implementation of a guideline to decrease use of acid ......the nicu, particularly near the...

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) are some of the most frequently prescribed medications in the NICU. Despite limited safety and efficacy data in neonates, almost one quarter of NICU patients receive acid-suppressing medications, with the majority continued after discharge, although there is significant

interhospital variation in prescription rates.1, 2

Mounting evidence of adverse effects from acid-suppressing medications3 – 6 has raised concerns about their risk-benefit profile in infants. Recent guidelines recommend against routine usage of PPIs/H2RAs in both term and preterm infants, 7 and the American Academy of Pediatrics “Choosing

Implementation of a Guideline to Decrease Use of Acid-Suppressing Medications in the NICUAsimenia Angelidou, MD, PhD, a, b Katherine Bell, MD, b, c Munish Gupta, MD, MMSc, b, d Kristen Tropea Leeman, MD, a, b Anne Hansen, MD, MPHa, b

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acid-suppressing medications are used extensively in term and preterm newborns despite limited efficacy data and increasing evidence for potential harm. We sought to reduce nonindicated use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in our level III/IV NICU by developing and implementing a guideline for their use. Our specific aim was to reduce prescriptions among infants <1 month corrected age from a baseline of 7.5 to 4 per month by December 2016.METHODS: Our outcome measures were number of nonindicated PPI/H2RA prescriptions per month, total (indicated and nonindicated) prescriptions per month and percent of patient days with PPI/H2RA therapy. We also tracked potential complications associated with PPIs/H2RAs as secondary outcomes and gastrointestinal bleed as a balancing measure. Interventions and plan-do-study-act cycles included implementation of the initial guideline, guideline revision based on staff feedback, and staff education. By using statistical process control charts and interrupted time series analysis, we compared outcomes over an 8-month baseline period and 2 postimplementation periods spanning 19 months.RESULTS: Nonindicated prescription of PPIs/H2RAs decreased from mean 7.5 per month to 0 (P = .001). Concurrently, total PPI/H2RA prescriptions decreased from mean 11.5 per month to 2.5 (P = .002). Rates of the balancing measure and potentially related complications remained stable over time.CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an evidence-based guideline in our unit led to a significant decrease in nonindicated use of acid-suppressing medications and reduced the burden of exposure to PPIs/H2RAs. This intervention could feasibly be implemented in other similar inpatient settings.

abstract

To cite: Angelidou A, Bell K, Gupta M, et al. Implementation of a Guideline to Decrease Use of Acid-Suppressing Medications in the NICU. Pediatrics. 2017;140(6):e20171715

aDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; dDepartment of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; bDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; and cDepartment of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Drs Angelidou and Bell assisted with study design, performed data collection and analysis, and drafted the manuscript; Dr Gupta performed data analysis and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr Tropea Leeman assisted with study design and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr Hansen conceptualized and designed the study and reviewed and revised the manuscript; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.

DOI: https:// doi. org/ 10. 1542/ peds. 2017- 1715

Accepted for publication Aug 21, 2017

Address correspondence to Asimenia Angelidou, MD PhD, Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Enders 9, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: [email protected]

PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275).

Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

FUNDING: Supported by the Quality Improvement and Patient Safety trainee grant provided to Drs Bell and Angelidou by the Program for Patient Safety and Quality and the Office of Graduate Medical Education at Boston Children’s Hospital.

Angelidou et alImplementation of a Guideline to Decrease Use of Acid-Suppressing Medications in the NICU

2017https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1715

6Pediatrics

ROUGH GALLEY PROOFDecember 2017

140

PEDIATRICS Volume 140, number 6, December 2017:e20171715 Quality RepoRt by guest on May 15, 2020www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from

https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1715

Wisely” campaign recently identified usage in preterm infants as 1 of the top 5 unnecessary treatments in newborn medicine.8

Acid-suppressing medications are most commonly prescribed in the NICU for gastroesophageal reflux (GER), apnea and bradycardia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, airway anomalies, and bowel anomalies.1, 2 The lack of high quality evidence in infants prevents consensus regarding use for airway anomalies9, 10 and bowel anomalies such as esophageal atresia, 7, 11 which remain controversial. However, evidence clearly demonstrates no benefit from acid suppression for GER in term or preterm infants12 –15 or apnea in premature infants.16 – 22

