is its carcinogenic potential, but this fact should not
detract from its advantages in spot development.
In principle, DIG-ELISA in its former version
(Elwing et al., 1980) should be a reliable technique
and, therefore, it was surprising to find a poor corre-
lation between two measurements of immunoglobu-
lins on the same samples (correlation coefficients:
0.36 for IgG and � 0.15 for IgM). It was hypothe-
sized that a possible cause of the low reliability was
differing efficiencies of adsorption of the antigen on
each dish (Engvall, 1980; Parsens, 1981), and, if so, a
procedure yielding homogeneous binding should
solve the problem. One such procedure has been
reported (Wood and Gadow, 1983; Hobbs, 1989):
The antigen is chemically bound to poly(lysine, phe-
nylalanine) previously adsorbed on the petri dish. This
simple modification was indeed found to yield a
reliable assay. Hobbs (1989) activated the polyamino
acid with bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate, whereas
Wood and Gadow (1983) used glutaraldehyde. In
the author’s experience, bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suber-
ate worked better than glutaraldehyde, which agrees
with the results by Hobbs (1989). However, suberic
acid bis(N-hydroxysuccinimide ester) worked as well
as bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate and was cheaper
(its insolubility in water was remedied by dissolving
the chemical in a mixture of PBS and dimethyl
sulfoxide, 1.5:1, v/v).
The modified DIG-ELISA described here permit-
ted the reliable measurement of IgG and IgM concen-
trations in serum, but, in addition, the same technique
also allowed the measurement of antibodies to cells.
The diameters of the spots produced by several
dilutions of serum (containing IgG antibodies to rat
erythrocytes) were linearly related to the logarithms of
the dilutions, and the regression lines from five sera
were parallel (Table 2 and Results).
Since DIG-ELISA is a time consuming technique
(z 2 days), should it not be more convenient to use
ELISA instead? To answer this question, one has to
consider the advantages and drawbacks of each tech-
nique. ELISA is faster and is more amenable to
automation, but DIG-ELISA has these features: (a) it
requires very simple equipment (for instance, there is
no need for a plate reader), which lends itself to use in
the field (e.g., in veterinary applications (Bautista-
Garfias et al., 1989; Ibarra et al., 1998) and in tropical
medicine (Kumar et al., 1987; Castilla et al., 1988));
(b) it allows low affinity antibodies to encounter an
excess of antigen (Gunnarsson and Svedhem, 1998);
(c) the reference and sample lines are parallel, which
makes it possible to read sample concentrations from
the reference line. In the author’s experience, and also
that of other’s (Gripenberg and Gripenberg, 1983;
Franc�ois-Gerard et al., 1988), lines are not always
parallel in the ELISA procedure. In general, ELISA is
the technique of choice if one has the appropriate
equipment and if the reference and sample lines are
parallel.
Table 2
DIG-ELISA can measure the level of IgG antibodies to rat
erythrocytes
Dish 1 Dish 2
Intercept Slope r Intercept Slope r
Plasma 1 18.20 3.84 0.999 18.52 3.62 0.994
Plasma 2 16.91 3.47 0.999 17.55 3.94 0.999
Plasma 3 15.18 3.38 0.995 15.83 3.48 0.999
Plasma 4 16.50 3.63 0.998 16.73 3.42 0.999
Plasma 5 15.84 3.69 0.999 17.00 3.55 0.998
Five mice were immunized with rat erythrocytes and the diameters
of the (anti-erythrocytes) IgG spots, revealed by the DIG-ELISA
described in this report, were plotted against the logarithm (to the
base 10) of the dilutions. The assay was done in duplicate in two
different petri dishes.
Equations are of the form diameter (mm) = intercept+(slope*log10dilution).
r is the correlation coefficient of the regression line.
J. Vidal / Journal of Immunological Methods 270 (2002) 163–170 169
![Page 8: Improvements to the enzyme-developed radial immunodiffusion technique](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081810/575074de1a28abdd2e96ad4a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
In conclusion, DIG-ELISA has been improved in
two ways: size and sharpness of the spots have been
increased by development with diaminobenzidine–
nickel–silver, and the technique has been made reli-
able by chemically attaching the antigen to a poly-
amino acid (poly(lysine, pheylalanine)) adsorbed on
the petri dish.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a fellowship (Project
no. BSO 2000-0661) from the Spanish Ministry of
Education.
