Implementation and Deployment of IMS-Implementation and Deployment of IMS-LD. LD.

Outcomes of the IDLD projectOutcomes of the IDLD project

Implementation and Deployment of IMS-Implementation and Deployment of IMS-LD. LD.

Outcomes of the IDLD projectOutcomes of the IDLD project Karin Lundgren-Cayrol

Olga MarinoGilbert PaquetteMichel LéonardIleana de la Teja

Canada Canada ResearchResearch Chair in Cognitive and Educational Engineering Chair in Cognitive and Educational EngineeringICALT-06, July 5-7, 2006 Kerkrade, The NetherlandsICALT-06, July 5-7, 2006 Kerkrade, The Netherlands

http://www.idld.org/http://www.idld.org/

ID Work at the ID Work at the LICEF Research CentreLICEF Research Centre

MOT plus

1998-19991998-1999

MOT 2.0

1995-19971995-1997

MOT+LD

2003-20042003-2004

AGD

1992-19951992-1995

MISA 3.0

MISA 2.0

1995-19971995-1997

MISA 4.0

MISA LD

MISA Templates

1997-19981997-1998

ADISA

1999-20021999-2002

IDLDPortal

2005-20062005-2006

IDLD Project ObjectivesIDLD Project Objectives

Goal Start Deploy and Implement the IMS Learning Design Specification in Canada

Objectives• Create a first LD repository• Improve the MOT+LD editor• Develop methodological support• Provide a proof of concept for a

deployment strategy

Collaborative and Iterative Collaborative and Iterative Deployment and Implementation Deployment and Implementation StrategyStrategy

1. Familiarize Partners to IMS-LD – Select Partner organizations– Present Basic Concepts; Demonstrate Process and Tools: Narrative

Form, MOT+LD, PALOMA Repository Manager

2. Planning between Partners and Support Team– Partner Goals, UoL Pre-Selection– Iterations planning, working at a distance or in blended mode

3. Preparation: Provide guidelines and help tools– Modeling technique– Instructional design principles, structured description, etc.– Build a narrative of existing or new designs

4. Implementation sub-process– Face to face workshops and Email support– First draft of an LD graphic model based on narrative– Validate a first model and demonstrate additional tool functions– Communities of Practice: build and validate new LD models – Upload and reference (IEEE-LOM) models to PALOMA

5. Process Evaluation– Debreifing sessions and documentation of the process– Write a Best Practice Report

Process, Tools and ParticipantsProcess, Tools and Participants (2)(2)

MOT+LDEditor

PALOM@LOM Manager

Upload

Reference

Item URL

RELOADEditor

ExportValidate

Export

Extend

RELOAD PlayerOthers, TELOS

MOT+HTML Navigator

IMS-LDManifest

ExportValidate

ExportSimulate

Participants in the field trialsParticipants in the field trials

• Simon Fraser University– 1 researcher and 2 students– Produced 15 UoLs

• Concordia University– 2 researchers and 4 students– Produced 20 UoLs

• Canada School of Public Service– 1 training manager, 2 Inst.Designers– Produced 5 UoLs

• TÉLUQ-LICEF– CICE Research Team (4)– Produced 12 UoLs– Support to the other teams

Learning Design DescriptionsLearning Design Descriptions

• Narrative• Descriptive Forms• UML Representation • MOT/MISA Representation• MOT+ XML-Schemas • MOT+LD Representation• LD XML-Schema (Manifest)

MOT+LD Graphic LanguageMOT+LD Graphic Language(Level A - Method)(Level A - Method)

Staff

R

Learner

R

LearningObjectives

PrerequisiteI

I

IndexedSearch

eMail

Conference

LearningObject Outcome

Environment

C

C

C I/P

C C I/PExternalUnit of Learning

Method

Play

Act

SupportActivity

LearningActivity

ActivityStructure

C

C

CC

C

C

Using the LOM to Metatag LDs in Using the LOM to Metatag LDs in the IDLD Repositorythe IDLD Repository

• Granularity (LOM 1.8)– Resources, Basic UoL (Nuggets), Courses,

Programs• Relations (LOM 7.0)

– Between Aggregates and Component Nuggets;

– Between Representation Formats– Between Examplars and Patterns (Templates)

• Classifications (LOM 9.0)– Learning Design Typology (From MISA and

CETIS)– Cognitive Strategy Typology (Bloom

Extension)

A Semantic Referential for LDsA Semantic Referential for LDs

Metatagging LDsMetatagging LDs

Search and Access to LDsSearch and Access to LDs

Reusability ProcessReusability Process

• Modeling a Course and Generalizing to a Pattern (Instructional Strategy Level)

• Decomposing into Primitive LD or Direct Creation (Instructional Tactic Level)

• Aggregating a Course Pattern from primitive LD (New Strategy)

• Specification of Course Pattern to one or more Course Examplar

Conclusion: Conclusion: The Tool SetThe Tool Set

• Graphic MOT+LD Representation– Provide a Global View of an LD– LD objects and links have transparent

meanings– Facilitate LD Construction and Reuse

(Patterns, Decomposition, Recomposition, Specification)

– Produce a standard LD XML manifest• Using the LOM to Reference LDs

– Search in a Global Reporitories Network– Navigation between related LDs

Conclusion: Conclusion: Next StepsNext Steps• Tools are adequate, but still need to be

refined– Itegrate Property Sheets to MOT+LD– Develop a multiplatform and collaborative editor– Improve guides and add modeling examples

• Implementation strategy should develop autonomy– Diversify partnership– Carry out more field experiments – Gather specific and generic examples– Elaborate Best Practices

• Measure overall impact in 6 to 12 months– Number of visits and demands for tools– Number of new UoL in the Repository

Questions / CommmentsQuestions / Commments

IDLD SITE: http://www.idld.orgContact person: olga.marino@teluq.uqam.ca

An invitation to link your LDrepository to ours