Although benefits of acid suppression in infancy seem increasingly unlikely, adverse effects from PPI/H2RA treatment are now well documented. Reduced gastric acidity, alteration of the gut microbiome and interference with neutrophil function result in increased risk of gastrointestinal infections in term infants3 and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.4, 5, 23 Treatment increases rates of community-acquired pneumonia even in healthy infants in the outpatient setting23 and is associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia in the PICU24 and late-onset sepsis in the NICU.25 Gastric pH changes impede calcium absorption with potentially harmful effects on bone development and increased risk of fractures.6 Adverse effects are of particular concern for neonates and premature infants, whose relative liver immaturity may result in delayed drug metabolism.6

Because of these concerns, we assembled a quality improvement team to measure and reduce the nonindicated use of PPIs/H2RAs in our NICU. We sought to develop a guideline for prescription of acid-suppressing medications to foster change in prescribing behavior and reduce practice variation.26

In addition to guideline development, we sought to use quality improvement methods to implement the guideline and ensure adherence. The specific aim of our project was to reduce the number of nonindicated PPI/H2RA prescriptions among infants <1 month corrected age from a baseline of 7.5 to 4 per month by December 2016.

METhODS

Setting

The Boston Children’s Hospital NICU is an academic tertiary and quaternary referral center serving infants ≤6 months old with complex medical or surgical conditions. More than 650 infants are admitted each year through the emergency department or transferred from other hospitals. More than 80% of these infants are <1 month corrected age at admission. All infants are cared for by a multidisciplinary team, including neonatologists, neonatal fellows, neonatal nurse practitioners, and NICU-dedicated nutritionists and pharmacists. The team caring for infants with surgical diagnoses additionally includes pediatric surgeons, pediatric surgical fellows, and surgical critical care fellows.

Before this project, there were no guidelines regarding the use of acid-suppressing medications in our NICU, and prescription of these medications was per clinician discretion. Medication prescriptions are written by the neonatal fellow, surgical critical care fellow, or neonatal nurse practitioner in our unit.

Intervention

We assembled an interdisciplinary team of physicians specializing in neonatology (fellows and attending physicians, including the NICU medical director), pediatric surgery, and pediatric gastroenterology; NICU nurses; and neonatal pharmacists. Our team analyzed key drivers (Fig 1) and developed interventions to

minimize nonindicated use of acid-suppressing medications. Interventions fell into 3 categories: (1) establishing evidence-based criteria for PPI/H2RA prescription and implementing them as a clinical practice guideline, (2) educating staff, and (3) encouraging staff buy-in and guideline uptake. Figure 2 shows a timeline of the interventions.

Guideline Development

Our team performed a literature review and agreed on the following evidence-based indications for prescribing a PPI/H2RA to infants <1 month corrected age: (1) lack of integrity of the gastric lining, 27 (2) esophageal atresia, 7 (3) otolaryngologic surgery or vocal cord edema and erythema with airway compromise, 9 (4) short bowel syndrome or presence of ostomy (due to association with gastric acid hypersecretion28), and (5) systemic steroid therapy.27, 29 Prescription for these conditions was considered justifiable but not mandatory. Although many of these indications are controversial, there was not enough evidence to confidently exclude benefit from PPI/H2RA use in these conditions; therefore, use based on clinician judgment and local expert consensus was considered reasonable. Conditions specifically not supported by the guideline included nil per os (NPO) status, feeding intolerance, uncomplicated GER, and apnea and bradycardia.12, 13, 16, 17

In February 2016, we received feedback from clinical staff that a small subset of patients warranted a trial of acid-suppressing medication therapy for conditions not prespecified by the guideline; generally, these were difficult clinical cases (eg, patients considered for surgical intervention because of feeding problems) in which distinguishing between uncomplicated GER and symptomatic GER disease (GERD) was challenging.

ANGELIDOU et al2



6Pediatrics


140

by guest on May 15, 2020www.aappublications.org/newsDownloaded from

We do not routinely use pH or impedance probes to diagnose GERD because of their invasive nature and lack of correlation with objective esophagitis, 30 nor do we routinely use a reflux symptom index score. We revised the guidelines to include a medication trial for indications not specified by our original guideline; clinicians wishing to initiate a trial of therapy were then considered compliant if they documented the goal and length of the trial (up to 7 days based on H2RA/PPI pharmacokinetics), and objective criteria for deciding whether treatment was effective.

We excluded patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia or receiving extracorporeal membrane

oxygenation because they are cohorted in a different unit in our hospital.