References
Bautista-Garfias, C.R., Lopez-Arellano, M.E., Sanchez-Albarran,
A., 1989. A new method for serodiagnosis of sheep fascioliasis
using helminth excretory–secretory products. Parasitol. Res. 76,
135.
Castilla, M.M., Santos-Gomez, M., Guzman-Bracho, C., Bautista-
Garfias, C.R., 1988. A new method for diagnosis of Chagas’
disease: diffusion-in-gel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J.
Parasitol. 74, 805.
Cursons, R.T., 1982. DIG-ELISA for the serologic diagnosis of
toxoplasmosis. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 77, 459.
Dematteis, S., Arburuas, G., Marco, M., Migues, M., Nieto, A.,
1989. Quantitative determination of anti-hydatid antibodies by
Elisa without a colorimetric reading. Int. J. Parasitol. 19, 229.
Elwing, H., Nygren, H., 1979. Diffusion-in-gel enzyme-linked im-
munosorbent assay (DIG-ELISA): a simple method for quanti-
tation of class-specific antibodies. J. Immunol. Methods 31, 101.
Elwing, H., Lange, S., Nygren, H., 1980. Diffusion-in-gel enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assay (DIG-ELISA): optimal conditions
for quantitation of antibodies. J. Immunol. Methods 39, 247.
Engvall, E., 1980. Enzyme immunoassay ELISA and EMIT. Meth-
ods Enzymol. 70, 419.
Franc�ois-Gerard, C., Gerard, P., Rentier, B., 1988. Elucidation of
non-parallel EIA curves. J. Immunol. Methods 111, 59.
Frigo, B., Scopsi, L., Patriarca, C., Rilke, F., 1991. Silver enhance-
ment of nickel-diaminobenzidine as applied to single and double
immunoperoxidase staining. Biotech. Histochem. 66, 159.
Gripenberg, M., Gripenberg, G., 1983. Expression of antibody ac-
tivity measured by ELISA. Anti-ssDNA antibody activity char-
acterized by the shape of the dose– response curve. J. Immunol.
Methods 62, 315.
Gunnarsson, H., Svedhem, A., 1998. The usefulness of diffusion-
in-gel-ELISA in clinical practice as illustrated by a Campylo-
bacter jejuni outbreak. J. Immunol. Methods 215, 135.
Hobbs, R.N., 1989. Solid-phase immunoassay of serum antibodies
to peptides. Covalent antigen binding to adsorbed phenylala-
nine– lysine copolymers. J. Immunol. Methods 117, 257.
Ibarra, F., Montenegro, N., Vera, Y., Boulard, C., Quiroz, H., Flores,
J., Ochoa, P., 1998. Comparison of three ELISA tests for seroe-
pidemiology of bovine fascioliosis. Vet. Parasitol. 77, 229.
Kumar, G.S., Mak, J.W., Lam, P.L., Tan, M.A., Lim, P.K., 1987.
Diffusion-in-gel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA
and IFA test in the detection of malarial antibodies. Southeast
Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 18, 502.
Ludany, A., Gallyas, F., Gaszner, B., Andrasfalvy, B., Szucs, G.,
Kellermayer, M., 1993. Skimmed-milk blocking improves silver
post-intensification of peroxidase–diaminobenzidine staining
on nitrocellulose membrane in immunoblotting. Electrophoresis
14, 78.
Merchenthaler, I., Stankovics, J., Gallyas, F., 1989. A highly sensi-
tive one-step method for silver intensification of the nickel–
diaminobenzidine endproduct of peroxidase reaction. J. Histo-
chem. Cytochem. 37, 1563.
Parsens, G.H., 1981. Antibody-coated plastic tubes in radioimmu-
noassay. Methods Enzymol. 73, 224.
Wood, W.G., Gadow, A., 1983. Immobilisation of antibodies and
antigens on macro solid phases—a comparison between adsorp-
tive and covalent binding. A critical study of macro solid phases
for use in immunoassay systems. Part I. J. Clin. Chem. Clin.
Biochem. 21, 789.
J. Vidal / Journal of Immunological Methods 270 (2002) 163–170170