Staff Education

Before guideline implementation, our team spent 2 months familiarizing NICU staff with the guideline and addressing misconceptions about PPI/H2RA use. A team member provided in-person education at monthly staff meetings for physicians, nurse practitioners, and nurses. We posted a 1-page guideline summary in several locations in the NICU, particularly near the computers used to order medications and in the rounding workroom. After revision of the guideline in February 2016, we spent an additional 2 months reeducating staff, including

rotating attending physicians, by using similar methods (Fig 2).

Encouraging Staff Buy-In and Uptake

We sent monthly reminder e-mails summarizing the guideline to the on-service physicians and nurse practitioners. A project team member visited the unit daily on weekdays during the first month after implementation to answer questions and subsequently team members were available by e-mail. By using the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) method, 31 we assessed the success of our implementation process by reviewing outcome data every 2 months and made rapid cycle changes as needed to support uptake and adherence (Fig 2). Changes included: (1) recruiting our NICU nutritionists

PEDIATRICS Volume 140, number 6, December 2017 3



6Pediatrics


140

FIGURE 1Key driver diagram. MD, doctor of medicine; NP, nurse practitioner; RN, registered nurse.


(who help clinicians write parenteral nutrition [PN] orders) to assess need for H2RA inclusion in PN on the basis of guideline criteria, (2) adding a notation to the nurses’ daily rounding sheet to ensure the indication for the medication was discussed on rounds, (3) providing an incentive of free lunch for the unit staff each week that they achieved 100% adherence to the guideline, and (4) assigning a dedicated staff member to collect data daily on rounds, enabling real-time data tracking and feedback.

Data Collection and Measures

We performed a retrospective chart review from February to September 2014 to obtain adequate data to assess the baseline rate and indications for acid-suppressing medication prescription. We then prospectively collected data for 19 months after guideline implementation, ending when the project had met its goal consistently for 6 months. We obtained census and demographic data from the Children’s Hospitals Neonatal Database. We identified all infants

<1 month corrected age who were prescribed acid-suppressing medications (at least 1 dose enterally or intravenously, including in PN) from electronic prescription data, and tracked the number of PPI/H2RA prescriptions (both indicated and nonindicated) and the duration of therapy.

The primary outcome measure was the number of prescriptions each month that did not meet guideline criteria (ie, nonindicated prescriptions). Secondary outcomes included the total number of (indicated and nonindicated) PPI/H2RA prescriptions each month, and the ratio of patient days on which a PPI/H2RA was administered to total patient days each month for infants admitted at <1 month corrected age as a measure of overall burden of exposure.

In each period, we categorized the reasons for nonindicated prescriptions (by using chart review from the daily progress notes at the time of prescription) for analysis with Pareto charts. After guideline implementation, we requested that

clinicians complete a paper form (Supplemental Fig 8) documenting the indication for new prescriptions. Starting in July 2016, a dedicated staff member completed the form during daily rounds.

The completion rate for paper-tracking forms served as our process measure.

Additional outcome measures were complications that have been associated with acid-suppressing medication use, including sepsis (defined as positive blood, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid culture results or clinical diagnosis resulting in treatment with antibiotics for at least 7 days), ventilator-associated pneumonia or tracheitis, necrotizing enterocolitis (Bell stage >1), and fracture (confirmed by radiograph). We also tracked gastrointestinal bleeding as an outcome that might indicate harm from withholding acid-suppressing medication. We retrieved this information from the Children’s Hospitals Neonatal Database and daily International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision billing codes.

ANGELIDOU et al4



6Pediatrics


140

FIGURE 2Project timeline. CL, center line; LCL, lower control limit; RN, registered nurse; UCL, upper control limit.


http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1542/peds.2017-1715/-/DCSupplemental

Data were collected and managed by using Research Electronic Data Capture tools.32

Statistical Analysis

We used statistical process control charts to analyze changes in the outcome measures over time.31 We used c-charts for the primary outcome measure of number of nonindicated and total prescriptions of PPIs/H2RAs because an infant could have >1 prescription during his or her hospitalization and the number of infants admitted each month was relatively constant. We used a p-chart for the secondary outcome measure of ratio of PPI/H2RA days to total patient days. Because there were significant differences in each outcome between periods, we identified process changes between each period and analyzed the control charts with those process changes. Changes in median values of outcomes in each period were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test, and proportions were compared by χ2 test.

We then validated our findings from the control charts by using interrupted time series (ITS) analysis, which can distinguish change in outcome occurring because of an intervention from change that would have been expected on the basis of the trend occurring during the previous time period. To assess differences between periods, we calculated differences between the average level in each period while controlling for the trend in the baseline period.

We used QI Macros for Excel version 2015.10 (KnowWare International Inc, Denver, CO) to create and analyze control charts. All other analyses were performed by using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0 (IBM Corporation) and SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

Ethics

This project was identified by the Boston Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board as a

quality improvement project and therefore exempt from review.

RESULTS

Demographic data for infants admitted to the NICU at <1 month corrected age were similar in each period, with the exception of fewer surgical diagnoses in period 3 (Table 1).

For the primary outcome measure of number of nonindicated prescriptions per month, c-chart analysis showed a significant decrease in each postimplementation period, from 7.5 in the baseline period to 2.5 in period 2 and 0 in period 3 (Fig 3). Statistical comparison of the medians in the 3 periods (Table 2) confirmed significant differences. ITS analysis (Table 3) confirmed the significant reduction in nonindicated prescriptions in each period, revealing that after taking into account the trend toward increasing prescription of PPIs/H2RAs over time during the baseline period,




6Pediatrics


140

TABLE 1 Characteristics of Infants <1 Month Corrected Age Admitted to the NICU During Each Period of the Project

Characteristica Period 1b Period 2 Period 3 P

N = 370 N = 401 N = 293

Admissions per month, median number (range)

46.5 (35–52) 42 (34–59) 48 (39–64) .44

Boys, n (%) 217 (58.7) 230 (57.4) 185 (63.1) .29Gestational age at birth, median week

(range)37 (23–42) 37 (23–41) 38 (22–42) .22

<30 59 (16%) 48 (15%) 40 (14%) .12 30–<37 119 (32%) 99 (25%) 81 (28%) ≥37 192 (52%) 244 (61%) 172 (59%)Birth weightc, median gram (range) 2767 (500–5330) 2865 (430–5449) 2910 (560–4820) .37 <1500 71 (19%) 65 (16%) 43 (15%) .35 1500–2499 94 (26%) 86 (21%) 65 (22%) ≥2500 203 (55%) 233 (58%) 180 (61%)Postmenstrual age at admission,

median week (range)39 (24–43) 39 (23–43) 39 (24–43) .94

<30 27 (7%) 29 (7%) 23 (8%) .69 30–<37 82 (22%) 75 (19%) 53 (18%) 37–<44 261 (71%) 297 (74%) 217 (74%)Postnatal age on admission, median

day (range)3 (0–132) 4 (0–126) 3 (0–118) .44

Length of stay, median day (range) 5 (0–126) 5 (0–170) 4 (0–64) .55Surgical diagnoses, n (%) 133 (35.9) 131 (32.7) 65 (22.1) <.001

a Data are displayed as median (range) for nonparametric continuous data, compared by a Kruskal-Wallis test and N (%) for categorical data, compared by a χ2 test.b Period 1: baseline before guideline implementation (February 1–October 30, 2014); period 2: postimplementation (May 1, 2015–January 31, 2016); period 3: postimplementation (June 1–November 30, 2016).c Birth weight data were missing for 2 infants in period 1, 17 in period 2, and 5 in period 3.


there were on average 7.9 fewer prescriptions per month in period 2 than expected and 12.8 fewer per month in period 3. As a sensitivity analysis, we also performed control charts and ITS analysis for the number of nonindicated prescriptions if medication trial prescriptions were classified as nonindicated, and the significant reduction in each period remained (data not shown).

Concurrent with the decrease in nonindicated prescriptions, the total number of PPI/H2RA prescriptions per month also decreased from 11.6 at baseline to 3.7 in the final period (Fig 4). In addition, the ratio of PPI/H2RA patient days to total patient days (which reflects the overall burden of exposure to acid-suppressing medications) decreased to less than half the baseline value (20.2% vs 44.7%, P < .001) (Fig 5). Statistical comparison of the median values in each period confirmed significant decreases between periods (Table 2). With our ITS analysis, we confirmed the significant reduction in patient days of medication exposure but the reduction in total number of prescriptions did not reach statistical significance (Table 3).

The Pareto chart showed that before guideline implementation, acid-suppressing medications were commonly prescribed to infants

ANGELIDOU et al6



6Pediatrics


140

FIGURE 3C-chart of nonindicated prescriptions of acid-suppressing medications among infants <1 month corrected age. Triangles with a dashed line represent the number of nonindicated prescriptions under the original guideline definitions (ie, the number of infants started on a trial of acid-suppressing medications for indications not specifically covered by the guideline). CL, center line; LCL, lower control limit; UCL, upper control limit.

TABLE 2 Process and Outcome Measure Results

Measurea Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 P

Process measure No. PPI/H2RA prescriptions with completed

paper-tracking form, N (percentage of PPI/H2RA prescriptions)b

— 19 (37.3%) 17 (77.2%) <.001

Outcome measures No. nonindicated prescriptions per month, median

(range)7.5 (4–11) 2 (0–8) 0 (0–2) .001

Total no. prescriptions per month, median (range) 11.5 (7–16) 8 (4–12) 2.5 (2–8) .002 Patient days with PPIs/H2RAs over total patient days

per month, percentage (95% CI)42.8% (41.3–44.3) 32.9% (31.6–34.3) 20.2% (19.9–21.5) <.001

Proportion of infants <1 mo corrected age who developed infection, percentage (95% CI)

18.1% (14.2–22.1) 15.7% (12.1–19.3) 14.3% (10.3–18.4) .40

CI, confidence interval; —, not applicable.a Data are displayed as median (range) for integer data, compared by a Kruskal-Wallis test and percentage (95% CI) or N (percentage) for proportion data, compared by a χ2 test.b Process measure was only calculated for mo after implementation of the paper-tracking form in July 2015.

TABLE 3 ITS Analysis of Outcomes

Nonindicated Prescriptions

Total Prescriptions

PPI/H2RA Patient Days per Total Patient Days

Baseline trend (slope) 0.3 (P = .04) −0.03 (P = .26) 0.1 (P = .87)Level change from period 1 to

period 2−7.9 (P < .001) −3.4 (P = .21) −12.8 (P = .08)

Level change from period 1 to period 3

−12.8 (P < .001) −7.5 (P = .11) −26.3 (P = .04)


with surgical diagnoses while NPO, particularly through routine inclusion of H2RAs in PN (Fig 6). After our first PDSA cycle that was focused on PN, we eliminated routine use of H2RAs and virtually eliminated nonindicated H2RA use in PN, which was sustained throughout the entire project (Supplemental Fig 7). Infants with gastroschisis were also routinely prescribed acid suppression during the baseline period, which we eliminated completely (Fig 6). Improvements in prescriptions for GER and apnea and bradycardia were slower but finally decreased in period 3 after additional PDSA cycles introducing staff incentives for guideline adherence and real-time data collection on rounds.

There was a significant increase in paper-tracking form completion in period 3 (Table 2), which served as our process measure. None of the nonindicated prescriptions had a paper-tracking form filled out.

Complications associated with PPI/H2RA use were variable during each period, but showed no significant change over time (Table 2). The most common occurrence was infection, with an incidence of 14% to 18%. No infants developed necrotizing enterocolitis or fracture during or after treatment with PPIs/H2RAs. There were no cases of our balancing measure, gastrointestinal bleeding.

DISCUSSION

Implementation of an evidence-based guideline for use of acid-suppressing medications resulted in a significant decrease in prescription of these medications in our tertiary and quaternary NICU, particularly for conditions not supported by the guideline. We also showed a significant reduction in the exposure of infants <1 month corrected age to acid-suppressing medication, both in terms of number of prescriptions and percentage of patient days on which

acid suppression was administered, after guideline implementation.

Nonindicated uses among surgical patients (gastroschisis and routine inclusion in PN for NPO infants) declined quickly after guideline implementation, suggesting that education alone was enough to change practice. Inclusion of a pediatric surgeon on the project team likely improved buy-in and uptake among the surgical providers. Improvements for medical diagnoses such as reflux and apnea and bradycardia were slower despite broad support from physicians, including the medical director of our NICU. This may have been, in part, because of lack of guideline awareness among some rotating attending physicians, and adherence improved after guideline dissemination among this group.

After guideline launch, we used several PDSA cycles to improve guideline adherence. Interventions such as including acid-suppressing medications on the nurses’ rounding sheet had limited impact, whereas the introduction of staff incentives had notable impact, which remained even after discontinuation of the incentives, indicating sustained change. Real-time data collection was key to the project’s success by allowing us to provide the staff incentives and give timely feedback to providers, and because the process of daily data collection likely also increased staff awareness of the guideline. We noted anecdotally a marked improvement in documentation of the indication for PPI/H2RA prescription throughout the postimplementation periods, suggesting increased staff awareness of the guideline and thoughtfulness about indications for use.

Responding to staff feedback and revising the guideline to include a trial of medication use for difficult cases was also instrumental in achieving 100% adherence to the guideline. The decision of staff to




6Pediatrics


140

FIGURE 4C-chart of total number of new prescriptions of acid-suppressing medications, both indicated and nonindicated, among infants <1 month corrected age. Numbers shown are the center line for each period. CL, center line; LCL, lower control limit; UCL, upper control limit.




prescribe PPIs/H2RAs in these trial cases was largely claimed to be a “last resort” before more invasive treatments (such as postpyloric feeds) were pursued. We were reassured that providers did not use the trial as an excuse for liberal prescription because the burden of PPI/H2RA exposure continued to decrease in period 3. Over a 6-month period, there were only 3 cases of the trial being used, all for possible GERD: 1 of the patients had the rare diagnosis of diaphragmatic flutter and was treated long-term because of symptomatic improvement during the trial, whereas the other 2 were discharged 1 and 3 days after medication initiation (1 of whom was available for follow-up, and medication was discontinued because of ineffectiveness).

Despite the significant reduction in use of acid-suppressing medications, we did not detect any decrease in the incidence of potentially associated adverse events, including infection, necrotizing enterocolitis, or fractures. Necrotizing enterocolitis and fracture were such rare events that conclusions are limited. Infections, on the other hand, are relatively common in the NICU but are multifactorial events unlikely to be solely attributable to acid-suppressing medications.

Our project has some limitations. This intervention may not be generalizable to NICUs that care for a different patient mix (for example, nonsurgical cases or primarily inborn infants) or in which rates of PPI/H2RA use are already low; although, the baseline rate of

acid-suppressing medication use and indications for prescription in our unit were remarkably similar to other published series including units with widely varying patient populations.1, 2 Development of any guideline for acid-suppressing medications in neonates is limited by the poor quality of available efficacy data, and it could be argued that there are no indications for PPI/H2RA use in the NICU that are supported by high-quality evidence. Nevertheless, even with the inclusion of some controversial indications in our guideline, we were able to significantly impact prescription rates. The decline in total prescriptions paralleling the decline in nonindicated prescriptions is reassuring in that prescribers did not simply reclassify prescriptions from nonindicated to indicated conditions. In addition, although we did not see any increase in potential adverse events, continued monitoring is needed to ensure decreased PPI/H2RA use is not associated with adverse events over time. Finally, although this guideline was successful in the inpatient setting, recent evidence shows the majority of infants receiving acid-suppressing medications after NICU discharge were started on the medication as outpatients.3, 33 Given the known risks of PPI/H2RA use in outpatient infant populations, 3 addressing outpatient prescription via establishment of similar guidelines would be an important next step but was beyond the scope of our project.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the mounting evidence for potential adverse effects, acid-suppressing medications should only be prescribed to neonates after careful consideration. Implementation of an evidence-based guideline in our tertiary and quaternary NICU accompanied by leadership involvement, staff

ANGELIDOU et al8



6Pediatrics


140

FIGURE 5P-chart of burden of acid-suppressing medication exposure among infants <1 month corrected age, expressed as percentage of patient days on which infants received acid-suppressing medications. Numbers shown are the center line for each period. CL, center line; LCL, lower control limit; UCL, upper control limit.


incentives, and real-time data tracking led to excellent adherence that directly correlated with a substantial decrease in overall burden of exposure to PPI/H2RAs in our unit. This guideline could be feasibly implemented in other similar

settings providing inpatient care to sick newborns.

ACkNOwLEDGMENTS

We thank Brenda Dodson, Jenny Kim, and Esther Chang from

the Pharmacy Department at Boston Children’s Hospital for providing pharmacy-derived data for medication administration; Susan Maher, Jackie Paquette, and Mark Moline for their assistance with abstraction of data from the Children’s Hospitals Neonatal Database; Allison Cox for assisting with real-time data tracking; Ashley Park for administrative assistance; and Radhika Kamalia from the Department of Medicine Quality Improvement Department and Patrice Melvin from the Program for Patient Safety and Quality for their assistance with statistical analysis.

REFERENCES

1. Slaughter JL, Stenger MR, Reagan PB, Jadcherla SR. Neonatal histamine-2 receptor antagonist and proton pump inhibitor treatment at United States children’s hospitals. J Pediatr. 2016;174:63–70.e3

2. Dhillon AS, Ewer AK. Diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr. 2004;93(1):88–93

3. Canani RB, Cirillo P, Roggero P, et al; Working Group on Intestinal Infections of the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (SIGENP). Therapy with gastric acidity inhibitors increases

the risk of acute gastroenteritis and community-acquired pneumonia in children. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5). Available at: www. pediatrics. org/ cgi/ content/ full/ 117/ 5/ e817

4. Guillet R, Stoll BJ, Cotten CM, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Association of H2-blocker therapy and higher incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2006;117(2). Available at: www. pediatrics. org/ cgi/ content/ full/ 117/ 2/ e137

5. More K, Athalye-Jape G, Rao S, Patole S. Association of inhibitors of gastric

acid secretion and higher incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm very low-birth-weight infants. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(10):849–856

6. Stark CM, Nylund CM. Side effects and complications of proton pump inhibitors: a pediatric perspective. J Pediatr. 2016;168:16–22

7. Vandenplas Y, Rudolph CD, Di Lorenzo C, et al; North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition; European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition. Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North




6Pediatrics


140

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

ABBREvIATIONS

GER: gastroesophageal refluxGERD: gastroesophageal reflux

diseaseH2RA: histamine-2 receptor

antagonistITS: interrupted time seriesNPO: nil per osPDSA: plan-do-study-actPN: parenteral nutritionPPI: proton pump inhibitor

FIGURE 6Pareto chart of diagnoses for nonindicated prescriptions of acid-suppressing medication in each period. Some infants had >1 diagnosis associated with their prescription. Period 1: baseline before guideline implementation (February 1, 2014, to September 20, 2014); period 2: postimplementation (May 1, 2015, to January 31, 2016); period 3: postimplementation (June 1, 2016, to November 30, 2016).


www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/117/5/e817




American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;49(4):498–547

8. Ho T, Dukhovny D, Zupancic JA, Goldmann DA, Horbar JD, Pursley DM. Choosing wisely in newborn medicine: five opportunities to increase value. Pediatrics. 2015;136(2). Available at: www. pediatrics. org/ cgi/ content/ full/ 136/ 2/ e482

9. Venkatesan NN, Pine HS, Underbrink M. Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in children. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60(4):865–878

10. Hagander L, Muszynska C, Arnbjornsson E, Sandgren K. Prophylactic treatment with proton pump inhibitors in children operated on for oesophageal atresia. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012;22(2):139–142

11. Shawyer AC, D’Souza J, Pemberton J, Flageole H. The management of postoperative reflux in congenital esophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2014;30(10):987–996

12. Orenstein SR, Hassall E, Furmaga-Jablonska W, Atkinson S, Raanan M. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole in infants with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Pediatr. 2009;154(4):514–520.e4

13. Omari TI, Haslam RR, Lundborg P, Davidson GP. Effect of omeprazole on acid gastroesophageal reflux and gastric acidity in preterm infants with pathological acid reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44(1):41–44

14. Moore DJ, Tao BS, Lines DR, Hirte C, Heddle ML, Davidson GP. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of omeprazole in irritable infants with gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr. 2003;143(2):219–223

15. Orenstein SR, Shalaby TM, Devandry SN, et al. Famotidine for infant gastro-oesophageal reflux: a multi-centre, randomized, placebo-controlled,

withdrawal trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17(9):1097–1107

16. López-Alonso M, Moya MJ, Cabo JA, et al. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux. Pediatrics. 2006;118(2). Available at: www. pediatrics. org/ cgi/ content/ full/ 118/ 2/ e299

17. Finer NN, Higgins R, Kattwinkel J, Martin RJ. Summary proceedings from the apnea-of-prematurity group. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3 pt 2):S47–S51

18. Poets CF. Gastroesophageal reflux: a critical review of its role in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2004;113(2). Available at: www. pediatrics. org/ cgi/ content/ full/ 113/ 2/ e128

19. Peter CS, Sprodowski N, Bohnhorst B, Silny J, Poets CF. Gastroesophageal reflux and apnea of prematurity: no temporal relationship. Pediatrics. 2002;109(1):8–11

20. Kimball AL, Carlton DP. Gastroesophageal reflux medications in the treatment of apnea in premature infants. J Pediatr. 2001;138(3):355–360

21. Fuloria M, Hiatt D, Dillard RG, O’Shea TM. Gastroesophageal reflux in very low birth weight infants: association with chronic lung disease and outcomes through 1 year of age. J Perinatol. 2000;20(4):235–239

22. Akinola E, Rosenkrantz TS, Pappagallo M, McKay K, Hussain N. Gastroesophageal reflux in infants < 32 weeks gestational age at birth: lack of relationship to chronic lung disease. Am J Perinatol. 2004;21(2):57–62

23. Canani RB, Terrin G. Gastric acidity inhibitors and the risk of intestinal infections. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;26(1):31–35

24. Elward AM, Warren DK, Fraser VJ. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in pediatric intensive care unit patients: risk factors and outcomes. Pediatrics. 2002;109(5):758–764

25. Bianconi S, Gudavalli M, Sutija VG, Lopez AL, Barillas-Arias L, Ron N. Ranitidine and late-onset sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinat Med. 2007;35(2):147–150

26. Nuffield Institute for Health, University of Leeds; Centre for Health Economics and the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York; Research Unit, Royal College of Physicians. Implementing clinical practice guidelines: can guidelines be used to improve clinical practice? Leeds, UK: University of Leeds; 1994. Effective Health Care 8

27. López-Herce J, Dorao P, Elola P, Delgado MA, Ruza F, Madero R; The Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Study Group. Frequency and prophylaxis of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in critically ill children: a prospective study comparing the efficacy of almagate, ranitidine, and sucralfate. Crit Care Med. 1992;20(8):1082–1089

28. Hyman PE, Everett SL, Harada T. Gastric acid hypersecretion in short bowel syndrome in infants: association with extent of resection and enteral feeding. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986;5(2):191–197

29. Reveiz L, Guerrero-Lozano R, Camacho A, Yara L, Mosquera PA. Stress ulcer, gastritis, and gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(1): 124–132

30. Salvatore S, Hauser B, Vandemaele K, Novario R, Vandenplas Y. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants: how much is predictable with questionnaires, pH-metry, endoscopy and histology? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;40(2):210–215

31. Provost L, Murray S. The Health Care Data Guide: Learning From Data for Improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2011

32. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381

33. D’Agostino JA, Passarella M, Martin AE, Lorch SA. Use of gastroesophageal reflux medications in premature infants after NICU discharge. Pediatrics. 2016;138(6):e20161977

ANGELIDOU et al10



6Pediatrics


140








DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-1715 originally published online November 21, 2017; 2017;140;Pediatrics

Anne HansenAsimenia Angelidou, Katherine Bell, Munish Gupta, Kristen Tropea Leeman and

in the NICUImplementation of a Guideline to Decrease Use of Acid-Suppressing Medications

ServicesUpdated Information &

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/140/6/e20171715including high resolution figures, can be found at:

Referenceshttp://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/140/6/e20171715#BIBLThis article cites 31 articles, 8 of which you can access for free at:

Subspecialty Collections

subhttp://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/fetus:newborn_infant_Fetus/Newborn Infantsubhttp://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/quality_improvement_Quality Improvement_management_subhttp://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/administration:practiceAdministration/Practice Managementfollowing collection(s): This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the

Permissions & Licensing

http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtmlin its entirety can be found online at: Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or

Reprintshttp://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtmlInformation about ordering reprints can be found online:


http://http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/140/6/e20171715

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/140/6/e20171715#BIBL

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/administration:practice_management_sub

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/administration:practice_management_sub

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/quality_improvement_sub

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/quality_improvement_sub

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/fetus:newborn_infant_sub

http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/fetus:newborn_infant_sub

http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml

http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml

DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-1715 originally published online November 21, 2017; 2017;140;Pediatrics

Anne HansenAsimenia Angelidou, Katherine Bell, Munish Gupta, Kristen Tropea Leeman and

in the NICUImplementation of a Guideline to Decrease Use of Acid-Suppressing Medications

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/140/6/e20171715located on the World Wide Web at:

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/suppl/2017/11/18/peds.2017-1715.DCSupplementalData Supplement at:

1073-0397. ISSN:60007. Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print

the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois,has been published continuously since 1948. Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it


http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/140/6/e20171715

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/suppl/2017/11/18/peds.2017-1715.DCSupplemental

implementation of a guideline to decrease use of acid ......the nicu, particularly near the...

Documents